DOCSLIB.ORG

Executive Summary

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Executive Summary CHAPTER I: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY As Anchorage approaches its centennial in 2015, the city has been presented with a valuable opportunity to celebrate its history. Both the built environment of its oldest neighborhoods and its intangible cultural heritage oơer the chance to plan for responsible, sustainable development in the future. This Historic Preservation Plan for Anchorage’s Four Original Neighborhoods provides a chance to explore new ideas and creative solutions for the preservation of each neighborhood’s unique character. The recommendations contained within this plan are based on a broad deƤnition of historic preservation that goes beyond just bricks and mortar. Preservation and quality of life issues are inextricably linked, which is why the plan includes strategies related to improving walkability, fostering a healthy local economy, and telling stories about our heritage. ADOPTED 2/12/2013 AO 2013ǧ12 1 HISTORIC PRESERVATION PLAN FOR ANCHORAGE’S FOUR ORIGINAL NEIGHBORHOODS Purpose of the Plan The Historic Preservation Plan (HPP) for Anchorage’s Four Original Neighborhoods is a community- ECTIVE ͙͗ ȃ based plan focused on preserving historic character while planning for a sustainable future in HISTORIC PRESERVATION Anchorage’s original neighborhoods. The plan area includes the Government Hill, Downtown, South Addition, and Fairview Community Council areas. Because its borders include three of the four To identify and address the preservation neighborhoods, the Ship Creek area is also included in the HPP. and management of historic resources in Anchorage’s Four Original Neighborhoods. The purpose of the HPP is to address the preservation and management of historic resources, enhance local preservation values, and provide guidance for future impacts to historic resources To provide guidance for future mitigation to and landscape features in Anchorage’s Four Original Neighborhoods. The HPP is meant to be impacts to historic resources and landscapes used with existing neighborhood and Municipality planning documents, and will be adopted as identiƤed during completion of the Historic an element of the Municipality’s Comprehensive Plan. The HPP is speciƤc to the plan area, and Preservation Plan (HPP). provides recommendations that are relevant to the entire plan area as well as to each of the four neighborhoods. Information in the HPP can be used to inƪuence and inform the planning and design of future development projects and of individual buildings—including public infrastructure such as HPP O ECTIVE ͚͗ ȃ transportation, trails, and parks—to ensure the protection of neighborhood character and values that IDENTIFICATION OF KNIK ARM the citizens of Anchorage have expressed. CROSSING PROJECT IMPACTS The plan is intended to meet two primary objectives: (1) IdentiƤcation and preservation of To address the impacts to historic and cultural historic character and important historic resources of Anchorage’s Four Original Neighborhoods; resources from the design, construction, and and (2) identiƤcation of nik Arm Crossing Bridge Project impacts to Anchorage’s Four Original operation of the nik Arm Crossing project Neighborhoods, as well as the direct and indirect costs of these impacts to the Municipality of (AC). The AC will introduce physical/built, Anchorage, private businesses, property owners, and residents (see sidebar). visual, atmospheric, and audio impacts through right-of-way alignments and signiƤcantly increased traƥc volumes. To provide additional information not included in the Government Hill Neighborhood Plan. ADOPTED 2/12/2013 2 AO 2013ǧ012 CHAPTER I: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Preservation in Anchorage Today Historic preservation is not new to the Municipality of Anchorage. In fact, the Municipality has been actively supporting historic preservation activities, such as the survey and documentation of historic resources, since the late 1970s and early 1980s. Many in the Anchorage community have continued these practices in the Four Original Neighborhoods by restoring private residences and opening signiƤcant historic sites to the public, such as the Oscar Anderson House and the Pioneer Schoolhouse. The HPP promotes these established preservation values, and therefore the plan begins with a review of the current local historic preservation