AMBER VALLEY BOROUGH COUNCIL

DRAFT LOCAL PLAN

Historic Environment Assessments of Potential Housing Sites

2016-17 Historic Environment Assessments Of Potential Housing Sites 2016-17

Each of the potential sites that the Borough Council has considered in the preparation of the Draft Local Plan has been subject to an assessment of the impact that residential development would have on the on the historic environment.

The assessments have been used to inform the process of selecting the proposed Housing Growth Sites in the Draft Local Plan, as well as the Draft Sustainability Appraisal Report which accompanies the Draft Local Plan.

The sites have been assessed with regard to the Historic England Guidance, which includes the following:-

 Historic Environment Good Practice Advice in Planning Note 2 - Managing Significance in Decision-Taking in the Historic Environment (2015)

 Historic England’s Guidance Note 3 -The Historic Environment and Site Allocations in Local Plans (2015)

 The Setting of Heritage Assets - Historic Environment Good Practice Advice in Planning: 3 (2015)

 Conservation Principles Policies and Guidance (2008).

Please note that the site numbers referred to in the assessments (e.g. PHS001) as those set out in Appendix 6: Site Appraisals in the Draft Sustainability Appraisal Report – Technical Appendices.

The following abbreviations have been used throughout the assessments:-

DVMWHS – Derwent Valley Mills World Heritage Site HER – Historic Environment Record OUV – Outstanding Universal Value PHS – Potential Housing Site UNESCO - United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation WHS – World Heritage Site

SITE ASSESSMENT (HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT) Site: PHS001 Site Address: Millfield, Mill Lane, Belper

A Potential heritage assets which may be affected:  Part of site within the Belper and Milford Conservation Area rest adjacent -  Part of site within the World Heritage Site rest adjacent  Majority of Site within World Heritage Site Buffer Zone  Historic Environment Record – opposite Belper Deer Park, adjacent to the site of a blacking mill  Archaeology

B What contribution the site (in its current form) makes to the significance of the heritage asset(s): The Outstanding Universal Value (OUV) of the Site was defined by the following criteria, agreed by UNESCO when the site was inscribed. They are: C (ii) That the site exhibits “an important interchange of human values, over a span of time or within a cultural area of the world, on developments in architecture or technology, monumental arts, town planning or landscape design”; C (iv) That the site is “an outstanding example of a type of building or architectural or technological ensemble or landscape, which illustrates a significant stage in human history”. The UNESCO World Heritage Committee recorded that these criteria were met for the following reasons: C (ii) The Derwent Valley saw the birth of the factory system, when new types of building were erected to house the new technology for spinning cotton developed by Richard Arkwright in the late 18th century. C (iv) In the Derwent Valley for the first time there was large-scale industrial production in a hitherto rural landscape. The need to provide housing and other facilities for workers and managers resulted in the creation of the first modern industrial settlements.

The site contributes to the rural setting of the World Heritage Site and the Belper and Milford Conservation Area. It enables an appreciation of the landscape setting within which the industrial development in the valley began. The site also forms the rural setting to the Belper and Milford Conservation Area which also derives significance from this land as part of its setting.

C What impact does the allocation have on that significance: Development of the site would impact on the rural setting and appreciation of the World Heritage Site and the Conservation Area and would be harmful to OUV.

The development of the site would reduce the rural backdrop of the Conservation Area and impact negatively its setting.

The site lies adjacent to a site that was refused on these grounds and dismissed on appeal and the issues with this site mirror those tested at the appeal.

D Potential for enhancement?  None identified

E Avoiding Harm / Potential Mitigation  None identified

Conclusions: The development of the site would impact negatively on the significance of the World Heritage Site and the Belper and Milford Conservation Area.

SITE ASSESSMENT (HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT) PHS002 Site Address: High Road, South Wingfield

A Potential heritage assets which may be affected:  Scheduled Monument: Wingfield Manor and grade I listed.  Listed Building(s) – setting of All Saints Church, Holme Lane, South Wingfield (grade II*) and outbuilding to Windy Gap Farm (grade II), Conservation Area – Within South Wingfield Conservation Area  Historic Environment Record – deer park in vicinity  Other: potential non-designated Heritage Assets (buildings) adjacent to the site

B What contribution the site (in its current form) makes to the significance of the heritage asset(s): The site occupies a ridge top setting which forms part of the rural setting to grade II* listed Church. Views to the Church are available from the site and the site is very visible from the Church

It is part of the Conservation Area and forms the rural setting to it particularly when approaching from the north.

C What impact does the allocation have on that significance: Development would result in the loss of a dry stone wall which contributes to the character and appearance of the Conservation Area.

Development of the site would reduce the rural setting of the Conservation Area when approached from the north. It would result in an inappropriate form of development, at odds with its historic settlement pattern.

Development would also impact on views to and from a grade II* listed church and its rural setting.

D Potential for enhancement?  None identified

E Avoiding Harm / Potential Mitigation  One or two dwellings adjacent to the existing buildings would minimise harm.

Conclusions: Would have a negative impact on the significance of the South Wingfield Conservation Area and All Saints Church.

SITE ASSESSMENT (HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT) PH003 Site Address: Ashead Ratcliffe Premises, Derby Road, Belper

A Potential heritage assets which may be affected:  Scheduled Monument - none  Listed Building(s) – 200m to east of Railway Bridge grade II, 160m to south of 20-24 Derby Road grade II listed.  Conservation Area – within Belper and Milford Conservation Area  World Heritage Site – within Derwent Valley Mills World Heritage Site  Registered Historic Park or Garden- no  Historic Environment Record – directly adjacent toll road Opposite site of a C19 house – now built on Opposite earthworks: medieval lynchets (field earth works) Opposite Iron foundry and brick works.  Other:  Archaeology- potential

B What contribution the site (in its current form) makes to the significance of the heritage asset(s): The Outstanding Universal Value (OUV) of the Site was defined by the following criteria, agreed by UNESCO when the site was inscribed. They are: C (ii) That the site exhibits “an important interchange of human values, over a span of time or within a cultural area of the world, on developments in architecture or technology, monumental arts, town planning or landscape design”; C (iv) That the site is “an outstanding example of a type of building or architectural or technological ensemble or landscape, which illustrates a significant stage in human history”. The UNESCO World Heritage Committee recorded that these criteria were met for the following reasons: C (ii) The Derwent Valley saw the birth of the factory system, when new types of building were erected to house the new technology for spinning cotton developed by Richard Arkwright in the late 18th century. C (iv) In the Derwent Valley for the first time there was large-scale industrial production in a hitherto rural landscape. The need to provide housing and other facilities for workers and managers resulted in the creation of the first modern industrial settlements.

The site lies adjacent to the river Derwent, the A6 (the former toll road) and the railway which are important attributes of the World Heritage Site. It is visible site within the WHS and the Conservation Area.

C What impact does the allocation have on that significance: The site is currently in industrial use. Development of the site for housing would change the character of the area from industrial to residential.

D Potential for enhancement?  Non identified

E Avoiding Harm / Potential Mitigation  There is a need to pay special regard to the design of development to minimise impacts on the character and appearance of the Conservation Area.

Conclusions: The site is a brownfield site and it is considered that providing the design, massing, scale etc., is appropriate for the site, its redevelopment would not impact adversely on OUV. Additionally it is considered that the site could be redeveloped without unacceptable impacts on the Conservation Area.

SITE ASSESSMENT (HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT) PHS006 Site Address: Land at Bullsmoor, off Kilbourne Road, Belper

A Potential heritage assets which may be affected:  Site lies within the World Heritage Site Buffer Zone  Adjacent to Pottery Farm (grade II listed)  Archaeology potential – to be confirmed  Adjacent Belper and Milford Conservation Area B What contribution the site (in its current form) makes to the significance of the heritage asset(s): The Outstanding Universal Value (OUV) of the Site was defined by the following criteria, agreed by UNESCO when the site was inscribed. They are: C (ii) That the site exhibits “an important interchange of human values, over a span of time or within a cultural area of the world, on developments in architecture or technology, monumental arts, town planning or landscape design”; C (iv) That the site is “an outstanding example of a type of building or architectural or technological ensemble or landscape, which illustrates a significant stage in human history”. The UNESCO World Heritage Committee recorded that these criteria were met for the following reasons: C (ii) The Derwent Valley saw the birth of the factory system, when new types of building were erected to house the new technology for spinning cotton developed by Richard Arkwright in the late 18th century. C (iv) In the Derwent Valley for the first time there was large-scale industrial production in a hitherto rural landscape. The need to provide housing and other facilities for workers and managers resulted in the creation of the first modern industrial settlements.

The site lies within the DVMWHS buffer zone. The site contributes to the rural setting of the World Heritage Site and the Belper and Milford Conservation Area. It enables an appreciation of the rural landscape within which the industrial development in the valley began. It therefore contributes to the OUV of the DVMWHS

The site also forms part of the rural setting to the Belper and Milford Conservation Area which also derives significance from this land as part of its setting.

The site also forms part of the wider rural agricultural setting to the grade II listed Pottery Farm from which it derives significance.

C What impact does the allocation have on that significance: Development of the site would impact on the rural setting and appreciation of the World Heritage Site and the Conservation Area and would be harmful to OUV.

The development of the site would reduce the rural backdrop of the Conservation Area and impact negatively its setting.

The proposal would impact on the openness around Pottery Farm. Currently there is a small field separating the farm from the Valiant factory complex providing an amount of physical separation. The development of this area would result in development around the listed building and remove part of its context.

D Potential for enhancement? None identified.

E Avoiding Harm / Potential Mitigation  Development of the existing car park to the north of the site – adjacent to existing development would not impact on OUV or the setting of Pottery Farm.

Conclusions: The development of the whole site would impact negatively on the OUV of the World Heritage Site, the setting of the Belper and Milford Conservation Area and the setting of the grade II listed Pottery Farm.

SITE ASSESSMENT (HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT) Site Ref: PHS007 Site Address: Cromford Road, Crich

A Potential heritage assets which may be affected:  Listed Building(s) – St Mary’s Church (grade I)  Crich Stand (grade II)  Conservation Area –Crich Conservation Area  Historic Environment Record – Toll Road, Packhorse Road Vicarage Cottages 22-26 Cromford Road  Other: Historic landscape character. Possible non-designated heritage assets within the conservation area  Archaeology: Development Management Archaeologist comments: 7. 38 Cromford Rd, Crich: probably within the medieval core of the village, because of proximity to the Grade I Listed medieval church. Potential for setting impacts to church and Conservation Area. B What contribution the site (in its current form) makes to the significance of the heritage asset(s): St Mary’s Church Medieval church. The land forms the rural setting to the church and there is inter- visibility from the land to the church and vice versa.

Crich Stand The building was originally built as a viewing platform over Derbyshire and to the Trent Valley. It was later rebuilt and dedicated to the Sherwood Forrester’s Regiment although its function as a viewing platform has remained. The building has always had close associations with the village (being built by a major land holder of the village).

The site is visible from Crich stand and views to the monument are visible on the approach from the village.

Conservation Area The land forms part of the setting of the Crich Conservation Area. The Conservation Area is based on the historic village core which has evolved over centuries. The site provides a rural backdrop and separation between vernacular development and the quarry. The land has never been developed and provides open views into and out of the Conservation Area.

The site is bounded by a dry stone wall which contributes to the character and appearance of the Conservation Area.

Historic Environment Record / Non designated Heritage Assets No contribution identified

C What impact does the allocation have on that significance: The development of this area of land would have a detrimental impact on the setting of the Crich Conservation Area as it would reduce the ability of people to experience the vernacular buildings and the church on the approach from the north of the village. It would alter the historic pattern of development adjacent to an historic part of the Conservation Area.

Development would also result in the loss/alteration of the stone wall a feature of the Conservation Area

It would also block the remaining views of the grade I listed St Mary’s Church from the north.

Views to Crich Stand would be interrupted from on the approach to it from the village and views to the village from the monument D Potential for enhancement?  None identified

E Avoiding Harm / Potential Mitigation  None identified

Conclusions: Development of the whole site would have a harmful impact on the setting of the Conservation Area and the setting of a grade I listed building.

SITE ASSESSMENT (HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT) Site Ref: 008 Site Address: Asher Lane Business Park (South) Ripley

A Potential heritage assets which may be affected:  Scheduled Monument: - Butterley Tunnel, Cromford Canal, Ripley lies in the vicinity and is attached to this area of the tunnel.  Historic Environment Record – Cromford Canal – Butterley Tunnel lies beneath the site Adjacent to Butterley workers housing Other: Archaeology: Development Management Archaeologist comments: 8. Asher Lane Business Park – south: Butterley Tunnel of the Cromford Canal runs beneath the site – this is a regionally important asset (perhaps even nationally important given the nearby scheduling under Butterley Works). Any redevelopment of the site needs to be informed by a robust strategy for preserving the tunnel in situ. B What contribution the site (in its current form) makes to the significance of the heritage asset(s): The Butterley Tunnel runs beneath the site and its lies adjacent to workers dwellings from the Butterley Iron Work. It therefore provides evidential significance in respect of the Butterley Tunnel.

C What impact does the allocation have on that significance: The development of the site has the potential to impact on remains important to the further understanding of the Butterley Tunnel scheduled monument.

D Potential for enhancement?  Opportunity for repairs to the tunnel in order to help safeguard its significance E Avoiding Harm / Potential Mitigation  Avoid development above the tunnel to preserve the tunnel in situ. 

Conclusions: Butterley Tunnel of the Cromford Canal runs beneath the site – this is a regionally important asset (perhaps even nationally important given the nearby scheduling under Butterley Works). Any redevelopment of the site needs to be informed by a robust strategy for preserving the tunnel in situ.

SITE ASSESSMENT (HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT) PHS009 Site Address: Mount Pleasant, Ripley

A Potential heritage assets which may be affected:  Historic Environment Record – adjacent The Old Vicarage  Other: Non-designated heritage asset the Old Vicarage and its outbuildings retaining many original features to the south of the site

B What contribution the site (in its current form) makes to the significance of the heritage asset(s): The site lies adjacent to non-designated heritage asset but no evidence to suggest this land was part of the old Vicarage’s land.

C What impact does the allocation have on that significance: The site lies adjacent to the garden of The Old Vicarage and is part of its wider setting. However the Old Vicarage lies in a self-contained plot which appears separate from the site. D Potential for enhancement?  Non identified  E Avoiding Harm / Potential Mitigation Sensitive design possible planting would minimise harm to the setting of the Old Vicarage. Conclusions: A sensitively designed scheme could be accommodated without affect the significance of the non-designated heritage assets.

SITE ASSESSMENT (HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT) PHS011 Site Address: Nether Farm, Birchwood Lane, Somercotes

A Potential heritage assets which may be affected:  Historic Environment Record – Birchwood Methodist Church built 1850- 3 by John Smedley  B What contribution the site (in its current form) makes to the significance of the heritage asset(s): Curtilage and setting of the Church does not extend to this piece of land

C What impact does the allocation have on that significance: No impact on significance

D Potential for enhancement?  None identified

E Avoiding Harm / Potential Mitigation  N/A

Conclusions: No harm to identified heritage assets.

SITE ASSESSMENT (HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT) PHS012 Site Address: Land to the West of Belper Lane, Belper

A Potential heritage assets which may be affected:  Scheduled Monument - no  Listed Building(s) – Wyver Farm grade II (approx. 590m), Dalley House, Dalley Lane grade II (528m), The Barn, Dalley Lane grade II listed (520m), Belper Mills complex grade I,II* and II (850m), Dalley Farm (grade II and II*)  Conservation Area – Belper and Milford Conservation Area (640m)  World Heritage Site Buffer Zone Site lies within the Buffer Zone  World Heritage Site- Derwent Valley Mills WHS (640m)  Registered Historic Park or Garden- River gardens grade II*(approx. 800m) and Belper Cemetery grade II (1km)  Historic Environment Record – St Faith’s Church, Dalley Lane (658m), Wesleyan Methodist Chapel, Belper (670m)  Other: Part of the site includes historic landscape  Archaeology- potential – Archaeological assessment as part of the planning application showed ridge and furrow on the site indicates agricultural use since the post-medieval period.  B What contribution the site (in its current form) makes to the significance of the heritage asset(s):

The Outstanding Universal Value (OUV) of the Site was defined by the following criteria, agreed by UNESCO when the site was inscribed. They are:

C(ii) That the site exhibits “an important interchange of human values, over a span of time or within a cultural area of the world, on developments in architecture or technology, monumental arts, town planning or landscape design”; C(iv) That the site is “an outstanding example of a type of building or architectural or technological ensemble or landscape, which illustrates a significant stage in human history”. The UNESCO World Heritage Committee recorded that these criteria were met for the following reasons: C(ii) The Derwent Valley saw the birth of the factory system, when new types of building were erected to house the new technology for spinning cotton developed by Richard Arkwright in the late 18th century. C(iv) In the Derwent Valley for the first time there was large-scale industrial production in a hitherto rural landscape. The need to provide housing and other facilities for workers and managers resulted in the creation of the first modern industrial settlements.

The site lies within the DVMWHS buffer zone. The site contributes to the rural setting of the World Heritage Site and the Belper and Milford Conservation Area. It enables an appreciation of the rural landscape within which the industrial development in the valley began. It therefore contributes to the OUV of the DVMWHS

The site also forms part of the wider rural setting to the Belper and Milford Conservation Area which also derives significance from this land as part of its setting.

C What impact does the allocation have on that significance: Development of the site would impact on the rural setting and appreciation of the World Heritage Site and the Conservation Area and would be harmful to OUV.

The development of the site would reduce the rural backdrop of the Conservation Area and impact negatively its setting.

D Potential for enhancement?  None identified

E Avoiding Harm / Potential Mitigation It is considered that large scale development in this location would affect OUV. Although it is considered that a small amount of development could be accommodated if built tightly adjacent to the existing properties due to the topography and existing development that would provide screening and a backdrop to the development. Conclusions: Development of the whole site would have impact negatively on the OUV of the WHS.

SITE ASSESSMENT (HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT) Site Ref:PHS013 Site Address: Land at Woodside Farm, The Common Crich

A Potential heritage assets which may be affected:  Listed Building(s): site adjacent Woodbank House, 142 The Common Crich. (grade II) 120 The Common, Crich (grade II)  Historic Environment Record – former quarries to west of site  Other: Former quarry railway runs through part of site Development Management Archaeologist comments: 13. Land at Woodside Farm. The Common, Crich: HER 18420 for a former mineral railway associated with Cliff Quarry. Would need assessment and recording but likely to be dealt with through planning process (NPPF paras 128 and 141). B What contribution the site (in its current form) makes to the significance of the heritage asset(s): The site provides part of the rural setting to Woodbank House which is surrounded on three sides by open fields. The site also contains the former railway.

C What impact does the allocation have on that significance: The site runs along the rear boundary of Woodbank House. Development to the rear of the property could have an adverse impact on its setting if it did not take account of its setting. There are few windows on the rear northern elevation and the principle elevation and thus the main outlook from the property is to the south. It overlooks its garden which has not changed in area in the previous 120 years and would not be impacted upon by the development. The development of the site has the potential to impact on the current tranquillity of the area and be over bearing given the sloping topography of the site.

Development could also result in the loss of the railway.

D Potential for enhancement?  None identified

E Avoiding Harm / Potential Mitigation  Reduce site area to ensure that development is sited sufficiently far away from and lower than the listed building to preserve its significance.  Ensure railway is retained as part of any scheme

Conclusions: Development of the whole site could impact negatively on the setting of Woodbank House; however reducing the site area would reduce the impact. An assessment of industrial archaeological potential would be required but could be dealt with through planning process.

SITE ASSESSMENT (HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT) PHS015 Site Address: Former Laidlaw Premises, Milnhay Rd, Langley Mill

A Potential heritage assets which may be affected:  Historic Environment Record – Site of a mission church on part of the site – since demolished

B What contribution the site (in its current form) makes to the significance of the heritage asset(s): N/A

C What impact does the allocation have on that significance: N/A

D Potential for enhancement? N/A in terms of heritage

E Avoiding Harm / Potential Mitigation N/A

Conclusions: No identified heritage impacts

SITE ASSESSMENT (HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT) PHS016 Site Address: Ashbourne Road, Markeaton Lane, Mackworth

A Potential heritage assets which may be affected: Scheduled Monuments: Mackworth Medieval Settlement

Listed Buildings: Old School House Markeaton Lane (Grade II Listed Building) adjacent to the site Lower Vicarwood (Grade II Listed Building); (1.3km) The eight Listed Buildings of Mackworth; including g Gatehouse to Mackworth Castle (grade I) Castle Cottage grade II, Old School and attached boundary wall (gradeII).Gateway and Walls enclosing graveyard, Tomb adjacent both grade II, Church of All Saints grade I adjacent to the site. Home Farmhouse, The Farm, The Green, Markeaton Lane listed grade II (approx. 350m)

Registered Park and Gardens: Kedleston Hall (Grade I Registered Park and Garden); (1.5km)

Conservation Areas: Mackworth (Conservation Area);(adjacent) Markeaton Conservation Area (250m) Kedleston (Conservation Area); (1.5km)

Historic Environment Record – Roman road through the site Ridge and furrow earthworks to the southwest

Non-designated Heritage Assets: The site is bordered by Markeaton Hall Park to the southeast

Archaeology: Given the proximity of the site to the scheduled monument and a Roman road there is potential for undiscovered archaeological remains. Development Management Archaeologist Comments: Land off Ashbourne Rd & Markeaton Lane, Mackworth. Immediate landscape setting of Mackworth medieval village Scheduled Monument and Mackworth Conservation Area. Significant harmful impacts to designated heritage assets, therefore not ‘sustainable development’ and unsound to allocate.

B What contribution the site (in its current form) makes to the significance of the heritage asset(s): The site forms part of the setting to Mackworth village most of which is a scheduled monument. It also forms part of the setting of the Mackworth Conservation Area which is centred on its village. There is a historical relationship between Mackworth village and Markeaton (part of which is a conservation area) and the site provides the rural setting between these two early settlements.

The site contains further evidence of the medieval settlement in the form of non-designated medieval remains which contribute to the significance of the scheduled monument.

The site forms part of the wider agricultural setting to the grade I Kedleston Hall Registered Park and Garden where it is possible to appreciate the relationship of the Hall to its wider estate. The site provides separation between the urban area of Derby and the RPG which enables the Park to be experienced in a rural setting.

The site lies within 480m of a Lower Vicarwood farmhouse which derives significance from its agricultural location.

Part of the significance of the Mackworth medieval settlement is that it provides evidence of an abandoned village. Included in this is a medieval meadow and sites of late medieval buildings. The site provides the rural location to the scheduled monument and enables an appreciation of the contraction of the village in a rural landscape.

