DOCSLIB.ORG

View the Report and Cover Letter

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
View the Report and Cover Letter United States Department of Justice Annual Report Working together to end the violence U.S. Department of Justice Office on Violence Against Women 2018 Tribal Consultation Report Sioux Falls, SD August 21–22, 2018 1 Acronyms and Definitions Acronym Definition AFN Alaska Federation of Natives ANWRC Alaska Native Women's Resource Center BIA Bureau of Indian Affairs CFR Court of Federal Regulations CJIS Criminal Justice Information System COPS Office of Community Oriented Policing Services CTAS Coordinated Tribal Assistance Solicitation DOI U.S. Department of the Interior DOJ U.S. Department of Justice FBI Federal Bureau of Investigation FVPSA Family Violence Prevention and Services Act HHS U.S. Department of Health and Human Services IHS Indian Health Service LAV Legal assistance for victims LGBTQ Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer NCAI National Congress of American Indians NCIC National Crime Information Center NICS National Instant Criminal Background Check System NIJ National Institute of Justice NIWRC National Indigenous Women's Resource Center OJP Office of Justice Programs OVC Office for Victims of Crime OVW Office on Violence Against Women P.L. Public Law SANE Sexual assault nurse examiner SAUSA Special assistant U.S. attorney SDVCJ Special domestic violence criminal jurisdiction SORNA Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act STOP Services, Training, Officers, Prosecutors (STOP) Violence Against Women formula grant SURVIVE Act Securing Urgent Resources Vital to Indian Victim Empowerment Act TAP Tribal Access Program TLOA Tribal Law and Order Act TTA Training and technical assistance U.S.C. U.S. Code VAWA Violence Against Women Act VOCA Victims of Crime Act 2 Table of Contents Acronyms and Definitions ..................................................................................................................2 Disclaimers ........................................................................................................................................5 Introduction ......................................................................................................................................6 Consultation Questions ......................................................................................................................6 Tribal Consultation Event ...................................................................................................................6 Welcome and Opening.............................................................................................................................. 7 Update from Tribal Caucus Meeting ......................................................................................................... 8 Tribal Testimony .............................................................................................................................. 10 Akiak Native Community ......................................................................................................................... 10 Asa’carsarmiut Tribe of Mountain Village .............................................................................................. 12 Central Council of Tlingit and Haida Indian Tribes of Alaska .................................................................. 14 Cherokee Nation ..................................................................................................................................... 15 Chippewa Cree Tribe ............................................................................................................................... 16 Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes ............................................................................................... 17 Crow Creek Sioux Tribe ........................................................................................................................... 18 Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians .......................................................................................................... 20 Eight Northern Indian Pueblos ................................................................................................................ 20 Emmonak Village ..................................................................................................................................... 21 Kenaitze Indian Tribe .............................................................................................................................. 22 Little River Band of Ottawa Indians ........................................................................................................ 24 Little Traverse Bay Bands of Odawa Indians ........................................................................................... 25 Lower Elwha Klallam Tribe ...................................................................................................................... 26 Northern Arapaho and Eastern Shoshone Tribes ................................................................................... 28 Native Village of Nunam Iqua ................................................................................................................. 28 Oglala Sioux Tribe .................................................................................................................................... 29 Pauma Band of Luiseño Indians .............................................................................................................. 31 Restoring Ancestral Winds ...................................................................................................................... 33 Santa Clara Pueblo .................................................................................................................................. 34 Sisseton Wahpeton Oyate....................................................................................................................... 35 StrongHearts Native Helpline.................................................................................................................. 