International Test Conference

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

International Test Conference Magdy Abadir Ralf Arnold Freescale Semiconductor Infineon Technologies International Salem Abdennadher Patrick Au Test Conference Intel IBM Jais Abraham Florence Azais AMD L1RMM 2009 Technical Erkan Acar Charles Bachand Paper Reviewers Intel Advanced Micro Devices YiCai Dhruva Acharyya Kedarnath Balakrishnan LSI Verigy AMD Adrian Carbine Brice Achkir Mehdi Baradaran Tahoori Intel Cisco Systems Northeastern University Darrell Carder John Acken Thomas Bartenstein Freescale Semiconductor CityWeb Cadence Design Systems. Luigi Carro SamanAdham Pouria Bastani UFRGS LogicVision Canada Intel John Carulli Vishwani Agrawal Luis Basto Texas Instruments Auburn University Cadence Design Systems Olivier Caty NisarAhmed Nadir Basturkmen Sun Microsystems Texas Instruments Intel Krishnendu Chakrabarty Heiko Ahrens Bernd Becker Duke University Freescale Semiconductor University of Freiburg Tapan Chakraborty Robert Aitken Dawit Belete Alcatel-Lucent ARM Freescale Semiconductor Krishna Chakravadhanula Zaid AI-Ars Serge Bernard Cadence Design Systems Delft University ofTechnology L1RMM Sreejit Chakravarty Hussain AI-Asaad Paul Berndt LSI University of California at Davis Cypress Semiconductor Victor Champac Gregory Aldrich Jayanta Bhadra National Inst. for Astrophysics Mentor Graphics Freescale Semiconductor Kameshwar Chandrasekar Micheal Ales Sandeep Bhatia Intel Texas Instruments Atrenta Yi-Shing Chang Bashir AI-Hashimi Bhargab Bhattacharya Intel Indian Statistical Institute Mohammad AIi-Bakhshian Mango Chao McGill University Dilip Bhavsar National Chiao-Tung University Intel Chris Allsup Abhijit Chatterjee Synopsys Sounil Biswas Georgia Institute of Technology NVIDIA Sobeeh Almukhaizim Gang Chen Kuwait University Shawn Blanton Mentor Graphics Carnegie Mellon University Anthony Ambler Chen-Huan Chiang University of Texas at Austin Cristiana Bolchini Alcatel-Lucent Technologies Politecnico di Milano Ali Ameri Vivek Chickermane McGill University Alberto Bosio Cadence Design Systems L1RMM Enamul Amyeen Kelma Christophe Intel Sebastian Bota NXP Semiconductors Universitat de les Illes Balears Dong An Kun Chuai CMC Microsystems Ben Brown McGill Univers ity LTX-Credence Sadok Aouini Jaeyong Chung McGill University Victoria Bruce University of Texas at Austin Advanced Micro Devices Davide Appello Christopher Clark STMicroelectronics Steve Butkovich Intellitech Cisco Systems Dave Armstrong Thomas Clouqueur Advantest Kenneth Butler AMD Texas Instruments 17 INTERNATIONAL Don Edenfeld Saket Goyal ~ TEST CONFERENCE Intel LSI 2009 Stefan Eichenberger Shalabh Goyal NXP Semiconductors National Semiconductor William Eisenstadt James Grealish 2009 Technical University of Florida Intel Paper Reviewers William Eklow XinliGu Cisco Systems Cisco Systems Edward Cole, Jr. Sandia National Laboratories Piet Engelke lois Guiller Albert-Ludwigs -Universitat Freiburg Synopsys Dennis Conti IBM Frank-Uwe Faber Ruifeng Guo Infineon Technologies AG Mentor Graphics Bruce Cory NVIDIA Daniel Fan Puneet Gupta NVIDIA Erika Cota Lei Fang UFRGS Microsoft Sandeep Gupta University of Southern California Alfred Crouch Michele Favalli ASSET InterTech University of Ferrara Alan Hales Texas Instrruments Dariusz Czysz Derek Feltham Poznan University ofTechnology Intel Said Hamdioui Delft University of Technology Ramyanshu Datta D. Michael Fennelly Texas Instruments Roos Instruments Gert Hansel Qimonda Scott Davidson John Ferrario Sun Microsystems IBM Ian Harris University of California Irvine Frans De Jong Scott Fetherston NXP Semiconductors PLX Technology Peter Harrod ARM Dirk De Vries Marie-Lise Flottes PDF Solutions L1RMM Ismed Hartanto Xilinx Frank Demmerle