LDI17 Lens Design I 3 Properties of Optical Systems II.Pdf

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

LDI17 Lens Design I 3 Properties of Optical Systems II.Pdf Lens Design I Lecture 3: Properties of optical systems II 2017-04-20 Herbert Gross Summer term 2017 www.iap.uni-jena.de 2 Preliminary Schedule - Lens Design I 2017 Introduction, Zemax interface, menues, file handling, preferences, Editors, updates, 1 06.04. Basics windows, coordinates, System description, 3D geometry, aperture, field, wavelength Diameters, stop and pupil, vignetting, Layouts, Materials, Glass catalogs, Raytrace, 2 13.04. Properties of optical systems I Ray fans and sampling, Footprints Types of surfaces, cardinal elements, lens properties, Imaging, magnification, Properties of optical systems II 3 20.04. paraxial approximation and modelling, telecentricity, infinity object distance and afocal image, local/global coordinates Properties of optical systems III Component reversal, system insertion, scaling of systems, aspheres, gratings and 4 27.04. diffractive surfaces, gradient media, solves 5 04.05. Advanced handling I Miscellaneous, fold mirror, universal plot, slider, multiconfiguration, lens catalogs Representation of geometrical aberrations, Spot diagram, Transverse aberration 6 11.05. Aberrations I diagrams, Aberration expansions, Primary aberrations 7 18.05. Aberrations II Wave aberrations, Zernike polynomials, measurement of quality 8 01.06. Aberrations III Point spread function, Optical transfer function Principles of nonlinear optimization, Optimization in optical design, general process, 9 08.06. Optimization I optimization in Zemax Initial systems, special issues, sensitivity of variables in optical systems, global 10 15.06. Optimization II optimization methods System merging, ray aiming, moving stop, double pass, IO of data, stock lens 11 22.06. Advanced handling II matching Symmetry principle, lens bending, correcting spherical aberration, coma, 12 29.06. Correction I astigmatism, field curvature, chromatical correction Field lenses, stop position influence, retrofocus and telephoto setup, aspheres and 13 06.07. Correction II higher orders, freeform systems, miscellaneous 3 Contents 3rd Lecture 1. Types of surfaces 2. Cardinal elements 3. Lens properties 4. Imaging 5. Special infinity cases 6. Paraxial approximation 4 Important Surface Types . Special surface types . Data in Lens Data Editor or in Extra Data Editor . Gradient media are descriped as 'special surfaces' . Diffractive / micro structured surfaces described by simple ray tracing model in one order . Standard spherical and conic sections . Even asphere classical asphere . Paraxial ideal lens . Paraxial XY ideal toric lens . Coordinate break change of coordinate system . Diffraction grating line grating . Gradient 1 gradient medium . Toroidal cylindrical lens . Zernike Fringe sag surface as superposition of Zernike functions . Extended polynomial generalized asphere . Black Box Lens hidden system, from vendors . ABCD paraxial segment Cardinal elements of a lens . Focal points: 1. incoming parallel ray intersects the axis in F‘ y 2. ray through F is leaves the lens P' u' F' parallel to the axis f ' focal plane . Principal plane P: location of apparent ray bending principal plane s BFL nodal planes s P' . Nodal points: u' N N' Ray through N goes through N‘ and preserves the direction u Notations of a lens P principal point S vertex of the surface O n n n F focal point 1 2 s intersection point y of a ray with axis N N' F F' u S' u' f focal length PF S P P' y' r radius of surface O' curvature s s' d thickness SS‘ f f' f f' n refrative index BFL BFL sP s'P' a' a d Main properties of a lens . Main notations and properties of a lens: 1 1 - radii of curvature r , r 1 2 c1 c2 curvatures c r1 r2 sign: r > 0 : center of curvature is located on the right side - thickness d along the axis - diameter D - index of refraction of lens material n y ' y . Focal length (paraxial) f F , f ' tanu tanu' n n' . Optical power F f f ' . Back focal length intersection length, measured from the vertex point sF' f 'sH ' Lens shape . Different shapes of singlet lenses: 1. bi-, symmetric 2. plane convex / concave, one surface plane 3. Meniscus, both surface