DOCSLIB.ORG

Release Notice This Document Is Available Through the Australia Pacific LNG Upstream Phase 1 Project Controlled Document System Teambinder™

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Release Notice This Document Is Available Through the Australia Pacific LNG Upstream Phase 1 Project Controlled Document System Teambinder™ Pre-Clearance Survey Report – Orana Spur Line Project Report Release Notice This document is available through the Australia Pacific LNG Upstream Phase 1 Project controlled document system TeamBinder™. The responsibility for ensuring that printed copies remain valid rests with the user. Once printed, this is an uncontrolled document unless issued and stamped Controlled Copy. Third-party issue can be requested via the Australia Pacific LNG Upstream Phase 1 Project Document Control Group. Document Conventions The following terms in this document apply: • Will, shall or must indicate a mandatory course of action • Should indicates a recommended course of action • May or can indicate a possible course of action. Document Custodian The custodian of this document is the Australia Pacific LNG Upstream Phase 1 Project – Pipeline Environment Manager. The custodian is responsible for maintaining and controlling changes (additions and modifications) to this document and ensuring the stakeholders validate any changes made to this document. Deviations from Document Any deviation from this document must be approved by the Australia Pacific LNG Upstream Phase 1 Project – Pipeline Environment Manager. Disclaimer This report has been prepared on behalf of and for the exclusive use of Australia Pacific LNG, and is subject to and issued in accordance with the agreement between Australia Pacific LNG and Unidel Group Pty Ltd. Australia Pacific LNG and Unidel Group accepts no liability or responsibility whatsoever for it in respect of any use of or reliance upon this report by any third party. Copying this report without the permission of Australia Pacific LNG or Unidel Group is not permitted. Doc Ref: Q-4319-15-RP-0001 Revision: 1 Page 2 of 57 Pipelines, Australia Pacific LNG Upstream Phase 1 Uncontrolled when printed unless issued and stamped Controlled Copy. Pre-Clearance Survey Report – Orana Spur Line Project Report Table of Contents 1. Executive summary ................................................................................... 6 2. Introduction ........................................................................................... 7 3. Purpose ................................................................................................. 7 3.1. Compliance table .......................................................................................... 7 4. Scope ................................................................................................... 9 5. Document references ................................................................................ 9 6. Terms & abbreviations .............................................................................. 10 6.1. Document terms and definitions ...................................................................... 10 6.2. Abbreviations ............................................................................................. 10 7. Approach to address approval conditions ........................................................ 11 7.1. Reporting .................................................................................................. 11 7.2. Route refinement ........................................................................................ 11 7.3. Surveys .................................................................................................... 11 7.4. Ecological studies undertaken to date ............................................................... 11 7.5. Desktop searches ........................................................................................ 12 8. Detailed fieldwork methodology .................................................................. 12 8.1. Approach .................................................................................................. 12 8.1.1. Nomenclature ............................................................................................ 12 8.1.2. Survey timeframe ....................................................................................... 13 8.2. Flora survey ............................................................................................... 13 8.2.1. Preliminary assessment and site planning ........................................................... 13 8.2.2. Targeted flora species .................................................................................. 13 8.2.3. Field survey methodology .............................................................................. 13 8.2.4. Vegetation assemblages ................................................................................ 14 8.3. Fauna survey.............................................................................................. 14 8.3.1. Preliminary assessment and site planning ........................................................... 14 8.3.2. Target fauna species.................................................................................... 14 8.3.3. Field survey methodology .............................................................................. 15 8.3.4. Regional ecosystem associations and microhabitat features ...................................... 16 8.4. Data capture and field equipment.................................................................... 18 9. Pre-clearance survey results ....................................................................... 18 9.1. Flora assessment ......................................................................................... 