DOCSLIB.ORG

North West Surrey Local Group Million Voices for Nature Newsletter

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

a North West Surrey Local Group million voices for nature letter news Web site: www.nwsurreyrspb.org.uk Spring 2011 Group Leaders: Dave and Mary Braddock Newsletter Editor: Peter Hambrook (For contact details please see the back page of this newsletter) Leaders’ Spot Hello All, Although concerned about the world, I am fed up with all the doom and gloom going round at the moment. Summer is only a few weeks away so we are going to start this newsletter, upbeat, with a good old bit of North West Surrey drum banging. Our group membership is stable and we have our first junior member of the group, so a very warm welcome to JO1, or Jasper as he is better known. Hope you get as much out of the group as I do... having just come back from two fantastic trips to Norfolk and Spain. Our website is doing very well with many “hits” each month and the electronic newsletter is going from strength to strength, just shy of half of the group receive it this way. Please consider having yours delivered electronically. Collectively a considerable saving for the group finances and best of all it's in colour! Just drop me a line. We are a small, friendly local group. We don't raise vast amounts of money but we have a big heart. Last year despite the economic downturn we managed to raise a staggering equivalent of £71 per group member. This sum does not include the amount raised by pin badges or RSPB memberships - more about these inside. Sadly, I am a bit of a closet statistics gatherer. How many of you know that we have sold over £19,000 worth of pin badges in the last six years? Or how many of you know that we have made a profit of over £3,600 on selling plants, £3,000 from street collections, £1,200 from giving talks to others and £385 from selling bird boxes in the same timescale. Did you know that we have also recruited 145 members to the RSPB in that time? I could go on and bury you in figures but I won't. To be honest, I must admit that I knew we did very well but not the actual totals achieved. The point I want to make is that by and large we let our achievements go unnoticed. I hope to change this and will unashamedly blow our trumpet when necessary. Where do we go from here.............? Any suggestions? Dave Braddock. Leaders’ Email Addresses Please note that Dave and Mary’s email addresses were inadvertently reverted to their old ones in the current programme. Their correct email addresses are shown on the back page in this and the previous two newsletters. WELCOME! A very warm welcome to the following new group members: Jasper Worrallo (Sunbury); Elaine Brindley (Thorpe) We look forward to meeting you at our indoor and outdoor events. Editor Required After editing this newsletter since Reg Leutchford stood down in 2000, I have decided that it is time to hand the baton on to someone with new ideas. I have therefore advised the Committee that I wish to relinquish the post of Editor following production of the spring 2012 issue, or earlier if possible. I have given a year‟s notice in order to enable my replacement to get up to speed and ensure a smooth hand over. If you are interested in taking on this job please contact Dave, Mary or myself and we will arrange to give you a briefing on what the job entails. I will put some thought into a formal job description once this newsletter has been put to bed. Peter Hambrook Local Group News GROUP ACHIEVEMENTS Recent Events Quiz Nite January 2011 Nine teams of six turned up on the 15th January for the annual North West Surrey RSPB Quiz Nite at New Haw Community Hall. New Haw has been the home of this quiz since it started 10 years ago and over those years the teams have pitted their wits against question writer and “Ref” Dave Braddock! Some have fared better than others with a sense of competition and friendly rivalry amongst the various teams in the war to win! Led by Question Master Craig Watson, who has done well not to be tongue tied by some of the far reaching questions, there has been opportunity for laughter and banter between both him and the tables. At the very first quiz Craig had brought along girlfriend, Louise. They are now happily married and living in South Wales, making the trip especially for the Quiz Nite to share our company once a year. The reason for reviewing the last ten years is that Dave has decided to stand down as question writer and “Ref”. So thanks to everyone who