DOCSLIB.ORG

A History of Women Philosophers Vol. IV

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A History of Women Philosophers Vol. IV A HISTORY OF WOMEN PHILOSOPHERS A History of Women Philosophers 1. Ancient Women Philosophers, 600 B.C.-500 A.D. 2. Medieval, Renaissance and Enlightenment Women Philosophers, 500-1600 3. Modern Women Philosophers, 1600-1900 4. Contemporary Women Philosophers, 1900-today PROFESSOR C. J. DE VOGEL A History of Women Philosophers Volume 4 Contemporary Women Philosophers 1900-today Edited by MARY ELLEN WAITHE Cleveland State University, Cleveland, U.S.A. Springer-Science+Business Media, B. V. Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Contemporary women philosophers : 1900-today / edited by Mary Ellen Waithe. p. cm. -- (A History of women philosophers ; v. 4.) Includes bibliographical references (p. xxx-xxx) and index. ISBN 978-0-7923-2808-7 ISBN 978-94-011-1114-0 (eBook) DOI 10.1007/978-94-011-1114-0 1. Women philosophers. 2. Philosophy. Modern--20th century. r. Waithe. Mary Ellen. II. Series. Bl05.W6C66 1994 190' .82--dc20 94-9712 ISBN 978-0-7923-2808-7 printed an acid-free paper AII Rights Reserved © 1995 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht Originally published by Kluwer Academic Publishers in 1995 Softcover reprint ofthe hardcover lst edition 1995 No part of the material protected by this copyright notice may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system, without written permission from the copyright owner. Contents Acknowledgements xv Introduction to Volume 4, by Mary Ellen Waithe xix 1. Victoria, Lady Welby (1837-1912), by William Andrew 1 Myers I. Introduction 1 II. Biography 1 III. Philosophy 5 1. Beginnings of a Philosophy of Interpretation 5 2. The Science of Signifies 13 IV. Other Intellectual Interests 17 V. Welby's Influence and the Development of Significs 20 VI. Conclusion 21 2. E. E. Constance Jones (1848-1922), by Mary Ellen Waithe 25 and Samantha Cicero I. Biography 25 II. Works 28 1. Ethics 28 (a) A Primer of Ethics 28 (b) Other Ethical Writings 29 2. Analytic Philosophy 31 (a) Categorical Propositions 31 (b) Identity of Denotation in Diversity of Intension 31 (c) Identity in Diversity as an Axiom of Logic 31 III. The Originality of Jones' Thought 36 1. Does Jones Anticipate Frege? 36 2. Does Jones Anticipate Russell? 37 ix x Contents 3. Could Russell Not Have Read Frege? 43 4. Might Frege Have Relied on Jones? 45 IV. Conclusion 46 3. Charlotte Perkins Gilman (1860-1935), by Julien S. 51 Murphy I. Biography 51 II. Gilman's Philosophical Work 55 1. Androcentric Philosophy 56 2. Androcentric Religion 57 3. Philosophy of Social Evolution 58 4. Gilman's Eugenics 63 5. Androcentric Ethics 64 6. Suicide and Euthanasia 65 4. Lou Salome (1861-1937), by Sandra A. Wawrytko 69 I. Biography 69 II. Philosophy 71 1. Philosophy of Religion: The Religious Experience 72 2. The Philosophy of Women: The Experiences of Love 73 and Sexuality 3. Psychoanalytical Theorizing and Influence 75 4. Later Writings 76 III. Influences 77 IV. Conclusions 79 5. Mary Whiton Calkins (1863-1930), by Beatrice H. Zedler 103 I. Biography 103 II. Psychology 104 1. Education, Contributions and Publications in the Field 104 of Psychology 2. What Psychology Is and Is Not 106 3. The Self and Its Relation to Soul and to Body 107 4. The Distinction and Relation between Psychology and 110 Philosophy III. Philosophy 111 1. Education, Contributions, and Publications in Phi- 111 losophy 2. Main Philosophical Ideas 112 3. Ethics and Other Philosophical Areas 117 IV. Conclusion 119 Contents xi 6. L. Susan Stebbing (1885-1943), by Morgan Grayce 125 Willow I. Biography 125 II. Philosophy 128 1. Pragmatism and French Voluntarism 128 2. A Modern Introduction to Logic 131 3. Logic in Practice 136 4. Thinking