DOCSLIB.ORG

Sandpiper Pipeline: Comparison of Environmental Effects of Reasonable Alternatives

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Sandpiper Pipeline: Comparison of Environmental Effects of Reasonable Alternatives Sandpiper Pipeline: Comparison of Environmental Effects of Reasonable Alternatives In the Matter of the Application of North Dakota Pipeline Company LLC for a Certificate of Need for the Sandpiper Pipeline Project in Minnesota Minnesota Public Utilities Commission Docket CN-13-473 Minnesota Department of Commerce Energy Environmental Review and Analysis | December 2014 Sandpiper Pipeline: Comparison of Environmental Effects of Reasonable Alternatives Abstract North Dakota Pipeline Company LLC (NDPC) is proposing to construct the Sandpiper Project, a 565 to 608-mile long pipeline and associated facilities from the Tioga, North Dakota, through Minnesota to Superior, Wisconsin. On November 8, 2013, NDPC filed two applications with the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission (Commission): the first for a Certificate of Need (CN) and the second for a pipeline route permit for the project. The CN rules at Minn. R. 7853.0130 require, in determining if a certificate of need should be granted, that consideration be paid to the “natural and socioeconomic environments compared to the effects of reasonable alternatives,” and “the effect of the proposed facility, or a suitable modification of it, upon the natural and socioeconomic environments compared to the effect of not building the facility.” For the Sandpiper Project, the Commission concluded that an environmental analysis of six system alternatives, which were identified in the Route Permit docket, and six alternatives to the proposed project identified by NDPC in its CN application would provide it with valuable information to be weighed along with other information while making its need decision. This document is intended to provide that analysis. It is intended for the use of any party who chooses to advocate for or against consideration of an alternative in the certificate of need docket. This document, and all other documents related to the Sandpiper Project CN proceeding, is available on the Commission’s website at: http://mn.gov/puc/; select Search eDockets and enter the year (13) and docket number (473). The document is also available on Department of Commerce website at: http://mn.gov/commerce/energyfacilities/Docket.html?Id=33599. Contributors to this document include: Department of Commerce, Energy Environmental Review and Analysis staff: Deborah Pile, Larry Hartman, Jamie MacAlister and Rich Davis HDR, Inc. 1 Sandpiper Pipeline: Comparison of Environmental Effects of Reasonable Alternatives SANDPIPER PIPELINE: COMPARISON OF ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS OF REASONABLE ALTERNATIVES TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Title Page No. ABSTRACT ........................................................................................................................................................ 1 1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................ 12 2 CERTIFICATE OF NEED APPLICATION ALTERNATIVES – DESCRIPTION AND POTENTIAL IMPACTS ............................... 16 3 SYSTEM ALTERNATIVES – DESCRIPTIONS ....................................................................................................... 41 4 SYSTEM ALTERNATIVES – ENVIRONMENTAL OVERVIEW AND ANALYSIS .............................................................. 47 4.1 Resource Background Information and Methodologies ............................................................ 48 4.1.1 Geology/Soils/Groundwater (Maps A-3, 4, 5 and 6) ..................................................... 48 4.1.2 Ecoregions (Map A-7) .................................................................................................... 52 4.1.3 Land Cover (Maps A-8 and 9) ........................................................................................ 56 4.1.4 Water Resources (Maps A-10, 11 and 12) .................................................................... 57 4.1.5 Special Species and Critical Habitat (Map A-13, Appendix E) ....................................... 58 4.1.6 Public Resource and Recreational Lands (Map A-14 and 15) ....................................... 59 4.1.7 Cities and Population (Maps A-16 and 17) .................................................................... 60 4.1.8 Community Features (Map A-18) .................................................................................. 60 4.1.9 Cultural Resources (Map A-19 and 20) ......................................................................... 61 4.1.10 Contaminated Areas (Map A-21 and 22) ...................................................................... 62 4.1.11 Air Emissions ................................................................................................................. 