The site also provides a rural context to the grade I listed church parts of which date from the C14. The site provides the church with the backdrop of a relatively isolated position, demonstrating how Mackworth has contracted, leaving the church on its own.

The site provides the rural setting to the Old School House (grade II) formerly a school and associated house. The site enables the building to be appreciated in its original isolated setting where it served a rural dispersed population. C What impact does the allocation have on that significance: Development of the site would result in the urban area being closer to the boundary of the RPG and urbanise part of the countryside between Derby and the Park. This would have a negative impact on its setting and its significance.

Development of the site would have a negative impact on the rural setting of the grade I listed Church of All Saints removing a significant part of the rural land around it.

Development of the site would have a negative impact on the significance of the Mackworth scheduled monument as it would adversely affect its setting by divorcing it from its rural context.

Development between Mackworth and Markeaton will impact negatively on the setting of the Conservation Areas and the significance they derive from their setting by removing their rural backdrop.

Development of the whole of the site would result in the loss of medieval features (ridge and furrow and holloway), and adversely impact on the significance of a non-designated heritage asset and the evidence that assists the understanding of the scheduled monument.

Development would surround the listed building and prevent it being appreciated in its original rural context. It would therefore have an adverse impact on the setting and as such the significance of the listed building.

D Potential for enhancement?  None identified E Avoiding Harm / Potential Mitigation Mitigation The site contributes to the rural setting of the designated heritage assets; it is not considered that there are mitigation measures that could overcome the harmful impacts. Conclusions:

Development of the site would impact negatively on the setting of a number of designated heritage assets including grade 1 listed All Saints Church, Mackworth Conservation Area and Mackworth Medieval Settlement Scheduled Monument and result in the loss of non-designated heritage assets. It is not considered that mitigation measures exist to overcome the impacts.

SITE ASSESSMENT (HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT) PHS017 Site Address: Bowbridge Garage, Ashbourne Road, Mackworth

A Potential heritage assets which may be affected:  Scheduled Monument - no  Listed Building(s) – Bowbridgefields Farm grade II (430m), Home Farm grade II (537m)  Conservation Area –Kedleston (1.7km)  Registered Historic Park or Garden – Kedleston Hall grade I (1.7km)  Historic Environment Record – Evidence of medieval ridge and furrow found adjacent to the site, adjacent toll road.  Other:  Archaeology – potential due to ridge and furrow adjacent to west and also to east of site– further information to be provided by DC Archaeologist.

B What contribution the site (in its current form) makes to the significance of the heritage asset(s): Part of the site is brownfield land and part of the site is undeveloped. The land may have been associated with Bowbridgefields Farm (inconclusive). The undeveloped land makes a contribution to the rural / agricultural setting of the listed farmhouse and aids the understanding of the former agricultural use of the building.

The site is at a lower level and does not contribute to the significance of the Mackworth Conservation Area or the scheduled monuments in that location.

The site makes a limited contribution to the agricultural/rural landscape setting of Kedleston Historic Park and Garden and the Kedleston Conservation Area.

C What impact does the allocation have on that significance: Development would make a small change to the wider setting of Kedleston Hall Historic Park and Garden and the approach to Bowbridgefields Farm. As the site is relatively small the impact on Kedleston Hall Park and Garden is very limited as is the impact on the setting of Bowbridgefields Farm.

D Potential for enhancement?  None identified E Avoiding Harm / Potential Mitigation  Redevelopment of the brownfield area of land only  Keeping the height of development low  Increasing landscaping on the north, east and west

Conclusions: It is considered that the site could be developed in a way that would not impact on the significance of heritage assets.

SITE ASSESSMENT (HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT) PHS018 Site Address: Cotes Park, Birchwood Way, Somercotes

A Potential heritage assets which may be affected:  Historic Environment Record – land abuts former colliery in use in the later 19th and early 20th Century Adjacent Midland Railway line  Other:  Archaeology: 18. Coates Park, Birchwood Way, Somercotes: HER 26005 former Lower Birchwood Colliery. Would need assessment of industrial archaeology potential through planning process.

B What contribution the site (in its current form) makes to the significance of the heritage asset(s): N/A to any designated heritage assets

C What impact does the allocation have on that significance: No adverse impact on setting of Midland Railway or former colliery

D Potential for enhancement?  None identified

E Avoiding Harm / Potential Mitigation  N/A

Conclusions: Would need assessment of industrial archaeology potential through planning process. No impacts on other heritage assets.

SITE ASSESSMENT (HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT) PHS019 Site Address: Land North of Derby Road, Denby

A Potential heritage assets which may be affected:  Scheduled Monument - Ryneld Street (Roman Road) 500m to south  Listed Building(s) – Park Hall Farm grade II* listed to north west of site (417m) Gatepiers and garden walls to Park Hall Farmhouse grade II  Conservation Area - Kilburn to south west approx 700m. World Heritage Site  World Heritage Site Buffer Zone- no  Registered Historic Park or Garden-no  Historic Environment Record – site of Denby Ironworks HER record refers to a brick tower surviving but no evidence on aerial photos Adjacent to Ripley branch of Midland Mainline route Opposite site of former medieval park Adjacent site of Brick and tile making site Adjacent site of former colliery  Other:  Archaeology- potential for archaeological remains (as per comments previously received from Development Management Archaeologist)- DMA comments: 19. Land North of Derby Road, Denby: HER 18806 site of 19th century Denby Ironworks. Would need assessment of industrial archaeology potential through planning process.

B What contribution the site (in its current form) makes to the significance of the heritage asset(s): The site lies at the entrance to the grade II* listed farmhouse and currently provides an open approach.

No impact on setting of the Kilburn Conservation Area as site is of sufficient distance not to make a contribution to its significance.

C What impact does the allocation have on that significance: Development of the site would be visible from and on the approach to the grade II* listed farmhouse. It would also change the character of land on the approach.

D Potential for enhancement?  Non identified

E Avoiding Harm / Potential Mitigation  Screening would help to reduce the impact of development to the setting of the grade II* listed farmhouse.

Conclusions: Although development has the potential to affect the setting of the grade II* listed building screening would help to mitigate the impacts. HER 18806 site of 19th century Denby Ironworks. Would need assessment of industrial archaeology potential through planning process.

SITE ASSESSMENT (HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT) PHS020 Site Address: Land at Amber Valley Rugby Club, Lower Somercotes

A Potential heritage assets which may be affected:  Scheduled Monument -  Listed Building(s) – 486m away from Riddings House (grade II)  Conservation Area –170m from Riddings Conservation Area  World Heritage Site- no  World Heritage Site Buffer Zone- no  Registered Historic Park or Garden- no  Historic Environment Record –  Other:  Archaeology: Development Management Archaeologist comments: The ground investigation report submitted with the application shows the site to have been subject to significant ground disturbance in the context of use as a clay pit, and then opencast coal extraction, before landfill and re-use. This use history will have completely removed any archaeological remains within the site and I recommend therefore that the site retains no archaeological potential.

B What contribution the site (in its current form) makes to the significance of the heritage asset(s): The site forms part of the countryside setting to the Riddings Conservation Area. It also lies opposite one of the entrances to Riddings House former residence of the Oakes family who owned the adjacent ironworks etc.

C What impact does the allocation have on that significance: The development of this site would impact on the approach to the Conservation Area and Riddings House. Access to the site resulting in loss of the hedge would alter the approach towards both of these heritage assets.

D Potential for enhancement?  no E Avoiding Harm / Potential Mitigation  Careful treatment of the site and entrance could reduce the impact on the setting of the Conservation Area and approach to Riddings House

Conclusions: Impact on significance of Conservation Area and Grade II listed building could be mitigated.

SITE ASSESSMENT (HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT) Site Ref: 021 Site Address: Former Butterley Engineering Works

A Potential heritage assets which may be affected:  Scheduled Monument -Butterley Works blast furnaces, canal tunnel and underground wharf 1791 all within the site

 Listed Building(s) – Building to west of gatehouse – grade II within the site Entrance building to Butterley Company works and attached steps bollard and pillar grade II

 Historic Environment Record – Butterley Iron Works  Archaeology interest within the site Development Management Archaeologist comments: 21. Former Butterley Engineering Works, Ripley: includes a Scheduled Monument (Butterley Works blast furnaces, canal tunnel and underground wharf), Grade II listed office and gate house buildings, and regionally/nationally important former industrial buildings associated with the early history of the Butterley Ironworks (HER 24733). Redevelopment of the site has potential to secure a sustainable future for the heritage assets, but any allocation of the site would need to be conditional on retention and re-use of the remaining historic buildings (as a community asset?) and close co-operation with Historic England to ensure a design solution that conserves the significance of the designated assets and provides additional benefits in terms of ongoing repairs and maintenance.

B What contribution the site (in its current form) makes to the significance of the heritage asset(s): The site contains national and locally important buildings. The site is significant on both a national and local level. It has important scheduled monuments in respect of the Butterley Tunnel and blast furnaces within it illustrating the early phase of iron production. It has historical value being the site which produced the ironwork for St Pancras Station and other similarly important projects.

The site was an important local employer and local people associate with the more recent buildings on the site which represent its more recent phase of iron production.

C What impact does the allocation have on that significance: The demolition of the buildings would have a great impact on the significance of the site and a great impact on the significance of all the designated heritage assets.

D Potential for enhancement?  There is the opportunity for increased public access and interpretation  Increasing understanding through research and recording  There is the opportunity to retain, repair and regenerate the site as part of any development  The listed buildings although not on the Heritage at Risk Register are in a poor state of repair and there is the opportunity to prevent their deterioration and repair them as part of the scheme.

E Avoiding Harm / Potential Mitigation  Retention of the buildings and keeping development away from the scheduled monuments and interpretation of the assets would help to avoid harm to the significance of the assets.  Retention of the boundary walls and other structures would reduce harm to significance.  Siting of new development will therefore be important and master planning of the site would help to ensure an appropriate scheme develops.

Conclusions: Development of the whole site would result in harm to the significance of heritage assets as it would result in the demolition of buildings and scheduled monument. There is however potential for retaining and repairing the buildings and other benefits such as interpretation and increased public access as part of a sympathetic, carefully designed scheme.

Archaeology comments: Redevelopment of the site has potential to secure a sustainable future for the heritage assets, but any allocation of the site would need to be conditional on retention and re-use of the remaining historic buildings (as a community asset?) and close co-operation with Historic England to ensure a design solution that conserves the significance of the designated assets and provides additional benefits in terms of ongoing repairs and maintenance.

SITE ASSESSMENT (HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT) PHS022 Site Address: Birches Lane, South Wingfield

A Potential heritage assets which may be affected:  Listed Building(s) – setting of All Saints Church, Holme Lane South Wingfield Church (grade II*) outbuilding to Windy Gap Farm (grade II), Wingfield Manor scheduled monument and grade I listed.  Conservation Area –conservation area related to manorial village.  Historic Environment Record – deer park in vicinity  Other: possible non-designated Heritage Assets (buildings) close to the site

B What contribution the site (in its current form) makes to the significance of the heritage asset(s): The site has a ridge top, visible position forming part of the rural setting to All Saints Church which has continually enjoyed an isolated position. The site provides views to the Church and the site is visible from the Church.

When travelling from the north the site provides views towards the Conservation Area which is a manorial village that has retained its historic settlement pattern

C What impact does the allocation have on that significance:

Development of the site would reduce the rural setting of the Conservation Area when approached from the north and result in an inappropriate form of development within and adjacent to it at odds with its historic settlement pattern.

Development would also impact on views to and from a grade II* listed church and its rural setting.

D Potential for enhancement?  None identified

E Avoiding Harm / Potential Mitigation  None identified

F Conclusions: Would have impact negatively on the significance of the South Wingfield Conservation Area and the setting of South Wingfield Church, grade II* listed. .

SITE ASSESSMENT (HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT) PHS023 Site Address: Dimple Lane Crich

A Potential heritage assets which may be affected:  Historic Environment Record – Hilts Quarry to rear adjacent to route of Butterley Gang Road built in 1793 Development Management Archaeologist comments: . Land at Dimple Lane, Crich: Immediately adjacent to the incline on the Butterley Gangroad (HER 18423) as it leaves the former Hilts Quarry. The Gangroad is currently being considered for scheduling (and the incline is an important section which could potentially be scheduled). I therefore suggest that allocation of this site is unwise until the designation process is complete.  Other – landscape – historic character

B What contribution the site (in its current form) makes to the significance of the heritage asset(s): The site lies adjacent to archaeological site that is being considered for scheduling and as such forms part of its setting. C What impact does the allocation have on that significance: The site forms part of the setting to the Butterley Gangroad and development would impact on the setting of this section of the asset.

D Potential for enhancement?  N/A E Avoiding Harm / Potential Mitigation  Keep a buffer between the asset and any development.

F Conclusions: Development Management Archaeologist considers that allocation of this site is unwise until the designation process is complete.

SITE ASSESSMENT (HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT) PHS024 Site Address: All Saints Church Hall Site, Moseley St Ripley

A Potential heritage assets which may be affected:  Listed Building(s) – Church of All Saints, Church Street (grade II)  Other: The building is approximately 1950’s and church hall

B What contribution the site (in its current form) makes to the significance of the heritage asset(s): The building is the church hall and therefore has historical associations with the listed Church of All Saints. The site is visible from the Church.

C What impact does the allocation have on that significance: The allocation would result in the loss of the building but the significance of the Church would not be affected by the loss of the church hall.

D Potential for enhancement?  Non identified

E Avoiding Harm / Potential Mitigation  Height and design of development would need to respect the proximity of All Saints Church.

Conclusions: Although the site is visible from All Saints Church (grade II) providing scale respects the Church there would be no adverse heritage impacts from the development of the site.

SITE ASSESSMENT (HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT) PHS027 Site Address: Land to North of A38 and South of Wingfield Rd

A Potential heritage assets which may be affected:  Historic Environment Record – site contains small part of site of ironworks an adjacent to site of former Highfield Colliery, spoil heaps and scrub woodland  Other: Archaeological interest identified

B What contribution the site (in its current form) makes to the significance of the heritage asset(s): The site includes part of a site on the Derbyshire Historic Environment Record (HER 16201), the site of a medieval bloomery ironworks, dam and mill pond certainly active between about 1565 and 1615, and possibly originating much earlier.

C What impact does the allocation have on that significance: Archaeological impact that will require comments from the Development Control Archaeologist.

D Potential for enhancement?  Non identified E Avoiding Harm / Potential Mitigation  Subject to comments from DM Archaeologist, it is likely that development could be accommodated and that any archaeological areas could be avoided.

Conclusions: Possible archaeological implications however no impact on the significance of other heritage assets.

SITE ASSESSMENT (HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT) PHS028 Site Address: Land at Nottingham Rd, Ripley

A Potential heritage assets which may be affected:

 Scheduled Monument - no  Listed Building(s) –milepost along Nottingham Road (grade II)  Conservation Area – no  World Heritage Site- no  World Heritage Site Buffer Zone- no  Registered Historic Park or Garden- no  Historic Environment Record – site within former deer park The route of the former Butterley tramway/ mineral line falls within the site.  Other:  Archaeology: Development Archaeologist Comments: The northern/eastern boundary of the site is formed by the former course of a 19th century mineral tramway (HER 24708) associated with the Butterley Works site and retaining evidence for former cuttings along the route. Development in this location may therefore provide opportunities for conservation and enhancement of this route as part of the Green Infrastructure associated with the site.

B What contribution the site (in its current form) makes to the significance of the heritage asset(s): The site includes the mineral tramway associated with the Butterley Works and is part of the former deer park and as such provides evidential value of these assets.

C What impact does the allocation have on that significance: Development of the site could result in the removal of the evidence associated with the assets. D Potential for enhancement?  Potential for conservation and enhancement of the mineral tramway associated with the Butterley Works site as part of the Green Infrastructure associated with the site.  E Avoiding Harm / Potential Mitigation  Ensure the remains of the tramway are retained and their setting enhanced as part of development

Conclusions: Limited impacts which can be mitigated and therefore no unacceptable impacts on heritage assets.

SITE ASSESSMENT (HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT) Site Ref: 029 Site Address: Land South of Kirk’s Lane, Belper

A Potential heritage assets which may be affected: • Site lies within the World Heritage Site Buffer Zone • The site lies close to the World Heritage Site and the Belper and Milford Conservation Area - • Historic Environment Record – opposite Belper Deer Park, • Archaeology- 29. Land South of Kirk's Lane, Belper: Large site within World Heritage Site Buffer Zone and only 200m from the World Heritage Site boundary. Could potentially be an unsound allocation due to the usual issues surrounding the ‘arrested’ settlement edge in the Derwent Valley and Outstanding Universal Value. I would recommend this site is not allocated without detailed visual impact and sensitivity work relating to the World Heritage Site, and consultation with the World Heritage Site advisory team. B What contribution the site (in its current form) makes to the significance of the heritage asset(s): The Outstanding Universal Value (OUV) of the Site was defined by the following criteria, agreed by UNESCO when the site was inscribed. They are:

Criterion (ii) the site should exhibit an important interchange of human values, over a span of time or within a cultural area of the world, on developments in architecture or technology, monumental arts, town planning or landscape design. Criterion (iv) the site should be an outstanding example of a type of building or architectural or technological ensemble or landscape, which illustrates a significant stage in human history. The UNESCO World Heritage Committee recorded that these criteria were met for the following reasons: Criterion (ii) The Derwent Valley saw the birth of the factory system, when new types of building were erected to house the new technology for spinning cotton developed by Richard Arkwright in the late 18th century Criterion (iv) In the Derwent Valley for the first time there was large-scale industrial production in a hitherto rural landscape. The need to provide housing and other facilities for workers and managers resulted in the creation of the first modern industrial settlements.

The site contributes to the rural setting of the World Heritage Site and the Belper and Milford Conservation Area. It enables an appreciation of the landscape setting within which the industrial development in the valley began. The site also forms part of the rural setting to the Belper and Milford Conservation Area which also derives significance from this land as part of its setting.

C What impact does the allocation have on that significance:

Development of the site would impact on the rural setting and appreciation of the World Heritage Site and the Conservation Area and would be harmful to OUV.

The development of the site would reduce the rural backdrop of the Conservation Area and impact negatively its setting.

D Potential for enhancement? • None identified

E Avoiding Harm / Potential Mitigation • None identified.

Conclusions: The development of the land would be harmful to the OUV of the World Heritage Site and to the setting of the Belper and Milford Conservation

SITE ASSESSMENT (HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT) PHS031 Site Address: Land to the South of B600 Lower Somercotes

A Potential heritage assets which may be affected:  Listed Building(s) – Riddings House (grade II) St James Church Riddings (grade II) 4 Church Street, Riddings (grade II) 9 Park Mews (grade II) Circular water trough, Park Mews (gradeII)

 Conservation Area –Riddings Conservation Area

 Historic Environment Record – Riddings Ironworks and tramway adjacent Riddings Park – evidence of ridge and furrow

 Other: Potential for non-designated heritage assets e.g. the Lodge to Riddings Park to north east and Furnace Row

B What contribution the site (in its current form) makes to the significance of the heritage asset(s): Part of the site had associations with Riddings Park as it contains one of the entrances to it via the lodge off the B600. The land has also had associations with the Alfreton Works, having old shafts within the site. It may retain evidential value in this respect It has both historical and evidential value in terms of this relationship and it therefore makes a contribution to the setting of the Riddings Conservation Area.

The site also contributes to the setting of Riddings House (grade II). This has associations with both the iron works and the Park as it was built and extended by the local ironmaster, Oakes, who also owned much of the village of Riddings.

The site is part of the wider setting of St James Church which was also built on land given by the Oakes family and has views over the Park.

4 Church Street, 9 Park Mews, Circular water trough and Park Mews are self-contained and the site does not contribute to their significance.

C What impact does the allocation have on that significance:

The lodge survives and is still visible as the entrance to the Park and drive to Riddings House. Development in this location would affect character of the park land leading up to Riddings Park and to Ridding House.

D Potential for enhancement? None identified E Avoiding Harm / Potential Mitigation  None identified

Conclusions: Development of the whole site would have impact negatively on the Riddings Conservation Area and Riddings House.

SITE ASSESSMENT (HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT) PHS032 Site Address: Land North of Ashbourne Road, Kirk Langley

A Potential heritage assets which may be affected:  Scheduled Monument -  Listed Building(s) – 29 Ashbourne Road (Langley Barton), grade II listed (opposite), Meynell House, 16 Ashbourne Road (grade II)  Conservation Area –Kirk Langley Conservation Area, Kedleston Conservation Area  Registered Historic Park or Garden- Kedleston PAG grade (1.8km)  Historic Environment Record – 125m to north Ridge and furrow visible on aerial photographs taken in 1971 and 1973 in two adjacent fields. The northern-most field also contains at least three relatively large pits - possibly former marl pits (1, 2) At least some of the ridge and furrow survives, as do the pits. Also site of C14th deer park lies to the north –around Meynell Langley Hall Adjacent turnpike road  Other – part historic landscape  Archaeology- in an area where there is potential for archaeological interest, ridge and furrow and a findspot of flints found close by.

B What contribution the site (in its current form) makes to the significance of the heritage asset(s): The Kirk Langley Conservation Area includes historic buildings within the village setting. The village has associations with Meynell Langley Hall as land in the village was once owned by Godfrey Meynell the occupant of Meynell Langley Hall). The site lies between the village and Meynell Langley Hall and is part of the open land between that land and the village. The site also provides a rural setting to the Conservation Area and to 29 Ashbourne Road. The setting of both the village and 29 Ashbourne Road appears to have changed little over time

The site may be visible from the edge of Kedleston Historic Park and Garden, being at a similar level to the boundary of the Park. It is therefore likely to be visible in wider views from its periphery.

C What impact does the allocation have on that significance: The proposal would have an impact on the setting of the Conservation Area and the setting of 29 Ashbourne Road. It would erode part of the rural setting particularly to 29 Ashbourne Road and between the village and Meynell Langley Hall.

Development of this area of land would in fill a gap between the village and an existing area of linear development. This result in a linear development of approx. 400m along Ashbourne Road, greatly extending the limits of the village and be a form of development that does not follow the historical pattern of development in the Conservation Area.

The development would reduce the openness in the setting of Kedleston Hall PAG.

D Potential for enhancement?  none E Avoiding Harm / Potential Mitigation  Reducing the extent of the site would reduce the impact on the Conservation Area. It would help to prevent the village merging with the existing linear development to the east of Kirk Langley.  Any development would need to be sensitively designed to be in keeping with such a sensitive location.  Landscaping on the north of the site would help to screen the development from the HPAG.

Conclusions: The site as submitted would have negative impacts on the setting of the Kirk Langley Conservation Area; Development of the site would also negatively impact on the significance of 29 Ashbourne Road (opposite).

