It's Not You, It's the Internet: Navigating the Changing Landscape

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

It's Not You, It's the Internet: Navigating the Changing Landscape It’s Not You, It’s the Internet: Navigating the changing landscape of communications and organizing Interviews Astolfi, Maggie. (2016, August 23). Phone interview. Bhargava, Deepak. (2016, June). Personal interview. Borgos, Seth. (2016, June). Phone interview. Carter, Allie. (2016, July). Phone interview. Dehlendorf, Andrea. (2016, July). Phone interview. Lake, Celinda. (2016, July 26). Phone interview. Gilchrist, Garlin. (2016, July). Phone interview. Goodstein, Scott. (2016, September 9). Phone interview by Ellie Klerlein at Spitfire Strategies. Mak, Cayden. (2016, September 29). Phone interview. May, Emily. (2016, October 19). Phone interview. Mogus, Jason. (2016, September 16). Phone interview by Ellie Klerlein at Spitfire Strategies. Mulvey, Julian. (2016, July 7). Phone interview. Mushovic, Ineke. (2016, July). Phone interview. Rosenblatt, Alan. (2016, July). Phone interview. Silberman, Michael. (2016, September 22). Phone interview by Ellie Klerlein at Spitfire Strategies. Shenker-Osorio, Anat. (2016, September 9). Personal interview. Snook, Michael. (2016, September 15). Phone interview by Ellie Klerlein at Spitfire Strategies. Sweeney, Tim. (2016, August 5). Phone interview. Trybus, John. (2016, July). Personal interview. Warren, Dorian. (2016, July). Phone interview. Wells, Chris. (2016, September 8). Phone interview. Wolfson, Evan. (2016, August 11). Phone interview. Index of Sources Parker, Emily. 2016. “#BlackLivesMatter and the Power and Limits of Social Media.” Medium. December 2. https://medium.com/@emilydparker/how-blacklivesmatter-resembles-activism-in-the-authoritarian- world-24d1200864f6#.xnyq3fo27. 1 “3 Best Ways for Nonprofits to Use Data.” 2013. Nonprofit Hub. June 19. http://nonprofithub.org/nonprofit-marketing-plan/best-ways-for-nonprofits-to-use-data/. “5 Online Video Trends to Inform Your 2017 Media Plan.” 2016. Think with Google. Accessed October 3. https://www.thinkwithgoogle.com/infographics/online-video-trends-2017-media-plan.html. “5 Research Studies That Will Drastically Affect How You Write Copy.” 2013. Unbounce. February 26. http://unbounce.com/conversion-rate-optimization/writing-persuasive-copy/. Vitulli, Marcella. 2017. “5 Things You Need to Know about Nonprofits + Big Data.” Accessed February 16. https://blog.everyaction.com/5-things-you-need-to-know-about-nonprofits-big-data. “8 Writing Lessons from Michelle Obama’s DNC Speech – Poynter.” 2016. Accessed July 27. http://www.poynter.org/2016/8-writing-lessons-from-michelle-obamas-dnc-speech/423307/. “9/12 Project Website.” n.d. 9/12 Project: Principles and Values. http://www.the912-project.com/. “10 Consumer Behavior Studies on Persuasion and Conversion.” 2016. Accessed July 11. https://www.helpscout.net/consumer-behavior/. “10 Dos and Don’ts of Conducting Survey Research.” 2016. Nonprofit Hub. May 24. http://nonprofithub.org/human-resources/10-dos-and-donts-of-conducting-survey-research/. Radcliffe, Damian. 2016. “10 Ways the Tech Industry and the Media Helped Create President Trump.” The Conversation. Accessed December 5. http://theconversation.com/10-ways-the-tech-industry-and- the-media-helped-create-president-trump-69609. Chang, Alvin. 