DOCSLIB.ORG

STELLAR DAISY CASUALTY INVESTIGATION REPORT Loss of Buoyancy and Foundering with Multiple Loss of Life

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
STELLAR DAISY CASUALTY INVESTIGATION REPORT Loss of Buoyancy and Foundering with Multiple Loss of Life REPUBLIC OF THE MARSHALL ISLANDS Maritime Administrator STELLAR DAISY CASUALTY INVESTIGATION REPORT Loss of Buoyancy and Foundering with Multiple Loss of Life South Atlantic Ocean | 31 March 2017 Official Number: 3486 IMO Number: 9038725 CONDOLENCES The Republic of the Marshall Islands Maritime Administrator offers its sincere condolences to the families and friends of the 22 individuals who perished in the 31 March 2017 casualty. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Republic of the Marshall Islands Maritime Administrator commends the surviving members of the crew of STELLAR DAISY for their dedication to searching for their fellow crewmembers. The Master and crew of SPITHA, and particularly ELPIDA, are also commended for their efforts in searching for and rescuing the surviving members of STELLAR DAISY crew. The Republic of the Marshall Islands Maritime Administrator thanks the marine safety investigation authorities from the Republic of Korea, the Republic of the Philippines, and the Federative Republic of Brazil, which participated as substantially interested States, and Polaris Shipping Co., Ltd., the Korean Register of Shipping, and Vale SA, which were interested parties, for their cooperation. Published by: Republic of the Marshall Islands Maritime Administrator on 19 April 2019 DISCLAIMER In accordance with national and international requirements, the Republic of the Marshall Islands Maritime Administrator (the “Administrator”) conducts marine safety investigations of marine casualties and incidents to promote the safety of life and property at sea and to promote the prevention of pollution. Marine safety investigations conducted by the Administrator do not seek to apportion blame or determine liability. While every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the information contained in this Report, the Administrator and its representatives, agents, employees, or affiliates accept no liability for any findings or determinations contained herein, or for any error or omission, alleged to be contained herein. Extracts may be published without specific permission providing that the source is duly acknowledged; otherwise, please obtain permission from the Administrator prior to reproduction of the Report. AUTHORITY An investigation, under the authority of the Republic of the Marshall Islands laws and regulations, including all international instruments to which the Republic of the Marshall Islands is a Party, was conducted to determine the cause of the casualty. Maritime Administrator Please submit questions to: 11495 Commerce Park Drive, Reston, Virginia 20191-1506 USA | tel: +1 703 620 4880 | fax: +1 703 476 8522 | [email protected] TABLE OF CONTENTS PART 1: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 9 PART 2: FINDINGS OF FACT 11 PART 3: ANALYSIS 55 PART 4: CONCLUSIONS 75 PART 5: PREVENTATIVE ACTIONS 77 PART 6: RECOMMENDATIONS 81 Part 1: Executive Summary 9 PART 1: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY On 31 March 2017, the 266,141 deadweight ton (DWT), very large ore carrier (VLOC) STELLAR DAISY sank while on a laden voyage from Ilha Guaíba, Federative Republic of Brazil (hereinafter “Brazil”) to Qingdao, People’s Republic of China (hereinafter “China”). At the time, STELLAR DAISY was underway in the South ofthe MarshallRepublic Islands Maritime Administrator Atlantic Ocean and was more than 1,700 nautical miles (NM) from the coast of Oriental Republic of Uruguay (hereinafter “Uruguay”) and 1,800 NM from the west coast of Republic of South Africa (hereinafter “South Africa”). The water depth in the area was approximately 3,400-3,600 meters (m). Of the 24 crewmembers on board, two were rescued. The other 22 crewmembers are missing and presumed deceased. The marine safety investigation conducted by the Republic of the Marshall Islands Maritime Administrator (the “Administrator”) determined that the likely direct cause of STELLAR DAISY foundering was a rapid list to port following a catastrophic structural failure of the ship’s hull that resulted in a loss of buoyancy and uncontrolled flooding. The structural failure and flooding are thought to have begun in the No. 2 port water ballast tank (WBT) and then progressed rapidly to include structural failure and flooding in multiple WBTs, voids, and cargo holds. The structural damage was likely due to a combination of factors, including the strength of the ship’s