Hideo Fujiwara Infineon Technologies Nara Institute of Science and Technol­ Gurgen Harutyunyan ogy Virage Logic rao desineni IBM George Gal Kazumi Hatayama McGill Semiconductor Technology Academic Stefano Di Carlo Research Center Politecnico di Torino Murali Gala Sun Microsystems Charles Hawkins Giorgio Di Natale University of New Mexico L1RMM Anne Gattiker IBM John Hayes Paul Dickinson Sun Microsystems Colm Gavin Sybille Hellebrand Credence University of Paderborn Luigi Dilillo L1RMM Philip Geiger Christopher Henderson Dell Inc Semitracks, Inc. Jason Doege AMD Grady Giles graham hetherington Advanced Micro Devices texas instruments Art Downey Advantest Pamela Gillis Mokhtar Hirech IBM Synopsys Vijay Durairaj Synopsys Patrick Girard Michael Hsiao L1RMM/CNRS Virginia Tech Bradley Dutton Auburn University Emil Gizdarski Jiun-Lang Huang Synopsys National Taiwan University Kumar Dwarakanath DAFCA Dimitris Gizopoulos Yu Huang University of Piraeus Mentor Graphics Jennifer Dworak Brown University Sandeep Goel Leendert Huisman Theodore Eaton Robert Gottlieb Bill Huott Cisco Ststems Intel IBM 18 Tomoo Inoue David Lavo Hiroshima City University UC Santa Cruz International Kazuhiko Iwasaki Donghwi Lee Test Conference Tokyo Metropolitan University NVIDIA Vikram Iyengar Chris Lemoine IBM LTX-Credence 2009 Technical Gerald Johnson Regis Leveugle Paper Reviewers Teradyne INPG TM Mak Doug Josephson Adam Ley Intel Intel ASSET InterTech Yiorgos Makris Hong-Shin Jun James Li Yale University Cisco Systems National Taiwan University Hans Manhaeve Dimitri Kagaris Jin-Fu Li Q-Star Test nv Southern Illinois University National Central University prasad mantri Seiji Kajihara Mike Li Sun Microsystems Kyushu Institute of Technology Altera Martin Margala Sumant Kale Xiaowei Li University of Massachusetts Lowell Texas Instruments Chinese Academy of Sciences Erik Jan Marinissen Sungho Kang Yanjing Li IMEC Yonsei University Stanford University Gregory Maston Rohit Kapur Eric Liau Synopsys Synopsys Qimonda Mitsuo Matsuomoto Ramesh Karri Ken Lick Advantest Polytechnic Institute of NYU Xijiang Lin Peter Maxwell Mark Kassab Mentor Graphics Aptina Imaging Mentor Graphics Yen-Tzu Lin Teresa McLaurin Xrysovalantis Kavousianos Carnegie Mellon University ARM University of loannina Chunsheng Liu Vishal Mehta David Keezer NVIDIA NVIDIA Georgia Institute ofTechnology Jin Liu Sankaran Menon Brion Keller Texas Instruments Intel Cadence Design Systems Xiao Liu Henri Merkelo Hans Kerkhoff Texas Instruments atSpeed Technologies CTIT - University of Twente J.C. Lo Cecilia Metra Kee Sup Kim University of Rhode Island University of Bologna Intel Ethan Long Salvador Mir Seongwon Kim Texas Instruments TIMA Laboratory IBM T.J. Watson Research Center Marc Loranger Subhasish Mitra David King FormFactor Stanford University Texas Instruments Lawrence Luce Yukiya Miura Nektarios Kranitis Teradyne Tokyo Metropolitan University University of Athens Yuhai Ma Kohei Miyase Andrzej Krasniewski Advantest America Kyushu Institute ofTechnology Warsaw University of Technology Marco Macedo Kartik Mohanram Sandip Kundu McGill University Rice University University of Massachusetts Jose' Machado da Silva Claudio Montiel Claus Kuntzsch Universidade do Porto Texas Instruments Carl Moore Akinori Maeda Maxim Integrated Products Mary Kusko Verigy Japan IBM Grzegorz Mrugalski Ashraf Majid Mentor Graphics Eric Larson Georgia Institute of Technology Self Employed Peter Muhmenthaler Amitava Majumdar Muhmenthaler Erik Larsson AMD Linkoping University 19 INTERNATIONAL George Ontko Michele Portolan ~ TEST CONFERENCE Texas Instruments Alcatel-Lucent 2009 Nobuaki Otsuka Paolo Prinetto Toshiba Politecnico di Torino Sule Ozev Mike Purtell 2009 Technical Arizona State University Intersil Paper