DOCSLIB.ORG

Answering 10 Fundamental Questions About the Mississippi River Delta INTRODUCTION

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

The Science and Engineering Special Team is a network of eminent scientists and engineers convened by the National Audubon Society, the Environmental Defense Fund, and the National Wildlife Federation to provide objective and independent analysis pertaining to Mississippi River Delta restoration. SCIENCE & ENGINEERING SPECIAL TEAM • CHAIR: John Day, Ph.D. • Mary Kelly Department of Oceanography and Coastal Sciences Parula, LLC Louisiana State University • G. Paul Kemp, Ph.D. • Conner Bailey, Ph.D. National Audubon Society Department of Agricultural Economics & Rural Sociology Auburn University • Shirley Laska, Ph.D. Department of Sociology • David Batker, M.S. University of New Orleans Earth Economics • Sarah Mack, Ph.D. • Samuel Bentley, Ph.D. Tierra Resources, LLC Department of Geology & Geophysics Louisiana State University • James Morris, Ph.D. Department of Biological and Marine Sciences • Jaye Cable, Ph.D. University of South Carolina Department of Marine Sciences University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill • William Nuttle, Ph.D. Eco-hydrology.com • Robert Costanza, Ph.D. Department of Sustainability • Andy Nyman, Ph.D. Portland State University School of Renewable Natural Resources Louisiana State University Agricultural Center & • James Cowan, Ph.D. Louisiana State University Department of Oceanography & Coastal Studies Louisiana State University • David Rogers, Ph.D., P.E. Department of Geological Sciences & Engineering • Linda Deegan, Ph.D. Missouri University of Science & Technology The Ecosystems Center Woods Hole Marine Biological Laboratory • Gary Shaffer, Ph.D. Department of Biological Sciences • Angelina Freeman, Ph.D. Southeastern Louisiana University Environmental Defense Fund • Fred Sklar, Ph.D. • Liviu Giosan, Ph.D. Everglades Division Department of Geology and Geophysics South Florida Water Management District Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution • Clinton S. Willson, Ph.D., P.E. • Robert Gramling, Ph.D. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Department of Sociology Louisiana State University University of Louisiana, Lafayette TABLE OF CONTENTS ICntrODU TION 1 SEDIMENT AVAILABILITY 6 1 Samuel Bentley, Clinton S. Willson, Angelina Freeman Usef ULNESS OF DIVersiOns 8 2 Samuel Bentley, Angelina Freeman, Liviu Giosan, Clinton S. Willson, Jaye Cable THE E EFF CT OF NUTRIENTS ON WetLAND VEGETATION 12 3 James Morris, Andy Nyman, Gary Shaffer THTI E RELA OnsHIP Between FisHeries AND COASTAL RestOratiON 15 4 James Cowan, Linda Deegan NTIAVIGA ON ISSUes 18 5 David Rogers, Paul Kemp LeVees AND FLOOD PROTECTION 22 6 David Rogers, Jaye Cable, William Nuttle RestOratiON AND COMMUnities 24 7 Conner Bailey, Shirley Laska, Robert Gramling WHU at LO isiana STANDS TO LOSE 28 8 David Batker, Sarah Mack, Fred Sklar, Mary Kelly, Angelina Freeman, William Nuttle, Robert Costanza UR GENCY OF RestORING LOUisiana’S COAST 31 9 David Batker, Sarah Mack, Fred Sklar, Mary Kelly, Angelina Freeman, William Nuttle, Robert Costanza C OASTAL RestOratiON, CLIMATE CHANGE, AND ENERGY 34 10 John Day, Matthew Moerschbaecher AnswerinG 10 FUNDAMENTAL QUestiOns ABOUT THE MISSISSIPPI RIVER DELTA INTRODUCTION The Mississippi River Delta is one of the largest and There is widespread recognition of the need to most productive coastal ecosystems in North America. restore the delta, but doing so will require innovative From energy, to fisheries, to navigation, the richness technology, billions of dollars, and a national of this ecosystem has sustained the U.S. economy for commitment. In the face of these challenges, many 300 years. In particular, the coastal wetlands have have asked whether it is even possible to restore the protected communities and critical national assets delta. Others have wondered whether doing so should from storm damage. However, this ecosystem is in be a national priority. With so many other needs grave danger. Unless we act soon, the delta and the throughout our country, the thinking goes, we need benefits it provides our country will disappear. compelling evidence of both feasibility and merit if we are to put the Mississippi River Delta at the top of The Mississippi River created the delta over the past the list. 7,500 years, depositing sediment from upstream and changing its course periodically to find a shorter route This document presents that evidence, based on to the Gulf of Mexico. But in the 19th and 20th centuries, a thorough examination of the primary questions levees and other artificial structures were built along people have raised about the future of the Mississippi the lower river for navigation and flood control. These River Delta: What are the economic impacts of levees isolated the river from its delta, even as