DOCSLIB.ORG

Summary Under the Criteria and Evidence for Final Determination Against the Federal Acknow1edgment of the Little Shell Tribe Of

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Summary Under the Criteria and Evidence for Final Determination Against the Federal Acknow1edgment of the Little Shell Tribe Of Summary under the Criteria and Evidence for Final Determination Against the Federal Acknow1edgment of the Little Shell Tribe of Chippewa Indians of Montana Prepared in Response to a Petition Submitted to the Assistant Secretary - Indian Affairs for Federal Acknowledgment that this Group Exists as an Indian Tribe. Little Shell Tribe of Chippewa Indians of Montana (Petitioner #31) Summary under the Criteria and Evidence for Final Determination against the Federal Acknowledgment of the Little Shell Tribe of Chippewa Indians of Montana TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION……......................................................................................................1 Administrative History of the Petition since the Proposed Finding ....................................2 Summary of the Proposed Finding and Analysis of Departures from Precedent ................3 Technical Assistance Provided by the OFA since the Proposed Finding ................................................................................................15 Third Party Comments to the PF and the Petitioner’s Response .......................................15 Maps ...................................................................................................................................17 Terminology .......................................................................................................................22 Definition of the Historical Tribe ......................................................................................22 Historical Overview of the Little Shell Petitioner .............................................................24 Unambiguous Previous Federal Acknowledgment ............................................................26 SUMMARY UNDER THE CRITERIA (25 CFR 83.7) 83.7(a) ................................................................................................................................32 83.7(b) ................................................................................................................................40 83.7(c) ................................................................................................................................80 83.7(d) ..............................................................................................................................109 83.7(e) ..............................................................................................................................110 ii Little Shell Tribe of Chippewa Indians of Montana (Petitioner #31) 83.7(f).............................................................................................................................145 83.7(g) ............................................................................................................................146 APPENDICES Appendix I: Examples of Households Included as Part of the “Little Shell Community Group” that Did Not Have Pembina Band Ancestry until Much Later in Time ...........................147 Appendix II: Description and Analysis of Origins and Migration of the Petitioner’s 104 “Common Progenitors” and their Descendants in the Red River Valley before 1880 ......................................................................................................................149 Appendix III: Description and Analysis of the Petitioner’s Documented Lineal Ancestors ..................153 Appendix IV: Critique of the Little Shell Group Marriage Data, 1850-1940.........................................156 Appendix V: Statistical Breakdown of Little Shell Petitioner Marriage Data ......................................159 Appendix VI: Description and Analysis of Petitioner’s Witnessing Data ..............................................163 Appendix VII: Description and Analysis of the Petitioner’s “Little Shell Families” on the Federal Census Records ...................................................................................................165 Appendix VIII: Statistical breakdown of the Little Shell Petitioner’s Census Data, 1880-1930 ..............169 Appendix IX: Analysis of External Descriptions of the Petitioner’s Ancestors in Montana, 1880’s-1890’s ..................................................................................................................178 Appendix X: Analysis of the Claimed Connection of the Petitioner’s Ancestors to the Turtle Mountain Reservation ...........................................................................................185 Appendix XI: Land Ownership Patterns of Lewistown Homesteaders ..................................................190 iii Little Shell Tribe of Chippewa Indians of Montana (Petitioner #31) Appendix XII: Description and Analysis of Turtle Mountain Allotment Data as Evidence of Community in Montana...........................................................................192 Appendix XIII: Evaluation and Analysis of the Petitioner’s Model of “Historic Social Cores” ..............194 Appendix XIV: Description and Analysis of the Petitioner’s Model of Marriage