Pesticides and Their Metabolites in Wells of Suffolk County, New York, 1998

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Pesticides and Their Metabolites in Wells of Suffolk County, New York, 1998 Prepared in cooperation with the NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION Pesticides and their Metabolites in Wells of Suffolk County, New York, 1998 u -^^ 41 °[ NEW YORK IO Base from U.S. Census TIGER/line files (1990) Albers equal-area conic projection 1:100,000 scale Figure 1. Map of Suffolk County showing location of sites sampled. ABSTRACT or suspected residues. Laboratory residue, and some samples Five insecticide residues and analytical methods with extremely contained as many as 11 different 20 herbicide residues were low detection limits - from 0.001 pesticides or pesticide detected in water samples to 0.2 jog/L (micrograms per liter) metabolites. Only four water- collected from 50 shallow wells - were used to analyze the quality standards were exceeded screened in the surficial sand and samples for 60 pesticide residues. in the samples collected in this gravel aquifer in Suffolk County, Forty-four of the samples study. Dieldrin exceeded the New Long Island in areas with known contained at least one pesticide York State Class GA standard U.S. Department of the Interior WRIR 99-4095 U.S. Geological Survey June 1999 (0.004 jog/L) in samples from INTRODUCTION a statewide monitoring program eight wells. The Federal and New to assess pesticide occurrence in York State Maximum The permeable soils in ground water and surface water of Contaminant Level for simazine Suffolk County make the surficial Long Island and the State of New (4 jog/L) was exceeded in samples sand-and-gravel aquifer highly York. This report describes the from two wells, and the State susceptible to contamination from results of a joint study conducted Class GA standard for simazine activities on the land surface. This by the NYSDEC, USGS, and (0.5 Jig/L) was exceeded in highly permeable aquifer is a SCDH to sample wells in Suffolk samples from six wells. Federal source of water for domestic and County (including water supply water-quality standards have not public supply systems in the wells) with known or suspected been established for many of the County, and is hydraulically pesticide residues. The primary compounds detected in this study, connected to underlying aquifers purpose of this study was to including herbicide metabolites. that are also used for public supplement the SCDH pesticide- Maximum concentrations of supply. Because of the monitoring program. Because all four herbicide metabolites - vulnerability and importance of of these samples are from raw, metolachlor ESA (ethanesulfonic the surficial sand-and-gravel untreated water from the surficial acid), metolachlor OA (oxanilic aquifer, and in response to aquifer, the results reported here acid), and the alachlor metabolites documented contamination of the are not representative of chemical alachlor ESA and alachlor OA - surficial aquifer by aldicarb in the characteristics of drinking water. exceeded 20 Jig/L. The maximum early 1980's (Zaki and others, The pesticide residues concentration of one herbicide 1982; Baier and Robbins, 1982; monitored in this study include (tebuthiuron) exceeded 10 jag/L, Soren and Stelz, 1984; Eckhardt many not monitored by SCDH. and the maximum concentration and Stackelberg, 1995), the For example, the samples of three herbicides (simazine, Suffolk County Department of collected in this study were metolachlor, and atrazine) and one Health Services (SCDH) analyzed for the herbicide herbicide metabolite established a ground-water tebuthiuron, which is commonly (deisopropylatrazine) ranged from monitoring program for pesticides used in association