DOCSLIB.ORG

Authorisation and Decision-Making in Native Title

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Authorisation and Decision-Making in Native Title Authorisation and decision-making in native title Nick Duff Goldfields Land and Sea Council Authorisation and decision-making in native title Authorisation and decision-making in native title Nick Duff Goldfields Land and Sea Council First published in 2017 by AIATSIS Research Publications © Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies, 2017. All rights reserved. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study, research, criticism or review, as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968 (the Act), no part of this article may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system, without prior permission in writing from the publisher. The Act also allows a maximum of one chapter or 10 per cent of this publication, whichever is the greater, to be photocopied or distributed digitally by any educational institution for its educational purposes, provided that the educational institution (or body that administers it) has given a remuneration notice to Copyright Agency Limited (CAL) under the Act. The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies. Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies (AIATSIS) GPO Box 553, Canberra ACT 2601 Phone: (61 2) 6246 1111 Fax: (61 2) 6261 4285 Email: [email protected] Web: www.aiatsis.gov.au National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry Creator: Duff, Nick, author. Title: Authorisation and decision-making in native title / Nick Duff. ISBN: 9781922102614 (paperback) 9781922102607 (ebook) 9781922102638 (ePub) Subjects: Native title (Australia) Land tenure--Law and legislation--Australia. Aboriginal Australians--Land tenure. Culture and law--Australia. Australian Other Creators/Contributors: Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies Typeset in Garamond Contents Summary ix Abbreviations xi Acknowledgments xii 1. Introduction 1 1.1 What this book is about 4 1.2 What is authorisation? 4 Authorisation in the claims process 5 Authorisation in the agreement-making process 6 Authorisation after the determination 6 Authorisation for compensation applications 6 2. Authorisation in native title determination applications 7 2.1 What is an applicant? 7 Applicants are joint but not incorporated 8 Eligibility to be named applicant 13 Summary: What is an applicant? 16 2.2 When and why is it necessary to establish authorisation? 17 Originating application — Form 1 17 Registration test 17 Jurisdiction 19 Strike-out, dismissal and ‘show cause’ orders 21 Joinder 24 Replacing the existing applicant 25 Taking steps in the proceedings 25 2.3 Legal, political and social importance of the applicant 26 3. Authorising an applicant 29 3.1 The ‘native title claim group’: conceptualising the authorising constituency 29 Subgroups and shared country 35 ‘Trust-like’ claims 40 Social or cultural coherence not required 42 Representative structures in the authorisation process 44 Summary: native title claim group 46 Published by AIATSIS Research Publications v 3.2 Authorisation by ‘all the persons’ in the native title claim group 46 What proportion of claim group members must be involved in authorisation? 47 Will opposition by a minority prevent authorisation? 52 Must an authorisation meeting be representative of all subgroups? 55 May (or must) the application be authorised separately by the various constituent subgroups? 57 Applicant need not reflect internal subgroup structure 59 Will the participation of non–claim group members at a meeting void the authorisation given? 60 Is a meeting actually required at all? 61 3.3 Authorisation in practice 66 Before the meeting — research and notification 66 Pre-meeting research 67 Circulation of notices 67 Content of notices 69 Other matters 72 Attempts to prevent meetings 73 At the meeting — decision-making processes 74 Mutually exclusive hierarchy of processes in s. 251B 75 Traditional decision-making process 76 Non-traditional decision-making process 83 Proving the process and outcomes 87 Quality versus form in the decision-making process 89 4. Actions by the applicant 95 4.1 Extent of applicant autonomy 95 Amendments and errors 97 Interlocutory steps, discontinuance, consent determination 99 Conditional appointment 101 Disagreement between applicant and some members of the claim group 105 4.2 Disagreement, disability or death within the applicant 107 Can an applicant act by majority if the terms of appointment say so? 107 Can an applicant act by majority without an explicit provision? 