AIR METHODS CORPORATION (Exact Name of Registrant As Specified in Its Charter)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

AIR METHODS CORPORATION (Exact Name of Registrant As Specified in Its Charter) UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 ____________ FORM 10-K (Mark One) X ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 OR TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from to Commission file number 0-16079 AIR METHODS CORPORATION (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Delaware 84-0915893 (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) (I.R.S. employer identification no.) 7301 South Peoria, Englewood, Colorado 80112 (Address of principal executive offices and zip code) 303-792-7400 (Registrant’s telephone number, including area code) Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Not Applicable Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: COMMON STOCK, $.06 PAR VALUE PER SHARE (the "Common Stock") (Title of Class) Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes [ ] No [X] Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes [ ] No [X] Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [ ] Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. [ ] Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (Check one): Large accelerated Filer [ ] Accelerated Filer [ X ] Non-accelerated Filer [ ] Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.) Yes [ ] No [X ] State the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold, or the average bid and asked price of such common equity, as of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter: $77,163,000 The number of outstanding shares of Common Stock as of February 24, 2006, was 11,615,590. TABLE OF CONTENTS To Form 10-K Page PART I ITEM 1. BUSINESS...............................................................................................................................1 General.....................................................................................................................................1 Contracts in Process.................................................................................................................3 Employees................................................................................................................................3 Government Regulation...........................................................................................................4 Internet Address.......................................................................................................................4 ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS......................................................................................................................4 ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS ..................................................................................9 ITEM 2. PROPERTIES ..........................................................................................................................9 Facilities...................................................................................................................................9 Equipment and Parts ................................................................................................................9 ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS ......................................................................................................10 ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS ..........................10 PART II ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS...............................................................................................11 ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA .........................................................................................12 ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS..............................................................14 Overview................................................................................................................................14 Results of Operations.............................................................................................................16 Liquidity and Capital Resources ............................................................................................22 Outlook for 2006....................................................................................................................26 Critical Accounting Policies ..................................................................................................26 New Accounting Standards....................................................................................................28 ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK ......28 ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA ......................................28 ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE............................................................29 ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES......................................................................................29 ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION .....................................................................................................29 i PART III ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT ............................30 ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.........................................................................................33 ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT...................................................................................................................39 ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS ..................................41 ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES.......................................................42 PART IV ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES......................................... IV-1 SIGNATURES ........................................................................................................................................ IV-4 ii PART I ITEM 1. BUSINESS GENERAL Air Methods Corporation, a Delaware corporation, (Air Methods or the Company) was originally incorporated in Colorado in 1982 and now serves as the largest provider of air medical emergency transport services and systems throughout the United States of America. We provide air medical emergency transport services under two separate operating models: the Community-Based Model (CBM) and the Hospital-Based Model (HBM). In October 2002, we acquired 100% of the membership interest of Rocky Mountain Holdings, LLC (RMH), a Delaware limited liability company which conducted both CBM and HBM operations. RMH, Mercy Air Service, Inc. (Mercy Air), and LifeNet, Inc. (LifeNet) operate as wholly-owned subsidiaries of Air Methods. As of December 31, 2005, our CBM division provided air medical transportation services in 17 states, while our HBM division provided air medical transportation services to hospitals located in 26 states and Puerto Rico under operating agreements with original terms ranging from one to ten years. Under both CBM and HBM operations, we transport persons requiring intensive medical care from either the scene of an accident or general care hospitals to highly skilled trauma centers or tertiary care centers. Our Products Division designs, manufactures, and installs aircraft medical interiors and other aerospace or medical transport products. Financial information for each of our operating segments is included in the notes to our consolidated financial statements included in Item 8 of this report. Community-Based Model CBM services, also referred to as independent provider operations, are performed by our LifeNet Division and include medical care, aircraft operation and maintenance, 24-hour communications and dispatch, and medical billing and collections. CBM aircraft are typically based at fire stations or airports. CBM revenue consists of flight fees billed directly to patients, their insurers, or governmental agencies. Due to weather conditions and other factors, the number of flights is generally higher during the summer months than during the remainder of the year, causing revenue generated from operations to fluctuate accordingly. Following the acquisition of RMH in October 2002, its CBM operations were combined with our already existing
Recommended publications
  • Monthly Noise Report Steve Spurlock Superintendent of Safety and Security January 2018
    Airport Advisory Commission Wayne Chaney Sr. Chair Jeffrey Anderson Vice Chair Alvaro Castillo Hal Gosling Rita Nayak Phil Ramsdale Jeff Rowe Roland B. Scott, Jr. Karen Sherman Airport Management Jess L. Romo, A.A.E. Airport Director Juan López-Rios Deputy Airport Director Ken Mason Executive Assistant Claudia Lewis Manager of Administration & Finance Fred Pena Airport Operations Manager Ambi Thurai Engineering Officer Dale Worsham Administrative Officer Karl Zittel Airside Operations Officer Long Beach Airport Stephanie Montuya-Morisky Public Affairs Officer Monthly Noise Report Steve Spurlock Superintendent of Safety and Security January 2018 Matthew Brookes Airport Properties Officer Ron Reeves Noise & Environmental Affairs Officer COMMERCIAL AIRCRAFT LATE NIGHT ACTIVITY LGB Current Month & Calendar Year-To-Date Statistics (10 PM- 7AM) January 2018 January CY-T-D 2018 10PM - 11PM Activity 2018 2017 Change 2018 2017 Change Air Carrier & Commuter Operations 3,128 2,926 6.9% 3,128 2,926 6.9% American/Mesa/SkyWest Airlines 1 1 0.0% 1 1 0.0% Delta/SkyWest Airlines 2 6 -66.7% 2 6 -66.7% FedEx 0 0 0 0 JetBlue Airways 31 39 -20.5% 31 39 -20.5% Southwest Airlines 1 2 -50.0% 1 2 -50.0% UPS 0 0 0 0 Subtotal 10PM-11PM 35 48 -27.1% 35 48 -27.1% 11PM- 7AM Activity 2018 2017 Change 2018 2017 Change American/Mesa/SkyWest Airlines 1 2 -50.0% 1 2 -50.0% Delta/SkyWest Airlines 1 2 -50.0% 1 2 -50.0% FedEx 0 0 0 0 JetBlue Airways 31 31 0.0% 31 31 0.0% Southwest Airlines 0 4 -400.0% 0 4 -400.0% UPS 0 0 0 0 Subtotal 11PM-7AM 33 39 -15.4% 33 39 -15.4% TOTAL 68 87 -21.8% 68 87 -21.8% Notes: 2.2% (68 of 3,128) of total commercial operations occurred between 10pm - 7am.
    [Show full text]
  • Arapahoe County Public Airport Authority (A Component Unit of Arapahoe County, Colorado) Financial Statements Years Ended December 31, 2016 and 2015
