DOCSLIB.ORG

Established Native Perennial Grasses Out-Compete an Invasive Annual Grass Regardless of Soil Water and Nutrient Availability

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Established Native Perennial Grasses Out-Compete an Invasive Annual Grass Regardless of Soil Water and Nutrient Availability Plant Ecol DOI 10.1007/s11258-011-9992-1 Established native perennial grasses out-compete an invasive annual grass regardless of soil water and nutrient availability Christopher M. McGlone • Carolyn Hull Sieg • Thomas E. Kolb • Ty Nietupsky Received: 21 December 2010 / Accepted: 6 October 2011 Ó Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011 Abstract Competition and resource availability influ- grasses were highly competitive against B. tectorum, ence invasions into native perennial grasslands by non- regardless of water, N, or P availability. Bromus native annual grasses such as Bromus tectorum.Intwo tectorum reproductive potential (viable seed produc- greenhouse experiments we examined the influence of tion) was not significantly influenced by any experi- competition, water availability, and elevated nitrogen mental manipulation, except for competition with P. (N) and phosphorus (P) availability on growth and smithii. In all cases, B. tectorum per-plant production of reproduction of the invasive annual grass B. tectorum viable seeds exceeded parental replacement. Our results and two native perennial grasses (Elymus elymoides, show that established plants of Elymus elymoides Pascopyrum smithii). Bromus tectorum aboveground and Pascopyrum smithii compete successfully against biomass and seed production were significantly reduced B. tectorum over a wide range of soil resource when grown with one or more established native availability. perennial grasses. Conversely, average seed weight and germination were significantly lower in the B. Keywords Bromus tectorum Á Competition Á tectorum monoculture than in competition native Greenhouse Á Nitrogen Á Phosphorus Á perennial grasses. Intraspecific competition reduced Water availability per-plant production of both established native grasses, whereas interspecific competition from B. tectorum increased production. Established native perennial Introduction Resource competition is an important driver of non- C. M. McGlone (&) Á T. Nietupsky native plant invasions. Establishment and spread of non- Ecological Restoration Institute, Northern Arizona native plants in new areas often depends on acquiring University, P.O. Box 15017, Flagstaff, AZ 86011, USA resources faster than, and often at the expense of, native e-mail: [email protected] plants (Rees et al. 2001;Levineetal.2003). Competitive C. M. McGlone Á T. E. Kolb Á T. Nietupsky differences between native and non-native species School of Forestry, Northern Arizona University, depend on the taxa involved and the environmental P.O. Box 15018, Flagstaff, AZ 86011, USA context because of differences in species’ growth and reproductive responses to resource availability (Rees C. H. Sieg USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, et al. 2001). Understanding competitive interactions at 2500 S Pine Knoll Dr, Flagstaff, AZ 86001, USA the time of invasion can help guide prevention and 123 Plant Ecol post-invasion restoration efforts (Davis et al. 2000; availability, and N and P availability on B. tectorum D’Antonio and Meyerson 2002). and native perennial grass productivity and B. tecto- Bromus tectorum L. (cheatgrass) is a highly inva- rum reproductive potential, we conducted a replace- sive non-native species (Knapp 1996). This Eurasian ment series greenhouse experiment with B. tectorum annual grass is the dominant species on *20 million seedlings and established plants of two perennial grass hectares in the western U.S. (Bradley and Mustard species native to Arizona ponderosa pine forests: 2005). Areas where B. tectorum dominates often have Elymus elymoides (Raf.) Swezey (bottlebrush squir- more frequent fire (Brooks et al. 2004) and altered reltail) and Pascopyrum smithii (Rydb.) A. Lo¨ve biodiversity (Bolton et al. 1993; Brandt and Rickard (western wheatgrass). The plants were grown at both 1994; Belnap and Phillips 2001). Bromus tectorum high and low water availability and with and without N invasions are often driven by disturbance (Bradford and P amendments. To allow for continuity with and Lauenroth 2006), but undisturbed communities previous greenhouse research on B. tectorum—native can also be invaded (Belnap and Phillips 2001). After perennial grass competition, we