Appendix BB Significant Species Management Plan

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Appendix BB Significant Species Management Plan Appendix BB Significant Species Management Plan Significant Species Management Plan Rev 1 September 2011 Significant Species Management Plans QCLNG Gas Field Rev 1 September 2011 Prepared by Unidel QCLNG-BX00-ENV-PLN-000025 Uncontrolled when printed 1 of 312 Significant Species Management Plan Rev 1 September 2011 Table of Contents DEFINITIONS 6 Acronyms and Abbreviations 10 Referenced / Associated Documents 10 1. INTRODUCTION 12 1.1 Purpose of the SSMP 13 1.2 Scope of SSMP 13 1.3 Legislative Requirements 16 1.3.1 Commonwealth ................................................................................................................................. 16 1.3.2 State .................................................................................................................................................. 16 1.4 SSMP Authors 16 1.5 Review of SSMP 16 1.6 Roles and Responsibilities 17 1.7 Reporting 17 1.8 Distribution and Intended Audience 18 2. BACKGROUND 18 3. SSMP FRAMEWORK 19 3.1 Structure of SSMP 19 3.1.1 Identification of TECs and Species ................................................................................................... 19 3.1.2 Standard Management Procedures .................................................................................................. 19 3.1.3 Individual Significant Species Management Plans ........................................................................... 19 3.2 Gas Field Project Staging 20 3.2.1 Development ..................................................................................................................................... 20 3.2.2 Operation .......................................................................................................................................... 21 3.2.3 Decommissioning .............................................................................................................................. 21 3.3 Associated Management Plans and Linkages to the SSMP 21 3.3.1 Constraint Planning and Field Development Protocol ...................................................................... 22 3.3.2 Environmental Authorities ................................................................................................................. 22 3.3.3 Remediation, Rehabilitation, Recovery and Monitoring Plan ........................................................... 23 3.3.4 Offset Plan ........................................................................................................................................ 24 3.3.5 CSG Water Management and Monitoring Plan ................................................................................ 25 4. METHODOLOGY 28 4.1 Rationale for Inclusion of TECs and Species 28 4.1.1 TECs ................................................................................................................................................. 28 4.1.2 Species ............................................................................................................................................. 28 4.2 SMPs 29 5. SIGNIFICANT SPECIES MANAGEMENT PLANS 42 5.1 Standard Management Procedures 45 5.1.1 Implement the Constraints Protocol (Protocol) ................................................................................. 45 5.1.2 Pre-Clearance Surveys ..................................................................................................................... 45 5.1.3 Confirmed Impacts to TECs and EVNT Flora ................................................................................... 47 5.1.4 Recording Impacts ............................................................................................................................ 49 3 of 312 Significant Species Management Plan Rev 1 September 2011 5.2 Water Management Procedures 50 5.2.1 Surface Water ................................................................................................................................... 50 5.2.2 Groundwater ..................................................................................................................................... 50 5.3 Project Rehabilitation 51 5.3.1 Site Specific Rehabilitation Plans ..................................................................................................... 51 5.3.2 Rehabilitation Monitoring and Performance Indicators ..................................................................... 52 5.4 Threatened Ecological Communities 53 5.4.1 Identification of TECs ........................................................................................................................ 53 5.4.2 TEC Project Specific Threats ............................................................................................................ 54 5.4.3 TEC Standard Mitigation Measures .................................................................................................. 54 5.4.4 TEC Rehabilitation and Recovery ..................................................................................................... 55 5.4.5 TEC Performance Measures ............................................................................................................ 55 5.4.6 TEC Monitoring ................................................................................................................................. 56 5.5 TEC Management Plans 57 5.5.1 Acacia harpophylla dominant and co-dominant (Brigalow) .............................................................. 