Metro Rail Past and Future in Los Angeles Metro Rail – System Description / Current

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Metro Rail Past and Future in Los Angeles Metro Rail – System Description / Current Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Metro Rail Past and Future In Los Angeles Metro Rail – System Description / Current The Los Angeles Red Line: Union Station Metro Rail to North Hollywood 14.8 Miles System consists of two Heavy Purple Line: Union Rail (Subway) Station to Wilshire/Western 5 Miles lines and three Light Rail 4 Miles shared Track, (Interurban) lines 15.7 Miles total Blue Line: 7th Street to Long Beach Transit Mall 22 Miles Green Line: Norwalk to Marine 20 Miles Gold Line: Sierra Madre Villa to Atlantic 19.4 Miles Metro Rail Lines Vehicle Overview Red & Purple Blue Green Gold Gold Line Red & Purple Blue Green & Gold Gold Color zzz zzz zzz zzz zzz zzz Miles 15.9 22 19.6 13.7 6.8 (Eastside) 650A / P865 / P2000 / P2550 / Type / Mfg. Breda Nippon Sharyo Siemens Duewag Breda Weight Empty (lbs.) 80,000 94,000 98,000 109,000 Length (ft.) 75 90 90 90 Passenger 220 276 262 264 Max. Load Max. Speed (mph) 70 55 65 55 Original Agencies • The Heavy Rail lines were built and originally operated by the Southern California Rapid Transit District (SCRTD) which was the immediate predecessor agency of the present-day Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (LACMTA or Metro) Original Agencies • The Light Rail lines were built by the Los Angeles County Transportation Commission (LACTC) which was founded in 1977 to handle planning and construction of highway and transit projects in Los Angeles, they too were merged into Metro in 1993 • The SCRTD operated the Light Rail Line built by LACTC up until the merger Metro Blue Line • The First new rail line in Los Angeles was the Metro Blue Line • Ground was broken at the Shop facility October 1, 1985 • The first segment from Pico to Anaheim opened July 14, 1990 Metro Blue Line • The original fleet was built by Sumitomo Nippon/Sharyo under contract P-865 including cars 100-153 (54 cars) in 1989 and 1990 • Heavily modified the entire fleet remains in service today (Cyclops light, electronic horns, Schunk Pantographs, LED lights, automated PA, Kenwood radio system, CCTV/DVR system) Metro Blue Line • Two extensions completed the line within a year: – Long Beach Loop added 5th St, 1st St, Transit Mall, and Pacific St stations opening September 1, 1990 – Los Angeles’ first modern subway station opened February 15, 1991 at 7th St/Metro Center, the future Heavy Rail station completed on lower level in anticipation of future addition of the Metro Red Line Metro Blue Line – Historical Perspective • The Metro Blue Line is mostly built on the historic route and property of Pacific Electric’s Long Beach line opened on July 4, 1902 and operated continuously through April 9, 1961 Taken over first by the Los Angeles Metropolitan Coach lines in 1953 and the Los Angeles Metropolitan Transit Authority in 1958 it was the last operating electric Interurban rail line in Southern California Metro Blue Line • The original line (before modifications for EXPO) had: – 22 Stations / 1 Yard – 2 Terminal Double Crossovers – 3 Manual Crossovers – 2 Interlocking Pockets – 2 Manual Turnouts – 2 Mixed Interlockings with SPRR crossings – 1 Crossover Interlocking – 1 Station Siding – 20 Traction Power Substations Metro Blue Line • Over 20 years many changes have already occurred: – Station platforms extended to accommodate 3-car trains – Both Amoco and Vargas railway crossings removed – Pico and San Pedro manual crossovers removed – New full interlocking crossovers added to Venice and Maple, half crossover at Compton – New junction at Washington and Flower to new EXPO line – Washington tail track and turnout upgraded to 4 storage tracks and full interlocking – T signals changed to Bar signals with Train Coming warnings added – Replacement of all Controlled Power Corporation CPC TPSS with Siemens has begun – Platform Between Car Barriers Metro Red Line MOS-1 • The First Heavy Rail line in Los Angeles was the Metro Red Line • Ground was broken at the Shop facility September 29, 1986 • The first segment from Union Station to Westlake opened January 30, 1993, the last act of the SCRTD before merging into LACMTA Metro Red Line MOS-1 • The original fleet was built by Breda Costruzione Ferroviarie under contract A-650 including cars 501-530 (30 cars) in 1992 • Budd cars were borrowed from the recently opened Miami Metro Dade Heavy Rail system for testing purposes due to delays in delivering the Breda cars Metro Red Line – Historical Perspective • The First Segment of the Metro Red Line was built along Wilshire Blvd which never saw rail service before • It was then, as it is now, the premier boulevard of Los Angeles and was served by Double Deck buses operated originally by the Los Angeles Motor Bus company later merged into the Pacific Electric and Los Angeles Transit Lines in 1949 • It continues to be a major bus corridor with the first Rapid Bus line opened in 2000 supplementing local and limited stop service. Lines 20, 720, and 920 run there now using articulated buses Metro Red Line – Historical Perspective • Los Angeles had a subway from 1925 to 1955 serving Glendale, Burbank, Hollywood, and Santa Monica operated by the Western District of the Pacific Electric Railway • Although a portion of the tunnel was demolished in connection with the construction of the ARCO towers, most of the subway along with the entrance portal, power substation, and terminal station remain intact, tours are still occasionally given • It was an Interurban/Suburban streetcar subway only 1 mile in length similar in application to the present Blue Line underground segment into 7th/Metro (4th and Hill to 2nd and Beverly) Metro Red Line MOS-1 • The original line had: – 5 Stations / 1 Yard – 3 Terminal Double Crossovers – 5 Traction Power Substations – 1 Emergency Generator – All Emergency Exits within station boxes Metro Green Line • LACTC’s second Light Rail line was meant to allow one of the last Los Angeles Freeways to be built, the Glen Anderson I-105 Century Freeway • Ground was broken January 28, 1991 • The entire line from Norwalk to Marine opened August 12, 1995 Metro Green Line • The original fleet was built by Sumitomo Nippon/Sharyo under contract P-2020 including cars 154-168 (15 cars) in 1994 and 1995 • Heavily modified the entire fleet remains in service today on the Blue Line (Cyclops light, electronic horns, Schunk Pantographs, LED lights, automated PA, Kenwood radio system, CCTV/DVR system) Metro Green Line • A new fleet replaced the original cars by 2002 • The cars were built by Siemens Duewag of Germany and took a long time to place in service • Cars 201-228 and 301-302 were delivered between 1998 and 2002 • The 300 series cars were originally configured for driverless operation “robot cars” • Car borne between car barriers were mounted later, first application in Los Angeles, now in process of being removed Metro Green Line – Historical Perspective • The construction of the Century Freeway devastated the existing roads and residences and does not follow pre-existing rail, road, or transit lines with a couple of exceptions – The portion between Harbor and Crenshaw roughly parallels some of the Redondo Beach via Gardena line built November 12, 1911 and closed January 15, 1940. Some tracks remain for freight service The portion between Wilmington and Long Beach stations roughly parallels some of the Santa Ana line which opened November 6, 1905, was shortened to Bellflower on July 2, 1950 and finally closed by LAMTA on May 25, 1958 Metro Green Line • The Green Line has: – 14 Stations / 1 Yard – 2 Terminal Double Crossovers – 1 Double Crossovers – 2 Interlocking Pockets – 8 Crossover Interlockings – 19 Traction Power Substations Metro Red Line Segment 2A • The next Red Line extension was to be broken up into two steps, segments 2A and 2B • Segment 2A continued west from Westlake to Wilshire Western and would later be re-named the Purple line Metro Red Line Segment 2A • This new extension opened to the public July 13, 1996 and included – 3 new stations – 2 new terminal interlockings – A pocket track – 2 new Traction Power Substations and another generator – The first 4 emergency exits outside of a station box Metro Red Line Segment 2B • Segment 2B continued north under Vermont and Hollywood Boulevards to Hollywood and Vine opened on June 12, 1999 • Fleet expansion was necessary to serve this extension bringing cars 531-586 into service from 1997-1998, these cars have AC motors and are considered the “option” cars • Many