2016. “40% of Adults Who Have Downloaded Pokémon Go Are 25 or Older.” Vox. July 14. http://www.vox.com/culture/2016/7/14/12190170/pokemon-go-ios-android-adult-age. Sahil Patel. 2016. “85 Percent of Facebook Video Is Watched without Sound.” DigiDay, May 17. http://digiday.com/platforms/silent-world-facebook-video/. Biggs, John. 2016. “100% Fun.” TechCrunch. Accessed July 25. http://social.techcrunch.com/2016/07/22/100-fun/. “2015 Year In Review.” 2016. Yik Yak Blog. Accessed March 25. http://blog.yikyak.com/blog/2015-year- in-review. Spitfire. n.d. “2016-Digital-S M A R T S -Guide.pdf.” Spitfire Communications. “A 6-Year-Old Girl and a Male Fetus Were Killed in a Car Crash. The Compensation for the Fetus Was Much Higher.” 2016. Washington Post. Accessed October 26. https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/business/wonk/settlements/. Hernández, Javier C. 2016. “Across China, Walmart Faces Labor Unrest as Authorities Stand Aside.” The New York Times, November 16. http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/17/world/asia/across-china- walmart-faces-labor-unrest-as-authorities-stand-aside.html. “Adaptive Content - The Data Shows Why It Matters Right Now.” 2015. Copyblogger. January 5. http://www.copyblogger.com/why-adaptive-content/. 2 Lotan, Gilad. 2016. “A Deep Dive into the Underlying Data.” Medium. September 29. https://medium.com/i-data/trumpwon-trend-vs-reality-16cec3badd60#.vygvbicmd. Gitau, Shikoh, Gary Marsden, and Jonathan Donner. 2010. “After Access: Challenges Facing Mobile-Only Internet Users in the Developing World.” In , 2603. ACM Press. doi:10.1145/1753326.1753720. Gershgorn, Dave, and Mike Murphy. 2016. “A Glimpse into Facebook’s Notoriously Opaque—and Potentially vulnerable—Trending Algorithm.” Quartz. Accessed September 12. http://qz.com/769413/heres-how-facebooks-automated-trending-bar-probably-works/. “A Grassroots Presidential Campaign Uses the Power of Twitter to Attract New Donors.” 2016. Accessed September 6. http://marketing.twitter.com/en/success-stories/a-grassroots-presidential-campaign- uses-the-power-of-twitter.html. “A Look at Facebook’s Billion Dollar 2016 Hit on the News Ecosystem.” 2016. Poynter. November 30. http://www.poynter.org/2016/a-look-at-facebooks-billion-dollar-2016-hit-on-the-news- ecosystem/440471/. “Amazon vs. YouTube: Why the Content Creator Is the Ultimate Winner - Recode.” 2016. Accessed August 25. http://www.recode.net/2016/6/9/11886568/video-platforms-amazon-youtube-content- creator-video-direct. Inc, Gallup. 2016. “Americans’ Confidence in Institutions Stays Low.” Gallup.com. Accessed July 12. http://www.gallup.com/poll/192581/americans-confidence-institutions-stays-low.aspx. “Americans Don’t Have Much Trust in Social Media as a Source of News, a New Report Says.” 2016. Nieman Lab. Accessed July 25. http://www.niemanlab.org/2016/04/americans-dont-have-much-trust- in-social-media-as-a-source-of-news-a-new-report-says/. “Americans’ Engagement With Organizations Wanes, Report Says.” 2014. The Chronicle of Philanthropy. December 17. https://www.philanthropy.com/article/Americans-Engagement-With/152055/. “Americans for Prosperity Website.” n.d. https://americansforprosperity.org/. “Americans Have Lost Confidence ... in Everything.” 