DOCSLIB.ORG

Modifications to Gulf Cobia Size and Possession Limits

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Modifications to Gulf Cobia Size and Possession Limits Tab C, No. 5(a) 10/10/18 Modifications to Gulf of Mexico Migratory Group Cobia Size and Possession Limits Draft Framework Amendment 7 to the Fishery Management Plan for Coastal Migratory Pelagic Resources in the Gulf of Mexico and Atlantic Region October 2018 This is a publication of the Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council Pursuant to National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Award No. NA15NMF4410011. This page intentionally blank ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT COVER SHEET Draft Framework Amendment 7 to Modify Gulf of Mexico Migratory Group Cobia Size and Possession Limits Type of Action ( ) Administrative ( ) Legislative (X) Draft ( ) Final Responsible Agencies: National Marine Fisheries Service Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Southeast Regional Office Council 263 13th Avenue South 2203 North Lois Avenue, Suite 1100 St. Petersburg, Florida 33701 Tampa, Florida 33607 727-824-5305 813-348-1630 727-824-5308 (fax) 813-348-1711 (fax) http://sero.nmfs.noaa.gov http://www.gulfcouncil.org Contact: Kelli O’Donnell Contact: Ryan Rindone [email protected] [email protected] Contact: Rich Malinowski [email protected] Gulf Cobia Size and i Possession Limits ABBREVIATIONS USED IN THIS DOCUMENT ABC acceptable biological catch ACL annual catch limit ACT annual catch target ALS accumulated landings system AM accountability measure ASFMC Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission BiOP biological opinion CMP coastal migratory pelagics CHTS Coastal Household Telephone Survey CS consumer surplus Councils Gulf of Mexico and South Atlantic Fishery Management Councils DPS distinct population segment EA environmental assessment EEZ exclusive economic zone EFH essential fish habitat EIS Environmental Impact Statement EJ environmental justice ESA Endangered Species Act FES (mail-based) fishing effort survey FL fork length FMP fishery management plan GDP gross domestic product GMFMC Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council Gulf Gulf of Mexico Gulf Council Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council HAPC habitat area of particular concern IPCC Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change LHWG Life History Working Group MMPA Marine Mammal Protection Act MRIP Marine Recreational Information Program MSY maximum sustainable yield NARW North Atlantic right whales NMFS National Marine Fisheries Service NOAA National Oceanic and Atmospheric Agency NOR net operating revenue OFL overfishing limit OY optimum yield PAH polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons PS producer surplus RQ regional quotient SAFMC South Atlantic Fishery Management Council SEDAR Southeast Data, Assessment, and Review SEFSC Southeast Fisheries Science Center Gulf Cobia Size and ii Possession Limits SEFSC-SSRG Southeast Fisheries Science Center Social Science Research Group SERO NMFS Southeast Regional Office South Atlantic Council South Atlantic Fishery Management Council SSC Scientific and Statistical Committee VOC volatile organic compounds ww whole weight lw landed weight Gulf Cobia Size and iii Possession Limits TABLE OF CONTENTS Environmental Assessment Cover Sheet ......................................................................................... i Abbreviations Used in this Document ............................................................................................ ii Table of Contents ........................................................................................................................... iv List of Tables ................................................................................................................................. vi List of Figures .............................................................................................................................. viii Chapter 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Background ........................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Purpose and Need ................................................................................................................. 6 1.3 History of Management ........................................................................................................ 6 Chapter 2. Management Alternatives ............................................................................................ 