YORK REGION DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD
PROPERTY MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE
PUBLIC SESSION
Meeting #4 Tuesday, April 19, 2016 Room 200 – Education Centre Aurora 5:30 p.m.
AGENDA 1. Call to Order
2. Approval of Agenda
3. Declaration of Conflict of Interest
4. Receipt of Minutes of Meeting #3 – March 22, 2016 1 – 2
5. BUSINESS ARISING
6. BOARD REPORTS
6.1 Proposed Development Application ZA 16 124169 City of Markham 3 – 6
6.2 Proposed Development Application 19T-16V001 City of Vaughan 7 – 9
6.3 Proposed Development Application Z.15.041/DA.15.093 City of Vaughan 10 – 12
7. INFORMATION ITEMS
7.1 Capital Strategy Plan 2016 – 2020 13 – 19
7.2 Schedules for 2016 – 2017: New Elementary and Secondary Schools and Additions to Schools 20 – 21
8. Next Meeting Date
Tuesday, May 17, 2016 Room 200 Education Centre Aurora
9. Adjournment
4. YORK REGION DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD PROPERTY MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE
MINUTES OF MEETING #3 (PUBLIC) MARCH 22, 2016
The public session of the Property Management Committee meeting was held at 5:30 p.m. in Room 200 at the Aurora Education Centre on Tuesday, March 22, 2016, with the following trustee members present: P. Adams-Luchowski, L. Aversa, L. Carruthers (Chair), A. DeBartolo, N. Elgie, C. McBain, J. Nathan and B. Pang.
The following staff members were present; D. Adams, L. Johnstone, G. Luk, S. Meehan, W. Muirhead-Toporek, J. Parappally, L. Reinhardt, M. Roberts, J. Ross, K. Shaw-Edmond and S. Yake.
Regrets: Trustees C. Chan, S. Geller, A. Tam and M. Van Beek.
DECLARATION OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST
Committee Chair L. Carruthers asked any trustee who has a direct personal interest or direct or indirect pecuniary interest in any matter being discussed by the Property Management Committee during the meeting to state the conflict and nature thereof. No conflicts were declared by trustees at this time.
RECEIPT OF MINUTES
The minutes of the February 16, 2016 Property Management Committee meeting, were received for information.
BOARD RECOMMENDATIONS
(*)1. That the York Region District School approve the following recommendations, as outlined in the staff report dated March 22, 2016. (Appendix 1)
1) That the York Region District School Board release the Block 11 #1 elementary school site in the City of Vaughan.
2) That the Director of Planning for the City of Vaughan be advised of this action.
3) That the York Catholic District School Board be advised of the release.
(*)2. That the York Region District School Board approve the following recommendations, as outlined in the staff report dated March 22, 2016. (Appendix 2)
1) That the York Region District School Board will not require a public elementary school site within proposed development applications 19T-15G03/03.1087, Town of Georgina.
2) That the Director of Planning for the Town of Georgina be advised of this action.
1 PROPERTY MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE MINUTES - PUBLIC PAGE 2 OF 2 MARCH 22, 2016
(*)3. That the York Region District School Board approve the following recommendations, as outlined in the staff report dated March 22, 2016. (Appendix 3)
1) That the York Region District School Board will not require a public elementary school site within proposed development applications OPA 16.002/ ZBA 16.002/19T(W)-16.001, Town of Whitchurch-Stouffville.
2) That the Director of Planning for the Town of Whitchurch-Stouffville be advised of this action.
(*)4. That the York Region District School Board approve the following recommendations, as outlined in the staff report dated March 22, 2016. (Appendix 4)
1) That the York Region District School Board will not require a public elementary school site within proposed development applications ZBA 16.003/ 19T(W)-16.002, Town of Whitchurch-Stouffville.
2) That the Director of Planning for the Town of Whitchurch-Stouffville be advised of this action.
(*)5. That the York Region District School Board approve the following recommendations, as outlined in the staff report dated March 22, 2016. (Appendix 5)
1) That the York Region District School Board will not require a public elementary school site within proposed development applications OPA 16.001/ZBA 16.001, Town of Whitchurch-Stouffville.
