DOCSLIB.ORG

Political Developments in Slovenia in 2017 Helena Motoh

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Political Developments in Slovenia in 2017 Helena Motoh ISSN: 2560-1601 Vol. 2 No. 1 (SI) December 2017 Slovenia Political briefing: Political developments in Slovenia in 2017 Helena Motoh 1052 Budapest Petőfi Sándor utca 11. +36 1 5858 690 Kiadó: Kína-KKE Intézet Nonprofit Kft. [email protected] Szerkesztésért felelős személy: Chen Xin Kiadásért felelős személy: Huang Ping china-cee.eu Briefing on the most important political developments in Slovenia in 2017 In 2017 Slovenian political sphere was marked by several important events and developments. Domestic politics was mostly marked by the fact that 2017 was the year of presidential elections and a year leading to the scheduled 2018 parliamentary elections. Within both frameworks there was a lot of new development within and between political parties. There were also events outside the domestic politics, in economy and investment that greatly influenced the dynamics on the political stage, such as the heated debate on the Magna company project in Hoče and the referendum about the law on the second railway track Divača-Koper. Generally speaking, the political dynamics could be seen on two different levels: (1) between the existing political parties and within them, and (2) outside the sphere of parliamentary parties, where other factions and groups are organizing before the 2018 elections. 1) Dynamics within and between the existing political parties Domestic politics in 2017 was marked by structural dynamics within the leading political party, between the government parties and between the government and the opposition. There was also some profiling evident between the right-wing parties of the opposition, all that being doubtlessly additionally motivated by the upcoming 2018 parliamentary elections. For the leading political party, Modern Centre Party (SMC) the year began with a split at the top of the party structure, namely, a disagreement between its president and Prime Minister, Miro Cerar, and vice-president and President of the Parliament, Milan Brglez. The dispute began during the preparation of the Law on Foreigners, where Brglez opposed the fairly conservative immigration regulations proposed by the government. Initially Cerar called for the Brglez resignation from the position of the vice-president, but they resolved the dispute before the SMC 1 party congress in February. The disagreement still lead many to speculation what will be the position and perspectives for this political party to try to keep some political power in the 2018 elections. The dynamics between the government and the opposition had at times also revealed some cracks within the government coalition. In September, SDS called for an interpellation in the parliament against the Minister of Health, Milojka Kolar Celarc, for not being successful in putting forward the promised reform of the national health care system. The vote of confidence took place on September 14 with 23 votes supporting the motion of no confidence and 42 against, thus the interpellation failed. It was, however, rather surprising that not only the opposition members of parliament supported the motion of no confidence, but also several members of the government parties did not give a supporting vote for the Minister Kolar Celarc and presented critical arguments against the Minister in the parliament debate. The second interpellation was an expression of a more straightforward conflict between the Minister of Justice, Goran Klemenčič, and the leader of the main opposition party (Slovenian Democratic Party, SDS), Janez Janša. Their disagreement dates back to 2012/13 when Klemenčič, at the time representing the Commission for the Prevention of Corruption of the Republic of Slovenia as its president, issued the Investigation Report on the parliamentary parties' leader. The 2013 report revealed that Janez Janša, who was Prime Minister at the time, and Zoran Janković, leader of an opposition party, violated the law by failing to properly report the source of their assets. This report, which was later disputed by both political leaders and eventually abolished due to procedural reasons, led to the public demonstrations and the fall of Janša government. The 2017 interpellation was mostly directed at Klemenčič's role as the president of the Commission for the Prevention of Corruption, allegedly failing to take measures against dubious activities in the New Bank of Ljubljana (NLB) in 2011, related to a large transaction being made by an Iranian bank through NLB. The vote of confidence on November 17 kept Klemenčič as minister with 18 for his resignation and 47 in his support. There was also a series of shifts in the main 2 opposition party SDS, with several prominent members leaving the party, mostly for disagreements with the policies of the party president Janša (most notably Vera Ban, MP Andrej Čuš and the former minister Dragutin Mate). 