Lean Infographic

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Lean Infographic LEAN MANUFACTURING DEVELOPMENT TIMELINE Global competition Inception The rise of global competition begins with American domination of the internation auto market. Toyota Motor Corporation is Early developments in lean manufacturing center around automation, standardization of work and developetd in Japan, largely in response to low domestic sales developments in manufacturing theory. of Japanese automobiles. Lean manufacturing begins Henry Ford KIICHIRO TOYODA Alfred P. Sloan Ford GM 1913 first turns on his assembly 1921 visits U.S. textile 1923 becomes president of 1925 begins assembly in 1927 begins assembly in Japan, at with advancements in line, signaling a new era in factories to observe General Motors, institutes Japan, under their their subsidiary company, automation and year manufacturing year methods year organizational changes year subsidiary company, year GM-Japan interchangeability, dating back as far as the 1700s. 1924: Jidoka Coninuous flow Sakichi Toyoda perfects his automatic production leads to 15 million Kiichiro Toyoda loom and coins the term”Jidoka,” units of the Ford Model T over 15 owned a textile company, and actively meaning “machine with a human touch,” In the late 1920s and years sought ways to improve the manufacturing referring to the automatic loom’s ability to process 1930s, American detect errors and prevent defects. automaking dominates the global market, including the Japanese market. Ford and GM “A Bomber an Hour” expand operations Ford-run, government-funded Willow Run Bomber plant mass produces the B-24 WORLD WAR II ENDS WORLD WAR II begins in the Pacific, 1937 World War II TOYOTA MOTORS Germany formally with the Japanese 1937 TOYODA COMPANY surrenders, followed 1945 invasion of China YEAR leads to rationing, materials Toyota Motor Corporation 1937 1927 shortages and other - established, with Kiichiro adapts assembly line to months later by Japan year loom production year YEAR challenges to manufacturing 1945 Toyoda as President WORLD WAR II begins in Europe, with the German invasion of 1939 During World War II, both Poland YEAR Flow production in practice Factory laid out according to a plan Ford and Toyota are forced Economic strains and wartime policies present to divert resources into authored by Kiichiro Toyoda, optimized for early flow production military manufacturing. UNITED STATES unique challenges to the manufacturing Scarcity of materials slows joins World War II, 1941 industry, along with opportunities to test new, some progress, but declaring war on Japan YEAR eicient methods of production. encourages greater eiciency Wartime shortages Just in Time manufacturing systems still modeled aer this process MANAGING DIRECTORS SUPERMARKET SYSTEM NORMAN BODEK John Krafcik JAMES WOMACK In recent decades, lean 1950 of the Toyota Motor 1954 of supplying parts in 1979 begins transcribing 1988 A student at MIT, coins 1990 publishes “The Machine manufacturing has Corporation train with the Toyota plant is first Japanese literature on the phrase “lean that Changed the World” continued to expand year the Ford Motor Company year implemented year manufacturing eiciency year production” in a paper year through industries around the world, both in practice and theory. Following the conclusion of World War II, the United States and “Lean manufacturing” enters the industrial and academic lexicon, and both Japan begin collaborating to further develop manufacturing manufacturers and researchers work to adapt the theory and practices developed eiciency, especially in the automotive industry. in the auto industry to apply to a wide range of industries. Peacetime cooperation Translation and Expansion Prepared by the Eagle Group | www.eaglegroupmanufacturers.com Consider this “weakest link.” How can it be strengthened, replaced or with employees and witnessing the production process firsthand. eliminated? By adopting a culture of gemba, companies can improve in several ways, including: Building communication chains between the shop floor and the executive oices tools Cellular Manufacturing Promoting a more thorough understanding of issues that aect production Cellular manufacturing is the practice of grouping equipment and processes Cultivating a more harmonious work environment of lean manufacturing around specific parts, rather than grouping them based on equipment type or process type. Traditionally, manufacturing environments are organized so that all parts go through one process, and are then transported to another area to undergo another process. In cellular manufacturing, a part stays inside a single “cell” to undergo several processes. In setting up manufacturing cells, Kaizen Developed over decades, the following tools can be used manufacturers must plan and execute the following: individually or in combination to improve eiciency and make One of the cornerstones of lean manufacturing, Kaizen focuses on continuous manufacturing “leaner.” When embarking on a journey towards Product grouping: combine parts based on key production similarities (size, improvement in the manufacturing process. It’s obvious that any business lean manufacturing, each company must decide which tools to equipment used, common processes) would want to improve their processes as much as possible, but Kaizen is more about creating an environment that allows continuous, incremental implement, and how to customize each one to fit their particular Cell design: organize equipment within the cell, taking into account movement improvement. To use Kaizen, companies should: needs. of