programs and tools in Anchorage. In 1995, the Municipality of Anchorage became a CertiƤed Local Government (CLG), which means that it partnered with the State Historic Preservation Oƥce and the National Park Service to promote grassroots historic preservation. The Anchorage Historic Preservation Commission (AHPC) was formed in January 2007 to support the goals of the CLG. Since that time, the AHPC has partnered with groups such as Alaska Association for Historic Preservation, Anchorage Woman’s Club, and the Cook Inlet Historical Society, among others, on preservation projects in the Four Original Neighborhoods. The Municipality currently utilizes historic resource surveys and context statements to gather information about its heritage. Surveys are essential because they form the foundation of a city’s preservation program: identifying and discovering signiƤcant buildings and landscapes allows residents and planners to fully incorporate these resources and values into planning and development decisions. Prior architectural surveys and studies conducted in the Four Original Neighborhoods have all been conducted using a variety of diơerent methods, which has led to some inconsistencies in the results. These surveys are summarized in the HPP, and are on Ƥle at the Municipality of Anchorage Planning Department or the Alaska State Historic Preservation Oƥce. Education about historic preservation incentive programs at the federal, state, and local levels would increase utilization of these programs in Anchorage. Incentives already administered by the National Park Service and the Alaska State Historic Preservation Oƥce include Federal Rehabilitation Tax Credits, The HPP promotes the established preservation values in Alaska Historical District Revolving Loan Fund, New Markets Tax Credits, low-income housing tax credits, the Municipality of Anchorage. and energy credits. Implementation of strategies in Anchorage 2020: Anchorage Bowl Comprehensive Plan—many of which are powerful preservation tools—would also establish local preservation incentives. ADOPTED 2/12/2013 AO 2013ǧ12 3 HISTORIC PRESERVATION PLAN FOR ANCHORAGE’S FOUR ORIGINAL NEIGHBORHOODS HPP and Title 21 REFERENCES TO OTHER PLANS The nomination of historic districts and historic architectural standards will be addressed in the future AMC 21.05.03 (Title 21) after Title 21 adoption. Nomination of properties and architectural standards will include public Comprehensive Plan elements involvement, property-owner support, and municipal review and approval. AMC_4.60.030 (AHPC) HPP and Anchorage 2020 E.4: Formulate a Historic Preservation Plan, and submit to the assembly, mayor, and planning and Policy #51 of Anchorage 2020 states, DzThe Municipality shall deƤne Anchorage’s historic buildings and zoning commission for incorporation into the sites and develop a conservation strategy.” The strategy to implement Policy #51 is the development 2020 Comprehensive Plan. of a Functional Plan speciƤcally noted as a Historic Preservation Plan. Functional Plans study and recommend future needs for speciƤc public facilities and services. Examples of other functional plans: Anchorage 2020: Anchorage Bowl Areawide Trails Plan; Long-Range Transportation Plan; and the Anchorage Park, Natural Resource, and Comprehensive Plan Recreation Facility Plan. The HPP recommendations for public facilities, including municipal-owned Conserve Anchorage’s heritage of historic historic buildings, trails, and services, are consistent with Anchorage 2020. buildings and sites. Policy 51: The Municipality shall deƤne Anchorage’s historic buildings and sites and develop a conservation strategy. Functional Plan (Historic Preservation Plan). ADOPTED 2/12/2013 4 AO 2013ǧ012 CHAPTER I: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Summary of Principal Recommendations The principal recommendations in the HPP include projects, programs, and strategies that will preserve neighborhood character; maintain and/or increase trails and walking access; incorporate elements of our important history through a variety of interpretive elements; provide guidance to the Anchorage Historic Preservation Commission, Community Councils, the Planning and Zoning Commission and the Assembly in land use and historic preservation decisions; and identify strategies for the mitigation of large infrastructure projects. These include: à Walking, Biking and Trail Projects; à Historic Property and Building Preservation; à Telling