DOCSLIB.ORG

Flood Risk Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Flood Risk Assessment 20-22 Bridge Street, Staines, TW18 4TW Client Consulting Engineers CDP Staines Ltd GTA Civils Ltd 22 Gilbert Street Gloucester House London 66a Church Walk W1K 5EJ Burgess Hill West Sussex Ref: 6988 RH15 9AS Date: August 2017 Tel: 01444 871444 Flood Risk Assessment: 20-22 Bridge Street, Staines Index 1 Introduction 2 2 Existing Site & Flood Risk Profile 3 3 Proposed Development & Mitigation 5 Schedule of Appendices A Site Location Map & Aerial Photos B Environment Agency & SFRA Flood Maps C Architect’s Scheme Drawings D Flood Response Plan Issue Issue date Compiled Checked Preliminary Issue 22 August 2017 JP GK/MR 2nd Preliminary Issue 29 August 2017 JP MR 3rd Preliminary Issue 21 October 2017 JP MR First Issue 31 October 2017 JP MR Report by: John Pakenham BSc (Hons) Checked by: Grant Kahil BEng (Hons) Overseen by: Martin Roberts I Eng, ACIWEM, MCIHT W:\Projects\6988 FRA, Compagnie Du Parc, 22 Bridge Street, Staines TW18 4TW\2.3 Job No: 6988 Specifications & Reports\F. Flood Risk Assessments Date: August 2017 1 Flood Risk Assessment: 20-22 Bridge Street, Staines 1 Introduction 1.1 GTA Civils Ltd. was appointed by its client, CDP Staines Ltd, to provide a Flood Risk Assessment (FRA) report. This objective is to get the Environment Agency’s (EA) pre-application for the development of 20-22 Bridge Street, Staines TW18 4TW. This FRA has been written to satisfy the needs of the EA and the 2012 National Planning Policy Framework. 1.2 This report has been prepared for the Client in relation to the proposed development at the above address and no responsibility is accepted to any third party for all or part of this study in connection with this or any other development. 1.3 This report is concerned with ensuring the development will be safe, ie passing the second part of the Exception Test. W:\Projects\6988 FRA, Compagnie Du Parc, 22 Bridge Street, Staines TW18 4TW\2.3 Job No: 6988 Specifications & Reports\F. Flood Risk Assessments Date: August 2017 2 Flood Risk Assessment: 20-22 Bridge Street, Staines 2 Existing Site & Flood Risk Profile 2.1 The site is located in Staines, which is administered by Spelthorne Borough Council (SBC). 2.2 It is 100m northeast of the River Thames and 50m northwest of the River Colne, which discharges into the Thames. Currently the site comprises 2 storeys of flats (C3) over a Chinese Takeaway business (use class A5) at ground level. Site location maps and an aerial view are shown in Appendix A. 2.3 The levels to the front of the unit are higher than those to the rear (east). The external levels range between 16.76m AOD and 15.05m AOD. The existing unit’s lowest FFL is 15.12m AOD. There is a small cellar at the rear of the site whose floor level is 14.47m AOD. The site is 100% impermeable. 2.4 Fluvial Risk: The EA’s fluvial flood map in the Appendix indicates that the site has an annual probability of >1% (1 in 100 years) of flooding from rivers. The site is outside the area that benefits from defences. This places the site in undefended Flood Zone 3A, at having a high probability of flooding. (FZ3B: The cellar level of 14.47m AOD, ie less than the 20 years flood level of 14.65m AOD, is irrelevant as there is no conduit for flood waters to enter this space. This is a sufficiently watertight space). 2.5 The EA’s modelled flood data (in Appendix B) shows that the site is liable to flood to a level of 15.63m in the 1% AEP storm (100 years). This rises to 15.97m in the 1% +20% climate change AEP event (100 years + 20% CC). 2.6 The NPPF states that the predicted effects of climate change should be taken into account when determining a proposed development’s flood risk, because the flood risk has to be assessed for the likely lifetime of developments. The EA’s revised climate change allowances, introduced in 2016, should be applied. For a More Vulnerable use (dwelling) in the Thames’s basin the higher central band is to be taken (as much of this building is in place already). 