18 9.1.1. Threatened ecological communities (TECs) ......................................................... 18 9.1.2. Regional ecosystems .................................................................................... 19 9.1.3. High value regrowth .................................................................................... 21 Doc Ref: Q-4319-15-RP-0001 Revision: 1 Page 3 of 57 Pipelines, Australia Pacific LNG Upstream Phase 1 Uncontrolled when printed unless issued and stamped Controlled Copy. Pre-Clearance Survey Report – Orana Spur Line Project Report 9.1.4. Recorded flora species ................................................................................. 26 9.1.5. EVNT and MNES flora species .......................................................................... 26 9.1.6. Other flora species ...................................................................................... 27 9.1.7. Pest flora species ....................................................................................... 28 9.1.8. Environmentally sensitive areas ...................................................................... 28 9.1.9. BAMM constraints........................................................................................ 29 9.2. Fauna assessment ........................................................................................ 29 9.2.1. Recorded fauna species ................................................................................ 29 9.2.2. MNES fauna species ..................................................................................... 30 9.2.3. EVNT fauna species ..................................................................................... 37 9.2.4. Pest fauna species ...................................................................................... 37 9.3. Wetlands and watercourses ............................................................................ 40 10. Recommendations ................................................................................... 40 11. References ............................................................................................ 42 Appendix A: Scope and data collection ................................................................. 43 Appendix B: Map Series ................................................................................... 45 Appendix C: Flora Species Observed During Pre-Clearance Survey ................................. 53 Appendix D: Fauna Species observed During Pre-Clearance Survey ................................ 57 Table of Figures Figure 1: DEHP regional ecosystem and HVR mapping ............................................................ 46 Figure 2: Ground-truthed regional ecosystem mapping .......................................................... 47 Figure 3: Location of significant flora ............................................................................... 48 Figure 4: Location of weed species ................................................................................... 49 Figure 5: Environmentally Sensitive Area mapping ................................................................ 50 Figure 6: BAMM constraints mapping ................................................................................. 51 Figure 7: Fauna habitat features...................................................................................... 52 List of Tables Table 1: Applicable approval conditions and section of this report where addressed ........................ 7 Table 2: Associated document references ............................................................................ 9 Table 3: Terms and definitions ........................................................................................ 10 Table 4: Abbreviations .................................................................................................. 10 Table 5: Microhabitat features recorded by the ecology survey team ......................................... 16 Table 6: Habitat quality definitions
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Literature Cited in Lizards Natural History Database
    Literature Cited in Lizards Natural History database Abdala, C. S., A. S. Quinteros, and R. E. Espinoza. 2008. Two new species of Liolaemus (Iguania: Liolaemidae) from the puna of northwestern Argentina. Herpetologica 64:458-471. Abdala, C. S., D. Baldo, R. A. Juárez, and R. E. Espinoza. 2016. The first parthenogenetic pleurodont Iguanian: a new all-female Liolaemus (Squamata: Liolaemidae) from western Argentina. Copeia 104:487-497. Abdala, C. S., J. C. Acosta, M. R. Cabrera, H. J. Villaviciencio, and J. Marinero. 2009. A new Andean Liolaemus of the L. montanus series (Squamata: Iguania: Liolaemidae) from western Argentina. South American Journal of Herpetology 4:91-102. Abdala, C. S., J. L. Acosta, J. C. Acosta, B. B. Alvarez, F. Arias, L. J. Avila, . S. M. Zalba. 2012. Categorización del estado de conservación de las lagartijas y anfisbenas de la República Argentina. Cuadernos de Herpetologia 26 (Suppl. 1):215-248. Abell, A. J. 1999. Male-female spacing patterns in the lizard, Sceloporus virgatus. Amphibia-Reptilia 20:185-194. Abts, M. L. 1987. Environment and variation in life history traits of the Chuckwalla, Sauromalus obesus. Ecological Monographs 57:215-232. Achaval, F., and A. Olmos. 2003. Anfibios y reptiles del Uruguay. Montevideo, Uruguay: Facultad de Ciencias. Achaval, F., and A. Olmos. 2007. Anfibio y reptiles del Uruguay, 3rd edn. Montevideo, Uruguay: Serie Fauna 1. Ackermann, T. 2006. Schreibers Glatkopfleguan Leiocephalus schreibersii. Munich, Germany: Natur und Tier. Ackley, J. W., P. J. Muelleman, R. E. Carter, R. W. Henderson, and R. Powell. 2009. A rapid assessment of herpetofaunal diversity in variously altered habitats on Dominica.
