DOCSLIB.ORG

Sustainable Procurement in British Dairy Supply Chain

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Sustainable Procurement in British Dairy Supply Chain Sustainable Procurement in British Dairy Supply Chain By: William Rongxuan Zhao A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Philosophy 2017 Sustainable Procurement in British Dairy Supply Chain By: William Rongxuan Zhao A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Philosophy The University of Sheffield Faculty of Social Science Management School April 2017 Abstract Purpose – Dairy industry has several negative environmental impacts while continuous decline of number of British farmers in the supply chain questions the overall sustainability of the UK dairy supply chain. The research aims to explore the promotion of sustainable development in the British dairy sector and its supply chain through specific objectives, which are: to identify the current penetration level of different sustainability practices on dairy farming and milk purchasing; to investigate drivers, barriers and benefits of implementing sustainability practices in dairy sector; to identify different supply chain types existing in dairy sector and their implications to sustainability performance. Design / methodology / approach – questionnaire survey was used to collect data from dairy producers and dairy processors. 43 and 53 valid questionnaires returned from dairy producers and dairy processors, respectively, were used in the analysis. Findings – Social sustainability requirements received highest penetration level in sustainable procurement practices, while GHG emission requirements received lowest level of penetration. The most important driver for processor implementing sustainable procurement practices is company’s reputation and brand image, barrier is economic reasons, benefit is the creation of competitive advantage. The research also identified two major types of SC structure operating in the British dairy sector, Type A (farmer – processor - customer) and Type D (farmer and processor –- customer). Type D SC is advantageous to implement sustainability practices and achieved high sustainability performance. Practical implications –Improving sustainability performance throughout dairy supply chain needs continuous financial inputs. It would be very helpful to establish dairy sustainability accreditation and labelling scheme. Originality / value – This work is the first research so far which examined the penetration level of 15 environmental and social sustainability practices in dairy farming and milk sourcing, also identified drivers, barriers and benefits of implementing these practices. Financial incentive, information transparency and lead firm pressure can affect the coupling / decoupling of primary and secondary agency role in dairy supply chain. Key words - Sustainable procurement, Supply chain management, British dairy sector, Environmental sustainability, Social sustainability, double agency theory Table of Contents List of Figures ............................................................................................................................ 5 List of Tables .............................................................................................................................. 7 List of Abbreviation .................................................................................................................... 8 Acknowledgement ..................................................................................................................... 9 1. Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 10 1.1. The Emergence of Sustainability as a Business Issue ....................................... 10 1.2. Sustainability Issues in the Agri-food Supply Chain............................................ 11 1.2.1. The Introduction to British Dairy Industry ..................................................... 12 1.2.2. Sustainability Issues in Dairy Supply Chains ............................................... 15 1.2.3. Research Aims ................................................................................................. 17 2. Literature Review ................................................................................................................ 19 2.1. Introduction ................................................................................................................... 19 2.2. Sustainable Farming ............................................................................................... 19 2.2.1. GHG Emission Reduction ............................................................................... 20 2.2.2. Farmland Conservation ................................................................................... 21 2.2.3. Resource Utilisation......................................................................................... 21 2.2.4. Waste Disposal ................................................................................................ 22 2.2.5. Social Sustainability......................................................................................... 22 2.2.6. A summary of sustainable farming approaches .......................................... 23 2.3. Sustainable Procurement ....................................................................................... 24 2.3.1. History of Sustainable Procurement .............................................................. 24 2.3.1.1. Procurement Management ..................................................................... 24 2.3.1.2. Sustainable Procurement Management ............................................... 