Our Stories through Interpretation Projects; à IdentiƤcation of Historic Resources for Mitigation of Transportation Impacts; à Nomination of Properties and Districts to the National Register; and à Historic Preservation Funding. Walkability, bikeability, and easy access to the Tony nowles Coastal Trail are among the characteristics valued most Walking and Biking highly by residents of the Four Original Neighborhoods. Anchorage was established in 1915. At that time, the Alaska Engineering Commission (AEC) started construction of the Alaska Railroad and the 13 AEC cottages built on what became Government Hill. The Ƥrst auction and platting of downtown Anchorage also occurred in 1915. This came after the establishment of the AEC oƥces in Ship Creek in 1914. Motorized vehicles were nonexistent
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Mid-Twentieth Century Architecture in Alaska Historic Context (1945-1968)
    Mid-Twentieth Century Architecture in Alaska Historic Context (1945-1968) Prepared by Amy Ramirez . Jeanne Lambin . Robert L. Meinhardt . and Casey Woster 2016 The Cultural Resource Programs of the National Park Service have responsibilities that include stewardship of historic buildings, museum collections, archeological sites, cultural landscapes, oral and written histories, and ethnographic resources. The material is based upon work assisted by funding from the National Park Service. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Department of the Interior. Printed 2018 Cover: Atwood Center, Alaska Pacific University, Anchorage, 2017, NPS photograph MID-TWENTIETH CENTURY ARCHITECTURE IN ALASKA HISTORIC CONTEXT (1945 – 1968) Prepared for National Park Service, Alaska Regional Office Prepared by Amy Ramirez, B.A. Jeanne Lambin, M.S. Robert L. Meinhardt, M.A. and Casey Woster, M.A. July 2016 Table of Contents LIST OF ACRONYMS/ABBREVIATIONS ............................................................................................... 5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................... 8 1.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ..................................................................................................................... 9 1.1 Historic Context as a Planning & Evaluation Tool ............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • SUMMER 2017 Tanana River Alaska Railroad Adventure Packages Are Make the Absolute Most of a Day in Alaska
    RAILBELT MAP Alaska Railroad See Alaska By Rail FAIRBANKS Day Trips SUMMER 2017 Tanana River Alaska Railroad Adventure Packages are Make the absolute most of a day in Alaska. SCHEDULES & FARES multi-day itineraries that include rail travel, Our summer trains pair perfectly with a accommodations and activities for a seamless wide variety of unique Alaska activities: Alaska adventure. LI A ARK EN P • Take the train to Seward for a Kenai Fjords D AL DENALI N IO wildlife and glacier cruise T LI A A E The Deluxe Alaska Sampler N G N E N • D A The Deluxe Alaska Sampler showcases the best of Alaska Ride the rail to Talkeetna for a flightseeing R in one week: tour of Denali and the Alaska Range A K S DAY 1 – Arrive in Anchorage • Explore the Spencer Glacier Whistle Stop — A L a backcountry area only accessible by rail — HURRICANE DAY 2 – Glacier Discovery Train to rafting at A with a guided nature walk, ice climbing or Spencer Glacier rafting on a glacial river DAY 3 – Coastal Classic Train to Kenai Fjords TALKEETNA glacier cruise DAY 4 – Explore Seward, Alaska Learn more about these and dozens of other Alaska Railroad day trips at AlaskaRailroad.com/DayTrips DAY 5 – Denali Star Train to Denali National Park DAY 6 – Wildlife Tour in Denali National Park Find more at AlaskaRailroad.com DAY 7 – Denali Star Train to Anchorage Susitna River Additional rate information WASILLA EST Learn more about the Deluxe Alaska Sampler OR L F Multi-day Alaska rail packages & day trips NA and other Adventure Packages at IO AT N Destination information & depot locations Knik River H - AlaskaRailroad.com/Packages - C A G Hotel recommendations ANCHORAGE U H C Alaska Railroad photos & videos O K I N GIRDWOOD C O L E T Winter rail schedules & packages WHITTIER Sign up for the Alaska Railroad e-newsletter PORTAGE More ways to connect: SPENCER GLACIER GRANDVIEW Kenai River Kenai Lake Anchorage Depot Skilak Lake 411 West 1st Avenue, 907.265.2494 Fairbanks Depot SEWARD 1031 Alaska Railroad Depot Road, 907.458.6025 Sullivan W.