2) That the Director of Planning for the Town of Whitchurch-Stouffville be advised of this action.
INFORMATION ITEM
Schedules for 2016 – 2017: New Elementary and Secondary Schools and Additions to Schools
Staff provided information to committee members regarding the Schedules for 2016-2017: New Elementary and Secondary Schools and Additions to Schools.
March 22, 2016
For further information, please contact J. Ross, Senior Manager, Planning and Property Development, S. Yake, Coordinating Superintendent, or J. Parappally, Director of Education.
2 6.1
YORK REGION DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION ZA 16 124169 CITY OF MARKHAM
Background:
The purpose of this report is to request approval of the comments that are to be submitted to the City of Markham concerning the Board’s requirement for a school site within the proposed development application.
Rationale:
A. Application:
ZA 16 124169 by Corradgo Gazze Holdings Ltd (Options for Homes).
B. Location:
The proposed application is located west of Ninth Line and South of Major Mackenzie Drive East in the City of Markham. A six-storey condominium apartment building is proposed. Please see attached map (Appendix A).
C. Proposed Housing Units:
Condominium Apartments 117
D. Total Pupil Yield:
Elementary 2 - 11 Secondary 2 - 5
The pupil yield range reflects regional and community high density yields.
E. School Accommodation:
Elementary
Current Attendance Area
At the elementary panel, the proposed application is located within the Greensborough Public School boundary. Greensborough Public School is Junior Kindergarten to Grade 8 school with a capacity of 592 and two portables on site bringing the effective capacity to 638 and an October 31, 2015 enrolment of 538.
Secondary
Current Attendance Area
At the secondary panel, the proposed application is located within the Unnamed Greensborough Secondary School boundary and holding at Bur Oak Secondary School.
3 City of Markham – Proposed Development Application ZA 16 124169 Page 2 of 3
Bur Oak Secondary School has a capacity of 1,320 and six portables on site bringing effective capacity to 1,459 and an October 30, 2015 enrolment of 1,699 FTE.
Future Attendance Area
The Unnamed Cornell Secondary School boundary is currently being held at Bur Oak Secondary School. The Unnamed Cornell Secondary School is proposed to open in September 2017 and will provide additional pupil places to serve the area.
Relationship to Board Priorities:
This report reinforces the Board’s commitment to the stewardship of Board resources, by aligning human and financial resources with Board priorities and demonstrating professionalism and accountability for high standards of practice in all Board operations. It also supports the Board’s commitment to enhancing confidence in public education.
Estimated Cost:
Not applicable at this time.
Timeline:
The City of Markham had requested the Board’s comments concerning the proposed development application by March 22, 2016. Staff has requested an extension of time in which to comment.
Recommendations:
That the York Region District School Board approve the following recommendations:
(*)1. That the York Region District School Board will not require a public elementary school site within the proposed development applications ZA 16 124169, City of Markham.
(*)2. That the Director of Planning for the City of Markham be advised of this action.
Communications Implementation Plan:
Property Management Committee April 19, 2016 Board Meeting May 3, 2016
Appended Data:
Appendix A – Location of Development Application ZA 16 124169, City of Markham
Respectfully submitted,
S. Yake Coordinating Superintendent, Human Resources, Plant and Planning Services
4 City of Markham – Proposed Development Application ZA 16 124169 Page 3 of 3
April 19, 2016
For further information, please contact S. Yake, Coordinating Superintendent, J. Ross, Senior Manager, Planning and Property Development or J. Parappally, Director of Education.
5 Appendix A Location of Development Application ZA 16 124169 City of Markham ¯
Ninth Line
ZA 16 124169
Sam Chapman PS ^
Highway 48 Major Mackenzie Drive East * SS Site
Donald Cousens PS Castlemore Avenue !
