COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIVISION Department of Planning and Development Review Frederick County, Maryland 21701
30 North Market Street Frederick County, Maryland 21701 (301) 600-1138
TO Frederick County Planning Commission
FROM Jim Gugel, Planning Manager
DATE June 29, 2012
SUBJECT 2011 Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Review Briefing
ISSUE Staff will provide an informational briefing of the Comprehensive Plan/Zoning Review in preparation for the joint FcPc/BOCC public hearing on July 31st.
BACKGROUND
Following the Board of County Commissioners (BOCC) public hearings held in January 2012, the BOCC conducted a series of work sessions in February and made preliminary decisions on the individual requests. Based on these preliminary decisions staff prepared a report, (Approved Requests Analysis) with additional staff comments and a summary of the impacts. The report was presented to the BOCC on May 31st where the Board made additional revisions to their preliminary decisions. The Board also directed that the Draft Comprehensive Plan/Zoning changes be taken back to the Planning Commission for review and recommendation.
The material that will be reviewed with the Planning Commission includes the following:
1. Approved Requests Analysis – documents the overall process and components of the review. Also includes a countywide summary of the requests and a regional summary of individual requests and staff comments made at the BOCC work session on May 31st. 2. Property Owner Request Summaries – a spreadsheet for each planning region provides a summary of each request in addition to staff comments and the preliminary decisions by the BOCC. A location map for the requests, for each region, is also included. 3. Residential Needs and Development Capacity Analysis – an amended version that incorporates updated population projections and different assumptions on appropriate levels of development capacity. 4. Property Owner Applications – All of the applications are currently available on the Community Development web page (www.frederickcountymd.gov/2011zoningreview). 5. Mapping – the Draft approved requests are mapped on the 2010 Land Use Plan and the Zoning maps.
Comprehensive Plan/Zoning Process – Remaining Steps and Schedule
FcPc Informational Briefing – July 11, 2012
Joint FcPc/BOCC Public Hearing – July 31, 2012 Held at Oakdale High School at 6:00 pm. Map displays will be available starting at 5:00 pm. Decisions would be made at a public work sessions following the public hearing
FcPc Review and Recommendation – August 8 and 15 (if necessary) Conduct discussion of public hearing comments and issues and vote on a recommendation to the BOCC
BOCC Work Session – late August Review the FcPc recommendation and make any final revisions to the plan, zoning, or water/sewer mapping.
BOCC Adoption – mid September Following the BOCC’s final direction, staff would prepare the final plan, zoning, and water/sewer maps for adoption by the BOCC. The new zoning would be effective that day.
RECOMMENDATION Staff provides this material as an informational briefing in preparation for the July 31st public hearing.
May 16, 2012 REVISED: July 3, 2012 Frederick County Community Development Division
2011 Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Review Approved Requests Analysis
INTRODUCTION
In January 2011 the Board of County Commissioners (BOCC) announced its desire to review the 2010 County Comprehensive Plan and specifically to address the downzonings that occurred as part of the 2010 Plan’s comprehensive zoning process. On May 19, 2011 at a public work session the BOCC voted to initiate a Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Review, with an application period in the summer 2011 to allow property owners to request changes in their land use plan designation and/or zoning.
This analysis report has been revised and updated to reflect further direction from the BOCC made at their work session held on May 31st.
Update Process Summary
1. 60-Day Referral and Comment Period – The requests were summarized by planning region and were referred to county and state agencies, municipalities, and adjoining counties. The referral was completed in early September 2011. 2. County Planning Commission Review – Following the 60-day comment period the Planning Commission was scheduled to conduct four (4) public hearings organized by planning region on November 16th, 17th, 30th, and December 1st. At the hearing on November 17th the Planning Commission voted to suspend their review and recommended to the BOCC that no changes be made to the 2010 County Plan. 3. BOCC Review – The BOCC held four public hearings on January 10th, 18th, 24th, and 31st 2012. The Board held three work sessions (February 14th, 21st, and 23rd 2012) to review the individual requests and took preliminary votes on each. BOCC held a work session on May 31, 2012 4. Analysis – Has been revised and updated to reflect further direction from the BOCC on May 31st. 5. Joint Public Hearing and Planning Commission Referral - A joint FcPc/BOCC public hearing will be held July 31, 2012 on the Draft comprehensive plan and zoning changes as currently proposed by the BOCC 6. Adoption of the Plan/Zoning – Following the FcPc review the BOCC may make further revisions and give final direction for the adoption of land use plan, zoning map and water/sewer plan map changes.
2011 Comprehensive Plan & Zoning Review – Request Analysis Staff Report, July 2012 1
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Amendment Components
This review process will include three individual components that will primarily address mapping though revisions to the 2010 County Plan text document will also be made following adoption of the maps.
Comprehensive Zoning Map – appropriate mapping will be provided that reflects the approved requests.
Land Use Plan Map - Revisions to the Plan map will generally follow the zoning changes to maintain consistency between the zoning classification and the appropriate land use plan designation.
Water and Sewerage Plan - Revisions to the Water/Sewer Plan classifications will be proposed relative to changes in the zoning and/or land use plan designations. The following general revisions would be made: No Planned Service (NPS) to Planned Service (PS) – properties that are proposed to be included within a community growth area with a land use plan designation other than Ag/Rural or Natural Resource. The zoning would still be Agricultural. No Planned Service (NPS) to 5 – properties proposed for zoning other than Agricultural or Resource Conservation AND are currently within a community growth area or proposed to be within a community growth area. Planned Service (PS) to 5 – properties currently within a community growth area, having a development land use plan designation and proposed to be rezoned to other than Agricultural or Resource Conservation.
COUNTYWIDE SUMMARY
Currently, there are 206 requests under consideration. This number includes several new requests submitted after the application period in the summer 2011 and also reflects several requests that have been withdrawn. Of the 206 requests, the BOCC have given preliminary approval for 166. The tables below provide a summary of the approved requests including the countywide totals and for each planning region.
Approved Land Use Plan Designation Changes Table 1 shows the acreages approved for general land use plan designation categories. The specific land use plan designations included within the general categories are noted as follows: Commercial – General Commercial, Village Center, Mixed Use Industrial – Limited Industrial, General Industrial, Office/Research/Industrial Residential – Rural Residential, Rural Community, and Low/Medium/High Density Residential Ag/Rural (CGA) – Indicates a plan designation of Agricultural/Rural within a community growth area (CGA)
2011 Comprehensive Plan & Zoning Review – Request Analysis Staff Report, July 2012 2
Table 1 Approved Land Use Plan Designation Changes (acres)
Approved Zoning District Changes Table 2 shows the acreage approved for general zoning categories. A second table provides the detailed breakdown for the specific zoning districts. Commercial – General Commercial (GC), Village Center (VC), Mixed Use (MX) Industrial – Limited Industrial (LI), General Industrial (GI), Office/Research/Industrial (ORI) Residential – R-1 Low Density, R-3 Low Density, R-5 Medium Density
Table 2 Approved Zoning Changes (acres)
2011 Comprehensive Plan & Zoning Review – Request Analysis Staff Report, July 2012 3
Residential Development Potential The total residential development potential for the approved requests is summarized in Table 3 below. The development potential separates requests for zoning (which may also include a land use plan designation request) from requests only for land use plan designations to avoid double counting. Analysis is also provided in Table 4 for the potential development that would occur on well/septic.
Table 3 Approved Residential Development Potential
The total residential development noted in Table 3 is expected to occur over a 20+ year timeframe. Regardless of the amount of development potential, the most significant factor that will affect the timing of development is the economy. The relative timeframe for the residential development to occur can be described as follows:
Zoning Potential – Those properties receiving residential zoning could be considered for development in a near-term timeframe over the next 10 years or so. Properties within a municipal growth area will also be subject to an annexation process with ultimate approval by the respective municipality.
Low Density Residential Plan Designation – This potential represents properties that are receiving a land use plan designation of Low Density Residential (LDR) and in many cases are being added to a community growth area. The zoning for properties, however, will remain Agricultural (A) so the timeframe for development may be in a mid-term period of 10 or more years. These properties would need to go through a subsequent rezoning process in the County or would be subject to an annexation process for those within a municipal growth area.
Community Growth Area Designation – This designation includes properties that would be added to a community growth area (CGA) but would remain with an Agricultural/Rural land use plan designation. This category is referred to as Future Growth Area in the 2010 County Plan and has a long-term development timing of perhaps 20+ years.
2011 Comprehensive Plan & Zoning Review – Request Analysis Staff Report, July 2012 4
Well and Septic Development The development potential expected to be served on well/septic only includes those requests for zoning or plan designations if they are outside of a community growth area (CGA).
NOTE: The requests for R-1 or R-3 zoning on properties within a CGA are expected to be annexed into the respective municipality and are not counted under the well/septic development potential.
The potential development assumes an average lot size of 2.5 acres/lot on the entire gross acres.
Table 4 Well and Septic Development Potential
No. of Potential Planning Region Acres Properties Lots/Dwellings Adamstown 0 0 0
Brunswick 2 280 112
Frederick 5 106 48
Middletown 10 128 51
New Market 5 103 41
Thurmont 4 97 38
Urbana 9 663 265
Walkersville 2 29 11 566 Total 37 properties 1406 acres lots/dwellings
2011 Comprehensive Plan & Zoning Review – Request Analysis Staff Report, July 2012 5
REGIONAL SUMMARY
At their work sessions in February to review the individual requests the Board noted the need for additional analysis or staff comment for individual requests.
The BOCC reviewed these comments and issues at their work session on May 31st. The BOCC’s decisions are described following the staff response. These decisions are also described in the regional request summaries.
Adamstown Region
Case # AD-3 (Windridge) – Current Board action would restore the GI plan designation to about 70 % (155 acres) of the property. Staff Response – staff recommends applying the GI plan designation to the entire 222 acre property. The remaining 67 acres would be difficult to maintain with agriculture given how much industrial development would adjoin the property. This parcel would also be removed from the Carrollton Manor Priority Preservation Area. SEE MAP 2 BOCC Decision – BOCC voted to support staff recommendation to expand GI plan designation.
Case # AD-13B (Mackintosh) – Current Board action would restore the prior split of Agricultural (A) and Resource Conservation (RC) zoning. Requested the rezoning of the 111 acre parcel from Resource Conservation (RC) to either Limited Industrial (LI) or General Industrial (GI). This parcel has significant environmental constraints including 100-year floodplain, wetlands, mature forest, and existing Forest Resource Ordinance (FRO) easements. Staff Response - only support approximately 7 acres of LI or GI zoning along the MD 28 frontage for the portion of the parcel outside of the 100-year floodplain and FRO easements. This area would also be bounded by a small stream. SEE MAP 1 BOCC Decision – Voted to rezone approximately 7 acres to LI or GI along MD 28.
Case # AD-13-A (Mackintosh) – Current Board action would restore the GC plan designation only (would remain zoned A). Staff Response – Staff would recognize the historic significance of St. Paul’s and would stress the need for appropriate buffering with any commercial development. An alternative to consider would be Village Center designation, which may provide a more appropriate intensity of development adjoining the church. BOCC decision – maintained prior action to only restore GC plan.
Eastalco Community Growth Area The current Board action restores the LI and GI zoning on the Eastalco property and the GI plan designation for the Windridge property (155 acres). All of the properties restored to the growth area as industrial would be removed from the Carrollton Manor Priority Preservation Area. Even though the Windridge property is within a community growth area it is not proposed for community water/sewer service and would remain classified as No Planned Service (NPS) on the Water and Sewer Plan.
2011 Comprehensive Plan & Zoning Review – Request Analysis Staff Report, July 2012 6
Staff Response The most significant issue with the restoration of the zoning for this employment growth area is the need to address road access to US 15 at a planned interchange with Mountville Rd. (SEE MAP 2) Beyond access to US 15 is the issue of east/west connections through this employment between US 15 and MD 85 in the vicinity of Buckeystown. The prior 2001 Adamstown Region Plan identified an east/west arterial road using Manor Woods Rd. and Hawker Rd. to connect US 15 and MD 85. As part of the 2010 County Plan staff recommended that the existing alignment of Mountville Rd. from US 15 to Ballenger Creek Pike be upgraded from a Collector classification to a Minor Arterial. Also recommended was a new Minor Arterial road alignment from the intersection of Mountville Rd. and Ballenger Creek Pike through the southern portion of the Eastalco property to New Design Rd. Staff recommends adding this Minor Arterial to the highway plan. SEE MAP 2
Staff also recommends two revisions to the land use plan designations and zoning proposed to be restored. 1. The southwest portion of the Eastalco property would be restored with a split between Limited Industrial (LI) and General Industrial (GI). Staff recommends this entire area be Limited Industrial to provide a better balance between the amount of LI and GI lands especially with the addition of the Windridge property (222 acres) as GI. 2. There is a small area (23 acres) of LI zoning on the west side of New Design Rd. that was a remnant of a larger GI area almost extending down to Adamstown Rd. These 23 acres were rezoned to LI in 1991. Staff would not recommend restoring this 23 acre area of LI as it adjoins property that has been given to the Carroll Manor Recreation Council for a park and would be too small by itself to be easily developed based on its configuration and the fact it does not follow any property lines.
BOCC Decision – maintained prior action to fully restore LI and GI on the plan/zoning. Requested to consider alternative alignments of an east-west arterial roadway. Map 2 has been revised to show alternative alignments for an east-west arterial.
Brunswick Region
Case #BR-2 (Ingram) – For the Ingram property request the remaining issue is the appropriateness of either R-1 or R-3 zoning. The prior zoning on the parcel (53 acres) was R-1. The development potential differences are described below: R-1 – 1 dwelling/acre on individual well/septic systems. Based on an average of 2.5 acres/lot applied to the entire acreage could yield approximately 22 lots/dwellings. For R-1 the matching plan designation is Rural Residential (outside of Jefferson CGA) R-3 – 3 dwellings/acre on public water/sewer provided through the Jefferson community systems. Based on net acreage of 70% (37 acres) maximum yield could be approximately 111 dwellings. The matching plan designation would be Low Density Residential (within the Jefferson CGA). Staff Response – Staff would support the R-3, which would give the option of developing on public water/sewer and would not preclude development on individual well/septic systems (at R-1 density). BOCC decision – supported staff recommendation for R-3 zoning and LDR plan to provide option of developing on water/sewer or well/septic.
2011 Comprehensive Plan & Zoning Review – Request Analysis Staff Report, July 2012 7
Case # BR-6 (Jefferson Valley) – request in the Woodbourne Manor development would add 8 acres of R-3 zoning in a strip that is currently designated on the plan as Low Density Residential. The 8 acres, currently zoned Agricultural, includes portions of three (3) residential lots and some proposed HOA open space. None of the 8 acres is within the existing water recharge easement established to support the community water system serving the development. The development is currently limited by MDE to a maximum of 198 dwellings even if the additional 8 acres is rezoned to R-3. Staff Response – would recommend extending the R-3 zoning and LDR plan designation to incorporate remaining land beyond the subject 8 acres up to the boundary of the water recharge easement. (SEE MAP 3) This area totals approximately 15 acres and includes additional HOA open space land (8.3 acres total) and portions of three (3) residential lots subdivided under the current Agricultural zoning. The total area proposed to be designated LDR with R-3 zoning would be approximately 23 acres of which 8.3 acres would be HOA open space. BOCC Decision – supported recommendation to expand R-3 zoning and LDR plan
Case # BR-8 (Johnson) – Current Board action to restore would only include portion (29.9 acres) of the parcel within the community growth area with an Agricultural/Rural plan designation. Staff Response – Staff would support including the entire parcel (50.9 acres) within the community growth area with an Agricultural/Rural land use plan designation. The Ag/Rural designation is appropriate given the issues with the water and sewer system capacities. BOCC Decision – supported recommendation to include entire parcel within the Jefferson growth area.
Frederick Region
Case #FR-3 (Barbieto) – The action to only restore the R-1 would leave the parcel with split zoning of R-1 (4.75 acres) and A in a very odd configuration. Staff Response - recommend zoning the entire parcel (10.3 acres) R-1 with a matching Rural Residential plan designation. BOCC Decision – supported recommendation to rezone entire parcel to R-1 to avoid split zoning.
Case # FR-20 (Lidie) – Current Board action would approve the new request for Agricultural zoning to allow for more flexibility in constructing accessory structures. Staff Response – Staff had identified an option to address the issue through a Zoning text amendment. However, rezoning to Agricultural would in the end be a better option. BOCC Decision – no change in prior action to rezone to Agricultural.
Priority Preservation Area Issue (SEE MAP 4) The Board’s action for cases FR-30 (Crum) and 31 (Thatcher) would remove the Priority Preservation Area (PPA) from these properties. There would still be PPA designations on several adjoining properties, most of them within the City’s growth area, on the west side of the Monocacy River. Staff Response - staff would recommend removing all of the PPA on the west side of the Monocacy River for the Walkersville PPA. The staff draft of the Walkersville PPA prepared for the 2010 County Plan did not include any properties on the west side of the Monocacy River. BOCC Decision – supported recommendation to remove PPA designation on the west side of the Monocacy River.
2011 Comprehensive Plan & Zoning Review – Request Analysis Staff Report, July 2012 8
Community Growth Area Revision (SEE MAP 4) An existing farm parcel (TM 57, Parcel 28, 138 ac.) known as the Richfield Farm was removed from the Frederick growth area in the 2010 Plan. This parcel (See Map 3) is surrounded by the City on three sides and is within the City’s 20-year growth area with a Mixed Use land use plan designation. Staff Response – Staff recommends to include this parcel within the Frederick growth area with a Mixed Use land use plan designation to match the City’s designation. The zoning would remain Agricultural and RC. BOCC Decision – supported recommendation to include Richfield property in Frederick growth area with a Mixed Use plan designation.
Middletown Region
Case # MD-2 (Gaver) – The current Board action would restore the RC zoning. The Gavers have submitted a letter withdrawing their request to restore the RC zoning. Staff Response - Staff met with the Gavers and explained that the Agricultural zoning will provide more subdivision rights and flexibility for the 14 acre parcel. The Gaver’s have submitted a letter indicating a desire to keep the current Agricultural zoning, which reflects the characteristics of the property.
Case # MD-4 (Walz) – The request is only to restore approximately 1.5 acres of R-1 zoning. There is an existing garden center/nursery use on the parcel, which was approved under the Agricultural zoning. Staff Response - would support the restoration of only the 1.5 acres to avoid making the garden center use non-conforming. BOCC Decision – no change in prior action to restore 1.5 acres of R-1 with remainder of parcel remaining Ag.
Case # MD-6 (Shafer) – Current Board action would restore the prior zoning, which would split the parcel (4.7 ac.) with RC and A zoning. Staff Response – Staff has not been able to contact the Shafer’s though we would not object to having the entire parcel zoned Agricultural (A) as requested by the applicant as it is on the edge of the RC area. BOCC Decision – supported recommendation to zone entire parcel Agricultural to avoid split zoning.
Case # MD-17 (AC Jets) – Current Board action would restore 37.9 acres of R-3 zoning along US 40A and LDR plan designation on 102.8 acres of the parcel. Staff Response – Staff would note the inconsistency with applying the R-3 zoning on the portion of the parcel, which is designated on both the County Plan and the Town’s Plan as General Commercial. BOCC Decision – no change in prior action to restore R-3 zoning.
Case # MD-18 (C & D) (Yinger) – Current Board action would restore R-1 zoning on parcels 781 and 782. Staff has met with Mr. Yinger to explain the advantages of keeping the Village Center (VC) zoning as was adopted in the 2010 Plan and Mr. Yinger has agreed to withdraw the request for R-1 zoning and to expand the VC on Parcel 781 by approximately 6 acres for a total of 12.1 acres. SEE MAP 5 Staff Response – Staff supports maintaining the VC zoning and would not object to an expansion of the VC on Parcel 781. The balance (33.9 ac.) of Parcel 781 would then remain zoned Resource Conservation (RC). BOCC Decision – supported recommendation to expand VC zoning for an additional 6 acres.
2011 Comprehensive Plan & Zoning Review – Request Analysis Staff Report, July 2012 9
New Market Region
Case # NM-1 (Tate) – The Board’s action would approve GC zoning for this parcel even though the existing zoning has always been Agricultural (A). Staff Response - support the GC zoning given the existing and planned commercial and industrial uses surrounding the property. BOCC Decision – no change in prior action to approve GC zoning.
Case # NM-6 (RJD) – The current Board action would restore the ORI, LI, and R-5 zoning and corresponding plan designations. Mr. Demitt has since requested that the plan designation be ORI for the entire area per his application. Staff Response – Staff would not object to the ORI plan designation, even though it would be inconsistent with the LI and R-5 zoning, since the ultimate goal is to facilitate MXD zoning. The MXD floating zone could not be applied to land designated residential. It should be noted that maintaining County zoning on this parcel would likely preclude it from being considered for annexation into New Market. BOCC Decision – supported application of ORI plan designation on entire parcel with the LI and R-5 zoning.
Case # NM-23 (Cawood) – The Board’s current action would deny the new request for VC zoning. This property was not downzoned and has always been zoned Agricultural. Until recently the property had been used as an auto repair shop. The immediate area has a mix of residential and commercial uses along Old National Pike. Staff Response - staff believes that the VC would be an appropriate zoning given the past commercial use of the property and would be compatible with surrounding uses. BOCC Decision – Approved request for VC zoning, which reversed prior action to deny.
Case # NM-26 and 30 (Howard Payne) – The Board’s current action would deny the new requests for GI zoning (from RC) on both cases. These parcels have been recently sold (September 2011) to an individual wanting to locate a landscaping contractor business on it. Neither parcel has ever been zoned industrial. Staff Response – Mr. Payne sold these two parcels to Mr. Hurd in September 2011 possibly under the premise that they were already zoned industrial. Although, it is not very clear as Mr. Payne submitted requests to rezone them from RC to GI. Staff would not object to the GI zoning for parcel 123 (NM-26). Staff would not recommend GI zoning for parcel 122 (NM-30) which has 100-year floodplain and moderate slopes. Staff would also note that rezoning to GI will likely significantly increase the tax assessment of the parcel. BOCC Decision – Approved request for GI on Parcel 123 (Case # NM-26), which reversed prior action to deny. No change in prior action to deny GI on Parcel 122 (Case # NM-30).
Case # NM-32 (Rayburn) – The Board’s current action would deny the new request for R-3 zoning. The applicant has contested that the parcel is too small and inappropriate for PUD zoning. Staff Response – The 80 acre parcel would not be too small and in fact PUD zoning would provide much greater design flexibility for smaller parcels. An infill property in Adamstown is only 10 acres and has been approved for PUD zoning for 50 dwelling units. The PUD zoning would also provide the option of having a commercial component in the development possibly along the MD 144 frontage. BOCC Decision – no change in prior action to deny request for R-3.
2011 Comprehensive Plan & Zoning Review – Request Analysis Staff Report, July 2012 10
Linganore Community Growth Area
The analysis for the Linganore community includes the proposed additions to the community growth area (CGA) as well the development potential for several properties currently within the CGA. SEE MAP 6) The table that follows projects the pupil yield and other comments are provided addressing road alignments that will need to be added to the land use plan.
It is recommended that the Casey and Blentlinger properties be included within the Linganore community growth area. The Smith/Cline properties should be included within the New Market community growth area since they are also targeted for annexation by the Town of New Market.
BOCC Decision – no change in prior action to restore LDR plan designation for Oakdale (Case # NM-12), Casey (Case # NM-42), Blentlinger (Case # NM-36), and Smith/Cline (Case# NM-13 and NM-14). Supported recommendation for planned road alignments and school sites as shown on Map 6.
2011 Comprehensive Plan & Zoning Review – Request Analysis Staff Report, July 2012 11
Potential Pupil Request Acres 1 Yield Range2 Dwellings ES 645—640 Oakdale 1,265 3,2354 MS 324—381 NM-12 HS 450—492 ES 266—343 Casey 638 1,340 MS 135—145 NM-42 HS 187—203 ES 118—151 Blentlinger 282 592 MS 60—70 NM-36 HS 82—90 Notes: ES 77—142 Smith/Cline 1 264 554 MS 55—65 70% of gross acreage @ 3 NM-13, 14 HS 76—84 dwellings/acre if LDR. MDR @ ES 61—61 5 dwellings/acre. Gladhill 2 146 307 MS 31—37 2007 FCPS pupil generation NM-16 HS 43—47 rates . Range utilizes Beshers ES 8—7 countywide school average NM-08 16 34 MS 5—5 pupil yield rates and property’s HS 6—6 current school district pupil yield rate. Assumed 60% Traylor ES 14—16 single-family, 20% townhouse, NM-39 34 72 MS 8—8 20% multi-family HS 11—12 3 Assumes the following ES 1189—1360 Subtotal 2,645 6,134 du’s maximum school capacities: MS 618—711 ac. ES: 700; MS: 900; HS: 1600 HS 855—934 4 Based on 2008 DRRA Other properties currently within Linganore CGA proposal. Includes existing ES 65—66 undeveloped PUD properties Cromwell/Dorsey 154 323 MS 35—38 under ownership of HS 36—49 Oakdale Investments. ES 32—32 Resco 75 159 MS 16—19 HS 22—25 Carey/Hutzel ES 30—29 NM-20, 21 41 146 MS 15—17 HS 21—22 ES 127 – 127 270 Subtotal 628 du’s MS 66 – 74 ac. HS 79 – 96 ES 1,316 –1,487 2,915 TOTAL 6,762 du’s MS 684 – 785 ac. HS 934 – 1,030
2011 Comprehensive Plan & Zoning Review – Request Analysis Staff Report, July 2012 12
Oakdale (NM-12) Transportation: o Eaglehead Drive reconstruction from Linganore Creek to Oakdale High School o Woodridge Road extension to Gas House Pike o Yeagertown Road connection to Pinehurst Drive o Gas House Pike, Central Church Road improvements Water and sewer capacity from New Design Road Water Treatment Plan and Ballenger WWTP generally sufficient to serve this development. Bens Branch and Boyers Mill Road Sewer Pump Stations expanded and now in operation. New infrastructure lines and other details to serve future development determined by the DUSWM. Identification of school sites, public parkland.
Casey and Blentlinger (NM-42 & NM-36) Identification of an arterial road connection: Boyers Mill Road to MD 75 Identification of school sites Linear stream valley parkland dedication. Community Park symbol retained along Hazlenut Run/Bens Branch Water and sewer capacity from New Design Road Water Treatment Plan and Ballenger WWTP generally sufficient to serve this development. Bens Branch and Boyers Mill Road Sewer Pump Stations expanded and now in operation. New infrastructure lines and other details to serve future development determined by the DUSWM. There are two properties not part of the Casey/Blentlinger ownership that are surrounded by the subject properties and should also be considered for the Low Density Residential land use plan designation.
Smith/Cline (NM-13 & NM-14) Properties within Town of New Market’s growth/annexation area and designated residential. These properties would be included within the New Market community growth area. Potential Collector road connection from Boyers Mill Rd. to Old New Market Road. This may be considered in addition to or in place of the arterial road connection through Casey/Blentlinger Water and sewer capacity from New Design Road Water Treatment Plan and Ballenger WWTP generally sufficient to serve this development. New infrastructure lines and other details to serve future development determined by the DUSWM. Regional Park symbol shown on 2010 Plan.
Staff Recommendations School Sites o Elementary – 2 sites on northern portion of Woodridge development at Gas House Pike and on Casey property. A third site will remain in the Greenview PUD. o Middle – 1 site, move current symbol on Ganley property in the New Market community to the Blentlinger property. o High – 1 site recommended in the Urbana region as part of the Monrovia Town Center site on east side of MD 75 north of MD 80. Roads o Arterial connection between Boyers Mill Rd. and MD 75 o Collector extension through Woodridge to Gas House Pike
2011 Comprehensive Plan & Zoning Review – Request Analysis Staff Report, July 2012 13
o Collector extension of Mussetter Rd. east of Boyers Mill Rd. to the Delaplaine property. o Allow for a connection between Eaglehead Dr. and Quinn Rd. o Internal collector connections within the Casey/Blentlinger properties Other Land Use Plan Revisions o There are 14 lots zoned Agricultural and the Audobon property that should be included within the Linganore CGA. The Audobon property would retain its Natural Resource plan designation and Resource Conservation (RC) zoning. The 14 lots would be designated Low Density Residential but retain their Agricultural (A) zoning.
