DOCSLIB.ORG

F I L E D SAN FRANCI~CO County Clerk Octpber 23,, 2020

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
F I L E D SAN FRANCI~CO County Clerk Octpber 23,, 2020 San Franciso Planning 49 South Van Ness Ave .. !4th Floo1 ~an Francisco. CA 94103. 415.558.6378 www.stplanning.org 2020-0000041 F I L E D SAN FRANCI~CO County Clerk Octpber 23,, 2020. ~:?-- , by: Fallon Lim ~ Approvo!Date: · . June.3Q, 2020 . Dep<Jty County Oeri< ·~ Case No.: 2020-005472.ENV ~ l Transportation Recovery Plan: COVID-19 Emergency Temporary ~ ' 1 Project Title: Transit La_nes & COVID- 19 Emergency Temporary· Bikeways· Project .....(....) 0 I Zoning: N/A I Block/Lot: N/A Lot Size: N/A Lead Agency: San Francisco Planning Department _ fil Project Sponsor: Michael Rhodes, Sari Fran.cisco Muriicipal Transportation Agency ~ 00 (415) 579-9702 0 0 . [email protected] · ~ ~ ··Staff Contact: Jenny Delumo (628) 652-7568 Jenny:[email protected] ' . To: county clerk, citY, and County of San Francisco · cityHallRoom16s· · 1 Dr. Carlton B. Gobdlett.Place San Frandscci, GA 9.4102 Pu'rsuant to the· Califor11ia Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the Guideli'nes of the Secretary for Resources, and San Francisco requ'irements, this Notice of Exemption is transmitted to you for filing. · At the end of the postfng p"eriod, prease return this Notice to the Staff Contact with a·notation of the period it was posted. ·· · · . Attached fee: $71 filing fee A. Project De.sc_ription and Location: San Francisco Municipal Tr~nsportation Agency's ·(SFMTA) Tran,sportation. Recovery Plan: COVID-19 Emer.gency Temporary Transit Lanes and Emergency Temporary Bikeways· project (the project) w9uld establish·temporary transit lanes high-occupahcy vehicle (HOV) lanes, and temporary bicycle facilities on 36 project corridors spread across severa I neighborho.ods throughout San Francisco. The project corrido~s are listed in Table 1. Tt1e SFMTA Bo~rd of Directors approved emergency temporary transit .lines on. the www.sfplonriing.org Pa.ra informacion en Espanol Uamar al Para saimpormasyon sa Tagalog tumawag sa 628.652.7550 Notice of Exemption CASEN0.~02D-005472ENV Transportation Recovery Plan: COVID-19 Eme.rgenc;y.Tern"poraryTransit Lanes & COVID-19 Temporary Em.erge~cy Bik~ways Project . following nine project corridors: La.guna Honda Boulevard from Clarendon Avenue to Dewey Boulevard; O'S~aughnessy Boulevard from Portola .Drive to 800 feet sou·therly; Mission Street from 11th Street to 1st Strei?t; 7th Street from Townsend Street to Market Street; 8th Street from Market Street to Townsend Street; Masonic Avenue from Haight Street to Geary Boulevard; Woodside Avenue from Laguna Honda Boulevard to Portola Drive; Bosworth Street from Elk Street to Arlington Street; and Presidio Avenue from Sacramento Street to Geary Boulevard. The SFMTA Board of Directors delegated their authority to the City Traffic Engineer to approve the remainder of th.e corridors. Table 1: COVID-19 Emergency Temporary Transit Lanes & COVID-19 Emergency Temporary Bikeways,Project Corridors · · · · .. ~ ... ·•· ... · Stre.et.s .... '· . ! From. ' . ,. " . To Potrero Avenue Cesar-Chcivez Division Street - Bayshore Boulevard Silver Avenue Cesar Chavez Laguna Honda Boulevard Clarendon Avenue Dewey Boulevard Woodside Avenue Laguna Honda Boulevard Portola Drive I O'Shaughnessy Boulevard Portola Drive 800 feet southernly Bosworth Street Hk Street Arlington Street Mission Street 11th Street lst Street Castro Street Divisadero Street