has made the Quiz the great success it has been – a great team effort, raising approximately £3,000 over the ten year period with all proceeds course going to the RSPB. Each year a team of helpers have made sure that tables are out ready and put away. Another team in the kitchen ensures the Ploughman‟s supper is ready for the break - and cleared away afterwards. Simon and his sister Karen have been round each year getting in the money for the raffle. People have been really generous over the years donating raffle prizes, and for a couple of years the winning team even gave back their winnings! This year was no different to the others (except for 2010, the odd year out, having been postponed to March because of snow!). There were seven rounds of different subjects, namely: films; songs; natural history; Royalty; „It‟s all Greek to me‟ (these last two being new ones for this year); „Pot Luck‟ and, as usual, a picture round to hand in after the break. Some teams kept their original names such as the „Little Bustards‟, „Resplendent Quetzels‟, „Jolly Robins‟ and „The Twitchwells‟ while other chose new ones such as „Spring Siskins‟, „Bar-tailed Halfwits‟, „Lovely Lapwings‟, „The Magpies‟ and the „F in Frigates‟. Each year Dave has made a point of wearing a silly hat, as his wife I can‟t even remember where this idea came from! Sometimes “The Hat” would be planned many weeks before the event, another time it would be a matter of sorting it out on the day. David Shenton, a regular attendee of the Quiz, would make a bee-line on the night to see what the hat looked like! He was disappointed in 2011 - Dave went overboard in a different direction! Having been given a Billy “Man” bag for Christmas, he decided to get in touch with his feminine side - see the picture of my man wearing stripey tights with shorts. It raised a laugh on the night and he now knows how girls get on with wearing tights! RSPB NW Surrey Local Group – Spring 2011 2 The Royal Society for the Protection of Birds (RSPB) is a registered charity: England and Wales no. 207076, Scotland no.SC037654 Anyway, the winners on the night once again were the Little Bustards, 10 points ahead of their nearest rivals, “F” in Frigates, and third were a new team The Magpies. Enjoying the bags of Jelly Tots as losers were the Spring Siskins. We made a £236 profit on the night. If there is anyone out there who would like to take up the gauntlet and the challenge, this position now lies vacant. Mary Braddock National Nest Box Week – RHS Wisley Sat 12th February 2011 With spring very much in the air we set up our information display at RHS Wisley gardens to help promote National Nestbox Week. Hannah, Mick, Alan, Chris, Simon and Paul were on hand at various times during the day and were kept busy dispensing information and being called upon for all sorts of advice „avian‟. It is quite evident that the Great British Public is very fond of their garden birds - and rather less fond of cats, grey squirrels, foxes and magpies. Three new RSPB memberships were taken out during the day, several interested people took away details of our local group and Mick did a sterling job keeping the Wisley tills ticking over with his advice and considerable sales skills in birdseed merchandising. We were given a prominent position in the garden shop to set out our display and were well looked after by the RHS staff so for all of us it was an enjoyable, worthwhile and successful day. Paul Brindley Pin Badges. Simon has been running our pin badge monitoring scheme for several years now and you saw the magnificent running total on the front page. Simon and his team have raised over £1600.00 this year and Simon is asking for more people who would be willing to help by being a collector. He would also like some ideas or suggestions of sites we could approach to take a box. I think thanks and congratulations should go to Simon and his team for all their hard work and efforts. Either drop Simon a line for information or I can pass on to him. Dave Braddock Memberships. Mary and the events team have recruited a creditable 17 RSPB memberships this year. With people thinking of their finances more it has been much harder recruiting this year but Mary and the gang have managed to keep up their sterling work. Many thanks to them all. Dave Braddock CAMPAIGN CORNER Would you plant seedlings in an endangered habitat? Gardeners in the UK are using peat at an alarming rate of 3 billion litres per year.
Recommended publications
  • Flood Risk Assessment