Thurmont Region
Case # TH-1 (Hinerman) – Current Board action to deny the new request for LI zoning. Staff Response – would not object to the LI zoning to bring the current uses on the property in compliance with an appropriate zoning district. Staff would note that the property appears to be used for material and construction equipment storage not related to the landscape contractor business. Staff would also stress the need for the business to comply with all site plan and permitting requirements. BOCC Decision – Approved request for LI zoning, which reversed prior action to deny.
Case # TH-4 (Imrie) – Current Board action would restore the prior zoning, which would be split with a small area of RC. Staff Response – would recommend applying the R-1 zoning to the entirety of both lots with the corresponding Rural Community plan designation. BOCC Decision – supported recommendation to apply R-1 to entire parcel to avoid split zoning.
Urbana Region
Case # UR-30 (Fingerboard Properties) – Current Board action would rezone from VC to GC. Staff Response – Given the location of this parcel adjoining (was once part of the Landon House parcel) the Dolan property (Landon House) staff would prefer to have MX zoning versus GC zoning to provide greater flexibility in uses and to provide a better opportunity for joint development with the Dolan property. BOCC Decision – no change in prior action to rezone to GC.
Case # UR-32 (Dolan) – Current Board action to deny new request for MX zoning. Staff Response – Staff reiterates its position to maintain the VC zoning on this parcel given the historical significance of the site. BOCC Decision – no change in prior action to deny request for MX.
Case # UR-35 (Urbana Fire Co.) – Current Board action is to approve request for MX zoning. The site will continue to include the fire station leaving only the carnival grounds available for future development. Staff Response – Though staff believes the VC is still appropriate given the limited land available for development and adjoining uses which are not expected to be redeveloped at higher intensities, we would not object to the requested MX zoning. BOCC Decision – no change in prior action to approve request for MX.
2011 Comprehensive Plan & Zoning Review – Request Analysis Staff Report, July 2012 14
Case # UR-40 (Ramsburg) – Current Board action is to deny new request for R-1 zoning. Staff Response – would continue to recommend retaining the existing A zoning. Staff and prior Board’s have consistently supported the long-standing policy of not expanding Rural Subdivisions (now referenced as Rural Residential) and do not believe that this property has unique circumstances that would warrant rezoning to R-1. This rezoning would establish a precedent to rezone other agricultural properties that adjoin existing subdivisions and would be argued to be “infill”. The A zoning on this property has been upheld in at least two prior reviews by other Boards. BOCC Decision – no change in prior action to deny request for R-1.
Urbana Community Growth Area
The following analysis looks at those requests that would expand the Urbana CGA beyond the existing Villages of Urbana/Urbana Highlands PUD. The expanded growth area would mostly reflect what was previously adopted in the 2004 Urbana Region Plan. As in the 2004 Region Plan these properties would be included within the community growth area but designated Agricultural/Rural to reflect a long-term development timing. Before these properties would be considered for a residential plan designation a comprehensive water/sewer study will need to be conducted. Beyond the need to provide additional school and road infrastructure is the water and sewer capacity. The primary issue is the finite capacity of the transmission lines through the Monocacy National Battlefield property. These lines cannot be expanded in any way that would require encroachment into the Battlefield property. SEE MAP 7
2011 Comprehensive Plan & Zoning Review – Request Analysis Staff Report, July 2012 15
Potential Pupil Property Acres Dwellings Yield Range2
Villages of Urbana & ES 31 - 38 Urbana Highlands PUDs --- 151 MS 16 - 18 (Remaining Pipeline Only) HS 21 - 26
1 ES 120 - 140 Urbana Town Ctr MXD (currently designated as 55 600 MS 60 - 69
Age-Restricted residences) HS 84 - 101
ES 510 - 578 Expanded CGA 1 1,269 2,561 MS 257 - 284 (New Requests Only) HS 356 - 414 ES 661 - 756 TOTALS 1,450 ac. 3,312 DUs MS 333 - 371 HS 461 - 541
Notes: 1 70% of gross acreage @ 3 dwellings/acre 2 2007 FCPS pupil generation rates . Used countywide average and local Urbana-area school pupil yield rates . Assumed residential housing type mix of 60% single-family, 20% townhouse, 20% multi-family. Pupil yield for 50 acres are subtracted to account for location of two public school sites (ES & MS). 3 Includes only those acres associated with residential uses in the approved 181 acre MXD
Staff Recommendations School Sites o Elementary – 1 site within the expanded growth area. This would be in addition to the new school currently under consideration to relieve the Centerville and Urbana schools. o Middle – 1 site within the expanded growth area. Roads o Arterial connection between I-270 at Park Mills Rd. to Ball Rd/ Ijamsville Rd. o New interchange on I-270 at Park Mills Rd. o Collector connections between the Villages of Urbana and the expanded growth area.
BOCC Decision – no change to prior action to restore properties surrounding the Villages of Urbana PUD into the Urbana growth area. Supported recommendation to add planned road alignments and school sites as shown on Map 7.
2011 Comprehensive Plan & Zoning Review – Request Analysis Staff Report, July 2012 16
Monrovia Community Growth Area
The proposed expansion of this growth area involves what was first approved as the Monrovia Town Center PUD in 2006. This original approval was for 1,608 dwellings on 402 acres and was to be an age- restricted community. The general commercial land at the MD 75/80 intersection would have been incorporated into the Monrovia Town Center project.
The current Board action would restore the Low Density Residential land use plan designation on the entire property holdings from the original Monrovia Town Center. Staff offers two options for the Monrovia CGA. SEE MAP 8. The pupil yield estimates for the two options on shown on tables on the following page. The staff recommendations would be the same for both options.
Option 1 – Would restore all of the Monrovia Town Center properties with the addition of the Burall property and two northern parcels. Option 2 – Would focus the Monrovia Town Center to the west side of MD 75 still including the Burall property.
Staff Recommendations and Comments School Sites o High – 1 site within the Monrovia Town Center properties. Targeted on a 65-acre land bay on east side of MD 75. This school would address development from an expanded Urbana community and from development in the Linganore and New Market communities. Roads o New collector connection from MD 75 east to Weller Rd. that would provide additional access to the high school and would provide a continuous collector connection from the Landsdale development on Ed McClain Rd. to MD 75. Other Facilities o Fire station site for the relocation of the existing Green Valley substation o Community park site that may be targeted for the Burrall parcel. o Water and sewer capacity from New Design Road Water Treatment Plan and Ballenger WWTP generally sufficient to serve this development. Wastewater will be accessed by the Middle Phase of the Bush Creek Interceptor, which the Landsdale PUD project will be constructing. Water is provided through the East County water transmission line.
BOCC Decision – supported Option 1 and staff recommendations for planned road alignments and school site as shown on Map 8.
2011 Comprehensive Plan & Zoning Review – Request Analysis Staff Report, July 2012 17
Monrovia CGA – Option 1
Potential Pupil Property Acres Dwellings Yield Range1
ES 219-220 Landsdale PUD 397 1,1002 MS 110-143 (currently designated as Age-Restricted residences) HS 153-165
ES 269-270 Monrovia Town Center 3 402 1,350 MS 135-176 (original PUD approved parcels) HS 188-203
ES 11 4 Burrall Property 24 51 MS 6-7 HS 8
ES 34 4 Northern Parcels 80 168 MS 17-22 HS 24-26 ES 533-535 TOTALS 903 ac. 2,669 du’s MS 268-348 HS 373-402
Monrovia CGA – Option 2
Potential Pupil Property Acres Dwellings Yield Range1
Landsdale PUD ES 219-220 2 (currently designated as 397 1,100 MS 110-143 Age-Restricted residences) HS 153-165
ES 175 Monrovia Town Center 3 MS 88-114 (PUD approved parcels; 306 875 w/s of transmission lines) HS 122-132
ES 11 Burrall Property 24 514 MS 6-7 HS 8 ES 405-406 TOTALS 727 ac. 2,026 du’s MS 204-264 HS 283-305
2011 Comprehensive Plan & Zoning Review – Request Analysis Staff Report, July 2012 18
1Pupil yield is calculated as the range between the number of students generated using the County average rate and the local feeder system rate (Green Valley ES, Windsor Knolls MS, and Linganore HS). Calculations assume a residential housing type mix of 60% single family detached, 20% townhouse, and 20% multi-family.
2Dwelling units as approved for the Landsdale (Green Valley) PUD in 2004
3Assumes a dwelling unit yield of 4 DUs/acre; 65 acres are removed from this calculation to account for school site dedication
4Housing yield calculated using 70% of gross acreage @ 3 DUs/acre
Walkersville Region
Case # WA-08 (Frall) – Applicant requested rezoning from VC to MX for vacant Lot 3. BOCC Decision – approved request for MX on Lot 3.
2011 Comprehensive Plan & Zoning Review – Request Analysis Staff Report, July 2012 19
2011 Comprehensive Plan & Zoning Review - Property Owner Requests - Feb. 23, 2012 w/ May 31 BOCC revisions in bold italics
URBANA REGION
CASE INFORMATION PROPERTY Pre-2010 Existing Requested BOCC Staff Comments
CPZ11-UR-1 TAX MAP: 96 BY Motion to restore. Pre-2010 Plan: ORI/VC Plan and ORI/VC zoning PARCEL: 60 Office/Resch./Ind. Office/Resch./Ind. Mixed Use PS second. COMP ACRES: 22.95 ac. Village Center Village Center Vote: 3-1-1 (DG Not downzoned in 2010. Property is located within the Urbana CGA. APPLICANT: PLAN LOCATION: w/s Urbana opposed; KD absent) Urbana Pike frontage planned and zoned for VC land uses. Existing Peggy Ann Webb, farmhouse and ag buildings remain on site. Staff would not object to Pike/MD 355; east of MD Merhl E. Giesler, Mary MX land use and zoning on this parcel. 80; across from Cracked L. Fleming and James Claw Restaurant ORI ORI MX F. Giesler ZONING VC VC
CPZ11-UR-2 TM: 97 BY Motion to restore. Pre-2010 Plan: GC Plan and GC zoning P: 221 Gen. Commercial Ag/Rural Gen. Commercial BS second. COMP ACRES: 3 ac. Vote: 3-1-1 (DG Vacant property is located outside of the Monrovia CGA. Also not APPLICANT: PLAN LOCATION: w/s Green opposed; KD absent) included in pre-2010 larger Monrovia CGA. Staff would not object to Kajen Group II, Inc. GC land use and zoning on this parcel as part of an expanded Valley Rd/MD 75; south of Monrovia CGA. However, applicant may consider R-1 zoning as a MD 80 GC A GC more appropriate to combine with requested R-1 zoning on adjoining Burral property (UR-3). ZONING
CPZ11-UR-3 TAX MAP: 97 BY Motion to approve Pre-2010 Plan: AgRural/RC/Rural Neigh. Plan and A/R-1 zoning PARCEL: 3 Ag/Rural Ag/Rural Rural Res. (19.6 ac) the request. COMP ACRES: 93.84 ac. (area Resource Cons. Natural Resrce. Nat. Resrce. (4.5 ac) PS second. Vacant property is located outside of the Monrovia CGA. Also not APPLICANT: PLAN of change request: Rural Vote: 3-1-1 (DG included in pre-2010 larger Monrovia CGA. Re-alignment of MD 75 Catherine Burall would split this parcel. approx. 24.1 ac.) Neighborhood opposed; KD absent) LOCATION: w/s Green Valley Rd/MD 75; s/s of A A R-1 (24.1 ac) MD 80; e/s of power ZONING R-1 (24.1 ac) transmission r.o.w.
CPZ11-UR-4 TM: 97 BY Motion to restore. Pre-2010 Plan: Rural Res. Plan and R-1 zoning P. 12 (148.9 ac) Rural Residential Ag/Rural Rural Residential PS second. COMP P. 20 (65.4 ac) Rural Residential Vote: 3-1-1 (DG Properties are not located within a CGA. Down-zoned due to APPLICANT: PLAN ACRES: 214.3 ac opposed;KD absent) proximity to other large agricultural parcels in the Green Valley area. Franklin & Bess Additional R-1 zoning will add to well/septic issues. LOCATION: n/s & s/s of Gladhill Gladhill Brothers Rd; east of Browningsville Rd R-1 R-1 (11.4 ac) R-1 ZONING A (202.9 ac)
CPZ11-UR-5 TAX MAP: 105 BY Motion to restore. Pre-2010 Plan: ORI/LI Plan and ORI/LI zoning PARCEL: 32 Office/Resch./Ind. Office/Resch./Ind. Office/Resch./Ind. PS second. COMP ACRES: 174.54 ac. Limited Ind. Lim. Ind. (134.5 ac) Limited Ind. Vote: 3-1-1 (DG Property is located outside of the Urbana CGA. Previously within APPLICANT: PLAN LOCATION: s/s of Mott Nat. Resrce (40 ac) (174.5 ac) opposed;KD absent) CGA (pre-2010). Seeking reversion of RC/NR acreage back to Pleasants Investments ORI/ORI. Staff would not object to reinstatement of pre-2010 CGA Rd; between I-270 & MD Limited Partnership boundary, plan designation, and zoning on parcel 32. 355 ORI ORI & LI (134.54 ac) ORI & LI (174.54 ac) ZONING LI RC (40 ac)
Updated 6/21/2012 Page 1 URBANA REGION
CASE INFORMATION PROPERTY Pre-2010 Existing Requested BOCC Staff Comments
TM:TAX MAP:105 96 PSBY Motion to restore. Pre-2010 Plan: ORI/RuralCommORI/VC Plan and PlanORI/VC and zoningORI/R-1 zoning CPZ11-UR-6 Office/Resch./Ind. Office/Resch./Ind. Mixed Use P:PARCEL: 37 60 Rur. Com. (24.8 ac) Ag/Rural Rur. Com. (24.8 ac) BYPS second. COMP ACRES: 103.622.95 ac. O/R/IVillage (78.8 Center ac) NaturalVillage CenterResource O/R/I (78.8 ac) Vote: 3-1-1 3-1-1 (DG (DG PropertyNot downzoned is located in 2010. outside Property of the Urbanais located CGA. within Previously the Urbana all but CGA. the APPLICANT: PLAN Urbana Pike frontage planned and zoned for VC land uses. Existing LOCATION: n/sw/s &Urbana s/s of opposed; KD absent) R-1 area was within the CGA (2004 Urbana Plan). Seeking reversion Pleasants Investments tofarmhouse pre-2010 and plan ag and buildings zoning. remain Staff would on site. not Staff object would to reinstatement not object to FirePike/MD Tower 355; Rd; east e/s of MDI- ofMX pre-2010 land use CGA and zoningboundary, on thisORI parcel. plan designation, and ORI zoning on Limited Partnership 80; across from Cracked 270; adjacent to parcel 37. MontgomeryClaw Restaurant County line R-1 (24.8 ac) A R-1 (24.8 ac) ZONING ORI (78.8 ac) RC ORI (78.8 ac)
CPZ11-UR-7 TAX MAP: 87 BY Motion to restore in Pre-2010 Plan: AgRural/RC Plan and A zoning PARCEL: 26 Ag/Rural Ag/Rural Low Density Res. CGA only. PS second. COMP ACRES: 152.84 ac. Resources Cons. Vote: 3-1-1 (DG Not downzoned in 2010. Farmed property is located outside of the APPLICANT: PLAN LOCATION: s/s of Ball (within Urbana opposed; KD absent) Urbana CGA. Previously included in pre-2010 larger Urbana CGA. Carol P. Myers – Applicant seeks inclusion within CGA and LDR plan designation. Staff Rd; east of Tabler Rd; CGA) Trustee – Montgomery would not support LDR plan designation. Expansion of CGA should north of Villages of Family Trust be examined within the context of a Community Plan update. Urbana A A A ZONING
CPZ11-UR-8 TM: 87 BY Motion to restore in Pre-2010 Plan: AgRural/RC Plan and A/RC zoning P: 201 Ag/Rural Ag/Rural Low Density Res. CGA only. PS second. COMP ACRES: 82.68 ac. Resource Cons. Natural Resource Natural Resource Vote: 3-1-1 (DG Not downzoned in 2010. Farmed property is located outside of the APPLICANT: PLAN LOCATION: n/s of Ball (within Urbana opposed; KD absent) Urbana CGA. Previously 65% included in pre-2010, larger Urbana David Montgomery CGA. Applicant seeks inclusion within CGA and LDR plan Rd; east of Tabler Rd; CGA) designation. Staff would not support LDR plan designation. north of Villages of A A A Expansion of CGA should be examined within the context of a Urbana Community Plan update. ZONING RC RC RC
CPZ11-UR-9 TAX MAP: 87 BY Motion to restore in Pre-2010 Plan: AgRural Plan and A zoning PARCEL: 49 Ag/Rural Ag/Rural Low Density Res. CGA only. PS second. COMP ACRES: 110.35 ac. (within Urbana Vote: 3-1-1 (DG Not downzoned in 2010. Farmed property is located outside of the APPLICANT: PLAN LOCATION: n/s of Ball CGA) opposed; KD absent) Urbana CGA. Previously included in pre-2010, larger Urbana CGA. Charlotte Montgomery Applicant seeks inclusion within CGA and LDR plan designation. Staff Rd; west of Ijamsville Rd; would not support LDR plan designation. Expansion of CGA should north of Villages of be examined within the context of a Community Plan update. Urbana A A A ZONING
CPZ11-UR-10 TM: 96 BY Motion to approve Pre-2010 Plan: Rural Sub. Plan and R-1/A zoning P: 208 (Lot 34) Rural Subdv. Rur. Res. (14.8 ac) Ag/Rural the request. COMP ACRES: 22.69 ac. Ag/Rural (7.89 ac) PS second. Not downzoned in 2010. Property is located outside of the Urbana APPLICANT: PLAN LOCATION: w/s of Vote: 3-1-1 (DG CGA. Currently has split zoning with A and R-1. Staff does not R. Michael Parrotte object to applying A zoning on entire parcel. Roderick Rd; s/s of opposed; KD absent) Fingerboard Rd; southwest of Urbana R-1 R-1 (14.8 ac) A ZONING A A (7.89 ac)
Updated 6/21/2012 Page 2 URBANA REGION
CASE INFORMATION PROPERTY Pre-2010 Existing Requested BOCC Staff Comments
TAX MAP: 106 96 BY Motion to restore. Pre-2010 Plan: RuralORI/VC Neigh.Plan Plan and andORI/VC R-1 zoning CPZ11-UR-11 Office/Resch./Ind. Office/Resch./Ind. Mixed Use PARCEL: 6 60 Rural Rur. Res. (4 ac.) Rur. Res. (20.88 ac) BSPS second. COMP ACRES: 20.88 22.95 ac.ac. (of 37+ NeighborhoodVillage Center Ag/RuralVillage Center (16.88 ac) Vote: 3-1-1 (DG PropertyNot downzoned is located in 2010. outside Property of any CGAis located and spanswithin the FrederickUrbana CGA. & APPLICANT: PLAN Urbana Pike frontage planned and zoned for VC land uses. Existing ac.LOCATION: parcel) w/s Urbana opposed; KD absent) Montgomery County boundary with 40% land in Mont. Co.. Applicant Eskay Family LLC seeksfarmhouse to extend and ag R-1 buildings zoning ontoremain remaining on site. 17Staff acres. would At not the object to LOCATION:Pike/MD 355; south east of ColdMD landowner'sMX land use requestand zoning in 2009, on this the parcel. BoCC maintained approx. 4 acres 80; across from Cracked Brook Dr; west of of R-1 zoning to allow Eskay family to complete subdivision activity. BrowningsvilleClaw Restaurant Rd; spans R-1 R-1 (4 ac.) R-1 (20.88 ac) Frederick/Montgomery ZONING A (16.88 ac) County boundary
CPZ11-UR-12 TM: 98 BY Motion to restore. Pre-2010 Plan: Rural Neigh./RC Plan and R-1 zoning P: 8 Rural Ag/Rural Rural Residential BS second. COMP ACRES: 144 ac. Neighborhood Natural Resource Vote: 3-1-1 (DG Property is currently farmed and located outside of any CGA. Down- APPLICANT: PLAN LOCATION: s/s MD Resource Cons. opposed; KD absent) zoned due to proximity to other large agricultural parcels in the Green Donald Franz Valley area. Additional R-1 zoning will add to well/septic issues. 80/Fingerboard Rd; west of Maryland Manor Ct R-1 A R-1 ZONING
CPZ11-UR-13 TAX MAP: 106 BY Motion to restore. Pre-2010 Plan: Rural Neigh. Plan and R-1 zoning PARCEL: 1, 114 Rural Rur. Res. (7.9 ac) Rural Residential PS second. COMP ACRES: 115 ac. Neighborhood Ag/Rural Vote: 3-1-1 (DG Property is located outside of any CGA. Significant progress made APPLICANT: PLAN LOCATION: s/s of Days opposed; KD absent) toward the development of the Day's Range development under the Days Range, LLC prior R-1 zoning. Ct & Drummers Pass; north of Montgomery County boundary R-1 R-1 (7.9 ac) R-1 ZONING A
CPZ11-UR-14 TM: 97 BY Motion to restore. Pre-2010 Plan: GC Plan and GC zoning P: 248 Gen. Commercial Ag/Rural Gen. Commercial BS second. COMP ACRES: 11.27 ac. Vote: 3-1-1 (DG Vacant property is located outside of the Monrovia CGA, but was APPLICANT: PLAN LOCATION: NE quadrant opposed; KD absent) included in pre-2010, larger Monrovia CGA. Re-alignment of MD 75, Tuscan Venture Group, as proposed in the previously approved PUD, could affect this parcel. of intersection of MD 75 & LLC Staff would not object to GC land use and zoning on this parcel as MD 80; west of electrical part of an expanded Monrovia CGA. transmission line r.o.w. GC A GC ZONING
CPZ11-UR-15 TAX MAP: 97 PS Motion to restore. Pre-2010 Plan: GC Plan and GC zoning PARCEL: 251 Gen. Commercial Ag/Rural Gen. Commercial BS second. COMP ACRES: approx. 1 ac. Vote: 3-1-1 (DG Vacant property is located outside of the Monrovia CGA, but was APPLICANT: PLAN LOCATION: n/s of MD 80 opposed; KD absent) included in pre-2010, larger Monrovia CGA. Staff would not object to D. Oscar Fuster and GC land use and zoning on this parcel as part of an expanded at eastern intersection Jorge D. Fuster Monrovia CGA. with MD 75 (heading south) GC A GC ZONING
Updated 6/21/2012 Page 3 URBANA REGION
CASE INFORMATION PROPERTY Pre-2010 Existing Requested BOCC Staff Comments
TM:TAX MAP: 96 BY Motion to restore. Pre-2010 Plan: ORI/VC Plan and ORI/VC zoning CPZ11-UR-16 Office/Resch./Ind. Office/Resch./Ind. Mixed Use P:PARCEL: 60 PS second. COMP ACRES: 22.95 ac. Village Center Village Center Vote: 3-1-1 (DG Not downzoned in 2010. Property is located within the Urbana CGA. APPLICANT: PLAN Urbana Pike frontage planned and zoned for VC land uses. Existing LOCATION: w/s Urbana opposed; KD absent) farmhouse and ag buildings remain on site. Staff would not object to Peggy Ann Webb, Pike/MD 355; east of MD Duplicate Request Merhl E. Giesler, Mary MX land use and zoning on this parcel. 80; across from Cracked see Case # UR-1 L. Fleming and James Claw Restaurant F. Giesler ZONING
CPZ11-UR-17 TAX MAP: 106 BY Motion to restore. Pre-2010 Plan: Rural Comm. Plan and R-1 zoning PARCEL: 15 (Lots 1 & 2) Rural Community Ag/Rural Rural Residential BS second. COMP ACRES: 50.4 ac. & 74.51 Vote: 3-1-1 (DG Vacant property is located outside of the Urbana CGA. Parcel is APPLICANT: PLAN ac. opposed; KD absent) split by MD 75 where it intersects with MD 355. Planned re-alignment Hyattstown Associates, of MD 75 runs across northern edge of this property. Additional R-1 LOCATION: e/s and w/s LLC zoning would add to well/septic issues. of MD 75 at intersection with MD 355; adjacent to R-1 A R-1 Montgomery County ZONING boundary
CPZ11-UR-18 TM: 96 BY Motion to restore in Pre-2010 Plan: AgRural Plan and A zoning P: 58 Ag/Rural Ag/Rural Low Density Res. CGA only. BS second. COMP ACRES: 90.52 ac. (within Urbana Vote: 3-1-1 (DG Not downzoned in 2010. Property is located outside of the Urbana APPLICANT: PLAN LOCATION: e/s of MD 80; CGA) opposed; KD absent) CGA. Approximately 70% of parcel was located within the pre-2010 Madeline E. Main CGA. Applicant is requesting LDR plan designation and placement in west of Big woods Rd; Urbana CGA. Staff would not support LDR plan designation. south of Thompson Dr A A A Expansion of CGA should be examined within the context of a Community Plan update. ZONING
CPZ11-UR-19 TAX MAP: 96 BY Motion to restore in Pre-2010 Plan: AgRural/RC Plan and A zoning PARCEL: 3 Ag/Rural Ag/Rural Low Density Res. CGA only. PS second. COMP ACRES: 152.85 ac. Resource Cons. Vote: 3-1-1 (DG Not downzoned in 2010. Property is located outside of the Urbana APPLICANT: PLAN LOCATION: w/s of Tabler (within Urbana opposed; KD absent) CGA. Parcel was located within the pre-2010 CGA. Applicant is Robert S. Wilcom and requesting LDR plan designation and placement in Urbana CGA. Rd; near intersection with CGA) Barbara W. Wilcom Staff would not support LDR plan designation. Expansion of CGA MD 355 A A A should be examined within the context of a Community Plan update. ZONING
CPZ11-UR-20 TM: 96 PS motion to restore in Pre-2010 Plan: AgRural/RC Plan and A zoning P: 2 Ag/Rural Ag/Rural Low Density Res. CGA only. BS second. COMP ACRES: 125.14 ac. Resource Cons. Vote: 3-1-1 (DG Not downzoned in 2010. Property is located outside of the Urbana APPLICANT: PLAN LOCATION: e/s of Reels (within Urbana opposed; KD absent) CGA. Parcel was located within the pre-2010 CGA. Applicant is Steven W. Wilcom requesting LDR plan designation and placement in Urbana CGA. Mill Rd at intersection with CGA) Staff would not support LDR plan designation. Expansion of CGA Araby Church Rd & MD should be examined within the context of a Community Plan update. 355 A A A ZONING
Updated 6/21/2012 Page 4 URBANA REGION
CASE INFORMATION PROPERTY Pre-2010 Existing Requested BOCC Staff Comments
TAX MAP: 96 BY Motion to deny.restore. Pre-2010 Plan: AgRuralORI/VC Plan and ORI/VCA zoning zoning CPZ11-UR-21 Office/Resch./Ind. Office/Resch./Ind. Mixed Use PARCEL: 23560 Ag/Rural Ag/Rural Low Density Res. BSPS second. COMP ACRES: 5022.95 ac. ac. Village Center Village Center Vote: 4-0-1 3-1-1 (KD (DG absent) Not downzoned in 2010. Property is located outsidewithin the of theUrbana Urbana CGA. APPLICANT: PLAN Urbana Pike frontage planned and zoned for VC land uses. Existing LOCATION: n/s w/s of Urbana Park opposed; KD absent) CGA. Applicant is requesting LDR plan designation and placement in R Triple J Inc. Urbanafarmhouse CGA. and Staff ag buildings would not remain support on LDR site. plan Staff designation. would not object to MillsPike/MD Rd; 355;between east I-270 of MD ExpansionMX land use of andCGA zoning should on be this examined parcel. within the context of a 80; across from Cracked and MD 355 Community Plan update. Claw Restaurant A A A ZONING
CPZ11-UR-22 TM: 96 BY Motion to restore in Pre-2010 Plan: AgRural Plan and A zoning P: 221 Ag/Rural Ag/Rural Low Density Res. CGA only. BS second. COMP ACRES: 66.23 ac. (within Urbana Vote: 3-1-1 (DG Not downzoned in 2010. Property is located outside of the Urbana APPLICANT: PLAN LOCATION: south of Ball CGA) opposed; KD absent) CGA. Parcel was located (95%) within the pre-2010 CGA. Applicant Amos Denslow Faux- is requesting LDR plan designation, R-3 zoning, and placement in Rd; northern edge of Burhans Trust Urbana CGA. Staff would not support LDR plan designation or R-3 Urbana Highlands A A A zoning. Expansion of CGA should be examined within the context of a Community Plan update. ZONING
CPZ11-UR-23 TAX MAP: 87 PS Motion to restore in Pre-2010 Plan: AgRural/RC Plan and A zoning PARCEL: 260 Ag/Rural Ag/Rural Low Density Res. CGA only. BS second. COMP ACRES: 107.77 ac. Resource Cons. Vote: 3-1-1 (DG Not downzoned in 2010. Property is located outside of the Urbana APPLICANT: PLAN LOCATION: s/s of Ball (within Urbana opposed; KD absent) CGA. Parcel was located within the pre-2010 CGA. Applicant is Calvin B. and Dorothy requesting LDR plan designation and R-3 zoning. Staff would not RD; north of Urbana CGA) S.B. Early support LDR plan designation or R-3 zoning. Expansion of CGA Highlands A A A should be examined within the context of a Community Plan update. ZONING
CPZ11-UR-24 TM: 106 BY Motion to restore. Pre-2010 Plan: Rural Neigh. Plan and R-1 zoning P: 2 Rural Ag/Rural Rural Residential BS second. COMP ACRES: 13 ac. Neighborhood Vote: 3-1-1 (DG Property is located outside of any CGA and spans the Frederick & APPLICANT: PLAN LOCATION: south of Cold opposed; KD absent) Montgomery County boundary. Access is via Montgomery County H.F. Payne roads. Applicant seeks R-1 zoning to complete planned subdivision Brook Dr; west of Construction Co. Inc. activity. Browningsville Rd; adjacent to, and access R-1 A R-1 via, Montgomery County ZONING boundary
CPZ11-UR-25 TAX MAP: 87 BY Motion to restore in Pre-2010 Plan: AgRural Plan and A zoning PARCEL: 231 Ag/Rural Ag/Rural Rural Residential CGA plan only. PS COMP ACRES: 3.01 ac. (within Urbana second. Vote: 3-Not downzoned in 2010. Property is located outside of the Urbana APPLICANT: PLAN LOCATION: n/s of Ball CGA) 1-1 (DG opposed; KD CGA. Parcel was located within the pre-2010 CGA. Applicant is Howard Payne requesting Rural Res. plan designation and R-1 zoning. The A zoning Rd; west of Ijamsville Rd; absent) would permit the construction of a single residence on the parcel. north of Urbana A A R-1 Staff does not support R-1 zoning on this parcel. ZONING
Updated 6/21/2012 Page 5 URBANA REGION
CASE INFORMATION PROPERTY Pre-2010 Existing Requested BOCC Staff Comments
TM:TAX MAP:88 96 BY Motion to restorerestore. Pre-2010 Plan: LDRORI/VC Plan Plan and and PUD ORI/VC zoning zoning CPZ11-UR-26 Office/Resch./Ind. Office/Resch./Ind. Mixed Use P:PARCEL: 22 60 Low Density Res. Ag/Rural Low Density Res. LDRPS second. only w/ scenario COMP ACRES: 82.5 22.95 ac. ac. Village Center Village Center analysis.Vote: 3-1-1 PS second.(DG PropertyNot downzoned is located in 2010. outside Property of the isMonrovia located CGA,within butthe was Urbana included CGA. in APPLICANT: PLAN Urbana Pike frontage planned and zoned for VC land uses. Existing LOCATION: e/s w/s of Urbana Ed Vote:opposed; 3-1-1 KD (DG absent) pre-2010, larger Monrovia CGA. This parcel was part of the Monrovia Payne Investments, Townfarmhouse Center and PUD. ag buildings The PUD remain project on is site. subject Staff to would an ongoing not object to McClainPike/MD Rd;355; west east of of MD MD opposed; KD absent) LLC lawsuit.MX land use and zoning on this parcel. 75;80; southacross of from village Cracked of MonroviaClaw Restaurant PUD A A ZONING
CPZ11-UR-27 TAX MAP: 97 PS Motion to restore. Pre-2010 Plan: Rural Neigh. Plan and A/R-1 zoning PARCEL: 37 Rural Ag/Rural Rural Residential BY second. COMP ACRES: 5.39 ac. Neighborhood Vote: 3-1-1 (DG This is a vacant, remainder parcel from surrounding subdivision. APPLICANT: PLAN LOCATION: e/s of rolling opposed;KD absent) Staff would not object to the R-1 zoning, but would prefer 'A' to avoid American Homes Real split zoning of parcel. Meadow Ct; n/s of Estate Corp. Browningsville Rd A A R-1 ZONING R-1
CPZ11-UR-28 TM: 97 BS Motion to restore. Pre-2010 Plan: GC Plan and GC zoning P: 0000 Gen. Com. (15.46 ac) Ag/Rural Gen. Com. (15.46 ac) PS second. COMP ACRES: 15.46 ac. (out of Vote: 3-1-1 (DG Property is located outside of the Monrovia CGA, but was included in APPLICANT: PLAN 31 ac. total) opposed; KD absent) pre-2010, larger Monrovia CGA. Though previously zoned GC this Roy Stanley parcel was to have been developed as part of the Monrovia Town LOCATION: Northwest Center PUD. This parcel is subject to an ongoing lawsuit. quadrant of intersection of MD 75 (north) & MD 80; GC (15.46 ac) A GC (15.46 ac) site of 75/80 Drag Strip ZONING
CPZ11-UR-29 TAX MAP: 88 PS Motion to restore. Pre-2010 Plan: GC Plan and GC zoning PARCEL: 28 Gen. Com. (17.06 ac) Ag/Rural Gen. Com. (17.06 ac) BS second. COMP ACRES: 17.06 ac. Vote: 3-1-1 (DG Property is located outside of the Monrovia CGA, but was included in APPLICANT: PLAN (portion of 115 ac. parcel) opposed; KD absent) pre-2010, larger Monrovia CGA. This parcel was not part of the Roy Stanley, Wilcoms Monrovia Town Center PUD, but its conceptual development was LOCATION: n/s of MD 80 Family Partnership intended to be tied into that development project. Request this near intersection with MD GC (17.06 ac) A GC (17.06 ac) parcel as part of an expanded Monrovia CGA. Also requesting 75 (south); e/s of electrical restoration of CGA & all Water & Sewer Plan designations (W4, S4) transmission r.o.w. ZONING removed as a result of 2010 Comp Plan.