to Some Purpose 137 5. A Modern Elementary Logic 138 6. Philosophy and the Physicists 139 7. Ideas and Illusions 148 7. Edith Stein (1891-1942), by Mary Catherine Baseheart, 157 S. CN. and Linda Lopez McAlister with Waltraut Stein I. Biography 157 II. Philosophy 162 1. Personhood 164 (a) Psycho Physical Unity 164 (b) Knowledge of Other Persons 167 (c) Consciousness and Spirituality 170 (d) Woman 172 (e) Individual and Community 173 2. Theology 174 (a) Thomasism and Phenomenology 174 (b) Finite and Eternal Being 176 3. Metaphysics 177 (a) Being 177 (b) Act and Potency 178 (c) Eternal Being 180 (d) Essence and Existence 182 III. Conclusion 184 8. Gerda Walther (1897-1977), by Linda Lopez McAlister 189 I. Biography 189 II. Philosophy 195 1. Phenomenology 195 2. Mysticism 198 3. Parapsychology, Mysticism and Phenomenology 202 III. Conclusions 205 xii Contents 9. Ayn Rand (1905-1982), by Jenny A. Heyl 207 I. Biography 208 II. Literary Works 213 1. The Early Ayn Rand (1984) 213 2. Night of January 16th (originally titled Penthouse 214 Legend) (1936) III. Objectivist Philosophy 214 1. For the New Intellectual: The Philosophy ofAyn Rand 215 (1961) 2. We the Living (1936) 216 3. Anthem (1938) 216 4. The Fountainhead (1943) 217 5. Atlas Shrugged (1957) 218 6. The Newsletters (January 1962 - February 1976) 218 7. The Virtue of Selfishness (1964) 219 8. Capitalism: The Unknown Ideal (1966) 220 9. Introduction to Objectivist Epistemology (1967) 220 10. The Romantic Manifesto (1969) 221 11. The New Left: The Anti-Industrial Revolution (1971) 221 12. Philosophy: Who Needs It? (1982) 221 13. The Voice of Reason: Essays in Objectivist Thought 222 (1988) IV. Conclusion 222 10. Cornelia Johanna de Vogel (1905-1986), by Th. G. 225 Sinnige I. Background 225 II. Biography 226 III. Ancient Philosophy 228 IV. Christian Philosophy 234 V. On Theological Orthodoxy and Women 237 VI. Conclusions 240 11. Hannah Arendt (1906-1975), by Mary Ellen Waithe 243 I. Biography 243 II. Works 244 1. On Revolution 245 2. The Life of the Mind 248 III. Conclusions 257 Contents xiii 12. Simone de Beauvoir (1908-1986), by JeJfner Allen and Jo- 261 Ann Pilardi I. Biography 261 II. Works 261 III. Philosophy of the Self 268 1. Background 268 2. Self and Other in Beauvoir's Early Essays 270 3. Self and Other in The Second Sex 274 IV. Conclusion 282 13. Simonel Weil (1909-1943), by Kate Lindemann 287 I. Biography 287 II. Philosophical Work 290 1. Forms 290 2. Limit, Space, Time, Attention 292 3. Lived Experience of Oppressed Human Beings 294 III. Conclusions 296 14. Twentieth Century Women Philosophers, by Mary Ellen 299 Waithe 1. Sophie Willock Bryant: 1850-1922 300 2. Julia Henrietta Gulliver: 1856-1940 305 3. Helen Dendy Bosanquet: 1860-1925 306 4. Jane Addams: 1860-1935 311 5. Elizabeth S. Haldane: 1862-1937 314 6. May Sinclair: 1863-1946 315 7. Ellen Bliss Talbot: 1867-1968 320 8. Emma Goldman: 1869-1940 323 9. A. M. (Maud?) Bodkin: b. 1875 325 10. Evelyn Underhill: 1875-1941 327 11. Helen Knight: fl. 1877 330 12. Grace Mead Andrus De Laguna: 1878-1978 331 13. Nima Hirschensohn Alderblum: c. 1882-1974 332 14. Beatrice Edgell: fl. 1875 333 15. F. Rosamond Shields: fl. 1913 338 16. Katherine Everett Gilbert: 1886-1952 339 17. Una Mirrieles Bernard Sait: 1886-? 342 18. Helen Huss Parkhurst: 1887-1959 346 19. Sister Mary Patricia Garvey: 1888-1952 348 xiv Contents 20. Karin Costelloe Stephen: 1889-1953 349 21. Phyllis Ackerman: fl. 1893 351 22. Dorothy Wrinch Nicholson: 1894-1976 352 23. Marjorie Silliman Harris: fl. 1913 355 24. E. M. Whetnall: fl. 1900 355 25. Ruth Lydia Saw: 1901-1983? 