    Arapahoe County Public Airport Authority (A Component Unit of Arapahoe County, Colorado) Financial Statements Years Ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 Table of Contents PAGE Independent Auditor’s Report 1 Management’s Discussion and Analysis (Unaudited) 3 BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Statements of Net Position 14 Statements of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Net Position 16 Statements of Cash Flows 18 Notes to the Financial Statements 20 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Funds Available - Budget and Actual (Non-GAAP Budgetary Basis) - 2016 36 Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Budgetary Basis (Actual) to Statements of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Net Position - 2016 37 Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Funds Available - Budget and Actual (Non-GAAP Budgetary Basis) - 2015 38 Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Budgetary Basis (Actual) to Statements of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Net Position - 2015 39 Independent Auditor’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting and on Compliance and Other Matters Based on an Audit of the Financial Statements Performed in Accordance with Government Auditing Standards 40 Independent Auditor’s Report Board of Commissioners Arapahoe County Public Airport Authority Englewood, Colorado Report on the Financial Statements We have audited the accompanying financial statements of Arapahoe County Public Airport Authority (the Authority), a component unit of Arapahoe County, Colorado as of and for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, and the related
    [Show full text]
  • Commercial Airline Categories Notes on Tables
    Safety Half-year Significant non-fatal accidents/incidents: All commercial airline categories Date: 11 Mar ● Carrier: Transcarga International Airways ● Aircraft type/registration: Airbus A300F (YV560T) ● Location: Maiquetia, Venezuela Injuries (crew/pax): 0 ● Occupants (crew/pax): 3 ● Phase: TO The crew aborted take-off when the left GE Aviation CF6 engine suffered detached and hit a workshop at the airport. The aircraft was delivered to an uncontained failure. A disk failure, believed to be a turbine disk, Eastern Airlines in 1983 and began operating with Transcarga in 2014. Date: 12 Mar ● Carrier: Grant Aviation ● Aircraft type/registration: Cessna 208B Caravan (N407GV) ● Location: Chevak airport, Alaska, USA Injuries (crew/pax): 0/0 ● Occupants (crew/pax): 1/3 ● Phase: TO The pilot began the take-off run for a scheduled domestic service, but runway surface and crosswind. The aircraft swerved off the runway and then elected to abandon the attempt because of a combination of an icy rolled onto a wingtip, sustaining considerable damage. Date: 20 Mar ● Carrier: Trigana Air Service ● Aircraft type/registration: Boeing 737-400F (PK-YSF) ● Location: Jakarta International airport, Indonesia ● Injuries (crew/pax): 0 ● Occupants (crew/pax): 4 ● Phase: L The aircraft was operating a cargo flight from Halim Perdanakusuma In- Directional control was lost and the aircraft ground looped off the left ternational airport, Jakarta to Sultan Hasanuddin airport, Makassar. Just side of the runway; coming to rest on the grass beside the runway on its before lift-off or during the initial climb after take-off, the right engine belly. Tyre marks on the runway suggest that the right main wheel may failed.
    [Show full text]
  • Advertising Opportunity Guide Print
    AAAE’S AAAE DELIVERS FOR AIRPORT EXECUTIVES NO.1 RATED PRODUCT M AG A Z IN E AAAEAAAE DELIVERSDELIVERS FOR AIRPORTAIRPORT EXECUTIVESEXECUTIVES AAAE DELIVERS FOR AIRPORT EXECUTIVES AAAE DELIVERS FOR AIRPORT EXECUTIVES MMAGAZINE AG A Z IN E MAGAZINE MAGAZINE www.airportmagazine.net | August/September 2015 www.airportmagazine.net | June/July 2015 www.airportmagazine.net | February/March 2015 NEW TECHNOLOGY AIDS AIRPORTS, PASSENGERS NON-AERONAUTICAL REVENUE SECURITYU.S. AIRPORT TRENDS Airport Employee n Beacons Deliver Airport/ Screening Retail Trends Passenger Benefits n Hosting Special Events UAS Security Issues Editorial Board Outlook for 2015 n CEO Interview Airport Diversity Initiatives Risk-Based Security Initiatives ADVERTISING OPPORTUNITY GUIDE PRINT ONLINE DIGITAL MOBILE AIRPORT MAGAZINE AIRPORT MAGAZINE ANDROID APP APPLE APP 2016 | 2016 EDITORIAL MISSION s Airport Magazine enters its 27th year of publication, TO OUR we are proud to state that we continue to produce AVIATION Atop quality articles that fulfill the far-ranging needs of airports, including training information; the lessons airports INDUSTRY have learned on subjects such as ARFF, technology, airfield and FRIENDS terminal improvements; information about the state of the nation’s economy and its impact on air service; news on regulatory and legislative issues; and much more. Further, our magazine continues to make important strides to bring its readers practical and timely information in new ways. In addition to printed copies that are mailed to AAAE members and subscribers, we offer a full digital edition, as well as a free mobile app that can be enjoyed on Apple, Android and Kindle Fire devices. In our app you will discover the same caliber of content you’ve grown to expect, plus mobile-optimized text, embedded rich media, and social media connectivity.
