Red List of Grasshoppers, Bush-Crickets and Crickets (Orthoptera) of the Carpathian Mountains

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Red List of Grasshoppers, Bush-Crickets and Crickets (Orthoptera) of the Carpathian Mountains RED LIST OF GRASSHOPPERS, BUSH-CRICKETS AND CRICKETS (ORTHOPTERA) OF THE CARPATHIAN MOUNTAINS Anton Krištín (Slovakia) & Iorgu Ionuț Ștefan (Romania) (eds) Data and assessment process contributors and authors of relevant and cited publications: Anton Krištín (Slovakia), Iorgu Ionuț Ștefan (Romania), Miklós Heltai, Barnabas Nagy (Hungary), Jevhen Lyushenko, Vasil Chumak (Ukraine), Jaroslav Holuša, Petr Kočárek (Czech Republic), Axel Hochkirch (Germany) Introduction pathian region: Data was collected from the literature, from sources given by BioREGIO project partners in Orthoptera are among the most important bio-indicators particular countries (see data contributors above) and of the status of integrity of natural habitats, especially own published and unpublished data (see literature for habitats with small plot sizes. Therefore, Orthoptera section, unpublished records only by KRIŠTÍN A. & assemblages provide valuable information on habitat con- IORGU I. Ş.). ditions and status of sites (MARINI et al. 2009). 2. Data was entered in the online database platform of Global assessments of the conservation status of ca. 1000 the project BioREGIO Carpathians as well as into a European species of grasshoppers, crickets and bush-c- Microsoft Excel database. rickets for the IUCN Red List of Threatened SpeciesTM 3. All 142 Orthoptera species present in the Carpathian started in 2011. The Red List status of 60 species has been orographic units (excluding Serbia due to missing data) published in 2012. Altogether, the global Red List status were evaluated according to the IUCN Red List criteria of 236 Orthoptera species has been assessed (IUCN (IUCN 2001). Only one species (not native and intro- 2013), 14 of which occur in the Carpathians (Chorthippus duced, Meconema meridionale) could not be assessed and acroleucus VU, Gampsocleis glabra LC, Isophya harzi VU, Metri- was included in the category “Not Applicable” (NA). optera domogledi VU, Miramella irena VU, Odontopodisma non- The other 141 species were classifi ed to the categories tana VU, Odontopodisma rubripes VU, Onconotus servillei VU, Critically Endangered (CR), Endangered (EN), Vul- Poecilimon affi nis LC, Poecilimon ampliatus LC, Saga pedo VU, nerable (VU), Near Threatened (NT), Least Concern Stenobothrus eurasius VU, Uvarovitettix transylvanicus VU and (LC) and Data defi cient (DD). Altogether 80 out of Zubovskia banatica VU). 141 species were not listed in the Bioregio database Red Lists of Orthoptera have been published in several due to technical reasons (fi lling the occurrence, loca- Carpathian countries (however, based upon different cri- tions, habitats, threats in all orographic units in very teria): Poland (LIANA 1992, LIANA 2002, GŁOWACIŃSKI & common and abundant species), but they fulfi l the ge- NOWACKI 2004), former Czechoslovakia (GULIČKA 1992), neral criteria for the category LC. Red List assessments Hungary (NAGY 1999), Slovakia (KRIŠTÍN 2001), Czech Re- from particular countries were also considered, based public (HOLUŠA & KOČÁREK 2005), Ukraine (AKIMOV 2009, on the proposals of project partners and considering МАTELESHKO & POTISH 2011). A European Red List is not the extinction risk in surrounding Carpathian countries available yet and there is only one Carpathian Red List or adjacent Non-Carpathian territories. No assessment prepared ten years ago, based on unknown criteria, which was done for the small part of the Carpathians located includes fi ve Orthoptera species (WITKOWSKI et al. 2003). in Serbia, due to the absence of a partner. Assessment Method Our purpose was to collect and process all existing data For processing the existing data on grasshoppers, crickets on Orthoptera species from six Carpathian countries and bush-crickets in the Carpathian region of Slovakia, (Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, Romania, Slovakia, Czech Republic, Poland, Ukraine and Romania the fol- and Ukraine) and enter them into a database developed lowing three steps were used: by the State Nature Conservancy of the Slovak Republic 1. Documentation on the Orthoptera fauna in the Car- in order to assess the Red List status. 