357 26. Ivy MacKenzie: fl. 1902 363 27. Margaret Masterman Braithwaite: fl. 1905 363 28. Margaret MacDonald: fl. 1907-1956 364 29. Helen M. Smith: fl. 1907 366 Appendix 381 Bibliography 383 Index 461 Acknowledgements So many have contributed so much to this volume. In addition to the very capable contributions made by the named authors, I wish to thank several people who have helped with the research, writing, and editing of this volume. Professor Alice Ambrose was kind enough to take my telephone call during Christmas holiday of 1991. She allowed me to read to her the contents of an entire file drawer containing the names of those women philosophers who are discussed in the final chapter, or who are mentioned in the Appendix. She graciously filled in details she remembered about the lives and works of many of those women. Often, when my research staff could find no published information about a subject's life, educa­ tion, professional experience, or even a date of death, Professor Ambrose was able to provide me with personal remembrances. I have indicated in the text and notes to Chapter 14, information that Professor Ambrose provided. Speaking with her gave me an odd sensation of work com­ pleted and of times changed. After our conversation ended, I recollected the feeling that had come over me that day, more than a decade ago, when I "found" the first work I located by an ancient woman philosopher. I remember standing in the library stacks, poring through page after page of Stobaeus, looking for the fragment by Aesara of Lucania On Human Nature which from Wolff's Latin translation, was clearly a work of phi­ losophy. I did not read Greek (and still don't), but had transliterated Wolff's Greek for Aesara of Lucania. And suddenly, there it was, staring back at me from the pages of Stobaeus. Tears came to my eyes. And now, a decade later, I was actually speaking to someone who personally had known a woman philosopher about whom I was writing. The millennia bridged from the time of Aesara to the time about which I spoke with Alice Ambrose contained our entire history, the history of women philosophers.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Man a Machine
    Man a Machine Julien Offray de La Mettrie Man a Machine Table of Contents Man a Machine..........................................................................................................................................................1 Julien Offray de La Mettrie............................................................................................................................1 i Man a Machine Julien Offray de La Mettrie This page copyright © 2001 Blackmask Online. http://www.blackmask.com It is not enough for a wise man to study nature and truth; he should dare state truth for the benefit of the few who are willing and able to think. As for the rest, who are voluntarily slaves of prejudice, they can no more attain truth, than frogs can fly. I reduce to two the systems of philosophy which deal with man's soul. The first and older system is materialism; the second is spiritualism. The metaphysicians who have hinted that matter may well be endowed with the faculty of thought have perhaps not reasoned ill. For there is in this case a certain advantage in their inadequate way of expressing their meaning. In truth, to ask whether matter can think, without considering it otherwise than in itself, is like asking whether matter can tell time. It may be foreseen that we shall avoid this reef upon which Locke had the bad luck to shipwreck. The Leibnizians with their monads have set up an unintelligible hypothesis. They have rather spiritualized matter than materialized the soul. How can we define a being whose nature is absolutely unknown to us? Descartes and all the Cartesians, among whom the followers of Malebranche have long been numbered, have made the same mistake. They have taken for granted two distinct substances in man, as if they had seen them, and positively counted them.