dams, maintaining the status quo? How will restoration affect dikes, and other changes on the Mississippi River communities, fisheries, and navigation? Will sea level and its tributaries diminished sediment supply by 50 rise and subsidence negate our efforts? This paper percent. When the life sustaining water and sediment systematically answers these and other questions. Our of the river no longer flowed over the delta, wetlands research reveals considerable consensus within and loss rapidly accelerated. A quarter of the deltaic across scientific disciplines about how the Mississippi landscape, over 1,800 square miles, have been lost River Delta functions and what actions must be taken in the past 100 years. Oil and gas canals, dredged to ensure long term sustainability. It is clear that to provide energy to U.S. markets, allowed salt water immediate action is warranted and is essential to the from the Gulf of Mexico to intrude into freshwater future stability of our nation’s economy. Yes, saving the areas, further stressing the ecosystem. A host of other delta will require bold thinking and focused action. But factors—invasive species, subsidence, and sea level the cost of doing nothing is far greater. rise, to name a few—add to the problem. If we do not turn the tide now, much of the ecological and economic value of the delta will be lost by the end of this century. 1 SAVING THE MISSISSIPPI RIVER DELTA 3. Will Diversions Introduce Nutrients That Harm Summaries of our research are presented below. Wetland Vegetation? Diversions will have impacts on vegetation, particularly on 1. Is There Enough Sediment to Restore the Delta? the distribution of some plant species. However, without The Mississippi River does not now, nor has it ever supplied diversions and other methods for introducing nutrient rich enough sediment to continuously sustain the entire delta fresh water into the ecosystems of coastal Louisiana, the coastline. There have always been areas that were building wetlands will degrade to open water. Thus, the effect of and areas that were eroding. In recent decades, we have nutrients is not large enough to offset the larger benefits of reduced river sediment supply by approximately half, which diversions for coastal Louisiana, particularly if diversions are further constrains our ability to build land. Nevertheless, the pulsed to allow a balance of salt and fresh water. available sediment supply is still huge and adequate to the challenge of sustaining targeted regions of coastal Louisiana, 4. Will Diversions Harm Fisheries? if we are able to use this valuable resource efficiently. Different species will react in varying ways to landscape changes. However, our analysis supports the claim that the 2. Are Diversions Useful Tools for Building Land? large scale sediment diversions being considered for the If properly designed and operated, sediment diversions can Mississippi River Delta have a good chance of supporting the build substantial land from river sediment. Historical patterns health of fisheries because they may allow the ecosystem to of land growth and loss also suggest that with continued reset to a more sustainable baseline. In any case, the status subsidence and sea level rise, sediment supply must be quo will prove disastrous for the Gulf fisheries and the many maintained in order to sustain the land that is formed. human communities that depend on them. 5. How Will Restoration Affect Navigation? Reconfiguring the river and revising the decades old Mississippi River and Tributaries Project is imperative. Doing so will secure the long term viability of Louisiana’s navigation industry and its key role in the nation’s economy. These needs dovetail with the state’s plans to use sediment diversions to address coastal land loss. 6. Can Levees Alone Provide Enough Flood Protection? By themselves, levees cannot provide the storm protection that will protect national assets and coastal residents. In fact, by damaging nearby wetlands or encouraging unwise development in protected areas that require pumps to stay dry, levees can actually increase exposure to flood risks. Levee systems should be only one of several lines of defense, including wetland buffers. Photo By: Yuki Kokubo, www.yukikokubo.com 7. Will Restoration Measures Displace Communities? Some communities will be affected by restoration measures that change water salinity and the locations of coastal resources. For most communities, however, lack of wetland restoration will make the coast more vulnerable to continued flooding as well as hazards such as the BP oil spill. Ultimately, these threats, and not restoration, will be what force people away from the coast. If restoration and mitigation projects are coordinated to create compatible outcomes, they will be positive activities for coastal communities. 2 Photo By:
Recommended publications
  • Coastal Erosion - Orrin H

