Anti Racism Discussion Guide

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

ANTI-RACISM

DISCUSSION GUIDE

Naꢀonwide uprisings against police brutality and movements like Black Lives Maꢁer have brought systemic racism to the forefront—making it imperaꢀve for district and school leaders to culꢀvate anꢀ-racist school systems. Historically, district leaders have focused on mulꢀcultural literacy and implicit bias training, but the naꢀonal conversaꢀon has catalyzed a focus on anꢀ-racism.

District leaders across the country are asking how they as individuals can (a) examine their own beliefs and acꢀons and (b) foster an environment in which they can push conversaꢀons about race, racism, and other equity issues. Although conversaꢀons about race pull individuals out of their comfort zones and, at ꢀmes, lead to conflict and tension between parꢀcipants, it is important to lead producꢀve discussions about equity issues in your districts and schools. We created this discussion guide to help leaders effecꢀvely navigate these topics by establishing goals for equity discussions, brainstorming quesꢀons for holding construcꢀve conversaꢀons, and idenꢀfying acꢀons to take as a result of the perspecꢀves and informaꢀon shared.

I idenꢀfy how I

may unknowingly

benefit from racism

I promote & advocate for policies & leaders

that are anꢀ-racist

DEFINE WHAT YOU HOPE TO EXAMINE

I recognize racism is a present & current problem

I seek out quesꢀons

that make me uncomfortable.
I sit with my discomfort
I deny racism is a problem

There are several frameworks available in surrounding anꢀꢁracism research; therefore, it is criꢀcal for districts to define what they hope to examine. Topics range from understanding how members of the community feel about a raceꢁrelated issue to exploring how students from diverse racial and ethnic groups can benefit from sharing their experiences. Without a clear focus for the discussion, facilitators won’t be able to provide the most impacꢂul, educaꢀonal, and open conversaꢀon, and may miss an opportunity to bring stakeholders together.

I speak out when I see

racism in acꢀon

  • I avoid hard
  • I understand my

own privilege in ignoring racism.

quesꢀons

Becoming

Anꢀ-Racist

  • FEAR ZONE
  • LEARNING ZONE
  • GROWTH ZONE

I educate myself about race & structural racism
I strive to be comfortable
I educate my peers how racism harms our profession
I talk to others
I am vulnerable who look &
I don’t let mistakes

deter me from

being beꢁer

about my own biases & knowledge gaps think like me
I listen to others who think & look

differently than me
I yield posiꢀons

of power to those otherwise marginalized

Source: U.S. Department of Jusꢀce

I surround myself with others who think & look

differently than me

Source (right): Adapted from a figure by Dr. Andrew M. Ibrahim, which is inspired by the wriꢀng of Dr. Ibram X. Kendi.

THE ALLY CONTINUUM

Districts are using the Ally Conꢀnuum to facilitate allyship among key stakeholders.

  • APATHETIC
  • AWARE
  • ACTIVE
  • ADVOCATE

NO UNDERSTANDING
OF THE ISSUES
KNOWS BASIC CONCEPTS, NOT
ACTIVE ON BEHALF OF
SELF OR OTHERS
WELL-INFORMED,
SHARING AND SEEKING
DIVERSITY WHEN
COMMITTED, ROUTINELY
AND PROACTIVELY CHAMPIONING

  • ASKED/PROMPTED
  • INCLUSION

Source: Adapted from a figure by Jennifer Brown

© 2020 Hanover Research K12MISC0220

1

GLOSSARY

Race: A human group defined by itself or others as disꢀnct by virtue of perceived common physical characterisꢀcs that are held to be inherent. Determining which characterisꢀcs consꢀtute the race is a choice made by human beings; neither markers nor categories are predetermined by any biological factors.

ESTABLISH GOALS FOR THE CONVERSATION

Ethnicity: A sense of common ancestry based on cultural aꢃachments, past linguisꢀc heritage, religious affiliaꢀons, claimed kinship, or some physical traits.

Once you have defined what you are working toward, you should prepare goals for your discussion about the inequiꢀes in your district.

