DOCSLIB.ORG

Ecology Assessment Report Lot 51 RP896380, Lots18, 21 & 30 on BWR 98 and Lot 20 on BWR 267 Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ecology Assessment Report Lot 51 RP896380, Lots18, 21 & 30 on BWR 98 and Lot 20 on BWR 267 Report Ecology Assessment Report Lot 51 RP896380, Lots18, 21 & 30 on BWR 98 and Lot 20 on BWR 267 Report Table of Contents 1. Definitions & Abbreviations ......................................................................... 4 1.1. Definitions .................................................................................................. 4 1.2. Abbreviations ............................................................................................... 4 2. Introduction ........................................................................................... 5 2.1. Limitation ................................................................................................... 5 3. Site Context ........................................................................................... 6 3.1. Location ..................................................................................................... 6 3.2. Climate ...................................................................................................... 6 3.3. Geology and Soils .......................................................................................... 6 3.4. Current Land Use .......................................................................................... 6 4. Methodology ........................................................................................... 8 4.1. Desktop and Literature Review ......................................................................... 8 4.2. Field Survey ................................................................................................. 8 4.2.1. Reconnaissance Survey .................................................................................. 8 4.2.2. Vegetation Community Survey ......................................................................... 8 4.2.3. Threatened Flora and Fauna Survey ................................................................... 9 4.2.4. Fauna and Habitat Survey ............................................................................... 9 4.2.5. Exotic Flora and Fauna Survey ......................................................................... 9 4.2.6. Disturbance Survey....................................................................................... 9 5. Results and Discussion .............................................................................. 10 5.1. Desktop and Literature Review ....................................................................... 10 5.1.1. Commonwealth Matters ................................................................................ 10 5.1.2. State Matters ............................................................................................ 14 5.2. Field Survey ............................................................................................... 22 5.2.1. Commonwealth Matters ................................................................................ 22 5.2.2. State Matters ............................................................................................ 28 6. Conclusion & Recommendations ................................................................... 38 7. References ............................................................................................ 40 8. Appendix A: Results of EPBC protected matters search tool (15 March 2012) .............. 44 9. Appendix B: Results of Wildlife Online Database Search (Accessed 13 March 2012) ....... 45 10. Appendix C: Results of DERM Referrable Wetland search (13 March 2012) ................. 46 11. Appendix D: Flora recorded at the study area during field survey ........................... 47 12. Appendix E: Fauna recorded at the study area during field survey .......................... 49 Doc Ref: Q-4500-15-RP-0011 Revision: 0 Page 2 of 50 Operations & Project Support – Environment Team, Australia Pacific LNG Upstream Phase 1 Uncontrolled when printed unless issued and stamped Controlled Copy. Ecology Assessment Report Lot 51 RP896380, Lots18, 21 & 30 on BWR 98 and Lot 20 on BWR 267 Report Table of Figures Figure 1: Study area overview (Rev0) .................................................................................. 7 Figure 2: ESAs mapped within the study area (Rev0) ............................................................. 16 Figure 3: REs mapped by DERM within the study area (Rev0) ................................................... 21 Figure 4: TECs identified within the study area (Rev0) ........................................................... 24 Figure 5: Habitat for threatened and EVNT species potentially occurring in the study area (Rev0) ..... 30 Figure 6: Pest species (flora) identified within the study area (Rev0) ......................................... 32 Figure 7: Ground-truthed REs within the study area (Rev0) ..................................................... 35 Figure 8: Wetlands and waterbodies within the study area (Rev0) ............................................. 37 List of Tables Table 1: Definitions ....................................................................................................... 4 Table 2: Abbreviations .................................................................................................... 4 Table 3: EPBC protected matters search tool results for TEC’s potentially occurring within the study area ........................................................................................................................ 10 Table 4: EPBC listed flora potentially occurring within the study area ........................................ 11 Table 5: EPBC listed fauna potentially occurring within the study area ....................................... 