DOCSLIB.ORG

Governance of the Arctic and Antarctic

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Governance of the Arctic and Antarctic PERRY CENTER OCCASIONAL PAPER MARCH 2021 Real and Imaginary Issues: Governance of the Arctic and the Antarctic Andrés Borjas and Dr. Fabiana Sofía Perera WILLIAM J. PERRY CENTER FOR HEMISPHERIC DEFENSE STUDIES National Defense University Cover Caption: China has recently built two powerful icebreaker the Xue Long and the Xue Long 2, as part of an effort to expand the country’s presence in Arctic and Antarctic waters. Credit: CGTN News. About the authors: Andres Borjas is a Junior at Tufts University studying International Relations and Political Science. His research interests focus on great power competition, economic statecraft, and authoritarianism in a global context. Andres interned as a Research Assistant at the Perry Center from June 2020 to January 2021. Dr. Fabiana Sofía Perera is an Assistant Professor at the William J. Perry Center for Hemispheric Defense Studies. Prior to joining the Perry Center, Fabiana was a Rosenthal Fellow at the Office of the Secretary of Defense, Under Secretary for Policy, Western Hemisphere Affairs. Fabiana holds an MA in Latin American Studies from Georgetown University and earned a PhD in Political Science from The George Washington University. For her doctorate, Fabiana completed fieldwork in Venezuela and Ecuador. Her research and analysis have appeared in numerous publications including The Washington Post, CNN.com, and War on the Rocks. Disclaimer: The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and are not an official policy nor position of the National Defense University, the Department of Defense nor the U.S. Government. Editor-in-Chief: Pat Paterson Layout Design: Viviana Edwards Real and Imaginary Issues: Governance of the Arctic and the Antarctic Andrés Borjas and Dr. Fabiana Sofía Perera WILLIAM J. PERRY CENTER FOR HEMISPHERIC DEFENSE STUDIES PERRY CENTER OCCASIONAL PAPER MARCH 2021 Real and Imaginary Issues: Governance of the Arctic and the Antarctic Andrés Borjas and Dr. Fabiana Sofía Perera The Arctic might be the one place in the world where the real and imaginary boundaries of the West and its challengers meet. Unlike at the southern pole, the Arctic is a region that has been inhabited for thou- sands of years and one in which the West and its challengers border each other. The countries that lay claim to the Arctic face each other in a contentious situation that creates challenges to broad multilateral governance. By contrast, in the Antarctic, a region that has no permanent population, multilateralism has flourished as a way of governance. This lack of a permanent Antarctic identity coupled with expan- sive multilateralism has enabled challengers to the West with no direct connection to the region - China in particular - to gain a foothold there despite geographical distance and lack of historical ties. This paper first focuses on the development of the Arctic Council, the region’s most important multilateral forum and covers how claimant states in the High North - despite successes in some areas - struggled to address the questions of regional identity and more substantive issues such as security cooperation. A revanchist Russia in the 21st century threatens states attempting to address issues of Arctic security through smaller multilateral fora. In these cases, the problem of Arctic identity often serves as the keystone that would make or break cooperation. The paper then engages with the issue of non-Arctic states aspiring for a foothold in the region by explaining the development of the membership hierarchy and most importantly the weaponization of Arctic identity in this process to exclude powerful aspirants, particularly China, from becoming a legitimate regional actor. China’s actions in the Arctic are then explored further, illustrating Beijing’s deep engagement with the region and its frustrations with the problems that Arctic identity poses for its goals. Lastly, the system of Antarctic governance is explained and compared to the politics of the Arctic that also has implications for China’s rise in the polar regions. 