186 zzbornik_cervenebornik_cervene zzoznamy.inddoznamy.indd 118686 227.8.20147.8.2014 222:36:272:36:27 Results (Summary) References Altogether 142 Orthoptera species (ca 10.3% of the Carpathians & Red Lists 1382 European species) were recorded in the Carpathian GULIČKA, J. (1992). Orthoptera. Pp. 69-73. In: Škapec, Mountains, in six Carpathian countries (CZ, SK, PL, UA, L. (ed): Červená kniha ohrožených a vzácných druhů HU, RO; Table 1). The number of species ranged from rostlin a živočichů ČSFR 3 - Bezobratlí. [Red data book 55 (Poland) to 133 (Romania) taxa, following the tempe- of endangered and rare plant and animal species of the rature gradient along this region and illustrating the strong ČSFR 3 - Invertebrates]. Príroda, Bratislava, 160 pp. (in impact on thermophilous insects as well as the proporti- Czech). onal size of Carpathians in the particular countries. In these countries, the number of species listed in national HARZ, K. (1969). Die Orthopteren Europas - The Or- Red Lists ranged from 12 (Poland, one threatened speci- thoptera of Europe. Vol. I. - The Hague, Dr.W. Junk es) to 33 (Romania, 20 threatened species) and 37 species B.V., 749 pp. (Slovakia, 13 threatened species). HARZ, K. (1975). Die Orthopteren Europas - The Or- Altogether, 61 of the 141 assessed species were included thoptera of Europe. Vol. II. - The Hague, Dr. W. Junk in Carpathian Red List, but only 20 of them are listed as B.V., 939 pp. threatened. Ten species were assessed as EN (Isophya har- zi, Isophya ciucasi, Isophya nagyi, Saga pedo, Gampsocleis glabra, IUCN (2013). IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Metrioptera domogledi, Zubovskia banatica, Chorthippus acroleu- Version 2013.2. <www.iucnredlist.org>. Downloaded cus, Paracaloptenus caloptenoides, Podismopsis transsylvanica) and on 31 January 2014. ten as VU (Isophya costata, I. sicula, I. dochia, Poecilimon inter- KRIŠTÍN, A. & KAŇUCH, P. (2013). A review of distribu- medius, Onconotus servillei, Uvarovitettix transsylvanicus, Mira- tion and ecology of three Orthoptera species of Euro- mella irena, Odontopodisma decipiens, Odontopodisma montana, pean importance with contributions from their recent Stenobothrus eurasius, Table 1). Most of EN species are also north-western range. Journal of North Western Zoo- included on the global IUCN Red List. logy 9: 185-190. A total of 16 species was endemic to the Carpathians (11.3% of 142) and further six species sub-endemic MARINI, L., FONTANA, P., BATTISTI A. & GASTON K.J. (Table 1), meaning that they also occur at a few sites in (2009). Response of orthopteran diversity to abandon- the area surrounding the Carpathians. ment of seminatural meadows. Agric. Ecosyst. Envi- ron. 132: 232–236. Main threats NAGY, B. (2005). Orthoptera fauna of the Carpathian The major threats detected in most red-listed species are: basin – recent status of knowledge and a revised che- i) Habitat loss/degradation, abandonment of traditio- cklist. - Entomofauna carpathica 17: 14-22. nal management, of grass cutting and grazing and fol- WITKOWSKI, Z.J., KRÓL, W. & SOLARZ, W. (eds) (2003). lowing succession leading to overgrowing by shrubs Carpathian List Of Endangered Species. WWF and and trees (e.g. Saga pedo, Gampsocleis glabra, Metrioptera Institute of Nature Conservation, Polish Academy of domogledi, Paracaloptenus caloptenoides, Odontopodisma deci- Sciences, Vienna-Krakow. piens, Miramella irena, Stenobothrus eurasius). ii) Human settlement expansion, use of insecticides, Czech Republic overgrazing (e.g. Isophya harzi, I. ciucasi, I. nagyi, I. sicula, HOLUŠA, J. (1995). Orthoptera náplavových šterkovišť I. dochia, Paracaloptenus caloptenoides, Saga pedo, Chorthip- řeky Ostravice a Morávky. Klapalekiana 31: 91-99. pus acroleucus, Podismopsis transsylvanica). iii) Afforestation of non-forest habitats (e.g. Saga pedo, HOLUŠA, J. (1996). Výskyt saranče Stethophyma grossum Paracaloptenus caloptenoides, Stenobothrus eurasius). (Caelifera, Acrididae) na severní Moravě a v českém iv) Restricted range, low densities, limited dispersal with Slezsku. Čas. Slez. Muz. Opava (A), 45: 285-286. combination with above mentioned threats: (e.g. most HOLUŠA, J. (1997). Druhové spektrum sarančí (Caelife- of brachypterous species Isophya harzi, I. ciucasi, I. nagyi, ra) a kobylek (Ensifera) údolí potoka Dinotice (Vsetín- I. sicula, I. dochia, Poecilimon intermedius, Onconotus servillei, ské vrchy). Klapalekiana 33: 11-16. Gampsocleis glabra, Uvarovitettix transsylvanicus, Miramella irena, Zubovskia banatica, Chorthippus acroleucus, Podismop- HOLUŠA, J. (2000). K poznání sarančí (Caelifera) a ko- sis transsylvanica). bylek (Ensifera) Moravsko slezských Beskyd. Klapale- kiana 36: 41-70. Acknowledgments HOLUŠA, J. & KOČÁREK, P. (2005). Orthoptera (rovno- We would like to thank prof. Anna Liana from Poland křídlí). –Pp. 133-135. In: Farkač, J., Král, D., Škorpík, for her consultations during preparation of the draft Red M. (eds). Červený seznam ohrožených druhů České re- List. publiky: Bezobratlí. AOPK, ČR, Praha. HOLUŠA, J., KOČÁREK, P. & VLK, R. (2013). Monitoring and conservation of Saga pedo (Orthoptera: Tettigonii- 187 zzbornik_cervenebornik_cervene zzoznamy.inddoznamy.indd 118787 227.8.20147.8.2014 222:36:272:36:27 dae) in an isolated northwestern population. J. Insect. KRIŠTÍN, A., KAŇUCH, P. & PUCHALA, P. (2005). Rov- Conserv. 17: 663-669. nokrídlovce (Orthoptera s.l.) Malých Karpát. Ochrana prírody 24: 141-152. (in