109 What are the consequences of disagreement within the applicant? 111 Separate legal representation 113 4.3 Obligations of the applicant 113 4.4 Legal professional obligations 116 vi Published by AIATSIS Research Publications 5. Changing the composition of the applicant 119 5.1 How can the composition of the applicant be changed? 121 Non-66B method 123 Change to composition of the proposed replacement applicant between authorisation and application 125 Section 66B method 126 Authorisation of the replacement applicant 127 Grounds for removal or replacement 129 Discretion 136 Documents required 138 5.2 Consequences of a failed s. 66B application 139 6. Changing the claim group description 141 6.1 Authorisation by pre-amendment group 141 Participation in decision-making by non-members of pre-amendment claim group 144 6.2 Authorisation by proposed amended claim group 145 Where amended claim group authorises replacement applicant 147 Where outgoing applicant refuses to make the application for amendment 150 Replacement applicant composed entirely of pre-amendment claim group members 153 Replacement applicant contains some individuals not part of pre-amendment claim group 154 Where original authorisation was defective 156 6.3 Summary on changing claim group description 158 7. Authorisation and decision-making in agreement-making 161 7.1 Entering and authorising ILUAs 162 Area ILUA 163 Who must be party to an Area ILUA? 164 Who must authorise an Area ILUA? 171 Process for authorisation 180 Separate decisions 184 Combined decision 184 When an RNTBC is involved 186 Documentation 187 Objections and registration 188 Alternative Procedure ILUA 191 Body Corporate ILUA 192 Published by AIATSIS Research Publications vii 7.2 Entering and authorising s. 31 agreements 193 The legal mechanics of s. 31 agreements 193 The role and autonomy of the applicant in s. 31 agreements 194 Where some of the named applicants disagree or are unavailable 196 Privity under s. 31 agreements 201 8. Post-determination decision-making and nominating the RNTBC 203 8.1 Nominating a PBC for determination 205 Who can nominate? 206 Is evidence of authorisation or consent required? 207 Process for nominating an existing RNTBC for a further determination 210 Process for replacing the RNTBC 210 Replacement initiated by common law native title holders 210 Replacement initiated by liquidator 212 Criteria for replacement corporations 212 8.2 Decision-making within RNTBCs 213 Consultation and consent requirements for native title decisions 216 Native title decision 217 Regulation 8 procedure 219 Alternative consultation process (Regulation 8A) 221 Documenting the process 222 Summary 225 9. Native title compensation claims 227 9.1 Claim filed by RNTBC 227 9.2 Claim filed by individual named applicants 228 10. Conclusion 231 10.1 The scope of authority 232 10.2 Logical circles 233 10.3 Loss of procedural self-reliance? 236 10.4 Navigating in difficult territory 238 viii Published by AIATSIS Research Publications Summary Native title involves an interface between the Australian legal system and Indigenous legal, cultural and political systems. In Australia, traditional Indigenous rights in land are necessarily recognised and managed at the group level, even in contexts where some rights can be held individually. At the same time, the Australian legal system generally demands hard-edged decisions, with legal consequences that are concrete, final and binding rather than fluid, contextual and renegotiable. In this setting, native title law must regulate complex and contested interactions between the Australian legal system and sometimes large and disparate groups of Indigenous people. In doing so, the law faces a twin challenge: how to remain neutral in the face of competing claims about legitimate Indigenous authority, while ensuring that internal disagreements do not make collective agency impossible. The Australian legal system addresses this challenge by imposing a centralised representative structure on Indigenous group decision-making. During the native title claims process and compensation claims, this is done by requiring groups to appoint one or more individuals to act as the ‘applicant’ in the Federal Court. After native title is formally recognised, a new representative structure is mandated – the ‘registered native title body corporate’. In both cases, the law sets out rules that both govern the process by which the group authorises the representative and define the scope of the representative’s power to make decisions on behalf of the group without prior consultation. Together, these rules can broadly be referred to as the ‘law on authorisation’. In the more than 20 years since the first native title claim, a vast and complex body of law and practice has developed, covering everything from