3 Perry Center Occasional Paper, March 2021 Caption: A bird’s eye view of the North Pole shows the many nations that have strategic interests in the Arctic region. Credit: U.S. Department of State. Defining the Arctic and Antarctic The Arctic comprises territory from eight states surrounded by a mostly frozen ocean. In this northern- most part of the world defining boundaries is complicated by the shifting nature of the landscape and the intersecting and overlapping multilateral regimes that govern the space. Most commonly the Arctic is defined as the region that lies north of the Arctic circle (66o 33’ N) though there are other definitions. In the United States (U.S.), the Arctic is “all United States and foreign territory north of the Arctic Circle.” Similar definitions are also proposed by other Arctic states.1 Due in part to their remoteness, the polar regions - the Arctic and the Antarctic - have seldom weighed heavily on global consciousness compared to traditional security issues that dominate the discourse in the U.N. General Assembly, the one institution supposed to be a bulwark against anarchy in the international system. Nevertheless, their place outside the center of attention is a testament to the success of the regional and international frameworks that have governed these regions. In the challeng- 1 National Science Foundation, “Arctic Policy and Research Act of 1984 (amended 1990),” 1984, https://www.nsf.gov/geo/ opp/arctic/iarpc/arc_res_pol_act.jsp#112. 4 Perry Center Occasional Paper, March 2021 ing political and natural environment of the Arctic, fora for collaboration such as the Arctic Council have featured prominently and successfully created frameworks for environmental regulation, energy exploitation, and maritime crisis management. Similarly, collective action has dominated Antarctic governance. The 1959 Treaty of the Antarctic and the subsequent Antarctic Treaty System (ATS) have successfully worked as tools for preserving the Antarctic’s security and environmental stability and insured the continent and its waters remain primar- ily a “scientific preserve” used “exclusively for peaceful purposes.”2 Caption: The Antarctic Treaty was signed on December 1, 1959 by twelve countries and the first meeting was held on July 1, 1961 in New Zealand (shown here). Credit: Antarctic and Southern Ocean Coalition (ASOC). The ATS defines the Antarctic as the territory south of 60o. Below this line no country has territo- rial claims. North of it, Australia, Norway, and the United Kingdom have territorial claims through the Heard and McDonald Islands, Bouvet Island, and South Georgia and South Sandwich Islands respec- tively. Climate change, coupled with an increasingly contentious global environment, presents novel challenges for the governance of the Arctic and the Antarctic. Both regions currently experience ex- 2 Heather Conley, Terry Toland, Jamie Krout, A New Security Architecture for the Arctic: An American Perspective (Washington, DC: Center for Strategic and International Studies, 2012), 13. 5 Perry Center Occasional Paper, March 2021 treme environmental costs of climate change and are warming two to three times faster than the rest of the world.3 Moreover, the return of great power competition as a driving force in international relations has implications for the Arctic and Antarctic security. The rapidly evolving Russia-China-U.S. dynamic threatens to awaken frozen conflicts and will impose added stressors on the capable yet fragile multilat- eral frameworks of each region.4 In the current moment of heightened and growing risk, it is imperative to understand how the Arctic and Antarctic systems have historically preserved security and protected the poles from broader global conflict. Furthermore, upon closer look, it becomes apparent that, despite the similar challenges faced by both the polar regions, there are key differences in each of their gov- ernance structures. As such, what are the factors that have shaped their diverging paths? What lessons can the multilateral systems in the Arctic and Antarctic learn from each other in order to become more robust structures better suited to preserving polar security in the face of developing threats? From the development of governance models in the polar regions, it is clear that the Arctic and Antarctic are heading down diverging paths. In the High North, it is apparent that an “Arctic identity” enabled by a natural set of territorial claims and exacerbated by the current context of contentious great power relations has been a significant obstacle to broad multilateral governance in the region. By con- trast, the lack of “Antarctic identity” has allowed multilateralism to enjoy primacy in the management of the Antarctic, a situation that enabled non-Antarctic countries - China in particular - to gain a foot- hold in the region despite geographical distance and lack of any territorial claim. The Arctic as an idea has been integrated into the national identity of the states that border the region. In the U.S., Alaska’s annexation was tied to the expansionistic romanticism of Manifest Destiny and the northernmost state is still considered to be the country’s “last frontier.”5 For Canada, its Arctic identity is part of the nation’s “core myth” that serves to distinguish its sovereignty from the United States.6 In Russia, historical and geographical claims have been used to present the country as an “Arctic Great Power,” an identity that emphasizes its “uniqueness” with re- 3 Kendra Pierre-Louis, “Antarctica Is Melting Three Times as Fast as a Decade Ago,” New York Times, June 13, 2018, https:// www.nytimes.com/2018/06/13/climate/antarctica-ice-melting-faster.html; Eric Niiler, “The Arctic Is Warming Much Faster Than the Rest of Earth,” Wired, December 4, 2019, https://www.wired.com/story/the-arctic-is-warming-much-faster-than- the-rest-of-earth/. 