have elected to use a invasion, B. tectorum can dominate an ecosystem for similar replacement series design to Lowe et al. (2003) decades (Brandt and Rickard 1994). allowing us to determine the relative strength of inter- Competition with perennial grasses can restrict the and intraspecific competition (Jolliffe 2000). We spread of B. tectorum (Yoder and Caldwell 2002; Booth hypothesized that: (1) B. tectorum and native perennial et al. 2003; Chambers et al. 2007). The competitiveness grass growth would be negatively affected by inter- of perennial grasses against B. tectorum is dependent on specific competition, as would B. tectorum reproduc- the life stage of the perennial grasses. Greenhouse and tive potential; (2) competitive relationships between field experiments indicate B. tectorum will generally B. tectorum and native perennial grasses would be out-compete perennial grass seedlings (Lowe et al. altered by increased water availability favoring 2003; Humphrey and Schupp 2004). Yet, field studies B. tectorum; and (3) competitive relationships between suggest that established perennial grasses, particularly B. tectorum and native perennial grasses would be Elymus L. spp. (squirreltail) and Agropyron Gaertn. altered by nutrient amendments favoring B. tectorum. spp. (wheatgrass), can inhibit B. tectorum establish- ment and growth (Yoder and Caldwell 2002; Booth et al. 2003; Chambers et al. 2007). Materials and methods As an annual, B. tectorum is more dependent on the immediate availability of resources than perennial Experimental design grasses (Marschner 1995). Arid and semi-arid regions where B. tectorum has successfully invaded are limited We conducted this study at the Rocky Mountain by water availability. Furthermore, nitrogen (N) avail- Research Station (RMRS) Greenhouse in Flagstaff, ability can alter B. tectorum germination, growth, and AZ (35.1°N 111.69°W). We established two replace- competitive ability (Blank et al. 1994; Lowe et al. ment series experiments (deWit 1960), each contain- 2003; Beckstead and Augspurger 2004). Availability ing a native perennial grass in competition with of phosphorus (P) has also been positively related to B. tectorum in a 6 9 3 9 2 factorial randomized B. tectorum performance (Miller et al. 2006). complete block design with 10 blocks. The first Past research has shown that B. tectorum has poor experiment tested competition between B. tectorum survivorship in Pinus ponderosa C. Lawson (ponder- and E. elymoides. The second experiment tested osa pine) forests in the northwestern United competition between B. tectorum and P. smithii. Both States (Pierson and Mack 1990). Recently, however, experiments tested effects on plant production of six B. tectorum has established persistent populations in levels of interspecific competition, three levels of montane P. ponderosa forests of northern Arizona nutrient availability, and two levels of water avail- (Laughlin and Fule´ 2008; McGlone et al. 2009). Field ability. All plants were grown in 3 l, (16 cm-diameter, research suggests that established perennial grasses and 18.5 cm-tall) plastic pots in a medium of 75% soil and plant-available N and P may influence B. tectorum and 25% perlite. We collected soil 10 km south of invasion in Arizona forests (McGlone et al. 2011). Flagstaff in a P. ponderosa forest with basalt-derived To evaluate the influence of competition, water Typic Argiustolls. All species used in the greenhouse 123 Plant Ecol experiment grow near the soil collection area. We fertilization. Phosphorus was applied at a rate of mixed the soil, collected three samples and measured 5gPm-2 year-1 in a single dry application on April total N, total P, and PO4 at the RMRS Laboratory in 1, 2008. This level significantly increased above- Flagstaff, AZ. Each block contained one replicate of ground growth of native perennial grasses in field each treatment combination for a total of 360 pots per studies in northern Arizona (G. Newman, School of experiment. Each treatment replicate was assigned a Forestry, Northern Arizona University, unpublished random location within each block. The blocks were data). established along a moisture and temperature gradient To test the competitive relationships between based on proximity to the cooling fan at one end of the established native perennials and B. tectorum seed- greenhouse. lings, we planted the native perennial grass seeds Species competitive ability (competition) was esti- several months before planting B. tectorum seeds. In mated by comparing plant growth