DOCSLIB.ORG

Guide to Hydrographic Surveying

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Guide to Hydrographic Surveying Online Continuing Education for Professional Engineers Since 2009 Guide to Hydrographic Surveying PDH Credits: 5 PDH Course No.: OHS101 Publication Source: Original Courseware by Donald W. Parnell, PE Release Date: 2018 DISCLAIMER: All course materials available on this website are not to be construed as a representation or warranty on the part of Online-PDH, or other persons and/or organizations named herein. All course literature is for reference purposes only, and should not be used as a substitute for competent, professional engineering council. Use or application of any information herein, should be done so at the discretion of a licensed professional engineer in that given field of expertise. Any person(s) making use of this information, herein, does so at their own risk and assumes any and all liabilities arising therefrom. Copyright © 2009 Online-PDH - All Rights Reserved 1265 San Juan Dr. - Merritt Island, FL 32952 Phone: 321-501-5601 Comprehensive Guide to Hydrographic Surveying Credits: 5 PDH Course Description Hydrography is the science of measuring and describing the topographical features and the entire aquatic environment as a whole, beneath the surface of water bodies. These subsurface features affect bridge scour, flood mitigation, erosion control and siltation transport, maritime navigation, marine construction, dredging, offshore oil exploration and offshore oil drilling, among many other activities. Hydrographic surveying does not strictly apply to coastal and oceanic regions of the US. Hydrographic surveying has many applications inland. Many environmental and civil engineering project in and around bodies and channels of water (streams and rivers, lakes and ponds, wetlands) can all benefit from hydrographic surveys and analysis. Topics Intro and overview of hydrographic surveying History and early methods of measurement Sounding poles, lead lines, wire drags Echo sounders and fathometers Agencies which perform hydrographic surveys: office of coast survey, NOAA, USGS, COE, IHO, NOO Marine magnetometry DC resistivity imaging Radar altimetry GPR for marine applications SONAR devices: side scan, single beam, multi beam sonar Light Pulse (LIDAR) devices US maritime limits and boundaries Sources of existing bathymetric datasets Types of tidal datums (sounding and chart) and tidal cycles Online-PDH 1265 San Juan Dr. AUV, ROV and UAS technologies Merritt island, FL 32952 Crowdsourced bathymetric surveying Fisheries acoustics Original Courseware by: Donald W. Parnell, PE All rights reserved Chapter 1: Introduction Hydrographic Surveys for Safe Navigation There are numerous reasons to conduct a hydrographic survey, but the most common Page 1: Hydrographic Surveying objective is for compiling nautical data along What is Hydrography? navigational channels, with an emphasis on the Hydrography is a branch of physical oceanography measurement and profiling of the subsurface or applied science which deals with the measuring physical features that may affect safe navigation and description of the configuration of the bottoms and travel by marine vessels. and adjacent land areas of oceans, lakes, rivers, harbors, and other water forms. What are Hydrographic Surveys? A hydrographic survey deals with measuring and description of features of a water area and the bed configuration; however, it may also encompass a wide variety of other objectives such as the measuring of tides, currents, gravity, Earth magnetism, and for determining the physical and chemical properties of water. The image above shows a dredging operation Bathymetric Surveying consisting of a clamshell bucket dredge on a barge The label of hydrographic surveying is often synonymously applied to bathymetric surveying. Documenting the Geomorphic Changes However, the Routine hydrographic surveys are essential to latter actually documenting the transportation of silt and Bathymetry refers to the sedimentation, in order to unsure safe lanes of The term "bathymetry," originally study and shipping in rivers and along coastlines. nautical in origin, referred to the ocean's depth relative to the sea measurement of level (free surface), although it the bottom or Natural currents and storm events such as has since come to refer to the “bed” of a hurricanes tends to shift the silt on the sea or river “submarine topography,” or the navigable water beds, potentially accumulating in previously depths and shapes of the body (whether it dredged channels, causing dangerous conditions or underwater earthen terrain. is an ocean, river, obstructions. lake or other body or channel of water.) In other Locating Submerged Obstacles words it deals with the topography of the solid In addition to the surveying of geomorphic earth, beneath a body of water. changes, hydrographic surveys may be utilized to locate submerged vessels and other hazardous Below are various types of hydrographic surveying debris along river and sea beds. methods. A hydrographic survey can be used to facilitate offshore oil and gas exploration, drilling operations, marine construction, dredging, installation of subsea cables and more. Other Applications Other applications for hydrographic surveying: to generate the data needed to create and update nautical charts to verify that navigational channels are This agency was established when then President, clear and accurate Thomas Jefferson and Congress authorized a port and harbor maintenance (dredging), survey to be taken of coasts of the newly