DOCSLIB.ORG

Habitats Regulations Assessment Enabling Works to Allow Implementation of Full Runway Alternation During Easterly Operations at Heathrow Airport April 2013

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Habitats Regulations Assessment Enabling Works to Allow Implementation of Full Runway Alternation During Easterly Operations at Heathrow Airport April 2013 Habitats Regulations Assessment Enabling works to allow implementation of full runway alternation during easterly operations at Heathrow Airport April 2013 HRA ii Contents 1. Introduction 1 1.1 Background to the Development 1 1.2 Purpose of this Report 2 1.3 Structure of this Report 3 2. Project Description (Step 2) 5 2.1 Site Context 5 2.1.1 Surrounding Area 6 2.2 Description of the Physical Works 6 2.2.1 Airfield Infrastructure 6 2.2.2 Concrete Break Out 7 2.2.3 Noise barrier at Longford 7 2.2.4 Construction methodology 8 2.2.5 Construction Environmental Management Plan (CEMP) 9 2.2.6 Decommissioning 10 2.3 Description of the Operational Changes 10 2.3.1 Sensitivity Analysis: Extreme Easterly and Westerly Operations 11 2.3.2 Noise limits 11 2.3.3 Noise monitoring locations 12 2.4 Other projects or plans that could act in combination to affect Natura 2000 sites 13 3. Identifying Natura 2000 Sites within Potential Zone of Influence (Step 3) 14 3.1 Information gathering and literature search 14 3.1.1 Methodology 14 3.1.2 Air quality 14 3.1.3 Noise 15 3.1.4 Identified Natura 2000 sites 15 3.1.5 South West London Waterbodies SPA/Ramsar 17 3.1.6 Windsor Forest & Great Park SAC 22 3.1.7 Richmond Park SAC 23 4. Screening of impacts not for consideration (Step 4) 25 HRA iii 4.1 Methodology 25 4.1.1 Air quality assessment 25 4.1.2 Noise assessment 26 4.2 Impacts to South West London SPA component sites 26 4.2.1 Assessment of effects 26 4.2.2 Changes to air quality baseline 26 4.2.3 Changes to noise baseline 27 4.3 Impacts to Windsor Forest & Great Park SAC 28 4.3.1 Assessment of effects 28 4.3.2 Changes to air quality baseline 28 4.3.3 Changes to noise baseline 28 4.4 Impacts to Richmond SAC 29 4.4.1 Assessment of effects 29 4.4.2 Changes to air quality baseline 29 4.4.3 Changes to noise baseline 29 5. Significance of effects (Step 5) 30 5.1 Methodology for establishing significant effects 30 5.2 Impacts to South West London SPA component sites: Wraysbury Reservoir and Wraysbury I (North) Gravel Pit resulting from an increase in the number of aircraft arriving on Runway 09R in an easterly direction 31 5.2.1 Wraysbury Reservoir – Baseline Ecological Status 31 5.2.2 Wraysbury I (North) Gravel Pit – Baseline Ecological Status 32 5.2.3 Discussion regarding noise disturbance on wildfowl 32 5.2.4 Operational changes and predicted ATM/noise increases 33 5.2.5 Changes to noise baseline at Wraysbury Reservoir and Wraysbury I (North) Gravel Pit 34 5.3 Other projects or plans that could act in combination to affect the conservation features of the relevant European Sites 35 6. Conclusions 36 6.1 Summary 36 Appendices Appendix A Sites ranked in order of Max Gadwall and Max Shoveler counts Appendix B Screening of potential impacts Appendix C Noise footprint comparison HRA 1 1. Introduction 1.1 Background to the Development The Cranford Agreement was a verbal undertaking made by a senior Government official on the 31st July 1952, at a meeting of the Cranford Residents' and District Amenities Association. The undertaking given is understood to have been a statement of best endeavours that, as far as practicable, Runway 09L (the northern runway) at Heathrow Airport would not be used for departures over Cranford when the airport was on an easterly operational mode (i.e. when the wind is blowing from the east). It is understood that the reason for the introduction of the Cranford Agreement was to protect the residents of Cranford, which, until the runways were extended westwards in the 1960s, was the nearest residential area to the airport, from the noise of departing aircraft (which was considered to be more disruptive than the noise from arriving aircraft). Therefore, under the current arrangements during easterly operations (which occurs for around 29% of the time), aircraft usually depart from Runway 09R (the southern runway) with arrivals using Runway 09L (the northern runway). The Cranford Agreement has therefore prevented a more equitable distribution of noise around Heathrow Airport and the application of „runway alternation‟ during easterly operations i.e. using both runways for