stations have Joint Development projects which have since changed their surface appearance Metro Red Line – Historical Perspective • Unlike earlier Red Line segments, this extension followed old rail routes – Vermont Blvd was a heavily patronized “Yellow Car” line operated by the Los Angeles Railway and its successors the Los Angeles Transit Lines and LAMTA, the V line was one of 5 lines that ran until the end of streetcar service in Los Angeles on July 30, 1963 Hollywood Blvd was Pacific Electric Western District territory served by the Subway we saw earlier using cars named for this famous thoroughfare. Steam trains opened the line before the turn of the century and the Metropolitan Coach Lines ended rail service on September 26, 1954. The cars are remembered in the Hollywood Western Station mezzanine Metro Red Line Segment 2B • This new extension included: – 5 new stations – 2 new terminal interlockings – 4 new Traction Power Substations – 2 more emergency exits outside of a station box Metro Red Line Segment 3 • The last Red Line extension segment continued under Hollywood Blvd
Recommended publications
  • Volume I Restoration of Historic Streetcar Service
    VOLUME I ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT RESTORATION OF HISTORIC STREETCAR SERVICE IN DOWNTOWN LOS ANGELES J U LY 2 0 1 8 City of Los Angeles Department of Public Works, Bureau of Engineering Table of Contents Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................................. ES-1 ES.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................... ES-1 ES.2 Purpose and Need ............................................................................................................................................... ES-1 ES.3 Background ............................................................................................................................................................ ES-2 ES.4 7th Street Alignment Alternative ................................................................................................................... ES-3 ES.5 Safety ........................................................................................................................................................................ ES-7 ES.6 Construction .......................................................................................................................................................... ES-7 ES.7 Operations and Ridership ...............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 3 Assessment of Urban Transport Systems in Bangkok
    Assessment Urban Transport System: Bangkok, Thailand Siradol Siridhara Mahidol University BLAK Bangkok Metro and Vicinity Population 16.43 million Bkk Population 5.56 million Employment 10.42 million Income 39,459 baht/hh Bangkok Metro and Vicinity 35 million trips per day. ≈ 70% by private vehicles. Average Speeds Morning peak hour 10.7 kph Evening peak hour 14.2 kph Key Players Regulators, Project Owners & Operators Rail Bus Regulators Project Owners Project Operators 3 Current Rail Network Current Network: 5 Lines, 97 Stations, 142.9 km Light Green Line 32 stations 39.5 km Dark Green Line 13 stations 14.7 km Blue Line 26 stations 47.0 km Purple Line 16 stations 23.6 km Airport Rail Link 8 Stations 28.6 km Total 153.4 km Green Blue Purple Red Ridership (approx.) 1500000 trips/day4 Future Rail Network Future Network: Approx. 540 km Light Green Line 55 stations 66.5 km Dark Green Line 20 stations 22.5 km Blue Line 42 stations 55.0 km Purple Line 32 stations 42.8 km Orange Line 30 stations 35.4 km Pink Line 30 stations 36.0 km Yellow Line 23 stations 30.4 km Brown Line 23 stations 21.0 km Gold Line 4 stations 2.7 km Grey 39 stations 26.0 km Light Blue Line 19 stations 30.0 km Light Red Line 55 stations 58.5 km Dark Red Line 20 stations 80.8 km Airport Rail Link 14 Stations 49.5 km Total 504 km 5 Assessment Urban Transport System: Bangkok SUTI01 Extent to Which Transport Plans Cover Public Transport, Intermodal Facilities and Infrastructure for Active Modes MIN SCORE MAX 0 11 16 No Aspects Explanation Score 1 Walking Networks Little attention has been paid to pedestrian network planning, although the awareness of maintenance of walkways and other pedestrian facilities have 2 been raised from the general public.
