DOCSLIB.ORG

Earth – Mars Cycler Vehicle Conceptual Design

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Earth – Mars Cycler Vehicle Conceptual Design Earth – Mars Cycler Vehicle Conceptual Design by Bhumika Patel A thesis submitted to the Department of Aerospace, Physics, and Space Sciences at Florida Institute of Technology in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Aerospace Engineering Flight Mechanics and Control Systems Melbourne, Florida December 2019 We the undersigned committee hereby approve the attached thesis, “Earth – Mars Cycler Vehicle Conceptual Design,” by Bhumika Patel. _________________________________________________ Markus Wilde, Ph.D. Assistant Professor Aerospace, Physics, and Space Sciences Thesis Advisor _________________________________________________ Andrew Aldrin, Ph.D. Associate Professor Aldrin Space Institute Committee Member _________________________________________________ Brian Kish, Ph.D. Assistant Professor Aerospace, Physics, and Space Sciences Committee Member _________________________________________________ Daniel Batcheldor, Ph.D. Professor Aerospace, Physics, and Space Sciences Department Head Abstract Title: Earth – Mars Cycler Vehicle Conceptual Design Author: Bhumika Patel Advisor: Markus Wilde, Ph. D. This thesis summarizes a conceptual design for an Earth – Mars Cycler vehicle designed to transfer astronauts between Earth and Mars. The primary objective of the design study is to accommodate the crews’ needs and to estimate the overall mass and power required during Earth – Mars transfer. The study defines a concept of operations and system functional requirements and discusses the systems breakdown and subsystems design analysis. Systems developed for the cycler vehicle is designed primarily for the S1L1 cycler trajectory. The initial sizing of cycler subsystems is based on reference data from historical human spaceflight. The study performed for subsystems requirements is based on one-way trip (~154 days) to Mars. The study also addresses accommodations and life support requirements. The study does not include any detailed discussions related to the process of the vehicle assembly and launch from the ground. iii Table of Contents Table of Contents .................................................................................................................. iv List of Figures ....................................................................................................................... vi List of Tables ....................................................................................................................... vii Acknowledgement ............................................................................................................. viii 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Mission Background ............................................................................................ 1 1.2 Objectives and Scope ........................................................................................... 5 1.3 Limitations ........................................................................................................... 6 2. Mission Architecture ..................................................................................................... 7 2.1 Cycler Concept of Operations (ConOps) ............................................................. 7 2.2 System Functional Requirements ....................................................................... 10 2.3 System Breakdown ............................................................................................. 12 2.4 Vehicle Initial Sizing .......................................................................................... 15 2.4.1 Estimating Initial Vehicle Mass ................................................................ 15 2.4.2 Mass Budget .............................................................................................. 17 2.4.3 Power Budget ............................................................................................ 20 3. Earth-Mars Cycler Vehicle Concept Design ............................................................... 23 3.1 Environmental Control and Life Support System (ECLSS) ............................... 23 3.2 Crew Accommodations ...................................................................................... 30 3.3 Power System ..................................................................................................... 34 3.4 Thermal Control System .................................................................................... 38 iv 3.5 Guidance, Navigation and Controls System (GNC)........................................... 41 3.6 Autonomous Robotics Manipulators System (ARMS) ...................................... 46 3.7 Extravehicular Activity (EVA) Systems ............................................................ 50 3.8 Structures ............................................................................................................ 51 3.9 Propulsion System .............................................................................................. 55 4. Discussion ................................................................................................................... 58 5. Conclusion .................................................................................................................. 60 5.1 Future Work ....................................................................................................... 61 References ........................................................................................................................... 