Ecological Patterns of Early Life Stages of Fishes in a Large River-Floodplain of the San Francisco Estuary

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Ecological Patterns of Early Life Stages of Fishes in a Large River-Floodplain of the San Francisco Estuary American Fisheries Society Symposium 39:111–123, 2004 © Copyright by the American Fisheries Society 2004 Ecological Patterns of Early Life Stages of Fishes in a Large River-Floodplain of the San Francisco Estuary TED R. SOMMER*, WILLIAM C. HARRELL, RYON KURTH, FREDERICK FEYRER, STEVEN C. ZEUG, AND GAVIN O’LEARY Aquatic Ecology Section, California Department of Water Resources 3251 S Street, Sacramento, California 95816, USA Abstract.—We examined assemblage patterns of early life stages of fishes for two major tributaries of the upper San Francisco Estuary: (1) Sacramento River channel, and (2) Yolo Bypass, the river’s seasonal floodplain. Over four hydrologically diverse years (1999–2002), we collected 15 species in Yolo Bypass egg and larval samples, 18 species in Yolo Bypass rotary screw trap samples, and 10 species in Sacramento River egg and larval samples. Fishes captured included federally listed species (delta smelt Hypomesus transpacificus and splittail Pogonichthys macrolepidotus) and several game species (Ameri- can shad Alosa sapidissima, striped bass Morone saxatilis, crappie Pomoxis spp., and Chi- nook salmon Oncorhynchus tshawytscha). As in other regions of the estuary, alien fish comprised a large portion of the individuals collected in Yolo Bypass (40–93% for egg and larval net samples; 84–98% for rotary screw trap samples) and Sacramento River (80–99% for egg and larval net samples). Overall ranks of species abundances were significantly correlated for Yolo Bypass and Sacramento River, suggesting that each assemblage was controlled by similar major environmental factors. However, species diversity and richness were higher in Yolo Bypass, likely because of a wider variety of habitat types and greater hydrologic variation in the floodplain. In both landscapes, we found evidence that timing of occurrence of native fishes was earlier than aliens, consis- tent with their life history and our data on adult migration patterns. We hypothesize that Yolo Bypass favors native fishes because the inundation of seasonal floodplain typically occurs early in the calendar year, providing access to vast areas of spawning and rearing habitat with an enhanced food web. Conclusions from this analysis have implications for the management of aquatic biodiversity of tributaries to the San Fran- cisco Estuary and perhaps to other lowland rivers. Introduction creased habitat area and diversity (Junk et al. 1989), terrestrial carbon subsidies to food webs Data from relatively undisturbed large rivers (Thorpe et al. 1998), and decreased predation indicate that the structure and function of dif- or competition (Corti et al. 1997). For fishes, ferent trophic levels are determined by inter- floodplain may function as spawning habitat actions between the river channel and its flood- (Penaz et al. 1992; Killgore and Baker 1996), plain (Junk et al. 1989). Floodplains can as rearing habitat (Sabo and Kelso 1991; provide higher biotic diversity and increased Gehrke 1992; Turner et al. 1994), and as mi- production of fish (Bayley 1991; Gutreuter et gration corridors (authors’ unpublished data). al. 2000) and invertebrates (Gladden and Unfortunately, there is relatively little infor- Smock 1990; Sommer et al. 2001a). Potential mation from large, regulated rivers, particu- mechanisms for floodplain effects include in- larly in temperate areas, where floodplain con- nectivity has typically been compromised by river channelization and the construction of * Corresponding author: [email protected] dams and levees (Michener and Haeuber 1998). 111 112 SOMMER ET AL. In this study, we examined assemblage water spills into Yolo Bypass over Fremont trends in the early life stages of fishes in two Weir, inundating the floodplain to a mean major tributaries of the San Francisco Estu- depth of generally less than 2 m. In low-flow ary: (1) Sacramento River channel, and (2) Yolo periods, water is confined to a tidal perennial Bypass, the river’s seasonal floodplain (Fig- channel along the eastern edge of the flood- ure 1). Several attributes of this system made plain. Although agriculture has been one of the it attractive for study. The floodplain is mostly primary land uses in the floodplain for the past separated from the adjacent river channel by three decades, the majority of the floodplain is a levee, allowing us to differentiate between presently (or soon to be) managed for wildlife