Reviewers Andrea Paganini Carol Pyron IBM Freescale Semiconductor Nilanjan Mukherjee Mentor Graphics Rubin Parekhji Jie Qin Texas Instruments (India) Auburn University Tom Munns Munns Consulting Joonsung Park Wangqi Qiu The University of Texas at Austin Pextra Corporation Fidel Muradali National Semiconductor Sung-Boem Park Jaan Raik Stanford University Tallinn University ofTechnology Amit Nahar Texas Instruments Kenneth Parker Rajesh Raina Agilent Technologies Freescale Semiconductor Michinobu Nakao Renesas Technology Bruce Parnas Raghuraman Rajanarayanan AMD Tom Napier Ishwar Parulkar FormFactor Sun Microsystems Janusz Rajski Mentor Graphics Suriyaprakash Natarajan Antonis Paschalis Intel NCSR Rochit Rajsuman Roctechnology Udaya Natarajan Chintan Patel Intel University of Maryland Baltimore C Ravikumar County Texas Instruments Debashis Nayak Intel Jayashri Patil Jeff Rearick International Institute of Information AMD Jim Neeb Technology Intel Maurizio Rebaudengo Srinivas Patil Politecnico di Torino Nicola Nicolici Intel McMaster University Sudhakar Reddy Bipul Paul University of Iowa Phil Nigh Toshiba America Research IBM Rosa Reinosa Sandeep Pendharkar Hewlett-Packard D Nikolos Advanced Micro Devices Michel Renovell Dayton Norrgard Rajesh Pendurkar L1RMM Agilent Technologies RMI Corporation Paul Reuter Franc Novak Zebo Peng Mentor Graphics Jozef Stefan Institute Linkoping University Mike Ricchetti Jim O'Reilly Charles Pilch AMD IC Test Northwest Texas Instruments Alan Righter Steven Oakland James Plusquellic Analog Devices IBM Microelectronics University of New Mexico Jochen Rivoir Cengiz Oezcan Frank Poehl Verigy Philips Semiconductors Infineon Technologies Gordon Roberts Ajay Ojha OseiPoku McGill University Intel Carnegie Mellon University Gordon Robinson David Oka Ilia Polian Independent Consultant LOA Technology Inc Albert-Ludwigs-University of Freiburg Rosa Rodriguez Toshiyuki Okayasu Irith Pomeranz Universitat Politecnica de Catalunya Advantest Purdue University Jeffrey Roehr Martin Omana Wojtek Poppe MediaTek Wireless University of Bologna NVIDIA Luis Rolindez Toshinobu Ono Jean-Michel Portal STMicroelectronics NEC
Recommended publications
  • Cadence SPB / Orcad 17.4 System Requirements
    A Parallel Systems Technical Note Cadence SPB / OrCAD 17.4 System Requirements Supported Operating Systems Windows 10 (64-bit) Professional, including Dark Theme mode Windows Server 2012 (All Service Packs) Windows Server 2012 R2 Windows Server 2016 Note: Cadence Allegro and OrCAD products do not support Windows 10 Starter and Home Basic. In addition, Windows Server support does not include support for Windows Remote Desktop. Windows RT and Tablets/Phones, including Windows 10 Phone, are not supported. Note: 64-bit Windows require 64-bit Flex software dongle drivers if using dongle-based licensing. Recommended Hardware Intel® Core™ i7 4.30 GHz or AMD Ryzen™ 7 4.30 GHz with at least 4 cores Note: Faster processors are preferred. 16 GB RAM 50 GB free disk space (SSD drive is recommended) 1920 x 1200 display resolution with true color (at least 32bit colour) A dedicated graphics card supporting OpenGL, minimum 2GB (with additional support for DX11 for 3D Canvas) Dual monitors (For physical design) Broadband Internet connection for some service Ethernet port/card (for network communications and security hostID) Three-button Microsoft-compatible mouse Supported MATLAB Version R2019A-64Bit (For the PSpice-MATLAB interface) Microsoft SharePoint for Allegro Pulse Cadence® Allegro® Pulse supports an interface to Microsoft SharePoint. Following are the requirements for SharePoint: • Windows Server 2012 (64-bit) • SharePoint Foundation 2013 • Microsoft SQL Server 2012 (64-bit) • Following 64-bit browsers: • Microsoft® Internet Explorer® 11.0 on windows • Mozilla Firefox 52.0 ESR on Windows • Mozilla Firefox 52.0 on Linux • Google Chrome 58.0 on Windows Using Spaces in File and Directory Names Support for spaces in file and directory names applies only to Windows.
