Čejchan Adolf a Contribution to the Knowledge of the Orthoptera Of
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Biotropika: Journal of Tropical Biology | Vol
E-ISSN 2549-8703 I P-ISSN 2302-7282 BIOTROPIKA Journal of Tropical Biology https://biotropika.ub.ac.id/ Vol. 9 | No. 1 | 2021 | DOI: 10.21776/ub.biotropika.2021.009.01.03 THE ABUNDANCE AND DIVERSITY OF GRASSHOPPER (ORTHOPTERA) IN BATU CITY, EAST JAVA KELIMPAHAN DAN KEANEKARAGAMAN BELALANG (ORTHOPTERA) DI KOTA BATU, JAWA TIMUR Mufti Abrori1)*, Amin Setyo Leksono2), Zulfaidah Penata Gama2) Received : December 14th 2020 ABSTRACT Grasshoppers included in the order Orthoptera in the class of insects. Orthoptera orders Accepted : December 24th 2020 are divided into two parts, which a large suborder Ensifera and Caelifera. Most grasshopper species have a role as herbivores and a good protein source for other animals. Grasshopper abundance and diversity of ecosystems are more stable in a low disorder and the other way around. The factors that affect grasshoppers which environmental factors such as the structure of the vegetation, atmospheric temperature, and relative humidity. Author Affiliation: The purpose of this study to analyze the abundance and diversity of grasshoppers in Batu City, East Java. The research location is in Tahura R. Soerjo Cangar, an agricultural area 1) Master Student, Faculty of in Sumbergondo Village, Coban Talun, and Junrejo District. Measurement of biotic and Mathematics and Natural abiotic factors was carried out at the grasshoppers living locations, and then the data were Sciences, University of Brawijaya analyzed using the Shannon Wiener Diversity index (H'), Importance Value Index (INP), 2) Biology Departmen, Faculty of and Biplot analysis. The results were obtained as 754 individual grasshoppers from the Mathematics and Natural Caelifera suborder. While 201 individuals were found in the Ensifera suborder. -
Draft Carpathian Red List of Forest Habitats
CARPATHIAN RED LIST OF FOREST HABITATS AND SPECIES CARPATHIAN LIST OF INVASIVE ALIEN SPECIES (DRAFT) PUBLISHED BY THE STATE NATURE CONSERVANCY OF THE SLOVAK REPUBLIC 2014 zzbornik_cervenebornik_cervene zzoznamy.inddoznamy.indd 1 227.8.20147.8.2014 222:36:052:36:05 © Štátna ochrana prírody Slovenskej republiky, 2014 Editor: Ján Kadlečík Available from: Štátna ochrana prírody SR Tajovského 28B 974 01 Banská Bystrica Slovakia ISBN 978-80-89310-81-4 Program švajčiarsko-slovenskej spolupráce Swiss-Slovak Cooperation Programme Slovenská republika This publication was elaborated within BioREGIO Carpathians project supported by South East Europe Programme and was fi nanced by a Swiss-Slovak project supported by the Swiss Contribution to the enlarged European Union and Carpathian Wetlands Initiative. zzbornik_cervenebornik_cervene zzoznamy.inddoznamy.indd 2 115.9.20145.9.2014 223:10:123:10:12 Table of contents Draft Red Lists of Threatened Carpathian Habitats and Species and Carpathian List of Invasive Alien Species . 5 Draft Carpathian Red List of Forest Habitats . 20 Red List of Vascular Plants of the Carpathians . 44 Draft Carpathian Red List of Molluscs (Mollusca) . 106 Red List of Spiders (Araneae) of the Carpathian Mts. 118 Draft Red List of Dragonfl ies (Odonata) of the Carpathians . 172 Red List of Grasshoppers, Bush-crickets and Crickets (Orthoptera) of the Carpathian Mountains . 186 Draft Red List of Butterfl ies (Lepidoptera: Papilionoidea) of the Carpathian Mts. 200 Draft Carpathian Red List of Fish and Lamprey Species . 203 Draft Carpathian Red List of Threatened Amphibians (Lissamphibia) . 209 Draft Carpathian Red List of Threatened Reptiles (Reptilia) . 214 Draft Carpathian Red List of Birds (Aves). 217 Draft Carpathian Red List of Threatened Mammals (Mammalia) . -