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Indigenous Heritage Technical Report – Pipeline
    Australia Pacific LNG Project Volume 5: Attachments Attachment 37: Indigenous Heritage Technical Report – Pipeline Australia Pacific LNG Main Transmission Pipeline Indigenous heritage A report to Australia Pacific LNG by Heritage Consulting Australia Pty Ltd GPO Box 2677 Canberra ACT 2601 November 2009 Volume 5: Attachments Attachment 37: Indigenous Heritage Technical Report – Pipeline Table of contents 1. Introduction................................................................................................................................. 2 1.1 Setting ...................................................................................................................................... 2 1.2 Purpose.................................................................................................................................... 2 1.3 Scope of Works........................................................................................................................ 3 1.4 Legislative framework .............................................................................................................. 4 1.4.1 Commonwealth Legislation ......................................................................................... 4 1.4.2 State legislation........................................................................................................... 5 1.4.3 Local Government Legislation..................................................................................... 6 1.5 Cultural heritage significance assessment..............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Native Title Information Talk Delivered at Fernvale Futures on 22 February 2014. Tim Wishart Slide 1 I Acknowledge and Offer M
    A Native Title Information Talk Delivered at Fernvale Futures on 22 February 2014. Tim Wishart Slide 1 I acknowledge and offer my respect to the country on which we meet and to the Traditional Owners of this country and to their Old People and Elders. The organisation for which I work, Queensland South Native Title Services is a native title service provider recognised and funded by the Federal Government under the Native Title Act (1993). Slide 2 The area for which QSNTS has statutory recognition under the Native Title Act covers an area spanning Queensland, along the New South Wales border from the Coral Sea to the South Australian border, north to about 250 kilometres north of Mt Isa and running diagonally south eastwards to the coast, marginally south of Sarina. Slide 3 I ought to say that views and opinions expressed are mine and are not necessarily reflective of corporate views or policy of QSNTS. In this conversation I will refer to the Native Title Act as ‘the Act’. But in the consciousness of Queensland Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander society, the expression “the Act” is often a reference to The Aboriginal Protection and Restrictions of the Sale of Opium Act 1897. That legislation was an Act of the Queensland Parliament. As a result of dispersal, malnutrition, use of opium and diseases, all a consequence of European incursion into traditional lands coupled with the attempted genocide that came with that incursion, it was widely believed in Queensland that Aborigines were members of a 'dying race'. In 1894 pressure from some quarters of the community saw the Queensland Government commission Archibald Meston to look at what had conveniently, for the colonising power, become the plight of Aboriginal people.
    [Show full text]
  • Many Voices Queensland Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Languages Action Plan