8 2.1 Action 1: Modify the Minimum Size Limit for the Gulf of Mexico Migratory Group Cobia .................................................................................................................................... 8 2.2 Action 2: Modify the Possession Limit for the Gulf Cobia .............................................. 15 Chapter 3. Affected Environment ................................................................................................ 19 3.1 Description of the Fishery and Status of the Stock ........................................................... 19 3.1.1 Description of the Fishery ......................................................................................... 19 3.1.2 Status of the Stocks ................................................................................................... 22 3.2 Description of the Physical Environment .......................................................................... 22 3.3 Description of the Biological/Ecological Environment .................................................... 26 3.3.1 Cobia Life History and Biology ................................................................................ 26 3.3.2 Bycatch ..................................................................................................................... 27 3.3.3 Protected Species ...................................................................................................... 28 3.3.4 General Information .................................................................................................. 29 3.4 Description of the Economic Environment ....................................................................... 33 3.4.1 Commercial Sector.................................................................................................... 34 3.4.2 Recreational Sector ................................................................................................... 39 3.5 Description of the Social Environment .............................................................................. 48 3.5.1 Fishing Communities ................................................................................................ 48 3.5.2 Environmental Justice Considerations ...................................................................... 52 3.6 Description of the Administrative Environment ................................................................ 54 3.6.1 Federal Fishery Management .................................................................................... 54 3.6.2 State Fishery Management ........................................................................................ 55 Gulf Cobia Size and iv Possession Limits Chapter 4. Environmental Consequences .................................................................................... 56 4.1 Action 1: Modify the Minimum Size Limit for the Gulf of Mexico Migratory Group Cobia .................................................................................................................................. 56 4.1.1 Direct and Indirect Effects on the Physical Environment ......................................... 56 4.1.2 Direct and Indirect Effects on the Biological and Ecological Environments ........... 56 4.1.3 Direct and Indirect Effects on the Economic Environment ...................................... 58 4.1.4 Direct and Indirect Effects on the Social Environment ............................................ 60 4.1.5 Direct and Indirect Effects on the Administrative Environment .............................. 61 4.2 Action 2: Modify the Possession Limit for the Gulf Cobia .............................................. 62 4.2.1 Direct and Indirect Effects on the Physical Environment ......................................... 62 4.2.2 Direct and Indirect Effects on the Biological and Ecological Environments ........... 62 4.2.3 Direct and Indirect Effects on the Economic Environment ...................................... 64 4.2.4 Direct and Indirect Effects on the Social Environment ............................................ 67 4.2.5 Direct and Indirect Effects on the Administrative Environment .............................. 68 4.3 Cumulative Effects ............................................................................................................ 68 Chapter 5. Regulatory Impact Review ......................................................................................... 72 Chapter 6. Regulatory Flexibility Analysis ................................................................................. 73 Chapter 7. List of Agencies, Organizations and Persons Consulted ............................................ 74 Chapter 8. List of Preparers ......................................................................................................... 75 Chapter 9. References .................................................................................................................. 76 Appendix A. Other Applicable Laws ........................................................................................... 78 Appendix B. Considered but Rejected