radii with the same sign . Convex: bending outside Concave: hollow surface . Principal planes P, P‘: outside for mesicus shaped lenses P P' P P' P P' P P' P P' P P' bi-convex lens plane-convex lens positive meniscus lens bi-concave lens plane-concave negative lens meniscus lens Lens bending und shift of principal plane . Ray path at a lens of constant focal length and different bending R R . Quantitative parameter of description X: X 1 2 R2 R1 . The ray angle inside the lens changes . The ray incidence angles at the surfaces changes strongly . The principal planes move For invariant location of P, P‘ the position of the lens moves P P' F' X = -4 X = -2 X = 0 X = +2 X = +4 Cardinal Points of a Lens . Real lenses: The surface with the principal points as apparent ray bending points is a curved shell . The ideal principal plane exists only in the paraxial approximation P' s'P' 11 Limitation of Principal Surface Definition . The principal planes in paraxial optics are defined as the locations of the apparent ray bending of a lens of system . In the case of a system with corrected sine conditions, these surfaces are spheres . Sine condition and pupil spheres are also limited for off-axis points near to the optical axis . For object points far from the axis, the apparent locations are complicated surfaces, which may consist of two branches 12 Limitation of Principal Surface Definition . A r4eal microscopic lens has a nearly perfect spherical shape of the principal surface Optical imaging . Optical Image formation: All ray emerging from one object point meet in the perfect image point . Region near axis: gaussian imaging ideal, paraxial pupil field O stop . Image field size: point 2 Chief ray chief ray object . Aperture/size of marginal light cone: ray optical system marginal ray axis O1 O'1 defined by pupil stop image O'2 Formulas for surface and lens imaging n' n n'n 1 . Single surface imaging equation s' s r f ' 1 1 1 . Thin lens in air n 1 focal length f ' r1 r2 . Thin lens in air with one plane r surface, focal length f ' n 1 r . Thin symmetrical bi-lens f ' 2n 1 . Thick lens in air 1 1 1 n 12 d n 1 focal length f ' r r nr r 1 2 1 2 Imaging equation s' . Imaging by a lens in air: 4f' lens makers formula real object virtual image real image 1 1 1 real image s' s f 2f' . Magnification s' 2f' 4f' m s s - 4f' -2f' . Real imaging: s < 0 , s' > 0 real object -2f' . Intersection lengths s, s' virtual image virtual object virtual image measured with respective to the principal planes P, P' - 4f' Magnification . Lateral magnification for finite imaging y' f tanu m . Scaling of image size y f 'tanu' principal planes y focal point focal point F P P' F' image object z f f' z' y' s s' Angle Magnification . Afocal systems with object/image in infinity tan w' nh . Definition with field angle w angular magnification tan w n'h' w' w f . Relation with finite-distance magnification m f ' Object or field at infinity . Image in infinity: image - collimated exit ray bundle image at infinity - realized in binoculars eye lens . Object in infinity field lens stop - input ray bundle collimated - realized in telescopes - aperture defined by diameter lens acts as aperture stop not by angle collimated entrance bundle object at infinity image in focal plane 19 Telecentricity . Special stop positions: 1. stop in back focal plane: object sided telecentricity 2. stop in front focal plane: image sided telecentricity 3. stop in intermediate focal plane: both-sided telecentricity . Telecentricity: 1. pupil in infinity 2. chief ray parallel to the optical axis object object sides chief rays telecentric image parallel to the optical axis stop 20 Telecentricity . Double telecentric system: stop in intermediate focus . Realization in lithographic projection systems object lens f1 telecentric lens f2 image stop f1 f2 f1 f2 21 Telecentricity, Infinity Object and Afocal Image 1.Telecentric object space . Set in menue General / Aperture . Means entrance pupil in infinity . Chief ray is forced to by parallel to axis . Fixation of stop position is obsolete . Object distance must be finite . Field cannot be given as angle 2.Infinity distant object . Aperture cannot be NA . Object size cannot be height . Cannot be combined with