2) The newly formed political movements in the light of the 2018 elections Currently, the opinion polls (source: Delo) show an interesting dynamic. For the last two years, the support for the leading government party, the Modern Centre Party (SMC) of Prime Minister Miro Cerar, has been very low, around 10%, which was a sharp contrast to the high result of almost 35% in the 2014 elections. In 2016 the party with the best poll result was the Slovenian Democratic Party (SDS) of Janez Janša, getting the support over 12% of respondents. The situation, however, has recently started to change. Especially after the second track referendum success in September this year the support for SMC started to pick up slowly, getting almost 12% in October this year. The political party that performed best in the recent polls is the Social Democrats party (SD). Its support has been around 10%, but grew to overtake SDS and was already more than 16% in October, with SDS dropping down from 18% down to 15% in a month. It is difficult to say whether this was a reaction to the presidential elections, where the winner – although allegedly independent candidate – Borut Pahor, had the support of SD, the political party he was a long-term president of. But another phenomenon is taking place, fairly typical for the pre-election period. Around 30% of the respondents would either vote for “another political party” (nine most prominent were the option), for “none of the listed parties”, “doesn’t intend to vote” or “doesn’t know yet”. With the turnout of around 50% at the last parliamentary elections, the remainder of the undecided respondents presents a big space of opportunity for the new political parties and movements. The success of the newly established political parties on the parliamentary elections is already almost proverbial. The last two parliamentary elections were 3 won by newly established political parties, which previously had no experience with state politics. Before 2011 elections, two political parties were established. The liberal party called Civic List (DL) of Gregor Virant was established on October 21, a little bit more than a month before the December 4 elections and a day later Zoran Janković, the mayor of Ljubljana at the time (and today) established his Positive Slovenia (PS). Both were successful in parliamentary elections, DL getting more than 8% and Positive Slovenia surprisingly more than 28,51%. The polls predicted the victory of SDS, which came in second with 2% difference. Although Janković could not successfully construct the government, which led to a right-central government of Janša (SDS+DL, DeSUS, SLS), the pattern repeated itself in the next elections. Before 2014 elections, again a new political party was formed, advocating primarily the fight against corruption and the establishment of the rule of law. It was led by a well- known law expert, Miro Cerar Jr., son of Miro Cerar Sr., a famous sportsman and Olympic gold medalist. His party, similarly established a month and a half before the 2014 elections, won with a very high result, getting 34,49% of votes. This phenomenon, dubbed in media as »The New Faces Party«, partly repeated in the 2017 presidential elections. The second most successful candidate, Marjan Šarec, came from a background of a politically unknown mayor of a small town near Ljubljana, but still came second with only few % difference after Borut Pahor. When asked about his plans after the second-round loss, Šarec hinted at his plans for shifting from the realm of the local politics to the state level and there were substantiated speculations about his participation in the parliamentary elections 2018. Several other new political parties will also compete, all together at least six new political movements: Marjan Šarec List (mentioned above) Ultra-conservative catholic party Voice for Children and Families (GOD) was established in March by Aleš Primc, Metka Zevnik and Angelca Likovič 4 former SMC member of parliament Bojan Dobovšek established Good state party (Dobra država) in November ultra-right presidential candidate Andrej Šiško announced his participation with his movement United Slovenia (ZS) former SDS member of parliament Andrej Čuš united with a few (right wing) environmental movements to form his candidate list for elections The split in Slovenian People's Party (SLS) resulted in the establishment of centre-right New People's Party (NLS), led by a former mayor of Maribor, Franc Kangler 5.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Slovenia Before the Elections
    PERSPECTIVE Realignment of the party system – Slovenia before the elections ALEŠ MAVER AND UROŠ URBAS November 2011 The coalition government under Social Democrat Prime make people redundant. Nevertheless, the unemploy- Minister Borut Pahor lost the support it needed in Parlia- ment rate increased by 75 per cent to 107,000 over three ment and early elections had to be called for 4 Decem- years. This policy was financed by loans of 8 billion eu- ber, one year before completing its term of office. What ros, which doubled the public deficit. are the reasons for this development? Which parties are now seeking votes in the »political marketplace«? What However, Prime Minister Pahor overestimated his popu- coalitions are possible after 4 December? And what chal- larity in a situation in which everybody hoped that the lenges will the new government face? economic crisis would soon be over. The governing par- ties had completely different priorities: they were seek- ing economic rents; they could not resist the pressure of Why did the government of lobbies and made concessions; and they were too preoc- Prime Minister Borut Pahor fail? cupied with scandals and other affairs emerging from the ranks of the governing coalition. Although the governing coalition was homogeneously left-wing, it could not work together and registered no significant achievements. The next government will thus Electoral history and development be compelled to achieve something. Due to the deterio- of the party system rating economic situation – for 2012 1 per cent GDP growth, 1.3 per cent inflation, 8.4 per cent unemploy- Since the re-introduction of the multi-party system Slo- ment and a 5.3 per cent budget deficit are predicted – venia has held general elections in 1990, 1992, 1996, the goals will be economic.