25 2.3.2. Drivers of Sustainable Procurement ............................................................. 27 2.3.2.1. Organisation ............................................................................................. 28 2.3.2.2. Regulatory ................................................................................................. 29 2.3.2.3. Customers ................................................................................................. 30 2.3.2.4. Competition ............................................................................................... 30 2.3.2.5. Society ....................................................................................................... 30 2.3.2.6. A summary of drivers of sustainable procurement .............................. 31 2.3.3. Barriers of Sustainable Procurement ............................................................ 34 2.3.3.1. Costs.......................................................................................................... 34 1 2.3.3.2. Lack of Legitimacy .................................................................................. 34 2.3.3.3. Regulation ................................................................................................ 35 2.3.3.4. Poor Supplier Commitment .................................................................... 35 2.3.3.5. Lack of Resource .................................................................................... 36 2.3.3.6. A summary of barriers to sustainable procurement ............................ 36 2.3.4. Benefits of Sustainable Procurement ........................................................... 38 2.3.4.1. Environmental Benefits .......................................................................... 38 2.3.4.2. Financial Benefits .................................................................................... 38 2.3.4.3. Operational Benefits ............................................................................... 39 2.3.4.4. Social Benefits ......................................................................................... 39 2.3.4.5. A summary of benefits of sustainable procurement ........................... 40 2.4. Theories of Sustainable Supply Chain Management (SSCM) .............................. 41 2.4.1. Agency Theory ..................................................................................................... 42 2.4.2. Connectedness to Nature Theory ...................................................................... 44 2.4.2.1. Environmental Ethics ................................................................................... 45 2.4.2.1.1. Distinctions between different environmental value orientations .... 45 2.4.2.1.2. Evaluation of ecocentric and anthropocentric values and attitudes 47 2.5. Research gaps and research questions .................................................................. 48 3. Research Methodology...................................................................................................... 51 3.1. Introduction .................................................................................................................. 51 3.2. Research philosophy and approach ......................................................................... 52 3.3. Research Method ........................................................................................................ 54 3.3.1. Sample selection .................................................................................................. 54 3.3.1.1. Dairy producer ............................................................................................... 54 3.3.1.2. Dairy processor ........................................................................................... 55 3.3.2. Questionnaire Design ....................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 'Orkney Island Cheddar' As a Protected Geographical Indication
    Application to Register the name ‘Orkney Island Cheddar’ as a Protected Geographical Indication (PGI) under the EU Protected Food Name Scheme A Consultation Paper Rural and Environment Directorate Food and Drink Industry Division T: 0300-244 9148 F: 0131-244 9990 E: [email protected] ___ March 2011 Dear Consultee APPLICATION TO REGISTER THE NAME ‘ORKNEY ISLAND CHEDDAR’ AS A PROTECTED GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATION (PGI) UNDER THE EU PROTECTED FOOD NAME SCHEME I am writing to you concerning an application the Scottish Government has received to register ‘Orkney Island Cheddar’ as a Protected Geographical Indication (PGI) under the above scheme. You or your members may have an interest, or have previously declared an interest, in this application. Details of the scheme can be found at: http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Topics/Business-Industry/Food-Industry/national- strategy/rep/PFNs If the application is successful and the name is protected then only Orkney Island Cheddar conforming to the registered specification would be permitted to use the name. However, before a decision on whether to forward the application to the European Commission for the next stage of the process can be made, in compliance with Article 5.5 of Council Regulation (EC) 510/2006, we are required to consult interested parties within the UK to give them an opportunity to comment or object to the application. I am therefore attaching the specifications which set out the conditions which would need to be met should the application be approved. If you wish to comment or object to the application please let me have your response by 5pm on 28 June 2011.