Source: Stephen Cornell and Douglas Hartmann

CONSIDERATIONS FOR ORGANIZING A FORMAL DIALOGUE ON RACE

COMMUNITY DYNAMICS AND INDIVIDUAL CONCERNS

PARTICIPANTS AND THEIR NEEDS

Facilitators should consider historical and current community contexts and issues related to race that might be addressed in formal

conversaꢀons. Possibiliꢀes include:

Facilitators should consider which stakeholder groups will parꢀcipate in the dialogue, as this will influence the topics addressed during the conversaꢀon. Possible parꢀcipants include:

ꢀ Sharing of cultural knowledge between different racial and

ethnic groups;

ꢀ District and school staff (e.g., administrators, teachers, instrucꢀonal support staff, operaꢀons staff);

ꢀ Addressing a historical or current event or problem in the

community or the naꢀon at-large; and

ꢀ Community members (e.g., elected officials, business partners, representaꢀves of local nonprofits); and

ꢀ Exploring implicit biases and systemic injusꢀces or inequaliꢀes.

ꢀ Students and their families.

IMMEDIATE AND LONG-TERM GOALS

DISCUSSION FORMAT AND CADENCE

Facilitators should consider their objecꢀves in hosꢀng a formal conversaꢀon around race or specific racially-focused events and issues. Possible goals include:
ꢀ Building relaꢀonships between parꢀcipants of different races and ethniciꢀes;

Facilitators should consider how they wish to organize and structure the discussion to best achieve outlined goals. Possible formats include:

ꢀ Small group meeꢀngs with a limited number of specified parꢀcipants (e.g., a high school class, a commiꢁee meeꢀng);
ꢀ Open forums that can be aꢁended by any interested individuals or groups; and

ꢀ Learning empathy for the challenges faced by a historically or currently disadvantaged racial group; and

ꢀ Ongoing working sessions that occur on a set schedule.

ꢀ Planning acꢀons to address problemaꢀc community dynamics.

© 2020 Hanover Research K12MISC0220

Source: Community Relaꢀons Service, U.S. Department of Jusꢀce

2

ESTABLISH GOALS FOR THE CONVERSATION

Facilitators should first consider local climate, national events, historical contexts, and the experiences of individuals from different races to generate potential foci for the

discussion. They should research how “race remains a key predictor of access, opportunity, safety[,] and wellꢁbeing” and how this dynamic plays out within their local school community. Such reflecꢀons can encompass how specific groups or individuals within the district, including the facilitators themselves, face disadvantages, prejudice, or bias due to their race and, conversely, how others may experience unearned

  • privileges and advantages due to their
  • the external construcꢀon of racial

idenꢀꢀes (i.e., how others perceive an individual of a certain race) and its internal manifestaꢀon (i.e., how individuals idenꢀfy and define themselves). Relatedly, facilitators need to consider their own racial idenꢀty and the disadvantages or privileges that accompany it—as well as parꢀcipants’ interpretaꢀon of those disadvantages or privileges—to appropriately frame their individual experiences and maintain conscious consideraꢀon of how their race impacts their ability to lead a raciallyꢁ focused conversaꢀon. race. Knowledge of racial issues and dispariꢀes and how they manifest in schools and the community will allow facilitators to begin brainstorming ways in which raciallyꢁfocused conversaꢀons may challenge those issues and dispariꢀes and the narraꢀves surrounding them.

These exploraꢀons should also emphasize the specific concerns of those groups or individuals that will parꢀcipate in the conversaꢀon. In parꢀcular, facilitators should anꢀcipate parꢀcipants having different percepꢀons and experiences with

DISCUSSION GOALS TO ADVANCE RACIAL JUSTICE AND EQUITY IN EDUCATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS

AWARENESS

CAPACITY-BUILDING

ACTION

Build parꢀcipants’ awareness of equity issues and their ability to understand and examine those issues criꢀcally. As such, the conversaꢀon will help normalize reflecꢀve dialogue about race and related issues.

Develop a specific skill or knowledge set for parꢀcipants to leverage in their daily work around racial equity. Moreover, the conversaꢀon may introduce specific strategies or resources for parꢀcipants to use immediately.

Iniꢀate a parꢀcular acꢀon plan, policy shiſt, or program to combat insꢀtuꢀonal racism and advance racial jusꢀce. These conversaꢀons focus on coordinaꢀon of parꢀcipants’ efforts and the resources at their disposal.