    [Show full text]
  • EUDO Citizenship Observatory
    EUDO CITIZENSHIP OBSERVATORY COUNTRY REPORT: SLOVENIA Felicita Medved Revised and updated June 2013 http://eudo-citizenship.eu European University Institute, Florence Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies EUDO Citizenship Observatory Report on Slovenia Felicita Medved Revised and updated June 2013 EUDO Citizenship Observatory Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies in collaboration with Edinburgh University Law School Country Report, RSCAS/EUDO-CIT-CR 2013/24 Badia Fiesolana, San Domenico di Fiesole (FI), Italy © Felicita Medved This text may be downloaded only for personal research purposes. Additional reproduction for other purposes, whether in hard copies or electronically, requires the consent of the authors. Requests should be addressed to [email protected] The views expressed in this publication cannot in any circumstances be regarded as the official position of the European Union Published in Italy European University Institute Badia Fiesolana I – 50014 San Domenico di Fiesole (FI) Italy www.eui.eu/RSCAS/Publications/ www.eui.eu cadmus.eui.eu Research for the EUDO Citizenship Observatory Country Reports has been jointly supported, at various times, by the European Commission grant agreements JLS/2007/IP/CA/009 EUCITAC and HOME/2010/EIFX/CA/1774 ACIT and by the British Academy Research Project CITMODES (both projects co-directed by the EUI and the University of Edinburgh). The financial support from these projects is gratefully acknowledged. For information about the project please visit the project website at http://eudo-citizenship.eu Slovenia Felicita Medved1 1 Introduction This report focuses on državljanstvo of the Republic of Slovenia, i.e. on citizenship or nationality as a legal bond between a person and a sovereign state.
    [Show full text]
  • Codebook Indiveu – Party Preferences
    Codebook InDivEU – party preferences European University Institute, Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies December 2020 Introduction The “InDivEU – party preferences” dataset provides data on the positions of more than 400 parties from 28 countries1 on questions of (differentiated) European integration. The dataset comprises a selection of party positions taken from two existing datasets: (1) The EU Profiler/euandi Trend File The EU Profiler/euandi Trend File contains party positions for three rounds of European Parliament elections (2009, 2014, and 2019). Party positions were determined in an iterative process of party self-placement and expert judgement. For more information: https://cadmus.eui.eu/handle/1814/65944 (2) The Chapel Hill Expert Survey The Chapel Hill Expert Survey contains party positions for the national elections most closely corresponding the European Parliament elections of 2009, 2014, 2019. Party positions were determined by expert judgement. For more information: https://www.chesdata.eu/ Three additional party positions, related to DI-specific questions, are included in the dataset. These positions were determined by experts involved in the 2019 edition of euandi after the elections took place. The inclusion of party positions in the “InDivEU – party preferences” is limited to the following issues: - General questions about the EU - Questions about EU policy - Questions about differentiated integration - Questions about party ideology 1 This includes all 27 member states of the European Union in 2020, plus the United Kingdom. How to Cite When using the ‘InDivEU – Party Preferences’ dataset, please cite all of the following three articles: 1. Reiljan, Andres, Frederico Ferreira da Silva, Lorenzo Cicchi, Diego Garzia, Alexander H.