37 Uniting Three Fires Against Violence ...................................................................................................... 37 Wabanaki Tribes of Maine ...................................................................................................................... 39 White Mountain Apache Tribe ................................................................................................................ 41 Winnebago Tribe of Nebraska ................................................................................................................ 42 Yankton Sioux Tribe ................................................................................................................................ 44 3 Written Testimony ........................................................................................................................... 46 Alaska Federation of Natives .................................................................................................................. 46 Anvik Native Village................................................................................................................................. 48 Apache Tribe of Oklahoma...................................................................................................................... 52 Cook Inlet Tribal Council ......................................................................................................................... 58 Confederated Tribes of the Goshute Reservation, Paiute Indian Tribe of Utah, San Juan Southern Paiute Tribe, and Navajo Nation ............................................................................................................. 60 Confederated Tribes of Siletz Indians ..................................................................................................... 61 Eastern Shawnee Tribe of Oklahoma ...................................................................................................... 62 Mesa Grande Band of Mission Indians ................................................................................................... 65 National Congress of American Indians .................................................................................................. 66 Navajo Nation ......................................................................................................................................... 75 Nez Perce Tribe ....................................................................................................................................... 75 Nottawaseppi Huron Band of the Potawatomi....................................................................................... 76 Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians ............................................................................................ 80 Tohono O’odham Nation ........................................................................................................................ 86 DOJ Presentations ............................................................................................................................ 96 COPS Funding .......................................................................................................................................... 96 NIJ Research Initiatives and Programs Addressing Crime and Victimization in Indian Country and Alaska .....................................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Northern Paiute and Western Shoshone Land Use in Northern Nevada: a Class I Ethnographic/Ethnohistoric Overview
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Bureau of Land Management NEVADA NORTHERN PAIUTE AND WESTERN SHOSHONE LAND USE IN NORTHERN NEVADA: A CLASS I ETHNOGRAPHIC/ETHNOHISTORIC OVERVIEW Ginny Bengston CULTURAL RESOURCE SERIES NO. 12 2003 SWCA ENVIROHMENTAL CON..·S:.. .U LTt;NTS . iitew.a,e.El t:ti.r B'i!lt e.a:b ~f l-amd :Nf'arat:1.iern'.~nt N~:¥G~GI Sl$i~-'®'ffl'c~. P,rceP,GJ r.ei l l§y. SWGA.,,En:v,ir.e.m"me'Y-tfol I €on's.wlf.arats NORTHERN PAIUTE AND WESTERN SHOSHONE LAND USE IN NORTHERN NEVADA: A CLASS I ETHNOGRAPHIC/ETHNOHISTORIC OVERVIEW Submitted to BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT Nevada State Office 1340 Financial Boulevard Reno, Nevada 89520-0008 Submitted by SWCA, INC. Environmental Consultants 5370 Kietzke Lane, Suite 205 Reno, Nevada 89511 (775) 826-1700 Prepared by Ginny Bengston SWCA Cultural Resources Report No. 02-551 December 16, 2002 TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Figures ................................................................v List of Tables .................................................................v List of Appendixes ............................................................ vi CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION .................................................1 CHAPTER 2. ETHNOGRAPHIC OVERVIEW .....................................4 Northern Paiute ............................................................4 Habitation Patterns .......................................................8 Subsistence .............................................................9 Burial Practices ........................................................11
    [Show full text]
  • 2010 Census CPH-T-6. American Indian and Alaska Native Tribes in the United States and Puerto Rico: 2010
    2010 Census CPH-T-6. American Indian and Alaska Native Tribes in the United States and Puerto Rico: 2010 Description of Table 1. This table shows data for American Indian and Alaska Native tribes alone and alone or in combination for the United States. Those respondents who reported as American Indian or Alaska Native only and one tribe are shown in Column 1. Respondents who reported two or more American Indian or Alaska Native tribes, but no other race, are shown in Column 2. Those respondents who reported as American Indian or Alaska Native and at least one other race and one tribe are shown in Column 3. Respondents who reported as American Indian or Alaska Native and at least one other race and two or more tribes are shown in Column 4. Those respondents who reported as American Indian or Alaska Native in any combination of race(s) or tribe(s) are shown in Column 5, and is the sum of the numbers in Columns 1 through 4. For a detailed explanation of the alone and alone or in combination concepts used in this table, see the 2010 Census Brief, “The American Indian and Alaska Native Population: 2010” at <www.census.gov/prod/cen2010/briefs/c2010br-10.pdf>. Table 1. American Indian and Alaska Native Population by Tribe1 for the United States: 2010 Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census, special tabulation. Internet release date: December 2013 Note: Respondents who identified themselves as American Indian or Alaska Native were asked to report their enrolled or principal tribe. Therefore, tribal data in this data product reflect the written tribal entries reported on the questionnaire.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary Under the Criteria and Evidence for Final Determination Against the Federal Acknow1edgment of the Little Shell Tribe Of
