Herbicides in Pooled Raw Milk in Connecticut

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Herbicides in Pooled Raw Milk in Connecticut 136 Journal of Food Protection, Vol. 54, No. 2, Pages 136-137 (February 1991) Copyright© International Association of Milk, Food and Environmental Sanitarians Herbicides in Pooled Raw Milk in Connecticut HARRY M. PYLYPIW, JR. and LESTER HANKIN* Department of Analytical Chemistry, The Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station, Box 1106, New Haven, Connecticut 06504 Downloaded from http://meridian.allenpress.com/jfp/article-pdf/54/2/136/1662776/0362-028x-54_2_136.pdf by guest on 29 September 2021 (Received for publication June 29, 1990) ABSTRACT and Drug Administration) (2). Concentrations found of these pesticides were always well below the action level. Pooled raw milk samples collected in Connecticut were Since cows in Connecticut consume quantities of corn analyzed for the herbicides 2,4-D, Atrazine, Simazine, and Alachlor. silage and grass, we investigated milk for the presence of For 2,4-D, 25.6% of the samples had no detectable level, for herbicides used on these feeds. Atrazine 7.7%, and for Alachlor 10.3%. None contained Simaz­ ine. Concentrations averaged 0.021 ppm for 2,4-D, 0.0075 for MATERIALS AND METHODS Atrazine, and 0.0067 for Alachlor. No sample exceeded the EPA tolerance for any of the herbicides. Analysis was by enzyme immunoassay. A total of 78 samples was collected in Connecticut from milk tank trucks from January to April, 1990 by inspectors of the Dairy Division of the Connecticut Department of Agricul­ ture. Each sample was from a pooled supply from the tank truck Field corn is a major agricultural crop in Connecticut. and represented from 1 to 7 farms. Samples were refrigerated Herbicides are generally applied in the spring, either pre- when collected and delivered to this laboratory within 24 h. or postemergence, to control weeds (3). Applications of Milk was tested for 2,4-D, Atrazine, Simazine, and Alachlor herbicides is not only labor saving but also limits weed by enzyme immunoassay procedures (5). All milk samples were growth when the field is too wet to be cultivated. Herbi­ prepared by adding 100 ul of the milk to 9.9 ml of distilled cides used to control weeds in corn are generally Alachlor water. A portion of this diluted milk sample (80 ul) was ana­ and Atrazine. These are usually used preemergence but lyzed in duplicate along with samples of milk spiked with EPA may be used postemergence when the corn is just above standards of Atrazine, Alachlor, and 2,4-D to eliminate matrix effects. The detection limit for these herbicides is 0.001 ppm. the ground. The crop may be diminished by 50% or more Preparation of the antiserum, antibody tubes, and reagent is described if weed control is not used (10). In late summer the corn by Bushway et al. (5). Confirmation of Atrazine and Alachlor in is harvested, chopped, made into silage, and fed to dairy the milk was by mass spectrometry (MS) using the method of cows. Because these herbicides are slightly soluble in water Huang (8). The MS detection limit for these compounds is 0.001 (6,9), they might migrate from soil to corn and thus from ppm. silage to milk. Herbicides also are used on pasture and hayfields to RESULTS AND DISCUSSION control perennial weeds such as wild garlic and onion that can cause off-odors and off-taste in milk. The herbicide The concentrations of 2,4-D, Atrazine, and Alachlor 2,4-D (2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid) is registered for such found are listed in Table 1. No samples were found to uses with a 7-14 d delay in grazing and up to 30 d delay contain Simazine. Many samples had nondetectable levels. in harvesting for hay depending on the formulation. Thus, For 2,4-D, 25.6% of the samples had no detectable amount, milk from cows grazing the pasture or consuming cut grass for Atrazine 7.7%, and for Alachlor 10.3%. might also contain traces of 