    Flood Risk Assessment

    Flood Risk Assessment 20-22 Bridge Street, Staines, TW18 4TW Client Consulting Engineers CDP Staines Ltd GTA Civils Ltd 22 Gilbert Street Gloucester House London 66a Church Walk W1K 5EJ Burgess Hill West Sussex Ref: 6988 RH15 9AS Date: August 2017 Tel: 01444 871444 Flood Risk Assessment: 20-22 Bridge Street, Staines Index 1 Introduction 2 2 Existing Site & Flood Risk Profile 3 3 Proposed Development & Mitigation 5 Schedule of Appendices A Site Location Map & Aerial Photos B Environment Agency & SFRA Flood Maps C Architect’s Scheme Drawings D Flood Response Plan Issue Issue date Compiled Checked Preliminary Issue 22 August 2017 JP GK/MR 2nd Preliminary Issue 29 August 2017 JP MR 3rd Preliminary Issue 21 October 2017 JP MR First Issue 31 October 2017 JP MR Report by: John Pakenham BSc (Hons) Checked by: Grant Kahil BEng (Hons) Overseen by: Martin Roberts I Eng, ACIWEM, MCIHT W:\Projects\6988 FRA, Compagnie Du Parc, 22 Bridge Street, Staines TW18 4TW\2.3 Job No: 6988 Specifications & Reports\F. Flood Risk Assessments Date: August 2017 1 Flood Risk Assessment: 20-22 Bridge Street, Staines 1 Introduction 1.1 GTA Civils Ltd. was appointed by its client, CDP Staines Ltd, to provide a Flood Risk Assessment (FRA) report. This objective is to get the Environment Agency’s (EA) pre-application for the development of 20-22 Bridge Street, Staines TW18 4TW. This FRA has been written to satisfy the needs of the EA and the 2012 National Planning Policy Framework. 1.2 This report has been prepared for the Client in relation to the proposed development at the above address and no responsibility is accepted to any third party for all or part of this study in connection with this or any other development.
  • South Colne Sub-Area 3

    South Colne Sub-Area 3

    SOUTH COLNE DETAILED STRATEGIES SUB-AREA 3 South Colne character South Colne is characterised by flatter topography as the River Colne approaches its confluence with the Thames. Braided watercourses and flood meadows typify the landscape, which is dominated in aerial views by a series of large reservoirs, the product of historic gravel extraction industry in the area. The South West London Reservoirs are internationally significant for the populations of overwintering birds they support, some from as far afield as the Arctic. This area also includes Heathrow airport and the extensive associated transport infrastructure. In close proximity to the airport lie some significant heritage assets including Harmondsworth Barn, the largest timber- framed building in England. © Brian Robert Marshall CC Andreas Trepte, www.photo-natur.net Harmondsworth Barn River Colne flowing through Staines Moor Lakes and reservoirs important for SOUTH COLNE overwintering wildfowl DETAILED SUB-AREA 3 STRATEGIES © Stefan Czapski The Causeway at Staines Reservoir Ankerwycke Priory - home to the Ankerwycke Colne Brook at Wraysbury - important for Yew wildlife Colne & Crane valleys green infrastructure strategy 51 South Colne area strategy overview The strategy for South Colne and Heathrow associated opportunities for education and is to improve and repair the landscape and interpretation and new viewpoints. connectivity for people and wildlife, conserve INTERWOVEN RIVERS and enhance valuable ecological habitats and Water and biodiversity enhancements should aim promote access for all to new and improved to restore floodplains and focus on the benefits of RECREATION landscape destinations. natural landscapes to contribute to natural flood LOCAL + GLOBAL management in this low lying landscape. The Roads and other major infrastructure in this area Duke of Northumberland’s River and Longford WATER SPORTS create particular severance and impair the River close to Heathrow could be enhanced TRANSFORM quality of the user experience.
  • Kittiwake Black-Headed Gull