    [Show full text]
  • S-70 Firehawk® Multi-Role Helicopter
    ™ ® S-70 Firehawk Multi-role Helicopter Colorado Backgrounder In Southern California, a Sikorsky S-70 Firehawk helicopter flies low to drop water on a small wildland fire. The aircraft’s ability to reach remote fires quickly — often before ground firefighters arrive — can prevent a small blaze from spreading out of control. The state of Colorado is looking to acquire several multirole Firehawk aircraft for both firefighting and year-round search and rescue. Background: Governor Jared Polis has added to the proposed budget for 2021-2022 fiscal year an S-70 Firehawk helicopter as a permanent state-owned asset to fight wildfires. The $23.9 The case to own million cost of the aircraft with associated equipment and training is part of a $78 million firefighting assets package for wildfire relief, mitigation and prevention. The budget also indicates a long-term plan to acquire several Firehawk aircraft this decade for aerial firefighting and other roles, such From Colorado’s as search and rescue. proposed 2021-22 budget The Colorado Connection: United Rotorcraft, a division of Air Methods, based at Centennial “These additional resources Airport in Englewood, has developed an aerial firefighting system to convert an S-70 Black enhance the state’s overall Hawk helicopter into a ‘Firehawk.’ The company is the sole installer of the system, which capacity to perform mitigation features a 1,000-gallon (3,785 liter) water tank system and a retractable snorkel — both attached projects, aggressive attack on new fires, and critical support to local to the belly of the aircraft. To give the tank extra clearance from the ground, United Rotorcraft jurisdictions on larger, longer adds an extension to each of the aircraft’s two front wheels (see diagram on page 2.) Optional duration fires.
    [Show full text]
  • We Impr E Y R J Rney
    CONNECTIONS & OPPORTUNITIES 2018 ANNUAL REPORT ® We impre yr jrney E-470 ROUTE Larkridge 160TH Regional Retail Center E-470 ROUTE 25 A-E E-470 MAININE TO PAA YORK ST TO INTERCHANGE NWP NO TO INTERCHANGE U.S. 85 SERVICE CENTER QUEBEC STREET 144TH BRIGHTON 76 THORNTON Barr Lake 120TH 120TH ADAMS COUNTY 112TH COLORADO BLVD 104TH 104TH COMMERCE CITY 96TH Denver International Airport 25 Rocky Mountain Arsenal PENA BLVD National Wildlife Refuge 64TH 56TH TOWER RD TOWER PICADILLY RD PICADILLY Downtown 225 26TH Denver E-470 FACING WEST NEAR 96TH AVENUE COLFAX AVE 70 6TH 6TH PKWY Buckley COLORADO BLVD APPROACHING THREE DECADES AS A TOLLING LEADER MISSISSIPPI AVE Air PARKER RD Force Base AURORA Since its inception in 1991, E-470 has been prominent in tolling services and technology. 25 JEWELL AVE EVANS The Authority’s rollout of All-Electronic Tolling in 2009 marked one of the first implementations of this ILIFF AVE technology in the country. Through ExpressToll, Colorado’s “One Stop Toll Shop”, E-470 has provided GUN CLUB RD CLUB GUN HAMPDEN AVE centralized customer service, billing and back-office support for all of Colorado’s tolling facilities, Cherry Creek QUINCY AVE Reservoir Quincy transforming and expanding tolling in the state. BELLEVIEW AVE Reservoir SMOKY HILL RD ORCHARD RD 25 During 2018, E-470 staff and its Board of Directors realized new opportunities to provide maximum PEORIA ST PEORIA Southlands ARAPAHOE RD Mall benefit to ExpressToll customers of E-470 as well as the larger Colorado community. Leading the charge SANTA FE DR ARAPAHOE COUNTY BROADWAY Centennial COUNTY LINE RD Airport were the E-470 Board of Directors’ unanimous votes to implement a toll rate freeze and to remove the Park Meadows GARTRELL RD Shopping District Vehicle Registration Fee (VRF), which had been in place since the founding of the Authority in 1988.
