DOCSLIB.ORG

Dam Removal Analysis Guidelines for Sediment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Dam Removal Analysis Guidelines for Sediment Advisory Committee on Water Information Subcommittee on Sedimentation U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Technical Service Center Denver, Colorado December 2017 SUBCOMMITTEE ON SEDIMENTATION The Subcommittee on Sedimentation (http://acwi.gov/sos/index.html) seeks to facilitate collaboration among Federal agencies, university research organizations, and professional society organizations to identify and address major sediment- related problems and issues facing the United States. The Subcommittee on Sedimentation was formed in 1939 and now reports to the Federal Advisory Committee on Water Information (ACWI), which is under the U.S. Department of the Interior, Assistant Secretary for Water and Science. Member organizations are listed in the table below: Agricultural Research Service National Resources Conservation Service U.S. Department of Agriculture U.S. Forest Service National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce National Marine Fisheries Service U.S. Army Corps of Engineers U.S. Department of Defense Bureau of Land Management Bureau of Reclamation U.S. Department of Interior National Park Service U.S. Geological Survey Federal Highway Administration U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Tennessee Valley Authority Other federal representatives U.S. Environmental Protection Agency American Society of Civil Engineers Colorado Water Resources Research Institute Consortium of Universities for the Advancement of Professional and university research Hydrologic Science, Inc. organizations Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences Missouri Water Resources Research Center Bureau of Reclamation Technical Service Center, Denver, Colorado Dam Removal Analysis Guidelines for Sediment Prepared by: Timothy J. Randle, Ph.D., P.E., D.WRE. Supervisory Hydraulic Engineer and Manager, Sedimentation and River Hydraulics Group Jennifer Bountry, M.S., P.E. Hydraulic Engineer, Sedimentation and River Hydraulics Group Peer Reviewed by: Blair P. Greimann, Ph.D., P.E. Hydraulic Engineer, Sedimentation and River Hydraulics Group In addition, the information presented in this guideline has been externally peer reviewed by the following subject matter experts listed below (in alphabetical order) from other federal agencies, universities, private consultants, and non- governmental organizations: • American Rivers • Chris Bromley (Scottish Environment Protection Agency) • Chauncey Anderson (U.S. Geological Survey) • Mathias J. Collins (National Marine Fisheries Service, NMFS) • Joanna Curran (Northwest Hydraulic Consultants) • Tom Augspurger (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service) • Jeff Duda (U.S. Geological Survey) • Amy East (U.S. Geological Survey) • Ken Finkelstein (National Marine Fisheries Service) • Jon Fripp (USDA - Natural Resource Conservation Service) • Alex Hackman (Massachusetts Department of Fish and Game) • Eric Hutchens (National Marine Fisheries Service) • Jim MacBroom (Milone & MacBroom) v • Jon Major (U.S. Geological Survey) • Toby Minear (Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences) • Joe Rathbun (Michigan Department of Environmental Quality) • Marcin Whitman (California Department of Fish and Game) • Molly Wood (U.S. Geological Survey) Acknowledgements The development of these guidelines was only possible with the dedication and hard work of many people working under the sponsorship of the Subcommittee on Sedimentation. The guidelines benefited greatly from the input during workshops in 2008 and 2009 by numerous technical experts working in the field of dam removal representing federal and state agencies, universities, private consultants, and non- governmental agencies. Mathias J. Collins (NMFS) helped write the section on monitoring and adaptive management. Joe Rathbun (Michigan Department of Environmental Quality, retired) contributed to the section on contaminants. Tom Augspurger from U.S. Fish and Wildlife contributed to linking interagency risk assessment methodologies and water quality analysis. The U.S. Geological survey hosted the 2008 workshop in Portland, Oregon and a field trip to the Sandy River, Oregon where Marmot Dam had been removed. Rose Wallick, Chauncey Anderson, Jon Major, Kurt Spicer, and Heather Bragg are acknowledged for their efforts to host the workshop and organize and lead the field trip. Acknowledgements go to the leaders of the technical teams who summarized the ideas into the first draft components of the guidelines. The reservoir erosion and sedimentation group was led by Peter Downs of Stillwater Sciences, the downstream river sediment transport and deposition group was led by Will Graf of the University of South Carolina, and the water quality group was led by Chauncey Anderson of the U.S. Geological