The Family of Cats—Delineation of the Feline Basic Type1 Barnabas Pendragon and Niko Winkler

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Family of Cats—Delineation of the Feline Basic Type1 Barnabas Pendragon and Niko Winkler Papers The family of cats—delineation of the feline basic type1 Barnabas Pendragon and Niko Winkler Based on previously reported hybridizations, cats have long been considered to belong to a single basic type.2 However, there has been discussion concerning whether great cats and small cats might represent independent sister clades. Recent DNA sequencing data confirm that such distinctions are not fundamental in nature and that all cats share a common genetic ancestry. More recently described hybridizations between great cats and small cats, along with various other studies described in the present article, further support the hypothesis that all cats belong to a single clearly delineated basic type. The Nimravidae (paleosabers), the Machairodontinae (neosabers) and the genus Panthera, each underwent a prominent radiation during the tertiary period. All three taxa represent cat-like placental carnivores, and they may all have arisen from the same basic type. Cats and their taxonomic position with numerous, horny papillae that are directed backwards; digitigrade extremities with fi ve toes on the forefoot and he cat family is placed within the order Carnivora, four on the hindfoot; claws that are sharp, strongly curved, which comprises nine extant families (or ten if T and usually highly retractile, protected by a fl eshy sheath mongooses are considered a separate family; Herpestidae). (except in the genus Acinonyx, the cheetahs).4 The carnivores are grouped into two suborders: the cat- like carnivores, or Feliformia, including the Felidae (cats), One or two family histories? the Hyaenidae (hyenas), the Viveridae (civets), and the Herpestidae (mongooses); and the dog-like carnivores, The earliest cat-like carnivore family, the Nimravidae or Caniformia, including the Canidae (dogs), the Ursidae (paleosabers), includes two lineages that suddenly appear (bears), the Procyonidae (raccoons), and the Mustelidae in the late Eocene jungles of North America. One lineage, (weasels), as well as two marine families, the Otariidae represented by Hoplophoneus, was saber-toothed; the other (sea lions) and the Phocidae (seals). The present role of lineage, represented by Dinictis, was rather like a modern carnivores in nature is regulatory, keeping in check the serval. So convincingly cat-like are these fossils that numbers of herbivores. They are assumed to indirectly help originally they were called paleofelids and designated the maintain healthy populations of herbivores by selectively fi rst cats.5 The more recent cat family, the Felidae, include the devouring non-healthy and phenotypically disadvantaged modern cats, Felinae; and the neosabers, Machairodontinae, animals. The carnivores share a relatively homogeneous e.g. Smilodon.6 The Nimravidae and the Felidae display phenotype. Many are capable of running quickly, possess only modest skeletal differences. Nevertheless, they are conspicuous canine teeth often used for catching and killing placed into two distinct families. The most prominent prey, and display the carnivore-typical carnassial teeth, skeletal difference is that nimravid fossils lack a bony wall which include the last premolars of the upper jaw and the (septum) in their middle-ear chambers (auditory bullae) or fi rst molars of the lower jaw. Instead of having a grinding sometimes the whole chamber, implying these structures surface, these teeth have a fl attened, razor-like crown used were cartilaginous.7 The nimravid, Barbourofelis, which for slicing through muscle tissue when devouring prey. In lived contemporaneously with the Felidae, had ossifi ed the omnivorous carnivores, such as bears, true carnassial auditory bullae, but there is no evidence of a bony septum.8 teeth do not develop. Such morphogenetic differences require modest selective The 38 species of extant cat have a very characteristic change. Indeed even in extant cats the auditory bullae are phenotype readily distinguished from other species of fi rst cartilaginous and only later ossify. As versatile as animals, even by laymen. Recently, the clouded leopard ossifi cation of the auditory bullae has proven to be in helping (Neofelis nebulosa) was separated into two species, which, defi ne extant cat species, calling an extinct animal a non-cat if acknowledged, brings the total number of species to 39.3 that is otherwise clearly a cat, simply for want of evidence They possess a lithe, muscular, compact and deep-chested of such ossifi cation, seems excessive. body. Technical diagnostics include: pointed, elongate The Nimravidae-Felidae ‘two-family’ hypothesis is canine teeth; large carnassials, strongly shearing in function; supported less by ossifi cations and more by phylogenetic the dental formula 3/3, 1/1, 2-3/2, 1/1; ossifi ed auditory considerations; specifi cally, that the Felidae arose from bullae, infl ated in appearance and divided by a bilaminate Proailurus during the Miocene in the Old World.8 septum (except Leopardus jacobita, the Andean mountain