formed expansion, and re-design “United States of America." coastal engineering and geomorphological First Head of the US Coast Survey evaluations The first person to officially head the US Coast beach erosion and replenishment studies Survey was Ferdinand Rudolph Hassler, who coastal zone management assembled a number of skilled professionals from offshore resources development various scientific communities, to survey and chart oil and gas exploration out the coastlines of the US. volumetric studies erosion and siltation studies pre- and post-dredge evaluations Types of Professionals at river crossing profiles and evaluations the USCS aquatic vegetation design mathematicians cartographers flood studies geodesists to locate and verify the integrity of meteorologists submerged cabling and piping hydrographers for determining fisheries habitat and topographers understanding marine geologic processes sailors and laborers administrators to determine seabed and riverbed materials (i.e. sand, mud, rock) preliminary bed analysis for anchoring, The first official US survey - 1834 construction of marine structures, and The first official hydrographic survey performed in pipeline and cable routing the US was conducted along the southern shore of Long Island in 1834. disaster response following storm events; looking for changes in depth or debris in The first official US nautical chart – 1839 navigational channels In 1839, the US government produced its first nautical chart. However, many privately commissioned charts of the Americas were known Page 3: History of Hydrographic Surveying to exist prior to this date. Origins The history of hydrographic and bathymetric surveying likely dates back to the origins of sailing. As long as people have sailed the oceans, there has been the need to chart pathways for safe travel to avoid vessel groundings, and to document regional and seasonal oceanic currents and meteorological patterns. US Coast Survey Establishment of the US Coast Survey – 1807 Navigational chart of the Potomac estuary In the US, the first officially sanctioned (created in 1838 by the Alex’a Canal Company) hydrographic surveying office began in 1807, with the establishment of the “US Coast Survey”, which is one of the oldest scientific agencies in the US. Page 4: Early Hydrographic Surveying and other bathymetric methodologies, they are still Methods – Sounding Poles and Lead Lines sold by some “Mark Twain” survey supply Prior to 1900s – Poles and Lines In modern literature, Samuel companies, and Shallow water surveys – In early hydrographic Clemens took his pen name from may be used in practice, shallow water surveys consisted of depth his early employment as a areas where leadsman on the Mississippi River. measurements conducted by use of sounding The leadsman was the person large amounts of poles. who used a sounding pole or lead vegetation or line to measure the river depths thick mud would Deep water surveys – Sounding Lines to ensure the boat was staying tend to distort In greater depths, a sounding line (or lead line) was away from the shallow banks. To the electronic "mark twain" referred to marking used to make measurements of river channel, returns of estuarial and oceanic navigational pathways. a depth of the water of two fathoms, or 12 feet. modern Positions were determined by three-point sextant equipment. fixes to mapped reference points. A more sophisticated means of measuring deep water at Lead Lines this time was through the use of sounding Lead line systems consisted of ropes or lines, with machines, which were simply reel or drum based depth markings and line devices. lead weights attached (see image). The lead Sounding poles weights were usually A sounding pole (see image below) is simply a long conical in shape, rod, (usually made of wood, or aluminum in weighing around 12- present day use), that is used to measure 14 lbs., and navigational channel depths. Though mainly used occasionally had a to measure water depth, they may be used to small amount of wax
Load more

Recommended publications
  • OCEANS ´09 IEEE Bremen
    11-14 May Bremen Germany Final Program OCEANS ´09 IEEE Bremen Balancing technology with future needs May 11th – 14th 2009 in Bremen, Germany Contents Welcome from the General Chair 2 Welcome 3 Useful Adresses & Phone Numbers 4 Conference Information 6 Social Events 9 Tourism Information 10 Plenary Session 12 Tutorials 15 Technical Program 24 Student Poster Program 54 Exhibitor Booth List 57 Exhibitor Profiles 63 Exhibit Floor Plan 94 Congress Center Bremen 96 OCEANS ´09 IEEE Bremen 1 Welcome from the General Chair WELCOME FROM THE GENERAL CHAIR In the Earth system the ocean plays an important role through its intensive interactions with the atmosphere, cryo- sphere, lithosphere, and biosphere. Energy and material are continually exchanged at the interfaces between water and air, ice, rocks, and sediments. In addition to the physical and chemical processes, biological processes play a significant role. Vast areas of the ocean remain unexplored. Investigation of the surface ocean is carried out by satellites. All other observations and measurements have to be carried out in-situ using research vessels and spe- cial instruments. Ocean observation requires the use of special technologies such as remotely operated vehicles (ROVs), autonomous underwater vehicles (AUVs), towed camera systems etc. Seismic methods provide the foundation for mapping the bottom topography and sedimentary structures. We cordially welcome you to the international OCEANS ’09 conference and exhibition, to the world’s leading conference and exhibition in ocean science, engineering, technology and management. OCEANS conferences have become one of the largest professional meetings and expositions devoted to ocean sciences, technology, policy, engineering and education.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Natural and Anthropogenic Sound Sources and Acoustic Propagation in the North Sea