    Summary under the Criteria and Evidence for Final Determination Against the Federal Acknow1edgment of the Little Shell Tribe of Chippewa Indians of Montana Prepared in Response to a Petition Submitted to the Assistant Secretary - Indian Affairs for Federal Acknowledgment that this Group Exists as an Indian Tribe. Little Shell Tribe of Chippewa Indians of Montana (Petitioner #31) Summary under the Criteria and Evidence for Final Determination against the Federal Acknowledgment of the Little Shell Tribe of Chippewa Indians of Montana TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION……......................................................................................................1 Administrative History of the Petition since the Proposed Finding ....................................2 Summary of the Proposed Finding and Analysis of Departures from Precedent ................3 Technical Assistance Provided by the OFA since the Proposed Finding ................................................................................................15 Third Party Comments to the PF and the Petitioner’s Response .......................................15 Maps ...................................................................................................................................17 Terminology .......................................................................................................................22 Definition of the Historical Tribe ......................................................................................22 Historical Overview of
    [Show full text]
  • TRIBE OR TRIBAL ORGANIZATION INITIAL CR RELEASE Alabama Ma-Chis Lower Creek Indian Tribe $7,037 Mowa Band of Choctaw Indians
    2018 Initial CR Release of LIHEAP Block Grant Funds to Indian Tribes and Tribal Organizations under P.L. 115-56 INITIAL CR TRIBE OR TRIBAL ORGANIZATION RELEASE Alabama Ma-Chis Lower Creek Indian Tribe $7,037 Mowa Band of Choctaw Indians $128,077 Poarch Band of Creek Indians (also in Florida) $82,073 United Cherokee Ani-Yun Wiya Nation $33,442 Alaska Aleutian/Pribilof Islands Association $165,633 Aniak Traditional Council $149,594 Assn. of Village Council Presidents $2,392,465 Bristol Bay Native Association $900,047 Chuathbaluk Traditional Council $18,751 Cook Inlet $259,388 Kenaitze Indian Tribe $117,991 Orutsararmuit Native Council $218,761 Seldovia Village $10,938 Sitka Tribe of Alaska $65,595 Tanana Chiefs Conference $1,493,031 Tlingit & Haida Central Council $700,036 Yakutat Tlingit Tribe $31,252 Arizona Cocopah Tribe $7,223 Colorado River Indian Tribes (also in California) $23,645 Gila River Pima-Maricopa Community $72,889 Navajo Nation (also in New Mexico and Utah) $1,391,576 Pascua Yaqui Tribe $27,844 Quechan Tribe (also in California) $17,796 Salt River Pima Maricopa Ind. Cmty. $26,894 San Carlos Apache Tribe $44,348 White Mountain Apache Tribe $63,355 California Berry Creek Rancheria $5,620 Big Valley Band of Pomo Indians $1,513 Bishop Paiute $21,182 Coyote Valley Pomo Band $4,669 Enterprise Rancheria $2,162 Hoopa Valley Tribe $38,734 Hopland Band $5,880 Karuk Tribe $28,100 2018 Initial CR Release of LIHEAP Block Grant Funds to Indian Tribes and Tribal Organizations under P.L. 115-56 INITIAL CR TRIBE OR TRIBAL ORGANIZATION RELEASE Mooretown Rancheria $16,038 N.
    [Show full text]
  • The Wind River Indian Reservation, Wyoming
    THESIS CULTURALLY SPECIFIC INFORMATION IN WATER AND RIVER CORRIDOR MANAGEMENT: THE WIND RIVER INDIAN RESERVATION, WYOMING Submitted by Cathleen M. Flanagan Department of Earth Resources In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Science Colorado State University Fort Collins, Colorado Spring2000 ,-/ f ...' ';;cJ I t: \ f tJ/ COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY March 28, 2000 WE HEREBY RECOMMEND THAT THE THESIS PREPARED UNDER OUR SUPERVISION BY CATHLEEN M. FLANAGAN ENTITLED "CULTURALLY SPECIFIC INFORMATION IN WATER AND RIVER CORRIDOR MANAGEMENT: THE WIND RIVER INDIAN RESERVATION, WYOMING" BE ACCEPTED AS FULFILLING IN PART REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE. iii OOLORADO STATE UN IV. LIBRARIES ABSTRACT OF THESIS CULTURALLY SPECIFIC INFORMATION IN WATER AND RIVER CORRIDOR MANAGEMENT: THE WIND RIVER INDIAN RESERVATION, WYOMING Knowledge is based on a set of assumptions about reality and the world that is dictated by environment, tradition and religion (Sterling, 1990). Indigenous people and their culturally specific knowledge associated with local ecosystems are being credited with bio-diversity protection around the world. As a result, environmental managers are acknowledging the long-range environmental benefits of indigenous approaches for managing natural resources. This recognition has catalyzed the inclusion of indigenous people in the development of sustainable resource management solutions, affording them a voice in nature conservation and resource management agendas in areas around the world. However, in the United States, Native Americans' cultural and ecological knowledge of local ecosystems has been overlooked in making resource management decisions. Although current research has explored the value and protection of indigenous knowledge, little effort has been focused on developing ways to integrate indigenous ecological knowledge with Euro-American scientific knowledge to obtain sustainable solutions to resource dilemmas.