Proailurus, the animal currently nominated the fi rst ‘true’ cat, which has a double-chambered bulla);4 a tongue covered cat, was short, only 15 cm in length. It had very many 118 JOURNAL OF CREATION 25(2) 2011 Papers civet-like features and was probably plantigrade (walking on the soles of its feet) and not digitigrade (walking on its toes) like cats today.9 Perhaps the need for a link to a postulated ‘common-civet ancestor’ is the primary motivation for trying to classify Proailurus among the cats. It had been previously classifi ed among the civets (Viverridae) and there is much to support this classifi cation still; plantigrade gait, fl atter skull, extra teeth, the bones of Proailurus are very similar to the living viverrid, Cryptoprocta, the fossa of Madagascar.2,5,7 The next most recent cat, Pseudaelurus, had a clearly cat-like skull, based on its general morphology and dentition. It roamed Europe and North American during the Miocene. Several different forms of Pseudaelurus existed and these are believed to have formed the basis for the later radiation and diversifi cation of the neofelid cats and the sabretooth tigers.9 Proailurus, from the Miocene, is the reason why New World paleosabers from the Eocene Figure 1. The anatomy of the feline hyoid apparatus and its ‘complete’ ossification. The hyoid apparatus joins the larynx (La) cannot be cats. As a result the origins of the paleosabers to the middle ear capsules (M = auditory bullae) via two parallel have had to be placed elsewhere; e.g. within the dog-like chains of seven ‘bones’. The fifth bone links the two chains, forming carnivores10 or even outside the carnivores11. It is easy to the central basihyoid. The first and seventh members of the chains see how the two-family hypothesis could be specious, based are always cartilaginous and are not displayed in the figure. Tr = trachea. (After Dahm in Peters and Hast, ref. 13.) on preconceived notions. Differences in ossifi cation of skeletal features are not were replaced by woodland savannas.15 These more necessarily diagnostic of family status. A case in point is the open forest conditions resulted in adaptive radiations in early attempt to separate small cats and big cats into separate herbivore groups including oreodonts, anchitheres and small subfamilies based on ossifi cations in their hyoid apparatus rhinocerotoids (Janis 1998). Since these were the principle and their ability to roar.7 Sir Richard Owen12 was the fi rst prey of the Nimravidae, adaptive radiation in the herbivores to explore hyoid anatomy and felid vocalization. The hyoid would account for the adaptive radiation observed in the apparatus consists of two chains of seven bones, joined paleosabers during that period. Similarly, at the Miocene/ at the fi fth (basihyoid). These stretch from the auditory Pliocene transition, grassland savannas were replaced by bullae to the larynx, support the voice box, and confer prairies.15 Adaptive radiations of cursorial herbivore groups, characteristic vocalizations (see fi gure 1). In small cats (the including camelids, antilocaprines, and equines was then felines) the third bones (epihyoids) are ossifi ed and short, accompanied by adaptive radiation of their predators, the and they cannot roar. In the larger big cats (the pantherines) Felidae.16 Today both the paleosabers (Nimravidae) and the third epihyoids are cartilaginous and extended, and all neosabers (Machairodontinae) are completely extinct. but one of these cats can roar. In snow leopards (P. uncia; Only in the extant clouded leopard (Neofelis nebulosa) can fi gure 2) the epihyoids are cartilaginous; however, they still a vestige of the saber tooth phenotype still be observed; cannot roar because they lack additional pads in their vocal although both the upper and the lower canines are folds.13,14 Ossifi cation of the seven hyoid bones in felids is pronounced, this is a unique occurrence in the cat family. never complete. Both the fi rst (tympanohyoid) and seventh Why these animals became extinct is something of a (chondrohyoid) ‘bones’ are cartilaginous. These attach to mystery. These large carnivores would have required large the auditory bullae and cartilaginous larynx, respectively.13 prey; saber teeth are ineffi cient for capturing and killing Bone ossifi cations are of less taxonomic importance than small prey. Biome change may have led to an imbalance genetic and hybridization data, which support the conclusion in predator–prey relations, resulting both in the loss of that small cats and big cats belong in the same subfamily. sustainable populations of large prey and in the extinction It is submitted that lack of ossifi cation of the auditory of these remarkable cats. bullae in the Nimravidae is similarly of questionable diagnostic use for the family’s phylogenetic position Pelage pattern—a common origin and that the Nimravidae represent at least a sister clade of the Felidae, if not actual members of the same basic The development of melanistic coat colour patterns type. Their distributions refl ected the dominant biomes. within the cat family is not entirely understood, but some During the course of the Tertiary period, gradual cooling interesting conclusions can be drawn.