    UNCLASSIFIED Oude Waalsdorperweg 63 P.O. Box 96864 2509 JG The Hague The Netherlands TNO report www.tno.nl TNO-DV 2009 C085 T +31 70 374 00 00 F +31 70 328 09 61 [email protected] Assessment of natural and anthropogenic sound sources and acoustic propagation in the North Sea Date February 2009 Author(s) Dr. M.A. Ainslie, Dr. C.A.F. de Jong, Dr. H.S. Dol, Dr. G. Blacquière, Dr. C. Marasini Assignor The Netherlands Ministry of Transport, Public Works and Water Affairs; Directorate-General for Water Affairs Project number 032.16228 Classification report Unclassified Title Unclassified Abstract Unclassified Report text Unclassified Appendices Unclassified Number of pages 110 (incl. appendices) Number of appendices 1 All rights reserved. No part of this report may be reproduced and/or published in any form by print, photoprint, microfilm or any other means without the previous written permission from TNO. All information which is classified according to Dutch regulations shall be treated by the recipient in the same way as classified information of corresponding value in his own country. No part of this information will be disclosed to any third party. In case this report was drafted on instructions, the rights and obligations of contracting parties are subject to either the Standard Conditions for Research Instructions given to TNO, or the relevant agreement concluded between the contracting parties. Submitting the report for inspection to parties who have a direct interest is permitted. © 2009 TNO Summary Title : Assessment of natural and anthropogenic sound sources and acoustic propagation in the North Sea Author(s) : Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • 2015.01.20 14:47:22 -08'00'
    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration NOAA Marine and Aviation Operations NOAA Ship FAIRWEATHER S-220 1010 Stedman Street Ketchikan, AK 99901 January 20, 2014 MEMORANDUM FOR: Commander Benjamin K. Evans, NOAA Chief, Pacific Hydrographic Branch FROM: Commander David J. Zezula, NOAA Commanding Officer, NOAA Ship Fairweather TITLE: 2014 Data Acquisition and Processing Report Approval As Chief of Party, I acknowledge that all of the information contained in this report is complete and accurate to the best of my knowledge. This report is respectfully submitted to N/CS34, Pacific Hydrographic Branch. In addition, the following individuals were responsible for oversight and compilation of this report: ____________________________________ Douglas A. Bravo Chief Survey Technician ____________________________________ Lieutenant Ryan A. Wartick, NOAA Field Operations Officer ____________________________________ Lieutenant Matthew M. Forney, NOAA Secondary Field Operations Officer Attachment Fairweather 2014 Data Acquisition & Processing Report A. INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................... A-1 B. EQUIPMENT .................................................................................................................. B-1 1.0 Hardware ...................................................................................................................... B-1 1.1 Hardware Systems Inventory ....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Descriptive Report to Accompany Hydrographic Survey H-10791
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION NATIONAL OCEAN SERVICE Data Acquisition & Processing Report Type of Survey Hydrographic Project No. 2011 Rainier field season Time frame June - October 2011 LOCALITY State Washington/Alaska General Locality Strait of Georgia, WA and West of Prince of Wales Island, AK 2011 CHIEF OF PARTY Captain Donald W. Haines, NOAA LIBRARY & ARCHIVES DATE Data Acquisition and Processing Report NOAA Ship Rainier (s221) 2011 Field Season Chief of Party: Captain Donald W. Haines, NOAA A. EQUIPMENT This Data Acquisition and Processing Report describes both the survey equipment used and the standard methods for acquisition applied to the equipment used. Not necessarily all equipment described within this report was used during data acquisition for all projects and/or sheets. Data were acquired by the following Rainier survey vessels: Hull Number Vessel type 2801 28 foot Jensen survey launch 2802 28 foot Jensen survey launch 2803 28 foot Jensen survey launch 2804 28 foot Jensen survey launch S221 231 foot steel hydrographic ship Vessels S221, 2801, 2802, 2803, and 2804 are used to acquire shallow-water multibeam (SWMB) data and sound velocity profiles. Any vessel may be utilized for collecting bottom samples and detached positions (DPs). Vessel descriptions and offset measurements are included in the 2011 NOAA Ship Rainier Hydrographic Readiness Review Package. Three different categories of echosounder systems are available for use by Rainier survey vessels. The individual system(s) chosen for use in a given area were decided at the discretion of the Hydrographer using the guidance stated in the Hydrographic Survey Project Instructions, the Hydrographic Surveys Specifications and Deliverables Manual (HSSDM), and the Field Procedures Manual, and depended upon the limitations of each system, the bottom topography, the water depth, and the ability of the platform vessel to safely navigate the area.