Mount Joy PS ! ! ! Little Rouge PS
Bur Oak Avenue Greensborough PS
! Wismer PS # Bur Oak SS
Unnamed Cornell SS (Proposed 2017 Opening) * 16th Avenue ! !Edward T. Crowle PS Cornell Village PS
Reesor Park PS # S Public Elementary School Public Elementary School Site Proposed Roads Ú T Ê Public Elementary French Immersion Public Secondary School Site Road Centreline $ Public Secondary School Location of Proposed Plan
Ninth Line Ramer Wood PS Franklin Street PS 6 ! ^ # 6.2
YORK REGION DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION 19T-16V001 CITY OF VAUGHAN
Background:
The purpose of this report is to request approval of the comments that are to be submitted to the City of Vaughan concerning the Board’s requirement for a school site within the proposed development application.
Rationale:
A. Application:
19T-16V001 by Dufferin Vistas Agent: Lucas & Associates (Attn: Glenn Lucas)
B. Location:
The proposed application is located west of Dufferin Street and north of Rutherford Road in the City of Vaughan. Please see attached map (Appendix A).
C. Proposed Housing Units:
Townhomes 105
D. Total Pupil Yield:
Elementary 27 Secondary 12
E. School Accommodation:
Elementary
Current Attendance Area
At the elementary panel, the proposed application is located within the Forest Run Public School boundary. Forest Run Public School is Junior Kindergarten to Grade 8 school with a capacity of 618 and an October 31, 2015 enrolment of 510.
Secondary
Current Attendance Area
At the secondary panel, the proposed application is located within the Stephen Lewis Secondary School boundary. Stephen Lewis Secondary School has a capacity of 1,353 and six portables on site bringing the effective capacity to 1,492 and an October 30, 2015 enrolment of 1,335 FTE.
7 City of Vaughan – Proposed Development Application 19T-16V001 Page 2 of 2
Relationship to Board Priorities:
This report reinforces the Board’s commitment to the stewardship of Board resources, by aligning human and financial resources with Board priorities and demonstrating professionalism and accountability for high standards of practice in all Board operations. It also supports the Board’s commitment to enhancing confidence in public education.
Estimated Cost:
Not applicable at this time.
Timeline:
The City of Vaughan had requested the Board’s comments concerning the proposed development application by April 27, 2016. Staff has requested an extension of time in which to comment.
Recommendations:
That the York Region District School Board approve the following recommendations:
(*)1. That the York Region District School Board will not require a public elementary school site within the proposed development applications 19T-16V001, City of Vaughan.
(*)2. That the Director of Planning for the City of Vaughan be advised of this action.
Communications Implementation Plan:
Property Management Committee April 19, 2016 Board Meeting May 3, 2016
Appended Data:
Appendix A – Location of Development Application 19T-16V001, City of Vaughan
Respectfully submitted,
S. Yake Coordinating Superintendent, Human Resources, Plant and Planning Services
April 19, 2016
For further information, please contact S. Yake, Coordinating Superintendent, J. Ross, Senior Manager, Planning and Property Development or J. Parappally, Director of Education.
8 Appendix A Location of Development Application 19T-16V001 City of Vaughan ¯
Vaughan-Carrville SS Site *
Major Mackenzie Drive ! Anne Frank PS
Dufferin Street
Romeo Dallaire PS ^ ! Nellie McClung PS
! Dr. Roberta Bondar PS
19T-16V001
Rutherford Road
Peter Rubert
Carrville Mills PS !
Rutherford Road
Stephen Lewis SS Forest Run PS
! # ! Thornhill Woods PS
# Public Elementary School Proposed Roads Location of Proposed Plan
Dufferin Street ÊÚ Public Elementary French Immersion Road Centreline $ Public Secondary School !
9 6.3
YORK REGION DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Z.15.041/DA.15.093 CITY OF VAUGHAN
Background:
The purpose of this report is to request approval of the comments that are to be submitted to the City of Vaughan concerning the Board’s requirement for a school site within the proposed development application.
Rationale:
A. Application:
Z.15.041/DA.15.093 by Housing York
B. Location:
The proposed application is located east of Kipling Avenue and north of Regional Road 7 in the City of Vaughan. A six-storey mixed-use affordable housing development with ground floor commercial space is proposed. Please see attached map (Appendix A).
C. Proposed Housing Units:
Rental Apartments 160
D. Total Pupil Yield:
Elementary 3 - 16 Secondary 3 - 8
The pupil yield range reflects regional and community rental apartment yields.