    [Show full text]
  • January–June 2005 · $10.00 / Rails To
    January–June 2005 · $10.00 / Rails to Rubber to Rails Again, Part 1: Alabama–Montana Headlights The Magazine of Electric Railways Published since 1939 by the Electric Railroaders’ Association, Inc. WWW.ERAUSA.ORG Staff Contents Editor and Art Director January–June 2005 Sandy Campbell Associate Editors Raymond R. Berger, Frank S. Miklos, John Pappas Contributors Edward Ridolph, Trevor Logan, Bill Volkmer, Columns Alan K. Weeks 2 News Electric Railroaders’ Compiled by Frank Miklos. International transportation reports. Association, Inc. E Two-Part Cover Story Board of Directors 2008 President 18 Rails to Rubber to Rails Again Frank S. Miklos By Edward Ridolph. An extensive 60-year summary of the street railway industry in First Vice President the U.S. and Canada, starting with its precipitous 30-year, post-World War II decline. William K. Guild It continues with the industry’s rebirth under the banner of “light rail” in the early Second Vice President & Corresponding Secretary 1980s, a renaissance which continues to this day. Raymond R. Berger Third Vice President & Recording Secretary Robert J. Newhouser Below: LAMTA P3 3156 is eastbound across the First Street bridge over the Los Treasurer Angeles River in the waning weeks of service before abandonment of Los Angeles’ Michael Glikin narrow gauge system on March 31, 1963. GERALD SQUIER PHOTO Director Jeffrey Erlitz Membership Secretary Sandy Campbell Officers 2008 Trip & Convention Chairman Jack May Librarian William K. Guild Manager of Publication Sales Raymond R. Berger Overseas Liason Officer James Mattina National Headquarters Grand Central Terminal, New York City A-Tower, Room 4A Mailing Address P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • City of West Hollywood Appendix J
    R2, R3, R4 Multi-Family Survey Report City of West Hollywood Appendix J: 1986-87 Survey Context, prepared by Johnson Heumann Research Associates Appendices November 2008 ARCHITECTURAL RESOURCES GROUP Architects, Planners & Conservators, Inc. when a small group of citizens formed the West Hollywood Incorporation Committee. By November of that year, studies by the Local Agency Formation Commission confirmed that incorporation was indeed economically feasible. Tenants led by the Coalition for Economic Survival, homeowners concerned with planning issues and the gay community were among the leading advocates of cityhoog. Formal application was made on April 4, 1984. On November 4, 1984, by a 4:1 favorable margin, the voters approved incorporation . One of the new city's first tasks was to begin to draft a General Plan , the land use policy document for the municipality required· by State law. In January of 1985, the city began the process of preparing the Plan, noting that the physical environment, social character and quality of life within the City would be influenced by the General Plan. It was a stated goal to link land use and urban design, emphasizing the relationship between parcels and uses throughout the city. A reduction of density from those outlined in the West Hollywood Community Plan, .---- prepared before incorporated by the County of Los Angeles, was planned. As an i ntegral part of this planning process. the city of West Hollywood applied for c survey grant from the State Off ice of Historic Preservation in November of 1985 . 1.2 DEVELOPMENT HISTORY The area now known as West Hollywood has played a key role in t h e development of Los Angeles County west of Los Angeles .
    [Show full text]
  • Charoen Nakhon Thailand
    NAVARANG ASSET PRESENT CHAROEN NAKHON THAILAND About Best Health & Culture Restaurants Wellness Heritage CHAROEN Instagramable NAKHON Coffee Culture ATTRACTIONS! And more ... VOL. 01 MAY 2021 01 CHAROEN NAKHON How to get there? From 40 Suvarnabhumi international mins airport From 20 Sukhumvit rd mins (Siam-Asoke) From 5 BTS Krung mins Thon Buri Charoen Nakhon is located along Thailand’s most majestic river “The Chao Praya”. Widely regarded as Bangkok’s most popular trade route and cultural heritage site. From cool art and lifestyle hubs, ‘trendy cafes, and superb street eats to iconic riverside hotels, not to forget the unique shopping districts, life on Charoen Nakhon has never been more attractive. With the new BTS Gold Line on rails, Charoen Nakhon is one of the most desirable neighborhoods of Bangkok. 02 CHAROEN NAKHON About Charoen Nakhon There are few places in the world that make it possible for The riverside neighborhood can visitors to see its urban areas via boat. Charoen Nakhon is a be reached via a handful of BTS charming neighborhood situated in the Thonburi community on stations, or by boat, which is the western banks of the Chao Phraya River. Thonburi was the oftentimes a faster and more capital of Thailand for a short time in 1768, after Ayutthaya authentic way to see the city. was destroyed by the Burmese. After the capital was moved While many tourists who venture across the river, Thonburi became a separate city, but now it is this way come to stay in one of one of many districts that make up the city of Bangkok.