    [Show full text]
  • GS40 0.11-Μm CMOS Standard Cell/Gate Array
    GS40 0.11-µm CMOS Standard Cell/Gate Array Version 1.0 January 29, 2001 Copyright Texas Instruments Incorporated, 2001 The information and/or drawings set forth in this document and all rights in and to inventions disclosed herein and patents which might be granted thereon disclosing or employing the materials, methods, techniques, or apparatus described herein are the exclusive property of Texas Instruments. No disclosure of information or drawings shall be made to any other person or organization without the prior consent of Texas Instruments. IMPORTANT NOTICE Texas Instruments and its subsidiaries (TI) reserve the right to make changes to their products or to discontinue any product or service without notice, and advise customers to obtain the latest version of relevant information to verify, before placing orders, that information being relied on is current and complete. All products are sold subject to the terms and conditions of sale supplied at the time of order acknowledgement, including those pertaining to warranty, patent infringement, and limitation of liability. TI warrants performance of its semiconductor products to the specifications applicable at the time of sale in accordance with TI’s standard warranty. Testing and other quality control techniques are utilized to the extent TI deems necessary to support this war- ranty. Specific testing of all parameters of each device is not necessarily performed, except those mandated by government requirements. Certain applications using semiconductor products may involve potential risks of death, personal injury, or severe property or environmental damage (“Critical Applications”). TI SEMICONDUCTOR PRODUCTS ARE NOT DESIGNED, AUTHORIZED, OR WAR- RANTED TO BE SUITABLE FOR USE IN LIFE-SUPPORT DEVICES OR SYSTEMS OR OTHER CRITICAL APPLICATIONS.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to MBA Recruitment in The
    Guide to MBA Recruitment in the Top 100 IT Companies EXAMPLE ENTRIES September 2018 Workmaze Limited 3 William House Rayne Road Braintree Essex CM7 2AA UK. Registered in England: Company Registration No. 4100091 VAT No. 766 486 087. ©2018 Workmaze Ltd A-Z Index of Companies Click on the company name to COMMUNICATIONS COMPUTERS & DISTRIBUTORS SERVICES TELECOMMUNICATIONS be taken to the individual EQUIPMENT PERIPHERALS company entry. Please note: all CDW Accenture AT & T Inc. information was correct at time Cisco Systems Inc. Acer Group Tech Data Corp. Amazon.com Inc. Aronson Security Group of publication. Ericsson Apple Inc Applied Materials Inc. BT Group plc Harris Corp Arrow Electronics INTERNET Automatic Data Processing China Mobile Ltd KDDI Corp. Agilent Technologies Cognizant Technology Deutsche Telekom L3 Technologies Inc. Au Optronics TD Ameritrade Holdings CA Technologies Telefónica O2 Europe plc Motorola BenQ eBay Inc. FIS Mobile Telesystems Nokia Canon Inc Google IBM NII Holdings Qualcomm Inc. Capgemini Oath Infosys Technologies NTT DOCOMO Sagemcom Casio Orange SAIC Sanmina-SCL UTStarcomm Inc. Compal Electronics SoftBank Unisys Sprint Dell Technologies Wipro Technologies Tele2 AB Fujitsu SEMI-CONDUCTORS Telefonica HP Inc SOFTWARE Telia Company Hitachi Consulting Advanced Micro Devices Verizon Communications Hon Hai Precision ASE Technology Activision Blizzard Vodafone Innolux Corporation Advantest Corp. Adobe Systems WIND Hellas Telecomm Jabil Circuit Amphenol Amdocs Ltd Xerox Corp. Lenovo Analog Devices Autodesk Inc. Longsys (Shenzen) Flex DXC Technology Lexmark International Intel Electronic Arts LG Electronics MediaTek Intuit NEC NovaTek McAfee Quanta Computer Texas Instruments Microsoft Corporation Samsung Electronics United Microelectronics Oracle Corp. Sharp Symantec Corporation Seagate Toshiba TPV Technology Western Digital Workmaze Limited 3 William House Rayne Road Braintree Essex CM7 2AA UK.