© 2020 Hanover Research K12MISC0220

3

TIPS FOR FACILITATING THE CONVERSATION

Facilitators must also consider how to structure criꢀcal conversaꢀons about race. Logisꢀcal items such as distribuꢀng preꢁreading or reference data, scheduling a meeꢀng ꢀme, selecꢀng quesꢀons and prompts for discussion, and outlining rules and procedures for administering the discussion (e.g., managing talk ꢀme, dealing with increased tensions) are an important part of these consideraꢀons. Facilitators must also determine how to structure these criꢀcal conversaꢀons so that they are construcꢀve and focused on goals. This includes intenꢀonal framing of conversaꢀons around intended goals and results. norms. Facilitators will generally want to emphasize empathy, respect, the session. Conversaꢀons about racial injusꢀce can oſten center on the Black community; while this is a criꢀcal focus point, these conversaꢀons may fail to make space for the first Americans to experience racism: Indigenous people. Facilitators should name the Indigenous territories where the discussion is taking place, explain why this is important to acknowledge, and address the relevance of Indigenous rights to the subject maꢃer of the discussion.

  • confidenꢀality,
  • acceptance
  • with

discomfort, and conflict management when seꢄng rules.

Here are a few examples facilitators can use to start the conversaꢀon:

“Share the airspace.” “What is said here stays here; what is learned here leaves here.”

“Challenge ideas, not people.”

Finally, facilitators should include a land acknowledgment at the start of

Source: Amnesty Internaꢀonal

In addiꢀon, at the start of any formal conversaꢀon around race, racial equity, and social jusꢀce, facilitators should work with parꢀcipants to formalize and codify norms and expectaꢀons. Ideally, facilitators will collaborate with the parꢀcipants to establish these norms and expectaꢀons, though facilitators maysimplyneed to present parꢀcipants with a set of guidelines that they must adhere to—if ꢀme constraints prevent group collaboraꢀon around

© 2020 Hanover Research K12MISC0220

4

QUESTIONS TO GUIDE THE CONVERSATION

POTENTIAL QUESTIONS RELATED TO INDIVIDUALLY LIVED EXPERIENCES

1. What is your racial, ethnic, and/or cultural background?
What aspect of your racial or ethnic identity makes you the proudest?
2. When were you first aware of your race? What

ACTIVITY

circumstances drove this recognition?
3. How often do you think about your racial or

A helpful way for facilitators to ask this quesꢀon is to write down parꢀcipants' answers on a flipchart or index cards. The facilitator can then place the answers around the room randomly and allow parꢀcipants to do a "gallery walk". This can ease parꢀcipants into being more willing to share their perspecꢀves openly.

ethnic identity?
4. In what ways does your race impact your personal life?
Your professional life?
5. Does racial or ethnic identity enter in your process of making important or daily decisions? If so, how?
6. How much and what type of contact do you have with people of other races or groups? What is the nature of these relationships?
7. Have you ever felt “different” in a group setting because of your race/ethnicity? How did this affect you?

BYSTANDER INTERVENTION

8. Have you ever experienced a situation where your race or ethnicity seemed to contribute to a problem or uncomfortable situation?

The bystander effect is “the concept that when there are a group of people that witness an incident, that we as individuals are less likely to respond.” Facilitatorscandiscusshowparꢀcipantscanadvocate forvicꢀmsinthesesituaꢀonsbyintervening—helping to remove them from the situaꢀon, distracꢀng the insꢀgator (e.g., taking them aside to ask an unrelated quesꢀon), and, if in a workplace or similar seꢄng, reporꢀng the abuse to a leader.

9. Have you ever witnessed someone being treated unfairly because of their race or ethnicity? How did you respond?
10. How would you answer the question of where we want to go in race relations as a community?
11. What things have you seen that give you hope for improved race relations?
12. What are some steps you could take to improve race relations in our schools and community?

Source: Kelly CharlesꢁCollins

© 2020 Hanover Research K12MISC0220

5

QUESTIONS TO GUIDE THE CONVERSATION

POTENTIAL QUESTIONS RELATED TO
COMMUNITY AND SCHOOL EXPERIENCES

1. How would you describe the overall state of race relations in our community?
2. What problems do you see in the school community that are related to race and ethnicity?
3. What racial groups tend to be socially isolated from one another in our community?
4. Are there any specific factors (e.g., language, socioeconomic status, neighborhood segregation) that compound issues related to race?
5. What are some of the underlying conditions and hindering forces negatively affecting race relations in our community?
6. In what ways do we agree and/or disagree about the nature of our racial problems, what caused them, and how serious they are?
7. How do racial divisions adversely impact individuals from specific races and the communityꢁatꢁlarge?
8. If we had excellent race relations, what kinds of things would we see, hear, and feel in the community?
9. What are the main changes that need to happen to increase understanding and cooperative action across racial lines?
10. What are some steps we could take to improve race relations in our schools and community?
11. Should we continue and expand this dialogue to get more people involved? How could we do that?
12. What will we do to ensure followꢁup to this conversation?