CPZ11-UR-30 TM: 96 BY Motion to approve Pre-2010 Plan: VC Plan and VC zoning P: 189 Village Center Village Center Gen. Commercial the request w/ analysis COMP ACRES: 4.79 ac. of MX. PS second. Not downzoned in 2010. Property is located within the Urbana CGA. APPLICANT: PLAN LOCATION: s/s of Vote: 4-0-1 (KD absent) Parcel is adjacent to the Landon House site (listed NRHP - 1975). Fingerboard Properties, Commercial and mixed use development occurring in vicinity. Staff Worthington Blvd (new 5/31 Confirmed prior LLC would not object to GC zoning due to the location and configuration MD 355); n/s of MD 80; action to approve of this parcel. adjacent to Landon House VC VC GC change to GC zoning property ZONING
Updated 6/21/2012 Page 6 URBANA REGION
CASE INFORMATION PROPERTY Pre-2010 Existing Requested BOCC Staff Comments
TAX MAP: 9796 PSBY Motion to restore.restore in Pre-2010 Plan: AgRural/RCORI/VC Plan Plan and andORI/VC A zoning zoning CPZ11-UR-31 Office/Resch./Ind. Office/Resch./Ind. Mixed Use PARCEL: 4760 Ag/Rural in CGA Ag/Rural Low Density Res. CGAPS second. only. BS second. COMP ACRES: 87.87 22.95 ac.ac. ResourceVillage Center Cons. Village Center Vote: 3-1-1 3-1-1 (DG (DG Not downzoned in 2010. Property is located outsidewithin the of theUrbana Urbana CGA. APPLICANT: PLAN Urbana Pike frontage planned and zoned for VC land uses. Existing LOCATION: e/sw/s MDUrbana 80; opposed; KD absent) CGA. Parcel was located within the pre-2010 CGA. Applicant is England Hills LLC – requestingfarmhouse LDRand ag plan buildings designation, remain previous on site. W&SStaff designations,would not object and to northPike/MD of Centreville 355; east of MD placementMX land use in andUrbana zoning CGA. on Staffthis parcel. would not support LDR plan Charlie Seymour 80; across from Cracked A A A designation or previous W&S designations. Expansion of CGA Claw Restaurant should be examined within the context of a Community Plan update. ZONING
CPZ11-UR-32 TM: 96 BY Motion to deny. Pre-2010 Plan: VC Plan and VC zoning P: 38 Village Center Village Center Mixed Use DG second. COMP ACRES: 5.7 ac. Vote: 4-0-1 (KD absent) Not downzoned in 2010. Property is located within the Urbana CGA. APPLICANT: PLAN and site LOCATION: NW 5/31 - Confirmed House are listed in the National Register of Historic Places. Tycon Realty LLC – Staff would object to GC or MX zoning due to the potential for quadrant of intersection of maintaining VC Kevin P. Dolan significant loss of historical integrity for the site. MD 80 and Urbana Pike Zoning (old Md 355); site of VC VC MX Landon House historic ZONING property
CPZ11-UR-33 TAX MAP: 96 BY Motion to approve Pre-2010 Plan: VC Plan and VC zoning PARCEL: 39 Village Center Village Center Mixed Use the request. COMP ACRES: 4.26 ac. PS second. Not downzoned in 2010. Property is located within the Urbana CGA. APPLICANT: PLAN LOCATION: Southeast Vote: 3-1-1 (DG Parcel contains a small commercial center. Staff would not object to Turning Point Inn LLC – MX zoning due to the location of this parcel, the existing development quadrant of intersection of opposed; KD absent) Charlie Seymour on-site, and the ability for its development to occur in concert with the MD 80 and Urbana adjacent P.247 (aka P. 48). Parkway; east of VC VC MX roundabout ZONING
CPZ11-UR-34 TM: 96 BY Motion to approve Pre-2010 Plan: VC/ORI Plan and VC/ORI zoning P: 247 Village Center Village Center Mixed Use request. PS second. COMP ACRES: 1.38 ac. Office/Resch./Ind. Office/Resch./Ind. Vote: 4-0-1 (KD absent) Not downzoned in 2010. Property is located within the Urbana CGA. APPLICANT: PLAN LOCATION: Southeast Parcel boundaries 'shifted' to the east when roundabout was built. A Turning Point Inn LLC – bank structure currently occupies the site. Staff would not object to quadrant of intersection of Charlie Seymour MX zoning due to the location of this parcel, the existing development MD 80 and Urbana VC VC MX on-site, and the ability for its development to occur in concert with the Parkway; adjacent to adjacent P.39. roundabout ZONING ORI
CPZ11-UR-35 TAX MAP: 96 BY Motion to approve Pre-2010 Plan: VC Plan and VC zoning PARCEL: 198 Village Center Village Center Mixed Use request. PS second. COMP ACRES: 15.73 ac. Vote: 3-1-1 (DG Not downzoned in 2010. Property is located within the Urbana CGA. APPLICANT: PLAN LOCATION: w/s of 'old' opposed; KD absent) Parcel is adjacent to Urbana Elementary on south, and to electric Urbana Volunteer Fire substation on north side. Both sites zoned R-1. Staff believes the VC MD 355/Urbana Pike; fire 5/31 - Confirmed prior Department, c/o Jim is appropriate given the size and configuration of this parcel and the station property; north of, action to approve May, Chief VC VC MX scale and intensity of surrounding uses as well as the limited direct and adjacent to, Urbana request to MX. vehicular access necessary to support larger scale development. Elementary ZONING
Updated 6/21/2012 Page 7 URBANA REGION
CASE INFORMATION PROPERTY Pre-2010 Existing Requested BOCC Staff Comments
TM:TAX MAP:96 96 BY Motion to approverestore. Pre-2010 Plan: VCORI/VC Plan Planand VCand zoning ORI/VC zoning CPZ11-UR-36 Office/Resch./Ind. Office/Resch./Ind. Mixed Use P:PARCEL: 174 60 Village Center Village Center Mixed Use request.PS second. PS second. COMP ACRES: 35,28322.95 ac. s.f. Village Center Village Center Vote: 3-1-1 3-1-1 (DG (DG Not downzoned in 2010. Property is located within the Urbana CGA. APPLICANT: PLAN Urbana Pike frontage planned and zoned for VC land uses. Existing LOCATION: s/sw/s ofUrbana opposed; KD absent) Parcel contains a 2800 s.f. storage garage. Staff would not object to Joseph Knott MXfarmhouse zoning dueand toag the buildings location remain of this on parcel site. andStaff the would ability not for object its to UrbanaPike/MD Pike; 355; betweeneast of MD developmentMX land use andto occur zoning in concerton this parcel. with the adjacent P.34. If GC or MX Urbana80; across Church from RdCracked & VC VC MX zoning is applied, careful consideration should be given to the size, SugarloafClaw Restaurant Pkwy scale, and intensity of structures and uses at the time of site ZONING development.
CPZ11-UR-37 TAX MAP: 96 BY Motion to approve Pre-2010 Plan: VC Plan and VC zoning PARCEL: 34 Village Center Village Center Mixed Use request. PS second. COMP ACRES: 2.48 ac. Vote: 3-1-1 (DG Not downzoned in 2010. Property is located within the Urbana CGA. APPLICANT: PLAN LOCATION: s/s of opposed; KD absent) Parcel contains a 2800 s.f. storage garage. Staff would not object to G&K Corporation, R. MX zoning due to the location and configuration of this parcel and the Urbana Pike; between Hood Geisbert, III / Joe ability for its development to occur in concert with the adjacent P.174. Urbana Church Rd & Knott VC VC MX If GC or MX zoning is applied, site plan should consider the size, Sugarloaf Pkwy scale, and intensity of development. ZONING
CPZ11-UR-38 TM: 97 BY Motion to restore Pre-2010 Plan: LDR Plan and PUD zoning P: 0000 Low Density Res. Ag/Rural LDR (20.745 ac) LDR only w/ scenario COMP ACRES: 20.745 ac. (of analysis. PS second. Property is located outside of the Monrovia CGA, but was included in APPLICANT: PLAN approx. 31 ac. Total) Vote: 3-1-1 (DG pre-2010, larger Monrovia CGA. This parcel was part of the Monrovia Roy Stanley Town Center PUD. A 'Kart' track as well as a portion of the dragway LOCATION: Northwest opposed;KD absent) currently occupy the site. The PUD project is subject to an ongoing quadrant of intersection of lawsuit. MD 75 (north) & MD 80; PUD A A site of 75/80 Drag Strip ZONING
CPZ11-UR-39 TAX MAP: 105 BY Motion to deny w/ Pre-2010 Plan: LI/ORI Plan and LI/ORI zoning PARCEL: 27 Limited Ind. (90 ac) Limited Ind. (90 ac) General Ind. (90 ac) analysis. PS COMP ACRES: 183.81 ac. (area O/R/I (93.81 ac) O/R/I (93.81 ac) O/R/I (93.81 ac) second. Vote: 4-0-1 Not downzoned in 2010. Property is located within the Urbana CGA. APPLICANT: PLAN of change request: 90+ (KD absent) Seeking to change majority of LI zoning to GI. Staff would not Pleasants Investments, support shift to GI zoning at this time. Any potential changes in land ac.) LP use or zoning of this area should be examined within the context of a LOCATION: n/s of Mott Community & Corridor Plan update. Rd; between MD 355 and LI (90 ac) LI (90 ac) GI (90 ac) Doctor Perry Rd; south of ZONING ORI (93.81 ac) ORI (93.81 ac) ORI (93.81 ac) Urbana
CPZ11-UR-40 TM: 96 DG Motion to deny w/ Pre-2010 Plan: AgRural/RC Plan and A zoning P: 69 Ag/Rural Ag/Rural Rural Residential analysis. BY second. COMP ACRES: 125.8 ac. Resource Cons. Vote: 2-1-1 (PS Not downzoned in 2010. Property is located outside of the Urbana APPLICANT: PLAN LOCATION: w/s of opposed; BS abstained; CGA. Property has used all of its Ag subdivision rights. Jacob R. Ramsburg, Staff does not support rezoning of this parcel. Roderick Rd.; near Layton KD absent) Jr., et al Ct; southwest of Urbana 5/31 - motion to A A R-1 approve R-1 zoning. Vote: 2-2-1 (DG, BY ZONING opposed), (BS abstained). Motion Failed, R-1 NOT approved
Updated 6/21/2012 Page 8 URBANA REGION
CASE INFORMATION PROPERTY Pre-2010 Existing Requested BOCC Staff Comments
TAX MAP: 11196 BY Motion to restore. Pre-2010 Plan: AgRural/RCORI/VC Plan Plan and andORI/VC A zoning zoning CPZ11-UR-41 Office/Resch./Ind. Office/Resch./Ind. Mixed Use PARCEL: 3660 Ag/Rural Natural Resource Nat. Resrce. (5.5 ac) BSPS second. COMP ACRES: 8.522.95 ac. ac. ResourceVillage Center Cons. Village Center Ag/Rural (3 ac) Vote: 3-1-1 3-1-1 (DG (DG PropertyNot downzoned is located in 2010. outside Property of the Urbanais located CGA. within Portion the Urbana of parcel CGA. APPLICANT: PLAN Urbana Pike frontage planned and zoned for VC land uses. Existing LOCATION: Betweenw/s Urbana opposed;KDopposed; KD absent)absent) was rezoned from A to RC in 2010 Plan to reflect revised 100-year Global Mission Church floodplain.farmhouse Applicantand ag buildings is requesting remain that on entiresite. Staff parcel would be planned not object to SlatePike/MD Quarry 355; Rd east & I-270;of MD of Greater Washington, AgRuralMX land anduse andzoned zoning A. RC on zoning this parcel. does not affect either the access or southern80; across parcel from edgeCracked SBC proposal for a church on the adjjoining parcel. adjacentClaw Restaurant to Montgomery A RC RC (5.5 ac) county line ZONING A (3 ac)
CPZ11-UR-42 TM: 105 BY Motion to restore Pre-2010 Plan: AgRural/RC Plan and A zoning P: 109 Ag/Rural Ag/Rural (72.57 ac) Ag/Rural (78.87 ac) only. BS second. COMP ACRES: 78.87 ac. Resource Cons. Nat. Resrce. (6.3 ac) Vote: 3-1-1 (DG Small portion of parcel was rezoned from A to RC in 2010 Plan to APPLICANT: PLAN LOCATION: w/s of I-270; opposed; KD absent) reflect existing forest area and revised 100-year floodplain. A Site Global Mission Church Plan application to contruct a place of worship on the site that was south of Doctor Perry Rd of Greater Washington, filed in December 2008 has not yet been approved. Applicant is SBC A A (72.57 ac) A (78.87 ac) requesting that entire parcel be planned AgRural and zoned A. RC zoning on a portion of the parcel does not affect proposal for a ZONING RC (6.3 ac) church.
CPZ11-UR-43 TAX MAP: 97 PS Motion to approve Pre-2010 Plan: GC Plan and GC zoning PARCEL: 217 Gen. Commercial Ag/Rural Gen. Commercial request for entire COMP ACRES: 21.33 ac. parcel. Property is located outside of the Monrovia CGA, but was included in APPLICANT: PLAN LOCATION: s/s of MD 80; BS second. pre-2010, larger Monrovia CGA. This parcel was not part of the Adel Development Monrovia Town Center PUD. A portion of the relocated MD 75 at intersection of MD 75 Vote: 3-1-1 (DG Company, LLC alignment passes through the northeastern corner of the parcel. Staff (north) and MD 80 opposed;KD absent) GC A GC would not object to a restoration of land use and zoning on this parcel as part of an expanded Monrovia CGA. Staff would not object ZONING to extending the GC zoning to entirety of parcel due to impacts as a result of MD75/MD80 realignment.
CPZ11-UR-44 TM: 88 BY Motion to restore Pre-2010 Plan: LDR Plan and PUD zoning P: 27 Low Density Res. Ag/Rural Low Density Res. LDR only w/ scenario COMP ACRES: 135.83 ac. analysis. BS second. Property is located outside of the Monrovia CGA, but was included in APPLICANT: PLAN LOCATION: Between Ed Vote: 3-1-1 (DG pre-2010, larger Monrovia CGA. This parcel was part of the Monrovia Roy Stanley Town Center PUD. A planned collector road connecting Ed McClain McClain Rd & MD 75; opposed; KD absent) Rd and MD 75 passes through the center of this property. The PUD north of and adjacent to project is subject to an ongoing lawsuit. 75/80 Drag Strip PUD A A ZONING
CPZ11-UR-45 TAX MAP: 88 BS Motion to restore Pre-2010 Plan: LDR Plan and PUD zoning PARCEL: 28 Low Density Res. Ag/Rural Low Density Res. LDR only w/ scenario COMP ACRES: 96.47 ac. analysis. PS second. Property is located outside of the Monrovia CGA, but was included in APPLICANT: PLAN LOCATION: e/s of MD Vote: 3-1-1 (DG pre-2010, larger Monrovia CGA. This parcel was part of the Monrovia Roy Stanley Town Center PUD and is bifurcated by electrical transmission lines . 75; north of MD 80; split opposed; KD absent) The PUD project is subject to an ongoing lawsuit. by power transmission r.o.w. PUD A A ZONING
Updated 6/21/2012 Page 9 URBANA REGION
CASE INFORMATION PROPERTY Pre-2010 Existing Requested BOCC Staff Comments
TM:TAX MAP:88 96 BSBY Motion to restore.restore Pre-2010 Plan: LDRORI/VC Plan Plan and and PUD ORI/VC zoning zoning CPZ11-UR-46 Office/Resch./Ind. Office/Resch./Ind. Mixed Use P:PARCEL: 127 60 Low Density Res. Ag/Rural Low Density Res. LDRPS second. only w/ scenario COMP ACRES: 65.122.95 ac. ac. Village Center Village Center analysis.Vote: 3-1-1 PS second.(DG PropertyNot downzoned is located in 2010. outside Property of the isMonrovia located CGA,within butthe was Urbana included CGA. in APPLICANT: PLAN Urbana Pike frontage planned and zoned for VC land uses. Existing LOCATION: s/sw/s ofUrbana Weller Vote:opposed; 3-1-1 KD (DG absent) pre-2010, larger Monrovia CGA. This parcel was part of the Monrovia Roy Stanley, 75/80 Townfarmhouse Center and PUD ag buildingsand is bifurcated remain onby site. electrical Staff wouldtransmission not object lines. to Rd;Pike/MD north 355; of tranquility east of MD Ct; opposed; KD absent) Dragway, Inc. TheMX landPUD use project and zoningis subject on tothis an parcel. ongoing lawsuit. split80; across by power from Cracked transmissionClaw Restaurant r.o.w. PUD A A ZONING
CPZ11-UR-47 TM: 96 BS Motion to restore in Pre-2010 Plan: Ag/Rural in Urbana CGA on Plan and A zoning Ag/Rural in Urbana Ag/Rural Low Density Res. APPLICANT: P: 4 CGA only. PS second. COMP CGA New request. Marshall Davis ACRES: 290 ac. Vote: 3-1-1 (DG LOCATION: e/s of Tabler PLAN opposed; KD absent) Rd.
A A A ZONING
CPZ11-UR-48 TM: 88 BY Motion to restore Pre-2010 Plan: LDR Plan and R-3 zoning in Monrovia CGA COMP Low Density Res. Ag/Rural Low Density Res. P: 21 PLAN LDR only. BS second. APPLICANT: New Request. This is a panhandle parcel that was completely Roy Stanley, ACRES: 2 ac. Vote: 3-1-1 (DG LOCATION: e/s of Ed R-3 A A opposed; KD absent) surrounded by the Monrovia Town Center PUD. ZONING McClain Rd.