E. School Accommodation:
Elementary
Current Attendance Area
At the elementary panel, the proposed application is located within the Woodbridge Public School boundary. Woodbridge Public School is Junior Kindergarten to Grade 8 school with a capacity of 586 and an October 31, 2015 enrolment of 484.
Secondary
Current Attendance Area
At the secondary panel, the proposed application is located within the Woodbridge College boundary. Woodbridge College has a capacity of 756 and 11 portables on site bringing the effective capacity to 1,010 and an October 30, 2015 enrolment of 639 FTE.
10 City of Vaughan – Proposed Development Application Z.15.041/DA.15.093 Page 2 of 2
Relationship to Board Priorities:
This report reinforces the Board’s commitment to the stewardship of Board resources, by aligning human and financial resources with Board priorities and demonstrating professionalism and accountability for high standards of practice in all Board operations. It also supports the Board’s commitment to enhancing confidence in public education.
Estimated Cost:
Not applicable at this time.
Timeline:
The City of Vaughan had requested the Board’s comments concerning the proposed development application by April 7, 2016. Staff has requested an extension of time in which to comment.
Recommendations:
That the York Region District School Board approve the following recommendations:
(*)1. That the York Region District School Board will not require a public elementary school site within the proposed development applications Z.15.041/DA.15.093, City of Vaughan.
(*)2. That the Director of Planning for the City of Vaughan be advised of this action.
Communications Implementation Plan:
Property Management Committee April 19, 2016 Board Meeting May 3, 2016
Appended Data:
Appendix A – Location of Development Application Z.15.041/DA.15.093, City of Vaughan
Respectfully submitted,
S. Yake Coordinating Superintendent, Human Resources, Plant and Planning Services
April 19, 2016
For further information, please contact S. Yake, Coordinating Superintendent, J. Ross, Senior Manager, Planning and Property Development or J. Parappally, Director of Education.
11 Appendix !A Location of Development Application Z.15.041/DA.15.093 ¯ City of Vaughan
Pine Valley Dr
Z.15.041/ DA.15.093 Woodbridge Ave
Woodbridge PS Woodbridge College ! Highway 7 #
Kipling Ave
Islington Avenue
Martin Grove Rd
# Public Elementary School Proposed Roads ÊÚ Public Elementary French Immersion Road Centreline $ Public Secondary School Location of Proposed Plan 12 7.1
YORK REGION DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD 2016 – 2020 CAPITAL STRATEGY
Background:
Last year, Trustee’s approved the 2015 – 2019 Capital Strategy Report which was a comprehensive review of all schools in the Region including school by school enrolment projections, capacity and school utilization information, and portable use. It also provided information on small schools, French Immersion and residential development trends.
The 2016 - 2020 Capital Strategy builds on the comprehensive review undertaken in 2015.
This year’s Strategy reports on new pupil place requirements which will serve as the basis for the Board’s multi-year capital funding request to the Ministry of Education; elementary and secondary utilization; and proposed pupil accommodation reviews.
1. Capital Strategy Goals: The goals of the Board’s Capital Strategy are provided below. The implementation of each goal is subject to Ministry approvals and funding.
A. To provide community schools for all students wherever possible. • Designate school sites in new community areas. • Review residential development applications as part of the municipal planning process to determine school accommodation requirements.
B. To provide permanent accommodation to match sustainable community growth in a timely fashion. • Annually review 10 year enrolment projections for all schools. • Submit business cases to the Ministry of Education for new pupil places where student threshold has been reached and surrounding pupil places are utilized. • Construct new schools/additions with a capacity to align with long term sustainable enrolment.
C. To minimize the reliance on portable accommodation. • Use portables for temporary accommodation. • Locate portables at holding schools until a viable threshold is reached for a new school or at existing schools experiencing peak enrolment.
D. To replace older school facilities where conditions warrant. • Review facility condition and renewal needs for all schools. • Focus on schools with facility and site constraints as well as accommodation pressures from new development.