11 Table 6: EPBC listed migratory species potentially occurring within the study area ........................ 12 Table 7: EPBC listed marine species potentially occurring within the study area ........................... 13 Table 8: WoNS potentially occurring within the study area ..................................................... 13 Table 9: Pest fauna species potentially occurring within the study area...................................... 14 Table 10: Wildlife Online records of threatened flora species within the study area ....................... 14 Table 11: Wildlife Online records of threatened fauna species within the study area ..................... 14 Table 12: Endangered REs mapped by DERM as present within the study area .............................. 17 Table 13: Of concern REs mapped by DERM as present within the study area ............................... 18 Table 14: No concern at present REs mapped by DERM as present within the study area ................. 19 Table 15: HVR mapped by DERM as present within the study area ............................................. 20 Table 16: Likelihood of occurrence for TEC’s identified as potentially occurring within the study area (EPBC desktop search) .................................................................................................. 22 Table 17: EPBC protected flora species potentially occurring within the study area ....................... 25 Table 18: EPBC protected fauna species potentially occurring within the study area ...................... 26 Table 19: EPBC migratory species or habitat of species potentially occurring within the study area .... 27 Table 20: EVNT fauna species potentially occurring within the study area ................................... 29 Table 21: Introduced flora (excluding pasture species) recorded during the field survey ................. 31 Table 22: Endangered RE ground-truthed within the study area ............................................... 33 Table 23: Of concern RE ground-truthed on within the study area ............................................. 33 Table 24: No concern at present RE ground-truthed on site ..................................................... 34 Doc Ref: Q-4500-15-RP-0011 Revision: 0 Page 3 of 50 Operations & Project Support – Environment Team, Australia Pacific LNG Upstream Phase 1 Uncontrolled when printed unless issued and stamped Controlled Copy. Ecology Assessment Report Lot 51 RP896380, Lots18, 21 & 30 on BWR 98 and Lot 20 on BWR 267 Report 1. Definitions & Abbreviations 1.1. Definitions Table 1: Definitions Term Definition Project Australia Pacific LNG Upstream Phase 1 Project Study area Lot 18 BWR 98, Lot 20 BWR 267, Lot 21 BWR 98, Lot 30 BWR 98, and Lot 51 RP896380 Unidel Unidel Group Pty Ltd 1.2. Abbreviations Table 2: Abbreviations Abbreviation Description DBH Diameter at breast height DERM Department of Environment and Resource Management DSEWPaC Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities EIS Environmental impact statement EP Act Environmental Protection Act (Qld) 1994 EPBC Act Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act (C’wlth) 1999 ESA Environmentally sensitive area EVNT Endangered, vulnerable or near threatened HVR High value regrowth MNES Matters of national environmental significance NC Act Nature Conservation Act (Qld) 1992 NC Reg Nature Conservation (Wildlife) Regulation (Qld) 2006 RE Regional ecosystem WoNS Weeds of national significance Doc Ref: Q-4500-15-RP-0011 Revision: 0 Page 4 of 50 Operations & Project Support – Environment Team, Australia Pacific LNG Upstream Phase 1 Uncontrolled when printed unless issued and stamped Controlled Copy. Ecology Assessment Report Lot 51 RP896380, Lots18, 21 & 30 on BWR 98 and Lot 20 on BWR 267 Report 2. Introduction Unidel Group Pty Ltd (Unidel) was commissioned
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Testing the Relevance of Binary, Mosaic and Continuous Landscape Conceptualisations to Reptiles in Regenerating Dryland Landscapes
    Testing the relevance of binary, mosaic and continuous landscape conceptualisations to reptiles in regenerating dryland landscapes Melissa J. Bruton1, Martine Maron1,2, Noam Levin1,3, Clive A. McAlpine1,2 1The University of Queensland, Landscape Ecology and Conservation Group, School of Geography, Planning and Environmental Management, St Lucia, Australia 4067 2The University of Queensland, ARC Centre of Excellence for Environmental Decisions, St. Lucia, Australia 4067 3Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Department of Geography, Mt. Scopus, Jerusalem, Israel, 91905 Corresponding author: [email protected] Ph: (+61) 409 875 780 The final publication is available at Springer via http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10980-015-0157-9 Abstract: Context: Fauna distributions are assessed using discrete (binary and mosaic) or continuous conceptualisations of the landscape. The value of the information derived from these analyses depends on the relevance of the landscape representation (or model) used to the landscape and fauna of interest. Discrete representations dominate analyses of landscape context in disturbed and regenerating landscapes; however within-patch variation suggests that continuous representations may help explain the distribution of fauna in such landscapes. Objectives: We tested the relevance of binary, mosaic, and continuous conceptualisations of landscape context to reptiles in regenerating dryland landscapes. Methods: For each of thirteen reptile groups, we compared the fit of models consisting of one landscape composition and one landscape heterogeneity variable for each of six landscape representations (2 x binary, 2 x mosaic, and 2 x continuous), at three buffer distances. We used Akaike weights to assess the relative support for each model. Maps were created from Landsat satellite images.