    [Show full text]
  • IEEE 802.3Da SPMD TF Meeting May 19, 2021 Prepared by Peter Jones
    IEEE 802.3da SPMD TF meeting May 19, 2021 Prepared by Peter Jones Presentations posted at: https://www.ieee802.org/3/da/index.html Agenda/Admin - Chad Jones All times in Pacific Time (PT) 7:01am: The Chair reviewed the agenda in https://www.ieee802.org/3/da/public/051921/8023da_agenda_051921.pdf. The Chair asked if there were any corrections or additions to the agenda. There being no corrections or additions, the agenda stands approved. The Chair asked if anyone hasn’t had a chance to review the minutes for April 21, 2021. None responded. The Chair asked if there were any change to be made to the April 21, 2021 minutes. None responded. The April 21, 2021 minutes were approved by unanimous consent. 7:09am: Call for patents was made, no one responded. 7:14am: opening agenda slides complete. The meeting moves on to presentations. Presentations/Discussion. 7:14am: LTspice Model Validation Chris DiMinico, MC Communications/PHY-SI LLC/SenTekse/Panduit Bob Voss, Panduit Paul Wachtel, Panduit 7:21am: presentation done, start of Q&A. 7:30am: Q&A done. 7:30am: Startup sequence Michael Paul, ADI 8.05am: presentation & Q&A done. 8:05am: Editors comments George Zimmerman, CME Consulting/various 8:28am: Closing remarks Next meeting: May 26, 2021 , 7:00am PT. Meeting closed – 8:31am PT Attendees (from Webex + emails) Name Employer Affiliation Attended 05/19 Alessandro Ingrassia Canova Tech Canova Tech y Anthony New Prysmian Group Prysmian Group y Bernd Horrmeyer Phoenix Contact Phoenix Contact y Bob Voss Panduit Corp. Panduit Corp. y Brian Murray Analog Devices Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Designcon 2016 Needs and Capabilities for Modeling Of
    DesignCon 2016 Needs and Capabilities for Modeling of Capacitor Derating Panel discussion Brad Brim, Cadence Design Systems Istvan Novak, Oracle Tim Michalka, Qualcomm Technologies Wilmer Companioni, KEMET Electronics Shoji Tsubota, Murata Manufacturing Sam Chitwood, Cadence Design Systems Abstract Capacitors vary with temperature, bias voltage and age; a phenomenon typically referred to as derating. Libraries of SPICE or S-parameter models are provided by component manufacturers for non-derated components - new capacitors at a specific temperature and bias. Detailed derating data and related methodologies are often considered manufacturer-proprietary. Some manufacturers provide software to generate and display derated models while others specify general derating behavior in data sheets. OEMs have expressed a desire for more detailed and automated power integrity analyses to consider derating effects. Representatives from component manufacturers, OEMs and EDA will discuss these analysis needs and the electrical models required to support such. Audience participation is strongly encouraged to help judge the breadth of industry need in this area and help influence future contributions. TITLE Needs and Capabilities for Modeling of Capacitor Derating Moderator: Image Brad Brim (Cadence) Participants: Istvan Novak (Oracle) Tim Michalka (Qualcomm) Wilmer Companioni (KEMET) Shoji Tsubota (Murata) Sam Chitwood (Cadence) Needs and Capabilities for Modeling of Capacitor Derating Brad Brim (Cadence) 1 Moderator Brad Brim Product Engineering Architect, Cadence Design Systems [email protected] Brad has been in the EDA industry for more than 25 years. His graduate studies and initial commercial contributions were in the area of electromagnetic simulation and passive component modeling for circuit simulation. Some of the products he has worked on include: Momentum, ADS, HFSS, PowerSI and OptimizePI.
