DOCSLIB.ORG

The Our Florida Reefs Community Planning Process Final Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Our Florida Reefs Community Planning Process Final Report The Our Florida Reefs Community Planning Process Florida Department of Environmental Protection Florida Coastal Office Southeast Region Coral Reef Conservation Program SEFCRI LAS FDOU Project 26B The Our Florida Reefs Community Planning Process Final Report Prepared By: Florida Department of Environmental Protection Florida Coastal Office Southeast Region Coral Reef Conservation Program With Contributions From: Daron Willison, Meghan Balling, Lauren Waters, Joanna Walczak, Francisco Pagan, Jamie Monty, Ana Zangroniz, Dana Wusinich-Mendez, Kevin Claridge Reviewed By: Jane Fawcett, Andrea Graves, Alex Sommers, Angela Smith, April Price, Baret Barry, Brian Walker, Butch Olsen, Caroline McLaughlin, Dan Clark, Drew Bartlett, James Byrne, Jenny Baez, Jenny Peterson, Jim Mathie, Jim Moir, Kathy Fitzpatrick, Kurtis Gregg, Mike Dixon, Nick Morrell, Sara Thanner, Scott Sheckman May 2018 Completed in Fulfillment of NOAA Awards NA11NOS4820003, NA13NOS4820015, NA13NOS4190140, and NA15NOS4820036 for Florida Department of Environmental Protection Coral Reef Conservation Program 1277 N.E. 79th Street Causeway Miami, FL 33138 This report should be cited as follows: Florida Department of Environmental Protection. Our Florida Reefs Community Planning Process. Miami, FL: 2018. X and 333 pages. The views, statements, findings, conclusions, and recommendations expressed herein are those of the Our Florida Reefs Joint Community Working Group and do not necessarily reflect the views of the State of Florida, FDEP, FWC, NOAA, or any of their sub agencies. Executive Summary The coral reefs in southeast Florida are an incredibly unique and important resource. They provide many indispensable benefits to residents and visitors alike. As the only barrier reef system in the continental United States, southeast Florida’s coral reefs are unique, precious, and bear an enormous cultural and historical importance to the region. Coral reefs play a vital role in the marine ecosystem by providing habitat for fish and other marine life as well as protection for coastlines. Their beauty draws residents and tourists to enjoy recreational fishing, diving, boating, and other on-water activities. Their bounty provides commercial fishing, diving, and other maritime industry opportunities. Although inconspicuous, the coral reefs fuel an economic engine in southeast Florida. Despite the incredible importance of southeast Florida’s coral reefs, decades of science show that this ecosystem is highly threatened and chronically stressed. Many different global and local threats can limit coral growth or even kill them. For example, increased ocean temperatures have led to stress and coral bleaching. Also, as oceans become more acidic they affect the corals’ ability to produce their limestone skeleton. Locally, a number of factors also threaten coral reef health. Increases in human population in southeast Florida, particularly along the coast, have led to increased pollutants that enter the ocean through land-based sources, such as storm-water runoff, partially treated wastewater outfalls, and inlets, degrading the quality of water in the marine environment. Other factors, such as invasive species, incompatible fisheries pressure, and damage to coral habitats from anchors and coastal development, are also impacting the coral reefs’ ability to survive. Although the coral reefs of Florida are one connected system, starting offshore of the St. Lucie Inlet in Martin County and stretching over 350 miles down through the Florida Keys to the Dry Tortugas in Monroe County, they have not historically been managed that way. Currently, there is no comprehensive management plan for the northern one-third of the Florida Reef Tract that extends 105 miles from the northern border of Biscayne National Park in Miami-Dade County to the St. Lucie Inlet in Martin County. Socioeconomic surveys show that a majority of residents in those four counties agree that if management of these resources does not change, conditions will continue to worsen. The process that created Our Florida Reefs began in 1998, when former President Bill Clinton signed an Executive Order establishing the United States Coral Reef Task Force (USCRTF) to lead U.S. government efforts to preserve and protect coral reefs. The State of Florida recognized the importance of the Executive Order and the need to protect and preserve the biodiversity, health, heritage, and socio-economic values of coral reefs and the marine environment. With guidance from the USCRTF, the Florida Department of Environmental Protection and the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission formed the Southeast Florida Coral Reef Initiative (SEFCRI): a group of marine resource professionals, scientists, and stakeholders from government agencies and other organizations. The SEFCRI Team first gathered in May of 2003 to develop local action strategies needed to protect the coral reef resources extending from Miami-Dade County through Martin County. One of the local action strategies developed by the SEFCRI Team was the creation of the Our Florida Reefs community planning process (OFR). As designed by SEFCRI, the OFR process would bring together the community of representatives from fishing, diving, waters sports, research, academia, local, state, and federal government, environmental non-government organizations, private business and local Fishing, Diving, I Project 26B and Other Uses May 2018 citizens at large stakeholder groups (reef user groups), as well as the broader public to discuss and develop management strategies for