    [Show full text]
  • CHSS Annualreport 2015.Indd
    College of Humanities Social Sciences Leading the way& to wisdom. ANNUAL REPORT ACADEMIC YEAR 2015 - 2016 ON THE COVER Students collaborate in a Spanish 1 classroom. College of Humanities & Social Sciences 201 Mullica Hill Road Glassboro, New Jersey 08028 www.rowan.edu/colleges/chss facebook.com/RowanCHSS youtube.com/RowanCHSS twitter.com/@RowanCHSS CONTENTS 2 | Dean’s Message 3 | Senator Fred Madden Charges Graduates to Make an Impact 3 | Castner Receives Distinguished Alumni Award 4 | RCHGS Highlights Connections Between Past and Present 5 | New Degree Programs in CHSS Offer New Opportunities 6 | Rowan Partners With Law Schools in New 3 + 3 Program 7 | College Welcomes International Conference 7 | Student Awarded Prestigious Boren Scholarship 8 | College Celebrates Ongoing Accomplishments 9 | New Faculty Bring Fresh Perspectives 11 | CHSS Faculty Honored at Celebrating Excellence Awards 12 | In Appreciation WWW.ROWAN.EDU/COLLEGES/CHSS 1 it iS with mixed emotionS that Justice Studies Program is an integral to serve the College as I rejoin my I write this message for the Annual part of our partnership agreements faculty colleagues. Report for 2015-16, my f nal year as dean with Rowan College at Gloucester of the College of Humanities and Social County and Rowan College at Dr. Cindy Vitto Sciences. Burlington County. We also have Dean instituted accelerated 3 + 3 programs Much change is occurring within with Drexel’s Kline School of Law, CHSS, all of it positive, and the most Widener University-Delaware Law signif cant change of all is a transition School, and Rutgers Law School. Dean’s to a new dean, Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Elisabeth Leinfellner.Indd
    Drei Pioniere der philosophisch-linguistischen Analyse von Zeit und Tempus: Mauthner, Jespersen, Reichenbach Elisabeth Leinfellner, Wien [A philosophical school in Tlön] reasons that the present is indefi nite, that the future has no reality other than as a present hope, that the past has no reality other than as a present memory. Jorge Luis Borges, Tlön, Uqbar, Orbis Tertius 1. Einleitung: die semantische Rolle der Tempora Unsere alltägliche, ,psychologische‘, aber auch die abstrakte newtonsche oder mathematische Vorstellung von Zeit – die ,klassischen‘ Zeitvorstellungen – laufen darauf hinaus, dass es eine einfache lineare Abfolge von Vergangen- heit-Gegenwart-Zukunft gibt. Analysiert man jedoch natürliche Sprachen, dann bietet sich ein anderes, komplexeres Bild: Würde man der einfachen, klassischen Vorstellung folgen, dann käme man in der Sprache mit drei Tempora aus: Präsens, Präteritum, Futurum. Ein Blick in die Grammatiken verschiedener Sprachen zeigt aber, dass es auch andere Tempora neben die- sen dreien gibt, so im heutigen Deutsch das Plusquamperfekt und das Fu- turum exactum. Gewisse Tempora und auch temporale Ersatzformen lösen mehr oder minder glücklich das Problem, dass z.B. in einer Erzählung im Präteritum manchmal auch im zeitlichen Rückgriff eine Vergangenheit vor der Vergangenheit dargestellt werden muss, oder eine Zukunft in der Ver- gangenheit. Die Ursachen für eine nicht chronologische Darstellung sind vielfältig, z.B. stilistisch-textliche oder dass wir uns an Ereignisse nicht im- mer in der richtigen Reihenfolge erinnern. Weiters muss die Verwendung der Tempora in erzählenden Texten die Rekonstruktion des chronologischen Ablaufs von Ereignissen erlauben, z.B. aus praktischen Gründen. Dass Texte keineswegs immer chronologisch geordnet sind, hat in verschiedenen Disziplinen und oft im Gefolge des russischen Formalismus zu einer Unterscheidung zwischen zwei zeitlichen Achsen geführt, der chronologischen Achse der Abfolge der Ereignisse, und F.