© 2020 Hanover Research K12MISC0220

6

CLOSING THE CONVERSATION

Facilitators should recognize and explain to parꢀcipants that a single or even a series of raciallyꢁfocused conversaꢀons may sꢀll result in more work needing to be done to accomplish target goals. Relatedly, every individual parꢀcipant maynot be enꢀrelysaꢀsfied with the end result of a conversaꢀon, so it will fall on facilitators to highlight progress made toward goals at the conclusion of a given discussion. For instance, the facilitator may take the following acꢀons to provide some sense of closure to the conversaꢀon in the absence of or in addiꢀon to a measurable representaꢀon of goal achievement: and offer space for others to share how the conversaꢀon impacted them;
Indeed, facilitators should reiterate that parꢀcipants have learned something from the conversaꢀon while also encouraging individuals and the whole group to complete any planned or proposed acꢀon derived during the conversaꢀon, whether those acꢀons are undertaken at the personal or the insꢀtuꢀonal level. This might mean encouraging parꢀcipants to learn more to build on knowledge and skills acquired during a given conversaꢀon or educaꢀng others in the school community. Conversely, facilitators may ask parꢀcipants to implement a series of acꢀons which they outlined to alter organizaꢀonal policies or modify individual behaviors as they relate to racial equity.
ꢀ Encourage parꢀcipants to share an appreciaꢀon for the group process or of someone in the group;
ꢀ Ask parꢀcipants to share what they learned about themselves or what they took from the conversaꢀon;
ꢀ Prompt parꢀcipants to follow up with another parꢀcipant for deeper dialogue to conꢀnue learning and personal discovery;
ꢀ Inquire if there are any acꢀons people are inspired to take as a result of the conversaꢀon; and
ꢀ Schedule a future conversaꢀon or an ongoing meeꢀng ꢀme with the same parꢀcipants.
ꢀ Extend graꢀtude to everyone for their courage and willingness to parꢀcipate in a difficult—but necessary—conversaꢀon;
ꢀ Share how the conversaꢀon impacted themselves personally,

© 2020 Hanover Research K12MISC0220

7

SOURCE LIST

DEFINE WHAT YOU HOPE TO EXAMINE

“Understanding Race and Privilege.” Naꢀonal Associaꢀon of School Psychologists, 2016. hꢃps:// www.nasponline.org/resourcesꢁandꢁpublicaꢀons/ resourcesꢁandꢁpodcasts/diversity/socialꢁjusꢀce/ understandingꢁraceꢁandꢁprivilege
“Indigenous Land Acknowledgment”. Naꢀve Governance Center. hꢃps://naꢀvegov.org/aꢁguideꢁ toꢁindigenousꢁlandꢁacknowledgment/
“Let’s Talk! Discussing Race, Racism, and Other Difficult Topics with Students.” Teaching Tolerance. hꢃps://www.tolerance.org/sites/default/files/ general/TT%20Difficult%20Conversaꢀons %20web.pdf
“Race”. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, May 25, 2020. hꢃps://plato.stanford.edu/entries/race/
Hampton, C. and K. Lee. “Chapter 27. Working Together for Racial Jusꢀce and Inclusion | Secꢀon 4. Strategies and Acꢀviꢀes for Reducing Racial Prejudice and Racism.” Community Tool Box | Center for Community Health and Development, University of Kansas. hꢃps://ctb.ku.edu/en/tableꢁ ofꢁcontents/culture/culturalꢁcompetence/reduceꢁ prejudiceꢁracism/main
Ishani Perera, Ayendri. “Acꢀvism Skills: Land and Territory Acknowledgement”. Amnesty Internaꢀonal, September 1, 2017. hꢃps://www. amnesty.ca/blog/acꢀvismꢁskillsꢁlandꢁandꢁterritoryꢁ acknowledgement