4 Abhishek Saxena, “The Return of Great Power Competition to the Arctic,” The Arctic Institute, October 22, 2019, https:// www.thearcticinstitute.org/return-great-power-competition-arctic/.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2007 – 2008 – Roger Moe, Former Democratic Letter from Will Steger
    ANNUAL REPORT 2007–2008 INSPIRE EMPOWER EDUCATE SOLAR WIND TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 The Will Steger Foundation (WSF) is dedicated to creating programs that foster international “ [Will Steger and the leadership and cooperation through environmental education and policy. WSF] were the ones that brought the left and the WSF seeks to inspire, educate and empower the world to understand the threat of and solutions right into the center on to global warming. this issue [global warm- CHANGE ACTION ing].” ANNUAL REPORT 2007 – 2008 – Roger Moe, former Democratic Letter from Will Steger...................................................................................................... 2 Congressman Letter from the Executive Director ................................................................................... 4 Fostering Leadership and International Cooperation ...................................................... 6 Inspiring Others through the Eyewitness Account .......................................................... 8 Empowering Others through Education ........................................................................ 10 Global Warming 101 initiative ....................................................................................... 18 Media Outreach .............................................................................................................. 24 Supporters ....................................................................................................................... 26 2801 21st Avenue South, Suite
    [Show full text]
  • X********X************************************************** * Reproductions Supplied by EDRS Are the Best That Can Be Made * from the Original Document
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 302 264 IR 052 601 AUTHOR Buckingham, Betty Jo, Ed. TITLE Iowa and Some Iowans. A Bibliography for Schools and Libraries. Third Edition. INSTITUTION Iowa State Dept. of Education, Des Moines. PUB DATE 88 NOTE 312p.; Fcr a supplement to the second edition, see ED 227 842. PUB TYPE Reference Materials Bibliographies (131) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC13 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Annotated Bibllographies; *Authors; Books; Directories; Elementary Secondary Education; Fiction; History Instruction; Learning Resources Centers; *Local Color Writing; *Local History; Media Specialists; Nonfiction; School Libraries; *State History; United States History; United States Literature IDENTIFIERS *Iowa ABSTRACT Prepared primarily by the Iowa State Department of Education, this annotated bibliography of materials by Iowans or about Iowans is a revised tAird edition of the original 1969 publication. It both combines and expands the scope of the two major sections of previous editions, i.e., Iowan listory and literature, and out-of-print materials are included if judged to be of sufficient interest. Nonfiction materials are listed by Dewey subject classification and fiction in alphabetical order by author/artist. Biographies and autobiographies are entered under the subject of the work or in the 920s. Each entry includes the author(s), title, bibliographic information, interest and reading levels, cataloging information, and an annotation. Author, title, and subject indexes are provided, as well as a list of the people indicated in the bibliography who were born or have resided in Iowa or who were or are considered to be Iowan authors, musicians, artists, or other Iowan creators. Directories of periodicals and annuals, selected sources of Iowa government documents of general interest, and publishers and producers are also provided.
