I I I I I I I I -Iii- I I

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

I I I I I I I I -Iii- I I I ••1 . I SUSITNA HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT . -. .. ::· ": • •J .·! I . i I MIDDLE SUSITNA RIVER SEDIMENTATION STUDY STREAM CHANNEL STABILITY ANALYSIS I OF SELECTED SLOUGHS, SIDE CHANNELS AND MAIN CHANNEL LOCATIONS I I I Report by I Harza-Ebasco Susitna Joint Venture I Prepared for Alaska Power Authority I I I I I March 1985 I I I I I I 'l'A.BLE OF CORTENTS I SECTION/TITLE PAGE List of Tables ;li I List of Exhibits ;., 1.0 SUMMARY I 3 2.0 BACKGROUND I .1 3.0 SCOPE OF STUDY 4.0 SETTING s I 7 5.0 STUDY SITES , 5.1 Main Channel Near River Cross Section 4 I 5.2 Main Channel Between River Cross Sections • 12 and 13 , 5.3 Main Channel Upstream From Lane Creek I ,... 5.4 Mainste!m 2 Side Channel at River Cross 8 I Section 18.2 5.5 Slough 8A 5.6 Slough 9 ' I 5.7 Main Channel Upstream Fr~ 4th of July Creek ' 5.8 Side Channel 10 ' I 5.9 Lower Side Channel 11 ' 5.10 Slough 11 ,. I 5.11 Upper Side Channel 11 5.12 Main Channel Between River Cross Sections ,. I 46 and 48 ,. 5.13 Side Channel 21 ,, I 5.14 Slough 21 6.0 DATA SOURCES " I I I -i- I I I I TABLE OF CONTENTS I SECTION/TITLE 7.0 GENERAL APPROACH I 7.1 Degradation 7.1.1 Competent Bottom Velocity ,, I 7.1.2 Tractive Force 7.1.3 Meyer-Peter, Muller Formula 1.1 7.1.4 Schoklitsch Formula I 7.1.5 Shields Criteria II 7.1.6 Depth of Degradation I 7.2 Aggradation 8.0 HYDRAULIC DATA USED IN THE ANALYSIS I 8.1 Dominant Discharge 8.2 Mean Velocities, Average Depths and I Channel Widths 8.3 Channel Bed Slopes 8.4 Hanning's Roughness Coefficients I 8.5 Bed Material Size Distribution 9.0 SEDIMENTATION PROCESS I 9.1 Natural Conditions ,, 9.1.1. River Morphology I 9.1.2. Channel Stability 9.1.3. Intrusion of Fine Sediments I 9.2 With-Project Conditions 9 . 2.1 River Morphology 9.2.2 Channel Stability Jl I 9.2.3 Intrusion of Fine Sediments u ~tr~£tte/llt't.s - TABLES I EXHIBITS I APPENDIX A I -11- I I I I LIST OF TABLES I Nuober Title 1 Characteristics of Study Sites on Middle Susitna I River 2 Hydraulic Parameters for Mainstem Sites I 3 Hydraulic Parameters for Side Channels and Sloughs I 4 Representative Bed Material Size Distribution for Selected Sloughs, Side Channels and Main­ stem Sites I 5 Transportable Bed Material Sizes in Selected Sloughs, Side Channels and Mainstem Sites I 6 Potential Degradation in Selected Sloughs, Side Channels and Mainstem Sites I 7 Natural and With-Project Average Weekly Flows of Susitna River at Gold Creek 8 Maxhnuil Natural and With-Project Weekly Flows I of Susitna Riv~r at Gold Creek I I I I I I I I -iii- I I I LIST OF EXHIBITS I Number Title I 1 Location Map 2 Locations of Study Sites 3 Main Channel near River Cross Section 4 I 4 Main Channel between River Cross Sections 12 and 13 5 Main Channel upstream from Lane Creek I 6 Hainstem 2 Side Channel 7 Slough SA I 8 Slough 9 9 Main Channel upstream from 4th of July Creek I 10 Side Channel 10 11 Lower Side Channel 11 12 Slough 11 I 13 Upper Side Channel 11 14 Main Channel between River Cross Sections 46 I and 48 15 Side Channel 21 I 16 Slough 21 17 Relatiouship between Particle Size and Bottom I Velocity 18 Relationship between Mean Diameter and Critical Tractive Force I 19 Relations hips between Slough/Side Channel l)ischarge and Discharge at Gold Creek I 20 Hydraulic Parameters for Slough 9 21 Hydraulic Parameters for Lower Channel 11 I 22 Size Distribution of Bed Material in Main Channel near Cross Section 4 I 23 Size Distribution of Bed Material in Main Channel