E. To utilize excess capacity within the system wherever practical. • Consider existing vacant pupil spaces when locating programs such as French Immersion and Gifted or other board uses (e.g. administrative requirements). • Encourage partnerships with municipalities and other agencies in locations with excess capacity according to Board Policy 422, Facility Partnerships.
13 2016 – 2020 Capital Strategy Page 2 of 4
F. To combine schools and/or undertake pupil accommodation reviews where circumstances warrant according to Board Policy 463, Student Accommodation Review. • Prepare a Capital Strategy to identify small and/or underutilized schools, and areas of decline.
2. Elementary and Secondary Utilization
At the elementary panel, student enrolment currently utilizes 91 per cent of the Board’s school capacity. Because areas of growth are not always in proximity to areas of available pupil places, there will be a continued need for new pupil places to serve these areas.
At the secondary panel, student enrolment currently utilizes 97 per cent of the Board’s school capacity with moderate fluctuations expected over the next 5 years. The Board’s secondary school utilization is based on current approved school construction projects to 2017, including the opening of a new high school in Markham in 2017.
3. Capital Strategy List (Appendix A)
The 2016 – 2020 Capital List proposes 4 new elementary schools, 1 replacement school and 1 secondary school. New schools and school replacements may include partnerships with other school boards, municipalities and early childhood education and community service providers. Replacement schools are a critical part of the Capital Strategy designed to improve the effectiveness of existing schools.
4. Proposed Pupil Accommodation Reviews (Appendix B)
In accordance with Policy #463.0, Student Accommodation Review, a separate report will be presented by staff, to the Board of Trustees, proposing that pupil accommodation reviews be considered for Newmarket Central (J.L.R. Bell Public School) and Markham Thornhill (Stornoway Crescent Public School).
At this early stage in the process, staff is proposing that planning areas be considered rather than specific schools since accommodation solutions for J.L.R. Bell Public School and Stornoway Crescent Public School will be found within the broader geographic planning area. Determining which schools in the planning area should be included in the review will be part of a separate report (the Initial Staff Report), which is described in Board Policy #463, Student Accommodation Review.
Consultation Process:
The draft 2016 – 2020 Capital Strategy was reviewed by senior staff.
Relationship to Board Priorities:
Mission, Vision, Values: Responsibility
We are individually and collectively responsible for creating the best possible school community to support the achievement and well-being of all individuals. We are responsible for the delivery of effective and sustainable educational programs and stewardship of Board resources.
14 2016 – 2020 Capital Strategy Page 3 of 4
Trustee Multi Year Plan: Stewardship of Board Resources
Align human and financial resources with Board priorities by: • Demonstrating professionalism and accountability for high standards of practice in all Board operations. • Enhancing confidence in public education. • Ensuring new initiatives are focused and attainable. • Modeling continuous environmental sustainability.
Estimated Cost:
Not applicable
Timeline:
Not applicable.
Recommendations:
That the Property Management Committee receive the 2016-2020 Capital Strategy Report for information.
Note: The following recommendations will be presented to the Board of Trustees for consideration at the May 3, 2016 Board Meeting.
That the York Region District School Board approve the following recommendations:
(*)1. That the 2016 – 2020 Capital Strategy Report be received for information.
(*)2. That the 2016 – 2020 Capital Strategy List be approved for submission to the Ministry with supporting Business Cases when requested.
Communications Implementation Plan:
Property Management Committee April 19, 2016 Board Meeting May 3, 2016 Post on YRDSB website Following Board meeting
Appended Data:
Appendix A – Capital Strategy List Appendix B – Proposed Pupil Accommodation Reviews
Respectfully submitted,
S. Yake Coordinating Superintendent, Human Resources, Plant and Planning Services
15 2016 – 2020 Capital Strategy Page 4 of 4
April 19, 2016
For further information, please contact S. Yake, Coordinating Superintendent, J. Ross, Senior Manager, Planning and Property Development or J. Parappally, Director of Education.
16 APPENDIX A 2016 - 2020 CAPITAL STRATEGY LIST
For Submission to the Ministry of Education * Proposed Proposed Project Name Municipality Opening Capacity
2018 Cathedral #2 ES (Dual FI) Markham 615 2018 Block 12 ES Vaughan 615 2019 Cornell #4 ES Markham 615 2019 Sharon PS (Replacement) / New School East Gwillimbury 615 2019 Aurora 2C ES Aurora 615 2020 Block 11 SS Vaughan TBD *Timelines are contingent on receiving required approvals and permits from all authorities having jurisdiction prior to construction start dates.