SITE ASSESSMENT (HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT) PHS033 Site Address: Land to the rear of 445-469 Somercotes Hill

A Potential heritage assets which may be affected:  Historic Environment Records: – 471 Somercotes Hill and adjacent property site of former Primitive Methodist chapel.

B What contribution the site (in its current form) makes to the significance of the heritage asset(s): Although the proposed access lies adjacent to no 471 Somercotes Hill. It is not considered that the site contributes to the significance of heritage assets.

C What impact does the allocation have on that significance: Adjacent to the former site but no impact on significance

D Potential for enhancement?  N/A E Avoiding Harm / Potential Mitigation  N/A

Conclusions: No heritage impacts

SITE ASSESSMENT (HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT) PHS034 Site Address: Land at Asher Lane, Business Park (north)

A Potential heritage assets which may be affected:  Listed Building(s) – Butterley Railway signal box on opposite side of Midland Railway (grade II)  Historic Environment Record – Egerton Cotton Mill, Hammersmith (part of the site) Former Midland Railway adjacent and branch line went through the site Former Railway Viaduct now demolished adjacent Opposite site of former Pentrich Colliery  Archaeology: Development Management Archaeologist Comments: 34. Land at Asher Lane Business Park, Ripley: HER 24739 former Egerton Cotton Mill with some partial survival of buildings. Would need assessment of industrial archaeology through planning process. 

B What contribution the site (in its current form) makes to the significance of the heritage asset(s): The site forms part of the undeveloped setting to the Signal Box sited along the Butterley Railway line where it is visible from the public footpath.

The site contains some remnants of the buildings of the former Egerton Cotton Mill there is therefore evidential value in the remains

The branch line has been removed and the site does not make any particular contribution to significance of the remaining railway line

C What impact does the allocation have on that significance: Development would urbanise the land adjacent to the listed signal box and affect the ability of the public to view the listed signal box from the footpath.

The development would remove the remains of the Egerton Cotton Mill buildings.

D Potential for enhancement?  None identified

E Avoiding Harm / Potential Mitigation  Ensure that the eastern area of the site remains free from development to protect the setting of the Signal Box  Possible recording / research of the Egerton Cotton Mill for interpretation. 

Conclusions: Development of the whole site would have a negative impact on setting of heritage assets / archaeology but the impacts could be mitigated.

SITE ASSESSMENT (HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT) PHS035 Site Address: Land at Lockwoods, Ripley Road, Sawmills

A Potential heritage assets which may be affected:  Listed Building(s) – Bull Bridge adjacent (grade II)  Historic Environment Record – Site of C19 and early C20 brick and tile works Midland Railway Line of Cromford Canal  Archaeology: Development Management Archaeologist Comments: 35. Land at Lockwoods, Ripley Rd, Sawmills: HER 24783 site of Ambergate Brick and Tile Works (19th century). Will need assessment of industrial archaeology (and evaluation of wider site) through planning process.  B What contribution the site (in its current form) makes to the significance of the heritage asset(s): The site is sufficiently far away not to make a contribution to significance of the listed bridge Part of the route of former Cromford Canal lies within the site and the site therefore contributes to the significance of the non-designated asset.

C What impact does the allocation have on that significance: No impact on the significance of the bridge. Development of the site could prevent or create the restoration of the route of the Cromford Canal in this area

D Potential for enhancement?  Potential for reinstatement of Cromford Canal to navigable state

E Avoiding Harm / Potential Mitigation  Keep the route of the Cromford Canal and its tow path free from development for future reinstatement 

Conclusions:

Heritage concerns could be addressed as part of the development.

SITE ASSESSMENT (HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT) PHS036 Site Address: Land at Radbourne Lane, Mackworth

A Potential heritage assets which may be affected:  Scheduled Monument - Mackworth medieval settlement including the castle gatehouse, part of the medieval open field system and a pinfold  Listed Building(s) – Home Farmhouse, The Old School and attached boundary wall, The Thatched Cottage, Lowes Road, Castle Cottages, all grade II, Gateway and Walls enclosing graveyard, Tomb adjacent All Saints Church both grade II Church of All Saints grade I, Gatehouse to Mackworth Castle grade I all in Mackworth village Lower Vicarwood (Farmhouse) grade II (approx. 1.5 km)  Conservation Area –adjacent to Mackworth Conservation Area  Registered Historic Park or Garden: Kedleston Registered Park and Garden (approx. 2km)  Historic Environment Record – remains of fishponds ridge and furrow earthworks within the site.  Archaeology: likely impacts on archaeology, comments from Development Management Archaeologist: 36. Land at Radbourne Lane, Mackworth: Immediate landscape setting of Mackworth medieval village Scheduled Monument and Mackworth Conservation Area. I note that the ridge and furrow setting of the medieval village is preserved in open space in the north of the site (Concept Plan 1) although ‘Concept Plan’ shows some potentially harmful tree planting in field corners in this area. It is possible that the southern part of the site could be allocated without harmful effects to setting, but this decision should be informed by visual impact and sensitivity work carried out in consultation with Historic England with regard to the setting of the Scheduled Monument and the Conservation Area. Allocation of the whole site would be unsound.

B What contribution the site (in its current form) makes to the significance of the heritage asset(s): The site is part of the agricultural setting to the Mackworth Conservation Area and the scheduled monument which lie within Mackworth Village together with a number of listed buildings including the grade I listed All Saints Church.

The site contains non-designated heritage assets in the form of remnants of medieval ridge and furrow remains that contribute to the understanding of the Mackworth medieval settlement (a scheduled monument). The A52 now separates the site from Mackworth village however the site would not have been separated to the extent it is now and as such the site remains important to the designated heritage assets in addition to contributing to the contribution to the character of the historic landscape.

The site also contributes to the wider setting of the Kedleston Registered Park and Garden, being visible from the periphery.

The site forms part of the wider setting of Lower Vicarwood listed farmhouse which derives significance from a rural setting.

What impact does the allocation have on that significance: The development of the site would erode the medieval features within the site which contribute to the understanding of the scheduled monument in Mackworth village. It would result in built development adjacent to the abandoned medieval settlement which would prevent the appreciation of the asset in a rural context.

Development of the site would impact negatively on the setting of the Mackworth Conservation Area which is centred on the village. It would result in development up to the boundary of the Conservation Area affecting views and its context. D Potential for enhancement? None identified E Avoiding Harm / Potential Mitigation Harm could be reduced by a reduction of the site such that the medieval features could be preserved.

As the site is 2km away from Kedleston RPG and 1.5 km away from Lower Vicarwood farmhouse screening may be possible to limit the impact on the setting of these assets.

Conclusions: Screening could help to mitigate the impact on the setting of Kedleston Hall Park and Garden, and Lower Vicarwood farmhouse.

Although a reduction in the site area and preservation of the medieval non-designated heritage assets could reduce the impact of development, it is considered that development of the site would remain harmful to the setting of the Conservation Area and scheduled monuments in particular.

Development Management Archaeologist Comments:

SITE ASSESSMENT (HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT) PHS037 Site Address: Leabrooks Club Ltd Greenhill Lane Leabrooks

A Potential heritage assets which may be affected:  None  All HER records too far away from site

B What contribution the site (in its current form) makes to the significance of the heritage asset(s): N/A

C What impact does the allocation have on that significance: N/A

D Potential for enhancement?  N/A E Avoiding Harm / Potential Mitigation  N/A

Conclusions: No heritage imapcts

SITE ASSESSMENT (HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT) PHS038 Site Address: Land North of Denby

A Potential heritage assets which may be affected:  Scheduled Monument - Ryneld Street (Roman Road) 500m to south  Listed Building(s) – Park Hall Farm grade II* listed adjacent to the site Gatepiers and garden walls to Park Hall Farmhouse grade II  Conservation Area –Kilburn to south west approx 700m.  World Heritage Site - no  World Heritage Site Buffer Zone- no  Registered Historic Park or Garden-no  Historic Environment Record – HER 17022: The Openwoodgate Branch Lines of the Little Eaton Gangway (record includes the Belper and Morley Park Railway) – a network of early plateways/railways built between c1815 and 1855 in context with development of the coal and iron industries across the region; padstones and elements of infrastructure survive in places HER 18806: Denby Ironworks (1860-1929): no longer extant though archaeological remains are almost certain to survive; HER 18816: Denby Hall Colliery (established mid 19th century) – no extant built heritage remains; part of the site may have been subsequently opencast; HER 18813: Brick and Tile Works near Denby Colliery (19th-20th century) – no extant built heritage remains; HER 18821: Park Hall park – a medieval park created in the early 14th century; boundaries are unknown and no extant park pale is recorded. A parker’s lodge may have stood on the site of the later Park Hall HER 99055: route of the Ripley branch of the Midland Railway, opened in 1855 The also contains the Grade II Listed Park Hall (HER 18807) – an early 17th century house with extensive additions of 1702 and early 20th century restoration, possible on the site of a medieval park lodge.  Archaeology:  Development Management Archaeologist Comments: In terms of archaeological potential, the landscape has been extensively opencast, and these areas will retain no potential for hitherto unknown below-ground archaeology. Some un-extracted parts may survive – the north-west corner of the area in particular - with a corresponding background potential.   Although there is a level of local heritage significance in the area – with particular connection to its industrial history - there are no heritage grounds to preclude allocation of the site for development. This type of industrial record (19th century colliery and ironworks sites) is found in most areas of eastern Derbyshire, and the potential for earlier below- ground archaeology is hugely limited by the extent of opencast extraction. The area does not have high historic landscape value as scored by HLC. All of these issues could be dealt with through the planning process (policies under NPPF chapter 12) with appropriate scoping in of cultural heritage and archaeology to ES/pre-application studies, and potential conditions for archaeological recording..

 Historic landscape character: the majority of the area is scored in Historic Landscape Characterisation (HLC) as ‘post-1650 enclosure’ with rebuilt field boundaries following recent opencasting and restoration. Four fields at the north-western corner are scored as ‘Ancient fields – fossilised strip system’ and are of higher historic landscape value, as is a small area at the site’s southern boundary.

B What contribution the site (in its current form) makes to the significance of the heritage asset(s): The site lies at the entrance to the grade II* listed farmhouse and currently provides an open approach.

The site forms the rural setting to the farmhouse which is early C17 and historically associated to farming the land surrounding it. The land continues to provide this reference.

No impact on setting of the Kilburn Conservation Area as site is of sufficient distance not to make a contribution to its significance.

C What impact does the allocation have on that significance: Development of the site would change the character of the land surrounding the listed building removing it from its context.

D Potential for enhancement?  None identified – public access already exists.

E Avoiding Harm / Potential Mitigation  Reducing the site area to site development away from the listed building would reduce the impact in addition to careful design.

Conclusions: Development of the whole site would have a negative impact on the significance of the listed Park Hall Farmhouse (grade II*) and the associated listed structures.

Potential archaeological implications with development of the site which would need to be considered as part of any planning application.

SITE ASSESSMENT (HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT) PHS039 Site Address: Land at Nottingham Rd A610 Codnor Off Alfreton Rd

A Potential heritage assets which may be affected:  No known heritage assets in the area however the land retains an old field pattern.  Archaeology – No comments received from the Development Management Archaeologist - assume archaeological issues can be dealt with through the planning application process B What contribution the site (in its current form) makes to the significance of the heritage asset(s): Old field boundaries are still in existence.

C What impact does the allocation have on that significance: Field boundaries likely to be lost.

D Potential for enhancement?  N/A

E Avoiding Harm / Potential Mitigation  Unlikely that it would be possible to retain field boundaries as part of the development.

Conclusions: The impacts on heritage assets could be addressed in sensitive development of the site.

SITE ASSESSMENT (HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT) PHS040 Site Address: Codnor Gate remaining land, Ripley

A Potential heritage assets which may be affected:  Listed Building(s) – Codnor Gate Farm, grade II lies within the site  Historic Environment Record – Part of site within the former medieval deer park  Other:  Archaeology- Development Management Archaeologist Comments: 40. Land at Codnor Gate – note Grade II Listed Codnor Gate Farmhouse within this site. B What contribution the site (in its current form) makes to the significance of the heritage asset(s): Some of the land does contribute to the significance of the listed building being part of its domestic curtilage and being relatively open to the east and west, allowing views to and from it. Its farmland setting has however been eroded by the modern industrial development and is enclosed to the north by development.

C What impact does the allocation have on that significance: Development of the whole site would result in the loss of the listed building and therefore have a major impact.

D Potential for enhancement?  The building requires some repairs and there could be an opportunity for this to be part of a wider development scheme.

E Avoiding Harm / Potential Mitigation  The site boundary could be amended to retain the building and land that has been part of its curtilage and the adjacent building which has also been part of the group of buildings on the site for at least 130 years. It could also ensure views are retained from the east, west and south.

Conclusions: Development of the whole site would result in the loss of the listed building and therefore have a major impact. However the site boundary could be amended to reduce the impact and development could take place without negative impacts on the significance of the grade II listed building.

SITE ASSESSMENT (HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT) PHS041 Site Address: Children’s Play Area, Church Street, Kilburn

A Potential heritage assets which may be affected:  Listed Building(s) – opposite Kilburn Hall, Cruck Barn and outbuildings, Manor Court, Church Street, both grade II  Conservation Area –Kilburn Conservation Area  Historic Environment Record – none  Archaeology – No comments received from the Development Management Archaeologist - assume archaeological issues can be dealt with through the planning application process B What contribution the site (in its current form) makes to the significance of the heritage asset(s): Part of the site lies within the Kilburn Conservation and the remaining part of the site lies adjacent. The site is also opposite Kilburn Hall a grade II listed building and comprises an open area that does not appear to have been previously developed. The site makes a positive contribution to the Kilburn Conservation Area with a low stone wall along the boundary with the A609 and trees and vegetation which contributes to the character of the Conservation Area. The openness contrasts with the enclosed nature of the Hall opposite and makes a positive contribution to its setting.

C What impact does the allocation have on that significance: The development of the site would remove an important open area with public access in the Kilburn Conservation Area which provides views within the Conservation Area

The development of the area is likely to result in changes / loss of a stone boundary wall, a feature which contributes positively to the character and appearance of the Conservation Area.

D Potential for enhancement?  None identified

E Avoiding Harm / Potential Mitigation  Reducing the site area would reduce the impact on the Conservation Area.

Conclusions: The site lies in a sensitive location which contributes to the character and appearance of the Conservation Area. Development of the whole of the site would impact negatively on its significance.

SITE ASSESSMENT (HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT) PHS042 Site Address: Ripley Colliery reclamation Land, Ripley

A Potential heritage assets which may be affected:  Historic Environment Record – Disused Branch Lines adjacent to the site Site and along the edge  Archaeology: No comments received from the Development Management Archaeologist - assume archaeological issues can be dealt with through the planning application process B What contribution the site (in its current form) makes to the significance of the heritage asset(s): The site was a former colliery site and therefore has an historical association with the former railway lines listed in the HER.

C What impact does the allocation have on that significance: The site has been reclaimed and there is no evidence of the former colliery on the site part of the line of the railway could be removed by the development of the site.

D Potential for enhancement?  None identified. E Avoiding Harm / Potential Mitigation  The route of the former railway could be kept free from development to protect the route of the former railway line. 

Conclusions: The site could be developed without an adverse impact on the historic environment.

SITE ASSESSMENT (HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT) Site Ref: 043 Site Address: Fletcher Street to Church Street, Heanor

A Potential heritage assets which may be affected:  Listed Building(s) – Site is adjacent to 8 Church Street grade II, St Lawrence’s Church grade II*, 19 Market St grade II, Town Hall, grade II  Historic Environment Record – Adjacent to Wesleyan Methodist Chapel built 1839 but significantly extended. Adjacent to site of Sunday School built 1847(since demolished)  Other: potential non-designated heritage assets around the church and along Church Street.  Archaeology- potential identified comments from Development Management Archaeologist: 43. Land off Fletcher Street, Heanor: the site is likely to run through medieval backplots associated with the line of Market Street (medieval archaeology has been recorded on the site of the Florence Shipley Home). Development may have harmful impacts on the setting of the Grade II* Listed St Laurence’s Church and this should be carefully assessed before allocation.

B What contribution the site (in its current form) makes to the significance of the heritage asset(s): The site forms part of the setting to 8 Church Street and the grade II* listed St Lawrence’s Church. The area to the east of the site has not been previously developed and has been planted with trees for at least the past 130 years. The trees are visible in wider views together with the Church tower. The site is therefore is an important part of the church’s setting and contributes to the significance of 8 Church Street.

19 Market Street was built as a bank and designed to front Market Street. Similarly Town Hall’s principle elevation fronts Market Street. The site lies to the rear of these building enables views of them from the north. However there is no evidence to suggest that the site has any historical links with these buildings. Currently the land is car parking immediately to the north of the building and does not make a positive contribution to their setting.

C What impact does the allocation have on that significance: Listed Buildings  St Lawrence’s Church: development of the site would impact on the Church’s setting to the north which appears to have changed very little. The Church occupies an elevated position appearing to be the tallest building in relation to the rest of the town particularly when viewed from the north  8 Church Street: the site would impact on the tree cover surrounding the listed building to the north and east.  19 Market Street: site is to rear of this listed building, main elevation of building faces Market Street. Designed to face the Market Place and be part of the townscape of the Market Place. Sensitive development to the rear would have little impact on significance.  Town Hall: Designed to face Market Street and be part of the townscape of the Market Place. Sensitive development to the rear would have little impact on significance HER entries  Wesleyan Chapel and Sunday School altered / demolished and therefore development to the rear would have no impact on significance. Potential Archaeology  There is likely to be a need to condition any development dependant on input from Development Control Archaeologist. D Potential for enhancement?  Potential to create new access routes.  Potential to improve the setting of designated and non-designated heritage assets. There is a particular opportunity to develop the area to improve the setting to the rear of the buildings along the Market Place. E Avoiding Harm / Potential Mitigation  Development of the land around St Lawrence’s Church would adversely affect it and 8 Church Street’s setting. The trees should be retained and this area should be kept free from built development.  The site although at a lower level than Market Place and St Lawrence’s Church, is however visible in long distance views. It is important that any new development be kept lower than the listed buildings to retain views of them from the north and also be carefully designed to improve their setting. It is also important that the materials used in any new development complement the existing listed buildings.

Conclusions: The site does affect the setting of a number of listed buildings. Providing the most sensitive part of the site around the St Lawrence’s Church remains free from development a sensitive scheme could be accommodated without adversely affecting their setting.

SITE ASSESSMENT (HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT) PHS 044 Site Address: Duffield Depot, Derby Road, Duffield

A Potential heritage assets which may be affected:  Scheduled Monument - Duffield Bridge 730m to north west  Listed Building(s) – 157 Derby Road grade II approx. 285m to south, St Alkmunds Church (grade I) to north east (520m approx.)  Conservation Area – Duffield Conservation Area approx. 257m to east of site  World Heritage Site: east of site (approx. 90m)  World Heritage Site Buffer Zone- Site lies totally within the WHS Buffer Zone.  Registered Historic Park or Garden – no  Historic Environment Record – Site of C19 gas works, gate houses still survive Adjacent to toll road – one of earliest in Derbyshire  Archaeology: Development Management Archaeologist Comments: 44. Duffield Depot, Derbyshire Road, Duffield. Contains HER 22330, the site of a 19th century gasworks, of which one gatehouse still stands. This is a handsome building and allocation of the site should be contingent upon its retention and re-use. B What contribution the site (in its current form) makes to the significance of the heritage asset(s): The site lies in the WHS Buffer Zone where the rural landscape setting to the World Heritage Site has been preserved. The site is used as a depot with low density buildings and landscaping features surrounding it. Other than being part of this rural setting it makes no other contribution to the significance of the WHS.

It is not considered that the site makes any contribution to the setting of 157 Derby Road, or St Alkmunds Parish Church given their proximity and the current use of the site.

The site contains a non-designated heritage asset in the form of a characterful gatehouse with original features on the exterior. This makes a positive contribution to the local area.

C What impact does the allocation have on that significance:

The development of the site for approx. 22 dwellings would intensify development in this location. Given that the site is previously developed and is unlikely to have an adverse impact on the rural landscape setting of the World Heritage Site

Development of the whole site would lead to the loss of a non-designated heritage asset.

D Potential for enhancement? There is the potential to restore the gatehouse as part of the scheme and improve the gateway in to the site. There is potential to remove some of the vegetation and reveal the rear of the building. There is also the potential to clear the temporary buildings and redevelop with more sympathetic buildings.

E Avoiding Harm / Potential Mitigation The site could be developed whilst retaining the gatehouse and its adjoining wall and to retain the landscaping particularly along the southern boundary.

Conclusions: There is potential for redevelopment of the site. In order to avoid impact on the non-designated heritage asset these should be retained as part of any scheme.

SITE ASSESSMENT (HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT) PHS045 Site Address: Sanuk 3 Ridgeway on the Hill, Ambergate

A Potential heritage assets which may be affected:  Adjacent to World Heritage Site Buffer Zone  Archaeology: No comments received from the Development Management Archaeologist - assume archaeological issues can be dealt with through the planning application process B What contribution the site (in its current form) makes to the significance of the heritage asset(s): Adjacent to but not within the Buffer Zone.

C What impact does the allocation have on that significance: Due to the topography of the land the site does not impact on the OUV of the World Heritage Site

D Potential for enhancement?  Non identified

E Avoiding Harm / Potential Mitigation  N/A 

Conclusions: Development of the site would not impact negatively on any identified heritage assets

SITE ASSESSMENT (HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT) Site Ref: 046 Site Address: Old Vicarage, Mount Pleasant, Ripley

A Potential heritage assets which may be affected:  Historic Environment Record – The Old Vicarage  Non-designated heritage asset the Old Vicarage and its outbuildings retaining many original features  Archaeology: Development Management Archaeologist Comments: 46. The Old Vicarage, Mount Pleasant, Ripley. The old vicarage building is HER 22412 and is of the same slag lump material as Ironville House. There is likely therefore to be a link with the Butterley Company (with the Ironworks only about 500m to the north-east). Because of this strong local significance allocation of the site should be contingent upon retention and re-use of the vicarage building.

B What contribution the site (in its current form) makes to the significance of the heritage asset(s): The site includes the non-designated heritage asset the Old Vicarage which makes a positive contribution visually and forms part of the history of the local area.

C What impact does the allocation have on that significance: Development of the site would result in the loss of the non-designated heritage asset and its outbuildings and development within the grounds would affect its setting

D Potential for enhancement?  Non identified  E Avoiding Harm / Potential Mitigation  Retain building and out buildings 

Conclusions: Development of the whole site would result in the loss of and therefore harm to the significance of a non-designated heritage asset.