with simazine, 1 to 10 jog/L. The herbicide and other chemicals of concern. and the metolachlor metabolites metolachlor, which is used on The SCDH program has metolachlor ethanesulfonic acid potato fields in Suffolk County, consistently demonstrated the (metolachlor ESA), metolachlor and its metabolites (metolachlor presence of older, persistent oxanilic acid (metolachlor OA), ESA and metolachlor OA) were residues from pesticides like and the simazine metabolite most frequently detected in aldicarb, which are no longer used deisopropylatrazine. Other samples from agricultural areas. on Long Island. More recent pesticides monitored in this study The herbicides simazine and monitoring by the SCDH has include many of the most tebuthiuron, which were used in shown that the herbicides commonly used pesticides in the utility rights-of-way, and the metolachlor and simazine are country. The laboratory methods simazine metabolite commonly detected in the shallow used to analyze the samples deisopropylatrazine were detected ground water of Suffolk County collected in this study have lower at concentrations greater than 0.05 (Baier and Trent, 1998). detection limits for many jog/L most frequently in samples Metolachlor has been used on pesticides than do the methods from residential and mixed land- potato crops, and simazine has used by SCDH. use areas. The results of this recently been used for weed Because this study was investigation are not necessarily control at utility substations. intended to complement the representative of conditions In 1997, the New York State SCDH program, however, many throughout the remainder of Long Department of Environmental pesticides that are commonly Island, because these samples Conservation (NYSDEC) in detected by the SCDH (including were collected in areas of known cooperation with the U.S. aldicarb and its degredates) were or suspected residues. Geological Survey (USGS) began not investigated in this study. Thus, the results of this study will not represent a complete description of all pesticide WHAT ARE METABOLITES? residues in ground water in Suffolk County. Metabolites are formed when a parent compound This report presents data degrades. Metabolites commonly are present at higher on the concentration and concentrations than the parent compound. Some metabolites frequency of detection of the 60 can form from the degradation of more than one compound. pesticide residues monitored in For example, deisopropylatrazine can form from the this study and discusses the degradation of either atrazine or simazine (Thurman and concentrations in relation to others., 1994). Other metabolites are specific to only one parent Federal and State water-quality compound. For example, metolachlor ESA and metolachlor standards. This report also relates OA are derived solely from the parent compound metolachlor. the detection of selected herbicide Sampling for herbicide metabolites in this study was residues to the predominant land motivated in part by findings in the midwestern United States use around the 50 wells sampled, that have shown that metolachlor ESA, metolachlor OA, and and discusses the concentrations deisopropylatrazine commonly are present in ground water in of these residues in relation to agricultural areas (Kolpin and others, 1997; Kolpin and one another. others, 1998). Concentrations of these metabolites often equaled or exceeded those of the parent compound. Few, if any, federal water-quality standards have been established for these metabolites. STUDY METHODS Samples were collected from 50 wells that tap the surficial sand-and-gravel (upper glacial) water-table aquifer in Suffolk County by personnel from the utility rights-of-way, or Environmental Protection SCDH and USGS between May metolachlor, aldicarb, or