Diversity and Distribution of Orthoptera Communities of Two Adjacent Mountains in Northern Part of the Carpathians
Travaux du Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle “Grigore Antipa” 62 (2): 191–211 (2019) doi: 10.3897/travaux.62.e48604 RESEARCH ARTICLE Diversity and distribution of Orthoptera communities of two adjacent mountains in northern part of the Carpathians Anton Krištín1, Benjamín Jarčuška1, Peter Kaňuch1 1 Institute of Forest Ecology SAS, Ľ. Štúra 2, Zvolen, SK-96053, Slovakia Corresponding author: Anton Krištín ([email protected]) Received 19 November 2019 | Accepted 24 December 2019 | Published 31 December 2019 Citation: Krištín A, Jarčuška B, Kaňuch P (2019) Diversity and distribution of Orthoptera communities of two adjacent mountains in northern part of the Carpathians. Travaux du Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle “Grigore Antipa” 62(2): 191–211. https://doi.org/10.3897/travaux.62.e48604 Abstract During 2013–2017, assemblages of bush-crickets and grasshoppers were surveyed in two neighbour- ing flysch mountains – Čergov Mts (48 sites) and Levočské vrchy Mts (62 sites) – in northern part of Western Carpathians. Species were sampled mostly at grasslands and forest edges along elevational gradient between 370 and 1220 m a.s.l. Within the entire area (ca 930 km2) we documented 54 species, representing 38% of Carpathian Orthoptera species richness. We found the same species number (45) in both mountain ranges with nine unique species in each of them. No difference in mean species rich- ness per site was found between the mountain ranges (mean ± SD = 12.5 ± 3.9). Elevation explained 2.9% of variation in site species richness. Elevation and mountain range identity explained 7.3% of assemblages composition. We found new latitudinal as well as longitudinal limits in the distribu- tion for several species. -
Dietary Mixing in Three Generalist Herbivores: Nutrient Complementation Or Toxin Dilution? Bernd F
Published in Oecologia 119, issue 4, 521-533, 1999 1 which should be used for any reference to this work Dietary mixing in three generalist herbivores: nutrient complementation or toxin dilution? Bernd F. HaÈ gele á Martine Rowell-Rahier Keywords Cylindrotoma distinctissima á Self-selection á Nutritional ecology á Polyphagy á Plant-insect interaction Abstract We reared larvae of three generalist insect which were in¯uenced by single diets varied consider- species on plants occurring in their habitats. Individuals ably, both within and between insect species. No food of each species were kept either on mixed diets, or on plant was toxic or deterrent to all experimental insect each plant species separately. We measured food plant species; a food plant that caused consumption eects preference in the mixed-diet group and compared insect (preingestive) for one insect species could be dealt with performance on single plants to the performance on the metabolically (postdigestive) by another; dierent food mixed diet. For all three insect species, food choice plants could cause behavioural eects (preingestive), within the mixed-diet groups was non-random and de- metabolic eects (postdigestive), or a combination of both livered the best overall performance, thus ful®lling the eects, all within the same insect species. However, one criteria for self-selected diets. When a single diet was as generality did emerge: once a food was ingested, further good as the mixed diet for one particular aspect of growth-relevant eects occurred metabolically (postdi- performance (Adenostyles alliariae and Petasites albus gestive) rather than via dierential egestion (digestibility). for Miramella alpina; A. -