62 v List of Figures Figure 1 - Ballistic S1L1 Cycler Trajectory [15] ................................................................... 4 Figure 2 - Earth-Mars Cycler Vehicle Con-Ops .................................................................... 9 Figure 3 - Earth-Mars Cycler Vehicle Functional Requirements ........................................ 11 Figure 4 – Cycler System Breakdown Structure ................................................................. 12 Figure 5 – Reference plot of Historical Human Spaceflights [19] ...................................... 16 Figure 6 - Average Power vs Dry Mass based on Historical Data ...................................... 20 Figure 7 - ECLSS Systems Interface [19] ........................................................................... 24 Figure 8 - Power System Interface ...................................................................................... 35 Figure 9 - Interface of GNC System .................................................................................... 43 Figure 10 - Canadarm-2 Mobile Servicing System [28] ...................................................... 47 Figure 11 - FANUC Multipurpose Robotic Manipulator [31]............................................. 49 Figure 12 - Pressurized Module Concept Design ................................................................ 52 vi List of Tables Table 1 - S1L1 Cycler Trajectory Parameters [15] ................................................................ 5 Table 2 - Cycler Vehicle Initial Mass Budget [18] .............................................................. 18 Table 3 - Cycler Average Power Budget [22] ..................................................................... 21 Table 4 - Requirements for Water Management System [19] ............................................. 26 Table 5 - Atmosphere Management Requirements [19] ...................................................... 27 Table 6 - Waste Management Requirements [19] ............................................................... 28 Table 7 - ECLSS Management Technologies [18] .............................................................. 29 Table 8 - Resources Requirements for Crew Accommodations [18] .................................. 33 Table 9 - Summary of Power Subsystem Estimates ............................................................ 38 Table 10 - Active Thermal Control System Hardware ........................................................ 41 Table 11 - GNC System Hardware [22] .............................................................................. 46 Table 12 - Canadarm-2 Systems Specifications [23] ........................................................... 47 Table 13 - FANUC 2000i Series Manipulator Specifications [31] ...................................... 49 Table 14 - EVA System Parameters [18]............................................................................. 51 Table 15 – Reference data of Supporting Structures [18, 32, 33] ........................................ 54 Table 16 - Propulsion System Initial Sizing ........................................................................ 57 Table 17 - Mass and Power Estimates of the Cycler Conceptual Design ............................ 58 vii Acknowledgement First and foremost, I would like to express extreme gratitude to my advisor Dr. Markus Wilde for believing and supporting me at every stage of my study. He has not only served as an advisor, but as a mentor throughout my thesis work for past few years. I would also like to thank my Master’s thesis committee Dr. Andrew Aldrin and Dr. Brian Kish. In addition, I would like to acknowledge my family for their extensive support during my academic career. A very special heartfelt thanks to my Uncle Mr. Bipinchandra B Patel and Aunt Mrs. Ritaben Bipinchandra Patel on supporting me financially and emotionally.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • AAS 13-250 Hohmann Spiral Transfer with Inclination Change Performed
    AAS 13-250 Hohmann Spiral Transfer With Inclination Change Performed By Low-Thrust System Steven Owens1 and Malcolm Macdonald2 This paper investigates the Hohmann Spiral Transfer (HST), an orbit transfer method previously developed by the authors incorporating both high and low- thrust propulsion systems, using the low-thrust system to perform an inclination change as well as orbit transfer. The HST is similar to the bi-elliptic transfer as the high-thrust system is first used to propel the spacecraft beyond the target where it is used again to circularize at an intermediate orbit. The low-thrust system is then activated and, while maintaining this orbit altitude, used to change the orbit inclination to suit the mission specification. The low-thrust system is then used again to reduce the spacecraft altitude by spiraling in-toward the target orbit. An analytical analysis of the HST utilizing the low-thrust system for the inclination change is performed which allows a critical specific impulse ratio to be derived determining the point at which the HST consumes the same amount of fuel as the Hohmann transfer. A critical ratio is found for both a circular and elliptical initial orbit. These equations are validated by a numerical approach before being compared to the HST utilizing the high-thrust system to perform the inclination change. An additional critical ratio comparing the HST utilizing the low-thrust system for the inclination change with its high-thrust counterpart is derived and by using these three critical ratios together, it can be determined when each transfer offers the lowest fuel mass consumption.