    Yetimarala Yidinji Yi rawarka lba Yima Yawa n Yir bina ach Wik-Keyangan Wik- Yiron Yam Wik Pa Me'nh W t ga pom inda rnn k Om rungu Wik Adinda Wik Elk Win ala r Wi ay Wa en Wik da ji Y har rrgam Epa Wir an at Wa angkumara Wapabura Wik i W al Ng arra W Iya ulg Y ik nam nh ar nu W a Wa haayorre Thaynakwit Wi uk ke arr thiggi T h Tjung k M ab ay luw eppa und un a h Wa g T N ji To g W ak a lan tta dornd rre ka ul Y kk ibe ta Pi orin s S n i W u a Tar Pit anh Mu Nga tra W u g W riya n Mpalitj lgu Moon dja it ik li in ka Pir ondja djan n N Cre N W al ak nd Mo Mpa un ol ga u g W ga iyan andandanji Margany M litja uk e T th th Ya u an M lgu M ayi-K nh ul ur a a ig yk ka nda ulan M N ru n th dj O ha Ma Kunjen Kutha M ul ya b i a gi it rra haypan nt Kuu ayi gu w u W y i M ba ku-T k Tha -Ku M ay l U a wa d an Ku ayo tu ul g m j a oo M angan rre na ur i O p ad y k u a-Dy K M id y i l N ita m Kuk uu a ji k la W u M a nh Kaantju K ku yi M an U yi k i M i a abi K Y -Th u g r n u in al Y abi a u a n a a a n g w gu Kal K k g n d a u in a Ku owair Jirandali aw u u ka d h N M ai a a Jar K u rt n P i W n r r ngg aw n i M i a i M ca i Ja aw gk M rr j M g h da a a u iy d ia n n Ya r yi n a a m u ga Ja K i L -Y u g a b N ra l Girramay G al a a n P N ri a u ga iaba ithab a m l j it e g Ja iri G al w i a t in M i ay Giy L a M li a r M u j G a a la a P o K d ar Go g m M h n ng e a y it d m n ka m np w a i- u t n u i u u u Y ra a r r r l Y L a o iw m I a a G a a p l u i G ull u r a d e a a tch b K d i g b M g w u b a M N n rr y B thim Ayabadhu i l il M M u i a a
    [Show full text]
  • A Case Study of Homelessness in Townsville
    ResearchOnline@JCU This file is part of the following reference: Thomas, Yvonne Angela (2012) An occupational perspective of wellbeing: a case study of homelessness in Townsville. PhD thesis, James Cook University. Access to this file is available from: http://eprints.jcu.edu.au/24920 The author has certified to JCU that they have made a reasonable effort to gain permission and acknowledge the owner of any third party copyright material included in this document. If you believe that this is not the case, please contact [email protected] and quote http://eprints.jcu.edu.au/24920 An Occupational Perspective of Wellbeing: A Case Study of Homelessness in Townsville Thesis submitted by Yvonne Angela THOMAS DipCOT, GradDip, MEd in January 2012 for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy In the School of Public Health, Tropical Medicine and Rehabilitation Sciences and School of Indigenous Australian Studies James Cook University i STATEMENT OF ACCESS I, the undersigned, author of this work, understand that James Cook University will make this thesis available for use within the University Library and via the Australian Digital Theses network, for use elsewhere. I understand that, as an unpublished work, a thesis has significant protection under the Copyright Act and I do not wish to place further restrictions on this work. ______________________________ _____31 January 2012__________ Signature Yvonne Thomas Date ii STATEMENT OF SOURCES DECLARATION I declare that this thesis is my own work and has not been submitted in any form for another degree or diploma at any university or other institution of tertiary education. Information derived from the published or unpublished work of others has been acknowledged in the text and a list of references is given.
    [Show full text]
  • Black Wars and White Settlement: the Conflict Over Space in the Australian Commemorative Landscape Matthew Graves, Elizabeth Rechniewski
    Black Wars and White Settlement: the Conflict over Space in the Australian Commemorative Landscape Matthew Graves, Elizabeth Rechniewski To cite this version: Matthew Graves, Elizabeth Rechniewski. Black Wars and White Settlement: the Conflict over Space in the Australian Commemorative Landscape. E-rea - Revue électronique d’études sur le monde an- glophone, Laboratoire d’Études et de Recherche sur le Monde Anglophone, 2017, 10.4000/erea.5821. hal-01567433 HAL Id: hal-01567433 https://hal-amu.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01567433 Submitted on 23 Jul 2017 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. E-rea Revue électronique d’études sur le monde anglophone 14.2 | 2017 1. Pastoral Sounds / 2. Histories of Space, Spaces of History Black Wars and White Settlement: the Conflict over Space in the Australian Commemorative Landscape Matthew GRAVES and Elizabeth RECHNIEWSKI Publisher Laboratoire d’Études et de Recherche sur le Monde Anglophone Electronic version URL: http://erea.revues.org/5821 DOI: 10.4000/erea.5821 Brought to you by Aix-Marseille Université ISBN: ISSN 1638-1718 ISSN: 1638-1718 Electronic reference Matthew GRAVES and Elizabeth RECHNIEWSKI, « Black Wars and White Settlement: the Conflict over Space in the Australian Commemorative Landscape », E-rea [Online], 14.2 | 2017, Online since 15 June 2017, connection on 23 July 2017.