personnel and production flows Promote communication between shop-floor employees and management Shop floor layout: organize cells on the shop floor, maximizing eiciency of storage and transportation Regularly request feedback from employees at all levels 5S Separate, record and quantify all aspects of production Schedule: starting and carrying out jobs in each cell 5S is oen the launching point for businesses just starting with lean The primary goal of cellular manufacturing is to reduce a part’s movement Continually stay abreast of technological advancements manufacturing. Much of 5S seems intuitive, but implementing each step can around the shop floor, which can be highly eective in reducing lead times, result in significant improvements in eiciency and quality. inventory buildup and production errors. Sort - Organize every workspace by separating the necessary (materials, tools) from the unnecessary (waste, scrap, redundancies) and remove KPIs (Key Performance Indicators) anything unnecessary from the production area Continuous Flow KPIs are performance indicators that align closely with broad company goals. Set In Order - lay out the necessary inputs of production (tools and When developed correctly, they oer a roadmap to all employees, and a way to materials) in an easy, intuitive manner Also known as one-piece flow, continuous flow is closely related to cellular self-evaluate success and improvement while on the job. Ideal KPIs should: manufacturing. In contrast to traditional “batch” manufacturing, continuous Shine - Clean the workspace and remove any clutter flow focuses on processing limited numbers of parts, one aer another. Involve measurement of waste For example, in a well established manufacturing cell, a part may go through Standardize - Make a list of instructions for repeating the first three steps, three or four dierent processes. As soon as the part has completely moved Be directly aected by shop-floor employees. so that any employee who arrives in the workspace knows exactly how to through the cell, the next part is taken and the processes repeated. As proceed continuous flow is perfected, any downtime or extraneous processes are While not everyone at the company attends the board meetings, KPIs can get removed from production. everyone on the same page and drive the company toward success. Sustain - Rinse and repeat. Sort, Set In Order and Shine on a regular basis, so that the workspace stays clean and clutter-free at all times. One of the major benefits of continuous flow production is that parts can be produced to match customer demand, and production can stop whenever demand is met. This way, standing inventory can be kept to a minimum. Muda Bottleneck Analysis Muda simply means “waste.” In manufacturing, muda is anything in the process that fails to add value to the customer’s purchase. Muda could be Bottleneck analysis is the practice of finding bottlenecks and reducing them, or Gemba excessive packaging, or unnecessary finishing processes, or even vending eliminating them entirely. machines in the break room stocked with unpopular snacks. Gemba is more of a philosophy than a concrete set of steps. Translating Evaluate the manufacturing chain, and look for the slowest or least stable roughly to “the real place,” gemba encourages executives and upper Muda comes in almost infinite shapes and sizes, and its elimination is the basic aspect of the process. management to spend as much time as possible on the shop floor, interacting tenet of lean manufacturing. Prepared by the Eagle Group | www.eaglegroupmanufacturers.com SMART goals are another example of a highly flexible lean tool, widely Early Equipment Management: apply knowledge of failures and issues to applicable in just about any industry. SMART is an acronym to help improve installation or production of new equipment OEE (Overall Equipment decision-makers design company goals. Using SMART, all goals should be: Training and Education: make sure everyone, from headquarters
Recommended publications
  • The Secrets of Toyota's Success Revealed in a "New" Book by Dr
    The Secrets of Toyota's Success Revealed in a "New" Book by Dr. Shigeo Shingo Once again Dr. Shigeo Shingo will amaze you. Along with Taiichi Ohno, Dr. Shingo co-developed TPS (LEAN) with his deep understanding of how to improve the overall process of production. Dr. Shingo reveals how he taught Toyota and other Japanese companies the art of identifying and solving problems. Many companies in the West are trying to emulate Lean but few can do it. Why not? Possibly, because we in the West do not recognize, develop and support the creative potential of every worker in solving problems. Toyota makes all employees problem solvers. Dr. Shingo gives you the tools to do it. A new book from Dr. Shigeo Shingo the co-creator of the Toyota Production System (Lean manufacturing) News Image Dr. Shingo was a master of Kaizen, he had the scientific training and innovative genius to deeply understand processes and the humility to realize that he needed the operators to take ownership. We are fortunate to have this new opportunity to gaze deeply into the thinking of one of the true geniuses behind TPS. --Dr. Shigeo Shingo. November 27, 2007 Vancouver, Washington Announcing a new hardcover Shigeo Shingo book, Kaizen and the Art of Creative Thinking. Once again Dr. Shingo will amaze you. Along with Taiichi Ohno, Dr. Shingo co-developed TPS (LEAN) with his deep understanding of how to improve the overall process of production. Dr. Shingo reveals how he taught Toyota and other Japanese companies the art of identifying and solving problems.