between Cross Sections 12 and 13 24 Size Distribution of Bed Material in Main Channel upstream I from Lane Creek I -iv- I I I LIST OF EXHIBITS I Number Title 25 Size Distribution of Bed Material in Mainsteam & I Side Channels at Cross Section 18.2 26 Size Distribution of Bed Material in Slough SA I 27 Size Distribution of Bed Material in Slough 9 2S Size Distribution of Bed Material in Main I Channel upstream from 4th of July Creek 29 Size Distribution of Bed Material in Side Channel 10 I 30 Size Distribution of Bed Material in Lower Side Channel 11 I 31 Size Distribution of Bed Material in Slough 11 and Upper Side Channel 11 I 32 Size Distribution of Bed Material in Main Channel between Cross Sections 46 and 4S I 33 Size Distribution of Bed Material in Side Channel 21 and Slough 21 34 Transportable Bed Material Sizes in Hain I Channel near Cross Section 4 35 Transportable Bed Material Sizes in Main I Channel between Cross Sections 12 and 13 36 Transportable Bed Material Sizes in Main I Channel upstream from Lane Creek 37 Transportable Bed Uaterial Sizes in Mainstem 2 I Side Channel 3S Transportable Bed l-faterial Sizes in Slough SA 39 Transportable Bed Material Sizes in Slough 9 I 40 Transportable Bed Material Sizes in Main Channel upstream from 4th of July Creek I 41 Transportable Bed Material Sizes in Side Channel 10 I 42 Transportable Bed Material Sizes in Lower Side Channel 11 I -v- I I I LIST OF EXHIBITS I Number Title 43· Transportable Bed Material Sizes in Slough 11 I 44 Transportable Bed Material Sizes in Upper Side Channel 11 I 45 Transportable Bed Material Sizes in Main Channel between Cross Sections 46 and 48 46 Transportable Bed Material Sizes in Side I Channel 21 47 Transportable Bed Material Sizes in Slough 21 I 48 Estimated Depth of Degradation in Main Channel near Cross Section 4 I 49 Estimated Depth of Degradation in Main Channel between Cross Sections 12 and 13 I 50 Estimated Depth of Degradation in Main Channel upstream from Lane Creek 51 Estimated Depth of Degradation in Mainstem 2 Side Channel 52 Estimated Depth of Degradation in Slough 9 I 53 Esti~ted Depth of Degradation in Main Channel upstream from 4th of July Creek I 54 Estimated Depth of Degradation in Side Channel 10 I 55 Estimated Depth of Degradation in Lower Side Channel 11 56 Estimated Depth of Degradation in Upper Side I Channel 11 57 Estimated Depth of Degradation in Main Channel I between Cross Sections 46 and 48 sa Estimated Depth of Degradation in Side Channel I 21 59 Estimated Depth of Degradation in Slough 21 I I -vi- I I I I 1.0 SUMMARY I This study was conducted to evaluate potential effects of the Susitna Hydro­ electric Project on channel stability at selected sites in the mainstem and I at selected sloughs and side channels. The sediment at ion process in the Susitna River under natural conditions also is discussed. The study reach I includes the Susitna River between Devil Canyon and the confluence of the Susitna and Chulitna rivers. The selected sites (shown on Exhibit 2) are : I 1. Mainstem Sites: near river Cross Section 4, river miles 99.0 to 100.0; between river cross sections 12 and 13, river miles 108.5 I to 110.0; upst ream from Lane Creek, river miles 113.6 to 114.2; upstream from 4th of July Creek, river miles 131.2 to 132.2 and I between river cross sections 46 and 48, river miles 136.9 to 137.4. I 2. Side Channels: Mainstem 2 Side Channel, Side Channel 10, Lower I and Upper Side Channels 11 and Side Channel 21. 