    [Show full text]
  • Low-Energy Lunar Trajectory Design
    LOW-ENERGY LUNAR TRAJECTORY DESIGN Jeffrey S. Parker and Rodney L. Anderson Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, California July 2013 ii DEEP SPACE COMMUNICATIONS AND NAVIGATION SERIES Issued by the Deep Space Communications and Navigation Systems Center of Excellence Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Joseph H. Yuen, Editor-in-Chief Published Titles in this Series Radiometric Tracking Techniques for Deep-Space Navigation Catherine L. Thornton and James S. Border Formulation for Observed and Computed Values of Deep Space Network Data Types for Navigation Theodore D. Moyer Bandwidth-Efficient Digital Modulation with Application to Deep-Space Communication Marvin K. Simon Large Antennas of the Deep Space Network William A. Imbriale Antenna Arraying Techniques in the Deep Space Network David H. Rogstad, Alexander Mileant, and Timothy T. Pham Radio Occultations Using Earth Satellites: A Wave Theory Treatment William G. Melbourne Deep Space Optical Communications Hamid Hemmati, Editor Spaceborne Antennas for Planetary Exploration William A. Imbriale, Editor Autonomous Software-Defined Radio Receivers for Deep Space Applications Jon Hamkins and Marvin K. Simon, Editors Low-Noise Systems in the Deep Space Network Macgregor S. Reid, Editor Coupled-Oscillator Based Active-Array Antennas Ronald J. Pogorzelski and Apostolos Georgiadis Low-Energy Lunar Trajectory Design Jeffrey S. Parker and Rodney L. Anderson LOW-ENERGY LUNAR TRAJECTORY DESIGN Jeffrey S. Parker and Rodney L. Anderson Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, California July 2013 iv Low-Energy Lunar Trajectory Design July 2013 Jeffrey Parker: I dedicate the majority of this book to my wife Jen, my best friend and greatest support throughout the development of this book and always.
    [Show full text]
  • Astrodynamics
    Politecnico di Torino SEEDS SpacE Exploration and Development Systems Astrodynamics II Edition 2006 - 07 - Ver. 2.0.1 Author: Guido Colasurdo Dipartimento di Energetica Teacher: Giulio Avanzini Dipartimento di Ingegneria Aeronautica e Spaziale e-mail: [email protected] Contents 1 Two–Body Orbital Mechanics 1 1.1 BirthofAstrodynamics: Kepler’sLaws. ......... 1 1.2 Newton’sLawsofMotion ............................ ... 2 1.3 Newton’s Law of Universal Gravitation . ......... 3 1.4 The n–BodyProblem ................................. 4 1.5 Equation of Motion in the Two-Body Problem . ....... 5 1.6 PotentialEnergy ................................. ... 6 1.7 ConstantsoftheMotion . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .... 7 1.8 TrajectoryEquation .............................. .... 8 1.9 ConicSections ................................... 8 1.10 Relating Energy and Semi-major Axis . ........ 9 2 Two-Dimensional Analysis of Motion 11 2.1 ReferenceFrames................................. 11 2.2 Velocity and acceleration components . ......... 12 2.3 First-Order Scalar Equations of Motion . ......... 12 2.4 PerifocalReferenceFrame . ...... 13 2.5 FlightPathAngle ................................. 14 2.6 EllipticalOrbits................................ ..... 15 2.6.1 Geometry of an Elliptical Orbit . ..... 15 2.6.2 Period of an Elliptical Orbit . ..... 16 2.7 Time–of–Flight on the Elliptical Orbit . .......... 16 2.8 Extensiontohyperbolaandparabola. ........ 18 2.9 Circular and Escape Velocity, Hyperbolic Excess Speed . .............. 18 2.10 CosmicVelocities
    [Show full text]
  • Optimisation of Propellant Consumption for Power Limited Rockets
    Delft University of Technology Faculty Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science Delft Institute of Applied Mathematics Optimisation of Propellant Consumption for Power Limited Rockets. What Role do Power Limited Rockets have in Future Spaceflight Missions? (Dutch title: Optimaliseren van brandstofverbruik voor vermogen gelimiteerde raketten. De rol van deze raketten in toekomstige ruimtevlucht missies. ) A thesis submitted to the Delft Institute of Applied Mathematics as part to obtain the degree of BACHELOR OF SCIENCE in APPLIED MATHEMATICS by NATHALIE OUDHOF Delft, the Netherlands December 2017 Copyright c 2017 by Nathalie Oudhof. All rights reserved. BSc thesis APPLIED MATHEMATICS \ Optimisation of Propellant Consumption for Power Limited Rockets What Role do Power Limite Rockets have in Future Spaceflight Missions?" (Dutch title: \Optimaliseren van brandstofverbruik voor vermogen gelimiteerde raketten De rol van deze raketten in toekomstige ruimtevlucht missies.)" NATHALIE OUDHOF Delft University of Technology Supervisor Dr. P.M. Visser Other members of the committee Dr.ir. W.G.M. Groenevelt Drs. E.M. van Elderen 21 December, 2017 Delft Abstract In this thesis we look at the most cost-effective trajectory for power limited rockets, i.e. the trajectory which costs the least amount of propellant. First some background information as well as the differences between thrust limited and power limited rockets will be discussed. Then the optimal trajectory for thrust limited rockets, the Hohmann Transfer Orbit, will be explained. Using Optimal Control Theory, the optimal trajectory for power limited rockets can be found. Three trajectories will be discussed: Low Earth Orbit to Geostationary Earth Orbit, Earth to Mars and Earth to Saturn. After this we compare the propellant use of the thrust limited rockets for these trajectories with the power limited rockets.