    [Show full text]
  • R/V ALKOR Cruise Report 512
    Cruise Report AL512 R/V ALKOR Cruise Report 512 North Sea Blowouts 15th July – 26th July, 2018 Cuxhaven - Kiel (Germany) Jens Karstens, Jens Schneider von Deimling, Christoph Böttner, Judith Elger, Helene-Sophie Hilbert, Michel Kühn, Rebecca Kühn, Philipp Müller, Benedict Reinardy, Bettina Schramm 2 Cruise Report AL512 Table of Contents 1 Introduction...................................................................................................................... 4 2 Narrative of the Cruise ..................................................................................................... 6 3 Participants ...................................................................................................................... 8 4 Methodology and Preliminary Results ............................................................................. 9 4.1 2D reflection seismic .............................................................................................................. 9 4.1.1 Methodology ............................................................................................................................. 9 4.1.2 Preliminary Results ................................................................................................................. 13 4.2 P-Cable 3D seismic .............................................................................................................. 13 4.3 Ocean-Bottom-Seismometer ................................................................................................ 14 4.3.1 Methodology
    [Show full text]
  • Noaa 13129 DS1.Pdf
    I. OVERVIEW A. Brief Summary and Project Period From April to July 2016, NOAA and partners will conduct three telepresence-enabled ocean exploration cruises on NOAA Ship Okeanos Explorer to collect critical baseline information in and around the Commonwealth of the Northern Marianas Islands (CNMI) and the Marianas Trench Marine National Monument (MTMNM). NOAA will work with the scientific and management community to characterize unknown and poorly-known areas through telepresence-based exploration. This expedition is part of a three year Campaign (CAPSTONE) focused on systematically collecting baseline information to support science and management needs within and around the Monuments and other protected places in the Pacific, and serves as an opportunity for NOAA and the Nation to highlight the uniqueness and importance of these national symbols of ocean conservation. This document contains project instructions for EX-16-05 Leg 1. Operations for this cruise will include ROV, mapping, telepresence-based remote participation, and CTD rosette operations. The expedition will be commence in Santa Rita, Guam with operations beginning on April 20th and conclude in Saipan, CNMI on May 11th. Operations will use the ship’s deep water mapping systems (Kongsberg EM302 multibeam sonar, EK60 split-beam fisheries sonars, ADCPs, and Knudsen 3260 chirp sub-bottom profiler sonar), NOAA’s two-body 6000 m remotely operated vehicle (ROVs Deep Discoverer and Seirios), CTD rosette, and the ship’s high-bandwidth satellite connection for real-time ship to shore communications. Daytime ROV dives are planned every day from April 21 –May 10. ROV dives will include high-resolution visual surveys and limited rock and biologic specimen sampling.