2,4-D. The concentration of 2,4-D ranged from none detected For many years this laboratory has tested raw milk for to 0.10 ppm with an average for all samples of 0.021 ppm. pesticides using a multi-residue method (4) which essen­ The average concentration of Atrazine found was 0.0075 tially monitors for chlorinated and organophosphate pesti­ ppm with a range from 0.001 to 0.019 ppm and for Alachlor cides. Generally, the only pesticide found was DDE the average was 0.0067 ppm with a range from 0.001 to (dichlordiphenyldichloroethylene) and always well below 0.018 ppm. The EPA tolerance concentration is 0.10 ppm the tolerances established at that time by the EPA (Envi­ for 2,4-D and 0.020 ppm for the other three herbicides (1). ronmental Protection Agency). After DDT (dichlorodiphen- No sample exceeded the tolerance for any of the herbi­ yltrichloroethane) and DDE were removed by the EPA cides, but sample no. 64 was at the tolerance level. from the allowable tolerance list (1), an action level of Three samples of milk found to contain Atrazine and 1.25 ppm (fat basis) was established by the FDA (Food 2,4-D were pasteurized both at 64°C for 30 min and at JOURNAL OF FOOD PROTECTION, VOL. 54, FEBRUARY 1991 HERBICIDE IN POOLED RAW MILK 137 TABLE 1. Herbicides in pooled raw milk. 63 " 0.028 0.009 0.005 Herbicide - ppm 64 " 0.100 0.009 0.004 Sample Date 2,4-D Atrazine Alachlor 65 " 0.080 0.007 0.005 Number Collected 66 " 0.080 ND 0.006 1 1/30/90 ND 0.004 0.002 67 4/25/90 0.026 0.004 0.002 2 ND 0.008 0.002 68 " 0.039 0.005 0.005 3 0.006 0.007 ND 69 " ND 0.007 0.009 4 0.040 0.016 ND 70 " ND 0.005 0.007 5 ND 0.003 ND 71 " 0.012 0.004 0.005 6 0.030 0.005 0.003 72 " ND 0.004 0.007 7 0.020 0.006 0.001 73 " 0.023 0.007 0.008 8 0.010 0.007 ND 74 " ND 0.004 0.007 9 0.020 0.004 ND 75 " ND 0.007 0.013 10 ND 0.001 0.001 76 " 0.023 0.012 0.012 11 0.010 0.005 0.002 77 " ND 0.005 0.012 12 ND 0.001 0.001 78 " 0.015 0.004 0.009 Downloaded from http://meridian.allenpress.com/jfp/article-pdf/54/2/136/1662776/0362-028x-54_2_136.pdf by guest on 29 September 2021 13 0.050 0.003 ND Wer age 0.021 0.0075 0.0067 14 0.040 0.007 ND 15 0.050 0.004 0.004 16 0.010 0.005 ND 17 2/21/90 0.020 ND 0.001 18 0.050 ND 0.004 19 0.025 ND 0.007 20 ND 0.005 0.008 76°C for 20 sec. One sample was spiked with these two 21 0.015 0.006 0.009 herbicides and pasteurized in a like manner. The concen­ 22 0.035 0.006 0.008 tration of these herbicides was not diminished by pasteuri­ 23 0.050 0.005 0.008 zation, with recoveries of at least 95%. 24 0.055 0.005 0.006 This study has found that low levels of 2,4-D, Atrazine, 25 ND 0.006 0.005 and Alachlor are present in milk but below tolerance levels 26 0.022 0.005 0.008 set by the EPA and below toxicity levels suggested by the 27 0.040 0.005 0.011 FDA (7). The presumed pathway is uptake of these herbi­ 28 0.048 0.005 0.012 cides by corn and grass and subsequent consumption by 29 0.012 0.006 0.003 the cow. Experiments are now in progress to test this 30 0.075 0.005 0.005 31 3/13/90 ND 0.005 0.009 hypothesis. 32 0.010 0.005 0.009 33 0.019 0.006 0.018 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 34 0.028 0.005 0.017 35 0.028 0.005 0.017 We thank inspectors of the Department of Agriculture for collecting 36 3/14/90 0.010 0.009 0.012 samples, Laura Rousso for technical assistance, Dr. Lee Huang for confir­ 37 0.010 0.006 0.012 mation of herbicides by mass spectrometry, and Dr. John Ahrens for helpful discussions about use of herbicides. 38 0.032 0.006 0.011 39 ND 0.017 0.010 40 0.025 0.016 0.014 REFERENCES 41 0.025 0.013 0.011 42 0.025 0.017 0.014 1. Anonymous. 1989. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 40, part 180, 43 ND 0.009 0.011 revised as of July 1. 1989. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washing­ ton, DC. 44 ND 0.015 0.010 2. Anonymous. 1987. FDA Compliance Policy Guides. Chapter 41-Pes- 45 ND 0.017 0.013 ticides. Food and Drug Administration, Office of Enforcement, Divi­ 46 0.022 0.013 0.017 sion of Compliance Policy, Washington, DC. 47 4/3/90 0.003 0.013 0.006 3. Anonymous. 1990. New England Chemical Weed Control. Coordi­ 48 0.009 ND 0.006 nated by P.C. Bhowmik, New England. Specialists of the Cooperative 49 0.008 0.006 0.013 Extension Service. University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA. 4. Anonymous. 1968. Pesticide Analytical Manual, Vol. 1. Food and 50 0.014 ND 0.012 Drug Administration, Washington, DC.