structure being compromised over time due to material fatigue, corrosion, unidentified Part 1: Executive Summary structural repairs, multi-port loading, and the forces imposed on the hull as a result of the weather conditions STELLAR DAISY encountered between 29–31 March 2017. The Administrator’s marine safety investigation also concluded that the likely causal factors include: 10 1. the large port and starboard wing tanks increased the potential for a major structural failure and loss of buoyancy in the event that one or more of these tanks flooded while the ship was in a laden condition; 2. a gap in the additional safety measures for bulk carriers contained in the International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea (SOLAS), 1974, Chapter XII, regulation 5 which does not require an assessment to ensure bulk carriers of 150 m or more in length of double-side skin construction, designed to carry solid bulk cargoes with a density of 1,000 kilograms per cubic meter (kg/m3) and above, constructed on or after 1 July 2006 with any part of the longitudinal bulkhead located within B/5 or 11.5 m, whichever is less, inboard from the ship’s side at a right angle to the centerline at the assigned summer load line can withstand the flooding of any one wing tank in all loading and ballast conditions; and 3. ineffective assessments of structural damage identified when the ship was in dry dock in 2011, 2012, and 2015 which failed to determine the cause of the structural damage, identify any potential defects with the conversion design, or require the development of appropriate repair plans. Republic ofthe MarshallRepublic Islands Maritime Administrator Part 2: Findings of Fact 11 PART 2: FINDINGS OF FACT The following Findings of Fact are based on the information available to the Administrator. Ship Details ofthe MarshallRepublic Islands Maritime Administrator 1. Ship particulars: see chart on page 12. New Construction 2. STELLAR DAISY1 was built as a 264,165 DWT, single hull, very large crude carrier (VLCC) in 1993 at the Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd. shipyard in Sapporo, Japan. The ship was designed, built, and classed in accordance with the applicable rules of the ClassNK Classification Society as a crude oil carrier.2 1 Although the ship was not named STELLAR DAISY until 1 January 2008, it will be referred to by this name throughout the report. 2 ClassNK Rules 1991 edition. Part 2: Findings of Fact 3. As built, STELLAR DAISY was longitudinally framed with web frames on 5.95 m centers. SHIP The ship’s structure included mild steel PARTICULARS and multiple grades of high tensile strength 12 steel.3 Within the cargo length, grade AH high Ship Name tensile strength steel was used for, among STELLAR DAISY other things, plate for the main deck, side Registered Owner shell, bottom shell, under deck longitudinals, VP-14 Shipping Inc. horizontal girders, frames, and oil tight ISM Ship Management bulkheads. Grade AH36 high tensile strength Polaris Shipping Co., Ltd. steel was used for the side shell longitudinals, bottom longitudinals, longitudinal bulkhead Flag State Republic of the Marshall Islands longitudinals, and transverse bulkhead vertical stiffeners.4 Date of Registry 22 January 2009 4. There were 15 tanks in the cargo length. Of ( ) ( ) these, the No. 1 port P /center C /starboard IMO No. Official No. Call Sign (S), No. 2 C, No. 3 P/C/S, No. 4 C, and No. 9038725 3486 V7RD9 5 P/C/S tanks were cargo oil tanks (COT). The No. 2 P/S and No. 4 P/S tanks were Year of Build Year Converted segregated WBTs. The ship’s other WBTs 1993 2009 were the forepeak tank (FPT) and the aftpeak tank (APT). Length x Breadth x Depth 311.89 x 58 x 29.5 meters 5. In January 2008, Polaris Shipping Co., Ltd. ( ) Polaris Shipping assumed responsibility Gross Net Deadweight for the commercial operation of STELLAR Tonnage Tonnage Tonnage DAISY and Syncro Shipping Co., Ltd. assumed 148,431 44,530 266,141 responsibility for the ship’s management in accordance with the International Management Ship Type Code for the Safe Operation of Ships and Very Large Ore Carrier (Converted from a Very Large Crude Carrier) for Pollution Prevention (International Safety Document of Compliance Recognized Organization 3 Steel with a specified minimum yield stress of 235 Newtons per square millimeter (N/mm2) is normal strength structural steel and is Korean Register of Shipping referred to as mild steel. Steel having a higher specified minimum yield stress is regarded as high tensile strength steel. High tensile Safety Management Certificate strength steel is commonly marked “AH.” Grades of high tensile strength steel are based on the minimum yield