The Result of a Comprehensive Survey of the Nashville Anddavidson County School Systems, Which Are Now Unified As the Metropolitanschool System
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
DOCUMENT RESUME ED 028 619 EF 003 025 A Comprehensive Survey of the Metropolitan School Systemof Nashville and Davidson County, Tennessee. Educational Research Services, Inc., White Plains, N.Y. Pub Date Sep 63 Note-298p- - EDRS Price MF-S1.25 HC-SI5.00 Descriptors-*Centralization, *County School Systems, *EducationalAdministration, Educational Finance, Enrollment Projections, Facility Requirements, Program Development,*School Redistricting, *School Surveys, Student Personnel Services The result of a comprehensive survey of the Nashville andDavidson County school systems, which are now unified as the MetropolitanSchool System.. Following an outline of the major aspects of the legal structure of thecharter for the new system, projections of enrollments are made, and the purposesand goals of education are identified to guide the new system in its development. Subject matterachievement levels are evaluated utilizing results of standardized achievement tests,and detailed descriptions are presented of the elementary and secondary school programs aswell as vocational-technical,adult evening school and community college education in each of the two systems. Descriptive and evaluative information is alsopresented for the following aspects of the systems--(1) pupil personnel services, (2) specialeducation services for exceptional children, (3) personnel,(4) physical plant, (5) building requirements, (6) business management, (7) administrative organization.and (8) financial implications. Based on the survey findings, recommendations aremade throughout the report for implementation in the development of theunified school sys tem. (FS) A COMPREHENSIVE SURVEY OF THE METROPOL I TAN SCHOOL SYSTEM Nashville and DavidsonCounty, Tennessee Educational Research SCHOOL AND COLLEGE CONSULTANTS Services inc. A COMPREHENSIVESURVEY of the METROPOLITAN SCHOOLSYSTEM of NASHVILLE AND DAVIDSONCOUNTY, TENNESSEE September 1963 HEALTH, EDUCATION &WELFARE U.S. DEPARTMENT Of OFFICE OF EDUCATION REPRODUCED EXACTLY AS RECEIVEDFROM THE THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN ORIGINATING IT.POINTS OF VIEW OR OPINIONS PERSON OR ORGANIZATION REPRESENT OFFICIAL .OFFICE OFEDUCATION STATED DO NOT NECESSARILY POSITION OR POLICY. Educational Research Services,Inc. 7 Holland Avenue,White Plains, New York TRANSITIONAL BOARD OF EDUCATION Metropolitan Government of Nashville and DavidsonCounty Dr. Henry H. Hill, Chairman E. C. Carman, Vke-Chairman Mrs. Tom A. Bland E. D. Chappell Dr. Walter S. Davis Andrew B. Gibson Elmer L. Pettit Frank P. White S. L. Wright, Jr. Superintendent of City Schools W. H. Oliver Superintendent of County Schools J. E. Moss .... and Staff of Report Preparedby Consultants Inc. EDUCATIONALRESEARCH SERVICES, Consultants and Staff Francis G. Cornell,Director Willard S. Elsbree David B. Austin Warren G. Findley Sarah Lou Hammond Jame:, E. Greene Richard H. Hagemeyer Lloyd M. Dunn William C. Geer Vernon E. Johnson Fritz Hess Walter M. Ormsby Frank Lopez John Garment Antoinette Cunniffe Barbara Dunton Rosa Sposato Joan P. O'Malley ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This survey would not have been possible without theexcellent coop- eration of the staffs of the Nashville City school system,the Davidson County school system and many officials and citizens inthe community. In addition to the regular staff of EducationalResearch Services, Inc., several specialists were engaged as part of the survey team.These include Willard S. Elsbree, Professor Emeritus, Teachers College,Columbia University, whose major contribution was Chapter XI on Personnel; David B. Austin, Professor ofEducation, Teachers College, Columbia University, who prepared Chapter VII onThe Secondary School Program; Warren G. Findley, Professor of Education andCoordinator of Educational Research, and James E. Greene, Chairman, Divisionof Graduate Studies, both of the College of Education, University ofGeorgia, who prepared staff studies on which Chapter V on Subject Matter AchievementLevels and Chapter IX on Pupil Personnel Services were based; SarahLou Hammond, Head, Elementary Education, Department of Early Childhood Education,School of Edu- cation, The Florida State University, who was responsiblefor the preparation of Chapter VI on The Elementary Sehool Program; Richard H. Hagemeyer,Assistant Superintendent, Adult and Technical Education, Charlotte-MecklenburgSchools, Charlotte, N.C., who provided Chapter VIII materials onVocational-Technical, Adult Evening School and Community College Education; and Lloyd M.Dunn, Chairman, Department of Special Education, George Peabody Collegefor Teachers, who together with William C. Geer, Executive Secretary, theCounail for Exceptional Children, and Vernon L. Johnson, Director, Special