NEW ISSUE NOT RATED
In the opinion of Stradiing Yocca Carlson & Rauth, a Professional Corporation, Newport Beach, California, under existing statutes, regulations, rulings and judicial decisions, and assuming the accuracy of certain representations and compliance with certain covenants and requirements described herein, interest (and original issue discount) on the Bonds is excluded from gross income for federal income tax purposes and is not an item of tax preference for purposes of calculating the federal alternative minimum tax imposed on individuals and corporations. In the further opinion of Bond Counsel, interest (and original issue discount) on the Bonds is exempt from State of California personal income tax. See ~LEGAL MATTERS - Tax Exemption."
$25,820,000 COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 04-2 (LAKE HILLS CREST) OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE SPECIAL TAX BONDS, SERIES 2005
Dated: Date of Delivery Due: September 1, as shown on inside cover Authority for Issuance. The bonds captioned above {the "Bonds") are being issued under the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982 (the "Acr) and a Bond Indenture, dated as of July 1, 2005 (the "Indenture"), by and between the Community Facilities District No. 04-2 (Lake Hills Crest) of the County of Riverside (the "Community Facilities District~) and The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A., as trustee (the "Trustee"). The Board of Supervisors (the "Board") of the County of Riverside (the ~countyn), acting as leglslatlve body of the Community Facilities District, and the eligible landowner voters in the Community Facilities District, have authorized the issuance of bonds in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $32,500,000. The Bonds are the only series of bonds to be issued under this authorization, other than refunding bonds. See "THE BONDS - Authority for Issuance. H Security and Sources of Payment. The Bonds are payable from proceeds of Net Taxes (as defined herein) levied on property within the Community Facilities District according to the rate and method of apportionment of special tax approved by the Board and the eligible landowner voters in the Community Facilities District. The Bonds are secured by a pledge of the Net Taxes and other amounts in the Special Tax Fund (exclusive of the Administrative Expense Account). See "SECURITY FOR THE BONDS." Use of Proceeds. The Bonds are being issued to (i) finance the acquisition and construction of certain road and appurtenant drainage facilities and related grading required as a condition for the development of the property in the Community Facilities District, which will be owned by the County, (ii) finance the acquisition and construction of certain water and sewer facilities and related grading required as a condition of development of the property in the Community Facilities District, which will be owned by Western Municipal Water District of Riverside County, and (iii) finance the acquisition and construction of certain flood control and storm water drainage facilities and related grading required as a condition for the development of the property in the Community Facilities District, which will be owned by Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District rRiverside County Flood Control"), (iv) fund a reserve fund for the Bonds, {v) fund capitalized interest on the Bonds through September 1, 2005, (vi) pay certain administrative expenses of the Community Facilities District, and (vii) pay the costs of issuing the Bonds. See ~FINANCING PLAN." Bond Terms. Interest on the Bonds is payable on March 1, 2006, and semiannually thereafter on each March 1 and September 1. The Bonds will be issued in denominations of $5,000 or integral multiples of $5,000. The Bonds, when delivered, will be initially registered in the name of Cede & Co., as nominee of The Depository Trust Company ("DTCH), New York, New York. OTC will act as securities depository for the Bonds. See "THE BONDS- General Bond Terms~ and "APPENDIX F OTC and the Book-Entry Only System.~ Redemption. The Bonds are subject to optional redemption, mandatory sinking fund redemption, and extraordinary redemption from Special Tax prepayments before maturity. In addition, the Term Bond maturing on September 1, 2035, is subject to extraordinary redemption from any surplus remaining in the Project Account following completion of the Public Facilities. See "THE BONDS~ Redemption.~ THE BONDS, THE INTEREST THEREON, AND ANY PREMIUMS PAYABLE ON THE REDEMPTION OF ANY OF THE BONDS, ARE NOT AN INDEBTEDNESS OF THE COUNTY, THE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT, THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA (THE "STATE") OR ANY OF ITS POLITICAL SUBDIVISIONS WITHIN THE MEANING OF ANY CONSTITUTIONAL OR STATUTORY LIMITATION OR RESTRICTION, AND NEITHER THE COUNTY, THE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT (EXCEPT TO THE LIMITED EXTENT DESCRIBED IN THIS OFFICIAL STATEMENT), THE STATE NOR ANY OF ITS POLITICAL SUBDIVISIONS IS LIABLE ON THE BONDS. NEITHER THE FAITH AND CREDIT NOR THE TAXING POWER OF THE COUNTY, THE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT (EXCEPT TO THE LIMITED EXTENT DESCRIBED IN THIS OFFICIAL STATEMENT) OR THE STATE OR ANY POLITICAL SUBDIVISION THEREOF IS PLEDGED TO THE PAYMENT OF THE BONDS. OTHER THAN THE SPECIAL TAXES, NO TAXES ARE PLEDGED TO THE PAYMENT OF THE BONDS. THE BONDS ARE NOT A GENERAL OBLIGATION OF THE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT, BUT ARE LIMITED OBLIGATIONS OF THE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT PAYABLE SOLELY FROM THE SPECIAL TAXES AS MORE FULLY DESCRIBED IN THIS OFFICIAL STATEMENT. MATURITY SCHEDULE (see Inside cover) This cover page contains certain information for quick reference only. It is not a summary of the issue. Potential investors must read the entire Official Statement to obtain information essential to the making of an informed investment decision. Investment in the Bonds involves risks which may not be appropriate for some investors. See "BONDOWNERS' RISKS" for a discussion of special risk factors that should be considered in evaluating the investment quality of the Bonds. The Bonds are offered when, as and if issued and accepted by the Underwriter, subject to approval as to their legality by Stradling Yocca Carlson & Rauth, a Professional Corporation, Newport Beach, California, Bond Counsel, and subject to certain other conditions. Jones Hall, A Professional Law Corporation, San Francisco, California will pass upon certain legal matters for the Underwriter as its counsel. Certain legal matters will be passed upon for the County and the Community Facilities District by the Office of County Counsel. It is anticipated that the Bonds, in book-entry form, will be available for delivery on or about August 18, 2005. E. J. De La Rosa & Co., Inc.
The date of this Official Statement is: August 2, 2005 MATURITY SCHEDULE
$8, 720,000 Serial Bonds (Base CUSIPt: 76911F)
Maturity Principal Interest {Segtember 1) Amount Rate Yield CUSIPt 2006 $450,000 2.950% 2.950% NH3 2007 460,000 3.000 3.200 NJ9 2008 475,000 3.200 3.500 NK6 2009 490,000 3.600 3.900 NL4 2010 505,000 3.800 4.100 NM2 2011 525,000 4.000 4.200 NNO 2012 545,000 4.125 4.300 NP5 2013 565,000 4.200 4.400 NQ3 2014 590,000 4.375 4.550 NR1 2015 615,000 4.400 4.650 NS9 2016 640,000 4.500 4.750 NT? 2017 670,000 4.625 4.850 NU4 2018 695,000 4.700 4.900 NV2 2019 730,000 4.750 4.950 NWO 2020 765,000 4.800 5.000 NX8
$4,400,000 5.000% Term Bond due September 1, 2025, Yield: 5.05% CUSIPt No. 76911 FN Y6
$5,590,000 5.000% Term Bond due September 1, 2030, Yield: 5.10% CUSIPt No. 76911FN Z3
$7,110,000 5.100% Term Bond due September 1, 2035, Yield: 5.15% CUSIPt No. 76911FP A6
t Copyright 2005, American Bankers Association. CUSiP data herein are provided by Standard & Poor's CUSIP Service Bureau, a division of The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., and are provided for convenience of reference only. Neither the Community Facilities District, the County nor the Underwriter assumes any responsibility for the accuracy of these CUSiP data. GENERAL INFORMATION ABOUT THIS OFFICIAL STATEMENT
No Offering May Be Made Except by this Official Statement. No dealer, broker, salesperson or other person has been authorized to give any information or to make any representations with respect to the Bonds other than as contained in this Official Statement, and if given or made, such other information or representation must not be relied upon as ha•ling been authorized.
No Unlawful Off.,rs or Solicitations. This Official Statement does not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy n any state in which such offer or solicitation is not authorized or in which the person making such offer or solicitatior is not qualified to do so or to any person to whom it is unlawful to make such offer or solicitation.
Effective Date. ''his Official Statement speaks only as of its date, and the information and expressions of opinion contained in this Official Statement are subject to change without notice. Neither the delivery of this Official Statement nor an I sale of the Bonds will, under any circumstances, create any implication that there has been no change in the affairs of the County, the Community Facilities District, any other parties described in this Official Statement, or in :he condition of property within the Community Facilities District since the date of this Official Statement.
Use of this Official Statement. This Official Statement is submitted in connection with the sale of the Bonds referred to herein and may not be reproduced or used, in whole or in part, for any other purpose. This Official Statement is not a contract with the purchasers of the Bonds.
Preparation of tUs Official Statement. The information contained in this Official Statement has been obtained from sources that 3re believed to be reliable, but this information is not guaranteed as to accuracy or completeness.
The Underwriter has provided the following sentence for inclusion in this Official Statement: The Underwriter has reviewed the information in this Official Statement in accordance with, and as part of, its responsibilities to investors under the federal ,ecurities laws as applied to the facts and circumstances of this transaction, but the Underwriter does not guarante-a the accuracy or completeness of such information.
Document ReferHnces and Summaries. All references to and summaries of the Indenture or other documents contained in this )fficial Statement are subject to the provisions of those documents and do not purport to be complete statements of those documents.
Stabilization of and Changes to Offering Prices. The Underwriter may overallot or take other steps that stabilize or maintain the mz rket price of the Bonds at a level above that which might otherwise prevail in the open market. If commenced, the L nderwriter may discontinue such market stabilization at any time. The Underwriter may offer and sell the Bonds to certain dealers, dealer banks and banks acting as agent at prices lower than the public offering prices stated on the cover page of this Official Statement, and those public offering prices may be changed from time to time by the Underwriter.
Bonds are Exem{Jt from Securities Laws Registration. The issuance and sale of the Bonds have not been registered under tt'·e Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, in reliance upon exemptions for the issuance and sale of municipal securities provided under Section 3(a)(2) of the Securities Act of Hl33 and Section 3(a)(12) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Estimates and Projections. Certain statements included or incorporated by reference in this Official Statement constitute "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, Secticn 21E of the Unit<'" "tates Securities Exchange Act of 1"" '. as amended, and Section 27A of the United States Securities Act of 1933, as amended. Such statements are generally identifiable by the terminology used s Jch as "plan," "expect," "estimate," "budget" or other similar words.
THE ACHIEVEMEMT OF CERTAIN RESULTS OR OTHER EXPECTATIONS CONTAINED IN SUCH FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS INVOLVE KNOWN AND UNKNOWN RISKS, UNCERTAINTIES AND OTHER FACTORS WHICH MAY CAUSE ACTUAL RESULTS, PERFORMANCE OR ACHIEVEMENTS DESCRIBED TO BE MATERIALLY DIFFERENT FROM ANY FUTURE RESULTS, PERFORMANCE OR ACHIEVEMENTS EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED BY SUCH FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS. THE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT DOES ~OT PLAN TO ISSUE ANY UPDATES OR REVISIONS TO THOSE FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS IF OR WHEN ITS EXPECTATIONS, OR EVENTS, CONDITIONS OR CIRCUMSTANCES ON WHICH SUCH STATEMENTS ARE BASED OCCUR. COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
Marion Ashley, Chairman, District 5 Bob Buster, Vice Chairman, District 1 John F. Tavaglione, Member, District 2 Jeff Stone, Member, District 3 Roy Wilson, Member, District 4
COUNTY STAFF
Larry Parrish, County Executive Officer Paul McDonnell, Treasurer & T~v Co!!<>rtnc Robert Byrd, Auditor-Controller William C. Katzenstein, County Counsel
BOND COUNSEL
Stradling Yocca Carlson & Rauth, a Professional Corporation Newport Beach, California
UNDERWRITER'S COUNSEL
Jones Hall, A Professional Law Corporation San Francisco, California
FINANCIAL ADVISOR
Fieldman, Rolapp & Associates Irvine, California
APPRAISER
Stephen G. White, MAI Fullerton, California
MARKET ABSORPTION CONSULTANT
En1pirc Econon1ics, Inc Capistrano Beach, California
SPECIAL TAX CONSUL TANT and CFD ADMINISTRATOR
Albert A. Webb Associates Riverside, California
TRUSTEE
The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A. Los Angeles, California TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page Page INTRODUCTION 1 PROPERTY OWNERSHIP AND PROPOSED FINANCING PLA\I 5 DEVELOPMENT 35 Estimated Sources and Uses of Funds 5 Property Ownership 35 Facilities to be Financed with Proceeds of LHC Entities 35 the Bonds 6 Lake Hills-Riverside 39 Funding and Acquisition Agreement 6 Environmental Conditions 40 Water District JCFA 7 Proposed Development 42 Flood Control Di ,trict JCFA 7 BOND OWNERS' RISKS 46 THE BONDS 8 Limited Obligation of the Community Facilities General Bond Tnrms 8 District to Pay Debt Service 46 Authority for lssL ance 9 Levy and Collection of the Special Tax 46 Debt Service Schedule 11 Payment of Special Tax is not a Personal Redemption 12 Obligation of the Property Owner 47 Issuance of Parity Bonds for Refunding Only 15 Appraised Values 47 SECURITY FOR THE BONDS 16 Property Values and Property Development 48 Pledge of Net Taxes 16 Concentration of Property Ownership 50 Special Taxes 17 Other Possible Claims Upon the Value of Rate and Method 17 Taxable Property 50 Covenant to Fomclose 22 Exempt Properties 51 Special Tax Fund 23 Depletion of Reserve Account 51 Redemption Acc)unt of the Special Tax Fund 25 Bankruptcy and Foreclosure Delays 52 Reserve Accoun: of the Special Tax Fund 26 Disclosure to Future Purchasers 54 Earnings Fund 26 No Acceleration Provisions 55 THE COMMUNITv' FACILITIES DISTRICT 28 Loss of Tax Exemption 55 General 28 Voter Initiatives 55 Estimated Maximum Special Tax Proceeds LEGAL MATTERS 56 and Debt Service Coverage 28 Legal Opinions 56 Market Absorptic n Study 30 Tax Exemption 56 Appraised Property Value 30 No Litigation 58 Appraised Value to Burden Ratio 32 CONTINUING DISCLOSURE 58 Direct and Overlapping Governmental NO RATINGS 59 Obligations 33 UNDERWRITING 59 Estimated Tax B Jrden on Single Family PROFESSIONAL FEES 60 Home 34
APPENDIX A General Information About Riverside County APPENDIX B Rate and Method of Apportionment of Special Tax for Community Facilities District No. 04-2 (Lake Hills Crest) of the County of Riverside APPENDIXC Summary Appraisal Report APPENDIX D - Market Absorption Study Summary and Conclusions APPENDIX E - Summary of Bond Indenture APPENDIX F OTC and the Book-Entry Only System APPENDIX G Form of Issuer Continuing Disclosure Certificate APPENDIX H Form of Property Owner Disclosure Certificate APPENDIX I Form of Opinion of Bond Counsel APPENDIX J Community Facilities District Boundary Map [THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFf BLANK] OFFICIAL STATEMENT
$25,820,000 COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 04-2 (LAKE HILLS CREST) OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE SPECIAL TAX BONDS, SERIES 2005
INTRODUCTION
This Official Statement, including the cover page and attached appendices, is provided to furnish inform 3tion regarding the bonds captioned above (the "Bonds") to be issued by Community Facilities District No. 04-2 (Lake Hills Crest) of the County of Riverside (the "Community Facilities District").
This introc'uction is not a summary of this Official Statement. It is only a brief description of and guide to, and is qualified by, more complete and detailed information contained in the entire Official S•atement, including the cover page and attached appendices, and the documents summarized or described in this Official Statement. A full review should be made of the entire Official Statement. The offering of the Bonds to potential investors is made only by means of the entire Official Statement.
Capitalize :I terms used but not defined in this Official Statement have the definitions given in the lnden'ure (as defined below).
The County. The County of Riverside (the "County") is located in southeastern California and en,;ompasses 7, 177 square miles. The County is bordered on the north by San Bernardino County, on the east by the State of Arizona, on the South by San Diego and Imperial Counties and on the west by Orange and San Bernardino Counties. See "APPENDIX A" for further informatior regarding the County.
Property Ownership. The current owners of the taxable property within the Community Facilities District are the following (collectively, the "Property Owners"):
LHC Riverside Associates, LLC, a California limited liability company ("LHC Riverside Associates"), and Riverside LHC, Ltd., a Florida limited partnership ("RiversidE· LHC"), as tenants in common (collectively, the "LHC Entities"), and
Lake Hills-Riverside, L.P., a California limited partnership {"Lake Hills- Riverside",.
Lake Hills-Riverside is currently under contract to acquire all of the LHC Entities' property in the Community Facilities District, and currently intends to develop 512 detached single-family homes within the Community Facilities District (however, it is possible that Lake Hills-Riverside will sell one residential neighborhood of 98 lots to another merchant builder for home constructior and sales).
Lake Hills·Riverside has engaged Lake Hills, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, to act as develo~ er (the "Builder") in connection with the construction of single-family homes
1 within the Community Facilities District, and Lake Hills, LLC, has engaged Brehm Communities, a California corporation, to act as general contractor ("Brehm Communities" or the "Project Manager") in connection with the construction of single-family homes and public improvements within the Community Facilities District.
For detailed information about the Property Owners, current land uses and proposed development plans for the property in the Community Facilities District, see "PROPERTY OWNERSHIP AND PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT."
The Community Facilities District. The Community Facilities District was formed and established by the County on January 11, 2005, under the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, as amended (the "Act"), following a public hearing conducted by the Board of Supervisors of the County (the "Board"); on the same date a landowner election was held at which the qualified electors of the Community Facilities District authorized the Community Facilities District to incur bonded indebtedness and approved the levy of special taxes. See 'THE BONDS -Authority for Issuance."
Authority for Issuance of the Bonds. The Bonds will be issued under the Act, certain resolutions adopted by the Board, acting as legislative body of the Community Facilities District (the "Legislative Body"), and a Bond Indenture, dated as of August 1, 2005 (the "Indenture"), by and between the Community Facilities District and The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A .. as trustee (the "Trustee"). See "THE BONDS - Authority for Issuance."
Purpose of the Bonds. Proceeds of the Bonds will be used primarily to finance the acquisition and construction of the following public improvements (collectively, the "Public Facilities"):
(i) certain road and appurtenant drainage facilities and related grading required as a condition for the development of the property in the Community Facilities District, which will be owned by the County,
(ii) certain water and sewer facilities and related grading required as a condition of development of the property in the Community Facilities District, which will be owned by Western Municipal Water District of Riverside County ("Western Municipal Water District"), and
(iii) certain flood control and storm water drainage facilities and related grading required as a condition for the development of the property in the Community Facilities District, which will be owned by Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District ("Riverside County Flood Control").
Bond proceeds will also fund a reserve fund for the Bonds, fund capitalized interest on the Bonds through September 1, 2005, pay certain administrative expenses of the Community Facilities District, and pay the costs of issuing the Bonds. See "FINANCING PLAN."
The Public Facilities will be constructed in accordance with the following agreements:
an agreement entitled "Infrastructure Funding and Acquisition Agreement" dated as of June 1, 2005 (the "Funding and Acquisition Agreement"), by and among the Community Facilities District, the County, Riverside LHC, LHC Riverside Associates, Lake Hills-Riverside, the Builder and the Project Manager,
2 an agreement entitled "Joint Community Facilities Agreement," dated as of November 1, 2004 (the "Water District JCFA"), by and among the County, Western Municipal Water District, Riverside LHC, LHC Riverside Associates, Lake Hills Riverside. the Builder and the Project Manager, and
• an agreement entitled "Joint Community Facilities Agreement," dated as of June 1, 2004 (the "Flood Control District JCFA"), by and among the County, Riverside County Flood Control, Riverside LHC, LHC Riverside Associates, Lake Hills-Riverside, the Build,,r and the Project Manager.
See "FIN,~NCING PLAN - Facilities to be Financed with the Proceeds of the Bonds."
Security and Sources of Payment for the Bonds. The Bonds will be secured by and payable from a pledge of the net proceeds of the Special Taxes (as defined in the Indenture) levied on the prc,perty in the Community Facilities District (the "Net Taxes") in accordance with the Rate and Method of Apportionment of Special Tax for Community Facilities District No. 04-2 (Lake Hills Crest) of the County of Riverside (the "Rate and Method"). The Bonds will be secured by a pledge of the Net Taxes and other amounts in the Special Tax Fund (exclusive of the Administrative Expense Account). See "SECURITY FOR THE BONDS."
The Corr munity Facilities District will covenant in the Indenture to cause foreclosure proceedings to t,e commenced and prosecuted against parcels with delinquent installments of the Special Tax under certain circumstances. For a more detailed description of the foreclosure covenant see "SECURITY FOR THE BONDS - Covenant to Foreclose."
Appraise•/. An appraisal of the property within the Community Facilities District dated May 12, 2005 (the "Appraisal"), was prepared by Stephen G. White, MAI of Fullerton, California (the "Appraiser") in connection with the issuance of the Bonds. The purpose of the appraisal was to ascertain the market value of the fee simple estate for the taxable property in the Community Faci ities District as of a May 1, 2005, date of value. Subject to the assumptions contained in the Appraisal, the Appraiser estimated that the fee simple interest in the property within the Comrr unity Facilities District, subject to the lien of the Special Taxes, and assuming the completion cf the Public Facilities to be financed with the proceeds of the Bonds, had an estimated aggreuate value of $109,700,000. See "THE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT - Appraised Prop ~rty Value" and "APPENDIX C Summary Appraisal Report" for further information on th,, Appraisal.
Market Absorption Study. Empire Economics, Inc., of Capistrano Beach, California (the "Market Ab:mrption Consultant"), prepared a Market Absorption Study dated March 11, 2005, (the "MarKet Absorptic:i Study"), to provide an estimate of the probable absorption schedules for thn forthcoming single-family residential developments proposed for the property in the Community Facilities District. Subject to the assumptions contained in the Market Absorption Stud•1, the Market Absorption Consultant estimated that the proposed 512 single family homes will be fully absorbed by the end of 2010. See "THE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT - Market Absorption Study" and "APPENDIX D Market Absorption Study Summary and Conclusions' for further information on the Market Absorption Study.
3 Risk Factors Associated with Purchasing the Bonds. Investment in the Bonds involves risks that may not be appropriate for some investors. See "BOND OWNERS' RISKS" for a discussion of certain risk factors which should be considered, in addition to the other matters set forth in this Official Statement, in considering the investment quality of the Bonds.
Professionals Involved in the Offering. The following professionals are participating in this financing:
• The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A., Los Angeles, California, will serve as the trustee, paying agent, registrar, authentication and transfer agent for the Bonds and will perform the functions required of it under the Indenture, and as dissemination agent for the Community Facilities District under the Issuer Continuing Disclosure Certificate described below.
Stradling Yocca Carlson & Rauth, a Professional Corporation, Newport Beach, California is serving as Bond Counsel to the Community Facilities District.
Jones Hall, A Professional Law Corporation, San Francisco, California, is serving as Underwriter's counsel.
Fieldman, Rolapp & Associates, Irvine, California, is serving as financial advisor to the County.
Stephen G. White, MAI, of Fullerton, California, prepared the Appraisal.
Empire Economics, Inc., of Capistrano Beach, California, prepared the Market Absorption Study.
Albert A. Webb Associates, of Riverside, California, acted as special tax consultant to the Community Facilities District and will act as administrator to the Community Facilities District.
4 FINANCING PLAN
Estimated Sources and Uses of Funds
The proceeds from the sale of the Bonds will be deposited into the following funds established by thE· Community Facilities District under the Indenture:
SOURCES Principal Amount of Bonds $25,820,000.00 Less: Original !ssue Discount (288,778.65) Less: Underwriter's Discount (412,861.80) Total Sources $25. 118,359.55
USES Deposit into Ccsts of Issuance Account of the Improvement Fund [1] $569,739.90 Deposit into Reserve Account of the Special Tax Fund [2] 1,675, 146.26 Deposit into Project Account of the Improvement Fund [3] 22,809,232.00 Deposit into Capitalized Interest Subaccount [4] 44,241.39 Deposit into Administrative Expense Account [5] 20 000.00 Total Uses $25, 118,359.55
[1] Includes, among other things, the acceptance and initial annual fees and expenses of the Trustee, leg al fees and expenses, costs of printing the Bonds and the preliminary and final official stalements for the Bonds, fees of financial consultants and all other related fees and expenses. [2] Equal to the Reserve Requirement with respect to the Bonds as of their date of delivery [3] Wil be used to pay the costs of the Public Facilities, as defined below. See .,_ Facilities to be Financed with Proceeds of the Bonds" below. [4] Represents interest on the Bonds through September 1, 2005, to be deposited ,n the Capitalized Interest Subaccount of the Interest Account of the Special Tax Fund. [5] Represents an amount estimated to pay Administrative Expenses from the Closing Date through the first apportionment of Special Taxes in February 2006.
5 Facilities to be Financed with Proceeds of the Bonds
Under the Resolution of Intention and the Community Facilities District Report. the Community Facilities District is authorized to finance the following Public Facilities:
Street Facilities. "Street Facilities" consist of certain road and appurtenant drainage facilities required as a condition for the development of the property in the Community Facilities District, which will be owned by the County, and may include street improvements to Lake Pointe Drive. Village Meadow Drive, Sky Ridge Drive. and Lincoln Street.
Water and Sewer Facilities. "Water and Sewer Facilities" consist of certain water and sewer facilities required as a condition of development of the property in the Community Facilities District, which will be owned by Western Municipal Water District, and may include water improvements in Lake Point Drive, Ridge Cliff, Old Lake Drive. Village Meadow Drive, Sky Ridge Drive, and Lincoln Street, a booster pump station and two reservoirs. and sewer improvements in Lake Point Drive. Village Meadow Drive, Spring Canyon Place, Sky Ridge Drive and Lincoln Street.
Flood Control Facilities. "Flood Control Facilities" consist of certain flood control and storm water drainage facilities required as a condition for the development of the property in the Community Facilities District, which will be owned by Riverside County Flood Control, and may include storm drain improvements to Spring Canyon Place and Sky Ridge Court.
Estimated Facilities Costs. The Bonds are anticipated to provide the following amounts for the acquisition and construction of the Public Facilities:
Street Facilities $7,342,964 Water and Sewer Facilities 10,575.633 Flood Control Facilities 904,710 Related Grading 3,985.925 Total: $22,809,232
See"- Estimated Sources and Uses of Funds" above.
Funding and Acquisition Agreement
The Funding and Acquisition Agreement provides that the Street Facilities will be constructed by Lake Hills-Riverside, Lake Hills, LLC, and Brehm Communities (collectively, the "Constructing Owner"), and sets forth, among other matters, those conditions under which the Street Facilities and related grading are to be constructed if the Constructing Owner is to be eligible to receive reimbursement for the costs of designing, engineering, and constructing the Street Facilities from the proceeds of the Bonds, and the "Purchase Price" (as defined in the Funding and Acquisition Agreement) for those Street Facilities ultimately acquired by the County.
Under the Funding and Acquisition Agreement, the Purchase Price (or the installments thereof) for each Street Facility and related grading is to be paid solely from the amounts in the Improvement Fund established under the Indenture, and the Community Facilities District is not
6 obligated to pay the Purchase Price for any Street Facilities except from the amounts in the Improvement Fund.