    [Show full text]
  • Los Angeles Transportation Transit History – South LA
    Los Angeles Transportation Transit History – South LA Matthew Barrett Metro Transportation Research Library, Archive & Public Records - metro.net/library Transportation Research Library & Archive • Originally the library of the Los • Transportation research library for Angeles Railway (1895-1945), employees, consultants, students, and intended to serve as both academics, other government public outreach and an agencies and the general public. employee resource. • Partner of the National • Repository of federally funded Transportation Library, member of transportation research starting Transportation Knowledge in 1971. Networks, and affiliate of the National Academies’ Transportation • Began computer cataloging into Research Board (TRB). OCLC’s World Catalog using Library of Congress Subject • Largest transit operator-owned Headings and honoring library, forth largest transportation interlibrary loan requests from library collection after U.C. outside institutions in 1978. Berkeley, Northwestern University and the U.S. DOT’s Volpe Center. • Archive of Los Angeles transit history from 1873-present. • Member of Getty/USC’s L.A. as Subject forum. Accessing the Library • Online: metro.net/library – Library Catalog librarycat.metro.net – Daily aggregated transportation news headlines: headlines.metroprimaryresources.info – Highlights of current and historical documents in our collection: metroprimaryresources.info – Photos: flickr.com/metrolibraryarchive – Film/Video: youtube/metrolibrarian – Social Media: facebook, twitter, tumblr, google+,
    [Show full text]
  • Pre-Consolidation Communities of Los Angeles, 1862-1932
    LOS ANGELES CITYWIDE HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT Context: Pre-Consolidation Communities of Los Angeles, 1862-1932 Prepared for: City of Los Angeles Department of City Planning Office of Historic Resources July 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE 1 CONTRIBUTOR 1 INTRODUCTION 1 THEME: WILMINGTON, 1862-1909 4 THEME: SAN PEDRO, 1882-1909 30 THEME: HOLLYWOOD, 1887-1910 56 THEME: SAWTELLE, 1896-1918 82 THEME: EAGLE ROCK, 1886-1923 108 THEME: HYDE PARK, 1887-1923 135 THEME: VENICE, 1901-1925 150 THEME: WATTS, 1902-1926 179 THEME: BARNES CITY, 1919-1926 202 THEME: TUJUNGA, 1888-1932 206 SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPY 232 SurveyLA Citywide Historic Context Statement Pre-consolidation Communities of Los Angeles, 1862-1932 PREFACE This historic context is a component of Los Angeles’ citywide historic context statement and provides guidance to field surveyors in identifying and evaluating potential historic resources relating to Pre- Consolidation Communities of Los Angeles. Refer to www.HistoricPlacesLA.org for information on designated resources associated with this context as well as those identified through SurveyLA and other surveys. CONTRIBUTOR Daniel Prosser is a historian and preservation architect. He holds an M.Arch. from Ohio State University and a Ph.D. in history from Northwestern University. Before retiring, Prosser was the Historic Sites Architect for the Kansas State Historical Society. INTRODUCTION The “Pre-Consolidation Communities of Los Angeles” context examines those communities that were at one time independent, self-governing cities. These include (presented here as themes): Wilmington, San Pedro, Hollywood, Sawtelle, Eagle Rock, Hyde Park, Venice, Watts, Barnes City, and Tujunga. This context traces the history of each of these cities (up to the point of consolidation with the City of Los Angeles), identifying important individuals and patterns of settlement and development, and then links the events and individuals to extant historic resources (individual resources and historic districts).
