DOCSLIB.ORG

3 M Hub Law Offices

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
3 M Hub Law Offices I 1 .~11~_- _ _ 1 '1 é.1:..:;-1:} -I ,:_||'-“'3 !'_},‘:;.Iin‘ '- """_, "2\ "7;-n_\\.\1l.f_' . 1' : £1.31 61- 21,1 E,“ 1 1 11 31129 11M HUB LAW OFFICES 1 Ford Greene, Esquire 2 F California State Bar No. 107601 1 711 Sir Francis Drake Boulevard 3 1 San Anselmo, California 94960-I949 R Telephone: (415) 258-0360 41 11 Attorney for Defendant 511 GERALD ARMSTRONG 6t 711 8 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 91 IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES l 0 1 1 1 _ CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY NO. BC O52 395 INTERNATIONAL, a California l2 1 not-for-profit religious corporation: ARHSTRONG'S RESPONSES TO 11 C§I'S REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION 13 111 Plaintiffs, 14 U1 I 15 NJ;-I~4_1*_1-u1‘4_n-no-_'?__ GERALD ARMSTRONG; DOES 1 16 “ through 25, inclusive, 17 Defendants. 1 18 \u-Ifiu-’\uu/\nuP\|-I\n-'\u-I5:-_I\na/\h—#\—/\h-/\u-/\-/\u-I I Q 19 M TO ALL INTERESTED PARTIES AND TO THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD 20 ‘ PROPOUNDING PARTY: Plaintiff Church of Scientology International 21 “ RESPONDING PARTY: Defendant Gerald Armstrong 22 1 444 __lIlIlII.7__|Il1_4 SET NO: One. 23 24 " BEQflE§I_EQB_AQH1§§lQ§_HQi_l cfl-rt‘‘As_ _‘__ During 1990 and 1991, you voluntarily provided aid and/or 25 4411‘ill!!!Lpi 26 1 advice to Bent Corydon and/or Corydon's attorney, Toby Plevin, in 1 1 27 11 the case of Beg; Corydon v, Church gf Scientology International, 1111 .11 1 28 1 et a1,, Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. C 694401. HUULAWOFFICES T:;_4' Fordfinenmilquirl 4; !SirFnn1:'IDnhBl-rd. I 1lAnltlun.O\ 94960 1 KI» ADHSSIOI (415)258-0369 Page 1 . ‘mum’: usvulszs to cars nmulsrs i i is ‘M K4 I CB1 363 Q l 2,‘ EE§£QN5E TO REQQESTi§QR ADMISSIQN 31 gArmstrong objects to this request for admission on the 4% grounds that it is vague and ambiguous as to phrase "aid and/or 5 advice." If the phrase is given the widest of meanings 6 imaginable, or an unqualified meaning, then Armstrong submits an 7 unqualified admission. 8 REQUEST FOR ADMISSION NO. 2 9 In May, 1992, you voluntarily provided a declaration to Gary 10 M. Bright and/or Jerold Fagelbaum. ll H RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR ADMISSION NO. 2 ii‘ 12 ,; Admitted. 13» REQUEST FOR ADMISSION NO. 3 14, Gary M. Bright and Jerold Fagelbaum are attorneys for .51 defendants and counter-claimants David Mayo, Church of the New 15 ~15 Civilization, John Nelson, Harvey Haber, Vivien Zegal and DeDe 17w Reisdorf in the case of Religious Technology Center, et al. V. wl 18$ Robin Scott, et al., United States District Court for the Central W 19» District of California, Case No. CV 85-711 JMI (Bx). 20 h RESEQNSE TQ QQUESI FQB AQLQLSQIQN §Q, 3 21 H Armstrong lacks sufficient information to be able to admit of 22 \ deny this request. Armstrong objects to this request, moreover, 23 xi\ on the ground that it seeks information which is more easily I 24 P!\. available to Scientology than Armstrong. Scientology knows who ml 25 M the parties and attorneys of record are in its various 26 1: litigations, including the case cited in its request. All that 27 notwithstanding, and lacking no information to the contrary, ii 28 l Armstrong submits an unqualified admission. 3 l HUI LAW OFFICES Q 1 Fonl Grunt. bquin 711 Sir Franc! Duh IML E SmAn|n.'.mn.C.A 9-1960 ii (415)255-0360 Page 2 . m-s'm:I='s usmlszs 1:0 cars aznczsn rm Amflssxcr .';_ _» _. _ ‘ "01, -.- . - .-. A- ,1 5:--.-.1,-. ,Ao,-.51:-'-R» | -.-4-lg...-- M4,...»-v*>.»....--.._.. i W ,' ,1‘ ., .7 3631 fig- ., _ 3:1 'i ""!» ,--. _ . 