    [Show full text]
  • Alliance Airborne Anti-Submarine Warfare
    June 2016 JAPCC Alliance Airborne Anti-Submarine Warfare A Forecast for Maritime Air ASW in the Future Operational Environment Joint Air Power Competence Centre von-Seydlitz-Kaserne Römerstraße 140 | 47546 Kalkar (Germany) | www.japcc.org Warfare Anti-Submarine Airborne Alliance Joint Air Power Competence Centre Cover picture © US Navy © This work is copyrighted. No part may be reproduced by any process without prior written permission. Inquiries should be made to: The Editor, Joint Air Power Competence Centre (JAPCC), [email protected] Disclaimer This publication is a product of the JAPCC. It does not represent the opinions or policies of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) and is designed to provide an independent overview, analysis, food for thought and recommendations regarding a possible way ahead on the subject. Author Commander William Perkins (USA N), JAPCC Contributions: Commander Natale Pizzimenti (ITA N), JAPCC Release This document is releasable to the Public. Portions of the document may be quoted without permission, provided a standard source credit is included. Published and distributed by The Joint Air Power Competence Centre von-Seydlitz-Kaserne Römerstraße 140 47546 Kalkar Germany Telephone: +49 (0) 2824 90 2201 Facsimile: +49 (0) 2824 90 2208 E-Mail: [email protected] Website: www.japcc.org Denotes images digitally manipulated FROM: The Executive Director of the Joint Air Power Competence Centre (JAPCC) SUBJECT: A Forecast for Maritime Air ASW in the Future Operational Environment DISTRIBUTION: All NATO Commands, Nations, Ministries of Defence and Relevant Organizations The Russian Federation has increasingly been exercising its military might in areas adjacent to NATO Nations. From hybrid warfare missions against Georgia to paramilitary operations in Crimea, the Russian Federation has used its land-based military to influence regional events in furtherance of their strategic goals.
    [Show full text]
  • Corrib Subsea Infrastructure Inspection and Maintenance Surveys - 2021
    Vermilion Exploration & Production Ireland Ltd Corrib Subsea Infrastructure Inspection and Maintenance Surveys - 2021 Natura Impact Statement 660841 November 2020 RSK GENERAL NOTES Project No.: 660841 Title: Corrib Subsea Infrastructure Inspection and Maintenance Surveys – Natura Impact Statement Client: Vermilion Exploration & Production Ireland Limited (Vermilion) Date: 13th November 2020 Office: Bristol Status: Final Authorised by: Project Manager Date: 13-11-2020 Andrew Bendell Authorised by: Project QA Rep Date: 13-11-2020 David Watson AB DW/JN 13-11-2020 E Final For issue AUTHOR CHECKED DATE ISSUED POST REV PURPOSE OF ISSUE ISSUED / ELECTRONIC RSK Environment Ltd (RSK) has prepared this report for the sole use of the client, showing reasonable skill and care, for the intended purposes as stated in the agreement under which this work was completed. The report may not be relied upon by any other party without the express agreement of the client and RSK. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to the professional advice included in this report. Where any data supplied by the client or from other sources have been used, it has been assumed that the information is correct. No responsibility can be accepted by RSK for inaccuracies in the data supplied by any other party. The conclusions and recommendations in this report are based on the assumption that all relevant information has been supplied by those bodies from whom it was requested. No part of this report may be copied or duplicated without the express permission of RSK and the party for whom it was prepared. Where field investigations have been carried out, these have been restricted to a level of detail required to achieve the stated objectives of the work.
    [Show full text]
  • Navy Integrated Tactical Environment System IIR – Data Gathering Data Gathering Requirements and Interim Database for NITES IIR
    Navy Integrated Tactical Environment System IIR – Data Gathering Data Gathering Requirements and Interim Database for NITES IIR Prepared By: Paul Acacia 31 Millbrook Avenue Dartmouth, Nova Scotia B2V 0A2 General Dynamics Canada Contractor's Document Number: 741284 Contract Project Manager: Heather Larmer, 613-596-7435 PWGSC Contract Number: W7714-115155/002/SV CSA: Mark Ball, DRDC CORA IM ORT, 613-992-4539 The scientific or technical validity of this Contract Report is entirely the responsibility of the Contractor and the contents do not necessarily have the approval or endorsement of Defence R&D Canada. This work was sponsored by Director Meteorology and Oceanography Contract Report DRDC-RDDC-2015-C210 September 2015 © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, as represented by the Minister of National Defence, 2015 © Sa Majesté la Reine (en droit du Canada), telle que représentée par le ministre de la Défense nationale, 2015 This page intentionally left blank. iii Abstract …….. Canadian Forces (CF) personnel are required to make assessments of the effects of meteorological, oceanographic, and/or ice conditions (hereafter referred to as “Met Effects”), on the operation of CF equipment. The current methods of assessing Met Effects for the CF rely on a suite of standard NATO criteria and manual or semi-automated processes. More sophisticated systems exist that offer improved estimates through automated software applications. One such system, Navy Integrated Tactical Environmental System, Variant II Redesign (NITES IIR or N2R), is a sophisticated Met Effects assessment application with performance degradation predictions for known capabilities. For each specific piece of equipment, the N2R application forms an assessment based on certain aspects of the equipment's operating characteristics and technical specifications and how they react to varying meteorological, oceanographic, or ice conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • LOCALITY Data Acquisition & Processing Report 2018