telecentricity 3.Afocal image location . Set in menue General / Aperture . Aberrations are considered in the angle domain . Allows for a plane wave reference . Spot automatically scaled in mrad 22 Infinity cases entrance case object image exit pupil example sample layout pupil . Systematic of all 1 finite finite finite finite relay infinity cases infinity 2 finite finite finite image metrology lens telecentric . Physically impossible: infinity infinity lithographic 3 finite finite object image projection lens 1. object and entrance telecentric telecentric 4f-system pupil in infinity afocal zoom 4 infinity infinity finite finite telescopes 2. image and exit beam expander pupil in infinity 5 finite finite infinity finite metrology lens camera lens 6 infinity finite finite finite focussing lens eyepiece 7 finite infinity finite finite collimator infinity 8 finite infinity object finite microscopic lens telecentric infinity infinity metrology 9 infinity finite finite image lens telecentric 10 infinity finite infinity finite impossible 11 finite infinity finite infinity impossible 12 infinity infinity infinity finite impossible 13 infinity finite infinity infinity impossible 14 infinity infinity finite infinity impossible 15 finite infinity infinity infinity impossible 16 infinity infinity infinity infinity impossible Paraxial Approximation . Paraxiality is given for small angles relative to the optical axis for all rays . Large numerical aperture angle u violates the paraxiality, spherical aberration occurs . Large field angles w violates the paraxiality, coma, astigmatism, distortion, field curvature occurs Paraxial approximation Paraxial approximation: .
Recommended publications
  • Breaking Down the “Cosine Fourth Power Law”
    Breaking Down The “Cosine Fourth Power Law” By Ronian Siew, inopticalsolutions.com Why are the corners of the field of view in the image captured by a camera lens usually darker than the center? For one thing, camera lenses by design often introduce “vignetting” into the image, which is the deliberate clipping of rays at the corners of the field of view in order to cut away excessive lens aberrations. But, it is also known that corner areas in an image can get dark even without vignetting, due in part to the so-called “cosine fourth power law.” 1 According to this “law,” when a lens projects the image of a uniform source onto a screen, in the absence of vignetting, the illumination flux density (i.e., the optical power per unit area) across the screen from the center to the edge varies according to the fourth power of the cosine of the angle between the optic axis and the oblique ray striking the screen. Actually, optical designers know this “law” does not apply generally to all lens conditions.2 – 10 Fundamental principles of optical radiative flux transfer in lens systems allow one to tune the illumination distribution across the image by varying lens design characteristics. In this article, we take a tour into the fascinating physics governing the illumination of images in lens systems. Relative Illumination In Lens Systems In lens design, one characterizes the illumination distribution across the screen where the image resides in terms of a quantity known as the lens’ relative illumination — the ratio of the irradiance (i.e., the power per unit area) at any off-axis position of the image to the irradiance at the center of the image.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to CODE V: Optics
    Introduction to CODE V Training: Day 1 “Optics 101” Digital Camera Design Study User Interface and Customization 3280 East Foothill Boulevard Pasadena, California 91107 USA (626) 795-9101 Fax (626) 795-0184 e-mail: [email protected] World Wide Web: http://www.opticalres.com Copyright © 2009 Optical Research Associates Section 1 Optics 101 (on a Budget) Introduction to CODE V Optics 101 • 1-1 Copyright © 2009 Optical Research Associates Goals and “Not Goals” •Goals: – Brief overview of basic imaging concepts – Introduce some lingo of lens designers – Provide resources for quick reference or further study •Not Goals: – Derivation of equations – Explain all there is to know about optical design – Explain how CODE V works Introduction to CODE V Training, “Optics 