    [Show full text]
  • Identification and Mapping of Existing Fuel Producing Industrial Complexes in Europe
    Project title: Project no.: 212831 Development of advanced biorefinery Instrument: Coordination and Support Action schemes to be integrated into existing Project start date: 1 June 2008 industrial fuel producing complexes Project end date: 31 May 2010 Project website: www.bioref-integ.eu Deliverable 1total Identification and mapping of existing fuel producing industrial complexes in Europe Organisation name of lead contractor for this deliverable: ECN Due delivery date from Annex I: November 2008 Actual delivery date: January 2009 Version: Final Fons Maes BVBA Dissemination level PU Public X RE Restricted to a group specified by the consortium (including the Commission Services) CO Confidential, only for members of the Consortium (including the Commission Services) Page 1 of 100 Contents List of tables 3 List of figures 4 Summary 7 1. Introduction 9 1.1 Work package 1 9 1.1.1 Task 1: Identification and mapping existing (fuel producing) complexes 9 1.1.2 Task 2: Definition of reference cases 10 1.1.3 The questionnaire 10 1.1.4 The structure of the report 10 2. Results of the sector-specific existing industrial (fuel producing) complexes in partner-related countries 11 2.1 Bioethanol sector 11 2.2 Biodiesel sector 13 2.3 Pulp & paper sector 16 2.4 Conventional oil refinery sector 17 2.5 Power production sector 17 2.5.1 Biomass-based power generation in partner-related countries 19 2.6 Food industry sector 21 2.7 Agrosector 22 3. Selection and definition of reference case industrial (fuel producing) complexes 25 3.1 Bioethanol sector 25
    [Show full text]
  • Led by Organisations Including ABP, Dunbia, Tulip, Dawn Meats, WM Perry
    Abattoir, Red Meat Slaughter And Primary Processing – Led by organisations including ABP, Dunbia, Tulip, Dawn Meats, W M Perry Ltd, C H Rowley Ltd, Peter Coates (Alrewas) Ltd, JA Jewett (Meat) Ltd, BW & JD Glaves & Sons Ltd, Euro Quality Lambs Ltd, A Wright & Son, Fowler Bros Ltd, C Brumpton Ltd Accountancy – Led by organisations including Baker Tilly, BDO, Costain, Dains, Deloitte, Government Finance Profession , Ernst & Young, Flemmings, Grant Thornton, Hall and Woodhouse, Harvey & Son, Hazlewoods LLP, Health Education East of England, Kingston Smith, KPMG, Lentells Chartered Accountants, London Borough of Barking and Dagenham, NHS Employers, PwC, Solid State Solutions and Warrington and Halton Hospital NHS Foundation Trust with the Association of Accounting Technicians (AAT), Association of Chartered Certified Accountants (ACCA), Chartered Institute of Management Accountants (CIMA), Chartered Institute of Public Finance and Accountancy (CIPFA) and the Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales (ICAEW). Accountancy (Phase 4) – Led by organisations including Derby Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Selby Jones Ltd, Shapcotts, Skills for Health Academy (North West), Bibby Ship Management, Jackson Stephen LLP, HFMA, Civil Service, Spofforths LLP, Norse Commercial Services Ltd, Norbert Dentressangle, Charles Wells Limited, TaxAssist Accountants, Mazars, Armstrong Watson, MHA Bloomer Heaven. Actuarial – Led by organisations including Aon Hewitt, Barnett Waddingham, Grant Thornton, KPMG, Mercer, Munich Re, PwC and RSA with the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries. Adult Care – Led by organisations including Barchester Healthcare, Caretech Community Services, Creative Support, Hand in Hands, Hendra Health Care (Ludlow), Hertfordshire County Council, Housing and Care 21, Oxfordshire County Council, Progressive Care, Surrey County Council, West England Centre for Inclusive Living, Woodford Homecare.
    [Show full text]
  • Meeting the Challenge: Agriculture Industry GHG Action Plan
    Meeting the Challenge: Agriculture Industry GHG Action Plan Delivery of Phase I: 2010 - 2012 04 April 2011 This Action Plan has been developed by an Industry Delivery Partners group including: AEA "We offer this Plan as a serious statement of intent and a commitment to reduce our industry‟s GHG emissions." Agricultural Industry Greenhouse Gas Action Plan - Framework, February 2010 Table of Contents Executive Summary 3 Introduction 4 Objectives 4 Overall Approach 6 Challenges 7 Key Principles 8 Priority On-Farm Actions 10 Activities Encouraging On-Farm Action 11 Opportunities 12 Key GHGAP Activities 15 Consideration of an Information Hub (iHub) 16 Communications 17 Monitoring Progress to 2012 19 Summary of Actions and Milestones 20 Governance 22 Annex A: On-Farm Actions to Reduce Emissions 25 Annex B: Activities to Deliver Each Priority for Action 28 Crop Nutrient Management 29 Soil and Land Management 32 Livestock Nutrition 33 Livestock Health 35 Energy Efficiency and Renewables Generation 36 Management Skills and Advice 37 Improved Genetic Potential 38 GHG Mitigation Research 39 2 Executive Summary The agriculture sector is committed to playing its part in contributing to meeting the national target of an overall 80% reduction in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by 2050. In response to the last Government‟s Low Carbon Transition Plan, published in July 2009, this Greenhouse Gas Action Plan (GHGAP) has been progressively developed by an industry partnership to deliver an initial reduction of 3Mt CO2e GHG emissions by 2020. Building upon an earlier Framework for Action published in February 2010, the first phase of this delivery plan sets out the process that will be implemented by a broad-based industry-led partnership, to encourage farmers and growers to take actions that will reduce their emissions over time.