    [Show full text]
  • Arctic Policy &
    Arctic Policy & Law References to Selected Documents Edited by Wolfgang E. Burhenne Prepared by Jennifer Kelleher and Aaron Laur Published by the International Council of Environmental Law – toward sustainable development – (ICEL) for the Arctic Task Force of the IUCN Commission on Environmental Law (IUCN-CEL) Arctic Policy & Law References to Selected Documents Edited by Wolfgang E. Burhenne Prepared by Jennifer Kelleher and Aaron Laur Published by The International Council of Environmental Law – toward sustainable development – (ICEL) for the Arctic Task Force of the IUCN Commission on Environmental Law The designation of geographical entities in this book, and the presentation of material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of ICEL or the Arctic Task Force of the IUCN Commission on Environmental Law concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers and boundaries. The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect those of ICEL or the Arctic Task Force. The preparation of Arctic Policy & Law: References to Selected Documents was a project of ICEL with the support of the Elizabeth Haub Foundations (Germany, USA, Canada). Published by: International Council of Environmental Law (ICEL), Bonn, Germany Copyright: © 2011 International Council of Environmental Law (ICEL) Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non- commercial purposes is authorized without prior permission from the copyright holder provided the source is fully acknowledged. Reproduction for resale or other commercial purposes is prohibited without the prior written permission of the copyright holder. Citation: International Council of Environmental Law (ICEL) (2011).
    [Show full text]
  • The Murmansk Initiative - RF: COMPLETION Carl Czajkowski,1Robert S
    WM’03 Conference, February 23-27, Tucson, AZ The Murmansk Initiative - RF: COMPLETION Carl Czajkowski,1Robert S. Dyer ,2 Anita A. Sörlie,3 Dennis W. Wester, 4 Bredo Moller, 3 1Brookhaven National Laboratory, Building 475B, Upton, NY 11973. 2 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue, Washington, DC 20034. 3Norwegian Radiation Protection Authority, PO Box 55, N-1345 Østerås, Norway. 4 Battelle Memorial Institute, P. O. Box 999, Richland, WA 99352., ia ABSTRACT The Murmansk Initiative-RF (MI) was conceived to provide the Russian Federation (RF) with the capacity to manage low-level liquid radioactive waste (LLRW) and comply with the requirements of the London Convention that prohibit ocean dumping of these wastes. The Initiative, under a trilateral agreement begun in 1994/95, has upgraded an existing low-level liquid radioactive waste treatment facility, increased its capacity from 1,200 m3 /year to 5,000 m3 /year, and expanded the capability of the facility to treat liquids containing salt (up to 20 g/L). The three parties to the agreement, the Russian Federation, Norway, and the United States, have split the costs for the project. It was the first project of its kind to utilize exclusively Russian subcontractors in the upgrade and expansion of the LLRW treatment plant on the premises of FGUP Atomflot (now FGUP Atomflot) in Murmansk, Russia. The project advanced into the test-operation phase. These start-up activities have included processing of actual radioactive liquid waste from the Arctic icebreaker fleet, and incorporation of these wastes into a cementation process of Russian design. Initial runs have revealed that procedures for unloading spent ion-exchange sorbents need to be improved and that sludges formed during removal of alkaline-earth metals should be compacted in order for the facility to operate at its full potential.
    [Show full text]
  • < 0CT0BER 10-14,2018>
    <#4> A PROJECT OF 100REPORTERS 01000100 01101111 0N, DC 01110101 01100010 T 01101100 01100101 00100000 01000101 01111000 01110000 011011112 01110011 01110101 01110010 01100101 00100000 WASHING / / Investigative Film Festival < 0CT0BER 10- 14,2018> FIVE DAY FESTIVAL + SYMPOSIUM 1 DOUBLE EXPOSURE, A PROJECT OF THE INVESTIGATIVE NEWS ORGANIZATION 100REPORTERS, CELEBRATES THE FINEST NEW FILMS INSPIRED BY THE INVESTIGATIVE INSTINCT. Investigative <# 20 Film 4> 18 Festival 2018 NATIONAL PORTRAIT GALLERY + THE LOFT + NATIONAL UNION BUILDING + NAVAL HERITAGE CENTER DoubleExposureFestival.com 75 <2018 DAY-TO-DAY FILM SCHEDULE> ALL SCREENINGS TAKE PLACE AT THE NAVAL HERITAGE CENTER UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED 7:00 PM WATERGATE (OPENING NIGHT) WEDNESDAY, Dir. Charles Ferguson. 