DOCSLIB.ORG

Collision Between Truck-Tractor Semitrailer and School Bus Near Mountainburg, Arkansas on May 31, 2001

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Collision Between Truck-Tractor Semitrailer and School Bus Near Mountainburg, Arkansas on May 31, 2001 NTSB/HAR-02/03 PB2002-916203 Highway Accident Report Collision Between Truck-Tractor Semitrailer and School Bus Near Mountainburg, Arkansas on May 31, 2001 RANS T PO National L R A T N LURIB US A P UNUM E O T I Transportation I O T N A N Safety Board S A D F E R T Y B OA Washington, D.C. Highway Accident Report Collision Between Truck-Tractor Semitrailer and School Bus Near Mountainburg, Arkansas on May 31, 2001 NTSB/HAR-02/03 PB2002-916203 National Transportation Safety Board Notation 7490 490 L’Enfant Plaza, S.W. Adopted September 4, 2002 Washington, D.C. 20594 National Transportation Safety Board. 2002. Collision Between Truck-Tractor Semitrailer and School Bus Near Mountainburg, Arkansas, on May 31, 2001. Highway Accident Report. NTSB/HAR-02/03. Washington, DC. Abstract: On May 31, 2001, near Mountainburg, Arkansas, a Gayle Stuart Trucking, Inc., truck-tractor semitrailer collided with a 65-passenger school bus operated by the Mountainburg, Arkansas, Public Schools. Three school bus passengers were fatally injured; two other passengers received serious injuries. Four passengers, the school bus driver, and the truckdriver sustained minor injuries. The major safety issues discussed in this report are the poor condition of the tractor semitrailer brakes, inadequate motor carrier inspections and oversight, the use of propane tanks on school buses, and occupant protection within school buses. As a result of its investigation, the Safety Board made recommendations to the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, the Commercial Vehicle Safety Alliance, the National Fire Protection Association, and spring brake manufacturers. The Safety Board reiterated a recommendation to the U.S. Department of Transportation. The National Transportation Safety Board is an independent Federal agency dedicated to promoting aviation, railroad, highway, marine, pipeline, and hazardous materials safety. Established in 1967, the agency is mandated by Congress through the Independent Safety Board Act of 1974 to investigate transportation accidents, determine the probable causes of the accidents, issue safety recommendations, study transportation safety issues, and evaluate the safety effectiveness of government agencies involved in transportation. The Safety Board makes public its actions and decisions through accident reports, safety studies, special investigation reports, safety recommendations, and statistical reviews. Recent publications are available in their entirety on the Web at <http://www.ntsb.gov>. Other information about available publications also may be obtained from the Web site or by contacting: National Transportation Safety Board Public Inquiries Section, RE-51 490 L’Enfant Plaza, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20594 (800) 877-6799 or (202) 314-6551 Safety Board publications may be purchased, by individual copy or by subscription, from the National Technical Information Service. To purchase this publication, order report number PB2002-916203 from: National Technical Information Service 5285 Port Royal Road Springfield, Virginia 22161 (800) 553-6847 or (703) 605-6000 The Independent Safety Board Act, as codified at 49 U.S.C. Section 1154(b), precludes the admission into evidence or use of Board reports related to an incident or accident in a civil action for damages resulting from a matter mentioned in the report. iii Highway Accident Report Contents Acronyms and Abbreviations . v Executive Summary . vi Factual Information . 1 Accident Narrative . 1 Truck . 1 School Bus . .3 Collision . 3 Injuries . 3 Medical and Pathological Information . 6 Toxicological Tests . 7 Survival Aspects . 7 Emergency Response . 7 Survivability . 8 Damage . 8 Driver Information . 9 Truckdriver . 9 School Bus Driver . 10 Vehicle and Wreckage Information . 10 Truck-Tractor Semitrailer . 10 School Bus . 18 Highway Information . 21 Highway Design . 21 Tire Marks . 25 Operational Information . 25 Gayle Stuart Trucking . 25 Mountainburg Public Schools . 26 Management Information . 26 Gayle Stuart Trucking Company . 26 Federal Oversight . 28 State Oversight . 30 Meteorological Information . 30 Tests and Research . 31 Sight Distance . 31 Brake Heat Tests . 31 Simulation . 34 Other Information . 35 Brake Data . 35 Brake Adjustment Methodology . 36 Spring Brakes . 37 Analysis . 38 The Accident . .38 Exclusions . 38 Contents iv Highway Accident Report Accident Discussion . 39 Truck Brakes . .41 Recommendation History . 41 Accident Vehicle . 44 Motor Carrier Inspection and Oversight . 48 Recommendation History . 48 Compliance Reviews . 49 Qualified Brake Inspector . 50 Fuel Tanks . 52 Recommendation History . ..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Allamerican-Web-Ready.Pdf