101,” Slide 1-3 Sign Conventions • Distances: positive to right t >0 t < 0 • Curvatures: positive if center of curvature lies to right of vertex VC C V c = 1/r > 0 c = 1/r < 0 • Angles: positive measured counterclockwise θ > 0 θ < 0 • Heights: positive above the axis Introduction to CODE V Training, “Optics 101,” Slide 1-4 Introduction to CODE V Optics 101 • 1-2 Copyright © 2009 Optical Research Associates Light from Physics 102 • Light travels in straight lines (homogeneous media) • Snell’s Law: n sin θ = n’ sin θ’ • Paraxial approximation: –Small angles:sin θ~ tan θ ~ θ; and cos θ ~ 1 – Optical surfaces represented by tangent plane at vertex • Ignore sag in computing ray height • Thickness is always center thickness – Power of a spherical refracting surface: 1/f = φ = (n’-n)*c
    [Show full text]
  • Section 10 Vignetting Vignetting the Stop Determines Determines the Stop the Size of the Bundle of Rays That Propagates On-Axis an the System for Through Object
    10-1 I and Instrumentation Design Optical OPTI-502 © Copyright 2019 John E. Greivenkamp E. John 2019 © Copyright Section 10 Vignetting 10-2 I and Instrumentation Design Optical OPTI-502 Vignetting Greivenkamp E. John 2019 © Copyright On-Axis The stop determines the size of Ray Aperture the bundle of rays that propagates Bundle through the system for an on-axis object. As the object height increases, z one of the other apertures in the system (such as a lens clear aperture) may limit part or all of Stop the bundle of rays. This is known as vignetting. Vignetted Off-Axis Ray Rays Bundle z Stop Aperture 10-3 I and Instrumentation Design Optical OPTI-502 Ray Bundle – On-Axis Greivenkamp E. John 2018 © Copyright The ray bundle for an on-axis object is a rotationally-symmetric spindle made up of sections of right circular cones. Each cone section is defined by the pupil and the object or image point in that optical space. The individual cone sections match up at the surfaces and elements. Stop Pupil y y y z y = 0 At any z, the cross section of the bundle is circular, and the radius of the bundle is the marginal ray value. The ray bundle is centered on the optical axis. 10-4 I and Instrumentation Design Optical OPTI-502 Ray Bundle – Off Axis Greivenkamp E. John 2019 © Copyright For an off-axis object point, the ray bundle skews, and is comprised of sections of skew circular cones which are still defined by the pupil and object or image point in that optical space.
    [Show full text]
  • Aperture Efficiency and Wide Field-Of-View Optical Systems Mark R
    Aperture Efficiency and Wide Field-of-View Optical Systems Mark R. Ackermann, Sandia National Laboratories Rex R. Kiziah, USAF Academy John T. McGraw and Peter C. Zimmer, J.T. McGraw & Associates Abstract Wide field-of-view optical systems are currently finding significant use for applications ranging from exoplanet search to space situational awareness. Systems ranging from small camera lenses to the 8.4-meter Large Synoptic Survey Telescope are designed to image large areas of the sky with increased search rate and scientific utility. An interesting issue with wide-field systems is the known compromises in aperture efficiency. They either use only a fraction of the available aperture or have optical elements with diameters larger than the optical aperture of the system. In either case, the complete aperture of the largest optical component is not fully utilized for any given field point within an image. System costs are driven by optical diameter (not aperture), focal length, optical complexity, and field-of-view. It is important to understand the optical design trade space and how cost, performance, and physical characteristics are influenced by various observing requirements. This paper examines the aperture efficiency of refracting and reflecting systems with one, two and three mirrors. Copyright © 2018 Advanced Maui Optical and Space Surveillance Technologies Conference (AMOS) – www.amostech.com Introduction Optical systems exhibit an apparent falloff of image intensity from the center to edge of the image field as seen in Figure 1. This phenomenon, known as vignetting, results when the entrance pupil is viewed from an off-axis point in either object or image space.