other Agency and includes some of the and August 1998 (fig. 1, table I). pesticides used in agricultural most commonly used pesticides Most (41) of these wells were fields. These residues were not in the nation. installed by the SCDH, and are caused by small-scale spillage of Each well sampled was part of their water-quality pesticides, but rather are the classified according to the land monitoring network. Well depths result of larger scale, nonpoint, use - agricultural, residential, or range from 9 to 202 feet below pesticide use. mixed within a quarter-mile land surface. The depth of the Samples were analyzed by radius of the well. Land-use data midpoint of the screened interval the USGS for 60 pesticides or are based on mapping-data ranges from 8 to 200 feet, and the pesticide metabolites using imagery generated from satellite depth of the median midpoint of methods described by Zaugg and data collected in 1994 (U. S. the screened interval was less others (1995), Meyer and others Geological Survey, 1997). than 60 feet. Depth to water (1993), and Ferrer and others Agricultural wells include those ranged from less than 10 feet to (1997) (table 2). The detection with more than 35 percent 130 feet, and the median depth to limits of the methods used to agricultural land use (row crop water was less than 50 feet. analyze the samples ranged from and pasture and hay), but less than The wells selected for 0.001 to 0.2 ng/L. The analytical 30 percent residential land within sampling are in areas known or method devised by Zaugg and a quarter-mile radius of the well. suspected to contain pesticide others was developed in Residential wells include those residues from simazine used on cooperation with the U.S. with more than 55 percent of the Table 1. Data on Wells sampled in Suffolk County, Long Island, New York, April- August 1998 [Depths are in feet below land surface. A dash (-) denotes missing data. Well Numbers for water supply wells are listed in bold] Sampling Number USGS Station date Depth to Depth of Land on fig. 1 Well Number no. (mo/d/yr) Community water screened interval use* 1 SI 12740.1 404319073055101 6/23/98 W. Sayville 10 10- 15 MI 2 S 71280.1 410106072293701 5/27/98 Cutchogue 20 42.0 - 44.5 AG 3 S 51566.1 405716072413301 6/10/98 Riverhead 55 76-86 AG 4 S51571.1 405805072403701 6/10/98 Riverhead 76 96 - 106 AG 5 SI 12499.1 404953073170501 6/18/98 Commack 95 130- 140 RE 6 SI 12248.1 404717073201301 5/28/98 Dix Hills 35 48-58 RE 7 SI 12422.1 405554072352201 7/1/98 Jamesport 6 15-20 MI 8 SI 12679.1 405626072442701 5/14/98 Baiting Hollow 76 100- 110 AG 9 SI 12870.1 404719073205701 6/3/98 Dix Hills 46 51-61 RE 10 SI 12328.1 404707073234201 5/19/98 Melville 55 68-78 RE 11 SI 12741.1 405516072183401 7/2/98 Mecox 10 16-26 AG 12 SI 12742.1 405730072364101 6/25/98 Aquebogue 35 39-49 AG 13 SI 12307.1 404900072451701 6/29/98 E.
Recommended publications
  • USDA, Forest Service Forest Health Protection GSA Contract No
    SERA TR 02-43-13-03b Triclopyr - Revised Human Health and Ecological Risk Assessments Final Report Prepared for: USDA, Forest Service Forest Health Protection GSA Contract No. GS-10F-0082F USDA Forest Service BPA: WO-01-3187-0150 USDA Purchase Order No.: 43-1387-2-0245 Task No. 13 Submitted to: Dave Thomas, COTR Forest Health Protection Staff USDA Forest Service Rosslyn Plaza Building C, Room 7129C 1601 North Kent Street Arlington, VA 22209 Submitted by: Patrick R. Durkin Syracuse Environmental Research Associates, Inc. 5100 Highbridge St., 42C Fayetteville, New York 13066-0950 Telephone: (315) 637-9560 Fax: (315) 637-0445 E-Mail: [email protected] Home Page: www.sera-inc.com March 15, 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF APPENDICES ...................................................... iv LIST OF WORKSHEETS ...................................................... v LIST OF ATTACHMENTS .................................................... v LIST OF TABLES ............................................................ v LIST OF FIGURES ......................................................... viii ACRONYMS, ABBREVIATIONS, AND SYMBOLS .............................. ix COMMON UNIT CONVERSIONS AND ABBREVIATIONS ......................... xi CONVERSION OF SCIENTIFIC NOTATION .................................... xii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................... xiii 1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................ 1-1 2. PROGRAM DESCRIPTION ................................................ 2-1 2.1. OVERVIEW
    [Show full text]
  • Herbicide Mode of Action Table High Resistance Risk
    Herbicide Mode of Action Table High resistance risk Chemical family Active constituent (first registered trade name) GROUP 1 Inhibition of acetyl co-enzyme A carboxylase (ACC’ase inhibitors) clodinafop (Topik®), cyhalofop (Agixa®*, Barnstorm®), diclofop (Cheetah® Gold* Decision®*, Hoegrass®), Aryloxyphenoxy- fenoxaprop (Cheetah®, Gold*, Wildcat®), fluazifop propionates (FOPs) (Fusilade®), haloxyfop (Verdict®), propaquizafop (Shogun®), quizalofop (Targa®) Cyclohexanediones (DIMs) butroxydim (Factor®*), clethodim (Select®), profoxydim (Aura®), sethoxydim (Cheetah® Gold*, Decision®*), tralkoxydim (Achieve®) Phenylpyrazoles (DENs) pinoxaden (Axial®) GROUP 2 Inhibition of acetolactate synthase (ALS inhibitors), acetohydroxyacid synthase (AHAS) Imidazolinones (IMIs) imazamox (Intervix®*, Raptor®), imazapic (Bobcat I-Maxx®*, Flame®, Midas®*, OnDuty®*), imazapyr (Arsenal Xpress®*, Intervix®*, Lightning®*, Midas®* OnDuty®*), imazethapyr (Lightning®*, Spinnaker®) Pyrimidinyl–thio- bispyribac (Nominee®), pyrithiobac (Staple®) benzoates Sulfonylureas (SUs) azimsulfuron (Gulliver®), bensulfuron (Londax®), chlorsulfuron (Glean®), ethoxysulfuron (Hero®), foramsulfuron (Tribute®), halosulfuron (Sempra®), iodosulfuron (Hussar®), mesosulfuron (Atlantis®), metsulfuron (Ally®, Harmony®* M, Stinger®*, Trounce®*, Ultimate Brushweed®* Herbicide), prosulfuron (Casper®*), rimsulfuron (Titus®), sulfometuron (Oust®, Eucmix Pre Plant®*, Trimac Plus®*), sulfosulfuron (Monza®), thifensulfuron (Harmony®* M), triasulfuron (Logran®, Logran® B-Power®*), tribenuron (Express®),
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Geological Survey National Water-Quality Assessment Program
    U.S. Geological Survey National Water-Quality Assessment Program Stream water-quality analytes Major ions and trace elements­schedule 998 (20 constituents) Pesticides ­­schedule 2437 (229 compounds) Alkalinity 1H­1,2,4­Triazole Arsenic 2,3,3­Trichloro­2­propene­1­sulfonic acid (TCPSA) Boron 2,4­D Calcium 2­(1­Hydroxyethyl)­6­methylaniline Chloride 2­[(2­Ethyl­6­methylphenyl)amino]­1­propanol Fluoride 2­Amino­N­isopropylbenzamide Iron 2­Aminobenzimidazole Lithium 2­Chloro­2',6'­diethylacetanilide 2­Chloro­4,6­diamino­s­triazine {CAAT} Magnesium (Didealkylatrazine) pH 2­Chloro­4­isopropylamino­6­amino­s­triazine Potassium 2­Chloro­6­ethylamino­4­amino­s­triazine {CEAT} Total dissolved solids 2­Chloro­N­(2­ethyl­6­methylphenyl)acetamide Selenium 2­Hydroxy­4­isopropylamino­6­amino­s­triazine 2­Hydroxy­4­isopropylamino­6­ethylamino­s­triazin Silica e {OIET} Sodium 2­Hydroxy­6­ethylamino­4­amino­s­triazine Specific conductance 2­Isopropyl­6­methyl­4­pyrimidinol Strontium 3,4­Dichlorophenylurea Sulfate 3­Hydroxycarbofuran Turbidity 3­Phenoxybenzoic acid Vanadium 4­(Hydroxymethyl)pendimethalin 4­Chlorobenzylmethyl sulfoxide Suspended sediment 4­Hydroxy molinate 4­Hydroxychlorothalonil Nutrients­schedule 2430 (18 constituents) 4­Hydroxyhexazinone A Inorganic carbon, suspended Acephate Dissolved inorganic carbon Acetochlor ammonia + organic nitrogen (unfiltered­Kjeldahl) Acetochlor oxanilic acid ammonia + organic nitrogen (filtered­Kjeldahl) Acetochlor sulfonic acid Ammonia as N, filtered Acetochlor sulfynilacetic acid nitrite, filtered Alachlor