    [Show full text]
  • Literature Cited in Lizards Natural History Database
    Literature Cited in Lizards Natural History database Abdala, C. S., A. S. Quinteros, and R. E. Espinoza. 2008. Two new species of Liolaemus (Iguania: Liolaemidae) from the puna of northwestern Argentina. Herpetologica 64:458-471. Abdala, C. S., D. Baldo, R. A. Juárez, and R. E. Espinoza. 2016. The first parthenogenetic pleurodont Iguanian: a new all-female Liolaemus (Squamata: Liolaemidae) from western Argentina. Copeia 104:487-497. Abdala, C. S., J. C. Acosta, M. R. Cabrera, H. J. Villaviciencio, and J. Marinero. 2009. A new Andean Liolaemus of the L. montanus series (Squamata: Iguania: Liolaemidae) from western Argentina. South American Journal of Herpetology 4:91-102. Abdala, C. S., J. L. Acosta, J. C. Acosta, B. B. Alvarez, F. Arias, L. J. Avila, . S. M. Zalba. 2012. Categorización del estado de conservación de las lagartijas y anfisbenas de la República Argentina. Cuadernos de Herpetologia 26 (Suppl. 1):215-248. Abell, A. J. 1999. Male-female spacing patterns in the lizard, Sceloporus virgatus. Amphibia-Reptilia 20:185-194. Abts, M. L. 1987. Environment and variation in life history traits of the Chuckwalla, Sauromalus obesus. Ecological Monographs 57:215-232. Achaval, F., and A. Olmos. 2003. Anfibios y reptiles del Uruguay. Montevideo, Uruguay: Facultad de Ciencias. Achaval, F., and A. Olmos. 2007. Anfibio y reptiles del Uruguay, 3rd edn. Montevideo, Uruguay: Serie Fauna 1. Ackermann, T. 2006. Schreibers Glatkopfleguan Leiocephalus schreibersii. Munich, Germany: Natur und Tier. Ackley, J. W., P. J. Muelleman, R. E. Carter, R. W. Henderson, and R. Powell. 2009. A rapid assessment of herpetofaunal diversity in variously altered habitats on Dominica.
    [Show full text]
  • Survey of Reptiles and Amphibians at Bimblebox Nature Reserve - Queensland
    Summary of an Observational Survey of Reptiles and Amphibians at Bimblebox Nature Reserve - Queensland Graham Armstrong – May, 2016 Objective - to provide an updated and more complete list of the herpetofauna recorded from Bimblebox Nature Refuge. Approach - 1. Review available data and records pertaining to the herpetofauna at Bimblebox Nature Refuge. 2. Visit Bimblebox Nature Refuge during Spring, Summer and Autumn seasons to make observational and photographic records of the herpetofauna observed. Methodology - In order to maximise the number of species recorded, 3 successive 2.5 day visits were made to BNR, one in September 2015, Jan 2016 and the end of April 2016. This approach potentially broadens the range of weather conditions experienced and hence variety of reptiles and amphibians encountered when compared to a single field visit. Survey methodology involved walking and driving around the nature refuge during the day and after dark (with the aid of a head torch to detect eye-shine). Active reptiles including those that ran for or from cover while passing by were recorded. Frequently, in situ photographic evidence of individuals was obtained and the photographs are available for the purpose of corroborating identification. To avoid any double counting of individual animals the Refuge was traversed progressively and the locations of animals were recorded using a GPS. During any one visit no area was traversed twice and when driving along tracks, reptiles were only recorded the first time a track was traversed unless a new species was detected at a later time. Available Records The most detailed list of reptiles and amphibians recorded as occurring on Bimblebox Nature Reserve comes from the standardised trapping program of Eric Vanderduys of CSIRO in Townsville.