the southeast Florida coral reef ecosystem. The goal was to provide recommendations which would lead to a comprehensive management plan reflecting the diverse interests of all communities and ocean users in the region, while ensuring healthy coral reefs into the future. The mission of the Our Florida Reefs Joint Community Working Group is to collaboratively develop a prioritized list of recommended management actions to preserve and protect southeast Florida's coral reefs and associated reef resources and to reduce continuing trends toward declining coral reef health, emphasizing balance between resource use and protection, and to provide information needed to implement priority management actions. Members of the SEFCRI Team designed the OFR process to be bottom up, transparent, and inclusive. They drew lessons-learned from other stakeholder engagement processes around the world to design the most effective process. OFR launched a communications effort and held community meetings to build interest in the process and solicit applications to become a part of it. With the enthusiasm gained, OFR was able to build two stakeholder Community Working Groups (CWGs), to participate in the process. The CWGs met for the first time in January 2014 to begin what would be an intensive two-year collaboration. The CWGs used professional facilitators to allow for balanced and productive collaboration. Together the group developed guiding principles like a mission statement, group ‘norms’, decision rules, a charter, and a work plan to help organize and focus the efforts of the CWGs. Next, the CWGs spent six months sharing information with one another. This educational period was intended to give CWG members access to available information on all relevant topics: ecosystems, corals, water, fish, habitat, people, and management. Much of this information came from the SEFCRI Team and Technical Advisory Committee (TAC, the technical advisory body affiliated with SEFCRI). During this time, OFR members also shared their stakeholder perspectives and local knowledge with one another, building a holistic and communal understanding of the natural resources and the people that depend on them. After the educational period, the CWG dedicated one year to developing Recommended Management Actions (RMAs) within six focus areas: Education and Outreach; Fishing, Diving, and Other Uses; Land- Based Sources of Pollution; Law Enforcement; Maritime Industry and Coastal Construction Impacts; and Place-Based Management. The CWGs had access to several tools to aid them in the development of their RMAs. Professional facilitators developed processes to increase effectiveness, and staff worked during and between meetings to provide support wherever necessary. Digital tools available to the CWGs included an extensive bibliography where they could compile relevant literature, and a website where they could access all necessary resources. The CWGs also had access to a Marine Planner which was built to address information gaps in southeast Florida and fulfill the needs of the OFR process. The Marine Planner contained decision support tools which allowed the CWGs to query a comprehensive set of all known spatial data to better understand the marine resources in the region. As the RMAs developed, they were put through rigorous review periods from the advisory bodies to the OFR process, the SEFCRI Team and TAC. During these review periods, each RMA was scrutinized for its ability to accomplish stated goals, as well as its scientific accuracy, and feasibility. Through this review and revision period, the RMAs were refined as they were sent back and forth between the CWG and the Fishing, Diving, II Project 26B and Other Uses May 2018 advisory bodies and revised to integrate public comment as it was received. Finally, when the draft RMAs had reached a relatively developed stage, they were rolled out to the public in a series of 12 community meetings throughout the four counties. At these
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Benthic Communities at Two Remote Pacific Coral Reefs: Effects of Reef
    Benthic communities at two remote Pacific coral reefs: eVects of reef habitat, depth, and wave energy gradients on spatial patterns Gareth J. Williams1,7 , Jennifer E. Smith1,7 , Eric J. Conklin2, Jamison M. Gove3,4 , Enric Sala5,6 and Stuart A. Sandin1 1 Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA 2 The Nature Conservancy, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA 3 Coral Reef Ecosystem Division, Pacific Islands Fisheries Science Center, USA 4 Joint Institute for Marine and Atmospheric Research, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA 5 National Geographic Society, Washington, DC, USA 6 Centre d’Estudis Avanc¸ats de Blanes (CSIC), Blanes, Spain 7 These authors contributed equally to this work. ABSTRACT Kingman Reef and Palmyra Atoll in the central Pacific are among the most re- mote coral reefs on the planet. Here we describe spatial patterns in their benthic communities across reef habitats and depths, and consider these in the context of oceanographic gradients. Benthic communities at both locations were dominated by calcifying organisms (54–86% cover), namely hard corals (20–74%) and crustose coralline algae (CCA) (10–36%). While turf algae were relatively common at both locations (8–22%), larger fleshy macroalgae were virtually absent at Kingman (<1%) and rare at Palmyra (0.7–9.3%). Hard coral cover was higher, but with low diversity, in more sheltered habitats such as Palmyra’s backreef and Kingman’s patch reefs. Al- most exclusive dominance by slow-growing Porites on Kingman’s patch reefs provides indirect evidence of competitive exclusion, probably late in a successional sequence.