stress. Grade AH or Recognized Organization AH32 high tensile strength steel has a minimum yield of 315 N/ mm2. Grade AH36 high tensile strength steel has a minimum yield of Korean Register of Shipping 355 N/mm2. See International Association of Classification Societies (IACS), Common Structural Rules for Bulk Carriers and Oil Tankers, Classification Society ( ) Part 1, Chapter 3, Section 2 1 January 2014 . Korean Register of Shipping 4 Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Co., Ltd., DWT 265,000 Ton Class Ore Carrier (M/V “STELLAR DAISY”) General Arrangement, Drawing JD 07066-H001, Rev. B, dated 21 January 2008 (hereinafter, Persons on Board “Midship Section Drawing”). The Midship Section Drawing was approved by the Korean Register of Shipping (KR) on 23 January 24 2008. The Midship Section Drawing includes the ship’s original Republic ofthe MarshallRepublic Islands Maritime Administrator structure and the structure after conversion. Part 2: Findings of Fact Management (ISM) Code). The ship also underwent a change of Classification Society from ClassNK to KR and the ship’s registration was changed to the Republic of Korea.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • In This Issue …
    In This Issue … INLAND SEAS®VOLUME 72 WINTER 2016 NUMBER 4 MAUMEE VALLEY COMES HOME . 290 by Christopher H. Gillcrist KEEPING IT IN TRIM: BALLAST AND GREAT LAKES SHIPPING . 292 by Matthew Daley, Grand Valley State University Jeffrey L. Ram, Wayne State University RUNNING OUT OF STEAM, NOTES AND OBSERVATIONS FROM THE SS HERBERT C. JACKSON . 319 by Patrick D. Lapinski NATIONAL RECREATION AREAS AND THE CREATION OF PICTURED ROCKS NATIONAL LAKESHORE . 344 by Kathy S. Mason BOOKS . 354 GREAT LAKES NEWS . 356 by Greg Rudnick MUSEUM COLUMN . 374 by Carrie Sowden 289 KEEPING IT IN TRIM: BALLAST AND GREAT LAKES SHIPPING by Matthew Daley, Grand Valley State University Jeffrey L. Ram, Wayne State University n the morning of July 24, 1915, hundreds of employees of the West- Oern Electric Company and their families boarded the passenger steamship Eastland for a day trip to Michigan City, Indiana. Built in 1903, this twin screw, steel hulled steamship was considered a fast boat on her regular run. Yet throughout her service life, her design revealed a series of problems with stability. Additionally, changes such as more lifeboats in the aftermath of the Titanic disaster, repositioning of engines, and alterations to her upper cabins, made these built-in issues far worse. These failings would come to a disastrous head at the dock on the Chicago River. With over 2,500 passengers aboard, the ship heeled back and forth as the chief engineer struggled to control the ship’s stability and failed. At 7:30 a.m., the Eastland heeled to port, coming to rest on the river bottom, trapping pas- sengers inside the hull and throwing many more into the river.
    [Show full text]
  • Annexes to Riverdance Report No 18/2009
    Annex 1 QinetiQ report on stability investigation of mv Riverdance COMMERCIAL IN CONFIDENCE MV RIVERDANCE Stability Investigation for MAIB August 2009 Copyright © QinetiQ ltd 2009 COMMERCIAL IN CONFIDENCE COMMERCIAL IN CONFIDENCE List of contents 1 Introduction 7 2 Investigation of the MV RIVERDANCE 8 2.1 MV RIVERDANCE Track 8 2.2 Environmental Conditions in the Area of the Incident 9 2.3 Loading Condition and Stability of MV RIVERDANCE 11 2.4 Stability Book Version 12 2.5 Evaluation of the Stability Book 12 2.6 Vessel loading condition 13 3 MV RIVERDANCE - Scenario Assessments 22 3.1 Prior to the incident 22 3.2 Dynamic Stability of MV RIVERDANCE in Stern Seas 22 3.3 The Turn to Starboard 27 3.4 Cargo Shift Prior to and After the Turn to Starboard 30 3.5 Wind Effects 37 3.6 Other potential contributing factors on the vessel angle following the turn 37 3.7 Combined List and Heel after turn - Cumulative effect of downflooding with cargo shift and wind effects 43 3.8 Potential Transfer of Fluid between Heeling Tanks (13) 47 3.9 The attempted re-floating of MV RIVERDANCE 58 3.10 The most likely sequence of events 59 4 Conclusions 63 4.1 Conclusions 63 5 References / Bibliography 66 6 Abbreviations 67 A Loading Conditions 68 A.1 Lightship 68 A.2 Estimated Load Condition 69 A.3 Plus 10% Cargo 70 A.4 Plus 15% Cargo 71 A.5 VCG Up 72 A.6 VCG Up plus 10% Cargo 73 A.7 VCG Up plus 15% Cargo 74 A.8 Cargo Shifted Up 75 A.9 Cargo Shifted Down 76 A.10 Tank states for all loading conditions 77 7 Initial distribution list 79 Page 4 COMMERCIAL IN CONFIDENCE COMMERCIAL IN CONFIDENCE List of Figures Figure 2-1 - MV RIVERDANCE track 9 Figure 2-2 - Water Depth 10 Figure 2-3 - Most likely cargo positioning 19 Figure 3-1- Parametric roll in regular head seas.