    Building a BETTER BUS NextGen Seating NEXTGEN SEAT Convertible seating has never been this easy - or this comfortable. Now there is no need to completely remove the entire seat when you want to change the seating configuration. With Blue Bird’s NextGen Seat, simply remove four bolts from the base of the seat cushion and reinstall the new seat that you want - it’s really that simple! Mix-and-match your seats as you need them, making your bus fleet more versatile without the need to spend large amounts of time or money. COMFORTABLE The recessed back pad gives passengers improved knee clearance, and the integrated head rest and built-in lumbar support sets a new standard in student seating comfort. Lap Belt Ready (LBR) INNOVATIVE A first in the Industry, the bottom cushion tilts up allowing for unprecedented access between seats as well as ease of cleaning. CONVERTIBLE Easily converts from one seat type to another by simply removing and reinstalling 4 bolts. 3-Point Belts Child Restraint Available in lap-belt ready, 3-point seat belt, (3PT) (CR) child restraint and 3-point child restraint. OEM Installed Air Conditioning AIR CONDITIONING Aftermarket installation can interfere with the structural design of the bus body, as well as put additional stress on critical engine, chassis and electrical systems. This OEM installation creates less maintenance for you, due to the frame-mount installation of the condensers during chassis assembly, EZ clip connectors which provide a no-leak hose to connector securement, and more. Contact your local dealer today to learn more about Blue Bird’s OEM air conditioning option! Standard Test Compliance Passenger Safety Cage 90 The All American passes Colorado Rack, Blue Bird’s custom designed one-piece LH Kentucky Pole and Altoona Tests in roof bow system ensures safe student its standard configuration, not as an transportation with an exceptionally option like the competition, highlighting strong structure.
    [Show full text]
  • AGENDA LOUISIANA MOTOR VEHICLE COMMISSION 3017 Kingman Street Metairie, Louisiana 70006 Monday, August 10, 2020 at 10:00 A.M. Via ZOOM Video
    AGENDA LOUISIANA MOTOR VEHICLE COMMISSION 3017 Kingman Street Metairie, Louisiana 70006 Monday, August 10, 2020 At 10:00 a.m. via ZOOM Video Call to order. Attendance roll call. Discussion: Emergency Rule (HCR 71) Discussion: 2020 Legislation (SB470, HB764, Act No. 275) Discussion: Fiscal Audit Compliance Questionnaire E xecutive Session. Report by Counselors. Report by Executive Director. Reading of the Minutes of March 9, 2020. Reading of the March, April, May, June and July Financial Statements. Ratification of Manufacturer Licenses issued: MANUFACTURER CITY LIC. # MAKE General Motors LLC Detroit, Michigan #MN-2019-00136 Bolt, Buick (light duty trucks, passenger cars), Cadillac (light duty trucks, passenger cars), Chevrolet (light duty trucks, passenger cars), GMC (light duty trucks), Low Cab Forward Proterra Inc. Burlingame, California #MN-2020-00126 Proterra Spartan Fire, LLC Brandon, South Dakota #MN-2020-00133 Spartan ER Ratification of Factory Branch License issued: FACTORY BRANCH CITY LIC. # Mack Trucks, Inc. Salem, Virginia #FB-2020-00111 Ratification of Distributor Branch License issued: DISTRIBUTOR BRANCH CITY LIC. # General Motors LLC Irving, Texas #DB-2019-00119 Ratification of Convertor Licenses issued: CONVERTOR CITY LIC. # MAKE Truck & Trailer Equipment Company, Inc. Lake Charles, Louisiana #CV-2018-00203 Truck & Trailer Equipments DBA TNT Equipment Frazer, LTD Houston, Texas #CV-2020-00163 Frazer Ambulance DBA Frazer, LTD of Texas Smeal Holding, LLC Snyder, Nebraska #CV-2020-00182 Smeal Fire Apparatus DBA Smeal Fire Apparatus Curbtender, Inc. Cedar Falls, Iowa #CV-2020-00183 Curbtender Refuge, Curbtender Trailer Forest River, Inc. Imlay City, Michigan #CV-2020-00186 Champion Bus Forest River, Inc. Salina, Kansas #CV-2020-00187 Eldorado National Textron Systems Corporation Slidell, Louisiana #CV-2020-00191 Big Dog Ratification of Specialty Vehicle Dealer Licenses issued: SPECIALTY VEHICLE DEALER CITY LIC.
