I PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT PLAN This Place Matters!

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

I PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT PLAN This Place Matters! i PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT PLAN This Place Matters! The images behind the logo: Alyeska Roundhouse-top right, Old Saint Nicholas Church-top left, Wendler Building-center, 4th Avenue Theatre-center right, and Ship Creek-bottom left-Home to First Salmon Ceremony PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT PLAN Anchorage’s Historic Preservation Plan A Strategy for Historic Preservation, Neighborhood Revitalization, and Economic Development Prepared by the Planning Department – Long-Range Planning Division and the Anchorage Historic Preservation Commission Adopted by the Anchorage Assembly on ………2018 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT PLAN Intentionally Left Blank PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT PLAN ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Mayor Ethan Berkowitz Planning and Zoning Commission Historic Preservation Commission Planning Department Tyler Robinson, Chair Debra Corbett, Chair Carol Wong, Planning Manager Anchorage Assembly Jon Spring, Vice Chair Kimberly Varner Wetzel, Vice Chair Kristine Bunnell, Project Manager, CLG Dick Traini, Chair Seth Andersen Bobbie Bianchi, Government Hill Representative Forrest Dunbar, Vice Chair Danielle Bailey Darrell Lewis, National Park Service Connor Scher, Planning Intern Christopher Constant Mitzi Barker Bryce Klug, RIM Architects Jody Seitz, Associate Planner Eric Croft Jared Gardner Kevin Keeler, At-Large Susan Perry, Principal Office Associate Amy Demboski Brian Looney, P.E. Richard Martin, Knik Tribal Council Fred Dyson Project Team Andre Spinelli Brandy Pennington, Realtor Suzanne La France Huddle, AK Gregory Strike Monty Rogers, Cultural Alaska, At-Large Pete Petersen Corvus Culture Summer Louthan, Ex-Officio-Alaska State Historic Felix Rivera Al Dobbins Project Management & Engineering Preservation Office Tim Steele Jennifer Novy, GISP Northern Land Use Research, Alaska, LLC John Weddleton Terry Lamberson, GISP PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT PLAN PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary 3Historic Preservation in Anchorage Thank you………………………………………………………………….....i Municipality of Anchorage’s Historic Preservation Program…………………32 Purpose Overview……………………………………………………………ii Other MOA Plans With Preservation Goals, Policies, and Actions……….......35 MOA-Owned Landmarks……………………………………………...……iii Local Preservation Organizations………………………………………….……38 Vicinity Map…………………………………………………………………iii Involving the Alaska Native Peoples in Historic Preservation………………...40 Public Engagement Overview…………………………………………….....iv Historic Preservation Program Accomplishments………………………….v 4Occupation and Settlement Organization and Using the Plan………………………………………..….vi Occupation and Settlement Overview………………………………………….42 Draft Priority Recommendations…………………………………………...vi 1Introduction 5 Properties of National Significance Nationally-Significant Properties in Anchorage………………………………52 Purpose……………………………………………………………………….1 National Register Listed and Eligible Properties……………………………….58 AMC 4.6.030 Economic and Social Benefits of Historic Preservation……2 MOAHPP and the MOA Historic Preservation Program………………….6 6Benefits of Historic Preservation MOAHPP Development Methodology…………………………………….9 Social Benefits Of Historic Preservation………………………………………..62 Planning Areas………………………………………………………………10 Economic Benefits Of Historic Preservation…………………………………...63 Public Engagement and Outreach………………………………………….12 Historic Preservation as an Economic Development Tool……………………….64 Appendix, Case Studies and Readings………………………………………15 What the MOAHPP Will and Will Not Do………………………………..15 7Anchorage Local Landmark and Landmark District Register Acronyms, Abbreviations, Glossary………………………………………..17 Intent of Local Landmarks Register…………………………………………….66 2Federal and State Historic Preservation Laws Types of Local Landmarks………………………………………………………66 Categories for Evaluating Local Landmark…………………………………….68 What is Historic Preservation………………………………………………26 Local Landmark Nomination Process………………………………………….69 Federal Historic Preservation Laws…………………………………………26 Local Landmark Frequently Asked Questions…………………………………70 Alaska State Historic Preservation Program……………………………….29 8Themes, Visions, Goals and Policies Themes, Visions, Goals, and Policies……………………………………………72 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT PLAN 9Implementation Plan Introduction…………………………………………………………...88 Consulting Parties…………………………………………..