    [Show full text]
  • ESS9 Appendix A3 Political Parties Ed
    APPENDIX A3 POLITICAL PARTIES, ESS9 - 2018 ed. 3.0 Austria 2 Belgium 4 Bulgaria 7 Croatia 8 Cyprus 10 Czechia 12 Denmark 14 Estonia 15 Finland 17 France 19 Germany 20 Hungary 21 Iceland 23 Ireland 25 Italy 26 Latvia 28 Lithuania 31 Montenegro 34 Netherlands 36 Norway 38 Poland 40 Portugal 44 Serbia 47 Slovakia 52 Slovenia 53 Spain 54 Sweden 57 Switzerland 58 United Kingdom 61 Version Notes, ESS9 Appendix A3 POLITICAL PARTIES ESS9 edition 3.0 (published 10.12.20): Changes from previous edition: Additional countries: Denmark, Iceland. ESS9 edition 2.0 (published 15.06.20): Changes from previous edition: Additional countries: Croatia, Latvia, Lithuania, Montenegro, Portugal, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden. Austria 1. Political parties Language used in data file: German Year of last election: 2017 Official party names, English 1. Sozialdemokratische Partei Österreichs (SPÖ) - Social Democratic Party of Austria - 26.9 % names/translation, and size in last 2. Österreichische Volkspartei (ÖVP) - Austrian People's Party - 31.5 % election: 3. Freiheitliche Partei Österreichs (FPÖ) - Freedom Party of Austria - 26.0 % 4. Liste Peter Pilz (PILZ) - PILZ - 4.4 % 5. Die Grünen – Die Grüne Alternative (Grüne) - The Greens – The Green Alternative - 3.8 % 6. Kommunistische Partei Österreichs (KPÖ) - Communist Party of Austria - 0.8 % 7. NEOS – Das Neue Österreich und Liberales Forum (NEOS) - NEOS – The New Austria and Liberal Forum - 5.3 % 8. G!LT - Verein zur Förderung der Offenen Demokratie (GILT) - My Vote Counts! - 1.0 % Description of political parties listed 1. The Social Democratic Party (Sozialdemokratische Partei Österreichs, or SPÖ) is a social above democratic/center-left political party that was founded in 1888 as the Social Democratic Worker's Party (Sozialdemokratische Arbeiterpartei, or SDAP), when Victor Adler managed to unite the various opposing factions.
    [Show full text]
  • Explaining Vote for Populist Parties: the Impact of the Political Trust, the Economic and the Political Context Danilo Serani De
    Explaining vote for populist parties: the impact of the political trust, the economic and the political context Danilo Serani Department of Political and Social Sciences Universitat Pompeu Fabra [email protected] Abstract Over the last decades, the uneven electoral success of populist parties in Europe sparked the interest of many scholars. Until now, special attention has been devoted only to radical (especially right-wing) populist parties, at the same time as the impact of political trust on the vote for these parties has not been sufficiently addressed. In this paper, I focus on the direct and conditional effects of the trust in the main political actors on the vote for radical and non-radical populist parties. By using data from the European Social Survey (2004- 2014), this paper investigates the association between political trust and the Great Recession, as well as with the ideological convergence of the establishment parties. The results seem to confirm that political (dis)trust has a direct impact on the vote for a populist party, and its effects are accentuated during a crisis and when the establishment parties converge to the center. Key words Political trust, voting behavior, populism, multilevel analysis, economic crisis Paper prepared for the WAPOR Conference, Barcelona, November 24-25th 2016 This is a draft, please do not quote or circulate without author’s permission Introduction Over the last three decades, Europe witnessed the spread of the third wave of populism (Mudde, 2007). Far from being a transitory anomaly of liberal democracies, populist challengers of the establishment parties managed themselves to consolidate their position in the party systems.