    [Show full text]
  • A Content Analysis of Consumer Technology Corporate Blogs As Interactive Public Relations Tools
    A Content Analysis of Consumer Technology Corporate Blogs as Interactive Public Relations Tools A Senior Project presented to the Faculty of the Journalism Department California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Bachelor of Science by Jayne Scuncio June, 2010 © Jayne Scuncio 1. Research Question 3 2. Introduction 4 3. Research Summary 7 3.1 Two-Way Symmetrical Model of Public Relations 7 3.2 Dialogic Communication Theory and Blogs 7 3.3 Definition of a Blog 9 3.4 Blogs as Public Relations Tools 11 4. Research Methodology 14 4.1 Navigation Tools 17 4.2 Multimedia Tools 17 4.3 Communication Tools 18 5. Discussion 20 5.1 Navigation Tools 21 5.2 Multimedia Tools 24 5.3 Communication Tools 27 6. Conclusion 32 7. Works Cited 34 8. Appendix 36 8.1 Photographs of Blogs Analyzed 36 8.1.1 Amazon.com 36 8.1.2 Cisco Systems 36 8.1.3 Dell 37 8.1.4 eBay 37 8.1.5 Google 38 8.1.6 Hewlett Packard 38 8.1.7 Intel 39 8.1.8 Microsoft 39 8.1.9 Oracle 40 8.1.10 Xerox 40 Scuncio 2 1. Research Question Do technology related companies implement all possible features in their corporate blogs, eliciting interactivity in the attempts to positively affect their relationships with publics? Scuncio 3 2. Introduction Since the advent of the mainstream Internet in the 1990’s, communication and interactivity have flourished. Euromonitor International (2009) found there were 227,219,000 Internet users in the United States in 2009—connecting with others around the world.
    [Show full text]
  • GS30 Product Overview
    GS30 0.15-µm CMOS Standard Cell/Gate Array Version 1.0 February, 2001 Copyright Texas Instruments Incorporated, 2001 The information and/or drawings set forth in this document and all rights in and to inventions disclosed herein and patents which might be granted thereon disclosing or employing the materials, methods, techniques, or apparatus described herein are the exclusive property of Texas Instruments. No disclosure of information or drawings shall be made to any other person or organization without the prior consent of Texas Instruments. IMPORTANT NOTICE Texas Instruments and its subsidiaries (TI) reserve the right to make changes to their products or to discontinue any product or service without notice, and advise customers to obtain the latest version of relevant information to verify, before placing orders, that information being relied on is current and complete. All products are sold subject to the terms and conditions of sale supplied at the time of order acknowledgement, including those pertaining to warranty, patent infringement, and limitation of liability. TI warrants performance of its semiconductor products to the specifications applicable at the time of sale in accordance with TI’s standard warranty. Testing and other quality control techniques are utilized to the extent TI deems necessary to support this war- ranty. Specific testing of all parameters of each device is not necessarily performed, except those mandated by government requirements. Certain applications using semiconductor products may involve potential risks of death, personal injury, or severe property or environmental damage (“Critical Applications”). TI SEMICONDUCTOR PRODUCTS ARE NOT DESIGNED, AUTHORIZED, OR WAR- RANTED TO BE SUITABLE FOR USE IN LIFE-SUPPORT DEVICES OR SYSTEMS OR OTHER CRITICAL APPLICATIONS.