2016. US News & World Report. Accessed August 4. http://www.usnews.com/news/blogs/ken-walshs-washington/2015/06/17/americans-have-lost- confidence-in-everything. Inc, Gallup. 2016. “Americans Increasingly Turn to Specific Sources for News.” Gallup.com. Accessed July 12. http://www.gallup.com/poll/193553/americans-increasingly-turn-specific-sources-news.aspx. Davenport, Thomas H. 2013. “Analytics 3.0.” Harvard Business Review. December 1. https://hbr.org/2013/12/analytics-30. McRaney, David. 2010. “Anchoring Effect.” You Are Not So Smart. July 28. https://youarenotsosmart.com/2010/07/27/anchoring-effect/. The Economist. 2016. “A New Kind of Weather,” March 26. http://www.economist.com/news/special- report/21695192-social-media-now-play-key-role-collective-action-new-kind-weather. 3 Frick, Walter. 2014. “An Introduction to Data-Driven Decisions for Managers Who Don’t Like Math.” Harvard Business Review. May 19. https://hbr.org/2014/05/an-introduction-to-data-driven-decisions- for-managers-who-dont-like-math. “An Island No More: Inside the Business of the Podcasting Boom.” 2016. Nieman Lab. Accessed September 16. http://www.niemanlab.org/2016/09/an-island-no-more-inside-the-business-of-the- podcasting-boom/. Weber, Lauren. 2017. “Apps Empower Workers, Ease Scheduling.” Wall Street Journal, January 3, sec. Business. http://www.wsj.com/articles/apps-empower-workers-ease-scheduling-1483455603. Ford, Paul. 2016. “Are We Smart Enough to Control Artificial Intelligence?” MIT Technology Review. Accessed August 11. https://www.technologyreview.com/s/534871/our-fear-of-artificial-intelligence/. “Are You Feeling the Bern or Coming Down with a (c)Hill?” 2016. Yik Yak Blog. Accessed March 25. http://blog.yikyak.com/blog/are-you-feeling-the-bern-or-coming-down-with-a-chill. “Artificial Intelligence.” 2016. WIRED. Accessed August 11. http://www.wired.com/tag/artificial- intelligence/. Adee, Sally. 2016. “A Social Network Built for Donating Aims to Fix Slacktivism | New Scientist.” Accessed March 25. https://www.newscientist.com/article/2079741-a-social-network-built-for- donating-aims-to-fix-slacktivism/. “Australia’s Party Leaders Take Debate to Facebook Live.” 2016. Civic Hall. Accessed August 1. http://civichall.org/civicist/australia-turnbull-shorten-debate-facebook/. “A Zimbabwean Pastor Built an Anti-Corruption Movement with Facebook.” 2016. Techonomy. July 22. http://techonomy.com/2016/07/27177/. Tervo, Theda Skocpol, Alexander Hertel-Fernandez and Caroline. 2016. “Behind ‘Make America Great,’ the Koch Agenda Returns with a Vengeance.” TPM. November 21. http://talkingpointsmemo.com/cafe/behind-make-america-great-the-koch-agenda-returns-with-a- vengeance. NetChange Consulting, NetChange Consulting. 2016. “Behind Today’s Breakthrough Advocacy Campaigns (SSIR).” Accessed June 13. http://ssir.org/articles/entry/behind_todays_breakthrough_advocacy_campaigns?utm_source=Enews& utm_medium=Email&utm_campaign=SSIR_Now&utm_content=Read_More. “Bernie 2016 Case Study.” 2016. Revolution Messaging. Accessed September 6. https://revolutionmessaging.com/cases/bernie-2016. Corasaniti, Nick. 2016. “Bernie Sanders Campaign Showed How to Turn Viral Moments Into Money.”