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Climate of the Southeast United States
    N$%"',$! C!"#$%& A++&++#&,% R&."',$! T&/),"/$! I,0*% R&0'1% S&1"&+ C!"#$%& '( %)& S'*%)&$+% U,"%&- S%$%&+ VARIABILITY, CHANGE, IMPACTS, AND VULNERABILITY Edited by: Keith T. Ingram Kirstin Dow Lynne Carter Julie Anderson Climate of the Southeast United States Variability, Change, Impacts, and Vulnerability © 2013 Southeast Climate Consortium All rights reserved under International and Pan-American Copyright Conventions. Reproduction of this report by electronic means for personal and noncommercial purposes ȱĴȱȱȱȱȱ ȱȱǯȱȱȱȱȱ ¢ȱȱȱȱȱ ȱȱȱȱ ȱȱȱ ȱ ȱȱȱ Ĵȱȱȱȱǯ ȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱǯ Printed on recycled, acid-free paper ȱȱȱȱȱȱ Citation: ǰȱ ǯǰȱ ǯȱ ǰȱǯȱǰȱ ǯȱǰȱǯȱŘŖŗřǯȱȱȱȱȱ ȱDZȱ¢ǰȱǰȱǰȱȱ¢ǯȱȱDZȱ ȱǯ Keywords:ȱȬĴȬȱǰȱǰȱǰȱȱ¢ǰȱ ǰȱǰȱȱǰȱ¢ǰȱȱ ǰȱȱǰȱ climate impacts, climate modeling, climate variability, coastal, drought, education, electric ȱǰȱ¡ȱ ǰȱĚǰȱȱǰȱ£ǰȱȱȱǰȱ ȱ ǰȱǰȱȬȱǰȱǰȱǰȱǰȱȱȱ ǰȱȱęǰȱȱǰȱǰȱȱǰȱǰȱȬ ȱ intrusion, sea level rise, silviculture, social vulnerability, Southeast, storm surge, tropical ǰȱǰȱ¢ǰȱǯǯȱȱ ǰȱȬȱǰȱ ȱǰȱ ǰȱ ę ȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱ ¢ȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱ¢ȱȱ¢ȱǰȱǰȱǰȱȱ Tribal Government or Non-governmental entity. Front Cover Images: ȱǰȱ ǰȱ¢ȱȱȱȱȱȱ ȂȱȱǻǼǯȱȱȱ¢ȱ ȱȱȱȱDZȱ ȱ¢ȱȱȱ ȱǰȱ¢ȱȱȱȱȱDzȱ¢ȱȱ ȱȱ ȱȱȱǰȱȱ ǯȱDzȱȱȱȱǰȱ¢ȱȱ ȱȱȱȱȱDzȱȱ ȱȱȱǻǼȱȱȱ ȱǰȱ ¢ȱȱDzȱȱĚ ȱȱȱȱȱǰȱ¢ȱȱȱȱ ȱDzȱȱȱȱǰȱǰȱǰȱȱĴǯ About This Series This report is published as one of a series of technical inputs to the Third National ȱȱǻǼȱǯȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱ ȱȱ ȱȱȱȱȱŗşşŖǰȱ ȱȱȱȱȱȱȱ and Congress every four years on the status of climate change science and impacts. The NCA informs the nation about already observed changes, the current status of the climate, and anticipated trends for the future. The NCA report process integrates ęȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱ¢ȱęȱȱ ęȱȱȱȱ ǯȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱ- ȱȱȱȱȱ¢ȱǯǯȱ£ǰȱȱȱȱȱ¢ȱȱ ȱȱȱ¢ȱȱȱȱȱȂȱǯ ȱȱȱŘŖŗŗǰȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱ¡ȱȱ ǰȱȱ¢ǰȱȱȱȱǰȱȬȱ£- ǰȱȱǰȱȱȱǰȱ ȱȱȱȱȱȱ Ĵȱȱȱȱȱǯȱ ȱǰȱȱȱȱǰȱȱ ȱȱ ȱȱȱȱȱȱǰȱ ȱȱȱȱȱ input reports highlighting past climate trends, projected climate change, and impacts ȱęȱȱȱȱǯȱȱȱȱȱ ȱȱȱ- ing this technical input.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report for Florida Middle Ground Project
    Final Report for Florida Middle Ground Project NOAA Coral Award NA05NMF4411045 CY 2005 Coral Project for the period 10/1/05 through 3/31/07 April 22, 2007 Lead PI: David F. Naar Associate Professor College of Marine Science University of South Florida 140 Seventh Avenue South Saint Petersburg, Florida 33701-5016 USA Voice: (727) 553 1637 Cell: (727) 510 9806 Fax: (727) 553 1189 Email: [email protected] Co-PIs: David Mallinson (East Carolina University) Felicia Coleman (FSU) GENERAL OBJECTIVES/LOGISTICS AND SUMMARY OF PROGRESS: We have completed mapping the entire Florida Middle Ground HAPC (Habitat Area of Particular Concern) using a high-resolution 300 kHz multibeam bathymetry and backscatter system (Figures 1-3) . The survey augmented the existing coverage in the area from previous USF cruises. The main scientific objectives of the cruise are to define the fish habitat areas within the Florida Middle Ground HAPC using multibeam bathymetry, multibeam backscatter, and ground truth data (previous and new sediment grab samples and previous video samples). Second, to eventually produce a Habitat Map that defines area of Sediment, rock, and coral reef. Third, to provide a map of the paleoshoreline during a previous glacial period, when sea level was lower. The first objective has been completed and the data DVD’s have been sent to the Gulf of Mexico Fisheries Management Council in March 2007. Drs. Mallinson and Naar have coauthored one paper presented at the international American Geophysical Union Meeting in 2006 (Mallinson et al., 2006) and have another paper submitted to a special volume (Hine et al., 2007) and have a third and final paper summarizing all our work at the Florida Middle Grounds in preparation (Mallinson et al., 2007).