Recommended publications
  • Table 7: Species Changing IUCN Red List Status (2014-2015)
    IUCN Red List version 2015.4: Table 7 Last Updated: 19 November 2015 Table 7: Species changing IUCN Red List Status (2014-2015) Published listings of a species' status may change for a variety of reasons (genuine improvement or deterioration in status; new information being available that was not known at the time of the previous assessment; taxonomic changes; corrections to mistakes made in previous assessments, etc. To help Red List users interpret the changes between the Red List updates, a summary of species that have changed category between 2014 (IUCN Red List version 2014.3) and 2015 (IUCN Red List version 2015-4) and the reasons for these changes is provided in the table below. IUCN Red List Categories: EX - Extinct, EW - Extinct in the Wild, CR - Critically Endangered, EN - Endangered, VU - Vulnerable, LR/cd - Lower Risk/conservation dependent, NT - Near Threatened (includes LR/nt - Lower Risk/near threatened), DD - Data Deficient, LC - Least Concern (includes LR/lc - Lower Risk, least concern). Reasons for change: G - Genuine status change (genuine improvement or deterioration in the species' status); N - Non-genuine status change (i.e., status changes due to new information, improved knowledge of the criteria, incorrect data used previously, taxonomic revision, etc.); E - Previous listing was an Error. IUCN Red List IUCN Red Reason for Red List Scientific name Common name (2014) List (2015) change version Category Category MAMMALS Aonyx capensis African Clawless Otter LC NT N 2015-2 Ailurus fulgens Red Panda VU EN N 2015-4
    [Show full text]
  • Dental and Temporomandibular Joint Pathology of the Kit Fox (Vulpes Macrotis)
    Author's Personal Copy J. Comp. Path. 2019, Vol. 167, 60e72 Available online at www.sciencedirect.com ScienceDirect www.elsevier.com/locate/jcpa DISEASE IN WILDLIFE OR EXOTIC SPECIES Dental and Temporomandibular Joint Pathology of the Kit Fox (Vulpes macrotis) N. Yanagisawa*, R. E. Wilson*, P. H. Kass† and F. J. M. Verstraete* *Department of Surgical and Radiological Sciences and † Department of Population Health and Reproduction, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, California, USA Summary Skull specimens from 836 kit foxes (Vulpes macrotis) were examined macroscopically according to predefined criteria; 559 specimens were included in this study. The study group consisted of 248 (44.4%) females, 267 (47.8%) males and 44 (7.9%) specimens of unknown sex; 128 (22.9%) skulls were from young adults and 431 (77.1%) were from adults. Of the 23,478 possible teeth, 21,883 teeth (93.2%) were present for examina- tion, 45 (1.9%) were absent congenitally, 405 (1.7%) were acquired losses and 1,145 (4.9%) were missing ar- tefactually. No persistent deciduous teeth were observed. Eight (0.04%) supernumerary teeth were found in seven (1.3%) specimens and 13 (0.06%) teeth from 12 (2.1%) specimens were malformed. Root number vari- ation was present in 20.3% (403/1,984) of the present maxillary and mandibular first premolar teeth. Eleven (2.0%) foxes had lesions consistent with enamel hypoplasia and 77 (13.8%) had fenestrations in the maxillary alveolar bone. Periodontitis and attrition/abrasion affected the majority of foxes (71.6% and 90.5%, respec- tively).