    [Show full text]
  • SUMMER 2016 Alaska’S National DAY 1 – Fly Into Fairbanks for Overnight Stay
    NEW! CENTENNIAL RAILBELT MAP SPECIAL Alaska’s National Parks by Rail 8 Days – Southcentral & Interior Alaska FAIRBANKS NENANA SUMMER 2016 Alaska’s National DAY 1 – Fly into Fairbanks for overnight stay. Tanana River DAY 2 – Travel north on a flightseeing tour and SCHEDULES & FARES marvel at the vast and remote land below. Cross Parks by Rail the Arctic Circle and view the rugged Brooks Mountains and the wild expanses of Gates of the LI A ARK EN P Arctic National Park and Preserve. Overnight in D AL DENALI N Fairbanks. IO Celebrate the centennial of the National Park T LI A A E N G N E N Service with the Alaska Railroad by exploring DAY 3 – Take the Denali Star Train south to Denali D A R four of America’s most breathtaking national National Park & Preserve. Watch for views of Denali and keep an eye out for wildlife. Overnight in Denali. A parks: Gates of the Arctic, Denali, Kenai Fjords K S and Lake Clark national parks. DAY 4 – Travel into Denali National Park & A L HURRICANE Preserve on a narrated tour of the park by bus. A Your guide will interpret the history, flora and fauna as you make your way to the heart of the park. Chulitna River Overnight in Denali. TALKEETNA DAY 5 – Spend the morning exploring the area before boarding the Denali Star Train for Talkeetna, home to world-class flightseeing and a charming Main Street. Overnight in Talkeetna. DAY 6 – Enjoy a morning flightseeing tour for an Find more at AlaskaRailroad.com up-close view of Denali and the Alaska Range.
    [Show full text]
  • Passenger Operations
    Passenger Operations 2018 Summer Operational Information AlaskaRailroad.com ARRC: Alaska Railroad Corp Abbreviations Key HAP: Holland America Princess WEX: Wilderness Express WS: Whistle Stop TSIA: Ted Stevens International Airport DMU: Diesel Multiple Unit (self propelled vehicle) HOS: Hours of Service RSIA: Rail Safety Improvement Act of 2008 T&E: Train and Engineman (Engineer, Conductor, Brakeaman CC: Coastal Classic (Anchorage – Seward – Anchorage) DSN: Denali Star North (Anchorage – Fairbanks) DSS: Denali Star South (Fairbanks – Anchorage) GD: Glacier Discovery (Anchorage – Whittier – Portage – Spencer WS – Grand View – Spencer WS – Portage – Whittier – Anchorage) HT: Hurricane Turn (Talkeetna – Hurricane Gulch – Talkeetna) CT: Cruise Train (Seward – TSIA – Seward) MEX: HAP McKinley Express (Seward – Whittier – Anchorage – McKinley Siding – Anchorage – Whittier – Seward) NB DEX: HAP Northbound Denali Express (Anchorage – Whittier – Denali Park – Healy – Fairbanks w/locomotive and Gold Star Coach) SB DEX: HAP Southbound Denali Express (Fairbanks w/locomotive and Gold Star – Healy - Denali Park – Whittier) NB HEX: HAP Northbound Healy Express (Anchorage – Denali - Healy) SB HEX: HAP Southbound Healy Express (Healy – Denali Park – Anchorage) 2 AlaskaRailroad.com Denali Star Northbound (DSN) Route: Anchorage to Fairbanks Additional Station Stops: Wasilla/Talkeetna/Denali Schedule Highlights: Depart Anchorage 0815 Arrive Talkeetna 1105 (20”- 25” Dwell) Arrive Denali Park 1545 (25”- 30” Dwell) Arrive Fairbanks 2000 Onboard crew switches at meet (Broad Pass/Colorado). Typically Wilderness Express will be the only pull customer on the DSN and DSS. 3 AlaskaRailroad.com Denali Star Southbound (DSS) Route: Fairbanks to Anchorage Additional Station Stops: Denali/Talkeetna/Wasilla Schedule Highlights: Depart Fairbanks 0815 Arrive Denali Park 1215 (25”- 30” Dwell) Arrive Talkeetna 1640 (20”- 25” Dwell) Arrive Anchorage 2000 Onboard crew switches at meet (Broad Pass/Colorado).