    [Show full text]
  • Facultative Cleaning Behavior in a Western Atlantic Sponge Goby, Elacatinus Xanthiprora (Teleostei: Gobiidae)
    NOTE Facultative cleaning behavior in a western Atlantic sponge goby, Elacatinus xanthiprora (Teleostei: Gobiidae) BENJAMIN VICTOR Ocean Science Foundation, 4051 Glenwood, Irvine, CA 92604, USA and Guy Harvey Research Institute, Nova Southeastern University, 8000 North Ocean Drive, Dania Beach, FL 33004, USA E-mail: [email protected] FRANK H. KRASOVEC 7412 Pine Summit Drive, Fuquay-Varina, NC 27526, USA Abstract There are two large sets of brightly striped gobies of the genus Elacatinus in the warm waters of the western Atlantic Ocean: one that cleans larger fishes at cleaning stations on coral reefs and another set that live in and among sponges and are not known to clean. The two sets of gobies are phylogenetically separate as well, forming two independent monophyletic sets of mtDNA-sequence lineages. At almost all locations there are species of both groups present; however, at the northern temperate limits, along the northeastern coast of the Gulf of Mexico and along the east coast of the USA at North Carolina (beyond the range of coral-reef development), only one species is present and it belongs to the sponge goby group. We report here that the Yellowprow Goby, Elacatinus xanthiprora, a member of the sponge goby group, regularly cleans fishes, both in the northern Gulf of Mexico and off North Carolina. Apparently, the absence of a local cleaner species permits the evolution of facultative cleaning behavior in a species from a group characterized by the absence of that behavior. Key words: ichthyology, coral-reef fishes, cleaner goby, ecology, symbiosis, mutualism, behavior, Yellowprow Goby, Florida, North Carolina. Citation: Victor, B.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Essential Fish Habitat Assessment for the Gulf of Mexico
    OCS Report BOEM 2016-016 Outer Continental Shelf Essential Fish Habitat Assessment for the Gulf of Mexico U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Ocean Energy Management Gulf of Mexico OCS Region OCS Report BOEM 2016-016 Outer Continental Shelf Essential Fish Habitat Assessment for the Gulf of Mexico Author Bureau of Ocean Energy Management Gulf of Mexico OCS Region Published by U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Ocean Energy Management New Orleans Gulf of Mexico OCS Region March 2016 Essential Fish Habitat Assessment iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1 PROPOSED ACTIONS ................................................................................................................... 1 2 GUIDANCE AND STIPULATIONS .................................................................................................. 4 3 HABITATS ....................................................................................................................................... 5 4 FISHERIES SPECIES ................................................................................................................... 10 5 IMPACTS OF ROUTINE ACTIVITIES ........................................................................................... 13 6 IMPACTS OF ACCIDENTAL EVENTS ......................................................................................... 19 7 CUMULATIVE IMPACTS ............................................................................................................... 22 8 OVERALL GENERAL CONCLUSIONS .......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Detection of Gaps in the Spatial Coverage of Coral Reef Monitoring Projects in the US Caribbean and Gulf of Mexico
    Rev. Biol. Trop., 51, Supl. 4: 127-140, 2003 www.rbt.ac.cr, www.ucr.ac.cr Detection of gaps in the spatial coverage of coral reef monitoring projects in the US Caribbean and Gulf of Mexico R.G. Asch1 & D.D. Turgeon2 1 Graduate School of Oceanography, University of Rhode Island, South Ferry Rd., Narragansett, RI 02882, USA. Tel: (401) 874-6704; e-mail: [email protected] 2 National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, 1305 East-West Hwy., Silver Spring, MD 20910, USA. Fax: (301) 713-3020; e-mail: [email protected] (Received 24-IX-01. Corrected 03-XI-02. Accepted 09-I-03) Abstract: As part of the US Coral Reef Task Force's National Program to Map, Assess, Inventory, and Monitor US Coral Reef Ecosystems, a comprehensive survey of projects/programs monitoring coral reef ecosystems and related habitats (i.e., seagrass beds and mangroves) in the US Caribbean and Pacific was undertaken. Information was gath- ered on a total of 296 monitoring and assessment projects conducted since 1990 in the US Caribbean and the Gulf of Mexico. Substantial gaps in monitoring coverage of US coral reef ecosystems were revealed through geographic in- formation system (GIS) analysis of survey metadata. Although southern Florida contains approximately two-thirds of all marine monitoring projects found in the US Caribbean and Gulf of Mexico, we were unable to identify any ongo- ing projects that monitor coral reefs along Florida's western coast and off of the Florida Middle Grounds. Addition- ally, Florida is covered by approximately 1 900 km2 of mangroves, yet there were only four ongoing projects that monitor this ecosystem, leaving gaps in coverage in the Lower and Middle Keys and along the eastern and western coasts.
