DOCSLIB.ORG

In-Store Sampling Differentiates Products, Educates Consumers

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
In-Store Sampling Differentiates Products, Educates Consumers Volume 33 June 28, 2013 Number 23 Scan this code for breaking In-store sampling differentiates news and the latest markets! products, educates consumers By Aaron Martin likely to purchase a product Consumer education is Spurrell, director, Cheshire if they’re satisfi ed with the especially important when Cheese Co., attributes the INSIDE MADISON, Wis. — Consumers sample, according to a PROMO a company launches a new company’s success to branding have many products to chose Industry Trends report. In-store product, or is trying to build a and marketing through social from in today’s increasingly sampling programs. new brand all together. Bella media and in-store product ✦ Lactalis American Group cluttered marketplace. This is Product sampling programs Via Farms, Baldwinsville, N.Y., samples. to close Mozzarella Fresca why companies ranging from also allow cheesemakers to is a farmstead operation that “As we have a very unusual plant in Tipton, Calif. farmstead artisan cheese- educate consumers about produces Chevre and processes range of fl avored cheese, peo- For details, see page 4. makers to multi-billion dollar specialty products and of- goat’s milk. It was launched ple can be wary of buying. The conglomerates utilize in-store fer suggestions for pairing three years ago. Bella Stahl, sample tasting surprises them ✦ Experts discuss global dairy product sampling programs to and preparation. Kristy Klug, co-owner, Bella Via Farms, says and convinces them that we market, U.S. price outlook differentiate their products marketing communications that engaging consumers with truly have the most amazing at INTL FCStone meeting. and educate consumers. specialist, Saputo Specialty product samples in retail set- range of cheese,” Spurrell says. For details, see page 5. Research suggests that of- Cheese Co., says consumers tings and at public events has “Our sales staff are trained to fering in-store product samples are often intimidated by the been integral to the company’s entice and encourage tasting of ✦ Dairy groups praise USDA has a major impact on consum- vast amount of specialty cheese growth. the samples to generate sales, for new school snack rules. er purchasing decisions. Sixty options available to them in the “One of the biggest positives and it works 100 percent of For details, see page 13. percent of shoppers report that marketplace. out of product sampling is label the time.” firsthand experience is the “The specialty cheese cat- recognition. People will come The interaction between ✦ Senate passes immigration most effective way to encour- egory includes an incredibly up to me and say, ‘I recognize the buyer and the sales staff reform bill; NMPF pleased. age purchases, and 90 percent wide range of products, making that, or I’ve seen that,’” Stahl needs to be fun and true to the For details, see page 20. of shoppers say they are more consumer education a very says. “Once you have that label brand. Offering a customer a important part of the sales recognition, some consumers piece of cheese on a toothpick process,” she says. “Sampling will look for it in their local likely won’t create a lasting is a tried-and-true option. We stores and ask store managers impression. It’s important to CDFA orders price relief, but know when people try our if they can order it.” fi rst get a consumer’s full at- cheeses, they’ll love them. We Cheshire Cheese Co., Mac- tention, and then to make the below level previously granted also use in-store materials that clesfi eld, England, has been interaction interesting and include a brief description of operating as a brand for less educational. SACRAMENTO, Calif. — The California Department of Food and the cheese along with wine than three years. The com- “The processor selling the Agriculture (CDFA) last Friday announced it would reinstitute tem- pairing and serving sugges- pany’s artisan cheeses are cheese should be just as excited porary price relief for milk producers at a reduced level through the tions. Educational tools like sold at more than 200 retail about the product as they want end of the year. However, the increase that will take effect July 1 is these help to build consumers’ locations in England, and the their consumer to become. I far less than what producers had asked for and only half the level of confi dence in their choices. It’s company is currently seeking think people can feel that,” the previous increase that had been in place through the end of May. so much easier to buy a piece of a distributor to enter the U.S. Stahl says. “They should be as The decision follows a May 20 public hearing CDFA called on its cheese when you know exactly market. The company realized engaged with people as they own motion to consider extending temporary price increases it previ- how to serve it and what to pair nearly $3 million in sales in its can at the ground level.” ously had ordered for the period of Feb.1 to May 31, 2013. There were it with.” third year of operation. Simon Turn to SAMPLE, page 19 a no price increases in June. After evaluating the May 20 hearing record, CDFA decided to amend the Class 1, 2, 3, 4a and 4b pricing formulas for July 1 through December 31 by: increasing the Class 1 price approximately $0.03 per hundredweight; increasing the Class 2 and 3 prices approximately