35% climate change should be applied, which means that the flood level rises to 35/20 x (15.97-15.63) + 15.63 = 16.225m AOD. 2.7 Recorded flooding between 11-13 February 2014 affected a large extent of Staines. It is contended that the return period was in excess of 1 in 100 years: it was reported in the media that these floods were the worst recorded in the last 250 years. It is understood that this area was unaffected, however. Photographs were taken of the site next door at Provident House, which is at the same elevation, broadly speaking as this site – see Appendix E. It would appear that the area benefitting from the defences extends to this site – not stopping short outside Provident House next door, as shown on the EA’s main flood map. W:\Projects\6988 FRA, Compagnie Du Parc, 22 Bridge Street, Staines TW18 4TW\2.3 Job No: 6988 Specifications & Reports\F. Flood Risk Assessments Date: August 2017 3 Flood Risk Assessment: 20-22 Bridge Street, Staines 2.8 Surface water flooding occurs when excess rainwater does not infiltrate into the ground, or is not intercepted. The EA’s Online ‘Surface Water Depth - Low Risk Scenario’ (1 in 1000 years) Flood Maps (in Appendix B) show that there is a very shallow and small area outside the unit on the east side that is affected in this scenario. Other sources of flooding 2.9 Sewer flooding occurs due to limited capacity or blockage in the sewer system causing backing up of storm water and effluent. There is no indication in SBC’s Strategic Flood Risk Assessment (SFRA) – or from the EA – that this site is prone to flooding from sewer failure. 2.10 Groundwater flooding occurs when water levels in the ground rise above surface elevations. Groundwater flooding is the least understood of all the sources of flooding and more research is needed. Low lying areas of permeable strata overlying an impermeable stratum are typical places where this can occur. As the proposals do not extend below ground level it is contended that this risk is very low. 2.11 Artificial sources: flooding from reservoirs, canals and docks. The EA reservoir flooding map shows the site is liable to flood to a depth of approximately 2m (as the shaded areas bisect the site). The ramifications of this will be discussed in the next section. It must be stressed that reservoirs are extremely well maintained and there are very few instances of such failure flooding in the last 150 years. There are no docks or canals in this vicinity. 2.12 In summary, the flood risk profile of this site is ‘High’: the main risk of flooding is from the river (Thames) but the risk of reservoir failure flooding cannot be discounted. W:\Projects\6988 FRA, Compagnie Du Parc, 22 Bridge Street, Staines TW18 4TW\2.3 Job No: 6988 Specifications & Reports\F. Flood Risk Assessments Date: August 2017 4 Flood Risk Assessment: 20-22 Bridge Street, Staines 3 Proposed Development & Mitigation 3.1 The proposed development is for refurbishment, extension (and conversion at ground floor to residential apartments) resulting in a 5 floor block of 9 apartments. All units shall be single storey. 3.2 Sequential / Exception Tests: as summarised in section 2.9 the flood risk is ‘High’. 3.3 Vulnerability and the Sequential Test: the vulnerability classification of any new development should be considered. According to Table 2 of the NPPF’s TG, dwelling units are rated as ‘More Vulnerable’. Hot food takeaways and offices are classed as ‘Less Vulnerable’. There is an increase in vulnerability to More Vulnerable, therefore. 3.4 Table 3 of the NPPF states that More Vulnerable uses, such as dwellings, are subject to passing the Sequential and Exception Tests in Flood Zone 3A and Less Vulnerable uses are ‘appropriate development’ in FZ3A. Figure 1 below shows this table: Figure 1: Table 3 of the NPPF’s Technical Guidance W:\Projects\6988 FRA, Compagnie Du Parc, 22 Bridge Street, Staines TW18 4TW\2.3 Job No: 6988 Specifications & Reports\F. Flood Risk Assessments Date: August 2017 5 Flood Risk Assessment: 20-22 Bridge Street, Staines 3.5 New buildings’ floor levels in FZ3A have to be set at least 0.3m above the critical flood level over its expected lifetime. The ground floor’s level will be set at the compliant level of 16.525m AOD, ie 0.3m above the flood level of 16.225m AOD – see section 2.6 above. 3.6 The building’s footprint (roofed) area will be reduced by 10.2m2. Appendix C contains a ‘built area comparison roof plan’ layout, which shows not only the footprint area reduced to 164.2m2 from 174.4m2, but also the area of permeable surfaces increasing from zero to 52.4m2. The table on this drawing shows both 34.5m2 of permeable paving at ground level and 17.9m2 of rain gardens at upper levels including roof level. 3.7 Safe access to dry land: because of the possibility of reservoir failure flooding and because occupants of all the flats would not be able to make their way unassisted to FZ1 (dry ground) during an intense storm - a Flood Response Plan is proposed. 3.8 It is proposed that a Flood Response Plan is incorporated in each unit - see Appendix D.
Recommended publications
  • South Colne Sub-Area 3