Within and Between “Social Core Areas” ..........................................................................................195 Appendix XV: Evaluation of the Petitioner’s Data and Analysis of “Social Knowledge of Members in Other Areas” ................................................................................................................196 Appendix XVI: Location of Petitioner’s Members, 1992 .........................................................................197 Appendix XVII: Individuals the Department Found Who Have Pembina Band Ancestry (The Petitioner’s Direct Ancestors and Others) ...............................................................198 Appendix XVIII: Petitioner’s Chart 1 or Chart 2 Ancestors Lacking Pembina Band Descent ....................220 Appendix XIX: Petitioner’s “Criterion E Progenitors” .............................................................................223 Bibliography for Sources not in the FAIR Database .......................................................225 FAIR Bibliography ..........................................................................................................232 iv Little Shell Tribe of Chippewa Indians of Montana (Petitioner #31) ABBREVIATIONS AND/OR ACRONYMS USED IN THIS REPORT AS-IA Assistant Secretary - Indian Affairs BAR Branch of Acknowledgment and Research BIA Bureau of Indian Affairs CFR Code of Federal Regulations DOI Department of the Interior FAIR Federal Acknowledgment Information Resource FD Final Determination FTM Family Tree MakerTM genealogy software FR Federal Register IBIA Interior Board of Indian Appeals IRA Indian Reorganization Act OFA Office of Federal Acknowledgment, formerly BAR PF Proposed Finding LS Little Shell Petitioner LSCG Little Shell Community Group RFD Reconsidered Final Determination RRS Red River Settlements TA Technical Assistance TMG The Master Genealogist, the Petitioner’s Genealogical Database TR Technical Report v Little Shell Tribe of Chippewa Indians of Montana (Petitioner #31) Summary under the Criteria and Evidence for Final Determination against the Federal Acknowledgment of the Little Shell Tribe of Chippewa Indians of Montana INTRODUCTION The Office of the Assistant Secretary-Indian Affairs (Assistant Secretary or AS-IA) within the Department of the Interior (Department or DOI) issues this final determination (FD) in response to the petition received from a group known as the Little Shell Tribe of Chippewa Indians of Montana (Little Shell, LS, or Petitioner #31), with an office located in the town of Great Falls, Montana. The LS petitioned for Federal acknowledgment as an Indian tribe under Part 83 of Title 25 of the Code of Federal Regulations (25 CFR Part 83), Procedures for Establishing that an American Indian Group Exists as an Indian Tribe. The Assistant Secretary delegated authority to sign some Federal acknowledgment findings to the Acting Principal Deputy-Assistant Secretary- Indian Affairs, effective June 4, 2009. The acknowledgment regulations, 25 CFR Part 83, establish the procedures by which groups may seek Federal acknowledgment as an Indian tribe entitled to a government-to-government relationship with the United States. To be entitled to such a political relationship, the petitioner must submit documentary evidence that the group meets all seven mandatory criteria set forth in section 83.7 of the regulations. The Department shall acknowledge the petitioner as an Indian tribe when it determines that the group satisfies all of the criteria in 83.7(a-g). The Office of Federal Acknowledgment (OFA),1 within the Office of the AS-IA, has responsibility for petition review and analysis. This FD concludes the petitioner does not meet all seven mandatory criteria and is not an Indian tribe within the meaning of Federal law. On July 21, 2000, the Department issued a proposed finding (PF) that concluded the petitioner met all seven mandatory criteria and proposed to acknowledge the group as an Indian tribe. In doing so, the AS-IA explicitly acknowledged several proposed departures from practice in previous acknowledgment decisions (65 FR 45395; Little Shell PF 2000, Summary, 6). Publishing notice of the PF in the Federal Register on that day initiated a 180-day comment period during which time the petitioner, interested and informed parties, and the public could submit arguments and evidence to support or rebut the PF. The regulations at 25 CFR 83.10(k) provide the petitioner a minimum
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Zbwleibniz-Informationszentrum
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Bessière, Céline; Gollac, Sibylle Article Is social network analysis useful for studying the family economy? economic sociology_the european electronic newsletter Provided in Cooperation with: Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies (MPIfG), Cologne Suggested Citation: Bessière, Céline; Gollac, Sibylle (2018) : Is social network analysis useful for studying the family economy?, economic sociology_the european electronic newsletter, ISSN 1871-3351, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies (MPIfG), Cologne, Vol. 19, Iss. 3, pp. 4-10 This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/181296 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. www.econstor.eu 4 demonstrate that the family is still a relevant unit of Is social analysis (Tilly & Scott, 1989 [1978]).