fish assemblage responses in each landscape. in “natural” habitats, including riparian and Like most other regions in North America, upland areas, emergent marsh, and permanent much of the historical floodplain habitat of ponds. The reach of the Sacramento River ad- large rivers in California has been lost due to jacent to Yolo Bypass is a deep (>5 m) channel channelization and levee and dam construc- with minimal emergent vegetation and has tion (Rasmussen 1996). However, the fact that steep, rock-covered banks with a narrow ripar- Yolo Bypass is one of the largest contiguous ian corridor; the lower half of this reach is a areas of floodplain habitat on the West Coast tidal freshwater channel. Outflow from Sacra- of the United States may greatly enhance its mento River and Yolo Bypass rejoin near Rio biological significance. In addition, the region Vista, where the combined discharge enters the is the focus of a major habitat restoration ef- brackish regions of the estuary. fort (CALFED 2000). Landscape scale data on In addition to changes in physical habi- trends in assemblages of early life stages of tat, the biota of the estuary has been altered by fishes in river and floodplain habitat could be a large number of species introductions relevant for resource management in the San (Cohen and Carlton 1998). Phytoplankton, Francisco Estuary and perhaps other regions. zooplankton, and macroinvertebrates have Our study was designed to address the fol- declined substantially following the introduc- lowing specific questions for early life stages tion of the alien bivalve Potamocorbula amu- of fishes: (1) does species composition and rensis (Kimmerer and Orsi 1996; Orsi and diversity differ for the two landscapes? and Mecum 1996; Jassby and Cloern 2000). Native (2) what are the temporal dynamics of the as- fishes have shown population decreases due semblages in each landscape? to multiple factors (Bennett and Moyle 1996), leading to the listing under the Federal En- Study Area dangered Species Act of two races of Chinook salmon Oncorhynchus tshawytscha, steelhead The San Francisco Estuary is one of the larg- Oncorhynchus mykiss, delta smelt Hypomesus est estuaries on the West Coast (Figure 1). The transpacificus, and splittail Pogonichthys system includes extensive downstream bays macrolepidotus. (Suisun, San Pablo, and San Francisco) and a delta, a network of tidal channels that receive Methods inflow from the Sacramento and San Joaquin rivers. The delta drains about 40% of Califor- Our overall approach was to collect compara- nia (Atwater et al. 1979). The estuary has been tive physical and biological data in the Sacra- substantially altered by a variety of anthropo- mento River channel and adjacent Yolo By- genic factors, including levees, dams, land pass floodplain. Field data were collected reclamation activities, water diversions, and during winter through early summer for 4 contaminants. The primary floodplain of the years (1999–2002). Flow in Yolo Bypass and Sacramento River is the Yolo Bypass, a 24,000- the adjacent stretch of Sacramento River dur- ha, partially leveed basin (Sommer et al. ing 1999–2002 was recorded at gauges oper- 2001a). The 61-km floodplain floods in winter ated by U.S. Geological Survey. Daily water and spring in about 60% of years, typically temperatures for each site were obtained from when Sacramento basin flows exceed approxi- temperature recorders (Onset Corp.) installed mately 2,000 m3/s. During these flood events, in tidal channels of Yolo Bypass and Sacra- ECOLOGICAL PATTERNS OF EARLY LIFE STAGES OF FISHES IN A LARGE RIVER-FLOODPLAIN 113 FIGURE 1. Location of Yolo Bypass and sampling stations identified with solid circles. 114 SOMMER ET AL. mento River (Figure 1). We sampled early life were used for analysis. The degree to which stages of age-0 fishes during winter and species assemblages differed between the two spring of 1999–2002 by egg and larval nets habitats was examined in three ways. First, and rotary screw trap. species ranks were compared between Sacra- The egg and larval net sampling was de- mento River and Yolo Bypass by calculating a signed to examine the general composition Spearman coefficient of rank correlation for and timing of fish assemblages in each habi- the combined data for 1999, 2001, and 2002. tat, not to identify fine scale spatial variation. Second, species richness was calculated based Sampling was generally conducted weekly on the combined data for all 3 years. In addi- during flood periods and monthly during low tion, Shannon indices (H’) were calculated for flow periods. Paired samples were usually each location based on the sum of the species collected at