    [Show full text]
  • A Practical Guide to Panoramic Multispectral Imaging
    A PRACTICAL GUIDE TO PANORAMIC MULTISPECTRAL IMAGING By Antonino Cosentino 66 PANORAMIC MULTISPECTRAL IMAGING Panoramic Multispectral Imaging is a fast and mobile methodology to perform high resolution imaging (up to about 25 pixel/mm) with budget equipment and it is targeted to institutions or private professionals that cannot invest in costly dedicated equipment and/or need a mobile and lightweight setup. This method is based on panoramic photography that uses a panoramic head to precisely rotate a camera and shoot a sequence of images around the entrance pupil of the lens, eliminating parallax error. The proposed system is made of consumer level panoramic photography tools and can accommodate any imaging device, such as a modified digital camera, an InGaAs camera for infrared reflectography and a thermal camera for examination of historical architecture. Introduction as thermal cameras for diagnostics of historical architecture. This article focuses on paintings, This paper describes a fast and mobile methodo‐ but the method remains valid for the documenta‐ logy to perform high resolution multispectral tion of any 2D object such as prints and drawings. imaging with budget equipment. This method Panoramic photography consists of taking a can be appreciated by institutions or private series of photo of a scene with a precise rotating professionals that cannot invest in more costly head and then using special software to align dedicated equipment and/or need a mobile and seamlessly stitch those images into one (lightweight) and fast setup. There are already panorama. excellent medium and large format infrared (IR) modified digital cameras on the market, as well as scanners for high resolution Infrared Reflec‐ Multispectral Imaging with a Digital Camera tography, but both are expensive.
    [Show full text]
  • The F-Word in Optics
    The F-word in Optics F-number, was first found for fixing photographic exposure. But F/number is a far more flexible phenomenon for finding facts about optics. Douglas Goodman finds fertile field for fixes for frequent confusion for F/#. The F-word of optics is the F-number,* also known as F/number, F/#, etc. The F- number is not a natural physical quantity, it is not defined and used consistently, and it is often used in ways that are both wrong and confusing. Moreover, there is no need to use the F-number, since what it purports to describe can be specified rigorously and unambiguously with direction cosines. The F-number is usually defined as follows: focal length F-number= [1] entrance pupil diameter A further identification is usually made with ray angle. Referring to Figure 1, a ray from an object at infinity that is parallel to the axis in object space intersects the front principal plane at height Y and presumably leaves the rear principal plane at the same height. If f is the rear focal length, then the angle of the ray in image space θ′' is given by y tan θ'= [2] f In this equation, as in the others here, a sign convention for angles heights and magnifications is not rigorously enforced. Combining these equations gives: 1 F−= number [3] 2tanθ ' For an object not at infinity, by analogy, the F-number is often taken to be the half of the inverse of the tangent of the marginal ray angle. However, Eq. 2 is wrong.
    [Show full text]
  • Lens Tutorial Is from C
    �is version of David Jacobson’s classic lens tutorial is from c. 1998. I’ve typeset the math and fixed a few spelling and grammatical errors; otherwise, it’s as it was in 1997. — Jeff Conrad 17 June 2017 Lens Tutorial by David Jacobson for photo.net. �is note gives a tutorial on lenses and gives some common lens formulas. I attempted to make it between an FAQ (just simple facts) and a textbook. I generally give the starting point of an idea, and then skip to the results, leaving out all the algebra. If any part of it is too detailed, just skip ahead to the result and go on. It is in 6 parts. �e first gives formulas relating object (subject) and image distances and magnification, the second discusses f-stops, the third discusses depth of field, the fourth part discusses diffraction, the fifth part discusses the Modulation Transfer Function, and the sixth illumination. �e sixth part is authored by John Bercovitz. Sometime in the future I will edit it to have all parts use consistent notation and format. �e theory is simplified to that for lenses with the same medium (e.g., air) front and rear: the theory for underwater or oil immersion lenses is a bit more complicated. Object distance, image distance, and magnification �roughout this article we use the word object to mean the thing of which an image is being made. It is loosely equivalent to the word “subject” as used by photographers. In lens formulas it is convenient to measure distances from a set of points called principal points.