    [Show full text]
  • Man a Machine
    MAN A MACHINE BY JULIEN OFFRAY DE LA METTRIE FRENCH-ENGLISH INCLUDING FREDERICK THE GREAT’S "EULOGY” ON LA METTRIE AND EX­ TRACTS FROM LA METTRIE’S “THE NATURAL HISTORY OF THE SOUL” PHILOSOPHICAL AND HISTORICAL NOTES BY GERTRUDE CARMAN BUSSEY M. A., WELLESLEY COLLEGE CHICAGO THE OPEN COURT PUBLISHING CO. 1912 UNIVERSITY $C-l*9L 'iF ^LO«C:-«i£ a r*D PU8LIC HEALTH orvV T K Z X ^su^ £ A r OK 14 f/.^J946 COPYRIGHT BY THE OPEN COURT PUBLISHING CO. 1912 TABLE OF CONTENTS. PAGE Preface...........................................................................................v Frederic the Great's Eulogy on Julien Offray De La M ettrie.......................................................................................i L’Homme Machine.................................................................... n Man a Machine..........................................................................83 The Natural History of theSoul: Extracts......................... 151 Appendix....................................................................................163 La Mettrie’s Relation to His Predecessors and to His Successors....................................................................... 165 Outline of La Mettrie’s Metaphysical Doctrine . .175 N o te s...................................................................................176 Works Consulted and Cited in the Notes .... 205 I n d e x ....................................................................................... 209 4 PREFACE. HE French text presented in this volume is taken
    [Show full text]
  • Ascribing Sexual Orientations
    Atlantis Vol. 13 No.2 Spring/Printemps 1988 Ascribing Sexual Orientations Christine Overall Queen's University ABSTRACT The goal of this paper is to suggest a somewhat different approach to the contemporary discussion of human sexual orientations. Instead of examining the nature of sexual orientation itself, it discusses the meanings of ascriptions of sexual orientation. (The discussion is confined to cases where the subject of ascription is female.) The paper begins with a survey of some prevalent ways of interpreting ascriptions of sexual orientation. It then comments on the variations in their meanings, and considers what the speaker is doing when uttering such an ascription. It concludes with some comments about an apparently anomalous sexual orientation, bisexuality. My interest in the ascription of sexual orientations what it is to be a lesbian (let alone a lesbian bisexual), and arose, in part, from three observations which I made over how one is to know whether any person (including one• the course of the past year.1 First, in my investigations of self) is one. ethical issues pertaining to reproductive technology, it became very clear that access to such processes as in vitro I was troubled, then, by both ontological and epistemo- fertilization and artificial insemination by donor is regu• logical problems: What is it to be lesbian or heterosexual lated and limited by means of the physician-enforced stip• or bisexual? How does one know whether a person is ulation that the female candidates for these technologies lesbian or heterosexual
    [Show full text]
  • Russell and the Cambridge Moral Sciences Club L by Jack Pitt