    [Show full text]
  • View the List of TAP-FULL, TAP-LIGHT, and BIA Tribes By
    TAP-FULL and TAP-LIGHT Tribes FY16 (User Feedback Phase) (all TAP FULL) • Cherokee Nation (Oklahoma) • Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation (Oregon) • Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians (North Carolina) • Gila River Indian Community of the Gila River Indian Reservation, Arizona • Keweenaw Bay Indian Community, Michigan • Pascua Yaqui Tribe of Arizona • Suquamish Indian Tribe of the Port Madison Reservation (Washington) • Tulalip Tribes of Washington • White Mountain Apache Tribe of the Fort Apache Reservation of Arizona * FY17 (all TAP FULL) • Assiniboine and Sioux Tribes of the Fort Peck Indian Reservation, Montana • Lac Courte Oreilles Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians of Wisconsin • Makah Indian Tribe of the Makah Indian Reservation (Washington) • Metlakatla Indian Community, Annette Island Reserve (Alaska) • Navajo Nation, Arizona, New Mexico & Utah • Reno-Sparks Indian Colony, Nevada • Sisseton-Wahpeton Oyate of the Lake Traverse Reservation, South Dakota • Standing Rock Sioux Tribe of North & South Dakota * • Tohono O’odham Nation of Arizona • Yurok Tribe of the Yurok Reservation, California FY18 (TAP FULL except where noted) • Colorado River Indian Tribes of the Colorado River Indian Reservation, Arizona and California * • Kootenai Tribe of Idaho (TAP-LIGHT) • Lummi Tribe of the Lummi Reservation (Washington) • Mashantucket Pequot Indian Tribe (Connecticut) • Mescalero Apache Tribe of the Mescalero Reservation, New Mexico * • Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians (Mississippi) (TAP-LIGHT) • Nez Perce Tribe (Idaho)
    [Show full text]
  • Conference Programming and Meet with Native American Journalists Over Shared Meals and Receptions
    Fourth Annual Conference on NATIVE AMERICAN NUTRITION MYSTIC LAKE CASINO HOTEL Prior Lake, Minnesota Green: PMS 377 C SEPTEMBER 15- 18, 2019 (Less Red) Brown: PMS 462 C Yellow: PMS 109 C WELCOME n behalf of the Shakopee Mdewakanton Sioux Community (SMSC) and the University of Minnesota, welcome to the Fourth Annual Conference on Native American Nutrition. Thank you for joining us for this conference series, which is uniquely focused on the nutrition of Indigenous peoples. As you likely know, the dietary health crisis is widespread across Indian Country. Thankfully, so are the talented individuals working to address it. Every day tribal leaders, researchers, activists and practitioners are conducting studies and building programs to restore food sovereignty and improve Native American nutrition. This conference gathers important expert voices each year to share their knowledge, learn from one another and build relationships. Our goal with this event is to help shine a light on the innovative work being done – and that it informs and inspires the work of others. We are happy that this year’s conference is being held in conjunction with the Native American Journalists Association’s annual National Native Media Conference. Over the next few days, you’ll have the opportunity to attend some of their conference programming and meet with Native American journalists over shared meals and receptions. We encourage you to get to know these media professionals and acquaint them with your own areas of research and community change. We hope that the next few days of this conference provide you with new insights and relationships to help aid your important work.