If the amounts deposited in the Improvement Fund, and any investment earnings thereon, are not sufficient to pay the purchase price of a Public Facility, including a Street Facility, the Cons:ructing Owner will be paid only those amounts remaining in the Improvement Fund toward the Purchase Price of the Public Facility, including a Street Facility. No priority is ascribed in the Funding and Acquisition Agreement or the Indenture to the funding of a particular Public Facility or type of Public Facility. Once the amounts deposited to the Improvement Funj, and any investment earnings thereon, are expended, the completion of any unfunded Public Facility will be the sole obligation of the Constructing Owner.
Notwithstanding any other provision of the Funding and Acquisition Agreement, the fact that there may net be sufficient funds available in the Improvement Fund to pay the Purchase Price for one or rrore Public Facilities, including the Street Facilities, will not relieve the Property Owners or the Constructing Owner from any of their obligations pursuant to the conditions of approval for Tract Nos. 28815 and 28816 to construct the Public Facilities, including the Street Facilities.
This section contains only a brief summary of the Funding and Acquisition Agreement. Potential purchas,irs of the Bonds are encouraged to review the entire Funding and Acquisition Agreement, which is available from the Special District Administrator of the County Executive Office.
Water District JCFA
The Water District JCFA sets forth conditions and procedures for the payment of the Water and Sewer Facilities costs with a portion of the proceeds of the Bonds. The Water District JCFA provides that Lake Hills-Riverside, the Builder and the Project Manager will remain obligated to construct the Water and Sewer Facilities and will remain responsible for any Water and Sewer Facilitins costs not paid with the proceeds of the Bonds.
The Water District JCFA also sets forth procedures and requirements for the design, construction, and dedication to Western Municipal Water District of the Water and Sewer Facilities.
Flood Control Dii,trict JCFA
The Flood Control District JCFA sets forth conditions and procedures for the payment of the Flood Contro Facilities costs with a portion of the proceeds of the Bonds. The Flood Control District JCFA provides that Lake Hills-Riverside, the Builder and the Project Manager will remain obligat,d to construct the Flood Control Facilities and will remain responsible for any Flood Control Facilities costs not paid with the proceeds of the Bonds.
The Flood Control District JCFA also sets forth procedures and requirements for the design, constructiJn, and dedication to Riverside County Flood Control of the Flood Control. Facilities.
7 THE BONDS
General Bond Terms
Dated Date, Maturity and Authorized Denominations. The Bonds will be dated their date of delivery and will mature in the amounts and on the dates set forth on the inside cover page of this Official Statement. The Bonds will be issued in fully registered form in denominations of $5,000 each or any integral multiple of $5,000.
Interest. The Bonds will bear interest at the annual rates set forth on the inside cover page of this Official Statement, payable semiannually on each March 1 and September 1, commencing March 1, 2006 (each, an "Interest Payment Date"). Interest will be calculated on the basis of a 360-day year composed of twelve 30-day months.
Payments of Interest and Principal. The Bonds are payable both as to principal and interest, and as to any premiums upon the redemption thereof, in lawful money of the United States of America. The principal of the Bonds and any premiums due upon the redemption thereof are payable upon presentation and surrender thereof at the Principal Office of the Trustee, or at the designated office of any successor Trustee.
Interest on any Bond is payable from the Interest Payment Date next preceding the date of its authentication unless (i) such date of authentication is an Interest Payment Date, in which event interest will be payable from such date of authentication; (ii) the date of authentication is after a Record Date but prior to the immediately succeeding Interest Payment Date, in which event interest will be payable from the Interest Payment Date immediately succeeding the date of authentication; or (iii) the date of authentication is prior to the close of business on the first Record Date occurring after the issuance of such Bond, in which event interest will be payable from the dated date of such Bond.
However, if at the time of authentication of such Bond interest is in default, interest on that Bond will be payable from the last Interest Payment Date to which the interest has been paid or made available for payment or, if no interest has been paid or made available for payment on that Bond, interest on that Bond will be payable from its dated date.
Interest on any Bond will be paid to the person whose name appears in the Bond Register as the Owner of such Bond as of the close of business on the Record Date. Such interest will be paid by check of the Trustee mailed on the applicable Interest Payment Date by first class mail, postage prepaid, to such Bondowner at his or her address as it appears on the Bond Register. In addition, upon a request in writing received by the Trustee on or before the applicable Record Date from an Owner of $1,000,000 or more in principal amount of the Bonds, payment will be made on the Interest Payment Date by wire transfer in immediately available funds to an account designated in writing by such Owner on or before the applicable Record Date.
However, for so long as the Bonds are registered in the name of Cede & Co. (DTC's partnership nominee), all payments of interest, principal and premium will be made to Cede & Co.
OTC and Book-Entry Only System. DTC will act as securities depository for the Bonds. The Bonds will be issued as fully-registered securities registered initially in the name of
8 Cede & Co. (DTC's partnership nominee). See "APPENDIX F - OTC and the Book-Entry Only System."
Authority for Is ,uance
Commu,1ity Facilities District Proceedings. The Bonds will be issued under the Act and the lndentu1·e. In addition, as required by the Act, the Board (acting in its own capacity and as the Legislat ve Body) has taken the following actions with respect to establishing the Community Faci ities District and authorizing issuance of the Bonds:
fiesolutions of Intention: On September 14, 2004, the Board adopted Resolution No. 04-427 stating its intention to establish the Community Facilities District and to authorize the levy of a special tax therein. On the same day the Board adopted Resolution No. 04-428 declaring its intention to incur bonded indebtedness in an amount not to exceed $32,500,000 within the Community Facilities District.
Resolution of Formation: Immediately following a noticed public hearing on January 11, 2005, the Board adopted Resolution No. 2005-03 (the "Resolution of Formation"), which established the Community Facilities District and authorized the levy of a special tax within the Community Facilities District, and called a special election by the quali1ied electors of the Community Facilities District.
Resolution of Necessity: On January 11, 2005, the Legislative Body adopted Resolution No. CFO 2005-01 declaring the necessity to incur bonded indebtedness in an aggregate amount not to exceed $32,500,000 within the Community Facilities District and submitting that proposition to the qualified electors of the Community Facilities District.
Landowner Election and Declaration of Results: On January 11, 2005, a special landowner election was held within the Community Facilities District in which the qualified electors approved a ballot proposition authorizing the issuance of up to
$32,500, 1 )00 in bonds to finance the acquisition and construction of the Public Facilities and the levy of the Special Taxes within the Community Facilities District. On January 11, 2005, the Legislative Body adopted Resolution No. CFD 2005-02, under which the Legislative Body approved the canvass of the votes.
N:;tice of Special Tax Lien: A Notice of Special Tax Lien was recorded in the real property records of Riverside County on January 25, 2005.
Ordinance Levying Special Taxes: The Board held the first reading of Ordinance No. 834 evying the Special Tax within the Community Facilities District on January 11, 2005, and held the second reading of the ordinance on January 25, 2005.
R,solution Authorizing Issuance of the Bonds: On June 28, 2005, the Legislative Body adopted Resolution No. CFD 2005-06 approving issuance of the Bonds for the Commun ty Facilities District in an amount not to exceed $27,425,000.
County Goals and Policies. The County has adopted Policy Number B-12, entitled "Local Goals and Policies for Land Secured Financing Districts," as amended (the "Goals and Policies").
9 The Goals and Policies generally establish goals and policies for the County's use of community facilities districts and assessment districts, and set forth four categories of community facilities districts, including "Traditional Community Facilities Districts" such as the Community Facilities District. The Goals and Policies establish an order of priority for financing by Traditional Community Facilities Districts and certain credit quality requirements for bonds issued by Traditional Community Facilities Districts, namely a 4:1 property value to public debt ratio (public debt is defined as community facilities district bonds and other bonds secured by special taxes or special assessments). Property value may be based on an appraisal or on assessed values.
The Goals and Policies also require that the total tax burden (that is, the anticipated maximum annual Traditional Community Facilities District special tax, together with ad valorem property taxes, special assessments, special taxes for any overlapping community facilities district, and any other taxes, fees and charges payable from and secured by the property) on any residential owner-occupied parcel in a Traditional Community Facilities District may not exceed 2% of the estimated base sales price of such parcel upon completion of the public and private improvements relating thereto.
The County may, in its discretion and to the extent permitted by law, waive any of the policies set forth in the Goals and Policies in particular cases. Exceptions to these policies will be considered that are consistent with current public financing practices when structuring bond refundings and workouts, when considering unique bond structures (such as escrowed bond proceeds or variable rate bonds) or when additional credit enhancements (such as bond insurance or credit supports) are present.
The County has determined that the issuance of the Bonds conforms with the Goals and Policies.
10 Debt Service Schedule
The following table presents the annual debt service on the Bonds (including sinking fund redemptions), assuming there are no optional or extraordinary redemptions.
Year Ending Total September 1 Principal Interest 111 Debt Service 2006 $450,000 $1,269,387.65 $1,719,387.65 2007 460,000 1,211,871.26 1,671,871.26 2008 475,000 1, 198,071.26 1,673,071.26 2009 490,000 1,182,871.26 1,672,871.26 2010 505,000 1, 165,231.26 1,670,231.26 2011 525,000 1,146,041.26 1,671,041.26 2012 545,000 1,125,041.26 1,670,041.26 2013 565,000 1, 102,560.00 1,667,560.00 2014 590,000 1,078,830.00 1,668,830.00 2015 615,000 1,053,017.50 1,668,017.50 2016 640,000 1,025,957.50 1,665,957.50 2017 670,000 997,157.50 1,667,157.50 2018 695,000 966,170.00 1,661, 170.00 2019 730,000 933,505.00 1,663,505.00 2020 765,000 898,830.00 1,663,830.00 2021 800,000 862, 110.00 1,662, 110.00 2022 835,000 822,110.00 1,657, 110.00 2023 880,000 780,360.00 1,660,360.00 2024 920,000 736,360.00 1,656,360.00 2025 965,000 690,360.00 1,655,360.00 2026 1,015,000 642, 110.00 1,657,110.00 2027 1,065,000 591,360.00 1,656,360.00 2028 1,115,000 538, 110.00 1,653, 110.00 2029 1, 170,000 482,360.00 1,652,360.00 2030 1,225,000 423,860.00 1,648,860.00 2031 1,285,000 362,610.00 1,647,610.00 2032 1,350,000 297,075.00 1,647,075.00 2033 1,420,000 228,225.00 1,648,225.00 2034 1,490,000 155,805.00 1,645,805.00 2035 1 565 000 79 815.00 1644815.00 Total: $25,820,000 $24,047,172.71 $49,867, 172. 71
[1] --he interest that will accrue through September 1, 2005, will be capitalized with the proceeds of the Bonds.
11 Redemption
Optional Redemption. The Bonds maturing on or after September 1, 2011 may be redeemed, at the option of the Community Facilities District from any source of funds on any Interest Payment Date on or after September 1, 2010, in whole, or in part from such maturities as are selected by the Community Facilities District and by lot within a maturity, at the following redemption prices expressed as a percentage of the principal amount to be redeemed, together with accrued interest to the date of redemption:
Redemption Redemption Date Price September 1, 2010 and March 1, 2011 102% September 1 , 2011 and March 1 , 2012 101% September 1, 2012 and any Interest Payment Date thereafter 100%
Mandatory Sinking Payment Redemption. The Term Bonds maturing on September 1, 2025 will be called before maturity and redeemed, from the Sinking Fund Payments that have been deposited into the Redemption Account, on September 1, 2021, and on each September 1 thereafter prior to maturity, in accordance with the schedule of Sinking Fund Payments set forth below. The Term Bonds so called for redemption will be selected by the Trustee by lot and will be redeemed at a redemption price for each redeemed Term Bond equal to the principal amount thereof, plus accrued interest to the redemption date, without premium, as follows:
Sinking Fund Redemption Date Redemption (September 1) Amount 2021 $800,000 2022 835,000 2023 880,000 2024 920,000 2025 (maturity) 965,000
The Term Bonds maturing on September 1, 2030 will be called before maturity and redeemed, from the Sinking Fund Payments that have been deposited into the Redemption Account, on September 1, 2026, and on each September 1 thereafter prior to maturity, in accordance with the schedule of Sinking Fund Payments set forth below. The Term Bonds so called for redemption will be selected by the Trustee by lot and will be redeemed at a redemption price for each redeemed Term Bond equal to the principal amount thereof, plus accrued interest to the redemption date, without premium, as follows:
Sinking Fund Redemption Date Redemption (September 1) Amount 2026 $1,015,000 2027 1,065,000 2028 1,115,000 2029 1, 170,000 2030 (maturity) 1,225,000
12 The Term Bonds maturing on September 1, 2035 will be called before maturity and redeemed, from 1he Sinking Fund Payments that have been deposited into the Redemption Account, on Sep:ember 1, 2031, and on each September 1 thereafter prior to maturity, in accordance with the schedule of Sinking Fund Payments set forth below. The Term Bonds so called for redemption will be selected by the Trustee by lot and will be redeemed at a redemption price for each redeemed Term Bond equal to the principal amount thereof, plus accrued interest le, the redemption date, without premium, as follows:
Sinking Fund Redemption Date Redemption (September 1} Amount 2031 $1,285,000 2032 1,350,000 2033 1,420,000 2034 1,490,000 2035 (maturity) 1,565,000
In the event of a partial optional redemption or extraordinary mandatory redemption of the Term Bonds, each of the remaining Sinking Fund Payments for such Term Bonds will be reduced, as nearly as practicable, on a pro rata basis, in integral multiples of $5,000.
Extraordinary Redemption from Special Tax Prepayments. The Bonds are subject to extraordinary redemption as a whole, or in part on a pro rata basis among maturities, on any Interest Payment Date, and will be redeemed by the Trustee, from Prepayments deposited to the Redemption Account under the Indenture, plus amounts transferred from the Reserve Account under the Indenture, at the following redemption prices, expressed as a percentage of the principal amoL nt to be redeemed, together with accrued interest to the redemption date:
Redemption Redemption Date Price Any Interest Payment Date prior to September 1, 2010 103% September 1 , 2010 and March 1 , 2011 102% September 1, 2011 and March 1, 2012 101% September 1, 2012 and any Interest Payment Date thereafter 100%
Extraordinary Redemption from Project Account Transfer. The Term Bonds maturing on September 1, 2035, are subject to extraordinary redemption, as a whole or in part, on any Interest Payment Date, from amounts transferred from the Project Account of the Improvement Fund in accordance with the Indenture.
The Indenture provides in part that upon receipt of a Certificate of the Administrator of the Community Facilities District stating that all or a specified portion of the amount remaining in the Improvement =und is no longer needed to pay "Project Costs" (as defined in the Indenture), the Trustee will transfer all or such specified portion, as applicable, of the moneys remaining on deposit in the Improvement Fund (plus amounts, if any, in the Reserve Account in excess of the Reserve Requirement) to the Principal Account or Redemption Account of the Special Tax Fund or to the Surplus Fund, as directed in the Certificate. Amounts transferred to the Redemption Account of the Special Tax Fund will be used to redeem Term Bonds in accordance with the Indenture.
13 The Term Bonds so called for redemption will be selected by the Trustee by lot and will be redeemed at a redemption price for each redeemed Term Bond equal to the principal amount thereof, plus accrued interest to the redemption date, without premium.
Selection of Bonds for Redemption. If less than all of the Bonds Outstanding are to be redeemed, the portion of any Bond of a denomination of more than $5,000 to be redeemed will be in the principal amount of $5,000 or an integral multiple of $5,000.
In selecting portions of such Bonds for redemption, the Trustee will treat such Bonds as representing that number of Bonds of $5,000 denominations which is obtained by dividing the principal amount of such Bonds to be redeemed in part by $5,000.
Notice of Redemption. When Bonds are due for redemption as described above, the Trustee will give notice, in the name of the Community Facilities District, of the redemption of such Bonds.
On the date fixed for redemption, there will become due and payable on each Bond or portion thereof called for redemption, the principal thereof, together with any premium, and interest accrued to the redemption date, and from and after the redemption date, interest thereon will cease to accrue and be payable.
At least 30 days but no more than 45 days prior to the redemption date, the Trustee will mail a copy of such notice, by first class mail, postage prepaid, to the respective Owners thereof at their addresses appearing on the Bond Register, and to the original purchaser of the Bonds.
Any notice of optional redemption of Bonds may state that such redemption is conditional upon the receipt by the Trustee on or prior to the date fixed for such redemption of moneys sufficient to pay the principal of, premium, if any, and interest on such Bonds to be redeemed and that, if such moneys are not so received, said notice will be of no force and effect and the Trustee will not be required to redeem such Bonds. If a redemption notice contains such a condition and such moneys are not so received, the redemption will not be made, and the Trustee will within a reasonable time thereafter give notice, in the manner in which the notice of redemption was given, that such moneys were not so received.
The actual receipt by the Owner of any Bond or the original purchaser of any Bond of notice of such redemption will not be a condition precedent to redemption, and neither the failure to receive nor any defect in such notice will affect the validity of the proceedings for the redemption of such Bonds, or the cessation of interest on the redemption date. A certificate by the Trustee that notice of such redemption has been given as herein provided shall be conclusive as against all parties and the Owner shall not be entitled to show that he or she failed to receive notice of such redemption.
In addition to the foregoing notice, further notice will be given by the Trustee as set out below, but no defect in this further notice nor any failure to give all or any portion of this further notice will in any manner defeat the effectiveness of a call for redemption if notice thereof is given as described above.
Each further notice of redemption will be sent not later than the date that notice of redemption is mailed to the Bondowners as described above by registered or certified mail or overnight delivery service or by such other means acceptable to such agencies to OTC and to any other registered securities depositories then in the business of holding substantial amounts
14 of obligations of types comprising the Bonds as determined by the Trustee and to one or more of the national information services that the Trustee determines are in the business of disseminating nc,tice of redemption of obligations such as the Bonds.
However, for so long as the Bonds are registered in the name of Cede & Co. (DTC's partnership nominee), all redemption notices to Bondowners will be sent only to OTC or Cede & Co., and it is th,, responsibility of OTC or Cede & Co. to send those notices to the beneficial owners of the Bc,nds. See "- General Bond Terms - OTC and Book-Entry Only System" above.
Effect of Notice and Availability of Redemption Money. If notice of redemption is duly given as described above, and the amount necessary for the redemption has been made available for that purpose and is available therefor on the date fixed for such redemption, the following will ap~ly:
(c1) the Bonds or portions thereof designated for redemption will, on the date fixed for redemption, become due and payable at the redemption price thereof as provided in the lnderture, anything in the Indenture to the contrary notwithstanding;
(t,) upon presentation and surrender thereof at the office of the Trustee, the redemption price of such Bonds will be paid to the Owners thereof;
(c) as of the redemption date the Bonds or portions thereof so designated for redempti Jn will be deemed to be no longer Outstanding and such Bonds or portions thereof will cease to bear further interest; and
(c) as of the date fixed for redemption, no Owner of any of the Bonds or portions thereof i;o designated for redemption will be entitled to any of the benefits of the lndenturE,, or to any other rights, except with respect to payment of the redemption price and interns! accrued to the redemption date from the amounts so made available.
Issuance of Parity Bonds for Refunding Only
The Corr munity Facilities District may at any time after the issuance and delivery of the Bonds issue Parity Bonds payable from the Net Taxes and other amounts deposited in the Special Tax Fund (other than in the Administrative Expense Account therein) and secured by a lien and charge upon such amounts equal to the lien and charge securing the Outstanding Bonds (and ani1 other Parity Bonds theretofore issued under the Indenture or under any Supplemental Indenture), but only for the purpose of refunding all or a portion of the Bonds or any Parity Bonds then Outstanding. The Community Facilities District may not issue Parity Bonds for the pu1·poses of funding additional Project Costs.
Parity Bonds issued to effect a partial refunding may be issued subject to the additional specific conditions set forth in the Indenture. See "APPENDIX E - Summary of Bond Indenture."
15 SECURITY FOR THE BONDS
Pledge of Net Taxes
General. The payment of the principal of, and interest and any premium on, the Bonds will be secured by a pledge of the Net Taxes and other amounts in the Special Tax Fund ( exclusive of the Administrative Expense Account).
Amounts in the Costs of Issuance Fund and the Improvement Fund are not pledged to the repayment of the Bonds. The Public Facilities to be financed with the proceeds of the Bonds are not in any way pledged to pay the debt service on the Bonds.
Net Taxes. The Indenture defines "Net Taxes" as "Gross Taxes" (the amount of all Special Taxes received by the District, together with the proceeds collected from the sale of property under the foreclosure provisions of the Indenture for the delinquency of such Special Taxes remaining after the payment of all costs related to such foreclosure actions or any settlement thereof), minus amounts set aside to pay Administrative Expenses. See " Special Tax Fund Administrative Expense Account" below.
The Indenture defines "Special Taxes" as the taxes authorized to be levied by the Community Facilities District on property within the Community Facilities District in accordance with the Ordinance, the Resolution of Formation, the Act and the voter approval obtained at the January 11, 2005 election in the Community Facilities District, including any scheduled payments and any Prepayments thereof, the net proceeds of the redemption or sale of property sold as a result of foreclosure of the lien of the Special Taxes to the amount of that lien, and penalties and interest thereon.
Limited Obligation. Neither the faith and credit nor the taxing power of the County, the State of California, or any political subdivision thereof other than the Community Facilities District is pledged to the payment of the Bonds. Except for the Special Taxes, no other taxes are pledged to the payment of the Bonds.
The Bonds are not general or special obligations of the County nor general obligations of the Community Facilities District, but are limited obligations of the Community Facilities District payable solely from certain amounts deposited by the Community Facilities District in the Special Tax Fund (exclusive of the Administrative Expense Account). The Community Facilities District's limited obligation to pay the principal of, premium, if any, and interest on the Bonds from amounts in the Special Tax Fund (exclusive of the Administrative Expense Account) is absolute and unconditional, free of deductions and without any abatement, offset, recoupment, diminution or set-off whatsoever.
No Owner of the Bonds may compel the exercise of the taxing power by the Community Facilities District (except as pertains to the Special Taxes) or the County or the forfeiture of any of their property.
The principal of and interest on the Bonds and premiums upon the redemption thereof, if any, are not a debt of the County, the State of California or any of its political subdivisions within the meaning of any constitutional or statutory limitation or restriction. The Bonds are not a legal or equitable pledge, charge, lien, or encumbrance upon any of the Community Facilities District's property, or upon any of its income, receipts or revenues, except the Net Taxes and
16 other amounts in the Special Tax Fund (exclusive of the Administrative Expense Account) that are, under the terms of the Indenture and the Act, set aside for the payment of the Bonds and interest thereon, and neither the members of the Legislative Body or the Board, nor any persons executing the Bonds, are liable personally on the Bonds by reason of their issuance.
Special Taxes
Levy of Special Taxes to Meet Special Tax Requirement. The Legislative Body will covenant in the I 1denture to levy the Special Tax in an amount sufficient, together with other amounts on deposit in the Special Tax Fund, to pay the following amounts (together, the "Special Tax Requirement"):
(1) the principal of and interest on the Bonds when due,
(2) the Administrative Expenses, and
(3) any amounts required to replenish the Reserve Account of the Special Tax Fund to th,3 Reserve Requirement.
The Community Facilities District will further covenant that it will take no actions that would discontinu3 or cause the discontinuance of the Special Tax levy or the Community Facilities District's authority to levy the Special Tax until the earlier of Fiscal Year 2035-36 or the date on which no 13onds are Outstanding.
Manner of Collection. Under the Act, the Special Taxes are payable and will be collected in the same manner and at the same time and in the same installment as the general taxes on real proJerty, and will have the same priority, become delinquent at the same times and in the same proportionate amounts and bear the same proportionate penalties and interest after delinquency as do the general taxes on real property.
Because the Special Tax levy is limited to the maximum Special Tax rates set forth in the Rate and Method, no assurance can be given that, in the event of Special Tax delinquencies, tho receipts of Special Taxes will, in fact, be collected in sufficient amounts in any given year to ,Jay debt se,vice on the Bonds.
Rate and Method
General. The Special Tax is levied and collected according to the Rate and Method, which provides the means by which the Board may annually levy the Special Taxes within the Community Facilities District, up to the Maximum Special Tax, and to determine the amount of the Special Tax that will need to be collected each Fiscal Year from the "Taxable Property" within the Commu1ity Facilities District.
The following is a synopsis of the provisions of the Rate and Method, which should be read in conjunctic n with the complete text of the Rate and Method, including its attachments, which is attached as "APPENDIX B." The meaning of the capitalized terms used but not defined in this section are as set forth in APPENDIX B. This section provides only a summary of the Rate and Method, and is qualified by more complete and detailed information contained in the entire Rate and M,;thod attached as APPENDIX B.
17 Special Tax Requirement. The Rate and Method defines the "Special Tax Requirement" as that amount required in any Fiscal Year to pay the following:
(i) annual debt service on all Outstanding Bonds due in the calendar year which commences in such Fiscal Year;
(ii) periodic costs on the Bonds, including but not limited to, credit enhancement and rebate payments on the Bonds;
(iii) Administrative Expenses (as defined in the Rate and Method);
(iv) an amount equal to any anticipated shortfall due to Special Tax delinquencies in the prior Fiscal Year; and
(v) any amount required to establish or replenish any reserve funds for the Bonds, less a credit for funds available to reduce the annual Special Tax levy as determined by the Administrator.
Assignment to Land Use Category. Each Fiscal Year, commencing with the 2005-06 Fiscal Year, all Parcels of Taxable Property within the Community Facilities District will be classified as Developed Property, Approved Property, Undeveloped Property, Public Property, or Property Owner's Association Property, as described below.
"Developed Property" means all Parcels of Taxable Property: (i) that are included in a Final Map that was recorded prior to the January 1st preceding the Fiscal Year in which the Special Tax is being levied, and (ii) that have been issued a building permit prior to the April 1st preceding the Fiscal Year in which the Special Tax is being levied.
"Approved Property'' means all Parcels of Taxable Property: (i) that are included in a Final Map that was recorded prior to the January 1st preceding the Fiscal Year in which the Special Tax is being levied, and (ii) that have not been issued a building permit prior to the April 1st preceding the Fiscal Year in which the Special Tax is being levied.
"Undeveloped Property'' means all Taxable Property not classified as Developed Property, Approved Property, Public Property or Property Owner's Association Property that is not Exempt Property.
"Public Property'' means, for any Fiscal Year, any Parcel within the boundary of the Community Facilities District which, as of the January 1 preceding the Fiscal Year for which the Special Tax is being levied, is owned by, dedicated to, or irrevocably offered for dedication to the federal government, the State of California, the County, or any other public agency, provided, however, that any Parcel leased by a public agency to a private entity and subject to taxation under Section 53340.1 of the Act will be taxed and classified according to its use.
"Property Owner's Association Property'' means any Parcel which, as of the January 1 preceding the Fiscal Year for which the Special Tax is being levied, is owned by a property owner association, including any master or sub-association.