    Coastal Erosion - Orrin H

    COASTAL ZONES AND ESTUARIES – Coastal Erosion - Orrin H. Pilkey, William J. Neal, David M. Bush COASTAL EROSION Orrin H. Pilkey Program for the Study of Developed Shorelines, Division of Earth and Ocean Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, U.S.A. William J. Neal Department of Geology, Grand Valley State University, Allendale, MI, USA. David M. Bush Department of Geosciences, State University of West Georgia, Carrollton, GA, USA. Keywords: erosion, shoreline retreat, sea level rise, barrier islands, beach, coastal management, shoreline armoring, seawalls, sand supply Contents 1. Introduction 2. Causes of Erosion 2.1. Sea Level Rise 2.2. Sand Supply 2.3. Shoreline Engineering 2.4. Wave Energy and Storm Frequency 3. "Special" Cases 4. Solutions to Coastal Erosion 5. The Future Glossary Bibliography Biographical Sketches Summary Almost all of the world’s shorelines are retreating in a landward direction—a process called shoreline erosion. Sea level rise and the reduction of sand supply to the shoreline by damming of rivers, armoring of shorelines and the dredging of navigation channels are among the major causes of shoreline retreat. As sea levels continue to rise, sometimesUNESCO enhanced by subsidence caused – byEOLSS oil and water extraction, global erosion rates should increase in coming decades. Three response alternatives are available to "solve" the erosionSAMPLE problem. These are cons tructionCHAPTERS of seawalls and other engineering structures, beach nourishment and relocation or abandonment of buildings. No matter what path is chosen, response to the erosion problem is costly. 1. Introduction Coastal erosion is a major problem for developed shorelines everywhere in the world. Such erosion is regarded as a coastal hazard and is a common focus of local and national coastal management.
  • Made in LOUISIANA from Spacecraft to Submarines, Made in Louisiana Means Quality Manufacturing

    Made in LOUISIANA from Spacecraft to Submarines, Made in Louisiana Means Quality Manufacturing

    Q3 & Q4 2011 Made in LOUISIANA From spacecraft to submarines, Made in Louisiana means quality manufacturing View the new GAMELOFT PICKS LA LA NAMED STATE OF and enhanced EQ for iPad FOR NEW STUDIO the Year (aGain) inside 12 letter from Secretary Moret 2011 Recap 4 Louisiana’s Economic Momentum Economic Update 6 round the world, “Made in Louisiana” means quality and The State Of Louisiana’s Economy innovation across a surprisingly broad array of products. From remotely operated, underwater vehicles that navigate new depths of the sea to spacecraft and satellite-enabled mobile Small Business Spotlight 10 communication devices, Louisiana companies are creating leading iSeatz Technology Powers 23 products of today and tomorrow. In this issue of EQ, we will provide Clients Around The World you with a sense of the scope of our engineered world. At the same time, we continue to maintain an impressive list of project wins that demonstrate why Louisiana continues to be more competitive in Behind The Scenes 12 the manufacturing world and in the global competition for quality LED FastStart™ Sways business investment. Major Manufacturer In this issue you also will learn how Louisiana’s customized workforce and training program, LED FastStart™, has impacted Momentum Louisiana 16 new and expanding facilities with its world-class recruitment, 15 Companies Say ‘Yes’ To Louisiana screening, training and leadership solutions. In addition, Louisiana’s 26 community and technical colleges are answering the manufacturing world’s need for process technicians through a model program. We Innovation Spotlight 24 also feature Louisiana’s port system – the largest in the world.
  • The Mississippi River Delta Basin and Why We Are Failing to Save Its Wetlands