    [Show full text]
  • Lean Manufacturing Essentials Lean Manufacturing Defined & Explained
    C O N S U L T A N T S E N G I N E E R S S T R A T E G I S T S www.strategosinc.com Lean Manufacturing Essentials Lean Manufacturing Defined & Explained These are core disciplines. Not every organization requires them all. Others require supplementary disciplines such as 5S. Determining which disciplines are most important and/or urgent is the subject of Strategos' "Workshop for Wagon masters" that formulates an implementation plan. Lean Manufacturing is "manufacturing without waste." Waste has many forms. Inventory Material, time, idle equipment, and Besides core disciplines, there inventory are examples. Most companies is an overall theme of waste 70%-90% of their available inventory reduction. Inventory resources. Even the best Lean hides waste. Almost every Manufacturers probably waste 30%. imperfection or problem creates a need for inventory. Hence, This is an enormous opportunity. Lean inventory is a result and Manufacturing and Cellular Manufacturing measures the imperfection of the system. improve material handling, inventory, Inventory also devours capital. For most quality, scheduling, personnel and customer companies, the inventory savings alone satisfaction. These improvements are not provide funding for implementing the just a few percentage points, they are order- system and the largest savings occur early of-magnitude. Typically such improvements on. Thus, Lean Manufacturing is essentially range from 30%-90%. The benefits have self-funding. been documented by academic researchers and some of their work is available at our website. People & Technology Factories include people. To The Core Disciplines function well, people and technology must integrate in a Most waste is invisible.
    [Show full text]
  • Process Improvement Glossary
    Process Improvement Glossary 5 Whys Asking why repeatedly to discover the root cause of a problem. 5S A system for organizing the workplace to reduce waste and make problems visible. The 5S's: sort (keep only what is essential), set in order (a place for everything and everything in its place), shine (clean and tidy), standardize (systems and procedures to maintain first 3 S's), and sustain. A3 A standard, one-page description of the problem, hypothesis, and the improvement to be tested. It combines analysis of data and intuition, to present a compelling story in support of strategy deployment. The succinct format supports effective communication and use of data to problem-solve. The name comes from the "A3" size of paper (11"x17") that is used. Andon Japanese term for "lantern". Historically, a light system would alert someone of a quality or process problem in the production line. Today, a light may be triggered automatically, or an employee can manually alert the team and leadership of a problem. The intent is to alert the entire team, including leadership, that there is a problem so the team can respond and fix the problem before the workflow is stopped, if at all possible. ("The Machine That Changed the World" points out that there are hundreds of andon calls a day in a Toyota plant, but the line never stops. That is because workers respond to the Andons promptly, and usually are able to correct the problem within the tact time.) Bottleneck A step of a process that limits the capacity of a larger process or system.
    [Show full text]
  • Application of Lean Methodology to Improve Processes in the Construction and Demolition Waste Industry
    Application of lean methodology to improve processes in the construction and demolition waste industry The Ambisider Case Study Mariana Marques Ribeiro Master in Civil Engineering Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal email: [email protected] Abstract – The construction industry is one of the largest consumers of natural resources and one of the main generators of construction and demolition waste (CDW). Thus, the incorporation of recycled aggregates in construction is fundamental in achieving sustainability, but this is only feasible if these are competitive in relation to new materials. Thus, lean management plays an important role in reaching efficiency of production processes within the CDW industry. This management paradigm, developed in the automotive industry, is currently one of the most used methodologies in improving production processes. This dissertation focuses on Ambisider, a Portuguese company of the construction sector that manages the CDW generated by the demolition worKs, it performs with the objective of increasing efficiency of the production process of recycled aggregates. The fundamental aim is to propose the implementation of improvement actions based on lean management following the DMAIC cycle (Define - Measure - Analyze - Improve - Control) methodology, an organized and sequential method for solving problems using various tools and methodologies from the six sigma management philosophy. The study of Ambisider recycling operations led to identify lean wastes, understand their root causes, and propose improvement strategies and respective forms of maintenance. The proposed improvements were designed in the future value stream mapping (VSM) showing improvements in production capacity, reduction of lead time and consequently improving the quality of aggregates, reducing production costs and increasing the organization level and competiveness of Ambisider.