    [Show full text]
  • The Rose Collection of Moccasins in the Canadian Museum of Civilization : Transitional Woodland/Grassl and Footwear
    THE ROSE COLLECTION OF MOCCASINS IN THE CANADIAN MUSEUM OF CIVILIZATION : TRANSITIONAL WOODLAND/GRASSL AND FOOTWEAR David Sager 3636 Denburn Place Mississauga, Ontario Canada, L4X 2R2 Abstract/Resume Many specialists assign the attribution of "Plains Cree" or "Plains Ojibway" to material culture from parts of Manitoba and Saskatchewan. In fact, only a small part of this area was Grasslands. Several bands of Cree and Ojibway (Saulteaux) became permanent residents of the Grasslands bor- ders when Reserves were established in the 19th century. They rapidly absorbed aspects of Plains material culture, a process started earlier farther west. This paper examines one such case as revealed by footwear. Beaucoup de spécialistes attribuent aux Plains Cree ou aux Plains Ojibway des objets matériels de culture des régions du Manitoba ou de la Saskatch- ewan. En fait, il n'y a qu'une petite partie de cette région ait été prairie. Plusieurs bandes de Cree et d'Ojibway (Saulteaux) sont devenus habitants permanents des limites de la prairie quand les réserves ont été établies au XIXe siècle. Ils ont rapidement absorbé des aspects de la culture matérielle des prairies, un processus qu'on a commencé plus tôt plus loin à l'ouest. Cet article examine un tel cas comme il est révélé par des chaussures. The Canadian Journal of Native Studies XIV, 2(1 994):273-304. 274 David Sager The Rose Moccasin Collection: Problems in Attribution This paper focuses on a unique group of eight pair of moccasins from southern Saskatchewan made in the mid 1880s. They were collected by Robert Jeans Rose between 1883 and 1887.
    [Show full text]
  • Northern Paiute and Western Shoshone Land Use in Northern Nevada: a Class I Ethnographic/Ethnohistoric Overview
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Bureau of Land Management NEVADA NORTHERN PAIUTE AND WESTERN SHOSHONE LAND USE IN NORTHERN NEVADA: A CLASS I ETHNOGRAPHIC/ETHNOHISTORIC OVERVIEW Ginny Bengston CULTURAL RESOURCE SERIES NO. 12 2003 SWCA ENVIROHMENTAL CON..·S:.. .U LTt;NTS . iitew.a,e.El t:ti.r B'i!lt e.a:b ~f l-amd :Nf'arat:1.iern'.~nt N~:¥G~GI Sl$i~-'®'ffl'c~. P,rceP,GJ r.ei l l§y. SWGA.,,En:v,ir.e.m"me'Y-tfol I €on's.wlf.arats NORTHERN PAIUTE AND WESTERN SHOSHONE LAND USE IN NORTHERN NEVADA: A CLASS I ETHNOGRAPHIC/ETHNOHISTORIC OVERVIEW Submitted to BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT Nevada State Office 1340 Financial Boulevard Reno, Nevada 89520-0008 Submitted by SWCA, INC. Environmental Consultants 5370 Kietzke Lane, Suite 205 Reno, Nevada 89511 (775) 826-1700 Prepared by Ginny Bengston SWCA Cultural Resources Report No. 02-551 December 16, 2002 TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Figures ................................................................v List of Tables .................................................................v List of Appendixes ............................................................ vi CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION .................................................1 CHAPTER 2. ETHNOGRAPHIC OVERVIEW .....................................4 Northern Paiute ............................................................4 Habitation Patterns .......................................................8 Subsistence .............................................................9 Burial Practices ........................................................11
    [Show full text]
  • Chippewa Cree Tribe