    [Show full text]
  • Brigalow Belt Bioregion – a Biodiversity Jewel
    Brigalow Belt bioregion – a biodiversity jewel Brigalow habitat © Craig Eddie What is brigalow? including eucalypt and cypress pine forests and The term ‘brigalow’ is used simultaneously to refer to; woodlands, grasslands and other Acacia dominated the tree Acacia harpophylla; an ecological community ecosystems. dominated by this tree and often found in conjunction with other species such as belah, wilga and false Along the eastern boundary of the Brigalow Belt are sandalwood; and a broader region where this species scattered patches of semi-evergreen vine thickets with and ecological community are present. bright green canopy species that are highly visible among the more silvery brigalow communities. These The Brigalow Belt bioregion patches are a dry adapted form of rainforest, relics of a much wetter past. The Brigalow Belt bioregion is a large and complex area covering 36,400 000ha. The region is thus recognised What are the issues? by the Australian Government as a biodiversity hotspot. Nature conservation in the region has received increasing attention because of the rapid and extensive This hotspot contains some of the most threatened loss of habitat that has occurred. Since World War wildlife in the world, including populations of the II the Brigalow Belt bioregion has become a major endangered bridled nail-tail wallaby and the only agricultural and pastoral area. Broad-scale clearing for remaining wild population of the endangered northern agriculture and unsustainable grazing has fragmented hairy-nosed wombat. The area contains important the original vegetation in the past, particularly on habitat for rare and threatened species including the, lowland areas. glossy black-cockatoo, bulloak jewel butterfl y, brigalow scaly-foot, red goshawk, little pied bat, golden-tailed geckos and threatened community of semi evergreen Biodiversity hotspots are areas that support vine thickets.
    [Show full text]
  • A Brief Overview of the Taxonomy and Nomenclature of the Genus
    Australasian Journal of Herpetology 57 Australasian Journal of Herpetology 34:57-63. ISSN 1836-5698 (Print) Published 20 July 2017. ISSN 1836-5779 (Online) A brief overview of the taxonomy and nomenclature of the genus Diplodactylus Gray 1832 sensu lato, with the formal naming of a new subgenus for the Diplodactylus byrnei Lucas and Frost, 1896 species group and two new species within this subgenus. RAYMOND T. HOSER 488 Park Road, Park Orchards, Victoria, 3134, Australia. Phone: +61 3 9812 3322 Fax: 9812 3355 E-mail: snakeman (at) snakeman.com.au Received 25 March 2017, Accepted 28 May 2017, Published 20 July 2017. ABSTRACT The taxonomy of the genus Diplodactylus Gray 1832 sensu lato was well resolved at the genus level by Oliver et al. (2007) and to a lesser extent other authors over the past 30 years to 2017. However a group known as the Wüster gang as detailed by Hoser (2015a-f) have unlawfully stopped most herpetologists from using taxonomy and nomenclature proposed by authors outside of their mob. As a result names formally proposed by Wells and Wellington (1989) for obvious species groups have been forcibly suppressed in herpetology since they were first published. This has remained the case even after Oliver et al. (2007) confirmed the validity of their genus-level classification in terms of three names they proposed. Taking an ultra-conservative position, Oliver et al. (2007) split Diplodactylus Gray 1832 sensu lato into three genera, using the first available names of Diplodactylus Gray 1832, Lucasium Wermuth, 1965 and Rhynchoedura Günther, 1867 for three main groups that diverged from one another in excess of 20 MYA.
    [Show full text]
  • Terrestrial Fauna Assessment
    Cameby Downs Continued Operations Project EnvironmentalEnvironmental Values Assessment Assessment APPENDIX E Terrestrial Fauna Assessment Cameby Downs Continued Operation Project Terrestrial Fauna Assessment May 2018 Syntech Resources Pty Ltd ecology / vegetation / wildlife / aquatic ecology / GIS Executive summary The Cameby Downs Mine is owned and operated by Syntech Resources Pty Ltd (Syntech) and is managed by Yancoal Australia Ltd (Yancoal). Syntech are considering expanding their operation area as part of the Cameby Downs Continued Operations Project (the Project) and an environmental values statement is being prepared to accompany a major Environmental Authority Amendment application. Syntech commissioned Ecosure Pty Ltd (Ecosure) to undertake terrestrial fauna field surveys and ecological assessments to address the minimum requirements in the Queensland Department of Environment and Heritage (DEHP) Information Request for an Amendment Application for an Environmental Authority. To supplement previous fauna surveys undertaken over the last decade, Ecosure undertook preliminary surveys and targeted surveys in July 2016. More comprehensive surveys followed in October 2016. Overall, six detailed trapping sites, 50 observational surveys and 56 targeted surveys were undertaken across the study area to determine the likelihood of occurrence of species listed as conservation significant species under State legislation and/ or threatened under Commonwealth legislation. A total of five conservation significant species have been recorded during field surveys (including previous surveys) conducted in the study area. These were: • koala (Phascolarctos cinereus) • glossy black-cockatoo (Calyptorhynchus lathami lathami) • grey snake (Hemiaspis damelii) • short-beaked echidna (Tachyglossus aculeatus) • yakka skink (Egernia rugosa) (during previous surveys only). A total of 192 species were recorded during the field surveys, including 13 amphibians, 101 birds, 25 mammals and 26 reptiles.