57 5.5.2 Weeping Myall Woodlands ............................................................................................................... 61 5.5.3 Semi-evergreen vine thickets of the Brigalow Belt and Nandewar Bioregions ................................. 65 5.5.4 The community of native species dependent on natural discharge of groundwater from the Great Artesian Basin ....................................................................................................................... 69 5.5.5 Natural Grasslands of the Queensland Central Highlands and the northern Fitzroy Basin ............. 75 5.5.6 Coolibah-Black Box Woodlands of the Darling Riverine Plains and the Brigalow Belt South bioregions ecological community..................................................................................................... 79 5.6 Threatened Flora Species 82 5.6.1 Identification of Threatened Flora Species ....................................................................................... 82 5.6.2 Threatened Flora Standared Mitigation Measures ........................................................................... 82 5.6.3 Threatened Flora Rehabilitation and Recovery ................................................................................ 83 5.6.4 Threatened Flora Performance Measures ........................................................................................ 83 5.6.5 Threatened Flora Monitoring ............................................................................................................ 84 5.6.6 Acacia barakulensis .......................................................................................................................... 85 5.6.7 Acacia curranii .................................................................................................................................. 88 5.6.8 Acacia lauta ...................................................................................................................................... 92 5.6.9 Acacia tenuinervis ............................................................................................................................. 96 5.6.10 Acacia wardellii ................................................................................................................................. 99 5.6.11 Callitris baileyi ................................................................................................................................. 102 5.6.12 Cadellia pentastylis ......................................................................................................................... 105 5.6.13 Calytrix gurulmundensis .................................................................................................................. 109 5.6.14 Commersonia argentea .................................................................................................................. 112 5.6.15 Cryptandra ciliata ............................................................................................................................ 115 5.6.16 Cupaniopsis shirleyana ................................................................................................................... 118 5.6.17 Denhamia parvifolia ........................................................................................................................ 121 5.6.18 Eleocharis blakeana ........................................................................................................................ 124 5.6.19 Eriocaulion carsonii ......................................................................................................................... 127 5.6.20 Eucalyptus curtisii ........................................................................................................................... 131 5.6.21 Eucalyptus pachycalyx subsp. waajensis ....................................................................................... 134 5.6.22 Eucalyptus virens ...........................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Amyema Quandang (Lindl.) Tiegh
    Australian Tropical Rainforest Plants - Online edition Amyema quandang (Lindl.) Tiegh. Family: Loranthaceae Tieghem, P.E.L. van (1894), Bulletin de la Societe Botanique de France 41: 507. Common name: Grey Mistletoe Stem Mistletoe, pendulous. Attached to branch by haustoria, epicortical runners (runners spreading across host bark) absent. Stems very finely white tomentose or scurfy with indumentum of very small,obscure, more or less stellate scales or hairs. Leaves Flowers. CC-BY: APII, ANBG. Leaves simple, opposite, sub-opposite or occasionally alternate. Stipules absent. Petiole 4-12 mm long. Leaf blade lanceolate to ovate, elliptic, sometimes falcate, 3-13 cm long, 0.8-4.5 cm wide, base ± cuneate or obtuse, margins entire, apex obtuse to acute. Longitudinally veined with 3 or 5 veins, obscure on both surfaces. White tomentose or scurfy on leaf surfaces with an indumentum of very small, obscure, more or less stellate scales/hairs, becoming sparse with age. Flowers Inflorescences axillary, flowers in umbel-like triads (groups of 3). Central flower sessile and lateral flowers stalked; pedicels 1-3 mm long. Flowers bisexual, actinomorphic, 5-merous. Calyx cupular about 1 mm long, entire without any lobing. Petals 5, free or shortly fused at base, becoming recurved at anthesis, 1.5-3 cm long, green, maroon to red tinged, with a short whit tomentum. Flowers in triads. CC-BY: APII, Stamens 5, epipetalous (attached to petals), red, anthers 2-4 mm long. Ovary inferior. ANBG. Fruit Fruit fleshy, a berry, ovoid, pear-shaped to globose, 6-10 mm long, greyish tomentose. Calyx remnants persistent at the apex forming an apical tube.