    Russell and the Cambridge Moral Sciences Club l by Jack Pitt IN HIS Autobiography Russell records his extreme satisfaction at being elected to the fraternal discussion group at Cambridge familiarly known as the Apostles. 2 In addition to including a number of congratulatory letters from elder Apostles, he writes: "The greatest happiness ofmy time at Cambridge was connected with a body whom its members knew as 'The Society,' but which outsiders, if they knew of it, called 'The Apostles.'''3 The sub­ sequent notoriety of this group obscured the fact that Russell I Gratitude is expressed to those at the University of Cambridge who kindly provided access to the Minutes of the Cambridge University Moral Sciences Club. The Minutes have been invaluable in constructing an historical context in which to locate Russell's participation in the Club, and in providing many details pertinent to that participation. 2 Its complete name is the Cambridge Conversazione Society. Its character and history is treated in Paul Levy's fascinating study, G. E. Moore and the Cam­ bridge Apostles (London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1979). I am indebted to this book for many points of fact in this essay, especially as these concern members of the Society. The interested reader may also wish to consult Peter Allen's The Cambridge Apostles: The Early Years (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1978). 3 Autobiography, 1872-1914 (Boston: Atlantic-Little, Brown, 1967), p. 91. 103 104 Russell winter 1981-82 Russell and the Cambridge Moral Sciences Club 105 maintained membership in other Cambridge societies. for The Athenaeum. Another of those in attendance was Alfred Philosophically the most important, and the one which will con­ Williams Momerie (Mummery), subsequently Professor of Logic cern us here, is the Cambridge University Moral Sciences Club and Metaphysics (1880-91) at King's College, London, and also (CUMSC).
    [Show full text]
  • H-France Review Vol. 14 (July 2014), No. 112 Florence Lotterie, Le Genre
    H-France Review Volume 14 (2014) Page 1 H-France Review Vol. 14 (July 2014), No. 112 Florence Lotterie, Le Genre des Lumières: Femme et philosophe au XVIIIe siècle. Paris: Classiques Garnier, 2013. 336 pp. Bibliography and index of names. $90.00 U.S. (hb). ISBN 978-28124-1025-3. Review by Jennifer M. Jones, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey Book V of Jean-Jacques Rousseau’s Émile, which proposed the striking model of Sophie’s feminine alterity, remains a touchstone for scholars of women and gender in eighteenth-century France. In the past two decades, however, historians have moved well beyond Rousseau in their exploration of the gendered history of the Enlightenment, scouring sources and sites that range from fashion magazines and salons to colonial treatises and pornographic literature. Drawing on the new social history of ideas in the 1970s and inspired by engagement with Jürgen Habermas’s model of the “public sphere” from the late 1980s, gender historians have continued to expand their field of inquiry.[1] Florence Lotterie reminds us, however, that scholars still have much to learn about how philosophy itself was gendered in the eighteenth century. She argues that the figure of the female philosopher stood at the center of both eighteenth-century fears and fantasies about the difference between the sexes and new definitions of philosophy itself. Florence Lotterie, professor of eighteenth-century French literature at the University of Paris VII Denis Diderot, is an especially learned guide to the gendered “mind of the Enlightenment”
    [Show full text]
  • Why Do Women Leave Philosophy?