Recommended publications
  • Social Media Job Expectations
    Social Media Job Expectations Twitter @FHNtoday User 1Push all new content from FHNtoday.com and FHNgameday.com ​ ● Push miscellaneous announcements ● User will focus on tagging people/groups when possible. ● Promote other social accounts weekly ● Push breaking news ● Check on Medium daily. ● Have at least 3 updates per week day ● Maintain look/profile of @FHNtoday ● Research this and brainstorm ways to make medium even stronger. Twitter @FHNtoday User 2 Push all new content from FHNgameday.com ● Push miscellaneous sports announcements ● User will focus on tagging people/groups when possible. ● Promote other social accounts weekly ● Push breaking sports news ● Check on Medium daily. ● Have at least 3 updates per week day ● Research this and brainstorm ways to make medium even stronger. Twitter @FHNtoday User 3: ● Maintain weekly analytics report ● User will focus on tagging people/groups when possible. ● Follow back accounts ● Follow new accounts ● Maintain lists ● Check on Medium daily. ● RT appropriate members of the community. 1 or 2 per day ● Reply to @mentions ● Utilize: https://analytics.twitter.com ​ OK -- Pinterest User 1: Focus on school-related topics like Homecoming, Pep Assembly's, etc. ● Focus on at least one board per week with multiple postings per day ● Work to maintain and update previous related boards when appropriate ● Share information at least once per week with Facebook and Twitter User #1 to promote ● Work to maintain/increase followers/board followed ● Check on Medium daily. ● Maintain overall look/profile of account OK -- Pinterest User 2: ● Focusing on trending topics or things that are going viral. ● Focus on at least one board per week with multiple postings per day ● Work to maintain and update previous related boards when appropriate ● Share information at least once per week with Facebook and Twitter User #1 to promote ● Maintain weekly analytics of Pinterest ● Check on Medium daily.
    [Show full text]
  • Additional Resources
    Resource Guide to Communication Scholarship on Social Justice Activism Lawrence R. Frey, Kellie Brownlee, Jeanette Musselwhite Additional Resources Conceptual/Theoretical Scholarship on Communication and Social Justice Activism A. Communication Aldás, E. N., & Pinazo, D. (2013). “Communication and engagement for social justice.” Peace Review, 25, 343–348. doi:10.1080/10402659.2013.816552 Andersen, P. A. (1993). “Beyond criticism: The activist turn in the ideological debate.” Western Journal of Communication, 57, 247–256. doi:10.1080/10570319309374447 Barge, J. K. (Ed.). (1996). “Dialogue: Communication and social justice [Special section].” Communication Studies, 47, 110–151. Contains the essays: Frey, L. R., Pearce, W. B., Pollock, M. A., Artz, L., & Murphy, B. A. O. “Looking for justice in all the wrong places: On a communication approach to social justice.” 110–127. doi:10.1080/10510979609368467 Wood, J. T. “Social justice research: Alive and well in the field of communication.” 128–134. doi:10.1080/10510979609368468 Makau, J. M. “Notes on communication education and social justice.” 135–141. doi:10.1080/10510979609368469 Pollock, M. A., Artz, L., Frey, L. R., Pearce, W. B., & Murphy, B. A. O. “Navigating between Scylla and Charybdis: Continuing the dialogue on communication and social justice.” 142–151. doi:10.1080/10510979609368470 Broome, B. J., Carey, C., De La Garza, S. A., Martin, J., & Morris, R. (2005). “In the thick of things: A dialogue about the activist turn in intercultural communication.” In W. J. Starosta & G.-M. Chen (Eds.), Taking stock in intercultural communication: Where to now? (pp. 145–175). Washington, DC: National Communication Association. Carragee, K. M., & Frey, L.