18 ";raxable Property'' means all Parcels in the Community Facilities District which are not e "Exempt Property'' is defined as up to 628.30 Acres of Public Property and Property Owner's Association Property. Exempt Property status will be assigned by the Administrator in the chronological order in which property becomes Public Property and Property Owner's Association Property. After the limit of 628.30 Acres has been reached, the Maximum Special Tax obligation for any additional Public Property or Property Owner's Association Property will be subject to the levy of the Special Tax as provided for in the Rate and Method, to the extent permitted under the Act and applicabl ~ laws. However, if 10.11 acres are dedicated for the purpose of a school site, these 10.11 Acres will be exempt in addition to the 628.30 Acres. Maximum Special Tax Rate. The Maximum Special Tax rate is defined in the Rate and Method as follows: 09veloped Property. Commencing Fiscal Year 2005-06, and each Fiscal Year thereafte·, the Maximum Special Tax for each Parcel of Residential Property classified as Devel,)ped Property will be the greater of (i) the applicable Assigned Special Tax set or (ii) the Backup Special Tax. Commencing Fiscal Year 2005-06, and each Fiscal Year thereafter, the Maximum Special Tax for each Parcel of Non-Residential Property classified as Developed Property will be the Assigned Special Tax. • Assigned Annual Special Tax. The Assigned Special Tax for each Parcel of Developed Property is determined by reference to Table 1 in the Rate and Method, which is as follows: Assigned Special Taxable Tax Per Land Use Category Unit Taxable Unit 1-~esidential Property (4,201 or more Sq.Ft.) D/U $5, 170 2-~esidential Property (4,001 to 4,200 Sq.Ft.) D/U $4,615 3-~esidential Property (3,601 to 4,000 Sq.Ft.) D/U $4.470 4-~esidential Property (3,401 to 3,600 Sq.Ft.) D/U $4,065 5-~esidential Property (3,201 to 3,400 Sq.Ft.) D/U $3,965 6-~esidential Property (3,001 to 3,200 Sq.Ft.) D/U $3,740 7-,esidential Property (2,801 to 3,000 Sq.Ft.) D/U $3,515 8-,esidential Property (2,501 to 2,800 Sq.Ft.) D/U $3,415 9- ,esidential Property (2,500 or less Sq Ft.) D/U $3,170 1C - Non-Residential Property Acre $14,445 Backup Special Tax. The Backup Special Tax for each Parcel of Residential Property created by a specific Final Map will be determined by multiplying $14,445 by the total Acreage of Taxable Property within the Final Map, excluding the Acreage associated with lots or Parcels that are or are expected to be classified as Non-Residential Property, Public Property and Property Owner's Association Property under the current land use entitlements in such Final Map, and dividing such amount by the total number of lots classified or expected to be classified as Residential Property within the specific Final Map. 19 If a single Final Map is recorded for Tract No. 28815 and a single Final Map is recorded for Tract No. 28816 at the same time, both Final Maps will be treated as a single Final Map for purposes of determining the Backup Special Tax. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the number of Parcels of Residential Property in a specific Final Map is subsequently changed or modified by recordation of a lot line adjustment or similar instrument, then the Backup Special Tax will be recalculated for the area that has been changed or modified using the methodology described in the preceding paragraph. Approved Property. The Maximum Special Tax for each Parcel of Approved Property expected to be classified as Residential Property under the current land use entitlements will be the Backup Special Tax computed as set forth above. The Maximum Special Tax for each Parcel of Approved Property expected to be classified as Non-Residential Property under the current land use entitlements will be $14,445 per Acre. Public Property and/or Property Owner's Association Property that is not Exempt Property. The Maximum Special Tax for each Parcel of Public Property or Property Owner's Association Property that is not Exempt Property will be the amount determined by multiplying the Acreage of the Parcel by $14,445 per Acre. Undeveloped Property. The Maximum Special Tax for each Parcel of Undeveloped Property will be the amount determined by multiplying the Acreage of the Parcel by $14,445 per Acre. Method of Apportionment. Under the Rate and Method, commencing with Fiscal Year 2005-06 and for each following Fiscal Year, the Legislative Body will determine the Special Tax Requirement and will levy the Special Tax until the amount of Special Taxes equals the Special Tax Requirement. The Special Tax will be levied each Fiscal Year as follows: First. The Special Tax will be levied Proportionately on each Parcel of Developed Property at up to 100% of the applicable Assigned Special Tax to satisfy the Special Tax Requirement. Second. If additional monies are needed to satisfy the Special Tax Requirement after the first step has been completed, the Special Tax will be levied Proportionately on each Parcel of Approved Property at up to 100% of the Maximum Special Tax for Approved Property. Third. If additional monies are needed to satisfy the Special Tax Requirement after the first two steps have been completed, the Special Tax will be levied Proportionately on each Parcel of Undeveloped Property at up to 100% of the Maximum Special Tax for Undeveloped Property. Fourth. If additional moneys are needed to satisfy the Special Tax Requirement after the first three steps have been completed, the Special Tax to be levied on each Parcel of Developed Property whose Maximum Special Tax is derived by the application 20 of the Backup Special Tax will be increased in equal percentages from the Assigned Special Tax up to the Maximum Special Tax for each such Parcel, as needed. Fifth If additional monies are needed to satisfy the Special Tax Requirement after the first four steps have been completed, the Special Tax will be levied Proportionalely on each Parcel of Public Property and/or Property Owner's Association Property that is not Exempt Property at up to 100% of the Maximum Special Tax. Notwithstanding the above, under no circumstances will the Special Taxes levied against any Parcel of Residential Property be increased by more than 10% per Fiscal Year as a consequence of de inquency or default by the owner of any other Parcel within the Community Facilities District. Appeals. Any owner of a Parcel claiming that the amount or application of the Special Tax levied on the "arcel is not correct and requesting a refund may file a written notice of appeal with the Administrator after the Special Tax in dispute has been paid but, not later than 12 months after th,i mailing of the property tax bill on which the Special Tax appears. The Administrator will pmmptly review the appeal, and if necessary, meet with the property owner, consider written and oral evidence regarding the amount of the Special Tax, convene the CFD special tax review board and decide the appeal. This procedure will be exclusive and its exhaustion by any property owner will be a condition precedent to any legal action by such owner. Full Prepayment of Annual Special Taxes. The Maximum Special Tax obligation may only be prepaid an :J permanently satisfied for a Parcel of Public Property, Property Owner's Association Proper:y, Developed Property, Approved Property or Undeveloped Property for which a building pe·mit has been issued, provided that the terms set forth under the Rate and Method are satisfied, including (among others) the following conditions: A prepayment may be made only if there are no delinquent Special Taxes with respect :o such Parcel at the time of prepayment. No Special Tax prepayment will be allowed unless the amount of Maximum Special Taxes that may be levied on all Parcels of Taxable Property after the proposed prnpayment will be at least 1.1 times maximum annual debt service on the Bonds that will remain outstanding after the prepayment plus estimated annual Administrative Expenses. The Prepayment Amount is generally calculated as the amount of outstanding Bonds to be redeemed with the Special Tax prepayment, plus the applicable Bond redemption premium, interest, and admini:;trative fees and expenses, and less a reserve fund credit, all as set forth in further detail in APPENDIX B. Partial Prepayment of Annual Special Taxes. The Maximum Special Tax obligation on a Parcel of Developed Property may be partially prepaid in increments of $5,000. The partial prepayment amount is generally calculated as the full Prepayment Amount multiplied by the percent by which the owner of the Parcels is partially prepaying the Maximum Special Tax obligation, all as set forth in further detail in APPENDIX B. 21 Duration of Special Tax Levy. Special Taxes will be levied for the period necessary to satisfy the Special Tax Requirement, but in no event may it be levied after Fiscal Year 2035-36 or the stated maturity of the Bonds, whichever is sooner. Covenant to Foreclose Sale of Property for Nonpayment of Taxes. The Indenture provides that the Special Tax is to be collected in the same manner as ordinary ad valorem property taxes are collected and, except as provided in the special covenant for foreclosure described below and in the Act, is to be subject to the same penalties and the same procedure, sale and lien priority in case of delinquency as is provided for ad valorem property taxes. Under these procedures, if taxes are unpaid for a period of five years or more, the property is subject to sale by the County. Foreclosure Under the Mello-Roos Law. Under Section 53356.1 of the Act, if any delinquency occurs in the payment of the Special Tax, the Community Facilities District may order the institution of a Superior Court action to foreclose the lien therefor within specified time limits. In such an action, the real property subject to the unpaid amount may be sold at judicial foreclosure sale. Such judicial foreclosure action is not mandatory. However, the Community Facilities District will covenant in the Indenture that, under Section 53356.1 of the Act: • it will commence appropriate judicial foreclosure proceedings against parcels with total Special Tax delinquencies in excess of $5,500 (not including interest and penalties thereon) by the October 1 following the close of each Fiscal Year in which the last of such Special Taxes were due, and it will commence appropriate judicial foreclosure proceedings against all parcels with delinquent Special Taxes by the October 1 following the close of each Fiscal Year in which it receives Special Taxes in an amount which is less than 95% of the total Special Taxes levied in such Fiscal Year, and it will diligently pursue to completion such foreclosure proceedings. However, notwithstanding the foregoing, the Community Facilities District may elect to accept payment from a property owner of at least the enrolled amount but less than the full amount of the penalties, interest, costs and attorneys' fees related to a Special Tax delinquency, if permitted by law. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in certain instances the amount of a Special Tax delinquency on a particular parcel is so small that the cost of appropriate foreclosure proceedings will far exceed the Special Tax delinquency and in such cases foreclosure proceedings may be delayed by the Community Facilities District until there are sufficient Special Tax delinquencies accruing to such parcel (including interest and penalties thereon) to warrant the foreclosure proceedings cost. The Community Facilities District covenants that it will deposit the net proceeds of any foreclosure in the Special Tax Fund and will apply such proceeds remaining after the payment of Administrative Expenses to make current payments of principal and interest on the Bonds, to bring the amount on deposit in the Reserve Account up to the Reserve Requirement, and to pay any delinquent installments of principal or interest due on the Bonds. 22 Sufficiencir of Foreclosure Sale Proceeds; Foreclosure Limitations and Delays. No assurances can be given that the real property subject to a judicial foreclosure sale will be sold or, if sold, that the proceeds of sale will be sufficient to pay any delinquent Special Tax installment. The rv ello-Roos Law does not require the Community Facilities District to purchase or otherwise acquire any lot or parcel of property foreclosed upon if there is no other purchaser at such sale. Section 53356.6 of the Mello-Roos Law requires that property sold pursuant to foreclosure under lhe Mello-Roos Law be sold for not less than the amount of judgment in the foreclosure action, plus post-judgment interest and authorized costs, unless the consent of the owners of 75% of the outstanding Bonds is obtained. However, under Section 53356.6 of the Mello-Roos Law, tt1e Community Facilities District, as judgment creditor, is entitled to purchase any property sold at foreclosure using a "credit bid," where the Community Facilities District could submit a bid crediting all or part of the amount required to satisfy the judgment for the delinquent amount of the Special Tax. If the Community Facilities District becomes the purchaser under a credit bid, the Community Facilities District must pay the amount of its credit bid into the redemption fund established for the Bonds, but this payment may be made up to 24 months after the date of the foreclosure sale. Foreclosure by court action is subject to normal litigation delays, the nature and extent of which are largely d ~pendent on the nature of the defense, if any, put forth by the debtor and the Superior Court calE,ndar. In addition, the ability of the Community Facilities District to foreclose the lien of delinquent unpaid Special Taxes may be limited in certain instances and may require prior consent of thE, property owner if the property is owned by or in receivership of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the "FDIC"). See "BOND OWNERS' RISKS - Bankruptcy and Foreclosure Delays." No Teeter Plan. Because the Community Facilities District does not participate in the "Teeter Plan" (which is the County's Alternative Method of Distribution of Tax Levies and Collections and of Tax Sale Proceeds, as provided for in Section 4701 et seq. of the California Revenue and Taxation Code), collections of Special Taxes will reflect actual delinquencies. Special Tax Fund Deposits. Under the Indenture, the Trustee will, on each date on which the Special Taxes are received from the Community Facilities District, deposit the Special Taxes in the Special Tax Fund to be held in trust for the Owners (except for Special Tax prepayments, which will be deposited to the Redemption Account as specified in a Certificate of the Administrator of the District). Disbursements. The Trustee will transfer the Special Taxes on deposit in the Special Tax Fund on the daes and in the amounts described below, in the following order of priority, to: (1) tre Administrative Expense Account of the Special Tax Fund; (2) tr e Interest Account of the Special Tax Fund; (3) tr e Principal Account of the Special Tax Fund; (4) Ire Redemption Account of the Special Tax Fund; 23 (5) the Reserve Account of the Special Tax Fund; (6) the Rebate Fund; and (7) the Surplus Fund. At maturity of all of the Bonds, and after all principal and interest then due on the Bonds then Outstanding has been paid or provided for and any amounts owed to the Trustee have been paid in full, moneys in the Special Tax Fund and any accounts therein may be used by the Community Facilities District for any lawful purpose. Administrative Expense Account. The Trustee will transfer from the Special Tax Fund and deposit in the Administrative Expense Account of the Special Tax Fund from time to time amounts necessary to make timely payment of Administrative Expenses as set forth in a Certificate of the Administrator of the Community Facilities District. Except as set forth in the following sentence, the total amount transferred in a Bond Year may not exceed the "Administrative Expenses Cap" until such time as there has been deposited to the Interest Account and the Principal Account an amount, together with any amounts already on deposit therein, that is sufficient to pay the interest and principal on all Bonds due in such Bond Year and to restore the Reserve Account to the Reserve Requirement. However, amounts in excess of the Administrative Expenses Cap may be transferred to the Administrative Expense Account to the extent necessary to collect delinquent Special Taxes. The term "Administrative Expenses Cap" is defined in the Indenture as $40,000 per Bond Year, which will increase on July 1 of each year, commencing July 1, 2006, by 2% of the amount in effect for the prior Fiscal Year. Interest Account and Principal Account. The principal of and interest due on the Bonds until maturity, other than principal due upon redemption, will be paid by the Trustee from the Principal Account and the Interest Account of the Special Tax Fund, respectively. For the purpose of assuring that the payment of principal of and interest on the Bonds will be made when due, after making the transfer to the Administrative Expense Account required by the Indenture, at least one Business Day prior to each March 1 and September 1, the Trustee will make the following transfers from the Special Tax Fund first to the Interest Account and then to the Principal Account; provided, however, that to the extent that deposits have been made in the Interest Account or the Principal Account from the proceeds of the sale of the Bonds, or otherwise, the transfer from the Special Tax Fund need not be made; and provided, further, that, if amounts in the Special Tax Fund (exclusive of the Reserve Account) are inadequate to make the foregoing transfers, then any deficiency will be made up by transfers from the Reserve Account: (a) To the Interest Account, an amount such that the balance in the Interest Account one Business Day prior to each Interest Payment Date is equal to the installment of interest due on the Bonds on that Interest Payment Date and any installment of interest due on a previous Interest Payment Date which remains unpaid. Moneys in the Interest Account will be used for the payment of interest on the Bonds as it becomes due. 24 (b) To the Principal Account, an amount such that the balance in the Principal Account one Business Day prior to September 1 of each year equals the principal payment du,, on the Bonds maturing on that September 1 and any principal payment due on a previous September 1 which remains unpaid. Moneys in the Principal Account will be usecl for the payment of the principal of such Bonds as it becomes due at maturity. Redemption AccOL,nt of the Special Tax Fund Sinking Fu11d Payments. With respect to each September 1 on which a Sinking Fund Payment is due, after the deposits have been made to the Administrative Expense Account, the Interest Account and the Principal Account of the Special Tax Fund as required by the Indenture, the Truslee will next transfer into the Redemption Account of the Special Tax Fund from the Special Ta, Fund the amount needed to make the balance in the Redemption Account one Business Day prior to each September 1 equal to the Sinking Fund Payment due on any Outstanding Bonds on such September 1; provided, however, that, if amounts in the Special Tax Fund are inadEquate to make these transfers, then any deficiency will be made up by an immediate transfer from the Reserve Account, if funded, pursuant to the Indenture. Moneys so deposited in the Redemption Account will be used and applied by the Trustee to call and redeem Term Bonds in accordance with the Sinking Fund Payment schedules set forth in the Indenture. Optional RE,demption. After making the deposits to the Administrative Expense Account, the lntere ,t Account and the Principal Account of the Special Tax Fund under the Indenture, and to the Redemption Account for Sinking Fund Payments then due as described above, and in accordance with the Community Facilities District's election to call Bonds for optional redemption under the Indenture, the Trustee will transfer from the Special Tax Fund and deposit in the F:edemption Account moneys available for the purpose and sufficient to pay the principal and the premiums, if any, payable on the Bonds called for optional redemption. However, ar1ounts in the Special Tax Fund (other than the Administrative Expense Account therein) may be applied to optionally redeem Bonds only if immediately following such redemption the amount in the Reserve Account will equal the Reserve Requirement. Special Tax Prepayments. Prepayments of Special Taxes deposited to the Redemption Accoun: will be applied on the redemption date established under the Indenture for the use of such Special Tax Prepayments, together with money transferred from the Reserve Account under the 11denture, to the payment of the principal of, premium, and interest on the Bonds to be redeemed with such Special Tax Prepayments. Purchase in Lieu of Redemption. Moneys set aside in the Redemption Account will be used solely for the purpose of redeeming Bonds, and will be applied on or after the redemption date to the paymenl of principal of and premium, if any, on the Bonds to be redeemed upon presentation and surrender of such Bonds and, in the case of an optional redemption or an extraordinary redemption from Special Tax Prepayments, to pay the interest thereon. However, in 1,eu or partially in lieu of such call and redemption, moneys deposited in the Redemption Account may be used to purchase Outstanding Bonds in the manner described below. 25 Purchases of Outstanding Bonds may be made by the Community Facilities District at public or private sale as and when and at such prices as the Community Facilities District may in its discretion determine but only at prices (including brokerage or other expenses) not more than par plus accrued interest, plus, in the case of moneys set aside for an optional redemption or an extraordinary redemption, the premium applicable at the next following call date according to the premium schedule established under the Indenture. Any accrued interest payable upon the purchase of Bonds may be paid from the amount reserved in the Interest Account of the Special Tax Fund for the payment of interest on the next following Interest Payment Date. Reserve Account of the Special Tax Fund Establishment. In order to further secure the payment of principal of and interest on the Bonds, certain proceeds of the Bonds will be deposited into the Reserve Account in an amount equal to the Reserve Requirement (see "FINANCING PLAN - Estimated Sources and Uses of Funds"). "Reserve Requirement" is defined in the Indenture to mean, as of any date of calculation, an amount equal to the least of the following: (i) $1,675, 146.26, (ii) 10% of the initial principal amount of the Bonds and Parity Bonds (as defined in the Indenture), if any, (iii) Maximum Annual Debt Service on the then Outstanding Bonds and Parity Bonds, if any, or (iv) 125% of average Annual Debt Service on the then Outstanding Bonds and Parity Bonds, if any. Disbursements. Moneys in the Reserve Account will be used solely for the purpose of paying the principal of, including Sinking Fund Payments, and interest on the Bonds when due if the moneys in the Interest Account and the Principal Account of the Special Tax Fund are insufficient for those purposes. or moneys in the Redemption Account of the Special Tax Fund are insufficient to make a Sinking Fund Payment when due, and for the purpose of making any required transfer to the Rebate Fund under the Indenture. See "APPENDIX E - Summary of Bond Indenture" for a description of the timing, purpose and manner of disbursements from the Reserve Account of the Special Tax Fund. Earnings Fund All earnings on all Funds and Accounts established and maintained under the Indenture (except earnings on the Administrative Expense Account of the Special Tax Fund, the Project Account of the Improvement Fund, and the Rebate Fund, which will remain therein) are to be placed in the Earnings Fund. Upon receipt of such earnings, the Trustee will disburse from the Earnings Fund earnings pursuant to a written direction of the Community Facilities District in the following order of priority: (1) Earnings in excess of the Yield on the Bonds will be transferred to the Rebate Fund pursuant to a written direction of the Administrator of the Community Facilities District. Any amount remaining in the Earnings Fund after the deposit to the Rebate Fund has been satisfied will be applied by the Trustee in the priorities described below. 26 (2) To the Administrative Expense Account, the amount needed to pay the Administrative Expenses. (3) To the Reserve Account, the amount required to bring the balance in such Account to I he Reserve Requirement required to be on deposit therein. (4) A.ny remaining balance will be transferred to the Project Account of the Improvement Fund until completion of the Project. (5) Any remaining balance will be transferred to the Special Tax Fund after completion )f the Project. 27 THE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT General Description and Location. The Community Facilities District is located in the northwestern portion of the County, in an unincorporated area approximately one mile south of the 91 Freeway and approximately three miles east of the 1-15 Freeway. The property is generally surrounded by City of Corona to the west, an unincorporated community of Home Gardens to the northwest, the City of Riverside to the north, unincorporated Riverside County area to the south and east, and Lake Mathews just over a mile to the southeast. The Community Facilities District is situated along Lakepointe Drive and Skyridge Drive, and extends for nearly two miles between Indiana Avenue (nearby to the northwest) and La Sierra Avenue (nearby to the southeast). All of the taxable property in the Community Facilities District is being developed for residential use as single-family detached homes. See "APPENDIX A - General Information About Riverside County" for certain demographic information on the County. The boundary map of the Community Facilities District is attached as APPENDIX J. Estimated Maximum Special Tax Proceeds and Debt Service Coverage The Rate and Method is structured to produce Special Tax revenues from the Assigned Special Tax and the Maximum Special Tax which, when applied to the projected debt service on the Bonds plus the annual Administrative Expense Cap amount, is anticipated to result in a debt service coverage ratio of 110% for the life of the Bonds. The projected debt service coverage ratio for each Bond Year is set forth in the table below. 28 Table 1 Projected Debt Service Coverage Bond Projected Less Total Available Projected Projected Year Ending Sp€icial Tax Administrative Special Tax Annual Debt Debt Service Revenues 111 Revenues Service [31 Coverage Ratio 2006 $2,)27,160 $(40,000) $1,987,160 $1,675, 146 1.186 2007 2,)27,160 (40,800) 1,986,360 1,671,871 1. 188 2008 2,)27,160 (41,616) 1,985,544 1,673,071 1. 187 2009 2,)27,160 (42,448) 1,984,712 1,672,871 1.186 2010 2, )27. 160 (43,297) 1,983,863 1,670,231 1.188 2011 2, )27. 160 (44, 163) 1,982,997 1,671,041 1. 187 2012 2,)27.160 (45,046) 1.982. 114 1,670,041 1. 187 2013 2,)27,160 (45,947) 1.981.213 1,667,560 1.188 2014 2,)27,160 (46,866) 1,980,294 1,668,830 1.187 2015 2, )27, 160 (47,804) 1,979,356 1,668,018 1. 187 2016 2,,)27, 160 (48,760) 1,978,400 1,665,958 1. 188 2017 2,')27, 160 (49.735) 1,977,425 1,667, 158 1.186 2018 2,,)27, 160 (50,730) 1,976,430 1,661,170 1 190 2019 2,1)27, 160 (51,744) 1,975,416 1,663,505 1. 188 2020 2,1)27,160 (52,779) 1,974,381 1,663,830 1. 187 2021 2,1)27,160 (53,835) 1,973,325 1,662, 110 1187 2022 2,1)27,160 (54,911) 1,972,249 1,657,110 1.190 2023 2,1)27, 160 (56,010) 1,971,150 1,660,360 1. 187 2024 2,ll27, 160 (57,130) 1,970,030 1,656,360 1. 189 2025 2,027,160 (58.272) 1,968,888 1,655,360 1. 189 2026 2,027, 160 (59,438) 1,967,722 1,657, 110 1. 187 2027 2,027,160 (60,627) 1,966,533 1,656,360 1.187 2028 2,027,160 (61,839) 1,965,321 1,653,110 1 189 2029 2,ll27, 160 (63,076) 1,964,084 1,652,360 1. 189 2030 2,027, 160 (64,337) 1,962,823 1,648,860 1.190 2031 2,027, 160 (65,624) 1,961,536 1,647,610 1. 191 2032 2,027,160 (66,937) 1,960,223 1,647,075 1.190 2033 2,027, 160 (68,275) 1,958,885 1,648,225 1. 188 2034 2,027, 160 (69,641) 1,957,519 1,645.805 1.189 2035 2,027, 160 (71,034) 1,956, 126 1,644,815 1. 189 [1] Assumes that all Special Tax revenues will be generated from the application of the Assigned Special Tax Rate to Developed Property under the Rate and Method for the life of the Bonds. [2] Administrative Expenses are projected to escalate at 2o/o per year starting with Bond Year ending September , , 2007. [3] Excludes dE bt service to be paid from capitalized interest. See "FINANCING PLAN - Estimated Sources anc Uses of Funds." Source: Albert A. WE bb Associates. However, the debt service coverage ratio for the Bonds could fall below 110% under certain circumstanc,,s if the Community Facilities District exercises its right under the Indenture to cause the Trustee to transfer amounts in excess of the Administrative Expenses Cap to the Administrative Expense Account of the Special Tax Fund (but only to the extent necessary to collect delinquent Special Taxes) prior to the transfer of amounts necessary to pay debt service on the Bonds. See "SECURITY FOR THE BONDS - Special Tax Fund,'' 29 Market Absorption Study General. The Market Absorption Study was prepared by Empire Economics, Inc., to provide an estimate of the probable schedules for the forthcoming single-family residential developments proposed for the property in the Community Facilities District. Subject to its assumptions and limiting conditions, the Market Absorption Study concluded that the property in the Community Facilities District is expected to be absorbed at the rates shown below: Number of AbsorQlion Housing Neighborhood Site Designation Units [1] 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Rock Ridge Project Area #1 114 20 35 35 24 0 Stone View Project Area #2 104 30 30 30 14 0 Orchard Heights Project Area #3 98 25 30 30 13 0 High Point Project Area #4 93 15 25 25 28 0 Silver Sage Project Area #5 103 20 -29. -29. 20 23 Totals: Totals: 512 110 140 140 99 23 [1] Unit counts for the Rock Ridge and Stone View neighborhoods changed after the date of the Market Absorption Study, and are currently 110 units in Rock Ridge and 108 units in Stone View. See "PROPERTY OWNERSHIP AND PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT" below. Source: Empire Economics, Inc. The County and the Community Facilities District make no representation as to the accuracy or completeness of the Market Absorption Study. The Summary and Conclusions from the Market Absorption Study are attached as APPENDIX D. Appraised Property Value The Appraisal. The Appraisal was prepared by Stephen G. White, MAI of Fullerton, California (the "Appraiser") to ascertain the market value of the fee simple estate of the 512 proposed single family detached homes and lots in the Community Facilities District as of a May 1, 2005 date of value. The Appraisal was intended to comply with the reporting requirements set forth under Standard Rule 2-2(b) of the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice for a Summary Appraisal Report, and with the appraisal standard proposed by the California Debt and Investment Advisory Commission. Basis for Appraisal and Assumptions. The property rights appraised were of a fee simple interest subject to easements of record, the lien of the Special Taxes, and the lien of the Community Facilities District No. 84-2 (Lakehills) of the County of Riverside, Series 1999 Special Tax Refunding Bonds. The Appraisal was based on certain assumptions and limiting conditions set forth in APPENDIX C, including the assumption that ail of the improvements and benefits to the property to be funded by the Bonds are completed and have accrued to the property. In this case, the Appraiser assumed that the proceeds of the Bonds would fund $22,470,000 for public facilities. (See "FINANCING PLAN" for the Community Facilities District's current estimate of the amount of Bond proceeds to be used for these purposes.) 