in species mixtures May 2007, we planted E. elymoides and P. smithii to growth in monocultures. The mixtures were: seeds at three times the desired density. After germi- 5/0, 4/1, 3/2, 2/3, 1/4, 0/5 native/B. tectorum plants. nation the seedlings were thinned to the target density. Elymus elymoides (Sand Hollow cultivar) and In August 2007, commensurate with the timing of field P. smithii (Arriba cultivar) seeds were purchased from germination of B. tectorum, we planted B. tectorum Granite Seed Company in Lehi, Utah. Bromus tecto- seeds at three times the target density and then thinned rum seed was collected in 2007 from P. ponderosa after germination. Locations of B. tectorum and native forests at Flagstaff and Mt. Trumbull, Arizona. Mean seeds within each pot were randomly assigned at annual
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Comparison of Cumulative-Germination Response of Cheatgrass (Bromus Tectorum L.) and Five Perennial Bunchgrass Species to Simulated Field-Temperature Regimes
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln U.S. Department of Agriculture: Agricultural Publications from USDA-ARS / UNL Faculty Research Service, Lincoln, Nebraska 2010 A comparison of cumulative-germination response of cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum L.) and five perennial bunchgrass species to simulated field-temperature regimes Stuart P. Hardegree USDA-Agricultural Research Service, [email protected] Corey A. Moffet USDA-Agricultural Research Service Bruce A. Roundy Brigham Young University Thomas A. Jones USDA-Agricultural Research Service Stephen J. Novak Boise State University See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usdaarsfacpub Part of the Agricultural Science Commons Hardegree, Stuart P.; Moffet, Corey A.; Roundy, Bruce A.; Jones, Thomas A.; Novak, Stephen J.; Clark, Patrick E.; Pierson, Frederick B.; and Flerchinger, Gerald N., "A comparison of cumulative-germination response of cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum L.) and five perennial bunchgrass species to simulated field- temperature regimes" (2010). Publications from USDA-ARS / UNL Faculty. 855. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usdaarsfacpub/855 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the U.S. Department of Agriculture: Agricultural Research Service, Lincoln, Nebraska at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Publications from USDA-ARS / UNL Faculty by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Plant Propagation Protocol
    Plant Propagation Protocol for Elymus elymoides ESRM 412 – Native Plant Production http://courses.washington.edu/esrm412/protocols/ELEL5.pdf TAXONOMY Family Names Family Scientific Poaceae Name: Family Common True grasses Name: Scientific Names Genus: Elymus Species: Elymoides Species Authority: Swezey Variety: Sub-species: Cultivar: Authority for Variety/Sub- species: Common Sitanion hystrix (Nutt.) J.G. Smith Synonym(s) Elymus hystrix L. var. bigeloviana (Fern.) Bowden (include full Elymus hystrix L. var. histrix scientific names Elymus elymoides (Raf.) Swezey var. brevifolius (J.G. Sm.) Barkworth (e.g., Elymus Elymus elymoides (Raf.) Swezey var. californicus (J.G. Sm.) Barkworth glaucus Buckley), Elymus elymoides (Raf.) Swezey spp. elymoides including variety Elymus elymoides (Raf.) Swezey var. brevifolius (J.G. Sm.) Barkworth or subspecies Elymus elymoides (Raf.) Swezey spp. hordeoides (Suksdorf) Barkworth information) Elymus elymoides (Raf.) Swezey var. brevifolius (J.G. Sm.) Barkworth (7) Common Name(s): Bottlebrush squirreltail; Squirreltail bottlebrush; Squirreltail; Squirrel tail (1) (2) (7) Species Code (as ELEL5 per USDA Plants database): GENERAL INFORMATION Geographical range Ecological Found throughout western North America from Canada to Mexico. Grows distribution in a wide range of habitats, from shadescale communities to alpine tundra to low lands of the Great Basin. (7) Climate and Typically found from 600 to 3,500 meters. It has been documented in elevation range California from 100 m to 4,300 m in elevation. Widespread in the interior regions of western North America at mid to high elevation sites that receive 6 to 14 inches mean annual precipitation. (3) (5) (7) Local habitat and A component of many different community types, including short-grass abundance prairies where it may be associated with Pascopyrum smithii and Aristida purpurea; sagebrush scrub, where it may be associated with Koeleria macrantha; and sagebrush rangelands with Artemisia tridentata.