    [Show full text]
  • The Far Right in Slovenia
    MASARYK UNIVERSITY FACULTY OF SOCIAL STUDIES DEPARTMENT OF POLITICAL SCIENCE The Far Right in Slovenia Master‟s thesis Bc. Lucie Chládková Supervisor: doc. JUDr. PhDr. Miroslav Mareš, Ph.D. UČO: 333105 Field of Study: Security and Strategic Studies Matriculation Year: 2012 Brno 2014 Declaration of authorship of the thesis Hereby I confirm that this master‟s thesis “The Far Right in Slovenia” is an outcome of my own elaboration and work and I used only sources here mentioned. Brno, 10 May 2014 ……………………………………… Lucie Chládková 2 Acknowledgments I would like to express my gratitude to doc. JUDr. PhDr. Miroslav Mareš, Ph.D., who supervised this thesis and contributed with a lot of valuable remarks and advice. I would like to also thank to all respondents from interviews for their help and information they shared with me. 3 Annotation This master‟s thesis deals with the far right in Slovenia after 1991 until today. The main aim of this case study is the description and analysis of far-right political parties, informal and formal organisations and subcultures. Special emphasis is put on the organisational structure of the far-right scene and on the ideological affiliation of individual far-right organisations. Keywords far right, Slovenia, political party, organisation, ideology, nationalism, extremism, Blood and Honour, patriotic, neo-Nazi, populism. 4 Contents 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 7 2. Methodology .........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Between Populism and Socialism: Slovenia’S Left Party Alen Toplišek
    This is an Accepted Manuscript of a book chapter published by Routledge in The Populist Radical Left in Europe on 14 March 2019, available online: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315180823-4 Between populism and socialism: Slovenia’s Left party Alen Toplišek Abstract This chapter offers the first in-depth study of both structural and agential factors behind the emergence and electoral breakthrough of a new radical left party in Slovenia, the Left. It defines the party’s ideological profile and it analyses its tactics of party competition through a selection of concrete examples. It concludes by outlining two possible trajectories for the future electoral and organisational development of the party. Introduction The Left (Levica) is a relative newcomer in the Slovenian party system and the European Populist Radical Left (PRL) party family more widely. Formally established in March 2014 as a coalition party under the name of the United Left, it managed to surpass the 4% electoral threshold in the July 2014 parliamentary elections with 5.97% of the popular vote. The electoral result translated into six seats in a 90-member National Assembly, putting the new party on a par with the traditional party on the Slovenian Left, the Social Democrats, which was their worst electoral result since Slovenia’s independence in 1991. The novelty of the United Left was notable not only in terms of its electoral breakthrough in July 2014, but also regarding its founding organisational structure and its organic ties with new left social movements. The United Left was a coalition of three smaller parties and the ‘fourth bloc,’ which represented social movements and individuals: (1) Initiative for Democratic Socialism (IDS); (2) Democratic Labour Party (DSD); (3) the Party for the Sustainable Development of Slovenia (TRS); and (4) civil society movements and individuals.