63 4.1.12 High-Consequence Areas and Natural Disaster Hazard Areas (Maps A-23 through 27)64 4.2 SA-Applicant ............................................................................................................................... 65 4.2.1 Geology/Soils/Groundwater ......................................................................................... 65 4.2.2 Ecoregions ..................................................................................................................... 70 4.2.3 Land Cover..................................................................................................................... 71 4.2.4 Water Resources ........................................................................................................... 72 4.2.5 Special Species and Critical Habitat .............................................................................. 73 4.2.6 Public Resource and Recreational Lands ...................................................................... 76 4.2.7 Cities and Population Density ....................................................................................... 78 4.2.8 Community Features ..................................................................................................... 79 4.2.9 Cultural Resources ........................................................................................................ 80 4.2.10 Contaminated Areas ..................................................................................................... 81 4.2.11 Air Emissions ................................................................................................................. 81 4.2.12 High-Consequence Areas and Natural Disaster Hazard Areas ...................................... 82 4.3 SA-03 Viking-North Branch-Superior.......................................................................................... 83 2 Sandpiper Pipeline: Comparison of Environmental Effects of Reasonable Alternatives 4.3.1 Geology/Soils/Groundwater ......................................................................................... 83 4.3.2 Ecoregions ..................................................................................................................... 87 4.3.3 Land Cover..................................................................................................................... 88 4.3.4 Water Resources ........................................................................................................... 90 4.3.5 Special Species and Critical Habitat .............................................................................. 91 4.3.6 Public Resource and Recreational Lands ...................................................................... 95 4.3.7 Cities and Population Density ....................................................................................... 97 4.3.8 Community Features ..................................................................................................... 98 4.3.9 Cultural Resources ........................................................................................................ 99 4.3.10 Contaminated Areas ................................................................................................... 100 4.3.11 Air Emissions ............................................................................................................... 101 4.3.12 High-Consequence Areas and Natural Disaster Hazard Areas .................................... 102 4.4 SA-04 Alliance-Chicago ............................................................................................................. 102 4.4.1 Geology/Soils/Groundwater ....................................................................................... 103 4.4.2 Ecoregions ................................................................................................................... 108 4.4.3 Land Cover................................................................................................................... 109 4.4.4 Water Resources ......................................................................................................... 110 4.4.5 Special Species and Critical Habitat ............................................................................ 112 4.4.6 Public Resource and Recreational Lands .................................................................... 117 4.4.7 Cities and Population Density ..................................................................................... 119 4.4.8 Community Features ................................................................................................... 121 4.4.9 Cultural Resources ...................................................................................................... 123 4.4.10 Contaminated
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Arthur Gray Leonard (North Dakota) Edward C