3. Sloughs: SA, 9, 11 and 21. I For natural conditions, temporal deposition and/or scour was studied at the I sites in qualitative terms. Under with-project conditions, a more quantitative estimate of potential degradation and/or aggradation was made I for each study site. Intrusion of fine sediment into the gravel bed and its subsequent entrapment also were studied. I The hydraulic and sediment data required for the study were derived from various reports prepared by the Alaska Department of Fish ani Game, Susitna I Hydro Aquatic Studies Team; R&M Consultants, Incorporated; U.S. Geological Survey, Water Resources Division, Anchora·ge; and Harza-Ebasco Susitna Joint I Venture during 1983 and 1984. The data were used to develop relationships I I 42188202 1 850404 I I between the discharge rates at Gold Creek stream gaging station and corresponding flows at the mainstem sites and the flows entering the sloughs I and side channels. These data also were used to estimate mean velocities, coverage depths and channel widths at each site. The bed material size I distribution representative for the material at each site was derived from the analysis of the bed material samples collected by Harza-Ebasco. I The sizes of transportable bed material corresponding to a selected range of discharges were estimated as the average of the five sizes computed using I the methods of competent bottom velocity; tractive force; Meyer-Peter, Muller formula; Schoklitscb formula and Shields criteria. A comparison of I median bed material size and the transportable size at each site indicated that under natural conditions, most of the selected sites are subject to I temporal scour and/or deposition depending upon the magnitude and characteristics of the sediment load and high flows caused by floods or I breaching of ice jams.
Recommended publications
  • Scour and Fill in Ephemeral Streams
    SCOUR AND FILL IN EPHEMERAL STREAMS by Michael G. Foley , , " W. M. Keck Laboratory of Hydraulics and Water Resources Division of Engineering and Applied Science CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Pasadena, California 91125 Report No. KH-R-33 November 1975 SCOUR AND FILL IN EPHEMERAL STREAMS by Michael G. Foley Project Supervisors: Robert P. Sharp Professor of Geology and Vito A. Vanoni Professor of Hydraulics Technical Report to: U. S. Army Research Office, Research Triangle Park, N. C. (under Grant No. DAHC04-74-G-0189) and National Science Foundation (under Grant No. GK3l802) Contribution No. 2695 of the Division of Geological and Planetary Sciences, California Institute of Technology W. M. Keck Laboratory of Hydraulics and Water Resources Division of Engineering and Applied Science California Institute of Technology Pasadena, California 91125 Report No. KH-R-33 November 1975 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The writer would like to express his deep appreciation to his advisor, Dr. Robert P. Sharp, for suggesting this project and providing patient guidance, encouragement, support, and kind criticism during its execution. Similar appreciation is due Dr. Vito A. Vanoni for his guidance and suggestions, and for generously sharing his great experience with sediment transport problems and laboratory experiments. Drs. Norman H. Brooks and C. Hewitt Dix read the first draft of this report, and their helpful comments are appreciated. Mr. Elton F. Daly was instrumental in the design of the laboratory apparatus and the success of the laboratory experiments. Valuable assistance in the field was given by Mrs. Katherine E. Foley and Mr. Charles D. Wasserburg. Laboratory experiments were conducted with the assistance of Ms.