    [Show full text]
  • Page 1 of 32 VEHICLE RECALLS by MANUFACTURER, 2000 Report Prepared 1/16/2008
    Page 1 of 32 VEHICLE RECALLS BY MANUFACTURER, 2000 Report Prepared 1/16/2008 MANUFACTURER RECALLS VEHICLES ACCUBUIL T, INC 1 8 AM GENERAL CORPORATION 1 980 AMERICAN EAGLE MOTORCYCLE CO 1 14 AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO 8 212,212 AMERICAN SUNDIRO MOTORCYCLE 1 2,183 AMERICAN SUZUKI MOTOR CORP. 4 25,023 AMERICAN TRANSPORTATION CORP. 5 1,441 APRILIA USA INC. 2 409 ASTON MARTIN 2 666 ATHEY PRODUCTS CORP. 3 304 B. FOSTER & COMPANY, INC. 1 422 BAYERISCHE MOTOREN WERKE 11 28,738 BLUE BIRD BODY COMPANY 12 62,692 BUELL MOTORCYCLE CO 4 12,230 CABOT COACH BUILDERS, INC. 1 818 CARPENTER INDUSTRIES, INC. 2 6,838 CLASSIC LIMOUSINE 1 492 CLASSIC MANUFACTURING, INC. 1 8 COACHMEN INDUSTRIES, INC. 8 5,271 COACHMEN RV COMPANY 1 576 COLLINS BUS CORPORATION 1 286 COUNTRY COACH INC 6 519 CRANE CARRIER COMPANY 1 138 DABRYAN COACH BUILDERS 1 723 DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION 30 6,700,752 DAMON CORPORATION 3 824 DAVINCI COACHWORKS, INC 1 144 D'ELEGANT CONVERSIONS, INC. 1 34 DORSEY TRAILERS, INC. 1 210 DUTCHMEN MANUFACTURING, INC 1 105 ELDORADO NATIONAL 1 173 ELECTRIC TRANSIT, INC. 1 54 ELGIN SWEEPER COMPANY 1 40 E-ONE, INC. 1 3 EUROPA INTERNATIONAL, INC. 2 242 EXECUTIVE COACH BUILDERS 1 702 FEATHERLITE LUXURY COACHES 1 83 FEATHERLITE, INC. 2 3,235 FEDERAL COACH, LLC 1 230 FERRARI NORTH AMERICA 8 1,601 FLEETWOOD ENT., INC. 5 12, 119 FORD MOTOR COMPANY 60 7,485,466 FOREST RIVER, INC. 1 115 FORETRAVEL, INC. 3 478 FOURWINNS 2 2,276 FREIGHTLINER CORPORATION 27 233,032 FREIGHTLINER LLC 1 803 GENERAL MOTORS CORP.
    [Show full text]
  • North Dakota
    NORTH DAKOTA SCHOOL BUS DRIVER’S GUIDE MARCH 2015 EDITION DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION Kirsten Baesler, STATE SUPERINTENDENT Bismarck, North Dakota 58505-0440 2 A MESSAGE FROM THE SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION Over 40,000 students are transported each day to North Dakota schools in school buses. The safety of these students and the efficiency of a district's transportation program depends on the dedicated men and women who accept the important responsibility of driving our school buses. This publication is the thirteenth edition of the handbook for North Dakota school bus drivers. We hope that this handbook answers many questions and gives school bus drivers the necessary guidelines to perform effectively and efficiently. Driving a school bus involves much more than merely driving a vehicle on the highways. The school bus driver must also be responsible for the safety and welfare of children, must be teacher by example, must promote good public relations, and must understand how to properly use and care for the school bus, a complex and expensive piece of equipment. The purpose of this guide is to provide each school bus driver with the basic information needed to develop the skills, attitudes, and knowledge that result in safe and efficient driving. It is my sincere hope that each of North Dakota's school bus drivers will study and properly apply the information presented in this guide to assure a safer transportation program for our students. Driving a school bus is one of the most important jobs we have in our school systems. You carry our state’s most precious resource.