    [Show full text]
  • Abundances of Coplanted Native Bunchgrasses and Crested Wheatgrass After 13 Years☆,☆☆
    Rangeland Ecology & Management 68 (2015) 211–214 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Rangeland Ecology & Management journal homepage: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/rama Abundances of Coplanted Native Bunchgrasses and Crested Wheatgrass after 13 Years☆,☆☆ Aleta M. Nafus a,⁎, Tony J. Svejcar b,DavidC.Ganskoppc,KirkW.Daviesd a Graduate Student, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97330, USA b Research Leader, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Burns, OR 97720, USA c Emeritus Rangeland Scientist, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Burns, OR 97720, USA d Rangeland Scientist, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Burns, OR 97720, USA article info abstract Keywords: Crested wheatgrass (Agropyron cristatum [L] Gaertm) has been seeded on more than 5 million hectares in Agropyron cristatum western North America because it establishes more readily than native bunchgrasses. Currently, there is restoration substantial interest in reestablishing native species in sagebrush steppe, but efforts to reintroduce native revegetation grasses into crested wheatgrass stands have been largely unsuccessful, and little is known about the sagebrush steppe long-term dynamics of crested wheatgrass/native species mixes. We examined the abundance of crested wheatgrass and seven native sagebrush steppe bunchgrasses planted concurrently at equal low densities in nongrazed and unburned plots. Thirteen years post establishment, crested wheatgrass was the dominant bunchgrass, with a 10-fold increase in density. Idaho fescue (Festuca idahoensis Elmer), Thurber’s needlegrass (Achnatherum thurberianum (Piper) Barkworth), basin wildrye (Leymus cinereus [Scribn. & Merr.] A. Löve), and Sandberg bluegrass (Poa secunda J. Presl) maintained their low planting density, whereas bluebunch wheatgrass (Pseudoroegneria spicata [Pursh] A.
    [Show full text]
  • Reference Plant List
    APPENDIX J NATIVE & INVASIVE PLANT LIST The following tables capture the referenced plants, native and invasive species, found throughout this document. The Wildlife Action Plan Team elected to only use common names for plants to improve the readability, particular for the general reader. However, common names can create confusion for a variety of reasons. Common names can change from region-to-region; one common name can refer to more than one species; and common names have a way of changing over time. For example, there are two widespread species of greasewood in Nevada, and numerous species of sagebrush. In everyday conversation generic common names usually work well. But if you are considering management activities, landscape restoration or the habitat needs of a particular wildlife species, the need to differentiate between plant species and even subspecies suddenly takes on critical importance. This appendix provides the reader with a cross reference between the common plant names used in this document’s text, and the scientific names that link common names to the precise species to which writers referenced. With regards to invasive plants, all species listed under the Nevada Revised Statute 555 (NRS 555) as a “Noxious Weed” will be notated, within the larger table, as such. A noxious weed is a plant that has been designated by the state as a “species of plant which is, or is likely to be, detrimental or destructive and difficult to control or eradicate” (NRS 555.05). To assist the reader, we also included a separate table detailing the noxious weeds, category level (A, B, or C), and the typical habitats that these species invade.
    [Show full text]
  • Crested Wheatgrass (Agropyron Cristatum) Seedings in Western Colorado: What Can We Learn?