1 1 1 4_:-__- REQUEST FOR ADMISSION NO. 4 1 You worked as a paralegal for attorney Ford Greene since 2 3 August, 1991. RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR ADMISSION N0. 4 4 Armstrong objects to this request for admission on the 5 t term Armstrong admits 6 grounds that it is vague and ambiguous as to to the term 7 "paralegal." Nevertheless, omitting tha , 8* that he has worked for Ford Greene since August, 1991, and is l' alified self—admitted paralegal. With that 9 intera ia, an unqu 10 understanding Armstrong submits an unqualified admission. REQUEST FOR ADMISSION NO. 5 ll 12, You attended the convention of the Cult Awareness Network in isi November, 1992. EST FO ISS H NO 5 14k RESPONSE TQ §§QQ 5 Lgfl IQ . Admitted. 15 lei naguasm roa ADMISSION no. e In November, 1992, you provided a videotaped interview to 17 18 Jerry Whitfield. RESPONSE TQ EQQUESE FOR ADHLSSLQN NO. 6 19 Admitted. 20E i 21, B3Q§§§1_§QB_BQ§1§§lQ§_§Q;_l 2 2* In June, 1993 you gave an interview to 7one or more reporters orter from 23% from Ngw§wgg3_magazine. 24, 1" zsn» Armstrong admits that he gave an interview to a rep , i 1 26i Ngwsweeg magazine, but lacks sufficient information to be able i 4* 7* know if said interview was in May or June of 1993. He Ii’!-"="""-==has ,*-\:_'.' é q__‘__‘_-. 2 Av _ . 6 ’. 28§ diligent search but has no confirming facts otherwise"..'-1,;-.*"-==an’[email protected]'-:~_¢-:*».&f* 1, -I $5? -. -~= ='?5"-'\‘.1=\1 ‘.'i‘3¥¢ ~ 1’!‘="‘-"""'; .=. 1r'a“-‘- in 1 i -R5“ "‘-S‘ 1’.3- 1". -. = Q .‘.-‘ H flxfifiay--. , ‘ “.m;ifl)*¢€E: "'- Hill UNI QFFIG5 ,6 1' . , . a \-I ‘J, '9 " t 1 Fodfimnm i.nqu.'uI . _ Q‘ , : . ",4? 1". -I.‘-1. .,. -\. -.,,xY1.v-‘I:;-.._-I ‘"‘r_ _._._.__!_ ., K?Q’_ QIt‘-'--‘ -0 - p- —-___-__(‘| _ ' \ ‘4 _ . "*0 i -{L .—e .- _-_ ,__— _.- _ --fi___i _-e..-~-__\. _.-., _ -.Jf _' .'.-_ -. - ._..1:.\»'.‘mma-=-'b¢.___0?J.|- ‘sam,_~h,-.>2;'11?\\_'#.J...,,.r~‘-wt_":;,. _ =: , ''- . T - - ‘ '=*- Fnnnl on-all ~ ~ ~- 1 1 _ I ""-<.-_-_m9£I'°'?=i'h‘i"'-‘"-'-' —¢-:-.-—- - - _ _ - flutocs-—— -- -—---.-- ~ -- ~,- -. gmmasaws-"-""':'-.3:' "-'11.------»:a.*7"-if-'9‘; .- , f '*<..-'.-J--" 6»=‘- a.-.»3:-we-Bf-"-4*.‘-§‘.q.:!':‘‘5"-.-.r.=.'~'rt’ H’ 3632 ll way. 2 “, REQUEST FOR ADMISSION NO. 8 3, In August, 1993, you gave an interview to one or more 4 in reporters from Entertainment Television. 5" RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR ADMISSION NO. B 6 Armstrong admits that he gave an interview to a reporter from 7 1 Entertainment Television, but that said interview could have been 8} in July of 1993. with that as an understanding, Armstrong submits 9 an unqualified admission. 10g REQUEST FOR ADMISSION NO. 9 ll, In August, 1993, you provided a copy of a manuscript entitled "ONE HELL OF A STORY An Original Treatment for Motion Picture 12g1 W, l3\ Purposes Created and Written by Gerald Armstrong to Entertainment l4i Television. l5\ RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR ADMISSION NO. 9 16 Armstrong admits that he provided "One Hell of a Story" to up Entertainment Television, but that said provision could have been 18$ in July of 1993. With that as an understanding, Armstrong submits l9fl an unqualified admission. 2 0 REQUEST E05 ADMISSION N0. IO 2 ll In June, 1993, you helped form a Colorado corporation called 22 "Fight.Against Coercive Tactics, Inc." (hereinafter, "FACTI"). 23‘ l BE§2QE§E_IQ_BEQE§§I_EQB_ADB1fl§IQE_BQi_lQ N 24%H Armstrong objects to this request for admission on the 2s, T grounds that it is vague and ambiguous as to the terms "helped and I74!-lb 26* form." ‘H ~ 27 \ '1 REQUEST FOB ADQISSION NQ. 11 \ \ J‘ ,\ , 1: 28 \ From June, 1993 until June, 1994 you were the President of 1 HUILAWOFFICES Fordfiruae. iqairl Wiii 711 SirFram:'IDrI.i-Illvd. W SllAmdn0.CA 94960 M (4i5)&-(Em Page 4 . naunmlrs us:-onszls 1:0 cars uqUIS'1'8 rm AIIIIS-SI£I I E 3 6 R 3 l FACTI. 2; RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR ADMISSION NO. 11 Denied. 3 ii 4 M REQUEST FOR ADMISSION NO. 12 5% FACTI maintains and operates an electronic "library" in the 6‘ form of a computer bulletin board which contains, inter alia, 7 IL documents relating to plaintiff. 8 -RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR ADMISSION NO. 12 W 9 Armstrong lacks sufficient information to be able to admit or 10 deny this request. Aside from the fact that Armstrong has no 11 actual knowledge of anything Fight Against Coercive Tactics (Fact) 12 does, lacking facts to the contrary, Armstrong submits an 13 unqualified admission.i Ii 14¢ REQUEST FOB QQMISSIQN NQ, 1} 1l 15 i§7__r“4I~u-ur4i-u*1-It _nq;_ You provided documents to FACTI with the intention that those 16 1 T documents would become a part of its electronic library. Y 17 RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR ADMISSION N0. 13 18 with the understanding that Armstrong does not know of the 19 existence of such a library, has never seen neither it nor one, 20 and understanding that by "intention" is meant "hope," Armstrong 21 i submits an unqualified admission. 22 M1 BEQH§§!;IQB_AQ!I§§IQN_§Qi_l1 ,11 i 1. 23 M In January, 1994, FACTI sent a mailing to hundreds of people 24 i requesting negative information about Scientology entities and 25 F related individuals "to assist ongoing litigation." I 26 BES2QNSE_IQ_BEQHE§I_EQB_AQHlfl§1QN_NQm_l1 27 x Armstrong lacks sufficient information to be able to admit or 28 I deny this request numerically. Armstrong objects to this request 11 HUD LAW OH-‘ICES hdfiwmfimh 1 711SitF:I:I.'ID|'allll'\i.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Dangerous Discourse of Dianetics: Linguistic Manifestations of Violence Toward Queerness in the Canonical Religious Philosophy of Scientology
    Relics, Remnants, and Religion: An Undergraduate Journal in Religious Studies Volume 2 Issue 2 Article 4 5-5-2017 The Dangerous Discourse of Dianetics: Linguistic Manifestations of Violence Toward Queerness in the Canonical Religious Philosophy of Scientology Francesca Retana University of Puget Sound, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://soundideas.pugetsound.edu/relics Recommended Citation Retana, Francesca (2017) "The Dangerous Discourse of Dianetics: Linguistic Manifestations of Violence Toward Queerness in the Canonical Religious Philosophy of Scientology," Relics, Remnants, and Religion: An Undergraduate Journal in Religious Studies: Vol. 2 : Iss. 2 , Article 4. Available at: https://soundideas.pugetsound.edu/relics/vol2/iss2/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Publications at Sound Ideas. It has been accepted for inclusion in Relics, Remnants, and Religion: An Undergraduate Journal in Religious Studies by an authorized editor of Sound Ideas. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Retana: The Dangerous Discourse of Dianetics: Linguistic Manifestations Page 1 of 45 The Dangerous Discourse of Dianetics: Linguistic Manifestations of Violence Toward Queerness in the Canonical Religious Philosophy of Scientology I. Uncovering the Anti-Queer Sentiment in the Dianetic Perspective At present, there is a groundswell of public sensational interest in the subject of Scientology; and, in fact, in the time since I began this research paper, a nine-episode documentary series has premiered and reached finale on A&E titled “Scientology and the Aftermath”— a personal project hosted by sitcom celebrity, ex-Scientologist, and author of Troublemaker: Surviving Hollywood and Scientology, Leah Remini.1 I could not begin to enumerate the myriad exposés/memoirs of ex-Scientologists that have been published in recent years nor could I emphasize enough the rampant conspiracy theories that are at the disposal of any curious mind on what many have termed “the cult” of Scientology.