30 The Appraiser relied on the Market Absorption Study for the projected home pricing. The Appraiser also assumed that the estimates of the remaining costs by ownership to get the lots from as is cone ition to "finished lots," which the Appraiser obtained from the property owners, are reasonat ly accurate. As of the May 1, 2005 date of value, the property in the Community Facilities District was in the following condition: Stone View: Grading was completed or nearing completion on the lots in the center and east portions of the neighborhood, and was still in process on the lots at the westerly end. Paving of streets at the far easterly end of the neighborhood was also just underway. Co1struction had not yet started on any of the homes. Silver Sage: Grading was completed or nearing completion on the lots in the center and east portions of the neighborhood, and was still in process on the remaining lots. Paving of the streets at the far easterly end of the neighborhood was also just underway. Cc,nstruction had not yet started on any of the homes. Orchard Heights: Grading was nearing completion on the lots in the south part of the neighborhood, and was still in process on the lots in the north part. Streets had not yet been paved and construction had not yet started on any of the homes. Rock 1~idge: Rough grading was underway on these lots, but with a substantial amount of grading work yet to be completed to get all of the lots to a blue-top condition. High f'oint: Rough grading was underway on these lots, but with a substantial amount of grading work yet to be completed to get all of the lots to a blue-top condition. Value Estimate. The Appraiser estimated that, as of the May 1, 2005 date of value, the fee simple interest in the property within the Community Facilities District (subject to easements of record, to the lien of the Special Taxes, and to the Community Facilities District No. 84-2 (Lakehills) of the Ccunty of Riverside, Series 1999 Special Tax Refunding Bonds) had the following market valuE,s: Property Owner Estimated Value LHC Riverside Associates, LLC/Riverside LHC, Ltd. $71,500,000 Lake Hil s-Riverside, L.P. 38,200 000 Total: $109,700,000 Valuation ME·thods. The Appraiser estimated the value of the property in the Community Facilities District based on the Sales Comparison Approach, which considers recent sales of bulk residenlial lots from the general area in comparison to the subject property on a finished lot basis. A deduction is then made for the estimated remaining costs to get the lots from the as is condition to finished lot condition, resulting in a value indication for the as is condition of the lots. The estimate of value for the property was achieved using the sales prices of comparable finished lots in the area that were listed or had sold within the prior 10 months. A discounted cash flow analysis was not used. The County and the Community Facilities District make no representation as to the accuracy or completeness of the Appraisal. See APPENDIX C for the Summary Appraisal Report. 31 Appraised Value to Burden Ratio The table below shows the projected value to burden ratio for the property in the Community Facilities District based on the appraised values set forth in the Appraisal, and the lien represented by the principal amount of the Bonds and the outstanding principal amount of the Community Facilities District No. 84-2 (Lakehills) of the County of Riverside, Series 1999 Special Tax Refunding Bonds (the "CFO 84-2 Bonds"). See "- Direct and Overlapping Governmental Obligations" below. No assurance can be given that the amounts shown in this table will conform to those ultimately realized in the event of a foreclosure action following delinquency in the payment of the Special Taxes. Table 2 Appraised Values and Value to Burden Ratio Principal Projected Total Principal Amount Property Number Appraised Amount of of CFD 84-2 Value to Owner of Homes [1] Value [2] Bonds [31 Bonds [41 Burden [5] LHC Riverside Associates/Riverside LHC 372 $71,500,000 $18,759,844 $434,709 3.73:1 Lake Hills-Riverside, LP. 140 38,200,000 7060156 72 631 5.36:1 Total: 512 $109,700,000 $25,820,000 $507,340 4. 17:1 [1] Source: the Appraisal. [2] Market value estimated by the Appraiser as of May 1, 2005. [3] Allocation between Property Owners based on projected Fiscal Year 2005-06 levy. See "Table 5, Property Ownership" below. [4] See "- Direct and Overlapping Governmental Obligations" below. Allocation between Property Owners based on Fiscal Year 2004-05 levy. [5] Average value to burden per lot; actual value to burden per lot may vary. Source: Albert A. Webb Associates and the Appraiser. 32 Direct and Overlapping Governmental Obligations Contained vtithin the boundaries of the Community Facilities District are certain overlapping local agencies providing public services and assessing property taxes, assessments, special taxes and other charges on the property in the Community Facilities District. Many of these local agencies have outstanding debt. The direct and overlapping obligations affecting the property in the Community Facilities District for Fiscal Year 2004-05 are shown in the following table. Table 3 Direct and Overlapping Governmental Obligations COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 04-2 (LAKE HILLS CREST) OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE 2004-05 Secured Roll Assessed \/.due $1,848,768 Secured Property Taxes Description on Tax Bill f')pe Total Parcels rotal Le\') •:,;, Applicnble Parcels tcvi Amount COMMl:~! I'( /"ACILITJES DJST K4-2 CFO ! .130 $785,204 .16 ()_) ]'\, )(\ $287.628 N.\\'. 1vlOSQlJIT{) & VECTOR CON'I ROL DISTRl("l SP! 131.108 $400,486 0 001''.·., 3X $4 lvl\\'D STANDUY v,.:ES'I \VTR 220,204 SJ..184.4()2 0.203'\, 38 $6.877 ALVORD t_;:,.,;JrJED SCHOOL ( ;o 20,340 $2.706507 0.012°/;, 38 S3J3 RIVERSIDE C0\11'v1ll:\ITY COLI.F(iE c;o 222.716 $8,207,072 0 01 ?'\, .iX S 1.395 MFTROPOLITAN \VTR DFRT SV (_)() 413,378 $4.816,()(12 11.002'!·,, 3K SI07 (iENFRA! PLRPOSE I"/" 752,870 $1.J52.208.!08 0 001"';, 3k $18.488 211114-115 TOTAL PROPERTY 1AX l/ABIUTl' $314,831 TOTAL PROPERTY TAX LIABILITY AS PERCEI\TAGE OF 2004-05 ASSESSED VALLATIO'.'I 17.03°/o Land Secured Bond lndehtcdnesi Outstanding Direct and Ovcrlapr1ing Bonded Debt "f)·pc Issued ()utstanding ·~·;, Applicable Pa reds Amount COLJNTY O! Rl\'ERSJDE (TD 84-2 llEFLNDJN(i CFD $4,6.15J)()() S 1,385,000 36.63 l'\i, 26 $507,340 COL'"\ l'Y OJ· RI\TRSIOL CFD 04-2 Cl lJ TBU{I) rBD( I) 100 (){)'\, TBD( I I TOTAL OLTSTANDl'.\G LA'IID SECURED BO'.\D l'.'IDEBTED'IIESS (2) $507,340 (;cncral Obligation Bond lndl•htcdncss Outstanding Dirc\'1 and Overlapr,ing Bonded Debt Typi: Issued Outstanding o/o Applicahle Parcels Amount ALVORD UNIFIED SCHOOL GO S57,000J)00 $49,850,0110 0.041()"/I, 38 S20J<;7 I R!VERSIDI·: COJ\.1MUNITY COLLLC E GO $65,000JlOO $6: Authorized and llnissued Direct 1·nd Overlapping Bonded Debt (2) T~ pc Authorized l!nissued %, Applicable Parcels Amount ALVORD LJNIFIED SCHOOL GO S57 _000JlOO $(1 0.042''.-t, ,x $0 1 RIVERS!OE ('0:'vlMlJNITY ('OLI.L( l·'. GO 5350JJOO,OOO 1'285,()()0,000 0.004 ',;, 38 '!>10.59 1) .\·1FTROPOLITAN \VATER DJSTRJ('l GO $850Jl00.000 so 0.0001% JX so TOTAL LNISSl:ED GEI\ER.\L OBLIGATIOl'i 801\D 1'1/DEBTED'.\ESS (2) $!0.599 TOTAL Ol:TSTAI\DING AI\D l:NJSSLED GENERAL OHLIGATION BOND 11\Dl:BTED'IIESS (2) 534,447 { ! l Excludc;, Md!o-Roo~ bonds to be ;.okL (2) Additional bonded indeblcdnc;.c; nr 1vailable bond authnrizauon may cxL;t but arc not shown becathc a lax w;1;, not levil·d for the rdCn:nccd fiscal year. Source: Albert A. Webb Associate;.. 33 CFD 84-2 Bonds. The CFO 84-2 Bonds were originally issued in February 1999 in the total principal amount of $4,635,000, for the primary purpose of refunding certain outstanding special tax bonds previously issued by Community Facilities District No. 84-2 (Lakehills). The CFO 84-2 Bonds are currently outstanding in the principal amount of $1,385,000, and mature on September 1, 2006. Estimated Tax Burden on Single Family Home The following table sets forth the estimated total tax burden on single family homes in five land use categories set forth under the Rate and Method (categories selected as a conservative representative of the proposed homes to be constructed in the Community Facilities District), based on estimated tax rates for Fiscal Year 2004-05. Table 4 Analysis of Taxes and Assessments As a Percent of Single Family Unit Base Sales Price Land Use Category Under Rate and Method 4000-4200 3601-4000 3401-3600 2801-3000 2501-2800 Sq. Ft. Sq Ft. Sq. Ft. Sq.__Ft. Sq. Ft. Base Sales Price [11 $675,000 $615,000 $560,000 $525,000 $480,000 Ad Valorem Property Taxes (21 General Property Tax (1.00%) 6,750 6,150 5,600 5,250 4,800 Alvord USO G.O. Bond 307 280 255 239 218 Riverside Community College G.O. Bond 122 111 101 95 86 MWO G.O. Bonds 39 36 32 30 28 Subtotal Ad Valorem Taxes 7,218 6,576 5,988 5,614 5,132 Special Assessments/Taxes for Infrastructure [31 CFO No. 04-2 (Lake Hills Crest) 4,615 4,470 4,065 3,515 3,415 Special Assessments/Taxes for Services [4] CSA's 77 77 77 77 77 Flood Control Stormwater/Cleanwater 4 4 4 4 4 NW Mosquito & Vector Control 12 12 12 12 12 MWO Standby 9 9 9 Subtotal 102 102 102 102 102 Subtotal Assessments & Special Taxes 4,717 4,572 4.167 3,617 3,517 TOTAL $11,934 $11,148 $10,155 $9,231 $8,649 Taxes & Assessments as % of Base Price 1.77% 1.81 % 1.81 % 1. 76% 1.80% [1] As provided by the Appraisal dated May 12, 2005. [2] Ad valorem rates are based on the levy for Fiscal Year 2004-05. [3] Assumes that initial levy on Developed Property will occur after final maturity of the CFO 84-Bonds in September 2006. [4] Estimated based on the levy for Fiscal Year 2004-05. Source: Albert A. Webb Associates. 34 PROPERTY OWNERSHIP AND PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT The informaUon about the Property Owners contained in this Official Statement has been provided by representatives of the Property Owners and has not been independently confirmed or verified by the Underwriter, the County or the Community Facilities District. Neither the Underwriter, the County nor the Community Facilities District make any representation as to the accuracy or adequacy of this information. There may be material adverse changes in this information after the date of this Official Statement. Property Ownership The table bE low shows the current property ownership within the Community Facilities District. Table 5 Property Ownership Percentage Share of 2005-06 Number Special Tax Property Owner of Lots 111 Liability 121 LHC Entities 372 72.66% Lake Hills-Riverside 140 27.34% Total 512 100.00% [1 Source: the Appraisal. [2: The projected Special Tax liability assumes that all parcels are levied as "Approved Property" for Fiscal Year 2005-06. Source: Albert A. Webb Associates and the Appraiser. LHC Entities Ownership Structure. The LHC Entities are LHC Riverside Associates, LLC, a California limited liability company, and Riverside LHC, Ltd., a Florida limited partnership, which own their property in the Community Facilities District as tenants in common (with an 80% share owned by Riverside LHC and a 20% share owned by LHC Riverside Associates). Riverside LHC I Richland. The general partner of Riverside LHC is Urban Properties of California. Inc., a Florida corporation doing business in California as Urban West Properties of California, Inc. ("•Jrban West"). The limited partner of Riverside LHC is the Oakville Non Exempt Trust. Urban West is affiliated through spousal ownership and management staff with Richland Investments, LLC, a real estate group owned by John H. Bray, an individual. Mr. Bray has been active in real estate investment and development in California, Texas, Florida and Canada for over 25 years through his companies, Richland Investments, LLC, Richland Properties, Inc., Richland Ventures, Inc., and Richland Communities, Inc., all based in Newport Beach and Roseville, California, and Tampa, Florida (collectively "Richland"). Richland has developed many office and industrial buildings, anchored retail shopping centers, and residential-master planned communities. Richland does not typically fully develop 35 its properties, electing to sell approved or semi-finished parcels to merchant builders or end users for further development. The Internet site for Richland is www.richlandcommunities.com. This Internet address is included for reference only, and the information on this Internet site is not a part of this Official Statement or incorporated by reference into this Official Statement. No representation is made in this Official Statement as to the accuracy or adequacy of the information contained on this Internet site. Land development activity by Richland and its affiliates in California has included significant holdings in eleven master-planned developments, including: Development Location Description Morro Hills Master Plan Oceanside entitled for approximately 1,000 residential lots. public golf course, elementary school site, and village center portions of North Central Roseville Specific Plan Roseville approximately 1,715-acres entitled for approximately 1,500 residential units and approximately 285 acres designed for commercial, business professional and light industrial land use Woodcreek East Roseville approximately 350 single family residential lots; Highland Reserve North Specific Plan Roseville entitled for approximately 1,770 residential units and approximately 162 acres of commercial use The Westlake Plaza Center Phase Ill Thousands entitled for approximately 475,000 square feet of Oaks office space and a 200-bed senior assisted living facility Pinehurst Specific Plan Chino Hills entitled for approximately 693 residential lots with supporting retail use Westlake North Specific Plan Westlake entitled for approximately 1.414.000 square feet of Village commercial and office space, and approximately 250 residential units Lincoln Ranch Murrieta entitled for approximately 441 residential lots with supporting retail use Crown Valley Specific Plan Riverside entitled for approximately 419 residential lots County Richland will certify to the following representations at the Closing: • Neither Richland nor any of its affiliates has ever defaulted to any material extent in the payment of special taxes or assessments in connection with the Community Facilities District or any other community facilities districts or assessment districts in California within the past five years. This representation is qualified by the following statement: Richland has been a landowner in a number of community facilities districts in California. Richland has never had a special tax delinquency on property where Richland, or any related entity, was the original petitioner forming the community facilities district. Richland has also acquired land development projects that were either in default or on the verge of default in the payment of special taxes or assessments. 36 Richland has successfully restructured three out of four of these projects. However, in the course of implementing these projects, Richland or its affiliated companies has had one short term and one long term special tax delinquency. The first delinquency occurred in th3 City of Chino Hills Community Facilities District No. 9, wherein Richland Pinehurst, L.P. (one of the Richland Entities) was obligated to pay by November 1, 1996, and did not pay a one-time discharge payment in the amount of $1,079,964.56 on approximately 12.9 acres of commercially zoned property. On July 28, 1998, Richland Pinehurst, L.F. finalized a Settlement Agreement with the City of Chino Hills to pay the one-time discharge payment in five installments of $215,992.92 commencing on May 31, 1999, and each May 31st thereafter. All five installments have been paid. Since the one-time disc1arge payment was not structured to match any near term bondholder payment dates, all payment amounts owed to bondholders were made by the City of Chino Hills on a timely basis and the original bonds were successfully refunded in 1999. The sEcond delinquency occurred in the City of Lancaster Communities District No. 89-1 ("CF) No. 89-1") wherein Richland Ventures, Inc. acquired residential property that was in arrears in the payment of both special and general property taxes. Richland Ventures, Inc. entered into a Memorandum of Understanding with the City of Lancaster, wherein Richland purchased subordinate bonds in the amount of $850,000 to retire delinquent CF) No. 89-1 special taxes and acquired residential parcels through periodic foreclose sale,;. Ultimately, Richland Ventures, Inc. sequentially acquired approximately 187 acres through series of foreclosure sales starting in April 1998 and ending in November 2000. Due to economic and entitlement issues with the proposed development, Richland Ventures, Inc. ceased paying its special and general property taxes after Docember 1998 and subsequently conveyed its holdings to a third party purchaser in F 3bruary 2002. Neither Richland nor any of its affiliates is currently in default on any loans, lines of credit or other cbligation, the result of which could materially adversely affect the development and sale of the LHC Entities' property in the Community Facilities District. Richland is solvent and no proceedings are pending or, to the actual knowledge of Richland, threatened in which Richland may be adjudicated as bankrupt or become the debtor in a bankruptc:r proceeding, or discharged from all of its respective debts or obligations, or granted an extensi,Jn of time to pay its respective debts or a reorganization or readjustment of its respective debts. There i, no litigation or administrative proceeding of any nature in which Richland has been served, or to Richland's actual knowledge, is pending or threatened against Richland which, if successful, would materially adversely affect the ability of the LHC Entities to complete the development and ;ale of their property within the Community Facilities District, or to pay the Special Taxes or ordinary ad valorem property tax obligations when due on their property within the Community Facilit es District, or which challenges or questions the validity or enforceability of the Bonds, the R 9solution of Issuance, the Indenture, the Property Owner Continuing Disclosure Certificate or the Bond Purchase Contract. Richland is not aware of any material failures to comply with previous undertakings by it or its affiliates to provide periodic continuing disclosure reports or notices of material events in California within the past five years. 37 LHC Riverside Associates I J.D. Pierce Company. The managing member of LHC Riverside Associates is J.D. Pierce Company, Inc., a California corporation that was formed in 1994 and is headquartered in Irvine, California. The other member of LHC Riverside Associates is Steven L. Craig. J.D. Pierce Company is currently in the process of entitling, constructing and selling numerous projects in the Inland Empire region of southern California. J.D. Pierce Company and its affiliates had closings of approximately 160 homes in 2004 and expects to close in excess of 400 homes in 2005. The Internet site for J.D. Pierce Co. is www.jdpiercehomes.com. This Internet address is included for reference only, and the information on this Internet site is not a part of this Official Statement or incorporated by reference into this Official Statement. No representation is made in this Official Statement as to the accuracy or adequacy of the information contained on this Internet site. Some of the other development projects recently completed or currently under development by J.D. Pierce Company and its affiliates in southern California include the following: Number of Development Location Dwelling Units Mont Valier II San Jacinto 33 Celebrations Perris 28 Sonrisa Victorville 212 Tesoro San Jacinto 249 Sanderson Ranch San Jacinto 211 Cherrybrook Lane Victorville 123 BelAire Victorville 86 San Jacinto San Jacinto 600 [1] Veranda Beaumont 87 Sunday in the Park Lake Hills 110 [1] Being developed for investment and sale to merchant builders. J.D. Pierce Company will certify to the following representations at the Closing: Neither J.D. Pierce Company nor any of its affiliates has ever defaulted to any material extent in the payment of special taxes or assessments in connection with the Community Facilities District or any other community facilities districts or assessment districts in California within the past five years. Neither J.D. Pierce Company nor any of its affiliates is currently in default on any loans, lines of credit or other obligation, the result of which could materially adversely affect the development and sale of the LHC Entities' property in the Community Facilities District. J.D. Pierce Company is solvent and no proceedings are pending or, to the actual knowledge of J.D. Pierce Company, threatened in which J.D. Pierce Company may be adjudicated as bankrupt or become the debtor in a bankruptcy proceeding, or discharged from all of its respective debts or obligations, or granted an extension of time to pay its respective debts or a reorganization or readjustment of its respective debts. There is no litigation or administrative proceeding of any nature in which J.D. Pierce Company has been served, or to J.D. Pierce Company's actual knowledge, is pending or 38 threatened against ,1.D. Pierce Company which, if successful, would materially adversely affect the ability of the LHC Entities to complete the development and sale of their property within the Community Facilitie:; District, or to pay the Special Taxes or ordinary ad valorem property tax obligations when due on their property within the Community Facilities District, or which challenges or questions the validity or enforceability of the Bonds, the Resolution of Issuance, the Indenture, the Property Owner Continuing Disclosure Certificate or the Bond Purchase Contract. J.D. =>ierce Company is not aware of any material failures to comply with previous undertakinqs by it or its affiliates to provide periodic continuing disclosure reports or notices of material events in California within the past five years. Lake Hills-Riversido Ownership Structure. Lake Hills-Riverside is Lake Hills-Riverside, L.P., a California limited partnership whose general partner is MSIII GP, LLC, a California limited liability company, and whoBe limited partners are Hearthstone Multi-State Residential Value Added Fund, Ill, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, and Hearthstone-SEPII Homebuilding Investors, LLC (SeriEs 2), a Delaware limited liability company. Hearthstone, Inc., a California corporation ("Hearthstone"), is the manager of MSIII GP, LLC (the general partner of Lake Hills-Riverside) and the general partner of the managing member of Hearthst:ine Multi-State Residential Value Added Fund, Ill, LLC, and Hearthstone SEPII Homebuilding Investors, LLC (Series 2) (the limited partners of Lake Hills-Riverside). Hearthstone is a real estate investment company devoted exclusively to investing institutional capital in residential development. Hearthstone manages funds for numerous public and private pension plans, university endowments, Fortune 100 companies and large private trusts. Hearthstone invest~ these funds in homebuilding and residential lot development projects throughout the United States. The officers of Hearthstone have been involved in the development of ove1· 50,000 homes in all major regions of the United States in the course of their careers. Hearthstone is headquartered in San Rafael, California, has offices in Los Angeles, San Diego and Chicago. Hearthstone has invested in over 300 homebuilding projects in approximately 20 sta· es. The Internet site for Hearthstone is www.hearthstone.com. This Internet address is included for reference only, and the information on this Internet site is not a part of this Official Statement or incorpcrated by reference into this Official Statement. No representation is made in this Official Statement as lo the accuracy or adequacy of the information contained on this Internet site. History of Property Tax Payments; Loan Defaults; Bankruptcy. Hearthstone will certify to the followin~. representations at the Closing: NeithE r Hearthstone nor any of its affiliates has ever defaulted to any material extent in the paymE·nt of special taxes or assessments in connection with the Community Facilities District or E,ny other community facilities districts or assessment districts in California within the past five years. 39 Neither Hearthstone nor any of its affiliates is currently in default on any loans, lines of credit or other obligation, the result of which could materially adversely affect the development of the property in the Community Facilities District Hearthstone is solvent and no proceedings are pending or, to the actual knowledge of Hearthstone, threatened in which Hearthstone may be adjudicated as bankrupt or become the debtor in a bankruptcy proceeding, or discharged from all of its respective debts or obligations, or granted an extension of time to pay its respective debts or a reorganization or readjustment of its respective debts. There is no litigation or administrative proceeding of any nature in which Hearthstone has been served, or to the actual knowledge of Hearthstone, is pending or threatened against Hearthstone which, if successful, would materially adversely affect the ability of Hearthstone to complete the development and sale of its property within the Community Facilities District, or to pay the Special Taxes or ordinary ad valorem property tax obligations when due on its property within the Community Facilities District, or which challenges or questions the validity or enforceability of the Bonds, the Resolution of Issuance, the Indenture, the Property Owner Continuing Disclosure Certificate or the Bond Purchase Contract. Hearthstone is not aware of any material failures to comply with any previous continuing disclosure undertakings by it or its affiliates to provide periodic continuing disclosure reports or notices of material events in California within the past five years. Construction Services. Lake Hills-Riverside has engaged Lake Hills, LLC to act as the developer in connection with the construction of single-family homes within the Community Facilities District. Lake Hills, LLC, has engaged Brehm Communities to act as general contractor in connection with the construction of single-family homes within the Community Facilities District. Brehm Communities is a homebuilding firm with over 40 years experience in the construction and sale of homes ranging from affordable condominiums and first-time homes to master-planned communities. Brehm Communities has completed over 3,000 homes in southern California communities that include San Diego County and the Inland Empire. Forrest "Woody" Brehm established the company and currently serves as its Chairman & Chief Executive Officer, and Horace Hogan II serves as the company's President & Chief Operating Officer. More information about Brehm Communities is available on the Internet at www.brehmco.com. This Internet address is included for reference only, and the information on this Internet site is not a part of this Official Statement or incorporated by reference into this Official Statement. No representation is made in this Official Statement as to the accuracy or adequacy of the information contained on this Internet site. Environmental Conditions CEQA Review. In January 1999, the County approved a Mitigated Negative Declaration under the California Environmental Quality Act {"CEQA") in connection with development approvals for the property in the Community Facilities District (including the approval of Tentative Tract Maps 28815 and 28816). No additional discretionary approvals are required for the proposed development in the Community Facilities District that would require additional environmental review under CEQA. 40 Hazardous Substances. GeoSoils, Inc. of Murrieta, California, prepared a Phase I Environmental Site t,ssessment dated August 6, 1999, for the property in the Community Facilities District. The assessment concluded that the overall potential for significant amounts of hazardous materials/waste and/or petroleum contamination onsite is low; however, the uncertainty of potenlial environmental concerns could not be entirely eliminated, and the assessment made the following recommendations: (a) all debris and trash should be disposed of offsite; and (b) al hough not observed within the property, any hazardous or petroleum contaminated materials encountered should be evaluated prior to removal and disposal. The Property Owners have represented that all recommendations made in this report have been followed and will be followed during the course of site development on the property in the Community Facilities District. Seismic Conditions. GeoSoils, Inc. of Murrieta, California, prepared a Grading Plan Review dated Noverrber 16, 2000, for the property in the Community Facilities District. The report concluded thEt the site appears suitable for its intended use, from a geotechnical viewpoint, provided tre recommendations presented in the report are implemented. The report noted that no known active faults cross the site area, and the site is not within an Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zcne. The report also concluded that the potential for liquefaction, is considered low to nil, provided the recommendations provided in the report are implemented during site design and construction. Wetlands and Riparian Habitat. The development of the property in the Community Facilities District is being carried out in accordance with a Mitigation, Monitoring and Management Plan dated January 2001, prepared by PCR Services Corporation of Irvine, California, under which the Property Owners are required to create three riparian wetland habitats that will be p 3rtially used to satisfy mitigation requirements imposed in connection with the issuance of the following federal and state permits, which were issued due to impacts to wetlands and streamteds that constitute "jurisdictional waters" under federal and state laws and regulations: Permit:; issued by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, with a final expiration date of March 18, 2007. A WatE,r Quality Waiver issued by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board effective as of February 18, 2000, under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act. The permit does not have an expi ·ation date. A Streambed Alteration Agreement issued by the California Department of Fish and Game, originally Eiffective as of March 1, 2000, which was subject to subsequent extensions with an expiration date of March 1, 2004. • A Biological Opinion issued by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service originally effective as of October 26, 2000, as further amended. This opinion has no expiration date. The Property :Jwner has represented that all site work affecting wetlands authorized under the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Section 404 permit will be completed before the permit expires. that all site work affecting streambeds authorized under the Streambed Alteration Agreement was comoleted before the expiration of the agreement, and that all mitigation measures required by these permits have been or will be complied with. 41 Proposed Development No assurances can be made that the Property Owners will have the resources, willingness and ability to successfully complete development activities on their property within the Community Facilities District as currently planned. No representation is made as to the ability (financial or otherwise) of either Property Owner to complete its property development as currently planned. General. All of the taxable property in the Community Facilities District is currently in the process of being developed as 512 detached single-family homes in five residential neighborhoods, as follows: Stone View 108 lots Silver Sage 103 lots Orchard Heights 98 lots Rock Ridge 110 lots High Point 93 lots Property Acquisition by Lake Hills-Riverside. The LHC Entities originally acquired all of the property in the Community Facilities District in June 1998. Lake Hills-Riverside has entered into an agreement to acquire all of the LHC Entities' property in the Community Facilities District through three phased take-downs. Lake Hills-Riverside exercised its option to acquire the first phase of 140 lots in March 2004. The option agreement requires Lake Hills Riverside to acquire the second phase ( 140 lots) no later than 10 days following the issuance of the Bonds, and to acquire the final phase (232 lots) by September 28, 2005. Other than the issuance of the Bonds, no unsatisfied conditions remain to the obligation of Lake Hills-Riverside to exercise its option to acquire the remaining two phases on the schedule described above. Possible Sale of Orchard Heights Neighborhood to Merchant Builder. Lake Hills Riverside is currently negotiating the sale of the Orchard Heights neighborhood, consisting of 98 proposed single-family homes, to another merchant builder, which would occur once the infrastructure and site work on the Orchard Heights neighborhood have been completed. The buyer entity would then carry out home construction and sales to end users. However, Lake Hills-Riverside has not made a final decision or entered into an agreement for the sale of this neighborhood as of the date of the Preliminary Official Statement. If Lake Hills-Riverside decides not to sell the Orchard Heights neighborhood to another builder, then Lake Hills Riverside intends to develop the Orchard Heights neighborhood as described below. Entitlement Status. The project is being developed in accordance with two Tract Maps, as set forth below: No. of Tentative Map Final Map Tract No. Lots Approval Approval 28815 235 Jan. 1999 Dec. 2004 28816 277 Jan. 1999 Dec. 2004 42 Utilities. It is expected that utility services for the property in the Community Facilities District will be provided by the following: • Water: Western Municipal Water District • Sanitary sewer: Western Municipal Water District • Storm water c'rainage: Riverside County Flood Control • Electricity: Southern California Edison lnfrastructurE Development. Mass grading, site work and off-site infrastructure improvements on the property in the Community Facilities District (including the construction of the Public Facilities b,'>ing financed with the proceeds of the Bonds) is currently underway, and is being carried out in phases corresponding to the planned development schedule. All grading is anticipated to be complete by December 2005, and all off-site infrastructure development (including sewer, water and storm drain improvements, street improvements (including curb, gutter, sidewalk and ~aving), two sewer lift stations, a water tank (including building and pump), offsite pump enhancement, and grading) is anticipated to be complete by May 2006. As of May 1, 2005, based on information provided by the Property Owners, the Appraiser assumed !,at the total cost to complete the property in the Community Facilities District to "finished lot" condition (including grading, streets, utilities, fencing/walls, landscape, erosion control, fees, engineering. consultants, and contingency) was as follows: Total Finished Lot Costs: $54,563,855 Less Estimated Costs to be Funded with Bond Proceeds: (22,500 000) Remaining •::osts to Complete: $32,063,855 The Appraiser further allocated these total remaining finished lot costs in the amount of $28,757,700 to the L -IC Entities' property (372 lots), and in the amount of $3,306, 155 to the Lake Hills-Riverside ,roperty (140 lots), resulting in an average remaining cost of $77,306 per lot for the lots owned by the LHC Entities and an average of $23,615 per lot for the lots owned by Lake Hills-Riversic e. According to the Appraiser, the differential is due to the fact that the bulk of the land development work completed thus far has been on the first takedown of the 140 lots currently owned by Lake Hills-Riverside, with a much greater amount of work yet to be completed on the lots -)wned by the LHC Entities. 