    [Show full text]
  • Slovenian Democratic Path After European Union Accession
    The Difficult Look Back: Slovenian Democratic Path after European Union Accession MIRO HAČEK Politics in Central Europe (ISSN: 1801-3422) Vol. 15, No. 3 DOI: 10.2478/pce-2019-0023 Abstract: In the third wave of democratic changes in the early 1990s when the Central and Eastern European (CEE) political landscape changed radically and the democrati‑ sation processes started in the eastern part of the continent, Slovenia was one of the most prominent countries with the best prospects for rapid democratic growth. Slove‑ nia somewhat luckily escaped the Yugoslav civil wars and towards the end of the 20th century was already on the path towards a stable and consolidated democracy with the most successful economy in the entire CEE area. After the dissolution of Yugoslavia, Slovenia had a simple and straight ‑forward political goals, i.e. to join the European union as soon as possible, thus consolidating its place among the most developed countries within the region. After some setbacks, this goal was accomplished in (so far) the biggest enlargement to the Union in May 2004. But what happened after Slovenia managed to successfully achieve its pair of major political goals? In this chapter, we search for an answer to this question and find out why Slovenian voters are increas‑ ingly distrustful not only of political institutions, but why so ‑called new political faces and instant political parties are so successful and why Slovenian democracy has lost a leading place among consolidated democracies in CEE. Keywords: Slovenia; European Union; membership; distrust; democracy. Introduction After declaring its independence from former Yugoslavia in 1991, the Republic of Slovenia expressed its willingness and objective, both in its strategic develop‑ ment documents and at the highest political levels, to become a full member of POLITICS IN CENTRAL EUROPE 15 (2019) 3 419 the European Union (EU).1 As the crucial developmental documents2 indicate, the optimum long ‑term development of the Slovenian economy is inextricably tied to Slovenia’s full membership in the EU.
    [Show full text]
  • European Election Study 2014 EES 2014 Voter Study First Post-Electoral Study
    European Election Study 2014 EES 2014 Voter Study First Post-Electoral Study Release Notes Sebastian Adrian Popa Hermann Schmitt Sara B Hobolt Eftichia Teperoglou Original release 1 January 2015 MZES, University of Mannheim Acknowledgement of the data Users of the data are kindly asked to acknowledge use of the data by always citing both the data and the accompanying release document. How to cite this data: Schmitt, Hermann; Popa, Sebastian A.; Hobolt, Sara B.; Teperoglou, Eftichia (2015): European Parliament Election Study 2014, Voter Study. GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA5160 Data file Version 2.0.0, doi:10.4232/1. 12300 and Schmitt H, Hobolt SB and Popa SA (2015) Does personalization increase turnout? Spitzenkandidaten in the 2014 European Parliament elections. European Union Politics, Online first available for download from: http://eup.sagepub.com/content/early/2015/06/03/1465116515584626.full How to cite this document: Sebastian Adrian Popa, Hermann Schmitt, Sara B. Hobolt, and Eftichia Teperoglou (2015) EES 2014 Voter Study Advance Release Notes. Mannheim: MZES, University of Mannheim. Acknowledgement of assistance The 2014 EES voter study was funded by a consortium of private foundations under the leadership of Volkswagen Foundation (the other partners are: Riksbankens Jubileumsfond, Stiftung Mercator, Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian). It profited enormously from to synergies that emerged from the co-operation with the post-election survey funded by the European Parliament. Last but certainly not least, it benefited from the generous support of TNS Opinion who did the fieldwork in all the 28 member countries . The study would not have been possible the help of many colleagues, both members of the EES team and country experts form the wider academic community, who spent valuable time on the questionnaire and study preparation, often at very short notice.