Survey. The Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission hosted the 2009 workshop. Scott Carney is acknowledged for his efforts to host the workshop and organize and lead the field visits to two local dam removal projects. The guidelines additionally benefited from a dam removal database compiled by American Rivers and USGS and interactions among a group of scientists gathered to review and disseminate the state of science in dam removal studies at the U.S. Geological Survey’s John Wesley Powell Center for Analysis and Synthesis in 2014 and 2015. A special thanks to the Reclamation’s Research and Development Office and Policy and Analysis Office for providing funding to write these guidelines and to the Subcommittee on Sedimentation for providing travel funding to non-federal participants at the workshops. Formatting of the document by Andrea Moore and illustrations by Cynthia Gray are greatly appreciated. List of participants at the October 2008 workshop in Portland, Oregon and their affiliation at the time of the workshop are provided in the table below. vi 2008 Workshop Participant Affiliation American Society of Civil Engineers, West David Admiral Consultants Chauncey Anderson U.S. Geological Survey Dick Bauman Bureau of Reclamation Jerry Bernard National Resources Conservation Service Jennifer Bountry Bureau of Reclamation American Society of Civil Engineers, West Jeff Bradley Consultants Curt Brown Bureau of Reclamation Scott Carney Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission Dan Cenderelli U.S. Forest Service Brian Cluer National Marine Fisheries Service Matt Collins National Marine Fisheries Service Yantao Cui Stillwater Sciences Pete Downs Stillwater Sciences John Esler Portland General Electric Stanford Gibson U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Doug Glysson U.S. Geological Survey Chris Goodell West Consultants Will Graf University of South Carolina Gordon Grant U.S. Forest Service Blair Greimann Bureau of Reclamation Craig Hickey University of Mississippi Bill Jackson National Park Service Yafei Jia University of Mississippi Cassie Klumpp Bureau of Reclamation Karl Lee U.S. Geological Survey Mary Ann Madej U.S. Geological Survey Christopher Magirl U.S. Geological Survey Jon Major U.S. Geological Survey James MacBroom Milone and MacBroom Marty Melchior Interfluve Charles Podolak National Center for Earth-Surface Dynamics Cynthia Rachol U.S. Geological Survey Tim Randle Bureau of Reclamation Joe Rathbun Michigan Department of Environmental Quality John Remus U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Stephen Scott U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Mike Shannon Agricultural Research Service Gary Smillie National Park Service Tim Straub U.S. Geological Survey Desiree Tullos Oregon State University Rose Wallick U.S. Geological Survey Marcin Whitman California Department of Fish and Game Andrew Wilcox University of Montana Laura Wildman American Rivers Brian Winter National Park Service vii List of participants at the October 2009 workshop in State College, Pennsylvania and their affiliation at the time of the workshop are provided in the table below. 2009 Workshop Participant Affiliation Chauncey Anderson U.S. Geological Survey Travis Bauer Bureau of Reclamation Jerry Bernard National Resources Conservation Service Jennifer Bountry Bureau of Reclamation Scott Carney Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission Dan Cenderelli USDA Forest Service Matt Collins National Marine Fisheries Service Yantao Cui Stillwater Sciences Joanna Curran University of Virginia Engineering Pete Downs Stillwater Sciences Brian Graber American Rivers John Gray U.S. Geological Survey Jeffrey Hartranft Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection Lisa Hollingsworth-Segedy American Rivers Vincent Humenay Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection Christopher Magirl U.S. Geological Survey Jim MacBroom Milone and MacBroom Marty Melchior Interfluve Katie Ombalski Clearwater Conservancy of North Central Pennsylvania Charles Podolak National Center for Earth-Surface Dynamics Tim Randle Bureau of Reclamation Joe Rathbun Michigan Department of Environmental Quality Matt Romkens Agricultural Research Service Gary Smillie National Park Service Sara Strassman American Rivers Tim Straub U.S. Geological Survey Illinois Marcin Whitman California Department of Fish & Game Shelby Zelonis University of South Carolina viii ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ASCE American Society of Civil Engineers DRIP Dam Removal Information Portal EPA Environmental Protection Agency ESA Endangered Species Act FEMA Federal Emergency Management Agency GPS global positioning system NEPA National Environmental Policy Act NID National Inventory of Dams NMFS National Marine Fisheries Service NOAA National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Recommended publications
  • System Reoperation Study