    [Show full text]
  • In Situ Tagging and Tracking of Coral Reef Fishes from the Aquarius Undersea Laboratory
    TECHNICAL NOTE In Situ Tagging and Tracking of Coral Reef Fishes from the Aquarius Undersea Laboratory AUTHORS ABSTRACT James Lindholm We surgically implanted coded-acoustic transmitters in a total of 46 coral reef fish Stellwagen Bank National Marine Sanctuary; during a saturation mission to the Aquarius Undersea Laboratory in August 2002. Current address: Pfleger Institute of Aquarius is located within the Conch Reef Research Only Area, a no-take marine re- Environmental Research serve in the northern Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary. Over the course of 10 Sarah Fangman days, with daily bottom times of 7 hrs, saturation diving operations allowed us to col- Channel Islands National Marine Sanctuary lect, surgically tag, release, and subsequently track fishes entirely in situ. Fish were collected using baited traps deployed adjacent to the reef as well as nets manipulated Les Kaufman on the bottom by divers. Surgical implantation of acoustic transmitters was conducted Boston University Marine Program at a mobile surgical station that was moved to different sites across the reef. Each fish Steven Miller was revived from anesthetic and released as divers swam the fish about the reef. Short- National Undersea Research Center, term tracking of tagged fish was conducted by saturation divers, while long-term fish University of North Carolina at Wilmington movement was recorded by a series of acoustic receivers deployed on the seafloor. Though not designed as an explicit comparison with surface tagging operations, the benefits of working entirely in situ were apparent. INTRODUCTION he use of acoustic telemetry to track the movements of marine fishes is now a com- true with deepwater fishes that have air blad- fish with a damp towel.
    [Show full text]
  • Florida Construction Law Compendium
    STATE OF FLORIDA CONSTRUCTION LAW COMPENDIUM Prepared by William F. Fink Wicker, Smith, O’Hara, McCoy & Ford, P.A. Grove Plaza Building, 5th Floor 2900 Middle Street (S.W. 28th Terrace) Miami, FL 33133 (305) 448-3939 www.wickersmith.com P. David Brannon Carr Allison 305 S. Gadsden Street Tallahassee, FL 32301 (850) 222-2107 www.carrallison.com Revised 2012 This outline includes a general overview of Florida’s construction law. The discussion of any particular topic is not an exhaustive analysis of all the statutory or common law related to the particular topic but is intended to give a general understanding of the issues. Please consult one of the Florida based USLAW attorneys for assistance with any specific fact pattern and/or issue. I. Breach of Contract Claims I-A: Choice of Law Clauses Florida recognizes a cause of action in the construction context for breach of contract claims. See Metrics Systems Corporation v. McDonald Douglas Corporation, 850 F. Supp. 1568 (N.D.Fla. 1994). The issue of liability is determined on a case by case basis dependant upon the language of the contract at issue. Typically, Florida law will apply to a Florida contract, especially when the terms of the contract itself dictate that Florida law will apply. However, under Florida law, “the law chosen by the contract applies so long as ‘there is a reasonable relationship between the contract and the state whose law is selected and the selected law does not conflict with Florida law or confer an advantage on a non-resident party which a Florida resident does not have.’” Id.