    Arthur Gray Leonard (North Dakota) Edward C. Murphy (North Dakota Geological Survey) Arthur Gray Leonard was born on March 15, 1865, in Clinton, N.Y. His father was a Congregational minister, which resulted in the family moving several times while Leonard was a boy. He graduated from Salt Lake Academy in Utah and from Oberlin College in 1889. Leonard returned to Oberlin College and obtained his master’s degree in 1895. He worked on and off for the Iowa Geological Survey between 1893 and 1903. The Iowa survey provided him with valuable field experience and training that he applied later in his career. He taught geology in Western Toledo, Iowa, during the winter months of 1894–96. In 1896, he became assistant state geologist of the Iowa Geological Survey. Shortly thereafter, he went to Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore, Md., obtaining his Ph.D. in 1898. He returned to the Iowa Geological Survey as assistant state geologist and remained there until 1903, except for 1 year’s leave of absence to teach at the University of Missouri. Dr. Leonard became state geologist of North Dakota and a professor of geology at the University of North Dakota in 1903. North Dakota had become a state in 1889. The North Dakota Geological Survey was formed in 1895, and had been under the direction of two previous state geologists (Earle Babcock, 1895–1902; Frank Wilder, 1902–03) prior to Leonard. He was to hold that position until his death on December 17, 1932. Leonard’s 29-year tenure as North Dakota state geologist is the longest in state history, although Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Minnesota Statutes 2020, Chapter 85
    1​ MINNESOTA STATUTES 2020​ 85.011​ CHAPTER 85​ DIVISION OF PARKS AND RECREATION​ STATE PARKS, RECREATION AREAS, AND WAYSIDES​ 85.06​ SCHOOLHOUSES IN CERTAIN STATE PARKS.​ 85.011​ CONFIRMATION OF CREATION AND​ 85.20​ VIOLATIONS OF RULES; LITTERING; PENALTIES.​ ESTABLISHMENT OF STATE PARKS, STATE​ 85.205​ RECEPTACLES FOR RECYCLING.​ RECREATION AREAS, AND WAYSIDES.​ 85.21​ STATE OPERATION OF PARK, MONUMENT,​ 85.0115​ NOTICE OF ADDITIONS AND DELETIONS.​ RECREATION AREA AND WAYSIDE FACILITIES;​ 85.012​ STATE PARKS.​ LICENSE NOT REQUIRED.​ 85.013​ STATE RECREATION AREAS AND WAYSIDES.​ 85.22​ STATE PARKS WORKING CAPITAL ACCOUNT.​ 85.014​ PRIOR LAWS NOT ALTERED; REVISOR'S DUTIES.​ 85.23​ COOPERATIVE LEASES OF AGRICULTURAL​ 85.0145​ ACQUIRING LAND FOR FACILITIES.​ LANDS.​ 85.0146​ CUYUNA COUNTRY STATE RECREATION AREA;​ 85.32​ STATE WATER TRAILS.​ CITIZENS ADVISORY COUNCIL.​ 85.33​ ST. CROIX WILD RIVER AREA; LIMITATIONS ON​ STATE TRAILS​ POWER BOATING.​ 85.015​ STATE TRAILS.​ 85.34​ FORT SNELLING LEASE.​ 85.0155​ LAKE SUPERIOR WATER TRAIL.​ TRAIL PASSES​ 85.0156​ MISSISSIPPI WHITEWATER TRAIL.​ 85.40​ DEFINITIONS.​ 85.016​ BICYCLE TRAIL PROGRAM.​ 85.41​ CROSS-COUNTRY-SKI PASSES.​ 85.017​ TRAIL REGISTRY.​ 85.42​ USER FEE; VALIDITY.​ 85.018​ TRAIL USE; VEHICLES REGULATED, RESTRICTED.​ 85.43​ DISPOSITION OF RECEIPTS; PURPOSE.​ ADMINISTRATION​ 85.44​ CROSS-COUNTRY-SKI TRAIL GRANT-IN-AID​ 85.019​ LOCAL RECREATION GRANTS.​ PROGRAM.​ 85.021​ ACQUIRING LAND; MINNESOTA VALLEY TRAIL.​ 85.45​ PENALTIES.​ 85.04​ ENFORCEMENT DIVISION EMPLOYEES.​ 85.46​ HORSE
    [Show full text]
  • Status of Mineral Resource Information for the Fort Berthold Indian Reservation, North Dakota
    STATUS OF MINERAL RESOURCE INFORMATION FOR THE FORT BERTHOLD INDIAN RESERVATION, NORTH DAKOTA By Bradford B. Williams Mary E. Bluemle U.S. Bureau of Mines N. Dak. Geological Survey Administrative report BIA-40 1978 CONTENTS SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS ................................................. 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................ 1 Area Location and Access .................................................... 1 Past Investigations .......................................................... 2 Present Study and Acknowledgments ........................................... 2 Land Status................................................................ 2 Physiography .............................................................. 3 GEOLOGY ..................................................................... 4 Stratigraphy ............................................................... 4 Subsurface .......................................................... 4 Surface ............................................................. 4 General ....................................................... 4 Bullion Creek and Sentinel Butte Formations ......................... 8 Golden Valley Formation......................................... 9 Cole Harbor Formation .......................................... 9 Structure................................................................. 10 MINERAL RESOURCES ......................................................... 11 General .................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Minnesota River at Belle Plaine Low Point Staff Gauge Ucoop 735