    [Show full text]
  • How to Win at Marine Cargo Claims: an English Perspective the Hague, Hague-Bisby and Hamburg Rules
    HOW TO WIN AT MARINE CARGO CLAIMS: AN ENGLISH PERSPECTIVE THE HAGUE, HAGUE-BISBY AND HAMBURG RULES Simon David Jones, English Solicitor Cozen O’Connor Tower 42, Level 27 25 Old Broad Street London, UK +44 (0) 20 7864 2000 [email protected] Atlanta Charlotte Cherry Hill Chicago Dallas Las Vegas* Los Angeles New York Newark Philadelphia San Diego San Francisco Seattle West Conshohocken Washington, DC Wilmington *Affiliated with the Law Offices of J. Goldberg & D. Grossman The views expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views or opinions of any current or former client of Cozen O'Connor. These materials are not intended to provide legal advice. Readers should not act or rely on this material without seeking specific legal advice on matters which concern them. Copyright (c) 2001 Cozen O'Connor ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 1 HOW TO WIN AT MARINE CARGO CLAIMS : AN ENGLISH PERSPECTIVE THE HAGUE, HAGUE-VISBY AND HAMBURG RULES Background At English common law the parties to a contract of affreightment covered by a Bill of Lading or similar document had complete freedom to negotiate their own terms as had the parties to a charterparty. Abuse of the carriers’ stronger bargaining position during the 19th century led to extremely onerous terms being placed in Bills of Lading. The first attempt to redress the balance between the interests of ship and cargo came from the United States in the form of the Harter Act of 1893. It soon became clear to the major marine trading countries that a single Convention binding all contracting parties was preferable to a system of similar but not identical Acts.
    [Show full text]
  • Potential for Terrorist Nuclear Attack Using Oil Tankers
    Order Code RS21997 December 7, 2004 CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web Port and Maritime Security: Potential for Terrorist Nuclear Attack Using Oil Tankers Jonathan Medalia Specialist in National Defense Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division Summary While much attention has been focused on threats to maritime security posed by cargo container ships, terrorists could also attempt to use oil tankers to stage an attack. If they were able to place an atomic bomb in a tanker and detonate it in a U.S. port, they would cause massive destruction and might halt crude oil shipments worldwide for some time. Detecting a bomb in a tanker would be difficult. Congress may consider various options to address this threat. This report will be updated as needed. Introduction The terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, heightened interest in port and maritime security.1 Much of this interest has focused on cargo container ships because of concern that terrorists could use containers to transport weapons into the United States, yet only a small fraction of the millions of cargo containers entering the country each year is inspected. Some observers fear that a container-borne atomic bomb detonated in a U.S. port could wreak economic as well as physical havoc. Robert Bonner, the head of Customs and Border Protection (CBP) within the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), has argued that such an attack would lead to a halt to container traffic worldwide for some time, bringing the world economy to its knees. Stephen Flynn, a retired Coast Guard commander and an expert on maritime security at the Council on Foreign Relations, holds a similar view.2 While container ships accounted for 30.5% of vessel calls to U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Stability Analysis Based on Theoretical Data and Inclining Test Results for a 1200 GT Coaster Vessel
    Proceeding of Marine Safety and Maritime Installation (MSMI 2018) Stability Analysis Based on Theoretical Data and Inclining Test Results for a 1200 GT Coaster Vessel Siti Rahayuningsih1,a,*, Eko B. Djatmiko1,b, Joswan J. Soedjono 1,c and Setyo Nugroho 2,d 1 Departement of Ocean Engineering, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Surabaya, Indonesia 2 Department of Marine Transportation Engineering, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Surabaya, Indonesia a. [email protected] *corresponding author Keywords: coaster vessel, final stability, preliminary stability. Abstract: 1200 GT Coaster Vessel is designed to mobilize the flow of goods and