Recommended publications
  • The Black Atlantic As a Counterculture of Modernity

    The Black Atlantic As a Counterculture of Modernity

    1 The Black Atlantic as a Counterculture of Modernity We who are bomeless,-Among Europeans today there is no lack of those who are entitled to call themselves homeless in a distinctive and honourable sense .. We children of the future, how could we be at bome in this today~ We feel disfavour for all ideals that might lead one to feel at home even in this fragile, broken time of transition; as fur "'realities," we do not believe that they will last. The ice that still supports people today has become very thin; the wind that brings the thaw is blowing; we ourselves who are homeless constitute a force that breaks open ice and other aU too thin "realities." NietssdIe On the notion of modernity. It is a vexed question. Is not every era "'modern" in relation to the preceding one? It seems that at least one of the components of "our" modernity is the spread of the awareness we have ofit. The awareness of our awareness (the double, the second degree) is our source of strength and our torment. BIW_nl GlissRnt STRIVING TO BE both European and black requires some specific forms of double consciousness. By saying this I do not mean to suggest that taking on either or both of these unfinished identities necessarily ex­ hausts the subjective resources of any parti.cuIar individual. However, where racist, nationalist, or ethnically absolutist discourses orchestrate po­ litical relationships so that these identities appear to be mutually exclusive, occupying the space: between them or trying to demonstrate their continu­ ity has been viewed as a provocative and even oppositional act of political insubordination.
  • Exploring Race and Privilege

    Exploring Race and Privilege

    Exploring Race and Privilege Exploring Race and Privilege presents materials on culturally responsive supervision from the second of a three‐part series designed for supervisors in teacher education. This series was developed in partnership with Dr. Tanisha Brandon‐ Felder, a consultant in professional development on equity pedagogy. This document contains handouts, planning tools, readings, and other materials to provide field supervisors with a scaffolded experience to improve their ability for culturally responsive supervision. The following materials build on the trust and community developed through the first set of activities The Power of Identity. Exploration of race and concepts such as white privilege will necessitate shared understanding of language and norms for conversation. 1. Understanding the Language of Race and Diversity 2. Ground Rules for Conversation 3. Color Line Instructions 4. Color Line Handout 5. White Privilege: Unpacking the Invisible Knapsack by Peggy McIntosh Understanding the Language of Race and Diversity Terms we all need to know: PREJUDICE Pre‐judgment, bias DISCRIMINATION Prejudice + action OPPRESSION Discrimination + systemic power. (Systemic advantage based on a particular social identity.) Racism = oppression based race‐ the socially constructed meaning attached to a variety of physical attributes including but not limited to skin and eye color, hair texture, and bone structure of people in the US and elsewhere. racism‐ the conscious or unconscious, intentional or unintentional, enactment of racial power, grounded in racial prejudice, by an individual or group against another individual or group perceived to have lower racial status. Types of racism: Internalized Racism Lies within individuals. Refers to private beliefs and biases about race and racism.
  • A History of Race Relations Social Science

    A History of Race Relations Social Science

    A History of Race Relations Social Science Vernon J. Williams, Jr. Purdue University This essay argues that the inclusion of white women, African Americans, Asian Americans, and American Indians into historiography is a fairly recent development; and that the aforementioned development, which did not begin until the 1960s, has resulted in rigorous investigation into the racial thought of Franz Uri Boas, Robert Ezra Park, and Gunnar Myrdal and a hot debate in reference to their significance and influence on today's social sciences. Furthermore, the integration of Af rican American history into the historiography of race relations social science has given impetus to the move­ ment towards making American intellectual history more inclusive. The purposes of this essay are twofold: first, it seeks to articulate the current scholarly debates centered around the purpose of the writings of Franz Uri Boas, Robert Ezra Park, and Gunnar Myrdal and their contributions to an understanding of Black-white relations in the United States; and second, it examines and analyzes the integration of African American history into the subfield of race relations social science. In so doing, I hope to demonstrate that during the past two decades the race relations social science has been telling Americans more about them­ selves on the historical issue of race-most of which they are reluctant to hear-than any other subfield in recent American intellectual history. -I- For more than five decades historically minded anthropologists and intellectual historians have celebrated the decisive role that Franz Uri Boas played in undermining the racist worldview that prevailed in the social sciences during the years before 1930.1 Surprisingly little of this literature-especially when one considers the amount of data which is readily accessible-deals with Boas's specific treatment of Explorations in Ethnic Studies Vol.
  • Kaiser Family Foundation/CNN: Survey of Americans on Race