    [Show full text]
  • MAP Act Coalition Letter Freedomworks
    April 13, 2021 Dear Members of Congress, We, the undersigned organizations representing millions of Americans nationwide highly concerned by our country’s unsustainable fiscal trajectory, write in support of the Maximizing America’s Prosperity (MAP) Act, to be introduced by Rep. Kevin Brady (R-Texas) and Sen. Mike Braun (R-Ind.). As we stare down a mounting national debt of over $28 trillion, the MAP Act presents a long-term solution to our ever-worsening spending patterns by implementing a Swiss-style debt brake that would prevent large budget deficits and increased national debt. Since the introduction of the MAP Act in the 116th Congress, our national debt has increased by more than 25 percent, totaling six trillion dollars higher than the $22 trillion we faced less than two years ago in July of 2019. Similarly, nearly 25 percent of all U.S. debt accumulated since the inception of our country has come since the outset of the COVID-19 pandemic. Now more than ever, it is critical that legislators take a serious look at the fiscal situation we find ourselves in, with a budget deficit for Fiscal Year 2020 of $3.132 trillion and a projected share of the national debt held by the public of 102.3 percent of GDP. While markets continue to finance our debt in the current moment, the simple and unavoidable fact remains that our country is not immune from the basic economics of massive debt, that history tells us leads to inevitable crisis. Increased levels of debt even before a resulting crisis slows economic activity -- a phenomenon referred to as “debt drag” -- which especially as we seek recovery from COVID-19 lockdowns, our nation cannot afford.
    [Show full text]
  • Culture Wars' Reloaded: Trump, Anti-Political Correctness and the Right's 'Free Speech' Hypocrisy
    The 'Culture Wars' Reloaded: Trump, Anti-Political Correctness and the Right's 'Free Speech' Hypocrisy Dr. Valerie Scatamburlo-D'Annibale University of Windsor, Windsor, Ontario, Canada Abstract This article explores how Donald Trump capitalized on the right's decades-long, carefully choreographed and well-financed campaign against political correctness in relation to the broader strategy of 'cultural conservatism.' It provides an historical overview of various iterations of this campaign, discusses the mainstream media's complicity in promulgating conservative talking points about higher education at the height of the 1990s 'culture wars,' examines the reconfigured anti- PC/pro-free speech crusade of recent years, its contemporary currency in the Trump era and the implications for academia and educational policy. Keywords: political correctness, culture wars, free speech, cultural conservatism, critical pedagogy Introduction More than two years after Donald Trump's ascendancy to the White House, post-mortems of the 2016 American election continue to explore the factors that propelled him to office. Some have pointed to the spread of right-wing populism in the aftermath of the 2008 global financial crisis that culminated in Brexit in Europe and Trump's victory (Kagarlitsky, 2017; Tufts & Thomas, 2017) while Fuchs (2018) lays bare the deleterious role of social media in facilitating the rise of authoritarianism in the U.S. and elsewhere. Other 69 | P a g e The 'Culture Wars' Reloaded: Trump, Anti-Political Correctness and the Right's 'Free Speech' Hypocrisy explanations refer to deep-rooted misogyny that worked against Hillary Clinton (Wilz, 2016), a backlash against Barack Obama, sedimented racism and the demonization of diversity as a public good (Major, Blodorn and Blascovich, 2016; Shafer, 2017).
    [Show full text]
  • Moving the Race Conversation Forward Part 1
    THE MOVING RACE CONVERSATION FORWARD HOW THE MEDIA COVERS RACISM, AND OTHER BARRIERS TO PRODUCTIVE RACIAL DISCOURSE PART 1 JANUARY 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS PART 1 Prologue A 1 | Introduction 1 2 | Content Analysis of Mainstream Media 6 3 | Harmful Racial Discourse Practices 11 4 | Recommendations and Conclusion 27 5 | Acknowledgments and Endnotes 30 6 | Appendix A 32 PROLOGUE oving the Race Conversation Forward is a two-part report that first, describes some of the major impediments to productive Engage with us racial discourse in the United States, and second, profiles and provides lessons from several recent interventions and initiatives and others who M that are breaking down significant barriers toward racial justice. are reshaping and PART ONE: HOW THE MEDIA COVERS RACISM, AND OTHER BARRIERS TO reforming the way PRODUCTIVE RACIAL DISCOURSE identifies and describes some of the key ways in which mainstream discourse in the United States unproductively approaches we talk about race issues of race and racism. In this report, we present our expansive analysis of recent media coverage on race and racism (Section 2), and our description of and racism in our Seven Harmful Racial Discourse Practices that occur not just in mainstream media, but in varied spaces where “race talk” takes place (Section 3). It also pro- country today and vides some everyday discourse recommendations applicable to everyone from racial and social justice advocates to media editors to leaders and members of into the future. religious groups to news consumers. PART TWO: RACIAL DISCOURSE CHANGE IN PRACTICE provides case studies of re- cent interventions and initiatives advanced by the racial justice field to disrupt and supplant unproductive mainstream discussions of race and racism.