    The Mississippi River Delta Basin and Why We Are Failing to Save Its Wetlands

    University of New Orleans ScholarWorks@UNO University of New Orleans Theses and Dissertations Dissertations and Theses 8-8-2007 The Mississippi River Delta Basin and Why We are Failing to Save its Wetlands Lon Boudreaux Jr. University of New Orleans Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.uno.edu/td Recommended Citation Boudreaux, Lon Jr., "The Mississippi River Delta Basin and Why We are Failing to Save its Wetlands" (2007). University of New Orleans Theses and Dissertations. 564. https://scholarworks.uno.edu/td/564 This Thesis is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by ScholarWorks@UNO with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Thesis in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights- holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/or on the work itself. This Thesis has been accepted for inclusion in University of New Orleans Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UNO. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Mississippi River Delta Basin and Why We Are Failing to Save Its Wetlands A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the University of New Orleans in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Urban Studies By Lon J. Boudreaux Jr. B.S. Our Lady of Holy Cross College, 1992 M.S. University of New Orleans, 2007 August, 2007 Table of Contents Abstract.............................................................................................................................
  • Coastal Land Loss and Wktlanb Restoration

    Coastal Land Loss and Wktlanb Restoration

    COASTAL LAND LOSS AND WKTLANB RESTORATION tSI R. E. Turner estuaryare causallyrelated to the landlosses this sealevel ri se,climate change~, soil type,geomorphic century." I then comparethe strengthof this frameworkand age, subsidence or tnanagement. hypothesisto someof theother hypothesized causes of land loss on this coast, There are laboratoryand Four Hypotheses small-scale field trials that support various hypotheses,It seemsto me thatthe mostreliable Four hypothesesabout the causes of indirect interpretationsare basedon what happensin the wetlandlosses in BaratariaBay will be addressed field, andnot on the resultsof computermodels, here adapted from Turner 1997!: laboratorystudies or conceptualdiagrams. H l. i ct n ences of The test results discussed herein are derived t !tin oil banks v d solelyfrom data derived at a landscapescale. The 'ori of 1 loss sin h data set is restricted to a discussion of the Barataria watershed. This watershed is a significant H2. componentof theLouisiana coastal zorie 14,000 lv ha!and there are a varietyof habitatdata available i tl on it. Its easternboundary is the MississippiRiver from whichoccasional overflowing waters are v n.vi hypothesizedto deliver enoughsediinents and on 1 v tno I freshwaterto significantlyinfluence the balanceof rit f i land lossor gain in the receivingwatershed, and whosere-introduction would restore the estuary's wetlands. Improvingour understandingof the H4. w rin si ecologicalprocesses operating in this watershed h ' ' of mightassist in the managementof others. The effect of geologicalsubsidence and sea DIrect and Indirect Causes of Wetland Loss level rise are not included in this list because both factorshave remained relatively stablethis century Wetlandloss is essentiallythe same as land loss when the land-loss rates rose and fell, Local on thiscoast Baurnann and Turner 1990!.
  • Life Cycle of Oil and Gas Fields in the Mississippi River Delta: a Review

    Life Cycle of Oil and Gas Fields in the Mississippi River Delta: a Review

    water Review Life Cycle of Oil and Gas Fields in the Mississippi River Delta: A Review John W. Day 1,*, H. C. Clark 2, Chandong Chang 3 , Rachael Hunter 4,* and Charles R. Norman 5 1 Department of Oceanography and Coastal Sciences, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70803, USA 2 Department of Earth, Environmental and Planetary Science, Rice University, Houston, TX 77005, USA; [email protected] 3 Department of Geological Sciences, Chungnam National University, Daejeon 34134, Korea; [email protected] 4 Comite Resources, Inc., P.O. Box 66596, Baton Rouge, LA 70896, USA 5 Charles Norman & Associates, P.O. Box 5715, Lake Charles LA 70606, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] (J.W.D.); [email protected] (R.H.) Received: 20 April 2020; Accepted: 20 May 2020; Published: 23 May 2020 Abstract: Oil and gas (O&G) activity has been pervasive in the Mississippi River Delta (MRD). Here we review the life cycle of O&G fields in the MRD focusing on the production history and resulting environmental impacts and show how cumulative impacts affect coastal ecosystems. Individual fields can last 40–60 years and most wells are in the final stages of production. Production increased rapidly reaching a peak around 1970 and then declined. Produced water lagged O&G and was generally higher during declining O&G production, making up about 70% of total liquids. Much of the wetland loss in the delta is associated with O&G activities. These have contributed in three major ways to wetland loss including alteration of surface hydrology, induced subsidence due to fluids removal and fault activation, and toxic stress due to spilled oil and produced water.
  • Incorporating Lower Mississippi River Port Assets Into Emergency Preparedness and Response Initiatives