departures and arrivals. When the airport is on westerly operations (which occurs for around 71% of the time), full runway alternation provides relief to affected communities living under the arrival and departure flight paths. This runway alternation has operated since 1972. Whilst the residents of Cranford currently still benefit from the lack of runway alternation during easterly operations, the residents of Windsor and adjoining areas under Runway 09L approach routes experience no relief from the noise of arriving aircraft, and communities to the east of Runway 09R, such as Hatton and North Feltham, experience no relief from aircraft departure noise. The Department for Transport (DfT) published a Consultation Document, “Adding Capacity at Heathrow” in November 2007, which sought to canvass views on how Heathrow Airport could be developed over the next 20 years or more. The document included an assessment by the Environmental Research and Consultancy Department (ERCD) of the UK Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) into the noise effects that would result from ending the Cranford Agreement. The ERCD study concluded that removing the Cranford Agreement (whilst retaining segregated-mode operation ) would result in a redistribution of noise exposure to the west of the airport under the easterly arrival flight paths and also to the east of the airport under the easterly flight departure paths. The study predicted that in 2015, assuming 480,000 ATMs, the removal of the Cranford Agreement would decrease the population within the 57dBA LAeq noise contour (described as the onset of community annoyance) by 10,500 due to the transfer of arrival operations away from Windsor and onto the arrivals flight track to Runway 09R. However, it was also predicted that there would be an increase in the number of people living in higher noise exposure areas; with an additional 3,300 people experiencing 63dBA LAeq or more. HRA 2 To inform the consultation document, the potential effects of ending the Cranford Agreement on air quality were also considered. This was also modelled on the basis of 480,000 ATMs in 2015. The results suggested that ending the Cranford Agreement would affect the distribution of NO2 concentrations at some receptors around the western end and eastern ends of the airport. Further to comments received in response to the DfT consultation, the Government‟s policy decision to end the Cranford Agreement was published in the document “Adding Capacity at Heathrow: Decisions following Consultation” dated 15 January 2009. Paragraphs 74 & 75 of this document state: “Ending the Cranford Agreement would redistribute noise more fairly around the airport…..The Secretary of State has therefore decided in the interests of equity to confirm the provisional view set out in the consultation document. Therefore the operating practice which implements the Cranford Agreement should end as soon as practicably possible. He notes that this would enable runway alternation to be introduced when the airport is operating on easterlies, giving affected communities predictable periods of relief from airport noise." Subsequent to the January 2009 decision, the DfT confirmed this position in a letter dated 17 February 2009, which also clearly specified that implementation of the decision to end the Cranford Agreement is the responsibility of the airport operator (HAL), who are expected to give effect to the decision as soon as practicably possible. It was also made clear that, “The Secretary of State does not envisage any further decision by him to be necessary” on the matter. On 7th September 2010, the coalition Government‟s Secretary of State for Transport (Theresa Villiers) reaffirmed support for the decision to end the Cranford Agreement in a ministerial statement as follows: “The previous Government's decisions in 2009 also included a commitment to end the Cranford Agreement. This decision was based on the desire to distribute noise more fairly around the airport and extend the benefits of runway alternation to communities under the flight paths during periods of easterly winds. We support that objective and do not intend to re-open the decision…….. I will look to BAA to ensure that proper consideration is given to appropriate mitigation and compensation measures for those likely to be affected by the proposals.” 