    [Show full text]
  • Southern and Western Queensland Region
    138°0'E 140°0'E 142°0'E 144°0'E 146°0'E 148°0'E 150°0'E 152°0'E 154°0'E DOO MADGE E S (! S ' ' 0 Gangalidda 0 ° QUD747/2018 ° 8 8 1 Waanyi People #2 & Garawa 1 (QC2018/004) People #2 Warrungnu [Warrungu] Girramay People Claimant application and determination boundary data compiled from NNTT based on boundaries with areas excluded or discrete boundaries of areas being claimed) as determination, a search of the Tribunal's registers and data sourced from Department of Resources (Qld) © The State of Queensland for they have been recognised by the Federal Court process. databases is required. Further information is available from the Tribunals website at GE ORG E TO W N People #2 Girramay Gkuthaarn and (! People #2 (! CARDW EL L that portion where their data has been used. Where the boundary of an application has been amended in the Federal Court, the www.nntt.gov.au or by calling 1800 640 501 Kukatj People map shows this boundary rather than the boundary as per the Register of Native Title © Commonwealth of Australia 2021 CARPENTARIA Tagalaka Southern and WesternQ UD176/2T0o2p0ographic vector data is © Commonwealth of Australia (Geoscience Australia) Claims (RNTC), if a registered application. The Registrar, the National Native Title Tribunal and its staff, members and agents Ewamian People QUD882/2015 Gurambilbarra Wulguru2k0a1b5a. Mada Claim The applications shown on the map include: and the Commonwealth (collectively the Commonwealth) accept no liability and give People #3 GULF REGION Warrgamay People (QC2020/N00o2n) freehold land tenure sourced from Department of Resources (QLD) March 2021.
    [Show full text]
  • First Nations Connections Plan
    First Nations Connections Plan Incorporating our Innovate Reconciliation Action Plan Ener January 2020-23 Queensland First Nations Connections Plan January 2020-23 ••• •• ABOVE: Alan Palmer (left) and Sam Bush (right) from Yurika, along with from Jay Shelley - 5B Solar (center) at the completion of the Doomagee Solar Farm project • •• in September, 2019. ••• • BELOW: Energy Queensland was recognised at the 2018 Queensland Reconciliation Awards, winning Acknowledgement the Partnership Category, with Queensland Theatre/ Energy Queensland would like to acknowledge Lonestar Company for the production ‘My Name is Jimi’. and pay respect to the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander ancestors across Queensland where we work and travelled to develop this Reconciliation Action Plan. The foundations laid by these ancestors – our First Nations peoples – gives strength, inspiration and courage to current and future generations, both Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander and non-Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander, towards creating a better Queensland. • We would especially like to acknowledge • • --,·§·~~~ the Traditional Owners and Custodians who honoured us by spending time sharing their • knowledge and wisdom. Their participation • in this process ensures that our Plan will be a • mechanism to ensure meaningful relationships are built between our businesses and the First Nations communities throughout Queensland. 2 First Nations Connections Plan January 2020-23 • • Contents A message from our Chairman and Chief Transformation Officer 4 A message
    [Show full text]
  • Contents What’S New
    July / August, No. 4/2011 CONTENTS WHAT’S NEW Quandamooka Native Title Determination ............................... 2 Win a free registration to the Joint Management Workshop at the 2011 National Native 2012 Native Title Conference! Title Conference: ‘What helps? What harms?’ ........................ 4 Just take 5 minutes to complete our An extract from Mabo in the Courts: Islander Tradition to publications survey and you will go into the Native Title: A Memoir ............................................................... 5 draw to win a free registration to the 2012 QLD Regional PBC Meeting ...................................................... 6 Native Title Conference. Those who have What’s New ................................................................................. 6 already completed the survey will be automatically included. Recent Cases ............................................................................. 