    [Show full text]
  • INDEX to PESTICIDE TYPES and FAMILIES and PART 180 TOLERANCE INFORMATION of PESTICIDE CHEMICALS in FOOD and FEED COMMODITIES
    US Environmental Protection Agency Office of Pesticide Programs INDEX to PESTICIDE TYPES and FAMILIES and PART 180 TOLERANCE INFORMATION of PESTICIDE CHEMICALS in FOOD and FEED COMMODITIES Note: Pesticide tolerance information is updated in the Code of Federal Regulations on a weekly basis. EPA plans to update these indexes biannually. These indexes are current as of the date indicated in the pdf file. For the latest information on pesticide tolerances, please check the electronic Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR) at http://www.access.gpo.gov/nara/cfr/waisidx_07/40cfrv23_07.html 1 40 CFR Type Family Common name CAS Number PC code 180.163 Acaricide bridged diphenyl Dicofol (1,1-Bis(chlorophenyl)-2,2,2-trichloroethanol) 115-32-2 10501 180.198 Acaricide phosphonate Trichlorfon 52-68-6 57901 180.259 Acaricide sulfite ester Propargite 2312-35-8 97601 180.446 Acaricide tetrazine Clofentezine 74115-24-5 125501 180.448 Acaricide thiazolidine Hexythiazox 78587-05-0 128849 180.517 Acaricide phenylpyrazole Fipronil 120068-37-3 129121 180.566 Acaricide pyrazole Fenpyroximate 134098-61-6 129131 180.572 Acaricide carbazate Bifenazate 149877-41-8 586 180.593 Acaricide unclassified Etoxazole 153233-91-1 107091 180.599 Acaricide unclassified Acequinocyl 57960-19-7 6329 180.341 Acaricide, fungicide dinitrophenol Dinocap (2, 4-Dinitro-6-octylphenyl crotonate and 2,6-dinitro-4- 39300-45-3 36001 octylphenyl crotonate} 180.111 Acaricide, insecticide organophosphorus Malathion 121-75-5 57701 180.182 Acaricide, insecticide cyclodiene Endosulfan 115-29-7 79401
    [Show full text]
  • Control of Melaleuca Seedlings and Trees by Herbicides RANDALL K
    J. Aquat. Plant Manage. 35: 55-59 Control of Melaleuca Seedlings and Trees by Herbicides RANDALL K. STOCKER1 AND D. R. SANDERS, SR.2 ABSTRACT starting in 1940 to prevent storm generated waves from erod- ing the levee system (Herbert Hoover Dike). From the tree Field tests of several herbicides at Lake Okeechobee, Flor- islands, melaleuca has spread into shallow wetland areas of ida, demonstrated effective control of melaleuca seedlings the lake. Because of the invasive nature of melaleuca (Craig- and mature trees. The lowest tested rates (4.5, 2.2, and 4.5 kg head 1971), and subsequent impacts to native plant (Myers ai/ha) of bromacil, hexazinone, and tebuthiuron (respec- 1984) and animal (Deuver et al. 1979, Maffei 1994, Mmazzot- tively) produced complete mortality of melaleuca seedings tii et al. 1981, Ostrenko et al 1979, Sowder and Woodall within six weeks of treatment. The highest tested rate (13.4 1985) communities, and because the USAE has determined kg ai/ha) of glyphosate also produced 100 percent mortality that the trees are no longer essential for bank stabilization, of seedlings, but 44 weeks were required to achieve these efforts have been underway since 1993 to control the trees results. At lower rates, tebuthiuron pellets were not as effec- and prevent further spread into adjacent wetlands. tive as the wettable powder formulation on seedlings. Only Melaleuca has been reported to be controlled by several dicamba + 2,4-D produced less than 100 percent mortality of herbicides. Imazapyr caused melaleuca mortality 12 months seedlings at the highest tested rate (87%). After 15 months, after treatment (Standish and Burns 1994).
