Workplace Stress Induced Among Nurses at Mbarara Regional
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Prevalence of Maternal Near Miss and Community-Based Risk Factors in Central Uganda
International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics 135 (2016) 214–220 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ijgo CLINICAL ARTICLE Prevalence of maternal near miss and community-based risk factors in Central Uganda Elizabeth Nansubuga a,b,c,⁎,NatalAyigaa,CherylA.Moyerd a Population Research and Training Unit, North West University, Mafikeng, South Africa b Department of Population Studies, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda c African Studies Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA d Departments of Learning Health Sciences and Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA article info abstract Article history: Objective: To examine the prevalence of maternal near-miss (MNM) and its associated risk factors in a community Received 4 November 2015 setting in Central Uganda. Methods: A cross-sectional research design employing multi-stage sampling collected Received in revised form 19 May 2016 data from women aged 15–49 years in Rakai, Uganda, who had been pregnant in the 3 years preceding the survey, Accepted 26 July 2016 conducted between August 10 and December 31, 2013. Additionally, in-depth interviews were conducted. WHO-based disease and management criteria were used to identify MNM. Binary logistic regression was used to Keywords: predict MNM risk factors. Content analysis was performed for qualitative data. Results: Survey data were collected Maternal near-miss from 1557 women and 40 in-depth interviews were conducted. The MNM prevalence was 287.7 per 1000 pregnan- Pregnancy complications Prevalence cies; the majority of MNMs resulted from hemorrhage. Unwanted pregnancies, a history of MNM, primipara, Risk factors pregnancy danger signs, Banyakore ethnicity, and a partner who had completed primary education only were asso- Uganda ciated with increased odds of MNM (all P b 0.05). -
Informal Support for People with Alzheimer's Disease and Related D
Informal Support for People With Alzheimer’s Disease and Related Dementias in Rural Uganda: A Qualitative Study Pia Ngoma Nankinga ( [email protected] ) Mbarara University of Science and Technology Samuel Maling Maling Mbarara University of Science and Technology Zeina Chemali Havard Medical School Edith K Wakida Mbarara University of Science and Technology Celestino Obua Mbarara University of Science and Technology Elialilia S Okello Makerere University Research Keywords: Informal support, dementia and rural communities Posted Date: December 17th, 2019 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.2.19063/v1 License: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Read Full License Page 1/16 Abstract Background: The generation of people getting older has become a public health concern worldwide. People aged 65 and above are the most at risk for Alzheimer’s disease which is associated with physical and behavioral changes. This nurtures informal support needs for people living with dementia where their families together with other community members are the core providers of day to day care for them in the rural setting. Despite global concern around this issue, information is still lacking on informal support delivered to these people with dementia. Objective: Our study aimed at establishing the nature of informal support provided for people with dementia (PWDs) and its perceived usefulness in rural communities in South Western Uganda. Methods: This was a qualitative study that adopted a descriptive design and conducted among 22 caregivers and 8 opinion leaders in rural communities of Kabale, Mbarara and Ibanda districts in South Western Uganda. The study included dementia caregivers who had been in that role for a period of at least six months and opinion leaders in the community. -
Bishop Stuart University P.O
BISHOP STUART UNIVERSITY P.O. Box 9 Mbarara Uganda. Tel: +256-4854-22970 Email: [email protected], [email protected] Kampala Liason Offi ce: St. Francis Community Centre Phase II building, 2nd Floor, Room 1 Makerere University. Email: [email protected] Tel: +256-773-724-003 Website: www.bsu.ac.ug INTRODUCTION Medical Services: The University has been blessed with a clinic • Bachelor of Animal Health and Producti on (BAHP)* • Bachelor of Banking and Investment Management (BBIM) Under the guidance of lecturers, the students of the faculty will Bishop Stuart University is a not-for-profi t Chartered educati onal which is manned by well trained nurses. For referrals, the pati ents • Bachelor of Sports Science (BSS) • Bachelor of Project Planning and Management (BPPM)* be conducti ng clinics to assist people with various legal problems, insti tuti on established by Ankole Diocese of the Province of the are referred to Ruharo Mission Hospital with which the university • Diploma in Midwifery (DMW) • Bachelor of Procurement and Supply Chain Management such as accessing justi ce, issues if domesti c violence, matt ers of has a partnership/health scheme. Anglican Church of Uganda to provide Christi an based higher • Advanced Certi fi cate in Appropriate and Sustainable (BPSCM)* succession. They will be writi ng to sensiti ze communiti es about Technologies (ACAST) • Bachelor of Community Psychology (BCP)* their rights, such as the right to a clean environment, the right to Educati on, training and research for the expansion of God’s Students Clubs: Many clubs and associati ons are progressively The university got an opportunity of sending its students of • Bachelor of Records Management and Informati on Science educati on, the right to health and the right to shelter, land rights kingdom, human Knowledge and bett erment of society. -