    [Show full text]
  • Gulf Gems: Treasured Places in Troubled Waters
    GULF GEMS: TREASURED PLACES IN TROUBLED WATERS “PROTECTING VITAL SOURCES OF RENEWAL—UNSCATHED MARSHES, HEALTHY REEFS, AND DEEP-SEA GARDENS—WILL PROVIDE HOPE FOR THE FUTURE OF THE GULF, AND FOR ALL OF US.” —SYLVIA EARLE ON THE COVER: THE GULF OF MEXICO AS SEEN FROM SPACE, CREDIT NASA. INSIDE COVER: LIFE IN MADISON SWANSON, CREDIT NOAA. GULF GEMS: TREASURED PLACES IN TROUBLED WATERS AUTHORS Katelin L. P. Shugart-Schmidt Elizabeth O. Ruff Michael Z. Gravitz Suggested Citation: Shugart-Schmidt, K. L. P., E. O. Ruff, and M. Z. Gravitz. 2014. Gulf Gems: Treasured Places in Troubled Waters. 32 pp. Marine Conservation Institute. Seattle, WA. ABOUT MARINE CONSERVATION INSTITUTE Marine Conservation Institute is a team of highly- experienced marine scientists and environmental-policy advocates dedicated to saving ocean life for us and future generations. The organization’s goal is to help the world create an urgently-needed worldwide system of strongly protected areas—the Global Ocean Refuge System (GLORES)—a strategic, cost-effective way to ensure the future diversity and abundance of marine life. Founded in 1996, Marine Conservation Institute is a US-based nonprofit organization with offices in Seattle, near San Francisco, and in Washington DC. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We are deeply indebted to Thomas Shirley, Charles Fisher, Erik Cordes, Harriet Nash, Tim Jones, and Sandra Brooke for providing valuable insights and constructive comments, and to Beth Pike for her mapping work, Stacey Harter for providing images, Lance Morgan for his thoughtful review, and Carolina La Rotta Dratva for the design and layout. We would like to thank the Herbert W.
    [Show full text]
  • Essential Fish Habitat
    12/12/16 Final Report 5-Year Review of Essential Fish Habitat Requirements Including Review of Habitat Areas of Particular Concern and Adverse Effects of Fishing and Non-Fishing in the Fishery Management Plans of the Gulf of Mexico December 2016 This is a publication of the Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council Pursuant to National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Award No. NA15NMF4410011. This page intentionally blank 5-Year Review of EFH i COVER SHEET Name of Action Essential Fish Habitat 5-Year Review Responsible Agencies and Contact Persons Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council 813-348-1630 2203 North Lois Avenue, Suite 1100 813-348-1711 (fax) Tampa, Florida 33607 [email protected] Claire Roberts ([email protected]) http://www.gulfcouncil.org National Marine Fisheries Service 727-824-5305 Southeast Regional Office 727-824-5308 (fax) 263 13th Avenue South http://sero.nmfs.noaa.gov St. Petersburg, Florida 33701 David Dale ([email protected]) Type of Action ( ) Administrative ( ) Legislative () Draft (X) Final 5-Year Review of EFH ii ABBREVIATIONS USED IN THIS DOCUMENT AP Advisory Panel CL Carapace length CMP Coastal Migratory Pelagic Resources in the Gulf of Mexico and Atlantic Region Council Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council DO Dissolved oxygen EA Environmental Assessment EEZ Exclusive Economic Zone EFH Essential Fish Habitat FEIS Final Environmental Impact Statement ER Eco-region F Instantaneous fishing mortality rate FL Fork length FMC Fishery management council FMP Fishery Management
    [Show full text]
  • An Illustrated Marine Decapod Crustacea] of Florida
    QcfU fja^ Technical Series Volume 8 Number 1 Parti State of Florida November 1986 Department of Environmental Regulation An Illustrated Marine Decapod Crustacea] of Florida Lawrence G. Abele and Won Kim o*' Illustrated by Elizabeth Woodsmall <MP- Technical Series Volume 8 Number 1 State of Florida Part a November 1986 Department of Environmental Regulation An Illustrated Guide to tl Marine Decapod Crustacea] of Florida Lawrence G. Abele and Won Kim Illustrated by Elizabeth Woodsmall An Illustrated Guide to the Marine Decapod Crustaceans of Florida Part 1 Lawrence G. Abele and Won Kim Florida State University Department of Biological Science Tallahassee, Florida 32306 Illustrated by Elizabeth Woods ma 11 Copyright © 1986 The Florida State University. All rights reserved. An Illustrated Guide to the Marine Decapod Crustaceans of Florida Part 2 Lawrence G. Abele and Won Kim Florida State University Department of Biological Science Tallahassee, Florida 32306 Illustrated by Elizabeth Woodsmall Copyright © 1986 The Florida State University. All rights reserved. List of Species i Contents List of Species ii Introduction 1 Brief Review of the Literature 1 Methods and Materials. 2 Classification and Arrangement of Taxa 2 Acknowledgments. 3 Diagrammatic Illustration of a Shrimp 4 Diagrammatic Illustration of a Crab 5 Annotated Checklist of the Decapod Crustaceans of Florida 7 Addendum to Checklist 69 Key to Families of Florida Decapods 70 Keys to Species of Florida Decapods 79 Literature Cited 731 Taxonomic Index 748 il List of Species List of Species [See also Addendum to Checklist] Suborder Dendrobranchiata Family Aristeidae 1. Aristaeomorphafoliacea (Risso, 1827). 7, 79, 81 2. Plesiopenaeus edwardsianus (Johnson, 1867).