CPZ11-UR-49 TM: 106 5/31 Deny request for P: 75 COMP Resource Resource Ag/Rural A zoning. Vote: 5-0. APPLICANT: PLAN Conservation Conservation David and Barbara ACRES: 6.2 ac. Cromartie LOCATION: s/s of Prices Distillery Rd. east of MD RC A 75 RC ZONING
CPZ11-UR-50 TM: 95 5/31 Deny request to Ag/Rural Ag/Rural Placement in P: 18 COMP include in Urbana APPLICANT: Urbana Community Montouri LLC ACRES: 151 ac. PLAN growth area. LOCATION: w/s of Araby growth area Vote: 5-0. Church Rd. A A A ZONING
CPZ11-UR-51 TM: 88 5/31 Approve as Property request and analysis is in relation to UR 44, U 45, UR 46 P: 2 - 24 ac, (Burrall) COMP P. 2 - Ag/Rural Ag/Rural outside LDR and in depicted as Option 1 requests. APPLICANT: P. 15 & 18 - LDR growth area Monrovia growth Staff P. 15 - 75 ac. (Trimble) PLAN for Monrovia growth P. 18 - 5 ac. (Poole) area area. ACRES: 104 ac. total Vote: 4-1 (DG). A A LOCATION: between Ed A McClain Rd. and MD 75 ZONING
Updated 6/21/2012 Page 10 2011 Comprehensive Plan & Zoning Review - Property Owner Requests - Feb. 14, 2012 w/ May 31 BOCC revisions in bold italics
THURMONT REGION
CASE INFORMATION PROPERTY Pre-2010 Existing Requested BOCC Staff Comments
CPZ11-TH-1 TAX MAP: 19 Pre-2010 Plan: Rural Neigh. Plan and R-1 zoning PARCEL: 196 Rural Rural Residential Limited Industrial Pre-2008 Plan: LDR Plan and R-1 zoning COMP ACRES: 2.25 ac. Neighborhood BY motion to deny w/ No zoning change in 2010. Property is located within the Town of APPLICANT: PLAN LOCATION: N. analysis. KD second. Thurmont's CGA and designated for GC land uses. Current owner Eric G. Hinerman operating general contracting business (with on-site storage of Franklinville Rd, north of Vote: 5-0 equipment and material) on this parcel in apparent violation of the intersection with US 15 5/31 - approve R-1 R-1 LI zoning ordinance. Staff supports the Rural Res. plan designation with across from Roddy Creek request for LI zoning to remain R-1. Rd ZONING zoning. Vote: 5-0
CPZ11-TH-2 TM: 4 Pre-2010 Plan: LDR/RC Plan and R-3/GC zoning P: 38 Low Density Res. Low Density Res. Low Density Res. Pre-2008 Plan: LDR Plan and R-3/GC zoning COMP ACRES: 66.24 ac. Resource Cons. Property is located within the County's and Town of Emmitsburg's APPLICANT: PLAN LOCATION: n/s N. Seton CGA and designated for LDR land uses. The small GC-zoned area is Silver Fancy Farms Inc. BY motion to restore. located on the southwest corner of the parcel. Staff supports the LDR Ave, west of its PS second. Vote: 4-1 plan designation with zoning to remain A to facilitate annexation into intersection with US 15; Emmitsburg. north of Emmitsburg R-3 A R-1 (DG opposed) ZONING GC
CPZ11-TH-3 TAX MAP: 14 Pre-2010 Plan: AgRural Plan and GC zoning PARCEL: 17 Ag/Rural Ag/Rural Gen. Commercial Pre-2008 Plan: Comm.Rural Plan and GC zoning COMP ACRES: 6.24 ac. This small, isolated GC-zoned area is currently vacant. Properties APPLICANT: PLAN LOCATION: n/s Motter were in commercial use when the 1959 zoning map was adopted. Larry & Migdalia Fiscus BY motion to restore. Staff supports a VC plan designation with VC zoning to allow for Station Rd at its (original applicant: PS second. Vote: 4-1 some business and/or residential use of the site. intersection with Four Flora B. Sayler) Ponts Rd; approx. 1.75 GC A GC (DG opposed) miles southeast of Saint ZONING Anthony
CPZ11-TH-4 TM: 14 Pre-2010 Plan: RuralComm./RC Plan and R-1/RC zoning BY motion to restore. P: 1 (Lots 1 & 2) Rural Community Natural Resource Rural Community Pre-2008 Plan: RuralComm./RC Plan and R-1/RC zoning COMP ACRES: Lot 1 - 4.41 ac.; Resource cons. KD second. Vote: 4- These forested parcels are currently vacant. RC zoning permits a APPLICANT: PLAN Lot 2 - 5.09 ac. 1 (DG opposed) residence on each parcel. Staff supports maintaining the NR plan Mark E. Imirie designation with RC zoning. LOCATION: n/s 5/31 - approve R-1 Kelbaugh Rd; east of for entire lots. R-1 RC R-1 intersection with Hemler Vote: 3-2- (DG Rd; village of Saint ZONING RC opposed, BY - Anthony Restore only). CPZ11-TH-5 TAX MAP: 4 Pre-2010 Plan: AgRural/RC/LDR Plan and R-3 zoning PARCEL: 24 Ag/Rural Low Density Res. Low Density Res. Pre-2008 Plan: MDR/Conservation Plan and R-3 zoning COMP ACRES: 16.39 ac. Resource Cons. Property is located within the County's and Town of Emmitsburg's APPLICANT: PLAN LOCATION: intersection Low Density Res. CGA and designated for LDR on Town's Plan. Parcel was 'down- James M. Stockman BS motion to restore. zoned' and 'up-planned' (from AgRural to LDR) in the 2010 Comp of N. Seton Ave. & US 15 KD second. Vote: 4- Plan process. Staff supports the LDR plan designation with zoning to (NW quadrant); northeast remain A to facilitate annexation into Emmitsburg. of Emmitsburg R-3 A R-1 1 (DG opposed) ZONING
Updated 6/21/2012 Page 1 THURMONT REGION
CASE INFORMATION PROPERTY Pre-2010 Existing Requested BOCC Staff Comments
TAX MAP: 419 Pre-2010 Plan: LIRural Plan Neigh. and A Plan zoning and (within R-1 zoning CGA) CPZ11-TH-6 Rural Rural Residential Limited Industrial PARCEL: 16196 Limited Industrial Ag/Rural Limited Industrial Pre-2008 Plan: GCLDR Plan Plan and and A R-1 zoning zoning (within CGA) COMP ACRES: 14.752.25 ac. ac. Neighborhood BY motion to deny w/ No zoning change in 2010. Property is located within the Town of APPLICANT: PLAN BY motion to restore Thurmont's CGA and designated for GC land uses. Current owner LOCATION: intersectionN. analysis. KD second. Vacant property is located outside of the County's CGA butwithin the James M. Stockman LI plan only. Townoperating of Emmitsburg's general contracting CGA and business designated (with foron-site AgRural storage land of uses. ofFranklinville Welty Rd &Rd, US north 15 (NE of Vote: 5-0 KD second. Theequipment parcel andhad material)been designated on this parcel for employment in apparent uses violation in both of thethe quadrant);intersection northeast with US 15of 5/31 - approve A A LI Vote: 4-1 (DG 1995zoning & ordinance.2008 Thurmont Staff supportsRegion Plans. the Rural Staff Res. would plan support designation including with Emmitsburgacross from Roddy Creek request for LI withinzoning the to remainCounty R-1.CGA but retain Ag/Rural plan designation with Rd ZONING zoning.opposed) Vote: 5-0 zoning to remain A.
CPZ11-TH-7 TAX MAP: 3 Pre-2010 Plan: RuralNeigh. Plan and GC zoning (not in CGA) PARCEL: 55, 19 Rural Rural Residential Village Center Pre-2008 Plan: MDR and GC zoning (in CGA) COMP ACRES: approx 0.95 ac. Neighborhood Property is located outside the County's and Town of Emmitsburg's APPLICANT: PLAN BY motion to LOCATION: intersection CGAs and designated for AgRural land uses. Parcel is vacant and Hope Alive Inc. approve the VC adjacent to planned roadway extension & reconfiguration of the of Tract Rd & request. DG second. Brookfield Dr/Tract Rd - MD 140 intersection. Staff would support VC Waynesboro Rd/MD 140 zoning due to scale and intensity of surrounding neighborhood. (NW quadrant); west of GC R-1 VC Vote: 4-1 (KD Emmitsburg ZONING opposed)
CPZ11-TH-8 TM: 25 Pre-2010 Plan: Rural Neigh./RC and R-1 zoning P: 44 Rural Ag/Rural Rural Residential Pre-2008 Plan: LDR Plan and R-1 zoning COMP ACRES: 30.25 ac. Neighborhood This mostly forested parcel is currently vacant. Parcel is outside of APPLICANT: PLAN LOCATION: s/s Wood any CGA and located amidst some low-density residential and Jerry D. Smith & Naomi BY motion to restore. agricultural properties. Ct; w/s Brice Rd; north of V. Smith KD second. Vote: 4- Catoctin Furnace R-1 A R-1 1 (DG opposed) ZONING
CPZ11-TH-9 TAX MAP: 3 PARCEL: 30 Ag/Rural Rural Residential COMP ACRES: 25.968 ac. PLAN WITHDRAWN LOCATION: n/s Mountain View Rd; s/s Waynesboro APPLICANT: Rd/MD 140; west of WITHDRAWN Joseph t. Horman, Emmitsburg A R-1 BY APPLICANT on Aug. 15 George T. Horman, & ZONING Ebenezer Israel
CPZ11-TH-10 TM: 8 Pre-2010 Plan: GI Plan and GI zoning (in CGA) P: 45 General industrial Ag/Rural General Industrial Pre-2008 Plan: GI Plan and GI zoning (in CGA) COMP ACRES: 14.15 ac. Property is located within the County's and Town of Emmitsburg's APPLICANT: PLAN LOCATION: s/s Keysville CGAs and designated for AgRural (County)/Commercial (Town) land Emmitsburg Limited BY motion to restore. uses. Forested parcel is currently vacant. Staff would not object to GI Rd; e/s US 15; southeast Partnership BS second. Vote: 4-1 for the plan but to maintain A zoning to facilitate annexation. of Emmitsburg GI A GI (DG opposed) ZONING
Updated 6/21/2012 Page 2 THURMONT REGION
CASE INFORMATION PROPERTY Pre-2010 Existing Requested BOCC Staff Comments
TAX MAP: 19 Pre-2010 Plan: AgRuralRural Neigh. and APlan zoning and R-1 zoning CPZ11-TH-11 Rural Rural Residential LimitedRural Comm. Industrial (~3 ac) PARCEL: 284196 (Lot 1) Ag/Rural Ag/Rural Pre-2008 Plan: LDRAgRural Plan and and A R-1 zoning zoning COMP ACRES: 25.332.25 ac. ac. Neighborhood BY motion to deny w/ ThisNo zoning mostly change cleared in parcel 2010. isProperty currently is usedlocated for withina single the residence. Town of APPLICANT: PLAN Thurmont's CGA and designated for GC land uses. Current owner LOCATION: n/sN. of apples analysis. KD second. Parcel is outside of any CGA and located amidst some rural-density Keith Mauzy, SR. & BY motion to deny. residentialoperating general and predominantly contracting businessagricultural (with properties. on-site storage Applicant of seeks churchFranklinville Rd; west Rd, northof of Vote: 5-0 Kevin Mauzy PS second. adequateequipment amount and material) of R-1 on zoning this parcel to facilitate in apparent subdivision violation of one of the (1) intersection w/with Seiss US 15Rd; 5/31 - approve A A R-1 (approx. 3 ac) Vote: 5-0 additionalzoning ordinance. lot. Staff Staff supports supports maintaining the Rural the Res. AgRural plan designation plan with northeastacross from of RoddyThurmont Creek request for LI designationzoning to remain with AR-1. zoning. Rd ZONING zoning. Vote: 5-0
CPZ11-TH-12 TM: 19 Pre-2010 Plan: AgRural Plan and R-1 zoning P: 64 Ag/Rural Ag/Rural Rural Residential Pre-2008 Plan: Rural Comm. Plan and R-1 zoning COMP ACRES: 44.72 ac. Property is located outside of County CGA and within the Town of APPLICANT: PLAN LOCATION: intersection Thurmont's CGA and designated for AgRural land uses in both plans. Edanrae Inc. BY motion to restore. Forested parcel is currently occupied by a single residence. The of Rocky Ridge Rd & PS second. Vote: 4-1 Town of Thurmont foresees annexation of this parcel beyond the Graceham Rd (NW R-1 A R-1 (DG opposed) timeframe of its current master plan (20+ years). Staff supports quadrant); village of concurrence with municipal plan to include in County CGA but Graceham, east of ZONING retaining both the AgRural plan designation and A zoning. Thurmont
CPZ11-TH-13 TM: 19 Pre-2010 Plan: MDR Plan and R-1 zoning (in CGA) P: 63 Med. Density Res. Med. Density Res. Med. Density Res. Pre-2008 Plan: MDR Plan and R-1 zoning (in CGA) COMP ACRES: 13 ac. Property is located within both the County and the Town of APPLICANT: PLAN LOCATION: n/s Rocky BY motion to restore. Thurmont's CGAs and designated for MDR land uses in both plans. Edanrae Inc. Forested parcel is currently vacant. The Town of Thurmont foresees Ridge Rd; village of PS second. annexation of this parcel within the timeframe of its current master Graceham, east of Vote: 4-1 (DG R-1 A R-1 plan. Staff supports concurrence with municipal plan by Thurmont (immediately opposed) acknowledging the town's CGA but retaining the A zoning to facilitate west of CPZ11-TH-12) ZONING municipal annexation.
CPZ11-TH-14 TM: 19 Pre-2010 Plan: RC Plan and A/GC zoning P: 88 Resource Cons. Natural Resource Gen. Commercial Pre-2008 Plan: GC Plan and A/GC zoning COMP ACRES: 7.67 ac. Property is located outside of the County CGA and within the Town APPLICANT: PLAN LOCATION: n/s Roddy of Thurmont's CGA and designated for AgRural (Town) Forested St. John's Literary BS motion to restore. parcel is currently vacant and adjacent to an existing commercial Rd at its intersection with Institution at Prospect PS second. Vote: 4-1 use. The Town of Thurmont foresees eventual annexation of this US 15; north of Thurmont Hall, Inc. A A GC (entire parcel) (DG opposed) parcel. Staff supports concurrence with municipal plan by acknowledging the town's CGA but retaining both the AgRural plan ZONING GC (4.2 ac) designation and A zoning.
TAX MAP: 4 Pre-2010 Plan: LI Plan and LI zoning (in CGA) CPZ11-TH-15 Limited Ind. (20.8 ac) Limited Ind. (20.8 ac) PARCEL: 30 Limited Ind. Pre-2008 Plan: LI and LI zoning (in CGA) COMP ACRES: 13.75 ac. (7.05 ac) Property is located outside the County's and Town of Emmitsburg's APPLICANT: PLAN LOCATION: e/s Old Ag/Rural (13.75 ac) CGAs and designated for Limited Industrial & AgRural land uses. Nasser & Mahnaz BS motion to restore. Land Use designation and zoning shifted from 100% LI to partial LI in Gettysburg Rd; south of Baradar KD second. Vote: 4- the 2010 Comp Plan. Parcel and surrounding properties were Pennsylvania state line; LI (20.8 ac) LI (7.05 ac) LI (20.8 ac) 1 (DG opposed) removed from CGA in 2010 Comp Plan. Parcel is predominantly northeast of Emmitsburg vacant and adjacent to the Pennsylvania border. Staff supports LI ZONING A (13.75 ac) for entire 20.8 acre parcel.
Updated 6/21/2012 Page 3 THURMONT REGION
CASE INFORMATION PROPERTY Pre-2010 Existing Requested BOCC Staff Comments
TM:TAX MAP:8 19 Pre-2010 Plan: Ag/RuralRural Neigh. and PlanR-1 zoningand R-1 (in zoning CGA) CPZ11-TH-16 Rural Rural Residential Limited Industrial P:PARCEL: 147 196 Ag/Rural LDR (11.8 ac) LDR (16.9 ac) Pre-2008 Plan: LDRLDR Planand R-1and zoningR-1 zoning (in CGA) COMP ACRES: 28.72.25 ac. (withinNeighborhood CGA) Ag/Rural (16.9 ac) for Ag/Rural portion BY motion to deny w/ LocatedNo zoning partially change within in 2010. the County'sProperty CGAis located (11.8 within acres) the and Town entirely of APPLICANT: PLAN Thurmont's CGA and designated for GC land uses. Current owner LOCATION: n/sN. & s/s of BYanalysis. motion KD to second.restore. within the Town of Emmitsburg's CGA. The parcel is designated LDR EDC Properties, LLC inoperating the Town general plan. Thecontracting northern business portion of (with the on-siteparcel wasstorage removed of AnnandaleFranklinville Rd; Rd, westnorth of of PSVote: second. 5-0 fromequipment the County and material) CGA in theon this2010. parcel Parcel in apparentis mostly violationcleared exceptof the for Emmitsburgintersection with US 15 Vote:5/31 - 4-1approve (DG R-1 A (28.7 ac) R-1 (28.7 ac) azoning single ordinance. residence Staffon the supports southern the portion. Rural Res. Staff plan supports designation with across from Roddy Creek opposed)request for LI concurrencezoning to remain with R-1.the Emmitsburg Plan to include northern parcel Rd ZONING zoning. Vote: 5-0 within CGA with LDR plan designation. Ag zoning should remain to facilitate annexation.
CPZ11-TH-17 TM: 8 Pre-2010 Plan: AgRural/RC and A/R-1 (partially in CGA) P: 4 Ag/Rural Ag/Rural Low Density Res. Pre-2008 Plan: AgRural/LDR and A/R-1 (partially in CGA) COMP ACRES: 43.75 Resource Cons. Natural Resource Property is located outside of both the County's and the Town of APPLICANT: PLAN LOCATION: w/s of (partially in CGA) Emmitsburg's CGAs. The eastern portion of the parcel was included EDC Properties, LLC BY motion to restore. in the County CGA in the 2008 Comp Plan and later removed to be Mountain View Rd; n/s of BS second. Vote: 4-1 concurrent with Emmitsburg's plan. The parcel is predominantly Annandale Rd; west of A A R-1 (43.75 ac) (DG opposed) cleared for agricultural use. Staff supports concurrence with the Emmitsburg municipal plan by maintaining the Ag/Rural/NR land use designation. ZONING R-1 (4.6 ac) The A zoning should remain to facilitate municipal annexation of the parcel.
CPZ11-TH-18 TM: 8 Pre-2010 Plan: AgRural/RC/LDR Plan and R-1 (in CGA) P: 175 Ag/Rural LDR (57.67 ac) LDR (105.6 ac) Pre-2008 Plan: LDR/Conserv. Plan and R-1 (mostly in CGA) COMP ACRES: 105.57 ac. Resource Cons. Ag/Rural Mostly within the County's and entirely within Emmitsburg's CGAs. APPLICANT: PLAN LOCATION: s/s of Low Density Res. Nat. Resrce. (47.9 ac) The County land use des. (~70%) is LDR with the balance in Anne M. Braverman BY motion to restore. Ag/Rural & NR. The eastern portion lies within the Town. The parcel Annandale Rd; west of, Revocable Trust BS second. Vote: 4-1 is mostly cleared for agriculture. Staff supports concurrence with the and adjacent to, R-1 A (105.6 ac) R-1 (105.6 ac) (DG opposed) municipal plan and expansion of the CGA into the balance of the Emmitsburg property. LDR plan des. should extend to the NR designated ZONING floodplain. Staff supports the A zoning to facilitate municipal annexation of the parcel.
CPZ11-TH-19 TAX MAP: 14 Pre-2010 Plan: RuralComm. Plan and R-1 zoning PARCEL: 167 & 1A Rural Community Rural Community Ag/Rural Pre-2008 Plan: RuralComm. Plan and R-1 zoning COMP ACRES: P. 167 - .65 ac., APPLICANT: PLAN P. 1A - .33 ac. Both parcels total about 1 acre. Parcel 1A is vacant and P. 167 has a Charles & Penny BY motion to deny. residence. Applicants wish to engage in micro-agriculture and are LOCATION: n/s of Stonesifer BS second. prevented from raising a steer in the R-1 zoning district where 3 Kelbaugh Rd; 1/3 mile R-1 R-1 A Vote: 5-0 acres are required to have farm animals. Applicant may pursue a north of intersection w/ zoning text change to allow raising of steer on parcels of this size. Hemler Rd; village of ZONING Saint Anthony
Updated 6/21/2012 Page 4 2011 Comprehensive Plan & Zoning Review - Property Owner Requests - Feb. 21, 2012 w/ May 31 BOCC revisions in bold italics
NEW MARKET REGION
CASE INFORMATION PROPERTY Pre-2010 Existing Requested BOCC Staff Comments
CPZ11-NM-01 TAX MAP: 80 No change from 2010 Plan. PARCEL: 146, lot 1 Property located within the New Market CGA. Staff supports COMP Low Density Res. Low Density Res. Gen. Commercial BY motion to ACRES: 1.01 the request in order to facilitate the adapative reuse of an APPLICANT: PLAN approve request. BS LOCATION: N/S Old historic residential property for office uses. Haley/Carole Tate second. National Pike, 0.40 miles Vote: 4-0-1 with PS east of MD 75 Pre-2008 NM Plan: absent. A A GC ZONING 5/31 Confirmed GC zoning change
CPZ11-NM-02 TAX MAP: 90 Pre-2008 NM Plan: Pre-2008 New Market Plan: Rural Neighborhood plan/Ag. PARCEL: 67 zoning COMP Rural Ag/Rural Rural Residential ACRES: 86 BY motion to restore Property is not within a CGA nor Mt. Airy's growth/annexation APPLICANT: PLAN Neighborhood LOCATION: NE corner of plan designation. BS area. Expansion of Rural Residential Plan designation into William Wimmer, c/o Sidney Rd & Old National second. Ag./Rural area not indicated by the Comprehensive Plan. Wimmer Real Estate, Pike Vote: 3-1-1, LLC. A A R-1 DG opposed ZONING PS absent
CPZ11-NM-03 TAX MAP: 79 No change from either 2010 Plan or 2008 New Market Region PARCEL: 34 Plan. COMP Low Density Res. Low Density Res. Gen. Commercial ACRES: 19 Staff does not support additional GC zoning at this site as APPLICANT: PLAN LOCATION: South side BY motion to deny. approximately 200,000 sq. ft. of commercial uses proposed for Harvest Wind Lutheran Old National Pike, across BS second. Linganore Town Center plus 40 acres of GC zoning exist at the Church, from Eaglehead Drive Vote: 4-0-1 with PS Mussetter Road/Old National Pike intersection. Should assess A A GC absent. as part of a Corridor Plan. ZONING
CPZ11-NM-04 TAX MAP: 78 Pre-2010 Plan: LDR plan and Ag. zoning PARCEL: 338 Parcel is fully wooded, contains steep and moderate slopes COMP Low Density Res. Natural Resource Ag/Rural ACRES: 12.7 and is part of a 200+acre, contiguous forested area south of APPLICANT: PLAN BY motion to restore. LOCATION: West side Lake Linganore. NR/RC is consistent with the physical Robert Renn & Mark BS second. Meadow Rd, 1,100 feet characteristics of the parcel. Renn Vote: 3-1-1 with DG south of Lake Linganore opposed and PS A RC A ZONING absent.
CPZ11-NM-05 TAX MAP: 80 Pre-2008 New Market Plan: LDR plan and R-3 zoning. PARCEL: 9 The Town of New Market has identified this parcel for COMP Low Density Res. Low Density Res. Low Density Res. ACRES: 55 annexation as Economic Development Flex in their 2011 Draft APPLICANT: PLAN BY motion to restore. LOCATION: N/S Old Master Plan. Staff recommends retention of Agricultural Turnpike Farms, L.P., BS second. National Pike, 2,400 ft zoning to facilitate anexation per the Town's Plan (Ganley) Vote: 3-1 -1 with DG west of Detrick Rd. Pre-2008 NM Plan: opposed and PS Withdrawn R-3 A R-3 absent. May 29, 2012 ZONING
Updated 6/21/2012 Page 1 NEW MARKET REGION
CASE INFORMATION PROPERTY Pre-2010 Existing Requested BOCC Staff Comments
CPZ11-NM-06 TAX MAP: 8880 Pre-2008 NM Plan: Pre-2008No change New from Market 2010 Plan.Plan: ORI, LI, MDR plan and ORI, LI, R- PARCEL: 32146, lot 1 Office/Resch./Ind. 5Property zoning. located within the New Market CGA. Staff supports COMP Low Density Res. Office/Resch./Ind.Low Density Res. ORIGen. (20 Commercial ac), BY motion to restore. ACRES: 131.51.01 Limited Industral Townthe request of New in Marketorder to identifies facilitate this the parceladapative for annexation reuse of an as APPLICANT: PLAN Limited Ind. (30 ac) BSapprove second. request. BS LOCATION: S/E N/S side Old of MDR Economichistoric residential Development property Flex. for Staffoffice supports uses. the retention of RJD Development LDR (81 ac) Vote:second. 3-1 -1 with DG BaldwinNational Road,Pike, 0.40south miles of I- the ORI designation and ORI/Ag. zoning in order to facilitate an Corp. (Richard Demitt) Vote: 4-0-1 with PS 70east of MD 75 opposed and PS MXD development. This will allow greater development Pre-2008 NM Plan: absent. absent. flexibility and better overall site design than can be realized ORI ORI (20 ac) ORI (20 ac) 5/31 Confirmed GC 5/31 - approve ORI from the past arbitrary locations of the R-5, LI, and ORI zoning LI A (111 ac) LI (30 ac) zoning change ZONING plan, zoning remains that previously existed. R-5 R-5 (81 ac) split as restored. Vote - 4-1 (DG)
CPZ11-NM-07 TAX MAP: 88 Pre-2008 NM Plan: Pre-2008 New Market Plan: GC plan and GC zoning. PARCEL: 4 A site plan was submitted for a 4-acre area in 2000. Parcel has COMP Gen. Commercial Natural Resource Gen. Commercial ACRES: 8.8 several constraints including a sewer line on the west side of APPLICANT: PLAN BY motion to restore. LOCATION: W/S MD 75, Davis Branch, streams, wetlands, slopes and woodlands. Market Station & BS second. south of I-70 E/B Ramp, Recommend retaining NR/RC on northern portion. Baldwin Rd, LLC Vote: 3-1 -1 with DG north of Baldwin Road Pre-2008 NM Plan: (Richard Demitt) opposed and PS GC RC GC ZONING absent.
CPZ11-MN-08 TAX MAP: 78 Pre-2008 NM Plan: Pre-2008 New Market Plan: LDR plan and R-3 zoning. PARCEL: 480 Staff supports the rezoning request for 16 acres of R-3 at the COMP Low Density Res. Natural Resource Natural Res. (20 ACRES: 36 end of Dresden Place, with the remainder of the forested APPLICANT: PLAN ac), BY motion to LOCATION: Terminus of slopes on the parcel NR/RC and remaining out of the CGA. Beshers Land Co, No. LDR (16 ac) restore.KD second. Dresden Place, adjacent 2, LLC (Eric Beshers) Vote: 3-1 -1 with DG to Spring Ridge Pre-2008 NM Plan: opposed and PS R-3 (16 ac) RC RC (20 ac) absent. ZONING R-3 (16 ac)
CPZ11-MN-09 TAX MAP: 89 Pre-2010 Plan: Rural Neighborhood plan and R-1 zoning. PARCEL: p/o 22 Property is not within a CGA. This is a small remainder parcel COMP Rural Ag/Rural Rural Residential ACRES: 6 and staff would not object to restoring the R-1 zoning. APPLICANT: PLAN Neighborhood BY motion to restore. LOCATION: E/S William Browning KD second. Bartholows Rd, 600 ft. Vote 3-1 -1 with DG north of West Oak Drive opposed and PS R-1 A R-1 ZONING absent.
CPZ11-NM-10 TAX MAP: 87 Pre-2010 Plan: LDR plan and R-1 zoning. PARCEL: 22 Subject parcel is remainder after 31 well/septic residential lots COMP Low Density Res. Ag/Rural Low Density Res. ACRES: 28 (Hunting Hills) created in early 1970's. Change to A zoning in APPLICANT: PLAN BY motion to restore. LOCATION: E/S Ijamsville 2010 was with concurrence of the property owner. Staff would Clare Hill KD second. Rd, south of Mahogany not object to restoring the LDR Plan designation and R-1 Vote 3-1-1 with DG Run zoning opposed and PS R-1 A R-1 ZONING absent.
Updated 6/21/2012 Page 2 NEW MARKET REGION
CASE INFORMATION PROPERTY Pre-2010 Existing Requested BOCC Staff Comments
CPZ11-NM-11 TAX MAP: 8980 Pre-2010No change Plan: from Rural2010 NeighborhoodPlan. and RC Plan; R-1 (15 PARCEL: 247146, lot 1 ac.)Property zoning located within the New Market CGA. Staff supports COMP Rur.Low Neigh.Density (12 Res. ac) NaturalLow Density Resource Res. RuralGen. Commercial Res. (12 ac) BY motion to ACRES: 811.01 Remainderthe request parcelin order accesses to facilitate Ridgeway the adapative Court via reuse a 25-ft. of an wide APPLICANT: PLAN Res. Cons. (69 ac) BYapprove motion request. to restore. BS LOCATION: Terminus N/S Old of 'pandhandle.'historic residential Zoning property Ordinance for office requires uses. a panhandle to be 20- Atanasoff Family Ltd. KDsecond. second. RidgewayNational Pike, Court, 0.40 Monrovia miles feet wide to serve a single lot or two 10-ft adjacent Pnshp VoteVote: 3-1 4-0-1 -1 with DGPS east of MD 75 panhandles to serve two lots. Even with R-1 zoning, the absent. opposed and PS access condition would only permit 2 new residential lots. The R-1 (12 ac) RC RC (69 ac) 5/31 Confirmed GC ZONING absent. existing RC zoning would allow two 10-acre lots. RC (69 ac) R-1 (12 ac) zoning change
CPZ11-NM-12 TAX MAP: 68, 69, 78, 79 Pre-2008 NM Plan: Pre-2010 Plan: Ag/Rural, LDR Plan; A and PUD zoning. PARCEL: Multiple Parcels Pre-2008 NM Plan: LDR Plan, PUD zoning. COMP Low Density Res. Low Density Res., Low Density Res. BY motion to restore. ACRES: 668 2008 NM Region Plan removed LDR Plan and PUD zoning APPLICANT: PLAN Ag/Rural, KD second w/ LOCATION: Lake from several land bays. 2010 Plan removed additional LDR Oakdale Investments, Natural Resource analysis as part of Linganore Plan and PUD zoning. Applicant seeks restoration of all LDR LLC. litigation. Pre-2008 NM Plan: Plan and PUD zoning. Subject to current litigation. Vote: 3-1 -1 with DG PUD A A opposed and PS ZONING RC absent. PUD CPZ11-NM-13 TAX MAP: 79 Pre-2008 NM Plan: Pre-2008 New Market Plan: LDR plan and Ag. zoning PARCEL: 29 & 283, lot 2 The Town of New Market has identified this parcel for COMP Low Density Res. Ag/Rural Low Density Res. ACRES: P. 29: 170 ac.; annexation as Planned Residential Development (PDR) in their APPLICANT: PLAN BY motion to restore. P.283, lot 2: 2 ac. Draft Plan. Staff would not object to restoring the LDR Plan Charlyn, LLC (Cline KD second. LOCATION: East and designation, though maintaining the Ag zoning to facilitate farm) Vote 3-1-1 with DG west sides of Boyers Mill annexation per the Town's Plan. opposed and PS Road, 1 mile north of MD A A A 144 ZONING absent.