    Report Date: 09/20/2021 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NWSLI CITY AZRAN ST COUNTY LAT (DMS) LON(DMS) LAT(DD) LON(DD) STNTYPE WFO DETAIL PROGRAM PROGRAM ID ELEV --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- AADM5 ADA MN NORMAN 47 18 00N 096 31 00W 47.3000 -96.5167 WOS FGF UCOOP 906 ADAM5 ADA MN NORMAN 47 18 00N 096 31 00W 47.3000 -96.5167 WOS FGF COOPAB 21-0018 906 ADEM5 ADA 3E MN NORMAN 47 18 00N 096 26 00W 47.3000 -96.4333 WOS FGF UCOOP ADSM5 ADA 2S MN NORMAN 47 15 45N 096 30 03W 47.2625 -96.5008 WOS FGF WILD RICE RVR NR ADA GOES 5531C28E UCOOP AWNM5 ADA 1N MN NORMAN 47 19 16N 096 30 50W 47.3211 -96.5139 WOS FGF ADA NDAWN MESO-ST 78 910 ADOM5 ADOLPH 1N MN ST. LOUIS 46 47 56N 092 16 51W 46.7989 -92.2808 WOS DLH UCOOP ADRM5 ADRIAN MN NOBLES 43 37 57N 095 56 32W 43.6325 -95.9422 WOS FSD UCOOP 1650 AFTM5 AFTON 2NNW MN WASHINGTON 44 55 24N 092 47 31W 44.9234 -92.7920 WOS MPX AFTON 2 NNW UCOOP 840 AIT AITKIN MN AITKIN 46 32 54N 093 40 36W 46.5483 -93.6767 WOS DLH AWOS AITM5 AITKIN 2E MN AITKIN 46 31 33N 093 40 03W 46.5257 -93.6674 WOS DLH AITKIN 2E COOPAB 21-0059 1215 Report Date: 09/20/2021 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NWSLI CITY AZRAN ST COUNTY LAT (DMS) LON(DMS) LAT(DD) LON(DD) STNTYPE WFO DETAIL PROGRAM PROGRAM ID ELEV ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    [Show full text]
  • Status of Mineral Resource Information for the Standing Rock Indian Reservation, North Dakota and South Dakota
    STATUS OF MINERAL RESOURCE INFORMATION FOR THE STANDING ROCK INDIAN RESERVATION, NORTH DAKOTA AND SOUTH DAKOTA By Lee R. Rice Richard Bretz U.S. Bureau of Mines South Dakota Geological Survey Administrative Report BIA-41 1978 CONTENTS SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS ................................................. 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................ 1 Previous Work ............................................................. 2 Land Status................................................................ 2 Map Coverage ............................................................. 3 Physiography .............................................................. 3 GEOLOGY ..................................................................... 4 General ................................................................... 4 Stratigraphy ............................................................... 4 Outcropping Rock Units ............................................... 4 Subsurface Rock Units ................................................. 5 Structure.................................................................. 5 GEOPHYSICS ................................................................... 6 MINERAL RESOURCES .......................................................... 6 General ................................................................... 6 Energy Resources........................................................... 6 Lignite ............................................................. 6 General
    [Show full text]
  • DATE: March 20, 2018 TO: Board of Water and Soil Resources
    DATE: March 20, 2018 TO: Board of Water and Soil Resources’ Members, Advisors, and Staff FROM: John Jaschke, Executive Director SUBJECT: BWSR Board Meeting Notice – March 28, 2018 The Board of Water and Soil Resources (BWSR) will meet on Wednesday, March 28, 2018, beginning at 9:00 a.m. The meeting will be held in the lower level Board Room, at 520 Lafayette Road, Saint Paul. Parking is available in the lot directly in front of the building (see hooded parking area). The following information pertains to agenda items: COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS Water Management and Strategic Planning Committee One Watershed, One Plan Operating Procedures and Plan Content Requirements – The One Watershed, One Plan Operating Procedures and Plan Content Requirements are the two policy documents that describe program requirements according to Minnesota Statutes §103B.801. These documents, which were based on policies for the pilot program (developed in 2014), were updated in 2016 when the program was formally established. Since that time, BWSR’s Water Planning Program Team has identified a need to improve the organization and clarity of these documents, along with minor changes to policy elements. The team recommends re-formatting both documents with the new State of Minnesota logo and style. For both documents, the majority of non-policy information (background, context, and optional items) have been removed. DECISION Other changes include: • Policy o High level summary of changes (see the last page of each document for more detail) • Operating Procedures o Removed automatic exemption for LGUs with less than 5% of their area in the planning boundary o Added requirements for sharing public comments during the plan review and approval process • Plan Content Requirements o Land and Water Resources Inventory changed to Narrative; added requirement for discussion of watershed context o Fairly extensive wording changes in Plan Administration and Implementation Programs sections resulting in minor changes to policy elements.