    [Show full text]
  • The "Our Florida Reefs" Community Planning Process
    The Our Florida Reefs Community Planning Process Florida Department of Environmental Protection Florida Coastal Office Southeast Region Coral Reef Conservation Program SEFCRI LAS FDOU Project 26B The Our Florida Reefs Community Planning Process Final Report Prepared By: Florida Department of Environmental Protection Florida Coastal Office Southeast Region Coral Reef Conservation Program With Contributions From: Daron Willison, Meghan Balling, Lauren Waters, Joanna Walczak, Francisco Pagan, Jamie Monty, Ana Zangroniz, Dana Wusinich-Mendez, Kevin Claridge Reviewed By: Jane Fawcett, Andrea Graves, Alex Sommers, Angela Smith, April Price, Baret Barry, Brian Walker, Butch Olsen, Caroline McLaughlin, Dan Clark, Drew Bartlett, James Byrne, Jenny Baez, Jenny Peterson, Jim Mathie, Jim Moir, Kathy Fitzpatrick, Kurtis Gregg, Mike Dixon, Nick Morrell, Sara Thanner, Scott Sheckman May 2018 Completed in Fulfillment of NOAA Awards NA11NOS4820003, NA13NOS4820015, NA13NOS4190140, and NA15NOS4820036 for Florida Department of Environmental Protection Coral Reef Conservation Program 1277 N.E. 79th Street Causeway Miami, FL 33138 This report should be cited as follows: Florida Department of Environmental Protection. Our Florida Reefs Community Planning Process. Miami, FL: 2018. X and 333 pages. The views, statements, findings, conclusions, and recommendations expressed herein are those of the Our Florida Reefs Joint Community Working Group and do not necessarily reflect the views of the State of Florida, FDEP, FWC, NOAA, or any of their sub agencies. Executive Summary The coral reefs in southeast Florida are an incredibly unique and important resource. They provide many indispensable benefits to residents and visitors alike. As the only barrier reef system in the continental United States, southeast Florida’s coral reefs are unique, precious, and bear an enormous cultural and historical importance to the region.