    [Show full text]
  • GENERAL ELECTIONS in SLOVENIA 3Rd June 2018
    GENERAL ELECTIONS IN SLOVENIA 3rd June 2018 European Great uncertainty in Slovenia just one month Elections monitor prior to the general elections Corinne Deloy On 14th March last Slovenian Prime Minister Miro Cerar (Modern Centre Party, SMC) chose to resign from office after the Supreme Court cancelled the referendum of 24th September 2017 which had focused on the construction of a second railway line (27km long) linking Divaca to Koper, Slovenia’s only trading port (22 million tonnes in 2016) on the Adriatic Sea. Analysis After the vote by the Drzavni Zbor (National Assembly), the lower house of parliament, in support of the second railway line, an organisation called the “Taxpayers should not pay” led by Vili Kovacic, and supported by the opposition parties, gained the necessary number of signatures (2500 then 40,000 the following month) to trigger the organisation of a popular referendum on the issue. On 24th September a short majority of voters (53.47%) dissolved and new general elections are organised within answered “yes” to the question: “Do you approve the the two months following the dissolution, but not fewer construction, the implementation and administration of a than 40 days after the announcement of the date of the second railway line Divaca-Koper as voted by the National election. The President of the Republic Borut Pahor quickly Assembly on 8th May 2017?”, 46.50% opted for “no”. In expressed his preference for a snap election. On 14th all 20,55% of the Slovenian population turned out to April he set the date of the next election for 3rd June, vote, i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • The Case of Four New Successful Parties in Slovenia
    158 POLITOLOGICKÝ ČASOPIS / CZECH JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE 2/2017 A Hint at Entrepreneurial Parties? The Case of Four New Successful Parties in Slovenia ALENKA KRAšOVEC* Abstract Since the 2011 elections several new Slovenian parties have recorded exceptional results and two newcomers even received a plurality vote in the 2011 and 2014 elections. Some scholars believe that, along with the successful new parties, a new party model has also developed. Therefore, we employed several key dimensions to find out whether four Slovenian new successful parties (List of Zoran Janković – Positive Slovenia, Citizen List of Gregor Virant – Citizen List, Party of Miro Cerar – Party of Modern Centre, and Alliance of Alenka Bratušek – Alliance of Social-Liberal Democrats) have exhibited elements of entrepreneurial parties. Analysis of several dimensions (party origin, resources in election campaign, party organisation and electoral appeals) reveals many similarities among the four parties but also that they can be classified as entrepreneurial parties (mainly when the minimal conceptualisation of this party model is used) only in some fragments and with some important reservations. Key words: political party; entrepreneurial party; new party; electoral success; Slovenia DOI: 10.5817/PC2017-2-158 1. Introduction In the last two elections in Slovenia, several new political parties recorded very good, even exceptional, electoral results. According to several scholars (e.g. Harmel, Robertson 1985; Lucardie 2000; Krouwel, Lucardie 2008; Bolleyer 2013), the success of new parties is in- fluenced by many determinants. We shall briefly present the most important ones in the Slovenian case, but above all the article will deal with the question of whether successful newcomers exhibit some common characteristics, particularly those typical of the entrepre- neurial party model.
    [Show full text]
  • Slovenia Country Report BTI 2018
    BTI 2018 Country Report Slovenia This report is part of the Bertelsmann Stiftung’s Transformation Index (BTI) 2018. It covers the period from February 1, 2015 to January 31, 2017. The BTI assesses the transformation toward democracy and a market economy as well as the quality of political management in 129 countries. More on the BTI at http://www.bti-project.org. Please cite as follows: Bertelsmann Stiftung, BTI 2018 Country Report — Slovenia. Gütersloh: Bertelsmann Stiftung, 2018. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Contact Bertelsmann Stiftung Carl-Bertelsmann-Strasse 256 33111 Gütersloh Germany Sabine Donner Phone +49 5241 81 81501 [email protected] Hauke Hartmann Phone +49 5241 81 81389 [email protected] Robert Schwarz Phone +49 5241 81 81402 [email protected] Sabine Steinkamp Phone +49 5241 81 81507 [email protected] BTI 2018 | Slovenia 3 Key Indicators Population M 2.1 HDI 0.890 GDP p.c., PPP $ 32885 Pop. growth1 % p.a. 0.1 HDI rank of 188 25 Gini Index 25.7 Life expectancy years 81.1 UN Education Index 0.915 Poverty3 % 0.0 Urban population % 49.6 Gender inequality2 0.053 Aid per capita $ - Sources (as of October 2017): The World Bank, World Development Indicators 2017 | UNDP, Human Development Report 2016. Footnotes: (1) Average annual growth rate. (2) Gender Inequality Index (GII). (3) Percentage of population living on less than $3.20 a day at 2011 international prices. Executive Summary From January 2015 to January 2017, the political situation in Slovenia began to stabilize, although heated debates occurred and several ministers resigned or were replaced.
    [Show full text]