    [Show full text]
  • White Paper Entitled 'A Review of Kaizen'
    MultiSpectra Consultants White Paper A Review of Kaizen Dr. Amartya Kumar Bhattacharya BCE (Hons.) ( Jadavpur ), MTech ( Civil ) ( IIT Kharagpur ), PhD ( Civil ) ( IIT Kharagpur ), Cert.MTERM ( AIT Bangkok ), CEng(I), FIE, FACCE(I), FISH, FIWRS, FIPHE, FIAH, FAE, MIGS, MIGS – Kolkata Chapter, MIGS – Chennai Chapter, MISTE, MAHI, MISCA, MIAHS, MISTAM, MNSFMFP, MIIBE, MICI, MIEES, MCITP, MISRS, MISRMTT, MAGGS, MCSI, MIAENG, MMBSI, MBMSM Chairman and Managing Director, MultiSpectra Consultants, 23, Biplabi Ambika Chakraborty Sarani, Kolkata – 700029, West Bengal, INDIA. E-mail: [email protected] Website: https://multispectraconsultants.com Kaizen is a concept referring to business activities that continuously improve all functions and involve all employees from the CEO to the assembly line workers. Kaizen ( 改 善 ) is the Sino- Japanese word for "improvement". Kaizen also applies to processes, such as purchasing and logistics, that cross organisational boundaries into the supply chain. By improving standardised programmes and processes, kaizen aims to eliminate waste (lean manufacturing). Kaizen was first practised in Japanese businesses after World War II, influenced in part by American business and quality-management teachers, and most notably as part of The Toyota Way. It has since spread throughout the world and has been applied to environments outside business and productivity. The Japanese word kaizen means "change for better", without inherent meaning of either "continuous" or "philosophy" in Japanese dictionaries and in everyday use. The word refers to any improvement, one-time or continuous, large or small, in the same sense as the English word "improvement". However, given the common practice in Japan of labelling industrial or business improvement techniques with the word "kaizen", particularly the practices spearheaded by Toyota, the word "kaizen" in English is typically applied to measures for implementing continuous improvement, especially those with a "Japanese philosophy".
    [Show full text]
  • Five Whys Analysis
    Five Whys Analysis Source: http://www.gnrtr.com/Generator.html?pi=141&cp=3 In solving an inventive problem, it is very important to understand the casual relation of phenomena taking place in a system... In solving an inventive problem, it is very important to understand the casual relation of phenomena taking place in a system. Constructing such chains is a very interesting process which sometimes yields completely unexpected results. The following story is popular in the engineering environment. Auxiliary engines of one of the first American spaceships had 5 ft in diameter although, according to the designers' calculations, their optimal diameter should have been a little larger. # 1. Why were the engines made with 5 ft diameter ? The limitation was caused by that the engines were delivered to the assembly site by railway which went through several tunnels. The distance between the rails was standard – 4 ft and 8.5 and the tunnel diameter was not much larger. #2. Why the standard distance between rails was 4 ft and 8.5? How did that figure arise? The American railway was designed after the English pattern. In England, in turn, the distance between rails was selected by analogy with the tram track which was just 4 ft and 8.5. But why? The thing is that first trams in England were produced at the same factory as horse- drawn vehicles. The distance between the wheels of such a vehicle was 4 ft and 8.5. # 3. Why ? Horse-drawn vehicles were made so that their wheels matched old ruts on roads and the distance between the ruts was 4 ft and 8.5 all over England.