130 min. 2018 OCTOBER 10 The Smithsonian’s National Portrait Gallery 3:00 PM SHORT CUTS: THURSDAY, HOW WE CHOOSE, NELLIE BLY MAKES THE NEWS, OUR NEW PRESIDENT, OCTOBER 11 THE TRIAL, WE BECAME FRAGMENTS Dirs. Alexandria Bombach; Penny Lane; Maxim Pozdorovkin; Johanna Hamilton; Luisa Conlon, Hanna Miller, Lacy Jane Roberts. 81 min. 6:00 PM STOLEN DAUGHTERS: KIDNAPPED BY BOKO HARAM Dirs. Gemma Atwal and Karen Edwards. 75 min. 2018 8:30 PM ROLL RED ROLL Dir. Nancy Schwartzman. 80 min. 2018 4:00 PM UNPROTECTED FRIDAY, Dir. Nadia Sussman. 45 min. 2018 OCTOBER 12 6:00 PM THE FEELING OF BEING WATCHED Dir. Assia Boundaoui. 87 min. 2018 8:30 PM GHOST FLEET Dirs. Shannon Service and Jeffrey Waldron. 88 min. 2018 DoubleExposureFestival.com 3 <2018 DAY-TO-DAY FILM SCHEDULE> 10:00 AM THE TRUTH ABOUT SATURDAY, KILLER ROBOTS OCTOBER 13 Dir. Maxim Pozdorovkin. 82 min. 2018 12:30 PM THE UNAFRAID Dirs.
    [Show full text]
  • On Thin Ice? (Mis)Interpreting Russian Policy in the High North Roderick Kefferpütz
    No. 205/February 2010 On Thin Ice? (Mis)interpreting Russian Policy in the High North Roderick Kefferpütz limate change in the Arctic is expected to make the ice cap dwindling to a record-low minimum extent the region a lot busier as new strategic of 4.3 million square km in September 2007.2 resources become available. The Russian C These developments open up an array of intractable Federation is a key player in this context, having put challenges, including threats to biodiversity and the forth a comprehensive Arctic strategy. Russian policy traditional way of life of autochthon communities in towards the so-called High North, however, is the Arctic region. Of particular danger to global oftentimes not seen in its entirety and has received a environmental stability, however, is the threat to low- plethora of criticism in the Western media and foreign lying coastal regions posed by rising sea levels. This policy community. This paper aims to contribute to a would not only have immense political, environmental better understanding of Russian actions in the High and social consequences; the economic effects would North by providing a succinct overview of Russian also be tremendous. According to Allianz financial policies in the region and identifying the fundamental services, a rise of half a metre by the middle of this rationale behind them. The paper concludes that century could put at risk more than 28 trillion dollars’ Russia’s Arctic policy is not only a lot more nuanced worth of assets in the world’s largest coastal cities.3 In but also not very different from the policies conducted addition, increasing temperatures in this volatile region by other riparian states.
    [Show full text]
  • The Arctic and the Seaborne Nuclear Arms Race
    DISARMING ARCTIC SECURITY Briefing papers by Ernie Regehr, O.C., Senior Fellow in Defence Policy and Arctic Security January 25, 2017 The Arctic and the Seaborne Nuclear Arms Race Headlines tell of a burgeoning Russian/American naval nuclear arms race1 and already tens of billions of dollars are being promised and spent in both countries on “modernizing” seaborne strategic nuclear weapons systems. While tactical nuclear weapons have been kept off their attack and general purpose submarines for at least a generation, there are indications they may be finding their way back. In the meantime, there is not yet any international regime or treaty or political will in place or contemplated for the exercise of seaborne nuclear restraint. The US now operates2 14 nuclear ballistic missile submarines (SSBNs – designated Ohio-class), each capable of carrying 24 inter-continental range ballistic missiles (the Trident II D5). Normally, two of these boats are in overhaul and not considered operational – so the usual count is 12 operational submarines carrying 288 missiles (even though not all 12 are always on patrol, and those on patrol do not necessarily carry the full complement of 24 missiles). Each missile caries three to six warheads, leading to the current count of 1,152 warheads on 12 deployed SSBNs. About 60 percent of the force operates in the Pacific and the rest in the Atlantic. US nuclear modernization programs for the SSBNs include up to 1600 new warheads (updated versions of existing warheads with enhanced targeting capabilities), to be built by 2019 (some of these are to go to the UK in a slightly modified version).