    Kaiser Family Foundation/CNN: Survey of Americans on Race

    REPORT November 2015 Kaiser Family Foundation/CNN Survey of Americans on Race Prepared by: Bianca DiJulio, Mira Norton, Symone Jackson, and Mollyann Brodie Kaiser Family Foundation In the last couple of years, several incidents in which African Americans were mistreated or in some cases killed by police have sparked renewed public attention to the issue of race relations in America. To better understand the current status of the issue, the Kaiser Family Foundation and CNN surveyed the U.S. public to gauge their views of race in America and personal experiences with discrimination or racism, with a focus on the views and experiences of Black and Hispanic people in America. Racism continues to be a reality for Blacks and Hispanics who report being denied jobs and housing because of their race, or being the victim of unfair treatment in public places like while shopping, dining out, or in dealings with police. Nearly half of Blacks report fearing for their life at some time because of their race. In light of these experiences, there are stark differences in how Blacks, Hispanics and Whites perceive the problem, as well as their attitudes about who is responsible for improving race relations, and views of the criminal justice system’s treatment of Blacks and Hispanics. Recent events have set inequities in the criminal justice system on this national stage and the survey explores views on the underlying reasons for recent protests and support for the Black Lives Matter movement. A third of Black Americans say they have been victims of racial discrimination at some point in their lives, denying them opportunities in housing or employment, and more than 4 in 10 (45 percent) say they have at some point been afraid their life was in danger because of their race.
  • The Importance of Collecting Data and Doing Social Scientific Research on Race ABOUT the AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION

    The Importance of Collecting Data and Doing Social Scientific Research on Race ABOUT the AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION

    STATEMENT OF THE AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION ON The Importance of Collecting Data and Doing Social Scientific Research on Race ABOUT THE AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION The American Sociological Association (ASA), founded in 1905, is a non-profit membership association dedicated to serving sociologists in their work, advancing sociology as a scientific discipline and profession, and promoting the contributions and use of sociology to society. As the national organization for 13,000 sociologists, the ASA is well positioned to provide a unique set of benefits to its members and to promote the vitality, visibility, and diversity of the discipline. Working at the national and international levels, the Association aims to articulate policy and implement programs likely to have the broadest possible impact for sociology now and in the future. William T. Bielby President Barbara F. Reskin Past-President Michael Burawoy President-Elect Sally T. Hillsman Executive Officer Cite publication as: American Sociological Association. 2003. The Importance of Collecting Data and Doing Social Scientific Research on Race. Washington, DC: American Sociological Association. For Information: American Sociological Association 1307 New York Avenue NW, Suite 700 Washington, DC 20005-4701 Telephone: (202) 383-9005 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.asanet.org Copyright © 2003 by the American Sociological Association The Importance of Collecting Data and Doing Social Scientific Research on Race The question of whether to collect statistics that allow the comparison of differences among racial and ethnic groups in the census, public surveys, and administrative databases is not an abstract one. Some scholarly and civic leaders believe that measuring these differences promotes social divisions and fuels a mistaken perception that race is a biological concept.
  • Lyndon Johnson and Albert Gore

    Lyndon Johnson and Albert Gore

    historian_88.qxp 20/12/2005 12:54 Page 8 Feature Lyndon Johnson and Albert Gore: — PROFESSOR A.J. BADGER Southern New Dealers And The Modern South LBJ and Albert Two Southern New Dealers Gore, Al’s father, Lyndon Johnson and Albert Gore were elected to Congress within a year of each other in helped to 1937-38. They were elected in the old style of patronage-oriented southern Democratic transform the Party politics in which a plethora of candidates, with few issues to divide them, contested Southern States. primary elections. Both circumvented the local county seat elites who usually delivered their counties' votes by taking their case directly to the people, mounting vigorous campaigns to establish their name recognition. Johnson reached out to the tiniest and most isolated communities in his district and completely overturned the 'leisurely pace normal in Texas elections.' Gore played the fiddle with a small band to attract a crowd on Saturday afternoons in courthouse squares across his district. But if they started their political lives in the traditional, old, rural South, their careers – LBJ till he stood down from the Presidency in 1968 in the face of the intractable war in Vietnam, Gore till he was defeated as the no I target of the Nixon Southern Strategy in 1970 – spanned the creation of the modern South. In no small measure they themselves contributed to the collapse of the poor, rural, white supremacy South and the creation of a prosperous, urban, bi-racial South. Their careers saw the replacement of the props that had underpinned
  • The Transatlantic Sixties