1.2 Purpose of this Report Ordinarily, Heathrow Airport Ltd (HAL) would carry out development projects within the boundary of Heathrow Airport using their permitted development rights under Part 18 of Schedule 2 of The Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) Order 1995 (GPDO). However, any development that would require EIA (under the EIA Regulations) because it is expected that it will result in significant environmental effects, does not fall under the GPDO rights. HAL recognises that new operating procedures at Heathrow Airport that will be facilitated by the proposed physical development (i.e. the Project) result in potentially significant environmental effects and thus EIA applies. HRA 3 In accordance with best practice, an EIA Scoping Report was prepared to identify the potentially significant environmental effects of the Project that needed to be considered in the Environmental Statement and to outline the approach that was to be undertaken to assess the significance of these effects. The EIA Scoping Report provided the opportunity for statutory and non-statutory consultees, and others with an interest in the Project to comment on the proposed scope of the EIA.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Taking Britain Further Heathrow’S Plan for Connecting the UK to Growth
    VOLUME 1 Taking Britain further Heathrow’s plan for connecting the UK to growth #BritainsHeathrow Disclaimer This document has been prepared by Heathrow Airport Limited solely in response to an invitation from the Airports Commission. It should not be used for any other purpose or in any other context and Heathrow Airport Limited accepts no responsibility for its use in that regard Contents Volume 1 - Technical submission Contents ........................................................................................................................ 3 Foreword ....................................................................................................................... 8 Executive Summary ................................................................................................... 11 Connecting for growth ................................................................................................................... 12 Listening to what our stakeholders say ........................................................................................... 18 Our vision for a world-class hub airport ........................................................................................... 20 Connecting all of the UK ................................................................................................................ 24 Building a sustainable Heathrow ..................................................................................................... 29 The deliverable solution .................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Flood Risk Assessment
    Flood Risk Assessment 20-22 Bridge Street, Staines, TW18 4TW Client Consulting Engineers CDP Staines Ltd GTA Civils Ltd 22 Gilbert Street Gloucester House London 66a Church Walk W1K 5EJ Burgess Hill West Sussex Ref: 6988 RH15 9AS Date: August 2017 Tel: 01444 871444 Flood Risk Assessment: 20-22 Bridge Street, Staines Index 1 Introduction 2 2 Existing Site & Flood Risk Profile 3 3 Proposed Development & Mitigation 5 Schedule of Appendices A Site Location Map & Aerial Photos B Environment Agency & SFRA Flood Maps C Architect’s Scheme Drawings D Flood Response Plan Issue Issue date Compiled Checked Preliminary Issue 22 August 2017 JP GK/MR 2nd Preliminary Issue 29 August 2017 JP MR 3rd Preliminary Issue 21 October 2017 JP MR First Issue 31 October 2017 JP MR Report by: John Pakenham BSc (Hons) Checked by: Grant Kahil BEng (Hons) Overseen by: Martin Roberts I Eng, ACIWEM, MCIHT W:\Projects\6988 FRA, Compagnie Du Parc, 22 Bridge Street, Staines TW18 4TW\2.3 Job No: 6988 Specifications & Reports\F. Flood Risk Assessments Date: August 2017 1 Flood Risk Assessment: 20-22 Bridge Street, Staines 1 Introduction 1.1 GTA Civils Ltd. was appointed by its client, CDP Staines Ltd, to provide a Flood Risk Assessment (FRA) report. This objective is to get the Environment Agency’s (EA) pre-application for the development of 20-22 Bridge Street, Staines TW18 4TW. This FRA has been written to satisfy the needs of the EA and the 2012 National Planning Policy Framework. 1.2 This report has been prepared for the Client in relation to the proposed development at the above address and no responsibility is accepted to any third party for all or part of this study in connection with this or any other development.