    [Show full text]
  • AP-42, CH 9.2.2: Pesticide Application
    9.2.2PesticideApplication 9.2.2.1General1-2 Pesticidesaresubstancesormixturesusedtocontrolplantandanimallifeforthepurposesof increasingandimprovingagriculturalproduction,protectingpublichealthfrompest-bornediseaseand discomfort,reducingpropertydamagecausedbypests,andimprovingtheaestheticqualityofoutdoor orindoorsurroundings.Pesticidesareusedwidelyinagriculture,byhomeowners,byindustry,andby governmentagencies.Thelargestusageofchemicalswithpesticidalactivity,byweightof"active ingredient"(AI),isinagriculture.Agriculturalpesticidesareusedforcost-effectivecontrolofweeds, insects,mites,fungi,nematodes,andotherthreatstotheyield,quality,orsafetyoffood.Theannual U.S.usageofpesticideAIs(i.e.,insecticides,herbicides,andfungicides)isover800millionpounds. AiremissionsfrompesticideusearisebecauseofthevolatilenatureofmanyAIs,solvents, andotheradditivesusedinformulations,andofthedustynatureofsomeformulations.Mostmodern pesticidesareorganiccompounds.EmissionscanresultdirectlyduringapplicationorastheAIor solventvolatilizesovertimefromsoilandvegetation.Thisdiscussionwillfocusonemissionfactors forvolatilization.Thereareinsufficientdataavailableonparticulateemissionstopermitemission factordevelopment. 9.2.2.2ProcessDescription3-6 ApplicationMethods- Pesticideapplicationmethodsvaryaccordingtothetargetpestandtothecroporothervalue tobeprotected.Insomecases,thepesticideisapplieddirectlytothepest,andinotherstothehost plant.Instillothers,itisusedonthesoilorinanenclosedairspace.Pesticidemanufacturershave developedvariousformulationsofAIstomeetboththepestcontrolneedsandthepreferred
    [Show full text]
  • Biochemical and Genotoxic Effects of a Commercial Formulation of the Herbicide Tebuthiuron in Oreochromis Niloticus of Different Sizes
    Ecotoxicol. Environ. Contam., v. 9, n. 1, 2014, 59-67 doi: 10.5132/eec.2014.01.008 Biochemical and genotoxic effects of a commercial formulation of the herbicide tebuthiuron in Oreochromis niloticus of different sizes M.F. FRANCO-BERNARDES; L.R. MASCHIO; M.T.V. DE AZEREDO-OLIVEIRA & E.A. DE ALMEIDA Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho. Rua Cristóvão Colombo, 2265. 15054-000. São José do Rio Preto, SP. Brazil. (Received April 16, 2014; Accept June 17, 2014) Abstract Pesticides are serious contaminants because they are designed to eliminate pests, but they also affect non-target species. The present study aimed to evaluate the biochemical and genetic effects of the herbicide tebuthiuron in Oreochromis niloticus of different sizes. Thus, we analyzed biomarkers in small and large O. niloticus specimens exposed to 62.5, 125 and 250 mg L-1 of tebuthiuron for 72 hours. Fish exposed to 250 mg L-1 had high mortality rates; therefore, the data could not be used. The results showed an increase in EROD activity in fish exposed to 125 mg L-1, but no GST alteration. Antioxidant enzymes GPx and CAT were altered only in the liver of treated fish compared to the control group: CAT decreased in large fish, and GPx increased in small fish. The MDA analysis did not evidence lipid peroxidation. High DNA damage in exposed small fish (not in large fish) was observed using comet assay, but a micronucleus test did not show mutagenicity. Moreover, a comparison between control groups with specimens of different sizes revealed that small fish are more susceptible than large fish to the tebuthiuron effects, since increased comet scores was observed only for smaller fish.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Herbicide Groups
    List of herbicides Group Scientific name Trade name clodinafop (Topik®), cyhalofop (Barnstorm®), diclofop (Cheetah® Gold*, Decision®*, Hoegrass®), fenoxaprop (Cheetah® Gold* , Wildcat®), A Aryloxyphenoxypropionates fluazifop (Fusilade®, Fusion®*), haloxyfop (Verdict®), propaquizafop (Shogun®), quizalofop (Targa®) butroxydim (Falcon®, Fusion®*), clethodim (Select®), profoxydim A Cyclohexanediones (Aura®), sethoxydim (Cheetah® Gold*, Decision®*), tralkoxydim (Achieve®) A Phenylpyrazoles pinoxaden (Axial®) azimsulfuron (Gulliver®), bensulfuron (Londax®), chlorsulfuron (Glean®), ethoxysulfuron (Hero®), foramsulfuron (Tribute®), halosulfuron (Sempra®), iodosulfuron (Hussar®), mesosulfuron (Atlantis®), metsulfuron (Ally®, Harmony®* M, Stinger®*, Trounce®*, B Sulfonylureas Ultimate Brushweed®* Herbicide), prosulfuron (Casper®*), rimsulfuron (Titus®), sulfometuron (Oust®, Eucmix Pre Plant®*), sulfosulfuron (Monza®), thifensulfuron (Harmony®* M), triasulfuron, (Logran®, Logran® B Power®*), tribenuron (Express®), trifloxysulfuron (Envoke®, Krismat®*) florasulam (Paradigm®*, Vortex®*, X-Pand®*), flumetsulam B Triazolopyrimidines (Broadstrike®), metosulam (Eclipse®), pyroxsulam (Crusader®Rexade®*) imazamox (Intervix®*, Raptor®,), imazapic (Bobcat I-Maxx®*, Flame®, Midas®*, OnDuty®*), imazapyr (Arsenal Xpress®*, Intervix®*, B Imidazolinones Lightning®*, Midas®*, OnDuty®*), imazethapyr (Lightning®*, Spinnaker®) B Pyrimidinylthiobenzoates bispyribac (Nominee®), pyrithiobac (Staple®) C Amides: propanil (Stam®) C Benzothiadiazinones: bentazone (Basagran®,
    [Show full text]
  • Chemical Weed Control
    2014 North Carolina Agricultural Chemicals Manual The 2014 North Carolina Agricultural Chemicals Manual is published by the North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, N.C. State University, Raleigh, N.C. These recommendations apply only to North Carolina. They may not be appropriate for conditions in other states and may not comply with laws and regulations outside North Carolina. These recommendations are current as of November 2013. Individuals who use agricultural chemicals are responsible for ensuring that the intended use complies with current regulations and conforms to the product label. Be sure to obtain current information about usage regulations and examine a current product label before applying any chemical. For assistance, contact your county Cooperative Extension agent. The use of brand names and any mention or listing of commercial products or services in this document does not imply endorsement by the North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service nor discrimination against similar products or services not mentioned. VII — CHEMICAL WEED CONTROL 2014 North Carolina Agricultural Chemicals Manual VII — CHEMICAL WEED CONTROL Chemical Weed Control in Field Corn ...................................................................................................... 224 Weed Response to Preemergence Herbicides — Corn ........................................................................... 231 Weed Response to Postemergence Herbicides — Corn ........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Recommended Classification of Pesticides by Hazard and Guidelines to Classification 2019 Theinternational Programme on Chemical Safety (IPCS) Was Established in 1980
    The WHO Recommended Classi cation of Pesticides by Hazard and Guidelines to Classi cation 2019 cation Hazard of Pesticides by and Guidelines to Classi The WHO Recommended Classi The WHO Recommended Classi cation of Pesticides by Hazard and Guidelines to Classi cation 2019 The WHO Recommended Classification of Pesticides by Hazard and Guidelines to Classification 2019 TheInternational Programme on Chemical Safety (IPCS) was established in 1980. The overall objectives of the IPCS are to establish the scientific basis for assessment of the risk to human health and the environment from exposure to chemicals, through international peer review processes, as a prerequisite for the promotion of chemical safety, and to provide technical assistance in strengthening national capacities for the sound management of chemicals. This publication was developed in the IOMC context. The contents do not necessarily reflect the views or stated policies of individual IOMC Participating Organizations. The Inter-Organization Programme for the Sound Management of Chemicals (IOMC) was established in 1995 following recommendations made by the 1992 UN Conference on Environment and Development to strengthen cooperation and increase international coordination in the field of chemical safety. The Participating Organizations are: FAO, ILO, UNDP, UNEP, UNIDO, UNITAR, WHO, World Bank and OECD. The purpose of the IOMC is to promote coordination of the policies and activities pursued by the Participating Organizations, jointly or separately, to achieve the sound management of chemicals in relation to human health and the environment. WHO recommended classification of pesticides by hazard and guidelines to classification, 2019 edition ISBN 978-92-4-000566-2 (electronic version) ISBN 978-92-4-000567-9 (print version) ISSN 1684-1042 © World Health Organization 2020 Some rights reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • Tebuthiuron Ecological Risk Assessment