    System Reoperation Study

    System Reoperation Study Phase III Report: Assessment of Reoperation Strategies California Department of Water Resources August 2017 System Reoperation Study Phase III Report This page is intentionally left blank. August 2017 | 2 Table of Contents Chapter 1. Introduction .......................................................................................................................................................................................1 -1 1.1 Study Authorization ....................................................................................................................................................................................1 -1 1.2 Study Area ..................................................................................................................................................................................................1 -2 1.3 Planning Principles .....................................................................................................................................................................................1 -4 1.4 Related Studies and Programs...................................................................................................................................................................1 -4 1.5 Uncertainties in Future Conditions ............................................................................................................................................................. 1-6 1.5.1 Climate Change ..........................................................................................................................................................................1
  • AFS Policy Statement #32: STUDY REPORT on DAM REMOVAL for the AFS RESOURCE POLICY COMMITTEE (Full Text)

    AFS Policy Statement #32: STUDY REPORT on DAM REMOVAL for the AFS RESOURCE POLICY COMMITTEE (Full Text)

    AFS Policy Statement #32: STUDY REPORT ON DAM REMOVAL FOR THE AFS RESOURCE POLICY COMMITTEE (Full Text) (DRAFT #7: 10/05/01, J. Haynes, Editor) (DRAFT #8: 02/23/03, T. Bigford) (DRAFT #9: 03/18/03, H. Blough) (DRAFT #10: 09/23/03, T. Bigford) (DRAFT #11: 09/25/03, T. Bigford) (DRAFT #12: 10/31/03, T. Bigford) (DRAFT #13: 1/9/04, T. Bigford) (DRAFT #14: 7/7/04, T. Bigford) (DRAFT #15: 7/18/04, T. Bigford) (DRAFT #16: 11/20/04, T. Bigford) 2003-2004 Resource Policy Committee Heather Blough, Co-Chair, Kim Hyatt, Co-Chair, Mary Gessner, Victoria Poage, Allan Creamer, Chris Lenhart, Jamie Geiger, Jarrad Rosa, Wilson Laney, Tom Bigford, Danielle Pender, Tim Essington with assistance from Jennifer Lowery 2002-2003 Resource Policy Committee Heather Blough, Co-Chair, Thomas E. Bigford, Co-Chair Allan Creamer, Bob Peoples, Chris Lenhart, Maria La Salete Bernardino Rodrigues, Jamie Geiger, Jarrad Rosa, Wilson Laney, Kim Hyatt, Danielle Pender 2001-2002 Resource Policy Committee Tom Bigford, Chair, Heather Blough, Vice Chair, Jim Francis, Bill Gordon, Judy Pederson, Larry Simpson, Jarrad Kosa, Jaime Geiger, Bob Peoples, Maria La Salete Bernardino Rodrigues, Chris Lenhart 2000-2001 Coordinating Committee James M. Haynes, Chair, R. Duane Harrell, Christine M. Moffitt (ex officio), tc "James M. Haynes, Chair, R. Duane Harrell, Christine M. Moffitt (ex officio), Gary E. Whelan, Maureen Wilson, James M. Haynes, Chair 1999-2000 Study Committee Larry L. Olmsted, Chair, Donald C. Jackson, Peter B. Moyle,Stephen G. Rideout November 20, 2004 Introduction This study report provides background information to support a recommendation by the American Fisheries Society’s (AFS) Resource Policy Committee to develop a Dam Removal Policy Statement for consideration by the Governing Board and the full membership.
  • Insights Into the Oroville Dam 2017 Spillway Incident