    [Show full text]
  • P.RIV.ATE RESIDENTS. R MER 581
    • MIDDLESEX. J ~ P.RIV.ATE RESIDENTS. r MER 581 ~atthewa Henry,t Maples, Upper Ted· May Mrs. P. W. St. Margaret's, West Meech Harry Davey, Cli:flord house,. dington road, Hampton Wick, Heath road, Child's Hill N W Parkland grove, Ashford Iingston-oh·Thames May Reginald,_ Elbury, Bury avenue, Meek Rt. 49 Morley rd. Twickenlham Matthew:& Henry, Tormead, Dene rd. Ruislip, Uxbridge Meere$ E. W. Harrow view, Cleve- :Northwood May R. H. Hollycroft, Stanmore land road, Ealing W :Matthews Henry David, 128 Vaughan May Richard George, Elstree, Wel- Mees :Miss; 49 Regina. rd. Ealing W ,raad, Harrow ling'ton road north, Hounslow Meggison Wharram, 1 Westbury gar- :!\latthews Henry William, Woodstock, May Seayers, 13 Tring av. Ealing W dens, Hanger lane, Ealing W Athenreum. road, Oakleigh park, May T. P. 33 Craven aven. Ealing W Mehret John, I Glebe aven. Enfield ,Whet-stone N May William James, 72 Pollard road, Meier Rudolph, so Sandringham rd. ~latthews J . .!..24 Mount rd.HndnNW Oakleigh park, Whetstone N Golders Green, Hendon N W Matthews James H. Rippledene, May W. J. 55 Waldemar av.Ealing W Meikle Alexander S. 6 Hawthorn viis. Fnnoh street, Sunbury Maycock Capt. Frederick, III The High .street, Wealdstone, Harrow )Jatthews Lester, 22 Woodlands road, Avenue, Ealing W Meikleham Mrs. 46 Woodstock aven. Wealdstone, Harrow Maycock George, Kilbirnie, Chester Golders Green, Hendon N W )!atthews Mrs. Io Egerton gardens, road, Northwood Meissner Mr8. 27 Ranelag'h id.EalngW Ealing W Maycock Percy W. H. 29 Teddington Melamed Samuel Max Ph.D. 17 The )latthews Mrs. 2 Mattock gardens, park, Teddington Ridgeway, Golders Grn.Hendon NW )lattock lane, Ealing W Mayer R.
    [Show full text]
  • South Colne Sub-Area 3
    SOUTH COLNE DETAILED STRATEGIES SUB-AREA 3 South Colne character South Colne is characterised by flatter topography as the River Colne approaches its confluence with the Thames. Braided watercourses and flood meadows typify the landscape, which is dominated in aerial views by a series of large reservoirs, the product of historic gravel extraction industry in the area. The South West London Reservoirs are internationally significant for the populations of overwintering birds they support, some from as far afield as the Arctic. This area also includes Heathrow airport and the extensive associated transport infrastructure. In close proximity to the airport lie some significant heritage assets including Harmondsworth Barn, the largest timber- framed building in England. © Brian Robert Marshall CC Andreas Trepte, www.photo-natur.net Harmondsworth Barn River Colne flowing through Staines Moor Lakes and reservoirs important for SOUTH COLNE overwintering wildfowl DETAILED SUB-AREA 3 STRATEGIES © Stefan Czapski The Causeway at Staines Reservoir Ankerwycke Priory - home to the Ankerwycke Colne Brook at Wraysbury - important for Yew wildlife Colne & Crane valleys green infrastructure strategy 51 South Colne area strategy overview The strategy for South Colne and Heathrow associated opportunities for education and is to improve and repair the landscape and interpretation and new viewpoints. connectivity for people and wildlife, conserve INTERWOVEN RIVERS and enhance valuable ecological habitats and Water and biodiversity enhancements should aim promote access for all to new and improved to restore floodplains and focus on the benefits of RECREATION landscape destinations. natural landscapes to contribute to natural flood LOCAL + GLOBAL management in this low lying landscape. The Roads and other major infrastructure in this area Duke of Northumberland’s River and Longford WATER SPORTS create particular severance and impair the River close to Heathrow could be enhanced TRANSFORM quality of the user experience.