    [Show full text]
  • Variability of Bed Mobility in Natural Gravel-Bed Channels
    WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, VOL. 36, NO. 12, PAGES 3743–3755, DECEMBER 2000 Variability of bed mobility in natural, gravel-bed channels and adjustments to sediment load at local and reach scales Thomas E. Lisle,1 Jonathan M. Nelson,2 John Pitlick,3 Mary Ann Madej,4 and Brent L. Barkett3 Abstract. Local variations in boundary shear stress acting on bed-surface particles control patterns of bed load transport and channel evolution during varying stream discharges. At the reach scale a channel adjusts to imposed water and sediment supply through mutual interactions among channel form, local grain size, and local flow dynamics that govern bed mobility. In order to explore these adjustments, we used a numerical flow ␶ model to examine relations between model-predicted local boundary shear stress ( j) and measured surface particle size (D50) at bank-full discharge in six gravel-bed, alternate-bar ␶ channels with widely differing annual sediment yields. Values of j and D50 were poorly correlated such that small areas conveyed large proportions of the total bed load, especially in sediment-poor channels with low mobility. Sediment-rich channels had greater areas of full mobility; sediment-poor channels had greater areas of partial mobility; and both types had significant areas that were essentially immobile. Two reach- mean mobility parameters (Shields stress and Q*) correlated reasonably well with sediment supply. Values which can be practicably obtained from carefully measured mean hydraulic variables and particle size would provide first-order assessments of bed mobility that would broadly distinguish the channels in this study according to their sediment yield and bed mobility.
    [Show full text]
  • Morphological Bedload Transport in Gravel-Bed Braided Rivers
    Western University Scholarship@Western Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository 6-16-2017 12:00 AM Morphological Bedload Transport in Gravel-Bed Braided Rivers Sarah E. K. Peirce The University of Western Ontario Supervisor Dr. Peter Ashmore The University of Western Ontario Graduate Program in Geography A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree in Doctor of Philosophy © Sarah E. K. Peirce 2017 Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd Part of the Physical and Environmental Geography Commons Recommended Citation Peirce, Sarah E. K., "Morphological Bedload Transport in Gravel-Bed Braided Rivers" (2017). Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository. 4595. https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd/4595 This Dissertation/Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarship@Western. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository by an authorized administrator of Scholarship@Western. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Abstract Gravel-bed braided rivers, defined by their multi-thread planform and dynamic morphology, are commonly found in proglacial mountainous areas. With little cohesive sediment and a lack of stabilizing vegetation, the dynamic morphology of these rivers is the result of bedload transport processes. Yet, our understanding of the fundamental relationships between channel form and bedload processes in these rivers remains incomplete. For example, the area of the bed actively transporting bedload, known as the active width, is strongly linked to bedload transport rates but these relationships have not been investigated systematically in braided rivers. This research builds on previous research to investigate the relationships between morphology, bedload transport rates, and bed-material mobility using physical models of braided rivers over a range of constant channel-forming discharges and event hydrographs.
    [Show full text]
  • American Fisheries Society Bethesda, Maryland Suggested Citation Formats
    Aquatic Habitat Assessment Edited by Mark B. Bain and Nathalie J. Stevenson Support for this publication was provided by Sport Fish Restoration Act Funds administered by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Division of Federal Aid Aquatic Habitat Assessment Common Methods Edited by Mark B. Bain and Nathalie J. Stevenson American Fisheries Society Bethesda, Maryland Suggested Citation Formats Entire Book Bain, M. B., and N. J. Stevenson, editors. 1999. Aquatic habitat assessment: common methods. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, Maryland. Chapter within the Book Meixler, M. S. 1999. Regional setting. Pages 11–24 in M. B. Bain and N. J. Stevenson, editors. Aquatic habitat assessment: common methods. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, Maryland. Cover illustration, original drawings, and modifications to figures by Teresa Sawester. © 1999 by the American Fisheries Society All rights reserved. Photocopying for internal or personal use, or for the internal or personal use of specific clients, is permitted by AFS provided that the appropriate fee is paid directly to Copyright Clearance Center (CCC), 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, Massachusetts 01923, USA; phone 508-750-8400. Request authorization to make multiple copies for classroom use from CCC. These permissions do not extend to electronic distribution or long- term storage of articles or to copying for resale, promotion, advertising, general distribution, or creation of new collective works. For such uses, permission or license must be obtained from AFS. Library of Congress Catalog Number: 99-068788 ISBN: 1-888569-18-2 Printed in the United States of America American Fisheries Society 5410 Grosvenor Lane, Suite 110 Bethesda, Maryland 20814-2199, USA Contents Contributors vii Symbols and Abbreviations viii 05.