    [Show full text]
  • Geo-Strategic Competition in the Arctic: What Next?
    Geo-Strategic Competition in the Arctic: What Next? Author: 1 Dr. Andreas Østhagen40F Senior Research Fellow Fridtjof Nansen Institute, Oslo / The Arctic Institute, Washington DC [email protected] In early May, the U.S. Sixth Fleet, together with the Royal Navy, conducted maritime security 1 operations in the Barents Sea, just off the Arctic coast of Norway and Russia.0F A few weeks later, the newly confirmed U.S. Secretary of the Navy, Kenneth J. Braithwaite, warned of increasing hostility in the Arctic, noting, “The Chinese and the Russians are everywhere, especially the 2 Chinese.”1F In late 2019, France’s Minister of the Armed Forces even compared the Arctic to the 3 Middle East.2F This followed a speech given a few months earlier on May 6 by the U.S. Secretary of State, Mike Pompeo, that represented a clear break with notions of the Arctic as a “zone of 4 peace.”3F The Arctic is one of the spots on the planet most affected by climate change, as the sea ice and Greenlandic ice sheet continue to melt at an ever-increasing pace. The region is also home to some of world’s largest fish stocks and has tremendous undiscovered oil and gas resources as well as an abundance of rare minerals found only in a few places around the world. In addition, the increasingly ice-free waters can serve as a shortcut from Europe to Asia (or reverse) via the top of the world. Therefore, few places have been the source of as much speculation, hype, and sweeping statements as the Arctic region at the start of the 21st century.
    [Show full text]
  • Russian Pipelines: Back to the Future?
    Pipe Dreams? Russian Pipelines Back to the Future? Edward C. Chow In Soviet mythology, the health of the country's economy, Edward C. Chow is Visiting Scholar at the national power, and influence in the world are directly linked Carnegie Endowment to the performance of its oil and gas industry. It is ironic, for International then, that peak oil and gas production in the U.S.S.R. was Peace. reached in the late 1980s just as economic collapse brought political disintegration. At the time, the Soviet Union was the biggest oil producer in the world, generating 12 million bar- rels per day, 11 million in Russia alone. Peak consumption at this time was over 8 million barrels per day in the Soviet Union and 5 million barrels per day in Russia. Considerable volumes of crude oil and petroleum products were exported by the Soviet Union, first to other countries in the Eastern Bloc, and then approximately 3 million barrels per day to those outside of the Comecon.1 Oil and gas were part of the important barter trade in the Communist block and provided economic leverage for Russia in maintaining cohesion of the sphere. Moreover, they served as principal sources of hard currency and geopolitical assets in the Soviet Union's relationship with the outside world. Given the remote location of many Russian production fields, pipelines have always played a critical role in transporting oil and gas. The construction of a vast system of pipelines was often cited as a crowning achievement of the Soviet oil and gas Winter/Spring 2004 [27] RUSSIAN PIPELINES industry.