Recommended publications
  • 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic Acid
    2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid IUPAC (2,4-dichlorophenoxy)acetic acid name 2,4-D Other hedonal names trinoxol Identifiers CAS [94-75-7] number SMILES OC(COC1=CC=C(Cl)C=C1Cl)=O ChemSpider 1441 ID Properties Molecular C H Cl O formula 8 6 2 3 Molar mass 221.04 g mol−1 Appearance white to yellow powder Melting point 140.5 °C (413.5 K) Boiling 160 °C (0.4 mm Hg) point Solubility in 900 mg/L (25 °C) water Related compounds Related 2,4,5-T, Dichlorprop compounds Except where noted otherwise, data are given for materials in their standard state (at 25 °C, 100 kPa) 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) is a common systemic herbicide used in the control of broadleaf weeds. It is the most widely used herbicide in the world, and the third most commonly used in North America.[1] 2,4-D is also an important synthetic auxin, often used in laboratories for plant research and as a supplement in plant cell culture media such as MS medium. History 2,4-D was developed during World War II by a British team at Rothamsted Experimental Station, under the leadership of Judah Hirsch Quastel, aiming to increase crop yields for a nation at war.[citation needed] When it was commercially released in 1946, it became the first successful selective herbicide and allowed for greatly enhanced weed control in wheat, maize (corn), rice, and similar cereal grass crop, because it only kills dicots, leaving behind monocots. Mechanism of herbicide action 2,4-D is a synthetic auxin, which is a class of plant growth regulators.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. EPA, Pesticide Product Label, DICAMBAZINE, 09/25/2003
    UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHINGTON. D.C. 20460 OFFICE OF PREVENTION, PESTICIDES AND TOXIC SUBSTANCES SEP 2 5 2003 Albaugh, Inc. clo Pyxis Regulatory Consulting, Inc. ATTN: Michael Kellogg 11324 1']'1' Ave. Ct. NW Gig Harbor, W A 98332 Dear Mr. Kellogg: Subject: Fast Track Amendment for Atrazine Product Product: Dicambaiine EPA Registration Number: 42750-41 Submission Date: 04/24/03 The labeling referred to above, submitted in connection with registration under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act, as amended is acceptable, provided you make the followmg changes before you release the product for shipment. 1. Change the PPE section to the following: • "Some materials that are chemical-resistant to this product are barrier laminate> 14 mils, neoprene rubber> 14 mils, polyvinyl chloride (PVC) > 14 mils, butyl rubber> 14 mils, orviton >14 mils. Ifyou want more options, follow the instructions for category A on an EPA chemical-resistance category selection chart. " • "Mixers, loaders, applicators and other handlers not using Engineering Controls must wear: Coveralls over long sleeved ~hirt and long pants Chemical resistant gloves Chemical resistant footwear plus socks Chemical resistant headgear (if overhead exposure) A NlOSH approved dust mist filtering respirator with any N, R, P or HE filter A chemical resistant apron (if exposed to undiluted product)" • "Mixers, loaders, applicators and other handlers using Engineering Controls must wear: Long-sleeved shirt and long pants Chemical resistant gloves and apron for mixers and loaders Shoes plus socks See Engineering Controls for additional requirements" Note to registrant: You must drop the N type filter from the respirator statement if the product contains or is used with oil.