CPZ11-NM-14 TAX MAP: 79 Pre-2008 NM Plan: Pre-2008 New Market Plan: LDR plan and Ag. zoning PARCEL: 213 The Town of New Market has identified this parcel for COMP Low Density Res. Ag/Rural Low Density Res. ACRES: 92 annexation as Planned Residential Development (PDR) in their APPLICANT: PLAN LOCATION: W/S Boyers BY motion to restore. Draft Plan. Staff would not object to restoring the LDR Plan Justron, LLC (Smith Mill Road, 3,000 feet north KD second. Vote 3-1- designation, though maintaining the Ag zoning to facilitate farm) of MD 144 1 with DG opposed annexation per the Town's Plan. A A A and PS absent. ZONING
CPZ11-NM-15 TAX MAP: 89 Pre-2008 NM Plan: Pre-2008 New Market Plan: LDR plan and R-1 zoning. PARCEL: 49 Property is not within a CGA. LDR Plan and R-1 zoning were COMP Low Density Res. Ag/Rural Rural Residential ACRES: 54 removed to maintain larger contiguous block of agricultural APPLICANT: PLAN BY motion to restore. LOCATION: E/S Bill properties in this area. LDR indicates planned (or existing) Richardson Ventures, KD second. Moxley Road, 6,000 feet public water and sewer, but this parcel not served by the LLC Vote 3-1-1 with DG south of I-70 Pre-2008 NM Plan: Subregional Samhill Water or Mill Bottom Sewer systems. opposed and PS R-1 A R-1 Ability to connect to the Subregional water and sewer system, ZONING absent. for development on public water and sewer, not guaranteed.
Updated 6/21/2012 Page 3 NEW MARKET REGION
CASE INFORMATION PROPERTY Pre-2010 Existing Requested BOCC Staff Comments
CPZ11-NM-16 TAX MAP: 7880 Pre-2008 NM Plan: Pre-2008No change New from Market 2010 Plan.Plan: LDR plan and Ag zoning. PARCEL: 742,146, lotslot 1 1--4 StaffProperty does located not support within the the LDR New forMarket expansion CGA. ofStaff the supports CGA. COMP Low Density Res. Ag/RuralLow Density Res. LowGen. DensityCommercial Res. BY motion to ACRES: Lot 1.01 1: 40 ac.; Couldthe request be evaluated in order asto facilitatepart of a theCommunity adapative Plan. reuse of an APPLICANT: PLAN BYapprove motion request. to restore. BS LotLOCATION: 2: 31 ac.; N/S Lot Old 3: 25 historic residential property for office uses. Gladhill Family KDsecond. second. ac.;National Lot 4:Pike, 49 0.40ac. miles(146 Partnership VoteVote: 3-1-1 4-0-1 with DGPS ac.east Total) of MD 75 absent. LOCATION: N/S Reichs opposed and PS A A A 5/31 Confirmed GC Ford Rd, 1,600 ft east of ZONING absent. the Monocacy River zoning change
CPZ11-NM-17 TAX MAP: 78 Pre-2010 Plan: Resource Conservation Plan; Ag zoning. PARCEL: 55 Staff does not support the LDR for expansion of the CGA. COMP Resource Cons. Ag/Rural Low Density Res. ACRES: 8.8 Could be evaluated as part of a Community Plan. APPLICANT: PLAN LOCATION: N/S Pinecliff BY motion to deny. Gladhill/Bare Park Road, 200 ft. north of KD second. Reichs Ford Rd Vote: 4-0-1 with PS A A A absent. ZONING
CPZ11-NM-18 TAX MAP: 98 Pre-2008 New Market Plan: Rural Neighborhood Plan and R-1 PARCEL: 104 zoning. COMP Rural Residential Rural Residential Low Density Res. ACRES: 20 Staff would not object to an LDR Plan designation with R-1 APPLICANT: PLAN BY motion to restore LOCATION: N/S Penn zoning for development on public water and sewer. However, James/Holly Frey zoning only. KD Shop Rd., 850 feet east of the ability to connect to the Samhill/Mill Bottom Sub-regional second. Vote: 3-1 -1 Lomar Drive Pre-2008 NM Plan: water and sewer system, for development on public water and with DG opposed R-1 A R-1 sewer, is not guaranteed. ZONING and PS absent.
CPZ11-NM-19 TAX MAP: 99 Pre-2008 New Market Plan: Rural Neighborhood plan and R-1 PARCEL: 3, lots 1, 2, 3, 4 zoning. COMP Rural Residential Rural Residential Rural Residential ACRES: Lot 1: 3.1 ac.; This 4-four lot well/septic subdivision (Shirley's Ridge) was APPLICANT: PLAN Lot 2: 2.3 ac.; Lot 3: 2.5 BY motion to restore. approved and recorded in 2009. The current Agricultural James/Holly Frey ac.; Lot 4: 3.2 ac. (total: KD second. Vote 3-1- zoning has no impact on future residential development on 11 acres) Pre-2008 NM Plan: 1 with DG opposed these 4 residential lots. LOCATION: W/S Penn R-1 A R-1 and PS absent. Shop Road ZONING
CPZ11-NM-20 TAX MAP: 79 Pre-2008 NM Plan: Pre-2008 New Market Plan: GC, MDR plan and R-5, GC PARCEL: 112 MDR (44 ac), zoning. Property is adjacent to parcel described in request # COMP Med. Density Res. Med. Density Res. ACRES: 16.3 Gen. Comm. (8 ac) 21 and combined for acreage calculations. APPLICANT: PLAN LOCATION: N/S Old Gen. Commercial BY motion to restore. Parcel is part of the larger Linganore Town Center. Staff would Hutzell Family National Pike, adjacent to BS second. Vote: 3-1-prefer to see PUD zoning on this and the Carey parcel, which Partnership Oakdale Elementary Pre-2008 NM Plan: 1 with DG opposed would provide greater flexibility for the overall design and for School R-5 (44 ac) A R-5 and PS absent. locating appropriate commercial uses. ZONING GC (8 ac)
Updated 6/21/2012 Page 4 NEW MARKET REGION
CASE INFORMATION PROPERTY Pre-2010 Existing Requested BOCC Staff Comments
CPZ11-NM-21 TAX MAP: 7980 Pre-2008 NM Plan: Pre-2008No change New from Market 2010 Plan.Plan: GC, MDR plan and R-5, GC PARCEL: 162146, lot 1 MDR (44 ac), zoning.Property located Property within is adjacent the New to Market parcel CGA.described Staff in supports request COMP Low Density Res. Med.Low DensityDensity Res.Res. Med.Gen. CommercialDensity Res. BY motion to ACRES: 35.7 1.01 Gen. Comm. (8 ac) #20the requestand combined in order for to acreagefacilitate calculations.the adapative reuse of an APPLICANT: PLAN Gen. Com. (10 ac) approve request. BS LOCATION: N/S N/S OldOld Gen. Commercial BY motion to restore. Parcelhistoric is residential part of the property larger Linganore for office uses.Town Center. Staff would E. Carlton and Gladys second. National Pike, adjacent0.40 miles to BS second. Vote: 3-1-prefer to see PUD zoning on this and the Carey parcel, which Carey Vote: 4-0-1 with PS Oakdaleeast of MD Elementary 75 would provide greater flexibility for the overall design and for Pre-2008 NM Plan: absent.1 with DG opposed School locating appropriate commercial uses. R-5 (44 ac) A R-5 (25.7 ac) 5/31and PSConfirmed absent. GC ZONING GC (8 ac) GC (10 ac) zoning change
CPZ11-NM-22 TAX MAP: 79 Pre-2008 NM Plan: Pre-2008 New Market Plan: Ag,Rural in growth area and Ag. PARCEL: 217 zoning. COMP Ag/Rural in CGA Ag/Rural Ag/Rural in CGA ACRES: 134 The Town of New Market has identified this parcel for APPLICANT: PLAN BY motion to restore. LOCATION: N/W side Old annexation as Economic Development Flex on their Draft Plan. George Delaplaine BS second. New Market Rd, west of Staff would not object to including within the New Market CGA Vote: 3-1 -1 with DG MD 75 with Ag./Rural Plan and Agricultural zoning to promote opposed and PS A A A annexation per the Town Plan. ZONING absent.
CPZ11-NM-23 TAX MAP: 89 No change made during 2010 Plan update or 2008 New PARCEL: 113 BY motion to deny w/ Market Plan update. COMP Ag/Rural Ag/Rural Village Center ACRES: 1.8 analysis. BS second. Property obtained S.E. approval in 1982 for auto repair in the APPLICANT: PLAN LOCATION: N/S Old Vote: 3-1 -1 with DG Ag zone. Property has a commercial building and a residence. Alan Cawood, National Pike, west of opposed and PS Staff would not object to VC zoning. Woodville Rd. absent. A A VC 5/31 - approve VC ZONING zoning. Vote 4-1 (BY) CPZ11-NM-24 TAX MAP: 81 Pre-2010 Plan: Ag.,Rural plan and Ag zoning. (within Mt. Airy PARCEL: 28 CGA) COMP Low Density Res. Low Density Res. ACRES: 25 Within Town of Mt. Airy's Annexation Area and identified on APPLICANT: PLAN LOCATION: N/S Prospect Town's Master Plan for low density resdiential uses. Timothy Rigler Road, adjacent to Town of WITHDRAWN Mt. Airy A R-3 11/14/2011 ZONING
CPZ11-NM-25 TAX MAP: 88 Pre-2010 Plan: GC Plan/ GI zoning. PARCEL: 177 Property contains a structure used as an office building for a COMP Gen. Commercial Gen. Commercial General Industrial ACRES: 0.33 contractors' company with associated commercial vehicular APPLICANT: PLAN BY motion to LOCATION: E/S MD 75 in storage. 2010 zoning change made to align zoning category Mt. Airy Building Supply approve request. KD historic Monrovia with Plan designation. Co. (Howard Payne) second. Vote: 4-0-1 with PS GI GC GI ZONING absent.
Updated 6/21/2012 Page 5 NEW MARKET REGION
CASE INFORMATION PROPERTY Pre-2010 Existing Requested BOCC Staff Comments
CPZ11-NM-26 TAX MAP: 8880 No change madefrom 2010 during Plan. 2010 Plan update or 2008 New PARCEL: 123 146, lot 1 MarketProperty Plan located update. within the New Market CGA. Staff supports COMP ResourceLow Density Consv. Res. NaturalLow Density Resource Res. GeneralGen. Commercial Industrial BY motion to deny w/ ACRES: 5.91.01 Landscapethe request characteristicsin order to facilitate consistent the adapative with application reuse of of an RC APPLICANT: PLAN analysis.approve request.KD second. BS LOCATION: W/SN/S Old MD 75, zoning.historic residential property for office uses. Howard Payne Vote:second. 3-1 -1 with DG GreenNational Valley Pike, Rd, 0.40 adjacent miles Property is vacant, predominantely wooded and adjacent to opposedVote: 4-0-1 and with PS PS toeast RR of MD 75 FEMA 100-yr floodplain, in addition to three residential absent. absent. dwellings. RC RC GI 5/31 Confirmed GC ZONING 5/31 - approve GI zoning change
CPZ11-NM-27 TAX MAP: 88 Pre-2010 Plan: GC Plan/ GI zoning. PARCEL: 49 Property has an office use in an historic structure with no COMP Gen. Commercial Gen. Commercial General Industrial ACRES: 2 BY motion to outdoor storage. Change in 2010 was made to have the zoning APPLICANT: PLAN LOCATION: E/S MD 75, approve request. BS consistent with the existing use and the Plan designation. Mt. Airy Building Supply Green Valley Rd, in second. Co. (Howard Payne) historic Monrovia Vote:3-1 -1 with DG GI GC GI opposed and PS ZONING absent.
CPZ11-NM-28 TAX MAP: 88 Pre-2010 Plan: GI (Plan)/ GC (zoning) PARCEL: 77 Staff would not object to the GC zoning and Plan designation. COMP General Industr. Village Center Gen. Commercial ACRES: 0.25 APPLICANT: PLAN LOCATION: W/S MD 75, BY motion to Howard Payne Green Valley Rd, south of approve the request. RR BS second. Vote: 4-0- GC VC GC 1 with PS absent. ZONING
CPZ11-NM-29 TAX MAP: 88 Pre-2010 Plan: GC (Plan)/ GI (zoning). PARCEL: 87 Property contains multiple dwellings used for contractors' office COMP Gen. Commercial Gen. Commercial General Industrial ACRES: 3.8 BY motion to and some storage. Change in 2010 was made to have the APPLICANT: PLAN LOCATION: E/S MD 75, approve request. BS zoning consistent with the Plan designation. Mt. Airy Building Supply Green Valley Rd, in second. Co. (Howard Payne) historic Monrovia Vote: 3-1-1 with DG GI GC GI oppose and PS ZONING absent.
CPZ11-NM-30 TAX MAP: 88 No change made during 2010 Plan update or 2008 New PARCEL: 122 Market Plan update. COMP Resource Consv. Natural Resource General Industrial BY motion to deny. ACRES: 0.98 Property is vacant, wooded and contains FEMA 100-yr APPLICANT: PLAN KD second. LOCATION: W/S MD 75, floodplain. Landscape features consistent with application of Howard Payne Vote: 4-0-1 with PS Green Valley Rd, south of RC zoning. absent. RR 5/31 Confirmed RC RC GI ZONING retaining RC zoning
Updated 6/21/2012 Page 6 NEW MARKET REGION
CASE INFORMATION PROPERTY Pre-2010 Existing Requested BOCC Staff Comments
CPZ11-NM-31 TAX MAP: 88 80 Pre-2010No change Plan: from GI2010 (Plan)/ Plan. GC (zoning) PARCEL: 76 146, lot 1 ParcelProperty contains located anwithin unused the New structure Market and CGA. is split Staff by supports MD 75. COMP GeneralLow Density Ind. Res. VillageLow Density Center Res. Gen. Commercial BY motion to ACRES: 0.80 1.01 Staffthe request supports in orderapplication to facilitate of GC the zoning adapative and Plan reuse designation of an PLAN BYapprove motion request. to BS APPLICANT: LOCATION: N/S Old historic residential property for office uses. LOCATION: E/S and W/S approvesecond. request. KD on the west side of MD 75. The portion on the east side of MD Mt. Airy Building Supply National Pike, 0.40 miles MD 75, Green Valley Rd. Vote: 4-0-1 with PS 75 should remain VC. Co. (Howard Payne) east of MD 75 second. Vote:absent. 4-0-1 with PS GC VC GC 5/31 Confirmed GC ZONING absent. zoning change
CPZ11-NM-32 TAX MAP: 78 No change made during 2010 Plan update or 2008 New PARCEL: 327 Market Plan update. COMP Low Density Res. Low Density Res. Low Density Res. BY motion to deny w/ ACRES: 80 Property within the Spring Ride/Bartonsville CGA and APPLICANT: PLAN analysis. KD second. LOCATION: S/S Old surrounded by R-1 and R-3 zoned land. Staff would prefer to Rayburn Family, LLP Vote: 4-0-1 with PS National Pike, west of have PUD zoning applied but would not object to the R-3 absent. Ijamsville Rd zoning. 5/31 Confirmed A A R-3 ZONING retaining AG zoning
CPZ11-NM-33 TAX MAP: 68 Pre-2008 NM Plan: Pre-2008 New Market Plan: LDR plan and Ag zoning. PARCEL: 176 & 11 Property is not within a CGA and has never been part of the COMP Low Density Res. Ag/Rural Low Density Res. ACRES: P. 176: 4.9 ac.; Linganore PUD. Comprehensive Plan focuses growth within APPLICANT: PLAN BY motion to restore P.11: 9.5 ac. CGAs on public water and sewer, not individual wells and Michael Thompson and plan designation. BS LOCATION: S/S Gas private septic sytems. Parcel 176 is not a legal lot. Properties Richard Lawson second. Vote: 3-1-1 House Pike @ Linganore not subject to any prior zoning change. with DG opposed Rd A A R-1 ZONING and PS absent.
CPZ11-NM-34 TAX MAP: 79 Pre-2010 Plan: LDR plan and Ag zoning. PARCEL: 262 Property is fully wooded and is part of a 200+ acre, contiguous COMP Low Density Res. Natural Resource Low Density Res. ACRES: 10 forested area south of Lake Linganore. Characteristics are APPLICANT: PLAN LOCATION: W/S Meadow BY motion to restore. consistent with the application of RC zoning and NR Plan Greg Dorsey Road, south of Lake BS second. Vote: 3-1-designation. Linganore 1 with DG opposed A RC A and PS absent. ZONING
CPZ11-NM-35 TAX MAP: 79 Pre-2010 Plan: LDR plan and Ag zoning. PARCEL: 101 Parcel is part of the larger Linganore Town Center area. Staff COMP Low Density Res. Ag/Rural (within Low Density Res. ACRES: 32 supports addition of LDR on this property to adjoin LDR APPLICANT: PLAN CGA) LOCATION: E/S Meadow BY motion to restore. holdings to the south. Cromwell Heritage, LLC Road, south of Lake BS second. Vote: 3-1- , c/o Greg Dorsey Linganore 1 with DG opposed A A A and PS absent. ZONING
Updated 6/21/2012 Page 7 NEW MARKET REGION
CASE INFORMATION PROPERTY Pre-2010 Existing Requested BOCC Staff Comments
CPZ11-NM-36 TAX MAP: 79 80 Pre-2008 NM Plan: Pre-2008No change New from Market 2010 Plan.Plan: LDR plan and Ag zoning. PARCEL: 2 146, & 3 lot 1 ShouldProperty be located evaluated within as the part New of a Market Community CGA. Plan Staff supports COMP Low Density Res. Ag/RuralLow Density Res. LowGen. DensityCommercial Res. BY motion to ACRES: P. 1.01 2: 154.5 ac.; the request in order to facilitate the adapative reuse of an APPLICANT: PLAN approve request. BS P.LOCATION: 3: 127.9 ac. N/S (total Old BY motion to restore. historic residential property for office uses. William/Lillian second. 282.4National ac) Pike, 0.40 miles KD second. Vote 3-1- Blentlinger Vote: 4-0-1 with PS LOCATION:east of MD 75 E/S Boyers absent.1 with DG opposed Mill Road A A A 5/31and PSConfirmed absent. GC ZONING zoning change
CPZ11-NM-37 TAX MAP: 68 Pre-2008 NM Plan: Pre-2008 New Market Plan: LDR plan and Ag zoning. PARCEL: 174, 175 This property was not created through a valid subdivision COMP Low Density Res. Ag/Rural Low Density Res. ACRES: P. 174: 12 ac.; BY motion to restore process and this is not recognized as a legal lot. APPLICANT: PLAN P. 175: 4.6 ac. plan only. KD Comprehensive Plan focuses growth within CGAs on public Kline, Scott, Visco LOCATION: W/S second. water and sewer, not individual wells and private septic Retirement Trust, Linganore Road, south of Vote 3-1 -1 with DG sytems. Gas House Pike A A R-1 opposed and PS ZONING absent.
CPZ11-NM-38 TAX MAP: 69 Pre-2010 Plan: LDR plan and PUD zoning. PARCEL: 198 (parcel Property is surrounded by the Oakdale holdings and was part COMP Low Density Res. Ag/Rural Low Density Res. does not show on maps) BY motion to restore of the Linganore PUD. Staff would support the LDR Plan APPLICANT: PLAN ACRES: 8 plan only. KD designation, but maintain Agricultural zoning for future Carolyn/Jack Anderson LOCATION: S/S Gas second. application of PUD zoning to facilitate design and development House Pike, 1 mile east of Vote 3-1-1 with DG compatability with adjacent parcels. McKaig Rd PUD A R-5 opposed and PS ZONING absent.
CPZ11-NM-39 TAX MAP: 69 Pre-2008 NM Plan: Pre-2008 New Market Plan: LDR plan and Ag zoning. PARCEL: 197 Could be evaluated as part of a Community Plan COMP Low Density Res. Ag/Rural LDR (25 ac) ACRES: 34 APPLICANT: PLAN LOCATION: terminus of BY motion to restore. Juanita Traylor Crickenberger Road BS second. Vote: 3-1 -1 with DG opposed A A A and PS absent. ZONING
CPZ11-NM-40 TAX MAP: 89 No change made in 2010 Plan or 2008 New Market Plan. PARCEL: 23 Property has used its Agricultural subdivision rights and COMP Ag/Rural Ag/Rural Rural Residential ACRES: 122 created 8 residential lots in 1977. Agricultural zoning APPLICANT: PLAN LOCATION: W/S Bill BY motion to deny. maintains a larger contiguous agricultural area along this Mayda Tsaknis Moxley Rd, 1.2 miles east BS second. corridor. Comprehensive Plan focuses growth within CGAs on of Bartholows Rd. Vote: 4-0-1 with PS public water and sewer. Expansion of Rural Residential A A R-1 absent. designation into Ag/Rural areas not indicated by ZONING Comprehensive Plan.
Updated 6/21/2012 Page 8 NEW MARKET REGION
CASE INFORMATION PROPERTY Pre-2010 Existing Requested BOCC Staff Comments
CPZ11-NM-41 TAX MAP: 88 80 Pre-2008 NM Plan: Pre-2008No change New from Market 2010 Plan.Plan: RC/GC (Plan)/GC (zoning) PARCEL: 32 146, & lot 100, 1 lot 1 ParcelsProperty havelocated several within environmental the New Market features CGA. includingStaff supports COMP Gen.Low DensityCommercial Res. Gen.Low DensityCommercial Res. Gen. Commercial BY motion to ACRES: P.1.01 32: 7 ac.; P. moderatethe request and in ordersteep toslopes, facilitate stream the adapative and some reuse forested of an areas. APPLICANT: PLAN Resource Cons. Natural Resource BYapprove motion request. to BS 100,LOCATION: lot 1: 28 N/S ac. Old Staffhistoric could residential not object property to the forGC office zoning uses. as these features would Saul Holdings LP approvesecond. request. KD LOCATION:National Pike, S/S 0.40 Baldwin miles be protected through various zoning regulations. second.Vote: 4-0-1 Vote with 3-1-1 PS Road,east of west MD 75of current MD Pre-2008 NM Plan: absent. 75 park/ride lot with DG opposed GC GC (17.6 ac) GC (30.9 ac) 5/31 Confirmed GC ZONING and PS absent. RC (13.3 ac) zoning change
CPZ11-NM-42 TAX MAP: 79/69 Pre-2008 NM Plan: Pre-2008 New Market Plan: LDR plan and PUD zoning PARCEL: 4, 11, 30, 122 Should be evaluated as part of a Community Plan. COMP Low Density Res. Ag/Rural Low Density Res. ACRES: P4: 133 ac; APPLICANT: PLAN BY motion to restore P11: 143 ac.; P30: 174 Betty Brown Casey, et the plan designation. ac.; P122: 188 ac. (638 al. KD second. Vote: 3- total) Pre-2008 NM Plan: 1-1 with DG opposed LOCATION: E/S Boyers PUD A R-3 Mill Road, west of MD 75 ZONING and PS absent.