    [Show full text]
  • Security Analysis of Tumblr
    Security Analysis of Tumblr 6.857 Spring 2017 Team Hackerman Remi Mir, Shruti Banda, Stephen Li, José Zúñiga Table of Contents Abstract 2 Introduction 2 What is Tumblr? 2 Motivation 2 Past Security Incidents 2 Principals and Actions 3 Guests 3 Users with Accounts 3 Group Users 4 Third Party Developers 4 Tumblr Corporation 4 Testing Methodology 4 Web Application 5 Burp Suite 6 Overview 6 Tests 6 Results 8 API 9 Overview 9 Tests 10 Invalid Inputs 10 Basic Scripting 11 Script Injection Attacks 12 Results 14 Conclusion 14 Summary 14 Recommendations 15 Further Work 15 Acknowledgements 16 References 16 1 Abstract Our project was to perform the security analysis of a popular microblogging site called Tumblr. The objective was to explore the different ways Tumblr ensures the protection of the information it collects from its users, and identify which areas it fails to secure. We especially focused on how Tumblr handles ​ the security as per its privacy policy, including all relevant account information, e.g. username, password, age, and email address. We constructed a security analysis document summarizing our attempts to detect flaws in both the web application and the API. Our group identified strengths and weaknesses of the web application and the API, and drafted recommendations for solutions that Tumblr can implement to make the platform more secure for its users. Introduction What is Tumblr? Tumblr is a popular microblogging platform with more than 20 million users from the United States [1] and over 300 million blogs in total [2]. It is also among the top ten social networking sites worldwide in 2017 [3].
    [Show full text]
  • C00490045 Restore Our Future, Inc. $4116274
    Independent Expenditure Table 2 Committees/Persons Reporting Independent Expenditures from January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2011 ID # Committee/Individual Amount C00490045 RESTORE OUR FUTURE, INC. $4,116,274 C00499731 MAKE US GREAT AGAIN, INC $3,793,524 C00501098 OUR DESTINY PAC $2,323,481 C00000935 DEMOCRATIC CONGRESSIONAL CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE $1,759,111 C00495028 HOUSE MAJORITY PAC $1,073,851 C00487363 AMERICAN CROSSROADS $1,016,349 C00075820 NATIONAL REPUBLICAN CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEE $810,157 C00507525 WINNING OUR FUTURE $788,381 C00442319 REPUBLICAN MAJORITY CAMPAIGN $710,400 C00503417 RED WHITE AND BLUE FUND $573,680 C00448696 SENATE CONSERVATIVES FUND $479,867 C90012758 CITIZENS FOR A WORKING AMERICA INC. $475,000 C00484642 MAJORITY PAC $471,728 C00495861 PRIORITIES USA ACTION $306,229 C00495010 CAMPAIGN TO DEFEAT BARACK OBAMA $266,432 C00499020 FREEDOMWORKS FOR AMERICA $241,542 C00504241 9-9-9 FUND $226,530 C00498261 RESTORING PROSPERITY FUND $202,873 C00503870 RETHINK PAC $156,000 C00432260 CLUB FOR GROWTH PAC $145,459 C90011057 NATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR MARRIAGE $142,841 C00454074 OUR COUNTRY DESERVES BETTER PAC - TEAPARTYEXPRESS.ORG $141,526 C00473918 WOMEN VOTE! $133,976 C00508317 LEADERS FOR FAMILIES SUPER PAC INC $122,767 C00488486 COMMUNICATIONS WORKERS OF AMERICA WORKING VOICES $107,000 C00492116 COOPERATIVE OF AMERICAN PHYSICIANS IE COMMITTEE $102,184 C90011230 AMERICAN ACTION NETWORK INC $96,694 C00348540 1199 SERVICE EMPLOYEES INT'L UNION FEDERAL POLITICAL ACTION FUND $83,975 C00505081 STRONG AMERICA NOW SUPER PAC
    [Show full text]
  • Effectiveness of Dismantling Strategies on Moderated Vs. Unmoderated