    [Show full text]
  • Centennial Airport Part 150 Cover P16-307740
    Introduction Centennial Airport has decided now is the right time to initiate the NEM Update. As such, Centennial Airport intends to accomplish: . An accurate reflection of the previously implemented NCP . Collection and analysis of information regarding current and forecasted operations as it relates to aircraft noise and land use compatibility . Update current and forecast aircraft noise exposure contours . Land use compatibility within the updated existing and forecast aircraft noise exposure contours to determine whether there is potential for continued use of Federal funds to implement the NCP measures . Communication of the updated information and results with the public and stakeholders 1.2 Federal Regulation Guiding Airport Noise Compatibility Planning The emphasis on aircraft noise compatibility planning in the United States started with the passing of the Aviation Safety and Noise Abatement (ASNA) Act of 1979. This act gave the FAA authority to provide assistance to airport operators to prepare and carry out noise compatibility programs. The FAA assistance includes both regulatory guidance and financial support. The FAA implemented the ASNA noise-related regulatory requirements in Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations Part 150 (14 CFR Part 150), “Airport Noise Compatibility Planning”. The regulation, most commonly referred to as “Part 150,” sets forth standards for airport operators to use in documenting noise exposure in their airport environs and for establishing programs to minimize noise-related land use incompatibilities. While participation in this program by an airport is voluntary, over 250 airport sponsors, including Centennial Airport, have participated in the program, which assists in standardizing noise analysis at a national level.
    [Show full text]
  • Oklahoma 2009 Ambulance Registry
    Oklahoma State Department of Health Protective Health Services Emergency Medical Services 1000 N.E. 10th Street Oklahoma City, OK 73117-1299 Telephone: (405) 271-4027 Fax: (405) 271-4240 Oklahoma 2009 Ambulance Registry Oklahoma State Department of Health State of Oklahoma The Honorable Brad Henry Governor Oklahoma State Department of Health Rocky McElvany, M.S. Interim Commissioner of Health Protective Health Services Henry F. Hartsell, Jr., Ph.D Deputy Commissioner Tom Welin Chief, Medical Facilities Emergency Medical Services Division R. Shawn Rogers Director Dr. Tim Cathey Medical Director Sharon DellaVecchio Administrative Assistant Roger Schilling North EMS Administrator Jay Mitchell South EMS Administrator Elizabeth Sullivan West EMS Administrator Robert Irby East EMS Administrator Eddie Manley Education Coordinator Bob Hitt EMT-Licensing-Coordinator Linda White EMS Data Coordinator Forward This annual report is compiled and published in accordance with Oklahoma Statute, Title 63, Section 1-2511. The Commissioner of Health, through the Emergency Medical Services Division (EMS), maintains a comprehensive registry of ambulance services and certified first response agencies in the State of Oklahoma, and publishes this report annually. The information published in this directory was reported to the EMS Division for the period of January 1, 2008 through December 31, 2008. Information requested by the EMS Division includes, but is not limited to, licensure status, level of care, condition and type of vehicles, number of licensed and certified emergency medical personnel at each of the several levels, number of emergency (Code 3) and non- emergency (Code 1) transport calls, dispatching and radio communication capabilities, response times, hospitals utilized and the geographic area normally served.
    [Show full text]
  • E-470 Toll Road and Vehicle Registration Fees
    E-470 TOLL ROAD AND VEHICLE REGISTRATION FEES The E-470 is a Colorado toll highway that received most of its funding from toll revenues, yet also received material support from value capture methods including developer right-of-way (ROW) contributions, vehicle registration fees, and highway expansion fees. It also benefited from modest joint development on its ROW. PROJECT OVERVIEW E-470 is a 47-mile, primarily four-lane, limited-access toll road that makes up a major portion of a circumferential beltway around the eastern portion of the Denver metropolitan area. E-470 connects in the south to the I-25/C-470 interchange and in the north to the I-25/Northwest Parkway interchange. It is also a major link to the Denver International Airport.1 The idea of E-470, or I-470 as originally planned, began in the 1960s when the Colorado Department of Highways (predecessor to the Colorado Department of Transportation [CDOT]), perceived a need for a beltway around the Denver metro area.2 The project was initially delayed due to opposition from the Colorado Department of Health and other stakeholders who were concerned that it would create air pollution.3 In 1987, the project was relabeled C-470, reflecting State rather than Federal ownership, and in 1990, the southwestern quadrant of the road segment was completed.4 The implementation of E-470 dates back to 1981, when Arapahoe County, Douglas County, Greenwood Village, and private developers began the “Centennial Airport Influence Area Transportation Study.” The 1982 study recommended the extension of C-470 east and north to I-70.