    South Colne Sub-Area 3

    SOUTH COLNE DETAILED STRATEGIES SUB-AREA 3 South Colne character South Colne is characterised by flatter topography as the River Colne approaches its confluence with the Thames. Braided watercourses and flood meadows typify the landscape, which is dominated in aerial views by a series of large reservoirs, the product of historic gravel extraction industry in the area. The South West London Reservoirs are internationally significant for the populations of overwintering birds they support, some from as far afield as the Arctic. This area also includes Heathrow airport and the extensive associated transport infrastructure. In close proximity to the airport lie some significant heritage assets including Harmondsworth Barn, the largest timber- framed building in England. © Brian Robert Marshall CC Andreas Trepte, www.photo-natur.net Harmondsworth Barn River Colne flowing through Staines Moor Lakes and reservoirs important for SOUTH COLNE overwintering wildfowl DETAILED SUB-AREA 3 STRATEGIES © Stefan Czapski The Causeway at Staines Reservoir Ankerwycke Priory - home to the Ankerwycke Colne Brook at Wraysbury - important for Yew wildlife Colne & Crane valleys green infrastructure strategy 51 South Colne area strategy overview The strategy for South Colne and Heathrow associated opportunities for education and is to improve and repair the landscape and interpretation and new viewpoints. connectivity for people and wildlife, conserve INTERWOVEN RIVERS and enhance valuable ecological habitats and Water and biodiversity enhancements should aim promote access for all to new and improved to restore floodplains and focus on the benefits of RECREATION landscape destinations. natural landscapes to contribute to natural flood LOCAL + GLOBAL management in this low lying landscape. The Roads and other major infrastructure in this area Duke of Northumberland’s River and Longford WATER SPORTS create particular severance and impair the River close to Heathrow could be enhanced TRANSFORM quality of the user experience.
  • Water Framework Directive) (England and Wales) Directions 2009

    Water Framework Directive) (England and Wales) Directions 2009

    The River Basin Districts Typology, Standards and Groundwater threshold values (Water Framework Directive) (England and Wales) Directions 2009 The Secretary of State and the Welsh Ministers, with the agreement of the Secretary of State to the extent that there is any effect in England or those parts of Wales that are within the catchment areas of the rivers Dee, Wye and Severn, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 40(2) of the Environment Act 1995(a) and now vested in them(b), and having consulted the Environment Agency, hereby give the following Directions to the Environment Agency for the implementation of Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy(c): Citation and commencement and extent 1.—(1) These Directions may be cited as the River Basin Districts Typology, Standards and Groundwater threshold values (Water Framework Directive) (England and Wales) Direction 2009 and shall come into force on 22nd December 2009. Interpretation 2.—(1) In these Directions— ―the Agency‖ means the Environment Agency; ―the Groundwater Directive‖ means Directive 2006/118/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the protection of groundwater against pollution and deterioration(d); ―the Priority Substances Directive‖ means Directive 2008/105/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on environmental quality standards in the field of water policy(e); ―threshold value‖ has the same meaning as in the Groundwater Directive; and ―the Directive‖ means Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23rd October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy.
  • 05: Water Quality and Hydro-Ecology Assessment

    05: Water Quality and Hydro-Ecology Assessment

    Heathrow Airport Limited Heathrow’s North-West Runway Water Quality and Hydro-ecology Assessment 16 June 2014 AMEC Environment & Infrastructure UK Limited 5 Copyright and Non-Disclosure Notice The contents and layout of this report are subject to copyright owned by AMEC (©AMEC Environment & Infrastructure UK Limited 2014). save to the extent that copyright has been legally assigned by us to another party or is used by AMEC under licence. To the extent that we own the copyright in this report, it may not be copied or used without our prior written agreement for any purpose other than the purpose indicated in this report. The methodology (if any) contained in this report is provided to you in confidence and must not be disclosed or copied to third parties without the prior written agreement of AMEC. Disclosure of that information may constitute an actionable breach of confidence or may otherwise prejudice our commercial interests. Any third party who obtains access to this report by any means will, in any event, be subject to the Third Party Disclaimer set out below. Third-Party Disclaimer Any disclosure of this report to a third party is subject to this disclaimer. The report was prepared by AMEC at the instruction of, and for use by, our client named on the front of the report. It does not in any way constitute advice to any third party who is able to access it by any means. AMEC excludes to the fullest extent lawfully permitted all liability whatsoever for any loss or damage howsoever arising from reliance on the contents of this report.
  • OXF8027 RPS HRA Screening Report Draft NPS Revision