    Incorporating Lower Mississippi River Port Assets Into Emergency Preparedness and Response Initiatives

    University of New Orleans ScholarWorks@UNO UNOTI Publications UNO Transportation Institute 2-2012 Incorporating Lower Mississippi River Port Assets into Emergency Preparedness and Response Initiatives James R. Amdal Merritt C. Becker, Jr. University of New Orleans Transportation Institute, [email protected] Jay Jayawardana Merritt C. Becker, Jr. University of New Orleans Transportation Institute Stanley L. Swigart Merritt C. Becker, Jr. University of New Orleans Transportation Institute Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.uno.edu/unoti_pubs Part of the Policy Design, Analysis, and Evaluation Commons, and the Transportation Commons Recommended Citation Amdal, James R.; Jayawardana, Jay; and Swigart, Stanley L., "Incorporating Lower Mississippi River Port Assets into Emergency Preparedness and Response Initiatives" (2012). UNOTI Publications. Paper 1. https://scholarworks.uno.edu/unoti_pubs/1 This Report is brought to you for free and open access by the UNO Transportation Institute at ScholarWorks@UNO. It has been accepted for inclusion in UNOTI Publications by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UNO. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Gulf Coast Research Center for Evacuation and Transportation Resiliency LSU / UNO University Transportation Center Incorporating Lower Mississippi River Port Assets into Emergency Preparedness and Response Initiatives Final Report: February 2012 James R. Amdal, Senior Fellow / Research Associate Dr. Jay Jayawardana (retired) Stanley L. Swigart, Research Associate Merritt C. Becker, Jr. UNO Transportation Institute Performing Organization Gulf Coast Research Center for Evacuation and Transportation Resiliency Merritt C. Becker Jr. University of New Orleans Transportation Institute New Orleans, LA Sponsoring Agency United States Department of Transportation Research and Innovative Technology Administration Incorporating Lower Mississippi River Port Assets into Emergency Preparedness and Response Initiatives GCCETR-11-07 by James R.
  • Portlog Summer2015.Pdf

    Portlog Summer2015.Pdf

    Economic Impact of the Port of South Louisiana Planning for the Future LSR’s State of the Art Facility CONTENTS PORT STAFF EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR Paul Aucoin DEPUTY DIRECTOR Roy Quezaire CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER Dale Hymel, Jr. DIRECTOR OF Cindy Martin ADMINISTRATION AIRPORT DIRECTOR Vincent Caire DIRECTOR OF BUSINESS Linda Prudhomme DEVELOPMENT EXECUTIVE COUNSEL Melissa Folse DIRECTOR OF FINANCE Grant Faucheux DIRECTOR OF Mitch Smith OPERATIONS DIRECTOR OF Tamara Kennedy HUMAN RESOURCES SPECIAL PROJECTS OFFICER Joel T. Chaisson DIRECTOR OF Lee “Buddy” Amedee TRADE DEVELOPMENT PORT OF SOUTH LOUISIANA 171 Belle Terre Blvd., P.O. Box 909 LaPlace, LA 70069-0909 www.portsl.com Phone: (985) 652-9278 | Fax: (504) 568-6270 GLOBALPLEX INTERMODAL TERMINAL Phone: (985) 652-9278 ASSOCIATED TERMINALS Phone: (985) 233-8500 The Port of South Louisiana is a member of the Ports Association of Louisiana. To become an associate member of PAL and to help further the maritime industry in Louisiana, please visit PAL’s web site at www.portsoflouisiana.org or call the PAL office at (225) 334-9040. PUBLISHED BY RENAISSANCE PUBLISHING LLC 2 DIRECTOR’S LOG 14 COMPANY PROFILE Louisiana Machinery Company supplies EDITOR Melanie Warner Spencer 3 OVERVIEW engines to vessels traversing the Gulf of Mexico and Mississippi River ART DIRECTOR Antoine Passelac 4 AROUND THE PORT SALES MANAGER Aimee Arceneaux Rudd 16 COMPANY PROFILE Godchaux-Henderson House project slated to give Bollinger Delivers the CGC Richard Dixon, Louisiana a sugar museum the 13th Fast Response Cutter To The USCG To advertise call Aimee at (504) 830-7240 6 WHAT’S NEW or email [email protected].
  • Mass Wasting Processes and Products of the Mississippi Delta Front