43 Home Development. Lake Hills-Riverside's anticipated construction schedule and unit mix for the property in the Community Facilities District are set forth below. No assurance can be given that home construction and sales will be carried out on the schedule and according to the plans outlined below, or that these home construction and sale plans or base prices will not change after the date of this Official Statement. Proposed Construction and Sales Schedule First Home Number Begin Home Open Model Sale Last Home Sale Neighborhood of Units Construction Homes Closings Closings 111 Rock Ridge 110 Dec.2005 Feb. 2006 July 2006 Nov. 2007 Stone View 108 May 2005 Sept. 2005 Dec.2005 Sept. 2007 Orchard Heights 98 Dec. 2005 Feb. 2006 July 2006 Oct. 2007 Silver Sage 103 May 2005 Sept. 2005 Dec. 2005 Sept. 2007 High Point 93 Dec. 2005 Feb.2006 July 2006 Dec. 2007 [1] See "THE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT - Market Absorption Study'" and "APPENDIX D - Market Absorption Study Summary and Conclusions." for a summary of the absorption conclusions contained in the Market Absorption Study. Proposed Unit Mix Number No. of Model Approx. Anticipated Neighborhood of Units Types Sguare Footage Base Prices Rock Ridge 110 3 2,600 to 3, 100 $478,000 to $523,000 Stone View 108 3 2,955 to 4,087 $523,000 to $618,000 Orchard Heights 98 3 3,412 to 3,829 $558,000 to $593,000 Silver Sage 103 3 4.143 to 5, 16B $672,000 to $747,000 High Point 93 3 3,800 to 4,200 $612,000 to $647,000 Site Development and Home Construction Financing Plan. Lake Hills-Riverside has financed and intends to finance the costs of land acquisition, infrastructure improvements and home construction costs through internal financing from its partners. Lake Hills-Riverside intends to use internal partnership financing from its limited partners, Hearthstone Multi-State Residential Value Added Fund, Ill, LLC, and Hearthstone SEPII Homebuilding Investors, LLC (Series 2) (each a "Limited Partner"), together with home sale proceeds, to finance all carrying costs for the property (including property taxes and the Special Taxes) until full sell-out of the single-family homes within the Community Facilities District. Under the Lake Hills-Riverside limited partnership agreement, the aggregate capital requirement of Lake Hills-Riverside equals an amount necessary to fund all costs of the development of the property in the Community Facilities District (less the amount of any debt financing), and the two Limited Partners commit to fund a total of 99% of the capital requirement, with each Limited Partner's respective share set forth in the agreement. The general partner of Lake Hills-Riverside may make capital calls on each Limited Partner to provide funds for project costs. 44 According to the audited financial statements of each Limited Partner, the investor members of each Limited Partner have committed certain capital amounts to the respective Limited Partner, which are due upon demand by that Limited Partner, and the failure by an investor member of either Limited Partner to provide capital upon demand can result in substantial forfeiture of existing investments, liability for damages to other members, and loss of rights to participate as members in company decisions of that Limited Partner. However, if and to the extent this source of financing is inadequate to pay the cost to complete the planned development of the property, the property may not be developed as planned. There can be no assurance of the willingness or ability of the partners of Lake Hills Riverside to make such funds available in the future, or the ability of Lake Hills-Riverside to obtain financing t 0om other sources. There is no legal obligation to Bond holders to make any such funds available for construction or development, or the payment of ad valorem property taxes or the Spec>al Taxes. The follov. ing table shows Lake Hills-Riverside's proforma cash flow projections for the development of the property in the Community Facilities District, net of Bond proceeds: Projected Sources and Uses of Funds 2004 2005 2006 2007 Total Sources of Funds Partnership Equity $29,697,385 $73,679,615[1] $(35,752,000) $(67,625,000) s Home Sale Proceeds 21,423,000[21 126 254 000 130 207 000 277 884 000 Total Sources $29,697.385 $95,102,615 $90,502,000 $62,582,000 $277,884,000 Uses of Funds Land Purchase 14,520,385 24,839,615 39,360,000 Site Development 7,142,000 26,046,000 14,455,000 (2,230,000) 45,413,000 Site Development Fee,. and Permits 1,967,000 3,450,000 296,000 46,000 5,759,000 Home Construction 1.499,000 16.923,000 45,163,000 18,691,000 82,276,000 Home Construction Fe1~s and Permits 150,000 383,000 59,000 592,000 Sales and Marketing 544,000 4,724,000 2,073,000 1,382.000 8,723,000 General & Administrati1re 1,026,000 2,744,000 2,645,000 3.085,000 9,500,000 Property Taxes 361,000 750,000 1,080,000 358,000 2,549,000 Other 2,638,000 15 476 000 24 407 000 18991000 61,512,000 Total Uses $29,697,385 $95, 102,615 $90,502.000 $40,382,000 $255,684,000 Sources in Excess of Uses 22,200,000 22,200,000 Cumulative Annual 22,200,000 [1] As of June 30 2005, approximately $44,287,000 of this amount had been contributed by the Lake Hills~Riverside Limited Partners and expended on site development and home construction costs. [2J Represents ths proceeds of the anticipated sale of the Orchard Heights neighborhood to another merchant builder, as described abo11e 45 BOND OWNERS' RISKS The purchase of the Bonds described in this Official Statement involves a degree of risk that may not be appropriate for some investors. The following includes a discussion of some of the risks which should be considered before making an investment decision. Limited Obligation of the Community Facilities District to Pay Debt Service The Community Facilities District has no obligation to pay principal of and interest on the Bonds if Special Tax collections are delinquent, other than from amounts, if any, on deposit in the Reserve Account of the Special Tax Fund or funds derived from the tax sale or foreclosure and sale of parcels for Special Tax delinquencies. The Community Facilities District is not obligated to advance funds to pay debt service on the Bonds. Levy and Collection of the Special Tax The principal source of payment of principal of and interest on the Bonds is the proceeds of the annual levy and collection of the Special Tax against property within the Community Facilities District. The annual levy of the Special Tax is subject to the Maximum Annual Special Tax rate authorized in the Rate and Method. The levy cannot be made at a higher rate even if the failure to do so means that the estimated proceeds of the levy and collection of the Special Tax, together with other available funds, will not be sufficient to pay debt service on the Bonds. In addition, the Act provides that the Special Taxes levied against any parcel of residential property may not be increased by more than 10% as a consequence of delinquency or default by the owner of any other parcel or parcels within the Community Facilities District. Because the Special Tax formula set forth in the Rate and Method is not based on property value, the levy of the Special Tax will rarely, if ever, result in a uniform relationship between the value of particular parcels of Taxable Property and the amount of the levy of the Special Tax against those parcels. Thus, there will rarely, if ever, be a uniform relationship between the value of the parcels of Taxable Property and their proportionate share of debt service on the Bonds, and certainly not a direct relationship. The following are some of the factors that might cause the levy of the Special Tax on any particular parcel of Taxable Property to vary from the Special Tax that might otherwise be expected: • Reduction in the number of parcels of Taxable Property for such reasons as acquisition of Taxable Property by a governmental entity and failure of the government to pay the Special Tax based upon a claim of exemption or, in the case of the federal government or an agency thereof, immunity from taxation, thereby resulting in an increased tax burden on the remaining taxed parcels. Failure of the owners of Taxable Property to pay the Special Tax and delays in the collection of or inability to collect the Special Tax by tax sale or foreclosure and sale of the delinquent parcels, thereby resulting in an increased tax burden on the remaining parcels. 46 • Development of a parcel of Taxable Property more rapidly than developm,nt of other parcels of Taxable Property, thereby resulting in the application of development factors in the Special Tax formula to the parcel and resulting in an increased tax burden on the parcel of Taxable Property. • Development of other parcels of Taxable Property less rapidly than expected, thereby resulting in delay in application of development factors in the Special Tax formula to the other parcels of Taxable Property and resulting in an increased tax burden on the parcel of Taxable Property. Except as set forth above under "SECURITY FOR THE BONDS Special Taxes" and " - Rate and Method," the Indenture provides that the Special Tax is to be collected in the same manner as ordin 3ry ad valorem property taxes are collected and, except as provided in the special covenant for foreclosure described in "SECURITY FOR THE BONDS - Covenant to Foreclose" and in the Act, is subject to the same penalties and the same procedure, sale and lien priority in case of delinquency as is provided for ordinary ad valorem property taxes. Under these procedures, if taxes are unpaid for a period of five years or more, the property is deeded to the State and then is subject to sale by the County. In addition, the Community Facilities District has cov,,nanted to institute foreclosure against delinquent parcels under certain conditions. If sales or foreclosures of property are necessary, there could be a delay in payments to owners of the Bonds pending such sales or the prosecution of foreclosure proceedings and receipt by the Community Facilities District of the proceeds of sale if the Reserve Account of the Special Tax Fund is depleted. See "SECURITY FOR THE BONDS - Covenant to Foreclose." Payment of Spec:ial Tax is not a Personal Obligation of the Property Owner An owner of Taxable Property is not personally obligated to pay the Special Tax. Rather, the Special Tax is an obligation only against the parcels of Taxable Property. If, after a default in the pa11ment of the Special Tax and a foreclosure sale by the Community Facilities District, the resulting proceeds are insufficient, taking into account other obligations also constituting a lien against the parcels of Taxable Property, the Community Facilities District has no recourse agairst the owner. Appraised Values The Appraisal attached as APPENDIX C estimates the market value of the taxable property within tile Community Facilities District. This market value is merely the present opinion of the Ap Jraiser, and is subject to the assumptions and limiting conditions stated in the Appraisal. The Community Facilities District has not sought the present opinion of any other appraiser of the value of the taxed parcels. A different opinion of market value might be rendered by a diff,,rent appraiser. The opinion of market value relates to sale by a willing seller to a willing buyer, each having similar information and neither being forced by other circumstances to sell or to buy. Consequently, thB opinion is of limited use in predicting the selling price at a foreclosure sale, because the sale s forced and the buyer may not have the benefit of full information. In addition, the opinion is a present opinion, based upon present facts and circumstances. Differing facts and circumstances may lead to differing opinions of value. The 47 appraised value is not evidence of future value because future facts and circumstances may differ significantly from the present. No assurance can be given that any of the Taxable Property in the Community Facilities District could be sold for the estimated market value contained in the Appraisal if that property should become delinquent in the payment of Special Taxes and be foreclosed upon. Property Values and Property Development The value of Taxable Property within the Community Facilities District is a critical factor in determining the investment quality of the Bonds. If a property owner defaults in the payment of the Special Tax, the Community Facilities District's only remedy is to foreclose on the delinquent property in an attempt to obtain funds with which to pay the delinquent Special Tax. Land development and land values could be adversely affected by economic and other factors beyond the Community Facilities District's control, such as a general economic downturn, adverse judgments in future litigation that could affect the scope, timing or viability of development, relocation of employers out of the area, stricter land use regulations, shortages of water, electricity, natural gas or other utilities, destruction of property caused by earthquake, flood or other natural disasters, environmental pollution or conlamination, or unfavorable economic conditions. Neither the Community Facilities District nor the County has evaluated development risks. Since these are largely business risks of the type that the property owner customarily evaluates individually, and inasmuch as changes in land ownership may well mean changes in the evaluation with respect to any particular parcel, the Community Facilities District is issuing the Bonds without regard to any such evaluation. Thus, the creation of the Community Facilities District and the issuance of the Bonds in no way implies that the Community Facilities District or the County has evaluated these risks or the reasonableness of these risks. On the contrary, the Board has made no such evaluation and is undertaking acquisition and construction of the Public Facilities even though these risks may be serious and may ultimately halt or slow the progress of land development and forestall the realization of Taxable Property values in the event of delinquency and foreclosure. The following is a discussion of specific risk factors that could affect the timing or scope of property development in the Community Facilities District or the value of property in the Community Facilities District. Land Development. Land values are influenced by the level of development in the area in many respects. First, undeveloped or partially developed land is generally less valuable than developed land and provides less security to the owners of the Bonds should it be necessary for the Community Facilities District to foreclose on undeveloped or partially developed property due to the nonpayment of Special Taxes. Second, failure to complete development on a timely basis could adversely affect the land values of those parcels that have been completed. Lower land values would result in less security for the payment of principal of and interest on the Bonds and lower proceeds from any foreclosure sale necessitated by delinquencies in the payment of the Special Tax. See "THE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT - Appraised Value to Burden Ratios." No assurance can be given that the proposed development within the Community Facilities District will be 48 completed, and in assessing the investment quality of the Bonds, prospective purchasers should evaluate the risks of noncompletion. Risks of Real Estate Investment Generally. Continuing development of land within the Community Facilities District may be adversely affected by changes in general or local economic conditions, fluctuations in or a deterioration of the real estate market, increased construction cost,;, development, financing and marketing capabilities of the individual property owner, water or Electricity shortages, and other similar factors. Development in the Community Facilities District may also be affected by development in surrounding areas, which may compete with the Community Facilities District. In addition, land development operations are subject to comprE hensive federal, state and local regulations, including environmental, land use, zoning and building requirements. There can be no assurance that proposed land development operations within the Community Facilities District will not be adversely affected by future government policies, including, but not limited to, governmental policies to restrict or control development, or future growth control initiatives. There can be no assurance that land development operations within the Community Facilities District will not be adversely affected by these risks. Natural CHsasters. The value of the Taxable Property in the future can be adversely affected by a vari aty of natural occurrences, particularly those that may affect infrastructure and other public improvements and private improvements on the Taxable Property and the continued habitability and enjoyment of such private improvements. The areas in and surrounding the Community Facilities District, like those in much of California, may be subject to unpredictable seismic activity. See "PROPERTY OWNERSHIP AND PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Environmental Conditions." Other natural disasters could include, without limitation, landslides, floods, droughts or tornadoes. OnE or more natural disasters could occur and could result in damage to improvements of •,arying seriousness. The damage may entail significant repair or replacement costs and that repair or replacement may never occur either because of the cost, or because repair or replacement will not facilitate habitability or other use, or because other considerations preclude such re pair or replacement. Under any of these circumstances there could be significant delinquencies in the payment of Special Taxes, and the value of the Taxable Property may well depreciate or disappear. Legal Requirements. Other events that may affect the value of Taxable Property include changes in the law or application of the law. Such changes may include, without limitation, local qrowth control initiatives, local utility connection moratoriums and local application of statewide tax and governmental spending limitation measures. Hazardous Substances. One of the most serious risks in terms of the potential reduction in the value of Taxable Property is a claim with regard to a hazardous substance. In general, the own,ars and operators of Taxable Property may be required by law to remedy conditions of the parcel relating to releases or threatened releases of hazardous substances. The federal Comr rehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980, sometimes referred to as "CERCLA" or the "Superfund Act," is the most well-known and widely applicable of thei;e laws, but California laws with regard to hazardous substances are also stringent and similar. Under many of these laws, the owner or operator is obligated to remedy a hazardous substance condition of property whether or not the owner or operator has anything to do with creating or handling the hazardous substance. The effect, therefore, should any of the Taxable Property be affected by a hazardous substance, is to reduce the marketability and 49 value of the parcel by the costs of remedying the condition, because the purchaser, upon becoming owner, will become obligated to remedy the condition just as is the seller. The appraised values set forth in this Official Statement do not take into account the possible reduction in marketability and value of any of the Taxable Property by reason of the possible liability of the owner or operator for the remedy of a hazardous substance condition of the parcel. Neither the Property Owners nor the Community Facilities District are aware of any hazardous substance liability affecting any of the Taxable Property. However, it is possible that such liabilities do currently exist and that the Community Facilities District and the Property Owners are not aware of them. Further, it is possible that liabilities may arise in the future with respect to any of the Taxable Property resulting from the existence, currently, on the parcel of a substance presently classified as hazardous but that has not been released or the release of which is not presently threatened, or may arise in the future resulting from the existence, currently on the parcel of a substance not presently classified as hazardous but that may in the future be so classified. Further, such liabilities may arise not simply from the existence of a hazardous substance but from the method of handling it. All of these possibilities could significantly affect the value of Taxable Property that is realizable upon a delinquency. See "PROPERTY OWNERSHIP AND PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT - Environmental Conditions." Endangered and Threatened Species. It is illegal to harm or disturb any plants or animals in their habitat that have been listed as endangered species by the United States Fish & Wildlife Service under the Federal Endangered Species Act or by the California Fish & Game Commission under the California Endangered Species Act without a permit. Although the Property Owners believe that no federally listed endangered or threatened species would be affected by the proposed development within the Community Facilities District, the discovery of an endangered plant or animal could delay development of vacant property in the Community Facilities District or reduce the value of undeveloped property. See "PROPERTY OWNERSHIP AND PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT - Environmental Conditions." Concentration of Property Ownership As of the date of issuance of the Bonds, a limited number of property owners are the sole owners of Taxable Property in the Community Facilities District, whose property is currently responsible for payment of all of the Special Taxes. See "PROPERTY OWNERSHIP AND PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT." Failure of any owner of property in the Community Facilities District to pay installments of the Special Tax when due could result in the depletion of the Reserve Account of the Special Tax Fund prior to reimbursement from the resale of foreclosed property or payment of the delinquent Special Tax and, consequently, an insufficiency of Special Tax proceeds to meet obligations under the Indenture. In that event, there could be a delay or failure in payments of the principal of and interest on the Bonds. Other Possible Claims Upon the Value of Taxable Property While the Special Taxes are secured by the Taxable Property, the security only extends to the value of such Taxable Property that is not subject to priority and parity liens and similar claims. 50 The table in the section entitled 'THE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT Direct and Overlapping Governmental Obligations" shows the presently outstanding amount of governmental obligations (with stated exclusions), the tax or assessment for which is or may become an obligation of one or more of the parcels of Taxable Property. The table also states the additional amount of general obligation bonds the tax for which, if and when issued, may become an oblig ,lion of one or more of the parcels of Taxable Property. The table does not specifically identify which of the governmental obligations are secured by liens on one or more of the parcels of Taxable Property. In addition, other governmental obligations may be authorized and undertaken or issued in the future, the :ax, assessment or charge for which may become an obligation of one or more of the parcels of Taxable Property and may be secured by a lien on a parity with the lien of the Special Tax securing the Bonds. In general, the Special Tax and all other taxes, assessments and charges also collected on the tax roll a ·e on a parity, that is, are of equal priority. Questions of priority become significant when ~ollection of one or more of the taxes, assessments or charges is sought by some other procE,dure, such as foreclosure and sale. In the event of proceedings to foreclose for delinquency o' Special Taxes securing the Bonds, the Special Tax will be subordinate only to existing prior governmental liens, if any. Otherwise, in the event of such foreclosure proceedings, the Special Taxes will generally be on a parity with the other taxes, assessments and charges, anc will share the proceeds of such foreclosure proceedings on a pro-rata basis. Although the Special Taxes will generally have priority over non-governmental liens on a parcel of Taxable Propeiy, regardless of whether the non-governmental liens were in existence at the time of the levy c,f the Special Tax or not, this result may not apply in the case of bankruptcy. See "- Bankruptc•1 and Foreclosure Delays" below. Exempt Properti,~s Certain properties are exempt from the Special Tax in accordance with the Rate and Method and the Act, which provides that properties or entities of the state, federal or local government are exempt from the Special Tax; provided, however, that property within the Community Facilities District acquired by a public entity through a negotiated transaction or by gift or devise, which is not otherwise exempt from the Special Tax, will continue to be subject to the Special Tax. See "SECURITY FOR THE BONDS - Rate and Method." In addition, although the Act provides that if property subject to the Special Tax is acquired by a public entity through eminent domain proceedings, the obligation to pay the Special Tax with respect to that property is to be treated as if it were a special assessment, the constitutionality and operation of these provisions :if the Act have not been tested, meaning that such property could become exempt from the cpecial Tax. The Act further provides that no other properties or entities are exempt from the Special Tax unless the pr:iperties or entities are expressly exempted in a resolution of consideration to levy a new special tax or to alter the rate or method of apportionment of an existing special tax. Depletion of Res,~rve Account The Reserve Account of the Special Tax Fund is to be maintained at an amount equal to the Reserve Requirement. See "SECURITY FOR THE BONDS - Reserve Account of the Special Tax Fund " Funds in the Reserve Account of the Special Tax Fund may be used to pay principal of and interest on the Bonds if insufficient funds are available from the proceeds of the 51 levy and collection of the Special Tax against property within the Community Facilities District. If funds in the Reserve Account of the Special Tax Fund for the Bonds are depleted, the funds can be replenished from the proceeds of the levy and collection of the Special Tax that are in excess of the amount required to pay all amounts to be paid to the Bond holders pursuant to the Indenture. However, no replenishment from the proceeds of a Special Tax levy can occur as long as the proceeds that are collected from the levy of the Special Tax against property within the Community Facilities District at the maximum Special Tax rates, together with other available funds, remains insufficient to pay all such amounts. Thus it is possible that the Reserve Account of the Special Tax Fund will be depleted and not be replenished by the levy of the Special Tax. Bankruptcy and Foreclosure Delays Bankruptcy. The payment of the Special Tax and the ability of the Community Facilities District to foreclose the lien of a delinquent unpaid tax, as discussed in "SECURITY FOR THE BONDS," may be limited by bankruptcy, insolvency or other laws generally affecting creditors' rights or by the laws of the State of California relating to judicial foreclosure. The various legal opinions to be delivered concurrently with the delivery of the Bonds (including Bond Counsel's approving legal opinion) will be qualified as to the enforceability of the various legal instruments by bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization, moratorium and other similar laws affecting creditors' rights, by the application of equitable principles and by the exercise of judicial discretion in appropriate cases. Although bankruptcy proceedings would not cause the Special Taxes to become extinguished, bankruptcy of a property owner or any other person claiming an interest in the property could result in a delay in superior court foreclosure proceedings and could result in the possibility of Special Tax installments not being paid in part or in full. Such a delay would increase the likelihood of a delay or default in payment of the principal of and interest on the Bonds. To the extent that property in the Community Facilities District continues to be owned by a limited number of property owners, the chances are increased that the Reserve Account of the Special Tax Fund established for the Bonds could be fully depleted during any such delay in obtaining payment of delinquent Special Taxes. As a result, sufficient moneys would not be available in the Reserve Account of the Special Tax Fund for transfer to the Bond Fund to make up shortfalls resulting from delinquent payments of the Special Tax and thereby to pay principal of and interest on the Bonds on a timely basis. Glasply Marine Industries. On July 30, 1992 the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued an opinion in a bankruptcy case entitled In re G/asply Marine Industries, holding that ad valorem property taxes levied by a county in the State of Washington after the date that the property owner filed a petition for bankruptcy would not be entitled to priority over the claims of a secured creditor with a prior lien on the property. Although the court upheld the priority of unpaid taxes imposed before the bankruptcy petition, unpaid taxes imposed subsequent to the filing of the bankruptcy petition were declared to be "administrative expenses" of the bankruptcy estate, payable after the claims of all secured creditors. As a result, the secured creditor was able to foreclose on the subject property and retain all the proceeds from the sale thereof except the amount of the pre-petition taxes. Pursuant to this holding, post petition taxes would be paid only as administrative expenses and only if a bankruptcy estate has sufficient assets to do so. In certain circumstances, payment of such administrative expenses may be allowed to be deferred. Once the property is transferred out of the bankruptcy estate (through foreclosure or otherwise) it would be subject only to current ad valorem taxes (i.e., not those accruing during the bankruptcy proceeding). 