    OXF8027 RPS HRA Screening Report Draft NPS Revision

    APPENDIX 5 GATWICK RUNWAY 2 MOLE GAP TO REIGATE ESCARPMENT SAC & ASHDOWN FOREST SPA/SAC REVISED HABITAT REGULATIONS ASSESSMENT REPORT: STAGE 1 (SCREENING) December 2017 Our Ref: OXF8027 RPS 20 Western Avenue Milton Park Abingdon OX14 4SH rpsgroup.com QUALITY MANAGEMENT Prepared by: Elizabeth White, Nick Betson, Fiona Prismall Reviewed by: Mike Barker, Julia Tindale Authorised by: David Cowan Date: December 2017 (Updated for Revised Draft NPS Consultation) Project Number/Document 8027 – HRA Screening Report Reference: COPYRIGHT © RPS The material presented in this report is confidential. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of Gatwick Airport Limited and shall not be distributed or made available to any other company or person without the knowledge and written consent of RPS. Revised Habitats Regulations Assessment Screening December 2017 rpsgroup .com /uk CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..................................................................................................................................... I 1 INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE OF ASSESSMENT .......................................................................... 1 Background and Purpose of this Report .................................................................................................. 1 HRA Process ............................................................................................................................................ 2 Guidance and Information Used in Preparing this Report ......................................................................
  • 03: Biodiversity Assessment

    03: Biodiversity Assessment

    Heathrow Airport Limited Heathrow’s North-West Runway Biodiversity Assessment 16 June 2014 AMEC Environment & Infrastructure UK Limited 3 Copyright and Non-Disclosure Notice The contents and layout of this report are subject to copyright owned by AMEC (©AMEC Environment & Infrastructure UK Limited 2014). save to the extent that copyright has been legally assigned by us to another party or is used by AMEC under licence. To the extent that we own the copyright in this report, it may not be copied or used without our prior written agreement for any purpose other than the purpose indicated in this report. The methodology (if any) contained in this report is provided to you in confidence and must not be disclosed or copied to third parties without the prior written agreement of AMEC. Disclosure of that information may constitute an actionable breach of confidence or may otherwise prejudice our commercial interests. Any third party who obtains access to this report by any means will, in any event, be subject to the Third Party Disclaimer set out below. Third-Party Disclaimer Any disclosure of this report to a third party is subject to this disclaimer. The report was prepared by AMEC at the instruction of, and for use by, our client named on the front of the report. It does not in any way constitute advice to any third party who is able to access it by any means. AMEC excludes to the fullest extent lawfully permitted all liability whatsoever for any loss or damage howsoever arising from reliance on the contents of this report.
  • Ruddy Shelduck Shelduck

    Ruddy Shelduck Shelduck

    +="( )" 5*, % *+ ,# %#8 " ) !" % Ruddy Shelduck was recorded in ten months of 20 at Cley Marsh in October. It is most and from 13 sites during 2005/06. The British likely that the majority of Ruddy Shelduck maximum of 22 was over twice that of the records originate from naturalised populations previous year. Half of the reports were of in mainland Europe. For example, numbers single birds and a further nine were of two have increased dramatically in Switzerland birds. All reports of more than two birds were over the last decade, with over 300 recorded from the North Norfolk Coast. These were of during waterbird counts there in November three at Holkham and Burnham Overy Fresh 2005, mostly in the northern half of the Marshes in January, and a record WeBS count country (V. Keller pers. comm.) "( 0 #$ -& :: 2" % - 2" 42 !+ 42 !" !+ The British Index for Shelduck dropped just coming during the moult period in July, whilst slightly in 2005/06, whilst the maximum count counts on the adjacent Dee Estuary peak in the was at its lowest for 30 years. The Northern autumn, and there is presumably a certain Ireland index, however, continues to rise as it degree of redistribution between these two has done steadily since the low in the early sites. Counts from the other sites supporting 1990s. The British monthly index shows a internationally important numbers were about peak in February following a gradual increase in line with their respective five-year means, through the winter as many birds return from with the exception of the Wash where numbers their moulting grounds in northwest Germany.
  • Draft Surrey Local Flood Risk Management Strategy 2012 - 2016