    [Show full text]
  • Devon Locally Led Inquiry Grasslands and Livestock Production in Devon Contents
    Devon Locally Led Inquiry Grasslands and Livestock Production in Devon Contents Preface 3 Key messages 4 Introduction 5 Flying the flag for grass 6 Grasslands’ contribution to agriculture 8 Agriculture in the regional economy 10 Nutrition related to grass-based livestock production 12 Climate-related complexities 14 Recommendations 17 References 18 Thanks The RSA Food, Farming and Countryside Commission would like to thank: Beth Dooley and Matt Lobley for their invaluable work enabling the working groups turn their research ideas into action; David Fursdon for chairing the Devon Committee so ably; Members of the Committee for their generosity in volunteering their time and expertise: Andrew Butler, Elaine Cook, Kevin Cox, Stephen Criddle, Keri Denton, Tim Dudgeon, Henri Greig, Peter Greig, Catherine Mead, Richard Pocock, Mary Quicke, Mel Squires, and the many additional stakeholders who shared their insights and networks. Preface Launched in November 2017, the RSA Food, from Devon and neighbouring Cornwall. This Farming and Countryside Commission is a major, Committee identified four key issues: Health and two-year independent inquiry, funded by Esmée Thriving Communities; New Entrants; Devon’s Fairbairn Foundation. Grasslands, and Environment and Biodiversity. Each of these were explored by their own working Chaired by Sir Ian Cheshire, with fourteen group, chaired by a member of the Committee. Commissioners from across sectors, the Work took place between June 2018 and May Commission is tasked with creating mandate for 2019. change across our food system, farming sector The Devon Committee were ably assisted by and in rural communities; shaping a long term Professor Matt Lobley and Beth Dooley from the vision for the future that’s fairer, stands the test University of Exeter who acted as lead researchers of time and aligns more closely with changing and authors.
    [Show full text]
  • Our Responsibility CORPORATE RESPONSIBILITY REPORT Arla Foods Is a Global Dairy Company Owned by More Than 11,200 Dairy Farmers in Seven European Countries
    2017 Our Responsibility CORPORATE RESPONSIBILITY REPORT Arla Foods is a global dairy company owned by more than 11,200 dairy farmers in seven European countries. Our products are sold on 120 markets globally. Foreword. Åke Hantoft, Chairman, and Peder 02 Tuborgh, CEO, share their views on corporate responsibility. Arla’s foundation for sustainability. Starting with 04 our Code of Conduct, we will achieve our vision through our strategy. UN Sustainable Development Goals. We focus 06 our efforts on the goals on which we can have the biggest positive impact. Our contribution to society. We engage in 08 stakeholder dialogue and actively contribute to society. 480,000 In Denmark, Sweden, the UK and Germany, consumers can visit Arla farms to learn more about dairy production and to enjoy Open Farm and cows out to pasture events. More than 480,000 consumers visited farms through these events. 93 % 93 per cent of Arla® branded products fulfill our Nutrition Criteria. No. 1 Arla is the world’s largest producer of organic dairy products. 100 % 100 per cent of our production volume is manufactured at sites with GFSI (Global Food Safety Initiative) certification or similar. We believe sustainability and profitability go hand in hand, and that our dedication to being responsible will benefit our business. Health. We offer a wide range of tasty 10 dairy products and help consumers live healthier lives. Inspiration. We see inspiration in all 16 parts of Arla, from our farmer owners sharing experiences to consumers exploring our products. Natural. We maintain high animal 22 welfare and reduce climate and environmental impact all the way from cow to consumer.