    [Show full text]
  • An Educator's Resource to Texas Mammal Skulls and Skins
    E4H-014 11/17 An Educator’s Resource to Texas Mammal Skulls and Skins for use in 4-H Wildlife Programs and FFA Wildlife Career Development Events By, Denise Harmel-Garza Program Coordinator I, Texas A&M AgriLife Extension Service, 4-H Photographer and coauthor, Audrey Sepulveda M.Ed. Agricultural Leadership, Education and Communications, Texas A&M University College Station, Texas 2017 “A special thanks to the Biodiversity Research and Teaching Collections at Texas A&M University for providing access to their specimens.” Texas A&M AgriLife Extension provides equal opportunities in its programs and employment to all persons, regardless of race, color, sex, religion, national origin, disability, age, genetic information, veteran status, sexual orientation, or gender identity. The Texas A&M University System, U.S. Department of Agriculture, and the County Commissioners Courts of Texas Cooperating. Introduction Texas youth that participate in wildlife programs may be asked to identify a skull, skin, scat, tracks, etc. of an animal. Usually, educators must find this information and assemble pictures of skulls and skins from various sources. They also must ensure that what they find is relevant and accurate. Buying skulls and skins to represent all Texas mammals is costly. Most educators cannot afford them, and if they can, maintaining these collections over time is problematic. This study resource will reduce the time teachers across the state need to spend searching for information and allow them more time for presenting the material to their students. This identification guide gives teachers and students easy access to information that is accurate and valuable for learning to identify Texas mammals.
    [Show full text]
  • Asiatic Golden Cat in Thailand Population & Habitat Viability Assessment
    Asiatic Golden Cat in Thailand Population & Habitat Viability Assessment Chonburi, Thailand 5 - 7 September 2005 FINAL REPORT Photos courtesy of Ron Tilson, Sumatran Tiger Conservation Program (golden cat) and Kathy Traylor-Holzer, CBSG (habitat). A contribution of the IUCN/SSC Conservation Breeding Specialist Group. Traylor-Holzer, K., D. Reed, L. Tumbelaka, N. Andayani, C. Yeong, D. Ngoprasert, and P. Duengkae (eds.). 2005. Asiatic Golden Cat in Thailand Population and Habitat Viability Assessment: Final Report. IUCN/SSC Conservation Breeding Specialist Group, Apple Valley, MN. IUCN encourages meetings, workshops and other fora for the consideration and analysis of issues related to conservation, and believes that reports of these meetings are most useful when broadly disseminated. The opinions and views expressed by the authors may not necessarily reflect the formal policies of IUCN, its Commissions, its Secretariat or its members. The designation of geographical entities in this book, and the presentation of the material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of IUCN concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. © Copyright CBSG 2005 Additional copies of Asiatic Golden Cat of Thailand Population and Habitat Viability Assessment can be ordered through the IUCN/SSC Conservation Breeding Specialist Group, 12101 Johnny Cake Ridge Road, Apple Valley, MN 55124, USA (www.cbsg.org). The CBSG Conservation Council These generous contributors make the work of CBSG possible Providers $50,000 and above Paignton Zoo Emporia Zoo Parco Natura Viva - Italy Laurie Bingaman Lackey Chicago Zoological Society Perth Zoo Lee Richardson Zoo -Chairman Sponsor Philadelphia Zoo Montgomery Zoo SeaWorld, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Carnivore Hotspots in Peninsular Malaysia and Their Landscape
    1 Carnivore hotspots in Peninsular Malaysia and their 2 landscape attributes 3 Shyamala Ratnayeke1*¶, Frank T. van Manen2¶, Gopalasamy Reuben Clements1&, Noor Azleen 4 Mohd Kulaimi3&, Stuart P. Sharp4& 5 1Department of Biological Sciences, Sunway University, Malaysia 6 7 2U.S. Geological Survey, Northern Rocky Mountain Science Center, Interagency Grizzly Bear Study Team, Bozeman, 8 MT 59715, USA 9 10 3Ex-Situ Conservation Division, Department of Wildlife and National Parks, Malaysia 11 12 4Lancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University, Lancaster, LA1 4YQ, UK 13 14 15 16 *Corresponding author 17 Email: [email protected] 18 19 ¶SR and FTVM are joint senior authors 20 &These authors also contributed equally to this work 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 Disclaimer: This draft manuscript is distributed solely for purposes of scientific peer review. Its content is 34 deliberative and pre-decisional, so it must not be disclosed or released by reviewers. Because the 35 manuscript has not yet been approved for publication by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), it does not 36 represent any official USGS finding or policy. 37 Abstract 38 Mammalian carnivores play a vital role in ecosystem functioning. However, they are prone to 39 extinction because of low population densities and growth rates, large area requirements, and 40 high levels of persecution or exploitation. In tropical biodiversity hotspots such as Peninsular 41 Malaysia, rapid conversion of natural habitats threatens the persistence of this vulnerable 42 group of animals. Here, we carried out the first comprehensive literature review on 31 43 carnivore species reported to occur in Peninsular Malaysia and updated their probable 44 distribution.