    Draft Surrey Local Flood Risk Management Strategy 2012 - 2016

    Draft Surrey Local Flood Risk Management Strategy 2012 - 2016 www.surreycc.gov.uk Making Surrey a better place Why is a strategy needed? Tell us what you think about The Government has recently given local flooding authorities new powers to help manage local flood risk in a more coordinated way. These new Earlier this year, Surrey County Council used responsibilities relate primarily to ‘local’ flood feedback from residents to inform its strategy risk, namely from surface water, groundwater about flood risk. It now wants to know what you and ordinary watercourses (smaller rivers, think of it. streams and ditches). Flood risk from all other To give your views, visit www.surreycc.gov.uk/ rivers (known as main rivers) remains the floodriskstrategy or call 03456 009 009. responsibility of the Environment Agency. The closing date for all responses is 30 November Surrey County Council now has a statutory duty 2012. to produce a strategy. The Surrey Local Flood Risk Management Strategy: • Explains how partners are working together to reduce flood risk. • Provides an overview of the ongoing flood risk management work underway across Surrey. • Outlines which organisations are responsible for different types of flooding to ensure a common understanding of roles, responsibilities and priorities within the county. Extreme weather, existing buildings in floodplains and limited funding mean we cannot stop flood incidents in Surrey. However, through the strategy we will coordinate our services so that flood risk is reduced and the aftermath of flood incidents is minimised. The strategy provides a real opportunity for us to work together with residents and businesses to reduce risk and prepare for the future.
  • London Water Supply [Electronic Resource] : a Retrospect and a Survey

    London Water Supply [Electronic Resource] : a Retrospect and a Survey

    THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF HEALTH LIBRARY ROYAL SANITARY INSTITUTE LIBRARY REGULATIONS 1. Books may be borrowed by Fellows, Members and Associ- ates personally or by a messenger producing a written order. The person to whom books are delivered shall sign a receipt for them in a book provided for that purpose. 2. Books may be sent through the post, or by some equivalent means of carriage, upon a written order. All charges of carriage to the Institute shall be defrayed by the borrower. 3. A borrower may not have more than tlH3e& volumes in his possession at one time. 4. A borrower will be considered liable for the value of any book lost or damaged while on loan to him, and if it be a separate volume, for the value of the whole work rendered imperfect. Marking or writing in the volumes is not permitted, and borrowers are requested to call attention to damage of this character. 5. Books may be retained for 28 days. Periodicals may be retained for 14 days. Applications for extension of the loan period must be made in writing before its expiry. No book may be kept longer than 3 months. New books will not be lent until after the expiration of one month from the date of their having been received by the Institute. The current number of a periodical may not be borrowed. 6. Borrowers retaining books longer than the time specified, and neglecting to return them when demanded, forfeit the right to borrow books until the volume or volumes be returned, and for such further time as may be ordered.
  • National Rivers Authority Thames Region Water Resources Development Options Final Report Volume 2 Technical Appendices April

    National Rivers Authority Thames Region Water Resources Development Options Final Report Volume 2 Technical Appendices April

    NATIONAL RIVERS AUTHORITY THAMES REGION WATER RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT OPTIONS FINAL REPORT VOLUME 2 TECHNICAL APPENDICES APRIL 1992 Record of Issue Issue Details Originator Date Approved Date «» \ A l o»i 2.<a /wt^i ‘ 1 S I * 1- Howard Humphreys & Partners Ltd Cobham Resource Consultants Thorncroft Manor Avalon House Dorking Road Marcham Road Leatherhead Abingdon Surrey Oxford KT22 8JB 0X14 1UG ENVIRONMENT AGENCY 089492 APPENDIX 2 ENGINEERING AND HYDROLOGY DATA ENGINEERING ENGINEERING Engineering Criteria The following design criteria have been used in drawing up the development options. Storage Impounding Dams and bunds have been taken as earth fill Dams and embankments with crest width of 8m, u/s slopes Bunded Reservoirs of 1 on 3.5 and d/s slopes of 1 on 3, freeboard has been taken as 2m. Bankside Storage The volume of bankside storage for Severn Thames transfer has been taken as 3 days storage at the maximum transfer rate. Gravel Pits It has been assumed that gravel pits will be on average 6m deep, the cut off slurry trench will be 600mm wide and will extend lm into the clay beneath the gravel. Adjacent pits will utilise a common cut-off and that access roads will be constructed round the perimeter of all pits. T ransmissiun Pipelines In sizing pipelines a limiting velocity of between 1.5 and 2.0 m/s has been adopted. The friction coefficient ’C’ in the Hazen Williams formula for calculating head loss has been taken as 135. Pipelines have been assumed to be in ductile iron. Pumping Pumps Maximum pumping head has been limited to 150m.
  • North West Surrey Local Group Million Voices for Nature Newsletter