CPZ11-NM-43 TAX MAP: 80 No change made in 2010 Plan or 2008 New Market Plan PARCEL: 21 Parcel has utilized its Ag-subdivision rights (3 lots in 1992). COMP Ag/Rural Ag/Rural Rural Residential ACRES: 32 Property is not within a CGA nor Mt. Airy's annextaion area. APPLICANT: PLAN LOCATION: N/S BY motion to deny. Comprehensive Plan focuses growth within CGAs on public Twin Arch Associates Woodville Rd @ Jesse BS second. water and sewer. Expansion of Rural Residential desgination Family LLLP Smith Rd. Vote: 4-0-1 with PS into Ag/Rural area not indicated by the Comprehensive Plan. A A R-1 absent. ZONING
CPZ11-NM-44 TAX MAP: 81 Pre-2008 NM Plan: Property is shown on the Town's 2003 Master Plan for future COMP PARCEL: 163 Low Density Res. Ag/Rural None Requested BY motion to restore annexation designated as residential. ACRES: 163 PLAN plan designation. BS LOCATION: S/S Old APPLICANT: Bohn Road second. Raymond/Jean Zeltman A A R-1 Vote: 3-1-1 with DG ZONING opposed and PS absent
CPZ11-NM-45 TAX MAP: 79 Pre-2008 NM Plan: This parcel was the original alignment for Old National Pike PARCEL: and was abandoned by SHA in 1992 and transferred to Mr. COMP Gen. Commercial Ag/Rural Gen. Commercial ACRES: approx. 1.70 BY motion to Koutsos at that time. The county base mapping, however, APPLICANT: PLAN LOCATION: directly approve the request continued to show it as road right-of-way without a clear zoning Koutsos behind New Market as presented by designation. Shopping Center staff. BS second. (abandoned Right-of-Way Gen. Commercial A Gen. Commercial Vote: 4-0-1 with PS for Old National Pike) ZONING absent
Updated 6/21/2012 Page 9 NEW MARKET REGION
CASE INFORMATION PROPERTY Pre-2010 Existing Requested BOCC Staff Comments
CPZ11-NM-46 TAX MAP: 69 80 Pre-2008 NM Plan: No change from 2010 Plan. PARCEL: 70 146, lot 1 Property located within the New Market CGA. Staff supports COMP Low Density Res. Ag/RuralLow Density Res. LowGen. DensityCommercial Res. BY motion to ACRES: 21.01 BY motion to restore the request in order to facilitate the adapative reuse of an APPLICANT: PLAN approve request. BS LOCATION: N/S N/S GasOld plan designation. BS historic residential property for office uses. Management Services, second. HouseNational Pike, Pike, west 0.40 of miles second. LC Vote: 4-0-1 with PS Centraleast of MDChurch 75 Road A absent.Vote: 3-1-1 with DG PUD A 5/31opposed Confirmed and PS GC ZONING zoningabsent. change
Updated 6/21/2012 Page 10 NEW MARKET REGION
CASE INFORMATION PROPERTY Pre-2010 Existing Requested BOCC Staff Comments
CPZ11-NM-47 TAX MAP: 78 80 Pre-2008 NM Plan: No change from 2010 Plan. PARCEL: 5 146, lot 1 Property located within the New Market CGA. Staff supports COMP Low Density Res. LDR,Low Density Nat. Res. Res. LowGen. DensityCommercial Res. BY motion to ACRES: 53.9 1.01 the request in order to facilitate the adapative reuse of an APPLICANT: PLAN Nat. Res. approve5/31 - approve request. BS LOCATION: N/S N/S MDOld 144 rezoningsecond. R-1 historic residential property for office uses. Herbert Shapiro National Pike, 0.40 miles at Linganore Rd. portionVote: 4-0-1 to R-3. with PS east of MD 75 R-3 - 32 ac. Vote:absent. 3-1-1 (DG) R-3, RC R-1 - 21.2 ac. RC 5/31 Confirmed GC ZONING (BS abstained). R-3 - 10.8 ac. zoning change RC
Updated 6/21/2012 Page 11 2011 Comprehensive Plan & Zoning Review - Property Owner Requests - Feb.14, 2012 w/ May 31 revisions in bold italics
MIDDLETOWN REGION
CASE INFORMATION PROPERTY Pre-2010 Existing Requested BOCC Staff Comments
CPZ11-MD-01 TAX MAP: 76 Pre-2010 Plan: LDR plan and R-1 zoning. PARCEL: 478, Lot 12 LDR Natural Resource Rural Residential NR/RC appropriate for this parcel on the eastern slope of Braddock COMP ACRES: 13 Mountain. Parcel contains a tributary to Ballenger Creek, a pond, APPLICANT: PLAN LOCATION: W/S Old BY motion to restore. moderate and steep slopes with some forest cover. 50% of parcel Daniel Blum (6.5 ac.) has RoB [Rohrersville-Lantz silt loam] soil associated with Swimming Pool Road, KD second. the stream system where on-site sewage disposal is prohibited. Braddock Heights Vote: 4-1 (DG R-1 RC R-1 opposed) ZONING
CPZ11-MD-02 TAX MAP: 30 Pre-2010 Plan: RC plan and zoning PARCEL: 221 Resource Con. Ag/Rural None Specified Property is cleared, open land and not connected to, nor part of, COMP ACRES: 13 forested western slopes of Catoctin Mountain. Parcel is original tract APPLICANT: PLAN LOCATION: E/S BY motion to restore. and could yield 3 + R Ag. lots, but only 2 RC lots. Staff does not Maynard/Betty Gaver support request. Wolfsville Rd., south of KD second. Delauter Rd. Vote: 4-1 (DG RC A RC Withdrawn opposed) 4/10/2012 ZONING
CPZ11-MD-03 TAX MAP: 65 Pre-2010 Plan: LDR Plan and A zoning PARCEL: 210, lot 1 LDR Ag/Rural LDR Property is located within the County's and Town of Middletown's COMP ACRES: 26 CGA. Staff supports development on public water/sewer and APPLICANT: PLAN LOCATION: South side PS motion to restore. annexation into Middletown. Staff supports the LDR plan designation Lewis/Deirdre Bruchey with zoning to remain A. MD 17. 1,500 feet west of KD second. Old Middletown Road Vote: 4-1 (DG A A A opposed) ZONING
CPZ11-MD-04 TAX MAP: 55 Pre 2010 Plan: Ag,Rural (14.7 ac.) & Rural Subd.(1.3 ac.)/Ag. PARCEL: 182, Lot 24 Ag./Rural (14.7 ac) Ag/Rural Rural Sub. (1.5 ac) zoning (14.7 ac)& R-1 zoning(1.3 ac.) COMP ACRES: 16 Rural Sub. (1.3 ac) PS motion to restore. Staff supports the request to restore the 1.3 ac. of R-1 zoning. A APPLICANT: PLAN LOCATION: NE side BY second. 2001 plat added 1.3 acres of land (zoned R-1 at the time) to this lot Ronald/Nancy Walz (24) from adjacent residential parcel for a future 1-lot subdivision of Hollow Rd., S/S US Rt. Vote: 5-0 lot 24. 40; 1,500 ft. south of 5/31 - Confirmed A (14.7 ac) A R-1 (1.5 ac) Hawbottom Rd. prior action to ZONING R-1 (1.3 ac) restore zoning
CPZ-11-MD-05 TAX MAP: 23 Pre-2010 Plan: GI plan and zoning. PARCEL: 297, Lots 1 & 2 General Industrial Limited Industrial General Industrial The parcel has exisitng buildings and contractor use. Zoning on 2.5 COMP ACRES: Lot 1: 2.5 ac; acres (total on both lots combined) was changed from GI to LI APPLICANT: PLAN Lot 2: 2.6 ac. PS motion to restore. during 2010 Plan update. Staff does not object to restoring GI zoning Karl Barron on 2.5 acres (on both lots combined). LOCATION: E/S KD second. Wolfsville Rd., 1 mile Vote 4-0-1 (BS GI LI GI north of Martin Road. abstained) ZONING
Updated 6/21/2012 Page 1 MIDDLETOWN REGION
CASE INFORMATION PROPERTY Pre-2010 Existing Requested BOCC Staff Comments
TAX MAP: 5476 Pre-2010 Plan: RCLDR plan plan and and zoning R-1 zoning. on majority of parcel. CPZ11-MD-06 LDR Natural Resource Rural Residential PARCEL: 124478, Lot 12 Res. Con. (4.58 ac) Natural Resource Ag/Rural BY motion to restore PropertyNR/RC appropriate is wooded forwith this a stream, parcel onFEMA the easternfloodplain slope plus of some Braddock steep COMP ACRES: 4.7313 Ag./Rural (0.15 ac) RC/A split. KD &Mountain. moderate Parcel slopes contains on western a tributary edge. to Property Ballenger had Creek, 1.3 acres a pond, APPLICANT: PLAN moderate and steep slopes with some forest cover. 50% of parcel LOCATION: W/S RenoOld second.BY motion to restore. rezoned from A to RC, and 0.15 acres changed from Ag/Rural to NR John/Brenda Shafer on(6.5 the ac.) 2010 has Plan. RoB [Rohrersville-LantzAgricultural activities silt are loam] permitted soil associated in the RC with MonumentSwimming PoolRd., 400Road, ft. Vote:KD second. 4-1 (DG zoningthe stream district. system Staff where does noton-site support sewage request disposal is prohibited. northBraddock of Bolivar Heights Rd. opposed)Vote: 4-1 (DG RC (3.43 ac) RC A opposed)5/31 - approve A ZONING A (1.3 ac) zoning for entire parcel. CPZ11-MD-07 TAX MAP: 65 No change from 2010 Plan. PARCEL: 70 Low Density Res. Low Density Res. Gen. Commercial Staff supports maintaining the split GC/R-3 zoning on this property to COMP ACRES: 0.92 ac. distinguish the business portion of property from the residential APPLICANT: Richard PLAN LOCATION: N/S Old BY motion to deny. portion. The R-3 on this parcel is adjacent to and buffers the Blickenstaff residential dwellings to the east and north. Changing the residence National Pike, 400 ft. west BS second. to GC will make it a non-conforming use. of Beechtree Drive Vote: 5-0. GC (0.35 ac) GC (0.35 ac) GC ZONING R-3 (0.57 ac) R-3 (0.57 ac)
CPZ11-MD-08 TAX MAP: 30 Pre-2010 Plan: RC plan and zoning. PARCEL: 25 Resource Con. Ag/Rural Ag/Rural Property is cleared, open agricultural land and doesn't possess COMP ACRES: 63 characteristics consistent with RC zoning. Parcel could yield 3 or 4 APPLICANT: PLAN LOCATION: E/S Pleasant BY motion to restore. Ag. subdivision lots per Development Review Office (see File S- Robert Short/Ronald 1134). Staff does not support request for RC zoning. A 5-lot Walk Road, 1300 ft north PS second. Chen subdivision was conditionally approved by the FcPc in 2005; FRO of Easterday Road Vote: 4-1 (DG RC A RC easements recorded; Common driveway plans approved in 2007. opposed) Property grandfathered for continuation of 5-acre lots in RC after 10- ZONING acre lot size established. Property retains 3 + Remainder subdivision lots with current Agricultural zoning.
CPZ-11-MD-09 TAX MAP: 55 Pre-2010 Plan: LDR plan, Ag. zoning PARCEL: 92 & 46 Low Density Res. Ag/Rural Low Density Res. Within Town of Middletown's Growth Boundary and identified on COMP ACRES: P.92: 105 ac; Town's Master Plan for low density resdiential uses. Staff supports APPLICANT: PLAN P.46: 13 ac. BY motion to restore. expansion of County CGA to mirror the Town's growth boundary and Mid-North Partners would support the LDR plan designation. LOCATION: W/S MD Rt. KD second. (Philip Topper, Jr.) 17, adjacent to Town of Vote: 4-1 (DG A A A Middletown opposed) ZONING
CPZ-11-MD-10 TAX MAP: 56 Pre-2010 Plan: LDR plan and R-1 zoning. PARCEL: 230 & 438 Low Density Res. Natural Resource Rural Residential Property is completely wooded and located on slopes of Braddock COMP ACRES: P. 230: 8 ac.; Mountain . Established County policies (WR-P-04, MG-P-04, AG-P- APPLICANT: PLAN P.438: 4 ac. BY motion to restore. 03, MG-G-06) do not support residential growth areas that utilize Herbert and Marilynn individual wells and private septic systems and expansion into NR LOCATION: W/S Ridge KD second. Dennison designated areas. RC zoning would help to maintain contiguous Rd, adjacent to I-70 in Vote: 4-1 (DG R-1 RC R-1 block of forestland along this part of Catoctin Mountain. Braddock Heights opposed) ZONING
Updated 6/21/2012 Page 2 MIDDLETOWN REGION
CASE INFORMATION PROPERTY Pre-2010 Existing Requested BOCC Staff Comments
TAX MAP: 37 76 Pre-2010 Plan: LDRAg/Rural plan andplan R-1and zoning.Ag zoning. CPZ11-MD-11 LDR Natural Resource Rural Residential PARCEL: 52,478, 53, Lot 20 12 Ag/Rural Ag/Rural Low Density Res. WithinNR/RC Town appropriate of Myersville's for this parcelGrowth on Boundary the eastern and slope identified of Braddock on COMP ACRES: P. 13 52: 23 ac.; and in Myersville Town'sMountain. Master Parcel Plan contains for low a density tributary resdiential to Ballenger uses. Creek, Staff a supportspond, APPLICANT: PLAN PS motion to moderate and steep slopes with some forest cover. 50% of parcel P.53:LOCATION: 6 ac.; W/SP. 20: Old 8 ac. CGA BY motion to restore. expansion of County CGA to mirror the Town's growth boundary with Donald Easterday approve the request. LDR(6.5 ac.)plan has designation. RoB [Rohrersville-Lantz silt loam] soil associated with LOCATION:Swimming Pool N/S Road, Canada KD second. BY second. the stream system where on-site sewage disposal is prohibited. HillBraddock Road atHeights Easterday Vote: 4-1 (DG Vote: 4-1 (DG Road A A A opposed) ZONING opposed)
CPZ-11-MD-12 TAX MAP: 76 Pre-2010 Plan: Rural Community plan and R-1 zoning PARCEL: 516 Rural Community Natural Resource Rural Residential 4.4 acres of developed property is fully wooded with 1 acre of COMP ACRES: 5.8 moderate slopes on the eastern side of Braddock Mountain. Parcel APPLICANT: PLAN LOCATION: end of PS motion to restore. is accessed by a 25-ft wide panhandle to Maitland Terrace through Kass, LLC the Poplar Ridge subdivision. R-1 zoning would allow for one Witmers Lane, Frederick KD second. (Ken/Stephanie Jordan) additional lot. in Braddock Heights Vote: 4-1 (DG R-1 RC R-1 opposed) ZONING
CPZ11-MD-13 TAX MAP: 56 Pre-2010 Plan: LDR plan and R-1 zoning PARCEL: 476 Low Density Res. Natural Resource Rural Residential Property is part of forested ridge and slope area along Braddock COMP ACRES: 43 Mountain and contains 11.2 acres of moderately sloped land. APPLICANT: PLAN LOCATION: E/S Ridge PS motion to restore. Established County policies (WR-P-04, MG-P-04, AG-P-03, MG-G- Mason-Dixon 06) do not support residential growth areas that utilize individual wells Road, adjacent to US Rt. KD second. Development Corp. and private septic systems and expansion into NR designated areas. 40, Braddock Heights Vote: 4-1 (DG R-1 RC R-1 opposed) ZONING
CPZ-11-MD-14 TAX MAP: 76 Pre-2010 Plan: LDR (3.2 ac.), Ag/Rural (22.8 ac)/ R-1 zoning (26 PARCEL: 85 LDR (3.2 ac) Natural Resource Rural Residential ac). COMP ACRES: 26 Ag/Rural (22.8 ac) Property situated on eastern forested slope of Braddock Mountain APPLICANT: PLAN LOCATION: W/S Mt. BY motion to restore. with 9.1 acres of moderate slopes. Property is land-locked and Rudy Hollow LLC current access for house traverses 4 parcels, severely compromising Philip Rd, south of Fulmer KD second. (Ken/Carol Rudy) future subdivision. Current RC zoning would permit one additional Road in Braddock Heights Vote: 4-1 (DG R-1 RC R-1 lot if access is secured. Established County policies (WR-P-04, MG- opposed) P-04, AG-P-03, MG-G-06) do not support residential growth areas ZONING that utilize individual wells and private septic systems and expansion into NR designated areas.
CPZ11-MD-15 TAX MAP: 76 Pre-2010 Plan: Rural Neighborhood plan and R-1 zoning. PARCEL: 81 Rur. Neighborhood Rural Residential Rural Residential 8.8 acres of parcel is forested with moderate slopes and zoned RC; COMP ACRES: 19 Natural Resource remainder of developed parcel (10.2 ac.) has gentle slopes, no APPLICANT: PLAN LOCATION: W/S Mount BS motion to restore. forest cover and zoned R-1. The 10 ac. of exsiting R-1 would likely Rudy Acres, LLC yield all that could be subdivided given the street frontage and Phillip Rd. at Fulmer Rd in PS second. (Ken/Carol Rudy) configuration of the parcel. Established County policies (WR-P-04, Braddock Heights Vote: 4-1 (DG R-1 R-1 (10.2 ac) R-1 MG-P-04, AG-P-03, MG-G-06) do not support residential growth opposed) areas that utilize individual wells and private septic systems and ZONING RC (8.8 ac) expansion into NR designated areas.
Updated 6/21/2012 Page 3 MIDDLETOWN REGION
CASE INFORMATION PROPERTY Pre-2010 Existing Requested BOCC Staff Comments
TAX MAP: 76 76 Pre-2010 Plan: RuralLDR plan Neighborhood and R-1 zoning. plan and R-1 zoning. CPZ11-MD-16 LDR Natural Resource Rural Residential PARCEL: 426 478, Lot 12 Rur. Neighborhood Natural Resource Rural Residential PropertyNR/RC appropriate is developed for and this containsparcel on 2 theacres eastern of woodlands slope of Braddockassociated COMP ACRES: 3 13 withMountain. larger Parcelforest complexcontains aon tributary Braddock to BallengerMountain. Creek, Parcle a is pond, currently APPLICANT: PLAN moderate and steep slopes with some forest cover. 50% of parcel LOCATION: N/SW/S FulmerOld BY motion to restore. landlocked though owners also have adjoining parcel. Established Ken/Carol Rudy County(6.5 ac.) policies has RoB (WR-P-04, [Rohrersville-Lantz MG-P-04, siltAG-P-O3, loam] soil MG-G-06) associated do withnot Rd,Swimming west of Pool Mount Road, Philip KD second. supportthe stream additional system residential where on-site growth sewage on well/septics disposal is nor prohibited. expansion of Rd.Braddock in Braddock Heights Heights Vote: 4-1 (DG R-1 RC R-1 such areas into NR designated areas. opposed) ZONING
CPZ11-MD-17 TAX MAP: 65 BY motion to restore Pre 2010 Plan: GC, HDR, LDR, RC plan and R-3, Ag zoning. PARCEL: 12 Gen. Com. Gen. Com. Gen. Com. (24.5 ac) Property is located within the Town of Middletown's Community COMP w/ analysis. KD ACRES: 152 LDR, HDR Ag/Rural LDR (102.8 ac) Growth Area. Town Plan designates frontage as Commercial w/ APPLICANT: PLAN second. LOCATION: E/S, and Resource Con. (in CGA) remainder low density residential Staff supports application of LDR A.C. Jets, LLC and Vote: 4-1 (DG and Commercial plan designation to be consistent with Town Plan. W/S Hollow Road, N/S Edison Dick, trustee opposed) Zoning should remain A to facilitate annexation into Middletown. Old National Pike A (114 ac) A A (114 ac) 5/31 - Confired ZONING R-3 (37.9 ac) R-3 (37.9 ac) prior action to restore zoning and plan CPZ11-MD-18(A) TAX MAP: 66 Pre-2010 Plan: LDR plan and R-1 zoning PARCEL: 219 Low Density Res. Natural Resource High Density Res. Property is forested and contains significant (4.5 ac.) steep slopes. COMP ACRES: 12 High Density Residential is not appropriate for a Rural Community APPLICANT: PLAN LOCATION: S/S Old BY motion to restore. that only has limited public water available. Staff would not object to Braddock Heights some R-1 zoning on the western portion of parcel adjacent to the National Pike, near BS second. Estates (David Yinger) Braddock Inn. terminus of Schley Vote: 4-1 (DG R-1 RC R-1 Avenue in Braddock opposed) Heights ZONING
CPZ11-MD-18(B) TAX MAP: 66 Pre-2010 Plan: LDR plan and R-1 zoning PARCEL: 401 Low Density Res. Rur. Com. (12.9 ac) High Density Res. Property is mostly zoned R-1 , which would likely support maximum COMP ACRES: 16 Nat. Res. (3.1 ac) development potential given access issues and physical constraints APPLICANT: PLAN LOCATION: S/S Old BY motion to restore. of the site. High Density Residential is not appropriate for a Rural Braddock Springs Community that has limited public water available. National Pike in BS second. Tollhouse (David Braddock Heights Vote: 4-1 (DG Yinger) R-1 R-1 (12.9 ac) R-1 opposed) ZONING RC (3.1 ac)
CPZ11-MD-18(C) TAX MAP: 66 Pre-2010 Plan: LDR plan and R-1 zoning PARCEL: 781 Low Density Res. Rur. Com. (6.1 ac) High Density Res. Property is forested and contains significant (27 ac.) steep slopes. COMP BY motion to restore ACRES: 46 Nat. Res. (39.9 ac) Six acres of property is not wooded, has VC zoning and is within APPLICANT: PLAN w/ analysis. BS LOCATION: Schley water service area. The VC zoning would allow for greater flexibiity, Braddock Heights second. including residential and/or commercial uses, than the requested R-1. Avenue and old Estates (David Yinger), Vote: 4-1 (DG Staff supports maintaining the current split between the VC and RC Swimming Pool Rd in zoning. Braddock Heights R-1 VC (6.1 ac) R-1 opposed) RC (39.9 ac) 5/31 - approve ZONING additional 6 ac. of VC zoning & keep existing VC
Updated 6/21/2012 Page 4 MIDDLETOWN REGION
CASE INFORMATION PROPERTY Pre-2010 Existing Requested BOCC Staff Comments
TAX MAP: 6676 Pre-2010 Plan: LDR plan and R-1 zoningzoning. CPZ11-MD-18(D) LDR Natural Resource Rural Residential P.PARCEL: 782 478, Lot 12 Low Density Res. Rural Community High Density Res. PropertyNR/RC appropriate has VC zoning, for this which parcel provides on the easterngreater flexibilityslope of Braddockand COMP ACRES: 113 densityMountain. than Parcel the requested contains a R-1 tributary . to Ballenger Creek, a pond, APPLICANT: David PLAN BY motion to restore moderate and steep slopes with some forest cover. 50% of parcel LOCATION: E/SW/S Old Old BY motion to restore. Yinger w/ analysis. KD (6.5 ac.) has RoB [Rohrersville-Lantz silt loam] soil associated with Swimming Pool RdRoad, in KD second. second. the stream system where on-site sewage disposal is prohibited. Braddock Heights Vote: 4-1 (DG Vote: 4-1 (DG Withdrawn R-1 VC R-1 opposed) ZONING opposed)
CPZ11-MD-19 TAX MAP: 66 P. 464 Low Density Res. Rural Community Rural Community COMP ACRES: 7,640 sq ft. APPLICANT: Pam PLAN LOCATION: E/S Jefferson 5/31 - approve O'Brien, Frederick Blvd. request for VC. Montessori School R-3 R-3 VC Vote: 5-0 ZONING
Updated 6/21/2012 Page 5 2011 Comprehensive Plan & Zoning Review - Property Owner Requests - Feb.14, 2012 w/ May 31 revisions in bold italics
FREDERICK REGION
CASE INFORMATION PROPERTY Pre-2010 Existing Requested BOCC Staff Comments
CPZ11-FR-01 TAX MAP: 40 Previous Comp Plan: Rural Community PARCEL: 378 lots 2 &3 Rural Community Rural Community Rural Community Previous Zoning: R1 COMP ACRES: approx. 25 acres Staff would not object to the R-1, which would be consistent with the APPLICANT: PLAN LOCATION: north side current Rural Community plan designation. If the property is currently Charles M. Boyles BY motion to restore. being used as a garden center, R-1 zoning would create a non- Fish Hatchery Road at US BS second. Vote: 4-1 conformity. 15 R-1 A R1 (DG opposed) ZONING
CPZ11-FR-02 TAX MAP: 48 Previous Comp Plan: Institutional, Ag/Rural, Resource Conservation PARCEL: part of 104 Ag/Rural Ag/Rural Ag/Rural Previous Zoning: A, RC COMP ACRES: 8.365 Resource Conserv. Natural Resource Cemetery use is not permitted in the RC zone. APPLICANT: PLAN LOCATION: east side US Institutional BY motion to restore. Staff recommends maintaining RC zoning and Natural Resources Resthaven Memorial Plan designation only on the 100 year FEMA floodplain area, with A 15 just south of Old KD second. Gardens, Inc. zoning applied to the remaining portion of the property outside of the Frederick Rd Vote: 4-0-1 (DG A A A floodplain. abstained) ZONING RC RC
CPZ11-FR-03 TAX MAP: 48 Previous Comp Plan: Rural Subdivision PARCEL: 305 Rural Subdivision Ag/Rural Rural Residential Previous Zoning: R-1, A COMP ACRES: 10.3318 BY motion to restore. The property was zoned R-1 (4.75 ac.) and A (5.5 ac.) in 2002. Prior APPLICANT: PLAN LOCATION: west side BS second. Vote: 4-1 to 2002, the property was zoned only A. Staff does not object to Ronald and Tracy restoring prior R-1 zoning on entire parcel to avoid split zoning. Masser Road at Willis Ln. (DG opposed) Barbieto 5/31 - approve R-1 R-1 (4.75 ac) A R-1 zoning for entire ZONING A (5.5 ac) parcel.
CPZ11-FR-04 TAX MAP: 47 Previous Comp Plan: Rural Community PARCEL: 19 Rural Community Natural Resource Rural Residential Previous Zoning: R-1 COMP ACRES: 23.326 Parcel has a high percentage of steep slopes between 15% and 25% APPLICANT: PLAN LOCATION: n/s Indian and is a contiguous portion of forested land connecting to the Merhl Allen Wachter BY motion to restore. Frederick Municipal Watershed and Catoctin Mountain. The are two Springs Road west of Mt. KD second. Vote: 4- small DNR mapped wetlands on the property. The RC zoning allows Laurel Estates R-1 RC R-1 1 (DG opposed) subdivision into two lots. ZONING
CPZ11-FR-05 TAX MAP: 85 Previous Comp Plan: Ag/Rural PARCEL: 21 Ag/Rural Ag/Rural Gen. Commercial Previous Zoning: A COMP ACRES: 46.71 (entire parcel) Property had a General Industrial designation in 1998 which was APPLICANT: PLAN LOCATION: southeast changed to Ag/Rural in 2002. Prior to 1998, property was designated Ohannes Armani & BY motion to deny. Ag/Rural since 1984. side of Renn Road on Seda Gregian BS second. Property has had Agricultural zoning since 1972, prior to which the west side of US 340 A A GC - 10 ac Vote: 5-0 zoning was B-1 (1959-1972). ZONING A - 36.7 ac A Community Plan should be conducted for the entire area to assess industrial and commercial needs.
Updated 6/21/2012 Page 1 FREDERICK REGION
CASE INFORMATION PROPERTY Pre-2010 Existing Requested BOCC Staff Comments
TM:TAX 76MAP: 40 Previous Comp Plan: LowRural Density Community Residential CPZ11-FR-06 Rural Community Rural Community Rural Community P:PARCEL: 316 378 lots 2 &3 Low Density Res. Ag/Rural Low Density Res. Previous Zoning: R-3R1 COMP ACRES: .8approx. 25 acres PropertyStaff would is withinnot object the City to the of FrederickR-1, which Community would be consistent Growth Area with and the APPLICANT: PLAN BY motion to restore current Rural Community plan designation. If the property is currently LOCATION: s/snorth of side is completely surrounded by the City. Staff supports LDR plan Humberson Daughters LDRBY motion on plan to only.restore. designation,being used as which a garden would center, be consistent R-1 zoning with would City Plan. create Zoning a non- should ButterflyFish Hatchery Lane westRoad of at US LP, c/o Joann Schrodel KDBS second. Vote: 4-1 remainconformity. Ag to facilitate annexation into the City. McCain15 Dr. R-3 A A Vote:(DG opposed) 4-1 (DG ZONING opposed)
CPZ11-FR-07 TAX MAP: 46 Previous Comp Plan: Low Density Residential PARCEL: 415 Low Density Res. Ag/Rural Low Density Res. Previous Zoning: R-3 COMP ACRES: 34.83 Property is within City growth area. Staff supports LDR plan APPLICANT: PLAN BY motion to restore LOCATION: southside designation, which would be consistent with City Plan. Zoning should Humberson Daughters LDR on plan only. remain Ag to facilitate annexation into the City. Butterfly Lane west of LP, c/o Joann Schrodel KD second. McCain Dr. R-3 A A Vote: 4-1 (DG ZONING opposed)
CPZ11-FR-08 TM: 76 Previous Comp Plan: Rural Hamlet P: 207 Rural Hamlet Ag/Rural Ag/Rural Previous Zoning: R-1 COMP ACRES: 23.5 Natural Resource Property is adjacent to Feageville Rural Community and is about 1/3 APPLICANT: R. Allen PLAN LOCATION: s/s of MD BY motion to restore 100-year floodplain. Culler 180 near Feageville Lane w/ Rural Res. plan. KD second. Vote: 4- R-1 A R-1 1 (DG opposed) ZONING
CPZ11-FR-09 TAX MAP: 76 Previous Comp Plan: General Commercial, Resource Conservation PARCEL: 101 Gen. Commercial Gen. Commercial Ag/Rural Previous Zoning: GC COMP ACRES: 4.05 Resource Conserv. or Low Density Res. Applicant's preferred zoning is A. Property currently has a residence. APPLICANT: PLAN LOCATION: west side MD Staff supports maintaining GC on the plan and to assess commercial Dale G. Boyer BY motion to deny. needs as part of a community/corridor plan. 180 just south of I-70 PS second. GC GC A or R-1 Vote: 5-0 ZONING
CPZ11-FR-10 TM: 47 Previous Comp Plan: Ag/Rural, Low Density Residential P: 193 Ag/Rural Natural Resource Ag/Rural Previous Zoning: R-1, R-3, A COMP ACRES: 34.16 Low Density Res. Rural Residential Rural Residential The extant of R-1 (3.2 ac) and R-3 (4.1 ac) zoning remained APPLICANT: PLAN LOCATION: east side unchanged from 2010 Plan and could yield 18 lots using the White Catherine M. Smith Rock water/sewer system. Amount of RC zoned land is Bethel Road just north of BY motion to restore. approximately 26.9 acres. Potential subdivision under RC is 2 lots. Ford Rd. White Rock PS second. Vote: 5-0 A RC A for RC part: 26.9 ac. Potential subdivision under A is 4 lots (if is an original tract with no subdivision existing A lots). ZONING R-1 R-1 RC zoning applied because of larger contiguous forest. R-3 R-3 Staff recommends no change.