    Insights Into the Oroville Dam 2017 Spillway Incident

    geosciences Communication Insights into the Oroville Dam 2017 Spillway Incident Aristotelis Koskinas 1, Aristoteles Tegos 1,2,*, Penelope Tsira 1, Panayiotis Dimitriadis 1 , Theano Iliopoulou 1, Panos Papanicolaou 1, Demetris Koutsoyiannis 1 and Tracey Williamson 3 1 Department of Water Resources and Environmental Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, Heroon Polytechniou 9, Zografou, GR-15780 Zographou Athens, Greece; [email protected] (A.K.); [email protected] (P.T.); [email protected] (P.D.); [email protected] (T.I.); [email protected] (P.P.); [email protected] (D.K.) 2 Arup Group Limited, 50 Ringsend Rd, Grand Canal Dock, D04 T6X0 Dublin 4, Ireland 3 Arup, 4 Pierhead Street, Cardiff CF10 4QP, UK; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 9 December 2018; Accepted: 7 January 2019; Published: 11 January 2019 Abstract: In February 2017, a failure occurring in Oroville Dam’s main spillway risked causing severe damages downstream. A unique aspect of this incident was the fact that it happened during a flood scenario well within its design and operational procedures, prompting research into its causes and determining methods to prevent similar events from reoccurring. In this study, a hydroclimatic analysis of Oroville Dam’s catchment is conducted, along with a review of related design and operational manuals. The data available allows for the comparison of older flood-frequency analyses to new alternative methods proposed in this paper and relevant literature. Based on summary characteristics
  • Environmental Benefits of Dam Removal

    Environmental Benefits of Dam Removal

    A Research Paper by Dam Removal: Case Studies on the Fiscal, Economic, Social, and Environmental Benefits of Dam Removal October 2016 <Year> Dam Removal: Case Studies on the Fiscal, Economic, Social, and Environmental Benefits of Dam Removal October 2016 PUBLISHED ONLINE: http://headwaterseconomics.org/economic-development/local-studies/dam-removal-case-studies ABOUT HEADWATERS ECONOMICS Headwaters Economics is an independent, nonprofit research group whose mission is to improve community development and land management decisions in the West. CONTACT INFORMATION Megan Lawson, Ph.D.| [email protected] | 406-570-7475 P.O. Box 7059 Bozeman, MT 59771 http://headwaterseconomics.org Cover Photo: Whittenton Pond Dam, Mill River, Massachusetts. American Rivers. TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................. 1 MEASURING THE BENEFITS OF DAM REMOVAL ........................................................................................... 2 CONCLUSION ................................................................................................................................................. 5 CASE STUDIES WHITTENTON POND DAM, MILL RIVER, MASSACHUSETTS ........................................................................ 11 ELWHA AND GLINES CANYON DAMS, ELWHA RIVER, WASHINGTON ........................................................ 14 EDWARDS DAM, KENNEBEC RIVER, MAINE ...............................................................................................
  • Scour and Fill in Ephemeral Streams

    Scour and Fill in Ephemeral Streams

    SCOUR AND FILL IN EPHEMERAL STREAMS by Michael G. Foley , , " W. M. Keck Laboratory of Hydraulics and Water Resources Division of Engineering and Applied Science CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Pasadena, California 91125 Report No. KH-R-33 November 1975 SCOUR AND FILL IN EPHEMERAL STREAMS by Michael G. Foley Project Supervisors: Robert P. Sharp Professor of Geology and Vito A. Vanoni Professor of Hydraulics Technical Report to: U. S. Army Research Office, Research Triangle Park, N. C. (under Grant No. DAHC04-74-G-0189) and National Science Foundation (under Grant No. GK3l802) Contribution No. 2695 of the Division of Geological and Planetary Sciences, California Institute of Technology W. M. Keck Laboratory of Hydraulics and Water Resources Division of Engineering and Applied Science California Institute of Technology Pasadena, California 91125 Report No. KH-R-33 November 1975 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The writer would like to express his deep appreciation to his advisor, Dr. Robert P. Sharp, for suggesting this project and providing patient guidance, encouragement, support, and kind criticism during its execution. Similar appreciation is due Dr. Vito A. Vanoni for his guidance and suggestions, and for generously sharing his great experience with sediment transport problems and laboratory experiments. Drs. Norman H. Brooks and C. Hewitt Dix read the first draft of this report, and their helpful comments are appreciated. Mr. Elton F. Daly was instrumental in the design of the laboratory apparatus and the success of the laboratory experiments. Valuable assistance in the field was given by Mrs. Katherine E. Foley and Mr. Charles D. Wasserburg. Laboratory experiments were conducted with the assistance of Ms.
  • Marmot Dam Removal Geomorphic Monitoring & Modelling Project