Emerging Projects Year Project Name Municipality Proposed TBD Block 40 ES (South site) Vaughan 615 TBD Cornell ES Markham 615 TBD Holland Landing ES East Gwillimbury 615 TBD Kleinburg / Nashville ES Vaughan 615 TBD Markham Centre ES Markham 615 TBD Newmarket SE ES / School Addition Newmarket TBD TBD New School / Adrienne Clarkson PS (Addition) Markham / Richmond Hill TBD TBD North Leslie ES Richmond Hill 615 TBD Oak Ridges ES Richmond Hill 615 TBD Queensville ES East Gwillimbury 615 TBD Stouffville DSS (Addition) Whitchurch-Stouffville TBD TBD Stouffville NW ES Whitchurch-Stouffville 615 Emerging projects listed in alphabetical order.
17 APPENDIX B
PROPOSED PUPIL ACCOMMODATION REVIEWS
In accordance with Policy #463.0, Student Accommodation Review, staff may propose a pupil accommodation review of a school or group of schools to trustees for a number of reasons including:
• Utilization • Student Programming/Course Availability • Facility Condition • Enrolment size • Accessibility/AODA compliance • Site Limitations • Specialized Space (E.g. Labs, Gyms, IT)
In the most recent Guide to Pupil Accommodation Reviews, the Ministry of Education identified the most important goal of a pupil accommodation review as providing students with improved educational options and opportunities through enhanced program delivery. Whether that is achieved with a larger combined enrolment and/or newer facility, by bringing students together through a school consolidation, school boards are often able to offer a better educational experience.
The 2015 – 2019 Capital Strategy included a Small Schools section which identified those schools with an enrolment of 200 students or less. In the 2015 – 2016 school year, staff continued to review its small schools, and further focused on very small schools (defined by the Ministry in the School Board Efficiencies and Modernization Consultations as having enrolment less than 100) for the following reasons:
Program
Low enrolment impacts the following:
• Student programming and supports such as special education, ESL (English as a second language) and library. • The ability to offer a variety of extracurricular (co-curricular) opportunities, including those activities offered by lunch time and after school service providers. • Instructional challenges presented by cohorts with smaller numbers (sometimes fewer than 10). • School organizations that require combining 3 grades in one classroom. • Lower numbers of staff at the school for teacher collaboration, student supervision, and undertaking school and Board-wide initiatives.
Funding
• Changes to Ministry funding allocation for principals, vice-principals, office support staff and administrative supplies has shifted funding away from very small schools. • Ministry funding for staffing results in boards directing additional funds for small schools from the total staffing allocation to provide classroom and student support programming. • The Ministry has begun to eliminate Base Top-up Funding through the School Facility Operations and Renewal Grant. • Beginning in 2015–16, school boards are required to direct 80 per cent of School Condition Improvement (SCI) funding to key building components (for example, foundations, roofs, 18
windows) and systems (for example, HVAC and plumbing). School boards are allowed to use the remaining 20 per cent of SCI funding to address any locally identified needs. This means that SCI eligible projects will tend to be larger in scope over fewer schools. These changes reduce a school board’s ability to do smaller projects at more schools. • If renewal costs exceed 50 per cent of value of the school building, then ministry approval is required to proceed with the project. Small schools with low asset (building) value will require ministry approval to proceed.
Proposed Pupil Accommodation Reviews
As of October 2015, the Board operated three very small schools with an enrolment less than 100 students: Queensville Public School, J.L.R. Bell Public School, and Stornoway Crescent Public School.
As outlined in the 2015-2019 Capital Strategy, Queensville Public School will eventually be replaced once new growth occurs in the community. In the event that development is delayed, or the number of units significantly reduced, then staff would reassess the need for a pupil accommodation review process for the East Gwillimbury planning area.