    U.S. Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Ocean Service Data Acquisition & Processing Report Type of Survey: Navigable Area Project Number: S-B929-NRT5-18 Time Frame: July - August 2018 LOCALITY State(s): New Jersey New York General Locality: Hudson River 2018 CHIEF OF PARTY LTJG Dylan Kosten LIBRARY & ARCHIVES Date: Table of Contents A. System Equipment and Software.............................................................................................................. 1 A.1 Survey Vessels......................................................................................................................................1 A.1.1 NRT5........................................................................................................................................... 1 A.2 Echo Sounding Equipment................................................................................................................... 2 A.2.1 Multibeam Echosounders............................................................................................................ 2 A.2.1.1 Kongsberg Simrad EM 2040C...........................................................................................2 A.2.2 Single Beam Echosounders.........................................................................................................3 A.2.3 Side Scan Sonars.........................................................................................................................3 A.2.3.1 EdgeTech 4215...................................................................................................................4
    [Show full text]
  • Cruise Report
    CRUISE REPORT RRS James Cook cruise JC21 6th January – 10th February 2008 Rodman, Panama — Puerto Caldera, Costa Rica “Accretion of the lower oceanic crust at fast-spreading ridges: a rock drill and near- bottom seafloor survey in support of IODP drilling in Hess Deep” C.J. MacLeod (Chief Scientist) D.A.H. Teagle, K.M. Gillis P.W. Cazenave, H.E. Hansen, M. Harris, K.A. Howard, S.D. Hurst, B. Ildefonse, C.J. Lissenberg, A. Morris, D.J. Shillington & M. Tominaga Isis Team: D.R. Turner, J.A. Cooper, S.E. Dodd, D. Edge, W.H. Handley, P.J. Mason, L. Rolley, A.M. Sherring BGS Team: D.J. Smith, D. Baxter, N.C. Campbell, M.D. Wilson School of Earth & Ocean Sciences, Cardiff University, Main Building, Park Place, Cardiff CF10 3YE, Wales, United Kingdom CRUISE REPORT RRS James Cook cruise JC21 6th January – 10th February 2008 Rodman, Panama — Puerto Caldera, Costa Rica Contents Cruise Summary List of Participants Contact Details 1. Introduction 1.1 Preamble ………… 1 1.2 Cruise objectives ………… 2 1.3 Scientific background ………… 2 1.4 Geology of Hess Deep: previous work ………… 3 1.5 Original survey plan ………… 5 2. Ship’s Systems 2.1 Description of ship-fitted systems ………… 8 2.2 Potential field measurements: operations …………12 2.3 EM120 (ship’s) swath bathymetry: operations and processing summary …………13 3. Isis Remotely-Operated Vehicle 3.1 The Isis vehicle ………… 15 3.2 Isis operational strategy ………… 17 3.3 Isis swath acquisition and processing ………… 18 3.4 Use of a deep-towed magnetometer on Isis ………… 22 3.5 Isis near-bottom operations ………… 22 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Underwater Inspection of Bridge Substructures Using Imaging Technology
    Underwater Inspection of Bridge Substructures Using Imaging Technology June 14, 2018 Sponsored by Federal Highway Administration Office of Infrastructure FHWA-HIF-18-049 FOREWORD With the growth in the range and capabilities of sonar technology, many states are investigating its use for underwater bridge substructure inspection. FHWA provides overall guidance for these inspections and recognized the need for a comprehensive evaluation of the capabilities of sonar technologies for this important activity. In this study, a range of sonar technologies were evaluated in a variety of underwater conditions to evaluate how these technologies can be effectively used in conjunction with or independently of divers. It will be useful for bridge personnel responsible for inspecting bridge foundations. The study described in this report was conducted at the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Turner-Fairbank Highway Research Center (TFHRC) J. Sterling Jones Hydraulics Laboratory. The state transportation departments that contributed funding for this study were California, Missouri, North Dakota, South Carolina, Texas, and Wisconsin. Cheryl Allen Richter, P.E., Ph.D. Director, Office of Infrastructure Research and Development Notice This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the U.S. Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The U.S. Government assumes no liability for the use of the information contained in this document. This report does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation. The U.S. Government does not endorse products or manufacturers. Trademarks or manufacturers’ names appear in this report only because they are considered essential to the objective of the document. They are included for informational purposes only and are not intended to reflect a preference, approval, or endorsement of any one product or entity.
    [Show full text]