    [Show full text]
  • Ashley National Forest Assessment, Tribal Uses Report
    Ashley National Forest Assessment Tribal Uses Report Public Draft Prepared by: Jeff Rust Forest Archeologist for: Ashley National Forest April 2017 In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English. To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD-3027, found online at http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_cust.html and at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the information requested in the form. To request a copy of the complaint form, call (866) 632-9992. Submit your completed form or letter to USDA by: (1) mail: U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Wind River Interpretive Plan Size
    Wind River Indian Reservation Interpretive Plan for the Eastern Shoshone and the Northern Arapaho photo by Skylight Pictures © Preface This interpretive planning project was initiated through the desire of many to hear, sometimes for the ÀUVWWLPHWKHKLVWRU\RIWKH(DVWHUQ6KRVKRQHDQG1RUWKHUQ$UDSDKRSHRSOHRIWKH:LQG5LYHU,QGLDQ 5HVHUYDWLRQ7KLVSODQDWWHPSWVWRVKDUHDQLPSRUWDQWKLVWRU\LQRUGHUWRJDLQDEURDGHUXQGHUVWDQGLQJRI WKHSDVWDQGSUHVHQWRIWKHVWDWH:LWKWKLVPRUHFRPSUHKHQVLYHXQGHUVWDQGLQJWKRVHZKRFRQWULEXWHGWR WKLVSURMHFWKRSHWKDWDJUHDWHUKLVWRULFDODQGFXOWXUDODZDUHQHVVFDQEHJDLQHG 7KLVSODQUHÁHFWVWKHHIIRUWVRIWKH:\RPLQJ6WDWH+LVWRULF3UHVHUYDWLRQ2IÀFH:\RPLQJ2IÀFHRI7RXULVP DQGWKH:LQG5LYHU,QGLDQ5HVHUYDWLRQ7KH86'$)RUHVW6HUYLFH&HQWHUIRU'HVLJQDQG,QWHUSUHWDWLRQ KHOSHGJXLGHWKHSODQQLQJSURFHVVE\WDNLQJLGHDVDQGVWRULHVDQGWXUQLQJWKHPLQWRZRUGVDQGJUDSKLFV 1875 map portion of Wyoming Territory. Image from the Wyoming State Archives. 7KLVSURMHFWZDVIXQGHGE\JHQHURXVJUDQWVIURPWKH:\RPLQJ&XOWXUDO7UXVW)XQGDQG WKH:\RPLQJ'HSDUWPHQWRI7UDQVSRUWDWLRQ7($/*UDQWSURJUDPDVZHOODVIXQGVIURPWKH :\RPLQJ2IÀFHRI7RXULVPDQGWKH:\RPLQJ6WDWH+LVWRULF3UHVHUYDWLRQ2IÀFH$GGLWLRQDOO\ FRXQWOHVVKRXUVZHUHGRQDWHGWRWKHSURMHFWE\6KRVKRQHDQG$UDSDKRWULEDOPHPEHUV 7KHSRLQWVRIYLHZH[SUHVVHGLQWKLVGRFXPHQWDUHSUHVHQWHGIURPWKHLQGLYLGXDOSHUVSHFWLYHVRIWKH(DVWHUQ6KRVKRQHDQG 1RUWKHUQ$UDSDKRWULEHV(DFKWULEHKDVLWVRZQSHUVSHFWLYHVWKDWUHSUHVHQWLWVRZQKLVWRU\DQGHDFKWULEHVSRNHRQO\RQLWVRZQ EHKDOI7KHYLHZVH[SUHVVHGE\WKH(DVWHUQ6KRVKRQHDUHQRWQHFHVVDULO\WKHYLHZVH[SUHVVHGE\WKH1RUWKHUQ$UDSDKRDQGYLFH YHUVD7KHVHYLHZVGRQRWQHFHVVDULO\UHSUHVHQWWKHYLHZVRIWKH6WDWHRI:\RPLQJ
    [Show full text]
  • The Wind River Shoshone Sun Dance
    SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION Bureau of American Ethnology Bulletin 151 Anthropological Papers, No. 41 The Wind River Shoshone Sun Dance By D. B. SHIMKIN 397 CONTENTS PAGE Preface 401 The old Sun Dance 403 The Sun Dance complex 403 Origins of the Wind River Shoshone Sun Dance 409 The early Shoshone Sun Dance: Reconstruction 417 Social and psychological factors 428 The modern Sun Dance 435 The later history of the Shoshone Sun Dance 435 The modern Sun Dance^—generalized version 437 The modern Sun Dance— 1937 version 451 Social and psychological factors 464 Conclusions 472 Appendix 1. Manuscript notes on the Wind River Shoshone Sun Dance (1902), by H. H. St. Clair 474 Appendix 2. Principal informants 476 Appendix 3. Rohrschach test data on Sun Dancers and nonparticipants _ 477 Bibliography 481 ILLUSTRATIONS PLATES 30. Upper: Tom Compton, May 1937. Lower: The Sun Dance field, July 1, 1937 484 31. Upper: Measuring radii to locate side-post holes from the center pole. July 3, 1937. Lower: Compton fixing the buffalo head on the center pole, and Tassitsie painting it 484 32. Upper: How the rafters are raised. Lower: Getting ready to lift the center pole 484 33. Upper: Men putting up the side roof poles. Lower: The brush wall being finished 484 34. Upper: Before dawn. Orchestra and resting dancers. Lower: The dancers greet the rising sun 484 35. Upper: Another view of the dancers greeting the rising sun. Lower: A third view of the sunrise ceremony 484 36. Upper: The prayer songs around the fire. Lower: Details of the orchestra and spectators 484 37.