each location, except in 1999, collected over the same time period. The Sh- when an extra 11 samples were collected in annon indices were then compared between Yolo Bypass, and in 2000, when very few Yolo Bypass and Sacramento River using a t- samples were collected in either Sacramento test designed especially for the comparison of River (N = 1) or Yolo Bypass (N = 4). We used two diversity indices (Zar 1999). fixed sampling sites (Figure 1) located away For rotary screw trap data, we summa- from overhanging vegetation and bank eddies, rized the number of fishes, less than or equal in water velocities of approximately 15–60 to 40 mm fork length (FL), that were clearly cm/s, depending on flow. The 500-µm-mesh age-0 based on inspection of length-frequency net was 4 m in length with a 0.65-m-diameter data. Although this size range was somewhat mouth. The net was fished passively in cur- arbitrary, initial data review suggested that the rent near the surface for approximately 10 min rotary screw trap adequately sampled early during mid-morning (0900–1100 hours).
Recommended publications
  • LONGFIN SMELT Spirinchus Thaleichthys USFWS: None CDFG: Threatened
    LSA ASSOCIATES, INC. PUBLIC DRAFT SOLANO HCP JULY 2012 SOLANO COUNTY WATER AGENCY NATURAL COMMUNITY AND SPECIES ACCOUNTS LONGFIN SMELT Spirinchus thaleichthys USFWS: None CDFG: Threatened Species Account Status and Description. The longfin smelt is listed as a threatened species by the California Fish and Game Commission. Abundance of the longfin smelt has reached record lows in the San Francisco-Delta population, and the species may already be extinct in some northern California estuarine populations, resulting in an overall threat of extinction to the species within California (Federal Register 2008). The longfin smelt was also proposed for federal listing, but on April 8, 2009 the USFWS determined that the San Francisco Bay Estuary population does not qualify for listing as a distinct population segment under federal regulations. Further assessment of the entire population is being conducted, however, and future listing may be considered. Photo courtesy of California Department of Fish and Game Longfin smelt, once mature, are slim, silver fish in the family Osmeridae (true smelts). Moyle (2002) describes the species as being 90-110 mm (standard length) at maturity, with a translucent silver appearance along the sides of the body, and an olive to iridescent pinkish hue on the back. Mature males are often darker than females, with enlarged and stiffened dorsal and anal fins, a dilated lateral line region, and breeding tubercles on paired fins and scares. Longfin smelt can be distinguished from other California smelt by their long pectoral fins (which reach or nearly reach the bases of the pelvic fins), incomplete lateral line, weak or absent striations on the opercular bones, low number of scales in the lateral line (54-65) and long maxillary bones (which in adults extent just short of the posterior margin of the eye).
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Genome of the Korean Smelt Hypomesus Nipponensis and Its Transcriptomic
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.03.26.437215; this version posted March 28, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. 1 2 3 Draft Genome of the Korean smelt Hypomesus nipponensis and its transcriptomic 4 responses to heat stress in the liver and muscle 5 Biao Xuan1,2, Jongbin Park1,2, Sukjung Choi2, Inhwan You1,2, Bo-Hye Nam3, Eun Soo 6 Noh3, Eun Mi Kim3, Mi-Young Song4, Younhee Shin5, Ji-Hyeon Jeon5,6 and Eun Bae 7 Kim1,2,# 8 1 Department of Applied Animal Science, College of Animal Life Sciences, Kangwon National 9 University, Chuncheon 24341, Kangwon-do, Republic of Korea 10 2 Laboratory of Microbial Genomics and Big Data, College of Animal Life Sciences, Kangwon 11 National University, Chuncheon 24341, Kangwon-do, Republic of Korea 12 3 Biotechnology Research Division, National Institute of Fisheries Science, Busan 46083, Korea 13 4 Inland Fisheries Research Institute, National Institute of Fisheries Science, Gapyeong 12453, 14 Korea 15 5 Research and Development Center, Insilicogen Inc, Yongin 16954, Republic of Korea 16 6 Department of Biological Science, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon 16419, Korea 17 18 # Corresponding author 19 Mailing address: Department of Applied Animal Science, College of Animal Life Sciences, 20 Kangwon National University, Chuncheon 200-701, Republic of Korea. 21 Tel: +82-33-250-8642 22 Fax: +82-33-259-5574 23 E-mail: [email protected] 24 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.03.26.437215; this version posted March 28, 2021.