Consumers connect with Winners named in $0.05 per hundredweight; and increasing the Class 4a and 4b prices Wisconsin State approximately $0.15 per hundredweight. The changes will take effect cheese through recipes Fair competition for milk delivered to processing plants on or after July 1, and on aver- By Rena Archwamety age, these adjustments will increase the monthly pool prices for the WEST ALLIS, Wis. — period by approximately $0.125 per hundredweight. MADISON, Wis. — Whether consumers want to fi x a quick meal Dairy manufacturers from CDFA Secretary Karen Ross ordered the reduced levels of extended or a gourmet dinner, they can fi nd an array of sources for inspira- throughout the state sub- price relief despite a recommendation by the hearing panel that CDFA tion, including cooking shows, recipe blogs and tips from amateur, mitted close to 300 entries not continue temporary price relief. professional and celebrity chefs. Cheese and dairy companies are for the 2013 Wisconsin “As a result of the uncertainty regarding the current condition of using these channels as well to reach consumers and promote State Fair Cheese & Butter the dairy industry because of the lack of concrete data, the panel is accessible and innovative ways to use their products. Contest, held Thursday at concerned and needs to be cautious in recommending temporary price “We’ve always used recipes, even before the days of social Wisconsin State Fair Park. relief, so that the normal marketing conditions of the state’s milk sup- media,” says Jen Neary, director of marketing for integrated The contest featured 25 plies or fi nished dairy products are not disrupted,” the advisory panel services, Cabot Cheese, Cabot, Vt. “From our focus groups and classes. says in its post-hearing report. research, we know that’s what consumers want. Even in print The 2013 Grand Mas- Ross says in a letter to dairy industry stakeholders that while testimony ads, before social media, recipes really got consumers to stop ter Cheesemaker will be on the hearing record failed to provide economic data to justify the industry’s and look at our products.” named and all the winning a Turn to RELIEF, page 18 Turn to RECIPES, page 16 a Turn to CONTEST, page 14 a Reprinted with permission from the June 28, 2013, edition of CHEESE MARKET NEWS®© Copyright 2013 Quarne Publishing LLC; PH: (509) 962-4026; www.cheesemarketnews.com 2 CHEESE MARKET NEWS® — June 28, 2013 MARKET INDICATORS Chicago Mercantile Exchange Cash prices for the week ended June 28, 2013 CHEESE FUTURES for the week ended June 27, 2013 (Listings for each day by month, settling price and open interest) Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday June 24 June 25 June 26 June 27 June 28 Fri., June 21 Mon., June 24 Tues., June 25 Wed., June 26 Thurs., June 27 JUN13 1.777 873 1.778 872 1.778 869 1.777 869 1.778 869 Cheese Barrels JUL13 1.755 745 1.720 827 1.698 857 1.691 866 1.653 896 Price $1.6775 $1.6575 $1.6400 $1.5975 $1.5975 AUG13 1.806 715 1.777 751 1.752 797 1.760 785 1.740 807 Change -4 -2 -1 3/4 -4 1/4 NC SEP13 1.840 603 1.830 657 1.815 692 1.815 714 1.807 754 OCT13 1.845 647 1.835 721 1.820 744 1.820 770 1.818 777 Cheese 40-lb. block NOV13 1.823 836 1.820 903 1.810 917 1.805 923 1.805 931 Price $1.6875 $1.6875 $1.6775 $1.6375 $1.6375 DEC13 1.786 758 1.788 828 1.780 834 1.780 839 1.779 842 JAN 14 1.760 71 1.760 71 1.753 78 1.753 80 1.760 99 Change -3 3/4 NC -1 -4 NC FEB 14 1.737 31 1.737 31 1.737 38 1.737 38 1.737 38 MAR 14 1.740 23 1.740 23 1.738 35 1.732 37 1.732 37 Weekly average (June 24-28): Barrels: $1.6340(-.1105); 40-lb. Blocks: $1.6655(-.0575). APR 14 1.737 19 1.737 19 1.737 19 1.737 19 1.737 19 Weekly ave.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 'Orkney Island Cheddar' As a Protected Geographical Indication
    Application to Register the name ‘Orkney Island Cheddar’ as a Protected Geographical Indication (PGI) under the EU Protected Food Name Scheme A Consultation Paper Rural and Environment Directorate Food and Drink Industry Division T: 0300-244 9148 F: 0131-244 9990 E: [email protected] ___ March 2011 Dear Consultee APPLICATION TO REGISTER THE NAME ‘ORKNEY ISLAND CHEDDAR’ AS A PROTECTED GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATION (PGI) UNDER THE EU PROTECTED FOOD NAME SCHEME I am writing to you concerning an application the Scottish Government has received to register ‘Orkney Island Cheddar’ as a Protected Geographical Indication (PGI) under the above scheme. You or your members may have an interest, or have previously declared an interest, in this application. Details of the scheme can be found at: http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Topics/Business-Industry/Food-Industry/national- strategy/rep/PFNs If the application is successful and the name is protected then only Orkney Island Cheddar conforming to the registered specification would be permitted to use the name. However, before a decision on whether to forward the application to the European Commission for the next stage of the process can be made, in compliance with Article 5.5 of Council Regulation (EC) 510/2006, we are required to consult interested parties within the UK to give them an opportunity to comment or object to the application. I am therefore attaching the specifications which set out the conditions which would need to be met should the application be approved. If you wish to comment or object to the application please let me have your response by 5pm on 28 June 2011.