6 Legislation and Policy ............................................................. 12 Complete the survey at: Native Title Publications ......................................................... 13 http://www.tfaforms.com/208207 Native Title in the News ........................................................... 14 If you have any questions or concerns, please Indigenous Land Use Agreements (ILUAs) ........................... 20 contact Matt O’Rourke at the Native Title Research Unit on (02) 6246 1158 or Determinations ......................................................................... 21 [email protected]
    [Show full text]
  • A Guide to Traditional Owner Groups For
    A Guide to Traditional Owner Groups Th is m ap w as e nd orse d by th e Murray Low e r Darling Rive rs Ind ige nous Nations (MLDRIN) for Water Resource Plan Areas - re pre se ntative organisation on 20 August 2018 Groundwater and th e North e rn Basin Aboriginal Nations (NBAN) re pre se ntative organisation on 23 Octobe r 2018 Bidjara Barunggam Gunggari/Kungarri Budjiti Bidjara Guwamu (Kooma) Guwamu (Kooma) Bigambul Jarowair Gunggari/Kungarri Euahlayi Kambuwal Kunja Gomeroi/Kamilaroi Mandandanji Mandandanji Murrawarri Giabel Bigambul Mardigan Githabul Wakka Wakka Murrawarri Githabul Guwamu (Kooma) M Gomeroi/Kamilaroi a r a Kambuwal !(Charleville n o Ro!(ma Mandandanji a GW21 R i «¬ v Barkandji Mutthi Mutthi GW22 e ne R r i i «¬ am ver Barapa Barapa Nari Nari d on Bigambul Ngarabal C BRISBANE Budjiti Ngemba k r e Toowoomba )" e !( Euahlayi Ngiyampaa e v r er i ie Riv C oon Githabul Nyeri Nyeri R M e o r Gomeroi/Kamilaroi Tati Tati n o e i St George r !( v b GW19 i Guwamu (Kooma) Wadi Wadi a e P R «¬ Kambuwal Wailwan N o Wemba Wemba g Kunja e r r e !( Kwiambul Weki Weki r iv Goondiwindi a R Barkandji Kunja e GW18 Maljangapa Wiradjuri W n r on ¬ Bigambul e « Kwiambul l Maraura Yita Yita v a r i B ve Budjiti Maljangapa R i Murrawarri Yorta Yorta a R Euahlayi o n M Murrawarri g a a l rr GW15 c Bigambul Gomeroi/Kamilaroi Ngarabal u a int C N «¬!( yre Githabul R Guwamu (Kooma) Ngemba iv er Kambuwal Kambuwal Wailwan N MoreeG am w Gomeroi/Kamilaroi Wiradjuri o yd Barwon River i R ir R Kwiambul !(Bourke iv iv Barkandji e er GW13 C r GW14 Budjiti
    [Show full text]
  • <!Aueenslanb ~Obernment ~A?Ette
    [831] <!aueenslanb ~obernment ~a?ette EXTRAORDINARY PP 451207100087 PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY ISSN 0155-9370 VOL. 360) FRIDAY 13 JULY 2012 [No. 55 State DevelopmentandPublicWorks OrganisationAct1.971 DEPARTMENT OF STATE DEVELOPMENT, INFRASTRUCTURE AND PLANNING NOTICE The Governor in Council has approved, under section 125(1)(f) ofthe StateDevelopmentandPublicWorksOrganisationAct1.971, the GLNG Infrastructure Facility as an infrastructure facility that is of significance, particularly economically or socially, to Queensland and the Fitzroy and South West Statistical Divisions being the regions in which the GLNG Infrastructure Facility is being constructed. STATEMENT GIVING REASONS WHY THE GOVERNOR IN COUNCIL APPROVED BY GAZETTE NOTICE ON 12 JULY 2012 THE GLNG INFRASTRUCTURE FACILITY AS AN INFRASTRUCTURE FACILITY THAT IS OF SIGNIFICANCE UNDER THE STATEDEI/ELOPMENTANDPUBLICWORKSORGANISATIONACT15'71 1. DECISION On 12 July 2012, the Governor in Council approved by gazette notice under section 125(1)(f) of the State Developmentand PublicWorksOrganisationAct1.971 (SDPWOAct), the GLNG Infrastructure Facility described below as an infrastructure facility that is of significance, particularly economically or socially, to Queensland and the Fitzroy and South West Statistical Divisions being the regions in which the GLNG Infrastructure Facility is being constructed. The Governor in Council, in making that decision, considered and adopted the reasons set out below that were prepared by the Coordinator-General, Mr Barry Broe, under section 125(5) of the SDPWO Act. 2. INTRODUCTION The Coordinator-General received an application (the Application) dated 16 November 2011 from GLNG Operations Pty Ltd (the Applicant) on behalf of the Participants set out below, requesting that the GLNG Infrastructure Facility be approved by the Governor in Council as an infrastructure facility that is of significance under section 125(1)(f) of the SDPWO Act.