    [Show full text]
  • Hypomesus Nipponensis) Stock Trajectory in Lake Kasumigaura and Kitaura
    Open Journal of Marine Science, 2015, 5, 210-225 Published Online April 2015 in SciRes. http://www.scirp.org/journal/ojms http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ojms.2015.52017 Factors Affecting Japanese Pond Smelt (Hypomesus nipponensis) Stock Trajectory in Lake Kasumigaura and Kitaura Ashneel Ajay Singh1, Noriyuki Sunoh2, Shintaro Niwa2, Fumitaka Tokoro2, Daisuke Sakamoto1, Naoki Suzuki1, Kazumi Sakuramoto1* 1Department of Ocean Science and Technology, Tokyo University of Marine Science and Technology, Tokyo, Japan 2Freshwater Branch Office, Ibaraki Fisheries Research Institute, Ibaraki, Japan Email: *[email protected] Received 5 February 2015; accepted 26 March 2015; published 30 March 2015 Copyright © 2015 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Abstract The Japanese pond smelt (Hypomesus nipponensis) stock has been observed to fluctuate quite ri- gorously over the years with sustained periods of low catch in Lake Kasumigaura and Kitaura of the Ibaraki prefecture, Japan which would adversely affect the socioeconomic livelihood of the lo- cal fishermen and fisheries industry. This study was aimed at determining the factors affecting the stock fluctuation of the pond smelt through the different years in the two lakes. Through explora- tory analysis it was found that the pond smelt had significant relationship with total phosphorus (TP) level in both lakes. The global mean land and ocean temperature index (LOTI) was also found to be indirectly related to the pond smelt stock in lake Kasumigaura and Kitaura at the latitude band of 24˚N to 90˚N (l).
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Almanor General Fish Survey 2013
    State of California The Natural Resources Agency DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE Lake Almanor General Fish Survey 2013 Amber Rossi Environmental Scientist February 27, 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS ACRONYMS .............................................................................................................................. iv I. INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................... 1 II. METHODS .................................................................................................................. 1 Boat Electrofisher ...................................................................................................... 1 Figure 1. Lake Almanor 2008 .................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. Figure 2. Lake Almanor 2013 .................................................................................... 3 III. RESULTS ................................................................................................................... 4 Lake Almanor 2013 .................................................................................................... 4 Brown bullhead .......................................................................................................... 4 Brown trout ................................................................................................................ 4 Channel catfish .......................................................................................................... 4 Carp ...........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • M 12001 Supplement
    The following supplement accompanies the article Biological mechanisms of marine invasions Katherine J. Papacostas, Elizabeth W. Rielly-Carroll, Samuel E. Georgian, Dustin J. Long, Sarah D. Princiotta, Andrea M. Quattrini, Kim E. Reuter, Amy L. Freestone* *Corresponding author: [email protected] Marine Ecology Progress Series 565: 251–268 (2017) Table S1: Search parameters used in ISI Web of Science. General search terms used for all mechanisms were (non-native* OR nonnative* OR invasi* OR introduc* OR non-indigenous OR nonindigenous OR alien OR exotic OR invade*) AND (estuar* OR marine OR coastal OR ocean* OR sea OR *tidal), followed by mechanism-specific terms outlined below. Search results were then refined using Web of Science tools to those pertaining only to Marine and Freshwater Biology, and all research areas that were clearly not relevant (e.g., not biological) were excluded. All remaining papers were then individually evaluated for relevance. Over 2500 papers were evaluated for negative interactions alone. Mechanism Search terms Negative Interactions AND (“biotic resistance” OR “invasion resistance” OR diversity OR “diversity invasibility” OR “empty niche*” OR “limiting similarity” OR “Darwin’s naturalization” OR pre-adaptation OR “enemy release” OR “enemy escape” OR “natural enem*” OR “native enem*” OR allelopath* OR “chemical defense*” OR “novel weapon*” OR “novel chemical*” OR predat* OR herbivor* OR parasit* OR compet* OR consum*) Positive Interactions AND (meltdown OR facilitat* OR mutual* OR “positive interact*”