    [Show full text]
  • Brigalow Belt Bioregion – a Biodiversity Jewel
    Brigalow Belt bioregion – a biodiversity jewel Brigalow habitat © Craig Eddie What is brigalow? including eucalypt and cypress pine forests and The term ‘brigalow’ is used simultaneously to refer to; woodlands, grasslands and other Acacia dominated the tree Acacia harpophylla; an ecological community ecosystems. dominated by this tree and often found in conjunction with other species such as belah, wilga and false Along the eastern boundary of the Brigalow Belt are sandalwood; and a broader region where this species scattered patches of semi-evergreen vine thickets with and ecological community are present. bright green canopy species that are highly visible among the more silvery brigalow communities. These The Brigalow Belt bioregion patches are a dry adapted form of rainforest, relics of a much wetter past. The Brigalow Belt bioregion is a large and complex area covering 36,400 000ha. The region is thus recognised What are the issues? by the Australian Government as a biodiversity hotspot. Nature conservation in the region has received increasing attention because of the rapid and extensive This hotspot contains some of the most threatened loss of habitat that has occurred. Since World War wildlife in the world, including populations of the II the Brigalow Belt bioregion has become a major endangered bridled nail-tail wallaby and the only agricultural and pastoral area. Broad-scale clearing for remaining wild population of the endangered northern agriculture and unsustainable grazing has fragmented hairy-nosed wombat. The area contains important the original vegetation in the past, particularly on habitat for rare and threatened species including the, lowland areas. glossy black-cockatoo, bulloak jewel butterfl y, brigalow scaly-foot, red goshawk, little pied bat, golden-tailed geckos and threatened community of semi evergreen Biodiversity hotspots are areas that support vine thickets.
    [Show full text]
  • The Dynamics of Water on the Skin of Australian Carphodactyline and Diplodactyline Geckos
    This file is part of the following reference: Vucko, Matthew John (2008) The dynamics of water on the skin of Australian carphodactyline and diplodactyline geckos. Masters (Research) thesis, James Cook University. Access to this file is available from: http://eprints.jcu.edu.au/3249 The Dynamics of Water on the Skin of Australian Carphodactyline and Diplodactyline Geckos M.Sc. thesis submitted by Matthew John Vucko B.Sc. McGill University Grad. Dip. Res. Meth. James Cook University April 2008 For the degree of Masters by Research School of Marine and Tropical Biology James Cook University Townsville, Queensland 4811 Australia Title page photo Top – Strophurus krysalis (juvenile); spine from the dorsal surface of Phyllurus ossa; Oedura marmorata (Winton population) Middle – Hair sensor with bottlebrush-shaped bristles from Carphodactylus laevis; three drops on the dorsal surface of Lucasium steindachneri; primary scale from Phyllurus nepthys Bottom – Saltuarius cornutus (juvenile); spinules from the primary scale of Phyllurus ossa; Carphodactylus laevis in a defense posture Photo credit: Matthew J. Vucko Statement of access I, the undersigned, author of this work, understand that James Cook University will make this thesis available for use within the university library, via the Australian Theses Network, or by other means allow access to users in other approved libraries. I understand that as an unpublished work, a thesis has significant protection under the Copyright Act and beyond this. I do not wish to place any restriction on access to this thesis. ............................................... ......................................... Signature Date i Statement of sources Declaration I declare that this thesis is my own work and has not been submitted in any form for another degree or diploma at any university or other institution of tertiary education.
    [Show full text]
  • A Brief Overview of the Taxonomy and Nomenclature of the Genus
    Australasian Journal of Herpetology 57 Australasian Journal of Herpetology 34:57-63. ISSN 1836-5698 (Print) Published 20 July 2017. ISSN 1836-5779 (Online) A brief overview of the taxonomy and nomenclature of the genus Diplodactylus Gray 1832 sensu lato, with the formal naming of a new subgenus for the Diplodactylus byrnei Lucas and Frost, 1896 species group and two new species within this subgenus. RAYMOND T. HOSER 488 Park Road, Park Orchards, Victoria, 3134, Australia. Phone: +61 3 9812 3322 Fax: 9812 3355 E-mail: snakeman (at) snakeman.com.au Received 25 March 2017, Accepted 28 May 2017, Published 20 July 2017. ABSTRACT The taxonomy of the genus Diplodactylus Gray 1832 sensu lato was well resolved at the genus level by Oliver et al. (2007) and to a lesser extent other authors over the past 30 years to 2017. However a group known as the Wüster gang as detailed by Hoser (2015a-f) have unlawfully stopped most herpetologists from using taxonomy and nomenclature proposed by authors outside of their mob. As a result names formally proposed by Wells and Wellington (1989) for obvious species groups have been forcibly suppressed in herpetology since they were first published. This has remained the case even after Oliver et al. (2007) confirmed the validity of their genus-level classification in terms of three names they proposed. Taking an ultra-conservative position, Oliver et al. (2007) split Diplodactylus Gray 1832 sensu lato into three genera, using the first available names of Diplodactylus Gray 1832, Lucasium Wermuth, 1965 and Rhynchoedura Günther, 1867 for three main groups that diverged from one another in excess of 20 MYA.