BETTER GROWTH, BETTER CITIES Achieving Uganda’S Development Ambition
BETTER GROWTH, BETTER CITIES Achieving Uganda’s Development Ambition A paper by the Government of Uganda and the New Climate Economy Partnership November 2016 THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA About this paper The analysis in this paper was produced for the New Climate Partnership in Uganda research project, culminating in the report, Achieving Uganda’s Development Ambition: The Economic Impact of Green Growth – An Agenda for Action. This National Urban Transition paper is published as a supporting working paper and provides a fuller elaboration of the urbanisation elements in the broader report. Partners Achieving Uganda’s Development Ambition: The Economic Impact of Green Growth – An Agenda for Action was jointly prepared by the Government of Uganda through the Ministry of Finance, Planning and Economic Development (MFPED), the Ugandan Economic Policy Research Centre (EPRC) Uganda, the Global Green Growth Institute (GGGI), the New Climate Economy (NCE), and the Coalition for Urban Transitions (an NCE Special Initiative). Ministry of Finance, Planning and Economic Development Plot 2/12 Apollo Kaggwa Road P.O.Box 8147 Kampala, Uganda +256-414-707000 COALITION FOR URBAN TRANSITIONS A New Climate Economy Special Initiative Acknowledgements The project team members were Russell Bishop, Nick Godfrey, Annie Lefebure, Filippo Rodriguez and Rachel Waddell (NCE); Madina Guloba (EPRC); Maris Wanyera, Albert Musisi and Andrew Masaba (MPFED); and Samson Akankiza, Jahan-zeb Chowdhury, Peter Okubal and John Walugembe (GGGI). The technical -
Facilitation of an IT Training Centre in Uganda
Justine Magambo 13.06.2010 Proposal for Facilitation of an IT Training Centre in Uganda Past Performance In 2004, the education-africa project was initiated at the University of Cologne with the major goal of facilitating ICT use in teacher education. Meanwhile, the University of Cologne has signed Memorandums of Understanding with Kenyatta University, Kyambogo University and Mbarara University of Science and Technology. In 2008 Linuxola in cooperation with the Department of Educational Psychology at the University of Cologne formed a partnership to provide three African universities with computer hardware and software. The major aim was to support teaching staff and student teachers in these universities in developing ICT skills both for general use and for teaching. This concept was proposed in response to the study carried out by Justine Magambo1 in 2007 which explored the use ICT in teacher education in universities in sub-Sahara Africa. Objectives and activities Within this framework, Linuxola donated 20 computers to each of the three universities: Kenyatta University (Kenya), Kyambogo University and Mbarara University of Science and Technology in Uganda. Linuxola was in charge of fundraising for the computers, while the University of Cologne financed shipping. The African universities were to ensure space or rooms for the computers as well as identify IT focal points. Justine Magambo, who coordinated and managed the project and the partnership, visited all three universities to appraise their preparedness for the computer consignment. Her report showed that all three universities had appointed IT focal points and set up computer rooms. In February 2010 the computers for Mbarara and Kyambogo were delivered and cleared by Mbarara University as agreed by both university officials. -
Uganda Country Strategy Paper 2017-2021
AFRICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK GROUP UGANDA COUNTRY STRATEGY PAPER 2017-2021 RDGE/COUG June 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................. iii I. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................. 1 II. THE COUNTRY CONTEXT ......................................................................................................... 1 2.1 Political Context ......................................................................................................................................... 1 2.2 Economic Context ...................................................................................................................................... 2 2.3 Social development and Cross-cutting Issues……………………………………………………………….. .............................................. 5 III. STRATEGIC OPTIONS, PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE AND LESSONS ........................ 7 3.1 Country Strategic Framework .................................................................................................................. 7 3.2 Aid Coordination and Harmonization ...................................................................................................... 8 3.3 Country Challenges & Weaknesses and Opportunities and Strengths ................................................. 8 3.5 Key Findings of the CSP 2011-16 Country Portfolio Performance Review (CPPR) ......................... -