    [Show full text]
  • Brachychiton Rupestris (T.Mitch
    Brachychiton rupestris (T.Mitch. ex Lindl.) K.Schum. Familia: Sterculiaceae (Esterculiáceas), aunque actualmente está incluido en Malvaceae. Sinónimos: Delabechea rupestris T.Mitch. ex Lindl., Sterculia rupestris (T.Mitch. ex Lindl.) Benth. Nombre común: árbol botella. Aspecto general y detalle de las flores en Junio y detalle de los frutos en Agosto Etimología: Brachychiton deriva del griego brachys = corto y chiton = túnica o cubierta, probablemente en alusión a la cubierta externa persistente de las semillas. El epíteto específico rupestris procede del latín rupes,-is = roca, peñasco, seguido del sufijo –estris,-e, que indica lugar de crecimiento, que crece entre rocas, ambiente en el que crece en su lugar de origen. El nombre popular de “árbol bote- lla”, también aplicado a otros árboles, alude a la forma de engrosar el tronco. Procedencia: Este de Australia, en Queensland. Descripción: Árbol caducifolio o semicaducifolio, de 8-10 m de altura en cultivo, con las ramillas glabras y glaucas, la copa densa y globosa y el tronco engrosado en la base, liso, verdoso y teselado de joven, tornándose grisáceo y muy fisurado longitudinalmente con el paso de los años. Hojas juveniles palmati-digitadas o fuertemente lobuladas, con 3-9 folíolos o lóbulos, sésiles, de lineares a linear- lanceolados, de 6-14 x 0,3-1 cm. Pecíolo de 5-15 cm de largo; hojas adultas enteras, oblongo-lineares o lanceoladas, de 5-12 x 0,8-2 cm, con la base truncada, redondeada o cuneada, el margen ligeramen- te crenulado y el ápice acuminado, a veces apiculado; son glabras, de color verde brillante por el haz y más pálidas o glaucas por el envés, con el nervio central marcado en el haz y en el envés.
    [Show full text]
  • Identifying Climate Refugia for Key Species in New South Wales - Final Report from the Bionode of the NSW Adaptation Hub
    Identifying Climate Refugia for Key Species in New South Wales - Final Report from the BioNode of the NSW Adaptation Hub Linda J. Beaumont, John B. Baumgartner, Manuel Esperón-Rodríguez, David Nipperess 1 | P a g e Report prepared for the NSW Office of Environment and Heritage as part of a project funded by the NSW Adaptation Research Hub–Biodiversity Node. While every effort has been made to ensure all information within this document has been developed using rigorous scientific practice, readers should obtain independent advice before making any decision based on this information. Cite this publication as: Beaumont, L. J., Baumgartner, J. B., Esperón-Rodríguez, M, & Nipperess, D. (2019). Identifying climate refugia for key species in New South Wales - Final report from the BioNode of the NSW Adaptation Hub, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia. For further correspondence contact: [email protected] 2 | P a g e Contents Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................................. 5 Abbreviations .......................................................................................................................................... 6 Glossary ................................................................................................................................................... 7 Executive summary ................................................................................................................................. 8 Highlights
    [Show full text]
  • Threatened Wildlife Photographic Competition
    THREATENED WILDLIFE PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPETITION Winners Announced The Australian Wildlife Society Threatened Wildlife Photographic Competition is a national competition that awards and promotes endangered Australian wildlife through the medium of photography. The Australian Wildlife Society invited photographers to raise the plight of endangered wildlife in Australia. Our Society aims to encourage the production of photographs taken in Australia, by Australians, which reflects the diversity and uniqueness of endangered Australian wildlife. The annual judge’s prize of $1,000 was won by Native Animal Rescue of Western Australia (Mike Jones, Black Cockatoo Coordinator). The winning entry was a photo of a forest red-tailed black cockatoo named Makuru. The forest red-tailed black cockatoo (Calyptorhynchus banksia naso) is listed as Vulnerable; only two of the five subspecies of black cockatoo are listed as Threatened on account of habitat destruction and competition for nesting hollows. The photograph was taken in Native Animal Rescue’s Black Cockatoo Facility (opened 2011 thanks to a generous grant from Lotterywest), which allows them to receive and care for injured or ill black cockatoos. Makuru (a Nyungar word meaning The First Rains or Fertility Season) was the first captive-born black cockatoo at the facility in July 2016. The photo depicts the young cockatoo emerging from its breeding hollow at two months and 15 days. Thank you to all the contributors to the Society’s inaugural Threatened Wildlife Photographic Competition – please enter again next year. Australian Wildlife Vol 4 - Spring 2017 7 The annual people’s choice prize of $500 was won by Matt White Matt’s entry was a photo of a greater glider (Petauroides volans).