    [Show full text]
  • Critical Australian Indigenous Histories
    Transgressions critical Australian Indigenous histories Transgressions critical Australian Indigenous histories Ingereth Macfarlane and Mark Hannah (editors) Published by ANU E Press and Aboriginal History Incorporated Aboriginal History Monograph 16 National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry Title: Transgressions [electronic resource] : critical Australian Indigenous histories / editors, Ingereth Macfarlane ; Mark Hannah. Publisher: Acton, A.C.T. : ANU E Press, 2007. ISBN: 9781921313448 (pbk.) 9781921313431 (online) Series: Aboriginal history monograph Notes: Bibliography. Subjects: Indigenous peoples–Australia–History. Aboriginal Australians, Treatment of–History. Colonies in literature. Australia–Colonization–History. Australia–Historiography. Other Authors: Macfarlane, Ingereth. Hannah, Mark. Dewey Number: 994 Aboriginal History is administered by an Editorial Board which is responsible for all unsigned material. Views and opinions expressed by the author are not necessarily shared by Board members. The Committee of Management and the Editorial Board Peter Read (Chair), Rob Paton (Treasurer/Public Officer), Ingereth Macfarlane (Secretary/ Managing Editor), Richard Baker, Gordon Briscoe, Ann Curthoys, Brian Egloff, Geoff Gray, Niel Gunson, Christine Hansen, Luise Hercus, David Johnston, Steven Kinnane, Harold Koch, Isabel McBryde, Ann McGrath, Frances Peters- Little, Kaye Price, Deborah Bird Rose, Peter Radoll, Tiffany Shellam Editors Ingereth Macfarlane and Mark Hannah Copy Editors Geoff Hunt and Bernadette Hince Contacting Aboriginal History All correspondence should be addressed to Aboriginal History, Box 2837 GPO Canberra, 2601, Australia. Sales and orders for journals and monographs, and journal subscriptions: T Boekel, email: [email protected], tel or fax: +61 2 6230 7054 www.aboriginalhistory.org ANU E Press All correspondence should be addressed to: ANU E Press, The Australian National University, Canberra ACT 0200, Australia Email: [email protected], http://epress.anu.edu.au Aboriginal History Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Suicide Prevention for LGBTIQ+ Communities Learnings from the National Suicide Prevention Trial
    Science. Compassion. Action. Suicide prevention for LGBTIQ+ communities Learnings from the National Suicide Prevention Trial April 2021 Suicide prevention for LGBTIQ+ communities: Learnings from the National Suicide Prevention Trial ii Acknowledgements Black Dog Institute Black Dog Institute would like to acknowledge Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples as Australia’s First People and Traditional Custodians. We value their cultures, identities, and continuing connection to country, waters, kin and community. We pay our respects to Elders past and present and are committed to making a positive contribution to the mental health and wellbeing of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people across Australia. Brisbane North PHN We acknowledge the traditional custodians of this land, the Turrbal and Jagera People of Brisbane, the Gubbi Gubbi people of Caboolture and Bribie Island, the Waka Waka people of Kilcoy and the Ningy Ningy people of Redcliffe. We pay our respects to Elders past, present and emerging for they hold the memories, the traditions, the culture and the hopes of Aboriginal Australia. North Western Melbourne PHN We would like to acknowledge the Wurundjeri People, the Boonerwrung People and the Wathaurong People as the traditional custodians of the land on which our work takes place. We pay our respects to Elders past, present and emerging. Acknowledgement of lived experience We acknowledge those contributing to suicide prevention efforts who are survivors of a suicide attempt, have experienced suicidal behaviour, or have been bereaved or impacted by suicide. Your insights and contributions are critical. Thank you The Black Dog Institute thanks the interviewees and other stakeholders from the Brisbane North Primary Health Network (PHN), North Western Melbourne PHN and the LGBTIQ+ Health Australia for their contributions to the development of this document.
    [Show full text]