    Management of Biological Invasions (2012) Volume 3, Issue 2: 89–96 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3391/mbi.2012.3.2.03 Open Access © 2012 The Author(s). Journal compilation © 2012 REABIC Research Article Crested wheatgrass (Agropyron cristatum) seedings in Western Colorado: What can we learn? M. Nikki Grant-Hoffman*, Amanda Clements, Anna Lincoln and James Dollerschell Colorado National Landscape Conservation System, Bureau of Land Management, Grand Junction Field Office, USA E-mail: [email protected] (MNGH), [email protected] (AC), [email protected] (AL), [email protected] (JD) *Corresponding author Received: 17 September 2012 / Accepted: 10 October 2012 / Published online: 15 December 2012 Handling editor: Elias Dana, University of Almeria, Spain Abstract Non-native species have been widely transported, becoming components of ecosystems worldwide. In some cases this can change the structure and function of an ecosystem. Crested wheatgrass (Agropyron cristatum, Agropyron spp.) was introduced into the Western U.S. in the late 18th and early 19th centuries. Since introduction, it has been planted in western rangelands currently occupying millions of acres. Crested wheatgrass causes significant changes in areas where it dominates the vegetation, and restoring rangelands planted with crested wheatgrass to higher plant diversity and ecosystem function has been met with limited success. Here we revisit historical frequency monitoring data collected in western Colorado on public lands that were planted with crested wheatgrass between 1940 and 1980. We also monitored vegetation before and after mechanical treatment (removal of vegetation with the use of a dixie harrow pulled behind a tractor) and re-seeding of desirable species in three areas dominated by crested wheatgrass.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 6 Biological Report (PDF)
    Biological Constraints Analysis Tahoe Donner 5-Year Trail Implementation Plan Truckee, Nevada County, CA Nevada County File Number ___ Prepared for: Tahoe Donner Association Forrest Huisman, Director of Capital Projects 11509 Northwoods Boulevard Truckee, California 96161 530-587-9487 Prepared by: Micki Kelly Kelly Biological Consulting PO Box 1625 Truckee, CA 96160 530-582-9713 June 2015, Revised December 2015 Biological Constraints Report, Tahoe Donner Trails 5-Year Implementation Plan December 2015 Table of Contents 1.0 INFORMATION SUMMARY ..................................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 PROJECT AND PROPERTY DESCRIPTION ................................................................................................................. 4 2.1 SITE OVERVIEW ............................................................................................................................................................ 4 2.2 REGULATORY FRAMEWORK ............................................................................................................................................. 4 2.2.1 Special-Status Species ...................................................................................................................................... 5 2.2.2 Wetlands and Waters of the U.S. ..................................................................................................................... 6 2.2.3 Waters of the State .........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Resource Selection, and Demographic Rates of Female Greater Sage-Grouse Following Large-Scale Wildfire
    AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF Lee Foster for the degree of Master of Science in Wildlife Science presented on May 31, 2016 Title: Resource Selection and Demographic Rates of Female Greater Sage-Grouse Following Large-Scale Wildfire Abstract Approved: Katie. M. Dugger, Christian A. Hagen Understanding the effects of habitat disturbance on a species’ habitat selection patterns, and demographic rates, is essential to projecting the trajectories of populations affected by disturbance, as well as for determining the appropriate conservation actions needed to maintain those populations. Greater sage-grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus) is a species of conservation concern in western North America. The distribution of the species has been reduced by approximately half since European settlement, with concurrent and continuing population declines across its occupied range. The primary threats to the species are habitat alteration and loss, caused by multiple factors. In the western portion of its distribution, increasing wildfire activity is a primary cause of habitat loss and degradation. Single wildfires in this area may now reach extremely large sizes (>100,000 ha), and wildfires have been linked to local population declines. However, no published studies, to date, have examined the immediate effects of large-scale wildfire on sage-grouse habitat selection and demographic rates, using modern telemetry methods. I studied the habitat selection patterns, nest success, and survival of adult, and yearling female sage-grouse, captured within or near the Holloway fire, using state- of-the-art GPS-PTT telemetry methods. The Holloway fire burned ~187,000 ha of highly productive sage-grouse habitat in August, 2012. My study began during the first spring post-fire (March, 2013), and continued through February, 2015.