…………88 Program of Projects – Implementation Matrix……………………....89 10Case Studies and Readings………………………………………..104 11Bibliography…………………………………………………………...122 12Appendix………………………………………………………………126 MOAHPP Online Survey Summary The Greenest Building Fact Sheet Anchorage Original Neighborhoods Interpretive Plan Overview AMC 4.60.030 - Anchorage Historic Preservation Commission AMC 6.100 - Historic Preservation Project Fund Anchorage 2020 – Relevant Policies National Register Historic District Approval Process PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT PLAN Executive Summary Thank You Thank you! To the supporters of this planning effort. The planning team sought to involve We know the success and spoils of mineral wealth, a resolve to rebuild and remain, and the the community throughout the planning process, and our community stepped up and primal importance of salmon. We share the desire to live between mountains and sea, at helped in numerous ways; from showing up at workshops, volunteering to knock on doors the edge of the frontier thriving on all this place has to offer. Events in Anchorage to interview your neighbors, to actually writing some of your community’s history! We influenced the state, nation, and world. These include Alaska Statehood, the 1964 Good could not have done this without the overwhelming community support we received. Friday Earthquake, and the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act of 1971. Plans Are Living Documents Generations before us preserved and documented their memories through excellent The Municipal-Wide Historic Preservation Plan (MOAHPP) is intended to be a publications, oral histories, plays, and songs. Dena’ina place names, settlement patterns, comprehensive “living document” that establishes historic and cultural preservation goals, notable people, community-led efforts for change and preservation, roadway and trail policies, and action items. Adopted comprehensive, neighborhood and district plan historic development, and iconic architecture tell a story. Many important historic and cultural and cultural preservation goals, policies, and action items are included in Section 4. This features from important events need to be saved, celebrated, fixed, and used. was intentional to provide one comprehensive document to address preserving, educating, and celebrating our unique cultural and historic resources. The MOAHPP will be updated Where else can you find an “industrial” town surrounded by such breathtaking natural from time-to-time to reflect new information on historic and cultural resources, state-of- surroundings providing one of the most desirable places to live, work, learn, worship, travel, the-art preservation standards and tools, to provide new case studies and best practices. and recreate on earth. Occupation and Settlement Story This Place Matters—to us! Our occupation and settlement story winds through centuries of Dena’ina battle grounds, hunting and fishing places, and encampments. This prehistory is following by European and American fur traders, and gold seekers who braved the frozen places and remote inhospitable ground. Then the railroad came to Dgheyay Kaq ’ (Ship Creek), and the Dena’ina were moved off their traditional places. Everything changed. The MOAHPP acknowledges the changes, while encouraging preservation of buildings, sites, objects and stories to recognize the ambitions of the people. Our collective history from the first Dena’ina peoples, the fur and gold seekers, the hardy railroad and highway builders, the toiling homesteaders, the soldiers and aviators, the women, the capitalists, and the immigrants is something to know and celebrate. Outside Magazine refers to Anchorage as a town with an “industrial feel” and the “Best Place for Making the Most of Summer” in their “Top 25 Best Places to Live” in this country. Anchorage Museum and UAF Archive Most of us would probably agree with that description. i PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT PLAN Purpose Overview Functional Plans The purpose of this plan is to implement a historic preservation program directed by Historic preservation plans are “Functional Plans” Assembly Ordinance (A.O.) 2006-175 adopted by the Municipality of Anchorage (MOA) in adopted to study and recommend future needs 2006. The MOAHPP is intended to “encourage and further the interests of historic for public facilities and resources. Functional plan preservation by identifying, protecting, and interpreting the municipality’s significant examples include the: Area Wide Trails Plan; historic