    [Show full text]
  • The Spatial Distribution of Bed Sediment on Fluvial System: a Mini Review of the Aceh Meandering River
    Aceh Int. J. Sci. Technol., 5(2): 82-87 August 2016 doi: 10.13170/aijst.5.2.4932 Aceh International Journal of Science and Technology ISSN: 2088-9860 Journal homepage: http://jurnal.unsyiah.ac.id/aijst The Spatial Distribution of Bed Sediment on Fluvial System: A Mini Review of the Aceh Meandering River Muhammad Irham Faculty of Marine and Fisheries Science, University of Syiah Kuala, Banda Aceh 23111, Indonesia. Corresponding author, email: [email protected] Received : 2 August 2016 Accepted : 28 August 2016 Online : 31 August2016 Abstract - Dynamic interactions of hydrological and geomorphological processes in the fluvial system result in accumulated deposit on the bed because the capacity to carry sediment has been exceeded. The bed load of the Aceh fluvial system is primarily generated by mechanical weathering resulting in boulders, pebbles, and sand, which roll or bounce along the river bed forming temporary deposits as bars on the insides of meander bends, as a result of a loss of transport energy in the system. This dynamic controls the style and range of deposits in the Aceh River. This study focuses on the spatial distribution of bed-load transport of the Aceh River. Understanding the spatial distribution of deposits facilitates the reconstruction of the changes in controlling factors during accumulation of deposits. One of the methods can be done by sieve analysis of sediment, where the method illuminates the distribution of sediment changes associate with channel morphology under different flow regimes. Hence, the purpose of this mini review is to investigate how the sediment along the river meander spatially dispersed.
    [Show full text]
  • Grain Sorting in the Morphological Active Layer of a Braided River Physical Model
    Earth Surf. Dynam., 3, 577–585, 2015 www.earth-surf-dynam.net/3/577/2015/ doi:10.5194/esurf-3-577-2015 © Author(s) 2015. CC Attribution 3.0 License. Grain sorting in the morphological active layer of a braided river physical model P. Leduc, P. Ashmore, and J. T. Gardner University of Western Ontario, Department of Geography, London, Ontario, Canada Correspondence to: P. Leduc ([email protected]) Received: 8 June 2015 – Published in Earth Surf. Dynam. Discuss.: 10 July 2015 Revised: 22 October 2015 – Accepted: 23 November 2015 – Published: 15 December 2015 Abstract. A physical scale model of a gravel-bed braided river was used to measure vertical grain size sorting in the morphological active layer aggregated over the width of the river. This vertical sorting is important for ana- lyzing braided river sedimentology, for numerical modeling of braided river morphodynamics, and for measuring and predicting bedload transport rate. We define the morphological active layer as the bed material between the maximum and minimum bed elevations at a point over extended time periods sufficient for braiding processes to rework the river bed. The vertical extent of the active layer was measured using 40 hourly high-resolution DEMs (digital elevation models) of the model river bed. An image texture algorithm was used to map bed material grain size of each DEM. Analysis of the 40 DEMs and texture maps provides data on the geometry of the morpho- logical active layer and variation in grain size in three dimensions. By normalizing active layer thickness and dividing into 10 sublayers, we show that all grain sizes occur with almost equal frequency in all sublayers.