    [Show full text]
  • Comm Ties 1St Quarter 2005.Qxp
    Alaska Railroad Ongoing Projects: Fairbanks Intermodal Facility Alaska Railroad Corporation 1st Quarter, 2005 Collision Avoidance System www.alaskarailroad.com • (907) 265-2300 ISER OUTLINES ARRC ECONOMIC IMPACTS Fish Passage Improvements Recent research quantifies jobs, payroll attributed to ARRC Anchorage-to-Wasilla A new report by the University of average of 800 ARRC employees, this in- Track Realignment Alaska’s Institute for Social and state spending also supports approximately Economic Research (ISER) 1,100 non-Railroad Alaskan jobs ranging reaffirms what many railroaders from health care services to restaurants to Anchorage Rail Capacity Study already know - the Alaska retail trade. Railroad Corporation (ARRC) has a significant, positive impact on In addition to fiscal value, the ISER report Whistle Noise Reduction System the state’s economy and the lives discusses other benefits that stem from the of Alaskans. In a nutshell, ARRC Railroad’s existence. For example, ARRC Aspending supports nearly 1,900 enables economic development by Anchorage Yard Ops Center Alaskan jobs and pumps more than $83 providing an efficient transportation link million each year in payroll into the state’s necessary for Alaska businesses. economy. A report summary is included in this issue Ship Creek Intermodal Center ISER ‘s published report outlines of Community Ties. The full ISER report is ARRC’s economic significance to available on ISER’s website at Alaska by examining Railroad www.iser.uaa.alaska.edu. Improved Sidings & Signals spending for the 2001-to-2003 time period. The Whittier Development Planning review found that ARRC spends an Seward Loading average of $108 million each year in Alaska; this is split between For updates or comments on payroll for Railroad employees (41%) and purchases from these projects, visit the Alaska Alaska businesses (59%).
    [Show full text]
  • Signed Prints $55 Posters $30 Pins $5 Each Please Visit Our Online Gift Shop Or Anchorage and Fairbanks Depots to Purchase Your
    Signed prints $55 Posters $30 Pins $5 each Please visit our online gift shop or Anchorage and Fairbanks depots to purchase your Alaska Railroad souvenirs! © Alaska Railroad Corporation 2021 Print: 30” x 21” © Alaska Railroad Corporation 2021 2021 • SOAR MORE Poster: 16” x 20” “Soar More” Artist Debra Dubac’s acrylic painting depicts a profile of iconic Alaska Railroad locomotive No. 4321, escorted by an American bald eagle flying prominently overhead. The eagle symbolizes the spirit of Alas- ka, with the freedom to ‘soar more’ through the Last Frontier and the opportunities to do so, via the Alaska Railroad. 2021 © Alaska Railroad Corporation 2020 Poster: 16” x 20” © Alaska Railroad Corporation 2020 Print: 23” x 27.5” “Journeys” Artist Jason Vukovich watercolor painting depicts an Alaska Railroad passenger train moving over a river packed with salmon making their annual journey upstream to spawn. Knowing a feast awaits, bears journey to the salmon-rich streams to fatten up before winter. 2020 © Alaska Railroad Corporation 2019 Print: 26.5” x 23” © Alaska Railroad Corporation 2019 Poster: 20” x 16” “On Time for Dinner” Artist Susan Watkins’ oil painting depicts an Alaska Railroad passenger train moving beside a stream where a sow and her cubs prepare to fish for salmon along a stretch of track between Portage and Seward. 2019 Print: 26” x 24-1/4” Poster: 21” x 18-3/4” “Here Comes the Train” Artist Beverly Stevens uses watercolor to depict a winter setting with a dog team approaching 20 Mile River as an Alaska Railroad passenger train crosses the bridge.
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Context & Surveys
    CHAPTER V: HISTORIC CONTEXT & SURVEYS HISTORIC CONTEXT & SURVEYS Important themes and patterns of development in a community are established through survey and preparation of a historic context statement. These important tools, described in the sidebar, serve as the building blocks of a historic preservation plan. With a good understanding of its historic and WHY CONDUCT SURVEYS? cultural resources, a community is able to make informed planning decisions. A survey is a means to identify and document This chapter Ƥrst includes a historical context statement of the Denaǯina Athabascan people and historic resources. The information collected through the Four Original Neighborhoods. The context statement does not provide an exhaustive history, survey is then cataloged into a historic resources but rather summarizes important themes and patterns in the development of the historic core of inventoryȄa list or spreadsheet of the resources that Anchorage. The history of the Four Original NeighborhoodsȄAnchorageǯs historic coreȄreƪects all ere identiƤed and documented. As the National periods of Anchorageǯs development. Waterays ithin the plan area provided sustenance to the Park Service explains, the purpose of a survey is “to early Denaǯina Athabascan people, and the events that deƤned Anchorage during the Ƥrst half of gather the information needed to plan for the wise the 20th centuryȄconstruction of the railroad, the birth of aviation, and military buildǦupȄere all use of a community’s resources.” Once resources concentrated in the plan area. A detailed discussion of the history of each neighborhood is found in have been documented and evaluated for historic and Chapter VII: Neighborhood Character, Goals & Policies. cultural signiƤcance, those Ƥndings may inform future planning decisions.