    [Show full text]
  • Coral Habitat Areas Considered for Management in the Gulf of Mexico
    Tab N, No. 4 5/25/2017 Coral Habitat Areas Considered for Management in the Gulf of Mexico Draft Options for Amendment 9 to the Fishery Management Plan for the Coral and Coral Reefs of the Gulf of Mexico, U.S. Waters May 2017 This is a publication of the Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council Pursuant to National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Award No. NA15NMF4410011. This page intentionally left blank Gulf of Mexico Coral Amendment 9 Responsible Agencies: National Marine Fisheries Service Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management (Lead Agency) Council Southeast Regional Office 2203 North Lois Avenue, Suite 1100 263 13th Avenue South Tampa, Florida 33607 St. Petersburg, Florida 33701 813-348-1630 727-824-5305 813-348-1711 (fax) 727-824-5308 (fax) http://www.gulfcouncil.org http://sero.nmfs.noaa.gov Contact: Morgan Kilgour Contact: Cynthia Meyer [email protected] [email protected] Type of Action ( ) Administrative ( ) Legislative (X) Draft ( ) Final Coral Amendment 9 i Coral Protection Areas ABBREVIATIONS USED IN THIS DOCUMENT ACL annual catch limit ACT annual catch target AM accountability measure AP advisory panel CIOERT NOAA Cooperative Institute for Ocean Exploration, Research and Technology Council Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council DSCRTP NOAA Deep Sea Coral Research and Technology Program EA Environmental Assessment EEZ exclusive economic zone EFH Essential Fish Habitat EIS Environmental Impact Statement ELB electronic logbook FAC Florida Administrative Code Federal shrimp permit federal commercial Gulf
    [Show full text]
  • Mollusks Taken by Beam Trawl in the Vicinity of Gray's Reef National Marine Sanctuary on the Continental Shelf Off Georgia, Southeastern US
    Mollusks taken by Beam Trawl in the vicinity of Gray's Reef National Marine Sanctuary on the Continental Shelf off Georgia, Southeastern U.S. Item Type monograph Authors Wolfe, Dougals A. Publisher NOAA/National Ocean Service/National Centers for Coastal Ocean Science/Center for Coastal Fisheries and Habitat Research Download date 26/09/2021 22:59:08 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/1834/19903 Mollusks taken by Beam Trawl in the vicinity of Gray’s Reef National Marine Sanctuary on the Continental Shelf off Georgia, Southeastern U.S. NOAA Technical Memorandum NOS NCCOS 88 Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for their use by the United States government. Citation for this Report Wolfe, Douglas A. 2008. Mollusks taken by Beam Trawl in the vicinity of Gray’s Reef National Marine Sanctuary on the Continental Shelf off Georgia, Southeastern U.S. NOAA Technical Memorandum NOS NCCOS 88. 40 pp. Mollusks taken by Beam Trawl in the vicinity of Gray’s Reef National Marine Sanctuary on the Continental Shelf off Georgia, Southeastern U.S. Douglas A. Wolfe* NOAA, National Ocean Service National Centers for Coastal Ocean Science Center for Coastal Fisheries and Habitat Research NOAA Beaufort Laboratory 101 Pivers Island Road Beaufort, North Carolina 28516 *(retired) Present address: 109 Shore Drive, Beaufort, NC 28516 NOAA Technical Memorandum NOS NCCOS 88 December, 2008 Table of Contents Abstract…………………………………………………………………….. iii Introduction…………………………………………………………………. 1 Methods………………………………………………………………….….. 2 Results………………………………………………………………….……. 4 Sample Characteristics………………………………………….…….. 4 Total Numbers of Taxa………………………………………….……. 6 Species Associations and Community Composition……….….….….. 7 Effect of Depth……………………………………………….…. 7 The “Atrina-Cymatium” Community………………………...… 10 Thee Nassarius acutus-Phascolion-Pythinella Connection…… 11 Rock-Dwelling Species………………………………………… 13 Range Extensions…………………………………………….……….
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Amendment 53 to the Fishery Management Plan for the Reef Fish Fishery in the Gulf of Mexico Draft Environmental Impact Statement (Deis)
    4/27/2021 Red Grouper Allocations and Annual Catch Levels and Targets Amendment 53 to the Fishery Management Plan for the Reef Fish Resources of the Gulf of Mexico Revised Draft April 2021 This is a publication of the Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council Pursuant to National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Award No. NA15NMF4410011. This page intentionally blank COVER SHEET DRAFT AMENDMENT 53 TO THE FISHERY MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE REEF FISH FISHERY IN THE GULF OF MEXICO DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT (DEIS) Abstract: This DEIS is prepared pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act to assess the environmental impacts associated with a reasonable range of alternatives intended to modify the sector allocation, overfishing limit, acceptable biological catch, annual catch limits, and annual catch targets of red grouper in the Gulf of Mexico. This DEIS is being prepared using the 1978 CEQ NEPA Regulations. NEPA reviews initiated prior to the effective date of the 2020 CEQ regulations may be conducted using the 1978 version of the regulations. The effective date of the 2020 CEQ NEPA Regulations was September 14, 2020. This review began on April 21, 2020, and the agency has decided to proceed under the 1978 regulations. Responsible Agencies and Contact Persons Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council (Council) 813-348-1630 4107 W. Spruce Street, Suite 200 813-348-1711 (fax) Tampa, Florida 33607 [email protected] Matt Freeman ([email protected]) http://www.gulfcouncil.org National Marine Fisheries Service (Lead Agency) 727-824-5305 Southeast Regional Office 727-824-5308 (fax) 263 13th Avenue South http://sero.nmfs.noaa.gov St.
    [Show full text]