    The Transatlantic Sixties

    Grzegorz Kosc, Clara Juncker, Sharon Monteith, Britta Waldschmidt-Nelson (eds.) The Transatlantic Sixties Volume 4 The series America: Culture – History – Politics is edited by Christof Mauch, Michael Hochgeschwender, Anke Ortlepp, Ursula Prutsch, and Britta Waldschmidt-Nelson. Grzegorz Kosc, Clara Juncker, Sharon Monteith, Britta Waldschmidt-Nelson (eds.) The Transatlantic Sixties Europe and the United States in the Counterculture Decade This book is published with the generous support of the German Historical Insti- tute Washington, DC, the Lasky Center for Transatlantic Studies at the University of Munich, and the University of Southern Denmark. An electronic version of this book is freely available, thanks to the support of libraries working with Knowledge Unlatched. KU is a collaborative ini- tiative designed to make high quality books Open Access for the public good. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 (BY-NC-ND). which means that the text may be used for non-commercial purposes, provided credit is given to the author. For details go to http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/. Bibliographic information published by the Deutsche Nationalbibliothek The Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Natio- nalbibliografie; detailed bibliographic data are available in the Internet at http://dnb.d-nb.de All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or uti- lized in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any infor- mation storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
  • Towards a Greater Racial Equality: Brown V. Board, the Civil Rights Movement, and the Barrier of Segregation

    Towards a Greater Racial Equality: Brown V. Board, the Civil Rights Movement, and the Barrier of Segregation

    Towards a Greater Racial Equality: Brown v. Board, the Civil Rights Movement, and the Barrier of Segregation Annabella Li Junior Division Historical Paper Historical Paper Word Count: 2498 Introduction In the United States of the late 1870s to mid-1950s, signs proclaiming “COLORED” or “WHITE” in large block letters were commonly hung in public spaces, making clear the distinction between the two categories. Indeed, in a photo taken in May 1940, titled Bus Station in Durham, North Carolina, one such sign labeling a “COLORED WAITING ROOM” looms in the background of the stark black-and-white photo.1 On May 17, 1954, the racial segregation these signs represented was ruled illegal and unconstitutional in schools for the first time by the US Supreme Court in Brown v Board of Education. This landmark case overturned previous precedents supporting segregation, thus breaking down an important barrier not only physically and legally, but also psychologically and socially, to racial equality. Lacking this barrier of segregation, the racial classes of black and white were threatened. This led to violent backlash from white supremacists and failure of schools to integrate in many places, which influenced Americans nationwide and ultimately led to the Civil Rights Movement. Origins of Segregation Though existing for years beforehand in the North,2 widespread segregation in the United States is recognized to have started barely 75 years prior to when the picture in North Carolina was taken. At that time, the North’s victory in the Civil War and the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1865 brought freedom to slaves in the South.
  • Civil Rights and the 1960S: a Decade of Unparalleled Progress Leland Ware

    Civil Rights and the 1960S: a Decade of Unparalleled Progress Leland Ware

    Maryland Law Review Volume 72 | Issue 4 Article 4 Civil Rights and the 1960s: A Decade of Unparalleled Progress Leland Ware Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.umaryland.edu/mlr Part of the Biography Commons Recommended Citation Leland Ware, Civil Rights and the 1960s: A Decade of Unparalleled Progress, 72 Md. L. Rev. 1087 (2013) Available at: http://digitalcommons.law.umaryland.edu/mlr/vol72/iss4/4 This Conference is brought to you for free and open access by the Academic Journals at DigitalCommons@UM Carey Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Maryland Law Review by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UM Carey Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CIVIL RIGHTS AND THE 1960S: A DECADE OF UNPARALLELED PROGRESS ∗ LELAND WARE I. INTRODUCTION The 1960s were a decade unlike any other in the twentieth cen- tury. It was an intense time consumed by rapidly unfolding develop- ments. The decade began with institutionalized segregation still in- tact and massive resistance to school integration in the South. After ten years and hundreds of boycotts, demonstrations, and protests, federal laws were enacted that prohibited discrimination. This Trib- ute provides an overview of the events that propelled African Ameri- cans from segregation to full citizenship. Maryland’s Chief Judge Robert Mack Bell’s education during this decade of change under- scores how race relations were transformed during this critical period in our history. To go from a sit-in participant in the 1960s1 to the top jurist in a formerly segregated state speaks to the decade’s unparal- leled progress.
  • A Queer and Gendered Analysis of Blaxploitation Films

