Hydraulic Relationships Between Buried Valley Sediments and Adjacent Bedrock Formations
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
HYDRAULIC RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN BURIED VALLEY SEDIMENTS AND ADJACENT BEDROCK FORMATIONS A Thesis submitted to Kent State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Sciences By Wondwosen Mekonnen Seyoum August 2012 Thesis written by Wondwosen Mekonnen Seyoum B. Sc. Addis Ababa University, 1999 M. Sc. Addis Ababa University, 2005 M. Sc. Kent State University, 2012 Approved by Dr. Yoram Eckstein ________________________________________, Advisor Dr. Daniel Holm ________________________________________, Chair, Department of Geology Dr. Timothy Moerland ________________________________________, Dean, College of Arts and Sciences Dedicated to My Beloved Mom SHEWAYE TILAHUN (1957-2007) & My Father-in-law NIGUSSIE WOLDEYOHANNES (1931-2005) TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES .................................................................................................................. VII LIST OF TABLES ...................................................................................................................... X ACKNOWLEDGEMENT .......................................................................................................... XI CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................... 1 1.1. Introduction ............................................................................................................... 1 1.2. Earlier research .......................................................................................................... 5 1.3. Objective of the study .............................................................................................. 11 1.4. Description of the study area ................................................................................... 12 1.5. Geology and hydrogeology ...................................................................................... 14 1.5.1. Glacial deposits ........................................................................................... 15 1.5.2. Bedrock geology .......................................................................................... 19 CHAPTER 2 METHODOLOGY ................................................................................................. 25 2.1. Introduction ............................................................................................................. 25 2.2. Data ......................................................................................................................... 26 2.3. Conceptual model development .............................................................................. 28 2.3.1. Hydrostratigraphic units .............................................................................. 29 2.3.2. Hydraulic parameters .................................................................................. 31 2.3.3. Groundwater recharge and discharge ......................................................... 37 2.3.4. Groundwater levels and flow directions ...................................................... 39 iv 2.4. Numerical Model Construction ................................................................................ 39 2.4.1. Introduction ................................................................................................ 39 2.4.2. Finite difference approximation .................................................................. 42 2.4.3. Model design and model layers ................................................................... 45 2.4.4. Hydraulic conductivity and anisotropy ........................................................ 47 2.4.5. Boundary conditions ................................................................................... 49 2.4.6. Drain boundary ........................................................................................... 53 2.4.7. Recharge boundary ..................................................................................... 55 2.4.8. Calibration .................................................................................................. 58 2.4.9. Mass balance .............................................................................................. 63 CHAPTER 3 RESULTS ............................................................................................................. 64 3.1. Stratigraphy and hydrostratigraphic units ................................................................ 64 3.2. Hydraulic parameter estimation of the buried valley sediments (Outwash) ............. 70 3.2.1. Correction for partial penetration ............................................................... 71 3.2.2. Transmissivity and hydraulic conductivity analysis ...................................... 72 3.2.3. Spatial distribution of hydraulic parameters ................................................ 73 3.3. Conceptual groundwater model............................................................................... 74 3.4. Numerical Model Calibration ................................................................................... 79 3.5. Numerical Model results .......................................................................................... 82 3.5.1. Simulated hydraulic parameters.................................................................. 83 3.5.2. Simulated hydraulic heads .......................................................................... 85 v 3.5.3. Model mass balance.................................................................................... 89 CHAPTER 4 DISCUSSION ....................................................................................................... 94 4.1. Hydraulic characteristics of the buried valley sediments ...................................................... 94 4.2. Numerical model ................................................................................................................. 96 CHAPTER 5 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION......................................................................... 102 REFERENCES ....................................................................................................................... 105 APPENDIX........................................................................................................................... 112 I. Cross-sections across the buried valley showing the various stratigraphic units ....... 112 II. 2D conceptual model................................................................................................ 116 III. Inflow-outflow estimation using Darcy’s Law ............................................................ 117 IV. Calculation of the hydraulic parameters for the buried valley sediments .................. 118 V. Observed (field measured) Vs model computed head data....................................... 127 VI. Mass balance of each major aquifer layers ............................................................... 128 VII. Estimation of rate of flow contribution from bedrock aquifers along several across the buried valley ....................................................................................................... 129 vi LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1.1 An example of the possible hydraulic relationships in a section across a hypothetical buried valley ...................................................................................................... 3 Figure 1.2 Location map of the study area ............................................................................ 13 Figure 1.3 Digital Elevation Model (DEM) showing topography of the study area ................. 14 Figure 1.4 A stratigraphic column in Cuyahoga Valley (from Corbett et al, 1988) .................. 16 Figure 1.5 Isopach map of the glacial sediments (both the till and outwash) of the study area ...................................................................................................................................... 17 Figure 1.6 Networks of buried valleys in Geauga County (Modified from ODC, 1971) ........... 19 Figure 1.7 Bedrock geologic map, with bedrock topographic contours of the area (modified from Eberts, Bair, and De Roche, 1990) ................................................................ 22 Figure 1.8 Stratigraphic and hydrogeologic description of the study area (Richards, 1981) .................................................................................................................................... 24 Figure 2.1 Sample driller’s log and report (information are circled) ...................................... 27 Figure 2.2 Methodology chart showing steps in developing the conceptual model ............... 29 Figure 2.3 Cells showing nodes and cell notations ................................................................ 43 Figure 2.4 A given cell i,j,k with six surrounding cells (Modified from McDonald and Harbaugh, 1988) ................................................................................................................... 44 vii Figure 2.5 Published values of hydraulic conductivities from Halford and Kuniansky (2002) and Domenico and Schwartz (1990) .......................................................................... 49 Figure 2.6 Schematic map view representation of boundary conditions in the bedrock units and buried valley sediments of the glacial drift ............................................................ 51 Figure 2.7 Schematic representation of a drain in a single cell .............................................