buboceAvenue Divisadero Street Castro Street Sacramento Street. California Street .Argue! lo Boulevard steiner street .. Front Street Larkin Street Sacramento Street Gough Street Larkin Street · Gough Street Van Ness Avenue Van Ness Avenue Larkin Street Larkin Street Powell Street Clay Street Powell Street Sansome Street 7th Street and 8th Street Townsend Street Market.Street· .. Masonic Avenue Haight Street GearyBoulevard Presidio Avenue· Geary Boulevard Sacramento Street Fulton Street Stanyan Street 48thAvenue 4th Street Channel Street ' Berry Street Geary Boulevard Stanyan Street 34th Avenue Haight Street Webster Street . Buchanan street Lincoln Way 2nd Avenue 23rd Avenue. Park Presidio .~ Boulevard/Crossover o·rive Lincoln Way Lake Street Post Street Gough Street Market Street Kearny Street Gough Street Sutter Street Market Street Kearny Street Junipero Serra Ocean Avenue .· · · Geneva Aven.ue Bouievard .. Mission Stree·t 30th Street Huron Street 2 Notice of Exemption CASE NO. 2020~005472ENV Transportation Recovery Plan: COVI0-19 Emergency Temporary Transit Lanes & COVID-19 Temporary Emergency Bikeways Project ; .. .. I ; . Streets· .. •... F.rom, . To .. Hyde Street Eddy Streer Market Street Eddy Street Polk Street Hy.de Street Larkin Street Market Street Geary Street Geneva Ave Ocean Al/eilue Santos Street 19th Avenue/ Junipero Serra Boulevard Lincoln Way Alemany Boulevard Veterans Boulevard/Presidio ·Parkway/ Richardson Avenue/Lombard 5treet ·Van Ness Avenue . Lake Street The installation of the proposed temporary transit lanes and temporary HOV lanes 'NOUld not require'lane removal, but woo Id require either' the conversion of an existing mixed-flow lane, a parking lane, or conversion of an existing part time transit orily lane into full-time transit only arid bus/taxi/bicycle Only lanes.To accommodate the temporary bicycle facilities, the project would temporarily remove metered and unmetered parking spaces and temporarily relocate yellow, white, and blue loading zones on some · portions of the project corridors. The installation of the temporary oicycle facilities wou Id not require lane removal. The proposed project would also amend Article 200 ofDivision II and Article 600 of Division ll of the San Francisco Transportation Code authorizing the· City Traffic Engineer to designate temporary transit-only lanes and create associated tow-away zones, as authorized in Section 602 of the Transportation Code. The City Traffic Engineer would only be permitted to approved temporary transit lanes and tow-away zones on project corridors listed in Table 1. ' The identified street segments would revert to pre-project conditions within 120 days after the retraction of the February 25, 2020 proclamation of the COVID-19 local emergency issued by Mayor London Breed. B. Determination: The City and County of San Francisco decided to carry out or approve the project on June 30, 2020 when the SFMTA Board of Directors approved the project under Resolution No. 200630-062.' SFMTA is a_lso the project sponsor and will carry out the project. On September 29, 2020, the San Francisco Board of Supervisors affirmed the CEQA determination (Motion No. M20-138). A copy of the project documents may be examined at the San Francisco Planning Department under file no. 2020-005472ENV, the SFMTA under Resolution No. 200630-062, and San Francisco Board of Supervisors Board File 200903. An Exemption from Environmental Review has been prepared pursuant to the provisions of CEQA under: l. _Ministerial (Sec. 21080(b)(l); 15268) 2. _Declared Emergency (Sec. 21080(b)(3); 15269(a)) 3. _x__Emergency Profect (Statute Sec. 21080(b)(4); Guidelines Sec. 15269(c)) 3 NoJice of Exemption CASE NO. 2020-0054 72ENV Transportation Recovery Plan: COVID-19 Emergency Temporary Transit Lanes & COVID-19 Temporary Emergency Bikeways Project 4. __x__categorical Exemption. Class l, Existing Facilities (Guidelines Sec. 1530l(c)) 5. _Statutory Exemption_ Sfate code number: ___ 6. _Community Plan Exemption (Sec.