    [Show full text]
  • Asteroid Retrieval Mission
    Where you can put your asteroid Nathan Strange, Damon Landau, and ARRM team NASA/JPL-CalTech © 2014 California Institute of Technology. Government sponsorship acknowledged. Distant Retrograde Orbits Works for Earth, Moon, Mars, Phobos, Deimos etc… very stable orbits Other Lunar Storage Orbit Options • Lagrange Points – Earth-Moon L1/L2 • Unstable; this instability enables many interesting low-energy transfers but vehicles require active station keeping to stay in vicinity of L1/L2 – Earth-Moon L4/L5 • Some orbits in this region is may be stable, but are difficult for MPCV to reach • Lunar Weakly Captured Orbits – These are the transition from high lunar orbits to Lagrange point orbits – They are a new and less well understood class of orbits that could be long term stable and could be easier for the MPCV to reach than DROs – More study is needed to determine if these are good options • Intermittent Capture – Weakly captured Earth orbit, escapes and is then recaptured a year later • Earth Orbit with Lunar Gravity Assists – Many options with Earth-Moon gravity assist tours Backflip Orbits • A backflip orbit is two flybys half a rev apart • Could be done with the Moon, Earth or Mars. Backflip orbit • Lunar backflips are nice plane because they could be used to “catch and release” asteroids • Earth backflips are nice orbits in which to construct things out of asteroids before sending them on to places like Earth- Earth or Moon orbit plane Mars cyclers 4 Example Mars Cyclers Two-Synodic-Period Cycler Three-Synodic-Period Cycler Possibly Ballistic Chen, et al., “Powered Earth-Mars Cycler with Three Synodic-Period Repeat Time,” Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, Sept.-Oct.
    [Show full text]
  • Mars Exploration: an Overview of Indian and International Mars Missions Nayamavalsa Scariah1, Dr
    Taurian Innovative Journal/Volume 1/ Issue 1 Mars exploration: An overview of Indian and International Mars Missions NayamaValsa Scariah1, Dr. Mili Ghosh2, Dr.A.P.Krishna3 Birla Institute of Technology, Mesra, Ranchi Abstract- Mars is the fourth planet from the sun. It is 1. Introduction also known as red planet because of its iron oxide content. There are lots of missions have been launched to Mars is also known as red planet, because of the mars for better understanding of our neighboring planet. reddish iron oxide prevalent on its surface gives it a There are lots of unmanned spacecraft including reddish appearance. It is the fourth planet from sun. orbiters, landers and rovers have been launched into mars since early 1960. Sputnik was the first satellite The term sol is used to define duration of solar day on launched in 1957 by Soviet Union. After seven failure Mars. A mean Martian solar day or sol is 24 hours 39 missions to Mars, Mariner 4 was the first satellite which minutes and 34.244 seconds. Many space missions to reached the Martian orbiter successfully. The Viking 1 Mars have been planned and launched for Mars was the first lander reached on Mars on 1975. India exploration (Table:1) but most of them failed without successfully launched a spacecraft, Mangalyan (Mars completing the task specially in early attempts th Orbiter Mission) on 5 November, 2013, with five whereas some NASA missions were very payloads to Mars. India was the first nation to successful(such as the twin Mars Exploration Rovers, successfully reach Mars on its first attempt.
    [Show full text]
  • Tventy Five Years with CANADARM
    Canada celebrates Tventy five years with CANADARM -Canada’s ticket to the Space Shuttle and ISS Human participation is necessary in order to build large constructions in Like a space – that is a fact, to put it mildly human arm - but without the use of the right tools it will be impossible. With nerves When the plans for a shuttle of copper wiring, system first were introduced, a bones of graphite manipulator system was introduced as fibre, and electric a necessity, a robotic arm that could motors for muscles, deploy and retrieve space hardware Canadarm is like from the payload bay of the shuttle. the human arm. It Canadian industrial companies has rotating joints: accepted the challenge, and the two at the shoulder, manipulator system, Canadarm, made one at the elbow its space debut in November, 1981. and three at the The design and building of the Shuttle wrist. At 15 metres Remote Manipulator System also and weighing less marked the beginning of Canada’s than 480 kilograms, close collaboration with NASA in Canadarm can manned space flight. lift over 30,000 But the development did not kilograms in the stop there. A similar system for the weightlessness of Canadarm2 gives Canadian scientists space station was developed, and in space-or the mass of a fully loaded access to the Station’s laboratory April 2001, Space Shuttle Endeavour bus, using less electricity than a facilities to conduct experiments. delivered a package that was Canada’s teakettle. It also entitles key contribution to the International The brain of “In fact, the Station could Canada to send the system is a an astronaut to Space Station, the Canadarm 2.