    [Show full text]
  • Underactive Thyroid
    Underactive Thyroid PDF generated using the open source mwlib toolkit. See http://code.pediapress.com/ for more information. PDF generated at: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 14:27:58 UTC Contents Articles Thyroid 1 Hypothyroidism 14 Nutrition 22 B vitamins 47 Vitamin E 53 Iodine 60 Selenium 75 Omega-6 fatty acid 90 Borage 94 Tyrosine 97 Phytotherapy 103 Fucus vesiculosus 107 Commiphora wightii 110 Nori 112 Desiccated thyroid extract 116 References Article Sources and Contributors 121 Image Sources, Licenses and Contributors 124 Article Licenses License 126 Thyroid 1 Thyroid thyroid Thyroid and parathyroid. Latin glandula thyroidea [1] Gray's subject #272 1269 System Endocrine system Precursor Thyroid diverticulum (an extension of endoderm into 2nd Branchial arch) [2] MeSH Thyroid+Gland [3] Dorlands/Elsevier Thyroid gland The thyroid gland or simply, the thyroid /ˈθaɪrɔɪd/, in vertebrate anatomy, is one of the largest endocrine glands. The thyroid gland is found in the neck, below the thyroid cartilage (which forms the laryngeal prominence, or "Adam's apple"). The isthmus (the bridge between the two lobes of the thyroid) is located inferior to the cricoid cartilage. The thyroid gland controls how quickly the body uses energy, makes proteins, and controls how sensitive the body is to other hormones. It participates in these processes by producing thyroid hormones, the principal ones being triiodothyronine (T ) and thyroxine which can sometimes be referred to as tetraiodothyronine (T ). These hormones 3 4 regulate the rate of metabolism and affect the growth and rate of function of many other systems in the body. T and 3 T are synthesized from both iodine and tyrosine.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    Table of contents Executive Summary (Mai and Maj-Britt) .................................................................................................... 6 1. Introduction (Mai and Maj-Britt) ........................................................................................................... 8 1.1. Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 8 1.2. Problem statement ............................................................................................................................... 9 2. Method (Mai and Maj-Britt) ................................................................................................................ 10 2.1. Empirical data...................................................................................................................................... 10 2.1.1. Interview guide ............................................................................................................................ 12 2.1.2. Questionnaires ............................................................................................................................. 13 2.2. Theory of science ................................................................................................................................ 14 2.2.1. Hermeneutics ............................................................................................................................... 14 2.3. Theory of science in the thesis
    [Show full text]
  • Stay in Tune Ingredients • Packaging • Transportation
    Flexible & Innovative Dairy & Food Production Processing • Hygiene • Analysis Stay in Tune Ingredients • Packaging • Transportation 21 June 2011 Denmark - June 2011 Stay in Tune! “Stay in Tune” is the major theme running through Danish Dairy & Food In- dustry … worldwide this year. With the musical term “Stay in Tune”, we focus on how the dairy industry constantly must stay in tune on market conditions to meet trade and customer requirements. The global consumer preferences for dairy products are in fact multifaceted and cover besides disposable income also expectations of the in- dustries high CSR-profiles along with a lot of other implicit food qualities such as: natural, environmentally friendly, ecology, functional, convenience, health and wellness, indulgence, gourmet and inexpensive etc. Thus, the dairies sharpen their demands on the supplying industry to stay in tune on innovative solutions and equipment enabling the industry to produce dairy products on market demands. How do suppliers navigate through the dairy and food companies as well as the modern consumers constantly changing preferences for novelties? Flexi- The cover shows a lure. This instru- ble machinery easy adjustable for making different and often small scale prod- ment dates from the Danish Bronze Age (about 600 B. C.). It has only been uct series are just one of the answers. Innovative and/or functional ingredients found in Denmark and the former Dan- and packaging are others. Further also new and highly advanced analytical ish territories. Today it forms part of the Danish Quality sign known as the and hygienic concepts are needed to guarantee that the complex foods are of “Lure-brand”, used on dairy products.
    [Show full text]
  • Inspiring Innovation Across the Agrifood Sector
    Inspiring Innovation across the agrifood sector Who we are The UK Agri-Tech Centres are a unique collaboration between Government, academia and industry to drive greater efficiency, resilience and wealth across the agrifood sector. • Joining-up existing research excellence • Investing in new innovative resources and research • Addressing challenges that no one part of the agrifood sector can address alone • Positioning the UK as a global leader in sustainable food production Who we work with Together, the four Centres serve the needs of everyone involved in the UK agrifood sector: from farmers to advisors and the supply trade pre-farmgate; scientists to suppliers; processors to retailers. Our reach extends across all key industry players, trade associations and government. We are a shared voice to inform and influence industry priorities and ensure important industry issues are addressed. Why work with us The Centres are essential catalysts for change. We provide a gateway for companies and individuals seeking access to the very best science, expertise and technologies - stimulating new research, practice and technology for the agrifood sector. We are also building on existing knowledge, stimulating new research and technology as well as the transfer of knowledge across the whole sector. Each Centre has its own unique focus; offering capabilities that can lead the world in delivering sustainable food and farming solutions. Agri-EPI CHAP Engineering, precision & innovation for sustainable food Advancing crop productivity for future generations. production. CHAP is a catalyst for change, bringing together researchers, Agri-EPI supports and delivers research, development, industry and government to accelerate the identification, demonstration and training on precision agriculture and development and adoption of innovative agri-tech crop solutions engineering to maximise the agri‐tech sector’s contribution to to transform UK and global farming systems sustainably.