-21083.3; 15183) This project in its approved fo,rm has been determined to be exempt from environmental review. The project would mitigate a public health emergency and thus meets the definition ofan emergency project; none of the exclusions to issuing an emergency project statutory exemption apply to the project. The project woul~ make operational and minor alterations to existing public facilities and thus' also meets the definition of a Class l, Existing facilities categorical exemption; none of the exceptions to issuing a categorical exemptionrapply to ttie p·roject. Note: This .noUce is being issue9 during the susp~nsion of certain CEQA filing and posting requirements pursuant tC! executive orders N-54-20 and N-80-20, and its issuance complies with the alternative posting requirements stated in the orders. This notice also complies with local requirement's under the March 23rd Fifth Supplement to t~e Mayoral Proc(a.mation Declaring the Exister:ice of a Local Emergency Dated February25, 2020. Rich Hillis ,­ Planning Director I for October 21, 2020. --~-- By Lisa Gibson Date Erwironmental Review Officer· cc: Michael Rhodes, SFrylTA Mary Miles David Pilpel 4 State of California - Department of Fish and Wildlife 2020 ENVIRONMENTAL FILING FEE CASH RECEIPT DFW7S3.5a (REV.12101/19) Previously DFG 753.5a Print Finalize&Email RECEIPT NUMBER: 38-10123/2020-037 STATE CLEARINGHOUSE NUMBER (ff applicable) SEE INSlRUCTIONS ON.REVERSE. TYPE OR PRINT CLEARLY. LEAD AGENCY LEADAGENCY EMAIL DATE SAN FRANCISCO PLANNING DEPARTMENT [email protected] 10/23/202Q COUNTY/STATE AGENCY OF FILING DOCUMENT NUMBER SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY 2020-0000041 PROJECT TITLE TRANSIT LANES & COVID-19 EMERGENGY TEMPORARY BIKEWAYS PROJECT PROJECT APPLICANT NAME PROJECT APPLICANT EMAIL PHONE NUMBER JENNX. DELUMO jenny [email protected] (628) 652-7568 PROJECTAPPLICANT ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP CODE ) 49S.VANNESSAVE 14THFL SAN FRANCISCO !CA 94103 PROJECT APPLICANT (Check appropriate box) 18] Local Public Agency 0 School District D Other Special District 0 State Agency 0 Private Entity CHECK APPLICABLE FEES: D Environmental Impact Report (EIR) $ 3,343.25 $.--~-----­ D Mitigated/Negative Declaration (MND)(ND) $ 2,406.75 $ --------­ D Certified Regulatory Program (CRP) document - payment due directly to CDFW $ 1,136.50 $ --------- [El Exempt from fee Im Notice of Exemption (attach) D CDFW No Effect Determination (attach) D Fee previously paid (attach previously issued cash receipt copy) D Water Right Application or Petition Fee (State Water Resources Control Board only) $ 850.00 $ ---------- IE! County documentary handling fee $ J1 .oo $ ---'------7_1_.o_o D Other $ ~~~~~~~~~~~ '\ PAYMENT METHOD: 0 Cash D Credit D Check · [El Other JE# 321774 TOTAL RECEIVED $ 71.00 SIGNATURE AGENCY OF FILING PRINTED NAME AND TITLE Fallon Lim Deputy Clerk ORIGINAL -PROJECT APPLICANT COPY - CDFW/ASB COPY - LEAD AGENCY COPY - COUNTY CLERK DFW 753.Sa (Rev. 12012019) .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Sro) Occupants & Operators