    [Show full text]
  • Declaration “Let Our Indigenous Voices Be Heard” at March for Science, April 22, 2017
    Declaration “Let Our Indigenous Voices Be Heard” at March for Science, April 22, 2017 We the undersign support Indigenous Science – Let us March not just for Science-but for Sciences! 1. Dr. Robin Wall Kimmerer (Citizen Potawatomi Nation), Professor of Environmental and Forest Biology, Director Center for Native Peoples and the Environment, SUNY College of Environmental Science and Forestry, Syracuse, NY 2. Dr. Rosalyn LaPier (Blackfeet/Metis), Research Associate, Women's Studies, Environmental Studies, and Native American Religion, Harvard Divinity School, Cambridge, MA 3. Dr. Melissa K. Nelson (Turtle Mountain Chippewa), Associate Professor of American Indian Studies, San Francisco State University, President of the Cultural Conservancy, San Francisco, CA 4. Dr. Kyle P. Whyte (Citizen Potawatomi Nation), Timnick Chair in the Humanities, Associate Professor of Philosophy and Community Sustainability, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 5. Neil Patterson, Jr. (Tuscarora) Assistant Director, Center for Native Peoples and the Environment, SUNY College of Environmental Science and Forestry, Syracuse, NY and EPA Tribal Science Council. 6. Dr. Patty Loew, Professor, Department of Life Sciences Communication. University of Wisconsin- Madison 7. Patricia Cochran (Inupiat), Executive Director, Alaska Native Science Commission, Anchorage, AK 8. Dr. Gregory A. Cajete (Tewa-Santa Clara Pueblo), Director of Native American Studies-University College, Professor of Language, Literacy and Sociocultural Studies-College of Education, University of New Mexico 9. Dr. Deborah McGregor (Anishinaabe), Associate Professor, Canada Research Chair, Indigenous Environmental Justice, Osgoode Hall Law School and Faculty of Environmental Studies, York University 10. Leroy Little Bear (Blackfoot), Professor Emeritus, University of Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada 11. Dr. Karletta Chief (Navajo), Assistant Professor and Extension Specialist, Department of Soil, Water and Environmental Science.
    [Show full text]
  • Building Equitable Communities Jim Shelton
    United Way of Salt Lake Speaker Series: Building Equitable Communities Jim Shelton: Power of Place March 11, 2021 Remote transcription services provided by: TypeWell P.O. Box 221, Patagonia, AZ 85624 (844) 897-3935 [email protected] *** TypeWell transcription provides a meaning-for-meaning representation of spoken conversation to facilitate real-time communication access. This rough-edited copy is provided for reference and is not a verbatim record of the proceedings. *** United Way of Salt Lake Building Equitable Communities Speaker Series Jim Shelton: Power of Place Thursday, March 11, 2021 Transcriber: LMC [Music playing.] Bill Crim: Good afternoon, and welcome to the 2021 United Way of Salt Lake Speaker series: Building Equitable Communities. I wanted to take a minute before welcoming our guests to thank our generous sponsors for this year’s event. We are grateful to Salt Lake Community College for being this year’s presenting sponsor. AT&T is our major sponsor, Comcast is a supporting sponsor, and Rocky Mountain Power is our community sponsor. This is our fourth year doing a Speakers’ Series on Racial Equity. It’s long been the core work of United Way of Salt Lake to address inequities in education, health, and economic outcomes that exist in our communities. It’s long been our work to convene outcomes-focused, cross-sector partnerships. The speaker series is one way we can learn together and act together. Thank you for joining us. Please note we have closed caption available for today's event. I'd like to take a moment to recognize the land we're on.
    [Show full text]