and cultural resources for the economic and social benefit of the community” (A.O. Metropolitan Transportation Plan; and the 2007-175 section 1-A.). Briefly, the economic and social benefits of historic preservation are Anchorage Park, Natural Resource, and described as: Recreation Facility Plan. The MOAHPP makes recommendations on municipal-owned historic Social benefits are both tangible and intangible. These benefits are derived buildings, and public facilities such as trails and from community involvement and understanding, identifying ways for the MOAHPP roadways consistent with the goals and policies to support community involvement and understanding, identification of historic of Anchorage 2020. and cultural resources, sustaining our Quality of Life
Recommended publications
  • AMATII Proceedings
    PROCEEDINGS: Arctic Transportation Infrastructure: Response Capacity and Sustainable Development 3-6 December 2012 | Reykjavik, Iceland Prepared for the Sustainable Development Working Group By Institute of the North, Anchorage, Alaska, USA 20 DECEMBER 2012 SARA FRENCH, WALTER AND DUNCAN GORDON FOUNDATION FRENCH, WALTER SARA ICELANDIC COAST GUARD INSTITUTE OF THE NORTH INSTITUTE OF THE NORTH SARA FRENCH, WALTER AND DUNCAN GORDON FOUNDATION Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................ 5 Acknowledgments .........................................................................6 Abbreviations and Acronyms ..........................................................7 Executive Summary .......................................................................8 Chapters—Workshop Proceedings................................................. 10 1. Current infrastructure and response 2. Current and future activity 3. Infrastructure and investment 4. Infrastructure and sustainable development 5. Conclusions: What’s next? Appendices ................................................................................ 21 A. Arctic vignettes—innovative best practices B. Case studies—showcasing Arctic infrastructure C. Workshop materials 1) Workshop agenda 2) Workshop participants 3) Project-related terminology 4) List of data points and definitions 5) List of Arctic marine and aviation infrastructure ALASKA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION INSTITUTE OF THE NORTH INSTITUTE OF THE NORTH
    [Show full text]
  • Remote Desktop Redirected Printer
    %F-% %F-% Page 1 of 26 Opened --Project Name Item Number Unit (f) Quantity Eng Project (VersionID/Aksas/Ref. Description (f) (f) Est Min Avg Max Low Bid Std. ID)------ Bid Bid Bid Amount (f) 286 Listed Low 2nd 3rd Bidder Low Low % of Bidder Bidder Bid % of % of Bid Bid 2017 Sitka Perimeter Fencing & F-162a Linear 20 245.00 612.50 980.00 692,400 08 Gate Upgrades (47258//0) (8 Foot) Chain-Link Foot 250.00 980.00 245.00 0.00 2 Bids Tendered Fence 0.87% 2.83% 0.62% 0.00% 2010 King Cove Airport Fencing F-162a Linear 7,700 0.00 27.50 55.00 1,395,100 06 Improvements (8 Foot) Chain-Link Foot 59.00 55.00 0.00 0.00 (28973/51335/64) Fence 30.37% 30.36% 0.00% 0.00% 2 Bids Tendered 2014 Cold Bay Airport Fencing F-162a Linear 1,126 0.00 100.04 244.00 192,264 01 and Gates [8'] High Chain-Link Foot 59.00 55.23 61.80 73.00 (42046/14-25-1-013/56779/4572) Fence 28.31% 32.35% 31.65% 26.44% 7 Bids Tendered 2010 Lake Hood Seaplane Base F-162a Linear 648 0.00 21.79 30.05 384,465 09 Lake Hood Strip 4 Foot Chain-Link Foot 25.00 30.05 30.00 27.12 Improvements Fence 4.39% 5.06% 4.82% 4.20% (31273/52597/4572) 4 Bids Tendered 2011 Kodiak Airport F-162a Linear 576 40.00 45.00 50.00 22,758,321 06 Improvements, 2011 6' Chain-Link Fence Foot 50.00 50.00 40.00 45.00 (33348/52739/4572) 0.09% 0.13% 0.10% 0.09% 3 Bids Tendered 2013 Girdwood Airport 2012 F-162a Linear 13 54.55 171.93 320.00 415,812 02 Flood Permanent Repairs 6-Foot Chain-Link Foot 20.00 115.00 87.00 315.00 DMVA/DHS Fence 0.07% 0.36% 0.00% 0.00% (39936/55713/4572) 6 Bids Tendered 2009 Northern Region F-162a
    [Show full text]
  • Sponsor Statement