    North West Surrey Local Group Million Voices for Nature Newsletter

    a North West Surrey Local Group million voices for nature letter news Web site: www.nwsurreyrspb.org.uk Spring 2011 Group Leaders: Dave and Mary Braddock Newsletter Editor: Peter Hambrook (For contact details please see the back page of this newsletter) Leaders’ Spot Hello All, Although concerned about the world, I am fed up with all the doom and gloom going round at the moment. Summer is only a few weeks away so we are going to start this newsletter, upbeat, with a good old bit of North West Surrey drum banging. Our group membership is stable and we have our first junior member of the group, so a very warm welcome to JO1, or Jasper as he is better known. Hope you get as much out of the group as I do... having just come back from two fantastic trips to Norfolk and Spain. Our website is doing very well with many “hits” each month and the electronic newsletter is going from strength to strength, just shy of half of the group receive it this way. Please consider having yours delivered electronically. Collectively a considerable saving for the group finances and best of all it's in colour! Just drop me a line. We are a small, friendly local group. We don't raise vast amounts of money but we have a big heart. Last year despite the economic downturn we managed to raise a staggering equivalent of £71 per group member. This sum does not include the amount raised by pin badges or RSPB memberships - more about these inside.
  • Lbr 2008 Front Matter

    Lbr 2008 Front Matter

    London Natural History Society The Society publishes ornithological and other natural history records for the area within 20 miles of St Paul’s Cathedral. As well as Ornithology, other interests in natural history are catered for through the Society's Sections which record and study the major groups of flora and fauna, and the habitats in which they are found. Meetings organised by each Section are open to all members. New members, beginners and experts alike, are welcomed. An extensive programme of talks and field meetings, to which visitors are welcome, is provided throughout the year. As well as the annual London Bird Report, the Society publishes a journal, The London Naturalist, each year and its Newsletter and Bulletin of the London Bird Club every quarter. Members have access to a large lending and reference library of natural history books and can join one or more of several reading circles which circulate many natural history journals at a fraction of the cost of subscribing direct. Yearly subscriptions range from £20 (for ordinary membership) through £16 for senior members (over 65 years and who have been in continuous membership for ten years or more) to £5 for students (under 18 years of age, or receiving full-time education). Additional family members, who enjoy all the benefits of membership except separate publications, pay only £4 each. Cheques should be made payable to the London Natural History Society and sent to the Assistant Treasurer: Robin Blades, 32 Ashfield Road, London N14 7JY. Further copies of this issue of the London Bird Report may be obtained (price £8.00 plus £1.00 postage and packing in the UK) from: Catherine Schmitt, 4 Falkland Avenue, London, N3 1QR.

  • CTC 22 Staines-Upon-Thames to Chertsey Bridge

    Staines-upon-Thames to CTC Chertsey Bridge 22 Start Staines-upon-Thames, Thames Lodge Hotel — TW18 4SJ Finish Chertsey Bridge — KT16 8JA Distance 5.94km Duration 1 hour 13 minutes Ascent 18.2m Access Buses and trains at start of section; bus at end of section Facilities All facilities at start of section; pub at end of section 22.1 Staines-upon-Thames, Thames Lodge Hotel 0m 22.2 Cross to land side of Thames Side; R to rly bridge (Post 87); re-cross in front 2540m of bridge; descend to river to pass beneath rly on riverside path; follow path by river past end of Wheatsheaf Lane and round L bend in river; cross meadow and continue on riverside path to Penton Hook Lock. 22.3 Continue on riverside to Laleham, passing Litt le Ravenswell wall (crossing 1350m end of Vicarage Lane) to reach road at Ferry Lane. 22.4 Continue on riverside, on meadow or footpath, past caravan site and under 2050m M3, to Chertsey Weir; Posts 88 and 89 on L, then rise to Chertsey Bridge. © 2018-21 IG Liddell Coal Tax Circuit 22 – 1 This section of the Coal Tax Circuit route 22.1 starts at the Thames Lodge Hotel in Staines-upon Thames. The Elmsleigh bus station is adjacent to Communications House, which takes the north-eastern corner of the road junction. There are bus links from here to Hatt on Cross (for Heathrow), Hounslow, Kingston-upon-Thames, and Chertsey. The last of these is not Oyster-valid, nor are the direct bus services to the airport terminals.