52 The Gla,ply decision is controlling precedent in bankruptcy court in the State of California. If G/asp/y were held to be applicable to Special Taxes, a bankruptcy petition filing would prevent thE lien for Special Taxes levied in subsequent fiscal years from attaching so long as the property \A.as part of the estate in bankruptcy, which could reduce the amount of Special Taxes available t,J pay debt service on the Bonds. However, Glasply speaks as to ad valorem property taxes, and not special taxes, and no case law exists with respect to how a bankruptcy court would treat 1he lien for special taxes levied after the filing of a petition in bankruptcy. It should also be noted that on October 22, 1994, Congress enacted 11 U.S.C. § 362(b)(18), whicr added a new exception to the automatic stay for ad valorem property taxes imposed by a po itical subdivision after the filing of a bankruptcy petition. Under this Jaw, if a bankruptcy petition is filed on or after October 22, 1994, the lien for ad valorem property taxes in subsequent fiscal years will attach even if the property is part of the bankruptcy estate. Bond owners should be aware that the potential effect of 11 U.S.C. § 362(b)(18) on the Special Taxes also depends upc,n whether a court were to determine that the Special Taxes should be treated like ad valorem pr:iperty taxes for this purpose. Property Owned by FDIC. In addition, the ability of the Community Facilities District to foreclose upon th~ lien on property for delinquent Special Taxes may be limited for properties in which the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the "FDIC") has an interest. On November 26, 1996, the FD:c adopted a Statement of Policy Regarding the Payment of State and Local Property Taxes (the "Policy Statement") (which superseded a prior statement issued by the FDIC and the Re:;olution Trust Corporation in 1991 ). The Policy Statement applies to the FDIC when it is liquidating assets in its corporate and receivership capacities. The Policy Statement provides, in part, :hat real property of the FDIC is subject to state and local real property taxes if those taxes are assessed according to the property's value, and that the FDIC is immune from ad valorem real ~ roperty taxes assessed on other bases. The Policy Statement also provides that the FDIC will pay its proper tax obligations when they become due and will pay claims for delinquencies as promptly as is consistent with sound business practice and the orderly administration of the institution's affairs, unless abandonment of the FDIC interest in the property is appropriate. It further provides that the FDIC will pay claims for interest on delinquent property taxes owned at the rate provided under state law, but only to the extent the interest payment obligation is secured by a valid lien. The FDIC will not pay for any fines or penalties and will not pay nor recognize liens for such amounts. The Policy Statement also provides that if any property taxes (including interest) on FDIC-owned property are secured by a valid lien (in effect before the property became owned by the FDIC), the FDIC will pay those claims. No prope1y of the FDIC is subject to levy, attachment, garnishment, foreclosure or sale without the FDIC':, consent. In addition, a lien for taxes and interest may attach, but the FDIC will not permit a lien or security interest held by the FDIC to be eliminated by foreclosure without the FDI C's cons er t. With respE,ct to challenges to assessments, the Policy Statement provides: "The [FDIC] is only liable for state and local taxes which are based on the value of the property during the period for which the tax is imposed, notwithstanding the failure of any person, including prior record owners, to challenge an assessment under the procedures available under state law. In the exercise of it:, business judgment, the [FDIC] may challenge assessments which do not conform with the statutory provisions, and during the challenge may pay tax claims based on the assessment level deemed appropriate, provided such payment will not prejudice the challenge. The [FDIC] will generally limit challenges to the current and immediately preceding taxable year and lo the pursuit of previously filed tax protests. However, the [FDIC] may, in the 53 exercise of its business judgment, challenge any prior taxes and assessments provided that ( 1) the [FDIC's] records (including appraisals, offers or bids received for the purchase of the property, etc.) indicate that the assessed value is clearly excessive, (2) a successful challenge will result in a substantial savings to the [FDIC], (3) the challenge will not unduly delay the sale of the property, and (4) there is a reasonable likelihood of a successful challenge." The Policy Statement states that the FDIC generally will not pay non-ad valorem taxes, including special assessments, on property in which it has a fee simple interest unless the amount of tax is fixed at the time the FDIC acquires its fee simple interest in the property, nor will the FDIC recognize the validity of any lien to the extent it purports to secure the payment of any such amounts. Because the Special Taxes are neither ad valorem taxes nor special assessments, and because they are levied under a special tax formula under which the amount of the Special Tax is determined each year, the Special Taxes appear to fall within the category of taxes the FDIC generally will not pay under the Policy Statement. Following the County of Orange bankruptcy proceedings filed in December 1994, the FDIC filed claims against the County of Orange in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court and the Federal District Court which challenged special taxes that Orange County had levied on FDIC-owned property (and which the FDIC had paid) under the Act. The FDIC took a position similar to that outlined in the Policy Statement, to the effect that the FDIC, as a governmental entity, is exempt from special taxes under the Act. The Bankruptcy Court agreed, finding that the FDIC was not liable for post-receivership Mello-Roos taxes, and the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel affirmed. On appeal, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, while not specifically asked to decide on the issue, stated in its decision filed on August 28, 2001, that "the FDIC, as a federal agency, is exempt from the Mello-Roos tax," and quoted Section 53340(c) of the Act in stating that '"properties or entities' of the federal government are exempt from the tax." The Community Facilities District is unable to predict what effect the application of the Policy Statement, or the ultimate outcome of the County of Orange case, would have in case of a Special Tax delinquency on a parcel in which the FDIC has an interest. However, prohibiting the judicial foreclosure sale of a FDIC-owned parcel would likely reduce the number of or eliminate the persons willing to purchase a parcel at a foreclosure sale. Owners of the Bonds should assume that the Community Facilities District will be unable to foreclose on parcels of land in the Community Facilities District owned by the FDIC. Such an outcome would cause a draw on the Reserve Account of the Special Tax Fund and perhaps, ultimately, a default in payment of the Bonds. Disclosure to Future Purchasers The Community Facilities District has recorded a notice of the Special Tax lien in the Office of the Riverside County Recorder. While title companies normally refer to such notices in title reports, there can be no guarantee that such reference will be made or, if made, that a prospective purchaser or lender will consider such special tax obligation in the purchase of a parcel of land or a home in the Community Facilities District or the lending of money secured by property in the Community Facilities District. The Act and the Goals and Policies require the subdivider of a subdivision (or its agent or representative) to notify a prospective purchaser or long-term lessor of any lot, parcel, or unit subject to a Mello-Roos special tax of the existence and maximum amount of such special tax using a statutorily prescribed form. California Civil Code Section 1102.6b requires that in the case of transfers other than those covered by the above requirement, the seller must at least make a good faith effort to notify the prospective purchaser of the special tax lien in a format prescribed by statute. Failure by an owner of the 54 property to comply with these requirements, or failure by a purchaser or lessor to consider or understand the n3ture and existence of the Special Tax, could adversely affect the willingness and ability of the purchaser or lessor to pay the Special Tax when due. No Acceleration Provisions The Bonds do not contain a provision allowing for the acceleration of the Bonds in the event of a paym,nt default or other default under the terms of the Bonds or the Indenture. Under the Indenture, a Bond holder is given the right for the equal benefit and protection of all Bond holders sirr ilarly situated to pursue certain remedies. See "APPENDIX E - Summary of Bond Indenture." So long as the Bonds are in book-entry form, OTC will be the sole Bond holder and will be entitled to exercise all rights and remedies of Bond holders. Loss of Tax Exemption As discussed under the caption "LEGAL MATTERS - Tax Exemption," interest on the Bonds might become includable in gross income for purposes of federal income taxation retroactive to the date the Bonds were issued as a result of future acts or omissions of the Community Facilities District in violation of its covenants in the Indenture. The Indenture does not contain a spPcial redemption feature triggered by the occurrence of an event of taxability. As a result, if inlerest on the Bonds were to be includable in gross income for purposes of federal income t2xation, the Bonds would continue to remain outstanding until maturity unless earlier redeemed pursuant to optional or mandatory redemption or redemption upon prepayment of thE Special Tax. See 'THE BONDS - Redemption." Voter Initiatives Under the California Constitution, the power of initiative is reserved to the voters for the purpose of enacl ing statutes and constitutional amendments. Since 1978, the voters have exercised this power through the adoption of Proposition 13 and similar measures, including Proposition 218, v1hich was approved in the general election held on November 5, 1996. Any such initiative may affect the collection of fees, taxes and other types of revenue by local agencies ~ uch as the Community Facilities District. Subject to overriding federal constitutional principles, such collection may be materially and adversely affected by voter approved initiatives, possibly to the extent of creating cash-flow problems in the payment of outstanding obligc1tions such as the Bonds. Proposition 218-Voter Approval for Local Government Taxes-Limitation on Fees, Assessments, ard Charges-Initiative Constitutional Amendment, added Articles XIIIC and XIIID to the California Constitution, imposing certain vote requirements and other limitations on the imposition of new or increased taxes, assessments and property-related fees and charges. The Spec al Taxes and the Bonds were each authorized by not less than a two-thirds vote of the landcwners within the Community Facilities District who constituted the qualified electors at the time of such voted authorization. The Community Facilities District believes, therefore, that issuance of the Bonds does not require the conduct of further proceedings under the Act or Proposition 218. Like its antecedents, Proposition 218 is likely to undergo both judicial and legislative scrutiny before its impact on the Community Facilities District and its obligations can be 55 determined. Certain provisions of Proposition 218 may be examined by the courts for their constitutionality under both State and federal constitutional law, the outcome of which cannot by predicted. LEGAL MATTERS Legal Opinions The legal opinion of Stradling Yocca Carlson & Rauth, a Professional Corporation, Newport Beach, California, Bond Counsel, approving the validity of the Bonds will be made available to purchasers at the time of original delivery and is attached as APPENDIX I. Bond Counsel expresses no opinion to the Owners of the Bonds as to the accuracy, completeness or fairness of this Official Statement or other offering materials relating to the Bonds, and expressly disclaims any duty to advise the Owners of the Bonds as to matters related to this Official Statement. Bond Counsel represents the Underwriter on matters unrelated to the issuance of the Bonds. Jones Hall, A Professional Law Corporation, San Francisco, California, is serving as Underwriter's counsel and will pass upon certain legal matters for the Underwriter. Certain legal matters will be passed upon for the County and the Community Facilities District by County Counsel. Tax Exemption In the opinion of Stradling Yocca Carlson & Rauth, a Professional Corporation, Newport Beach, California ("Bond Counsel"), under existing statutes, regulations, rulings and judicial decisions, and assuming the accuracy of certain representations and compliance with certain covenants and requirements described herein, interest on the Bonds is excluded from gross income for federal income tax purposes and is not an item of tax preference for purposes of calculating the federal alternative minimum tax imposed on individuals and corporations. In the further opinion of Bond Counsel, interest on the Bonds is exempt from State of California personal income tax. Bond Counsel notes that, with respect to corporations, interest on the Bonds may be included as an adjustment in the calculation of alternative minimum taxable income which may affect the alternative minimum tax liability of such corporations. The difference between the issue price of a Bond (the first price at which a substantial amount of the Bonds of the same series and maturity is to be sold to the public) and the stated redemption price at maturity with respect to such Bond constitutes original issue discount. Original issue discount accrues under a constant yield method, and original issue discount will accrue to a Bondowner before receipt of cash attributable to such excludable income. The amount of original issue discount deemed received by the Bondowner will increase the Bondowner's basis in the Bond. In the opinion of Bond Counsel, the amount of original issue discount that accrues to the owner of the Bond is excluded from the gross income of such owner for federal income tax purposes, is not an item of tax preference for purposes of the federal alternative minimum tax imposed on individuals and corporations, and is exempt from State of California personal income tax. Bond Counsel's opinion as to the exclusion from gross income of interest (and original issue discount) on the Bonds is based upon certain representations of fact and certifications made by the Community Facilities District and others and is subject to the condition that the 56 Community Facilities District complies with all requirements of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amendE·d (the "Code"}, that must be satisfied subsequent to the issuance of the Bonds to assure that interest (and original issue discount) on the Bonds will not become includable in gross income for federal income tax purposes. Failure to comply with such requirements of the Code might caus, the interest (and original issue discount) on the Bonds to be included in gross income for federal income tax purposes retroactive to the date of issuance of the Bonds. The Community Facilicies District has covenanted to comply with all such requirements. The amoiJnt by which a Bondowner's original basis for determining loss on sale or exchange in the applicable Bond (generally, the purchase price) exceeds the amount payable on maturity (or an an earlier call date) constitutes amortizable bond premium, which must be amortized under Section 171 of the Code; such amortizable bond premium reduces the Bondowner's bai;is in the applicable Bond (and the amount of tax-exempt interest received), and is not deductible for federal income tax purposes. The basis reduction as a result of the amortization of bond premium may result in a Bondowner realizing a taxable gain when a Bond is sold by the ONner for an amount equal to or less (under certain circumstances) than the original cost of the Bond to the Owner. Purchasers of the Bonds should consult their own tax advisors as to the treatment, computation and collateral consequences of amortizable bond premium. The Internal Revenue Service (the "IRS") has initiated an expanded program for the auditing of tax-e>:empt bond issues, including both random and targeted audits. It is possible that the Bonds w II be selected for audit by the IRS. It is also possible that the market value of the Bonds might be affected as a result of such an audit of the Bonds (or by an audit of similar bonds). Bond Counsel's opinions may be affected by actions taken (or not taken) or events occurring (or not occurring} after the date hereof. Bond Counsel has not undertaken to determine, or to inform any person, whether any such actions or events are taken or do occur. The Indenture anj the Tax Certificate relating to the Bonds permit certain actions to be taken or to be omitted if a favorable opinion of Bond Counsel is provided with respect thereto. Bond Counsel express,,s no opinion as to the exclusion from gross income of interest (and original issue discount) on the Bonds for federal income tax purposes with respect to any Bond if any such action is tal Although Bond Counsel has rendered an opinion that interest (and original issue discount) on the Bonds is excluded from gross income for federal income tax purposes provided that the Commun ty Facilities District continues to comply with certain requirements of the Code, the ownership of the Bonds and the accrual or receipt of interest (and original issue discount) with respect to the Bonds may otherwise affect the tax liability of certain persons. Bond Counsel expresses no opinion regarding any such tax consequences. Accordingly, before purchasing any of the Bonds, all potential purchasers should consult their tax advisors with respect to collateral tax consequences relating to the Bonds. A copy of he proposed form of opinion of Bond Counsel is attached as Appendix I. 57 No Litigation At the time of delivery of the Bonds, the County and the Community Facilities District will certify that there is no action, suit, proceeding, inquiry or investigation, at law or in equity, before or by any court, public board or body, pending with respect to which the Community Facilities District has been served with process or threatened, which: • in any way questions the powers of the Board, the Legislative Body or the Community Facilities District, or • in any way questions the validity of any proceeding taken by the Board or the Legislative Body in connection with the issuance of the Bonds, or • wherein an unfavorable decision, ruling or finding could materially adversely affect the transactions contemplated by the Bond Purchase Contract, or which, in any way, could adversely affect the validity or enforceability of the Resolutions, the Bonds, the Indenture, the Issuer Continuing Disclosure Certificate or the Bond Purchase Contract, or to the knowledge of the Community Facilities District, which in any way questions the exclusion from gross income of the recipients thereof of the interest on the Bonds for federal income tax purposes, or in any other way questions the status of the Bonds under State tax laws or regulations. CONTINUING DISCLOSURE The Community Facilities District. The Community Facilities District will covenant in a continuing disclosure certificate, the form of which is set forth in "APPENDIX G Form of Issuer Continuing Disclosure Certificate" (the "Issuer Continuing Disclosure Certificate"), for the benefit of holders and beneficial owners of the Bonds, to provide certain financial information and operating data relating to the Community Facilities District and the Bonds by not later than nine months after the end of the Community Facilities District's fiscal year, or April 1 of each year, beginning on April 1, 2006. The Issuer Continuing Disclosure Certificate also requires the Community Facilities District to provide notices of the occurrence of certain enumerated events, if material. The initial Dissemination Agent under the Issuer Continuing Disclosure Certificate will be The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A. The covenants of the Community Facilities District in the Issuer Continuing Disclosure Certificate will be made in order to assist the Underwriter in complying with Securities and Exchange Commission Rule 15c2-12(b)(5) (the "Rule"). A default under the Issuer Continuing Disclosure Certificate will not, in itself, constitute an Event of Default under the Indenture, and the sole remedy under the Issuer Continuing Disclosure Certificate in the event of any failure of the Community Facilities District or the Dissemination Agent to comply will be an action to compel specific performance. During the past 5 years, the County (as the administrator of several special districts or agencies either formed by the County or of which the County is a member) has on two 58 occasions not met the continuing disclosure requirement under the Rule on a timely basis. In one instance, thE dissemination agent failed to file the annual report for Community Facilities District No. 89-1 Nhich the County had timely provided to the dissemination agent. The annual report was subse,1uently filed in February, 2003, promptly after the County became aware of the failure to file. The second incident involved Riverside County Public Financing Authority Rancho Villages Project/AD No. 159 Series 2003 (Junior Lien Bonds). Although other financings relating to Assessment District No. 159 have a report date of April 1, the report date for the 2003 financing had a February date. The annual report for all three issues (1999, 2000, and 2003) was provided to the dissemination agent on March 17, 2004. The Property Owners. Each Property Owner will covenant in a continuing disclosure certificate, the form of which is set forth in "APPENDIX H Form of Property Owner Disclosure Certificate" (the "=>roperty Owner Continuing Disclosure Certificate"), for the benefit of holders and beneficial owners of the Bonds, to provide certain information relating to that Property Owner and the parcels its owns within the Community Facilities District on a semi-annual basis, and to provide notices of the occurrence of certain enumerated events. The initial Dissemination Agent under each Property Owner Continuing Disclosure Certificate will be The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A. The obligation of each Property Owner to provide information is limited to the type of information descr bed in its continuing disclosure undertakings, and no determination has been made that any Property Owner is an "obligated person" for purposes of the Rule. The Community Facil ties District will not assume any responsibility for the enforcement of any Property Owner's obligations under its continuing disclosure undertakings, or for the accuracy of the information contained in any Property Owner's Semi-Annual Report. The obligations of each Property Owner under its Property Owner Continuing Disclosure Certificate will terminate on the earlier of (i) legal defeasance, prior redemption or payment in full of all the Bards, (ii) the date on which that Property Owner's property in the Community Facilities District is no longer responsible for 20% or more of the Special Taxes, or (iii) the date on which that Property Owner prepays in full all of the Special Taxes attributable to its property in the Community Facilities District. A default under a Property Owner Continuing Disclosure Certificate will not, in itself, constitute an Event of Default under the Indenture, and the sole remedy under a Property Owner Continuinfl Disclosure Certificate in the event of any failure of the applicable Property Owner or the Disssmination Agent to comply will be an action to compel specific performance. NO RATINGS The Bonds have not been rated by any securities rating agency. UNDERWRITING The Bond1 are being purchased by E. J. De La Rosa & Co., Inc. at a purchase price of $25, 118,359.55 (which represents the aggregate principal amount of the Bonds ($25,820,000.00) less an original issue discount of $288,778.65 and less an underwriter's discount of $412,861.80). 59 The purchase agreement relating to the Bonds provides that the Underwriter will purchase all of the Bonds, if any are purchased, the obligation to make such purchase being subject to certain terms and conditions set forth in such purchase agreement. The Underwriter may offer and sell Bonds to certain dealers and others at prices lower than the offering price stated on the cover page hereof. The offering prices may be changed from time to time by the Underwriter. PROFESSIONAL FEES In connection with the issuance of the Bonds, fees payable to certain professionals are contingent upon the issuance and delivery of the Bonds. Those professionals include: the Underwriter; Stradling Yocca Carlson & Rauth, a Professional Corporation, as Bond Counsel; • Jones Hall, A Professional Law Corporation, as Underwriter's counsel; Albert A. Webb Associates, as Special Tax Consultant (as to a portion of its fees); Fieldman, Rolapp & Associates, as Financial Advisor to the County; and The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A., as Trustee for the Bonds. EXECUTION The execution and delivery of the Official Statement by the Community Facilities District has been duly authorized by the County of Riverside on behalf of the Community Facilities District. COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 04-2 (LAKE HILLS CREST) OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE By: Isl Dean Deines Deputy County Executive Officer County of Riverside, on behalf of Community Facilities District No. 04-2 (Lake Hills Crest) of the County of Riverside 60 APPENDIX A GENERAL INFORMATION ABOUT RIVERSIDE COUNTY The folio Ning information is included only for the purpose of supplying general information regc rding Riverside County. This information is provided only for general informational purposes, and provides prospective investors limited information about Riverside County and its economic base. The Bonds are not a debt of the County, the State or any of its political subdivisiJns, and neither the County, the State nor any of its political subdivisions is liable therefor. History and Location of Riverside County Riverside County, which encompasses 7,177 square miles, was organized in 1893 from territory in San Eiernardino and San Diego Counties. Located in the southeastern portion of California, Rivers de County is bordered on the north by San Bernardino County, on the east by the State of Arizona, on the South by San Diego and Imperial Counties and on the west by Orange and San Bernardino Counties. There are 24 incorporated cities in Riverside County. Riverside County's varying topology includes desert, valley and mountain areas as well as gently rolling :errain. Three distinct geographical areas characterize Riverside County: the western valley a ·ea, the higher elevations of the mountains, and the deserts. The western valley, the San ,Jacinto mountains and the Cleveland National Forest experience the mild climate typical of Southern California. The eastern desert areas experience warmer and dryer weather conditior,s. Riverside County is the site for famous resorts, such as Palm Springs, as well as a leading area for inland water recreation. Nearly 20 lakes in Riverside County are open to the public. The dry summers and moderate to cool winters make it possible to enjoy these and other recreatiJnal and cultural facilities on a year-round basis. Riverside County Population According to the State Department of Finance, Demographic Research Unit, Riverside County's population was estimated at 1,877,000 as of January 1, 2005. The largest cities in Riverside Count)' are the cities of Riverside, Moreno Valley, Corona, Hemet, Indio, Palm Springs, Murrieta, Temecula and Cathedral City. The areas of most rapid population growth continue to be those more populated and industrialized cities in the western and central regions of Riverside County and the southwestern unincorporated region of Riverside County between Sun City and Temecula. The follov1ing table sets forth annual population figures, as of January 1, for cities located within Riverside County for each of the years listed: A-1 COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE Population Estimates 1990(') 2000 111 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 Banning 20,570 23,562 23,972 24,659 25.696 27,672 27,954 Beaumont 9,685 11,384 11,562 12,280 13,962 16,632 18,982 Blythe 8,428 20,465 20,839 21,304 21,381 22,200 22,005 Calimesa 7,139 7,214 7,316 7,428 7,477 7,434 Canyon Lake 9,952 10,164 10,410 10,649 10,847 10,912 Cathedral City 30,085 42,647 44, 111 45,698 47,908 49,452 50,632 Coachella 16,896 22,724 23,369 24,432 27, 123 28, 146 30,764 Corona 76,095 124,966 129,797 134,796 138,797 144,274 144,070 Desert Hot Springs 11,668 16,582 16,781 16,990 17,404 18,004 19,386 Hemet 36,094 58,812 60,052 61.869 63,017 64,889 66,455 Indian Wells 2.647 3,816 4,150 4,376 4,454 4,514 4,781 Indio 36,793 49,116 50,464 52,507 55, 155 60, 175 66, 118 Lake Elsinore 18,285 28,930 30,045 31,250 33,469 35.989 38,045 La Quinta 11,215 23,694 26,097 28,894 30,852 33, 104 36,145 Moreno Valley 118,779 142,379 144,401 147,340 151,887 157.865 165,328 Murrieta 44,282 46,465 51,950 68,555 79,045 85,102 Norco 23.302 24, 157 24,497 25,026 25.516 25,861 26,703 Palm Desert 23,252 41, 155 42,099 43, 129 44,490 45,610 49,280 Palm Springs 40, 181 42,805 43,422 43,981 44,564 45,039 45,731 Perris 21,460 36, 189 36,927 37,742 38.699 42048 44,594 Rancho Mirage 9,778 13,249 13,849 14,431 15, 155 15,787 16,416 Riverside 226.505 255, 166 262,311 271,004 277,527 281,810 285,537 San Jacinto 16.210 23,779 24,627 25,447 26,381 27, 198 28,437 Temecula 27,099 57,716 61,803 73, 164 75,996 78,841 81,397 Unincorporated 385,386 420,721 431,455 444,225 460,689 485,379 504,792 County Total 1,170,413 1,545,387 1,590,473 1,654,220 1,726,754 1,807,858 1,877,000 ( 1) From U.S. Census. Source: State Department of Finance estimates (as of January 1 ). Population The following sets forth the County and the State population estimates as of January 1 for the years 2001 through 2005: RIVERSIDE COUNTY AND STATE OF CALIFORNIA Estimated Population Year Riverside State of (January 1) County California 2001 1,590,473 34,441,561 2002 1,654,220 35,088,671 2003 1,726,754 35,691,442 2004 1,807,858 36,271,091 2005 1,877,000 36,810,358 Source: State of California Department of Finance, Demo~iraph1c Research Unit. A-2 Riverside County Employment Riverside County and San Bernardino County comprise the Riverside-San Bernardino Metropolitan Statistical Area. The following table summarizes the civilian labor force, employment and unemployment in the Riverside-San Bernardino Metropolitan Statistical Area for the calendar years 1999 through 2003. RIVERSIDE-SAN BERNARDINO Metropolitan Statistical Area Civilian Labor Force, Employment and Unemployment, Employment by Industry (Annual Averages) 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 Civilian Labor Force (1l 1,508,000 1,562,300 1,639,700 1,688,300 1,650,500 Employment 1,430,800 1,484, 100 1,543,400 1,588,700 1,556, 100 Unemployment 77,200 78,200 96,300 99,600 94,400 Unemployment Rate 5.1 o/o 5.0% 5.9°/o 5.9°/o 5.7°/o 2 Wage and Sala[Y Em~l1Jyment { ) Agriculture 21,700 20,900 20,300 20,300 18,800 Natural Resources and Mining 1,300 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 Construction 80, 100 88,400 90,900 99,000 110,800 Manufacturing 120,100 118,600 115,400 116,100 120,000 Wholesale Trade 38,300 41,600 41,900 43,500 44,400 Retail Trade 127,400 132,200 137,500 142,700 151,800 Transportation, Warehc using and Utilities 46,400 45,600 46,800 50, 100 54,300 Information 12.900 14,600 14, 100 13,900 13,800 Finance and Insurance 20,600 22,900 23,500 25,700 27,800 Real Estate and Rental and Leasing 14,200 15,300 15,900 16,900 17,500 Professional and Busin1?ss Services 97,000 101,700 106,800 115,400 125,200 Educational and Health Services 102,200 106,000 112,400 115,800 117,700 Leisure and Hospitality 100,800 104,400 107,200 109,000 115,200 Other Services 35,000 37.100 38, 100 38,400 38,800 Federal Government 18,200 16,900 16,900 17,000 17, 100 State Government 24,600 25,800 26,600 26,600 26,600 Local Government 149 300 157 600 169 300 167 900 167 800 Total All Industries 1,010,100 1,050,700 1,084,000 1,119,400 1, 168,500 ( 1) Labor force cata is by place of residence; includes self-employed individuals, unpaid family workers, household domestic workers, and workers on strike. (2) Industry employment is by place of work; excludes self-employed individuals, unpaid family workers, household domestic workers, and workers on strike. Source: State of California Employment Development Department. A-3 Largest Employers in Riverside County The following table lists the largest employers within the County: COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE Major Employers (As of January 1, 2005) EMPLOYER NAME LOCATION INDUSTRY Calif. State Transportation Lake Elsinore Government Offices-State Casino Morongo Cabazon Casinos Chase Manhattan Mortgage Corp Moreno Valley Real Estate Loans Desert Regional Medical Ctr Palm Springs Hospitals Eisenhower Medical Ctr Rancho Mirage Clinics Guidant Corp Temecula Physicians & Surgeons Equip & Supls-Mfrs Handsome Rewards Perris Mail Order & Catalog Shopping JW Marriott Desert Springs Rst Palm Desert Hotels & Motels La Quinta Resort & Club La Quinta Hotels & Motels Labtechniques Rancho Mirage Laboratories-Medical National RV Holdings Inc Perris Motor Homes-Manufacturers Oasis Distributing Thermal Fruits & Vegetables-Growers & Shippers Parkview Community Hospital Riverside Hospitals Parts Depot Beaumont Motorcycles & Motor Scooters-Supplies Pechanga Resort & Casino Temecula Casinos Riverside Community College Riverside Schools-Universities & Colleges Academic Riverside Community Hospital Riverside Hospitals Riverside County Regional Med Moreno Valley Hospitals Signatures Perris Mail Order & Catalog Shopping Spa Resort Casino Palm Springs Casinos Starcrest Perris Mail Order & Catalog Shopping Starcrest Products of CA Perris Mail Order & Catalog Shopping University of California Riverside Schools-Universities & Colleges Academic Valley Health System Hemet Hospitals Watson Pharmaceuticals Inc Corona Drug Millers Source: State of California Employment Development Department. A-4 Riverside Count( Effective Buying Income "Effective Buying Income" is defined as personal income less personal tax and nontax payments, a number often referred to as "disposable" or "after-tax" income. Personal income is the aggregate of wages and salaries, other labor-related income (such as employer contributions to private pension funds), proprietor's income, rental income (which includes imputed rental income of owner-occupants of non-farm dwellings), dividends paid by corporations, interest income from all sources, and transfer payments (such as pensions and welfare assistance). Deducted from this total are personal taxes (federal, state and local), nontax payment~ (fines, fees, penalties, etc.) and personal contributions to social insurance. According to U S. government definitions, the resultant figure is commonly known as "disposable perscnal income." COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE Effective Buying Income For Calendar Years 1999 through 2003 Median Total Effective Household Buying Income Effective Buying /ear Area (OOO's Omitted l Income ·1999 Riverside County $ 22,453,426 $35,145 California 590,376,663 39,492 United States 4,877,786,658 37,233 :>000 Riverside County $ 25, 144, 120 $39,293 California 652.190,282 44,464 United States 5,230824,904 39,129 :>001 Riverside County $ 23,617,301 $37,480 California 650,521,407 43,532 United States 5,303,481,498 38,365 :•002 Riverside County $ 25,180,040 $38,691 California 647,879,427 42,484 United States 5,340,682,818 38,035 :•003 Riverside County $ 27,623,743 $39,321 California 674,721.020 42,924 United States 5,466,880,008 38,201 Source: Sales & Marketing Management Survey of Buying Power. A-5 Construction Trends Provided below are the building permits and valuations for the County for calendar years 2000 through 2004. COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE Total Building Permit Valuations (valuations in thousands) 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 Permit Valuation New Single-family $2,519,841 $3,051, 190 $3,670,371 $4,665,675 $4,997,513 New Multi-family 125,296.2 174,628.0 165,413.0 406,483 0 404,615.9 Res. Alterations/Additions 67 303.7 70 849.7 106 855.8 135176.6 Total Residential 2,712,441.3 3,296,668. 