    [Show full text]
  • Local CIL Presentation to Members
    Local CIL Presentation to Local Spending Board Members Date – 16 August 2021 Officer – Joanna Ghazaleh Aims & Objectives ▪ What is CIL? ▪ What is Local CIL? ▪ Agreed Governance ▪ Apportionment ▪ Consultation Requirements ▪ Bidding Process ▪ CIL ‘Pots’ & Projections ▪ Appointing a Chair – Strategic CIL Task Group ▪ Going Forward 2 : 02 September 2021 What is CIL? ▪ The Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL) is a planning charge, introduced by the Planning Act 2008, as a tool for local authorities in England and Wales to help deliver infrastructure to support the development of their area. ▪ Introduced CIL in Spelthorne in 2015. ▪ Levy on all new residential development, charged on the additional floorspace created at a prescribed rate per square metre. ▪ Apportionment as follows – ▪ 80% spent on appropriate strategic infrastructure ▪ 15% must be spent in the local community where development has taken place ▪ 5% towards administrative costs Local CIL ▪ As required by the CIL Regulations, 15% of CIL collected is to be allocated to the local community where development has taken place. ▪ Local CIL is to be applied as follows: • towards the provision, improvement, replacement, operation or maintenance of infrastructure; or • towards anything else that is concerned with addressing the demands that development places on an area ▪ The levy can be used to increase the capacity of existing infrastructure or to repair failing existing infrastructure, if that is necessary to support development Agreed Local CIL Governance ▪ In order to allocate CIL based on development within the different areas, 15% will be apportioned across the set areas based on the amount of development that has taken place. ▪ Calculation based on the net increase in dwellings on an annual basis.
    [Show full text]
  • Issues & Options Integrated Impact Assessment (IIA)
    LOCAL PLAN INTEGRATED IMPACT ASSESSMENT (IIA) Scoping report | Stage A Consultation Draft | February 2018 Contents Draft Local Plan Integrated Impact Assessment (IIA) Scoping Report .................................................................................................................. 1 Figures and Tables ........................................................................................................................................................................................... 4 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................................................... 6 2. Brent’s Local Plan ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 14 3. The Integrated Impact Assessment Approach ............................................................................................................................................ 16 4. Identifying relevant plans, programmes and policies ................................................................................................................................... 18 5. Key Sustainable Issues and Opportunities.................................................................................................................................................. 27 6. Developing the IIA framework ....................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Water Framework Directive) (England and Wales) Directions 2009
    The River Basin Districts Typology, Standards and Groundwater threshold values (Water Framework Directive) (England and Wales) Directions 2009 The Secretary of State and the Welsh Ministers, with the agreement of the Secretary of State to the extent that there is any effect in England or those parts of Wales that are within the catchment areas of the rivers Dee, Wye and Severn, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 40(2) of the Environment Act 1995(a) and now vested in them(b), and having consulted the Environment Agency, hereby give the following Directions to the Environment Agency for the implementation of Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy(c): Citation and commencement and extent 1.—(1) These Directions may be cited as the River Basin Districts Typology, Standards and Groundwater threshold values (Water Framework Directive) (England and Wales) Direction 2009 and shall come into force on 22nd December 2009. Interpretation 2.—(1) In these Directions— ―the Agency‖ means the Environment Agency; ―the Groundwater Directive‖ means Directive 2006/118/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the protection of groundwater against pollution and deterioration(d); ―the Priority Substances Directive‖ means Directive 2008/105/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on environmental quality standards in the field of water policy(e); ―threshold value‖ has the same meaning as in the Groundwater Directive; and ―the Directive‖ means Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23rd October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy.