    [Show full text]
  • H420/02 Biological Diversity
    A Level Biology A H420/02 Biological Diversity Question Set 11 1 The cheetah, Acinonyx jubatus, is a member of the cat family, Felidae. Cheetahs display less intraspecific variation than other members of the family Felidae. Fig. 20.1 shows the mean body length of a population of cheetahs from southern Africa. The error bars on Fig. 20.1 show the standard deviation of mean body length. Fig. 20.1 (a) (i) At between 2.5 and 4 years old, the mean length of female cheetahs is less than that of males. Calculate how much shorter than males female cheetahs are. Show your working. Express your answer as a percentage to two significant figures. Answer……………% [2] (ii) Using only Fig. 20.1 and your answer to (i), what can be concluded about the significance of the difference between the length of male and female cheetahs aged between 2.5 and 4 years? Explain your answer. [2] (iii) A student looked at Fig. 20.1 and wrote: “The longest male cheetah that was measured was 1.52 m long”. Explain whether the information in Fig. 20.1 supports the student’s answer. [1] (iv) State the likely causes of variation in body length in cheetahs. [2] (b) The population of cheetahs has been declining for the past 100 years and is estimated to be between 6000 and 7000. Within the remaining cheetah population, intraspecific genetic diversity is very low. One isolated population of cheetahs in Iran has fewer than 100 individuals. (i) State one way in which genetic diversity can be measured.
    [Show full text]
  • Flat Headed Cat Andean Mountain Cat Discover the World's 33 Small
    Meet the Small Cats Discover the world’s 33 small cat species, found on 5 of the globe’s 7 continents. AMERICAS Weight Diet AFRICA Weight Diet 4kg; 8 lbs Andean Mountain Cat African Golden Cat 6-16 kg; 13-35 lbs Leopardus jacobita (single male) Caracal aurata Bobcat 4-18 kg; 9-39 lbs African Wildcat 2-7 kg; 4-15 lbs Lynx rufus Felis lybica Canadian Lynx 5-17 kg; 11-37 lbs Black Footed Cat 1-2 kg; 2-4 lbs Lynx canadensis Felis nigripes Georoys' Cat 3-7 kg; 7-15 lbs Caracal 7-26 kg; 16-57 lbs Leopardus georoyi Caracal caracal Güiña 2-3 kg; 4-6 lbs Sand Cat 2-3 kg; 4-6 lbs Leopardus guigna Felis margarita Jaguarundi 4-7 kg; 9-15 lbs Serval 6-18 kg; 13-39 lbs Herpailurus yagouaroundi Leptailurus serval Margay 3-4 kg; 7-9 lbs Leopardus wiedii EUROPE Weight Diet Ocelot 7-18 kg; 16-39 lbs Leopardus pardalis Eurasian Lynx 13-29 kg; 29-64 lbs Lynx lynx Oncilla 2-3 kg; 4-6 lbs Leopardus tigrinus European Wildcat 2-7 kg; 4-15 lbs Felis silvestris Pampas Cat 2-3 kg; 4-6 lbs Leopardus colocola Iberian Lynx 9-15 kg; 20-33 lbs Lynx pardinus Southern Tigrina 1-3 kg; 2-6 lbs Leopardus guttulus ASIA Weight Diet Weight Diet Asian Golden Cat 9-15 kg; 20-33 lbs Leopard Cat 1-7 kg; 2-15 lbs Catopuma temminckii Prionailurus bengalensis 2 kg; 4 lbs Bornean Bay Cat Marbled Cat 3-5 kg; 7-11 lbs Pardofelis badia (emaciated female) Pardofelis marmorata Chinese Mountain Cat 7-9 kg; 16-19 lbs Pallas's Cat 3-5 kg; 7-11 lbs Felis bieti Otocolobus manul Fishing Cat 6-16 kg; 14-35 lbs Rusty-Spotted Cat 1-2 kg; 2-4 lbs Prionailurus viverrinus Prionailurus rubiginosus Flat
    [Show full text]
  • Hubei Shennongjia
    ASIA / PACIFIC HUBEI SHENNONGJIA CHINA Laojunshan Component of the property - © IUCN Bruce Jefferies China - Hubei Shennongjia WORLD HERITAGE NOMINATION – IUCN TECHNICAL EVALUATION HUBEI SHENNONGJIA (CHINA) – ID 1509 IUCN RECOMMENDATION TO WORLD HERITAGE COMMITTEE: To inscribe the property under natural criteria. Key paragraphs of Operational Guidelines: Paragraph 77: Nominated property meets World Heritage criteria. Paragraph 78: Nominated property meets integrity and protection and management requirements. 1. DOCUMENTATION S. and Hong Qian. Global Significance of Plant Diversity in China. In The Plants of China: A a) Date nomination received by IUCN: 16 March Companion to the Flora of China (2015). Huang, J. H., 2015 Chen, J.H., Ying, J.S., and Ke‐Ping M. Features and distribution patterns of Chinese endemic seed plant b) Additional information officially requested from species. Journal of Systematics and Evolution 49, no. and provided by the State Party: On 6 September 2 (2011): 81-94. Li, Y. (2004). The effect of forest 2015, the State Party responded to issues which arose clear-cutting on habitat use in Sichuan snub-nosed during the course of the IUCN field evaluation mission. monkey (Rhinopithecus roxellana) in Shennongjia The letter, with accompanying maps, addressed a Nature Reserve, China. Primates 45.1 69-72.. López- range of issues and confirmed extensions to the Pujol, J., et al. (2011). Mountains of Southern China as nominated area and buffer zone in the Badong County “plant museums” and “plant cradles”: evolutionary and area. Following the IUCN World Heritage Panel a conservation insights. Mountain Research and progress report was sent to the State Party on 16 Development,31(3), 261-269.