SITE ASSESSMENT (HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT) PHS047 Site Address: Land to the east of Chesterfield Rd Alfreton

A Potential heritage assets which may be affected:  Listed Building(s) – Shirland Lodge Farm House, Chesterfield Road (grade II) (North East Derbyshire District) Shirland Park Farmhouse (grade II) (North East Derbyshire District)  Historic Environment Record – Alfreton Park – opposite

B What contribution the site (in its current form) makes to the significance of the heritage asset(s): The site contributes to the rural setting of the following listed farm buildings : Shirland Lodge Farm House, Chesterfield Road mid C17 with C18 addition and C20 alterations Shirland Park Farmhouse grade II (North East Derbyshire District) early C19

Alfreton Park The site is separated from the Park by the A61 but is visible together in wider views when approaching from the north. It is considered that the site makes little contribution to the setting of Alfreton Park.

C What impact does the allocation have on that significance: The proposal would reduce some of the rural setting the listed buildings currently lie within. Although the impact is limited by the distances these building are away from the site.

Development would make little impact on the setting of Alfreton Park

D Potential for enhancement?  Non identified E Avoiding Harm / Potential Mitigation

 If site area was reduced significantly and development was concentrated adjacent existing development on Chesterfield Road a limited amount of development could be accommodated

Conclusions: Development of the whole site would harm the significance of Shirland Lodge Farmhouse however some development could be accommodated without a negative impact on the setting of the nearby listed building if the site area was reduced sufficiently and development was concentrated adjacent existing development.

SITE ASSESSMENT (HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT) PHS048 Site Address: Land off Spring Road, Riddings.

A Potential heritage assets which may be affected:  Listed Building(s) – Riddings House (grade II) Moulders Arms (grade II) Vicarage (grade II) 13 and 14 Spring Road, (grade II) The Coach House, rear of 14 Spring Road (grade II)  Conservation Area - Riddings  Historic Environment Record –Riddings Park – possible ridge and furrow Adjacent former iron works Former Wesleyan Methodist Chapel lies close to the site.  Other: non-designated heritage assets within the conservation area.  Possible archaeological interest – within area where there was St Mary Magdalen Church  Development Management Archaeologist Comments: 48. Land off Spring Road, Riddings: Within the Riddings Conservation Area and within 130m of the Grade II Listed Riddings House. Potential for harm to Conservation Area and setting of House.

B What contribution the site (in its current form) makes to the significance of the heritage asset(s):  Listed Building(s) – The site forms part of the setting to Riddings House (grade II listed). Riddings House was built for the local ironworks owner James Oakes. The site forms part of the parkland which was created as a rural setting to the family home, separate from the village which they owned most of and the ironworks which they also owned. The site contributes to the significance Riddings House by historical association. This mature parkland character continues to contribute visually to the character of this area. Moulders Arms grade II –separate from the site but makes a contribution to its wider rural village setting Vicarage grade II - separate from the site but makes a contribution to its wider rural village setting 13 and 14 Spring Road, grade II and The Coach House, rear of 14 Spring Road – These were built by the Oakes family part of a stable complex which served Riddings House. The land would have been used to access Riddings House and there is a historical association between these properties and the site and contributes to their significance as a result.  Conservation Area – Riddings The site makes a positive contribution to the character and appearance of the Riddings Conservation Area. The site has the same character as Riddings Park, contains trees and open space that complement the area and shows how Riddings has evolved.  Historic Environment Record – Riddings Park – possible ridge and furrow – further work required in this area Adjacent former iron works (also owned by Oakes family) Former Wesleyan Methodist Chapel – self-contained – no direct impact Other: possible non-designated heritage assets within the conservation area, adjacent to the site. The site also forms part of their setting.

C What impact does the allocation have on that significance: The development of this site would be incongruous as it has remained undeveloped and still reads as being part of Riddings Park and the rural setting to Riddings House. This area of land has historical associations with the Oakes family’s residence and the development of the village and forms part of the setting of Riddings House and 13 & 14 Spring Road as a result.

This area has a very rural tranquil character. Development of this land would introduce additional vehicular movements which would also impact negatively on the character of this part of the Riddings Conservation Area.

Development of this land would not follow the historical pattern of development in the Conservation Area and be detrimental its character and appearance.

D Potential for enhancement?  Non identified E Avoiding Harm / Potential Mitigation  None identified.

Conclusions: The site would not preserve or enhance the character / appearance of the Conservation Area and would be harmful to the significance of Riddings House (grade II listed building) and to of 13 and 14 Spring Road.

SITE ASSESSMENT (HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT) PHS049 Site Address: Land at Hill Top Farm, Mill Lane, Belper (Site B)

A Potential heritage assets which may be affected:  Site lies within the World Heritage Site Buffer Zone  The site lies close to the World Heritage Site and the Belper and Milford Conservation Area -  Historic Environment Record – opposite Belper Deer Park, close to the site of a blacking mill Adjacent to Bath House and former swimming baths,

 Archaeology- Development Management Archaeologist Comments: 49. Land at Hilltop Farm, Mill Lane, Belper and 50. Land at Hilltop Farm SITE A, Mill Lane, Belper: same issues as for Kirk’s Lane (site 29), and even closer to the World Heritage Site boundary. I recommend these sites are not allocated without detailed visual impact and sensitivity work relating to the World Heritage Site, and consultation with the World Heritage Site advisory team.

B What contribution the site (in its current form) makes to the significance of the heritage asset(s): The Outstanding Universal Value (OUV) of the Site was defined by the following criteria, agreed by UNESCO when the site was inscribed. They are: C (ii) That the site exhibits “an important interchange of human values, over a span of time or within a cultural area of the world, on developments in architecture or technology, monumental arts, town planning or landscape design”; C (iv) That the site is “an outstanding example of a type of building or architectural or technological ensemble or landscape, which illustrates a significant stage in human history”. The UNESCO World Heritage Committee recorded that these criteria were met for the following reasons: C (ii) The Derwent Valley saw the birth of the factory system, when new types of building were erected to house the new technology for spinning cotton developed by Richard Arkwright in the late 18th century. C (iv) In the Derwent Valley for the first time there was large-scale industrial production in a hitherto rural landscape. The need to provide housing and other facilities for workers and managers resulted in the creation of the first modern industrial settlements.

The site lies within the DVMWHS buffer zone. The site contributes to the rural setting of the World Heritage Site and the Belper and Milford Conservation Area. It enables an appreciation of the rural landscape within which the industrial development in the valley began. It therefore contributes to the OUV of the DVMWHS

The site also forms part of the rural setting to the Belper and Milford Conservation Area which also derives significance from this land as part of its setting.

C What impact does the allocation have on that significance: Development of the site would impact on the rural setting and appreciation of the World Heritage Site and the Conservation Area and would be harmful to OUV.

The development of the site would reduce the rural backdrop of the Conservation Area and impact negatively its setting.

D Potential for enhancement?  None identified

E Avoiding Harm / Potential Mitigation  None identified

Conclusions: Residential development of this land was refused on these grounds and dismissed on appeal. The issues with this site remain the same as they were at the time of the appeal decision and its development will be harmful to the OUV of the World Heritage Site. and the Belper and Milford Conservation Area.

SITE ASSESSMENT (HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT) PHS050 Site Address: Land at Hill Top Farm, Mill Lane, Belper (Site A)

A Potential heritage assets which may be affected:  Site lies within the World Heritage Site Buffer Zone  The site lies close to the World Heritage Site and the Belper and Milford Conservation Area -  Historic Environment Record – opposite Belper Deer Park, close to the site of a blacking mill Adjacent to Bath House and former swimming baths,

Archaeology: Development Management Archaeologist Comments: 49. Land at Hilltop Farm, Mill Lane, Belper and 50. Land at Hilltop Farm SITE A, Mill Lane, Belper: same issues as for Kirk’s Lane (site 29), and even closer to the World Heritage Site boundary. I recommend these sites are not allocated without detailed visual impact and sensitivity work relating to the World Heritage Site, and consultation with the World Heritage Site advisory team. B What contribution the site (in its current form) makes to the significance of the heritage asset(s): The Outstanding Universal Value (OUV) of the Site was defined by the following criteria, agreed by UNESCO when the site was inscribed. They are: C (ii) That the site exhibits “an important interchange of human values, over a span of time or within a cultural area of the world, on developments in architecture or technology, monumental arts, town planning or landscape design”; C (iv) That the site is “an outstanding example of a type of building or architectural or technological ensemble or landscape, which illustrates a significant stage in human history”. The UNESCO World Heritage Committee recorded that these criteria were met for the following reasons: C (ii) The Derwent Valley saw the birth of the factory system, when new types of building were erected to house the new technology for spinning cotton developed by Richard Arkwright in the late 18th century. C (iv) In the Derwent Valley for the first time there was large-scale industrial production in a hitherto rural landscape. The need to provide housing and other facilities for workers and managers resulted in the creation of the first modern industrial settlements.

The site lies within the DVMWHS buffer zone. The site contributes to the rural setting of the World Heritage Site and the Belper and Milford Conservation Area. It enables an appreciation of the rural landscape within which the industrial development in the valley began. It therefore contributes to the OUV of the DVMWHS

The site also forms part of the rural setting to the Belper and Milford Conservation Area which also derives significance from this land as part of its setting.

C What impact does the allocation have on that significance: Development of the site would impact on the rural setting and appreciation of the World Heritage Site and the Conservation Area and would be harmful to OUV.

The development of the site would reduce the rural backdrop of the Conservation Area and impact negatively its setting.

D Potential for enhancement?  None identified

E Avoiding Harm / Potential Mitigation  None identified

Conclusions: Residential development of this land was refused on these grounds and dismissed on appeal. The issues with this site remain the same as they were at the time of the appeal decision and its development will be harmful to the OUV of the World Heritage Site and the Belper and Milford Conservation Area.

SITE ASSESSMENT (HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT) PHS051 Site Address: Pottery Farm, Belper

A Potential heritage assets which may be affected:  Site lies within the World Heritage Site Buffer Zone  Pottery Farm (grade II listed)  Historic Environment Record – Ridge and furrow earthworks within the site  Archaeology –Development Management Archaeologist comments: The site is approximately 12.5ha of previously undeveloped land to the south of Kilbourne Road, Belper, containing a Grade II Listed building at Pottery Farmhouse and within the buffer zone of the Derwent Valley Mills World Heritage Site.

Although there has been little archaeological investigation in the vicinity, and consequently potential remains largely unknown, I note the site’s location on the Derwent Valley fringe, at the interface between the valley slope gritstone geology and the Pennine Lower Coal Measures to the east. Given the mooted use of the Derwent Valley as a seasonal movement route during prehistory – and the preference for ridge routes above the more difficult valley floor, this suggests that the site may have potential for prehistoric remains. Bronze Age and Neolithic flints have been found nearby at The Gutter and Dovedale Crescent. In addition, possible earthwork features including medieval ridge and furrow are visible on aerial photographs.

The site therefore has archaeological potential requiring assessment in line with NPPF para 128.

Recommend a visual sensitivity study assessing the impacts of development on OUV through sensitivity mapping, viewpoint photography and ZTV mapping as appropriate.

Potential setting impacts to the Grade II Listed Building.

B What contribution the site (in its current form) makes to the significance of the heritage asset(s): The Outstanding Universal Value (OUV) of the Site was defined by the following criteria, agreed by UNESCO when the site was inscribed. They are: C(ii) That the site exhibits “an important interchange of human values, over a span of time or within a cultural area of the world, on developments in architecture or technology, monumental arts, town planning or landscape design”; C(iv) That the site is “an outstanding example of a type of building or architectural or technological ensemble or landscape, which illustrates a significant stage in human history”. The UNESCO World Heritage Committee recorded that these criteria were met for the following reasons: C(ii) The Derwent Valley saw the birth of the factory system, when new types of building were erected to house the new technology for spinning cotton developed by Richard Arkwright in the late 18th century. C(iv) In the Derwent Valley for the first time there was large-scale industrial production in a hitherto rural landscape. The need to provide housing and other facilities for workers and managers resulted in the creation of the first modern industrial settlements.

The site lies within the DVMWHS buffer zone. The site contributes to the rural setting of the World Heritage Site and the Belper and Milford Conservation Area. It enables an appreciation of the rural landscape within which the industrial development in the valley began. It therefore contributes to the OUV of the DVMWHS

Although industrial development has taken place to the north west, the site also forms part of the rural agricultural setting to the grade II listed Pottery Farm and allows appreciation of the building in its original context.

C What impact does the allocation have on that significance: Development of the site would impact on the rural setting and appreciation of the World Heritage Site and the Conservation Area and would be harmful to OUV.

The development of the site would reduce the rural backdrop of the Conservation Area and impact negatively its setting.

The proposal would impact on the openness around Pottery Farm. The land to the west is occupied by the Valiant factory complex which has eroded its landscape setting making the remaining open area to the east and south more important as a result.

D Potential for enhancement?  None identified

E Avoiding Harm / Potential Mitigation The site may contain small pockets where the significance of the heritage assets would not be affected such as the continuation of ribbon development between no.s 72-80 Sandbed Lane however further work would need to be undertaken to identify these areas. Conclusions: The development of the whole site would impact negatively on the World Heritage Site, the Belper and Milford Conservation Area and the setting of the grade II listed Pottery Farm.

SITE ASSESSMENT (HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT) PHS052 Site Address: Cinderhill, Denby, potential expanded allocation

A Potential heritage assets which may be affected:

 Scheduled Monument - Rykneld Street Roman Road 500m to south, Morley Park Works 380m to north  Listed Building(s) – Park Hall Farm grade II* listed within the site Gatepiers and garden walls to Park Hall Farmhouse grade II  Conservation Area –Kilburn to south west approx 700m.  World Heritage Site - no  World Heritage Site Buffer Zone- no  Registered Historic Park or Garden-no  Historic Environment Record – site of coal pit and workings Site of former medieval park Opposite site of former medieval park Adjacent to Ryknield Street (Roman Road) HER 17022: The Openwoodgate Branch Lines of the Little Eaton Gangway (record includes the Belper and Morley Park Railway) – a network of early plateways/railways built between c1815 and 1855 in context with development of the coal and iron industries across the region; padstones and elements of infrastructure survive in places HER 18806: Denby Ironworks (1860-1929): no longer extant though archaeological remains are almost certain to survive; HER 18816: Denby Hall Colliery (established mid 19th century) – no extant built heritage remains; part of the site may have been subsequently opencast; HER 18813: Brick and Tile Works near Denby Colliery (19th-20th century) – no extant built heritage remains; HER 18821: Park Hall park – a medieval park created in the early 14th century; boundaries are unknown and no extant park pale is recorded. A parker’s lodge may have stood on the site of the later Park Hall HER 99055: route of the Ripley branch of the Midland Railway, opened in 1855 The also contains the Grade II Listed Park Hall (HER 18807) – an early 17th century house with extensive additions of 1702 and early 20th century restoration, possible on the site of a medieval park lodge. Adjacent to line of Rykneld Street Roman road (HER 18802, 99016): archaeological evaluation required within the planning process. potential

•In terms of archaeological potential, the landscape has been extensively opencast, and these areas will retain no potential for hitherto unknown below-ground archaeology. Some un-extracted parts may survive

•Although there is a level of local heritage significance in the area – with particular connection to its industrial history - there are no heritage grounds to preclude allocation of the site for development. This type of industrial record (19th century colliery and ironworks sites) is found in most areas of eastern Derbyshire, and the potential for earlier below- ground archaeology is hugely limited by the extent of opencast extraction.

Other : Historic landscape character: the majority of the area is scored in Historic Landscape Characterisation (HLC) as ‘post-1650 enclosure’ with rebuilt field boundaries following recent opencasting and restoration. Four fields at the north-western corner are scored as ‘Ancient fields – fossilised strip system’ and are of higher historic landscape value, as is a small area at the site’s southern boundary. B What contribution the site (in its current form) makes to the significance of the heritage asset(s): The site forms the rural setting to the farmhouse which is early C17 and historically associated to farming the land surrounding it. The land continues to provide this reference.

The site also assists the appreciation of the Rykneld Road Scheduled Monument as it lies adjacent to an unscheduled section that was also part of that road.

Although Morley Works are located on the opposite side of the A38 the northern part of the site could impact on the rural surroundings of the scheduled monument.

No impact on setting of the Kilburn Conservation Area as site is of sufficient distance not to make a contribution to its significance. C What impact does the allocation have on that significance: Development of the site would change the character of the land surrounding the listed building removing it from its context.

It is not clear at this stage where the access to the site would be however development of the site could result in harm to Rykneld Street if remains were lost / the road required highway improvements which realigned the road.

Development on the northern most part of the site could impact on the rural setting of the scheduled Morley Works. D Potential for enhancement?  None identified E Avoiding Harm / Potential Mitigation  Reduction in the site area north would help to mitigate the impact on the scheduled monument.

Conclusions: Development of the whole site would have a negative impact on the significance of the listed Park Hall Farmhouse (grade II*) and the associated listed structures and the Morley works scheduled monument.

Potential archaeological implications with development of the site which would need to be considered as part of any planning application.

SITE ASSESSMENT (HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT) PHS054 Site Address: Poyser Lane End, Kirk Langley

A Potential heritage assets which may be affected:  Scheduled Monument - none  Listed Building(s) – The Pastures grade II 1.1km to west, Bowbridge House grade II approx. 1.1km to east Within village St Michael’s Church grade 1 800m to north and a number of other listed buildings within the Conservation Area  Conservation Area – Kirk Langley to north approx. 600m  Registered Historic Park or Garden – Kedleston grade 1 approx 2.4km away  Historic Environment Record – site of a Roman road to south of site (approx. 50m)  Other: Non-designated heritage assets potential for The Lawn, Moor Lane.  Archaeology – potential as adjacent to approximate route of a Roman Road- No comments received from the Development Management Archaeologist - assume archaeological issues can be dealt with through the planning application.

B What contribution the site (in its current form) makes to the significance of the heritage asset(s): The site lies within the setting of Kedleston Hall Historic Park and Garden and is part of the wider rural landscape to the south west in which it lies.

The site does not appear to make any contribution to the significance of the listed buildings in Kirk Langley or Bowbridge House or The Pastures

C What impact does the allocation have on that significance: The site would be visible from the edge of the Historic Park and Garden which surrounds Kedleston Hall. Development of the scale proposed would be visible but have limited impact on the significance of the Historic Park and Garden.

D Potential for enhancement?  None identified

E Avoiding Harm / Potential Mitigation  Landscaping would help to screen the development from Kedleston Hall Historic Park and Garden such that it could be accommodated without impact on its significance.

Conclusions: Limited impact on heritage assets and it is considered that the impact of the development could be mitigated given the proposed scale by landscaping and design.

SITE ASSESSMENT (HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT) PHS055 Site Address: Land adjacent to Belper Lane, Belper.

A Potential heritage assets which may be affected:  Scheduled Monument - N/A  Listed Building(s) – Wyver Farm grade II (389m), Dalley House, Dalley Lane grade II (143m), The Barn, Dalley Lane grade II listed (150m), Belper Mills complex grade I ,II* and II (1.4km)  Conservation Area – Belper and Milford Conservation Area (500m)  World Heritage Site- Derwent Valley Mills WHS (500m)  World Heritage Site Buffer Zone- lies within buffer zone  Registered Historic Park or Garden- River gardens grade II*(approx. 1kmm) and Belper Cemetery grade II (1km)  Historic Environment Record – St Faith’s Church, Dalley Lane (177m), Wesleyan Methodist Chapel, Belper (117m)  Archaeology: Development Management Archaeologist Comments: 55. Land adjacent to Belper Lane, Belper: same issues as for Kirk’s Lane (site 29). I recommend this site is not allocated without detailed visual impact and sensitivity work relating to the World Heritage Site, and consultation with the World Heritage Site advisory team. B What contribution the site (in its current form) makes to the significance of the heritage asset(s): The Outstanding Universal Value (OUV) of the Site was defined by the following criteria, agreed by UNESCO when the site was inscribed. They are:

Criterion (ii) the site should exhibit an important interchange of human values, over a span of time or within a cultural area of the world, on developments in architecture or technology, monumental arts, town planning or landscape design. Criterion (iv) the site should be an outstanding example of a type of building or architectural or technological ensemble or landscape, which illustrates a significant stage in human history. The UNESCO World Heritage Committee recorded that these criteria were met for the following reasons: Criterion (ii) The Derwent Valley saw the birth of the factory system, when new types of building were erected to house the new technology for spinning cotton developed by Richard Arkwright in the late 18th century Criterion (iv) In the Derwent Valley for the first time there was large-scale industrial production in a hitherto rural landscape. The need to provide housing and other facilities for workers and managers resulted in the creation of the first modern industrial settlements.

The site lies is within the buffer zone and forms part of the setting to the World Heritage Site. The site is agricultural in nature and is part of the wider rural landscape that is experienced when entering Belper from the west. It is also possible to see this area of land from the east of Belper and in the context of the mills showing that this land does highlight the mills in their rural setting.

The site also forms part of the wider rural setting to the Belper and Milford Conservation Area which also derives significance from this land as part of its setting.

The development of this site would also impact on the principle entrance to Wyver Farm which was built by the Strutt family and therefore of significance to the World Heritage Site. The site makes a positive contribution to the agricultural setting of Wyver Farm.

The site does not contribute to the significance of either the River Gardens or Belper Cemetery.

The site lies at a higher level than Dalley House and The Barn both grade II listed. It provides part of the rural agricultural setting to these listed buildings which has remained largely unchanged since they were built.

C What impact does the allocation have on that significance:

Development of the site would impact on the rural setting and appreciation of the World Heritage Site and the Conservation Area and would be harmful to OUV.

The development would be visible on the sky line when view from Dalley House and The Barn and impact on their rural agricultural setting.

D Potential for enhancement?  None identified

E Avoiding Harm / Potential Mitigation The impacts of development on the setting of the listed buildings Dalley House, Dalley Lane, The Barn could be mitigated by reducing the site area and concentrating development in areas which are not visible from these buildings.

A large-scale development in this location would affect OUV however it is considered that a smaller scheme that was set immediately adjacent to the existing development would reduce the impact.

Conclusions: The impacts of development on the setting of the listed buildings Dalley House, Dalley Lane, The Barn could be mitigated by reducing the site area and concentrating development in areas which are not visible from these buildings.

Development of the whole site would impact negatively on the OUV of the World Heritage Site.

SITE ASSESSMENT (HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT) PHS056 Site Address: Land off Wessington Lane, South Wingfield

A Potential heritage assets which may be affected:  Listed buildings (including those outside the Borough) none affected  Historic Environment Record – non designated Heritage Asset – Baptist Church, Birches Lane

B What contribution the site (in its current form) makes to the significance of the heritage asset(s): No real contribution to Baptist Church

C What impact does the allocation have on that significance: N/A

D Potential for enhancement?  N/A E Avoiding Harm / Potential Mitigation  N/A

F Conclusions: No impact on identified heritage assets.