    [Show full text]
  • Identification and Mapping of Existing Fuel Producing Industrial Complexes in Europe
    Project title: Project no.: 212831 Development of advanced biorefinery Instrument: Coordination and Support Action schemes to be integrated into existing Project start date: 1 June 2008 industrial fuel producing complexes Project end date: 31 May 2010 Project website: www.bioref-integ.eu Deliverable 1total Identification and mapping of existing fuel producing industrial complexes in Europe Organisation name of lead contractor for this deliverable: ECN Due delivery date from Annex I: November 2008 Actual delivery date: January 2009 Version: Final Fons Maes BVBA Dissemination level PU Public X RE Restricted to a group specified by the consortium (including the Commission Services) CO Confidential, only for members of the Consortium (including the Commission Services) Page 1 of 100 Contents List of tables 3 List of figures 4 Summary 7 1. Introduction 9 1.1 Work package 1 9 1.1.1 Task 1: Identification and mapping existing (fuel producing) complexes 9 1.1.2 Task 2: Definition of reference cases 10 1.1.3 The questionnaire 10 1.1.4 The structure of the report 10 2. Results of the sector-specific existing industrial (fuel producing) complexes in partner-related countries 11 2.1 Bioethanol sector 11 2.2 Biodiesel sector 13 2.3 Pulp & paper sector 16 2.4 Conventional oil refinery sector 17 2.5 Power production sector 17 2.5.1 Biomass-based power generation in partner-related countries 19 2.6 Food industry sector 21 2.7 Agrosector 22 3. Selection and definition of reference case industrial (fuel producing) complexes 25 3.1 Bioethanol sector 25
    [Show full text]
  • Led by Organisations Including ABP, Dunbia, Tulip, Dawn Meats, WM Perry
    Abattoir, Red Meat Slaughter And Primary Processing – Led by organisations including ABP, Dunbia, Tulip, Dawn Meats, W M Perry Ltd, C H Rowley Ltd, Peter Coates (Alrewas) Ltd, JA Jewett (Meat) Ltd, BW & JD Glaves & Sons Ltd, Euro Quality Lambs Ltd, A Wright & Son, Fowler Bros Ltd, C Brumpton Ltd Accountancy – Led by organisations including Baker Tilly, BDO, Costain, Dains, Deloitte, Government Finance Profession , Ernst & Young, Flemmings, Grant Thornton, Hall and Woodhouse, Harvey & Son, Hazlewoods LLP, Health Education East of England, Kingston Smith, KPMG, Lentells Chartered Accountants, London Borough of Barking and Dagenham, NHS Employers, PwC, Solid State Solutions and Warrington and Halton Hospital NHS Foundation Trust with the Association of Accounting Technicians (AAT), Association of Chartered Certified Accountants (ACCA), Chartered Institute of Management Accountants (CIMA), Chartered Institute of Public Finance and Accountancy (CIPFA) and the Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales (ICAEW). Accountancy (Phase 4) – Led by organisations including Derby Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Selby Jones Ltd, Shapcotts, Skills for Health Academy (North West), Bibby Ship Management, Jackson Stephen LLP, HFMA, Civil Service, Spofforths LLP, Norse Commercial Services Ltd, Norbert Dentressangle, Charles Wells Limited, TaxAssist Accountants, Mazars, Armstrong Watson, MHA Bloomer Heaven. Actuarial – Led by organisations including Aon Hewitt, Barnett Waddingham, Grant Thornton, KPMG, Mercer, Munich Re, PwC and RSA with the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries. Adult Care – Led by organisations including Barchester Healthcare, Caretech Community Services, Creative Support, Hand in Hands, Hendra Health Care (Ludlow), Hertfordshire County Council, Housing and Care 21, Oxfordshire County Council, Progressive Care, Surrey County Council, West England Centre for Inclusive Living, Woodford Homecare.