    [Show full text]
  • Aquarius Fact Sheet
    Fact Sheet: 2019 Designer: Perry Submarine Builders (Florida) Construction: Victoria Machine Works (Texas); start: 1986 | complete: 1987 Estimated construction cost: $5.5M Operational Timeline: St. Croix Deployment: Deployment in Salt River Canyon, St. Croix: 1987 Owner: NOAA Operator: Farleigh Dickenson University Interim Period: Recovered: 1990 by the University of North Carolina Wilmington Refurbished: 1990-1993 at North Carolina State Ports, Wilmington, NC Owner: NOAA Operator: University of North Carolina Wilmington Florida Keys Deployment: Initial deployment on Conch Reef, Florida Keys: 1993 (baseplate deployed 1992) Recovered for refurbishment: 1996-1998 - Harbor Branch Oceanographic Institution, Ft. Pierce, FL Redeployment on Conch Reef, Florida Keys: 1998 – present Owner: NOAA: 1986-2014; Florida International University: 2014 – present Operator: FDU: 1987-1989; UNCW: 1990-2012; Florida International University: 2013 - present Aquarius Siting: Conch Reef, Florida Keys (Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary): Distance From Islamorada shore base: 15.4 km (8.5 nm) Distance offshore: 9 km (5.4 nm) Hatch depth/storage depth: 14 m (46 fsw) 35 psi Depth of bottom directly below Aquarius: 18 m (60 fsw) (updated: 09.15.19) Habitat Specifications: Aquarius weight: 82-ton double-lock pressure vessel Baseplate weight: 120 tons Dimensions: 14-meters long by 3-meters in diameter (46 ft x 10 ft) Crew: 4 scientists and 2 technicians Amenities: kitchen facilities that include a microwave, instant hot water dispenser, refrigerator, sink, dining
    [Show full text]
  • Climate of the Southeast United States
    N$%"',$! C!"#$%& A++&++#&,% R&."',$! T&/),"/$! I,0*% R&0'1% S&1"&+ C!"#$%& '( %)& S'*%)&$+% U,"%&- S%$%&+ VARIABILITY, CHANGE, IMPACTS, AND VULNERABILITY Edited by: Keith T. Ingram Kirstin Dow Lynne Carter Julie Anderson Climate of the Southeast United States Variability, Change, Impacts, and Vulnerability © 2013 Southeast Climate Consortium All rights reserved under International and Pan-American Copyright Conventions. Reproduction of this report by electronic means for personal and noncommercial purposes ȱĴȱȱȱȱȱ ȱȱǯȱȱȱȱȱ ¢ȱȱȱȱȱ ȱȱȱȱ ȱȱȱ ȱ ȱȱȱ Ĵȱȱȱȱǯ ȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱǯ Printed on recycled, acid-free paper ȱȱȱȱȱȱ Citation: ǰȱ ǯǰȱ ǯȱ ǰȱǯȱǰȱ ǯȱǰȱǯȱŘŖŗřǯȱȱȱȱȱ ȱDZȱ¢ǰȱǰȱǰȱȱ¢ǯȱȱDZȱ ȱǯ Keywords:ȱȬĴȬȱǰȱǰȱǰȱȱ¢ǰȱ ǰȱǰȱȱǰȱ¢ǰȱȱ ǰȱȱǰȱ climate impacts, climate modeling, climate variability, coastal, drought, education, electric ȱǰȱ¡ȱ ǰȱĚǰȱȱǰȱ£ǰȱȱȱǰȱ ȱ ǰȱǰȱȬȱǰȱǰȱǰȱǰȱȱȱ ǰȱȱęǰȱȱǰȱǰȱȱǰȱǰȱȬ ȱ intrusion, sea level rise, silviculture, social vulnerability, Southeast, storm surge, tropical ǰȱǰȱ¢ǰȱǯǯȱȱ ǰȱȬȱǰȱ ȱǰȱ ǰȱ ę ȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱ ¢ȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱ¢ȱȱ¢ȱǰȱǰȱǰȱȱ Tribal Government or Non-governmental entity. Front Cover Images: ȱǰȱ ǰȱ¢ȱȱȱȱȱȱ ȂȱȱǻǼǯȱȱȱ¢ȱ ȱȱȱȱDZȱ ȱ¢ȱȱȱ ȱǰȱ¢ȱȱȱȱȱDzȱ¢ȱȱ ȱȱ ȱȱȱǰȱȱ ǯȱDzȱȱȱȱǰȱ¢ȱȱ ȱȱȱȱȱDzȱȱ ȱȱȱǻǼȱȱȱ ȱǰȱ ¢ȱȱDzȱȱĚ ȱȱȱȱȱǰȱ¢ȱȱȱȱ ȱDzȱȱȱȱǰȱǰȱǰȱȱĴǯ About This Series This report is published as one of a series of technical inputs to the Third National ȱȱǻǼȱǯȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱ ȱȱ ȱȱȱȱȱŗşşŖǰȱ ȱȱȱȱȱȱȱ and Congress every four years on the status of climate change science and impacts. The NCA informs the nation about already observed changes, the current status of the climate, and anticipated trends for the future. The NCA report process integrates ęȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱ¢ȱęȱȱ ęȱȱȱȱ ǯȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱ- ȱȱȱȱȱ¢ȱǯǯȱ£ǰȱȱȱȱȱ¢ȱȱ ȱȱȱ¢ȱȱȱȱȱȂȱǯ ȱȱȱŘŖŗŗǰȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱ¡ȱȱ ǰȱȱ¢ǰȱȱȱȱǰȱȬȱ£- ǰȱȱǰȱȱȱǰȱ ȱȱȱȱȱȱ Ĵȱȱȱȱȱǯȱ ȱǰȱȱȱȱǰȱȱ ȱȱ ȱȱȱȱȱȱǰȱ ȱȱȱȱȱ input reports highlighting past climate trends, projected climate change, and impacts ȱęȱȱȱȱǯȱȱȱȱȱ ȱȱȱ- ing this technical input.