    [Show full text]
  • Implementation of Lean Tools in Apparel Industry to Improve Productivity and Quality
    Current Trends in Fashion Technology & Textile Engineering ISSN: 2577-2929 Review Article Curr Trends Fashion Technol Textile Eng Volume 4 - Issue 1 - July 2018 Copyright © All rights are reserved by Prakash C DOI: 10.19080/CTFTTE.2018.04.555628 Implementation of Lean Tools in Apparel Industry to Improve Productivity and Quality Mothilal B and Prakash C* Department of Fashion Technology, Sona College of Technology, India Submission: April 19, 2018; Published: July 02, 2018 *Corresponding author: Prakash C, Department of Fashion Technology, Sona College of Technology, India, Tel No: ; Fax: +91-427- 4099888; Email: Abstract The rapid change in apparel styles, deviation of order quantities and increasing quality levels at the lowest possible cut-rate, demand the market. To increase the productivity of the apparel industries we need to reduce the wastage of the manufacturing and time to manufacture the product.apparel manufacturing Lean is the tool industry to reduce to the be focusedwastage on in moreall process effective of apparel and efficient manufacturing, manufacturing reducing processes cost and for value survival added in anto theimmensely product. competitive This paper proposes the lean tool for the apparel industry to reduce the overall wastage of the industries. Keywords: Abbreviations:Apparel FMEA: industry; Failure Eco-efficiency; Mode and Effect Industrial Analysis; wastes; SFPS: Single Lean Failuretools Points; TPM: Total Productive Maintenance; OEE: Overall Equipment Effectiveness; PDCA: Plan-Do-Check-Act or Plan-Do-Check-Adjust; PDSA: Plan-Do-Study-Act Introduction Tapping D [1] observed that lean strategy is to eliminate wastes Lean tools from the process. Any excess in equipment’s, materials, parts, and working period beyond the requirement is generally referred as of waste (muda), the improvement of quality, and production waste.
    [Show full text]
  • Lean Six Sigma for Dummies‰
    Lean Six Sigma FOR DUMmIES‰ 2ND EDITION by John Morgan and Martin Brenig-Jones A John Wiley and Sons, Ltd, Publication Lean Six Sigma For Dummies®, 2nd Edition Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd The Atrium Southern Gate Chichester West Sussex PO19 8SQ England www.wiley.com Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, Chichester, West Sussex, England Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, Chichester, West Sussex All Rights Reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmit- ted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, scanning or otherwise, except under the terms of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 or under the terms of a licence issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency Ltd, Saffron House, 6-10 Kirby Street, London EC1N 8TS, UK, without the permission in writing of the Publisher. Requests to the Publisher for permission should be addressed to the Permissions Department, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, The Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 8SQ, England, or emailed to [email protected], or faxed to (44) 1243 770620. Trademarks: Wiley, the Wiley logo, For Dummies, the Dummies Man logo, A Reference for the Rest of Us!, The Dummies Way, Dummies Daily, The Fun and Easy Way, Dummies.com, Making Everything Easier, and related trade dress are trademarks or registered trademarks of John Wiley & Sons, Inc., and/or its affiliates in the United States and other countries, and may not be used without written permission. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., is not associated with any product or vendor mentioned in this book.
    [Show full text]
  • Design of a Lean Manufacturing System for the Production of Compliant Wind at Sparton Electronics
    Dissertations and Theses 4-2014 Design of a Lean Manufacturing System for the Production of Compliant Wind at Sparton Electronics Arash Sabet-Rasekh Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.erau.edu/edt Part of the Mechanical Engineering Commons Scholarly Commons Citation Sabet-Rasekh, Arash, "Design of a Lean Manufacturing System for the Production of Compliant Wind at Sparton Electronics" (2014). Dissertations and Theses. 241. https://commons.erau.edu/edt/241 This Thesis - Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Design of a Lean Manufacturing System for the Production of Compliant Wind at Sparton Electronics By Arash Sabet-Rasekh A Thesis Submitted to the College of Engineering Department of Mechanical Engineering in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Mechanical Engineering Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Daytona Beach, Florida April 2014 Acknowledgement I would like to thank my thesis advisor Dr. Patrick Currier for his help and guidance throughout this entire project. Without his support and meaningful insight I would not have been able to complete this thesis. I am also thankful to Dr. Sathya Gangadharan (a.k.a. Dr. G) for his continued support and encouragement. I wish to express my genuine appreciation to Kevin Farthing at Sparton Electronics for his unlimited support, advice and patience. Lastly, but most importantly, I would like to thank my family for always being there for me and motivating me.