    [Show full text]
  • White River National Forest Rare Plant Survey 2006
    White River National Forest Rare Plant Survey 2006 Prepared for White River National Forest By Peggy Lyon, Janis Huggins and Georgia Doyle Colorado Natural Heritage Program 254 General Services Building Colorado State University Fort Collins CO 80523 Acknowledgments This project would not have been possible without the help of many people in the White River National Forest: Kevin Atchley for first requesting this survey and working to get a contract in place; Beth Brenneman and Keith Giezentanner who took over for Kevin when he left the area; Joe Doerr and Philip Nyland, for sharing their experience and caring about the rare plants on the forest. Also, we depend on the support of the staff of CNHP in Fort Collins, especially Dave Anderson, Jill Handwerk, Susan Spackman, and Amy Lavender. Thanks also to Tim Hogan at the CU Herbarium for assisting with identification of problem plants; Dee Malone for her expertise and transportation to Taylor Pass; and John Chapman, FS Volunteer, for his time and transportation to Warren Lakes. Colorado Natural Areas Program, under the energetic direction of Brian Kurzel, and members of the Colorado Native Plant Society assisted with a survey of the Hoosier Ridge State Natural Area. Finally, thanks to our spouses, George and Rick, for putting up with our absences over the summer, and our faithful companions Molly and Misia, who protected us from Ptarmigan and other scary things. 2 Executive Summary The White River National Forest contracted with Colorado State University in 2005 to have the Colorado Natural Heritage Program (CNHP) conduct a survey of sensitive plants on the forest.
    [Show full text]
  • New Generic Concepts in the Triticeae of the Intermountain Region: Key and Comments
    Great Basin Naturalist Volume 43 Number 4 Article 5 10-31-1983 New generic concepts in the Triticeae of the Intermountain Region: key and comments Mary E. Barkworth Utah State University Douglas R. Dewey Crops Research Laboratory, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Logan, Utah Riley J. Atkins Utah State University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbn Recommended Citation Barkworth, Mary E.; Dewey, Douglas R.; and Atkins, Riley J. (1983) "New generic concepts in the Triticeae of the Intermountain Region: key and comments," Great Basin Naturalist: Vol. 43 : No. 4 , Article 5. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbn/vol43/iss4/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Western North American Naturalist Publications at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Great Basin Naturalist by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. NEW GENERIC CONCEPTS IN THE TRITICEAE OF THE INTERMOUNTAIN REGION: KEY AND COMMENTS Mary E. Barkvvorth', R. Riley Atkins' Douglas Dewey% and J. Abstract.— Revision of the perennial genera of North American Triticeae requires recognition of seven new gen- era in the Intermonntain Region: Eltjtrigia, Letjmiis, Psatlnjwstachys, Pseudoroegneria, Thinopijrum, and the hybrid genera X Ehjleijmus and X Pseudelymus. One previously recognized genus, Sitanion, is included in Ehjmiis. Several new combinations are presented to accommodate the taxonomic changes. Ehjmits tmcln/caulus is treated as a wide- spread, polymorphic species with three subspecies in the region: subsp. trachycauhts, subsecundus, and latigliimis. Agropyron dd.systuchyum and A. albicans are treated as conspecific subspecies of Elymus lanceolatus.
    [Show full text]
  • Diagnostic Phytoliths for a Ponderosa Pine-Bunchgrass Community Near Flagstaff, Arizona
    THE SOUTHWESTERNNATURALISTTHENATURALIST SOUTHWESTEN46(3):282-2946(3) :282 294SEPTEMBER SEPTEMBER20012001 DIAGNOSTIC PHYTOLITHS FOR A PONDEROSA PINE-BUNCHGRASS COMMUNITY NEAR FLAGSTAFF, ARIZONA BECKYK. KERNS* School of Forestry,College of EcosystemScience and Management, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ 86011-5018 Present address:Pacific NorthwestResearch Station, United States Department of Agriculture,Forest Service, Corvallis, OR 97331 * Correspondent:[email protected]. us ABSTRACT-Phytolithanalysis could play an important role in understanding vegetation dynamics in southwestern ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa)forests, which have been dramatically altered by fire suppression and other factors. My objectives were to develop a phytolith reference collection and classification system for a ponderosa pine-bunchgrass community found near Flagstaff, Ari- zona. I examined 27 species of grasses found in and around the study area and ponderosa pine for diagnostic phytoliths. Twenty other species common to the area were examined for redundant phytolith forms. Eight phytolith forms were identified, including a diagnostic phytolith for pon- derosa pine, the spiny body. The general Poaceae subfamily system validated by numerous re- searchers is applicable to this community. Examination of phytolith shape frequencies show that for 7 species in the subfamily Pooideae, and 1 species in the Panicoideae, very few (0 to 5%) nondiagnostic phytolith forms were present. Nondiagnostic phytoliths, particularly rondels, were more common (7 to 22%) for the 3 species from the Chloridoideae subfamily. This result is consistent with the observation by other authors that all grasses produce rondel. forms and indi- cates that rondels will be over-represented in phytolith assemblages in comparison to actual veg- etation. The ponderosa pine spiny body appears to be a useful diagnostic for this area and vege- tation reconstructions using soil phytolith assemblages based on the system developed in this study could be used to understand grass-tree and grass vegetation dynamics.