    [Show full text]
  • Planning Brief
    mä~ååáåÖ=_êáÉÑ qÜÉ=^áêíê~Åâ=`çêêáÇçê ml v i b e l o ql k j OR gNQ NPN P^ t o ^v p_r o v o bpbo s l fo ^ PMQQ pq^ k t bi i j l l o hfk d =dbl o d b=sf o bpbo s l fo pq^ fk bp j l l o pq^ fk bp o bpbo s l fo p ^ PM ^ MP j OR gNP pq^ fk bp ` o q aÉÅÉãÄÉê=OMMO BOROUGH OF SPELTHORNE PLANNING BRIEF THE AIRTRACK CORRIDOR CONTENTS Page No. Preface v 1. Introduction 1 2. Overview of the Scheme 3 3. History and Alternatives 5 4. Breakdown of the Route 9 5. The Staines Chord Section 11 6. The Windsor Line Section 15 7. The Staines Moor Section 21 8. The Stanwell Moor Section 27 9. Construction Issues 30 10. Related Projects 33 Appendix A: Relevant Spelthorne Borough Local Plan Policies. Appendix B: Statement of Consultations, Representations, and the Council’s Response. ii LIST OF PLANS Facing Page 1. The Airtrack Corridor 1 2. Alternative Routes to Heathrow 5 3. The Airtrack Corridor Subdivided 9 4. Airtrack: Staines Chord Section 11 5. Airtrack: Windsor Line Section 17 6. Airtrack: The Staines Moor Section 21 7. Airtrack: The Stanwell Moor Section 27 8. Airtrack and Central Railway in Spelthorne 33 iii PREFACE The Planning Brief for the Airtrack Corridor was adopted by resolution of the Council on 12 December 2002. The document forms Supplementary Planning Guidance in support of the Spelthorne Borough Local Plan. Relevant Local Plan policies are identified in the text and reproduced in Appendix A.
    [Show full text]
  • Spelthorne Local Plan Response, January 2020
    Spelthorne Local Plan Preferred Options Consultation Response from the Colne Valley Regional Park Community Interest Company January 2020 Context and Introduction 1. The Colne Valley Regional Park covers 43 square miles. It is the first taste of countryside to the west of London. The Regional Park aims to ensure multi-functional use of land in line with the six objectives of the Park, namely: i. To maintain and enhance the landscape, historic environment and waterscape of the park in terms of their scenic and conservation value and their overall amenity. ii. To safeguard the countryside of the Park from inappropriate development. Where development is permissible it will encourage the highest possible standards of design. iii. To conserve and enhance biodiversity within the Park through the protection and management of its species, habitats and geological features iv. To provide opportunities for countryside recreation and ensure that facilities are accessible to all v. To achieve a vibrant and sustainable rural economy, including farming and forestry, underpinning the value of the countryside vi. To encourage community participation including volunteering and environmental education. To promote the health and social well-being benefits that access to high quality green space brings. 2. There is a strong geographical crossover between Spelthorne Borough and the Colne Valley Regional Park: 21% of Spelthorne Borough lies within the Colne Valley Regional Park (CVRP). The CVRP is a significant asset for Spelthorne and should be included in the ‘Spelthorne facts’ and ‘Open spaces and leisure’ sections of the Local Plan. 3. A Community Interest Company (CIC) oversees the CVRP. The CVRP CIC collaborates with Spelthorne BC to identify and, where resources allow, implement ways to enhance the environment and accessibility (by non motorised modes) of the Park.
    [Show full text]
  • 05: Water Quality and Hydro-Ecology Assessment
    Heathrow Airport Limited Heathrow’s North-West Runway Water Quality and Hydro-ecology Assessment 16 June 2014 AMEC Environment & Infrastructure UK Limited 5 Copyright and Non-Disclosure Notice The contents and layout of this report are subject to copyright owned by AMEC (©AMEC Environment & Infrastructure UK Limited 2014). save to the extent that copyright has been legally assigned by us to another party or is used by AMEC under licence. To the extent that we own the copyright in this report, it may not be copied or used without our prior written agreement for any purpose other than the purpose indicated in this report. The methodology (if any) contained in this report is provided to you in confidence and must not be disclosed or copied to third parties without the prior written agreement of AMEC. Disclosure of that information may constitute an actionable breach of confidence or may otherwise prejudice our commercial interests. Any third party who obtains access to this report by any means will, in any event, be subject to the Third Party Disclaimer set out below. Third-Party Disclaimer Any disclosure of this report to a third party is subject to this disclaimer. The report was prepared by AMEC at the instruction of, and for use by, our client named on the front of the report. It does not in any way constitute advice to any third party who is able to access it by any means. AMEC excludes to the fullest extent lawfully permitted all liability whatsoever for any loss or damage howsoever arising from reliance on the contents of this report.