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Efectiveness of dismantling strategies on moderated vs. unmoderated online social platforms Oriol Artime1*, Valeria d’Andrea1, Riccardo Gallotti1, Pier Luigi Sacco2,3,4 & Manlio De Domenico 1 Online social networks are the perfect test bed to better understand large-scale human behavior in interacting contexts. Although they are broadly used and studied, little is known about how their terms of service and posting rules afect the way users interact and information spreads. Acknowledging the relation between network connectivity and functionality, we compare the robustness of two diferent online social platforms, Twitter and Gab, with respect to banning, or dismantling, strategies based on the recursive censor of users characterized by social prominence (degree) or intensity of infammatory content (sentiment). We fnd that the moderated (Twitter) vs. unmoderated (Gab) character of the network is not a discriminating factor for intervention efectiveness. We fnd, however, that more complex strategies based upon the combination of topological and content features may be efective for network dismantling. Our results provide useful indications to design better strategies for countervailing the production and dissemination of anti- social content in online social platforms. Online social networks provide a rich laboratory for the analysis of large-scale social interaction and of their social efects1–4. Tey facilitate the inclusive engagement of new actors by removing most barriers to participate in content-sharing platforms characteristic of the pre-digital era5. For this reason, they can be regarded as a social arena for public debate and opinion formation, with potentially positive efects on individual and collective empowerment6.
    [Show full text]
  • A Generation Without Representation How Young People Are Severely Underrepresented Among Legislators
    A Generation Without Representation How Young People Are Severely Underrepresented Among Legislators By: Maggie Thompson and Anisha Singh September 2018 A Generation Without Representation How Young People Are Severely Underrepresented Among Legislators By: Maggie Thompson and Anisha Singh Contents 1 Introduction and Summary 3 Methodology 4 Historically Old Legislators 5 Older Means Less Diverse Race and Ethnicity Gender and Sexual Orientation Disability Religion Education, Military Experience, and Family 12 Young Legislators Are More Conservative Than Young Voters 13 An Overall Lack of Power 14 Why This Matters 16 What Can Be Done 20 Acknowledgments 21 Endnotes Introduction and Summary For a representative democracy to function, it is essential that government reflects its people—whether by race, ethnicity, gender, sexual orientation, experience, age, or background. Diversity in leadership roles results in a more effective and fair government.1 By this measure, our democracy is dramatically failing younger Americans. Approximately 62 million Millennials were of voting age during the 2016 general election, according to Pew Research Center.2 In 2018, young voters, namely Millennials and Generation Z, are set to make up 34 percent of the eligible voting population.3 This gives young voters a larger share of the potential electorate than any other single generation.4 Yet, despite making up the largest potential voting bloc5 in the country today, young people are severely underrepresented at both the state and federal level. This representation gap impacts young people, and the issues they care about, directly. When elected officials aren’t representative of their constituents, this can lead to policies that are not responsive to the needs of the governed.