Recommended publications
  • Orthoptera Acrididae
    Provided for non-commercial research and education use. Not for reproduction, distribution or commercial use. Vol. 12 No. 1 (2019) Egyptian Academic Journal of Biological Sciences is the official English language journal of the Egyptian Society for Biological Sciences, Department of Entomology, Faculty of Sciences Ain Shams University. Entomology Journal publishes original research papers and reviews from any entomological discipline or from directly allied fields in ecology, behavioral biology, physiology, biochemistry, development, genetics, systematics, morphology, evolution, control of insects, arachnids, and general entomology. www.eajbs.eg.net ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Citation: Egypt. Acad. J. Biolog. Sci. (A. Entomology) Vol. 12(1) pp: 153- 161 (2019) Egypt. Acad. J. Biolog. Sci., 12(1):153– 161 (2019) Egyptian Academic Journal of Biological Sciences A. Entomology ISSN 1687- 8809 www.eajbs.eg.net Cytogenetic and Meiotic Studies Reveal Conservatism in Acrida turrita (Linnaeus 1758) (Orthoptera: Acrididae) from Lagos, Nigeria Adekoya, K. O1*., Fakorede, S. T1., Okoro, A. N1. and Akpan, U. U1. 1Cell Biology and Genetics Department, University of Lagos, Nigeria E. Mail: [email protected] __________________________________________________________ ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Article History The Acrididae exhibits a stable karyotypic uniformity or Received:13/1/2019 conservatism and are a typical specimen for cytological and meiotic Accepted:8/2/2019 investigations. Despite the diversity and cytotaxonomic value of this _______________ family, however there are only a few studies on their karyology. Keywords: This paper is therefore aimed at describing the karyotype and Meiosis, meiotic behaviours of chromosomes of Acrida turrita from Nigeria, Chiasmata, West Africa. Ten (10) male A. turrita grasshoppers were randomly Karyotype, Acrida collected from different locations in the University of Lagos turrita, Nigeria community between May and June, 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • Biotropika: Journal of Tropical Biology | Vol
    E-ISSN 2549-8703 I P-ISSN 2302-7282 BIOTROPIKA Journal of Tropical Biology https://biotropika.ub.ac.id/ Vol. 9 | No. 1 | 2021 | DOI: 10.21776/ub.biotropika.2021.009.01.03 THE ABUNDANCE AND DIVERSITY OF GRASSHOPPER (ORTHOPTERA) IN BATU CITY, EAST JAVA KELIMPAHAN DAN KEANEKARAGAMAN BELALANG (ORTHOPTERA) DI KOTA BATU, JAWA TIMUR Mufti Abrori1)*, Amin Setyo Leksono2), Zulfaidah Penata Gama2) Received : December 14th 2020 ABSTRACT Grasshoppers included in the order Orthoptera in the class of insects. Orthoptera orders Accepted : December 24th 2020 are divided into two parts, which a large suborder Ensifera and Caelifera. Most grasshopper species have a role as herbivores and a good protein source for other animals. Grasshopper abundance and diversity of ecosystems are more stable in a low disorder and the other way around. The factors that affect grasshoppers which environmental factors such as the structure of the vegetation, atmospheric temperature, and relative humidity. Author Affiliation: The purpose of this study to analyze the abundance and diversity of grasshoppers in Batu City, East Java. The research location is in Tahura R. Soerjo Cangar, an agricultural area 1) Master Student, Faculty of in Sumbergondo Village, Coban Talun, and Junrejo District. Measurement of biotic and Mathematics and Natural abiotic factors was carried out at the grasshoppers living locations, and then the data were Sciences, University of Brawijaya analyzed using the Shannon Wiener Diversity index (H'), Importance Value Index (INP), 2) Biology Departmen, Faculty of and Biplot analysis. The results were obtained as 754 individual grasshoppers from the Mathematics and Natural Caelifera suborder. While 201 individuals were found in the Ensifera suborder.