In Situ Effects of Elevated CO2 on Plants and Insects
27 (Norby et al., 1999; Murray & Ceulemans, 1998). In our trees, leaf duration was somewhat prolonged in Carpinus and Fagus growing in elevated CO2, in contrast it was reduced in Quercus. A trend needed to be verified over more years. We did not find an effect of elevated CO2 on bud break, which is in line with other studies (Acer rubrum and A. saccharum, Norby et al., 2003; Fagus sylvatica, Forstreuter, 2002; Liquidambar styraciflua, Herrick & Thomas 2003; Populus trichocarpa, Sigurdsson, 2001). The release of vegetative buds from winter dormancy is controlled by a complex suite of environmental signals, of which temperature and photoperiod are most important (Kaszkurewicz & Fogg, 1967; Campbell & Sugano, 1979; Wielgolaski, 2001). A delay of autumnal senescence has been reported for Populus trees growing in elevated CO2 (Tricker et al. 2004), and a reduced leaf duration for Rumex obtusifolius (Pearson and Brooks 1995). These results contrasts with our findings in mature forest trees. However, we found a trend towards a prolonged leaf duration in trees growing in elevated CO2 in the drought year 2003. Several more years are needed to ascertain longer-term trends, but the outcome of the first four years of treatment provide little evidence for any changes in tree growth and phenology in elevated CO2. Thus, we assume no carbon limitation of growth in these trees under current CO2 concentrations. However, enhanced below ground C-turnover indicates a rapid flux of new carbon through this system (Steinmann et al., 2004), which led us to conclude that elevated CO2 enhance fluxes rather than pools of carbon (Körner et al., in preparation). -
Interpretation Manual of European Union Habitats - EUR27 Is a Scientific Reference Document
INTERPRETATION MANUAL OF EUROPEAN UNION HABITATS EUR 27 July 2007 EUROPEAN COMMISSION DG ENVIRONMENT Nature and biodiversity The Interpretation Manual of European Union Habitats - EUR27 is a scientific reference document. It is based on the version for EUR15, which was adopted by the Habitats Committee on 4. October 1999 and consolidated with the new and amended habitat types for the 10 accession countries as adopted by the Habitats Committee on 14 March 2002 with additional changes for the accession of Bulgaria and Romania as adopted by the Habitats Committee on 13 April 2007 and for marine habitats to follow the descriptions given in “Guidelines for the establishment of the Natura 2000 network in the marine environment. Application of the Habitats and Birds Directives” published in May 2007 by the Commission services. A small amendment to Habitat type 91D0 was adopted by the Habitats Committee in its meeting on 14th October 2003. TABLE OF CONTENTS WHY THIS MANUAL? 3 HISTORICAL REVIEW 3 THE MANUAL 4 THE EUR15 VERSION 5 THE EUR25 VERSION 5 THE EUR27 VERSION 6 EXPLANATORY NOTES 7 COASTAL AND HALOPHYTIC HABITATS 8 OPEN SEA AND TIDAL AREAS 8 SEA CLIFFS AND SHINGLE OR STONY BEACHES 17 ATLANTIC AND CONTINENTAL SALT MARSHES AND SALT MEADOWS 20 MEDITERRANEAN AND THERMO-ATLANTIC SALTMARSHES AND SALT MEADOWS 22 SALT AND GYPSUM INLAND STEPPES 24 BOREAL BALTIC ARCHIPELAGO, COASTAL AND LANDUPHEAVAL AREAS 26 COASTAL SAND DUNES AND INLAND DUNES 29 SEA DUNES OF THE ATLANTIC, NORTH SEA AND BALTIC COASTS 29 SEA DUNES OF THE MEDITERRANEAN COAST 35 INLAND -
Endemism in Italian Orthoptera