    [Show full text]
  • Native Animal Species List
    Native animal species list Native animals in South Australia are categorised into one of four groups: • Unprotected • Exempt • Basic • Specialist. To find out the category your animal is in, please check the list below. However, Specialist animals are not listed. There are thousands of them, so we don’t carry a list. A Specialist animal is simply any native animal not listed in this document. Mammals Common name Zoological name Species code Category Dunnart Fat-tailed dunnart Sminthopsis crassicaudata A01072 Basic Dingo Wild dog Canis familiaris Not applicable Unprotected Gliders Squirrel glider Petaurus norfolcensis E04226 Basic Sugar glider Petaurus breviceps E01138 Basic Possum Common brushtail possum Trichosurus vulpecula K01113 Basic Potoroo and bettongs Brush-tailed bettong (Woylie) Bettongia penicillata ogilbyi M21002 Basic Long-nosed potoroo Potorous tridactylus Z01175 Basic Rufous bettong Aepyprymnus rufescens W01187 Basic Rodents Mitchell's hopping-mouse Notomys mitchellii Y01480 Basic Plains mouse (Rat) Pseudomys australis S01469 Basic Spinifex hopping-mouse Notomys alexis K01481 Exempt Wallabies Parma wallaby Macropus parma K01245 Basic Red-necked pademelon Thylogale thetis Y01236 Basic Red-necked wallaby Macropus rufogriseus K01261 Basic Swamp wallaby Wallabia bicolor E01242 Basic Tammar wallaby Macropus eugenii eugenii C05889 Basic Tasmanian pademelon Thylogale billardierii G01235 Basic 1 Amphibians Common name Zoological name Species code Category Southern bell frog Litoria raniformis G03207 Basic Smooth frog Geocrinia laevis
    [Show full text]
  • NSW REPTILE KEEPERS' LICENCE Species Lists 1006
    NSW REPTILE KEEPERS’ LICENCE SPECIES LISTS (2006) The taxonomy in this list follows that used in Wilson, S. and Swan, G. A Complete Guide to Reptiles of Australia, Reed 2003. Common names generally follow the same text, when common names were used, or have otherwise been lifted from other publications. As well as reading this species list, you will also need to read the “NSW Reptile Keepers’ Licence Information Sheet 2006.” That document has important information about the different types of reptile keeper licenses. It also lists the criteria you need to demonstrate before applying to upgrade to a higher class of licence. THESE REPTILES CAN ONLY BE HELD UNDER A REPTILE KEEPERS’ LICENCE OF CLASS 1 OR HIGHER Code Scientific Name Common Name Code Scientific Name Common Name Turtles Monitors E2018 Chelodina canni Cann’s Snake-necked Turtle G2263 Varanus acanthurus Spiney-tailed Monitor C2017 Chelodina longicollis Snake-necked Turtle Q2268 Varanus gilleni Pygmy Mulga Monitor G2019 Chelodina oblonga Oblong Turtle G2271 Varanus gouldii Sand Monitor Y2028 Elseya dentata Northern Snapping Turtle M2282 Varanus tristis Black-Headed Monitor K2029 Elseya latisternum Saw-shelled Turtle Y2776 Elusor macrurus Mary River Turtle E2034 Emydura macquarii Murray Short-necked Turtle Skinks T2031 Emydura macquarii dharra Macleay River Turtle A2464 Acritoscincus platynotum Red-throated Skink T2039 Emydura macquarii dharuk Sydney Basin Turtle W2331 Cryptoblepharus virgatus Cream-striped Wall Skink T2002 Emydura macquarii emmotti Emmott’s Short-necked Turtle W2375
    [Show full text]
  • Mechanics, Diversity, and Ecology of Gecko Adhesion
    MECHANICS, DIVERSITY, AND ECOLOGY OF GECKO ADHESION A Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy with a Major in Biology in the College of Graduate Studies University of Idaho by Travis Jay Hagey August 2013 Major Professor: Luke. J. Harmon, Ph.D. ii AUTHORIZATION TO SUBMIT DISSERTATION This dissertation of Travis J. Hagey, submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy with a major in Biology and titled “Mechanics, Diversity, and Ecology of Gecko Adhesion,” has been reviewed in final form. Permission, as indicated by the signatures and dates given below, is now granted to submit final copies to the College of Graduate Studies for approval. Major Professor ______________________________ Date _______________ Luke J. Harmon Committee ______________________________ Date _______________ Members Craig P. McGowan ______________________________ Date _______________ Jack M. Sullivan ______________________________ Date _______________ Kellar Autumn Department ______________________________ Date _______________ Administrator James J. Nagler College of Science ______________________________ Date _______________ Dean Paul Joyce Final Approval and Acceptance by the College of Graduate Studies ______________________________ Date _______________ Jie Chen iii Abstract The question of why animals are shaped the way they are has intrigued scientists for hundreds of years. Studies of ecological morphology (the relationship between an organism’s form, function, and environment) often bridge multiple disciplines including biomechanics, ecology, phylogenetics, and comparative methods. In this dissertation, I gathered data and tested hypotheses that considered the link between morphology and performance and the relationship between performance and ecology. I focused my research on the adhesive abilities of geckos. Geckos are an understudied, diverse group of lizards, well known for their adhesive toe pads.