    [Show full text]
  • Top Four Problem-Solving Techniques in a High Performance Team
    4360 Corporate Road Charleston, SC 29405-7445 843.744.7110 www.LCE.com Top Four Problem-Solving Techniques in a High Performance Team By R. Keith Mobley While most people associate Lean with tools and principles such as value stream mapping, one-piece flow, Kanban, 5S, Total Productive Maintenance, and Kaizen events, few people think about the more mundane aspects of Lean. Problem solving is one of the keys to a successful Lean implementation because it empowers all those involved. Lean manufacturing has a unique way of solving problems. It does not just look at the effect of the problem and try to cover it with a Band-Aid. Rather the root cause of the problem is identified and the root cause, as well as all contributing factors, is eliminated from the system, process or infrastructure in order to permanently solve the problems. What is the difference in these two approaches? Simple, when you find and rectify the root causes the problem will be solved forever. Even other problems occurring due to these root causes will be eliminated in this effort. It is very clear now that we must find out the root causes of the problems before we think about rectifying them in Lean manufacturing environments. So how should we do this? What are the tools available to perform these tasks? Let's look at what problem solving is about. We'll begin by asking the question: "What is a problem?" A good definition of a problem is a variation from a recognized standard. In other words, you need to know how things should be before you can recognize a possible cause for them not being that way.
    [Show full text]
  • Lean Six Sigma Mindset Course
    Lean Six Sigma Mindset Course Robert Potter HELLO! I am Robert Potter I am a trainer since 1990. You can find me at [email protected] The History Walter A. Shewhart W. Edwards Deming The History ● W. Edwards Deming in the early to mid 1900’s proposed that business processes should be analyzed and measured to identify sources of variations that cause products to deviate from customer requirements. ● He recommended that business processes be placed in a continuous feedback loop so that managers can identify and change the parts of the process that need improvements. The History As a teacher, Deming created a rather simple diagram to illustrate this continuous process, commonly known as the PDCA cycle for Plan, Do, Check, Act*: ● PLAN: Design or revise business process components to improve results ● DO: Implement the plan and measure its performance ● CHECK: Assess the measurements and report the results to decision makers ● ACT: Decide on changes needed to improve the process Perfection: The Deming Cycle (what to do; for improvement) Plan (implement more widely); Operating Efficiency standardise) Act D (it, on a trial o basis; experiment) “Hold the gains” (Standard Work) Study (if it works; the risks; the variation, LEARN!) The History of Lean Six Sigma ● Six sigma was developed in between 1983 and 1992 by Dr Mikel Harry who was then with Motorola. ● It was refined some what in the following two years by ABB ● In 1994 Allied signal and General Electric took the system on board with great results ● From 1996 to 2004 most of the fortune 500 companies adopted the system.
    [Show full text]
  • Takt Time Grouping: a Method to Implement Kanban-Flow Manufacturing in an Unbalanced Process with Moving Constraints Mitchell Alan Millstein University of Missouri-St
    University of Missouri, St. Louis IRL @ UMSL Dissertations UMSL Graduate Works 7-6-2014 Takt Time Grouping: A Method to Implement Kanban-Flow Manufacturing in an Unbalanced Process with Moving Constraints Mitchell Alan Millstein University of Missouri-St. Louis, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://irl.umsl.edu/dissertation Part of the Business Commons Recommended Citation Millstein, Mitchell Alan, "Takt Time Grouping: A Method to Implement Kanban-Flow Manufacturing in an Unbalanced Process with Moving Constraints" (2014). Dissertations. 242. https://irl.umsl.edu/dissertation/242 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the UMSL Graduate Works at IRL @ UMSL. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations by an authorized administrator of IRL @ UMSL. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Takt Time Grouping A Method to Implement Kanban-Flow Manufacturing in an Unbalanced Process with Moving Constraints & Comparison to One Piece Flow and Drum Buffer Rope: Which is Better, When and Why Mitchell A. Millstein M.B.A, Washington University – St. Louis, MO, 1996 B.S., Engineering, Rutgers University – New Brunswick, NJ, 1988 A Thesis Submitted to The Graduate School at the University of Missouri – St. Louis in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Ph.D. in Business Administration with an emphasis in Logistics and Supply Chain Management Advisory Committee Joseph P. Martinich, Ph.D. Chairperson Robert M. Nauss, Ph.D. L. Douglas Smith, Ph.D. Donald C. Sweeney II, Ph.D. Revision: July 2, 2014 Copyright, Mitchell A. Millstein, 2014 1 Contents Abstract ......................................................................................................................................................... 7 Section 1: Introduction ................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]