    [Show full text]
  • Terrestrial Fauna Assessment
    Cameby Downs Continued Operations Project EnvironmentalEnvironmental Values Assessment Assessment APPENDIX E Terrestrial Fauna Assessment Cameby Downs Continued Operation Project Terrestrial Fauna Assessment May 2018 Syntech Resources Pty Ltd ecology / vegetation / wildlife / aquatic ecology / GIS Executive summary The Cameby Downs Mine is owned and operated by Syntech Resources Pty Ltd (Syntech) and is managed by Yancoal Australia Ltd (Yancoal). Syntech are considering expanding their operation area as part of the Cameby Downs Continued Operations Project (the Project) and an environmental values statement is being prepared to accompany a major Environmental Authority Amendment application. Syntech commissioned Ecosure Pty Ltd (Ecosure) to undertake terrestrial fauna field surveys and ecological assessments to address the minimum requirements in the Queensland Department of Environment and Heritage (DEHP) Information Request for an Amendment Application for an Environmental Authority. To supplement previous fauna surveys undertaken over the last decade, Ecosure undertook preliminary surveys and targeted surveys in July 2016. More comprehensive surveys followed in October 2016. Overall, six detailed trapping sites, 50 observational surveys and 56 targeted surveys were undertaken across the study area to determine the likelihood of occurrence of species listed as conservation significant species under State legislation and/ or threatened under Commonwealth legislation. A total of five conservation significant species have been recorded during field surveys (including previous surveys) conducted in the study area. These were: • koala (Phascolarctos cinereus) • glossy black-cockatoo (Calyptorhynchus lathami lathami) • grey snake (Hemiaspis damelii) • short-beaked echidna (Tachyglossus aculeatus) • yakka skink (Egernia rugosa) (during previous surveys only). A total of 192 species were recorded during the field surveys, including 13 amphibians, 101 birds, 25 mammals and 26 reptiles.
    [Show full text]
  • Native Animal Species List
    Native animal species list Native animals in South Australia are categorised into one of four groups: • Unprotected • Exempt • Basic • Specialist. To find out the category your animal is in, please check the list below. However, Specialist animals are not listed. There are thousands of them, so we don’t carry a list. A Specialist animal is simply any native animal not listed in this document. Mammals Common name Zoological name Species code Category Dunnart Fat-tailed dunnart Sminthopsis crassicaudata A01072 Basic Dingo Wild dog Canis familiaris Not applicable Unprotected Gliders Squirrel glider Petaurus norfolcensis E04226 Basic Sugar glider Petaurus breviceps E01138 Basic Possum Common brushtail possum Trichosurus vulpecula K01113 Basic Potoroo and bettongs Brush-tailed bettong (Woylie) Bettongia penicillata ogilbyi M21002 Basic Long-nosed potoroo Potorous tridactylus Z01175 Basic Rufous bettong Aepyprymnus rufescens W01187 Basic Rodents Mitchell's hopping-mouse Notomys mitchellii Y01480 Basic Plains mouse (Rat) Pseudomys australis S01469 Basic Spinifex hopping-mouse Notomys alexis K01481 Exempt Wallabies Parma wallaby Macropus parma K01245 Basic Red-necked pademelon Thylogale thetis Y01236 Basic Red-necked wallaby Macropus rufogriseus K01261 Basic Swamp wallaby Wallabia bicolor E01242 Basic Tammar wallaby Macropus eugenii eugenii C05889 Basic Tasmanian pademelon Thylogale billardierii G01235 Basic 1 Amphibians Common name Zoological name Species code Category Southern bell frog Litoria raniformis G03207 Basic Smooth frog Geocrinia laevis
    [Show full text]
  • Fitzroy, Queensland
    Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List What is the summary for and where does it come from? This list has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. The list was produced using the AustralianAustralian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. For each family of plant and animal covered by ANHAT (Appendix 1), this document gives the number of species in the country and how many of them are found in the region. It also identifies species listed as Vulnerable, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Conservation Dependent under the EPBC Act. A biodiversity summary for this region is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are notnot included included in in the the list. list. • The data used come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations.