    Mass Wasting Processes and Products of the Mississippi Delta Front

    Mass Wasting Processes and Products of the Mississippi Delta Front: Data Synthesis and Observation Sam Bentley1,2, Kehui Xu2,3, Ioannis Georgiou6, Jillian Maloney4, Michael Miner5, Greg Keller1,2, Jeff Obelcz2,3 1 LSU Dept of Geology and Geophysics 2 LSU Coastal Studies Institute 3 LSU Dept of Oceanography and Coastal Sciences 4 San Diego State University 5 US Bureau of Ocean Energy Management 6University of New Orleans River Deltas Worldwide Influenced by: • River water and sediment • Wave reworking • Tidal flows Examples of rivers with strongest Fluvial signature: • Mississippi, Po, Fraser • Yellow/Huang He • Others Figure: after Galloway, 1975 Delta Front: Active Marine Deposition from River Plumes Delta Front after Walsh and Nittrouer, 2009 Why is the delta-front region so important? • Proximal location of abundant mud deposition from river plumes • Sedimentary gateway between rivers and oceans • Navigation, petroleum resources • Geohazards – especially mass wasting, submarine landslides Project Study Area and Objectives The Mississippi River Delta Front: • Petroleum: Active production and transfer region for O&G • Impacted by submarine landslides at a range of temporal and spatial scales, producing substantial risk from these geohazards • Last major regional survey and studies ca. 1977-1982 Objectives for the present project: • Data gathering, synthesis, gap analysis • Geophysical data: focus on high-quality digital data sets • Pilot field studies using recent technologies for mapping, sampling, analysis • Develop proposal for major new regional survey and field/modeling analyses and synthesis Research Motivation and Questions: We know that the Mississippi River Delta Front is a region of active sedimentation and submarine landslides We know that major hurricanes cause landslides.
  • Coastal Processes Study at Ocean Beach, San Francisco, CA: Summary of Data Collection 2004-2006

    Coastal Processes Study at Ocean Beach, San Francisco, CA: Summary of Data Collection 2004-2006

    Coastal Processes Study at Ocean Beach, San Francisco, CA: Summary of Data Collection 2004-2006 By Patrick L. Barnard, Jodi Eshleman, Li Erikson and Daniel M. Hanes Open-File Report 2007–1217 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior DIRK KEMPTHORNE, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Mark D. Myers, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia 2007 For product and ordering information: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS Barnard, P.L.., Eshleman, J., Erikson, L., and Hanes, D.M., 2007, Coastal processes study at Ocean Beach, San Francisco, CA; summary of data collection 2004-2006: U. S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2007- 1217, 171 p. [http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2007/1217/]. Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted material contained within this report. ii Contents Executive Summary of Major Findings..................................................................................................................................1 Chapter 2 - Beach Topographic Mapping..............................................................................................................1
  • COASTAL LAND LOSS in FLORIDA Ralph R