    Philosophers’ volume 16, no. 6 1. When do women leave philosophy? Imprint march 2016 In 2012 in the United States, for every 100 men graduating with a col- lege degree, 141 women graduated.1 For decades now, more women have been enrolled in American universities than men. Yet, during these same decades, the proportion of women who major in philos- ophy has remained stagnant, hovering below one-third. So, while al- WHY DO WOMEN LEAVE most 60% of college graduates are now women, only 30% of philoso- phy majors are women (Department of Education, 2013; Paxton et al., 2012). In the humanities, religion and theology (35.6%) is the closest PHILOSOPHY? SURVEYING major to philosophy when it comes to the underrepresentation of fe- male majors. Among all majors, the only ones with similarly low ratios are economics (31%), physics (19.7%), computer science (22%), and en- gineering (20%).2 STUDENTS AT THE With women getting just 30% of philosophy bachelor’s degrees, it’s no surprise that the ratio of women to men is so low among philos- ophy graduate students (30%) and professors (20.7%) (Paxton et al., INTRODUCTORY LEVEL 2012; Norlock, 2012).3 The underrepresentation and treatment of fe- male graduate students and professors in philosophy has, for good rea- son, received increasing attention in recent years. But there has been limited discussion, and very few empirical investigations, of why so Morgan Thompson∗, Toni Adleberg†, Sam many women say goodbye to philosophy just after being introduced to it. In this article, we offer our initial attempts to gather data to test Sims‡, Eddy Nahmias§ various hypotheses aimed at answering this question and to suggest University of Pittsburgh∗, University of California, San Diego†, 1.
    [Show full text]
  • WISDOM (Tlwma) and Pffllosophy (FALSAFA)
    WISDOM (tLWMA) AND PfflLOSOPHY (FALSAFA) IN ISLAMIC THOUGHT (as a framework for inquiry) By: Mehmet ONAL This thcsis is submitted ror the Doctor of Philosophy at the University of Wales - Lampeter 1998 b"9tr In this study the following two hypothesisare researched: 1. "WisdotW' is the fundamental aspect of Islamic thought on which Islamic civilisation was established through Islamic law (,Sharfa), theology (Ldi-M), philosophy (falsafq) and mysticism (Surism). 2. "Due to the first hypothesis Islamic philosophy is not only a commentary on the Greek philosophy or a new form of Ncoplatonism but a native Islamic wisdom understandingon the form of theoretical study". The present thesis consists of ten chaptersdealing with the concept of practical wisdom (Pikmq) and theoretical wisdom (philosophy or falsafa). At the end there arc a gcncral conclusion,glossary and bibliography. In the introduction (Chapter One) the definition of wisdom and philosophy is establishedas a conceptualground for the above two hypothesis. In the following chapter (Chapter Two) I focused on the historical background of these two concepts by giving a brief history of ancient wisdom and Greek philosophy as sourcesof Islamic thought. In the following two chapters (Chapter Three and Four) I tried to bring out a possibledefinition of Islamic wisdom in the Qur'5n and Sunna on which Islamic jurisprudence (fiqh), theology (A-alim), philosophy (falsafq) and mysticism (Sufism) consistedof. As a result of the above conceptual approaching,I tried to reach a new definition for wisdom (PiLma) as a method that helps in the establishmentof a new Islamic way of life and civilisation for our life.
    [Show full text]
  • On Sidgwick's Demise: a Reply to Professor Deigh
    On Sidgwick’s Demise: A Reply to Professor Deigh ANTHONY SKELTON The University of Western Ontario In ‘Sidgwick’s Epistemology’, John Deigh argues that Henry Sidgwick’s The Methods of Ethics ‘was not perceived during his lifetime as a major and lasting contribution to British moral philosophy’ and that interest in it declined considerably after Sidgwick’s death because the epistemology on which it relied ‘increasingly became suspect in analytic philosophy and eventually [it was] discarded as obsolete’. In this article I dispute these claims. In a recent article in this journal, John Deigh1 argues that Henry Sidgwick’s The Methods of Ethics2 ‘was not perceived during his lifetime as a major and lasting contribution to British moral philosophy’ (438), and that interest in it declined considerably after Sidgwick’s death because the epistemology on which it relied ‘increasingly became suspect in analytic philosophy and eventually [it was] discarded as obsolete’ (439). In this article I dispute these claims. I Deigh argues that Sidgwick’s Methods ‘was not perceived during his lifetime as a major and lasting contribution to British moral philosophy’ (438). However, this is far from clear. First, to make his point Deigh relies on an article in Encyclopaedia Britannica and an obituary in Mind by Leslie Stephen.3 These are not decisive. Stephen announces at the outset of his obituary that he is not concerned to provide an estimate of Sidgwick’s work in philosophy, though he notes that Methods is a ‘great book’ and that Sidgwick’s work in ethics gave ‘the most important of all modern contributions towards a clear realisation of the conditions of approaching the problems involved’.4 The encyclopaedia article does not deny that Methods is a major contribution; instead, it merely fails to single it out.5 Second, a number of important philosophers were sent copies of Methods when the first edition was published in 1874, 1 John Deigh, ‘Sidgwick’s Epistemology’, Utilitas 19 (2007), pp.