    [Show full text]
  • Blue Bird Electric School Buses July 21, 2020 All Roads Lead to Blue Bird Electric School Buses
    Blue Bird Electric School Buses July 21, 2020 All Roads Lead to Blue Bird Electric School Buses GVWR 36,200lbs GVWR 33,000lbs 315 HP GVWR 14,500lbs 315 HP Battery Capacity = 155kWh 215 HP Battery Capacity = 155kWh Battery Capacity = 88kWh A long history in alternative fuels ▪ Blue Bird was a pioneer and first school bus OEM to embrace EV technology ▪ 1994 - Collaborated with Westinghouse Electronic Systems to develop first battery- powered school bus ▪ 1996 - Collaborated with Electrosource, Inc. to produce transit style electric shuttle buses for the Atlanta Summer Olympics 3 Present Day 2016 ▪ Blue Bird Received $4.4MM grant from US Department of Energy (US DOE) for the production of 10 V2G school buses. 2017 ▪ Blue Bird Launched our current iteration of the Blue Bird EV bus at the STN Expo, Reno in July 2017 2018 ▪ Blue Bird delivered its first electric-powered school buses to customers in California and Ontario (Canada) 2020 ▪ Blue Bird delivered its one hundredth electric-powered school bus 1 to 100 – in just 20 months! September 2018 April 2020 Blue Bird – Electric School Bus Sales Turn-key solution 7 Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) How do the acquisition cost and operational cost over the life of the vehicle compare to our current fleet? DIESEL VERSUS ELECTRIC COST OF OWNERSHIP Difference Diesel Electric Savings Diesel Bus Cost $100,000 Electric Bus Cost $350,000 $250,000.00 15 Yr lifetime 15 Yr lifetime Over lifetime Buy down $0 * Annual Grant Funding ($167,000) * Annual Replacement cycle 180 Cost over Replacement cycle 180 Cost
    [Show full text]
  • 2013 Florida School Bus Specifications
    FLORIDA SCHOOL BUS SPECIFICATIONS Revised 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Foreword .................................................................................................................................................................................... iii General Information and Warranty Provisions ...................................................................................................................... 1 Section I CHASSIS SPECIFICATIONS for types A1 (19-29 capacity) and A2 (30-47 capacity)............................... ..I-1 OPTIONAL CHASSIS EQUIPMENT for Type A ................................................................................................ I-9 Section II CHASSIS SPECIFICATIONS for types C and D ........................................................................................... II-1 OPTIONAL CHASSIS EQUIPMENT for types C and D ................................................................................. II-10 Section III BODY SPECIFICATIONS for types A1, A2, C, and D ................................................................................. III-1 EXCEPTIONS for Type D ................................................................................................................................ III-20 OPTIONAL BODY EQUIPMENT for types A1, A2, C, and D ....................................................................... III-21 Section IV EXCEPTIONAL CHILD BUS SPECIFICATIONS for types A, C, and D ................................................. IV-1 Section V AIR CONDITIONER
    [Show full text]
  • Cost Evaluation for Nine Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards
    TL DOT HS- 805 320 242 . H3 82 COST EVALUATION FOR NINE FEDERAL v . 6 MOTOR VEHICLE STANDARDS VOLUME VI FMVSS 220, 221, & 222 M. R. Harvey DEPARTMENT of J. A. Lesczhik transportation R. F. McLean 1 4 1980 De Lorean Motor Company JUL 2401 Elliott Street library Troy, Michigan 48084 J Contract No. D0T-HS-8-02015 Contract Amt. $332,007 NOVEMBER 1979 FINAL REPORT This document is available to the U.S. public through the National Technical Information Service, Springfield, Virginia 22161 Prepared For U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Washington, D.C. 20590 This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The United States Govern- ment assumes no liability for its contents or use thereof. 5 O.’P- T*cImmc«I K fr> P»c——tt«— P /• *' 2. C t»tiw Ac<*l»i*a Mo. 1. i Ho. s.L J)OT-HS-805 320 4pr.»W rnU J. !•>••• £>•*• COST EVALUATION FOR NINE FEDERAL MOTOR VEHICLE NOVEMBER 1979 SAFETY STANDARDS Vol. VI 4. 7«Imm| CWp.. miM Cat* $. —if Of|«w itiiMi B >»•»! Mo. 7 . AvAa/a M.R. GARVEY, J. A. LESCZHIK, R.F. McLEAN *. PwMkt Ot,s>i ukM K«m m* «<»IH 10. U«.l N. (THAIS) DE L0REAN MOTOR COMPANY RESEARCH & ENGINEERING DIVISION 1 I Conflict 04 G'tni N • 2401 ELLIOTT STREET D0T-HS- 8-0201 TROY. MICHIGAN 48084 13. Tjth ol R sport ond P *r«od Cov«r*^ FINAL REPORT DEMT^rOF^^RWlON 10/78 - 11/79 NATIONAL HIGHWAY TRAFFIC SAFETY ADMINISTRATION 400 SEVENTH STREET S.W.