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Craniometric Measurements of Two Sympatric Species of Vulpes in Ikh Nart Nature Reserve, Mongolia
    © 2018 Journal compilation ISSN 1684-3908 (print edition) http://mjbs.num.edu.mn Mongolian Journal of Biological http://biotaxa.org./mjbs Sciences MJBS Volume 16(1), 2018 ISSN 2225-4994 (online edition) http://dx.doi.org/10.22353/mjbs.2018.16.03 Original Article Comparative Craniometric Measurements of Two Sympatric Species of Vulpes in Ikh Nart Nature Reserve, Mongolia Tserendorj Munkhzul1, Richard P. Reading2, Bayarbaatar Buuveibaatar3 & James D. Murdoch4 1Mammalian Ecology Laboratory, Institute of General and Experimental Biology, Mongolian Academy of Sciences, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia 2International Conservation Coalition, Denver, Colorado 80220 USA, Butterfly Pavilion, Westminster, Colorado 80020 USA & Mongolian Conservation Coalition, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia 3Wildlife Conservation Society, Mongolia Program, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia 4Rubenstein School of Environment and Natural Resources, University of Vermont, George Aiken Center, Burlington, Vermont 05405 USA Abstract Key words: Corsac fox; In Mongolia, both the red fox (Vulpes vulpes) and corsac fox (Vulpes corsac) occupy cranium; morphometry; broad sympatric ranges, but despite their expansive ranges, few published details of red fox; Vulpes; skull. the craniometry of either species exist in Mongolia and other parts of northern and Article information: central Asia. To determine the morphological differences between two species of Received: 08 Febr. 2018 foxes, we tested for morphological and morphometrical differences between the red Accepted: 31 May 2018 (n = 13) and corsac (n = 11) foxes using 63 cranium measurements. All significantly Published online: different skull variables were larger for red foxes than corsac foxes. This paper 12 June 2018 reports comparison of the cranial measurements from skulls of red and corsac foxes Correspondence: and serves as a preliminary investigation of interspecific variation between these [email protected] species.
    [Show full text]
  • Return of a Lost Structure in the Evolution of Felid Dentition Revisited: a Devoevo Perspective on the Irreversibility of Evolution
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.02.04.429820; this version posted February 5, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. RUNNING HEAD: LYNX M2 AND IRREVERSIBILE EVOLUTION Return of a lost structure in the evolution of felid dentition revisited: A DevoEvo perspective on the irreversibility of evolution Vincent J. Lynch Department of Biological Sciences, University at Buffalo, SUNY, 551 Cooke Hall, Buffalo, NY, 14260, USA. Correspondence: [email protected] 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.02.04.429820; this version posted February 5, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. RUNNING HEAD: LYNX M2 AND IRREVERSIBILE EVOLUTION Abstract There is a longstanding interest in whether the loss of complex characters is reversible (so-called “Dollo’s law”). Reevolution has been suggested for numerous traits but among the first was Kurtén (1963), who proposed that the presence of the second lower molar (M2) of the Eurasian lynx (Lynx lynx) was a violation of Dollo’s law because all other Felids lack M2. While an early and often cited example for the reevolution of a complex trait, Kurtén (1963) and Werdelin (1987) used an ad hoc parsimony argument to support their proposition that M2 reevolved in Eurasian lynx. Here I revisit the evidence that M2 reevolved in Eurasian lynx using explicit parsimony and maximum likelihood models of character evolution and find strong evidence that Kurtén (1963) and Werdelin (1987) were correct – M2 reevolved in Eurasian lynx.