    [Show full text]
  • Scientology in Court: a Comparative Analysis and Some Thoughts on Selected Issues in Law and Religion
    DePaul Law Review Volume 47 Issue 1 Fall 1997 Article 4 Scientology in Court: A Comparative Analysis and Some Thoughts on Selected Issues in Law and Religion Paul Horwitz Follow this and additional works at: https://via.library.depaul.edu/law-review Recommended Citation Paul Horwitz, Scientology in Court: A Comparative Analysis and Some Thoughts on Selected Issues in Law and Religion, 47 DePaul L. Rev. 85 (1997) Available at: https://via.library.depaul.edu/law-review/vol47/iss1/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Law at Via Sapientiae. It has been accepted for inclusion in DePaul Law Review by an authorized editor of Via Sapientiae. For more information, please contact [email protected]. SCIENTOLOGY IN COURT: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS AND SOME THOUGHTS ON SELECTED ISSUES IN LAW AND RELIGION Paul Horwitz* INTRODUCTION ................................................. 86 I. THE CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY ........................ 89 A . D ianetics ............................................ 89 B . Scientology .......................................... 93 C. Scientology Doctrines and Practices ................. 95 II. SCIENTOLOGY AT THE HANDS OF THE STATE: A COMPARATIVE LOOK ................................. 102 A . United States ........................................ 102 B . England ............................................. 110 C . A ustralia ............................................ 115 D . Germ any ............................................ 118 III. DEFINING RELIGION IN AN AGE OF PLURALISM
    [Show full text]
  • Scientology and Estate Planning Handout Materials Are Available for Download Or Printing on the HANDOUT TAB on the Gotowebinar Console
    11/12/2019 Scientology and Estate Planning Handout materials are available for download or printing on the HANDOUT TAB on the gotowebinar console. If the tab is not open click on that tab to open it and view the materials. 1 1 Scientology and Estate Planning By: Thomas Cummins and Martin Shenkman, Esq. 2 2 General Disclaimer The information and/or the materials provided as part of this program are intended and provided solely for informational and educational purposes. None of the information and/or materials provided as part of this power point or ancillary materials are intended to be, nor should they be construed to be the basis of any investment, legal, tax or other professional advice. Under no circumstances should the audio, power point or other materials be considered to be, or used as independent legal, tax, investment or other professional advice. The discussions are general in nature and not person specific. Laws vary by state and are subject to constant change. Economic developments could dramatically alter the illustrations or recommendations offered in the program or materials. 3 3 1 11/12/2019 Additional Disclaimer If there are any errors in how a particular faith is portrayed please email [email protected] and I will correct the materials and recirculate them. There was no intent to provide more or less coverage of the impact of any particular faith on estate planning. Rather, the objective was to use customs of various faiths to illustrate how planning can be tailored to respect and reflect the precepts of any faith. If you feel something important, or a particular faith’s omissions in the materials should be addressed email me relevant information at [email protected] and I will correct the materials and recirculate them.