    DIRECTORY OF RESOURCES/SERVICES FOR RESIDENTIAL HOTEL (SRO) OCCUPANTS & OPERATORS THE CITY & COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO PREPARED BY SRO TASK FORCE October 18, 2018 1 San Francisco SRO Task Force 1660 Missi on Street, 6th Floor San Francisco, CA 94103- 2414 (415) 558- 6 220 SRO TASK FORCE MEMBERS James Sanbonmatsu Department of Building Inspection- Chair Chirag Bhakta Larry Kessler Non-profit SRO Operator/Manager DPH Environmental Health Angela Chu Sam Patel Chinatown SRO Collaborative SRO Operator Jordan Davis Margot Antonetty Tenant Representative Department of Homelessness and Supportive Housing Clifford Gilmore Central City SRO Collaborative Raul Fernandez-Berriozabal SRO Families United Collaborative Dan Jordan Tenant Representative Diana Martinez Mission SRO Collaborative Legal Advisor: Peter Keith City Attorney’s Office Administrative Support: Jennifer Cheungjew The Directory of Resources/Services for Residential Hotel (SRO) Occupant and Operators was compiled by Jennifer Cheungjew at the direction of the SRO Task Force membership. 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS INSTRUCTIONS ON DIRECTORY USE ................................................................................................................................ 4 CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO CALL-IN SERVICES ....................................................................................... 4 RESIDENTIAL HOTEL PROPER MAINTENANCE/OPERATIONS ...................................................................................... 5 ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERNS ..........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Board of Appeals City & County of San Francisco
    BOARD OF APPEALS CITY & COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO AGENDA FOR REGULAR MEETING - WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 14, 2015 5:00 P.M., CITY HALL, ROOM 416, ONE DR. CARLTON B. GOODLETT PLACE (1) PUBLIC COMMENT At this time, members of the public may address the Board on items of interest to the public that are within the subject matter jurisdiction of the Board except agenda items. With respect to agenda items, your opportunity to address the Board will be afforded when the item is reached in the meeting with one exception. When the agenda item has already been reviewed in a public hearing at which members of the public were allowed to testify and the Board has closed the public hearing, your opportunity to address the Board must be exercised during the Public Comment portion of the calendar. Each member of the public may address the Board for up to three minutes. If it is demonstrated that comments by the public will exceed 15 minutes, the President may continue Public Comment to another time during the meeting. (2) COMMISSIONER COMMENTS & QUESTIONS (3) ADOPTION OF MINUTES Discussion and possible adoption of the December 17, 2014 minutes. (4) REHEARING REQUEST Subject property at 456 – 27th Street. Letter from Lorna Murdock, appellant, requesting rehearing of Appeal No. 14-170, Murdock vs. DBI, PDA, decided Dec. 10, 2014. At that time, the Board voted 4-0-1 (one vacancy) to uphold the subject permit on the basis that it conforms to the Residential Design Guidelines. Permit Holder: Robert Edmonds. Project: construct a three-story, two-unit residential building with 1,750sf of ground floor area; BPA No.