    ALASKA STATE LEGISLATURE WHILE IN SESSION WHILE IN ANCHORAGE STATE CAPITOL 1500 W BENSON BLVD JUNEAU, AK 99801 ANCHORAGE, AK 99503 (907) 465-3704 (907) 269-0169 May 5, 2020 Mayor Ethan Berkowitz 632 W 6th Avenue Suite 840 Anchorage, Alaska 99501 Dear Mayor Berkowitz, Thank you for your leadership during this challenging and unprecedented time. We appreciate your frequent briefings and inclusion of medical professionals, business leaders, and neighbors. We are writing today with deep concern regarding early distribution of the CARES Act funds that did not make it to many small businesses in Anchorage. As of April 16, over 5,000 Alaskan businesses have received emergency relief loan funds through the Federal CARES Act. However, during a recent discussion with Anchorage Community Land Trust (ACLT), we learned that a substantial number of businesses located in Anchorage’s economic opportunity zones have not been able to access those loans. According to a survey conducted by ACLT, many small businesses located in these economic opportunity zones are experiencing significant barriers in qualifying or applying for these federal loans. As the Paycheck Protection Program and Economic Injury Disaster Loans were specifically created to retain employees, small businesses with less than 50 employees that do not have sophisticated relationships with large financial institutions, a robust bookkeeping system, are seasonal, or are recent start-ups are left unable to access these loans. The net result of the above barriers means many small businesses located in Anchorage’s economic opportunity zones, specifically those that are minority and women-owned, are unable to access the financial resources needed to sustain their operations during the COVID-19 related mandatory closures.
    [Show full text]
  • Arctic Marine Aviation Transportation
    SARA FRENCh, WAlTER AND DuNCAN GORDON FOundation Response CapacityandSustainableDevelopment Arctic Transportation Infrastructure: Transportation Arctic 3-6 December 2012 | Reykjavik, Iceland 3-6 December2012|Reykjavik, Prepared for the Sustainable Development Working Group Prepared fortheSustainableDevelopment Working By InstituteoftheNorth,Anchorage, Alaska,USA PROCEEDINGS: 20 Decem B er 2012 ICElANDIC coast GuARD INSTITuTE OF ThE NORTh INSTITuTE OF ThE NORTh SARA FRENCh, WAlTER AND DuNCAN GORDON FOundation Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................ 5 Acknowledgments ......................................................................... 6 Abbreviations and Acronyms .......................................................... 7 Executive Summary ....................................................................... 8 Chapters—Workshop Proceedings................................................. 10 1. Current infrastructure and response 2. Current and future activity 3. Infrastructure and investment 4. Infrastructure and sustainable development 5. Conclusions: What’s next? Appendices ................................................................................ 21 A. Arctic vignettes—innovative best practices B. Case studies—showcasing Arctic infrastructure C. Workshop materials 1) Workshop agenda 2) Workshop participants 3) Project-related terminology 4) List of data points and definitions 5) List of Arctic marine and aviation infrastructure AlASkA DepartmENT OF ENvIRONmental
    [Show full text]
  • Mid-Twentieth Century Architecture in Alaska Historic Context (1945-1968)
    Mid-Twentieth Century Architecture in Alaska Historic Context (1945-1968) Prepared by Amy Ramirez . Jeanne Lambin . Robert L. Meinhardt . and Casey Woster 2016 The Cultural Resource Programs of the National Park Service have responsibilities that include stewardship of historic buildings, museum collections, archeological sites, cultural landscapes, oral and written histories, and ethnographic resources. The material is based upon work assisted by funding from the National Park Service. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Department of the Interior. Printed 2018 Cover: Atwood Center, Alaska Pacific University, Anchorage, 2017, NPS photograph MID-TWENTIETH CENTURY ARCHITECTURE IN ALASKA HISTORIC CONTEXT (1945 – 1968) Prepared for National Park Service, Alaska Regional Office Prepared by Amy Ramirez, B.A. Jeanne Lambin, M.S. Robert L. Meinhardt, M.A. and Casey Woster, M.A. July 2016 Table of Contents LIST OF ACRONYMS/ABBREVIATIONS ............................................................................................... 5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................... 8 1.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ..................................................................................................................... 9 1.1 Historic Context as a Planning & Evaluation Tool ............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • ANCHORAGE, ALASKA AR No. 2021-13