    [Show full text]
  • Inadequate Regulation for Emergency Air Ambulance Transportation
    HEALTH POLICY Up in the Air: Inadequate Regulation REPORT MARCH 2017 for Emergency Air Ambulance Transportation EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Market shifts in emergency air ambulance services have surfaced serious consumer concerns and regulatory gaps. Troubling changes in the industry have led to an increase in the number of consumers receiving unexpected and exorbitant medical bills for air ambulance services. Further, an oversupply in the air ambulance market has contributed to unnecessary overuse of this life-saving service. Although states want to create consumer protections in this area, federal preemption has largely prevented the regulation by state governments. Consumers need to beware of using these services, which sometimes are not medically necessary and often not in insurance networks. However, when buying health insurance, savvy consumers can try to find coverage that has local air ambulance providers in the plan network. Consumers living in rural areas may be solicited to buy "membership programs" offered by some air ambulance operators, but should consider these offers with caution. While the cost may be low, they will only cover expenses beyond insurance if the air transport membership company is the one that handles the emergency. In order to address these issues, Congress should amend the Airline Deregulation Act to allow for greater state regulation; meanwhile, states should gather information about their emergency air ambulance landscapes, warn consumers about potential financial risks related to air ambulance transportation, and craft legislation to address consumer concerns where they can. When patients need to be airlifted to medical care in an emergency, the first priority is getting them to the right healthcare provider as quickly as possible.
    [Show full text]
  • Watson V. Air Methods Corp., 834 F.3D 891 (8Th Cir
    United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 15-1900 ___________________________ John A. Watson, V, lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant, v. Air Methods Corporation, lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee. ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis ____________ Submitted: January 10, 2017 Filed: August 31, 2017 ____________ Before RILEY, Chief Judge,1 WOLLMAN, LOKEN, MELLOY, SMITH, COLLOTON, GRUENDER, BENTON, SHEPHERD, and KELLY, Circuit Judges, En Banc. ____________ 1The Honorable William Jay Riley stepped down as Chief Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit at the close of business on March 10, 2017. He has been succeeded by the Honorable Lavenski R. Smith. Appellate Case: 15-1900 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/31/2017 Entry ID: 4574514 COLLOTON, Circuit Judge. John Watson sued his former employer, Air Methods Corporation, in Missouri state court, alleging a common-law claim for wrongful discharge in violation of public policy. Watson alleged that he was a “whistleblower” who disclosed safety violations at the company, and that Air Methods retaliated against him by terminating his employment. Air Methods removed the case to federal court and then moved to dismiss based on the pre-emption provision of the Airline Deregulation Act (“ADA”), 49 U.S.C. § 41713(b)(1). The district court, relying on our decision in Botz v. Omni Air International, 286 F.3d 488 (8th Cir. 2002), dismissed the complaint, and Watson appeals. We now hold that the ADA does not expressly pre-empt Watson’s state-law wrongful-discharge claims involving post hoc reporting of alleged violations of air- safety regulations.
    [Show full text]
  • GAO-17-637, Accessible Version, AIR AMBULANCE
    United States Government Accountability Office Report to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, House of Representatives July 2017 AIR AMBULANCE Data Collection and Transparency Needed to Enhance DOT Oversight Accessible Version GAO-17-637 July 2017 AIR AMBULANCE Data Collection and Transparency Needed to Enhance DOT Oversight Highlights of GAO-17-637, a report to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, House of Representatives Why GAO Did This Study What GAO Found Helicopter air ambulances reduce Between 2010 and 2014, the median prices providers charged for helicopter air transport times for critically ill patients ambulance service approximately doubled, from around $15,000 to about during life-threatening emergencies. $30,000 per transport, according to Medicare data from the Centers for Medicare Although patients typically have little to & Medicaid Services (CMS) and private health insurance data. Air ambulance no choice over the service or provider providers do not turn away patients based on their ability to pay and receive given the often emergency nature of payments from many sources depending on the patient’s coverage, often at the transports, they might be billed for rates lower than the price charged. For example, the Medicare median payment charges that have potentially was $6,502 per transport in 2014. Air ambulance providers might bill a privately- devastating financial impacts. GAO insured patient for the difference between the price charged and the insurance was asked to review air ambulance pricing. This report examines: (1) the payment—a practice called balance billing—when the provider lacks an in- prices charged for air ambulance network contract with the insurer.
    [Show full text]