    [Show full text]
  • Download the NEPA Re-Evaluation
    Geary Bus Rapid Transit Re-Evaluation Date: August 29, 2018 Project Title: Geary Corridor Bus Rapid Transit Project FEIS/ROD: Geary Corridor Bus Rapid Transit Project Final Environmental Impact Statement, certified June 15, 2018 Project Sponsor/Joint Lead Agency: San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency Project Sponsor/Joint Lead Agency Contact: Liz Brisson 415.701.4791 Joint Lead Agency: San Francisco County Transportation Authority Joint Lead Agency Contact: Colin Dentel-Post, 415.522.4836 Consulting Firm Contact: Circlepoint, Brianna Bohonok, 510.285.6761 Introduction Since certification of the combined Environmental Impact Statement and Record of Decision (EIS/ROD) in June 2018, the design of the Geary Bus Rapid Transit (Geary BRT project) has advanced as a result of public outreach, feedback, and the detailed design for Phase I of the project. Project changes include modifications to certain bus stops, intersections, parking, and pedestrian facilities within the Phase I segment of the corridor. As demonstrated below, the project changes would not result in new or more severe environmental effects. Pursuant to 40 CFR 1508.4, the following checklist has been prepared. This checklist incorporates by reference the Geary BRT FEIS and all technical studies and memoranda prepared for the FEIS, and incorporates by reference the Geary Project Refinements Transportation Analysis Technical Memorandum prepared for the project changes by San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency (SFMTA) dated August 8, 2018. _____A. DETAILED PROJECT DESCRIPTION: • Include project features and identify project sponsor. • Include funding source (e.g. CMAQ, formula funds, discretionary funds, etc.) Approved Project The San Francisco County Transportation Authority (SFCTA), in cooperation with the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) and SFMTA, proposes to implement physical improvements and modified bus service (BRT) along the 6.5 miles of the Geary Corridor.
    [Show full text]
  • NBUS Bus Time Schedule & Line Route
    NBUS bus time schedule & line map NBUS Judah Bus View In Website Mode The NBUS bus line (Judah Bus) has 2 routes. For regular weekdays, their operation hours are: (1) Ocean Beach: 5:16 AM - 11:45 PM (2) Townsend and 5th St: 12:00 AM - 11:45 PM Use the Moovit App to ƒnd the closest NBUS bus station near you and ƒnd out when is the next NBUS bus arriving. Direction: Ocean Beach NBUS bus Time Schedule 50 stops Ocean Beach Route Timetable: VIEW LINE SCHEDULE Sunday 5:16 AM - 11:45 PM Monday 5:16 AM - 11:45 PM Townsend St & 5 St 378 Townsend St, San Francisco Tuesday 5:16 AM - 11:45 PM Townsend St & 4th St Wednesday 5:16 AM - 11:45 PM 310 Townsend St, San Francisco Thursday 5:16 AM - 11:45 PM King St & 2nd St Friday 5:16 AM - 11:45 PM 141 King St, San Francisco Saturday 5:16 AM - 11:45 PM The Embarcadero & Brannan St Brannan Street, San Francisco The Embarcadero & Folsom St 299 Steuart St, San Francisco NBUS bus Info Direction: Ocean Beach Steuart St & Market St Stops: 50 Trip Duration: 48 min Market St & Drumm St Line Summary: Townsend St & 5 St, Townsend St & 101 Market St, San Francisco 4th St, King St & 2nd St, The Embarcadero & Brannan St, The Embarcadero & Folsom St, Steuart St & Market St & Battery St Market St, Market St & Drumm St, Market St & 475 Market St, San Francisco Battery St, Market St & 2nd St, Market St & Kearny St, Market St & Stockton St, Market St & 5th St, Market Market St & 2nd St St & Taylor St, Market St & 7th St, Market St & Hyde 590 Market Street, San Francisco St, Market St & Larkin St, Market St & Van Ness Ave,
    [Show full text]
  • San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency Board of Directors
    SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY BOARD OF DIRECTORS RESOLUTION No. 180821-118 WHEREAS, The San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency (SFMTA) has proposed the installation of parking and traffic modifications along the 38 Geary/38R Geary Rapid corridor between Market and Stanyan streets associated with the Geary Corridor Bus Rapid Transit Project (Geary BRT) as follows: A. ESTABLISH – TRAFFIC SIGNAL – Geary Boulevard and Cook Street (replaces two- way STOP control); Geary Boulevard and Buchanan Street (new mid-block pedestrian crossing) B. ESTABLISH – TRANSIT ONLY LANE AT ALL TIMES – Geary Boulevard, eastbound, from Stanyan Street to Collins Street; Geary Boulevard, westbound, from Collins Street to Stanyan Street; Geary Boulevard, eastbound, from Masonic Avenue to Presidio Avenue; Geary Boulevard, eastbound, from Baker Street to Steiner Street; Geary Boulevard, eastbound, from Fillmore Street to Gough Street; Geary Boulevard, westbound, from Gough Street to Baker Street; O'Farrell Street, eastbound, from Stockton Street to Grant Street C. ESTABLISH – MUNI AND GOLDEN GATE TRANSIT ONLY LANE AT ALL TIMES – Geary Boulevard, westbound, from Presidio Avenue to Masonic Avenue D. ESTABLISH – CROSSWALK – Steiner Street, east leg, at Geary Boulevard; Webster Street, east leg, at Geary Boulevard; Webster Street, west leg, at Geary Boulevard; Buchanan Street, mid-block, at Geary Boulevard E. ESTABLISH – SIDEWALK WIDENING, ESTABLISH – TOW-AWAY NO STOPPING ANYTIME – Geary Boulevard, north side, from Divisadero Street to 140 feet easterly
    [Show full text]
  • Corbett Heights, San Francisco (Western Part of Eureka Valley) Historic Context Statement
    Corbett Heights, San Francisco (Western Part of Eureka Valley) Historic Context Statement Prepared for Corbett Heights Neighbors Funded by Historic Preservation Fund Committee For Submittal to San Francisco Planning Department Prepared by Michael R. Corbett Architectural Historian 2161 Shattuck Avenue #203 Berkeley, California 94704 (510) 548-4123 mcorbett@ lmi.net Adopted by the Historic Preservation Commission on August 16, 2017 Historic Contex t Statement Corbett Heights F inal (Western Part of E ureka V alley) S an F rancisco, California TABLE OF CONTENTS I. GENERAL INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................... 1 A. Project Purpose .................................................................................................................................. 1 B. Historic Context Statements ............................................................................................................ 1 C. Project History and Personnel ......................................................................................................... 2 Sponsoring Organization ................................................................................................................ 2 Fiscal Sponsor .................................................................................................................................. 2 Volunteers ......................................................................................................................................... 2 Planning
    [Show full text]
  • San Francisco Architecture Guide 2020
    WHAT Architect WHERE Notes Zone 1: Fisherman’s Warf and the Piers + North Beach Pier 39 is a shopping center and popular tourist attraction built in 1978. The marina is also home to the floating Forbes Island restaurant. The sea lions at Pier 39 have become a tourist attraction in their own right. Although the reason for their migration to the pier *** Pier 39 Warren Simmons Pier 39 is unclear, the refurbishing of the docks in September 1989 required the removal of all boats from that area, leaving large open spaces for the sea lions to move into. Once the project was completed, boat owners returned, but did their best to navigate around the sea lions; no efforts were made to encourage the new guests to leave. Aquarium of the Bay was built in 1996 as an aquarium. It added additional attractions to the original building and has 273 species and more than 60,000 fish. Sharks circle overhead, manta rays sweep by and seaweed sways all around at the Aquarium of the Bay, where you * Aquarium of the Bay ? Pier 39 wander through glass tubes surrounded by sea life from San Francisco Bay. It's not for the claustrophobic, perhaps, but the thrilling fish- eye view, leaves kids and parents enthralled. General admission $27.95. Mon-Sun (10am-6pm) A few California sea lions began “hauling out” on PIER 39’s K-Dock shortly after the Loma Prieta earthquake hit San Francisco in October 1989. By January 1990, the boisterous barking pinnipeds started to *** Sea Lion Colony - Pier 39 arrive in droves and completely took over K-Dock, much to the exasperation of PIER 39’s Marina tenants.