    [Show full text]
  • “No-Parallax” Point in Panorama Photography Version 1.0, February 6, 2006 Rik Littlefield ([email protected])
    Theory of the “No-Parallax” Point in Panorama Photography Version 1.0, February 6, 2006 Rik Littlefield ([email protected]) Abstract In using an ordinary camera to make panorama photographs, there is a special “no- parallax point” around which the camera must be rotated in order to keep foreground and background points lined up perfectly in overlapping frames. Arguments about the location of this point are both frequent and confusing. The purpose of this article is to eliminate the confusion. It explains in simple terms that the aperture determines the perspective of an image by selecting the light rays that form it. Therefore the center of perspective and the no-parallax point are located at the apparent position of the aperture, called the “entrance pupil”. Contrary to intuition, this point can be moved by modifying just the aperture, while leaving all refracting lens elements and the sensor in the same place. Likewise, the angle of view must be measured around the no-parallax point and thus the angle of view is affected by the aperture location, not just by the lens and sensor as is commonly believed. Physical vignetting may cause the entrance pupil to move, depending on angle, and should be avoided for perfect stitches. In general, the no- parallax point is different from the “nodal point” of optical designers, despite frequent use (misuse) of that term among panorama photographers. Introduction In using an ordinary camera to make panorama photographs, there is a special “no- parallax point”1 around which the camera must be rotated in order to keep foreground and background points lined up perfectly in overlapping frames.
    [Show full text]
  • 6-1 Optical Instrumentation-Stop and Window.Pdf
    6.6. OpticalOptical instrumentationinstrumentation Last chapter ¾ Chromatic Aberration ¾ Third-order (Seidel) Optical Aberrations Spherical aberrations, Coma, Astigmatism, Curvature of Field, Distortion This chapter ¾ Aperture stop, Entrance pupil, Exit pupil ¾ Field stop, Entrance window, Exit window Aperture effects on image ¾ Depth of field, Depth of focus ¾ prism and dispersion ¾ Camera ¾ Magnifier and eyepiece Optical instruments ¾ Microscope ¾ Telescope StopsStops inin OpticalOptical SystemsSystems Larger lens improves the brightness of the image Image of S Two lenses of the same formed at focal length (f), but the same diameter (D) differs place by both lenses SS’ Bundle of rays from S, imaged at S’ More light collected is larger for from S by larger larger lens lens StopsStops inin OpticalOptical SystemsSystems • Brightness of the image is determined primarily by the size of the bundle of rays collected by the system (from each object point) • Stops can be used to reduce aberrations StopsStops inin OpticalOptical SystemsSystems How much of the object we see is determined by: Field of View Q Q’ (not seen) Rays from Q do not pass through system We can only see object points closer to the axis of the system Thus, the Field of view is limited by the system ApertureAperture StopStop • A stop is an opening (despite its name) in a series of lenses, mirrors, diaphragms, etc. • The stop itself is the boundary of the lens or diaphragm • Aperture stop: that element of the optical system that limits the cone of light from any particular object point on the axis of the system ApertureAperture StopStop (AS)(AS) E O Diaphragm E Assume that the Diaphragm is the AS of the system Entrance Pupil (E P) Entrance Pupil (EnnP) The entrance pupil is defined to be the image of the aperture stop in all the lenses preceding it (i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Opti 415/515