Education, Tennessee State Department of Education, prepared materialsreported in Chapter X on SpecialEducation Services for Exceptional Children. While the foregoing made major contributions to the report, asindi- cated above, the undersigned, as Director of this Survey,takes full responsibility for the conclusions and recommendations reported herein. September 1963 Francis G. Cornell Educational Research SCHOOL AND COLLEGE CONSULTANTS 7 HOLLAND AVENUE / WHITE PLAINS. NEW YORK Services inc. September 30, 1963 Dr. Henry H. Hill, President Transitional Board of Education Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County, Tennessee Nashville, Tennessee Dear Dr. Hill: It is our privilege to transmitherewith our report on the ComprehensiveSurvey of the Metropolitan School Systemof Nashville and Davidson County,Tennessee. In our work we have beenimpressed by the opportunities affordedby the combin- ation of the two school systems, not somuch for immediate gains, butbecause of the potential it offers for efficientlybuilding better educational services forthe people of Nashville and DavidsonCounty. This report is hence but a point ofdeparture for the creativethinking and able stewardship needed for years to come inprovkiing soundly appropriate educa- tional opportunities for the citizensof Metro. Surveys cannotbuild school systems. Mechanisms areneeded to assure prudent leadershipand enthusiastic support to avoid the manypotential pitfalls and disappointmentswhich lie ahead. The process of unification of the two systemsshould be completed as soon as possible, not only to equalize educationalopportunity and increase efficiency in management, but also toconsolidate purposes and goals andattitudes" of unity needed to work towardthem. it has been a pleasure to share inthe aspirations of the Board,staff and citizens in this undertaking. The prospectfor success in creating aneducationally sound and economically defensible school systemfor Metro is encouraging. We express our appreciation for theexcellent cooperation we have hadfrom the Board, staff and many others. Respectful su itted, Francis G. Cornell President TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION 1 II MAJOR PROVISIONS OF THE CHARTER 5 III PROJECTED ENROLLMENT TO 1972 10 IV PURPOSES AND GOALS FOR GOODEDUCATION 19 V SUBJECT MATTER ACHIEVEMENT LEVELS 26 VI THE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PROGRAM 41 VII THE SECONDARY SCHOOLPROGRAM 67 VIII VOCATIONAL-TECHNICAL, ADULT EVENING SCHOOL AND COMMUNITYCOLLEGE EDUCATION 80 IX PUPIL PERSONNEL SERVICES 92 X SPECIAL EDUCATION SERVICES FOREXCEPTIONAL CHILDREN 106 XI PERSONNEL 128 XII EVALUATION OF PHYSICAL PLANT 157 XIII PROJECTED BUILDING REQUIREMENTS 179 XIV BUSINESS MANAGEMENT 198 XV ADMINISTRATIVE ORGANIZATION 232 XVI FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS 263 Appendix A: BASIC INFORMATIONON SCHOOL BUILDINGS IN NASHVILLE-DAVIDSONCOUNTY SCHOOL SYSTEM AS OF MARCH 1963 273 - vi TABLES Page 1 BIRTHS TO RESIDENTS IN NASHVILLEAND DAVIDSON COUNTY AND CORRESPONDING1960CENSUS ENUMERATION BY AGE 12 2 ACTUAL AND PROJECTED OCTOBERMEMBERSHIP, NASHVILLE-DAVIDSON COUNTY METROPOLITAN SYSTEM,1957-1972 15 3 "ACCELERATION-RETARDATION" SCORES IN GRADES1-8 OF METRO SCHOOLS, BY RACE OFENROLLEE AND BY SOCIO-ECONOMIC STATUS OF THE SCHOOLCOMMUNITY OF INDIVIDUAL SCHOOLS,1961-62 27 4 COMPARISON OF HIGHEST AND LOWESTSCHOOLS ON COMPOSITE SCORES ON METROPOLITANACHIEVEMENT BATTERIES BY GRADE LEVEL AND BY SCHOOLSYSTEM, 19'1 -62 28 5 A COMPARISON OF "BEST" AND"POOREST" PERFORMANCE IN VARIOUS METROPOLITANACHIEVEMENT TEST CATEGORIES IN THE DAVIDSON COUNTYAND NASHVILLE SCHOOL SYSTEM, GRADES 1-8,1961-62 31 6 MEAN PERFORMANCES ON INDICATED TESTSBY HIGH SCHOOL ENROLLEES IN SPECIFIEDGRADES ,1962 33 7 MEAN PERCENTILE SCORES ON THE ESSENTIALHIGH SCHOOL CONTENT TEST, BY SEX AND RACE OFTENTH GRADE ENROLLEES AND BY SOCIO-ECONOMICSTATUS OF THE SCHOOL COMMUNITY OF INDIVIDUAL NASHVILLE SCHOOLS, FEBRUARY,1962 35 8 PERCENTAGE COMPARISON OF THREE GROUPSAS BASED ON THE DISTRIBUTION OF METROPOLITANREADINESS TOTAL SCORES AMONG "SUPERIOV"HIGH NORMAL," "AVERAGE," "LOW NORMAL," AND "POORRISK" CATEGORIES OF EXAMINEES, NASHVILLECITY SCHOOLS 36 9 MEAN PERFORMANCES ON THE VARIOUSCATEGORIES OF THE DIFFERENTIAL APTITUDE TEST: BYRACE AND SEX OF NINTH AND ELEVENTH GRADE ENROLLEESAND BY SOCIO-ECONOMIC STATUS OF THE SCHOOLCOMMUNITY OF !NDIVIDUAL NASHVILLE SCHOOLS,1961-62 37 TABLES (continued) Page 10 RESULTS OF STUDENTPERCEPTION INVENTORY ON 49 CLASSROOM PRACTICES INGRADES FOUR AND SIX GRADES 1-6, IN 11 DISTRIBUTION OF CLASS SIZES, NASHVILLE AND DAVIDSONCOUNTY, FALL 1962 52 12 MEDIAN CLASS SIZES INNASHVILLE AND DAVIDSON 53 COUNTY ELEMENTARYCLASSES, 1962 13 NUMBER OF HUMANINTERACTIONS IN CLASSES OF VARIOUS SIZE EXPRESSED ASRATIOS TO VALUES 57 FOR CLASS OF 25 14 SPECIAL EDUCATION SERVICES FOREXCEPTIONAL CHILDREN IN NASHVILLE ANDDAVIDSON COUNTY SCHOOLS 108 1962-63 15 ESTIMATED EXTENT TO WHICHEXCEPTIONAL CHILDREN