SITE ASSESSMENT (HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT) PHS057 Site Address: Off Amber Drive, Heanor

A Potential heritage assets which may be affected:  Historic Environment Record – Ripley and Heanor Branch of the Midland Railway goes through part of the site and the Erewash Valley line lies to the east of the site.  Archaeology: No comments received from the Development Management Archaeologist - assume archaeological issues can be dealt with through the planning application process

B What contribution the site (in its current form) makes to the significance of the heritage asset(s): The site includes the former route of the railway.

C What impact does the allocation have on that significance: The infrastructure has been removed and is no longer visible on the ground. The allocation therefore has no impact on significance.

D Potential for enhancement?  None identified

E Avoiding Harm / Potential Mitigation N/A Conclusions: No heritage impacts

SITE ASSESSMENT (HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT) PHS059 Site Address: Leafy Lane, Heanor

A Potential heritage assets which may be affected:  Listed Building(s) – St Lawrence Church (grade II*), Mundy Street School (grade II) and Butchers Arms (grade II) all approx. 300m away  Archaeology – Potential for archaeological remains however, no comments received from the Development Management Archaeologist - assume archaeological issues can be dealt with through the planning application process B What contribution the site (in its current form) makes to the significance of the heritage asset(s): The heritage assets are not in close proximity to the site however the tower of St Lawrence’s Church is visible from the site and vice versa. The land was also adjacent to the access to the Vicarage and could have formed part of its land.

C What impact does the allocation have on that significance: The site is set against other development on Hands Road and is not a space that is important to the significance of views to and from the Church. There may have been an historical association with the Church as old maps show the area as being adjacent to the drive to the Vicarage but it is not clear which Church the vicarage was associated with. However the vicarage is no longer in existence therefore the significance would be limited to an association with a listed asset.

The significance of the Mundy Street School and The Butcher’s Arms are not impacted upon by the development of this site due to the distance and as far can be identified there has been no historical association between the site and these heritage assets.

D Potential for enhancement?  None identified

E Avoiding Harm / Potential Mitigation None identified

Conclusions: Development of the site would not affect the significance of St Lawrence’s Church or other designated heritage assets.

SITE ASSESSMENT (HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT) PHS060 Site Address: Wingfield Road, Alfreton

A Potential heritage assets which may be affected:  Listed Building(s) – Alfreton Hall (grade II), St Martin’s Church grade II*  World Heritage Site Buffer Zone- no  Historic Environment Record – evidence of bell pits and other coal shafts identified during modern opencast mining Within the site of a medieval deer park  Archaeology: Development Management Archaeologist Comments: 60. Wingfield Road, Alfreton: Historic parkland (HER 16213) associated with Alfreton Hall (Grade II Listed), and a historic coal working site (HER 16205). Would need archaeological and setting assessment within planning process. Extent of this former area of parkland is relatively intact so it would be harmful to the setting of the Hall and also the Alfreton Conservation Area to allocate part of it for housing.

B What contribution the site (in its current form) makes to the significance of the heritage asset(s): Site contributes to Alfreton Hall’s open parkland setting and has always been parkland. Part of the wider area and the estate trees are still evident. Inter-visibility between the site and the Hall (this would require a site visit). Site forms part of the entrance to the hall and as such makes a positive contribution to its setting and Little contribution to the significance of St Martin’s Church.

C What impact does the allocation have on that significance: The development of the site would reduce the Hall’s parkland and have an impact on its setting. It would also fundamentally change the approach to the Hall when entering from the south. This approach has never been developed and remained unchanged and development would not be reversible.

D Potential for enhancement?  Non identified

E Avoiding Harm / Potential Mitigation  Non

Conclusions: The site would impact negatively on the significance of Alfreton Hall and its setting.

SITE ASSESSMENT (HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT) PHS063 Site Address: Thorpes Road, Heanor

A Potential heritage assets which may be affected:  Historic Environment Record – adjacent to the site of the dismantled Shipley-Heanor branch railway line which served a number of collieries in the area  Other: no non-designated heritage assets identified  Archaeology –find spot in vicinity however no comments received from the Development Management Archaeologist - assume archaeological issues can be dealt with through the planning application process B What contribution the site (in its current form) makes to the significance of the heritage asset(s): The site does not make a contribution to heritage assets within the area.

C What impact does the allocation have on that significance: N/A

D Potential for enhancement?  None identified

E Avoiding Harm / Potential Mitigation  N/A 

Conclusions: The site does not have an impact on the significance of heritage assets.

SITE ASSESSMENT (HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT) Site Ref: 064 Site Address: Ashbourne Road, Markeaton Lane, Mackworth

A Potential heritage assets which may be affected:  Scheduled Monuments- Mackworth Medieval Settlement

 Listed Buildings- Old School House Markeaton Lane (Grade II Listed Building) adjacent to the site Lower Vicarwood (Grade II Listed Building); (480M) The eight Listed Buildings of Mackworth; including Gatehouse to Mackworth Castle (grade I) Castle Cottage grade II, Old School and attached boundary wall (gradeII).Gateway and Walls enclosing graveyard, Tomb adjacent both grade II, Church of All Saints grade I adjacent to the site. Home Farmhouse, The Farm, The Green, Markeaton Lane listed grade II

 Registered Park and Gardens-Kedleston Hall (Grade I Registered Park and Garden);

 Conservation Areas:Mackworth (Conservation Area);Markeaton Conservation AreaKedleston (Conservation Area);

 Historic Environment Record – Roman road through the site. Ridge and furrow earthworks to the southwest

 Non-designated Heritage Assets: The site is bordered by Markeaton Hall Park to the southeast

 Other: historic landscape character in part

 Archaeology:Given the proximity of the site to the scheduled monument and a Roman road there is potential for undiscovered archaeological remains.

Development Management Archaeologist Comments: 64. Markeaton Stones, Markeaton Lane. Immediate landscape setting of Mackworth medieval village Scheduled Monument and Mackworth Conservation Area. The northern part of the site would also have harmful setting impacts to Kedleston Hall/Park and to the Grade II Listed Lower Vicarwood Farmhouse. Significant harmful impacts to designated heritage assets, therefore not ‘sustainable development’ and unsound to allocate.

B What contribution the site (in its current form) makes to the significance of the heritage asset(s): The site forms part of the setting to Mackworth village most of which is a scheduled monument. It also forms part of the setting of the Mackworth Conservation Area which is centred on its village. There is a historical relationship between Mackworth village and Markeaton (part of which is a conservation area) and the site provides the rural setting between these two early settlements.

The site contains further evidence of the medieval settlement in the form of non-designated medieval remains which contribute to the significance of the scheduled monument.

The site forms part of the wider agricultural setting to the grade I Kedleston Hall Registered Park and Garden where it is possible to appreciate the relationship of the Hall to its wider estate. The site provides separation between the urban area of Derby and the RPG which enables the Park to be experienced in a rural setting.

The site lies within 480m of a Lower Vicarwood farmhouse which derives significance from its agricultural location.

Part of the significance of the Mackworth medieval settlement is that it provides evidence of an abandoned village. Included in this is a medieval meadow and sites of late medieval buildings. The site provides the rural location to the scheduled monument and enables an appreciation of the contraction of the village in a rural landscape.

The site also provides a rural context to the grade I listed church parts of which date from the C14. The site provides the church with the backdrop of a relatively isolated position, demonstrating how Mackworth has contracted, leaving the church isolated.

The site provides the rural setting to the Old School House (grade II) formerly a school and associated house. The site enables the building to be appreciated in its original isolated setting where it served a rural dispersed population.

C What impact does the allocation have on that significance: Development of the whole of the site would result in the urban area being within just 450m of the boundary of the Park. The size of the site would urbanise a large amount of the countryside adjacent to the Park and have a negative impact on its setting and impact negatively on tis significance.

Development of the site would have a negative impact on the rural setting of Vicarwood Farm, which derives significance from its agricultural setting.

Development of the site would have a negative impact on the rural setting of the grade I listed Church of All Saints removing a significant part of the rural land around it.

Development of the site would have a negative impact on the significance of the Mackworth scheduled monument as it would adversely affect its setting by divorcing it from its rural context.

Development between Mackworth and Markeaton will impact negatively on the setting of the Conservation Areas and the significance they derive from their setting they derive from their setting by removing their rural backdrop.

Development of the whole of the site would result in the loss of medieval features (ridge and furrow and holloway), and adversely impact on the significance of a non-designated heritage asset and the evidence that assists the understanding of the scheduled monument.

Development would surround the listed building and prevent it being appreciated in its original rural context. It would therefore have an adverse impact on the setting and as such the significance of the listed building.

D Potential for enhancement? None identified E Avoiding Harm / Potential Mitigation Mitigation The site contributes to the rural setting of the designated heritage assets; it is not considered that there are mitigation measures that could overcome the harmful impacts. Conclusions: Development of the whole site would impact negatively on the significance of a number of designated and non- designated heritage assets including Church of All Saints (grade I listed), Kedleston Hall Registered Park and Garden (grade I), Old School House (grade II listed), Lower Vicarwood Farm (grade II listed), The Farm (grade II listed), The Green (grade II listed), Home Farnhouse (grade II listed) Mackworth Medieval Settlement Scheduled Monument, Kedleston Conservation Area, Mackworth Conservation Area, Markeaton Conservation Area,. The development of the site would alsoresult in the loss of non-designated heritage assets (remains of a Roman road, earthworks, and Toll Road). It is not considered that mitigation measures exist to overcome the impacts.

SITE ASSESSMENT (HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT) PHS065 Site Address: Pit lane, Waingroves

A Potential heritage assets which may be affected:  Listed Building(s) Farmbuilding Grade II - 370m to south Waingroves Hall grade II - 411m to south Waingroves Hall Cottage grade II - 405m to south St James Church Codnor Denby Lane, grade II 722m to south east of site  Conservation Area –Waingroves Hall Conservation Area - 360m to the south  Historic Environment Record – directly adjacent to two sites where there were brickworks Adjacent to conservation area – area of a possible enclosure ditch and pits possibly prehistoric but could be C18 Site of former Midland Railway and associated features 176m to south of site  Archaeology: Potential for archaeology - No comments received from the Development Management Archaeologist - assume archaeological issues can be dealt with through the planning application process

B What contribution the site (in its current form) makes to the significance of the heritage asset(s): The site helps to separate Waingroves from the Conservation Area. It lies on a route which leads towards the Waingroves Hall, the Farm and outbuildings, cottage and the Conservation Area and is part of the wider setting of the Conservation Area.

The extent of the farm / Hall’s land is not known. The land may have once formed part of the wider estate however this is not known.

No contribution to the significance of St James Church or the HER records.

C What impact does the allocation have on that significance: Development will affect the approach to the Conservation Area / listed buildings in the Conservation Area by changing it from grazing to housing and possible changes to the road in the area. It will also increase traffic movements in the area and impact on the tranquillity of the area.

D Potential for enhancement?  None identified

E Avoiding Harm / Potential Mitigation  Careful design and screening of the development will help in terms of impact on the approach and setting of the Conservation Area.

Conclusions: It is considered that careful design and screening could be undertaken as part of any development that would mitigate to a large extent the impact on the setting of the Waingroves Hall Conservation Area and listed buildings however this would not mitigate the impact on the tranquillity of the setting.

SITE ASSESSMENT (HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT) PHS066 Site Address: Newland/Taylor Lane, Heanor (AVA2014/0999)

A Potential heritage assets which may be affected: Taylor Lane  Historic Environment Record – Site of Ormonde Colliery C20 went out of production 1971 Site of a medieval corn mill and iron works Line of Heanor Branch of Midland Railway adjacent and runs through part of the site.  Listed Building(s) – Barn to rear of 21 High Street approx. 400m north west Ash Farm, Loscoe approx. 400m north west Newlands  Historic Environment Record – To north site of Heanor Branch of the Midland Railway (approx. 150m) To north site of Bailey Brook Colliery (approx. 150m) Findspot Roman coin at Berle Ave Heanor  Listed Buildings: Heanor Parish Church Grade II* in the Town Centre

 Conservation Areas - none  World Heritage Site none  World Heritage Site Buffer Zone- no  Registered Historic Park or Garden- no

 Archaeology: Comments received from Development Management Archaeologist- Newlands: There are no known archaeological or historic landscape constraints within the site. The western part of the site appears to have been subject to episodes of opencast coal extraction (Derbyshire County Council dataset) and this is likely to substantially limit any archaeological potential for hitherto unknown sites or remains. A planning submission for the site should therefore aim to establish the extent of opencast coal extraction within the site, and – if there are shown to be significant un-extracted areas – to provide a basic archaeological evaluation using geophysical survey in the first instance.

Taylor Lane: The eastern part of the Taylor Lane site was formerly the site of the Ormonde Colliery (Derbyshire Historic Environment Record 20513). This was an early 20th century colliery originally owned by the Butterley Company and decommissioned in 1971. Along the northern boundary of the site south of Furnace Lane is the site of a medieval corn mill, early ironworks and early 19th century corn mill (HER 20525). It is likely however that any archaeological potential within the site has been removed through opencasting of the site during the late 1990s, although I have been unable to confirm the extent of extraction from Derbyshire County Council’s record. A planning submission for the site need not therefore involve archaeological studies, but should contain sufficient information to establish firmly the extent of opencast coal extraction.

B What contribution the site (in its current form) makes to the significance of the heritage asset(s): The Taylors Lane site could include the remains associated with the entries on the Historic Environment Register.

The Ash Farm and Barn listed buildings are separated from the site by a large housing development and as such the site makes no contribution to their significance.

The site will be visible in longer views from and to Heanor Parish Church.

C What impact does the allocation have on that significance: Development of the Taylor Lane site could result in the loss of the remains of the structures entered on the Historic Environment Register.

Although the development of the sites would result in views of additional built development from the tower of Heanor Church, it is not considered that this would have an impact on its significance.

D Potential for enhancement?  None identified  E Avoiding Harm / Potential Mitigation  .N/A

Conclusions: It is considered that development of the sites would not be harmful to the significance of heritage assets.

SITE ASSESSMENT (HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT) PHS067 Site Address: Hall Road, Langley Mill

A Potential heritage assets which may be affected:  Scheduled Monument - none  Listed Building(s) – St Andrews Church (gradeII) 857m south west Eastwood Hall grade II and Hall Farm Buildings grade II approx.1km to east  Conservation Area –Great Northern Basin, Langley Mill 580m south east  World Heritage Site - no  World Heritage Site Buffer Zone- no  Registered Historic Park or Garden-no  Historic Environment Record – Erewash Valley Line Railway 150m west Cromford Canal 220m east Site of Aldercar Park approx 500m west  Archaeology: comments from Development Management Archaeologist: A site of which the southern part is brownfield in character, the northern fringe likely to have experienced disturbance during construction of neighbouring A610.

The site is located at the edge of the floodplain of the River Eerewash, and such floodplain-edge locations are often associated with human settlement in later prehistory and the Romano-British period. Aerial photographs show some nebulous cropmarks and or earthworks within the site which may have been an archaeological origin or may relate in part of the palaeochannels associated with the Erewash.

This archaeological potential would not preclude allocation of the site for housing development. The archaeological interest would be appropriately dealt with through the planning process

B What contribution the site (in its current form) makes to the significance of the heritage asset(s): It is considered that due to the topography and the A610 the site does not make any contribution to the setting of Eastwood Hall or its farm buildings.

It is considered that the site does not make any contribution to the significance of the St Andrews Church.

The site does not form part of the setting of the Great Northern Basin Conservation Area.

The site is separated by development from the railway line and does not make any contribution to its setting. The line of the Cromford Canal is 220m to the east and it would be possible to see the development from the site of the Cromford Canal but development would not prevent its reinstatement.

C What impact does the allocation have on that significance: No identified

D Potential for enhancement?  Non identified  E Avoiding Harm / Potential Mitigation  N/A 

Conclusions: It is considered that development of the site would not have an impact on the significance of heritage assets.

SITE ASSESSMENT (HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT) PHS068 Site Address: Sleetmoor Lane, Leamoor Avenue, Somercotes

A Potential heritage assets which may be affected:  Scheduled Monument - none  Listed Building(s) – none  Conservation Area - none  World Heritage Site no  World Heritage Site Buffer Zone- no  Registered Historic Park or Garden- none  Historic Environment Record – Line of former Swanwick Colliery Railway 355m to west  Archaeology: No comments received from the Development Management Archaeologist - assume archaeological issues can be dealt with through the planning application process B What contribution the site (in its current form) makes to the significance of the heritage asset(s): The site does not contribute the significance of any identified heritage assets.

C What impact does the allocation have on that significance:

N/A

D Potential for enhancement?  None identified

E Avoiding Harm / Potential Mitigation N/A

Conclusions: The development of the site does not impact on the significance of identified heritage assets

SITE ASSESSMENT (HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT) PHS069 Site Address: Radbourne Lane, Mackworth

A Potential heritage assets which may be affected:  Scheduled Monument - Mackworth medieval settlement including the castle gatehouse, part of the medieval open field system and a pinfold (approx. 1km)  Listed Building(s) – Home Farmhouse, The Old School and attached boundary wall, The Thatched Cottage, Lowes Road, Castle Cottages, all grade II, Gateway and Walls enclosing graveyard, Tomb adjacent All Saints Church both grade II Church of All Saints grade I, Gatehouse to Mackworth Castle grade I all in Mackworth village Lower Vicarwood (Farmhouse) grade II (approx. 2.5 km) Potlocks farmhouse (grade II) (approx. 1.5km) Silverhill Farmhouse (grade II) (approx1.6km) Radbourne Hall (grade I) (approx. 2.2km)  Conservation Area –adjacent to Mackworth Conservation Area (1km approx.)  Registered Historic Park or Garden: Kedleston Registered Park and Garden (approx. 3km)  Historic Environment Record –  Archaeology: Development Management Archaeologist comments: There have been five Portable Antiquities (PAS) records from within the site comprising a Roman brooch, a bronze age socketed axe and three finds of worked flint implements spanning the Mesolithic to the Bronze Age. This suggests that the site has the potential to contain archaeological remains of multi-period prehistoric to Romano-British occupation. The archaeological potential would not preclude allocation of the site for housing development The archaeological interest would be appropriately dealt with through the planning application process.

B What contribution the site (in its current form) makes to the significance of the heritage asset(s): The site lies approximately 1km from Mackworth Conservation Area and the scheduled monuments at Mackworth. Due to the topography and its distance it does not make any direct contribution to their significance.

The site is screened from Keldeston RPG and Lower Vicarwood farmhouse and as such does not contribute towards their significance.

The site is remote from the Potlocks farmhouse and Silverhill Farmhouse and due to topography does not make a contribution to their significance other than being part of the wider countryside in which they lie.

Radbourne Hall is contained within a parkland setting. Its principal elevations face north and south rather than towards the direction of the site and are well screened from the road. The topography rises from the parkland to the site. These factors indicate that the site does not make a contribution towards the significance of Radbourne Hall.

C What impact does the allocation have on that significance: Development of the site would result in the loss of a possible non- designated heritage asset.

The development of the site would result in the loss of a small part of the wider countryside location of the listed farms and Radbourne Hall however it is considered that the site makes little contribute to the significance of these assets. D Potential for enhancement?  None identified

E Avoiding Harm / Potential Mitigation  The farmhouse could be retained as part of the proposal

Conclusions: The site has little impact on the wider setting of the listed buildings to the south west and will be adjacent to a large urban extension immediately to the south west of the site.

It is considered that development could be accommodated on the site without affecting the significance of heritage assets.

SITE ASSESSMENT (HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT) PHS071 Site Address: Land north of Mellors Lane, Holbrook Potential heritage assets which may be affected:  Scheduled Monument - no  Listed Building(s) – adjacent Brook House (grade II) Holbrook Hall (grade II*)  Conservation Area – adjacent Holbrook Conservation Area  World Heritage Site -no  World Heritage Site Buffer Zone -no  Registered Historic Park or Garden- no  Historic Environment Record – adjacent to the Toll road -  Archaeology- no comments received from Development Management Archaeologist

A What contribution the site (in its current form) makes to the significance of the heritage asset(s): Old maps show that part of the site was within the grounds to Brooke House. The site contributes to the setting of Brooke House providing open views to and from it. The principal elevation faces the site, built as a convalescent home this was deliberate to for views outwards to the countryside (aid to recovery). The laundry and other services were sited to the rear facing Pond Road. No contribution to Toll Road The site forms part of the open and rural setting of the Holbrook Conservation Area. The site is part of the wider rural setting to Hobrook Hall being visible from the driveway to it. Holbrook Hall is a small country house set in large grounds. B What impact does the allocation have on that significance: Development of the site would obscure views to and from the principal elevation of Brook House which was built deliberately built facing outward to open views if the countryside.

Development of the site would have a negative impact on the rural setting and approach to the Conservation Area would be adversely affected by such large scale development and change in character to the approach.

The site would also impact negatively on the setting of Holbrook Hall creating a large swathe of new development visible form the grounds.

C Potential for enhancement?  None identified

D Avoiding Harm / Potential Mitigation  None identified

E Conclusions: Development of the whole site would be harmful to the setting of Brooke House, Holbrook Hall and the setting of the Holbrook Conservation Area.

SITE ASSESSMENT (HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT) PHS072 Site Address: Cottage Farm, 23 Cinder Road, Somercotes

A Potential heritage assets which may be affected:  Scheduled Monument - none  Listed Building(s) – Riddings House grade II listed 270m to south St James Church grade II 330m to south Riddings Farmhouse, 4 Church Street grade II 330m to south  Conservation Area – site includes part of Riddings Conservation Area  World Heritage Site -no  World Heritage Site Buffer Zone-no  Registered Historic Park or Garden-no  Historic Environment Record – Riddings Park evidence of ridge and furrow Other: site includes part of the line of the tramway associated with Alfreton iron works C1800 Possible non-designated heritage assets at Barrack Yard adjacent to the site  Archaeology: No comments received from the Development Control Archaeologist - assume archaeological issues can be dealt with through the planning application process..

B What contribution the site (in its current form) makes to the significance of the heritage asset(s):

The site includes part of Riddings Park Conservation Area. The Conservation Area consists of land that was once owned by the Oakes family, a prominent land owner in the area. Oakes was the owner of Alfreton Iron Works to the east and built Riddings House as their home within parkland setting much of which remains today.

The Oakes family were also responsible for Riddings Farmhouse and associated buildings (also listed) and gifted the land on which St James Church was built.

The site retains its historic field patterns and openness and appears part of the parkland setting. It also includes part of the Conservation Area where there is pedestrian access. It therefore contributes to the significance of these designated heritage assets. In addition the site also includes a section of the line of the former tramway which ran west from the iron works in the east. The site could therefore contain evidential value which contributes to the significance of the Conservation Area and Riddings House in particular.