    [Show full text]
  • Exposure to Herbicides in House Dust and Risk of Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
    Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology (2013) 23, 363–370 & 2013 Nature America, Inc. All rights reserved 1559-0631/13 www.nature.com/jes ORIGINAL ARTICLE Exposure to herbicides in house dust and risk of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia Catherine Metayer1, Joanne S. Colt2, Patricia A. Buffler1, Helen D. Reed3, Steve Selvin1, Vonda Crouse4 and Mary H. Ward2 We examine the association between exposure to herbicides and childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Dust samples were collected from homes of 269 ALL cases and 333 healthy controls (o8 years of age at diagnosis/reference date and residing in same home since diagnosis/reference date) in California, using a high-volume surface sampler or household vacuum bags. Amounts of agricultural or professional herbicides (alachlor, metolachlor, bromoxynil, bromoxynil octanoate, pebulate, butylate, prometryn, simazine, ethalfluralin, and pendimethalin) and residential herbicides (cyanazine, trifluralin, 2-methyl-4- chlorophenoxyacetic acid (MCPA), mecoprop, 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D), chlorthal, and dicamba) were measured. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated by logistic regression. Models included the herbicide of interest, age, sex, race/ethnicity, household income, year and season of dust sampling, neighborhood type, and residence type. The risk of childhood ALL was associated with dust levels of chlorthal; compared to homes with no detections, ORs for the first, second, and third tertiles were 1.49 (95% CI: 0.82–2.72), 1.49 (95% CI: 0.83–2.67), and 1.57 (95% CI: 0.90–2.73), respectively (P-value for linear trend ¼ 0.05). The magnitude of this association appeared to be higher in the presence of alachlor.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Herbicide Groups
    List of herbicides Group Scientific name Trade name clodinafop (Topik®), cyhalofop (Barnstorm®), diclofop (Cheetah® Gold*, Decision®*, Hoegrass®), fenoxaprop (Cheetah® Gold* , Wildcat®), A Aryloxyphenoxypropionates fluazifop (Fusilade®, Fusion®*), haloxyfop (Verdict®), propaquizafop (Shogun®), quizalofop (Targa®) butroxydim (Falcon®, Fusion®*), clethodim (Select®), profoxydim A Cyclohexanediones (Aura®), sethoxydim (Cheetah® Gold*, Decision®*), tralkoxydim (Achieve®) A Phenylpyrazoles pinoxaden (Axial®) azimsulfuron (Gulliver®), bensulfuron (Londax®), chlorsulfuron (Glean®), ethoxysulfuron (Hero®), foramsulfuron (Tribute®), halosulfuron (Sempra®), iodosulfuron (Hussar®), mesosulfuron (Atlantis®), metsulfuron (Ally®, Harmony®* M, Stinger®*, Trounce®*, B Sulfonylureas Ultimate Brushweed®* Herbicide), prosulfuron (Casper®*), rimsulfuron (Titus®), sulfometuron (Oust®, Eucmix Pre Plant®*), sulfosulfuron (Monza®), thifensulfuron (Harmony®* M), triasulfuron, (Logran®, Logran® B Power®*), tribenuron (Express®), trifloxysulfuron (Envoke®, Krismat®*) florasulam (Paradigm®*, Vortex®*, X-Pand®*), flumetsulam B Triazolopyrimidines (Broadstrike®), metosulam (Eclipse®), pyroxsulam (Crusader®Rexade®*) imazamox (Intervix®*, Raptor®,), imazapic (Bobcat I-Maxx®*, Flame®, Midas®*, OnDuty®*), imazapyr (Arsenal Xpress®*, Intervix®*, B Imidazolinones Lightning®*, Midas®*, OnDuty®*), imazethapyr (Lightning®*, Spinnaker®) B Pyrimidinylthiobenzoates bispyribac (Nominee®), pyrithiobac (Staple®) C Amides: propanil (Stam®) C Benzothiadiazinones: bentazone (Basagran®,
    [Show full text]
  • Pesticide Simazine and Breast Cancer Risk
    Pesticide Simazine and Breast Cancer Risk http://envirocancer.cornell.edu/Bibliography/pesticide/bib.simazine.cfm Skip to main content New Program Learning Resources Events Maps & Stats Research Resources BCERF Research Pesticide Simazine and Breast Cancer Risk Bibliography This bibliography is provided as a service to our readers. It is compiled from the entries in the BCERF Environmental Risk Factors Bibliographic Database. This bibliography is arranged topically. The topics include: Chemical Names and Trade Names Transformation Products and Metabolites History of Use and Usage Regulatory Status and Regulations Human Studies-Evidence of Carcinogenicity Animal Experimental Studies-Evidence of Carcinogencity Evidence of Estrogenicity Effect on Reproduction Formation of Co-Carcinogens Mutagenicity Environmental Fate Persistency in Soil Water Contamination Chemical Names and Trade Names Meister, R. T. (1997). Pesticide Dictionary; Simazine. In 1997 Farm Chemicals Handbook, R. T. Meister, ed. (Willoughby, OH: Meister Publishing Company), pp. C 334. Montgomery, J. H. (1993). Simazine. In Agrochemicals Desk Reference (Boca Raton: Lewis Publishers), pp. 371-377. WSSA. (1994). Simazine. In Herbicide Handbook, 7th, W. H. Ahrens, ed. (Champaign, IL: Weed Science Society of America), pp. 270-272. Transformation Products and Metabolites Adams, N. H., Levi, P., and Hodgson, E. (1990). In vitro studies of the metabolism of atrazine, simazine, and terbutryn in several vertebrate species. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 38, 1411-1417. WSSA. (1994). Simazine. In Herbicide Handbook, 7th, W. H. Ahrens, ed. (Champaign, IL: Weed Science Society of America), pp. 270-272. History of Use and Usage Bartowiak, D., Newhart, K., Pepple, M., Troiano, J., and Weaver, D. (1995). Sampling for Pesticide Residues in California Well Water; 1995 Update of the Well Inventory Data Base (Sacremento, CA: California Environmental Protection Agency, Dept.
    [Show full text]
  • Pesticides EPA 738-R-06-008 Environmental Protection and Toxic Substances April 2006 Agency (7508P)
    Simazine RED April 6, 2006 United States Prevention, Pesticides EPA 738-R-06-008 Environmental Protection and Toxic Substances April 2006 Agency (7508P) Reregistration Eligibility Decision for Simazine Page 1 of 266 Reregistration Eligibility Decision (RED) Document for Simazine List A Case Number 0070 Approved by: Date: April 6, 2006 Debra Edwards, Ph. D. Director Special Review and Reregistration Division Page 2 of 266 Table of Contents Simazine Reregistration Eligibility Decision Team ................................................................... 5 Glossary of Terms and Abbreviations ........................................................................................ 6 Abstract.......................................................................................................................................... 8 I. Introduction............................................................................................................................... 9 II. Chemical Overview................................................................................................................ 10 A. Chemical Identity ................................................................................................................10 B. Use and Usage Profile .........................................................................................................11 C. Tolerances............................................................................................................................12 III. Summary of Risk Assessments
    [Show full text]
  • PB1775 Common Commercial Pre-Packaged Herbicide Mixtures
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Field & Commercial Crops UT Extension Publications 3-2008 PB1775 Common Commercial Pre-packaged Herbicide Mixtures The University of Tennessee Agricultural Extension Service Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_agexcrop Part of the Plant Sciences Commons Recommended Citation "PB1775 Common Commercial Pre-packaged Herbicide Mixtures," The University of Tennessee Agricultural Extension Service, 08-0158 PB1775-2.5M-3/08 E12-5115-00-011-08, https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_agexcrop/65 The publications in this collection represent the historical publishing record of the UT Agricultural Experiment Station and do not necessarily reflect current scientific knowledge or ecommendations.r Current information about UT Ag Research can be found at the UT Ag Research website. This Production is brought to you for free and open access by the UT Extension Publications at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Field & Commercial Crops by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. PB1775 Common Commercial Pre-packaged Herbicide Mixtures Photo courtesy of Larry Steckel Gregory Armel, Assistant Professor Weed Science — Horticulture Crops and Invasive Weeds G. Neil Rhodes, Professor Weed Science — Forage , Biofuel Crops, Tobacco and Aquatics William Klingeman, Associate Professor Nursery Production Lawrence Steckel,
    [Show full text]
  • Using Countless Tons of Arsenic As a Non-Selective Contact and Soil Sterilant