    [Show full text]
  • Lucifer Over Luxor: Archaeology, Egyptology, and Occultism in Kenneth Anger’S Magick Lantern Cycle
    Doyle White, E 2016 Lucifer Over Luxor: Archaeology, Egyptology, and Occultism in Kenneth Anger’s Magick Lantern Cycle. Present Pasts, 7(1): 2, pp. 1–10, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/pp.73 RESEARCH PAPER Lucifer Over Luxor: Archaeology, Egyptology, and Occultism in Kenneth Anger’s Magick Lantern Cycle Ethan Doyle White* One of the great figureheads of American experimental cinema, Kenneth Anger (b.1927), is internationally renowned for his pioneering work, recognisable for its blend of homoerotica, popular and classical music, and dark, symbolist imagery. A follower of Thelema, the religion of infamous British occultist Aleister Crowley (1875–1947), Anger’s work is imbued with occult themes and undercurrents rarely comprehen- sible to the non-initiated viewer. In exploring these esoteric ideas, Anger makes use of archaeology and heritage in his short filmsEaux d’Artifice (1953) and Inauguration of the Pleasure Dome (1954–66), as well as in the lost films The Love That Whirls (1949) and Thelema Abbey (1955), which utilize such disparate elements as Aztec human sacrifice and putative Renaissance Satanism. However, this theme only reaches its apex in Lucifer Rising (1980), an exploration of Thelemic theology filmed at such sites as Avebury, Luxor, and Karnak, which reflects and propagates the Thelemic view of the past—an ‘alternative archaeology’ rooted in Crowley’s own fascination with Egyptomania. This paper seeks to explore Anger’s use of the past and place it in its proper context of twentieth-century Western esotericism. Kenneth Anger (b.1927) is one of the foremost figures of through the transformation of individual consciousness American experimental cinema, an artist who produced via artistic mediums (Hughes 2011: 12).
    [Show full text]
  • Freedom of Religion and the Church of Scientology in Germany and the United States
    SHOULD GERMANY STOP WORRYING AND LOVE THE OCTOPUS? FREEDOM OF RELIGION AND THE CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY IN GERMANY AND THE UNITED STATES Religion hides many mischiefs from suspicion.' I. INTRODUCTION Recently the City of Los Angeles dedicated one of its streets to the founder of the Church of Scientology, renaming it "L. Ron Hubbard Way." 2 Several months prior to the ceremony, the Superior Administrative Court of Miinster, Germany held that Federal Minister of Labor Norbert Bluim was legally permitted to continue to refer to Scientology as a "giant octopus" and a "contemptuous cartel of oppression." 3 These incidents indicate the disparity between the way that the Church of Scientology is treated in the United States and the treatment it receives in Germany.4 Notably, while Scientology has been recognized as a religion in the United States, 5 in Germany it has struggled for acceptance and, by its own account, equality under the law. 6 The issue of Germany's treatment of the Church of Scientology has reached the upper echelons of the United States 1. MARLOWE, THE JEW OF MALTA, Act 1, scene 2. 2. Formerly known as Berendo Street, the street links Sunset Boulevard with Fountain Avenue in the Hollywood area. At the ceremony, the city council president praised the "humanitarian works" Hubbard has instituted that are "helping to eradicate illiteracy, drug abuse and criminality" in the city. Los Angeles Street Named for Scientologist Founder, DEUTSCHE PRESSE-AGENTUR, Apr. 6, 1997, available in LEXIS, News Library, DPA File. 3. The quoted language is translated from the German "Riesenkrake" and "menschenverachtendes Kartell der Unterdruickung." Entscheidungen des Oberver- waltungsgerichts [OVG] [Administrative Court of Appeals] Minster, 5 B 993/95 (1996), (visited Oct.