    [Show full text]
  • CHAPTER 2: Are Hypomesus Chishimaensis and H
    MOLECULAR SYSTEMATICS AND BIOGEOGRAPHY OF THE HOLARCTIC SMELT FAMILY OSMERIDAE (PISCES). by KATRIINA LARISSA ILVES B.Sc., The University of British Columbia, 2000 B.A., The University of British Columbia, 2001 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES (Zoology) THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA December 2007 © Katriina Larissa Ilves, 2007 ABSTRACT Biogeographers have long searched for common processes responsible for driving diversification in the Holarctic region. Although terrestrial flora and fauna have been well studied, much of the marine biogeographic work addresses patterns and processes occurring over a relatively recent timescale. A prerequisite to comparative biogeographic analysis requires well-resolved phylogenies of similarly distributed taxa that diverged over a similar timeframe. The overall aim of my Ph.D. thesis was to address fundamental questions in the systematics and biogeography of a family of Holarctic fish (Osmeridae) and place these results in a broad comparative biogeographic framework. With eight conflicting morphological hypotheses, the northern hemisphere smelts have long been the subjects of systematic disagreement. In addition to the uncertainty in the interrelationships within this family, the relationship of the Osmeridae to several other families remains unclear. Using DNA sequence data from three mitochondrial and three nuclear genes from multiple individuals per species, I reconstructed the phylogenetic relationships among the 6 genera and 15 osmerid species. Phylogenetic reconstruction and divergence dating yielded a well-resolved phylogeny of the osmerid genera and revealed several interesting evolutionary patterns within the family: (1) Hypomesus chishimaensis and H. nipponensis individuals are not reciprocally monophyletic, suggesting that they are conspecific and H.
    [Show full text]
  • Butt Valley Reservoir General Fish Survey 2016-2017
    State of California The Natural Resources Agency DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE Butt Valley Reservoir General Fish Survey 2016-2017 Amber Mouser Environmental Scientist June 20, 2017 I. INTRODUCTION Butt Valley Reservoir (DFGLAKEID 1170, BVR) is located in Plumas County, in the northwestern portion of the Plumas National Forest. BVR is a 1,515 surface acre reservoir created in 1924 that sits at an elevation of 4,144 feet above mean sea level and is part of the North Fork Feather River watershed (Central Valleys Fish Hatchery 1961). The dam is owned and operated by the Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E). BVR was created on Butt Creek and is additionally fed by the Butt Valley Tunnel, which is a penstock that receives water from Lake Almanor. Water exits BVR via tunnels to the Caribou Powerhouse, which supports Belden Forebay. The recreational fishery established at BVR is primarily comprised of rainbow trout (RT) (Oncorhynchus mykiss), brown trout (BN) (Salmo trutta), and smallmouth bass (SMB) (Micropterus dolomieu). A fish population survey conducted by California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) in 1958 indicated that the early species compositions included of rainbow trout, Tui chub, green sunfish, suckers, pikeminnow, and carp. Based on that survey biologists recommended managing BVR as a “warmwater game fish lake.” In 1961, the lake was planted with largemouth bass, smallmouth bass, and redear sunfish. The BVR fishery is also influenced by fish species that come through the tunnel from Lake Almanor (Central Valleys Fish Hatchery 1961). The reservoir was stocked with brown trout in 1969 and 1975.