A Review of Land Tenure and Land Use Planning in the Six Kagera TAMP Districts in Uganda
A Review of Land Tenure and Land use Planning in the six Kagera TAMP Districts in Uganda BdBernard BhBashaas ha School of Agricultural Sciences, Makerere University. Outline of Presentation Background Objective and Methodology Research Questions PliiPreliminary Fi Fidindings Land tenure structure Background KLKey Laws and regu lati ons rel ati ng t o th e ownership, management and transfer of land and re ltdlated resources i n Ug Uand a. The Constitution • The Land Act (1998), • The Land regulations of 2004 • The Physical planning Act of 2010. This act specifically provides for the design and implementation of land use plans. Background cont’d Other Relevant Laws: • The land acquisition Act, • The Water Act and associated water resources regulati on s, • The National Forestry and tree planting Act (2003), • The National Environment Regulations (2001), • The mortgage Act, • the registration of titles Act and the rent restriction Act. Objective & Methodology Object ive To achieve a deeper understanding of the land tenure structure andld land use p lanni ng i n th e six Kagera TAMP districts Highlight the constraints and identify the opportun ities f or pri ority it acti on. Methodology A combination of literature review and key informant interviews with district level staff. Research Questions What is the current land tenure structure and its distribution in Uganda and in the six districts of the Kagera TAMP project? What are the strategies and plans in place to improve the land tenure structure in Uganda and in the six Kagera TAMP project districts, in particular? Do land use plans exist at the National level and in the six Kagera TAMP project districts? HdhiildHow do the existing land use pl ans compare (i n content, design process (approach) and coordination arrangements) with best practices. -
Download Download
Open Access ORIGINAL RESEARCH Assessment of the impact of the new paediatric surgery unit and the COSECSA training programme at Mbarara Hospital, Uganda Anne W. Shikanda, Martin S. Situma Pediatric Surgery Department, Mbarara University Teaching Hospital, Mbarara, Uganda Correspondence: Dr Anne W. Shikanda ([email protected]) © 2019 A.W. Shikanda & M.S. Situma. This open access article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/ East Cent Afr J Surg. 2019 Apr;24(1):133–139 licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. https://dx.doi.org/10.4314/ecajs.v24i2.10 Abstract Background This study aimed to assess the impact of a new pediatric surgical unit (PSU) established upcountry in a unique way in a govern- ment hospital with a non-governmental organization as the main stakeholder. The unit is run by one pediatric surgeon trained through COSECSA. It is the second PSU in the country. This PSU brought pediatric surgical services and training closer to the Mbarara community. Methods The study was conducted at Mbarara regional referral hospital (MRRH). It was a cross-sectional mixed design study. For the qual- itative arm, Key Informant interviews were done with the main stakeholders who established the PSU. Impact on training was assessed using a questionnaire to former postgraduate trainees (Alumni). Quantitative arm assessed number of surgeries by a historical audit of hospital operating room registers comparing volume of surgeries before and after the establishment of the unit. -
Psychiatric Hospitals in Uganda
Psychiatric hospitals in Uganda A human rights investigation w www.mdac.org mentaldisabilityadvocacy @MDACintl Psychiatric hospitals in Uganda A human rights investigation 2014 December 2014 ISBN 978-615-80107-7-1 Copyright statement: Mental Disability Advocacy Center (MDAC) and Mental Health Uganda (MHU), 2014. All rights reserved. Contents Foreword ...................................................................................................................................................................................................... 4 Executive summary ......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 6 1. Introduction, torture standards and hospitals visited.............................................................................................................................. 9 1(A). The need for human rights monitoring........................................................................................................................................................... 9 1(B). Uganda country profile .................................................................................................................................................................................... 10 1(C). Mental health ................................................................................................................................................................................................... -