    [Show full text]
  • Anatomy of the Red Panda (Ailurus Fulgens)
    Journal of Biology and Life Science ISSN 2157-6076 2019, Vol. 10, No. 1 Anatomy of the Red Panda (Ailurus fulgens) Modesta Makungu (Corresponding Author) Department of Veterinary Surgery and Theriogenology, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Sokoine University of Agriculture, P O Box 3020, Morogoro, Tanzania. Email: [email protected]; [email protected] Received: September 21, 2018 Accepted: October 19, 2018 doi:10.5296/jbls.v10i1.13677 URL: https://doi.org/10.5296/jbls.v10i1.13677 Abstract The red panda (Ailurus fulgens) is an endangered species primarily distributed in the southern China and Himalayas. It lives in mountain forests with bamboo understory. This review outlines the normal anatomy of the red panda in terms of its musculoskeletal system, respiratory system, circulatory system, digestive system and urogenital system. Knowledge of the normal anatomy of individual animal species is important for species identification and accurate interpretation and diagnosis of diseases. Keywords: anatomy, red panda 1. Introduction The red panda (Ailurus fulgens) (Figure 1) is classified as an endangered species by the International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources (IUCN, 2018). It belongs to order; Carnivora, family; Ailuridae, and genus; Ailurus (Wei and Zhang, 2009; IUCN, 2018). The red panda is the only living species of the family Ailuridae and genus Ailurus and is closely related to mustelids, procyonids and skunks (Wei and Zhang, 2009; Groves, 2011). 13 Journal of Biology and Life Science ISSN 2157-6076 2019, Vol. 10, No. 1 Figure 1. A photograph of an adult red panda (Ailurus fulgens fulgens) It is primarily distributed in India, Burma, China, Bhutan and Nepal (Roberts and Gittleman, 1984; Ghose and Dutta, 2011).
    [Show full text]
  • Animal Inspected at Last Inspection
    United States Department of Agriculture Customer: 3432 Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service Inspection Date: 10-AUG-16 Animal Inspected at Last Inspection Cust No Cert No Site Site Name Inspection 3432 86-C-0001 001 ARIZONA CENTER FOR NATURE 10-AUG-16 CONSERVATION Count Species 000003 Cheetah 000005 Cattle/cow/ox/watusi 000003 Mandrill *Male 000006 Hamadryas baboon 000004 Grevys zebra 000008 Thomsons gazelle 000002 Cape Porcupine 000002 Lion 000002 African hunting dog 000002 Tiger 000008 Common eland 000002 Spotted hyena 000001 White rhinoceros 000007 Spekes gazelle 000005 Giraffe 000004 Kirks dik-dik 000002 Fennec fox 000003 Ring-tailed lemur 000069 Total ARHYNER United States Department of Agriculture Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service 2016082567967934 Insp_id Inspection Report Arizona Center For Nature Conservation Customer ID: 3432 455 N. Galvin Parkway Certificate: 86-C-0001 Phoenix, AZ 85008 Site: 001 ARIZONA CENTER FOR NATURE CONSERVATION Type: ROUTINE INSPECTION Date: 19-OCT-2016 No non-compliant items identified during this inspection. This inspection and exit interview were conducted with the primate manager. Additional Inspectors Gwendalyn Maginnis, Veterinary Medical Officer AARON RHYNER, D V M Prepared By: Date: AARON RHYNER USDA, APHIS, Animal Care 19-OCT-2016 Title: VETERINARY MEDICAL OFFICER 6077 Received By: (b)(6), (b)(7)(c) Date: Title: FACILITY REPRESENTATIVE 19-OCT-2016 Page 1 of 1 United States Department of Agriculture Customer: 3432 Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service Inspection Date: 19-OCT-16
    [Show full text]