    Kittiwake Black-Headed Gull

    Kittiwake International threshold: 20,000** Rissa tridactyla Great Britain threshold: ? † † All-Ireland threshold: ? GB max: 1,394 Oct NI max: 84 Sep During WeBS counts, Kittiwakes were It is important to note that because a recorded at most of the traditional sites few key WeBS sites are near breeding during 2008/09. The peak monthly total of colonies it is likely that breeding success 1,394 birds in October is very low compared may significantly affect WeBS counts at to recent years. The highest counts these sites. Nevertheless, low numbers received were from Arran (800, October) recorded through WeBS may be associated and Dungeness & Rye Bay (500, January) with both the declining UK breeding but, relatively, few were reported from population and recent abysmal productivity Loch Strathbeg where the largest numbers (JNCC 2009). All records in Northern Ireland have frequently been seen in the past. were from Belfast Lough. 04/05 05/06 06/07 07/08 08/09 Mon Mean Sites with mean peak counts of 200 or more birds in Great Britain † Loch of Strathbeg 152 1,130 3,282 785 37 Jul 1,077 Arran 340 701 400 1,000 800 Oct 648 Tay Estuary (690) (740) (190) 300 (17) Aug 577 Dungeness and Rye Bay 500 Jan 500 Beadnell to Seahouses 140 512 850 (460) 200 Apr 432 Durham Coast 279 250 (363) (71) (225) Apr 297 Forth Estuary 170 (276) (379) (127) (334) Oct 290 Otter Estuary to Kingsbridge Estuary 250 250 Winterfield to Catcraig 285 430 3 Sep 239 Glyne Gap 19 457 (233) (78) Dec 238 Dee Estuary (Scotland) 161 191 175 458 183 Sep 234 Tweed Estuary 114 340 410
  • Staines Town Centre Draft Urban Design Framework

    Staines Town Centre Draft Urban Design Framework

    Spelthorne Borough Council Staines Town Centre Draft Urban Design Framework UI No 3041 Date 11/2008 Client Spelthorne Borough Council WE BELIEVE IN MAKING CITIES WORK THROUGH OUR UNIQUE INTER-DISCIPLINARY APPROACH TO URBAN DESIGN, TRANSPORTATION, REGENERATION AND DEVELOPMENT. 3041 CONTENTS STAINES Town CENTRE 1 INTRODUCTION .........................................................................................................................................5 THE TEAM URBAN INITIATIVES: 2 ConTEXT ...................................................................................................................................................9 URBAN DESIGN, PLANNING AND MOVEMENT 3 DRAFT URBan DEsign FramEwork .................................................................................................. 41 URBAN DELIVERY: 4 DELIVEring THE Vision ........................................................................................................................ 71 MARKET AND PROPERTY PROJECT DIRECTOR JOHN DALES DOCUMENT DATE 11/2008 1 Fitzroy Square London W1T 5HE t +44 (0)20 7380 4545 f +44 (0)20 7380 4546 www.urbaninitiatives.co.uk Aerial View of the Study Area N Terminal 5 Terminal 1-3 A3113 LONDON HEATHROW AIRPORT Cargo Terminal 01 Introduction Wraysbury Reservoir 1.1 Purpose and structure of the report King George VI Reservoir M25 This document presents a Draft Urban Design Staines Reservoir Framework (UDF) for Staines Town Centre prepared by Urban Initiatives on behalf of Spelthorne Borough Council. The report sets out the
  • Water Framework Directive) (England and Wales) Directions 2009