    COASTAL LAND LOSS in FLORIDA Ralph R

    COASTAL LAND LOSS IN FLORIDA Ralph R. Clark1 Abstract Florida has approximately 593 miles of shoreline fronting on the Atlantic Ocean and Straits of Florida and approximate­ ly 673 miles of shoreline fronting on the Gulf of Mexico with an additional 5,000 miles of bay and estuary shoreline (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 1971). Of a statewide total of 818.9 miles of open coast sandy beaches, 337.2 miles or 41.2 percent of the beaches are identified as erosion problem areas. These erosion problem areas include those beaches with a high erosion rate or recent significant erosion conditions, those beaches with a moderate or low erosion rate, but with a narrow width fronting a highly developed area, and those restored beaches with an active maintenance nourishment pro­ gram. Of these erosion problem areas, 217.8 miles or 26.6 percent of the statewide beach length, are areas of critical erosion, that is, segments of the shoreline where substantial development or recreation interests are threatened by the erosion processes. On a shorewide basis the Atlantic Ocean beaches of Florida typically have historical erosion rates of between 0 and -3 feet per year, while the Gulf of Mexico beaches typically have historical erosion rates of between 0 and -2 feet per year. Many of the problem areas have shoreline erosion rates in the magnitude of between -3 and -5 feet per year. The most extreme erosion rates are occurring along the southern portion of St. Joseph Peninsula at Cape San Bias where the annual shoreline recession exceeds -20 feet.
  • Managing the Anthropocene Marine Transgression to the Year 2100 and Beyond in the State of Florida U.S.A

    Managing the Anthropocene Marine Transgression to the Year 2100 and Beyond in the State of Florida U.S.A

    Climatic Change (2015) 128:85–98 DOI 10.1007/s10584-014-1301-2 Managing the Anthropocene marine transgression to the year 2100 and beyond in the State of Florida U.S.A. Randall W. Parkinson & Peter W. Harlem & John F. Meeder Received: 21 February 2014 /Accepted: 25 November 2014 /Published online: 10 December 2014 # Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014 Abstract We simulate the vulnerability of all 35 Florida coastal counties to the ongoing Anthropocene marine transgression using a bathtub model unconstrained by the artificial end date of year 2100. Our projections are based upon the association between rising sea level and atmospheric temperature; a 2.3 m rise per each 1 °C increase (Levermann et al., Proc Natl Acad Sci 10.1073/pnas.1219414110, 2013). Results are organized into seven regions based upon an assessment of hypsographic and geologic attributes. Each represents an area of common vulnerability characterized in this study as high (10 to 29 % average land loss), higher (15 to 77 % average land loss), and highest (43 to 95 % average land loss). This regional approach is designed to facilitate the implementation of effective adaptation activities by providing a logical basis for establishing or re-enforcing collaboration based upon a common threat and the utility of shared technical and financial resources. The benefits of a regional perspective in formulating an actionable response to climate change have already been demonstrated in south Florida. It is our intent to facilitate regional adaptation activities in other parts of the state and adjacent southern and southeastern seaboard. 1 Introduction The State of Florida is especially vulnerable to climate change and concomitant sea level rise.
  • NATURAL DEFENSES in ACTION HARNESSING NATURE to PROTECT OUR COMMUNITIES Copyright © 2016 National Wildlife Federation

    NATURAL DEFENSES in ACTION HARNESSING NATURE to PROTECT OUR COMMUNITIES Copyright © 2016 National Wildlife Federation

    NATURAL DEFENSES IN ACTION HARNESSING NATURE TO PROTECT OUR COMMUNITIES Copyright © 2016 National Wildlife Federation Suggested citation: Small-Lorenz, S.L., B. A. Stein, K. Schrass, D.N. Holstein, and A.V. Mehta. 2016. Natural Defenses in Action: Harnessing Nature to Protect Our Communities. Washington, DC: National Wildlife Federation. Natural Defenses in Action is available online at: www.nwf.org/nature-in-action Cover photo: Oystercatchers, Jamaica Bay, New York City. Photo: Don Riepe/ALS National Wildlife Federation 1990 K Street NW Washington, DC 20006 www.nwf.org NATURAL DEFENSES IN ACTION HARNESSING NATURE TO PROTECT OUR COMMUNITIES Stacy L. Small-Lorenz, Bruce A. Stein, Karl Schrass, D. Nicole Holstein, and Avalon V. Mehta Dunes, Stone Harbor, NJ. Photo: Stacy Small-Lorenz/NWF NATURAL DEFENSES IN ACTION | ii CONTENTS CONTENTS ...................................................................................... iii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..................................................................... 1 NATURAL DEFENSES IN ACTION ........................................................ 2 Mounting Risks, Increasing Losses ....................................................................................... 2 Using Nature to Better Protect Communities ............................................................................ 3 What Are Natural Defenses? ............................................................................................. 4 HIGHLIGHTING WHAT WORKS: PROFILES OF RESILIENCE ALLIES ......... 7 Discouraging