    [Show full text]
  • Saf-T-Liner® C2 School Brochure
    SAF-T-LINER ® C2 BECAUSE EVERY MILE MATTERS A bus that goes beyond State-of-the-art BusWise® Technologies. Zonar® remote fleet management. The ultra-efficient DD5™ engine. These are just a few of the innovations that define the Saf-T-Liner® C2 from Thomas Built Buses. Why do we constantly challenge ourselves, pushing beyond what we thought possible, to create the most advanced and intelligent school bus innovations on the market? One word: safety. Ever since we began manufacturing school buses, safety has been our guiding star. It’s a force that drives all of us, from the engineers who designed the C2 to the technicians who build quality and care into each bus we make. Safety is the reason smart innovation is at the heart of every aspect of the C2. Our enhanced visibility gives drivers added confidence on the road. Our efficient engines reliably transport kids to and from school. Our sustainable manufacturing helps improve the safety of the environment. All in a bus that reduces the total cost of ownership, allowing school districts to offer the safest transportation possible for years to come. The C2 is built for the children of today – and the children of tomorrow. We’re driven to protect them every step of the way, because it’s children who drive the future. Designed with drivers in mind It’s a fact: the more confident and alert bus drivers feel, the more safely they drive. That’s why we designed the C2 to be the most ergonomic and intuitive driving experience possible – with enhanced visibility, driver-friendly design and state-of-the-art technology.
    [Show full text]
  • Propane Autogas School Bus Manufacturers
    PROPANE AUTOGAS SCHOOL BUS MANUFACTURERS When schools adopt propane autogas school buses, everyone — students, parents, and educators — wins. Schools can reduce fuel and maintenance costs with propane autogas buses compared with diesel, giving them the opportunity to invest those savings where it matters most — back in the classroom. Here’s a list of propane-powered school bus manufacturers. Blue Bird Corporation www.blue-bird.com Blue Bird offers a complete line of Type A, C and D school buses in a variety of options and configurations. Since 1927, Blue Bird Corporation has continued to set industry standards with its innovative design and manufacturing capabilities. Additionally, Blue Bird provides comprehensive financial solutions through Blue Bird Capital Services. Today, Blue Bird has more than 1,500 employees, Georgia-based manufacturing facilities and an extensive network of Dealers and Parts & Service facilities throughout North America. Its global presence can be seen in more than 60 countries through sales into Africa, Asia, the Caribbean, Latin America, Europe and the Middle East. Collins Bus Corporation www.collinsbuscorp.com Headquartered in Hutchinson, Kansas, Collins Industries specializes in manufacturing Type A school buses, and also manufactures ambulances and other special-purpose vehicles. The company’s Nexbus Propane model is available only on a GM chassis. It was built in conjunction with CleanFUEL USA, which was the first company to develop liquid propane fuel injection engine systems in the United States. IC Bus www.icbus.com Each vehicle built by IC Bus is backed by the power of Navistarr, a global leader in the transportation industry with more than 175 years of experience building trucks, buses, RVs, and defense vehicle.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional School Bus Study (2012)
    REGIONAL SCHOOL BUS STUDY A Comparison Of Alternative Fuels For School Transportation Fleets January 2012 SOUTH CENTRAL REGIONAL COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS PLANNING FOR OUR REGION'S FUTURE REGIONAL SCHOOL BUS STUDY January, 2012 Prepared By: VN Engineers, Inc. 116 Washington Avenue North Haven, CT 06473 (203) 234-7862 Prepared For: South Central Regional Council of Governments 127 Washington Avenue, 4th Floor West North Haven, CT 06473 (203) 234-7555 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY School buses are an important part of our transportation system, as they provide a safe and reliable means for many children throughout the nation to get to and from school. However, exhaust from diesel engines contains numerous pollutants that not only contribute to poor outdoor air quality, but also can leak into passenger cabins of buses, amassing in concentrations that are much higher than outdoor air. Diesel exhaust has serious health impacts for all who are exposed to it, but children are particularly susceptible to its harmful effects and disproportionately suffer from asthma, respiratory irritations, and other possible long-term conditions. The vast majority of school buses in Connecticut and the SCRCOG region are diesel-powered. However, there have been a number of recent advances in alternative fuel technology and corresponding opportunities for bus operators to benefit from the use of alternative fuel technology to reduce diesel emissions, improve air quality, limit health risks, improve efficiency, extend vehicle life, and increase energy independence. Four of the most commonly used alternative fuels have been tested and used for school bus operations. They include: biodiesel, compressed natural gas, electricity, and propane.