    Water Framework Directive) (England and Wales) Directions 2009

    The River Basin Districts Typology, Standards and Groundwater threshold values (Water Framework Directive) (England and Wales) Directions 2009 The Secretary of State and the Welsh Ministers, with the agreement of the Secretary of State to the extent that there is any effect in England or those parts of Wales that are within the catchment areas of the rivers Dee, Wye and Severn, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 40(2) of the Environment Act 1995(a) and now vested in them(b), and having consulted the Environment Agency, hereby give the following Directions to the Environment Agency for the implementation of Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy(c): Citation and commencement and extent 1.—(1) These Directions may be cited as the River Basin Districts Typology, Standards and Groundwater threshold values (Water Framework Directive) (England and Wales) Direction 2009 and shall come into force on 22nd December 2009. Interpretation 2.—(1) In these Directions— ―the Agency‖ means the Environment Agency; ―the Groundwater Directive‖ means Directive 2006/118/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the protection of groundwater against pollution and deterioration(d); ―the Priority Substances Directive‖ means Directive 2008/105/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on environmental quality standards in the field of water policy(e); ―threshold value‖ has the same meaning as in the Groundwater Directive; and ―the Directive‖ means Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23rd October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy.
  • Îchesis Submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy. 1974. Seston Distribution and Phytoplankton Production in Axifew

    Îchesis Submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy. 1974. Seston Distribution and Phytoplankton Production in Axifew

    îChesis Submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy. 1974 . Seston Distribution and Phytoplankton Production in ax Ifew, Eutrophia Reservoir subject to Artificial Mixing. by Gordon Douglas Haffner, B.Sc, -GND-N. UPJiV / ProQuest Number: 10107304 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest. ProQuest 10107304 Published by ProQuest LLC(2016). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 - 2 - - ABSTRACT - Phytoplankton ecology of a new, artificially mixed Thames Valley Reservoir at Wraysbury, Buckinghamshire, was investigated during the period from late 1971 to early spring 1974. Biological, chemical, and physical aspects and their inter-relationships are discussed in reference to artificial mixing. Nitrates and phosphates were never limiting, and showed little fluctuation with phytoplankton growths. Although silicate concentrations decreased during vernal and autumnal diatom pulses of Stephanodiscus astraea (Ehrenb.) Grim. Stephanodiscus rotula (Kutz.) Hendey, dissolved silica seemed to be of secondary importance in limiting rates of growth or maximum yields. Particular emphasis was placed on the interactions of the seston, in particular the ratio of productive to non-productive particles as determined by particle frequency-size analyses using Coulter Counter Models A and B with 100 and 200 p.m.
  • 05: Water Quality and Hydro-Ecology Assessment

    05: Water Quality and Hydro-Ecology Assessment

    Heathrow Airport Limited Heathrow’s North-West Runway Water Quality and Hydro-ecology Assessment 16 June 2014 AMEC Environment & Infrastructure UK Limited 5 Copyright and Non-Disclosure Notice The contents and layout of this report are subject to copyright owned by AMEC (©AMEC Environment & Infrastructure UK Limited 2014). save to the extent that copyright has been legally assigned by us to another party or is used by AMEC under licence. To the extent that we own the copyright in this report, it may not be copied or used without our prior written agreement for any purpose other than the purpose indicated in this report. The methodology (if any) contained in this report is provided to you in confidence and must not be disclosed or copied to third parties without the prior written agreement of AMEC. Disclosure of that information may constitute an actionable breach of confidence or may otherwise prejudice our commercial interests. Any third party who obtains access to this report by any means will, in any event, be subject to the Third Party Disclaimer set out below. Third-Party Disclaimer Any disclosure of this report to a third party is subject to this disclaimer. The report was prepared by AMEC at the instruction of, and for use by, our client named on the front of the report. It does not in any way constitute advice to any third party who is able to access it by any means. AMEC excludes to the fullest extent lawfully permitted all liability whatsoever for any loss or damage howsoever arising from reliance on the contents of this report.
  • OXF8027 RPS HRA Screening Report Draft NPS Revision