1 3,923,627.4 5, 179,014.5 6,537,305.6 New Commercial 393,509.9 287,068.6 297,963.6 360,707.4 580,057.8 New Industrial 98,621 .8 74,766.3 80,881 .6 112,706.6 203,311 .9 New Other 119,978.4 152,854.0 187,510.6 261,793.6 334,001.0 Com. Alterations/Additions 157 802.1 143 351 .7 174 785.7 1731655 222 495.5 Total Nonresidential 769,912.2 658,040.6 741,141.5 908,373. 1 1,339,866. 1 New Dwelling Units Single Family 13,630 16,556 20,591 25, 137 29,478 Multiple Family 1 .780 2458 2.073 5,224 4 748 TOTAL 15,410 19,014 22,664 30,361 34,226 Source: Construction Industry Research Board, Building Permit Summary. A-6 Riverside County Commercial Activity Commercial activity is an important factor in Riverside County's economy. Much of Riverside Coun1y's commercial activity is concentrated in central business districts or small neighborhood commercial centers in cities. There are eight regional shopping malls in Riverside Counly: Riverside Plaza, Galleria at Tyler (Riverside), Palm Springs Mall, Desert Fashion Mall, Indio Fashion Mall, Hemet Valley Mall, Palm Desert Town Center and Moreno Valley Mall at TJwngate. There are also two factory outlet malls (Desert Hills Factory Stores and Lake Elsinore Outlet Center) and over 200 area centers in Riverside County. The table below shows the number of establishments selling merchandise subject to sales tax and the valuation of taxable transactions within the County for the last five years for which data is available. During the first two quarters of 2004, total taxable transactions in Riverside County were reported to be $12, 107,280,000, or 16.5% greater than total taxable transactions of $10,391,604 that were reported in Riverside County during the first two quarters of 2003. Annual figures are not yet available for 2004. COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE Taxable Transactions (figures in thousands) 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 Retail Stores: Apparel Stores $ 495,945 $ 538,578 $ 565,295 $ 610,388 $ 746,015 General Merchandise Stores 1,845,651 2,062,738 2,275,736 2,459,046 2,671,971 Specialty Stores 1, 186,231 1,277,359 1,379,979 1,501,106 1,649,224 Food Stores Group 828.641 889,894 930,232 967, 171 1,028,392 Eating and Drinking Group 1,233,274 1,364,808 1,465,467 1,559,215 1,713,632 Household Group 447,594 517,578 526,083 594,049 691,051 Building Materials G ·oup 1,017,564 1,210,838 1,339,020 1,427,831 1.678,347 Automotive Group 3,145,417 3,812,690 4,148,261 4,563,779 5, 198,391 Other Retail Stores 485 407 515 991 543 208 568 148 653,929 Retail Store Totals 10,685,724 12.190,474 13, 173,281 14,250,733 16,030,952 Business and Personnel Services 794,847 851,744 832,562 881,524 944,658 All Other Outlets 3 596 374 3 937 231 4 225 712 4 366 737 4 733 525 TOTAL ALL OUTLETS $15 QZ6 945 $16 9Z9449 $18 231 555 $19498 994 $21 ZQ9 135 (1) This category was included in Auto Dealers and Auto Supplies and Building Materials and Farm Implements in these years. Source: State Department of Equalization A-7 Riverside County Agriculture Agriculture remains a leading source of income in Riverside County. Principal agricultural products are milk, eggs, table grapes, grapefruit, nursery, alfalfa, dates, lemons and avocados. Four areas in Riverside County account for the major portion of agricultural activity: the Riverside/Corona and San Jacinto/Temecula Valley Districts in the western portion of Riverside County, the Coachella Valley in the central portion and the Palo Verde Valley near Riverside County's eastern border. Riverside County Transportation Easy access to job opportunities in Riverside County and nearby Los Angeles, Orange and San Diego Counties is important to Riverside County's employment picture. Several major freeways and highways provide access between Riverside County and all parts of Southern California. The Riverside Freeway (State Route 91) extends southwest through Corona and connects with the Orange County freeway network in Fullerton. Interstate 10 traverses the width of Riverside County, the western-most portion of which links up with major cities and freeways in the eastern part of Los Angeles County and the southern part of San Bernardino County. Interstate 15 and 215 extend north and then east to Las Vegas, and south to San Diego. The Moreno Valley Freeway (U.S. 60) provides an alternate (to Interstate 10) east-west link to Los Angeles County. Currently, Metrolink provides commuter rail service to Los Angeles and Orange Counties from several stations in Riverside County. Transcontinental passenger rail service is provided by Amtrak with a stop in Indio. Freight service to major west coast and national markets is provided by two transcontinental railroads Burlington Northern/Santa Fe and Union Pacific. Truck service is provided by several common carriers, making available overnight delivery service to major California cities. Transcontinental bus service is provided by Greyhound Lines. lntercounty, intercity and local bus service is provided by the Riverside Transit Agency to western County cities and communities. The Sunline Transit Agency provides local bus service throughout the Coachella Valley, including the cities of Palm Springs and Indio. The City of Banning also operates a local bus system. Riverside County seat, located in the City of Riverside, is within 20 miles of the Ontario International Airport in neighboring San Bernardino County. This airport is operated by the Los Angeles Department of Airports. Four major airlines schedule commercial flight service at Palm Springs Regional Airport. County-operated general aviation airports include those in Thermal, Hemet. Blythe and French Valley. The cities of Riverside, Corona and Banning also operate general aviation airports. There is a military base at March Air Force Base, which converted from an active duty base to a reserve-only base on April 1, 1996. Plans for joint military and civilian use of the base thereafter are presently being formulated by the March AFB Joint Powers Authority, comprised of Riverside County and the Cities of Riverside, Moreno Valley and Perris. A-8 Riverside County Environmental Control Services Water Supply. Riverside County obtains a large part of its water supply from groundwater sources, with certain areas of Riverside County, such as the City of Riverside, relying almost entirely on groundwater. As in most areas of Southern California, this groundwater source is not sufficient to meet countywide demand and Riverside County's water supply is supplemented by imported water. At the present time imported water is provided by the Colorado River tlqueduct and the State Water Project. At the regional and local level, there are several water districts that were formed for the primary purpose of :,upplying supplemental water to the cities and agencies within their areas. The Rancho Califcrnia Water District, the Coachella Valley Water District, the Western Municipal Water District and the Eastern Municipal Water District are the largest of these water districts in terms of area served. Riverside County is also served by the San Gorgonio Pass Water Agency, Desert Water Agency and Palo Verde Irrigation District. Flood Control. Primary responsibility for planning and construction of flood control and drainage systems v. ithin Riverside County is provided by the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District and the Coachella Valley Storm Water Unit. Sewage. There are 18 wastewater treatment agencies in Riverside County's Santa Ana River region and nine in Riverside County's Colorado River Basin region. Most residents in the rural unsewered aroas of Riverside County rely upon septic tanks and leach fields as an environmentally acce,ptable method of sewage disposal. Riverside County Education There are four elementary school districts, one high school district, eighteen unified (K- 12) school districts and four community college districts in Riverside County. Ninety-five percent of all K-12 students attend schools in the unified school districts. The three largest unified districts are l~iverside Unified School District, Moreno Valley Unified School District and Corona-Norco Unifie:J School District. There are seven two-year community college campuses located in the communities of Riverside, Moreno valley, Norco, San Jacinto, Menifee, Coachella Valley and Palo Verde Valley. There are also two universities and a four-year college located in the City of Riverside - the University of Cali'ornia, Riverside, La Sierra University and California Baptist College. A-9 [THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFf BLANK] APPENDIX B RATE Al'IID METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUIIIITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 04-2 (LAKE HILLS CREST) OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE [THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFr BLANK] RATE AND METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT :'110. 04-2 OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE (LAKE HILLS CREST) A Special Tax (all capitalized terms are defined in Section A. Definitions below), shall be applicable to each Parcel of Taxable Property located within the boundaries of Community Facilities District No. 04-2 (Lake Hills Crest) of the County of Riverside. The amount of Special Tax to be levied each Fiscal Year, commencing in Fiscal Ycar 2005-2006 for a Parcel shall be determined by the Legislative Body of the CFD by applying the appropriate Special Tax for Developed Proper!)', Approved Property, Undeveloped Property, and Public Property andlt1r Property Owner's Association Property that is not Exempt Property as set forth in Sections B. C, and D below. All of the real property within the CFD, unless exempted by law or by the provisions hereof in Section E., shall be taxed for the purposes, to the extent and in the manner herein provided. A. DEFINITIONS The terms hereinafter set forth have the following meanings: "Acre or Acreage" means the acreage of a Parcel as indicated on the most recent Assessor's Parcel Map, or if the land area is not shown on such Assessor's Parcel Map, the land area shown on the applicable Final Map, parcel map, condominium plan, or other similar instrument. "Act" means the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, as amended, being Chapter 2.5, of Part I of Division 2 of Title 5 of the California Government Code. ~~ Administriitive Expenses" means aJl actual or reasonably estitnated costs and expenses of the County that are chargeable or allocable to carry out its duties as the administrator of the CFD as allowed by the Act, which shall include without limitation, all costs and expenses ari:;ing out of or resulting from the annual levy and collection of the Special Tax, Special Tax appeals, foreclosure, trustee fees, rebate compliance calculation fees, any litigation involving the CFD, continuing disclosure undertakings of the County as imposed by applicable laws and regulations, communication with bondholders and normal administrative expenses. "Administrator" means the County Executive Officer of the County, or his or her designee. "Approved Property" means all Parcels of Taxable Property: (i) that are included in a Final Map that was recorded prior to the January I st preceding the Fiscal Year in which the Special Tax is being levied, and (ii) that have not been issued a building permit prior to the April I st preceding the Fiscal Year in which the Special Tax is being levied. B-1 "Assessor's Parcel Map" means an official map of the Assessor of the County designating parcels by an Assessor's parcel number. "Assigned Special Tax" means the Special Tax for each Land Use Category of Developed Property, as determined in accordance with Section C. l.a. below. "Backup Special Tax" means the Special Tax amount set forth in Section C.1.b., below. "Bonds" means any bonds or other debt (as defined in the Act) issued by the CFO and secured by the levy of Special Taxes. "CFD" means Community Facilities District No. 04-2 (Lake Hills Crest) of the County of Riverside established pursuant to the Act. "County" means the County of Riverside. "Developed Property" means all Parcels of Taxable Property: (i) that are included in a Final Map that was recorded prior to the January 1st preceding the Fiscal Year in which the Special Tax is being levied, and (ii) that have been issued a building permit prior to the April I st preceding the Fiscal Y car in which the Special Tax is being levied. "Exempt Property" means any Parcel which is exempt from Special Taxes pursuant to Section E., below. "Final Map" means a subdivision of property by recordation of a final map, parcel map, or lot line adjustment, pursuant to the Subdivision Map Act (California Government Code Section 66410 et seq.) or recordation ofa condominium plan pursuant to California Civil Code 1352 that creates individual Parcels for which building pennits may be issued without further subdivision. "Fiscal Year" means the period starting on July I of any calendar year and ending on June 30 of the following calendar year, commencing July I, 2005. "Indenture" means the bond indenture, fiscal agent agreement, trust agreement, resolution or other instrument pursuant to which Bonds are issued, as modified, amended and/or supplemented from time to time. "Land Use Category" means any of the categories listed in Table I, below. "Legislative Body" means the Board of Supervisors of the County acting ex officio as the Legislative Body of the CFO. "Maximum Special Tax" means the maximum Special Tax, determined in accordance with Section C, which can be levied in any Fiscal Year on any Parcel. "Non-Residential Property" means all Parcels of Developed Property for which a building permit was issued for a non-residential use. B-2 "Outstanding Bonds" means all issued Bonds, which will remain outstanding after the first interest and/or principal payment date following the current Fiscal Year, excluding Bonds to be redeemed at a later date with the proceeds of prior prepayment of a Parcel's obligation. "Parccl(s)'' means a lot or parcel shown on an Assessor's Parcel Map within the boundary of the CFD with an assigned parcel number valid at the time the Special Tax is enrolled for 1hc Fiscal Year for which the Special Tax is being levied. "Property Owner's Association Property" means any Parcel which, as of the January I preceding n e Fiscal Year for which the Special Tax is being levied, is owned by a property owner association, including any master or sub-association. "Proportionately" means for (i) Developed Property, that the ratio of the actual Special Tax levy to 1he Assigned Special Tax is the same for all Parcels of Developed Property, (ii) Approved Property that the ratio of the actual Special Tax levy to the Maximum Special Tax s the same for all Parcels of Approved Property, (iii) Undeveloped Property, that the ratic, of the actual Special Tax levy per Acre to the Maximum Special Tax per Acre is the same for all such Parcels , and (iv) Public Property and/or Property Owner's Association Property, that is not Exempt pursuant to Section E., the ratio of the actual Special Tax levy per Acre to the maximum Special Tax per Acre is the same for all such Property. "Public Prcperty" means, for any Fiscal Year, any Parcel within the boundary of the CFD which, as of the January I preceding the Fiscal Year for which the Special Tax is being levied, is owned by, dedicated to, or irrevocably offered for dedication to the federal government, the State of California, the County, or any other public agency, provided, hc,wever, that any Parcel leased by a public agency to a private entity and subject to taxation under Section 53340.1 of the Act shall be taxed and classified according to its use. "Residential Floor Area" means all of the square footage of living area within the perimeter o O a residential structure, not including any carport, walkway, garage, overhang, patio, enclosed patio or similar area, on a Parcel. The determination of Residential Floor Arca shall be made by reference to the building permit(s) for the Parcel. "Residential Property" means all Parcels of Developed Property for which a huilding permit has teen issued for purposes of constructing one or more residential dwelling units. "Special Ta,:(cs)" means the special tax to be levied in any Fiscal Year on each Parcel of Taxable Pror crty. "Special Ta~ Requirement" means that amount required in any Fiscal Year to pay: (i) annual debt service on all Outstanding Bonds due in the calendar year which commences in such Fiscal Year: (ii) periodic costs on the Bonds, including but not limited to, credit enhancement and rebate payments on the Bonds; (iii) Administrative Expenses; and (iv) an amount equal to any anticipated shortfall due to Special Tax B-3 delinquencies in the prior Fiscal Year; and (v) any amount required to establish or replenish any reserve funds for the Bonds, less (vi) a credit for funds available to reduce the annual Special Tax levy as detennined by the Administrator. "Taxable Property" means all Parcels in the CFD which are not exempt from the Special Tax pursuant to law or Section E., below. "Undeveloped Property" means all Taxable Property not classified as Developed Property, Approved Property, Public Property and/or Property Owner's Association Property that is not Exempt Property pursuant to the provisions of Section E. B. ASSIGNMENT TO LAND USE CATEGORY Each Fiscal Year, commencing with the 2005-2006 Fiscal Year, all Parcels of Taxable Property within the CFD shall be classified as Developed Property, Approved Property, Undeveloped Property, Public Property, or Property Owner's Association Property and shall be subject to the levy of Special Taxes in accordance with this Rate and Method of Apportionment as determined pursuant to Sections C., D., and E. below. Parcels of Developed Property shall further be classified as Residential Property or Non Residential Property. A Parcel of Residential Property shall further be classified to the appropriate Land Use Category based on the Residential Floor Area for such Parcel as shown in Table 1 below. C. MAXIMUM SPECIAL TAX RATE 1. Developed Property Commencing Fiscal Year 2005-2006, and each Fiscal Year thereafter, the Maximum Special Tax for each Parcel of Residential Property classified as Developed Properly shall be the greater of (i) an amount derived by application of the applicable Assigned Special Tax set forth in Table 1 or (ii) the amount derived by application of the Backup Special Tax as provided for in Section C. l .b. below. Commencing Fiscal Year 2005-2006, and each Fiscal Year thereafter, the Maximum Special Tax for each Parcel of Non-Residential Property classified as Developed Property shall be the Assigned Special Tax described in Table 1. a. Assigned Special Tax The Assigned Special Tax for each Land Use Category within the CFO is shown in Table I below. B-4 TABLE I Assigned Special Taxes for Developed Property Community Facilities District No. 04-2 Assigned Taxable Special Tax Per Land Use Category Unit Taxable Unit 1-Re sidel!.tial Pro[)erty (4,201 or more Sq.Ft.) D/U $5, 170 2-Re sidential Property_(4,00I to 4,200 Sq.Ft.) D/U $4,615 3-Re sidential Prope_rt)'.(3,601 to 4,000 Sq.Ft.) D/U $4,470 4-Re sidential Property_ (3,40 I to 3,600 Sq.Ft) D/U $4,065 5-Re sidential Propeli)'. (3,201 to 3,400 Sq,Ft.) D/U $3,965 6-Re sidenlial Pro[Jerty (3,001 to 3_,?00 Sq.Ft.) D/U $3,740 7-Re sidential Pro[Jerty (2,801 to 3,000 Sa.Ft.) D/U $3,515 $3,415 8-Re sidential Properly (2.501 lo 2,800 Sa.Ft.) D/U ··--·-- 9-Re sidential Property (2,500 or less Sa Ft.) D/U---· $3, 170 'lion-Residential Property Acre $14,44J_ IO - ·- b. Backup Special.Tax The Backup Special Tax for each Parcel of Residential Property created by a specific Final Map shall be determined by multiplying $14,445 by the total Acreage of Taxable Property within said Final Map, excluding the Acreage associated with lots or Parcels that are or are expected to be classified as Non-Residential Property, Public Property and Property Owner's Association Property pursuant to the current land use entitlements in such Final Map and dividing such amount by the total number of lots classified or expected to be classified as Residential Property within the specific Final Map. If a single Final Map is recorded for Tract No. 28815 and a single Final Map is recorded for Tract No. 28816 at the same time, both Final Maps shall be treated as a single Final Map for purposes of determining the Backup Special Tax. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the number of Parcels of Residential Property in a specific Final Map is subsequently changed or modified by recordation of a lot line adjustment or similar instrument, then the Backup Special Tax shall be recalculated for the area that has been changed or modified using the methodology described in the preceding paragraph. 2. Approved Property The Maximum Special Tax for each Parcel of Approved Property expected to be classil'ied as Residential Property pursuant to the current land use entitlements shall be the Backup Special Tax computed pursuant to Section C. I .b. The B-5 Maximum Special Tax for each Parcel of Approved Property expected to be classified as Non-Residential Property pursuant to the current land use entitlements shall be $14,445 per Acre. 3. Public Property and/or Property Owner's Association Property that is not Exempt Property pursuant to tbe provisions of Section E. The Maximum Special Tax for each Parcel of Public Property andior Property Owner's Association Property that is not Exempt Property pursuant to the provisions of Section E., shall be the amount determined by multiplying the Acreage of the Parcel by $14,445 per Acre. 4. Undeveloped Property The Maximum Special Tax for each Parcel of Undeveloped Property shall be the amount determined by multiplying the Acreage of the Parcel by $14,445 per Acre. D. METHOD OJ<' APPORTIONMENT OF THE SPECIAL TAX Commencing with Fiscal Year 2005-2006, and for each following Fiscal Year, the Legislative Body shall determine the Special Tax Requirement and shall levy the Special Tax until the amount of Special Taxes equals the Special Tax Requirement. The Special Tax shall be levied each Fiscal Y car as follows: First: The Special Tax shall be levied Proportionately on each Parcel of Developed Property at up to 100% of the applicable Assigned Special Tax to satisfy the Special Tax Requirement; Second: If additional monies arc needed to satisfy the Special Tax Requirement after the first step has been completed, the Special Tax shall be levied Proportionately on each Parcel of Approved Property at up to I 00% of the Maximum Special Tax for Approved Property; Third: If additional monies are needed to satisfy the Special Tax Requirement after the first two steps have been completed, the Special Tax shall be levied Proportionately on each Parcel of Undeveloped Property at up to 100% of the Maximum Special Tax for Undeveloped Property; Fourth: If additional moneys are needed to satisfy the Special Tax Requirement after the first three steps have been completed, the Special Tax to be levied on each Parcel of Developed Property whose Maximum Special Tax is derived by the application of the Backup Special Tax which shall be increased in equal percentages from the Assigned Special Tax up to the Maximum Special Tax for each such Parcel, as needed; Fifth: If additional monies are needed to satisfy the Special Tax Requirement after the first four steps have been completed, the Special Tax shall be levied Proportionately on each Parcel of Public Property and/or Property Owner's Association Property that is not B-6 Exempt Property pursuant to the provisions of Section E. at up to 100% of the Maximum Special Tax. Notwithstanc ing the above, under no circumstances will the Special Taxes levied against any Parcel of Residential Property be increased by more than ten percent (I 0%) per Fiscal year a,; a consequence of delinquency or default by the owner of any other Parcel within the (TD. E. EXEMPTIONS The Legislative Body shall not levy Special Taxes on up to 628.30 Acres of Public Property and Property Owner's Association Property. Exempt Property status will be assigned by the Administrator in the chronological order in which property becomes Public Propc!·ty and Property Owner's Association Property. After the limit of 628.30 Acres has been reached, the Maximum Special Tax obligation for any addit onal Public Property and/or Property Owner's Association Property shall be subject to the levy of the Special Tax as provided for in the fifth step in Section D .. to the extent permitted under the Act and applicable laws. However, if I 0.11 acres are dedicated for the purpose of a school site, these 10.11 Acres will be exempt in addition to the 628.30 A,;res. F. MA:"11:"IIER OF COLLECTIOi\ The Special Tax shall be collected in the same manner and at the same time as ordinary Ad valorem property taxes and shall be subject to the same penalties, the same procedure, sale and lien priority in the case of delinquency; provided, however, that County may directly bill the Special Tax, may collect Special Taxes at a different time or in a different manner if necessary to meet its financial obligations, and may covenant to foreclose and may actually foreclose on Parcels having delinquent Special Taxes as permitted by the Act. G. APPEALS Any owner of a Parcel claiming that the amount or application of the Special Tax levied on the Parcel is not correct and requesting a refund may file a written notice of appeal with the Administrator after the Special Tax in dispute has been paid but, not later than 12 months alter the mailing of the property tax bill on which the Special Tax appears. The Admininrator shall promptly review the appeal, and if necessary, meet with the property owner, consider written and oral evidence regarding the amount of the Special Tax, convene the CFD special tax review board and decide the appeal. This procedure shall be exclusive and its exhaustion by any property owner shall be a condition precedent to any legal action by such owner. B-7 H. PREP A Y\1ENT OF SPECIAL TAX The following definitions apply to Section H only: •'CFD Public Facilities" means either $24,592,241 (in 2004 dollars), which shall increase by the Construction Inflation Index on July 1, 2004, and on each July 1 thereafter, or such lower number as (i) shall be determined by the Administrator as sufficient to provide the public facilities under the authorized bonding program of the CFD, or (ii) shall be determined by the Legislative Body concurrently with a covenant that it will not issue any more Bonds to be supported by Special Taxes levied under this Rate and Method of Apportionment. "Construction Fund" means an account specifically identified in the Indenture to hold funds that are currently available for expenditure to acquire or construct public facilities eligible under the Act. "Construction Inflation Index" means the annual percentage change in the Engineering News-Record Building Cost Index for the City of Los Angeles, measured as of the calendar year, which ends in the previous Fiscal Year. In the event this index ceases to be published, the Construction Inflation Index shall be another index as determined by the Administrator that is reasonably comparable to the Engineering News Record Building Cost Index for the City of Los Angeles. "Future Facilities Costs" means the CFD Public Facilities minus public facility costs available to be funded through escrow accounts or funded by the Outstanding Bonds as defined in Section A, and minus public facility costs funded by interest earnings on the Construction Fund actually earned prior to the date of prepayment. 1. Prepavment in Full The Maximum Special Tax obligation may only be prepaid and permanently satisfied for a Parcel of Public Property, Property Owner's Association Property, Developed Property, Approved Property or Undeveloped Property for which a building permit has been issued. If Lot 277 of Tract 28816 has been acquired by a school district, this Parcel may he fully prepaid as if a building permit had been issued for Residential Property with Residential Floor Area of 4,20 I square feet. The Maximum Special Tax obligation applicable to a Parcel may be fully prepaid and the obligation of the Parcel to pay the Special Tax permanently satisfied as described herein; provided that a prepayment may be made only if there are no delinquent Special Taxes with respect to such Parcel at the time of prepayment. An owner of a Parcel intending to prepay the Maximum Special Tax obligation for the Parcel shall provide the Administrator with written notice of intent to prepay and within 10 business days of receipt of such notice, the Administrator shall notify such owner of the amount of the non-refundable deposit determined to cover the costs to he incurred hy the CFD in calculating the Prepayment Amount (as defined below) for the Parcel. Within 15 business days of receipt of such B-8 nonrefundable deposit, the Administrator shall notify such owner of the Prepayment Amount for the Parcel. The Prepayment Amount (defined below) shall equal the sum of the amounts as identified below (capitalized terms arc defined below): . Bond Redemption Amount _ plus . Redemption Premi11m __ plus Future Facilities f,.__ m_o~u_n_t ______~ nlus Defcasance Amount------n Ius Administrative Fees and Expenses less Reserve Fund Credit ----- Tota : equals Prepayment Amount The Prepayment Amount shall be determined as of the proposed prepayment date as follows: I. Confirm that no Special Tax delinquencies apply to such Parcel. 