    [Show full text]
  • Thematic Forest Dictionary
    Elżbieta Kloc THEMATIC FOREST DICTIONARY TEMATYCZNY SŁOWNIK LEÂNY Wydano na zlecenie Dyrekcji Generalnej Lasów Państwowych Warszawa 2015 © Centrum Informacyjne Lasów Państwowych ul. Grójecka 127 02-124 Warszawa tel. 22 18 55 353 e-mail: [email protected] www.lasy.gov.pl © Elżbieta Kloc Konsultacja merytoryczna: dr inż. Krzysztof Michalec Konsultacja i współautorstwo haseł z zakresu hodowli lasu: dr inż. Maciej Pach Recenzja: dr Ewa Bandura Ilustracje: Bartłomiej Gaczorek Zdjęcia na okładce Paweł Fabijański Korekta Anna Wikło ISBN 978-83-63895-48-8 Projek graficzny i przygotowanie do druku PLUPART Druk i oprawa Ośrodek Rozwojowo-Wdrożeniowy Lasów Państwowych w Bedoniu TABLE OF CONTENTS – SPIS TREÂCI ENGLISH-POLISH THEMATIC FOREST DICTIONARY ANGIELSKO-POLSKI TEMATYCZNY SŁOWNIK LEÂNY OD AUTORKI ................................................... 9 WYKAZ OBJAŚNIEŃ I SKRÓTÓW ................................... 10 PLANTS – ROŚLINY ............................................ 13 1. Taxa – jednostki taksonomiczne .................................. 14 2. Plant classification – klasyfikacja roślin ............................. 14 3. List of forest plant species – lista gatunków roślin leśnych .............. 17 4. List of tree and shrub species – lista gatunków drzew i krzewów ......... 19 5. Plant morphology – morfologia roślin .............................. 22 6. Plant cells, tissues and their compounds – komórki i tkanki roślinne oraz ich części składowe .................. 30 7. Plant habitat preferences – preferencje środowiskowe roślin
    [Show full text]
  • Invasion of the Body Snatchers: the Diversity and Evolution of Manipulative Strategies in Host–Parasite Interactions
    CHAPTER 3 Invasion of the Body Snatchers: The Diversity and Evolution of Manipulative Strategies in Host–Parasite Interactions † Thierry Lefe`vre,* Shelley A. Adamo, ‡ David G. Biron, Dorothe´e Misse´,* § k } David Hughes, , ,1 and Fre´de´ric Thomas*, ,1 Contents 3.1. Introduction 46 3.2. How Parasites Alter Host Behaviour 49 3.2.1. Parasitic effects on host neural function 49 3.2.2. Proteomics and proximate mechanisms 56 3.3. A Co-Evolutionary Perspective 66 3.3.1. Exploiting host-compensatory responses 66 3.2.2. Facultative virulence 72 3.4. The (River) Blind Watchmaker 75 3.5. Concluding Remarks 76 References 76 Abstract Parasite-induced alteration of host behaviour is a widespread trans- mission strategy among pathogens. Understanding how it works is an exciting challenge from both a mechanistic and an evolutionary perspective. In this review, we use key examples to examine the * Ge´ne´tique et Evolution des Maladies Infectieuses, UMR CNRS/IRD 2724, Montpellier, France { Department of Psychology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada { PIAF, UMR 547 INRA/Universite´ Blaise-Pascal, Clermont-Ferrand, France § Department of Organismal Biology, University of Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA } Institut de recherche en biologie ve´ge´tale, De´partement de sciences biologiques Universite´ de Montre´al, Montre´al, Que´bec, Canada k School of Biosciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK 1 Both authors contributed equally Advances in Parasitology, Volume 68 # 2009 Elsevier Ltd. ISSN 0065-308X, DOI: 10.1016/S0065-308X(08)00603-9 All rights reserved. 45 46 Thierry Lefe`vre et al. proximate mechanisms by which parasites are known to control the behaviour of their hosts.