    Marmot Dam Removal Geomorphic Monitoring & Modelling Project

    MARMOT DAM REMOVAL GEOMORPHIC MONITORING & MODELING PROJECT ANNUAL REPORT June 2008 – May 2009 Prepared for: Sandy River Basin Watershed Council PO Box 868 Sandy OR 97055 Prepared by: Charles Podolak Johns Hopkins University Department of Geography & Environmental Engineering 3400 N. Charles St, Baltimore MD 21218 Smokey Pittman Graham Matthews & Associates P.O. Box 1516, Weaverville, CA, 96093 June 2010 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We would like to sincerely thank all who assisted with the Marmot Dam Removal Geomorphic Monitoring & Modeling Project: Oregon Watershed Enhancement Board – funding Johns Hopkins University & The National Center for Earth-surface Dynamics (NCED) Peter Wilcock Project Advisor Daniela Martinez Graduate Assistant NCED & National Science Foundation Research Experience for Undergraduates Kim Devillier Intern Dajana Jurk Intern Cecilia Palomo Intern Tim Shin Intern Katie Trifone Intern Graham Matthews & Associates Graham Matthews GMA Principle Investigator Logan Cornelius Streamflow and Sediment Sampling Cort Pryor Streamflow and Sediment Sampling Brooke Connell Topographic Surveys Keith Barnard Topographic Surveys/Survey Data Analysis Sandy River Basin Watershed Council Russ Plaeger Director U.S. Geological Survey Jon Major Jim O’Connor Rose Wallick Mackenzie Keith U.S. Forest Service Connie Athman Gordon Grant Portland General Electric David Heinzman John Esler Tim Keller Tony Dentel Metro Parks Bill Doran Landowners Mary Elkins David Boos MARMOT DAM REMOVAL GEOMORPHIC MONITORING & MODELING PROJECT – 2009 ANNUAL REPORT ii
  • Fielder and Wimer Dam Removals Phase I

    Fielder and Wimer Dam Removals Phase I

    R & E Grant Application Project #: 13 Biennium 13-054 Fielder and Wimer Dam Removals Phase I Project Information R&E Project $58,202.00 Request: Match Funding: $179,126.00 Total Project: $237,328.00 Start Date: 4/26/2014 End Date: 6/30/2015 Project Email: [email protected] Project 13 Biennium Biennium: Organization: WaterWatch of Oregon (Tax ID #: 93-0888158) Fiscal Officer Name: John DeVoe Address: 213 SW Ash Street, Suite 208 Portland, OR 97204 Telephone: 503-295-4039 x1 Email: [email protected] Applicant Information Name: Bob Hunter Email: [email protected] Past Recommended or Completed Projects This applicant has no previous projects that match criteria. Project Summary This project is part of ODFW’s 25 Year Angling Plan. Activity Type: Passage Summary: The project is to solve the fish passage problems associated with Fielder and Wimer Dams by removing the aging structures. This grant will provide funding for the pre-implementation mapping, assessments, analyses, design work, permitting, construction drawings, and preparation of bid packages needed for removal of these two dams. This Phase I pre-implementation work will be followed by Phase II implementation of the dam removal and site restoration plans that will be developed in this first phase. Objectives: Fielder and Wimer Dams are located on Evans Creek, an important salmon and Project #: 13-054 Last Modified/Revised: 4/11/2014 3:16:13 PM Page 1 of 12 Fielder and Wimer Dam Removals Phase I steelhead spawning tributary of the Rogue River. Both dams are listed in the top ten in priority statewide on ODFW’s 2013 Statewide Fish Passage Priority List.
  • Variability of Bed Mobility in Natural Gravel-Bed Channels