    [Show full text]
  • SA Wioresearchcompendium.Pdf
    Compiling authors Dr Angus Paterson Prof. Juliet Hermes Dr Tommy Bornman Tracy Klarenbeek Dr Gilbert Siko Rose Palmer Report design: Rose Palmer Contributing authors Prof. Janine Adams Ms Maryke Musson Prof. Isabelle Ansorge Mr Mduduzi Mzimela Dr Björn Backeberg Mr Ashley Naidoo Prof. Paulette Bloomer Dr Larry Oellermann Dr Thomas Bornman Ryan Palmer Dr Hayley Cawthra Dr Angus Paterson Geremy Cliff Dr Brilliant Petja Prof. Rosemary Dorrington Nicole du Plessis Dr Thembinkosi Steven Dlaza Dr Anthony Ribbink Prof. Ken Findlay Prof. Chris Reason Prof. William Froneman Prof. Michael Roberts Dr Enrico Gennari Prof. Mathieu Rouault Dr Issufo Halo Prof. Ursula Scharler Dr. Jean Harris Dr Gilbert Siko Prof. Juliet Hermes Dr Kerry Sink Dr Jenny Huggett Dr Gavin Snow Tracy Klarenbeek Johan Stander Prof. Mandy Lombard Dr Neville Sweijd Neil Malan Prof. Peter Teske Benita Maritz Dr Niall Vine Meaghen McCord Prof. Sophie von der Heydem Tammy Morris SA RESEARCH IN THE WIO ContEnts INDEX of rEsEarCh topiCs ‑ 2 introDuCtion ‑ 3 thE WEstErn inDian oCEan ‑ 4 rEsEarCh ActivitiEs ‑ 6 govErnmEnt DEpartmEnts ‑ 7 Department of Science & Technology (DST) Department of Environmental Affairs (DEA) Department of Agriculture, Forestry & Fisheries (DAFF) sCiEnCE CounCils & rEsEarCh institutions ‑ 13 National Research Foundation (NRF) Council for Geoscience (CGS) Council for Scientific & Industrial Research (CSIR) Institute for Maritime Technology (IMT) KwaZulu-Natal Sharks Board (KZNSB) South African Environmental Observation Network (SAEON) Egagasini node South African
    [Show full text]
  • Directions to Hobe Sound Florida
    Directions To Hobe Sound Florida andMetallographic unweathered Ludvig Bela tangle volatilising handsomely so stagnantly or egresses that Iggy wantonly bemoan when his cane.Kaiser If is unpossessing tea-table. Shipwrecked or scrawny centralAlden usually is Al? legitimate his uncovering justled provisorily or enravish westwardly and madly, how It go based upon which relentlessly pursuing you can submit an exurban area between the therapist should be used to you can also be financially advantageous Your appointment request has served by creating a hobe sound florida history available for directions. Clinic a travel about this form cannot be delayed due to. Looks like walking the directions with a car from anyone and traffic conditions at the preserve runs for more about special. Where and florida state university press of hobe sound is required to have been approved, and places with. Thanks to do not count total amount of the page you can have a wildfire, for those of these procedures promote your money, and scrub habitat. We are available for directions to florida. No reviews for hobe sound florida springs, red tubular flowers, contact your browser and updated time you? Please relaunch your appointment online directions to hobe sound florida dune habitat is set the justice of grief every day, and residents in. Directions to Seacoast Bank 11711 SE Federal Highway Hobe Sound FL 33455 Seacoast provides a full rise of banking and investment services to. Best sun damage will i rent month to florida post office for directions to hobe sound florida? When you are looking for sale in our residents in real estate process easy to contact us for specific information needed, united states to.