    [Show full text]
  • ED45E Rare and Scarce Species Hierarchy.Pdf
    104 Species 55 Mollusc 8 Mollusc 334 Species 181 Mollusc 28 Mollusc 44 Species 23 Vascular Plant 14 Flowering Plant 45 Species 23 Vascular Plant 14 Flowering Plant 269 Species 149 Vascular Plant 84 Flowering Plant 13 Species 7 Mollusc 1 Mollusc 42 Species 21 Mollusc 2 Mollusc 43 Species 22 Mollusc 3 Mollusc 59 Species 30 Mollusc 4 Mollusc 59 Species 31 Mollusc 5 Mollusc 68 Species 36 Mollusc 6 Mollusc 81 Species 43 Mollusc 7 Mollusc 105 Species 56 Mollusc 9 Mollusc 117 Species 63 Mollusc 10 Mollusc 118 Species 64 Mollusc 11 Mollusc 119 Species 65 Mollusc 12 Mollusc 124 Species 68 Mollusc 13 Mollusc 125 Species 69 Mollusc 14 Mollusc 145 Species 81 Mollusc 15 Mollusc 150 Species 84 Mollusc 16 Mollusc 151 Species 85 Mollusc 17 Mollusc 152 Species 86 Mollusc 18 Mollusc 158 Species 90 Mollusc 19 Mollusc 184 Species 105 Mollusc 20 Mollusc 185 Species 106 Mollusc 21 Mollusc 186 Species 107 Mollusc 22 Mollusc 191 Species 110 Mollusc 23 Mollusc 245 Species 136 Mollusc 24 Mollusc 267 Species 148 Mollusc 25 Mollusc 270 Species 150 Mollusc 26 Mollusc 333 Species 180 Mollusc 27 Mollusc 347 Species 189 Mollusc 29 Mollusc 349 Species 191 Mollusc 30 Mollusc 365 Species 196 Mollusc 31 Mollusc 376 Species 203 Mollusc 32 Mollusc 377 Species 204 Mollusc 33 Mollusc 378 Species 205 Mollusc 34 Mollusc 379 Species 206 Mollusc 35 Mollusc 404 Species 221 Mollusc 36 Mollusc 414 Species 228 Mollusc 37 Mollusc 415 Species 229 Mollusc 38 Mollusc 416 Species 230 Mollusc 39 Mollusc 417 Species 231 Mollusc 40 Mollusc 418 Species 232 Mollusc 41 Mollusc 419 Species 233
    [Show full text]
  • Catalogue of the Type Specimens Deposited in the Department of Entomology, National Museum, Prague, Czech Republic*
    ACTA ENTOMOLOGICA MUSEI NATIONALIS PRAGAE Published 30.iv.2014 Volume 54(1), pp. 399–450 ISSN 0374-1036 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:7479D174-4F1D-4465-9EEA-2BBB5E1FC2A2 Catalogue of the type specimens deposited in the Department of Entomology, National Museum, Prague, Czech Republic* Polyneoptera Lenka MACHÁýKOVÁ & Martin FIKÁýEK Department of Entomology, National Museum in Prague, Kunratice 1, CZ-148 00 Praha 4-Kunratice, Czech Republic & Department of Zoology, Faculty of Sciences, Charles University in Prague, Viniþná 7, CZ-128 43, Praha 2, Czech Republic; e-mails: [email protected]; m¿ [email protected] Abstract. Type specimens from the collection of the polyneopteran insect orders (Dermaptera, Blattodea, Orthoptera, Phasmatodea) deposited in the Department of Entomology, National Museum, Prague are catalogued. We provide precise infor- mation about types of 100 taxa (5 species of Dermaptera, 3 species of Blattodea, 4 species of Phasmatodea, 55 species of Caelifera, and 33 species of Ensifera), including holotypes of 38 taxa. The year of publication of Calliptamus tenuicer- cis anatolicus MaĜan, 1952 and Calliptamus tenuicercis iracus MaĜan, 1952 are corrected. The authorship of the names traditionally ascribed to J. Obenberger is discussed in detail. Only the name Podisma alpinum carinthiacum Obenberger, 1926 is available since the publication by OBENBERGER (1926a). ‘Stenobothrus (Stauroderus) biguttulus ssp. bicolor Charp. 1825’ and ‘Stenobothrus (Stau- roderus) ssp. collinus Karny’ sensu OBENBERGER (1926a,b) refer to Gryllus bicolor Charpentier, 1825 and Stauroderus biguttulus var. collina Karny, 1907, respectively, which both have to be considered available already since their original descriptions by CHARPENTIER (1825) and KARNY (1907). Key words.