    Submitted by: Assembly Members Allard and Kennedy For reading: January 12, 2021 ANCHORAGE, ALASKA AR No. 2021-13 1 A RESOLUTION OF THE ANCHORAGE MUNICIPAL ASSEMBLY SUPPORTIVE 2 OF THE RESIDENTS TO HAVE PROPER AND LEGAL REPRESENTATION FOR 3 WEST ANCHORAGE, DISTRICT 3, AND CALLING FOR AN INTERIM 4 APPOINTMENT. 5 6 7 WHEREAS, former Mayor Ethan Berkowitz resigned on 23 October 2020 creating 8 a vacancy in the office of Mayor; and 9 10 WHEREAS, the Anchorage Assembly reorganized and voted in Assembly member 11 Austin Quinn-Davidson as Assembly Chair on 16 October 2020, so that on 23 12 October 2020, Assembly member Austin Quinn-Davidson was sworn in as Acting 13 Mayor; and 14 15 WHEREAS, the Assembly decided against holding a special election to fill the 16 vacancy of the office of Mayor but to rely on the regular election of April 2021, 17 thereby leaving an extended period in which the Assembly seat of the member from 18 District 3 would not be filled by an active participant on the Assembly; and 19 20 WHEREAS, there is one time in the Municipality’s history of the Chair serving as 21 Acting Mayor for an extended period, in 2009 when Assembly Chair Matt Claman 22 served as acting Mayor from January 3 to July 1, a period of less than 6 months; 23 and 24 25 WHEREAS, in our current situation the Acting Mayor will serve in that position from 26 October 23, 2020 until July 1, 2021, leaving the Assembly seat empty and without 27 participation in Municipal government for a period of over 8 months.
    [Show full text]
  • Chugach State Park Management Plan
    CHUGACH STATE PARK MANAGEMENT PLAN Adopted February 2016 CHUGACH STATE PARK MANAGEMENT PLAN Adopted February 2016 Alaska Department of Natural Resources Division of Parks and Outdoor Recreation Cover photos courtesy of: Bull Moose Fight by: Donna Dewhurst Northern Lights Rainbow by: Larry Anderson Falls Creek- Turnagain by: Stephen Nickel Bird Ridge by: Wayne Todd Lupine At Chugach and Eklutna Lake by: Jeff Nelson Evening Beaver Ponds by: Jim Wood Credits and Acknowledgements Planning Team Monica Alvarez, Project Manager/Planner, Alaska Department of Natural Resources, Division of Mining, Land & Water Amanda Hults, Planner, Alaska Department of Natural Resources, Division of Mining, Land & Water Thomas Harrison, Chugach State Park Superintendent, Alaska Department of Natural Resources, Division of Parks and Outdoor Recreation Matthew Wedeking, Chugach State Park Chief Ranger, Alaska Department of Natural Resources, Division of Parks and Outdoor Recreation Ruth Booth, Publisher, Alaska Department of Natural Resources, Division of Mining, Land & Water Plan Contributors Acknowledgements are gratefully due to the following Division of Parks and Outdoor Recreation staff for their help in the planning process and contributions to the plan: Thomas Crockett, Kurt Hensel, Preston Kroes, Ian Thomas, and Keith Wilson- Former and Present Chugach State Park Rangers; Blaine Smith- Chugach State Park Specialist; Bill Evans- Former Landscape Architect; Lucille Baranko- Landscape Specialist; Claire Leclair- Chief of Field Operations; Ben Ellis- Director;
    [Show full text]
  • August 31, 2020 the Honorable Mitch Mcconnell Majority Leader United States Senate Washington, DC 20510 the Honorable Chuck
    August 31, 2020 The Honorable Mitch McConnell The Honorable Chuck Schumer Majority Leader Minority Leader United States Senate United States Senate Washington, DC 20510 Washington, DC 20510 The Honorable Nancy Pelosi The Honorable Kevin McCarthy House Speaker Minority Leader United States House of Representatives United States House of Representatives Washington, DC 20510 Washington, DC 20510 Dear Leader McConnell, Speaker Pelosi, Leader Schumer, and Leader McCarthy: We write to urge you to include language in the next the coronavirus relief package to extend statutory reporting deadlines for the 2020 Census by four months. Further, we implore you to include language to extend the deadline for data collection to October 31, 2020. We are alarmed by the U.S. Census Bureau's August 3rd announcement that it would finish collecting data for the decennial count by September 30, 2020. This move will rush the enumeration process, result in inadequate follow-up, and undercount immigrant communities and communities of color who are historically undercounted. Senior career staff at the Census Bureau have publicly stated that meeting the statutory deadlines is impossible because of the delays that have already occurred. This decision to rush the Census in the wake of a pandemic raises concerns about the Bureau’s ability to accurately and completely count every person living in the United States. A rushed Census would hurt a diverse range of rural and urban communities, leaving them underrepresented locally and in Congress and cutting their fair share of federal funding for Medicaid, economic development, child care, schools, road and public transit improvements, home heating assistance for senior citizens, and many more vital services.