    [Show full text]
  • I PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT PLAN This Place Matters!
    i PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT PLAN This Place Matters! The images behind the logo: Alyeska Roundhouse-top right, Old Saint Nicholas Church-top left, Wendler Building-center, 4th Avenue Theatre-center right, and Ship Creek-bottom left-Home to First Salmon Ceremony PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT PLAN Anchorage’s Historic Preservation Plan A Strategy for Historic Preservation, Neighborhood Revitalization, and Economic Development Prepared by the Planning Department – Long-Range Planning Division and the Anchorage Historic Preservation Commission Adopted by the Anchorage Assembly on ………2018 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT PLAN Intentionally Left Blank PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT PLAN ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Mayor Ethan Berkowitz Planning and Zoning Commission Historic Preservation Commission Planning Department Tyler Robinson, Chair Debra Corbett, Chair Carol Wong, Planning Manager Anchorage Assembly Jon Spring, Vice Chair Kimberly Varner Wetzel, Vice Chair Kristine Bunnell, Project Manager, CLG Dick Traini, Chair Seth Andersen Bobbie Bianchi, Government Hill Representative Forrest Dunbar, Vice Chair Danielle Bailey Darrell Lewis, National Park Service Connor Scher, Planning Intern Christopher Constant Mitzi Barker Bryce Klug, RIM Architects Jody Seitz, Associate Planner Eric Croft Jared Gardner Kevin Keeler, At-Large Susan Perry, Principal Office Associate Amy Demboski Brian Looney, P.E. Richard Martin, Knik Tribal Council Fred Dyson Project Team Andre Spinelli Brandy Pennington, Realtor Suzanne La France Huddle, AK Gregory Strike Monty Rogers, Cultural Alaska, At-Large Pete Petersen
    [Show full text]
  • Comm Ties 1St Qtr 2003.Qxd
    Alaska Railroad Ongoing Projects: Fairbanks Intermodal Facility Alaska Railroad Corporation 1st Quarter, 2003 Nenana Rail Relocation study www.alaskarailroad.com • (907) 265-2300 2003 ALASKA RAILROAD FREIGHT UPDATE Denali Depot Improvements Rail and rail-barge business capitalizes on new opportunities Palmer Park-and-Ride Center he Alaska Railroad freight business assistance to the trucking company. has capitalized on several new Another SBS rail haul is scheduled in spring. Anchorage-to-Wasilla opportunities to expand service. Rail-Barge to the Rescue Track Realignment Rail to the Rescue When TOTE (Totem Ocean Trailer Express) In the first week of March, needed to provide one of its three Spenard Builders Supply steamships to the U.S. military for service in Anchorage Rail Capacity Study commissioned ARRC to rail its the Persian Gulf area, ARRC’s rail-barge barged-in materials from Seward partnership stepped in to help pick up the T to Anchorage for the first time. slack. During the first few months of the South Anchorage Double Track During the winter, the inlet ice and tide year, TOTE usually moves a large number of make it difficult for a barge to tie up in vehicles to the Alaska market. With one Anchorage, so SBS traditionally docks its steamship gone, TOTE fell short of capacity. Anchorage Yard Ops Center chartered barge in Seward, and trucks the cargo to Anchorage. ARRC partner Lynden is moving some of the overflow via rail-barge through Whittier. Ship Creek Intermodal Center The trucking company wasn’t able to While Lynden will provide the logistics, handle the entire load, so the railroad equipment and barge container space, hauled what it is best equipped to haul… ARRC will rail the containers into Improved Sidings & Signals big, heavy materials.