    [Show full text]
  • Cadence Design Systems, Inc
    Confidential Cadence Design Systems, Inc. February/March 2019 Safe Harbor Statement and Regulation G Safe Harbor Statement The following discussion contains forward looking statements, and our actual results may differ materially from those expectations discussed here. Additional information concerning factors that could cause such a difference can be found in our Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 29, 2018, our Form 10-K for the year ended December 29, 2018, the company’s future filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission and the cautionary statements regarding forward-looking statements in our February 19, 2019 earnings press release for the quarter ended December 29, 2018. Regulation G In addition to financial results prepared in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, or GAAP, this presentation will also contain certain non-GAAP financial measures. Cadence management believes that in addition to using GAAP results in evaluating our business, it can also be useful to measure results using certain non-GAAP financial measures. Investors and potential investors are encouraged to review the reconciliation of non-GAAP financial measures with their most direct comparable GAAP financial results, including those set forth in our February 19, 2019 press release and our CFO Commentary for the quarter ended December 29, 2018, both of which can be found in the quarterly earnings section of the investor relations portion of our website at cadence.com. 2 © 2019 Cadence Design Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. Cadence-at-a-glance • Leading provider of system design enablement (SDE) solutions – software, hardware, and IP • Mission critical technology for designing today’s electronic systems • Culture of innovation - more than 20 significant new products in last 3 years • Subscription software model with very high customer renewal rates and loyalty • Revenue: ~$2.14B • Headquarters in Silicon Valley ~7500 employees worldwide NASDAQ: CDNS; S&P 500 & Nasdaq 100 indexes 3 © 2019 Cadence Design Systems, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Cadence Design Systems, Inc. 2020 Proxy Statement
    NOTICE OF 2020 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS The 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of CADENCE DESIGN SYSTEMS, INC., a Delaware corporation, will be held as follows: When: Where: April 30, 2020 Cadence San Jose Campus 1:00 p.m. Pacific Time 2655 Seely Avenue, Building 10 San Jose, California 95134 Items of Business: The purpose of the 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders is to consider and take action on the following: 1. To elect the nine directors named in the proxy statement to serve until the 2021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and until their successors are elected and qualified, or until the directors’ earlier death, resignation or removal. 2. To approve the amendment of the Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan. 3. To vote on an advisory resolution to approve named executive officer compensation. 4. To ratify the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm of Cadence for its fiscal year ending January 2, 2021. 5. To vote on a stockholder proposal regarding special stockholder meetings, if properly presented at the meeting. 6. To transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof. These items of business are more fully described in the proxy statement accompanying this notice. Record Date: Holders of Cadence Design Systems, Inc. common stock at the close of business on March 2, 2020 are entitled to notice of and to vote at the 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and any adjournment or postponement thereof. How to Vote: Your vote is important to us. Please cast your vote promptly via the internet, telephone or mail.