    [Show full text]
  • Digital Activism in Asia: Good, Bad, and Banal Politics Online
    Asiascape: Digital Asia 7 (2020) 5-19 brill.com/dias Digital Activism in Asia: Good, Bad, and Banal Politics Online Bart Barendregt Leiden Institute of Cultural Anthropology and Sociology, Leiden, the Netherlands [email protected] Florian Schneider Leiden University Institute for Area Studies, Leiden, the Netherlands [email protected] Abstract This article introduces the special issue on ‘Digital Activism’ by exploring some of the trends in social media activism and scholarship thereof. The authors ask to what extent this literature helps us understand Asian forms of online activism, which forms of activism have relatively done well, and whether Asian activism requires its own the- orizing. Most of all, it is a plea for a careful and ethnographically informed approach to digital activism. Although outwardly they look similar and use the same templates, manuals, or even similar media strategies, not all forms of online activism promote democratic values. Furthermore, we argue that much of what happens under the ban- ner of digital activism is not necessarily politics with a capital P but, rather, consists of everyday forms of engagement, with sometimes seemingly vulgar contents and often familiar routines and natural forms, yet in their impact such ‘banal activism’ may have political implications. Keywords Asia – civic engagement – digital activism – mediatization – online community – social media © Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, 2020 | doi:10.1163/22142312-bja10004Downloaded from Brill.com09/25/2021 02:48:27AM via free access 6 Barendregt and Schneider 1 Hopes and Hoaxes New media have always held not just the promise of compressing space/time but also, and inherently, of spreading the values of transparency and democ- racy and of serving as a potential means of better and just governance.
    [Show full text]
  • “Facebook Is Hurting People at Scale”: Mark Zuckerberg's
    “Facebook Is Hurting People At Scale”: Mark Zuckerberg’s Employees Reckon With The Social Network They’ve Built As the US heads toward a crucial and contentious presidential election, the world's largest social network is facing an unprecedented cultural crisis. By Ryan Mac and Craig Silverman Posted on July 23, 2020, at 11:37 a.m. ET On July 1, Max Wang, a Boston-based software engineer who was leaving Facebook after more than seven years, shared a video on the company’s internal discussion board that was meant to serve as a warning. “I think Facebook is hurting people at scale,” he wrote in a note accompanying the video. “If you think so too, maybe give this a watch.” Most employees on their way out of the “Mark Zuckerberg production” typically post photos of their company badges along with farewell notes thanking their colleagues. Wang opted for a clip of himself speaking directly to the camera. What followed was a 24-minute clear-eyed hammering of Facebook’s leadership and decision-making over the previous year. The video was a distillation of months of internal strife, protest, and departures that followed the company’s decision to leave untouched a post from President Donald Trump that seemingly called for violence against people protesting the police killing of George Floyd. And while Wang’s message wasn’t necessarily unique, his assessment of the company’s ongoing failure to protect its users — an evaluation informed by his lengthy tenure at the company — provided one of the most stunningly pointed rebukes of Facebook to date.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 United States District Court
    Case 1:16-cv-08215 Document 1 Filed 10/20/16 Page 1 of 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK COLOR OF CHANGE and CENTER FOR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, and FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, Defendants. COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF 1. This is an action under the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”), 5 U.S.C. §§ 552 et seq., seeking declaratory, injunctive, and other appropriate relief to compel the Defendants, the United States Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”) and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (“FBI”) (collectively “Defendants”), to produce agency records that have been improperly withheld from Plaintiffs, Color of Change (“COC”) and the Center for Constitutional Rights (“CCR”) (collectively “Plaintiffs”). 2. Plaintiffs’ submitted a FOIA request to Defendants on July 5, 2016, seeking records related to federal government surveillance and monitoring of protest activities related to the Movement for Black Lives (“MBL”). See July 5, 2016 FOIA Request Letter from COC and CCR (“Request”), attached as Exhibit A. The Request documented the compelling and urgent need for public disclosure of information related 1 Case 1:16-cv-08215 Document 1 Filed 10/20/16 Page 2 of 17 to federal responses to public protests. Plaintiffs’ sought expedited processing and a fee waiver. 3. Police violence, criminal justice, and racial inequity are now the subjects of an impassioned national, political debate. MBL has played a significant role in bringing this discussion to the forefront by holding demonstrations in cities throughout the country, often in response to deadly police shootings of Black people.
    [Show full text]