The site forms part of the open and wider setting of and St James Church which also lies within the parkland.

C What impact does the allocation have on that significance: Development of the whole site would harm the setting of the Conservation Area, Riddings House and St James Church in particular. It would result in the development of part of the Conservation Area which is currently characterised by parkland and remove the line of the tramway which shows the development of the area.

Access to the land is stated from Parkside. This area has always provided an access to the Park. A stone wall runs along part of a field within the site and this would also be affected by the development and its loss and the alteration of this access to the Park would have an adverse impact on the character and appearance of the Conservation Area.

D Potential for enhancement?  None identified

E Avoiding Harm / Potential Mitigation Reducing the developed area would reduce the impact on the heritage assets but there could still be harm caused by access into the site. Conclusions: Development of the whole site would have a negative impact on Riddings Conservation Area, the significance of Riddings House (grade II) and St James Church (grade II).

SITE ASSESSMENT (HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT) PHS073 Site Address: 28 The Fleet, Belper, Derbyshire

A Potential heritage assets which may be affected:  Scheduled Monument - none affected  Listed Building(s) – 56a The Fleet (grade II listed) approx. 112m to the south, 25 The Fleet approx. 70m to the east  Conservation Area – Belper and Milford Conservation Area to the north, west and east (80m approx.)  World Heritage Site - 210m to north and 70m to the west approx.  World Heritage Site Buffer Zone- Site lies in the Buffer Zone  Registered Historic Park or Garden- none  Historic Environment Record – oil refinery on opposite side of railway, former deer park to east  Archaeology – No comments received from the Development Management Archaeologist - assume archaeological issues can be dealt with through the planning application process B What contribution the site (in its current form) makes to the significance of the heritage asset(s): The site is surrounded on all sides by development and does not make any contribution to the significance of the listed buildings above. In addition it does not contribute to the significance of the Conservation Area.

The site forms part of the setting to the WHS. However as it is bounded by residential development it reads as part of the built up area of Belper rather than part of the rural landscape in which industrialisation began.

C What impact does the allocation have on that significance: As the site is surrounded by residential development it is considered that further development of an appropriate scale and form would not have an impact on the significance of the DVMWHS.

D Potential for enhancement? None identified

E Avoiding Harm / Potential Mitigation It is considered that development of a height and scale appropriate to the adjacent buildings on the site would not result in unacceptable impacts on the significance of the DVMWHS

Conclusions: Subject to appropriate design development of the site could be accommodated without impacts on the significance of heritage assets. Site lies within the Derwent Valley Mills World Heritage Site Buffer Zone but impacts could be mitigated.

SITE ASSESSMENT (HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT) PHS074 Site Address: Field West of Longwalls Lane, Blackbrook

A Potential heritage assets which may be affected:  Scheduled Monument - none  Listed Building(s) – Western buildings at Crossroads Farm -271m  Crossroads Farm and various associated buildings grade II and II* 312m  Conservation Area –Belper and Milford 271m to East  World Heritage Site - 271m to East  World Heritage Site Buffer Zone- Site lies within Buffer Zone  Historic Environment Record – Site of Holly House Farm approx. 75m to north-west Adjacent to possible line of early route Adjacent to turnpike road Post medieval corn mill – opposite approx. 30m away to south west.  Other: possible non-designated heritage assets in area such as Blackbrook House and properties on opposite side of A517.  Archaeology – find spots in area – possible archaeological potential however no comments received from the Development Management Archaeologist - assume archaeological issues can be dealt with through the planning application process B What contribution the site (in its current form) makes to the significance of the heritage asset(s): The Outstanding Universal Value (OUV) of the Site was defined by the following criteria, agreed by UNESCO when the site was inscribed. They are: C (ii) That the site exhibits “an important interchange of human values, over a span of time or within a cultural area of the world, on developments in architecture or technology, monumental arts, town planning or landscape design”; C (iv) That the site is “an outstanding example of a type of building or architectural or technological ensemble or landscape, which illustrates a significant stage in human history”. The UNESCO World Heritage Committee recorded that these criteria were met for the following reasons: C (ii) The Derwent Valley saw the birth of the factory system, when new types of building were erected to house the new technology for spinning cotton developed by Richard Arkwright in the late 18th century. C (iv) In the Derwent Valley for the first time there was large-scale industrial production in a hitherto rural landscape. The need to provide housing and other facilities for workers and managers resulted in the creation of the first modern industrial settlements.

The site lies within the DVMWHS buffer zone. The site contributes to the rural setting of the World Heritage Site and the Belper and Milford Conservation Area. The site is elevated and adjacent to one of the major routes into Belper, as such very visible enabling an appreciation of the rural landscape within which the industrial development in the valley began. It therefore contributes to the OUV of the DVMWHS.

C What impact does the allocation have on that significance: The site is part of the rural landscape that surrounds the World Heritage Site Development of the site would impact on the rural setting and appreciation of the World Heritage Site and the Conservation Area and would be harmful to OUV.

The development of the site would reduce the rural setting of the Conservation Area and impact negatively its setting.

D Potential for enhancement?  None identified

E Avoiding Harm / Potential Mitigation  None identified

Conclusions: The development of the site would impact negatively on the OUV of the World Heritage Site, the setting of the Belper and Milford Conservation Area.

SITE ASSESSMENT (HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT) PHS075 Site Address: Land West of Crosshill Codnor

A Potential heritage assets which may be affected:  Scheduled Monument -no  Listed Building(s) – St James Church, Codnor (grade II) approx. 340m to north  Conservation Area -no  World Heritage Site – no  World Heritage Site Buffer Zone - no  Registered Historic Park or Garden - no  Historic Environment Record – 361m from Midland Railway and Ripley Heanor Branch -former railway disused  Archaeology- No comments received from the Development Management Archaeologist - assume archaeological issues can be dealt with through the planning application process.

B What contribution the site (in its current form) makes to the significance of the heritage asset(s): The site does not contribute to the significance of known heritage assets.

C What impact does the allocation have on that significance:

N/A

D Potential for enhancement?  none

E Avoiding Harm / Potential Mitigation  none 

Conclusions: No impact on the significance of heritage assets.

SITE ASSESSMENT (HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT) PHS077 Site Address: Land North Side Of Heanor Road, Smalley

A Potential heritage assets which may be affected:

 Scheduled Monument - no  Listed Building(s) – St John the Baptist (grade II) approx. 800m to south west, Smalley Hall (grade II ) 1km to south west  Conservation Area –no  World Heritage Site- no  World Heritage Site Buffer Zone-no  Registered Historic Park or Garden-no  Historic Environment Record –Richardson Endowed School Baptist Church and burial ground approx. 400m to south west of the site  Other:  Archaeology: No comments received from the Development Management Archaeologist - assume archaeological issues can be dealt with through the planning application process

B What contribution the site (in its current form) makes to the significance of the heritage asset(s): It is considered that due to its location the site does not make any contribution to heritage assets in the area.

C What impact does the allocation have on that significance:  N/A

D Potential for enhancement?  N/A

E Avoiding Harm / Potential Mitigation  N/A

Conclusions: No impact on heritage assets identified

SITE ASSESSMENT (HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT) PHS078 Site Address: Whitemoor Lane, Belper

A Potential heritage assets which may be affected:

 Scheduled Monument -no  Listed Building(s) –no  Conservation Area –no  World Heritage Site- no  World Heritage Site Buffer Zone- no but opposite  Registered Historic Park or Garden-no  Historic Environment Record –Toll road to east (Over Lane), Morley Deer Park 181m from site to east Site of Meadow 260m to west  Other:  Archaeology: No comments received from the Development Management Archaeologist - assume archaeological issues can be dealt with through the planning application process.

B What contribution the site (in its current form) makes to the significance of the heritage asset(s): The site lies beyond the Buffer Zone to the World Heritage Site and due to topography is not visible in a way that would affect the significance of the World Heritage Site. The site does not appear to impact on either the Toll Road of the Morley Deer Park- no comments received from Development Management Archaeologist

C What impact does the allocation have on that significance: N/A

D Potential for enhancement?  N/A E Avoiding Harm / Potential Mitigation  N/A

Conclusions: No unacceptable impacts on the significance of heritage assets.

SITE ASSESSMENT (HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT) PHS079 Site Address: Ash Farm, High Street, Loscoe

A Potential heritage assets which may be affected: • Scheduled Monument -no • Listed Building(s) – within the site Ash Farm and attached garden railings grade II and Barn, Ash Farm grade II • Conservation Area - no • World Heritage Site - no • World Heritage Site Buffer Zone -no • Registered Historic Park or Garden -no • Historic Environment Record – Former Heanor and Loscoe C of E school south of site approx. 112m • Other: historic landscape • Archaeology - comments received from the Development Control Archaeologist – Grade II listed buildings at Ash Farm with potentially harmful impacts. B What contribution the site (in its current form) makes to the significance of the heritage asset(s):

The site includes a listed farmhouse and barn and therefore contributes greatly to their significance.

C What i mpact does the allocation have on that significance :

The development of the whole site would result in loss of the listed buildings and / or a detrimental impact to the setting of the listed buildings.

D Potential for enhancement ? • It would be possible to increase access / better reveal the significance of assets as there currently is no access to the buildings.

E Avoiding Harm / Potential Mitigation • Amend the site boundary, to remove the listed buildings and their setting from the site.

Conclusions: Development of the whole site (i.e. demolition) would result in substantial harm to the significance of the two listed buildings.

SITE ASSESSMENT (HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT) PHS080 Site Address: Land South of Lumb Farm, Derby Rd, Marehay

A Potential heritage assets which may be affected:

• Scheduled Monument - no • Listed Building(s) – milepost (grade II) approx. 400m to west • Conservation Area –no • World Heritage Site - no • World Heritage Site Buffer Zone - no • Registered Historic Park or Garden - no • Historic Environment Record – former deer park, adjacent to former railway branch line • Other : landscape – secondary sensitivity (AMES) • Archaeology : No comments received from the Development Management Archaeologist - assume archaeological issues can be dealt with through the planning application process

B What contribution the site (in its current form) makes to the significance of the heritage asset(s): No contribution to significance of heritage assets

C What impact does the allocation have on that significance: N/A

D Potential for enhancement? • N/A • E Avoiding Harm / Potential Mitigation • N/A

Conclusions: No impact on significance of identified heritage assets.

SITE ASSESSMENT (HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT) PHS081 Site Address: Land to the rear of 120 Breach Rd, Marlpool, Heanor

A Potential heritage assets which may be affected: • Scheduled Monument -no • Listed Building(s) – no • Conservation Area -no • World Heritage Site -no • World Heritage Site Buffer Zone -no • Registered Historic Park or Garden -no • Historic Environment Record – site of Primitive Methodist Chapel approx. 100m to north east – demolished Post box approx. 136m to north east of site Marlpool junior school approx. 90m to north of site Site of Mount Zion Chapel 90m to north west Former Railway to east find spot 520m approx. to east of the site –Neolithic polished axe • Archaeology- No comments received from the Development Control Archaeologist - assume archaeological issues can be dealt with through the planning application process.

B What contribution the site (in its current form) makes to the s ignificance of the heritage asset(s):

Due to the nature of and distances from heritage assets the site does not contribute to their significance.

C What impact does the allocation have on that significance: N/A

D Potential for enhancement? • no

E Avoiding Harm / Potential Mitigation • N/A •

Conclusions: Archaeology No comments received from the Development Control Archaeologist - assume archaeological issues can be dealt with through the planning application process.

No impacts on identified heritage assets.

SITE ASSESSMENT (HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT) PHS082 Site Address: Land off Derby Rd, Swanwick, Alfreton

A Potential heritage assets which may be affected:

• Scheduled Monument - no • Listed Building(s) – none in the site Swanwick Hall School (grade II) and Coach House to Swanwick Hall School (grade II) 380m to east and 110,112,114 Derby Road (grade II) 400m to north of the site, St Andrews Church (grade II) 450m to north east • Conservation Area –no • World Heritage Site - no • World Heritage Site Buffer Zone -no • Registered Historic Park or Garden -no • Historic Environment Record – • Other : landscape some evidence of former opencast restoration in the site. • Archaeology : No comments received from the Development Management Archaeologist - assume archaeological issues can be dealt with through the planning application process

B What contribution the site (in its current form) makes to the s ignificance of the heritage asset(s): Swanwick Hall School lies within its own grounds and is separated from the site by Derby Road and C20 ribbon development. The site therefore does not make any contribution to the setting of Swanwick Hall.

110,112,114 Derby Road are self-contained and surrounded by development, it is not considered that the site makes any contribution to their significance.

St Andrews Church was built to serve the village as it grew during the C19 and the village has continued to grow around it. The Church tower can be seen against the site in wider views generally from the direction of the A38.

The site lies adjacent to Butterley Reservoir but is screened by a buffer of trees and as such does not contribute to its significance.

C What impact does the allocation have on that significance: The site would change wider views of the Church tower but due to it elevated position and the existing development it is not considered that development would harm its significance.

D Potential for enhancement? • No E Avoiding Harm / Potential Mitigation Ensure that any design takes into account the setting of St Andrew’s Church Conclusions: No harm to significance of identified heritage assets.

SITE ASSESSMENT (HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT) PHS083 Site Address: Chapel Street, Kilburn

A Potential heritage assets which may be affected: • Scheduled Monument -Rykneld Street (Roman Road) 80m to north • Listed Building(s) – Top Farm House (grade II*) approx. 579m • Conservation Area –approx 580m • World Heritage Site -no • World Heritage Site Buffer Zone -no • Registered Historic Park or Garden -no • Historic Environment Record – Roman road goes through the site. to north of site, remains of Kilbourne Colliery bounds the site and associated short stretch of mineral railway. • Other: historic landscape • Archaeology: 83. Land to the East side of Chapel Street, Kilburn: site is crossed by the Rykneld Street Roman Road (HER 21201); proximity of the Scheduled section just 80m north of the site boundary suggests that the road may be well- preserved and of high significance (potentially schedulable). Allocation should be contingent on robust pre-determination evaluation of the road alignment and any associated Roman archaeology, and provision for preservation and management within green space if justified by significance. Historic England should be consulted on setting impacts to the Scheduled section to the north.

B What contribution the site (in its current form) makes to the significance of the heritage asset(s): No contribution to setting of listed building or Kilburn Conservation Area due to distance.

The site includes part of the undesignated section of Rykneld Street Roman road and therefore aids the understanding of the scheduled section of the road

C What impact does the allocation have on that significance:

Possible impacts on archaeology see above.

D Potential for enhancement ? • no

E Avoiding Harm / Potential Mitigation • Possible to ensure development avoids the important areas of archaeology if the site boundary was amended. Possible access issues with this option. •

Conclusions: 83. Land to the East side of Chapel Street, Kilburn: site is crossed by the Ryknield Street Roman Road (HER 21201); proximity of the Scheduled section just 80m north of the site boundary suggests that the road may be well-preserved and of high significance (potentially schedulable). Allocation should be contingent on robust pre-determination evaluation of the road alignment and any associated Roman archaeology, and provision for preservation and management within green space if justified by significance. Historic England should be consulted on setting impacts to the Scheduled section to the north.

No impact on other heritage assets.

SITE ASSESSMENT (HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT) PHS084 Site Address: Off Church Street, Heage, Ripley

A Potential heritage assets which may be affected:

• Scheduled Monument - no • Listed Building(s) – St Luke’s Church (grade II*) approx. 70m to south west Crowtrees Farmhouse (grade II) 20m to south • Conservation Area – no • World Heritage Site - no • World Heritage Site Buffer Zone - no • Registered Historic Park or Garden - no • Historic Environment Record – site of Heage Colliery includes associated buildings within the site • Other : landscape secondary sensitivity (AMES)- historic landscape • Archaeology : No comments received from the Development Management Archaeologist - assume archaeological issues can be dealt with through the planning application process

B What contribution the site (in its current form) makes to the significance of the heritage asset(s): The site provides an agricultural setting to Crowtrees Farmhouse which is important to the understanding of the former agricultural use of the building.

C Wha t i mpact does the allocation have on that significance : Development of the site would remove some of the rural, agricultural setting giving an urban backdrop to the setting of Crowtrees Farmhouse and therefore affecting its significance.

Development of the site could result in the loss of the assets associated with the C19 colliery.

D Potential for enhancement? • None identified.

E Avoiding Harm / Potential Mitigation • The colliery assets could be retained as part of any development.

Conclusions: Development of the whole site would harm the significance of Crowtrees Farmhouse (grade II)

SITE ASSESSMENT (HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT) PHS085 Site Address: Land at Far Laund, Chesterfield Road, Belper

A Potential heritage assets which may be affected:

• Scheduled Monument - no • Listed Building(s) – Laund Farm (grade II), Lodge Farm (grade II) • Conservation Area –no • World Heritage Site - no • World Heritage Site Buffer Zone - yes partly within • Registered Historic Park or Garden - no • Historic Environment Record – yes the Medieval laund at Belper within the site, adjacent site of toll gate • Other : Archaeology : No comments received from the Development Management Archaeologist - assume archaeological issues can be dealt with through the planning application process

B What contribution the site (in its current form) makes to the s ignificance of the heritage asset(s): The site provides the rural setting if both Laund Farm and Lodge Farm both early buildings. The site allows the listed buildings to be experienced surrounded by the open land in which they were built.

The Outstanding Universal Value (OUV) of the Site was defined by the following criteria, agreed by UNESCO when the site was inscribed. They are: C (ii) That the site exhibits “an important interchange of human values, over a span of time or within a cultural area of the world, on developments in architecture or technology, monumental arts, town planning or landscape design”; C (iv) That the site is “an outstanding example of a type of building or architectural or technological ensemble or landscape, which illustrates a significant stage in human history”. The UNESCO World Heritage Committee recorded that these criteria were met for the following reasons: C (ii) The Derwent Valley saw the birth of the factory system, when new types of building were erected to house the new technology for spinning cotton developed by Richard Arkwright in the late 18th century. C (iv) In the Derwent Valley for the first time there was large-scale industrial production in a hitherto rural landscape. The need to provide housing and other facilities for workers and managers resulted in the creation of the first modern industrial settlements.

Part of the site lies in the Derwent Valley Mills World Heritage Site Buffer Zone and make a contribution towards it rural landscape and thus the OUV of the WHS.

C What impact does the allocation have on that significance: Development of the whole site would reduce the rural setting of the listed buildings and obscure views to and from the buildings to the rear.

Part of the site would reduce a small area which forms the rural backdrop to the Derwent Valley Mills World Heritage Site and would have a negative impact on its OUV.

D Potential for enhancement ? • none E Avoiding Harm / Potential Mitigation • none identified

Conclusions: Development of the whole site would impact negatively on the significance Laund Farm and Lodge Farmhouse and the OUV of the DVMWHS.

SITE ASSESSMENT (HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT) PHS086 Site Address: Heage Road, Ripley

A Potential heritage assets which may be affected:

• Scheduled Monument - no • Listed Building(s) – none in the vicinity • Conservation Area –no • World Heritage Site - no • World Heritage Site Buffer Zone -no • Registered Historic Park or Garden -no • Historic Environment Record – site partly within the former Hartshay colliery site and within former deer park. Adjacent to former mineral railway line • Other : Landscape secondary sensitivity (AMES) • Archaeology : No comments received from the Development Management Archaeologist - assume archaeological issues can be dealt with through the planning application process

B What contribution the site (in its current form) makes to the significance of the heritage asset(s): There has been very little development within the Hartshay deer park and the site is part of the park. C What i mpact does the allocation have on that significance : This area of the deer park is separated from the rest of the park and makes little contribution to its significance

D Potential for enhancement ? • N/A • E Avoiding Harm / Potential Mitigation • N/A

Conclusions: No unacceptable harm to heritage assets.

SITE ASSESSMENT (HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT) PHS087 Site Address: Acresview Close and Laburnum Crescent, Allestree

A Potential heritage assets which may be affected:

• Scheduled Monument -no • Listed Building(s) – Allestree Hall 1km to north west, Remains of Old Church, Quarndon (grade II) 458m to west, Kedleston Hotel 1.2km to west • Conservation Area –Quarndon Conservation Area 340m to west. Kedleston Conservation Area1.4km to west, • World Heritage Site - no • World Heritage Site Buffer Zone -no • Registered Historic Park or Garden - Kedleston Historic Park and Garden 1.4km to west • Historic Environment Record –Allestree Park 350m to east • Archaeology : No comments received from the Development Management Archaeologist - assume archaeological issues can be dealt with through the planning application process

B What contribution the site (in its current form) makes to the s ignificance of the heritage asset(s): The site forms part of the wider setting to Quarndon Conservation Area and will be visible from it.

C What impact does the allocation have on that significance: Development of the site would slightly reduce the rural setting of the Conservation Area. Although the site would be visible from Kedleston Park and Kedleston Hotel, the site is very small scale and set against the back drop of existing residential development D Potential for enhancement ? • N/A • E Avoiding Harm / Potential Mitigation • The impacts of the development of the site could be mitigated by carful design and screening along the northern and western boundaries

Conclusions: Negative impact on setting of designated heritage assets but could be mitigated.

SITE ASSESSMENT (HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT) PHS088 Site Address: Derby Road, Duffield

A Potential heritage assets which may be affected:

• Scheduled Monument - Duffield Bridge 700m to north west • Listed Building(s) – Allestree Hall (gradeII*) and Ice House at Allestree Hall (grade II), Church of St Alkmund (grade I) 485m to north-east, 157 Derby Road (Burley House) (grade II) 265m to south-east • Conservation Area –Duffield Conservation Area 340m to north • World Heritage Site - 90m to east • World Heritage Site Buffer Zone - most of the site lies within the Buffer Zone to the DVMWHS • Registered Historic Park or Garden -no • Historic Environment Record – adjacent to C19 gas works, gate houses still survive • Adjacent to toll road – one of earliest in Derbyshire • Other : historic landscape • Archaeology : Development Management Archaeologist Comments: 88. Land of Derby Road, Duffield: World heritage Site Buffer Zone – same issues as for sites on fringes of Belper (i.e. the ‘arrested’ settlement edge in the Derwent Valley and its contribution to Outstanding Universal Value). . Recommends this site is not allocated without detailed visual impact and sensitivity work relating to the World Heritage Site, and consultation with the World Heritage Site advisory team.

B What contribution the site (in its current form) makes to the s ignificance of the heritage asset(s): The site is agricultural in nature, gently sloping away from Derby Road. The site is visible and contributes to the rural setting of the DVMWHS and such its significance.

Allestree Hall is screened on the northern boundary by trees and some development along Burley Lane. Although the site lies within the countryside surrounding Alestree Hall and its park due to topography the site is experienced separately from Allestree Hall and therefore it is considered that the land contributes does not contribute to its significance.

It is not considered that the site makes any contribution to the setting of 157 Derby Road.