    [Show full text]
  • River Maintenance Methods Attachment
    Joint Biological Assessment, Part II River Maintenance Methods Attachment River Maintenance Methods Attachment 1. Introduction Each strategy can be implemented using a variety of potential methods. The selection of methods depends upon local river conditions, reach constraints, and environmental effects. Method categories are described in section 3.2.3. Methods are the river maintenance features used to implement reach strategies to meet river maintenance goals. Methods can be used as multiple installations as part of a reach-based approach, at individual sites within the context of a reach- based approach, or at single sites to address a specific river maintenance issue that is separate from a reach strategy. The applicable methods for the Middle Rio Grande (MRG) have been organized into categories of methods with similar features and objectives. Methods may be applicable to more than one category because they can create different effects under various conditions. The method categories are: • Infrastructure Relocation or Setback • Channel Modification • Bank Protection/Stabilization • Cross Channel (River Spanning) Features • Conservation Easements • Change Sediment Supply A caveat should be added that, while these categories of methods are described in general, those descriptions are not applicable in all situations and will require more detailed, site-specific, analysis for implementation. It also should be noted that no single method or method combination is applicable in all situations. The suitability and effectiveness of a given method are a function of the inherent properties of the method and the physical characteristics of each reach and/or site. It is anticipated that new or revised methods will be developed in the future that also could be used on the Middle Rio Grande.
    [Show full text]
  • Sediment Supply As a Driver of River Meandering and Floodplain
    LETTERS PUBLISHED ONLINE: 2 NOVEMBER 2014 | DOI: 10.1038/NGEO2282 Sediment supply as a driver of river meandering and floodplain evolution in the Amazon Basin José Antonio Constantine1*, Thomas Dunne2,3*, Joshua Ahmed1, Carl Legleiter4 and Eli D. Lazarus1 The role of externally imposed sediment supplies on the fine-grained Neogene sedimentary rocks of the Central Amazon evolution of meandering rivers and their floodplains is poorly Trough yield an order of magnitude less sediment per river each understood, despite analytical advances in our physical under- year9, and those that drain the Guiana Shield to the north and the standing of river meandering1,2. The Amazon river basin hosts Brazil Shield to the south of the Trough yield the least7. tributaries that are largely unaected by engineering controls As sedimentary deposits attached to the inner banks (convex and hold a range of sediment loads, allowing us to explore the relative to the channel centreline) of meander bends, point bars influence that sediment supply has on river evolution. Here we seem to be the link between changes in externally imposed calculate average annual rates of meander migration within 20 sediment supplies and adjustments in river behaviour. Modern reaches in the Amazon Basin from Landsat imagery spanning theory attributes the meandering behaviour of alluvial rivers to 1985–2013. We find that rivers with high sediment loads instabilities in river flow11 that arise either inherently12 or from experience annual migration rates that are higher than those of disruption of the flow field by bedforms13. Recent lab experiments rivers with lower sediment loads. Meander cutoalso occurs suggest that this latter influence may not be ubiquitous14,butthe more frequently along rivers with higher sediment loads.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 3 Transport of Gravel and Sediment Mixtures
    Parker’s Chapter 3 for ASCE Manual 54 CHAPTER 3 TRANSPORT OF GRAVEL AND SEDIMENT MIXTURES 3.1 FLUVIAL PHENOMENA ASSOCIATED WITH SEDIMENT MIXTURES When ASCE Manual No. 54, “Sedimentation Engineering,” was first published in 1975, the subject of the transport and sorting of heterogeneous sediments with wide grain size distributions was still in its infancy. This was particularly true in the case of bed- load transport. The method of Einstein (1950) was one of the few available at the time capable of computing the entire grain size distribution of particles in bed-load transport, but this capability had not been extensively tested against either laboratory or field data. Since that time there has been a flowering of research on the subject of the selective (or non-selective) transport of sediment mixtures. A brief attempt to summarize this research in a useful form is provided here. A river supplied with a wide range of grain sizes has the opportunity to sort them. While the grain size distribution found on the bed of rivers is never uniform, the range of sizes tends to be particularly broad in the case of rivers with beds consisting of a mixture of gravel and sand. These streams are termed “gravel-bed streams” if the mean or median size of the bed material is in the gravel range; otherwise they are termed “sand-bed streams.” The river can sort its gravel and sand in the streamwise, lateral and vertical directions, giving rise in each a) b) case to a characteristic Figure 3.1 Contrasts in surface armoring between a) the River morphology.