    Opti 415/515 Introduction to Optical Systems 1 Copyright 2009, William P. Kuhn Optical Systems Manipulate light to form an image on a detector. Point source microscope Hubble telescope (NASA) 2 Copyright 2009, William P. Kuhn Fundamental System Requirements • Application / Performance – Field-of-view and resolution – Illumination: luminous, sunlit, … – Wavelength – Aperture size / transmittance – Polarization, – Coherence –… • Producibility: – Size, weight, environment, … – Production volume –Cost –… • Requirements are interdependent, and must be physically plausible: – May want more pixels at a faster frame rate than available detectors provide, – Specified detector and resolution requires a focal length and aperture larger than allowed package size. – Depth-focus may require F/# incompatible with resolution requirement. • Once a plausible set of performance requirements is established, then a set optical system specifications can be created. 3 Copyright 2009, William P. Kuhn Optical System Specifications First Order requirements Performance Requirements • Object distance __________ • MTF vs. FOV __________ • Image distance __________ • RMS wavefront __________ • F/number or NA __________ • Encircled energy __________ • Full field-of-view __________ • Distortion % __________ • Focal length __________ •Detector – Type Mechanical Requirements – Dimensions ____________ • Back focal dist. __________ – Pixel size ____________ • Length & diameter __________ – # of pixels ____________ • Total track __________ – Format ____________ • Wavelength
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of Spie
    Using lightfields to simulate the performance of optical systems Item Type Article Authors Schwiegerling, Jim Citation Jim Schwiegerling "Using lightfields to simulate the performance of optical systems", Proc. SPIE 10743, Optical Modeling and Performance Predictions X, 1074308 (17 September 2018); doi: 10.1117/12.2320662; https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2320662 DOI 10.1117/12.2320662 Publisher SPIE-INT SOC OPTICAL ENGINEERING Journal OPTICAL MODELING AND PERFORMANCE PREDICTIONS X Rights © 2018 SPIE. Download date 25/09/2021 08:13:08 Item License http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ Version Final published version Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/632306 PROCEEDINGS OF SPIE SPIEDigitalLibrary.org/conference-proceedings-of-spie Using lightfields to simulate the performance of optical systems Jim Schwiegerling Jim Schwiegerling, "Using lightfields to simulate the performance of optical systems," Proc. SPIE 10743, Optical Modeling and Performance Predictions X, 1074308 (17 September 2018); doi: 10.1117/12.2320662 Event: SPIE Optical Engineering + Applications, 2018, San Diego, California, United States Downloaded From: https://www.spiedigitallibrary.org/conference-proceedings-of-spie on 16 May 2019 Terms of Use: https://www.spiedigitallibrary.org/terms-of-use Using light fields to simulate the performance of optical systems Jim Schwiegerling*a aCollege of Optical Sciences, University of Arizona, 1630 E. University Blvd., Tucson, AZ 85721 ABSTRACT The light field describes the radiance at a given point from a ray coming from a particular direction. Total irradiance comes from all rays passing the point. For a static scene, the light field is unique. Cameras integrate the light field. Each camera pixel sees the integration of the light field over the entrance pupil for ray directions associated with lens aberrations.
    [Show full text]
  • Apertures, Stops, Pupils, and Windows; Single-Lens Camera
    Overview: composite optical elements ray from infinity bends at 2nd PP ray from then goes FFP BFP the FFP through the BFP FFL BFL FFP BFP bends at then goes EFL EFL 1st PP on to infinity 1st PP 2nd PP 1st PP 2nd PP 1st PP 2nd PP BFP image object FFP EFL EFL MIT 2.71/2.710 02/23/09 wk4-a- 1 1 Today • Apertures & Stops – Aperture – Entrance Pupil – Exit Pupil – Field Stop – Entrance Window – Exit Window MIT 2.71/2.710 02/23/09 wk4-a- 2 2 Aperture Stop and Numerical Aperture medium of refr. index n Aperture stop θ: half-angle subtended by the imaging the physical element which system from limits the angle of acceptance of the imaging an axial object system Numerical Aperture Speed pronounced f-number, e.g. f/8 means (f/#)=8. The Aperture Stop Later we will also learn that the NA also limits the optical energy defines the resolution (or resolving power) of that is admitted through the system the optical system MIT 2.71/2.710 02/23/09 wk4-a- 3 3 Entrance & exit pupils image through image through preceding elements succeeding elements entrance aperture exit pupil stop pupil multi-element optical system MIT 2.71/2.710 02/23/09 wk4-a- 4 4 The Chief & Marginal Rays M.R. C.R. Chief Ray: Starts from off-axis object, goes through the center of the Aperture Marginal Ray: Starts from off-axis object, goes through the edge of the Aperture Together, the C.R.
    [Show full text]