    Utah State University DigitalCommons@USU All U.S. Government Documents (Utah Regional U.S. Government Documents (Utah Regional Depository) Depository) 11-2005 Tebuthiuron Ecological Risk Assessment Bureau of Land Management ENSR International Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/govdocs Part of the Environmental Indicators and Impact Assessment Commons Recommended Citation Bureau of Land Management and ENSR International, "Tebuthiuron Ecological Risk Assessment" (2005). All U.S. Government Documents (Utah Regional Depository). Paper 417. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/govdocs/417 This Report is brought to you for free and open access by the U.S. Government Documents (Utah Regional Depository) at DigitalCommons@USU. It has been accepted for inclusion in All U.S. Government Documents (Utah Regional Depository) by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@USU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Bureau of Land Management Reno, Nevada Tebuthiuron Ecological Risk Assessment Final Report November 2005 Bureau of Land Management Contract No. NAD010156 ENSR Document Number 09090-020-650 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Bureau of Land Management (BLM), United States Department of the Interior (USDI), is proposing a program to treat vegetation on up to six million acres of public lands annually in 17 western states in the continental United States (U.S.) and Alaska. As part of this program, the BLM is proposing the use of ten herbicide active ingredients (a.i.) to control invasive plants and noxious weeds on approximately one million of the 6 million acres proposed for treatment. The BLM and its contractor, ENSR, are preparing a Vegetation Treatments Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) to evaluate this and other proposed vegetation treatment methods and alternatives on lands managed by the BLM in the western continental U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Vegetation Treatments Using Herbicides Record of Decision Fact
    Vegetation Treatments Using Herbicides on BLM Lands In Oregon Environmental Impact Statement Record of Decision Fact Sheet October 2010 • This Record of Decision selects a modified version of Alternative 4 in the July 2010 Final Environmental Impact Statement for Vegetation Treatments Using Herbicides on BLM Lands in Oregon. • The Record of Decision does not authorize any herbicide treatment projects. Site-specific National Environmental Policy Act analysis will occur prior to any herbicide treatments at the BLM District level. • This action expands herbicide use beyond noxious weed treatments to include: -treatment of all invasive plants; -control of pests and diseases; -control of native vegetation in rights-of-way, administrative sites, and recreation sites; and -treatment of vegetation to achieve habitat goals specified in interagency conservation strategies for Federally-listed and other Special Status species. • This decision makes available 14 herbicides west of the Cascades (2,4-D, clopyralid, dicamba, dicamba + diflufenzopyr, diuron, fluridone, glyphosate, hexazinone, imazapic, imazapyr, metsulfuron methyl, picloram, sulfometuron methyl, and triclopyr) and 17 herbicides east of the Cascades (bromacil, chlorsulfuron, tebuthiuron, and the 14 herbicides available west of the Cascades). • As a result of 1984 and 1987 U.S. District Court orders, the BLM in Oregon has only been utilizing four herbicides and only uses those herbicides in the treatment of noxious weeds. In most cases, the additional herbicides being made available for possible use by this decision are newer, can be used in lower quantities, and are more target-specific than the four currently being used. 1 • The decision added the herbicide dicamba + diflufenzopyr (which was analyzed in the Final EIS as part of Alternative 5) to the herbicides proposed for use under the proposed action (Alternative 4) in the Final EIS.
    [Show full text]