    [Show full text]
  • Meeting the Challenge: Agriculture Industry GHG Action Plan
    Meeting the Challenge: Agriculture Industry GHG Action Plan Delivery of Phase I: 2010 - 2012 04 April 2011 This Action Plan has been developed by an Industry Delivery Partners group including: AEA "We offer this Plan as a serious statement of intent and a commitment to reduce our industry‟s GHG emissions." Agricultural Industry Greenhouse Gas Action Plan - Framework, February 2010 Table of Contents Executive Summary 3 Introduction 4 Objectives 4 Overall Approach 6 Challenges 7 Key Principles 8 Priority On-Farm Actions 10 Activities Encouraging On-Farm Action 11 Opportunities 12 Key GHGAP Activities 15 Consideration of an Information Hub (iHub) 16 Communications 17 Monitoring Progress to 2012 19 Summary of Actions and Milestones 20 Governance 22 Annex A: On-Farm Actions to Reduce Emissions 25 Annex B: Activities to Deliver Each Priority for Action 28 Crop Nutrient Management 29 Soil and Land Management 32 Livestock Nutrition 33 Livestock Health 35 Energy Efficiency and Renewables Generation 36 Management Skills and Advice 37 Improved Genetic Potential 38 GHG Mitigation Research 39 2 Executive Summary The agriculture sector is committed to playing its part in contributing to meeting the national target of an overall 80% reduction in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by 2050. In response to the last Government‟s Low Carbon Transition Plan, published in July 2009, this Greenhouse Gas Action Plan (GHGAP) has been progressively developed by an industry partnership to deliver an initial reduction of 3Mt CO2e GHG emissions by 2020. Building upon an earlier Framework for Action published in February 2010, the first phase of this delivery plan sets out the process that will be implemented by a broad-based industry-led partnership, to encourage farmers and growers to take actions that will reduce their emissions over time.
    [Show full text]
  • Our Responsibility CORPORATE RESPONSIBILITY REPORT Arla Foods Is a Global Dairy Company Owned by More Than 11,200 Dairy Farmers in Seven European Countries
    2017 Our Responsibility CORPORATE RESPONSIBILITY REPORT Arla Foods is a global dairy company owned by more than 11,200 dairy farmers in seven European countries. Our products are sold on 120 markets globally. Foreword. Åke Hantoft, Chairman, and Peder 02 Tuborgh, CEO, share their views on corporate responsibility. Arla’s foundation for sustainability. Starting with 04 our Code of Conduct, we will achieve our vision through our strategy. UN Sustainable Development Goals. We focus 06 our efforts on the goals on which we can have the biggest positive impact. Our contribution to society. We engage in 08 stakeholder dialogue and actively contribute to society. 480,000 In Denmark, Sweden, the UK and Germany, consumers can visit Arla farms to learn more about dairy production and to enjoy Open Farm and cows out to pasture events. More than 480,000 consumers visited farms through these events. 93 % 93 per cent of Arla® branded products fulfill our Nutrition Criteria. No. 1 Arla is the world’s largest producer of organic dairy products. 100 % 100 per cent of our production volume is manufactured at sites with GFSI (Global Food Safety Initiative) certification or similar. We believe sustainability and profitability go hand in hand, and that our dedication to being responsible will benefit our business. Health. We offer a wide range of tasty 10 dairy products and help consumers live healthier lives. Inspiration. We see inspiration in all 16 parts of Arla, from our farmer owners sharing experiences to consumers exploring our products. Natural. We maintain high animal 22 welfare and reduce climate and environmental impact all the way from cow to consumer.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    Table of contents Executive Summary (Mai and Maj-Britt) .................................................................................................... 6 1. Introduction (Mai and Maj-Britt) ........................................................................................................... 8 1.1. Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 8 1.2. Problem statement ............................................................................................................................... 9 2. Method (Mai and Maj-Britt) ................................................................................................................ 10 2.1. Empirical data...................................................................................................................................... 10 2.1.1. Interview guide ............................................................................................................................ 12 2.1.2. Questionnaires ............................................................................................................................. 13 2.2. Theory of science ................................................................................................................................ 14 2.2.1. Hermeneutics ............................................................................................................................... 14 2.3. Theory of science in the thesis