    Variability of Bed Mobility in Natural Gravel-Bed Channels

    WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, VOL. 36, NO. 12, PAGES 3743–3755, DECEMBER 2000 Variability of bed mobility in natural, gravel-bed channels and adjustments to sediment load at local and reach scales Thomas E. Lisle,1 Jonathan M. Nelson,2 John Pitlick,3 Mary Ann Madej,4 and Brent L. Barkett3 Abstract. Local variations in boundary shear stress acting on bed-surface particles control patterns of bed load transport and channel evolution during varying stream discharges. At the reach scale a channel adjusts to imposed water and sediment supply through mutual interactions among channel form, local grain size, and local flow dynamics that govern bed mobility. In order to explore these adjustments, we used a numerical flow ␶ model to examine relations between model-predicted local boundary shear stress ( j) and measured surface particle size (D50) at bank-full discharge in six gravel-bed, alternate-bar ␶ channels with widely differing annual sediment yields. Values of j and D50 were poorly correlated such that small areas conveyed large proportions of the total bed load, especially in sediment-poor channels with low mobility. Sediment-rich channels had greater areas of full mobility; sediment-poor channels had greater areas of partial mobility; and both types had significant areas that were essentially immobile. Two reach- mean mobility parameters (Shields stress and Q*) correlated reasonably well with sediment supply. Values which can be practicably obtained from carefully measured mean hydraulic variables and particle size would provide first-order assessments of bed mobility that would broadly distinguish the channels in this study according to their sediment yield and bed mobility.
  • Item F – Klamath Dam Removal - Contingency Funding March 9-10, 2021 Board Meeting

    Item F – Klamath Dam Removal - Contingency Funding March 9-10, 2021 Board Meeting

    Kate Brown, Governor 775 Summer Street NE, Suite 360 Salem OR 97301-1290 www.oregon.gov/oweb (503) 986-0178 Agenda Item F supports OWEB’s Strategic Plan priority #3: Community capacity and strategic partnerships achieve healthy watersheds, and Strategic Plan priority 7: Bold and innovative actions to achieve health in Oregon’s watersheds. MEMORANDUM TO: Oregon Watershed Enhancement Board FROM: Meta Loftsgaarden, OWEB Executive Director Richard Whitman, DEQ Director SUBJECT: Agenda Item F – Klamath Dam Removal - Contingency Funding March 9-10, 2021 Board Meeting I. Introduction Removal of the four PacifiCorp dams along the Klamath River in Oregon and California that block fish passage has been a priority of multiple governors in both states for over a decade. After extensive work by the Klamath River Renewal Corporation and its contractors (in partnership with states, tribes, federal agencies, irrigators, conservation groups, and many others), there is now a clear path to completing dam removal in 2023. This staff report updates the board on the dam removal project and asks for a general indication of board support in the unlikely event that additional funding is needed to complete restoration work following dam removal. II. Background PacifiCorp owns and operates four hydro-electric dams on the Klamath River, three in California and one in Oregon. PacifiCorp has decided to that it is in the best interest of the company and its customers to stop operating the dams rather than spending substantial amounts on improvements likely to be needed if they were to continue generating power. PacifiCorp has agreed to transfer ownership of the dams to the Klamath River Restoration Corporation, which in turn has contracted with Kiewit Infrastructure -- one of the nation’s most experienced large project construction firms – which will remove the dams and restore the river to a free-flowing condition.
  • (Entosphenus Tridentatus), California – Sacramento Regional Management Unit