Appendix A: Fc+ Planned and Actual Supported Sites, Fy 17/18
APPENDIX A: FC+ PLANNED AND ACTUAL SUPPORTED SITES, FY 17/18 Country/Site Sector Planned Actual FY 17/18 FY 17/18 T: Treatment & Prevention P: Prevention-only Bangladesh: 15 sites 7T, 4P 7T, 8P Ad-Din Dhaka Private T T Ad-Din Khulna Private T T Kumudini Hospital Private T T LAMB Hospital FBO T T Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical Government T T University Dr. Muttalib Community Hospital Private T T Mamm's Institute of Fistula & Women's Private T T Health Ad-Din Jashohor Private - P Hope Foundation Hospital NGO - P Gaibandha District Hospital Government - P Jhalakathi District Hospital Government - P Rangpur District Hospital Government P P Satkhira District Hospital Government P P Bhola District Hospital Government P P Ranagmati District Hospital Government P P 200 community clinics supported for 4Q Government checklist roll out DRC: 4 sites 5T 4T St. Joseph’s Hospital/Satellite Maternity FBO T T Kinshasa Panzi Hospital FBO T T HEAL Africa FBO T T Beniker Hospital FBO - T Imagerie Des Grands-Lacs Private T Support suspended Maternité Sans Risque Kindu Private T Support suspended Mozambique: 3 sites 2T 3T Hospital Central Maputo Government T T Clinica Cruz Azul Government T T Nampula Central Hospital Government - T WA/Niger: 9 sites 3T, 6P 3T, 6P Centre de Santé Mère / Enfant (CSME) Government T T Maradi Centre National de Référence des Government T T Fistules Obstétricales (CNRFO),Niamey Centre de Santé Mère /Enfant (CSME) Government T T Tahoua Madarounfa District Hospital, Maradi Government P P Guidan Roumji District Hospital, Maradi Government -
MBARARA CITY: Settlement Profiles
MBARARA MUNICIPALITY 2010 SLUM PROFILE PRODUCED BY ‘Joining hands with the Urban poor’ & UGANDA SLUM DWELLERS FEDERATION FORE WORD ACTogether Uganda, Uganda Slum Dwellers Federation in partnership with Mbarara Municipal council and Ministry of Lands Housing and Urban Development with support from SDI and Cities Alliance, found it necessary that they collect this information so that the challenges of the urban poor living in these slum settlements can be bought to the fore-front in planning and development of Mbarara Municipality. Our purpose of putting together these profiles is to provide an inner understanding and most uncomfortable truth about the status of the urban slum settlements in Mbarara. The report comprises of a list of slum settlements in Mbarara Municipality and carries the most standardized detail of the informal settlements as provided by slum dwellers them selves. It‟s paramount to note that the variables were not derived from professionals, academicians or technical people but rather the slum dwellers themselves who most understand the slum conditions simply because it‟s where they live and spend their time. We also found it very necessary to collect the past and present histories of each slum because with experience gained from working in slums, the history of each area has a significant role to play in its upgrading and development. Mbarara Municipal council has put in place necessary legal and regulatory mechanisms to safe guard the rights of people living in slum settlements and ensure that harmony, cohesion and inclusive development is given a priority. There fore it recognizes the presence, potentials and partnerships of people living in slums. -
Mbarara University of Science and Technology (MUST) – University of California, San Francisco Collaboration
Mobile technology to extend clinic-based counseling for HIV+s in Uganda (EXTEND) A study of the: Mbarara University of Science and Technology (MUST) – University of California, San Francisco collaboration Sponsored by: National Institute of Alcohol and Alcoholism (NIAAA) Protocol Version Number: 1.0 Protocol Version Date: April 1, 2019 Principal Investigator: Judith Hahn, PhD, MA University of California, San Francisco EXTEND RCT Protocol Version 1.0: April 1, 2019 1 Table of Contents Study Investigators ................................................................................................................................ 3 Glossary of Terms................................................................................................................................... 4 1. Study Synopsis ............................................................................................................................... 5 2. Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 5 2.1. Specific Aims........................................................................................................................................5 3. Background and rationale .............................................................................................................. 6 3.1. Preliminary Studies ..............................................................................................................................8 4. Study design overview