    [Show full text]
  • Attractions with the Symbol Require Reservations
    Thank you for choosing San Francisco Explorer Pass 4-Choice! There are few places in the world that combine a dense, bustling metropolis with awe-inspiring natural beauty, but the San Francisco Bay Area does just that. Set sail under the Golden Gate bridge, escape from Alcatraz, peruse the de Young Museum: in this guide, you’ll discover all there is to see and do in the City by the Bay. So fuel up with a dim sum lunch or satisfy your sweet tooth with a Ghirardelli chocolate, and enjoy San Francisco! This packet contains your admission pass(es) Your pass is required for admission at each attraction. Please print it out, carry it with you and retain it after each visit. How to use your admission pass Every pass has a unique code. A representative at the attraction will scan the code on each traveler’s pass, granting you admission. For special offers at shops and restaurants, show your pass to your server or cashier. Be aware of admission policies Please read attraction information for hours, closings, and special admis- sion instructions. Attractions with the symbol require reservations. Pass expiration Visiting your first attraction activates your pass. Then, you have 30 calen- dar days to use your pass. You may only visit each attraction once. You have one year from the purchase date to begin using your pass. Need help? If you need assistance with your pass please call us at 866-628-9028. If you lose your pass, reprint it at any time from your order confirmation email, or by using Order Lookup at smartdestinations.com.
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation Supporting Information
    DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT Better Market Street Project EIR APPENDIX 7: TRANSPORTATION SUPPORTING INFORMATION PLANNING DEPARTMENT CASE NO. 2014.0012E STATE CLEARINGHOUSE NO. 2015012027 Draft EIR Publication Date: February 27, 2019 Draft EIR Public Hearing Date: April 4, 2019 Draft EIR Public Comment Period: February 28, 2019 – April 15, 2019 Written comments should be sent to: Chris Thomas, AICP | 1650 Mission Street, Suite 400 | San Francisco, CA 94103 or [email protected] February 2019 APPENDIX 7: TRANSPORTATION SUPPORTING INFORMATION Case No. 2014.0012E Better Market Street Better Market Street Environmental Impact Report Case Number 2014.0012E Transportation Technical Appendix Prepared for: City and County of San Francisco Planning Department Prepared by: Fehr & Peers LCW Consulting Parisi Transportation Consulting CHS Consulting January 2019 TRANSPORTATION TECHNICAL APPENDIX Attachment 1: Roadway Network Classifications Attachment 2: Traffic Volumes • 2a: All Scenarios • 2b: Comparison (2015-2012) Attachment 3: VMT Summary Information Attachment 4: Parking and Loading Information • 4a: Loading Recommendations Report • 4b: Pipeline Development List • 4c: Loading and Parking Tables Attachment 5: Analysis Methodology • 5a: 2020 Baseline Conditions Projects • 5b: Methodology and Validation for Market/Mission Street VISSIM Model • 5c: Better Market Street VISSIM Modeling Approach • 5d: Dynamic Traffic Assignment Model PM Peak Period Validation for Better Market Street Project • 5e: Input Assumptions for Better Market
    [Show full text]
  • Resolution Log – 2005
    RESOLUTION LOG – 2005 05-01 1/4/05 Requesting the Controller to allot funds and to draw warrants against such funds available or will be available in payment of the following claims against the MTA: A. Latara Reed, Superior Ct. #420857 filed on 5/28/03 for $2,000 B. Peggy Elaine Cosmas, Superior Ct. #CGC03418121 filed on 3/7/03 for $4,500 C. Sheila Golden, Unlitigated Claim #0500675 filed on 8/24/04 for $7,037.22 D. Elizabeth Ing, Superior Ct. #429869 filed on 3/24/04 for $11,000 E. Jose Armando Ramirez, Superior Ct. #01401901 filed on 11/30/01 for $17,500 F. Jose Jimenez, Superior Ct. #CGC04044291 filed on 9/1/04 for $32,000 G. Michael Kellner, Superior Ct. #411335 filed on 8/9/02 for $60,000 05-002 1/4/05 Approving the following traffic modifications: A. ESTABLISH - TOW-AWAY, NO STOPPING - Evans Avenue, west side, from Napoleon Street to 100 feet northerly and Evans Avenue, east side, from Napoleon Street to 120 feet northerly. B. RESCIND - TWO-HOUR PARKING TIME LIMIT, APRIL THROUGH OCTOBER, 7 AM TO 10 PM, MONDAY THROUGH FRIDAY, 9 AM TO 6 PM, SATURDAY AND SUNDAY AND TWO-HOUR PARKING TIME LIMIT, NOVEMBER THROUGH MARCH, 7 AM TO 6 PM, MONDAY THROUGH SATURDAY - Townsend Street, south side, from 2nd Street to 27 feet westerly. C. RESCIND - PARKING METERS - Columbus Avenue, north side, west of Greenwich Street, rescinding #802 to increase the length of an existing Bus Zone. D. ESTABLISH - NO LEFT TURN - 505 Parnassus Avenue, driveway exit.