    A Queer and Gendered Analysis of Blaxploitation Films

    Marquette University e-Publications@Marquette Social and Cultural Sciences Faculty Research and Publications/Department of Social and Cultural Sciences This paper is NOT THE PUBLISHED VERSION; but the author’s final, peer-reviewed manuscript. The published version may be accessed by following the link in the citation below. Western Journal of Black Studies, Vol. 37, No. 1 (2013): 28-38. DOI. This article is © Washington State University and permission has been granted for this version to appear in e- Publications@Marquette. Washington State University does not grant permission for this article to be further copied/distributed or hosted elsewhere without the express permission from Washington State University. Contents Abstract ......................................................................................................................................................... 2 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 2 Literature Review .......................................................................................................................................... 3 Social Identity Theory ............................................................................................................................... 3 The Politics of Semiotics ........................................................................................................................... 4 Creating Racial Identity through Film and
  • Race, Space, and Riots in Chicago, New York, and Los Angeles This Page Intentionally Left Blank Race, Space, and Riots in Chicago, New York, and Los Angeles

    Race, Space, and Riots in Chicago, New York, and Los Angeles This Page Intentionally Left Blank Race, Space, and Riots in Chicago, New York, and Los Angeles

    Race, Space, and Riots in Chicago, New York, and Los Angeles This page intentionally left blank Race, Space, and Riots in Chicago, New York, and Los Angeles Janet L. Abu-Lughod 1 2007 3 Oxford University Press, Inc., publishes works that further Oxford University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education. Oxford New York Auckland Cape Town Dar es Salaam Hong Kong Karachi Kuala Lumpur Madrid Melbourne Mexico City Nairobi New Delhi Shanghai Taipei Toronto With offices in Argentina Austria Brazil Chile Czech Republic France Greece Guatemala Hungary Italy Japan Poland Portugal Singapore South Korea Switzerland Thailand Turkey Ukraine Vietnam Copyright ß 2007 by Oxford University Press, Inc. Published by Oxford University Press, Inc. 198 Madison Avenue, New York, New York 10016 www.oup.com Oxford is a registered trademark of Oxford University Press All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior permission of Oxford University Press. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Abu-Lughod, Janet L. Race, space, and riots in Chicago, New York, and Los Angeles / by Janet L. Abu-Lughod. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-19-532875-2 1. Race riots—United States—History—20th century. 2. African Americans— Social conditions—20th century. 3. United States—Race relations. I. Title. HV6477.A38 2007 305.896’073—dc22 2006102002 987654321 Printed in the United States of America on acid-free paper Remembering my mother’s tolerance for difference; my husband’s commitment to social justice This page intentionally left blank Preface ny researcher who has spent long years writing a book is always ambivalent A when it is done: happy to see it published but disappointed that its results must be engraved in stone (now digitized)—just as the processes of research and writing have led to a new level of understanding.
  • The Counterculture Generation: Idolized, Appropriated, and Misunderstood

    The Counterculture Generation: Idolized, Appropriated, and Misunderstood

    The Councilor: A Journal of the Social Studies Volume 82 Number 2 Article 3 May 2021 The Counterculture Generation: Idolized, Appropriated, and Misunderstood Rina R. Bousalis Florida Atlantic University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://thekeep.eiu.edu/the_councilor Part of the Curriculum and Instruction Commons, Curriculum and Social Inquiry Commons, Educational Methods Commons, Elementary Education Commons, Elementary Education and Teaching Commons, Higher Education and Teaching Commons, History Commons, Junior High, Intermediate, Middle School Education and Teaching Commons, and the Secondary Education Commons Recommended Citation Bousalis, Rina R. (2021) "The Counterculture Generation: Idolized, Appropriated, and Misunderstood," The Councilor: A Journal of the Social Studies: Vol. 82 : No. 2 , Article 3. Available at: https://thekeep.eiu.edu/the_councilor/vol82/iss2/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at The Keep. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Councilor: A Journal of the Social Studies by an authorized editor of The Keep. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Bousalis: Counterculture Generation: Idolized, Appropriated, and Misunderstood The Counterculture Generation: Idolized, Appropriated, and Misunderstood Introduction The 1960s to mid-1970s counterculture generation was an era of change in identity, family unit, sexuality, dress, and the arts. It was a time when youth rejected social norms and exhibited their disapproval of racial, ethnic, and political injustices through resistance, and for some subgroups, revolt. The term hippie was coined by 1960s mass media who tried to label youth who believed they were acting hip by rejecting societal norms (MacFarlane, 2015). Though some hippies did not participate in unruly conduct, the media tends to portray all hippies as radicals who partook in deviant behavior.