    87 In addition to requiring the user to obtain a permit from, the agricultural commissioner, t4e regulations prescribe certain conditions to be met by those who possess or use sodium arsenite as follows: (a) No pesticide containing sodium arsenite shall be applied on exposed vegetation (other than dormant grapeviries) unless the vegetation to be treated is enclosed within a good and su£ficient fence or otherwis.e made inaccessible to grazing animals, pets, and children. (b) No pesticide containing sodium arsenite sha,11 be applied on soil or vegetation (other than dormant grapevines) in any area penetrated by roots of any plant of value, without the written consent of the owner of such plant. ( c) No pesticide containing sodium arsenite shall be kept or placed in drinking cups, pop bottles, or other containers of a type commonly used for food or drink. (d) No pesticide containing sodium arsenite, whether in concentrated or dilute form, shall be stored, placed, or transported in any container or receptacle which does not bear on the outside a conspicuous poison label which conforms to the label required to be placed on all packages of arsenic compounds and pre:parations sold or delivered within the State. These are only procedures that any careful person would observe in the use of a poisonous material like sodium arsenite. It is just over one year since the regulations became effective. In that time we have heard of no accidental deaths involving sodium arsenite in California and the regulations appear to be serving a good purpose. SUBSTITUTE HERBICIDES FOR SODIUM ARSENITE W.
    [Show full text]
  • Turfgrass Weed Control
    MP521 Turfgrass Weed Control DIVISION OF AGRICULTURE R E S E A R C H & E X T E N S I O N University of Arkansas, United States Department of Agriculture, University of Arkansas System and County Governments Cooperating Contents Introduction to Turfgrass Weed Control .............. 3 Hairy Bittercress ................................................... 11 American Burnweed ............................................. 4 Henbit .................................................................. 11 Annual Bluegrass .................................................. 4 Kyllinga................................................................. 12 Annual Sedge........................................................ 4 Large Hop Clover................................................. 12 Bahiagrass ............................................................. 5 Lawn Burweed or Spurweed ................................ 12 Bermudagrass – Preplant Control ......................... 5 Lespedeza, Common ............................................ 13 Bermudagrass – Selective Suppression.................. 5 Lyreleaf Sage......................................................... 13 Carolina Geranium ............................................... 6 Moss ..................................................................... 13 Carpetweed ........................................................... 6 Nutsedge, Purple................................................... 14 Cat’s Ear Dandelion ............................................. 6 Nutsedge, Yellow..................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Volatilization of Alachlor and Atrazine As Influenced by Surface Litter" (1995)
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln U.S. Department of Agriculture: Agricultural Publications from USDA-ARS / UNL Faculty Research Service, Lincoln, Nebraska 1995 Volatilization of Alachlor and Atrazine as Influenced yb Surface Litter Timothy Gish USDA-ARS Ali Sadeghi USDA-ARS Brian J. Wienhold University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usdaarsfacpub Gish, Timothy; Sadeghi, Ali; and Wienhold, Brian J., "Volatilization of Alachlor and Atrazine as Influenced by Surface Litter" (1995). Publications from USDA-ARS / UNL Faculty. 1191. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usdaarsfacpub/1191 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the U.S. Department of Agriculture: Agricultural Research Service, Lincoln, Nebraska at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Publications from USDA-ARS / UNL Faculty by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Chemosphere, Vol. 31, No. 4, pp. 2971-2982, 1995 ~n Elsevier Scielice Ltd 0045-6535(95)00157-3 Printed in Great Britain Vdalilimflo. of Aladflor and ~ as l~em:~! by Surface Litter Timothy J. Gish*, All Sadeghi*', and Brian J. Wienhold"" * Soil Physicist, Hydrology Laboratory, Natural Resources Institute, U. S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville, Maryland 20705, USA. " Soil Scientist, Environmental Chemistry Laboratory, Natural Resources Institute, U. S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Bcitsville, Maryland 20705, USA. "'" Soil Scientist, Northern Great Plains Research Laboratory, U. S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Mandan, North Dakota 58554, USA (Received in Germany 4 April 1995; accepted 1 June 1995) ABSTRACT A basic knowledge of how herbicide volatilization is influenced by agronomic practices is necessary if long-term detrimental impacts from herbicides are to be minimized.