2. For a Parcel of Developed Property, compute the Maximum Special Tax obligation for the Parcel. For Parcels of Approved Property and Undeveloped Property, compute the Maximum Special Tax obligation for the Parcel as though it was already designated as Developed Property, based upon the building permit, which has been issued for the Parcel. For Parcels of Public Property or Property Owner's Association Property, compute the Maximum Special Tax obligation for the Parcel. 3_ Divide the Maximum Special Tax obligation derived pursuant to paragraph 2 by the total projected Maximum Special Taxes at build out of $2,027, 160, less the Maximum Special Tax obligation for any Parcels which have prepaid. 4. Multiply the quotient derived pursuant to paragraph 3 by the principal amount of the Outstanding Bonds to determine the amount of Outstanding Bonds to be redeemed with the Prepayment Amount (the "Bond Redemption Amount"). 5. Multiply the Bond Redemption Amount by the applicable redemption premium, if any, on the Outstanding Bonds to be redeemed (the "!?edemption Premium"). 6. Determine the Future Facilities Costs. 7. Multiply the quotient derived pursuant to paragraph 3 by the amount derived pursuant to paragraph 6 to determine the amount of Future Facilities Costs for the Parcel (the "Future Facilities Amount"). B-9 8. Determine the amount needed to pay interest on the Bond Redemption Amount from the first bond interest andior principal payment date following the current Fiscal Year until the earliest redemption date for the Outstanding Bonds on which Bonds can be redeemed from Special Tax prepayments. 9. Determine the Special Taxes levied on the Parcel in the current Fiscal Year which have not yet been paid. I 0. Determine the amount the Administrator reasonably expects to derive from the investment of the Bond Redemption Amount from the date of prepayment until the redemption date for the Outstanding Bonds to be redeemed with the Prepayment Amount. 11. Add the amounts derived pursuant to paragraphs 8 and 9 and subtract the amount derived pursuant to paragraph IO (the "LJefeasance Amount"). 12. Verify the administrative fees and expenses, including the cost of computing of the Prepayment Amount, the cost to invest the Prepayment Amount, the cost of redeeming the Outstanding Bonds, and the cost of recording notices to evidence the prepayment of the Maximum Special Tax obligation for the Parcel and the redemption of Outstanding Bonds (the "Administrative Fees and Expenses"). 13. The reserve fund credit (the "Reserve Fund Credit") shall equal the lesser of: (a) the expected reduction in the reserve requirement (as defined in the Indenture), if any, associated with the redemption of Outstanding Bonds as a result of the prepayment, or (b) the amount derived by subtracting the new reserve requirement (as defined in the Indenture) in effect after the redemption of Outstanding Bonds as a result of the prepayment from the balance in the reserve fund on the prepayment date, but in no event shall such amount be less than zero. 14. The Prepayment Amount is equal to the sum of the Bond Redemption Amount, the Redemption Premium, the Future Facilities Amount, the Defeasance Amount and the Administrative Fees and Expenses, less the Reserve Fund Credit. 15. From the Prepayment Amount, the Bond Redemption Amount, the Redemption Premium, and the Defeasance Amount shall be deposited into the appropriate fund as established under the Indenture and be used to redeem Outstanding Bonds or make debt service payments. The Future Facilities Amount shall be deposited into the Construction Fund. The Administrative Fees and Expenses shall be retained by the CFO. The Prepayment Amount may be sufficient to redeem other than a $5,000 increment of Bonds. In such event, the increment above $5,000 or an integral multiple thereof will be retained in the appropriate fund established under the B-10 Indenture to be used with the next redemption from other Maximum Special Tax obliga ion prepayments of Outstanding Bonds or to make debt service payments. As a result of the payment of the current Fiscal Year's Special Tax levy as determined pursuant to paragraph 9 above, the Administrator shall remove the curreni Fiscal Year's Special Tax levy for the prepaying Parcel from the County tax roll. With respect to any Parcel for which the Maximum Special Tax obliga'ion is prepaid, the Legislative Body shall cause a suitable notice to be rccord~d in compliance with the Act, to indicate the prepayment of the Maximum Special Tax obligation and the release of the Special Tax lien for the Parcel, and the obi igation of the Parcel to pay the Special Tax shall cease. Notwi 0hstanding the foregoing, no Special Tax prepayment shall be allowed unless the amount of Maximum Special Taxes that may be levied on all Parcels of Taxable Property after the proposed prepayment will be at least 1.1 times maxirrum annual debt service on the Bonds that will remain outstanding after the prepayment plus estimated annual Administrative Expenses. 2. Prepayment in Part The Maximum Special Tax obligation on a Parcel of Developed Property may be partial y prepaid in increments of $5,000. For purposes of determining the partial prepa, mcnt amount of the provisions of Section H. l shall he modified as provid~d by the following formula: PP~ ((P1 -A)x F)+A These ,erms have the following meaning: PP = Partial Prepayment P,. = !he Prepayment Amount calculated according to Section H. l F = the percent by which the owner of the Parcel(s) is partially prepaying the Maximum Special Tax obligation. A= the Administrative Fees and Expenses determined pursuant to Section H. l The ov111er of a Parcel who desires to partially prepay the Maximum Special Tax obligation for the Parcel shall notify the Administrator of (i) such owner's intent to part:ally prepay the Maximum Special Tax obligation, (ii) the percentage by which the Maximum Special Tax obligation shall be prepaid, and (iii) the compa1y or agency that will be acting as the escrow agent, if any. Within IO businc,:s days of receipt of such notice, the Administrator shall notify such owner of the 1111ount of the non-refundable deposit determined lo cover the cost to be incurred by the CFD in calculating the proper amount of a Partial Prepayment. Within 15 business days of receipt of such non-refundable deposit, the Administrator shall notify such owner of the amount of the Partial Prepayment for B-1 t the Parcel. A Partial Prepayment must be made not less than 60 business days prior to any redemption date for the Outstanding Bonds to be redeemed with the proceeds of the Partial Prepayment. With respect to any Parcel for which the Maximum Special Tax obligation is partially prepaid, the Administrator shall ( i) distribute the Partial Prepayment as provided in Paragraph 13 of Section H. l, and (ii) indicate in the records of the CFD that there has been a Partial Prepayment for the Parcel and that a portion of the Maximum Special Tax obligation equal to the remaining percentage (1.00 - F) of the Maximum Special Tax obligation will continue, and the Special Tax shall continue on the Parcel pursuant to Section D. I. TERM OF THE SPECIAL TAX Special Taxes shall be levied for the period necessary to satisfy the Special Tax Requirement, but in no event shall it be levied after Fiscal Year 2035-2036 or the stated maturity of the Bonds, whichever is sooner. B-12 APPENDIX C SUMMARY APPRAISAL REPORT SUMMARY APPRAISAL REPORT COVERING County of Riverside Community Facilities District No. 04-2 (Lake Hills Crest) DA TE OF VALUE: SUBMITTED TO: May I, 2005 Mr. Dean Deines County of Riverside-Executive Office 4080 Lemon St., 4'h Floor Riverside, CA 92501-3651 DATE OF REPORT: SUBMITTED BY: May 12, 2005 Stephen G. White, MAI 1370 N. Brea Blvd., Suite 205 Fullerton, CA 92835 Stephen G. White, lW:AI Real Estate Appraiser 1310 N. BREA BLVO., SUITE 205 · FULLERTON, CALlf'OANIA 92835-4128 C714J 73S--159S · FAX \714) 7,18-4371 May 12, 2005 Mr. Dean Deines Re: Community Facilities District County ofRiversid~-Executive Office No. 04-2 (Lake Hills Crest) 1 4080 Lemon St., 4 1, Floor Riverside, CA 92501-3651 Dear Mr. Deines: In accordance with your request and the County's authorization, I have completed a Complete Appraisal of the taxable property within the above referenced Community Facilities District (CFO). This property is in the master planned community of Lake Hills Reserve and is comprised of 512 single-family residential lots which are currently being graded and arc planned to be developed with five different neighborhoods or product types of homes. One ownership entity currently owns part of the lots in three of the neighborhoods ( 140 lots total), and these lots represent the first of three takedowns of the purchase of all oft 1c lots from the other ownership entity that still owns the balance of the lots in those three 1eighborhoods as well as all of the lots in the other two neighborhoods (372 lots total). The purpose of thi; appraisal is to estimate the market value of each of the two separate ownerships, by firsl considering the value of the lots by neighborhood/product type and then considering the sp~cific allocation of the lots in each neighborhood to the appropriate ownership entity. The valuation also reflects the as is condition of the lots ranging from partially graded to near finished condition, and the proposed public bond financing together with the projected tax rate of J_ l.8% (on projected base home pricing) to the future homeowners, including the special taxes. Based on the inspections of the properties and analysis of matters pertinent to value, the following conclusicns of market value have been arrived at, subject to the Assumptions and Limiting Conditiorn,, and as of May I, 2005: OwnershiE No. Lots :Vlarket Value LH(: River,;ide Associates, LL('./Rivcrside LH(\ Ltd. 372 $ 71,500,000 Lake Hills-Riverside, L.P. 140 $ 38 200,000 $109,700,000 (Ol'iE HUNDRED Nll'iE MILLION SEVEN HUNDRED THOUSAl'iD DOLLARS) MR. DEAN DEINES MAY 12,2005 PAGE2 The following is the balance of this 44-page Summary Appraisal Report which includes the Certification, Assumptions and Limiting Conditions, definitions, property data, exhibits, valuation and market data from which the value conclusions were derived. Sincerely, ./4LJ. d:lz ... Stephen G. White, MAI (State Certified General Real Estate Appraiser No. AG O133 l l) SGW:sw Ref: 05010 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGES Certification...... 5 Assumptions and Limiting Conditions...... 6-7 Purpose and Use of the Appraisal, Scope of the Appraisal, Date of Value, Property Rights Appraised, Definitions...... 8-9 GENERAL PROPERTY DATA Location, D,!scription of Surroundings, Description of Lake Hills Reserve...... I 0-16 STONEVIEW Property Data, Valuation. 17-25 SILVERSAGE Property Data, Valuation. 26-29 ORCHARD HEIGHTS Property Da ca, Valuation ...... 30-33 ROCKRIDGE Property Da.a, Valuation ... 34-36 HIGHPOINT Property Da·a, Valuation. 37-39 CONCLUSION OW VALUE BY OWNERSHIP...... 40 ADDENDA Tabulation Residential Land Sales ...... 41 Qualifications of Appraiser...... 42-44 CERTIFICATION I certify that, to the best of my knowledge and belief: 1. The statements of fact contained in this report are true and correct. 2. The reported analyses, opinions and conclusions are limited only by the reported assumptions and limiting conditions, and arc my personal, impartial, and unbiased professional analyses, opinions and conclusions. 3. I have no present or prospective interest in the properties that arc the subject of this report, and no personal interest with respect to the parties involved. 4. I have no bias with respect to the properties that are the subject of this report or to the parties involved with this assignment. 5. My engagement in this assignment was not contingent upon developing or reporting predetermined results. 6. My compensation for completing this assignment is not contingent upon the development or reporting of a predetermined value or direction in value that favors the cause of the client, the amount of the value opinion, the attainment of a stipulated result, or the occurrence of a subsequent event directly related to the intended use of this appraisal. 7. My analyses, opinions and conclusions were developed, and this report has been prepared, in conformity with the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice. 8. I have made a personal inspection of the properties that arc the subject of this report. 9. No one provided significant professional assistance to the person signing this report, other than data research and some report writing by my associate, Kirsten Patterson. IO. The use of this report is subject to the requirements of the Appraisal Institute relating to review by its duly authorized representatives. As of the date of this report, I have completed the requirements of the continuing education program of the Appraisal Institute. ~ LJ. ""1l____ _ Stephen G. White, MAI (State Certified General Real Estate Appraiser No. AGO 13311) 5 ASSUMPTIOl\'S Al\'D LIMITING CONDITIONS This appraisal has been based upon the following assumptions and limiting conditions: I. No responsibility is assumed for the legal descriptions provided or for matters pertaining t,) legal or title considerations. Title to the properties is assumed to be good and mirkctablc unless otherwise stated. 2. The prope1t es are appraised free and clear of any or all liens or encumbrances unless otherwise stiled. 3. Responsible ownership and competent prope1ty management are assumed. 4. The information furnished by others is believed to be reliable, but no warranty ts given for its accuracy. 5. All engineering studies, if applicable, arc assumed to be correct. Any plot plans or other illustrative material in this report arc included only to help the reader visualize the property. 6. It is assumed that there are no hidden or unapparent conditions of the properties, subsoil, or i.tructures that render them more or less valuable. No responsibility is assumed fm such conditions or for obtaining the engineering studies that may be required to discover them. 7. It is assumed that the properties are in full compliance with all applicable federal, state and local environmental regulations and laws unless the lack of compliance is stated, described and considered in the appraisal report. 8. It is assumed that the properties conform to all applicable zoning and use regulations and restrictions unless a nonconf()rtnity has been identified, described and con&idered in the appraisal report. 9. It is assumed that all required licenses, certificates of occupancy, consents and other legislative or administrative authority from any local, state or national government or private entity or organization have been or can be obtained or renewed for any use on which the va Jue estimates contained in the report are based. I 0. It is assumed that the use of the land and improvements is confined within the boundaries ,ir property lines of the properties described and that there arc no encroachments or trespasses unless noted in the report. 11. Unless othe1wise stated in this report, the existence of hazardous materials, which may or may not be present on the properties, was not observed by the appraiser. However, the appraiser is not qualified to detect such substances. The presence of such substan:es may affect the value of the property, but the values estimated in this 6 ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMITING CONDITIONS, Continuing appraisal are based on the assumption that there is no such material on or in the properties that would cause a loss in value. No responsibility is assumed for such conditions or for any expertise or engineering knowledge required to discover them. The client should retain an expert in this field, if desired. 12. Possession of this report, or a copy thereof, does not carry with it the right of publication, unless otherwise authorized. It is understood and agreed that this report will be utilized in the Official Statement, as required for the bond issuance. 13. The appraiser, by reason of this appraisal, is not required to give further consultation or testimony or to be in attendance in court with reference to the properties in question unless arrangements have previously been made. SPECIAL ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMITING CONDITIONS 1. Estimates of the remaining costs by ownership to get the lots from as is condition to "finished lots" have been obtained from the property owners, and these figures have been assumed to be reasonably accurate and have been relied upon in this appraisal. 2. The valuation has assumed that the CFD bond-financed facilities will include ±$22,470,000 to finance street improvements, storm drain facilities, water facilities and sewer facilities. 3. The valuation reflects that there are existing County of Riverside CFD 84-2 bonds in the outstanding amount of ±$1,385,000 that constitute an overlapping lien on the subject property, but these bonds will mature in September 2006. 4. The Market Absorption Study dated March 11, 2005 by Empire Economics, Inc. has been relied upon for the projected home pricing. 7 PURPOSE AND USE OF THE APPRAISAL The purpose of this appraisal is to estimate the market value of the as is condition of each of the two separate ownerships comprising the taxable property within Community Facilities District No. o,t-2 (Lake Hills Crest) of the County of Riverside, reflecting the proposed public bond financing. This Summary Appraisal Report is to be used as required in the bond issuance. SCOPE OF THE APPRAISAL It is the intent cf this Complete Appraisal that all appropriate data considered pertinent in the valuation of tre subject properties be collected, confirmed and reported in a Summary Appraisal Report, in conformance with the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice and the guidelines of the California Debt and Investment Advisory Commission. This has includ!d an inspection of the subject properties and their surroundings; obtaining of pertinent property data on the subject properties, including review of various maps and documents relaing to the properties, the subdivision and layout of the lots and the planned development/product types; obtaining of comparable land sales from a variety of sources; and analysis of ill of the data to the value conclusions. DATE OF VALUE The date ofvalle for this appraisal is May 1, 2005. PROPERTY RIGHTS APPRAISED This appraisal fr of the fee simple interest in the subject properties, subject to the special tax and assessment '1iens. DEFINITION OF MARKET VALUE The most probable price, as of a specified date, in cash or in terms equivalent to cash, or in other precisely revealed terms for which the specified property rights should sell after reasonable expo,ure in a competitive market under all conditions requisite to fair sale, with the buyer and seller each acting prudently, knowledgeably and for self-interest, and assuming that neither is under undue duress. DEFINITION OF FINISHED LOT This term describes the condition of residential lots in a single-family subdivision for detached homes in which the lots are fully improved and ready for homes to be built. Th is reflects that the lots have all development entitlements, infrastructure improvements completed, finish grading completed, all in-tract utilities extended to the property line of each lot, stree: improvements completed, common area improvements/landscaping (associated with :he tract) completed, resource agency permits (if necessary), and all 8 DEFINITION OF FINISHED LOT, Continuing development fees paid, exclusive of building permit fees, in accordance with the conditions of approval of the specific tract map. DEFINITION OF BLUE-TOP LOT This term describes residential lots in a single-family subdivision for detached homes in which the lots and streets have been rough graded, and the offsite infrastmcture of streets and utilities are completed to the tract, but not within the tract. 9 LOCATION MAP . ·,: .. .: ·' ' . . . .,. . IO GENERAL PROPERTY DATA LOCATION The map on the opposite page indicates the approximate location of the subject community of Lake Hills Reserve that extends northwest and southeast from the arrow on the map. The master-planned community of Lake Hills Reserve lies along Lakepointe Dr. and Skyridge Dr., and extends for nearly two miles between Indiana Ave. (nearby to the northwest) and La Sierra Ave. (nearby to the southeast), in unincorporated Riverside County area. The community of Lake Hills Reserve is located in the northwest part of the County of Riverside, about one mile south of the 91 Freeway and approximately 3 miles east of the 1-15 Freeway. Nearby to the west arc the City Limits of Corona, nearby to the northwest is the unincorporated community of Home Gardens, and nearby to the north are the City Limits of Riverside. To the south and east is unincorporated Riverside County area. and just over a mile to the southeast is Lake Mathews. DESCRIPTION OF SURROUNDINGS Lake Hills Reserve stretches nearly two miles along the ridgelines of a hilly and largely undeveloped area east of the City of Corona and south of the City of Riverside and the 91 Freeway. Residential developments arc scattered to the northwest, north, east and southeast of the subject, including the original part of the master-planned community of Lake Hills. To the south and west is mostly hilly, undeveloped land with some citrus groves in the canyon or valley areas. The general area has experienced significant residential development over the past 10 years, including the master-planned community of Victoria Grove across La Sierra Ave. to the southeast, as well as three smaller infill tracts in the area nearby to the north. In addition, KB Home is currently developing a tract of homes across La Sierra Ave. to the east, and two more tracts of homes are planned farther to the east. To the northwest of the subject the land slopes down to Indiana Ave. and the unincorporated community of Home Gardens which includes a mix of newer and older residential development, On the south side of Indiana Ave. at Lincoln St. is a small neighborhood of homes built in 1989 through which Lake Hills Reserve will be accessed from the northwest. Hornes in this neighborhood range in size from , 1,250 s.f. to 1,840 s.f., and recent sales indicate prices from $375,000 to $415,000. Farther to the west along the south side of Indiana A vc. arc two neighborhoods of homes that were built in the late 1980's. These homes range in size from ±1,400 s.f. to 2,200 s.f., and recent sales indicate prices from $355,000 to $510,000. Adjacent to the central portion of the subject, at Lakepointe Dr. and Skyridge Dr., is a small tract of 43 homes that were built in the rnid- I 990's. These homes range in II Loke Reser-,;€ Jnils :::GLOR :llliiililll Sbnin'i,;w O '.'.'k :), ,'°'1)rd H,;, ;,;.,;;. 'Jew,, H>t·;:;o,r:t ft\:;;,;, S3 '::0t Tok)! :,1 • S:::r.s:,c' ':'lf~ 1()T ,r· S,;w ·, __ ,..._ ., ' / ..,, j ., , - , -~- I ' ·•' ', ,s: ~ J ,-! ,•,· ±"• "'. ~SA~E" & ASSOC:!,ltS. Lake Hills Reserve ~ wn,~. ii,.;c BREHM COMMUNITTES ,~.A'IC f;.;P1RE REG,'.)!-< ''. '.';:,7' "~ -,_;.:; .....,; .·;:. 27i4 LOl{[R AVENUl WEST, S;J\T[ 300 PRODUCT EXHIBIT •,vc,.·~ >,.),1,,·1 CARLSBAD. CA 92008 COuNlY CF RIVERSIDE, ST.AT[ OF C-4Li~·c,~~d4 DESCRIPTION OF SURROUNDINGS, Continuing size from ±2,400 s.f. to 3,000 s.f. and many have good views. Recent sales indicate prices from $516,000 to $550,000. The land then slopes down to the north to various other neighborhoods of homes off of Lakcpointe Dr., southerly of Indiana Ave. The homes nearest the subject and part of the way up the hill were built in the early to mid- l 990's and range in size from ±2,250 s.f. to 3,000 s.f. Recent sales indicate the prices from $495,000 to $599,000. The homes farthest down the hill were built from the early to late l 990's, and range in size from ±1,200 s.f. to 2,200 s.f. Recent sales indicate prices from $340,000 to $493,000. To the northeast of the subject the land slopes well down to other homes off of Lake Knoll Pkwy., and adjacent to the east and southeast are homes off of Lakepointe Dr. that terrace down the hill from the subject. All of these neighborhoods were earlier phases of the Lake Hills community, and many of the homes have good views. The homes were built in the late 1980's through the late 1990's, and range in size from ±1,400 s.f to 2,600 s.f. Recent sales indicate the prices from $365,000 to $585,000. To the south and southwest of the subject is undeveloped land that slopes down the hills into canyon and valley areas. DESCRIPTION OF LAKE HILLS RESERVE Overview Lake Hills Reserve is a master planned community that contains a total of ±835 acres. The site is planned to be developed with 512 single family homes within five different neighborhoods, as well as a school site and a community park. Approximately 600 acres of the community will remain as open space. The five different neighborhoods are briefly described as follows: StoneView: I 08 lots, 8,063 s.f. average pad size; homes to be 2.955 s.f. to 4.087 s.f. with projected base pricing of$525,000 to $620,000. SilverSage: 103 lots, 11,402 s.f. average pad size; homes to be 4,227 s.f. to 5,121 s.f. with projected base pricing of$675,000 to $750,000. Orchard Heights: 98 lots, 7.102 s.f. average pad size; homes to be 3,412 s.[ to 3,829 s.f. with projected base pricing of$560,000 to $595.000. RockRidgc: 110 lots, 7,212 s.f. average pad size; homes to be 2.600 s.f. to 3,100 s.f with projected base pricing of $480,000 to $525,000. HighPoint: 93 lots, 10,749 s.f. average pad size: homes to be 3,800 s.f. to 4,200 s.f. with projected base pricing of$615,000 to $650,000. The residential development will be fairly spread out with much open space of canyon and hill areas between and/or around the various neighborhoods. The streets into and through the community will be meandering, with a number of single-loaded 13 DESCRIPTION OF LAKE HILLS RESERVE, Continuing streets ar,d cul-de-sacs. With its hilltop location, many homes within the community will have panoramic views of the distant mountains, city lights, canyon and valley areas, and Lake Mathews. These factors will create a low density and rural-type of setting, though still in close proximity to the 91 Freeway. The first phases of development will be taking place on the lots in the southeast part of the ccmmunity, with development then moving northwesterly to the center and northwest parts of the community. Ownersl!iI! As previously indicated, Lake Hills - Riverside, L.P. ( commonly known by the builder r.ame of Brehm Communities) currently owns 140 of the lots and LHC Riverside Associates, LLC/Riverside LHC, Ltd. (LHC) currently owns 372 of the lots. LHC ( or related entities) acquired the property for all 512 lots in 1998. In September 2003 an escrow was entered into with Brehm to sell the 512 lots in three takedowns, with 140 lots to close in March 2004, 140 lots to close in December 2004 and 232 lots to close in September 2005. The sale price was $39,300,000 plus an amount The first takedown of 140 lots closed on March 30, 2004. However, the second takedown was delayed since the CFD had not yet been funded, and it is now projected that both the second and third takedowns will close in September 2005. (Note: The ownership of the specific lots is discussed in later sections of the report.) Streets and Access Access t,J Lake Hills Reserve from the northwest is by Lincoln St. south from Indiana J,ve. which turns into Skyridge Dr. It then meanders through the west part of the community and connects to Lakcpointe Dr. in the central area. Lakepointe Dr. provides access to the community from the north and from the southeast. At the north, Lakepointe Dr. extends southerly from Indiana Ave. to the center part of the community. It will then continue southerly and easterly through the community, conncctir.g to the existing portion of the road that continues southeasterly down the hill and through the existing neighborhoods. Access is then east to La Sierra Ave. by Lake Cre ,t Dr. The extension of Lakepointe Dr. into the subject community from the southeast is currently being paved. It has then been graded for some distance further, and grading is still underway on the portion through the center of the community. Grading s also underway on Skyridge Dr. into the community, and it has not yet been paved. 14 DESCRIPTION OF LAKE HILLS RESERVE, Continuing Utilities The utilities are being extended into the subject community as part of the construction of the streets, and are provided as follows: Water & Sewer: Western Municipal Water District Electric: Southern California Edison Gas: Southern Ca1ifornia Gas Co1npany Telephone: SBC Zoning/General Plan/ Approvals The single-family lots in the subject community have the zoning designations of R-1, 7,200; R-1, 10,000; R-1, 15,000; and R-4. The first three designations permit one family dwelling with a minimum of 7,200 s.f., 10,000 s.f., and 15,000 s.f., respectively, and the R-4 designation is for planned residential development. The general plan designation is SP-144, with further designations of low, medium and medium high density residential, permitting from Yz-acrc minimum lot sizes up to 8 dwelling units per acre. The speci fie approvals for the planned development of Lake Hills Reserve are by final Tract Map Nos. 28815 and 28816 which were recorded December 2, 2004. Drainage/Flood Hazard Drainage will be within master-planned facilities that will be constructed throughout the community. Per FEMA Flood Map Panel Nos. 060245 13808 and 060245 0715A, both dated November 20, 1996, the subject lots arc located in Zones C (outside of the 100-year floodplain) and D (area of undetermined but possible flood hazards). However, as indicated on the tentative tract maps, the lots are not subject to inundation or flood hazard, and this is evident due to the hilltop location of the subject lots. Soil/Seismic/Environmental Conditions Per the tentative tract maps, this land is not subject to liquefaction or other geological hazards, nor is it in a Special Studies Zone. Review of other maps confirms that the subject property is not located within an Alquist Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone. This appraisal has assumed that, for all of the subject lots, all necessary grading and compacting has been or will be properly completed; that there are no abnormal soil or geological conditions that would affect the development of the lots as planned; that all necessary environmental pem1its and approvals have been obtained for single family residential development as planned; and that there are no other environmental conditions, including endangered species or habitat that would have a negative effect 15 DESCRIPTION OF LAKE HILLS RESERVE, Continuing on the i:fanned development. Furthermore, it has been assumed that all required mitigation measures have taken place or are reflected in the costs to complete the lots to finish,:d condition. Title Report A Preliminary Report by First American Title dated August 20, 2003, Order No. 0625-1016410, has been reviewed. Exceptions to title include a lien of special tax for CFD No. 84-2 as recorded January 30, 1989, and many easements for roads, public utilities, pipe lines, pole lines, access/ingress/egress, communications facilities, cables, drainage, conduits and underground facilities. It is noted that many of these easements are typical and necessary for a subdivision such as the subject, and other easements have been accommodated in the final tract maps. This appraisal has assu:ncd that there are no exceptions to title that would have a negative effect on the deve .opment of the lots with homes, as planned. Highest and Best Use The term highest and best use is defined as that use which is reasonable and probable, and supports the highest present value of the land or improvements, also described as the most profitable use which is legal, physically possible and financially feasible as of the effective date of the appraisal. The higt est and best use is concluded to be for development of homes on the subject lots as p .anned, and as allocated into the five different neighborhoods with different product types for each neighborhood. This use is legal by the planning approvals and the recorded tract maps, and it is physically possible as the lots are graded to buildablc pads with all infrastructure in place. In addition, the use is financially feasible as evidenced by t11c strong dctnand for vacant/buildablc residential lots as well as for new homes in this general area that has resulted in significantly increasiug prices in recent years. The projected base pricing for the homes, as previously listed, is from the Market Absorption Study dated March 11, 2005 by Empire Economics, Inc. This study indicates that these are relatively high-priced homes, considering the lot sizes as well as the home sizes, but this is regarded as being appropriate since their market orientation is expected to be towards move-up households. This study also concludes that the 512 homes would be absorbed (sold and occupied) from the first quarter of2006 through the first quarter of 2010. 16 =1~~==--~--1 . STONEVIEW .