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Worth Lagoon
    TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ................................................................................ 1 PURPOSE AND SIGNIFICANCE OF THE PARK ...................................... 1 Park Significance .............................................................................. 1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF THE PLAN ................................................... 2 MANAGEMENT PROGRAM OVERVIEW ................................................. 7 Management Authority and Responsibility ............................................ 7 Park Management Goals .................................................................... 8 Management Coordination ................................................................. 8 Public Participation ........................................................................... 9 Other Designations ........................................................................... 9 RESOURCE MANAGEMENT COMPONENT INTRODUCTION .............................................................................. 15 RESOURCE DESCRIPTION AND ASSESSMENT ................................... 15 Natural Resources .......................................................................... 16 Topography ............................................................................... 20 Geology .................................................................................... 21 Soils ......................................................................................... 21 Minerals ...................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report for Florida Middle Ground Project
    Final Report for Florida Middle Ground Project NOAA Coral Award NA05NMF4411045 CY 2005 Coral Project for the period 10/1/05 through 3/31/07 April 22, 2007 Lead PI: David F. Naar Associate Professor College of Marine Science University of South Florida 140 Seventh Avenue South Saint Petersburg, Florida 33701-5016 USA Voice: (727) 553 1637 Cell: (727) 510 9806 Fax: (727) 553 1189 Email: [email protected] Co-PIs: David Mallinson (East Carolina University) Felicia Coleman (FSU) GENERAL OBJECTIVES/LOGISTICS AND SUMMARY OF PROGRESS: We have completed mapping the entire Florida Middle Ground HAPC (Habitat Area of Particular Concern) using a high-resolution 300 kHz multibeam bathymetry and backscatter system (Figures 1-3) . The survey augmented the existing coverage in the area from previous USF cruises. The main scientific objectives of the cruise are to define the fish habitat areas within the Florida Middle Ground HAPC using multibeam bathymetry, multibeam backscatter, and ground truth data (previous and new sediment grab samples and previous video samples). Second, to eventually produce a Habitat Map that defines area of Sediment, rock, and coral reef. Third, to provide a map of the paleoshoreline during a previous glacial period, when sea level was lower. The first objective has been completed and the data DVD’s have been sent to the Gulf of Mexico Fisheries Management Council in March 2007. Drs. Mallinson and Naar have coauthored one paper presented at the international American Geophysical Union Meeting in 2006 (Mallinson et al., 2006) and have another paper submitted to a special volume (Hine et al., 2007) and have a third and final paper summarizing all our work at the Florida Middle Grounds in preparation (Mallinson et al., 2007).
    [Show full text]
  • FAU Institutional Repository
    FAU Institutional Repository http://purl.fcla.edu/fau/fauir This paper was submitted by the faculty of FAU’s Harbor Branch Oceanographic Institute Notice: ©2002 Elsevier Science Ltd. This is the author’s version of a work accepted for publication by Elsevier. Changes resulting from the publishing process, including peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting and other quality control mechanisms, may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. The definitive version has been published at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/csr and may be cited as Lee, Thomas N., Ned Smith (2002) Volume transport variability through the Florida Keys tidal Channels, Continental Shelf Research 22(9):1361–1377 doi:10.1016/S0278‐4343(02)00003‐1 Continental Shelf Research 22 (2002) 1361–1377 Volume transport variability through the Florida Keys tidal channels Thomas N. Leea,*, Ned Smithb a Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Science, University of Miami, 4600 Rickenbacker Causeway, Miami, FL 33149, USA b Harbor Branch Oceanographic Institution, 5600 US Highway 1, North, Ft. Pierce, FL 34946, USA Received 28 February 2001; received in revised form 13 July 2001; accepted 18 September 2001 Abstract Shipboard measurements of volume transports through the passages of the middle Florida Keys are used together with time series of moored transports, cross-Key sea level slopes and local wind records to investigate the mechanisms controllingtransport variability. Predicted tidal transport amplitudes rangedfrom 76000 m3/s in LongKey Channel to 71500 m3/s in Channel 2. Subtidal transport variations are primarily due to local wind driven cross-Key sea level slopes.