passengers in order to implement the Indonesian Sea Toll Program. This vessel is necessary to be analysed its stability to ensure the safety while in operation. The stability is analysed, firstly by theoretical approach (preliminary stability) and secondly, based on inclining test data to derive the final stability. The preliminary stability is analysed for the estimated LWT of 741.20 tons with LCG 23.797 m from AP and VCG 4.88 m above the keel. On the other hand, the inclining test results present the LWT of 831.90 tons with LCG 26.331 m from AP and VCG 4.513 m above the keel. Stability analysis on for both data is performed by considering the standard reference of IMO Instruments Resolution A. 749 (18) Amended by MSC.75 (69) Static stability, as well as guidance from Indonesian Bureau of Classification (BKI). Results of the analysis indicate that the ship meets the stability criteria from IMO and BKI. However results of preliminary stability analysis and final stability analysis exhibit a difference in the range 0.55% to 11.36%.
    [Show full text]
  • Ship Stability
    2018-08-07 Lecture Note of Naval Architectural Calculation Ship Stability Ch. 7 Inclining Test Spring 2018 Myung-Il Roh Department of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering Seoul National University 1 Naval Architectural Calculation, Spring 2018, Myung-Il Roh Contents þ Ch. 1 Introduction to Ship Stability þ Ch. 2 Review of Fluid Mechanics þ Ch. 3 Transverse Stability Due to Cargo Movement þ Ch. 4 Initial Transverse Stability þ Ch. 5 Initial Longitudinal Stability þ Ch. 6 Free Surface Effect þ Ch. 7 Inclining Test þ Ch. 8 Curves of Stability and Stability Criteria þ Ch. 9 Numerical Integration Method in Naval Architecture þ Ch. 10 Hydrostatic Values and Curves þ Ch. 11 Static Equilibrium State after Flooding Due to Damage þ Ch. 12 Deterministic Damage Stability þ Ch. 13 Probabilistic Damage Stability 2 Naval Architectural Calculation, Spring 2018, Myung-Il Roh 1 2018-08-07 How can you get the value of the KG? K: Keel G: Center of gravity Ch. 7 Inclining Test 3 Naval Architectural Calculation, Spring 2018, Myung-Il Roh The Problem of Finding an Accurate Vertical Center of Gravity (KG) The problem of finding an accurate KG for a ship is a serious one for the ship’s designer. FG G ü Any difference in the weight of structural parts, equipment, or welds in different ship will produce a different KG. K There is an accurate method of finding KG for any particular ship and that is the inclining test. 4 Naval Architectural Calculation, Spring 2018, Myung-Il Roh 2 2018-08-07 Required Values to Find the KG (2/3) Heeling moment produced by total weight Righting moment produced by buoyant force Static equilibrium of moment t =F × GZ Inclining test formula r B 6 Naval Architectural Calculation, Spring 2018, Myung-Il Roh Required Values to Find the KG (1/3) GZ» GM ×sinf (at small angle f ) GM= KB +BM - KGKG The purpose of the inclining test is to determine the position of the center of mass of the ship in an accurately known condition.
    [Show full text]
  • Maritime Carrier's Liability for Loss of Or Damage to Goods Under The
    Maritime Carrier's Liability for Loss of or Damage to Goods under the Hague Rules, Visby Rules and the Hamburg Rules, compared with his Liability as an Operator under the Relevant Rules of the International Multimodal Transport Convention. A Thesis Submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Hani M.S. Abdulrahim The School of Law, Faculty of Law and Financial Studies, University of Glasgow February 1994 © Hani M.S. Abdulrahim, 1994 ProQuest Number: 11007904 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a com plete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest ProQuest 11007904 Published by ProQuest LLC(2018). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States C ode Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106- 1346 “ILhl m i GLASGOW C>p I UNIVERr'T library ii To My mother, brothers, sisters and in memory of my father. Acknowledgements I wish with considerable enthusiasm to acknowledge and express my deepest grateful thanks and gratitude to Dr. W. Balekjian and Mr Alan Gamble for their invaluable guidance and encouragement in supervising this thesis. They have given unsparingly of their time to it. It gives me great pleasure to acknowledge the helpfulness of the Glasgow University library staff, and also my deep gratitude to Mrs Cara Wilson who kindly typed this work.