    [Show full text]
  • Plant Life of Western Australia
    INTRODUCTION The characteristic features of the vegetation of Australia I. General Physiography At present the animals and plants of Australia are isolated from the rest of the world, except by way of the Torres Straits to New Guinea and southeast Asia. Even here adverse climatic conditions restrict or make it impossible for migration. Over a long period this isolation has meant that even what was common to the floras of the southern Asiatic Archipelago and Australia has become restricted to small areas. This resulted in an ever increasing divergence. As a consequence, Australia is a true island continent, with its own peculiar flora and fauna. As in southern Africa, Australia is largely an extensive plateau, although at a lower elevation. As in Africa too, the plateau increases gradually in height towards the east, culminating in a high ridge from which the land then drops steeply to a narrow coastal plain crossed by short rivers. On the west coast the plateau is only 00-00 m in height but there is usually an abrupt descent to the narrow coastal region. The plateau drops towards the center, and the major rivers flow into this depression. Fed from the high eastern margin of the plateau, these rivers run through low rainfall areas to the sea. While the tropical northern region is characterized by a wet summer and dry win- ter, the actual amount of rain is determined by additional factors. On the mountainous east coast the rainfall is high, while it diminishes with surprising rapidity towards the interior. Thus in New South Wales, the yearly rainfall at the edge of the plateau and the adjacent coast often reaches over 100 cm.
    [Show full text]
  • Detailed Ecological Assessment
    Detailed Ecological Assessment St Aidan’s Anglican Girls School Ambiwerra Sports Complex MID 30 Thalia Court, Corinda Client St Aidan’s Anglican Girls School File Ref S520038ER001_v1.5 Date 8 March 2021 ii Quality Control St Aidan’s Anglican Girl’s School Prepared for C/- John Gaskell Planning Consultants S5 Consulting Pty Ltd (ACN 600 187 844) 22 Wolverhampton Street Prepared by Stafford, QLD, 4053 T 3356 0550 www.s5consulting.com.au Date 8 March 2021 Version Control Version Description Date Author Reviewer Approver 1.0 FINAL August 2020 KR (Ecologist) LH (Senior Ecologist) RS (Director) 1.2 FINAL September 2020 KR (Ecologist) LH (Senior Ecologist) RS (Director) 1.3 FINAL November 2020 KR (Ecologist) LH (Senior Ecologist) RS (Director) 1.4 FINAL 17 November 2020 KR (Ecologist) LH (Senior Ecologist) RS (Director) 1.5 FINAL 8 March 2021 RG (Ecologist) LH (Senior Ecologist) RS (Director) S5 Consulting Pty Ltd has prepared this document for the sole use of the Client and for a specific purpose, each as expressly stated in the document. No other party should rely on this document without the prior written consent of S5 Consulting Pty Ltd. These materials or parts of them may not be reproduced in any form, by any method, for any purpose except with written permission from S5 Consulting Pty Ltd. Subject to these conditions, this document may be transmitted, reproduced or disseminated only in its entirety. S520038ER001_v1.5 Ambiwerra Sports Precinct Detailed Ecological Assessment iii Table of Contents ABBREVIATIONS ......................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Survey Guidelines for Australia's Threatened Fish
    Survey guidelines for Australia’s threatened fish Guidelines for detecting fish listed as threatened under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 Authorship and acknowledgments This report updates and expands on a report prepared in May 2004 by Australian Museum ichthyologist John Pogonoski and approved by AMBS Senior Project Manager Jayne Tipping. The current (2011) report includes updates to the 2004 report and additional information regarding recently listed species, current knowledge of all the listed species and current survey techniques. This additional information was prepared by Australian Museum ichthyologists Dr Doug Hoese and Sally Reader. Technical assistance was provided by AMBS ecologists Mark Semeniuk and Lisa McCaffrey. AMBS Senior Project Manager Glenn Muir co- ordinated the project team and reviewed the final report. These guidelines could not have been produced without the assistance of a number of experts. Individuals who have shared their knowledge and experience for the purpose of preparing this report are indicated in Appendix A. Disclaimer The views and opinions contained in this document are not necessarily those of the Australian Government. The contents of this document have been compiled using a range of source materials and while reasonable care has been taken in its compilation, the Australian Government does not accept responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of the contents of this document and shall not be liable for any loss or damage that may be occasioned directly or indirectly through the use of or reliance on the contents of the document. © Commonwealth of Australia 2011 This work is copyright. You may download, display, print and reproduce this material in unaltered form only (retaining this notice) for your personal, non-commercial use or use within your organisation.