    [Show full text]
  • Taxonomic Assessment of Two Pygopodoid Gecko Subspecies from Western Australia
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/338531530 Taxonomic assessment of two pygopodoid gecko subspecies from Western Australia Article in Israel Journal of Ecology and Evolution · January 2020 DOI: 10.1163/22244662-20191078 CITATIONS READS 0 169 4 authors, including: Paul Doughty Ian Brennan Government of Western Australia Australian National University 136 PUBLICATIONS 2,689 CITATIONS 17 PUBLICATIONS 61 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: Barcoding utility in a mega-diverse, cross-continental genus: keeping pace with Cyrtodactylus geckos View project All content following this page was uploaded by Ian Brennan on 15 January 2020. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. Israel Journal of Ecology & Evolution, 2020 http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/22244662-20191078 Taxonomic assessment of two pygopodoid gecko subspecies from Western Australia Luke Kealleya,*, Paul Doughtya, Danielle Edwardsb and Ian G. Brennanc aDepartment of Terrestrial Zoology, Western Australian Museum, 49 Kew Street, Welshpool 6106, Australia bSchool of Natural Sciences, University of California, Merced, CA 95343, U.S.A. cDivision of Ecology & Evolution, Research School of Biology, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2600, Australia Abstract Subspecies designations for herpetofauna in Western Australia were largely coined in the 20th century where rigorous evolutionary concepts to species were not consistently applied. Rather, subspecies tended to designate geographic populations of similar-looking taxa to nominate forms, usually differing in size, pattern or colour and, at best, a few scalation differences. Here we re-evaluate two pygopodoid taxa from Western Australia using a combination of published and original genetic data coupled with a reassessment of morphology.
    [Show full text]
  • Golden-Tailed Gecko and Glossy Black- Cockatoo
    LAND AND WATER Habitat selection by two focal species; golden-tailed gecko and glossy black- cockatoo Chris R. Pavey, Eric Vanderduys and S. Raghu ISBN (print): 978‐1‐4863‐0702‐9 ISBN (online): 978‐1‐4863‐0703‐6 Citation Pavey, C. R., Vanderduys, E. and Raghu, S. (2016) Habitat selection by two focal species; golden‐ tailed gecko and glossy black‐cockatoo. A report to the Gas Industry Social and Environmental Research Alliance (GISERA). May 2016. CSIRO, Alice Springs Copyright © Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation 2016. To the extent permitted by law, all rights are reserved and no part of this publication covered by copyright may be reproduced or copied in any form or by any means except with the written permission of CSIRO. Important disclaimer CSIRO advises that the information contained in this publication comprises general statements based on scientific research. The reader is advised and needs to be aware that such information may be incomplete or unable to be used in any specific situation. No reliance or actions must therefore be made on that information without seeking prior expert professional, scientific and technical advice. To the extent permitted by law, CSIRO (including its employees and consultants) excludes all liability to any person for any consequences, including but not limited to all losses, damages, costs, expenses and any other compensation, arising directly or indirectly from using this publication (in part or in whole) and any information or material contained in it. CSIRO is committed to providing web accessible content wherever possible. If you are having difficulties with accessing this document please contact [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • Species Richness in Time and Space: a Phylogenetic and Geographic Perspective
    Species Richness in Time and Space: a Phylogenetic and Geographic Perspective by Pascal Olivier Title A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Ecology and Evolutionary Biology) in The University of Michigan 2018 Doctoral Committee: Assistant Professor and Assistant Curator Daniel Rabosky, Chair Associate Professor Johannes Foufopoulos Professor L. Lacey Knowles Assistant Professor Stephen A. Smith Pascal O Title [email protected] ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6316-0736 c Pascal O Title 2018 DEDICATION To Judge Julius Title, for always encouraging me to be inquisitive. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The research presented in this dissertation has been supported by a number of research grants from the University of Michigan and from academic societies. I thank the Society of Systematic Biologists, the Society for the Study of Evolution, and the Herpetologists League for supporting my work. I am also extremely grateful to the Rackham Graduate School, the University of Michigan Museum of Zoology C.F. Walker and Hinsdale scholarships, as well as to the Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Block grants, for generously providing support throughout my PhD. Much of this research was also made possible by a Rackham Predoctoral Fellowship, and by a fellowship from the Michigan Institute for Computational Discovery and Engineering. First and foremost, I would like to thank my advisor, Dr. Dan Rabosky, for taking me on as one of his first graduate students. I have learned a tremendous amount under his guidance, and conducting research with him has been both exhilarating and inspiring. I am also grateful for his friendship and company, both in Ann Arbor and especially in the field, which have produced experiences that I will never forget.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecology Assessment Report – Lot 4ROG3414 Ecology Assessment Report
    Ecology Assessment Report – Lot 4ROG3414 Ecology Assessment Report Release notice This document is available through the Australia Pacific LNG Upstream Phase 1 Project controlled document system TeamBinder™. The responsibility for ensuring that printed copies remain valid rests with the user. Once printed, this is an uncontrolled document unless issued and stamped Controlled Copy. Third-party issue can be requested via the Australia Pacific LNG Upstream Phase 1 Project Document Control Group. Document conventions The following terms in this document apply: • Will, shall or must indicate a mandatory course of action • Should indicates a recommended course of action • May or can indicate a possible course of action. Document custodian The custodian of this document is the Australia Pacific LNG Upstream Phase 1 Project – Environmental Approvals Manager. The custodian is responsible for maintaining and controlling changes (additions and modifications) to this document and ensuring the stakeholders validate any changes made to this document. Deviations from document Any deviation from this document must be approved by the Australia Pacific LNG Upstream Phase 1 Project – Environmental Approvals Manager. Doc Ref: Q-4300-15-RP-012 Revision: 0 Page 2 of 48 Approvals, Land and Stakeholder, Australia Pacific LNG Upstream Phase 1 Uncontrolled when printed unless issued and stamped Controlled Copy. Ecology Assessment Report – Lot 4ROG3414 Ecology Assessment Report Table of contents 1. Introduction ..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Spatially Explicit Cost-Effective Actions for Biodiversity Threat Abatement
    Spatially explicit cost-effective actions for biodiversity threat abatement Nancy Anne Auerbach BA, MBSc A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at The University of Queensland in 2015 School of Biological Sciences Abstract Biodiversity decline is indisputable, and rates of future decline depend on whether threats to species persistence are abated. However, current resources for threatened species management are less than required to stop further decline. Management that abates many threats to many species is necessary, yet decisions about how to do this under resource constraints are inherently complex. My thesis incorporates systematic conservation planning and cost-effectiveness analysis in a decision-support framework for prioritising spatially-explicit management actions for many species across a region. By prioritising action where it is expected to provide the greatest benefit to the most species at least cost, my research advances the thinking on decision support, and contributes to the effort to reduce biodiversity decline. Using information on threats to species that was compiled by the Queensland, Australia government, my research develops a decision-support process for managing threats to threatened species in a bio-diverse regional-scale management area, the Burnett-Mary Natural Resource Management Region. In my thesis, predicted distributions for 65 threatened species are modelled on co-occurring presence-only species locations and ecologically-meaningful environmental data. Three threats are addressed: invasive red fox predation; too frequent and intense fire; and habitat degradation from overgrazing. Indirect threat maps are made by combining predicted distribution models of species vulnerable to specific threats and are used to identify locations where threat- abating actions are most likely to provide benefit to species.
    [Show full text]