    [Show full text]
  • Safe Harbor Worksheet
    Safe Harbor Worksheet Description: Why should we care about Harbors? Roughly 90% of the world's goods are transported by sea. The port of NY/NJ is the third busiest port in the U.S. and the 18th in the World. Without our ports, life as we know it would not exist, however they are often overlooked. As trade volume increases, so does the size of ships. When European explorers first visited the New York Harbor, they found an estuary with a natural depth of 17 feet. As colonies became established and trade flourished, shipping channels were needed to allow for bigger ships. By 1880, the main ship channel was dredged to a depth of 24 feet and by 1891 to a depth of 30 feet. In 1914 the Ambrose Channel became the main entrance to the port of New York and had a depth of 40 feet and 2,000 feet wide (ship design changes/technological advancements allowed for wider ships). During World War II the main channel was dredged to 45 feet deep to accommodate larger ships up to Panamax size (the largest size ship which could travel through the Panama Canal). Panamax (1916) New Panamax (2016) Tonnage: 52,500 DWT Tonnage: 120,000 DWT Length: 950 ft Length: 1,201 ft Beam: 106 ft Beam: 161 ft Height: 190 ft Height: 190 ft Draft: 39.5 ft Draft: 50 ft Capacity: 5,000 TEU Capacity: 13,000 TEU Eventually even the Panama Canal was not big enough. In 2016, an expanded Panama Canal opened to allow for significantly larger ships (see above).
    [Show full text]
  • Rise of the Machines – a Legal Analysis of Seaworthiness in the Context of Autonomous Shipping
    FACULTY OF LAW Lund University Anders Kirchner Rise of the Machines – A Legal analysis of Seaworthiness in the context of autonomous shipping JURM02 Graduate Thesis Graduate Thesis, Master of Laws program 30 higher education credits Supervisor: Olena Bokareva Semester of graduation: Period 1 Spring Semester 2019 Contents SUMMARY 1 SAMMANFATTNING 3 PREFACE 6 ABBREVIATIONS 7 1 INTRODUCTION 9 1.1 History and background 9 1.2 Purpose and problem 11 1.3 Delimitations 12 1.4 Method, material and state of research 12 1.5 Outline 14 2 AUTONOMOUS SHIPS: EVOLUTION AND SELECTED PROJECTS 15 2.1 Introduction 15 2.2 Autonomous vessel projects 16 2.2.1 Svitzer Hermod 16 2.2.2 YARA Birkeland 16 2.2.3 Falco 17 2.2.4 ReVolt 17 2.2.5 MUNIN 18 2.2.6 Mitsui and Nippon Yusen project 18 2.2.7 Shone 19 2.2.8 Waterborne TP 19 2.3 Factors impacting autonomous vessels 20 2.3.1 Economy 20 2.3.2 Safety 23 2.3.3 Environment 25 2.4 Concluding remarks 27 3 THE CONCEPT OF AUTONOMOUS SHIPS: TERMINOLOGY AND LEGAL CONCEPT 29 3.1 Introduction 29 3.2 Definition of an autonomous ship 30 3.2.1 Waterborne project 30 3.2.2 MUNIN 30 3.2.3 NFAS 30 3.2.4 Lloyd’s Registers definitions of autonomy levels of vessels 31 3.2.5 IMO definitions of autonomy levels of ships 32 3.3 Shore control centre 32 3.4 Is an unmanned ship a ship? 33 3.4.1 UNCLOS 34 3.4.1.1 Background 34 3.4.1.2 Definition of a ship 34 3.4.2 MARPOL 73/78 35 3.4.2.1 Background 35 3.4.2.2 Definition of a ship 36 3.4.3 SOLAS and ISM Code 36 3.4.3.1 Background 36 3.4.3.2 Definition of a ship 37 3.4.4 COLREGs 37 3.4.4.1
    [Show full text]
  • Pleasure Boating and Admiralty: Erie at Sea' Preble Stolz*
    California Law Review VoL. 51 OCTOBER 1963 No. 4 Pleasure Boating and Admiralty: Erie at Sea' Preble Stolz* P LEASURE BOATING is basically a new phenomenon, the product of a technology that can produce small boats at modest cost and of an economy that puts such craft within the means of almost everyone.' The risks generated by this development create new legal problems. New legal problems are typically solved first, and often finally, by extension of com- mon law doctrines in the state courts. Legislative regulation and any solu- tion at the federal level are exceptional and usually come into play only as a later stage of public response.2 There is no obvious reason why our legal system should react differ- ently to the new problems presented by pleasure boating. Small boats fall easily into the class of personal property. The normal rules of sales and security interests would seem capable of extension to small boats without difficulty. The same should be true of the rules relating to the operation of pleasure boats and particularly to the liability for breach of the duty to take reasonable care for the safety of others. One would expect, therefore, that the legal problems of pleasure boating would be met with the typical response: adaptation of the common law at the state level. Unhappily this is not likely to happen. Pleasure boating has the mis- fortune of presenting basic issues in an already complex problem of fed- t I am grateful to Professor Geoffrey C. Hazard, Jr. for reading the manuscript in nearly final form, and to Professor Ronan E.