    [Show full text]
  • Writing Emotions
    Ingeborg Jandl, Susanne Knaller, Sabine Schönfellner, Gudrun Tockner (eds.) Writing Emotions Lettre 2017-05-15 15-01-57 --- Projekt: transcript.titeleien / Dokument: FAX ID 0247461218271772|(S. 1- 4) TIT3793_KU.p 461218271780 2017-05-15 15-01-57 --- Projekt: transcript.titeleien / Dokument: FAX ID 0247461218271772|(S. 1- 4) TIT3793_KU.p 461218271780 Ingeborg Jandl, Susanne Knaller, Sabine Schönfellner, Gudrun Tockner (eds.) Writing Emotions Theoretical Concepts and Selected Case Studies in Literature 2017-05-15 15-01-57 --- Projekt: transcript.titeleien / Dokument: FAX ID 0247461218271772|(S. 1- 4) TIT3793_KU.p 461218271780 Printed with the support of the State of Styria (Department for Health, Care and Science/Department Science and Research), the University of Graz, and the Faculty of Arts and Humanities University of Graz. An electronic version of this book is freely available, thanks to the support of libraries working with Knowledge Unlatched. KU is a collaborative initiative designed to make high quality books Open Access for the public good. The Open Access ISBN for this book is 978-3-8394-3793-3. More information about the initiative and links to the Open Access version can be found at www.knowledgeunlatched.org. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No- Derivs 4.0 (BY-NC-ND) which means that the text may be used for non-commercial purposes, provided credit is given to the author. For details go to http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/. To create an adaptation, translation, or derivative
    [Show full text]
  • Church of Scientology (England and Wales)
    CHARITY COMMISSION DECISION OF THE CHARITY COMMISSONERS FOR ENGLAND AND WALES MADE ON 17TH NOVEMBER 1999 APPLICATION FOR REGISTRATION AS A CHARITY BY THE CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY (ENGLAND AND WALES) 1. The issue before the Commissioners The Board of Commissioners considered an application by the Church of Scientology (England and Wales) (CoS) for registration as a charity pursuant to section 3(2) of the Charities Act 1993. In reaching their determination of the application the Commissioners considered whether CoS is charitable as being an organisation: (i) established for the charitable purpose of the advancement of religion and/or (ii) established for the charitable purpose of the promotion of the moral or spiritual welfare or improvement of the community, and if in the case of (i) or (ii) above CoS is so established for such a charitable purpose, whether it is established for the public benefit. 2. Conclusion The Commissioners having considered the full legal and factual case and supporting documents (including expert evidence) which had been put to them by CoS and having considered and reviewed the relevant law, taking into account the principles embodied in the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), the Commissioners concluded that CoS is not established as a charity and accordingly is not registrable as such. In so determining the Commissioners concluded as follows -: CoS is not charitable as an organisation established for the advancement of religion because having regard to the relevant law and evidence: (a) Scientology is not a religion for the purposes of English charity law. That religion for the purposes of charity law constitutes belief in a supreme being and worship of that being (section 6, pages 12 to 25).