Biodiversity Journal, 2020, 11 (2): 405–434 https://doi.org/10.31396/Biodiv.Jour.2020.11.2.401.434 Endemism in Italian Orthoptera Bruno Massa1 & Paolo Fontana2* 1Department Agriculture, Food and Forest Sciences, University of Palermo, Italy (retired); email: [email protected] 2Fondazione Edmund Mach, San Michele all’Adige, Italy *Corresponding author, email: [email protected] ABSTRACT The present paper discusses about the distribution of orthopterans endemic to Italy. This coun- try is located in the centre of the Mediterranean Basin and its palaeo-geographical origins are owed to complex natural phenomena, as well as to a multitude of centres-of-origin, where colonization of fauna and flora concerned. Out of 382 Orthoptera taxa (i.e., species and sub- species) known to occur in Italy, 160 (41.9%) are endemic. Most of them are restricted to the Alps, the Apennines or the two principal islands of Italy (i.e., Sardinia and Sicily). In addition, lowland areas in central-southern Italy host many endemic taxa, which probably originate from the Balkan Peninsula. In Italy, the following 8 genera are considered endemic: Sardoplatycleis, Acroneuroptila, Italopodisma, Epipodisma, Nadigella, Pseudoprumna, Chorthopodisma and Italohippus. Moreover, the subgenus Italoptila is endemic to Italy. For research regarding endemism, Orthoptera are particularly interesting because this order com- prises species characterized by different ecological traits; e.g., different dispersal abilities, contrasting thermal requirements or specific demands on their habitats. The highest percentage of apterous or micropterous (35.3%) and brachypterous (16.2%) endemic taxa live in the Apennines, which are among the most isolated mountains of the Italian Peninsula. -
Self-Selection of Macronutrients in Two Populations of Grasshoppers
Physiological Entomology (2008) 33, 264–273 DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3032.2008.00619.x Discriminating tastes: self-selection of macronutrients in two populations of grasshoppers DENNIS J. FIELDING and LINDA S. DEFOLIART 1Agricultural Research Service, U. S. Department of Agriculture, Fairbanks, Alaska, U.S.A. Abstract . The capacity to self-select an optimal balance of macronutrients (protein and carbohydrate) is studied in two populations of Melanoplus sanguinipes F. (Orthoptera: Acrididae). One population derives from the subarctic (interior of Alaska) and the other from the temperate zone (Idaho, U.S.A.). Over the duration of the fourth and fifth stadia, Alaskan grasshoppers consistently self-select a diet cen- tred on a 0.90 ratio of protein : carbohydrate, whereas protein and carbohydrate intake by the Idaho grasshoppers is contingent on the particular food choices pre- sented to them. When restricted to imbalanced diets, the Alaskan grasshoppers develop more rapidly than the Idaho grasshoppers, regardless of diet composition. The Idaho grasshoppers also have a greater amount of lipid than the Alaskan grass- hoppers across all diets. Performance measures (body mass, survival, developmental times) are more sensitive to dietary imbalances in the Alaskan grasshoppers than in the Idaho grasshoppers. When fed diets with low, but balanced, proportions of pro- tein and carbohydrate, grasshoppers of both populations are able to increase con- sumption to compensate for the low concentration of nutrients. The results suggest that demographic responses of insects to changes in host plant quality, such as may result from climate change, may differ among populations within a species. Key words . Acrididae , Orthoptera , insect nutrition. -
Rote Liste Der Gefährdeten Arten Der Schweiz: Heuschrecken