    [Show full text]
  • California Turfgrass Culture
    California Turfgrass Culture FORMERLY, SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA TURFGRASS CULTURE OCTOBER 1963 VOLUME 13 - NUMBER 4 Regulation of Sodium Arsenite as an Injurious Material John C. Hillis California Department of Agriculture Sacramento Effective January 1, 1962, sodium arsenite was placed pest or vegetation which it is intended to destroy. Thus under regulation as an injurious material. Since then, an injurious material sold for weed control or control of a persons intending to use it in California have been re- plant disease or of a micro-organism is subject to the quired to obtain a permit from the county agricultural requirement of a permit. On the other hand, if sodium commissioner. In addition, it is illegal to sell or deliver arsenite is sold for a non-agricultural and non-pesticidal it to persons who do not have the required permit. use, for example, in metallurgy, or in drilling to facilitate the operation mechanically, the use would not be subject The regulation was adopted after public hearing and to the requirement of a permit. consideration of the history of accidental deaths over the years as well as injury to property. All sizes of sodium arsenite pesticide containers are subject to the requirement of a permit; however, there is Section 1080 of the Agricultural Code provides that an exemption in that no permit is required to use products “after investigation and hearing the Director shall adopt sold as dilute ready-to-use syrups or dry baits, registered rules and regulations governing the application, in pest and labeled for use as poison baits for the control of control or other agricultural operations, of any material he insects and other arthropods, snails and slugs, or rodents.
    [Show full text]
  • Occurrence of Selected Pesticides and Their Metabolites in Near- Surface Aquifers of the Midwestern United States
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln USGS Staff -- Published Research US Geological Survey 1996 Occurrence of Selected Pesticides and Their Metabolites in Near- Surface Aquifers of the Midwestern United States Dana Kolpin U.S. Geological Survey E. Michael Thurman U.S. Geological Survey Donald Goolsby U.S. Geological Survey Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usgsstaffpub Part of the Earth Sciences Commons Kolpin, Dana; Thurman, E. Michael; and Goolsby, Donald, "Occurrence of Selected Pesticides and Their Metabolites in Near-Surface Aquifers of the Midwestern United States" (1996). USGS Staff -- Published Research. 72. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usgsstaffpub/72 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the US Geological Survey at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in USGS Staff -- Published Research by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1996, 30, 335-340 Occurrence of Selected Introduction Nonpoint source contamination of water resources from Pesticides and Their Metabolites agriculturally applied pesticides in the United States has been a topic of increased environmental concern over the in Near-Surface Aquifers of the last decade (1, 2). However, even more recently awareness has been growing that pesticide metabolites could also be Midwestern United States contaminating the nation's water resources (3-8). Al- though many of the commonly used pesticides in the United DANAW.KOLPIN* States have either a maximum contaminant level (MCL) or U.S.
    [Show full text]