    [Show full text]
  • An Assessment of Aerocapture and Applications to Future Missions
    Post-Exit Atmospheric Flight Cruise Approach An Assessment of Aerocapture and Applications to Future Missions February 13, 2016 National Aeronautics and Space Administration An Assessment of Aerocapture Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena, California and Applications to Future Missions Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology for Planetary Science Division Science Mission Directorate NASA Work Performed under the Planetary Science Program Support Task ©2016. All rights reserved. D-97058 February 13, 2016 Authors Thomas R. Spilker, Independent Consultant Mark Hofstadter Chester S. Borden, JPL/Caltech Jessie M. Kawata Mark Adler, JPL/Caltech Damon Landau Michelle M. Munk, LaRC Daniel T. Lyons Richard W. Powell, LaRC Kim R. Reh Robert D. Braun, GIT Randii R. Wessen Patricia M. Beauchamp, JPL/Caltech NASA Ames Research Center James A. Cutts, JPL/Caltech Parul Agrawal Paul F. Wercinski, ARC Helen H. Hwang and the A-Team Paul F. Wercinski NASA Langley Research Center F. McNeil Cheatwood A-Team Study Participants Jeffrey A. Herath Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Caltech Michelle M. Munk Mark Adler Richard W. Powell Nitin Arora Johnson Space Center Patricia M. Beauchamp Ronald R. Sostaric Chester S. Borden Independent Consultant James A. Cutts Thomas R. Spilker Gregory L. Davis Georgia Institute of Technology John O. Elliott Prof. Robert D. Braun – External Reviewer Jefferey L. Hall Engineering and Science Directorate JPL D-97058 Foreword Aerocapture has been proposed for several missions over the last couple of decades, and the technologies have matured over time. This study was initiated because the NASA Planetary Science Division (PSD) had not revisited Aerocapture technologies for about a decade and with the upcoming study to send a mission to Uranus/Neptune initiated by the PSD we needed to determine the status of the technologies and assess their readiness for such a mission.
    [Show full text]
  • Up, Up, and Away by James J
    www.astrosociety.org/uitc No. 34 - Spring 1996 © 1996, Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 390 Ashton Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94112. Up, Up, and Away by James J. Secosky, Bloomfield Central School and George Musser, Astronomical Society of the Pacific Want to take a tour of space? Then just flip around the channels on cable TV. Weather Channel forecasts, CNN newscasts, ESPN sportscasts: They all depend on satellites in Earth orbit. Or call your friends on Mauritius, Madagascar, or Maui: A satellite will relay your voice. Worried about the ozone hole over Antarctica or mass graves in Bosnia? Orbital outposts are keeping watch. The challenge these days is finding something that doesn't involve satellites in one way or other. And satellites are just one perk of the Space Age. Farther afield, robotic space probes have examined all the planets except Pluto, leading to a revolution in the Earth sciences -- from studies of plate tectonics to models of global warming -- now that scientists can compare our world to its planetary siblings. Over 300 people from 26 countries have gone into space, including the 24 astronauts who went on or near the Moon. Who knows how many will go in the next hundred years? In short, space travel has become a part of our lives. But what goes on behind the scenes? It turns out that satellites and spaceships depend on some of the most basic concepts of physics. So space travel isn't just fun to think about; it is a firm grounding in many of the principles that govern our world and our universe.