    [Show full text]
  • Initial Study of the Long-Term Operation of the State Water Project
    Initial Study of the Long-Term Operation of the State Water Project State Clearinghouse No. 2019049121 State of California Department of Water Resources November 22, 2019 Initial Study of the Long-Term Operation of the State Water Project State Clearinghouse No. 2019049121 Lead Agency: California Department of Water Resources Contact: Dean Messer, Division of Environmental Services, Regulatory Compliance Branch 916/376-9844 Responsible Agency: California Department of Fish and Wildlife November 22, 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Background ...................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Project Objectives ............................................................................................................ 1-2 1.2.1 Required Permits and Approvals ......................................................................... 1-2 1.2.2 Document Organization ....................................................................................... 1-2 1.3 Summary of Findings........................................................................................................ 1-3 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION .......................................................................................................... 2-1 2.1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A List of Freshwater, Anadromous, and Euryhaline Fishes of California
    CALIFORNIA FISH AND GAME California Fish and Game 86(4):244-258 2000 A LIST OF FRESHWATER, ANADROMOUS, AND EURYHALINE FISHES OF CALIFORNIA PETER B. MOYLE Department of Wildlife, Fish, and Conservation Biology University of California, Davis 1 Shields Avenue Davis, California 95616 e-mail: pbmoyle @ ucdavis.edu LIAM H. DAVIS California Department of Fish and Game 7329 Silverado Trail Yountville, California 94558 The freshwater fishes of California include 67 native resident or anadromous species, 53 non-native species, and 5 marine species that occur in fresh water, for a total of 125 species. Within these species, 100 taxa at lower levels (subspecies, Evolutionary Significant Units, runs of anadromous fish) are recognized. The number of freshwater fish species in California is increasing due to invasions of non-native fishes, which are becoming established at a rate of about 1 species every 3 years. Of the native fishes, 5 full species are extinct in California. Thus, the actual number of species maintaining populations in the state is 120. Of extant native species, 15 (22%) are threatened with extinction in the near future. Only 27 native species (40%) can be regarded as having secure populations. INTRODUCTION The fishes of California’s inland waters are a mixture of resident, anadromous, and euryhaline species, both native and non-native. The first attempt to compile a comprehensive list of these species was Evermann and Clark (1931), who listed 78 native species and 32 introduced species. Native species included an anomalous Pacific hagfish, Epatretus stouti, from the Eel River, 14 forms all now considered to be rainbow trout, and 18 other forms that are either no longer recognized as species or were mistakenly considered to be part of the California fish fauna.
    [Show full text]
  • Vertebrate Species with Known Or Potential Occurrence in Placer County
    A PPENDIX V Vertebrate Species with Known or Potential Occurrence in Placer County APPENDIX V. Vertebrate Species with Known or Potential Occurrence in Placer County Family/Common Name Scientific Name Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 West East Lampreys (Petromyzontidae) Pacific Lamprey Lampetra tridentata 1 Trouts, Salmon and Chars (Salmonidae) Central Valley Chinook Salmon Oncorhynchus tshawytscha 1 Central Valley Steelhead Oncorhynchus mykiss irideus 1 1 Lahonton Cutthroat Trout Oncorhynchus clarki henshawi 1 Resident Rainbow Trout Oncorhynchus mykiss irideus 1 Golden Trout (I) Oncorhynchus mykiss aquabonita ? 