    [Show full text]
  • New Insights Into the Karyotype Evolution of the Genus Gampsocleis (Orthoptera, Tettigoniinae, Gampsocleidini)
    COMPARATIVE A peer-reviewed open-access journal CompCytogen 12(4): New529–538 insights (2018) into the karyotype evolution of the genus Gampsocleis... 529 doi: 10.3897/CompCytogen.v12i4.29574 RESEARCH ARTICLE Cytogenetics http://compcytogen.pensoft.net International Journal of Plant & Animal Cytogenetics, Karyosystematics, and Molecular Systematics New insights into the karyotype evolution of the genus Gampsocleis (Orthoptera, Tettigoniinae, Gampsocleidini) Maciej Kociński1, Beata Grzywacz1, Dragan Chobanov2, Elżbieta Warchałowska-Śliwa1 1 Institute of Systematics and Evolution of Animals, Polish Academy of Sciences, Sławkowska 17, 31-016 Kraków, Poland 2 Institute of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Research, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, 1 Tsar Osvoboditel Boul., 1000 Sofia, Bulgaria Corresponding author: Maciej Kociński ([email protected]) Academic editor: D. Cabral-de-Mello | Received 6 September 2018 | Accepted 6 December 2018 | Published 19 December 2018 http://zoobank.org/C1DC4E65-DF52-4116-AFDD-C9AE43176DF3 Citation: Kociński M, Grzywacz B, Chobanov D, Warchałowska-Śliwa E (2018) New insights into the karyotype evolution of the genus Gampsocleis (Orthoptera, Tettigoniinae, Gampsocleidini). Comparative Cytogenetics 12(4): 529– 538. https://doi.org/10.3897/CompCytogen.v12i4.29574 Abstract Five species belonging to the genus Gampsocleis Fieber, 1852 were analyzed using fluorescencein situ hybridization (FISH) with 18S rDNA and telomeric probes, as well as C-banding, DAPI/CMA3 staining and silver impregnation. The studied species showed two distinct karyotypes, with 2n = 31 (male) and 2n = 23 (male) chromosomes. The drastic reduction in chromosome number observed in the latter case suggests multiple translocations and fusions as the main responsible that occurred during chromosome evolution. Two groups of rDNA distribution were found in Gampsocleis representatives analyzed.
    [Show full text]
  • ARTICULATA 2010 25 (1): 73–107 FAUNISTIK Orthoptera and Mantodea in the Collection of the Macedonian Museum of Natural Histo
    Deutschen Gesellschaft für Orthopterologie e.V.; download http://www.dgfo-articulata.de/ ARTICULATA 2010 25 (1): 73௅107 FAUNISTIK Orthoptera and Mantodea in the collection of the Macedonian Museum of Natural History (Skopje) with an annotated check-list of the groups in Macedonia Dragan P. Chobanov & Branislava Mihajlova Abstract During the revision of the Orthoptera collection of the Macedonian Museum of Natural History (Skopje) in 2004, four Mantodea and 102 Orthoptera species (al- together 1057 specimens) collected in the Republic of Macedonia were deter- mined. Furthermore, a revision of the literature about the Macedonian orthopte- ran fauna was executed and some own unpublished records were added. As a result of the present study, eight taxa are added and 27 taxa are subtracted from the list of the Macedonian fauna. Thus, the updated check list of the Orthoptera fauna of Macedonia comprises four species of Mantodea, 167 Orthoptera taxa and two additional subspecies. The study also revealed that two Orthoptera spe- cies must be eliminated from the list of the Serbian fauna. Zusammenfassung Im Zuge der Bearbeitung der Orthopterensammlung des Naturhistorischen Mu- seums von Mazedonien (Skopje), im Jahre 2004, konnten vier Mantiden- und 102 Orthopterenarten (zusammen 1057 Individuen), die in der Republik Mazedo- nien gesammelt wurden, untersucht werden. Zusätzlich wurde eine umfangreiche Literaturstudie über die mazedonische Orthopterenfauna durchgeführt, die weite- re Nachweise lieferte. Die vorliegende Studie ergab acht neue Taxa für Mazedo- nien, wohingegen 27 der für die mazedonische Fauna angegebenen Taxa nicht in Mazedonien vorkommen. Die aktuelle Checkliste der Orthopterenfauna Maze- doniens enthält somit vier Arten Gottesanbeterinnen, 167 Heuschreckenarten und zwei weitere Unterarten.