    [Show full text]
  • September 25, 2008 Rock Creek Starts Producing Gold
    Photo by Tyler Rhodes ONE STEP AHEAD OF THE SNOW—Andy Newton, visiting the area from Anchorage, makes his way down to the west fork of the Grand Central River Sept. 20 as the termination dust creeps down the Kigluaik Mountains framing the Grand Central valley. C VOLUME CVIII NO. 39 September 25, 2008 Rock Creek starts producing gold By Diana Haecker ity have been tested and commis- NovaGold Resources Inc. an- sioned. While construction of the nounced that gold production at the mill and the tailing storage facility Rock Creek hardrock, open-pit gold was underway, 450,000 tons of ore mine started last Friday. were already mined and stockpiled. After a two-year construction According to Large Mine Coor- phase, the gold mine has begun fully dinator Jack DiMarchi with the processing ore at the mine in the state Department of Environmen- Snake River valley, seven miles tal Conservation, a group of state north of Nome. regulators visited the mine Sept. 8 According to the company, all components of the processing facil- continued on page 4 Council aims bulldozer at derelict dwellings By Laurie McNicholas members a stack of color photos that The Nome Common Council ap- more vividly illustrate the conditions proved formal abatement of the than black-and-white photos in- Kakik property at 610 W. Fourth cluded in their meeting packet. Ave. and the Davis property at 210 He told the Council that Louis W. Fifth Ave. during a meeting Mon- Green Sr. recently had cleaned the day evening, but gave the owner of Kakik property on behalf of its the Kakik property 14 days to com- owner, who has spent the past sev- plete efforts to eliminate its health eral months in Anchorage under and safety hazards.
    [Show full text]
  • Tools and Technology
    TOOLS AND TECHNOLOGY Developed by Barclay Kopchak Developed by Leslie Fogg A Publication of Chugachmiut Heritage Preservation Department 1840 Bragaw Street, Suite 110, Anchorage, AK 99508-3463 With support from US Department of Education, ANE Grant #S356AQ09090054-10 We would like to thank the following people and institutions for their contribution: Leslie Fogg, Pua Weichart, Virginia Lacy, Johnny Moonin, Cordova Historical Museum, The National Museum of Natural History at the Smithsonian Institute, Holly Nordlum at Naniq Design, and Great Originals. TOOLS AND TECHNOLOGY Copyright © Chugachmiut, 2013. Produced by the Chugachmiut Heritage Preservation Department, under the supervision of Helen Morris, with assistance from Rhoda Moonin, Barclay Kopchak, Jed Palmer, Hanna Eklund, Helen Loescher and Bernice Tetpon. Copies of this publication can be ordered from: Chugachmiut Heritage Preservation Department 1840 Bragaw Street, Suite 110, Anchorage, Alaska 99508 Tel: 907-562-4155 Fax: 907-563-2891 www.chugachmiut.org Funded by the United States Department Education, ANA Grant Number S356A090054. Other Heritage Kits available: Abundance of Birds , Medicinal Plants, They are Hunting, Sugpiaq Clothing, Driftwood, Grass and Plant Fibers, Honoring the Seal, Native Trade and Change, Storytelling , Gathering Plants to Eat, Ancestry, Our Foods from the Sea, Symbols, Wamluk – Let’s Play, Alutiiq Hunting Hats, Traditional Fishing. Table Of Contents OVERVIEW ...............................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • SUMMER 2017 Tanana River Alaska Railroad Adventure Packages Are Make the Absolute Most of a Day in Alaska