    [Show full text]
  • Cadence Design Systems, Inc. Incoming Letter Dated December 21, 2018
    UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D .C. 20549 DIVISION OF CORPORATION FINANCE February 27, 2019 John P. Kelsh Sidley Austin LLP [email protected] Re: Cadence Design Systems, Inc. Incoming letter dated December 21, 2018 Dear Mr. Kelsh: This letter is in response to your correspondence dated December 21, 2018 and February 12, 2019 concerning the shareholder proposal (the “Proposal”) submitted to Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) by John Chevedden (the “Proponent”) for inclusion in the Company’s proxy materials for its upcoming annual meeting of security holders. We also have received correspondence from the Proponent dated December 27, 2018, January 25, 2019 and February 24, 2019. Copies of all of the correspondence on which this response is based will be made available on our website at http://www.sec.gov/divisions/corpfin/cf-noaction/14a-8.shtml. For your reference, a brief discussion of the Division’s informal procedures regarding shareholder proposals is also available at the same website address. Sincerely, M. Hughes Bates Special Counsel Enclosure cc: John Chevedden *** *** FISMA & OMB Memorandum M-07-16 February 27, 2019 Response of the Office of Chief Counsel Division of Corporation Finance Re: Cadence Design Systems, Inc. Incoming letter dated December 21, 2018 The Proposal requests that the board take each step necessary so that each voting requirement in the Company’s charter and bylaws (that is explicit or implicit due to default to state law) that calls for a greater than simple majority vote be eliminated and replaced by a requirement for a majority of the votes cast for and against applicable proposals, or a simple majority in compliance with applicable laws.
    [Show full text]
  • Comcast Expanding X1 Device Lineup with IP-Only Client, Next-Gen Gateway
    Comcast Expanding X1 Device Lineup With IP-Only Client, Next-Gen Gateway By: Jeff Baumgartner The evolution of Comcast’s X1 video platform continues to take shape as the operator begins to introduce a small IP-only client device and moves forward with the development of a next-generation gateway device that can anchor the service. Comcast confirmed last week that it has begun to roll out the Xi3, an all-IP HD video client for the X1 platform, in select markets around the country. A Comcast official said the MSO is deploying the new Pace-made device slowly in a number of unidentified markets, and added that Comcast expects the device to become “widely available across our footprint in Q1 or Q2 of next year.” The X1 platform is currently being anchored by the XG1, a hybrid (MPEG/IP) HDDVR that Comcast is sourcing from Arris and Pace. The new Xi3 model will serve as a multi-room companion to XG1 and work with Comcast’s new Cloud DVR product. Postings on the DSL Reports message board also turned up evidence that Cisco Systems is among the suppliers working on a new version of an X1 gateway called the XG2. A Comcast official confirmed that the image is a rendering of a future iteration of the XG1 gateway, but declined to detail the technical specs or when Comcast expected to make it available. A person familiar with the initiative said that iteration is a headed gateway that won’t feature internal DVR storage, meaning it will likely work with Comcast’s Cloud DVR or support attached storage.
    [Show full text]
  • Marvell to Buy Cavium for $6B
    Deal of the Week: Marvell to Buy Cavium for $6B Announcement Date November 20, 2017 Acquirer Marvell Technology Group Ltd. (NASDAQ: MRVL) Acquirer Description Designs, develops, and markets analog, mixed‐signal, digital signal processing, and embedded and standalone integrated circuits, with market segments including the enterprise, cloud, automotive, industrial and consumer markets Founded in 1995 and headquartered in Hamilton, Bermuda Acquirer Financial Mkt Cap: $11.8 billion LTM EBITDA: $502.8 million Statistics EV: $7.5 billion LTM EV / Revenue: 3.1x LTM Revenue: $2.4 billion LTM EV / EBITDA: 14.9x Target Company Cavium, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAVM) Target Description Designs, develops, and markets semiconductor processors for intelligent and secure networks in the United States and internationally Offers processor and board level products targeting routers, switches, appliances, storage and servers Founded in 2000 and headquartered in San Jose, California Target Financial Statistics Mkt Cap: $6.1 billion LTM EBITDA: $79.4 million EV: $5.2 billion LTM EV / Revenue: 6.0x LTM Revenue: $865.9 million LTM EV / EBITDA: NM Acquirer Advisor Goldman Sachs Target Advisor Qatalyst Partners and JPMorgan Price / Consideration $6 billion Cash and stock Rationale “This is an exciting combination of two very complementary companies that together equal more than the sum of their parts,” Matt Murphy, Marvell president and chief executive, said Marvell’s main business is in chips that control hard disk drives, a market that’s no longer
    [Show full text]