    [Show full text]
  • Combatting CULT MIND CONTROL
    Combatting CULT MIND CONTROL STEVEN HASSAN IIIIIIIHII Park Street Press / dedicate this book to people all over the world who have ever experienced the loss of their personal freedom, in the hope that it might help ease their suffering. Park Street Press One Park Street Rochester, VT 05767 Copyright © 1988, 1990 by Steven Hassan All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Hassan, Steven. Combatting cult mind control / Steven Hassan, p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0-89281-311-3 1. Cults—Controversial literature. 2. Cults—Psychological aspects. 3. Hassan, Steven. I. Title. BP603.H375 1990 306'. I—dc20 90-43697 CIP Printed and bound in the United States 10 98765432 Park Street Press is a division of Inner Traditions International, Ltd. Distributed to the book trade in Canada by Book Center, Inc., Montreal, Quebec Contents Foreword by Margaret Singer xiii Preface xvii Chapter 1 Exit-Counseling: The Background 1 Chapter 2 My Life in the Unification Church 12 Chapter 3 The Threat: Mind Control Cults Today 35 Chapter 4 Understanding Mind Control 53 Chapter 5 Cult Psychology 76 Chapter 6 Cult Assessment: How to Protect Yourself 95 Chapter 7 Exit-Counseling: Freedom Without Coercion 112 Chapter 8 How to Help 132 Chapter 9 Unlocking Cult Mind Control 148 Chapter 10 Strategies for Recovery 168 Chapter 11 The Next Step 187 Appendix Lifton's Eight Criteria of Mind Control 200 Resource Organizations 206 Endnotes 211 Bibliography 221 Index 233 About the Author 237 I Acknowledgments With heartfelt gratitude, I thank my parents, Milton and Estelle Hassan, for all their love and support.
    [Show full text]
  • How the Church of Scientology Lures in Closeted Individuals
    Relics, Remnants, and Religion: An Undergraduate Journal in Religious Studies Volume 3 Issue 1 Article 1 1-31-2018 How the Church of Scientology Lures in Closeted Individuals McKenna Cole [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://soundideas.pugetsound.edu/relics Recommended Citation Cole, McKenna (2018) "How the Church of Scientology Lures in Closeted Individuals," Relics, Remnants, and Religion: An Undergraduate Journal in Religious Studies: Vol. 3 : Iss. 1 , Article 1. Available at: https://soundideas.pugetsound.edu/relics/vol3/iss1/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Publications at Sound Ideas. It has been accepted for inclusion in Relics, Remnants, and Religion: An Undergraduate Journal in Religious Studies by an authorized editor of Sound Ideas. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Cole: How the Church of Scientology Lures in Closeted Individuals Cole 1 McKenna Cole Professor White REL 215 May 9, 2017 How the Church of Scientology Lures in Closeted Individuals Using Kate Bornstein's memoir, Queer and Present Danger, as a primary source, HBO’s Alex Gibney’s documentary Going Clear: Scientology and the Prison of Belief and several other articles and interview; I will be analyzing the manner in which the Church of Scientology provided closeted homosexual and other ‘sexual deviants’ a false sense of hope. This is done through the promise of a structured community and the possibility of ridding individuals of their homosexual tendencies, which during this time was seen as a mental and physical illness. In 1950 L. Ron Hubbard, an American science fiction author, published his groundbreaking novel titled, Dianetics: The Modern Science of Mental Health.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Activity for Teaching the Sociology of Religion I Created This Activity To
    Activity for Teaching the Sociology of Religion I created this activity to encourage active learning for an Introduction to Sociology class. In these introductory classes, students come from diverse major backgrounds and often are early in their college careers. For this reason, any activity I create for classes such as this one is designed to encourage both mastery of the material, but also to help students work on their ability to utilize a sociological perspective. The activity described below is designed to be used on the first or second day when the topic of religion is introduced in an introductory class (total time: approximately 1.5 to 2 hours for lecture and activity). Its most basic purpose is to teach students the sociological definition of “a religion.” More than that, however, I want students to engage with the diversity of religion present in our society. As described below, I chose to use three uncommon or extreme religious groups that students were likely not overly familiar with. After the activity concludes, however, I think it is important that the instructor engages the students in discussion about the connections that can be made between the activity and the wider sociopolitical forces that influence shared images of other religious groups. In this document, I have included a detailed summary of the short lecture that I give before the activity to introduce students to the topic of the sociology of religion. I also provide instructions for conducting the activity, the worksheet that I distribute to each student, and the documents that are shared by each group.