    [Show full text]
  • Approved Conservation Advice for Acacia Curranii (Curly-Bark Wattle)
    This Conservation Advice was approved by the Minister / Delegate of the Minister on: 1/10/2008 Approved Conservation Advice (s266B of the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999) Approved Conservation Advice for Acacia curranii (Curly-bark Wattle) This Conservation Advice has been developed based on the best available information at the time this Conservation Advice was approved; this includes existing plans, records or management prescriptions for this species. Description Acacia curranii, Family Mimosaceae, also known as Curly-bark Wattle, is an erect or spreading multi-stemmed shrub growing to 4 m tall, with distinctive red curling (minniritchi) bark. Branches are angular, maroon-grey with silky, downy hairs. The leaf-like phyllodes are erect, linear, depressed along the midrib, 13–18 cm long, 1–1.5 mm wide and covered by silky silver hairs. Flowers are golden yellow in colour and arranged in spikes 5–7 mm long on a stalk 1.5 mm long. Pods are flat, up to 6 cm long by 3 mm wide and with coarse long hairs. Seeds are oblong, about 3 mm long, greyish-brown with a pale area and a basal seed stalk (aril). Flowering time is August and September (Pedley, 1978; Tindale & Kodela, 2001; DECC, 2005a). Conservation Status Acacia curranii is listed as vulnerable. This species is eligible for listing as vulnerable under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (Cwlth) (EPBC Act) as, prior to the commencement of the EPBC Act, it was listed as vulnerable under Schedule 1 of the Endangered Species Protection Act 1992 (Cwlth). Acacia curranii is also listed as vulnerable under the Threatened Species Conservation Act 1995 (NSW) and vulnerable under the Nature Conservation (Wildlife) Regulation 2006 (Queensland).
    [Show full text]
  • Inquiry Into Ecosystem Decline in Victoria
    LC EPC Inquiry into Ecosystem Decline in Victoria Submission 100 Inquiry into Ecosystem Decline in riverside woodland each spring, to follow up the major project, and that is very impressive. Victoria Pre-Europeans, there was a significant population of The extent of the decline of Victoria’s biodiversity Manna Gum in the area, but the last big old tree died Vegetation: trees and collapsed five years ago, so my group has planted about 10 as the start of an effort to reintroduce this In 1993 Randall Robinson was employed by Heidel- species. berg Council to develop a flora species list for Wilson Reserve, Ivanhoe East. He identified 172 species, of Shrubs which 101 were weeds, some of them very minor but The pre-European landscape in Ivanhoe included many of them very serious threats to the riverside about 10 shrub species (up to 10 m tall), but after habitats. In the 27 years since then, especially since many decades of the Yarra’s north bank being the council amalgamations in 1996, Banyule Council devoted to dairy farming, to the 1930s, only two have has somewhat increased its commitment to habitat survived: Tree Violet and Prickly Currant Bush, both management and restoration. But very large parts of of which are super-abundant, far more than would be the Yarra riverside environment within Banyule are the case in a healthy mixed-species ecosystem. So my not managed at all and Banyule has made it clear it Friends group has, among other things, planted has no intention of managing it. hundreds of shrub seedlings of the species that went The unmanaged sections are as a result overwhelmed missing: Blackwood wattle, Prickly Moses wattle, by a variety of weed species: trees, shrubs, ground- Hazel pomaderris, Victorian Christmas Bush, Hop covers, grasses, climbing creepers.
    [Show full text]
  • Patterns of Evolution in Gobies (Teleostei: Gobiidae): a Multi-Scale Phylogenetic Investigation
    PATTERNS OF EVOLUTION IN GOBIES (TELEOSTEI: GOBIIDAE): A MULTI-SCALE PHYLOGENETIC INVESTIGATION A Dissertation by LUKE MICHAEL TORNABENE BS, Hofstra University, 2007 MS, Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi, 2010 Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in MARINE BIOLOGY Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi Corpus Christi, Texas December 2014 © Luke Michael Tornabene All Rights Reserved December 2014 PATTERNS OF EVOLUTION IN GOBIES (TELEOSTEI: GOBIIDAE): A MULTI-SCALE PHYLOGENETIC INVESTIGATION A Dissertation by LUKE MICHAEL TORNABENE This dissertation meets the standards for scope and quality of Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi and is hereby approved. Frank L. Pezold, PhD Chris Bird, PhD Chair Committee Member Kevin W. Conway, PhD James D. Hogan, PhD Committee Member Committee Member Lea-Der Chen, PhD Graduate Faculty Representative December 2014 ABSTRACT The family of fishes commonly known as gobies (Teleostei: Gobiidae) is one of the most diverse lineages of vertebrates in the world. With more than 1700 species of gobies spread among more than 200 genera, gobies are the most species-rich family of marine fishes. Gobies can be found in nearly every aquatic habitat on earth, and are often the most diverse and numerically abundant fishes in tropical and subtropical habitats, especially coral reefs. Their remarkable taxonomic, morphological and ecological diversity make them an ideal model group for studying the processes driving taxonomic and phenotypic diversification in aquatic vertebrates. Unfortunately the phylogenetic relationships of many groups of gobies are poorly resolved, obscuring our understanding of the evolution of their ecological diversity. This dissertation is a multi-scale phylogenetic study that aims to clarify phylogenetic relationships across the Gobiidae and demonstrate the utility of this family for studies of macroevolution and speciation at multiple evolutionary timescales.