> Umwelt-Vollzug > Rote Listen / Artenmanagement 19 > Rote Liste 07 Heuschrecken Rote Liste der gefährdeten Arten der Schweiz Ausgabe 2007 > Umwelt-Vollzug > Rote Listen / Artenmanagement > Rote Liste Heuschrecken Rote Liste der gefährdeten Arten der Schweiz Ausgabe 2007 Autoren: Christian Monnerat, Philippe Thorens, Thomas Walter, Yves Gonseth Herausgegeben vom Bundesamt für Umwelt BAFU und vom Schweizer Zentrum für die Kartografie der Fauna SZKF/CSCF Bern, 2007 Rechtlicher Stellenwert dieser Publikation Impressum Rote Liste des BAFU im Sinne von Artikel 14 Absatz 3 der Verordnung Herausgeber vom 16. Januar 1991 über den Natur- und Heimatschutz (NHV; Bundesamt für Umwelt (BAFU), Bern SR 451.1) www.admin.ch/ch/d/sr/45.html. Schweizer Zentrum für die Kartographie der Fauna (SZKF/CSCF), Neuenburg Diese Publikation ist eine Vollzugshilfe des BAFU als Aufsichtsbehörde und richtet sich primär an die Vollzugsbehörden. Sie konkretisiert Autoren unbestimmte Rechtsbegriffe von Gesetzen und Verordnungen Christian Monnerat, SZKF/CSCF und soll eine einheitliche Vollzugspraxis fördern. Berücksichtigen Philippe Thorens, Neuenburg die Vollzugsbehörden diese Vollzugshilfen, so können sie davon Thomas Walter, Agroscope Reckenholz-Tänikon (ART) ausgehen, dass sie das Bundesrecht rechtskonform vollziehen; Yves Gonseth, SZKF/CSCF andere Lösungen sind aber auch zulässig, sofern sie rechtskonform in Zusammenarbeit mit Anthony Lehmann, Universität Genf sind. Das BAFU veröffentlicht solche Vollzugshilfen (bisher oft auch als Richtlinien, Wegleitungen, Empfehlungen, Handbücher, Praxishilfen Begleitung u.ä. bezeichnet) in seiner Reihe «Umwelt-Vollzug». Francis Cordillot, Abt. Artenmanagement, BAFU Zitierung Monnerat C., Thorens P., Walter T., Gonseth Y. 2007: Rote Liste der Heuschrecken der Schweiz. Bundesamt für Umwelt, Bern, und Schweizer Zentrum für die Kartographie der Fauna, Neuenburg. Umwelt-Vollzug 0719: 62 S. -
ARTICULATA 2010 25 (2): 221–237 FAUNISTIK Distribution of Catantopinae Species (Orthoptera: Acrididae) in Hungary Nagy
ARTICULATA 2010 25 (2): 221237 FAUNISTIK Distribution of Catantopinae species (Orthoptera: Acrididae) in Hungary Nagy, A., Kisfali, M., Szövényi, G., Puskás, G. & Rácz, I. A. Abstract According to published and unpublished data seven grasshopper species be- longing to Catantopinae subfamily (Orthoptera: Acrididae) occur in Hungary. Six of them are rare in the Hungarian fauna and two are protected on national and/or international level. Here we present and revise distribution data in a 10 x 10 km UTM data base containing data of 177 grid cells. This actualized exact data set may serve as a basis for further studies in biogeography, conservation biology and faunistics. Zusammenfassung Nach unseren bisherigen Kenntnissen kommen sieben Springschreckenarten in Ungarn vor, die zur Unterfamilie der Catantopinae (Orthoptera: Acrididae) gehö- ren. Von diesen sind sechs Arten selten in unserer Fauna und zwei landesweit und international geschützt. Wir haben eine, auf das zehn km UTM-Netzgitter basierende Rasterdatenbank mit den gesammelten und überprüften Angaben der Arten zusammengestellt. Die Datenbank enthält Nachweise in 177 Zellen. Die dargestellten Funddaten sind aktualisiert und revidiert und bieten daher eine gute Grundlage für biogeografische, faunistische Untersuchungen und zur Natur- schutzbiologie. Introduction In the Pannonian biogeographical region simultaneous Mediterranean, Balcanic, Alpine, Carpathian and continental effects generate high species richness in various plant and animal taxa such as Orthoptera (RÁCZ 1998, NAGY et al. 2007a). 58 Acrididae species occur in Hungary (NAGY 2003). Grasslands (e.g. Pannonic salt steppes and salt marshes, Pannonic loess steppic grasslands and Pannonic sand steppes) are especially characteristic and vulnerable habitats of this region. The orthopterans are among the most important herbivorous insects of these habitats, considering both their species richness and abundance (AN- DERSEN et al. -