    [Show full text]
  • Peaches, Horton Road, Stanwell Moor, Middlesex TW19 6BQ Price £365,000 Freehold
    Staines Office: T: 01784 464606 E: [email protected] Peaches, Horton Road, Stanwell Moor, Middlesex TW19 6BQ Price £365,000 Freehold Located in Stanwell Moor with excellent access to Staines Town Centre and London Heathrow Airport, this detached two double bedroom bungalow is offered for sale in excellent condition throughout. Internally the property offers; a large reception hall, two excellent sized double bedrooms, a four piece bathroom suite, a lounge and a kitchen. Outside the property features a well maintained private front garden with a lawn area, well stocked borders, a large patio area and off street parking with double car port accessed via electric gate. EPC Rating E Directions: From our Staines office turn into Fairfield Avenue, follow this round to the traffic lights and turn left onto London Road. Proceed straight across the Crocked Billet roundabout onto Stanwell Moor Road/A3044. Proceed through the traffic lights and turn into Hithermoor Road on the left hand side, proceed along this road and follow around the right hand bend. Council Tax Banding: Spelthorne Borough Council, Council Tax Band D being £1,618.01 for 2015/16. Viewing: Via The Frost Partnership, 146 -148 High Street, Staines-upon-Thames, Surrey TW18 4AH. Special Note: For clarification, we wish to inform prospective purchasers that we have prepared these sale particulars as a general guide. We have not carried out a detailed survey, nor tested the service appliances and specific fittings. Room sizes should not be relied upon for carpets and furnishings. Whilst these particulars are believed to be correct they are not guaranteed by the vendor or the vendor's agent 'The Frost Partnership' and neither does any person have authority to make or give any representation or warranty on their behalf.
    [Show full text]
  • Leisure Directory 2019 Making the Most of Your Leisure Time in Spelthorne
    Free Leisure Directory 2019 Making the most of your leisure time in Spelthorne 01784 446433 [email protected] www.spelthorne.gov.uk/leisure Contents Adult education, libraries and 3 youth centres The Leisure Directory is a really useful Arts, culture and heritage 5 resource, full of Halls for hire 12 information about activities to enable Interests, groups and you to make the most 15 organisations of your leisure time in Spelthorne. There is something to suit all ages Parks and open spaces 24 and interests here. Play 28 Cllr Maureen Attewell, Cabinet Member for Community Wellbeing Sports, health and fitness 30 Disability symbol The Leisure Services team Many of the clubs and groups listed in We provide and promote a wide range of sport, this directory are fully inclusive. Those physical activity, youth, arts and heritage and with this symbol also have a dedicated wellbeing activities for local residents of all ages. disability session. Please contact the clubs or groups directly for more information. The team also supports and promotes local voluntary organisations and clubs. We help eNews - keep in touch them develop and provide activities within the community. Spelthorne Council produces a monthly Email [email protected], electronic newsletter containing Council news, call 01784 446433 or visit our website events, planning applications and more. www.spelthorne.gov.uk/leisure To receive the newsletter visit www.spelthorne.gov.uk/enews What’s on / Get Active Activity Finder Follow us Our What’s on page is packed with information to help keep you and your family active, visit www.spelthorne.gov.uk/whatson Don’t forget, you can follow Spelthorne Council on Facebook and Twitter.
    [Show full text]