    [Show full text]
  • BACK on TRACK Initiatives to Restore Rail Service to U.S
    BACK ON TRACK Initiatives to Restore Rail Service to U.S. Towns and Cities JOSEPH P. SCHWIETERMAN, PH.D. & JESSICA KUPETS LA Metro BR&W RR Historic Trust 2004-2020 CHADDICK INSTITUTE WORKING PAPER SEPTEMBER 29, 2020 BACK FROM ABANDONMENT: INITIATIVES TO RESTORE RAIL SERVICE TO U.S. TOWNS AND CITIES, 2004 - 2020 JOSEPH P. SCHWIETERMAN, PH.D. AND JESSICA KUPETS, DEPAUL UNIVERSITY - CHADDICK INSTITUTE FOR METROPOLITAN DEVELOPMENT SEATTLE SEATTLE BOSTON ­ PORTLAND ­ £ £ ­¤ ­­ ­ ¡ ­ ¢ £ ­­ BOSTON ­ ­ ­ ¢ CHICAGO NEW YORK SALT LAKE CITY ¡ ­ ­ ­ PHILADELPHIA DENVER RTD SAN FRANCISCO WASHINGTON ­­ ­ ­­ ­ LOS ANGELES ­ ­ ­ WASHINGTON ­ ­ LOS ANGELES ATLANTA ­ ­­ DALLAS ­ AUSTIN HOUSTON ORLANDO + # TAMPA ­ ­ ­ ­ MIAMI Back on Track - Summary of Findings Back on Track evaluates the extent and purpose of initiatives since 2004 that have restored rail service to communities across the U.S. mainland that previously lacked active rail lines. Using a variety of analytical tools, it identifies and categorizes initiatives to reactivate out-of-service routes, rebuild abandoned corridors, and create entirely new routes that reconnect municipalities to the rail
    [Show full text]
  • Reapportionment of Legislative Districts
    University of California, Hastings College of the Law UC Hastings Scholarship Repository Propositions California Ballot Propositions and Initiatives 1928 REAPPORTIONMENT OF LEGISLATIVE DISTRICTS Follow this and additional works at: http://repository.uchastings.edu/ca_ballot_props Recommended Citation REAPPORTIONMENT OF LEGISLATIVE DISTRICTS California Proposition 1 (1928). http://repository.uchastings.edu/ca_ballot_props/230 This Proposition is brought to you for free and open access by the California Ballot Propositions and Initiatives at UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Propositions by an authorized administrator of UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. , i, , , REAPPOfiTIONMENT OF LEGISLATIVE DISTRICTS. Act of Legisla- I , latu.t~ submitted to electors by referendum. Amends'Section 78 and t~'\I YES ' ... repeals ~ection 90 of Political Code. Reapportions the legislative dis- , I I-­ tricts of the state, defining and establishing. such districts, under I authority of Section 6 of Article IV of Constitution adopted November I NO 2, 19Z6r I (For ~II text of Measure see page 1, Part II) Argument In Favor of Reapportionment of interests of this great commonwealth: The act Legislative Districts Referendum Measure is a just, conscientious and carefully framed law. A vote ,"'yes" will sustain the law-the so- It deserves to be sustained. Vote yes on Pl'OPO- called vl\OggS Reapportionment A,ct"--enacted sition Number One on the ballot. " , by the state legislature in 19"27 by DNANI- J. M. INMAN, MOUS VOTE. The law' was enacted in obedi- State Senator, Seventp. District. ence to the mandate of the voters, who, at the gelleral election of 1926, adopted the Federal FRANK S.
    [Show full text]
  • Orange County Boundary and Annexation Report 2019-2020 (January 1)
    Orange County Boundary and Annexation Report 2019-2020 (January 1) LA HABRA BREA Ü YORBA LINDA FULLERTON LA PALMA 1. 0 2.5 5 10 Miles PLACENTIA BUENA PARK ANAHEIM CYPRESS VILLA PARK STANTON LOS ALAMITOS GARDEN GROVE SEAL ORANGE WESTMINSTER BEACH 2. UNINCORPORATED SANTA ANA TUSTIN HUNTINGTON BEACH FOUNTAIN VALLEY COSTA MESA IRVINE LAKE FOREST RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA MISSION LAGUNA NEWPORT BEACH VIEJO WOODS LAGUNA ALISO HILLS VIEJO LAGUNA BEACH LAGUNA NIGUEL 1. Annexation of Cielo Vista Development (CA 19-03) SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO 2. Reorganization of the 17th St. and Tustin Unincorporated DANA Island to the City of Santa Ana and MWDOC (RO 19-07) POINT SAN CLEMENTE January 1, 2020 Jurisdictions January 1, 2019 Jurisdictions Source: OC Geomatics, 2019 & 2020 Note: Coastal boundary represents mean high tide circa 2015. Coastal boundary approximated by CDR GIS staff. Orange County Boundary and Annexation Report 2019-2020 Total Area (Square Miles)* Area Change Annexation Detailed Annexation List: Jurisdiction January 1, 2019 January 1, 2020 2019-2020** Reference # Aliso Viejo 6.921 6.921 0 1. Annexation of Cielo Vista Development (CA 19-03) Anaheim 50.872 50.872 0 Effective: 12/20/2019 Brea 12.221 12.221 0 From the County of Orange to the City of Yorba Linda Buena Park 10.550 10.550 0 Uninhabited Costa Mesa 15.849 15.849 0 84.812 Acres (0.13251875 sq. miles) Cypress 6.622 6.622 0 Dana Point 6.602 6.602 0 2. Reorganization of the 17th St. and Tustin Unincorporated Island (RO 19-07) Fountain Valley 9.065 9.065 0 From Unincorporated to the City of Santa Ana and MWDOC Fullerton 22.447 22.447 0 Effective: 12/31/2019 Garden Grove 17.924 17.924 0 Inhabited Huntington Beach 27.612 27.612 0 24.79 Acres (0.038734375 sq.