    [Show full text]
  • Magnetoshell Aerocapture: Advances Toward Concept Feasibility
    Magnetoshell Aerocapture: Advances Toward Concept Feasibility Charles L. Kelly A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Aeronautics & Astronautics University of Washington 2018 Committee: Uri Shumlak, Chair Justin Little Program Authorized to Offer Degree: Aeronautics & Astronautics c Copyright 2018 Charles L. Kelly University of Washington Abstract Magnetoshell Aerocapture: Advances Toward Concept Feasibility Charles L. Kelly Chair of the Supervisory Committee: Professor Uri Shumlak Aeronautics & Astronautics Magnetoshell Aerocapture (MAC) is a novel technology that proposes to use drag on a dipole plasma in planetary atmospheres as an orbit insertion technique. It aims to augment the benefits of traditional aerocapture by trapping particles over a much larger area than physical structures can reach. This enables aerocapture at higher altitudes, greatly reducing the heat load and dynamic pressure on spacecraft surfaces. The technology is in its early stages of development, and has yet to demonstrate feasibility in an orbit-representative envi- ronment. The lack of a proof-of-concept stems mainly from the unavailability of large-scale, high-velocity test facilities that can accurately simulate the aerocapture environment. In this thesis, several avenues are identified that can bring MAC closer to a successful demonstration of concept feasibility. A custom orbit code that dynamically couples magnetoshell physics with trajectory prop- agation is developed and benchmarked. The code is used to simulate MAC maneuvers for a 60 ton payload at Mars and a 1 ton payload at Neptune, both proposed NASA mis- sions that are not possible with modern flight-ready technology. In both simulations, MAC successfully completes the maneuver and is shown to produce low dynamic pressures and continuously-variable drag characteristics.
    [Show full text]
  • Low-Excess Speed Triple Cyclers of Venus, Earth, and Mars
    AAS 17-577 LOW EXCESS SPEED TRIPLE CYCLERS OF VENUS, EARTH, AND MARS Drew Ryan Jones,∗ Sonia Hernandez,∗ and Mark Jesick∗ Ballistic cycler trajectories which repeatedly encounter Earth and Mars may be in- valuable to a future transportation architecture ferrying humans to and from Mars. Such trajectories which also involve at least one flyby of Venus are computed here for the first time. The so-called triple cyclers are constructed to exhibit low excess speed on Earth-Mars and Mars-Earth transit legs, and thereby reduce the cost of hyperbolic rendezvous. Thousands of previously undocumented two synodic pe- riod Earth-Mars-Venus triple cyclers are discovered. Many solutions are identified with average transit leg excess speed below 5 km/sec, independent of encounter epoch. The energy characteristics are lower than previously documented cyclers not involving Venus, but the repeat periods are generally longer. NOMENCLATURE ∆tH Earth-Mars Hohmann transfer flight time, days δ Hyperbolic flyby turning angle, degrees R;^ S;^ T^ B-plane unit vectors B B-plane vector, km µ Gravitational parameter, km3/sec2 θB B-plane angle between B and T^, degrees rp Periapsis radius, km T Cycler repeat period, days t0 Cycle starting epoch ∗ t0 Earth-Mars Hohmann transfer epoch tf Cycle ending epoch Tsyn Venus-Earth-Mars synodic period, days v1 Hyperbolic excess speed, km/sec INTRODUCTION Trajectories are computed which ballistically and periodically cycle between flybys of Venus, Earth, and Mars. Using only gravity assists, a cycling vehicle returns to the starting body after a flight time commensurate with the celestial bodies’ orbital periods, thereby permitting indefinite repetition.
    [Show full text]
  • Orbital Fueling Architectures Leveraging Commercial Launch Vehicles for More Affordable Human Exploration
    ORBITAL FUELING ARCHITECTURES LEVERAGING COMMERCIAL LAUNCH VEHICLES FOR MORE AFFORDABLE HUMAN EXPLORATION by DANIEL J TIFFIN Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of: Master of Science Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY January, 2020 CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES We hereby approve the thesis of DANIEL JOSEPH TIFFIN Candidate for the degree of Master of Science*. Committee Chair Paul Barnhart, PhD Committee Member Sunniva Collins, PhD Committee Member Yasuhiro Kamotani, PhD Date of Defense 21 November, 2019 *We also certify that written approval has been obtained for any proprietary material contained therein. 2 Table of Contents List of Tables................................................................................................................... 5 List of Figures ................................................................................................................. 6 List of Abbreviations ....................................................................................................... 8 1. Introduction and Background.................................................................................. 14 1.1 Human Exploration Campaigns ....................................................................... 21 1.1.1. Previous Mars Architectures ..................................................................... 21 1.1.2. Latest Mars Architecture .........................................................................
    [Show full text]