    [Show full text]
  • Branch's Elements of Shipping/Alan E
    ‘I would strongly recommend this book to anyone who is interested in shipping or taking a course where shipping is an important element, for example, chartering and broking, maritime transport, exporting and importing, ship management, and international trade. Using an approach of simple analysis and pragmatism, the book provides clear explanations of the basic elements of ship operations and commercial, legal, economic, technical, managerial, logistical, and financial aspects of shipping.’ Dr Jiangang Fei, National Centre for Ports & Shipping, Australian Maritime College, University of Tasmania, Australia ‘Branch’s Elements of Shipping provides the reader with the best all-round examination of the many elements of the international shipping industry. This edition serves as a fitting tribute to Alan Branch and is an essential text for anyone with an interest in global shipping.’ David Adkins, Lecturer in International Procurement and Supply Chain Management, Plymouth Graduate School of Management, Plymouth University ‘Combining the traditional with the modern is as much a challenge as illuminating operations without getting lost in the fascination of the technical detail. This is particularly true for the world of shipping! Branch’s Elements of Shipping is an ongoing example for mastering these challenges. With its clear maritime focus it provides a very comprehensive knowledge base for relevant terms and details and it is a useful source of expertise for students and practitioners in the field.’ Günter Prockl, Associate Professor, Copenhagen Business School, Denmark This page intentionally left blank Branch’s Elements of Shipping Since it was first published in 1964, Elements of Shipping has become established as a market leader.
    [Show full text]
  • (AGCS) Safety & Shipping Review 2021
    ALLIANZ GLOBAL CORPORATE & SPECIALTY Safety and Shipping Review 2021 An annual review of trends and developments in shipping losses and safety SAFETY AND SHIPPING REVIEW 2021 About AGCS Allianz Global Corporate & Specialty (AGCS) is a leading global corporate insurance carrier and a key business unit of Allianz Group. We provide risk consultancy, Property‑Casualty insurance solutions and alternative risk transfer for a wide spectrum of commercial, corporate and specialty risks across 10 dedicated lines of business. Our customers are as diverse as business can be, ranging from Fortune Global 500 companies to small businesses, and private individuals. Among them are not only the world’s largest consumer brands, tech companies and the global aviation and shipping industry, but also satellite operators or Hollywood film productions. They all look to AGCS for smart answers to their largest and most complex risks in a dynamic, multinational business environment and trust us to deliver an outstanding claims experience. Worldwide, AGCS operates with its own teams in 31 countries and through the Allianz Group network and partners in over 200 countries and territories, employing around 4,400 people. As one of the largest Property‑ Casualty units of Allianz Group, we are backed by strong and stable financial ratings. In 2020, AGCS generated a total of €9.3 billion gross premium globally. www.agcs.allianz.com 2 PAGE 4 Executive summary PAGE 10 Losses in focus: 2011 to 2020 Trends PAGE 18 1. The Covid factors PAGE 28 2. Larger vessels PAGE 38 3. Supply chains and ports PAGE 42 4. Security and sanctions PAGE 48 5.
    [Show full text]