    (Entosphenus Tridentatus), California – Sacramento Regional Management Unit

    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Arcata Fisheries Technical Report TR 2018-34 Regional Implementation Plan for Measures to Conserve Pacific Lamprey (Entosphenus tridentatus), California – Sacramento Regional Management Unit Damon H. Goodman and Stewart B. Reid U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Arcata Fish and Wildlife Office 1655 Heindon Road Arcata, CA 95521 (707) 822-7201 May 2018 Funding for this study was provided by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s Pacific Southwest Region Fish and Aquatic Conservation Program Office, with additional support provided by the Arcata Fish and Wildlife Office. This plan was developed as part of the Pacific Lamprey Conservation Initiative using information collected through: (1) regional stakeholder meetings hosted throughout the Sacramento Regional Management Unit in 2015-2017, (2) subsequent discussions with various stakeholders, and (3) the authors' experience. New information, as it becomes available, will be incorporated into subsequent revisions of this plan and posted on the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Arcata Fish and Wildlife Office website. Disclaimers: The mention of trade names or commercial products in this report does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use by the Federal Government. The Arcata Fish and Wildlife Office Fisheries Program reports its study findings through two publication series. The Arcata Fisheries Data Series was established to provide timely dissemination of data to local managers and for inclusion in agency databases. The Arcata Fisheries Technical Reports publishes scientific findings from single and multi-year studies that have undergone more extensive peer review and statistical testing. Additionally, some study results are published in a variety of professional fisheries and aquatic science journals.
  • Effects of the Glen Canyon Dam on Colorado River Temperature Dynamics

    Effects of the Glen Canyon Dam on Colorado River Temperature Dynamics

    Effects of the Glen Canyon Dam on Colorado River Temperature Dynamics GEL 230 – Ecogeomorphology University of California, Davis Derek Roberts March 2nd, 2016 Abstract: At the upstream end of the Grand Canyon, the Glen Canyon Dam has changed the Colorado River from a run-of-the-river flow to a deep, summer-stratified reservoir. This change in flow regime significantly alters the temperature regime of the Colorado River. Seasonal temperature variation, once ranging from near to almost , is now limited to 7 . The lack of warm summer temperatures has prevented spawning of endangered 0℃ 30℃ humpback chub in the Colorado River. Implementation of a temperature control device, to − 14℃ allow for warmer summer releases to mitigate negative temperature effects on endangered fish, was considered by the federal government. Ultimately, this proposal was put on indefinite hold by the Bureau of Reclamation and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service due to concerns of cost and unintended ecological consequences. The low-variability of the current dam-induced Colorado River temperature regime will continue into the foreseeable future. Agencies are reviewing humpback chub conservation efforts outside of temperature control. Keywords: Colorado River, Grand Canyon, Glen Canyon Dam, thermal dynamics 1.0 Introduction Temperature in natural water bodies is a primary driver of both ecological and physical processes. Freshwater plant and animal metabolisms are heavily affected by temperature (Coulter 2014). Furthermore, the thermal structure of a water body has significant impacts on the physical processes that drive ecosystem function (Hodges et al 2000); fluid dynamics drive transport of nutrients, oxygen, and heat. Human action, often the introduction of dams or industrial cooling systems, can alter the natural thermal regimes of rivers and lakes leading to reverberating impacts throughout associated ecosystems.
  • Morphological Bedload Transport in Gravel-Bed Braided Rivers

    Morphological Bedload Transport in Gravel-Bed Braided Rivers

    Western University Scholarship@Western Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository 6-16-2017 12:00 AM Morphological Bedload Transport in Gravel-Bed Braided Rivers Sarah E. K. Peirce The University of Western Ontario Supervisor Dr. Peter Ashmore The University of Western Ontario Graduate Program in Geography A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree in Doctor of Philosophy © Sarah E. K. Peirce 2017 Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd Part of the Physical and Environmental Geography Commons Recommended Citation Peirce, Sarah E. K., "Morphological Bedload Transport in Gravel-Bed Braided Rivers" (2017). Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository. 4595. https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd/4595 This Dissertation/Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarship@Western. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository by an authorized administrator of Scholarship@Western. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Abstract Gravel-bed braided rivers, defined by their multi-thread planform and dynamic morphology, are commonly found in proglacial mountainous areas. With little cohesive sediment and a lack of stabilizing vegetation, the dynamic morphology of these rivers is the result of bedload transport processes. Yet, our understanding of the fundamental relationships between channel form and bedload processes in these rivers remains incomplete. For example, the area of the bed actively transporting bedload, known as the active width, is strongly linked to bedload transport rates but these relationships have not been investigated systematically in braided rivers. This research builds on previous research to investigate the relationships between morphology, bedload transport rates, and bed-material mobility using physical models of braided rivers over a range of constant channel-forming discharges and event hydrographs.