    [Show full text]
  • December 2016 Table of Contents Section 1: Introduction
    Traill County Mitigation Plan December 2016 Table of Contents Section 1: Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 13 1.1 Plan Goals and Authority ................................................................................................................... 14 1.2 Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP) ........................................................................................ 14 1.3 Pre-Disaster Mitigation (PDM) ........................................................................................................... 15 1.4 Flood Mitigation Assistance (FMA) .................................................................................................... 15 1.5 Participation....................................................................................................................................... 15 Section 2: Mitigation Plan Update .......................................................................................................... 17 2.1 Planning Process .............................................................................................................................. 17 2.1.1 Plan Administrators ................................................................................................................... 19 2.1.2 Emergency Manager Role and Responsibilities ........................................................................ 19 2.1.3 The Mitigation Steering Committee (Note: The Local
    [Show full text]
  • The Campground Host Volunteer Program
    CAMPGROUND HOST PROGRAM THE CAMPGROUND HOST VOLUNTEER PROGRAM MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES 1 CAMPGROUND HOST PROGRAM DIVISION OF PARKS AND RECREATION Introduction This packet is designed to give you the information necessary to apply for a campground host position. Applications will be accepted all year but must be received at least 30 days in advance of the time you wish to serve as a host. Please send completed applications to the park manager for the park or forest campground in which you are interested. Addresses are listed at the back of this brochure. General questions and inquiries may be directed to: Campground Host Coordinator DNR-Parks and Recreation 500 Lafayette Road St. Paul, MN 55155-4039 651-259-5607 [email protected] Principal Duties and Responsibilities During the period from May to October, the volunteer serves as a "live in" host at a state park or state forest campground for at least a four-week period. The primary responsibility is to assist campers by answering questions and explaining campground rules in a cheerful and helpful manner. Campground Host volunteers should be familiar with state park and forest campground rules and should become familiar with local points of interest and the location where local services can be obtained. Volunteers perform light maintenance work around the campground such as litter pickup, sweeping, stocking supplies in toilet buildings and making emergency minor repairs when possible. Campground Host volunteers may be requested to assist in the naturalist program by posting and distributing schedules, publicizing programs or helping with programs. Volunteers will set an example by being model campers, practicing good housekeeping at all times in and around the host site, and by observing all rules.
    [Show full text]
  • Minnesota State Parks.Pdf
    Table of Contents 1. Afton State Park 4 2. Banning State Park 6 3. Bear Head Lake State Park 8 4. Beaver Creek Valley State Park 10 5. Big Bog State Park 12 6. Big Stone Lake State Park 14 7. Blue Mounds State Park 16 8. Buffalo River State Park 18 9. Camden State Park 20 10. Carley State Park 22 11. Cascade River State Park 24 12. Charles A. Lindbergh State Park 26 13. Crow Wing State Park 28 14. Cuyuna Country State Park 30 15. Father Hennepin State Park 32 16. Flandrau State Park 34 17. Forestville/Mystery Cave State Park 36 18. Fort Ridgely State Park 38 19. Fort Snelling State Park 40 20. Franz Jevne State Park 42 21. Frontenac State Park 44 22. George H. Crosby Manitou State Park 46 23. Glacial Lakes State Park 48 24. Glendalough State Park 50 25. Gooseberry Falls State Park 52 26. Grand Portage State Park 54 27. Great River Bluffs State Park 56 28. Hayes Lake State Park 58 29. Hill Annex Mine State Park 60 30. Interstate State Park 62 31. Itasca State Park 64 32. Jay Cooke State Park 66 33. John A. Latsch State Park 68 34. Judge C.R. Magney State Park 70 1 35. Kilen Woods State Park 72 36. Lac qui Parle State Park 74 37. Lake Bemidji State Park 76 38. Lake Bronson State Park 78 39. Lake Carlos State Park 80 40. Lake Louise State Park 82 41. Lake Maria State Park 84 42. Lake Shetek State Park 86 43.