    [Show full text]
  • Impacts of Land Clearing
    Impacts of Land Clearing on Australian Wildlife in Queensland January 2003 WWF Australia Report Authors: Dr Hal Cogger, Professor Hugh Ford, Dr Christopher Johnson, James Holman & Don Butler. Impacts of Land Clearing on Australian Wildlife in Queensland ABOUT THE AUTHORS Dr Hal Cogger Australasian region” by the Royal Australasian Ornithologists Union. He is a WWF Australia Trustee Dr Hal Cogger is a leading Australian herpetologist and former member of WWF’s Scientific Advisory and author of the definitive Reptiles and Amphibians Panel. of Australia. He is a former Deputy Director of the Australian Museum. He has participated on a range of policy and scientific committees, including the Dr Christopher Johnson Commonwealth Biological Diversity Advisory Committee, Chair of the Australian Biological Dr Chris Johnson is an authority on the ecology and Resources Study, and Chair of the Australasian conservation of Australian marsupials. He has done Reptile & Amphibian Specialist Group (IUCN’s extensive research on herbivorous marsupials of Species Survival Commission). He also held a forests and woodlands, including landmark studies of Conjoint Professorship in the Faculty of Science & the behavioural ecology of kangaroos and wombats, Mathematics at the University of Newcastle (1997- the ecology of rat-kangaroos, and the sociobiology of 2001). He is a member of the International possums. He has also worked on large-scale patterns Commission on Zoological Nomenclature and is a in the distribution and abundance of marsupial past Secretary of the Division of Zoology of the species and the biology of extinction. He is a member International Union of Biological Sciences. He is of the Marsupial and Monotreme Specialist Group of currently the John Evans Memorial Fellow at the the IUCN Species Survival Commission, and has Australian Museum.
    [Show full text]
  • Resistance and Resilience of Murray-Darling Basin Fishes to Drought Disturbance
    Resistance and Resilience of Murray- Darling Basin Fishes to Drought Disturbance Dale McNeil1, Susan Gehrig1 and Clayton Sharpe2 SARDI Publication No. F2009/000406-1 SARDI Research Report Series No. 602 SARDI Aquatic Sciences PO Box 120 Henley Beach SA 5022 April 2013 Final Report to the Murray-Darling Basin Authority - Native Fish Strategy Project MD/1086 “Ecosystem Resilience and the Role of Refugia for Native Fish Communities & Populations” McNeil et. al. 2013 Drought and Native Fish Resilience Resistance and Resilience of Murray- Darling Basin Fishes to Drought Disturbance Final Report to the Murray-Darling Basin Authority - Native Fish Strategy Project MD/1086 “Ecosystem Resilience and the Role of Refugia for Native Fish Communities & Populations” Dale McNeil1, Susan Gehrig1 and Clayton Sharpe2 SARDI Publication No. F2009/000406-1 SARDI Research Report Series No. 602 April 2013 Page | ii McNeil et. al. 2013 Drought and Native Fish Resilience This Publication may be cited as: McNeil, D. G., Gehrig, S. L. and Sharpe, C. P. (2013). Resistance and Resilience of Murray-Darling Basin Fishes to Drought Disturbance. Final Report to the Murray-Darling Basin Authority - Native Fish Strategy Project MD/1086 ―Ecosystem Resilience and the Role of Refugia for Native Fish Communities & Populations‖. South Australian Research and Development Institute (Aquatic Sciences), Adelaide. SARDI Publication No. F2009/000406-1. SARDI Research Report Series No. 602. 143pp. Front Cover Images – Lake Brewster in the Lower Lachlan River catchment, Murray-Darling Basin during extended period of zero inflows, 2007. Murray cod (Maccullochella peelii peelii), olive perchlet (Ambassis agassizii) and golden perch (Macquaria ambigua) from the, lower Lachlan River near Lake Brewster, 2007 (all images - Dale McNeil).
    [Show full text]