    [Show full text]
  • A Phylogeny and Revised Classification of Squamata, Including 4161 Species of Lizards and Snakes
    BMC Evolutionary Biology This Provisional PDF corresponds to the article as it appeared upon acceptance. Fully formatted PDF and full text (HTML) versions will be made available soon. A phylogeny and revised classification of Squamata, including 4161 species of lizards and snakes BMC Evolutionary Biology 2013, 13:93 doi:10.1186/1471-2148-13-93 Robert Alexander Pyron ([email protected]) Frank T Burbrink ([email protected]) John J Wiens ([email protected]) ISSN 1471-2148 Article type Research article Submission date 30 January 2013 Acceptance date 19 March 2013 Publication date 29 April 2013 Article URL http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/13/93 Like all articles in BMC journals, this peer-reviewed article can be downloaded, printed and distributed freely for any purposes (see copyright notice below). Articles in BMC journals are listed in PubMed and archived at PubMed Central. For information about publishing your research in BMC journals or any BioMed Central journal, go to http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/authors/ © 2013 Pyron et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. A phylogeny and revised classification of Squamata, including 4161 species of lizards and snakes Robert Alexander Pyron 1* * Corresponding author Email: [email protected] Frank T Burbrink 2,3 Email: [email protected] John J Wiens 4 Email: [email protected] 1 Department of Biological Sciences, The George Washington University, 2023 G St.
    [Show full text]
  • NSW REPTILE KEEPERS' LICENCE Species Lists 1006
    NSW REPTILE KEEPERS’ LICENCE SPECIES LISTS (2006) The taxonomy in this list follows that used in Wilson, S. and Swan, G. A Complete Guide to Reptiles of Australia, Reed 2003. Common names generally follow the same text, when common names were used, or have otherwise been lifted from other publications. As well as reading this species list, you will also need to read the “NSW Reptile Keepers’ Licence Information Sheet 2006.” That document has important information about the different types of reptile keeper licenses. It also lists the criteria you need to demonstrate before applying to upgrade to a higher class of licence. THESE REPTILES CAN ONLY BE HELD UNDER A REPTILE KEEPERS’ LICENCE OF CLASS 1 OR HIGHER Code Scientific Name Common Name Code Scientific Name Common Name Turtles Monitors E2018 Chelodina canni Cann’s Snake-necked Turtle G2263 Varanus acanthurus Spiney-tailed Monitor C2017 Chelodina longicollis Snake-necked Turtle Q2268 Varanus gilleni Pygmy Mulga Monitor G2019 Chelodina oblonga Oblong Turtle G2271 Varanus gouldii Sand Monitor Y2028 Elseya dentata Northern Snapping Turtle M2282 Varanus tristis Black-Headed Monitor K2029 Elseya latisternum Saw-shelled Turtle Y2776 Elusor macrurus Mary River Turtle E2034 Emydura macquarii Murray Short-necked Turtle Skinks T2031 Emydura macquarii dharra Macleay River Turtle A2464 Acritoscincus platynotum Red-throated Skink T2039 Emydura macquarii dharuk Sydney Basin Turtle W2331 Cryptoblepharus virgatus Cream-striped Wall Skink T2002 Emydura macquarii emmotti Emmott’s Short-necked Turtle W2375
    [Show full text]
  • Mechanics, Diversity, and Ecology of Gecko Adhesion
    MECHANICS, DIVERSITY, AND ECOLOGY OF GECKO ADHESION A Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy with a Major in Biology in the College of Graduate Studies University of Idaho by Travis Jay Hagey August 2013 Major Professor: Luke. J. Harmon, Ph.D. ii AUTHORIZATION TO SUBMIT DISSERTATION This dissertation of Travis J. Hagey, submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy with a major in Biology and titled “Mechanics, Diversity, and Ecology of Gecko Adhesion,” has been reviewed in final form. Permission, as indicated by the signatures and dates given below, is now granted to submit final copies to the College of Graduate Studies for approval. Major Professor ______________________________ Date _______________ Luke J. Harmon Committee ______________________________ Date _______________ Members Craig P. McGowan ______________________________ Date _______________ Jack M. Sullivan ______________________________ Date _______________ Kellar Autumn Department ______________________________ Date _______________ Administrator James J. Nagler College of Science ______________________________ Date _______________ Dean Paul Joyce Final Approval and Acceptance by the College of Graduate Studies ______________________________ Date _______________ Jie Chen iii Abstract The question of why animals are shaped the way they are has intrigued scientists for hundreds of years. Studies of ecological morphology (the relationship between an organism’s form, function, and environment) often bridge multiple disciplines including biomechanics, ecology, phylogenetics, and comparative methods. In this dissertation, I gathered data and tested hypotheses that considered the link between morphology and performance and the relationship between performance and ecology. I focused my research on the adhesive abilities of geckos. Geckos are an understudied, diverse group of lizards, well known for their adhesive toe pads.
    [Show full text]