    [Show full text]
  • “Project 600 Horsepower” Was Introduced at the Annual Convention
    SOUTH DAKOTA TRUCKING ASSOCIAtion’S CONVENTION EDITION - SEPTEMBER 2014 SDTA’S nEW MEMBERSHIP DRIVE CAMPAIGN “PROJECT 600 HORSEPOWEr” WAS INTRODUCED AT THE ANNUAL CONVENTION THE GOAL IS TO GET TO 600 SDTA MEMBERS BY NEXT YEARS CONVENTION. A SPECIAL PRIZE WILL BE AWARDED TO THE MEMBER WHO SIGNS UP OUR 600TH MEMBER. SEPTEMBER 24, 2014 Chairman’s Message..........................3 President’s Message..........................5 Update From Black Hills Log Haulers As- sociation President Robert Christian....7 September Driver of the Month..........9 Medical Examiners must continue to is- sue Medical Examiner’s Certificates...11 Welcome New SDTA Members...........12 Chairman’s Message Continued.........13 President’s Message Continued.........13 Review of SDTA’s 79th Annual Conven- The SD Trucking Association is designed tion in Rapid City........................14-30 to benefit trucking companies of all sizes. If you know a company that is unaware of the Headline: Be Healthy Behind the Wheel......31 benefits that come with membership, please give them our phone number and let us help Trucking Route Restrictions Through Lead them out. There is strength in numbers. and Deadwood, SD...........................33 Our goal is to make it to 600 SDTA members before next years convention! Board of Directors List.....................36 SDTA’S EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE Mike Habeck, Chairman of Board David Bultsma, Vice Chairman Greetings. The 2014 SDTA Annual Convention Jeff Gillespie, Treasurer was September 3rd through September 5th. Once Robert Christian, Secretary again we had a tremendous turnout. I would like Rick Hoogendoorn, Past Chairman Myron L. Rau, President to thank all of our members that participated in Mike Habeck, ATA Vice President this event.
    [Show full text]
  • Top 10 School Bus Companies Blog
    TOP 10 SCHOOL BUS COMPANIES Throughout the years, the task of making the best buses for school transportation has been handled by various companies. This article features 10 school bus companies which made a name for themselves, when it came to redefining the way we look at a school bus. #1 WAYNE CORPORATION Topping our list of companies is Wayne Corporation. Though the company declared itself bankrupt and discontinued operation in 1992, the Wayne Corporation had played a vital role in the development of safe buses for school children. They were the first and foremost to introduce the concept of school buses for schools. Their innovation predates the famous yellow coloured buses which are widely used these days. www.trackschoolbus.com They introduced the horse drawn carts, including kid hacks, which later evolved into automobiles which used full metal body chassis. Wayne Corporation introduced guard rails on the sides of all school buses, inboard wheelchair lifts, and even high-headroom doors. They were the first with a school bus based upon a cutaway van chassis, the Wayne Busette. This chassis design is still one of the most popular in North American markets even after more than 35 years. #2 BLUE BIRD An all time giant, the Blue Bird Corporation (formerly called Blue Bird Body Company) is clearly one of the top school bus manufacturing companies even today. Blue Bird's corporate headquarters and main manufacturing facilities are in Georgia. www.trackschoolbus.com It was in 1937 that the company began production of full-steel bus bodies. This innovation would soon replace the wooden bodies which were commonly used in the United States.
    [Show full text]