    [Show full text]
  • 2009-2010 Winter Programs & Special Events Catalog
    28 The Great Minnesota Ski Pass Get one and go! All cross-country skiers age 16 or older must have a Minnesota Ski Pass to use ski trails in state parks or state forests or on state or Grant-in-Aid trails. • You must sign your ski pass and carry it with you when skiing. • Rates are $5 for a daily ski pass, $15 for a one-season pass, and $40 for a three-season pass. • Ski pass fees help support and maintain Minnesota’s extensive cross-country ski trail system. • Daily ski passes are sold in park offices where weekend and holiday staff are available. Self-registration for one-season and three-season passes is available daily at all Minnesota state parks except Carley, George H. Crosby-Manitou, Monson Lake, and Schoolcraft. • You can also get daily, one-season, and three-season ski passes using Minnesota’s electronic licensing system, available at 1,750 locations around the state. To find a location near you, check the ELS page at mndnr.gov or call the DNR Information Center at 651-296-6157 or 1-888-646-6367. Metro Area Ski Trails 29 If you purchase a Minnesota ski pass for a special event such as candlelight ski event at a Minnesota state park, you may be wondering where else you can use it. Many cross-country ski trails throughout the state are developed and maintained with state and Grant-in-Aid funding. Grant-in-Aid trails are maintained by local units of government and local ski clubs, with financial assistance from the Department of Natural Resources.
    [Show full text]
  • Landscapes, Commemorations, and Enduring Conflicts of the U.S.-Dakota Arw of 1862
    Georgia State University ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University History Dissertations Department of History Fall 12-14-2011 Reconciling Memory: Landscapes, Commemorations, and Enduring Conflicts of the U.S.-Dakota arW of 1862 Julie A. Anderson Georgia State University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/history_diss Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Anderson, Julie A., "Reconciling Memory: Landscapes, Commemorations, and Enduring Conflicts of the U.S.-Dakota War of 1862." Dissertation, Georgia State University, 2011. https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/history_diss/28 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of History at ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in History Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. RECONCILING MEMORY: LANDSCAPES, COMMEMORATIONS, AND ENDURING CONFLICTS OF THE U.S.-DAKOTA WAR OF 1862 by JULIE HUMANN ANDERSON Under the Direction of Clifford M. Kuhn ABSTRACT The U.S.-Dakota War of 1862 resulted in the deaths of more than 500 Minnesota settlers, the expulsion of the Dakota people from their homeland, and the largest mass execution in U.S. history. For more than a century, white Minnesotans declared themselves innocent victims of Indian brutality and actively remembered this war by erecting monuments, preserving historic landscapes, publishing first-person narratives, and hosting anniversary celebrations. However, as the centennial anniversary approached, new awareness for the sufferings of the Dakota both before and after the war prompted retellings of the traditional story that gave the status of victimhood to the Dakota as well as the white settlers.
    [Show full text]
  • Campground Host Program
    Campground Host Program MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF PARKS AND TRAILS Updated November 2010 Campground Host Program Introduction This packet is designed to give you the information necessary to apply for a campground host position. Applications will be accepted all year but must be received at least 30 days in advance of the time you wish to serve as a host. Please send completed applications to the park manager for the park or forest campground in which you are interested. You may email your completed application to [email protected] who will forward it to your first choice park. General questions and inquiries may be directed to: Campground Host Coordinator DNR-Parks and Trails 500 Lafayette Road St. Paul, MN 55155-4039 Email: [email protected] 651-259-5607 Principal Duties and Responsibilities During the period from May to October, the volunteer serves as a "live in" host at a state park or state forest campground for at least a four-week period. The primary responsibility is to assist campers by answering questions and explaining campground rules in a cheerful and helpful manner. Campground Host volunteers should be familiar with state park and forest campground rules and should become familiar with local points of interest and the location where local services can be obtained. Volunteers perform light maintenance work around the campground such as litter pickup, sweeping, stocking supplies in toilet buildings and making emergency minor repairs when possible. Campground Host volunteers may be requested to assist in the naturalist program by posting and distributing schedules, publicizing programs or helping with programs.
    [Show full text]