    OXF8027 RPS HRA Screening Report Draft NPS Revision

    APPENDIX 5 GATWICK RUNWAY 2 MOLE GAP TO REIGATE ESCARPMENT SAC & ASHDOWN FOREST SPA/SAC REVISED HABITAT REGULATIONS ASSESSMENT REPORT: STAGE 1 (SCREENING) December 2017 Our Ref: OXF8027 RPS 20 Western Avenue Milton Park Abingdon OX14 4SH rpsgroup.com QUALITY MANAGEMENT Prepared by: Elizabeth White, Nick Betson, Fiona Prismall Reviewed by: Mike Barker, Julia Tindale Authorised by: David Cowan Date: December 2017 (Updated for Revised Draft NPS Consultation) Project Number/Document 8027 – HRA Screening Report Reference: COPYRIGHT © RPS The material presented in this report is confidential. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of Gatwick Airport Limited and shall not be distributed or made available to any other company or person without the knowledge and written consent of RPS. Revised Habitats Regulations Assessment Screening December 2017 rpsgroup .com /uk CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..................................................................................................................................... I 1 INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE OF ASSESSMENT .......................................................................... 1 Background and Purpose of this Report .................................................................................................. 1 HRA Process ............................................................................................................................................ 2 Guidance and Information Used in Preparing this Report ......................................................................
  • 03: Biodiversity Assessment

    03: Biodiversity Assessment

    Heathrow Airport Limited Heathrow’s North-West Runway Biodiversity Assessment 16 June 2014 AMEC Environment & Infrastructure UK Limited 3 Copyright and Non-Disclosure Notice The contents and layout of this report are subject to copyright owned by AMEC (©AMEC Environment & Infrastructure UK Limited 2014). save to the extent that copyright has been legally assigned by us to another party or is used by AMEC under licence. To the extent that we own the copyright in this report, it may not be copied or used without our prior written agreement for any purpose other than the purpose indicated in this report. The methodology (if any) contained in this report is provided to you in confidence and must not be disclosed or copied to third parties without the prior written agreement of AMEC. Disclosure of that information may constitute an actionable breach of confidence or may otherwise prejudice our commercial interests. Any third party who obtains access to this report by any means will, in any event, be subject to the Third Party Disclaimer set out below. Third-Party Disclaimer Any disclosure of this report to a third party is subject to this disclaimer. The report was prepared by AMEC at the instruction of, and for use by, our client named on the front of the report. It does not in any way constitute advice to any third party who is able to access it by any means. AMEC excludes to the fullest extent lawfully permitted all liability whatsoever for any loss or damage howsoever arising from reliance on the contents of this report.
  • Kittiwake Black-Headed Gull

    Kittiwake Black-Headed Gull

    Kittiwake International threshold: 20,000** Rissa tridactyla Great Britain threshold: ? † † All-Ireland threshold: ? GB max: 1,660 Jul NI max: 94 Sep 2007/08 was an unexceptional year for few key sites tend to be near breeding Kittiwakes recorded during WeBS Core colonies, it is likely that breeding counts, with a relatively low peak monthly productivity on given stretches of coastline total of 1,660 in July. The peak count at may affect WeBS counts at sites nearby. the site with the highest five-year average, Apart from a single at Dundrum Inner Bay, Loch of Strathbeg, was the lowest for three all records in Northern Ireland were from years. It is important to note that because a Belfast Lough. 03/04 04/05 05/06 06/07 07/08 Mon Mean Sites with mean peak counts of 200 or more birds in Great Britain † Loch of Strathbeg 6,300 152 1,130 3,282 785 Jun 2,330 Lunan Bay 3,400 100 250 133 67 Jun 790 Tay Estuary (133) (690) (740) (190) 300 Aug 577 Arran 290 340 701 400 1,000 Sep 546 Beadnell to Seahouses 350 140 512 850 (460) May 463 Tees Estuary 1,492 (56) 61 112 133 Aug 450 Tweed Estuary 860 114 340 410 132 Jun 371 Durham Coast (0) (279) (250) (363) (71) Aug (363) Winterfield to Catcraig 285 430 Apr 358 Forth Estuary (426) 170 (276) (379) (127) Sep 313 Nigg Bay to Cove Bay 846 0 0 (0) 282 Otter Estuary to Kingsbridge Estuary 250 Jan 250 Dee Estuary (Scotland) 248 161 191 175 458 Jun 247 Glyne Gap 19 457 (233) Feb 238 Don Mouth to Ythan Mouth 153 534 (165) 3 119 Jul 202 † as no British or All-Ireland thresholds have been set a qualifying level of 200 has been chosen to select sites for presentation in this report Black-headed Gull International threshold: 20,000** Chroicocephalus ridibundus Great Britain threshold: 19,000 † † All-Ireland threshold: ? GB max: 209,081 Feb NI max: 14,493 Jan Numbers of Black-headed Gulls recorded Four sites qualified as being of by WeBS in 2007/08 were similar to those in international importance, although this the previous year, with February again species has not been counted at several proving to be the peak month.
  • Ruddy Shelduck Shelduck