    The Chippewa Cree Tribe of the Rocky Boy's Reservation Phone: (406)395-4478 or 4210 - Finance Office 96 Clinic Road (406)395-4282 or 4321 - Business Committee Box Elder, Montana 59521 May 14,2010 Mr. Larry Strickling Administrator National Telecommunications and Information Administration U.S. Department of Commerce 1401 Constitution Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20230 RE: Recommendationsfor Broadband American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Applications for Round Two. Dear Mr. Strickling, Thank you for allowing the Chippewa Cree Tribe to comment on the American Recovery ano Reinvestment Act (ARRA) broadband round two applications pending before your agency. The seven Resewations in Montana have forrned the Montana Inter-tribal Telecommunications Consortium in partnership with the Native American Development Corporation by resolution to submit an application for funding through the Broadband Technology Opportunities Program (BTOP) to spur job creation and stimulate long-term economic growth and opportunity. These large, land based Montana Reservations average over 50% unemployment, located in remote rural areas, and are historically unserved and undeserved. This partnership will provide middle mile Broadband network to bring affordable and effective last mile opportunities to the Reservations in Montana which has few middle mile access points for reservations. Each Reservation will share in ownership of the planned middle mile network, which addresses affordability, access and the opportunity for economic development. Key anchor institutions, such as the Indian Health clinics, which provides critical services to the Reservation population are very supportive of this application's ability to bring information and communication services for health care. In addition the Montana Resewations will be able to leverage with partners Broadband services on the resewation that meet our economic goals and are of the quality that is required.
    [Show full text]
  • DATE: March 20, 2018 TO: Board of Water and Soil Resources
    DATE: March 20, 2018 TO: Board of Water and Soil Resources’ Members, Advisors, and Staff FROM: John Jaschke, Executive Director SUBJECT: BWSR Board Meeting Notice – March 28, 2018 The Board of Water and Soil Resources (BWSR) will meet on Wednesday, March 28, 2018, beginning at 9:00 a.m. The meeting will be held in the lower level Board Room, at 520 Lafayette Road, Saint Paul. Parking is available in the lot directly in front of the building (see hooded parking area). The following information pertains to agenda items: COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS Water Management and Strategic Planning Committee One Watershed, One Plan Operating Procedures and Plan Content Requirements – The One Watershed, One Plan Operating Procedures and Plan Content Requirements are the two policy documents that describe program requirements according to Minnesota Statutes §103B.801. These documents, which were based on policies for the pilot program (developed in 2014), were updated in 2016 when the program was formally established. Since that time, BWSR’s Water Planning Program Team has identified a need to improve the organization and clarity of these documents, along with minor changes to policy elements. The team recommends re-formatting both documents with the new State of Minnesota logo and style. For both documents, the majority of non-policy information (background, context, and optional items) have been removed. DECISION Other changes include: • Policy o High level summary of changes (see the last page of each document for more detail) • Operating Procedures o Removed automatic exemption for LGUs with less than 5% of their area in the planning boundary o Added requirements for sharing public comments during the plan review and approval process • Plan Content Requirements o Land and Water Resources Inventory changed to Narrative; added requirement for discussion of watershed context o Fairly extensive wording changes in Plan Administration and Implementation Programs sections resulting in minor changes to policy elements.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 85, No. 179/Tuesday
    Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 179 / Tuesday, September 15, 2020 / Notices 57239 from which the Native American human Band of Seneca (previously listed as Indians of Wisconsin; Red Lake Band of remains and associated funerary objects Tonawanda Band of Seneca Indians of Chippewa Indians, Minnesota; Sac & were removed is the aboriginal land of New York); Turtle Mountain Band of Fox Nation of Missouri in Kansas and the Absentee-Shawnee Tribe of Indians Chippewa Indians of North Dakota; and Nebraska; Sac & Fox Nation, Oklahoma; of Oklahoma; Bad River Band of the the Wyandotte Nation. Sac & Fox Tribe of the Mississippi in Lake Superior Tribe of Chippewa • According to other authoritative Iowa; Saginaw Chippewa Indian Tribe Indians of the Bad River Reservation, government sources, the land from of Michigan; Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Wisconsin; Bay Mills Indian which the Native American human Chippewa Indians, Michigan; Seneca Community, Michigan; Chippewa Cree remains and associated funerary objects Nation of Indians (previously listed as Indians of the Rocky Boy’s Reservation, were removed is the aboriginal land of Seneca Nation of New York); Seneca- Montana (previously listed as the Sac & Fox Nation of Missouri in Cayuga Nation (previously listed as Chippewa-Cree Indians of the Rocky Kansas and Nebraska; Sac & Fox Nation, Seneca-Cayuga Tribe of Oklahoma); Boy’s Reservation, Montana); Citizen Oklahoma; and the Sac & Fox Tribe of Shawnee Tribe; Sokaogon Chippewa the Mississippi in Iowa. Community, Wisconsin; St. Croix Potawatomi Nation, Oklahoma;
    [Show full text]
  • African Slavery in Documentary Films Why Now?
    Journal of Global Slavery 5 (2020) 1–21 brill.com/jgs African Slavery in Documentary Films Why Now? Francesca Declich University of Urbino Carlo Bo [email protected] Marie Rodet SOAS, University of London [email protected] The last two decades have witnessed much scholarly debate around discursive and non-discursive legacies of African slavery, as well as a growing interest in memories of slavery from the African continent.1 At the same time, an increas- 1 A large body of publications has emerged on slavery in the African continent, including among others: Martin A. Klein, “Studying the History of Those Who Would Rather Forget: Oral History and the Experience of Slavery,”History in Africa 16 (1989): 215; Edward A. Alpers, “Recollecting Africa: Diasporic Memory in the Indian Ocean World,”African Studies Review 43 (1) (2000): 83–99; Rosalind Shaw, Memories of the Slave Trade: Ritual and the Historical Imag- ination in Sierra Leone (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2002); Eric E. Hahonou and Baz Lecocq, “Introduction: Exploring Post-Slavery in Contemporary Africa,”International Journal of African Historical Studies 48, no. 2 (2015): 181–192; Alice Bellagamba, Sandra E. Greene, Martin A. Klein, African Slaves, African Masters. Politics, Memories, Social Life (Trenton NJ: Africa World Press, 2017); Alice Bellagamba. “Yesterday and today. Studying African slav- ery, the Slave Trade and their Legacies through Oral Sources,” in Alice Bellagamba, Sandra E. Greene, Martin A. Klein, eds., African Voices on Slavery and the Slave Trade. Vol 2: Sources and Methods (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016), 174–197; Alice Bellagamba. “Living in the shadows of slavery”, OPEN DEMOCRACY (2016) https://www.opendemocracy .net/beyondslavery/alice‑bellagamba/living‑in‑shadows‑of‑slavery, accessed on 10 Novem- ber 2019; Marie Rodet, “Escaping Slavery and Building Diasporic Communities in French Soudan and Senegal, ca.