    [Show full text]
  • Conditional Use Authorization HEARING DATE: FEBRUARY 21, 2013
    Executive Summary Conditional Use Authorization HEARING DATE: FEBRUARY 21, 2013 Date: February 14, 2013 Case No.: 2012.0010C Project Address: 450 Stanyan Street Current Zoning: RM-2 (Residential - Mixed, Moderate Density) RH-3 (Residential – House, Three-Family) 130-E Height and Bulk District Block/Lot: 1191/041 Project Sponsor: Verizon Wireless represented by Jay Gruendle, On-Air, LLC 465 First Street West, Suite 101 Sonoma, CA 95476 Staff Contact: Michelle Stahlhut – (415) 575-9116 [email protected] PROJECT DESCRIPTION The proposal is to modify an existing wireless telecommunications services (“WTS”) facility consisting of replacing nine existing antennas and relocating three of the nine antennas from the east face of the building to the north face of the building with associated equipment located inside of St. Mary’s Hospital as part of Verizon Wireless’s telecommunications network. Based on the zoning and use, the antennas are proposed on a Location Preference 1 Site (Preferred Location Site) according to the WTS Siting Guidelines. The proposed antennas would measure a maximum of 50” high by 12” wide by 7” thick. All nine antennas would be mounted on a facade of the building behind a radiofrequency transparent screen, with a maximum height of approximately 116 feet above grade. SITE DESCRIPTION AND PRESENT USE The Project Site, St. Mary’s Hospital, is located on Assessor’s Block 1191, Lot 041. The Project Site is part of the larger six acre medical center that includes all but the northwest corner of the block bound by Stanyan, Fulton, Shrader, and Hayes Streets. There are five major institutional buildings in the medical center.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 1: Architectural and Social Background
    HAIGHT-ASHBURY AND ITS CONTRIBUTION TO THE COUNTERCULTURE MOVEMENT A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Cornell University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in Historic Preservation and Planning by Ethan James Potter August 2020 i © 2020 Ethan James Potter i ABSTRACT The City of San Francisco, specifically the Haight-Ashbury neighborhood, was the epicenter of the American Counterculture Movement in the mid to late sixties. The social, cultural, and political impact of this movement is vast and widely known. This thesis provides a themed historical narrative of the Haight-Ashbury, specifically about its role in the Counterculture Movement. There are three major themes that explore the history of both the Counterculture Movement and Haight-Ashbury. Significant planning and preservation efforts for Haight-Ashbury, since the sixties, are also surveyed. Subjects such as intangible culture, history, city planning, and architecture are examined as they pertain to Haight-Ashbury and the Counterculture Movement. ii BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH Ethan Potter is, above all, passionate for history. He grew up in Sammamish Washington, playing baseball and football. He studied history, English, and anthropology at Washington State University graduating with a Bachelor of Arts in History. He then worked in education as a tutor and a docent. Ethan decided to pursue a degree in Historic Preservation for its ability to educate the public about history. Ethan was inspired to pursue history after reading Carl L. Becker’s 1930 speech, “Every Man A Historian,” which demonstrates how historical research is conducted by nearly everyone, every day.
    [Show full text]