Updated 6/21/2012 Page 2 FREDERICK REGION
CASE INFORMATION PROPERTY Pre-2010 Existing Requested BOCC Staff Comments
TAX MAP: 40 Previous Comp Plan: Ag/Rural,Rural Community Resource Conservation CPZ11-FR-11 Rural Community Rural Community Rural Community PARCEL: 169378 lots 2 &3 Ag/Rural Ag/Rural Low Density Res. Previous Zoning: A,R1 RC COMP ACRES: 90.93approx. 25 acres Resource Conserv. Natural Resource WasStaff rezonedwould not from object R-1 to to the A inR-1, 2002. which Recommend would be consistent maintain withA. the APPLICANT: PLAN current Rural Community plan designation. If the property is currently LOCATION: n/snorth Utica side Property is not in a growth area nor is it adjacent to Lewistown Rural Sanbower Builders, Inc. BY motion to deny.restore. Community.being used as The a garden property center, still has R-1 Ag zoning subdivision would createrights (3a non-plus a RoadFish Hatchery west of Old Road at US BS second. Vote: 4-1 remainderconformity. plus 1 additional cluster right. One farm lot has been Frederick15 Rd. A A R-1 Vote:(DG opposed) 5-0 used.) 1959-1991 Zoning: A ZONING RC 1991-2002 Zoning: R-1 2002-Current: A
CPZ11-FR-12 TM: 40 Previous Comp Plan: Ag/Rural, Resource Conserv., Rural P: 559 Resource Conserv. Natural Resource Natural Resource Community COMP ACRES: 66.48 Rural Community Rural Community Rural Community Previous Zoning: RC, A, R-1 APPLICANT: PLAN LOCATION: Powell Road Ag/Rural Ag/Rural The portion currently zoned R-1 (4.9 ac.) remained unchanged from Laurie Laymen Mills BY motion to restore. 2010 Plan. Amount of requested A land is approximately 62 acres. KD second. Vote: 4- Parcel is most likely not an original tract (assessed using aerial RC RC RC 1 (DG opposed) photography but would have to be confirmed with a Lot of Record determination). If so, there would be no subdivision potential under ZONING R-1 (4.9 ac) R-1 (4.9 ac) R-1 (4.9 ac) A, but would yield six lots under RC. Staff recommends maintaining A A the RC zone, which is consistent with the presence of forest cover on entire parcel and with adjoining RC. CPZ11-FR-13 TAX MAP: 66 Previous Comp Plan: Low Density Residential PARCEL: 597 Low Density Res. Rural Residential Low Density Res. Previous Zoning: R-1 COMP ACRES: 22.94 Property is not within the City's 20-year urban growth boundary APPLICANT: PLAN LOCATION: west side reflected in their 2010 City Plan and was removed from the County Caidlyn, LLC BY motion to restore. 2010 Plan in order to correspond with the City Plan. Designation was Kemp Lane BS second. Vote: 4-1 changed to correspond with City of Frederick Comprehensive Plan. R-1 R-1 R-1 (DG opposed) Should only be considered for LDR if City Plan is revised to include the property within its urban growth area. ZONING
CPZ11-FR-14 TM: 66 Previous Comp Plan: Low Density Residential P: 192 Low Density Res. Ag/Rural Low Density Res. Previous Zoning: R-1 COMP ACRES: 55 Property is included in the City's 20-year urban growth boundary and APPLICANT: PLAN LOCATION: west side designated Medium Density Residential. Staff would support Caidlyn, LLC PS motion to restore. application of LDR or MDR plan designation but zoning should Kemp Lane KD second. Vote: 4- remain A to facilitate annexation. R-1 A R-1 1 (DG opposed) ZONING
CPZ11-FR-15 TAX MAP: 56, 66 Previous Comp Plan: Low Density Residential PARCEL: 240 Low Density Res. Ag/Rural Low Density Res. Previous Zoning: R-1 COMP ACRES: 79.68 Property is included in the City's 20-year urban growth boundary and APPLICANT: PLAN LOCATION: west side designated Medium Density Residential. Staff would support Robert L. Hooper and PS motion to restore. application of LDR or MDR plan designation but zoning should Kemp Lane just south of Paulette M. Hooper KD second. Vote: 4- remain A to facilitate annexation. Rocky Springs Rd. R-1 A R-1 1 (DG opposed) ZONING
Updated 6/21/2012 Page 3 FREDERICK REGION
CASE INFORMATION PROPERTY Pre-2010 Existing Requested BOCC Staff Comments
TM:TAX 66MAP: 40 Previous Comp Plan: LowRural Density Community Residential CPZ11-FR-16 Rural Community Rural Community Rural Community P:PARCEL: 137 378 lots 2 &3 Low Density Res. Ag/Rural Low Density Res. Previous Zoning: R-1R1 COMP ACRES: 25approx. 25 acres PropertyStaff would is includednot object in tothe the City's R-1, 20-year which would urban be growth consistent boundary with andthe APPLICANT: PLAN current Rural Community plan designation. If the property is currently LOCATION: westnorth sideside designated Medium Density Residential. Staff would support Darryl R. Oden PSBY motion to restore. applicationbeing used ofas LDR a garden or MDR center, plan R-1designation zoning would but zoning create should a non- KempFish Hatchery Lane Road at US BS second. Vote: 4-1 remainconformity. A to facilitate annexation. 15 KD second. Vote: 4- R-1 A R-1 1(DG (DG opposed) opposed) ZONING
CPZ11-FR-17 TAX MAP: 56, 57 Previous Comp Plan: Low Density Residential, Resource PARCEL: 16, 207, 390, Low Density Res. Ag/Rural Low Density Res. Conservation COMP 439, 529, 296 Resource Conserv. Previous Zoning: A, R-1 APPLICANT: PLAN ACRES: 304.9 Property is included in the City's 20-year urban growth boundary and Keller Corporation BY motion to restore. designated Low Density Residential. Staff would support application LOCATION: @ Rocky PS second. Vote: 4-1 of LDR plan designation but zoning should remain A to facilitate Springs Road and Yellow A A R-1 (DG opposed) annexation. Springs Road The annexation has unofficially been pursued by the applicant ZONING R-1 through meetings with City and County staff and development of a draft annexation boundary plat. An official petition for annexation has not been filed. CPZ11-FR-18 TM: 66 Previous Comp Plan: Rural Community P: 59, Tract 2 Rural Community Natural Resource Rural Residential Previous Zoning: R-1 COMP ACRES: 32.73 ac Some portions of the property have characteristics that correspond APPLICANT: PLAN LOCATION: e/s of Kehne to RC zoning (forest cover and steep slopes) but other portions of the Bruce & Odette Reeder BY motion to restore. site are suitable for R-1 type development (flatter, less forest cover, Road and north of US 40 BS second. Vote: 4-1 R-1 on adjacent properties). Either zoning category can be R-1 RC R-1 (DG opposed) appropriate. ZONING
CPZ11-FR-19 TAX MAP: 85 Previous Comp Plan: Ag/Rural PARCEL: 85 Ag/Rural Gen. Commercial Gen. Commercial Previous Zoning: A COMP ACRES: 49.6 ac Ag/ Rural (entire parcel) No change in zoning from the 2010 Plan. Request to change APPLICANT: PLAN LOCATION: north side of Ag/Rural Comp Plan designation to General Commercial. Additional Gladhill Properties LTD BY motion to deny. commercial designation should be assessed as part of a community Mount Zion Road at US (Maurice Gladhill) KD second. plan for this area. 340 interchange A A - 36.7 ac A - 36.7 ac Vote: 5-0 ZONING GC - 12.9 ac GC - 12.9 ac
CPZ11-FR-20 TM: 40 Previous Comp Plan: Rural Community P: 87 Rural Community Rural Community Ag/Rural BY motion to Previous Zoning: R-1 COMP ACRES: 8.78 ac approve. PS second. No change in zoning from the 2010 Plan. Request is to change APPLICANT: PLAN LOCATION: south side of Vote: 4-1 (DG zoning to allow larger outbuilding. Consider addressing issue through Channa L. Lidie & a zoning text amendment. Mountaindale Road just opposed) James C. Lidie Jr. west of Bethel Rd. 5/31 - Confirmed R-1 R-1 A prior action to ZONING change zoning to Ag
Updated 6/21/2012 Page 4 FREDERICK REGION
CASE INFORMATION PROPERTY Pre-2010 Existing Requested BOCC Staff Comments
TAX MAP: 40 Previous Comp Plan: Ag/RuralRural Community CPZ11-FR-21 Rural Community Rural Community Rural Community PARCEL: 61378 lots 2 &3 Ag/Rural Ag/Rural Natural Resource Previous Zoning: AR1 COMP ACRES: 35.7approx. 25 acres NoStaff change would innot zoning object from to the the R-1, 2010 which Plan. would The beproperty consistent is entirely with the APPLICANT: PLAN current Rural Community plan designation. If the property is currently LOCATION: north side cleared and does not have characteristics consistent with application H.F. Payne BY motion to deny.restore. ofbeing RC usedzoning. as aAg garden subdivision center, rights R-1 zoninghave been would expended create a on non- the Fish Hatchery Road eastat US Construction Co. Inc. KDBS second. Vote: 4-1 property.conformity. of15 Putnam Rd. A A RC Vote:(DG opposed) 5-0 ZONING
CPZ11-FR-22 TM: 66 Previous Comp Plan: Low Density Residential P: 291 LDR Ag/Rural Rural Residential Previous Zoning: R-1 COMP ACRES: 26.93 Property is within Frederick City 20-year Urban Growth Boundary and APPLICANT: PLAN LOCATION: south side is designated Mixed Use. Staff would support an LDR plan Ajay Prakash designation but the zoning should remain A to facilitate annexation US 40Alt just west of into the City. Blentlinger Rd. WITHDRAWN R-1 A R-1 ZONING
CPZ11-FR-23 TAX MAP: 48 Previous Comp Plan: Ag/Rural, Resource Conservation PARCEL: 209 Ag/Rural Ag/Rural Ag/ Rural Previous Zoning: A, RC for portion on e/s US 15 COMP ACRES: 40.16 Resource Conserv. Natural Resource The portion of P. 209 on the e/s of US 15 is approximately 17. 5 ac. APPLICANT: PLAN BY motion to restore. LOCATION: n/s Old And previously had RC on floodplain and remainder zoned A (9.5 Padmini Nathan, BS second. ac.). 2010 Plan zoned entire portion RC due to floodplain and forest Frederick Road Hansonville Road, LLC Vote: 3-1-1 (DG cover. The property has characteristics that are consistent with A A A opposed and PS application of RC zoning. ZONING RC RC abstained)
CPZ11-FR-24 TM: 66 Previous Comp Plan: Low Density Residential P: 105 Low Density Res. Ag/Rural Low Density Previous Zoning: R-1 COMP ACRES: 8.52 Residential Property is currently undeveloped and is included in the City's 20- APPLICANT: PLAN LOCATION: Grove Hill year urban growth boundary, designated Low Density Residential. Sharon Nicholson BY motion to restore. Staff would support LDR plan designation but maintaining the A Road on south side US 40 BS second. Vote: 4-1 zoning to facilitate annexation into the City. R-1 A R-1 (DG opposed) This parcel adjoins several other parcels which are an enclave completely surrounded by the City. Staff would recommend restoring ZONING the LDR plan designation on all of the parcels in this enclave.
CPZ11-FR-25 TAX MAP: 85 Previous Comp Plan: Ag/Rural, Resource Conservation PARCEL: 83 Resource Conserv. Natural Resources LDR (35 ac) Previous Zoning: A COMP ACRES: 111.38 Ag/Rural Ag/Rural MDR (76 ac) No changes in plan or zoning from 2010 Plan. Request LDR (35 ac.) APPLICANT: PLAN LOCATION: north side of on north side of US 340 and MDR (76 ac.) on south side of US 340. Frederick Church of the BY motion to deny. Was Ag/Rural prior to 1991. Changed to LDR and MDR in 1992 Elmer Derr Road on both Brethren BS second. Comp Plan. Returned to Ag/Rural in 2002. sides of US 340 A A A Vote: 5-0 Property was purchaesd by applicant in March of 2007 with A zoning and Ag/Rural and Resource Conservation comp plan. ZONING A Community Plan should be conducted for the area to assess land use needs.
Updated 6/21/2012 Page 5 FREDERICK REGION
CASE INFORMATION PROPERTY Pre-2010 Existing Requested BOCC Staff Comments
TM:TAX 57MAP: 40 Previous Comp Plan: Rural Subdivision,Community Ag/Rural CPZ11-FR-26 Rural Community Rural Community Rural Community P:PARCEL: 106 378 lots 2 &3 Rural Subdivision Rural Residential Rural Residential Previous Zoning: R-1,R1 A COMP ACRES: 79.09approx. 25 acres Ag/Rural Ag/Rural NoStaff change would innot plan object or zoning to the R-1,from which2010 Plan.would be consistent with the APPLICANT: PLAN current Rural Community plan designation. If the property is currently LOCATION: northeastnorth side of Request to change A portion (40 ac.) to R-1 and inclusion in Winpenny Tell, LLC BY motion to deny.restore. water/sewerbeing used as service a garden area. center, The parcelR-1 zoning is not would within create the City's a non- 20-year YellowFish Hatchery Springs Road Road at off US DGBS second.second. Vote: 4-1 urbanconformity. growth area and thus should not be included in the water/sewer of15 Winpenny Tell Dr. R-1 (39.1 ac) R-1 (39.1 ac) R-1 (79 ac) Vote:(DG opposed) 5-0 service area. ZONING A A
CPZ11-FR-27 TAX MAP: 56 Previous Comp Plan: Rural Subdivision PARCEL: 543 Rural Subdivision Rural Residential Rural Residential Previous Zoning: R-1 COMP ACRES: 9.1 Requesting a Planned Service sewer designation. No other APPLICANT: PLAN LOCATION: n/s surrounding properties have a planned service designation and the Walter, Dianne, and BY motion to deny. property is not included in the Frederick Community Growth Area. Winpenny Drive Jean Martz BS second. R-1 R-1 R-1 Vote: 5-0 ZONING
CPZ11-FR-28 TM: 76 Previous Comp Plan: Office Research Industrial P: 91 Office/Resch./Ind. Ag/Rural Office/Resch./Ind. Previous Zoning: A COMP ACRES: 19.662 Property is located within the Ballenger Community Growth Area and APPLICANT: PLAN LOCATION: north side is across MD 180 from the Jefferson Tech Park. Staff would support G., F., B., and S., Kenel PS motion to restore. the ORI plan designation, however a Community Plan should be MD 180 just west of I-70 LLC KD second. Vote: 4- conducted for the area to assess land use needs. A A A 1 (DG opposed) ZONING
CPZ11-FR-29 TAX MAP: 48 Previous Comp Plan: Ag/Rural, Resource Conservation PARCEL: 49, 55 Ag/Rural Ag/Rural Ag/Rural in Previous Zoning: A COMP ACRES: 222 Resource Conserv. Frederick CGA No changes in plan or zoning from 2010 Plan. Request is for APPLICANT: PLAN LOCATION: north side inclusion in the Frederick City Growth Boundary. Beattie I. Renn BY motion to deny. Property is not within the City's 20-year urban growth boundary, but is Sundays Lane at US 15 BS second. in the City's "Area of Interest". A A A Vote: 5-0 ZONING
CPZ11-FR-30 TM: 48, 57 Property was annexed into the City in October 2009. 2010 County P: 66, 10, 26 Office/Research Ag/Rural w/ n/a Plan applied Ag/Rural plan designation with a Comment Area overlay COMP BY motion to remove ACRES: 287.429 Comment Area to reflect County's objection to the annexation. Request removal of APPLICANT: PLAN the Priority LOCATION: w/s US 15, e Comment Area, Priority Preservation Area designation, and Crum Land Farm Preservation Area restoration of the W-5/S-5 classification. of Willowbrook Road, n of Development, LLC and &Comment Area. Staff supports the request along with placing a Mixed Use plan Willow Road Crum Farm Comm. A MU-1 in the City n/a PS second. designation on the site. Development, LLC ZONING Vote: 4-1 (DG opposed)
Updated 6/21/2012 Page 6 FREDERICK REGION
CASE INFORMATION PROPERTY Pre-2010 Existing Requested BOCC Staff Comments
TM:TAX 57MAP: 40 PropertyPrevious wasComp annexed Plan: Rural into the Community City in October 2009. 2010 County CPZ11-FR-31 Rural Community Rural Community Rural Community P:PARCEL: 5 378 lots 2 &3 Office/Research Ag/Rural w/ n/a BY motion to remove PlanPrevious applied Zoning: Ag/Rural R1 plan designation with a Comment Area overlay COMP ACRES: 111.54approx. 25 acres Comment Area the Priority toStaff reflect would County's not object objection to the toR-1, the which annexation. would be Request consistent removal with theof APPLICANT: PLAN current Rural Community plan designation. If the property is currently LOCATION: eastnorth side side US Preservation Area Comment Area, Priority Preservation Area designation, and COPT Frederick, LLC BY motion to restore. restorationbeing used ofas the a garden W-5/S-5 center, water R-1 sewer zoning classification. would create a non- 15Fish just Hatchery south of Road Biggs at US designation & BS second. Vote: 4-1 Staffconformity. supports the request along with placing an ORI plan designation Ford15 Road Comment Area. A MO in the City n/a (DG opposed) on the site. PS second. RC ZONING Vote: 4-1 (DG opposed) CPZ11-FR-32 TAX MAP: 48, 57 Previous Comp Plan: Ag/Rural, Resource Conservation PARCEL: 17, 190, 102 Ag/Rural Ag/Rural Ag/Rural in Previous Zoning: A COMP ACRES: 245.19 Resource Conserv. Frederick CGA No changes in plan or zoning from 2010 Plan. Request inclusion in APPLICANT: PLAN LOCATION: n/s the Frederick City Growth Boundary. The property is not within the Crum Land Farm BY motion to deny. City's 20-year urban growth boundary, but is in the City's "Area of Willowbrook Road, w/s of Development, LLC and BS second. Interest". Staff recommends only amending the County Growth Sundays Lane, east and Crum Farm Comm. Boundary in response to a change in the City Growth Boundary. west of Bloomfield Road A A A Vote: 5-0 Development, LLC ZONING
CPZ11-FR-33 TM: 76 Previous Comp Plan: Ag/Rural, Resource Conservation P: 45, 156 Resource Conserv. Natural Resource Natural Resource Previous Zoning: A COMP ACRES: 252.7 Ag/Rural Ag/Rural Ag/Rural in No changes in plan or zoning from the 2010 Plan. Request inclusion APPLICANT: PLAN LOCATION: s/s I70, east Frederick CGA in the Frederick City Growth Boundary Grove Joint Venture, BY motion to deny. Neither parcel is located within the City's 20-year urban growth of Mt. Philip Road LLC KD second. boundary, but are in the City's "Area of Interest". Staff recommends A A A Vote: 5-0 only amending the County Growth Boundary in response to a change in the City Growth Boundary. ZONING
CPZ11-FR-34 TM: 85 Previous Comp Plan: Ag/Rural P: 135 Ag/Rural Institutional Med. Density Res. Previous Zoning: A COMP ACRES: 1.03 There was a mapping error in the 2010 Plan that included the parcel, APPLICANT: PLAN LOCATION: w/s Ballenger BY motion to accept thought to be part of the high school, as Institutional on the plan and Staff zoning. Creek Pike south of application from staff. Property has a residence on it so plan and zoning should reflect Tuscarora HS BS second. residential use. A I R-3 Vote: 5-0 ZONING
CPZ11-FR-35 TM: 57 P: 28 Office/Research Ag/Rural outside Mixed Use COMP ACRES: 138 Res. Con., in City growth area, in PPA Natural Res., 5/31 approve APPLICANT: PLAN LOCATION: e/s US 15 growth area include in growth inclusion in City Staff south of Biggs Ford Rd. area growth area as Mixed Use and remove PPA A A A designation. Vote: 4-1 ZONING (DG)
Updated 6/21/2012 Page 7 2011 Comprehensive Plan & Zoning Review - Property Owner Requests - Feb.14, 2012 w/ May 31 revisions in bold italics
BRUNSWICK REGION
CASE INFORMATION PROPERTY Pre-2010 Existing Requested BOCC Staff Comments
CPZ11-BR-01 TAX MAP: 92 Previous Comp Plan: Low Density Residential and Resource PARCEL: 20, 15 Low Density Res. Ag/Rural Rural Residential BY Motion to restore. Conservation COMP ACRES: 50.9, 201.96 Resource Conserv. Natural Resource PS second. Previous Zoning: R-1 APPLICANT: PLAN LOCATION: MD180 and Vote: 4-1 (DG 25.7 acres of this property is in Rosemont. A. David Demiray Rezoned from R-1 to A and was removed from Brunswick growth MD79 (Petersville Rd.) opposed.) area in the 2010 Plan update. Rural residential is equivalent comp just north of Rosemont R-1 A R-1 plan designation for R-1 zone outside the growth area and without water or sewer designation. ZONING Subdivision application for Ag cluster was approved for 7 lots. Extension application currently in process for 4 additional lots..
CPZ11-BR-02 TM: 84 Previous Comp Plan: Low Density Residential P: 56 Low Density Res. Ag/Rural Low Density Res. BY Motion to restore Previous Zoning: R-1 COMP ACRES: 52.6 to R-1. KD second. Rezoned from R-1 to A and removed from growth area in 2010 Plan APPLICANT: PLAN LOCATION: n/s Vote: 4-1 (DG update. Staff would support R-1 zoning with the Rural Residential J. Ingram & Sons, Inc. plan designation, which would be more compatiable with surrounding Mountville Road south of opposed) development. Jefferson 5/31 - approve R-3 R-1 A R-1 or R-3 zoning and in ZONING growth area with LDR on plan. CPZ11-BR-03 TAX MAP: 84 Previous Comp Plan: Village Center PARCEL: 65 Village Center Village Center Gen. Commercial BY motion to deny. Previous Zoning: Village Center COMP ACRES: 9.41 (or Mixed Use) PS second. APPLICANT: PLAN LOCATION: MD180 and Vote: 5-0 There was no change in zoning or designation on this property from Jefferson Village the 2010 Plan though a request for a portion of the parcel from VC to Holter Road Center LLC GC was considered, but not approved. The site and surroundings VC VC GC (or MX) have characteristics that are appropriate to maintaining the VC zoning. ZONING
CPZ11-BR-04 TM: 83 Previous Comp Plan: Highway Service P: 39 Highway Service Ag/Rural Gen. Commercial BS motion to restore Previous Zoning: GC COMP ACRES: 8.6 w/GC plan. BY Property was subdivided in 1994. APPLICANT: PLAN LOCATION: MD180 at second. Vote: 4-1 James V. Carone, et al, US340 interchange west (DG opposed) Trustees for the Carone of Jefferson Family Trust GC A GC ZONING
CPZ11-BR-05 TAX MAP: 92 Previous Comp Plan: no change from 2010 Plan PARCEL: 25 Ag/Rural Low Density Res. Low Density Res. BY motion to restore. Previous Zoning: R-1 COMP ACRES: 36.17 within Brun CGA KD second. Ag zoning is applied to prevent development in the County and APPLICANT: PLAN LOCATION: south side Vote: 4-1 (DG encourage development in the City through annexation. Property is Brian Quinlan in the Brunswick Growth Area, has a residential designation. Zoning MD464 just east of opposed) should remain A to facilitate annexation into the City of Brunswick. Brunswick R-1 A R-1 ZONING
Updated 6/21/2012 Page 1 BRUNSWICK REGION
CASE INFORMATION PROPERTY Pre-2010 Existing Requested BOCC Staff Comments
TM:TAX 84MAP: 92 Previous Comp Plan: Low Density Residential and Resource CPZ11-BR-06 Low Density Res. Ag/Rural Rural Residential BY Motion to restore. P:PARCEL: 120 20, 15 Low Density Res. Low Density Res. Low Density Res. BY approve the PreviousConservation Zoning: R-3 COMP ACRES: 13850.9, 201.96 Resource Conserv. Natural Resource requestPS second. assuming no RequestPrevious minorZoning: expansion R-1 of R-3 200 feet to the north to match Low APPLICANT: PLAN 25.7 acres of this property is in Rosemont. LOCATION: northMD180 side and additionalVote: 4-1 (DGbuild out. Density Residential plan designation. Will not increase lot yield from Jefferson Valley LLC 198Rezoned lots currently from R-1 approved to A and exceptwas removed through from a new Brunswick subdivion growth process MD180MD79 (Petersville at Broad Run Rd.) Rd. PSopposed.) second. Vote: 5-0 and/orarea in athe change 2010 Planin the update. water allocation Rural residential permit through is equivalent MDE. comp just north of Rosemont 5/31 - approve R-3 R-3 (54 ac) R-3 (62 ac) Requestplan designation would expand for R-1 R-3 zone zoning outside by the8 ac. growth At 3 units/acre, area and without 8 acres of additional 15 ac. R- R-3water zoning or sewer allows designation. 24 units. VC (10 ac) VC (10 ac) ZONING 3, w/LDR plan. Subdivision application for Ag cluster was approved for 7 lots. A (74 ac) A (66 ac) Extension application currently in process for 4 additional lots..
CPZ11-BR-07 TAX MAP: 84 Previous Comp Plan: Low Density Residential, Ag/Rural PARCEL: 69 Ag/Rural Ag/Rural Low Density Res. BY motion to restore Previous Zoning: A, R-3 COMP ACRES: 43.72 Low Density Res. KD second. All of the R-3 zoning was removed in 2010 Plan and northern portion APPLICANT: PLAN LOCATION: n/s MD180 Vote; 4-1 (DG of the parcel was removed from the growth area. Staff supports William Long Jr. and including entire parcel in the growth area as LDR and would not west of Broad Run Road opposed) Virginia Jones object to the R-3 zoning. Includes adjoining A A R-3 (43.72 ac) Staff also recommends application of R-3 zoning to adjacent parcel Par. 196. to the southwest (map 84 parcel 196) to avoid a discontinuity in ZONING R-3 (32.98 ac) development.
CPZ11-BR-08 TAX MAP: 84 Previous Comp Plan: Ag/Rural partially withing Jefferson CGA PARCEL: 84 Ag/Rural Partially Ag/Rural outisde Low Density Res. BS motion to restore Previous Zoning: A COMP ACRES: 50.96 within Jefferson CGA Inside CGA BY second. APPLICANT: PLAN LOCATION: Broad Run CGA (29.9 ac.) (50.9 ac.) Vote; 4-1 (DG) Susan Johnson Road 5/31 - approve entire parcel (51 A A A ac.) in growth area ZONING w/Ag/Rural plan.
Updated 6/21/2012 Page 2 2011 Comprehensive Plan & Zoning Review - Property Owner Requests - Feb. 14, 2012 w/ May 31 revisions in bold italics .