    [Show full text]
  • 1981 Caltrans Inventory of Pacific Electric Routes
    1981 Inventory of PACIFIC ELECTRIC ROUTES I J..,. I ~ " HE 5428 . red by I58 ANGELES - DISTRICT 7 - PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION BRANCH rI P37 c.2 " ' archive 1981 INVENTORY OF PACIFIC ELECTRIC ROUTES • PREPARED BY CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (CALTRANS) DISTRICT 07 PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION BRANCH FEBRUARY 1982 • TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 Pacific Electric Railway Company Map 3a Inventory Map 3b II. NQR'I'HIRN AND EASTERN DISTRICTS 4 A. San Bernardino Line 6 B. Monrovia-Glendora Line 14 C. Alhambra-San Gabriel Line 19 D. Pasadena Short Line 21 E. Pasadena Oak Knoll Line 23 F. Sierra Madre Line 25 G. South Pasadena Line 27 H. North Lake Avenue Line 30 10 North Fair Oaks Avenue Line 31 J. East Colorado Street Line 32 K. Pomona-Upland Line 34 L. San Bernardino-Riverside Line 36 M. Riverside-Corona Line 41 III. WESTERN DISTRICT 45 A. Glendale-Burbank Line 47 B. Hollywood Line Segment via Hill Street 52 C. South Hollywood-Sherman Line 55 D. Subway Hollywood Line 58 i TABLE OF CONTENTS (Contd. ) -PAGE III. WESTERN DISTRICT (Conta. ) E. San Fernando valley Line 61 F. Hollywood-Venice Line 68 o. Venice Short Line 71 H. Santa Monica via Sawtelle Line 76 I. westgate Line 80 J. Santa Monica Air Line 84 K. Soldier's Home Branch Line 93 L. Redondo Beach-Del Rey Line 96 M. Inglewood Line 102 IV. SOUTHIRN DISTRICT 106 A. Long Beach Line 108 B. American Avenue-North Long Beach Line 116 c. Newport-Balboa Line 118 D. E1 Segundo Line 123 E. San Pedro via Dominguez Line 129 F.
    [Show full text]
  • TIMEPOINTS Volume 89 January/February/March 1996 Numbers 1, 2 & 3
    TIMEPOINTS Volume 89 January/February/March 1996 Numbers 1, 2 & 3 Angels Flight™ Re-opens JANUARY/FEBRUARY/MARCH 1996 Page 1 ™ Timepoints January/February/March 1996 Angels Flight Reopens The Southern California Traction Review On February 23, 1996 at approximately 9:37am the offi- cial first run of the restored version of Angels Flight™ Always a Newsletter in sight produced by ended almost 27 years of “Flightless” activity between Hill The Electric Railway Historical Association & Olive Streets in downtown Los Angeles. of Southern California, Inc. TIMEPOINTS has already brought you extensive coverage Subscription included in membership. of the rebuilding process (see November 1991 issue, mov- ing the winch house and arch to Hill Street, March 1994 ERHA membership is $25.00 per year issue devoted to the restoration, January/February/March Editorial Mailing Address Circulation, ERHA Business 1995 issue, construction begins and July/August/Septem- Digital Realitites ERHA of SC ber 1995 Olivet & Sinai and more construction progress) John Heller 1 World Trade Center but the reopening of the Flight means much to Angelenos 7315 Melrose Avenue P.O. Box 32161 and is the closest thing to heritage trolley operation we Hollywood, CA 90046 Long Beach, CA 90832-2161 have... ERHA of SC1995 Board of Directors Service hours are President Alan Fishel 6AM to 10PM seven days/ Vice-President John Heller week (original hours Recording Secretary Jerry Pass were 6AM to 12:20AM Treasurer Jed Hughes seven day/week) Membership Secretary William Costley Restoration cost: $4.1 At-Large David Cameron million Paul Ward Funding: CRA and ÇPershing Square Red LineStation Contributors .
    [Show full text]