    [Show full text]
  • Eupholidoptera Garganica (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae) in Budapest, Hungary
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/331893795 Eupholidoptera garganica (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae) in Budapest, Hungary Article in Acta Phytopathologica et Entomologica Hungarica · December 2018 DOI: 10.17112/FoliaEntHung.2018.79.37 CITATIONS READS 0 102 1 author: Gellért Puskás Hungarian Natural History Museum 29 PUBLICATIONS 101 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: Orthoptera fauna of the Hungarian Middle Mountain View project Local and Global Factors in Organization of Central-European Orthopteran Assemblages View project All content following this page was uploaded by Gellért Puskás on 20 March 2019. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. FOLIA ENTOMOLOGICA HUNGARICA ROVARTANI KÖZLEMÉNYEK Volume 79 2018 pp. 37–43 Eupholidoptera garganica (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae) in Budapest, Hungary Gellért Puskás Hungarian Natural History Museum, Department of Zoology, H-1088 Budapest, Baross u. 13, Hungary. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract – A small introduced population of Eupholidoptera garganica La Greca, 1959 (Orthop- tera: Tettigoniidae: Tettigoniinae: Pholidopterini) was found in a garden suburb of Albertfalva, part of Budapest. Altogether 8 singing males were detected in July 2018, on a less than 2 hectare area. Th e origin of the population is unknown; the species arrived most probably accidentally with horticultural plants from Italy. With 4 fi gures. Key words – established population, faunistics, introduced species, urban environment INTRODUCTION Th e anthropogenic spread of insects is a world-wide phenomenon (e.g. Kenis et al. 2009). In Hungary 170 invertebrates are regarded as invasive spe- cies (Báldi et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Der Hohen Tauern: Verbreitung, Ökologie, Gemeinschaftsstruktur Und Gefährdung
    Wissenschaftliche© Nationalpark Mitteilungen Hohe Tauern, aus download dem unter Nationalpark www.biologiezentrum.at Hohe Tauern ____________________ Bd. 4 (1998): 57-158 ____________________ Die Heuschrecken (Orthoptera: Saltatoria) der Hohen Tauern: Verbreitung, Ökologie, Gemeinschaftsstruktur und Gefährdung Ingeborg P. Illich & Nobert Winding Eingelangt am 21.11.1997 Inhalt 1 Zusammenfassung 58 2 Summary 60 3 Keywords 61 4 Einleitung 61 5 Untersuchungsgebiet und Probeflächen 62 5.1 Untersuchungsgebiete der qualitativen Erfassung 64 5.2 Untersuchungsgebiete der quantitativen Erfassung 64 6 Material und Methoden 65 6.1 Habitaterfassung 65 6.1.1 Ermittlung des Habitatangebotes 65 6.1.2 Ermittlung der Habitatnutzung 65 6.2 Heuschreckenerfassung 66 6.2.1 Untersuchungszeitraum und Witterung 66 6.2.2 Qualitative Erfassung 66 6.2.3 Quantitative Erfassung 67 7 Faunistik und Autökologie - Ergebnisse und Diskussion 67 7.1 Gesamtüberblick 67 7.2 Verbreitung und Ökologie der einzelnen Arten 67 Barbitistes serricauda - Laubholz-Säbelschrecke 67 Tettigonia cantans - Zwitscherschrecke 68 Decticus verrucivorus - Warzenbeißer 70 Platycleis grisea - Graue Beißschrecke 72 Metrioptera roeselii - Roesels Beißschrecke 73 Metrioptera brachyptera - Kurzflügelige Beißschrecke 74 Metrioptera saussuriana - Gebirgs-Beißschrecke 76 Pholidoptera aptera - Alpen-Strauchschrecke 78 Pholidoptera griseoaptera - Gewöhnliche Strauchschrecke 80 Anonconotus alpinus - Alpenschrecke 81 Gryllus campestris -Feldgrille 82 Tetrix subulata - Säbeldornschrecke 83 Tetrix tuerki -
    [Show full text]