    RAILBELT MAP Alaska Railroad See Alaska By Rail FAIRBANKS Day Trips SUMMER 2017 Tanana River Alaska Railroad Adventure Packages are Make the absolute most of a day in Alaska. SCHEDULES & FARES multi-day itineraries that include rail travel, Our summer trains pair perfectly with a accommodations and activities for a seamless wide variety of unique Alaska activities: Alaska adventure. LI A ARK EN P • Take the train to Seward for a Kenai Fjords D AL DENALI N IO wildlife and glacier cruise T LI A A E The Deluxe Alaska Sampler N G N E N • D A The Deluxe Alaska Sampler showcases the best of Alaska Ride the rail to Talkeetna for a flightseeing R in one week: tour of Denali and the Alaska Range A K S DAY 1 – Arrive in Anchorage • Explore the Spencer Glacier Whistle Stop — A L a backcountry area only accessible by rail — HURRICANE DAY 2 – Glacier Discovery Train to rafting at A with a guided nature walk, ice climbing or Spencer Glacier rafting on a glacial river DAY 3 – Coastal Classic Train to Kenai Fjords TALKEETNA glacier cruise DAY 4 – Explore Seward, Alaska Learn more about these and dozens of other Alaska Railroad day trips at AlaskaRailroad.com/DayTrips DAY 5 – Denali Star Train to Denali National Park DAY 6 – Wildlife Tour in Denali National Park Find more at AlaskaRailroad.com DAY 7 – Denali Star Train to Anchorage Susitna River Additional rate information WASILLA EST Learn more about the Deluxe Alaska Sampler OR L F Multi-day Alaska rail packages & day trips NA and other Adventure Packages at IO AT N Destination information & depot locations Knik River H - AlaskaRailroad.com/Packages - C A G Hotel recommendations ANCHORAGE U H C Alaska Railroad photos & videos O K I N GIRDWOOD C O L E T Winter rail schedules & packages WHITTIER Sign up for the Alaska Railroad e-newsletter PORTAGE More ways to connect: SPENCER GLACIER GRANDVIEW Kenai River Kenai Lake Anchorage Depot Skilak Lake 411 West 1st Avenue, 907.265.2494 Fairbanks Depot SEWARD 1031 Alaska Railroad Depot Road, 907.458.6025 Sullivan W.
    [Show full text]
  • Division of Parks and Outdoor Recreation Ten-Year Strategic Plan
    Division of Parks and Outdoor Recreation Ten-Year Strategic Plan 2007-2017 Division of Parks and Outdoor Recreation, Atwood Building, 550 West 7th Avenue, Suite 1380, Anchorage, AK 99501 November 31, 2006 Dear Friends, Alaska offers a great variety of outdoor recreation opportunities and cultural experiences. From fishing on the many beautiful streams to traveling on our thousands of miles of trails, the experiences are as diverse as the people of this great state and are embodied in the Division of Parks and Outdoor Recreation’s various parks and programs. In recent years the Division has faced many challenges trying to fulfill our mission to provide the high quality facilities and services people have come to expect. As a result, we initiated this strategic planning process to improve the effectiveness of the Division and better provide for the needs of state residents and visitors. I am confident that this document represents the priorities outlined by the public. The seven goals and various objectives, along with the strategies to achieve them, will serve as a blueprint for the management of state park areas and division programs and will help the Division tackle the challenges of the future. I am particularly proud of the fact that, as part of this planning process, many Alaskans took the time to attend meetings, submit comments and respond to our questionnaire. Alaskans clearly care deeply about our state parks and division programs and the many public benefits they provide. With my utmost gratitude and appreciation, I want to thank the staff, partners and hundreds of Alaskans who contributed toward making this plan a shared vision for our division’s future.
    [Show full text]