    [Show full text]
  • Women in Philosophy: Problems with the Discrimination Hypothesis
    Log In WOMEN IN PHILOSOPHY: PROBLEMS WITH THE DISCRIMINATION HYPOTHESIS Dec 10, 2014 | Neven Sesardic, Rafael De Clercq Your Email Address Neven Sesardic is professor of philosophy at Lingnan University, Tuen Mun, NT, Hong Kong; [email protected]. He is the author of Making Sense of Heritability (Cambridge University Press, 2005). Rafael De Clercq is associate professor and head of the Department of Visual Studies, and adjunct associate professor of philosophy, Lingnan University, Tuen Mun, NT, Hong Kong; [email protected]. The authors thank these individuals for useful comments on earlier drafts: Tomislav Bracanović, Stephen J. Ceci, Andrew Irvine, Paisley Livingston, Darrell Rowbottom, Nosson ben Ruvein, David N. Stamos, Matej Sušnik, Omri Tal, Daniel Wikler, Wendy M. Williams, and Jiji Zhang. None of these people, however, should be assumed to agree with the main claims of this paper. Editor’s Note: This is the complete version of an article with the same title adapted for the Winter 2014 Academic Questions (vol. 27, no. 4) A number of philosophers attribute the underrepresentation of women in philosophy largely to bias against women or some kind of wrongful discrimination. They cite six sources of evidence to support their contention: (1) gender disparities that increase along the path from undergraduate student to full-time faculty member; (2) anecdotal accounts of discrimination in philosophy; (3) research on gender bias in the evaluation of manuscripts, grants, and curricula vitae in other academic disciplines; (4) psychological research on implicit bias; (5) psychological research on stereotype threat; and (6) the relatively small number of articles written from a feminist perspective in leading philosophy journals.
    [Show full text]
  • Linguistic Scepticism in Mauthner's Philosophy
    LiberaPisano Misunderstanding Metaphors: Linguistic ScepticisminMauthner’s Philosophy Nous sommes tous dans un désert. Personne ne comprend personne. Gustave Flaubert¹ This essayisanoverview of Fritz Mauthner’slinguistic scepticism, which, in my view, represents apowerful hermeneutic category of philosophical doubts about the com- municative,epistemological, and ontological value of language. In order to shed light on the main features of Mauthner’sthought, Idrawattention to his long-stand- ing dialogue with both the sceptical tradition and philosophyoflanguage. This con- tribution has nine short sections: the first has an introductory function and illus- tratesseveral aspectsoflinguistic scepticism in the history of philosophy; the second offers acontextualisation of Mauthner’sphilosophyoflanguage; the remain- der present abroad examination of the main features of Mauthner’sthought as fol- lows: the impossibility of knowledge that stems from aradicalisationofempiricism; the coincidencebetween wordand thought,thinkingand speaking;the notion of use, the relevanceoflinguistic habits,and the utopia of communication; the decep- tive metaphors at the root of an epoché of meaning;the new task of philosophyasan exercise of liberation against the limits of language; the controversial relationship between Judaism and scepticism; and the mystical silence as an extreme conse- quence of his thought.² Mauthnerturns scepticism into aform of life and philosophy into acritique of language, and he inauguratesanew approach that is traceable in manyGerman—Jewish
    [Show full text]