    [Show full text]
  • WRITTEN FINDINGS of the DRAFT WASHINGTON STATE NOXIOUS WEED CONTROL BOARD Proposed Noxious Weed for 2016
    WRITTEN FINDINGS OF THE DRAFT WASHINGTON STATE NOXIOUS WEED CONTROL BOARD Proposed noxious weed for 2016 Scientific Name: Taeniatherum caput-medusae (L.) Nevski Synonyms: Elymus caput-medusae L., Taeniatherum asperum Nevski, Taeniatherum caput- medusae subsp. caput-medusae, Taeniatherum asperum auct. non (Simonkai) Nevski, Taeniatherum crinitum (Schreb.) Nevski, Taeniatherum crinitum (Schreb.) Nevski var. caput-medusae (L.) Wipff Common Name: medusahead, medusahead wildrye, medusahead rye Family: Poaceae Legal Status: Proposed noxious weed listing for 2016 Images: left, pulled mature plants with seedheads, image by Steve Dewey, Utah State University, Bugwood.org; center, monoculture of medusahead, image by John M. Randall, The Nature Conservancy, Bugwood.org; right, green medusahead inflorescence, image by Barry Rice, sarracenia.com, Bugwood.org. Description and Variation: Overall habit: Taeniatherum caput-medusae, commonly called medusahead, is a nonnative, winter annual grass that can grow up to 2 feet (60 cm) tall. Plants bloom in the spring after other nonnative annual grasses. Inflorescences are a dense spike with long awns that can be somewhat spreading and twisting, and are covered in small barbs. The mature spike with its spreading awns is said to roughly resembling medusa’s head, hence its common name. Roots: Medusahead roots are fibrous and begin as a shallow roots system and later in its lifecycle are able to grow deeper and access deep soil moisture (DiTomaso and Healy 2007). Growth studies by Hironaka (1961) found roots reached around 40 inches deep by mid-June during the 1956-1957 and 1957-1958 growing seasons. Stems: Medusahead stems, called culms, grow 0.33 to 2 feet (10 to 60 cm) tall, though sometimes up to 2.3 feet (70 cm) tall (Wipff 2007).
    [Show full text]
  • Bottlebrush Squirreltail), with E
    Plant Guide BOTTLEBRUSH Uses Reclamation/re-vegetation: Squirreltail displays SQUIRRELTAIL & many qualities which make it a good choice for what has been described as “assisted succession.” It is a BIG SQUIRRELTAIL short-lived perennial grass which can act as an early- seral species by competing with and replacing annual Elymus elymoides (Raf.) weedy species following fire. It is thought that after Swezey squirreltail establishes, annual weedy species should decrease in frequency and longer-lived, native & perennials may be more successfully reseeded and Elymus multisetus M.E. Jones established. Plant Symbol = ELEL5 & ELMU3 Its ability to germinate in the late fall and very early spring at a wide range of temperatures add to its Contributed by: USDA NRCS Idaho State Office capability to compete with cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum L.). Studies also indicate that squirreltail is capable of establishing in medusahead wildrye (Taeniatherum caput-medusae (L.) Nevski) infested sites. This makes squirreltail one of the more competitive native grasses available for reseeding disturbed rangelands. It is also a self-fertilizing species which allows it to produce seed despite sparse stands following seeding. Squirreltail is considered to be one of the most fire resistant native bunchgrasses. Older plants contain relatively low amounts of dead material when compared with other native bunchgrasses. This allows for hot, but quick burns which do not penetrate and damage the crown. However, during dry years plants can be damaged by severe burns. As an early-seral species, new plants often increase for two to three years following burns. Erosion control: When in large, dense stands, squirreltail is very effective at controlling wind and water erosion, due to its persistent ground cover.
    [Show full text]