1 1 Redband Trout (I) Oncorhynchus mykiss ssp ? ? ? Kokanee (I) Oncorhynchus nerka 1 Brown Trout (I) Salmo trutta 1 1 1 1 Brook Trout (I) Salvelinus fontinalis 1 1 1 1 Lake Trout (I) Salvelinus namycush 1 Mountain Whitefish Prosopium williamsoni 1 Herrings (Clupeidae) Threadfin Shad (I) Dorosoma petenense 1 American Shad (I) Alosa sapidissima 1 Smelts (Osmeridae) Wakasagi (I) Hypomesus nipponensis 1 1 Minnows (Cyprinidae) Lahontan Lake Tui Chub Gila bicolor pectinifer 1 Lahontan Creek Tui Chub Gila bicolor obesa 1 Sacramento Roach Hesperoleucus symmetricus 1 1 Hardhead Mylopharodon conocephalus 1 1 Sacramento Pike-minnow Ptychocheilus grandis 1 Lahontan Redside Richardsonius egregius 1 Sacramento Hitch Lavinia exilicauda exilicauda 1 Lahontan Speckled Dace Rhinichthys osculus robustus 1 Sacramento Speckled Dace Rhinichthys osculus ssp. 1 Golden Shiner (I) Notemigonus crysaleucus 1 Fathead Minnow (I) Pimephales promelas 1 Redshiner (I)
    [Show full text]
  • View Full Report
    Form Approved REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE OMB No. 0704-0188 The public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing the burden, to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports (0704-0188), 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. PLEASE DO NOT RETURN YOUR FORM TO THE ABOVE ADDRESS. 1. REPORT DATE (DD-MM-YYYY) 2. REPORT TYPE 3. DATES COVERED (From - To) October 2007 Final 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5a. CONTRACT NUMBER Spawning, Early Life Stages, and Early Life Histories of the Osmerids Found in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta of California 5b. GRANT NUMBER 5c. PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER 6. AUTHOR(S) 5d. PROJECT NUMBER Johnson C. S. Wang 5e. TASK NUMBER 5f. WORK UNIT NUMBER 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT National Environmental Science, Inc., Central Valley Project/Tracy NUMBER Fish Collection Facility, 6725 Lindemann Road, Byron CA 94514 Bureau of Reclamation, Tracy Fish Collection Facility, TO-412, Volume 38 6725 Lindemann Road, Byron CA 94514 9.
    [Show full text]
  • Photophase and Illumination Effects on the Swimming Performance and Behavior of Five California Estuarine Fishes
    PHOTOPHASE AND ILLUMINATION EFFECTS ON THE SWIMMING PERFORMANCE AND BEHAVIOR OF FIVE CALIFORNIA ESTUARINE FISHES PACIENCIA S. YOUNG, CHRISTINA SWANSON, AND JOSEPH J. CECH, JR. Running head: YOUNG ET AL.---LIGHT EFFECTS ON FISH SWIMMING Contact: (PSY) Department of Wildlife, Fish, and Conservation Biology, University of California, 1 Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616-8521, Voice (530)752-9546/FAX (530)752- 0175/[email protected] 1 Abstract.---Photophase and illumination affect many fish activities. In this study, we examined their effects on the critical swimming velocities (Ucrit), swimming gait patterns, and oral grasping behavior of five California estuarine fishes. All species (4-5 cm SL) swam similarly (mean Ucrit range:30-36 cm/s) under day/light conditions. However, both nighttime photophase and darkness decreased Delta Smelt (Hypomesus transpacificus) swimming velocities. Congeneric Wakasagi (H. nipponensis) swimming performance also decreased at night/dark conditions. Regardless of photophase and illumination, Delta Smelt, Wakasagi, and Splittail (Pogonichthys macrolepidotus) exhibited three swimming gaits: intermittent stroke-and-glide at low velocities, continuous stroking at moderate velocities, and intermittent burst-and-glide at high velocities near Ucrit. In contrast, Chinook Salmon (Onchorhynchus tshawytscha) used only two swimming gaits: continuous stroking and burst-and-glide under all conditions. Inland Silversides (Menidia beryllina) used these two gaits under light conditions and all three gaits under dark conditions. Some Wakasagi, Splittail, and Chinook Salmon orally grasped the upstream screen in the flume at moderate to high water velocities. Oral grasping does not require jaw teeth and may represent adaptive behavior in natural habitats. Regarding vulnerability to water diversions that operate in the dark at night, the threatened Delta Smelt and introduced Wakasagi, comparatively, may be more at risk than the other species.
    [Show full text]