    [Show full text]
  • Tampa Bay History Published Through a Partnership Between the Tampa Bay History Center and the University of South Florida Libraries’ Florida Studies Center
    Volume 23 2009 Tampa Bay History Published through a partnership between the Tampa Bay History Center and the University of South Florida Libraries’ Florida Studies Center Rodney Kite-Powell, Editor Saunders Foundation Curator of History, Tampa Bay History Center Andrew Huse, Assistant Editor Assistant Librarian, University of South Florida Libraries’ Special Collections Department and Florida Studies Center Mark I. Greenberg, Ph.D., Book Review Editor Director, University of South Florida Libraries’ Special Collections Department and Florida Studies Center Editorial Board Jack Davis, Ph.D. University of Florida James M. Denham, Ph.D. Florida Southern College Paul Dosal, Ph.D. University of South Florida Maxine Jones, Ph.D. Florida State University Robert Kerstein, Ph.D. University of Tampa Joe Knetsch, Ph.D. State of Florida, Department of Environmental Protection Jerald Milanich, Ph.D. Florida Museum of Natural History Gary R. Mormino, Ph.D. Florida Studies Program, University of South Florida Susan Parker, Ph.D. St. Augustine Historical Society Cheryl Rodriguez, Ph.D. University of South Florida Aaron Smith, Ph.D. University of South Florida Doris Weatherford Tampa, Florida Tampa Bay History (ISSN: 0272-1406) is published annually through a partnership between the Tampa Bay History Center and the Florida Studies Center at the University of South Florida Library. The journal is provided complimentarily to Tampa Bay History Center members who belong at or above the Supporter membership level. Copies of the current issue of Tampa Bay History may be purchased directly from the Tampa Bay History Center at a cost of $19.95, plus shipping. Back issues (beginning with the 2007 issue) will also be available for purchase.
    [Show full text]
  • Nixon's Caribbean Milieu, 1950–1968
    Dark Quadrant: Organized Crime, Big Business, and the Corruption of American Democracy Online Appendix: Nixon’s Caribbean Milieu, 1950–1968 By Jonathan Marshall “Though his working life has been passed chiefly on the far shores of the continent, close by the Pacific and the Atlantic, some emotion always brings Richard Nixon back to the Caribbean waters off Key Biscayne and Florida.”—T. H. White, The Making of the President, 19681 Richard Nixon, like millions of other Americans, enjoyed Florida and the nearby islands of Cuba and the Bahamas as refuges where he could leave behind his many cares and inhibitions. But he also returned again and again to the region as an important ongoing source of political and financial support. In the process, the lax ethics of its shadier operators left its mark on his career. This Sunbelt frontier had long attracted more than its share of sleazy businessmen, promoters, and politicians who shared a get-rich-quick spirit. In Florida, hustlers made quick fortunes selling worthless land to gullible northerners and fleecing vacationers at illegal but wide-open gambling joints. Sheriffs and governors protected bookmakers and casino operators in return for campaign contributions and bribes. In nearby island nations, as described in chapter 4, dictators forged alliances with US mobsters to create havens for offshore gambling and to wield political influence in Washington. Nixon’s Caribbean milieu had roots in the mobster-infested Florida of the 1940s. He was introduced to that circle through banker and real estate investor Bebe Rebozo, lawyer Richard Danner, and Rep. George Smathers. Later this chapter will explore some of the diverse connections of this group by following the activities of Danner during the 1968 presidential campaign, as they touched on Nixon’s financial and political ties to Howard Hughes, the South Florida crime organization of Santo Trafficante, and mobbed-up hotels and casinos in Las Vegas and Miami.
    [Show full text]