    [Show full text]
  • The Gnostic L. Ron Hubbard: Was He Influenced by Aleister Crowley?
    $ The Journal of CESNUR $ The Gnostic L. Ron Hubbard: Was He Influenced by Aleister Crowley? Massimo Introvigne CESNUR (Center for Studies on New Religions) [email protected] ABSTRACT: Scientology was defined by its founder himself, L. Ron Hubbard, as a “Gnostic religion.” In 1969, however, a Trotskyist Australian journalist and an opponent of Scientology, Alex Mitchell, disclosed in a Sunday Times article that Hubbard had been involved, in 1945–46, in the activities of California’s Agapé Lodge of the Ordo Templi Orientis, an occult organization led by British magus Aleister Crowley. The article generated a cottage industry of exposés criticizing Hubbard as having been a member of a “black magic” organization. Some scholars also believe Hubbard to have been influenced by Crowley in his subsequent writings about Dianetics and Scientology. While conflicting narratives exist about why exactly Hubbard participated in the activities of the Agapé Lodge and his leader, the rocket scientist Jack Parsons, the article argues that Hubbard researched magic well before 1945, came to conclusions about the role of magic in Western culture that are largely shared by 21st century scholars, and created with Scientology a system that is inherently religious rather than magic. KEYWORDS: Scientology, L. Ron Hubbard, Babalon Working, Aleister Crowley, Jack Parsons, John Whiteside Parsons, O.T.O., Agapé Lodge. Scientology and Gnosticism Some weeks ago, I was visited by a leading Chinese scholar of religion, Zhang Xinzhang from Zhejiang University. Zhang is a scholar of Gnosticism and a critic of movements the Chinese government identifies as xie jiao (“heterodox teachings,” sometimes translated, less accurately, as “evil cults”).
    [Show full text]
  • 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 United States District Court District of New Jersey Nxivm Corp
    1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY 2 3 NXIVM CORPORATION, et al., . 4 Plaintiffs, . Case No. 2:06-cv-01051 5 vs. Newark, New Jersey 6 ROSS INSTITUTE, et al., . February 9, 2011 . Volume 1 7 Defendants. 8 9 TRANSCRIPT OF HEARING BEFORE THE HONORABLE MARK FALK 10 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 11 APPEARANCES: 12 For the Plaintiff WILLIAM B. MCGUIRE, ESQ. NXIVM Corporation Tompkins, McGuire, Wachenfeld & 13 and Nancy L. Barry, LLP Salzman: Four Gateway Center 14 100 Mulberry Street Newark, NJ 07102 15 (973) 622-3000 Email: [email protected] 16 For Kristin Keeffe: ROBERT D. CROCKETT, ESQ. 17 Latham & Watkins, LLP 355 South Grand Avenue 18 Los Angeles CA 90071-1560 (213) 891-8254 19 Email: [email protected] 20 JOAN E. KARN, ESQ. Latham & Watkins, LLP 21 Newark NJ 07101-3174 (973) 639-7537 22 Email: [email protected] 23 JOHN M. FALZONE, ESQ. Latham & Watkins, LLP 24 Newark NJ 07101-3174 (973) 639-7099 25 Email: [email protected] 2 1 For Keith Raniere: ROBERT M. LEONARD, ESQ. Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP 2 500 Campus Drive Florham Park, NJ 07932-1047 3 (973) 360-1100 Email: [email protected] 4 For the Defendants ANTHONY SYLVESTER, ESQ. 5 Stephanie Franco, Riker, Danzig, Scherer, Hyland & Morris Sutton, Perretti, LLP 6 Rochelle Sutton: One Speedwell Avenue Morristown, NJ 07962-1981 7 (973) 538-0800 Email: [email protected] 8 HAROLD L. KOFMAN, ESQ. 9 Riker, Danzig, Scherer, Hyland & Perretti, LLP 10 One Speedwell Avenue PO Box 1981 11 Morristown, NJ 07962-1981 (973) 451-8452 12 Email: [email protected] 13 For the Defendants PETER L.
    [Show full text]