    [Show full text]
  • Using Personal Ancestral File (PAF) 5.2 by Terry Mason - 3 Dec
    Using Personal Ancestral File (PAF) 5.2 by Terry Mason - 3 Dec. 2005 On July 23rd, 2002 the PAF development team in Salt Lake City announced that PAF 5.2 was now ready for download from the Web site at www.familysearch.org. The list of enhancements is: • The program is more compatible with newer versions of the Windows operating systems, particularly Windows XP, • The file of LDS temples and their starting dates has been updated to include new temples, • Additional "HELP" files have been added, • The "Global Search and Replace" function now works for names, temple codes, and notes. • Attributes for the predefined custom events can now be edited, • The "Match/Merge" function has been enhanced, • Support for the Input Method Editors for non-roman languages has been improved, and • For LDS Church members, the TempleReady Update Files (OUP files) can now be used to update your PAF database with completed ordinance dates. The most significant of all of these enhancements is the option to update or submit records using a GEDCOM created by PAF through TempleReady for Windows. When the Ordinance Index contains data that is used to modify the personal records, a special file with the .OUP file extension is created. This file can be used to update a PAF database with the dates and temples. This is particularly useful for individuals who are unable to bring a backup of their complete database to a family history center. 1. How do you load PAF onto a home computer? PAF 5 is available using a browser with an Internet connection.
    [Show full text]
  • Tribal Nations
    Dinjii Zhuu Nation : Tribal Nations Map Gwich’in Tribal Nations Map Inuvialuit Vuntut Western Artic Innuit Deguth OurOur OwnOwn NamesNames && LocationsLocations Inuvialuit woman Draanjik Gwichyaa T'atsaot'ine Iglulingmiut Teetl'it Yellow Knives Inuit family KitlinermiutCopper Inuit Tr’ondëk Hwëch’in Netsilingmiut Han Netsilik Inuit Tununirmiut Tanana Sahtú Hare Utkuhiksalingmiut Hanningajurmiut Tutchone Ihalmiut Inuit Woman & Child Akilinirmiut Kangiqliniqmiut Galyá x Kwáan Denesoline Nations: Laaxaayik Kwáan Deisleen Kwáan Chipeweyan Harvaqtuurmiut Tagish Aivilingmiut Áa Tlein Kwáan Gunaa xoo Kwáan Kaska Dena Jilkoot Kwáan Kaska Krest‘ayle kke ottine Chipeweyan band Jilkaat Kwáan Aak'w Kwáan Qaernermiut Xunaa Kwáan T'aa ku Kwáan S'aawdaan Kwáan Xutsnoowú Kwáan Kéex' Kwáan Paallirmiut Tarramiut Sheey At'iká Lingít Kwáan Shtax' héen Kwáan Des-nèdhè-kkè-nadè Nation Dene Woman Kooyu Kwáan Tahltan K'atlodeeche Ahialmiut Dene Tha' Hay River Dene Sanyaa Kwáan Slavey Sayisi Dene Siquinirmiut Takjik'aan Kwáan Lingít Men WetalTsetsauts Hinya Kwáan Nisga'a Inuit Hunter Tsimshian Kaí-theli-ke-hot!ínne Taanta'a Kwáan Dane-zaa Thlingchadinne Itivimiut Sikumiut K'yak áannii Tsek’ene Beaver Gáne-kúnan-hot!ínne Dog Rib Sekani Etthen eldili dene Gitxsan Lake Babine Wit'at Haida Gitxaala Thilanottine Hâthél-hot!inne Xàʼisla Haisla Nat'oot'en Wet'suwet'en Hoteladi Iyuw Imuun Beothuk WigWam Nuxalk Nation: Nihithawiwin Bella Coola Woodlands Cree Sikumiut man DakelhCarrier Tallheo Aatsista Mahkan, HeiltsukBella Bella Siksika chief Kwalhna Stuic Blackfoot Nation
    [Show full text]
  • Editie Software
    de meest uitgebreide Internet gids op het gebied van genealogie en archief Editie Software 16 juli 2020 Software Inhoudsopgave Voorwoord . 1 Andere edities . 1 Ook voor uw e-reader! . 1 Uw bijdrage . 1 Creative Commons . 1 Nederlandstalig . 2 Engelstalig . 8 Internet . 21 Mobiel . 25 Innovatie op het vlak van Internet en genealogie . 