St Alkmunds Church is visible from the site and does contribute to the isolated, landscape setting in which it is set. C What impact does the allocation have on that significance: The development of the site would affect the OUV of the DVMWHS by the loss of a part of rural landscape setting.

It would also affect the approach to /setting of St Alkmunds Church, which will impact on its significance.

D Potential for enhancement? • no E Avoiding Harm / Potential Mitigation • no Conclusions: Development of the site would be detrimental to the setting of St Alkmund’s Church and impact on the OUV of the DVMWHS

SITE ASSESSMENT (HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT) PHS PHS089 Site Address: Over Lane, Openwoodgate, Belper

A Potential heritage assets which may be affected:

• Scheduled Monument - No • Listed Building(s) – Whitemoor Farmhouse approx. 370m (grade II) • Conservation Area –no • World Heritage Site - no • World Heritage Site Buffer Zone -yes part of site within • Registered Historic Park or Garden - no • Historic Environment Record – adjacent toToll Road • Archaeology : No comments received from the Development Management Archaeologist - assume archaeological issues can be dealt with through the planning application process

B What contribution the site (in its current form) makes to the significance of the heritage asset(s): The site lies within a built up area of Over Lane and lies behind other development, the site does not contribute to the significance of the WHS.

Whitemoor Farmhouse is surrounded by development and the site does not contribute to its significance.

C What i mpact does the allocation have on that si gnificance : N/A D Potential for enhancement ? • N/A E Avoiding Harm / Potential Mitigation • N/A

Conclusions: No impact on the significance of heritage assets

SITE ASSESSMENT (HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT) PHS090 Site Address: Land to the North of Bargate Rd, Belper

A Potential heritage assets which may be affected:

• Scheduled Monument - No • Listed Building(s) – • Conservation Area –no • World Heritage Site - • World Heritage Site Buffer Zone -no, adjacent to Buffer Zone • Registered Historic Park or Garden -no • Historic Environment Record – former deer park now partly developed (163m), Former quarry 30m to north east • Other : • Archaeology : No comments received from the Development Management Archaeologist - assume archaeological issues can be dealt with through the planning application process

B What contribution the site (in its current form) makes to the significance of the heritage asset(s):

The Outstanding Universal Value (OUV) of the Site was defined by the following criteria, agreed by UNESCO when the site was inscribed. They are: C (ii) That the site exhibits “an important interchange of human values, over a span of time or within a cultural area of the world, on developments in architecture or technology, monumental arts, town planning or landscape design”; C (iv) That the site is “an outstanding example of a type of building or architectural or technological ensemble or landscape, which illustrates a significant stage in human history”. The UNESCO World Heritage Committee recorded that these criteria were met for the following reasons: C (ii) The Derwent Valley saw the birth of the factory system, when new types of building were erected to house the new technology for spinning cotton developed by Richard Arkwright in the late 18th century. C (iv) In the Derwent Valley for the first time there was large-scale industrial production in a hitherto rural landscape. The need to provide housing and other facilities for workers and managers resulted in the creation of the first modern industrial settlements.

The site forms part of the open countryside surrounding Belper and contributes to the rural setting to the DVMWHS.

C What i mpact does the allocation have on that significance : The development of this site could reduce part of the rural setting to the WHS and impact on OUV

D Potential for enhancement? • E Avoiding Harm / Potential Mitigation A reduction in the overall site area could help to mitigate the impacts on OUV.

Conclusions: The site has the potential to impact on the significance of the Derwent Valley Mills World Heritage Site.

SITE ASSESSMENT (HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT) PHS091 Site Address: Land between Golden Valley and Lady Lea Road, Horsley

A Potential heritage assets which may be affected:

• Scheduled Monument - no • Listed Building(s) – St Clement’s Church (grade I) 930m to west • Conservation Area – Horsley Conservation Area 180m to west • World Heritage Site - no • World Heritage Site Buffer Zone -no • Registered Historic Park or Garden -no • Historic Environment Record – Rykneld Street Roman Road to east and Horsley deer park to south of site boundary • Other : part of the site includes historic landscape • Archaeology : Comments from Development Management Archaeologist 91. Land between Golden Valley & Lady Lea Road, Horsley Woodhouse: adjacent to the line of the Rykneld Street Roman Road (HER 99016); a Roman brooch has been found within the site (Portable Antiquities Scheme). Archaeological evaluation required within the planning process.

B What contribution the site (in its current form) makes to the significance of the heritage asset(s): The site is higher in relation to most of the Horsley Conservation Area and forms part of the open rural countryside which is visible in views to and from it.

C What i mpact does the allocation have on that significance : The development of the site would be of an inappropriate scale when set against the Conservation Area, and adversely affect part of its rural setting.

D Potential for enhancement ? • None identified • E Avoiding Harm / Potential Mitigation • None identified

Conclusions: Development of the site would have a negative impact on the significance of the Horsley Conservation Area.

SITE ASSESSMENT (HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT) PHS092 Site Address: Land to the north of 102 Alfreton Rd, Codnor

A Potential heritage assets which may be affected:

• Scheduled Monument - Codnor Castle 1.2km to south east • Listed Building(s) – Home Farm, Alfreton Road(grade II) 180m to south 465m to north west, Codnor Gate Farm House (grade II) • Conservation Area – no • World Heritage Site - no • World Heritage Site Buffer Zone - no • Registered Historic Park or Garden - no • Historic Environment Record – Codnor Park former deer park 400m to east • Other : landscape secondary sensitivity (AMES) • Archaeology : No comments received from the Development Management Archaeologist - assume archaeological issues can be dealt with through the planning application process

B What contribution the site (in its current form) makes to the significance of the heritage asset(s): Due to the location and scale the site does not contribute to the significance of heritage assets

C What i mpact does the allocation have on that significance : N/A

D Potential for enhancement ? • N/A • E Avoiding Harm / Potential Mitigation • N/A

Conclusions: No harm to significance of identified heritage assets.

SITE ASSESSMENT (HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT) PHS093 Site Address: Land West of Peatburn Avenue, Heanor Gate, Heanor

A Potential heritage assets which may be affected:

• Scheduled Monument - no • Listed Building(s) – no • Conservation Area –no • World Heritage Site - no • World Heritage Site Buffer Zone -no • Registered Historic Park or Garden -no • Historic Environment Record – site lies within an area formerly a deer park (Kidsley Park). • Other : landscape former opencast restoration • Archaeology : Formerly opencast and no comments received from the Development Management Archaeologist

B What contribution the site (in its current form) makes to the significance of the heritage asset(s): The site includes a former deer park but has been opencast therefore unlikely to be any contribution to the significance of the deer park

C What impact does the allocation have on that significance: No contribution

D Potential for enhancement? N/A E Avoiding Harm / Potential Mitigation N/A

Conclusions: No impact on the significance of heritage assets.

SITE ASSESSMENT (HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT) PHS094 Site Address: 65 Nottingham Rd, Codnor, Ripley

A Potential heritage assets which may be affected:

• Scheduled Monument - Codnor Castle 1km to north east • Listed Building(s) – 37 Nottingham Road (grade II) approx. 60m to west • Conservation Area – no • World Heritage Site - no • World Heritage Site Buffer Zone - no • Registered Historic Park or Garden - no • Historic Environment Record – Codnor Park former deer park approx. 500m to east • Archaeology : No comments received from the Development Management Archaeologist - assume archaeological issues can be dealt with through the planning application process

B What contribution the site (in its current form) makes to the s ignificance of the heritage asset(s): 37 Nottingham Road is a dwelling dating from the C17which has been surrounded by other residential dwellings. The site forms part of the open space beyond the dwellings and provides longer views to and from the building.

C What i mpact does the allocation have on that significance : There is the potential for development to be seen in views to and from 37 Nottingham Road and the impact will depend on the siting and design of the development which is uncertain. D Potential for enhancement? • None identified • E Avoiding Harm / Potential Mitigation • Ensure that the design and siting of development takes into account the listed building. Possible screening / moving development away from the north-eastern boundary.

Conclusions: No unacceptable impacts on heritage assets.

SITE ASSESSMENT (HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT) PHS095 Site Address: Hermitage Farm, Slack Lane, Riddings

A Potential heritage assets which may be affected:

• Scheduled Monument - no • Listed Building(s) – 190m to south Britain Colliery Engine House and Engine House Headstocks both grade II listed, Barn to Turners Charity, Turners Lane, Swanwick 435m to north, Newland Inn (grade II) 370m to south-east. • Conservation Area –Golden Valley approx. 200m to south- east • World Heritage Site - no • World Heritage Site Buffer Zone -no • Registered Historic Park or Garden -no • Historic Environment Record – HER 16215 (tramway embankment) and HER 31800 (Swanwick Colliery Railway) within the site. To the south Former deer park • Other: landscape has been affected by previous surface mining • Archaeology : 95. Hermitage Farm, Slack Lane, Riddings: HER 16215 (tramway embankment) and HER 31800 (Swanwick Colliery Railway) – will need assessment of industrial archaeology (and wider site) through planning process.

B What contribution the site (in its current form) makes to the s ignificance of the heritage asset(s): The listed barn to Turner’s Charity farm derives some significance from its setting; however none of the site is considered to be part of this due to topography.

The site does have links with the listed Headstocks and Engine House but the site has been surface mined which reduces the contribution it makes to their significance.

The site could contain archaeological remains and therefore has evidential value.

The site is screened from the Golden Valley Conservation Area and Newlands Inn and it is considered that the site does not contribute to their significance other than being part of the rural landscape approach.

C What impact does the allocation have on that significance: The archaeological remains may be removed by the development of the site.

D Potential for enhancement? None identified E Avoiding Harm / Potential Mitigation • Retention of screening from Newlands Inn and Golden Valley Conservation Area. • Archaeological assessment required

Conclusions: There are archaeological implications that will require an assessment. Retain screening to prevent impacts on significance of other heritage assets.

SITE ASSESSMENT (HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT) PHS096 Site Address: Land off Bradshaw Drive, Holbrook

A Potential heritage assets which may be affected: • Scheduled Monument -no • Listed Building(s) – adjacent Brook House grade II listed, in the vicinity of Holbrook Hall (grade II*) • Conservation Area –small part of the site lies within the Holbrook Conservation Area and lies adjacent to it. • World Heritage Site -no • World Heritage Site Buffer Zone -no • Registered Historic Park or Garden - no • Historic Environment Record – one field away from the Toll road - • Archaeology: No comments received from the Development Management Archaeologist - assume archaeological issues can be dealt with through the planning application process

B What contribution the site (in its current form) makes to the s ignificance of the heritage asset(s): The site lies close to Brooke House and partly within the Holbrook Conservation Area. The site forms part of the setting to the Conservation Area, it includes a stone wall which is the boundary of the Conservation Area prior to which is a relatively new residential development. The remaining part of the site, once moor contains a footpath through which links to Pond Road

The northern part of the site includes a number of trees which bound Brooke House. These contribute to the setting of Brooke House and the footpath enables views through to the building.

C What i mpact does the allocation have on that significance : Development of the site lies in close proximity to Brooke House and would reduce the rural area in which it was deliberately built. It would impact on views to and from the listed building and also include a stone wall which contributes to the character and appearance of the Holbrook Conservation Area.

D Potential for enhancement? • None identified

E Avoiding Harm / Potential Mitigation • None identified

Conclusions: Development of the whole site will impact on the setting of the Brooke House and the Holbrook Conservation Area

SITE ASSESSMENT (HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT) PHS097 Site Address: Land South of the A608, East of Smalley Village

A Potential heritage assets which may be affected:

• Scheduled Monument - no • Listed Building(s) – St John the Baptist (grade II) approx. 550m to south west, Smalley Hall (grade II )770m to south west • Conservation Area –no • World Heritage Site - no • World Heritage Site Buffer Zone -no • Registered Historic Park or Garden -no • Historic Environment Record – Richardson Endowed School Baptist Church and burial ground approx. 200m to west of the site, bell pits approx. 430m to east of site. Romano-British circular approx. 420m to east • Other : affected by surface mining but lies in secondary landscape sensitivity area, small part of site historic landscape • Archaeology : No comments received from the Development Management Archaeologist - assume if there are any archaeological issues given surface mining history this can be dealt with through the planning application process

B What contribution the site (in its current form) makes to the s ignificance of the heritage asset(s): It is considered that due to its location the site does not make any contribution to heritage assets in the area.

C What i mpact does the allocation have on that significance : N/A

D Potential for enhancement ? • N/A

E Avoiding Harm / Potential Mitigation • N/A

Conclusions: No harm to significance of identified heritage assets.

SITE ASSESSMENT (HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT) PHS098 Site Address: Lady Lea Industrial Estate, Horsley Woodhouse

A Potential heritage assets which may be affected:

• Scheduled Monument - no • Listed Building(s) – St Clement’s Church (grade I) 1.2km to west • Conservation Area –Horsley 440m to the south wets • World Heritage Site - no • World Heritage Site Buffer Zone -no • Registered Historic Park or Garden -no • Historic Environment Record – Ryknield Street Roman Road to east and Horsley deer park to south of site boundary • Other : • Archaeology : possible issues due to proximity to Roman Road possible evaluation required through the Planning process.

B What contribution the site (in its current form) makes to the significance of the heritage asset(s): The site is brownfield currently with industrial units and is screened by trees and set against the backdrop of residential development, it is not considered that the site makes a contribution to the significance of the Horsley Conservation Area or St Clement’s Church.

C What i mpact does the allocation have on that significance : N/A

D Potential for enhancement ? • None identified • E Avoiding Harm / Potential Mitigation • N/A

Conclusions: No impact on the significance of heritage assets.

SITE ASSESSMENT (HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT) PHS099 Site Address: Land off Street Lane, Ripley

A Potential heritage assets which may be affected:

• Scheduled Monument - Rykneld Street Roman Road 1km to south, • Morley Park Works 1km to north west Listed Building(s) – Park Hall Farm (grade II*) listed and Gatepiers and garden walls to Park Hall Farmhouse (grade II) 260m to west • Conservation Area – no • World Heritage Site - no • World Heritage Site Buffer Zone -no • Registered Historic Park or Garden -no • Historic Environment Record – site lies within area thought to be once medieval deer park Rykneld Street (Roman Road) along eastern boundary of the site • Other : landscape affected by open casting • Archaeology : Comments from Development Management Archaeologist: 99. Land off Street Lane, Ripley: adjacent to line of Rykneld Street Roman road (HER 18802, 99016): archaeological evaluation required within the planning process.

B What contribution the site (in its current form) makes to the s ignificance of the heritage asset(s): The site forms the rural setting to the farmhouse which is early C17 and historically associated to farming the land surrounding it. The land continues to provide this reference.

The site also assists the appreciation of the Rykneld Road Scheduled Monument as it lies adjacent to an unscheduled section that was also part of that road. C What impact does the allocation have on that significance: The development of the site would urbanise the rural area surrounding Park Hall Farm removing it from its context.

It is not clear at this stage where the access to the site would be however development of the site could result in harm to Rykneld Street if remains were lost / the road required highway improvements which realigned the road.

D Potential for enhancement ? • None identified • E Avoiding Harm / Potential Mitigation • It may be possible to reduce the quantum of development and site it away from Park Hall Farm, use an existing access.

Conclusions: Development of the whole site would have a negative impact on the significance of the listed Park Hall Farmhouse (grade II*). SITE ASSESSMENT (HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT) PHS100 Site Address: Ryknield Road, Kilburn

A Potential heritage assets which may be affected: • Scheduled Monument -no • Listed Building(s) – no • Conservation Area -no • World Heritage Site -no • World Heritage Site Buffer Zone -no • Registered Historic Park or Garden -no • Historic Environment Record – route of Roman road thought to go through small part of the site • Other: Historic landscape • Archaeology: 100. Land at Ryknield Lane, Kilburn: adjacent to line of Rykneld Street Roman road (HER 21201, 99016): archaeological evaluation required within the planning process. B What contribution the site (in its current form) makes to the significance of the heritage asset(s): The site has potential to reveal Roman remains which could contribute to the significance of Rykneld Street Roman Road.

C What impact does the allocation have on that significance: The development of the site has the potential to impact on remains important to the further understanding of the scheduled monument.

D Potential for enhancement? • N/A

E Avoiding Harm / Potential Mitigation • Retain part of the site which includes the archaeological remains as identified through investigations.

Conclusions: 100. Land at Ryknield Lane, Kilburn: adjacent to line of Ryknield Street Roman road (HER 21201, 99016): archaeological evaluation required within the planning process.

No impact on other heritage assets.

SITE ASSESSMENT (HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT) PHS101 Site Address: West of Horsley Road Kilburn

A Potential heritage assets which may be affected:

• Scheduled Monument - no • Listed Building(s) – Kilburn Hall (grade II) approx. 350m to north, Cruck Barn and outbuildings (grade II) approx. 290m to north, • Conservation Area – Kilburn 50m away • World Heritage Site - no • World Heritage Site Buffer Zone - no • Registered Historic Park or Garden -no • Historic Environment Record – route of former Little Eaton Tramway to east • Archaeology : no comments received from Development Management Archaeologist – assume impacts can be dealt with through planning application process.

B What contribution the site (in its current form) makes to the s ignificance of the heritage asset(s): The site lies to the rear of ribbon development and in an undeveloped area within 50m of and forms part of the rural setting to Kilburn Conservation Area. The land is enclosed by field boundaries and screened to some extent from the Conservation Area by trees.

The site also forms part to the wider rural setting to St Clement’s Church but as the site is small scale and visible adjacent to the built development of Kilburn it will have a limited impact on its setting.

C What impact does the allocation have on that significance: The pattern of development would be incongruous to the historic pattern of development within the Kilburn Conservation Area and would affect some views from the Holbrook Hall parkland.

D Potential for enhancement ? • Non identified • E Avoiding Harm / Potential Mitigation • The use of screening and careful design of units could reduce the impact on the Kilburn Conservation Area

Conclusions: It is likely that the impacts of development on heritage assets could be mitigated.

SITE ASSESSMENT (HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT) PHS102 Site Address: West of Horsley Road Lower Kilburn

A Potential heritage assets which may be affected:

• Scheduled Monument - no • Listed Building(s) – Church of St Clement (grade I) 458m to south-east, Cruck Barn and outbuildings (grade II) approx. 250m and Kilburn Hall (grade II) 320m to north • Conservation Area – Horsley Conservation Area 340m to south. Kilburn Conservation Area140m north • World Heritage Site - no • World Heritage Site Buffer Zone -no • Registered Historic Park or Garden -no • Historic Environment Record – Route of Little Eaton Tramway to west of site. • Other : Part of the site includes historic landscape • Archaeology : no comments received from Development Management Archaeologist – assume impacts can be dealt with through planning application process.

B What contribution the site (in its current form) makes to the s ignificance of the heritage asset(s): The site lies between Horsley and Kilburn and forms part of the rural backdrop to both the Horsley and Kilburn Conservation Areas. The site comprises a large swathe of undeveloped agricultural land that helps to separates the two villages. The site also provides part of the rural landscape setting of the Church of St Clement.

The site is visible from the parkland to Holbrook Hall.

C What impact does the allocation have on that significance: Development of the site would remove a substantial area of the rural approach to both conservation areas. It would also remove a considerable part of the rural setting to the Church and affect views particularly to St Clement’s Church. It would also affect some views from the Holbrook Hall parkland.

D Potential for enhancement ? • no • E Avoiding Harm / Potential Mitigation • None identified

Conclusions: Development of the whole site would have harmful impact on the significance of the Church of St Clements and the Horsley and Kilburn Conservation Areas.

SITE ASSESSMENT (HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT) PHS103 Site Address: West of Old Road, Heage

A Potential heritage assets which may be affected:

• Scheduled Monument -no • Listed Building(s) – none in the vicinity • Conservation Area – no • World Heritage Site - no • World Heritage Site Buffer Zone - no • Registered Historic Park or Garden - • Historic Environment Record – adjacent to turnpike road, site of churches in area but not close to the site. Morley Deer Park and possible coal mine 350m approx. to east. • Other : landscape secondary sensitivity • Archaeology : No comments received from the Development Management Archaeologist - assume archaeological issues can be dealt with through the planning application process

B What contribution the site (in its current form) makes to the significance of the heritage asset(s): The site does not contribute to the significance of heritage assets.

C What i mpact does the allocation have on that significance : N/A

D Potential for enhancement ? • N/A • E Avoiding Harm / Potential Mitigation • N/A

Conclusions: No harm to significance of identified heritage assets.

SITE ASSESSMENT (HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT) PHS104 Site Address: Land east of Pottery Lane, Denby

A Potential heritage assets which may be affected: • Scheduled Monument -no • Listed Building(s) – to south St Mary the Virgin Church grade I listed Church Farm, Denby Village grade II* War memorial grade II in church grounds Tombstone grade II in church grounds all approx. 120m from site • Conservation Area -no • World Heritage Site -no • World Heritage Site Buffer Zone -no • Registered Historic Park or Garden -no • Historic Environment Record –.site of cross within church grounds Other: • Archaeology : No comments received from the Development Management Archaeologist - assume archaeological issues can be dealt with through the planning application process.

B What contribution the site (in its current form) makes to the significance of the heritage asset(s): The site lies on the edge of Denby Village and contributes to the rural historic village setting of grade I St Mary the Virgin church. The development would be visible from the church.

The site makes no contribution to the significance of the tombstones or war memorial

C What impact does the allocation have on that significance:

The development would expand the village to the north in a scale and form that has not taken place within the village. This would reduce the rural setting of the church and would be visible from it. The church dates back to the early 1200’s. Very little development has taken place around it including on this site and has helped to preserve its setting for the past 800 years.

D Potential for enhancement ? • no

E Avoiding Harm / Potential Mitigation . • A limited amount of development to the north east of the site would make less impact on the setting of St Mary the Virgin Church.

Conclusions: The development of the whole site would have a negative impact on the setting of grade I listed Church.

Archaeology: No comments received from the Development Management Archaeologist - assume archaeological issues can be dealt with through the planning application process.

SITE ASSESSMENT (HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT) PHS106 Site Address: Ben's Farm Moorside Lane, Holbrook, Belper

A Potential heritage assets which may be affected:

• Scheduled Monument - no • Listed Building(s) – • Conservation Area –Holbrook Moor Conservation Area to south • World Heritage Site - no • World Heritage Site Buffer Zone -no • Registered Historic Park or Garden -no • Historic Environment Record – Methodist church to south Shaw Lane Quarry to east Toll Road along part of western boundary • Other : landscape secondary sensitivity (AMES), Non-designated heritage asset’s Ben’s Farmhouse and stone outbuildings • Archaeology : No comments received from the Development Management Archaeologist - assume archaeological issues can be dealt with through the planning application process.