Supplementary Materials: the Evaluation of Genetic Relationships
Supplementary Materials for the article: The evaluation of genetic relationships within Acridid grasshoppers (Orthoptera, Caelifera, Acrididae) on the subfamily level using molecular markers Sukhikh I., Ustyantsev K., Bugrov A., Sergeev M., Fet V., Blinov A. Published in Folia Biologica (Kraków), vol. 67 (2019), No. 3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3409/fb_67-3.12 Supplementary material contents: Supplementary Table 1. Supplementary Fig. 1. Supplementary Fig. 2.1. Supplementary Fig. 2.2. Supplementary Fig. 3.1. Supplementary Fig. 3.2. Supplementary Fig. 4. Supplementary Table 1. List of species and GenBank accession numbers used in the present study. Taxonomy is according to the Orthoptera Species File (CIGLIANO et al. 2019). CPCM – complete protein-coding mitochondrial sequences; COI, COII, and Cytb – mitochondrial genes; ITS2 – internal transcribed spacer 2 of nuclear ribosomal RNA genes. Accession numbers marked in bold correspond to the sequences obtained in the present study. Taxa CPCM CytB COII COI ITS2 Acrididae Acridinae Acridini Acrida bicolor JN167855 KX272710 KC261403 KX289534 Acrida cinerea KX673195 KX673195 KX673195 KX673195 KX289536 Acrida oxycephala KX289535 Acrida willemsei EU938372 EU938372 EU938372 EU938372 Truxalini Truxalis eximia KX272711 KC261407 KX289540 Truxalis nasuta JN167922 JN002159 JN167848 Hyalopterygini Eutryxalis filata JN167881 JN002128 JN167810 Phlaeobini Phlaeoba albonema EU370925 EU370925 EU370925 EU370925 Phlaeoba infumata KU866166 KU866166 KU866166 KU866166 Phlaeoba tenebrosa KF937392 KF937392 KF937392 -
Downloadable
This publication was elaborated within BioREGIO Carpathians project supported by South East Europe Programme and was fi nanced by a Swiss-Slovak project supported by the Swiss Contribution to the enlarged European Union and Carpathian Wetlands Initiative. Program švajčiarsko-slovenskej spolupráce Swiss-Slovak Cooperation Programme Slovenská republika CARPATHIAN RED LIST OF FOREST HABITATS AND SPECIES CARPATHIAN LIST OF INVASIVE ALIEN SPECIES (DRAFT) THE STATE NATURE CONSERVANCY OF THE SLOVAK REPUBLIC CARPATHIAN RED LIST OF FOREST HABITATS AND SPECIES CARPATHIAN LIST OF INVASIVE ALIEN SPECIES (DRAFT) OF INVASIVE LIST AND SPECIES CARPATHIAN HABITATS OF FOREST RED LIST CARPATHIAN ISBN 978-80-89310-81-4 2014 oobalka_cervenebalka_cervene zzoznamy.inddoznamy.indd 1 225.9.20145.9.2014 221:41:521:41:52 CARPATHIAN RED LIST OF FOREST HABITATS AND SPECIES CARPATHIAN LIST OF INVASIVE ALIEN SPECIES (DRAFT) PUBLISHED BY THE STATE NATURE CONSERVANCY OF THE SLOVAK REPUBLIC 2014 Table of contents Draft Red Lists of Threatened Carpathian Habitats and Species and Carpathian List of Invasive Alien Species . 5 Draft Carpathian Red List of Forest Habitats . 20 Red List of Vascular Plants of the Carpathians . 44 Draft Carpathian Red List of Molluscs (Mollusca) . 106 Red List of Spiders (Araneae) of the Carpathian Mts. 118 Draft Red List of Dragonfl ies (Odonata) of the Carpathians . 172 © Štátna ochrana prírody Slovenskej republiky, 2014 Red List of Grasshoppers, Bush-crickets and Crickets (Orthoptera) Editor: Ján Kadlečík of the Carpathian Mountains . 186 Available from: Štátna ochrana prírody SR Tajovského 28B Draft Red List of Butterfl ies (Lepidoptera: Papilionoidea) of the Carpathian Mts. 200 974 01 Banská Bystrica Slovakia Draft Carpathian Red List of Fish and Lamprey Species .