  • Landscape-Scale Connections Between the Land Use, Habitat Quality and Ecosystem Goods and Services in the Mureş/Maros Valley
    TISCIA monograph series Landscape-scale connections between the land use, habitat quality and ecosystem goods and services in the Mureş/Maros valley Edited by László Körmöczi Szeged-Arad 2012 Two countries, one goal, joint success! Landscape-scale connections between the land use, habitat quality and ecosystem goods and services in the Mureş/Maros valley TISCIA monograph series 1. J. Hamar and A. Sárkány-Kiss (eds.): The Maros/Mureş River Valley. A Study of the Geography, Hydrobiology and Ecology of the River and its Environment, 1995. 2. A. Sárkány-Kiss and J. Hamar (eds.): The Criş/Körös Rivers’ Valleys. A Study of the Geography, Hydrobiology and Ecology of the River and its Environment, 1997. 3. A. Sárkány-Kiss and J. Hamar (eds.): The Someş/Szamos River Valleys. A Study of the Geography, Hydrobiology and Ecology of the River and its Environment, 1999. 4. J. Hamar and A. Sárkány-Kiss (eds.): The Upper Tisa Valley. Preparatory Proposal for Ramsar Site Designation and an Ecological Background, 1999. 5. L. Gallé and L. Körmöczi (eds.): Ecology of River Valleys, 2000. 6. Sárkány-Kiss and J. Hamar (eds.): Ecological Aspects of the Tisa River Basin, 2002. 7. L. Gallé (ed.): Vegetation and Fauna of Tisza River Basin, I. 2005. 8. L. Gallé (ed.): Vegetation and Fauna of Tisza River Basin, II. 2008. 9. L. Körmöczi (ed.): Ecological and socio-economic relations in the valleys of river Körös/Criş and river Maros/Mureş, 2011. 10. L. Körmöczi (ed.): Landscape-scale connections between the land use, habitat quality and ecosystem goods and services in the Mureş/Maros valley, 2012.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Carpathian Red List of Forest Habitats
    CARPATHIAN RED LIST OF FOREST HABITATS AND SPECIES CARPATHIAN LIST OF INVASIVE ALIEN SPECIES (DRAFT) PUBLISHED BY THE STATE NATURE CONSERVANCY OF THE SLOVAK REPUBLIC 2014 zzbornik_cervenebornik_cervene zzoznamy.inddoznamy.indd 1 227.8.20147.8.2014 222:36:052:36:05 © Štátna ochrana prírody Slovenskej republiky, 2014 Editor: Ján Kadlečík Available from: Štátna ochrana prírody SR Tajovského 28B 974 01 Banská Bystrica Slovakia ISBN 978-80-89310-81-4 Program švajčiarsko-slovenskej spolupráce Swiss-Slovak Cooperation Programme Slovenská republika This publication was elaborated within BioREGIO Carpathians project supported by South East Europe Programme and was fi nanced by a Swiss-Slovak project supported by the Swiss Contribution to the enlarged European Union and Carpathian Wetlands Initiative. zzbornik_cervenebornik_cervene zzoznamy.inddoznamy.indd 2 115.9.20145.9.2014 223:10:123:10:12 Table of contents Draft Red Lists of Threatened Carpathian Habitats and Species and Carpathian List of Invasive Alien Species . 5 Draft Carpathian Red List of Forest Habitats . 20 Red List of Vascular Plants of the Carpathians . 44 Draft Carpathian Red List of Molluscs (Mollusca) . 106 Red List of Spiders (Araneae) of the Carpathian Mts. 118 Draft Red List of Dragonfl ies (Odonata) of the Carpathians . 172 Red List of Grasshoppers, Bush-crickets and Crickets (Orthoptera) of the Carpathian Mountains . 186 Draft Red List of Butterfl ies (Lepidoptera: Papilionoidea) of the Carpathian Mts. 200 Draft Carpathian Red List of Fish and Lamprey Species . 203 Draft Carpathian Red List of Threatened Amphibians (Lissamphibia) . 209 Draft Carpathian Red List of Threatened Reptiles (Reptilia) . 214 Draft Carpathian Red List of Birds (Aves). 217 Draft Carpathian Red List of Threatened Mammals (Mammalia) .
    [Show full text]