B What contribution the site (in its current form) makes to the significance of the heritage asset(s): Ben’s Farmhouse and stone outbuildings contribute positively to the character and appearance of the area and although located beyond the Holbrook Moor Conservation Area they have the same stone and are visible when approaching Holbrook from the north.

C What i mpact does the allocation have on that significance : The development of the site would result in the loss of the non-designated heritage asset and the open nature of the site on the approach to the Holbrook Moor Conservation Area

D Potential for enhancement? • None identified E Avoiding Harm / Potential Mitigation • Retain the non-designated heritage assets development as part of any scheme and consider design of the site carefully including screening as • Relocating development within the site • Identifying design requirements including open space, landscaping, protection of key views, density, layout and heights of buildings • Addressing infrastructure issues such as traffic management

Conclusions: No unacceptable harm to significance of designated heritage assets and impacts on non-designated asset could be mitigated.

SITE ASSESSMENT (HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT) PHS107 Site Address: Land at Crich Lane, Belper

A Potential heritage assets which may be affected:

• Scheduled Monument - no • Listed Building(s) – no • Conservation Area –no • World Heritage Site -no • World Heritage Site Buffer Zone - yes partly within • Registered Historic Park or Garden - • Historic Environment Record – yes Medieval ridge and furrow found within the site • Archaeology : Development Management Archaeologist Comments: 107. Land at Crich Lane, Belper. World Heritage Site Buffer Zone with potential ‘arrested settlement edge’ contributions to Outstanding Universal Value. ). I recommend this site is not allocated without detailed visual impact and sensitivity work relating to the World Heritage Site, and consultation with the World Heritage Site advisory team.

B What contribution the site (in its current form) makes to the s ignificance of the heritage asset(s):

The Outstanding Universal Value (OUV) of the Site was defined by the following criteria, agreed by UNESCO when the site was inscribed. They are: C (ii) That the site exhibits “an important interchange of human values, over a span of time or within a cultural area of the world, on developments in architecture or technology, monumental arts, town planning or landscape design”; C (iv) That the site is “an outstanding example of a type of building or architectural or technological ensemble or landscape, which illustrates a significant stage in human history”. The UNESCO World Heritage Committee recorded that these criteria were met for the following reasons: C (ii) The Derwent Valley saw the birth of the factory system, when new types of building were erected to house the new technology for spinning cotton developed by Richard Arkwright in the late 18th century. C (iv) In the Derwent Valley for the first time there was large-scale industrial production in a hitherto rural landscape. The need to provide housing and other facilities for workers and managers resulted in the creation of the first modern industrial settlements.

The site contributes to the rural landscape which surrounds Belper. It enables an appreciation of the rural landscape within which the industrial development in the valley began. It therefore contributes to the OUV of the DVMWHS.

Development of the whole site would result in the loss of ridge and furrow.

C What impact does the allocation have on that significance: Development of the site would reduce the rural landscape significantly given the scale of the site to and have a negative impact on OUV.

D Potential for enhancement ? • No E Avoiding Harm / Potential Mitigation • No indication at this stage that the impacts could be mitigated

Conclusions: Negative impact on significance of Derwent Valley Mills World Heritage Site.

SITE ASSESSMENT (HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT) PHS108 Site Address: Whitemoor Lane, Belper

A Potential heritage assets which may be affected: • Scheduled Monument - none • Listed Building(s) – none • Conservation Area - none • World Heritage Site -no • World Heritage Site Buffer Zone – opposite side of road • Registered Historic Park or Garden- no • Historic Environment Record – Morley Deer Park 181m from site to east Site of Meadow 260m to west Toll Road to east • Archaeology : No comments received from the Development Control Archaeologist - assume archaeological issues can be dealt with through the planning application process.

B What contribution the site (in its current form) makes to the s ignificance of the heritage asset(s):

The site lies beyond the Buffer Zone to the World Heritage Site and due to topography is not visible in a way that would affect the significance of the World Heritage Site.

C What i mpact does the allocation have on that significance : N/A

D Potential for enhancement? • no

E Avoiding Harm / Potential Mitigation • Ensure the field boundaries remain and are strengthened

Conclusions: No unacceptable impacts on heritage assets.

SITE ASSESSMENT (HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT) PHS109 Site Address: Land between 10 & 18 The Crescent, Horsley Woodhouse

A Potential heritage assets which may be affected:

• Scheduled Monument - no • Listed Building(s) – no • Conservation Area –no • World Heritage Site - no • World Heritage Site Buffer Zone -no • Registered Historic Park or Garden -no • Historic Environment Record – Record of United Free Chapel built approx. 150m to south east and Wesleyan Methodist Chapel 250m to south east (possible non-designated heritage asset) • Archaeology : No comments received from the Development Management Archaeologist - assume archaeological issues can be dealt with through the planning application process

B What contribution the site (in its current form) makes to the s ignificance of the heritage asset(s): The site lies behind existing C20 development, is divorced from the entries in the HER and does not contribute to the significance of heritage assets.

C What i mpact does the allocation have on that significance : The site lie

D Potential for enhancement ? • N/A • E Avoiding Harm / Potential Mitigation • N/A

Conclusions: No harm to significance of identified heritage assets.

SITE ASSESSMENT (HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT) PHS110 Site Address: Land south of Minster Way/West of Derby Rd Swanwick

A Potential heritage assets which may be affected:

• Scheduled Monument - no • Listed Building(s) – none in the site Swanwick Hall School and Coach House to Swanwick Hall School (grade II) 200m to east 110,112,114 Derby Road (grade II) 94m to north of the site, St Andrews Church (grade II)190m to north east • Conservation Area – no • World Heritage Site - no • World Heritage Site Buffer Zone -no • Registered Historic Park or Garden -no • Historic Environment Record – • Other : landscape some evidence of former opencast restoration. Archaeology : No comments received from the Development Management Archaeologist - assume archaeological issues can be dealt with through the planning application process B What contribution the site (in its current form) makes to the s ignificance of the heritage asset(s): Swanwick Hall School lies within its own grounds and is separated from the site by Derby Road and C20 ribbon development. The site therefore makes no contribution to the setting of Swanwick Hall.

110,112,114 Derby Road self-contained and surrounded by development, it is not considered that the site makes any contribution to their significance.

St Andrews Church was built to serve the village as it grew during the C19 and the village has continued to grow around it. The Church tower can be seen against the site in wider views generally from the direction of the A38.

C What i mpact does the allocation have on that significance : The site would change wider views of the Church tower but due to it elevated position and the existing development it is not considered that development would harm its significance.

D Potential for enhancement? • No E Avoiding Harm / Potential Mitigation N/A Conclusions: No harm to significance of identified heritage assets.

SITE ASSESSMENT (HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT) PHS111 Site Address: Cottage Farm Boothgate, Heage, Belper

A Potential heritage assets which may be affected:

• Scheduled Monument - Former Morley Park Furnaces 500m to east • Listed Building(s) – Former Morley Park Furnaces (grade II*), 17 Boothgate (grade II) • Conservation Area –no • World Heritage Site - no • World Heritage Site Buffer Zone -no • Registered Historic Park or Garden -no • Historic Environment Record – Site lies to the south of the Boothgate Hamlet, adjacent to the former Morley Deer Park and coalmines. Site lies adjacent to the former toll road (early turnpike road). • Other : landscape -secondary sensitivity • Archaeology : No comments received from the Development Management Archaeologist - assume archaeological issues can be dealt with through the planning application process

B What contribution the site (in its current form) makes to the significance of the heritage asset(s): The site forms part of the setting to Boothgate and also the approach to the access road to 17 Boothgate (Farmhouse).

The site does not appear to have been previously associated with the Morley Park Furnaces and now forms part of the agricultural land which now surrounds them. C What i mpact does the allocation have on that significance : Development of the site would affect the setting of Boothgate due to its scale and location. However due to topography and the orientation of 17 Boothgate it is considered that development would not affect its significance.

Development of the site would result in a change of the use of the land in relatively close proximity to Morley Works from agricultural to residential and affect how the monument is experienced. D Potential for enhancement ? • no E Avoiding Harm / Potential Mitigation • N/A.

Conclusions: Development of the site would impact on the significance of the Morley Parks Works Scheduled Monument however the impacts could be mitigated.

SITE ASSESSMENT (HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT) PHS112 Site Address: High Street Loscoe

A Potential heritage assets which may be affected:

• Scheduled Monument - no • Listed Building(s) – no • Conservation Area –no • World Heritage Site - no • World Heritage Site Buffer Zone -no • Registered Historic Park or Garden - no • Historic Environment Record – lies within the site of former Loscoe Colliery and adjacent to site of Loscoe water corn mill and mill pond and site of former quarry and Heanor Branch of the Midland Railway runs through the site. • Other : landscape - AMES secondary sensitivity • Archaeology : No comments received from the Development Management Archaeologist - assume archaeological issues can be dealt with through the planning application process

B What contribution the site (in its current form) makes to the significance of the heritage asset(s): No visual evidence of the former colliery on the site and no obvious contribution to the significance of Loscoe corn mill adjacent

C What i mpact does the allocation have on that significance : Development would not remove the significance of the site of the former colliery

D Potential for enhancement ? N/A E Avoiding Harm / Potential Mitigation • N/A

Conclusions: No harm to significance of identified heritage assets

SITE ASSESSMENT (HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT) PHS113 Site Address: Denby Common, Denby Village, Denby

A Potential heritage assets which may be affected: • Scheduled Monument -no • Listed Building(s) – Breach Farm – approx. 350m to north east • Conservation Area -no • World Heritage Site -no • World Heritage Site Buffer Zone -no • Registered Historic Park or Garden -no • Historic Environment Record – 350m to north East – Quaker burial ground • Archaeology: No comments received from the Development Control Archaeologist - assume archaeological issues can be dealt with through the planning application process.

B What contribution the site (in its current form) makes to the significance of the heritage asset(s): N/A

C What impact does the allocation have on that significance: N/A

D Potential for enhancement? • N/A E Avoiding Harm / Potential Mitigation • N/A

Conclusions: No impacts on known heritage assets.

SITE ASSESSMENT (HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT) PHS114 Site Address: Meadow View, Tants Meadow, Lower Kilburn

A Potential heritage assets which may be affected:

• Scheduled Monument - no • Listed Building(s) – Church of St Clement (grade I) 188m to south-east • Conservation Area –Horsley Conservation Area 40m to south. • World Heritage Site - no • World Heritage Site Buffer Zone -no • Registered Historic Park or Garden -no • Historic Environment Record – Route of Little Eaton Tramway on western boundary of site. • Archaeology : no comments received from Development Management Archaeologist – assume impacts can be dealt with through planning application process.

B What contribution the site (in its current form) makes to the s ignificance of the heritage asset(s): The Church dates from the early C14 and lies at the edge of the Horsley Conservation Area in an elevated position. Little development has taken place around the Church and it is still appreciated as much as it would in the medieval period. The site lies close to the Church and the Conservation Area and forms part of their rural setting.

C What impact does the allocation have on that significance: Development would be harmful to the setting of the Church and the Conservation Area. It would obstruct views towards the Church and prevent the appreciation of the Church and Conservation Area in their rural setting.

D Potential for enhancement? • no • E Avoiding Harm / Potential Mitigation • None identified

Conclusions: Development of the whole site would be detrimental to the significance of the Church of St Clements and the Horsley Conservation Area.

SITE ASSESSMENT (HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT) PHS115 Site Address: Breach Farm, Codnor Denby Lane, Denby

A Potential heritage assets which may be affected: • Scheduled Monument -no • Listed Building(s) – yes grade II barn which is within site and adjacent to Breach Farm which is also grade II listed • Conservation Area -no • World Heritage Site -no • World Heritage Site Buffer Zone -no • Registered Historic Park or Garden -no • Historic Environment Record – adjacent to a former Quaker burial site • Archaeology: Breach Farm, Codnor Denby Lane, Denby. Grade II Listed Farmhouse of c1600, and Grade II Listed 17th century outbuilding; remains of a Quaker meeting house and burial ground. Allocation should be contingent on conservation of significance and setting for the Listed Buildings and archaeological evaluation of the site within the planning process.

B What contribution the site (in its current form) makes to the s ignificance of the heritage asset(s): The site is part of the farm complex and contributes towards the significance of the barn which lies in the site and the adjacent farmhouse (Breach Farm).

C What impact does the allocation have on that significance:

The development of the site would impact negatively by removing the barn, affecting both its significance and that of Breach Farm. Development within its setting would permanently remove the openness around the farm building and detach it from its countryside setting.

D Potential for enhancem ent ? • None identified E Avoiding Harm / Potential Mitigation • None identified

Conclusions: The development of the site would impact negatively on the significance of two listed buildings, removing one and resulting in development that would have a negative impact on the setting of another listed building.

SITE ASSESSMENT (HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT) PHS116 Site Address: Off Grammer Street, Denby

A Potential heritage assets which may be affected: • Scheduled Monument -no • Listed Building(s) – Breach Farm / barn to west approx. 100m • Conservation Area -no • World Heritage Site -no • World Heritage Site Buffer Zone -no • Registered Historic Park or Garden -no • Historic Environment Record – to west approx. 166m former Quaker burial site • Other: • Archaeology - No comments received from the Development Control Archaeologist - assume archaeological issues can be dealt with through the planning application process.

B What contribution the site (in its current form) makes to the significance of the heritage asset(s): The site forms part of the agricultural setting of Breach Farm and the listed barn adjacent.

C What i mpact does the allocation have on that significance : Development of the site would reduce the agricultural setting and be an incongruous form of development within the immediate agricultural setting of the barn and the listed farmhouse.

D Potential for enhancement ? • No E Avoiding Harm / Potential Mitigation Reduction in development of the whole site would reduce impact - eg a small extension of Welldon Street may be able to be accommodated without significant impacts. Conclusions: Development of the whole site would impact negatively on the setting of Breach Farm and barn at Breach Farm both grade II listed.

SITE ASSESSMENT (HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT) PHS118 Site Address: Denby Pottery, Derby Road, Denby

A Potential heritage assets which may be affected: • Scheduled Monument - no • Listed Building(s) – 500m to east of Park Hall Farm (grade II*) • Conservation Area -no • World Heritage Site - no • World Heritage Site Buffer Zone - no • Registered Historic Park or Garden - no • Historic Environment Record – Part of Bourne’s Pottery (at Denby Pottery) lies within the site, part of the site lies within former deer park • Archaeology: No comments received from the Development Management Archaeologist - assume archaeological issues can be dealt with through the planning application process.

B What contribution the site (in its current form) makes to the significance of the heritage asset(s): The site includes part of the Denby Pottery Site which is an important heritage asset in the locality.

No impact on the significance of the former deer park features in this location removed by former uses.

Due to topography and the distance from Park Hall Farm it is considered that the site does not contribute to its significance.

C What impact does the allocation have on that significance: Development of the whole site could result in the loss of significance of part of Denby Pottery and as such would impact on the significance of the non-designated heritage assets.

D Potential for enhancement ? • No

E Avoiding Harm / Potential Mitigation • The impact of development could be mitigated by reducing the site area and retaining the significant buildings.

Conclusions: Although the site includes non-designated heritage assets it is considered that the impacts of the development could be mitigated.

SITE ASSESSMENT (HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT) PHS119 Site Address: Killis Lane, Kilburn, Belper

A Potential heritage assets which may be affected:

• Scheduled Monument - no • Listed Building(s) – White Hart (grade II) approx. 500m to west • Conservation Area – Holbrook approx. 600m to south • World Heritage Site - no • World Heritage Site Buffer Zone - no • Registered Historic Park or Garden - no • Historic Environment Record – none close by • Other : secondary landscape sensitivity – historic landscape character. • Archaeology : No comments received from the Development Management Archaeologist - assume archaeological issues can be dealt with through the planning application process

B What contribution the site (in its current form) makes to the significance of the heritage asset(s): The site is self-contained and in a location that does not contribute to any of the identified heritage assets.

C What impact does the allocation have on that significance: N/A

D Potential for enhancement? • N/A E Avoiding Harm / Potential Mitigation • N/A

Conclusions: No harm to significance of identified heritage assets.

SITE ASSESSMENT (HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT) PHS120 Site Address: Land North of Denby Village, Denby

A Potential heritage assets which may be affected: • Scheduled Monument -no • Listed Building(s) – to south St Mary the Virgin Church grade I listed Church Farm, Denby Village grade II* War memorial grade II in church grounds Tombstone grade II in church grounds all approx. 563m from site • Conservation Area -no • World Heritage Site - no • World Heritage Site Buffer Zone-no • Registered Historic Park or Garden-no • Historic Environment Record – Bourne’s Pottery (at Denby Pottery) 200m to west, former deer park to north • Other: Archaeology : No comments received from the Development Management Archaeologist - assume archaeological issues can be dealt with through the planning application process. B What contribution the site (in its current form) makes to the s ignificance of the heritage asset(s): The site does not contribute to the significance of the former deer park and does not encroach onto the Denby Pottery site or its setting.

• The site is screened from Denby Village and St Mary the Virgin Church and Church Farm by trees on the southern section of the site and beyond. Therefore it is not considered that the site contributes to the significance of these buildings.

C What impact does the allocation have on that significance: No impact on significance of identified heritage assets

D Potential for enhancement? • N/A

E Avoiding Harm / Potential Mitigation N/A

Conclusions: No impact on significance of identified heritage assets

SITE ASSESSMENT (HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT) PHS121 Site Address: Land North West of Denby Common, Denby Village, Denby

A Potential heritage assets which may be affected: • Scheduled Monument -no • Listed Building(s) – Breach Farm (grade II listed)– approx. 450m away to east • Conservation Area -no • World Heritage Site -no • World Heritage Site Buffer Zone -no • Registered Historic Park or Garden -no • Historic Environment Record – 350m to north East – Quaker burial ground and two former deer park to south (936m approx) partly within one to north thought to have been medieval deer park although boundary not known • Archaeology: No comments received from the Development Control Archaeologist - assume archaeological issues can be dealt with through the planning application process.

B What contribution the site (in its current form) makes to the s ignificance of the heritage asset(s): N/A

C What i mpact does the allocation have on that significance : N/A

D Potential for enhancement ? • N/A E Avoiding Harm / Potential Mitigation • N/A

Conclusions: No impacts on known heritage assets.

SITE ASSESSMENT (HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT) PHS122 Site Address: Land off Ticknall Lane Denby

A Potential heritage assets which may be affected: • Scheduled Monument - yes to west Rykneld Street section of Roman Road (approx. 13m) • Listed Building(s) – 640m approx. from Denby St Mary the Virgin Church Grade I Church Farm, Denby Village grade II* War memorial grade II in church grounds Tombstone grade II in church grounds

• Conservation Area -no • World Heritage Site -no • World Heritage Site Buffer Zone -no • Registered Historic Park or Garden -no • Historic Environment Record – to west site of Kilbourne Colliery and associated short stretch of mineral railway approx. 116m to west. • Archaeology: Comments from Development Management Archaeologist 122. Land off Ticknall Lane, Denby. A Scheduled length of the Ryknield Street Roman road lies on the western side of Ticknall Lane. Some consideration of setting impacts might be necessary; the site itself appears to have been opencast so is unlikely to need archaeological evaluation unless large undisturbed areas survive.

B What contribution the site (in its current form) makes to the significance of the heritage asset(s): The site lies adjacent to a scheduled monument and forms part of its setting, being on the opposite of the route of the scheduled Roman road.

Due to distance and topography there is no contribution to the setting of the designated Denby heritage assets.

It is considered that the site makes no contribution to the former Kilbourne Colliery.

C What impact does the allocation have on that significance: Development up to the boundary of the site would impact on the setting of the scheduled monument being part of the same road.

D Potential for enhancement? • no E Avoiding Harm / Potential Mitigation • amendments to the site boundary

Conclusions: Development of the whole site would have an impact on the setting of the scheduled monument being only 13m from edge of site.

SITE ASSESSMENT (HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT) PHS123 Site Address: Land off Pottery Lane, Denby

A Potential heritage assets which may be affected:

• Scheduled Monument - no • Listed Building(s) – St Mary the Virgin Church grade I listed, Church Farm, Denby Village grade II* War memorial grade II in church grounds Tombstone grade II in church grounds • Conservation Area – • World Heritage Site - • World Heritage Site Buffer Zone - • Registered Historic Park or Garden - • Historic Environment Record – site of cross within church grounds • Other : • Archaeology : No comments received from the Development Management Archaeologist - assume archaeological issues can be dealt with through the planning application process.

B What contribution the site (in its current form) makes to the significance of the heritage asset(s): The site lies on the edge of Denby Village and contributes to the rural historic village setting of grade I St Mary the Virgin church.

The site makes no contribution to the significance of the tombstones or war memorial

C What i mpact does the allocation have on that significance : The development would be visible in wider views to and from St Mary the Virgin Church and given its scale and location impact it would have a negative impact on its setting.

D Potential for enhancement? • No E Avoiding Harm / Potential Mitigation • Landscaping and amendments to the site boundary could potentially mitigate against the impact on the setting of St Mary the Virgin Church

Conclusions: Development of the whole site would harm the setting St Mary the Virgin Church (grade I listed).

SITE ASSESSMENT (HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT) PHS124 Site Address: Denby Common, Denby

A Potential heritage assets which may be affected:

• Scheduled Monument - no • Listed Building(s) – Breach Farm (grade II listed)– approx. 450m away to east • Conservation Area – no • World Heritage Site - no • World Heritage Site Buffer Zone -no • Registered Historic Park or Garden -no • Historic Environment Record – • Other : landscape affected by previous surface mining • Archaeology : No comments received from the Development Control Archaeologist - assume archaeological issues can be dealt with through the planning application process.

B What contribution the site (in its current form) makes to the significance of the heritage asset(s): Due to location and topography the site does not make a contribution to the significance of Breach Farm.

C What i mpact does the allocation have on that significance : N/A

D Potential for enhancement ? • N/A E Avoiding Harm / Potential Mitigation • N/A

Conclusions: The site does not impact on identified heritage assets.

SITE ASSESSMENT (HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT) PHS127 Site Address: Sandbed Lane, Bargate, Belper

A Potential heritage assets which may be affected:

• Scheduled Monument - no • Listed Building(s) –White Hart (grade II) approx. 400m • Conservation Area – no • World Heritage Site - • World Heritage Site Buffer Zone - • Registered Historic Park or Garden - • Historic Environment Record – adjacent Toll Road • Archaeology : No comments received from the Development Management Archaeologist - assume archaeological issues can be dealt with through the planning application process

B What contribution the site (in its current form) makes to the significance of the heritage asset(s): The White Hart is surrounded by development and the site makes no contribution to its significance

C What i mpact does the allocation have on that significance : N/A

D Potential for enhancement ? N/A E Avoiding Harm / Potential Mitigation N/A

Conclusions: No harm to significance of identified heritage assets.