Both J.L.R. Bell Public School and Stornoway Crescent Public School are projected to remain at their current enrolment levels. Staff is proposing that pupil accommodation reviews be considered for Newmarket Central (J.L.R. Bell Public School) and Markham Thornhill (Stornoway Crescent Public School).
Accommodation solutions for J.L.R. Bell Public School and Stornoway Crescent Public School will be found within the broader geographic planning area. Determining which schools in the planning area should be included in the review will be part of a separate report (Initial Staff Report) to the Board of Trustees as described in Board Policy #463, Student Accommodation Review.
19 7.2
YORK REGION DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD SCHEDULES FOR 2016-2017 NEW ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY SCHOOLS AND ADDITIONS TO SCHOOLS
Background:
This is a regularly scheduled report that is taken to the Property Management Committee on the status of all new elementary and secondary schools projects.
Rationale:
The schedules for New Schools and Additions are presented in this report.
Appendix A provides a list of projects that are approved and have been funded by the Ministry of Education.
Appendix B includes projects where applications for funding either have or will be submitted to the Ministry and approval for funding has not yet been granted.
Estimated Cost:
The total estimated project cost for each project will be presented to the Property Management Committee after tendering.
Funding for these projects will be generated through the Ministry Capital Approvals process.
Timeline:
Timelines are contingent on receiving required approvals and permits from all authorities having jurisdiction prior to construction start dates.
Communications Implementation Plan:
Property Management Committee April 19, 2016
Appended Data:
Appendix A – Schedules to September 2019 – Funded Projects Appendix B – Schedules for Non-Funded Projects
Respectfully submitted,
S. Yake Coordinating Superintendent, Human Resources, Plant and Planning Services
April 19, 2016
For further information, please contact S. Yake, Coordinating Superintendent, J. Stoangi, Senior Manager, Plant Services or J. Parappally, Director of Education.
20 Appendix A - Schedules to September 2017, Funded Projects
The following table includes projects that have received funding from the Ministry of Education. Scheduled dates are subject to change.
REPORT TO SITE PLAN PROJECT ARCHITECTURAL BUILDING PERMIT PROPERTY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT MUNICIPALITY APPLICATION TENDER CLOSE PROPOSED OPENING TYPE FIRM AND SUBMISSION MANAGEMENT BEGINS SUBMISSION CONTRACTOR COMMITTEE
Johnny Lombardi Makrimichalos Vaughan New School November 13, 2013 August 2014 January 29 2015 February 17 2015 March 30, 2015 September 2016 Public School Cugini Architects
Unnamed Cornell Snyder and Markham New School August 6, 2014 July 30 2015 October 8, 2015 October 20, 2015 November 2015 September 2017 Secondary School Associates Inc.
Stouffville South Whitchurch- East Elementary New School ZAS June 19 2014 August 28 2014 February 4, 2016 February 16, 2016 April 5, 2016 September 2017 Stouffville School
E.J. Sand Public Makrimichalos Markham Replacement December 2016 December 2017 April 2018 May 2018 July 2018 TBD School Cugini Architects
Charles Howitt 9 Classroom Makrimichalos Richmond Hill April 6, 2016 August 2016 January 2017 February 2017 April 2017 September 2017 Public School Addtion Cugini Architects
Appendix B - Schedules for Non-Funded Projects
The following table includes projects where applications for funding either have or will be submitted to the Ministry of Education and approval for funding has not yet been granted. Scheduled dates are subject to change.
REPORT TO SITE PLAN PROJECT ARCHITECTURAL BUILDING PERMIT PROPERTY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT MUNICIPALITY APPLICATION TENDER CLOSE PROPOSED OPENING TYPE FIRM AND SUBMISSION MANAGEMENT BEGINS SUBMISSION CONTRACTOR COMMITTEE
Cathedral #2 Snyder and Markham New School August 6 2014 July 24 2015 TBD TBD TBD TBD Elementary School Associates Inc.
Block 12 Vaughan New School MC Architects 16-Dec-15 TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD Elementary School
Cornell #4 Hossack & Markham New School 22-Oct-15 TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD Elementary School Associates
* Note shaded areas indicate work completed April 19, 2016 21