    [Show full text]
  • The USSR/Russia, Norway and International Сo-Operation
    The USSR/Russia, Norway and international сo-operation on environmental matters in the Arctic, 1984–1996 SVF-3901 Irina Karelina Master’s Thesis in Peace and Conflict Transformation Faculty of Humanities, Social Sciences and Education University of Tromsø Spring 2013 ii Abstract This thesis examines the USSR, Norway and international cooperation on environmental matters in the Arctic (1984-1996). During the Cold War, the region attracted much attention from of the main adversaries. It was a playground for strategic planners and a laboratory for the improvement of military technology. But at the same time these territories were also – at least potentially – a source for contacts between scientist of the East and the West. Especially in the last decade of the Cold War, scientists from both blocks more aware of the vulnerability of the environment and the intensification of exploration of natural resources. The Arctic, which was a highly militarized region during the Cold War, can thereby serve a good case to test out the impact of international cooperation. This thesis considers two main areas: the first area is about the historical development of political relations between USSR/Russia and Norway; Gorbachev’s policies contribution to the development of cooperation in international relations in the Arctic. The second area is about scientific environmental cooperation, which has can be described as transnational in scope and character, and its influence to the political situation in the Arctic. The thesis based on two theoretical approaches: the so-called “Copenhagen school”, and especially the concept of “securitization” on the one hand, and transnationalism theory on the other.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 PCTR Draft Report
    PC 172 PCTR 17 E rev.1 fin Original: English NATO Parliamentary Assembly POLITICAL COMMITTEE NATO AND SECURITY IN THE ARCTIC REPORT Gerald E. CONNOLLY (United States) Rapporteur Sub-Committee on Transatlantic Relations www.nato-pa.int 7 October 2017 172 PCTR 17 E rev.1 fin TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................. 1 II. THE ARCTIC AND EURO-ATLANTIC SECURITY ............................................................... 1 III. THE SECURITY IMPACT OF CLIMATE CHANGE ON THE ARCTIC – AN UPDATE .......... 3 IV. THE ARCTIC AND NATO-RUSSIA RELATIONS ................................................................. 5 V. THE INCREASING ENGAGEMENT OF CHINA IN THE ARCTIC ........................................ 8 VI. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ..................................................................... 9 SELECT BIBLIOGRAPHY .................................................................................................. 11 172 PCTR 17 E rev.1 fin I. INTRODUCTION 1. The Arctic region, or High North, ranked top of the security agenda during the Cold War due to its strategic importance. Its significance was largely reduced with the dissolution of the Soviet Union and the end of the confrontation between NATO and the Warsaw Bloc countries. However, due to both the warming climate in the Arctic and the re-emergence of geopolitical competition in the region, the Arctic is once again of profound importance to NATO security. According
    [Show full text]
  • PDF; HTML): Office Hours and Optional Virtual Sessions in Zoom
    Spring 2019 (updated: March 19, 2019; 76 pages): R678 Only 3 Credits Emerging Learning Technologies (The Famed "Monster Syllabus") Indiana University, School of Education, Room 2101, Mondays 7:00-9:45 pm Section 8743 FTF, Canvas: https://iu.instructure.com/courses/1772486 Section 10173 Online, Canvas: https://iu.instructure.com/courses/1772485 General Course Link to Canvas: http://canvas.iu.edu/ Instructor: Curt Bonk, Professor, Instructional Systems Technology Dept. Syllabus (PDF; HTML): http://php.indiana.edu/~cjbonk/Syllabus_R678_Spring_of_2019.htm Office Hours and Optional Virtual Sessions in Zoom: https://IU.zoom.us/j/8123222878 Weekly Discussion Moderators: http://www.trainingshare.com/r685.php Participant Bios and Interests: http://www.trainingshare.com/r678bios.php Online Role Play: http://www.trainingshare.com/r678roles.php Dropbox link for course files: https://www.dropbox.com/sh/prlxtgixwjb1g4p/AACU4yTbPyf444fEe0hi4noxa?dl=0 l=0 Curtis J. Bonk, Ph.D. Office: 2238 W. W. Wright Education Bldg. IST Dept. School of Education, IU Phone: (mobile # available upon request) E-mail: [email protected] Office Hours: as arranged Instructional Assistants: FTF Section: Meina Zhu: [email protected] Online Section: Parama Bhattacharya [email protected] Course Description and Rationale: Instead of passive consumption-based learning, we are living in a participatory age where learners have a voice and potentially some degree of ownership over their own learning. Here at the start of the twenty- first century, emerging technologies and activities– such as blogs, wikis, podcasts, ebooks, YouTube videos, massive open online courses (MOOCs), simulations, virtual worlds, and wireless and mobile computing – are generating waves of new opportunities in higher education, K-12 schools, corporate training, and other learning environments.
    [Show full text]