29 https://www.stamboomgids.nl/ i Software Voorwoord Op zoek naar een kwalitatieve genealogische bronnen, archieven en/of familienamen? De Stamboom Gids is de meest uitgebreide Internet gids op het gebied van genealogie, bronnen, familienamen en archieven! Alle ruim 20 duizend websites zijn gecategoriseerd en voorzien van een beschrijving en kleine schermafdruk. Genealogen kunnen websites toevoegen en/of voorzien van een recensie zodat wanneer u deze uitgebreide collectie doorbladert of doorzoekt de kwalitatieve websites direct in het oog springen. Andere edities De inhoud van de Stamboom Gids wordt in verschillende delen uitgegeven. De beschikbare edities in deze serie zijn: Archieven Bronnen, deel 1 en 2 Familienamen, beginnend met de letters A tot en met E, F tot en met K, L tot en met R, S tot en met Z Internationaal Internet specifiek Organisaties Software Specialisaties Aanraders - de beste genealogische websites volgens stamboomonderzoekers Ook voor uw e-reader! Deze uitgave biedt u een deel van collectie in PDF en EPUB formaat die u kunt afdrukken en/of bij de hand houden op laptop, tablet of e-reader zodat u ook zonder Internet de inhoud van de Stamboom Gids beschikbaar heeft! Uw bijdrage Kent u nog meer websites die interessant zijn voor genealogen? Voeg deze dan toe aan de Stamboom Gids via https://www.stamboomgids.nl/linktoevoegen.php.
    [Show full text]
  • Metis Settlements and First Nations in Alberta Community Profiles
    For additional copies of the Community Profiles, please contact: Indigenous Relations First Nations and Metis Relations 10155 – 102 Street NW Edmonton, Alberta T5J 4G8 Phone: 780-644-4989 Fax: 780-415-9548 Website: www.indigenous.alberta.ca To call toll-free from anywhere in Alberta, dial 310-0000. To request that an organization be added or deleted or to update information, please fill out the Guide Update Form included in the publication and send it to Indigenous Relations. You may also complete and submit this form online. Go to www.indigenous.alberta.ca and look under Resources for the correct link. This publication is also available online as a PDF document at www.indigenous.alberta.ca. The Resources section of the website also provides links to the other Ministry publications. ISBN 978-0-7785-9870-7 PRINT ISBN 978-0-7785-9871-8 WEB ISSN 1925-5195 PRINT ISSN 1925-5209 WEB Introductory Note The Metis Settlements and First Nations in Alberta: Community Profiles provide a general overview of the eight Metis Settlements and 48 First Nations in Alberta. Included is information on population, land base, location and community contacts as well as Quick Facts on Metis Settlements and First Nations. The Community Profiles are compiled and published by the Ministry of Indigenous Relations to enhance awareness and strengthen relationships with Indigenous people and their communities. Readers who are interested in learning more about a specific community are encouraged to contact the community directly for more detailed information. Many communities have websites that provide relevant historical information and other background.
    [Show full text]
  • Makrosammlung Für GEDCOM-Dateien
    GedTool Collection of Macros for GEDCOM Files Brief User Guide http://www.GedTool.de Translation: 1. October 2014 GedTool – Macros for GEDCOM files – V 2.5 Status: 08.09.2014 Table of Contents 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................... 4 2 Initial Setup ................................................................................................................................................... 6 2.1 Excel 97......................................................................................................................................................... 7 2.2 Excel 2000 / Excel XP / Excel 2003 ............................................................................................................. 7 2.3 Excel 2007 / Excel 2010 / Excel 2013 .......................................................................................................... 7 3 Menu........................................................................................................... Fehler! Textmarke nicht definiert. 4 Import/Export ........................................................................................... Fehler! Textmarke nicht definiert. 4.1 Import a GEDCOM file ................................................................................................................................ 9 4.2 Analyse a GEDCOM file ...........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]