    [Show full text]
  • Agricultural Revolution'
    3 European farmers and the British 'agricultural revolution' James Simpson Indebted in great part to Arthur Young, the traditional view of European agriculture over the long eighteenth century sees rapid technological and institutional changes taking place in England, but stagnation on the con­ tinent. Both these views have been challenged over the past decade or two. Today the concept of an 'agricultural revolution' in England is rejected by some historians, and others have questioned the contribution to pro­ ductivity growth of the well-known technical and institutional changes that took place. Likewise most French historians now reject the idea of a 'societe immobile' and argue that if change was slow, there were usually good economic reasons to continue using traditional farming systems and technology. Despite this change of emphasis, even the most revisionist historians have not challenged the idea that a significant productivity gap existed between Britain and other leading European economies in 1815.1 This paper tries to suggest a few reasons why this gap existed. The first section examines briefly the recent literature on long-run agrarian change in several European countries. I argue that incentives for investment in British agriculture were considerably more favourable than in most other countries in the period 1650 and 1750. The rest of the paper considers a number of areas where British agriculture developed along different lines to that of two major European economies, namely France and Spain. Section 2 looks at livestock specialisation, section 3 at the opportunities for labour-intensive farming during this period of population growth, and section 4 the restrictions to changes in land use because of the nature of property ownership.
    [Show full text]
  • Own-Brand Food, Homewares, Health and Beauty
    Total Number % of Female % of Male Worker Buying Group ZS Number Site name Address Country of Workers Workers Workers Representation Morrisons Food ZS1000075 Single Source Stafford Park 6, Telford, TF3 3AT United Kingdom 120 58% 42% Yes Morrisons Food ZS1000097 Huegli UK Ltd Oxleasow Road, Redditch, B98 0RE United Kingdom 99 51% 49% Yes Morrisons Food ZS1000985 Oakham Ales - Maxwell Road Maxwell Road, Woodston, Peterborough, PE2 7JB United Kingdom 40 23% 78% No Morrisons Food ZS1000990 Fromageries Papillon Impasse de la Route de Tiergues, Lauras, Roquefort Sur Soulzon, 12250 France 83 48% 52% Yes Morrisons Food ZS1001380 Mademoiselle Desserts - Valade Lieu Dit Valade, Condat Sur Trincou, 24530 France 500 46% 54% Yes Morrisons Non-Food ZS1001455 Kim Duc Vinh Loc 2 Industrial Zone, Long Hiep Commune, Ben Luc District, Long An Province, 850000 Vietnam 800 60% 40% Yes Morrisons Food ZS1001947 Alimentos Sumar S.A. - El Tejar Carretera Interamericana, El Tejar, 1 Guatemala 230 65% 35% No Morrisons Food ZS1002139 Konspol Bis Poznańska Street, Slupca, 62-400 Poland 939 59% 41% Yes Morrisons Food ZS1002164 Place UK Ltd Church Farm, Tunstead, Norwich, NR12 8RQ United Kingdom 577 38% 62% Yes Morrisons Food ZS1002170 TH21 - Minburi Suwinthawong Rd, Sansab, Minburi, Bangkok, 10510 Thailand 1360 61% 39% No Morrisons Food ZS1002195 Baronie UK Darwin Road, Willowbrook Industrial Estate, Corby, NN17 5XZ United Kingdom 136 54% 46% Yes Morrisons Food ZS1002269 Valeo Confectionary - Liverpool Beech Street, Liverpool, L7 0HA United Kingdom 184 41% 59% Yes
    [Show full text]