    [Show full text]
  • Dam Removal Analysis Guidelines for Sediment
    Dam Removal Analysis Guidelines for Sediment Advisory Committee on Water Information Subcommittee on Sedimentation U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Technical Service Center Denver, Colorado December 2017 SUBCOMMITTEE ON SEDIMENTATION The Subcommittee on Sedimentation (http://acwi.gov/sos/index.html) seeks to facilitate collaboration among Federal agencies, university research organizations, and professional society organizations to identify and address major sediment- related problems and issues facing the United States. The Subcommittee on Sedimentation was formed in 1939 and now reports to the Federal Advisory Committee on Water Information (ACWI), which is under the U.S. Department of the Interior, Assistant Secretary for Water and Science. Member organizations are listed in the table below: Agricultural Research Service National Resources Conservation Service U.S. Department of Agriculture U.S. Forest Service National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce National Marine Fisheries Service U.S. Army Corps of Engineers U.S. Department of Defense Bureau of Land Management Bureau of Reclamation U.S. Department of Interior National Park Service U.S. Geological Survey Federal Highway Administration U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Tennessee Valley Authority Other federal representatives U.S. Environmental Protection Agency American Society of Civil Engineers Colorado Water Resources Research Institute Consortium of Universities for the Advancement of Professional and university research Hydrologic Science, Inc. organizations Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences Missouri Water Resources Research Center Bureau of Reclamation Technical Service Center, Denver, Colorado Dam Removal Analysis Guidelines for Sediment Prepared by: Timothy J. Randle, Ph.D., P.E., D.WRE.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 4 Transport of Sediment by Water
    I Contents Symbols ................................................................................. 4-1 I Terms ................................................................................... 4-3 General ................................................................................. 4-4 Factors affecting sediment transport ......................................................... 4-4 Characteristics of water as the transporting medium .......................................... 4-4 Laminarsublayer ....................................................................... 4-4 Characteristics of transportable materials ................................................... 4-5 Mechanism of entrainment ................................................................. 4-5 Forces acting on discrete particles .......................................................... 4-5 Tractiveforce ........................................................................... 4-5 Determining critical tractive stress ......................................................... 4-6 Determining critical velocity .............................................................. 4-6 Hydraulicconsiderations ................................................................... 4-8 Fixedboundaries ........................................................................ 4-8 Movableboundaries ...................................................................... 4-8 Movement ofbedmaterial .................................................................. 4-9 Schoklitschformula
    [Show full text]
  • Sediment Transport and Channel Morphology of Small, Forested Streams1
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN WATER RESOURCES ASSOCIATION AUGUST AMERICAN WATER RESOURCES ASSOCIATION 2005 SEDIMENT TRANSPORT AND CHANNEL MORPHOLOGY OF SMALL, FORESTED STREAMS1 Marwan A. Hassan, Michael Church, Thomas E. Lisle, Francesco Brardinoni, Lee Benda, and Gordon E. Grant2 ABSTRACT: This paper reviews sediment transport and channel INTRODUCTION morphology in small, forested streams in the Pacific Northwest region of North America to assess current knowledge of channel stability and morphology relevant to riparian management prac- Forests significantly influence channel morphology tices around small streams. Small channels are defined as ones in and processes in streams. Particular effects are creat- which morphology and hydraulics may be significantly influenced ed by within channel accumulation of large woody by individual clasts or wood materials in the channel. Such chan- debris (LWD) and by channel margin trees. Wood is nels are headwater channels in close proximity to sediment sources, so they reflect a mix of hillslope and channel processes. Sediment critically important in regulating sediment transport inputs are derived directly from adjacent hillslopes and from the and diversifying channel form, thereby also having channel banks. Morphologically significant sediments move mainly major effects on aquatic and riparian ecology (e.g., as bed load, mainly at low intensity, and there is no standard Bisson et al., 1981; Sullivan, 1986; Bilby and Bisson, method for measurement. The larger clastic and woody elements in 1998). This paper presents a review of small forested the channel form persistent structures that trap significant vol- umes of sediment, reducing sediment transport in the short term stream dynamics, drawing primarily from research and substantially increasing channel stability.
    [Show full text]