    [Show full text]
  • CARES Act Money to Help Fill Capital Funding
    June / July 2020 All Aboard is a news bulletin for employees/retirees of the Alaska Railroad. The emailed version includes short briefs with links to longer stories or more information, most of which are posted on our employee website, Inside Track, https://insidetrack.akrr.com/. CORE VALUES: SUSTAINABILITY CARES Act money to help fill capital funding gap As announced by CEO Bill O’Leary in late July, the Alaska Railroad is getting some funding from the Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security (CARES) Act. Below are answers to some frequently asked questions about this funding. Why did we get CARES Act money? The act recognizes that public transportation agencies have been hard-hit by the pandemic. As providers of public transportation, Federal Transit Administration (FTA) grant recipients (like ARRC) were identified to receive CARES Act funds to support transportation infrastructure and services. What is the purpose of CARES Act money flowing through FTA? CARES Act funding is not meant to encourage recipients to come up with new projects. Rather, funding should support ongoing infrastructure needs. The funding is made available through an appropriation bill, the CARES Act, because the federal government recognized that transportation agencies have suffered tremendous cash losses, making it difficult, if not impossible, to fund essential capital investments and improvements. FTA expects ARRC to use the funding to keep our system in a state of good repair and help fill in for revenue shortfalls resulting from the pandemic. This is certainly the case for ARRC, which saw its 2020 budgeted $22 million net income become a forecasted loss of at least $9.3 million.
    [Show full text]
  • Anchorage Depot Anchorage, Alaska Page 2 3
    USDI/NPS NRHP Registration Form Anchorage Depot Anchorage, Alaska Page 2 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1986, as amended, I hereby certify that this X nomination ___ request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property X meets ___ does not meet the National Register Criteria. I recommend that this property be considered significant __ nationally __ statewide X locally. ( __ See continuation sheet for additional comments.) (9 of certifying official Date Alaska_____________________________________________________ State or Federal agency and bureau In my opinion, the property ___ meets ___ does not meet the National Register criteria. ( __ See continuation sheet for additional comments.) Signature of commenting or other official Date State or Federal agency and bureau 4. National Park Service Certification I, hereby certify that this property i I/ entered in the National Register __ See continuation sheet. ___ determined eligible for the National Register __ See continuation sheet. determined not eligible for the National Register removed from the National Register other (explain): ______________ / Signature of Keeper Date of Action NFS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 (Rev. 10-90) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES REGISTRATION FORM This form is for use in nominating or requestinbHa^^^gj^tMiis I'oT individual properties and districts. See instr^cJsAonir'Tn How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form (National Register Bulletin 16A).
    [Show full text]
  • 2004 Community Ties Archive
    Alaska Railroad Ongoing Projects: Fairbanks Intermodal Facility Alaska Railroad Corporation 1st Quarter, 2004 Collision Avoidance System www.alaskarailroad.com • (907) 265-2300 Photo by Sam Harrel Fish Passage Improvements Palmer Park-and-Ride Center Anchorage-to-Wasilla Track Realignment 2003 PERFORMANCE SETS STANDARD Anchorage Rail Capacity Study Railroad marks safest, most prosperous year in history otivated employees, a good number of man-hours in modern times Whistle Noise Reduction System plan executed well, and a (1.42 million). Train derailments were also more modern infrastructure down in 2003. ARRC met its goal to reduce boosted Alaska Railroad derailments by 20%, and ARRC’s “train Anchorage Yard Ops Center performance to the top of the accident rate” (an industry measure of charts in 2003. Here’s how incidents with more than $6,700 damage, the Railroad stacked up when for every million train miles run) was below Ship Creek Intermodal Center compared to both its 2003 the national average at 3.5. goals and five-year objectives: M Financial — 2003 goal: Grow overall Improved Sidings & Signals Safety — 2003 goal: Operate a safe revenue 2-4% per year. railroad • Five-year objective: Reduce The 2003 budget process pointed to a employee injuries to average no more than marginal, if not below average, year. 2.0 injuries per 200,000 man-hours. Whittier Development Planning However, a surprisingly strong Alaska 2003 was the Alaska Railroad’s safest, ever. economy and several unplanned business Perhaps the most important milestone was a opportunities contributed to revenue Seward Dock & Port Security reduction in injury severity, expressed as the growth of 7.5%.
    [Show full text]