    Ruddy Shelduck Shelduck

    +="( )" 5*, % *+ ,# %#8 " ) !" % Ruddy Shelduck was recorded in ten months of 20 at Cley Marsh in October. It is most and from 13 sites during 2005/06. The British likely that the majority of Ruddy Shelduck maximum of 22 was over twice that of the records originate from naturalised populations previous year. Half of the reports were of in mainland Europe. For example, numbers single birds and a further nine were of two have increased dramatically in Switzerland birds. All reports of more than two birds were over the last decade, with over 300 recorded from the North Norfolk Coast. These were of during waterbird counts there in November three at Holkham and Burnham Overy Fresh 2005, mostly in the northern half of the Marshes in January, and a record WeBS count country (V. Keller pers. comm.) "( 0 #$ -& :: 2" % - 2" 42 !+ 42 !" !+ The British Index for Shelduck dropped just coming during the moult period in July, whilst slightly in 2005/06, whilst the maximum count counts on the adjacent Dee Estuary peak in the was at its lowest for 30 years. The Northern autumn, and there is presumably a certain Ireland index, however, continues to rise as it degree of redistribution between these two has done steadily since the low in the early sites. Counts from the other sites supporting 1990s. The British monthly index shows a internationally important numbers were about peak in February following a gradual increase in line with their respective five-year means, through the winter as many birds return from with the exception of the Wash where numbers their moulting grounds in northwest Germany.
  • Airports Nps - Habitats Regulations Assessment Appendix B Appropriate Assessment of Short List Alternatives

    Airports Nps - Habitats Regulations Assessment Appendix B Appropriate Assessment of Short List Alternatives

    AIRPORTS NPS - HABITATS REGULATIONS ASSESSMENT APPENDIX B APPROPRIATE ASSESSMENT OF SHORT LIST ALTERNATIVES JUNE 2018 AIRPORTS NPS - HABITATS REGULATIONS ASSESSMENT APPENDIX B APPROPRIATE ASSESSMENT OF SHORT LIST ALTERNATIVES Department for Transport Project no: 70030195 Date: June 2018 WSP The Forum Barnfield Road Exeter EX1 1QR Tel: (01392) 229700 www.wsp.com iii TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 BACKGROUND ............................................................................ 1 1.1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................ 1 1.2 HABITATS REGULATIONS ASSESSMENT (HRA) SCREENING ................... 1 1.3 APPROPRIATE ASSESSMENT (AA) ............................................................... 2 1.4 IN-COMBINATION EFFECTS ON NATURA 2000 AND RAMSAR SITES ....... 3 1.5 CONSULTATION ............................................................................................... 5 2 EFFECTS OF DISTURBANCE ..................................................... 6 2.1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................ 6 2.2 RELEVANT EUROPEAN SITES ........................................................................ 6 2.3 APPROPRIATE ASSESSMENT ........................................................................ 7 2.4 SUMMARY OF POTENTIAL EFFECTS ON INTEGRITY AS A RESULT OF CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF THE SCHEMES ...................... 13 2.5 AVOIDANCE AND MITIGATION MEASURES ...............................................