ADAMSTOWN REGION
CASE INFORMATION PROPERTY Pre-2010 Existing Requested BOCC Staff Comments
CPZ11-AD-01 TAX MAP: 108 Previous Plan Designation: GC PARCEL: 54 & 1 Gen. Commercial Gen. Commercial Gen. Commercial Previous Zoning: GC COMP ACRES: P54 = 6.8 ac.; Ag/Rural APPLICANT: PLAN P1 = 1 ac. BY Motion to restore. GC zoning was removed on all of P. 1 and portion of P. 54 in 2010 Ballenger Enterprises, Plan. Request to restore GC zoning and plan on all of both parcels. LOCATION: N/S MD 28, BS second. LLC (Saeed Zaidi) Staff would support the request. east of Point of Rocks Vote: 4-1 (DG GC (7.8 ac) GC (5.3 ac) GC (7.8 ac) opposed) ZONING A (2.5 ac)
CPZ11-AD-02 TM: 85 Previous Plan Designation: Ag/Rural P: 84 Ag/Rural Ag/Rural Gen. Commercial Previous Zoning: A COMP ACRES: 16.58 APPLICANT: PLAN BY Motion to deny LOCATION: Horman Property has been zoned A since 1959. Parcel has site plan approval Catoctin/Frederick Soil BS second for SCD office building. GC zoning not necessary to support ag. Road and Elmer Derr Rd. Conservation District Vote: 5-0 related businesses. Neighborhood change and agricultural business at US 340 interchange A A GC land scarcity may be examined in a corridor plan for the area. ZONING
CPZ11-AD-03 TAX MAP: 94 Previous Plan Designation: General Industrial, Ag/Rural PARCEL: 12 Gen. Ind. (154.8 a) Ag/Rural Gen. Ind. (154.8 a) Previous Zoning: A COMP BY Motion to restore. ACRES: 222.53 Ag/Rural Natural Resource Ag/Rural APPLICANT: PLAN BS second. LOCATION: west side Resource Con. Adjacent to the Eastalco Growth Area. Request is to restore previous Windridge Properties, vote: 4-1 (DG designation of General Industrial (154.8 ac.) and corollary expansion Ballenger Creek Pike just L.C. opposed) of the growth area. north of Cap Stine Rd. A A A 5/31 - approve to ZONING expand GI to entire parcel
CPZ11-AD-04 TM: 85 Previous Plan Designation: Ag/Rural, Resource Conservation P: 38 Ag/Rural Ag/Rural O/R/I Previous Zoning: A COMP ACRES: 79.07 Resource Con. APPLICANT: PLAN BY Motion to deny. LOCATION: S Renn No change in zoning or plan from 2010 Plan. AD-4 and AD-5 are Julia S. Culler BS second. companion requests for a combination of ORI and GC across both Road at US340 Vote: 5-0 parcels, the extent of which is unspecified. This area is close to the A A ORI Mount Zion Rd/US 340 interchange and should be studied in a community plan to assess industrial/employment needs. ZONING
CPZ11-AD-05 TAX MAP: 85 Previous Plan Designation: Ag/Rural PARCEL: 22 Ag/Rural Ag/Rural Gen. Com. (2.4 ac) Previous Zoning: A COMP ACRES: 37.04 O/R/I (34.6 ac) APPLICANT: PLAN BY Motion to deny. LOCATION: 5124 Cap No change in zoning or plan in 2010 Plan. AD-4 and AD-5 are Julia S. Culler BS second. companion requests for a combination of ORI and GC across both Stine Road Vote 5-0 parcels, the extent of which is unspecified. This area is close the A A GC (2.4 ac) Mount Zion Road US 340 interchange and should be studied in a community plan to assess industrial/employment needs. ZONING ORI (34.6 ac)
Updated 6/21/2012 Page 1 ADAMSTOWN REGION
CASE INFORMATION PROPERTY Pre-2010 Existing Requested BOCC Staff Comments
TM:TAX 95MAP: 108 Previous Plan Designation: General GC Industrial CPZ11-AD-06 Gen. Commercial Gen. Commercial Gen. Commercial P:PARCEL: 1203 54 & 1 General Industrial Natural Resource General Industrial Previous Zoning: GIGC COMP ACRES: 2.32P54 =ac 6.8 ac.; Ag/Rural Rezoned from GI to RC in 2010 Plan. Assembly business is on APPLICANT: PLAN GC zoning was removed on all of P. 1 and portion of P. 54 in 2010 LOCATION:P1 = 1 ac. north side PSBY Motion to restore. adjoining LI zoned parcel. Has gravel area used for equipment Jerome J. Crewe Jr. stagingPlan. Request though thereto restore are no GC site zoning plan andapprovals plan on for all this. of both Entire parcels. parcel MichaelsLOCATION: Mill N/S Rd. MDjust 28,east KDBS second. isStaff in 100-year would support floodplain. the request. ofeast MD of 85 Point in Buckeystown of Rocks Vote: Vote: 4-1 4-1 (DG (DG GI RC GI opposed) ZONING
CPZ11-AD-07 TAX MAP: 85 Previous Plan Designation: Ag/Rural, Resource Conservation PARCEL: 172 Ag/Rural Ag/Rural Gen. Commercial Previous Zoning: A COMP ACRES: 59.73 Resource Con. No change in zoning or plan from 2010 Plan. Should be studied in a APPLICANT: PLAN BY Motion to deny. LOCATION: northeast community plan for this area to assess industrial/employment needs. George & Joan KD second. side Cap Stine Rd just Horman Vote 5-0 east of US 340/Mt. Zion Rd interchange A A A ZONING
CPZ11-AD-08 TM: 95 Previous Plan Designation: General Industrial and Village Center P: 1139 Gen. Industrial Limited Industrial Gen. Industrial Previous Zoning: GI and VC COMP ACRES: 6 Village Center Property is almost entirely in the FEMA 100 year floodplain. APPLICANT: PLAN BY motion to restore. LOCATION: north side Current contractors use would be allowed to continue "as is" in LI The Estate of Kenneth PS second. zone. LI would be more appropriate for any redevelopment given Manor Woods just west of R. Jordan Vote: 3-1-1 (DG proximity to Buckeystown and with floodplain constraints. Property MD 85 in Buckeystown GI LI GI opposed BS has received site plan approval for Grant County Mulch use. ZONING VC abstained)
CPZ11-AD-09 TAX MAP: 85, 94 Previous Plan Designation: Ag/Rural PARCEL: 3, 4 Ag/Rural Ag/Rural Gen. Industrial Previous Zoning: A COMP ACRES: 196 (p.3); 201 No change in zoning or plan from 2010 Plan. Requesting rezoning APPLICANT: PLAN BY Motion to deny. (p.4) because of adjacency to minor arterial and Essroc Quarry. Staff NDR Properties, LLC KD second. would not support at this time without a broader assessment of LOCATION: s/w of New Vote 5-0 industrial land needs in the county. Design Road, south of Lime Kiln Road A A GI ZONING
CPZ11-AD-10 TAX MAP: 103 Previous Plan Designation: Ag/Rural PARCEL: 138 Ag/Rural Ag/Rural LDR (3.5 ac) Previous Zoning: A COMP ACRES: 61 No change in zoning or plan from 2010 Plan. Request to rezone APPLICANT: PLAN LOCATION: s/s Doubs small portion (3.5ac.) to allow subdivision of tenant house for granting Chuck Wade BY Motion to deny. to associate. Staff would not support as it would set a precedent for Road, west of Doubs BS seconded similar situations. Court A A R-1 (3.5 ac) Vote 5-0 ZONING
Updated 6/21/2012 Page 2 ADAMSTOWN REGION
CASE INFORMATION PROPERTY Pre-2010 Existing Requested BOCC Staff Comments
TAX MAP: 102108 Previous Plan Designation: Ag/Rural, GC Resource Conservation CPZ11-AD-11 Gen. Commercial Gen. Commercial Gen. Commercial PARCEL: 1554 & 1 Ag/Rural Ag/Rural LDR Previous Zoning: AGC COMP ACRES: 96.41P54 = 6.8 ac.; Ag/Rural No change in plan or zoning from 2010 Plan. Also requesting APPLICANT: PLAN GC zoning was removed on all of P. 1 and portion of P. 54 in 2010 LOCATION:P1 = 1 ac. e/s Ballenger BY motionMotion to deny.restore. inclusion on the Point of Rocks Community Growth Area. Had LDR Point of Rocks LLC planPlan. designation Request to between restore GC1991 zoning and 2001. and plan on all of both parcels. CreekLOCATION: Pike north N/S MDof Canal 28, BS second. ShouldStaff would be assessed support the as request.part of community plan. Runeast developmentof Point of Rocks Vote: Vote: 4-1 4-1 (PS (DG A A R-3 opposed) ZONING
CPZ11-AD-12 TM: 103, 94 Previous Plan Designation: General Industrial, Limited Industrial, P: 3, 76, 28, 9, 70, 71, 67 Ag/Rural, RC Ag/Rural, NR Ag/Rural Resource Conservation, Ag/Rural COMP ACRES: 2164.48 General Ind. Gen. Ind. (401 ac) General Industrial BY motion to restore. Previous Zoning: LI, GI, A APPLICANT: PLAN LOCATION: Manor Limited Ind. Lim. Ind. (369 ac) Limited Industrial KD second. Requesting zoning and land use plan designation to be returned to Eastalco Aluminum pre-2010 status. Staff has concerns about the portions on n/s of Woods Roads and Vote: 4-1 (DG Company Manor Woods Rd. and the e/s of New Design Rd. There is a need to between Ballenger Creek opposed) 5/31 A A (1,251 ac) A assess other planning issues including roads and water/sewer. Pike and New Design Rd. - Confirmed prior GI (1,205 ac) GI (534 ac) GI (1,205 ac) ZONING action to restore LI (173 ac) LI (369 ac) LI (173 ac)
CPZ11-AD-13A TAX MAP: 102 Previous Plan Designation: General Commercial PARCEL: unknown Gen. Commercial Ag/Rural Gen. Commercial BY Motion to restore Previous Zoning: A COMP ACRES: 4.23 GC plan only. KD GC plan was changed to Ag/Rural and removed from growth area in APPLICANT: PLAN LOCATION: west side second. 2010 Plan. No change in zoning from 2010 Plan. GC zoning was PVI, LLC c/o Andy removed in 2001 Adamstown Region Plan. Prior to 2001 the zoning Ballenger Creek Pike at Vote: 4-1 (DG Mackintosh was as follows: 1959-M1, 1972-B3, 1977 to 2001-GC. US15/MD 464 opposed) 5/31 A A GC intersection - Confirmed prior ZONING action to restore GC plan only CPZ11-AD-13B TM: 102 Previous Plan Designation: Resource Conservation, Ag/Rural P: 23 Ag/Rural Natural Resource General Industrial Previous Zoning: RC, A COMP BY motion to restore. ACRES: 111 Resource Con. or Limited Ind. Portion of the property in within the FEMA 100 year flood plain. Entire APPLICANT: PLAN KD second LOCATION: both sides of site is forested and contiguous with forested lands along Potomac PVI, LLC c/o Andy Vote 4-1 (DG River and C&O Canal Park. 50.29 acres of site is in Forest Rock Hall Road Mackintosh opposed) Conservation Easement. Given the physical characteristics (streams, RC RC GI or LI 5/31 - approve 7 ac. floodplain, wetlands, forest) and FRO easement staff would not support industrial zoning. ZONING A of LI or GI zoning along MD 28
CPZ11-AD- 14 TM: 108 The previous Plan was GI and previous zoning was GI P: 49 Gen. Industrial LDR Gen. Industrial COMP ACRES: 4.9 There was a mapping error in the 2010 Plan which applied LDR plan APPLICANT: PLAN LOCATION: N/S MD 28 designation and PUD zoning to this parcel, which is part of the Staff BY motion to restore. Canam Steel facility. This will restore the proper plan designation and in Point of Rocks KD second. zoning to this parcel to match the other parcels owned by Canam. GI PUD GI Vote:5-0 ZONING
Updated 6/21/2012 Page 3 ADAMSTOWN REGION
CASE INFORMATION PROPERTY Pre-2010 Existing Requested BOCC Staff Comments
TM:TAX 95MAP: 108 VC NewPrevious request Plan received Designation: February GC 8, 2012 CPZ11-AD- 15 Gen. Commercial Gen. Commercial Gen. Commercial P:PARCEL: 1208 54 & 1 Res. Conserv. Natural Resource Previous Zoning: GC COMP ACRES: 0.32P54 = 6.8 ac.; Ag/Rural APPLICANT: PLAN GC zoning was removed on all of P. 1 and portion of P. 54 in 2010 LOCATION:P1 = 1 ac. N/S BY Motion to restore. Susan Massarini BY motion to deny. Plan. Request to restore GC zoning and plan on all of both parcels. MichaelsLOCATION: Mill N/S Road MD in 28, BS second. BS second. Staff would support the request. Buckeystowneast of Point of Rocks VC Vote: 4-1 (DG RC RC Vote:5-0 opposed) ZONING
CPZ11-AD- 16 TM: 94 New request received February 23, 2012 P: 54 Limited Industrial Ag/Rural General Industrial COMP ACRES: .9 Subject parcel adjoins a larger parcel owned by the Noffsingers that is APPLICANT: PLAN LOCATION: E/S Cap zoned GI and has a proposed sketch subdivision plan under review. Noffsinger BY motion to Stine Rd. at Manor approve. PS second. Woods Rd. A A General Industrial Vote:4-0-1 ZONING
Updated 6/21/2012 Page 4 2011 Comprehensive Plan & Zoning Review - Property Owner Requests - Feb. 14, 2012 w/ May 31 BOCC revisions in bold italics
WALKERSVILLE REGION
CASE INFORMATION PROPERTY Pre-2010 Existing Requested BOCC Staff Comments
CPZ11-WA-1 TAX MAP: 69 Pre-2010 Plan: AgRural/Rural Sub. Plan and A/R-1 zoning PARCEL: 3 Ag/Rural Ag/Rural (122 ac) Ag/Rural Pre-2006 Plan: AgRural/Rural Sub. Plan and A/R-1 zoning COMP ACRES: 122 ac. Rural Sub. (3.67 ac) Rural Res. (3.67 ac) APPLICANT: PLAN LOCATION: e/s McKaig Property is located outside of a CGA. The 3.67 acres of R-1 Roger E. Cochran & changed to A in 2010 Plan. The acreage in question is located along Rd, approximately 3/4th PS motion to restore. Dora Jean Cochran 370 feet of McKaig Road frontage and is partially forested. Frontage mile south of MD 26 BS second. Vote: 5-0 A A (122 ac) A lots exist along McKaig Road on either side of the subject acreage. Staff does not object to reverting to the R-1 zoning on the frontage ZONING R-1 (3.67 ac) R-1 (3.67 ac) portion of the 3.67 acre land area (w/ Rural Res. plan designation).
CPZ11-WA-2 TM: 41 P: 48 LDR (93.3 ac) LDR (73.5 ac) COMP ACRES: 98.45 ac. Lim. Ind. (5.1 ac) Lim. Ind. (24.9 ac) PLAN WITHDRAWN LOCATION: n/s Gravel Hill Rd; s/s MD 550; WITHDRAWN APPLICANT: adjacent to Town of BY APPLICANT Orren F. Stein Woodsboro A A ZONING LI (28.8 ac) R-1 (4.5 ac)
CPZ11-WA-3 TAX MAP: 58 Pre-2010 Plan: LDR/RC/LI Plan and A/RC zoning (in CGA) PARCEL: 89, 90 Resource Cons. Natural Resource Natural Resource Pre-2006 Plan: LDR/RC/LI Plan and A/RC zoning (in CGA) COMP ACRES: P. 89 (1.8 ac), Lim. Ind. (20.9 ac) Lim. Ind. (20.9 ac) Lim. Ind. (20.9 ac) APPLICANT: PLAN P.90 (107.6 ac) LDR (57.7 ac) Ag/Rural LDR (57.7 ac) No zoning change requested. Seeking reversion to 2006 Walkersville G. Hunter and Eleanor BY motion to restore. Reg. Plan land uses. Property is located partially within the County's LOCATION: s/s Biggs G. Bowers Jr. BS second. Vote: 4-1 and entirely within the Town of Walkersville's CGAs and designated Ford Rd; straddles A A A (DG opposed) for AgRural and LI land uses. Staff recommends concurrence with Walkersville Southern municipal plan. RR; adjacent to Town of ZONING RC RC RC Walkersville
CPZ11-WA-4 TM: 43 Pre-2010 Plan: Rural Comm/AgRural Plan and R-1/VC/A zoning P: 30 Ag/Rural Ag/Rural (52.78 ac) Ag/Rural Pre-2006 Plan: Rural Comm/AgRural Plan and A/VC/RC zoning COMP ACRES: 54.78 ac. Rural Community Rural Com. (2 ac) Rural Community APPLICANT: PLAN LOCATION: e/s MD 75; Seeking reversion to pre-2006 Walkersville Reg. Plan zoning and Jeanette Dora Cermak BY motion to restore. land uses. Property is located in village of Johnsville. Staff south of Molasses Rd; PS second. Vote: 4-1 recommends maintenance of R-1 and A zoning. village of Johnsville A (48.48 ac) A (52.78 ac) A (48.48 ac) (DG opposed) ZONING R-1 (2 ac) R-1 (2 ac) R-1 (2 ac) VC (4.3 ac) VC (4.3 ac)
CPZ11-WA-5 TAX MAP: 60 Pre-2010 Plan: LDR/RC Plan and R-3 zoning (in CGA) PARCEL: 51 (6 ac), p/o Low Density Res. LDR (48.34 ac) LDR (65.34 ac) Pre-2006 Plan: LDR/Conserv. Plan and R-3 zoning (in CGA) COMP 64 (59.34 ac) Resource Cons. Ag/Rural (17 ac) APPLICANT: PLAN ACRES: 65.34 ac. (area Most of the property (2 parcels) is located within the County's Libertytown BY motion to restore. Libertytown CGA and is designated for LDR . Approx. 17 of the 60 of change request: Development KD second. Vote: 4- acres were excised from the CGA and changed to A zoning (from R- approx. 17 acres) Company, LLC R-3 R-3 (48.34 ac) R-3 (65.34 ac) 1 (DG opposed) 3) in the 2010 Plan. Staff have no objection to reversion to the pre- LOCATION: s/s of South 2010 CGA with LDR plan and R-3 zoning on Parcel 64. the 6-acre St.; w/s of Jones Rd & ZONING A (17 ac) Parcel 51 remains almost entirely in the FEMA floodplain and should Green Valley Rd; village remain with Ag/rural plan and A zoning. of Libertytown
Updated 6/21/2012 Page 1 WALKERSVILLE REGION
CASE INFORMATION PROPERTY Pre-2010 Existing Requested BOCC Staff Comments
TM:TAX MAP:60 69 Pre-2010 Plan: RC/AgRuralAgRural/Rural Plan Sub. and Plan A zoning and A/R-1 zoning CPZ11-WA-6 Ag/Rural Ag/Rural (122 ac) Ag/Rural P:PARCEL: 58 3 Resource Cons. Ag/Rural LDR (1.32 ac) Pre-2006 Plan: Conserv./AgRuralAgRural/Rural Sub. Plan Plan and and A A/R-1zoning zoning COMP ACRES: 9.99122 ac.ac. (area of Ag/RuralRural Sub. (3.67 ac) Ag/RuralRural Res. (8.67 (3.67 ac) ac) APPLICANT: PLAN Property is located outside of a CGA. The 3.67 acres of R-1 changeLOCATION: request: e/s McKaigapprox. Not in a CGA. No down-zoning. Seeking R-1 zoning on portion of Michael W. & Lucille C. BY motion to deny. propertychanged thatto A includes in 2010 Plan.existing The home, acreage extension in question of CGA, is located and along 1.32Rd, approximately ac) 3/4th PS motion to restore. Sutphin, Trustees - BS second. appropriate370 feet of McKaigSewer Plan Road designations frontage and to isallow partially for connection forested. Frontage into LOCATION:mile south of MDe/s of26 MD BS second. Vote: 5-0 Sutphin Family publiclots exist systems. along McKaigRezoning Road is not on the either appropriate side of the solution. subject Aacreage. health 75; south of village of A A R-1 (1.32 ac) Vote: 5-0 Revocable Trust issueStaff doeswith thenot septicobject shouldto reverting dictate to needthe R-1 for zoningpublic sewer.on the frontage Libertytown ZONING A (8.67 ac) portion of the 3.67 acre land area (w/ Rural Res. plan designation).
CPZ11-WA-7 TAX MAP: 41 Pre-2010 Plan: AgRural/GI Plan and A/GI/LI zoning (mostly in CGA) PARCEL: 11 Ag/Rural Ag/Rural Ag/Rural Pre-2006 Plan: AgRural/GI Plan and A/GI/LI zoning (mostly in CGA) COMP ACRES: 50.44 ac. General Industrial Lim. Ind. (21.1 ac) Gen. Ind. (21.1 ac) APPLICANT: PLAN LOCATION: w/s of MD BY motion to Majority of property is located within the County's and Town of James E. Summers & Woodsboro's CGAs and designated for LI . Zoning was changed in 194; property straddles restore.BS second. Catherine A. Summers 2010 Plan to facilitate annexation by Town of Woodsboro. Staff Maryland Midland Vote: 4-1 (DG A A A (29.44 ac) recommends concurrence with municipal plan. Staff also does not Railway; south of opposed) object to LI or GI plan if Town of Woodsboro does not object to the Woodsboro ZONING GI GI (14.6 ac) GI. Zoning should remain A to facilitate annexation into Woodsboro. LI LI (6.5 ac)
CPZ11-WA-8 TM: 51 BY motion to deny. Pre-2010 Plan: VC/RC Plan and GC/VC zoning (in CGA) P: 123 (Lots 1 & 3) Village Center Lot 1 - Gen. Com. Village Center Pre-2006 Plan: VC Plan and VC zoning (in CGA) COMP PS second. ACRES: 1.75 ac. total Resource Cons. Lot 3 - Village (or Gen. Com./HDR) APPLICANT: PLAN Vote: 5-0 Lot 1: 37,540 sf Center No Downzoning. Lot 1 is already zoned GC (site of 7-Eleven store). Frall Developers, Inc 5/31 - approve Lot 3 is vacant and is zoned VC. Seeking MX, GC, or R-16 for Lot 3. Lot 3: 38,842 sf request for MX Staff supports maintaining VC zoning which would permit density LOCATION: n/s of Main similar to that of the existing condos. Street/MD 26 GC GC MX zoning for Lot 3. (Libertytown)east of ZONING VC VC (or GC/R-16) Vote:3-1-1, DG Daysville Rd. opposed, PS abstained). CPZ11-WA-9 TAX MAP: 51 Pre-2010 Plan: LDR/RC Plan and R-1 zoning PARCEL: 103 Low Density Res. Ag/Rural Rural Community Pre-2006 Plan: LDR Plan and R-1 zoning COMP ACRES: 88.05 ac. Resource Cons. APPLICANT: PLAN (change requested on Outside of Libertytown CGA. Staff have no objection to restoration of Libertytown Associates, BY motion to restore. R-1 zoning if subdivision plan application for this site was filed prior to 25.5 ac. portion of parcel) LP KD second. Vote: 4- January 2009. LOCATION: n/s Liberty Rd/MD 26; between R-1 (25.5 ac) A (88 ac) R-1 (25.5 ac) 1 (DG opposed) Liberty Knolls Ct & Fox ZONING A (62.5 ac) entire parcel A (62.5 ac) Ridge Dr; E of Libertytown
CPZ11-WA-10 TM: 42 Pre-2010 Plan: LI Plan and LI zoning (in CGA) P: 226 Limited Industrial Med. Density Res. Limited Industrial Pre-2006 Plan: LI Plan and LI zoning (in CGA) COMP ACRES: 12.583 ac. APPLICANT: PLAN LOCATION: w/s South Property is located within the County's and Town of Woodsboro's Wm. D. Bowers PS motion to restore. CGAs and designated for MDR land uses. Zoning was changed in Main St at intersection Lumber Co. BY second. Vote: 4-1 2010 Plan to facilitate annexation by Town of Woodsboro. Staff with Hildebrand La; LI A LI (DG opposed) recommends concurrence with municipal plan (MDR) and to maintain A zoning to facilitate annexation. ZONING
Updated 6/21/2012 Page 2 WALKERSVILLE REGION
CASE INFORMATION PROPERTY Pre-2010 Existing Requested BOCC Staff Comments
TAX MAP: 5869 Pre-2010 Plan: RC/LIAgRural/Rural Plan and Sub. RC/A Plan zoning and A/R-1 zoning CPZ11-WA-11 Ag/Rural Ag/Rural (122 ac) Ag/Rural PARCEL: 583 Limited Industrial Limited Industrial Limited Industrial Pre-2006 Plan: Conserv/LIAgRural/Rural Plan Sub. and Plan RC/A and zoning A/R-1 (in zoning CGA) COMP ACRES: 89122 ac. ac. ResourceRural Sub. Cons. (3.67 ac) Natural Resource Rural Res. (3.67 ac) APPLICANT: PLAN Property is located outside of a CGA. The 3.67 acres of R-1 LOCATION: n/se/s &McKaig e/s of No downzoning in 2010 or 2006. Majority of parcel in Town of Gloria J. Barr, Etal BY motion to deny. Walkersvillechanged to A CGA. in 2010 Property Plan. straddlesThe acreage Walkersville in question Southern is located RR along and RetreatRd, approximately Rd; straddling 3/4th the PS motion to restore. (Estate of Mary Baer) DG second. incorporated370 feet of McKaig portion Roadof Town frontage that includes and is partially rail right-of-way. forested. TownFrontage railroadmile south r.o.w. of MD 26 BS second. Vote: 5-0 A A LI Vote: 5-0 Planlots exist designates along McKaig as LI. ZoningRoad on should either remain side of A the to subjectfacilitate acreage. (Walkersville annexation.Staff does not object to reverting to the R-1 zoning on the frontage Southern/MDOT); west of ZONING RC RC portion of the 3.67 acre land area (w/ Rural Res. plan designation). Walkersville
CPZ11-WA-12 TM: 59 Pre-2010 Plan: AgRural Plan and A zoning P: 44 Ag/Rural Ag/Rural Rural Residential Pre-2006 Plan: AgRural Plan and A zoning COMP ACRES: 150 APPLICANT: PLAN LOCATION: intersection BY motion to deny. Not in a CGA. No down-zoning. Seeking R-1 zoning on 150-acre Shakil H. Siddiqui property that includes former Burton Nursery operation. Staff of Liberty Rd/MD 26 & BS second. recommend maintenance of current plan and zoning designations. Chestnut Grove Rd (SE Vote: 4-0-1 (KD A A R-1 quadrant); east of Mount absent) Pleasant ZONING
CPZ11-WA-13 TAX MAP: 58 Pre-2010 Plan: AgRural Plan and A zoning PARCEL: 7, 35, 74, 84, Ag/Rural Ag/Rural Ag/Rural & include 2006 Plan: AgRural & within Walkersville CGA on Plan and A zoning COMP 182, & 269 (within Walkersville Natural Resource in Fred. CGA BY motion to restore APPLICANT: PLAN ACRES: 882.75 ac. CGA) in Walk. CGA. Site was removed from Walkersville CGA in 2010 Plan Glade Valley Joint Applicant seeks inclusion within Frederick CGA and exclusion from LOCATION: n/s & s/s of PS second. Venture (for Glade Walkersville Priority Preservation Area (PPA). MD 26; west of Crum Rd Vote: 3-1-1 (DG Valley Farms Inc) & A A A The site is not within either Frederick's or Walkersville's growth area. Blake Construction opposed and KD Consideration of request should be made as part of next updates to ZONING RC RC Company, Inc absent) either Frederick's or Walkersville's Plan.
CPZ11-WA-14 TM: 68 Pre-2010 Plan: AgRural Plan and A zoning P: 3, 5, & 47 Ag/Rural Ag/Rural Ag/Rural & include 2006 Plan: AgRural Plan and A zoning COMP ACRES: 387.55 ac. in Fred. CGA APPLICANT: PLAN LOCATION: n/s & s/s of BY motion to deny. Applicant seeks inclusion within Frederick CGA and exclusion from Beattie I. Renn Walkersville PPA. Gas House Pike; east of PS second. The parcels are not included within the City's 20-year urban growth Riverside Vote: 4-0-1 (KD A A A boundary. absent) ZONING
CPZ11-WA-15 TAX MAP: 42 Pre-2010 Plan: GC Plan and GC zoning (in CGA) PARCEL: 89 Gen. Commercial Med. Density Res. Gen. Commercial Pre-2006 Plan: GC Plan and GC zoning (in CGA) COMP ACRES: 4.7 ac. APPLICANT: PLAN BY motion to restore. LOCATION: intersection Property is located within the County's and Town of Woodsboro's Lew Myers PS second. CGAs and designated for MDR land uses. Zoning was changed in of Hildebrand Lane & Vote: 3-1-1 (DG 2010 Plan to facilitate annexation by Town of Woodsboro. Staff South Main St (NE GC A GC opposed and KD recommends maintaining A zoning to facilitate annexation into quadrant); south of, and Woodsboro. adjacent to, Town of ZONING absent) Woodsboro
Updated 6/21/2012 Page 3 WALKERSVILLE REGION
CASE INFORMATION PROPERTY Pre-2010 Existing Requested BOCC Staff Comments
TAX MAP: 5169 NewPre-2010 request Plan: AgRural/Rural Sub. Plan and A/R-1 zoning CPZ11-WA-16 Ag/Rural Ag/Rural (122 ac) Ag/Rural PARCEL: 193 LDR Ag/Rural LDR Pre-2006 Plan: AgRural/Rural Sub. Plan and A/R-1 zoning COMP ACRES: 59.9ac. 122 ac. Rural Sub. (3.67 ac) Rural Res. (3.67 ac) APPLICANT: PLAN BY motion to restore. Property is located outside of a CGA. The 3.67 acres of R-1 LOCATION: e/sS/S McKaig Bert Newcomer PS second. changed to A in 2010 Plan. The acreage in question is located along DaysvilleRd, approximately Rd. in 3/4th PS motion to restore. Vote: 3-1-1 (DG 370 feet of McKaig Road frontage and is partially forested. Frontage Libertytownmile south of MD 26 BS second. Vote: 5-0 A A A opposed and KD lots exist along McKaig Road on either side of the subject acreage. Staff does not object to reverting to the R-1 zoning on the frontage ZONING absent) portion of the 3.67 acre land area (w/ Rural Res. plan designation).
Updated 6/21/2012 Page 4