    [Show full text]
  • Stay in Tune Ingredients • Packaging • Transportation
    Flexible & Innovative Dairy & Food Production Processing • Hygiene • Analysis Stay in Tune Ingredients • Packaging • Transportation 21 June 2011 Denmark - June 2011 Stay in Tune! “Stay in Tune” is the major theme running through Danish Dairy & Food In- dustry … worldwide this year. With the musical term “Stay in Tune”, we focus on how the dairy industry constantly must stay in tune on market conditions to meet trade and customer requirements. The global consumer preferences for dairy products are in fact multifaceted and cover besides disposable income also expectations of the in- dustries high CSR-profiles along with a lot of other implicit food qualities such as: natural, environmentally friendly, ecology, functional, convenience, health and wellness, indulgence, gourmet and inexpensive etc. Thus, the dairies sharpen their demands on the supplying industry to stay in tune on innovative solutions and equipment enabling the industry to produce dairy products on market demands. How do suppliers navigate through the dairy and food companies as well as the modern consumers constantly changing preferences for novelties? Flexi- The cover shows a lure. This instru- ble machinery easy adjustable for making different and often small scale prod- ment dates from the Danish Bronze Age (about 600 B. C.). It has only been uct series are just one of the answers. Innovative and/or functional ingredients found in Denmark and the former Dan- and packaging are others. Further also new and highly advanced analytical ish territories. Today it forms part of the Danish Quality sign known as the and hygienic concepts are needed to guarantee that the complex foods are of “Lure-brand”, used on dairy products.
    [Show full text]
  • Own-Brand Food, Homewares, Health and Beauty
    Total Number % of Female % of Male Worker Buying Group ZS Number Site name Address Country of Workers Workers Workers Representation Morrisons Food ZS1000075 Single Source Stafford Park 6, Telford, TF3 3AT United Kingdom 120 58% 42% Yes Morrisons Food ZS1000097 Huegli UK Ltd Oxleasow Road, Redditch, B98 0RE United Kingdom 99 51% 49% Yes Morrisons Food ZS1000985 Oakham Ales - Maxwell Road Maxwell Road, Woodston, Peterborough, PE2 7JB United Kingdom 40 23% 78% No Morrisons Food ZS1000990 Fromageries Papillon Impasse de la Route de Tiergues, Lauras, Roquefort Sur Soulzon, 12250 France 83 48% 52% Yes Morrisons Food ZS1001380 Mademoiselle Desserts - Valade Lieu Dit Valade, Condat Sur Trincou, 24530 France 500 46% 54% Yes Morrisons Non-Food ZS1001455 Kim Duc Vinh Loc 2 Industrial Zone, Long Hiep Commune, Ben Luc District, Long An Province, 850000 Vietnam 800 60% 40% Yes Morrisons Food ZS1001947 Alimentos Sumar S.A. - El Tejar Carretera Interamericana, El Tejar, 1 Guatemala 230 65% 35% No Morrisons Food ZS1002139 Konspol Bis Poznańska Street, Slupca, 62-400 Poland 939 59% 41% Yes Morrisons Food ZS1002164 Place UK Ltd Church Farm, Tunstead, Norwich, NR12 8RQ United Kingdom 577 38% 62% Yes Morrisons Food ZS1002170 TH21 - Minburi Suwinthawong Rd, Sansab, Minburi, Bangkok, 10510 Thailand 1360 61% 39% No Morrisons Food ZS1002195 Baronie UK Darwin Road, Willowbrook Industrial Estate, Corby, NN17 5XZ United Kingdom 136 54% 46% Yes Morrisons Food ZS1002269 Valeo Confectionary - Liverpool Beech Street, Liverpool, L7 0HA United Kingdom 184 41% 59% Yes
    [Show full text]
  • 42158 Arla Omslag GB
    Arla Foods amba Annual Report 2001/02 Skanderborgvej 277 DK-8260 Viby J. Denmark tel. +45 89 38 10 00 fax +45 86 28 16 91 e-mail [email protected] www.arlafoods.com CVR-nr. 25 31 37 63 Design, production & print: Datagraf Auning AS, Denmark Annual Report 2001/02 Contents Key figures . 2 Managing financial risk at Arla Foods . 38 The Chairman’s report . 5 Accounts . 40 Report . 6 Accounting policies . 41 Changes in the production structure . 10 Profit & loss account . 45 Market reports Home markets . .13 Balance sheet . 46 European markets . .17 Overseas markets . .20 Equity movements . 48 Ingredients for the food industry . 24 Cash flow statement . 49 Relations with co-operative owners . 25 Notes . 50 Innovation . 27 Group companies . 56 Environmental considerations . 28 Arla Foods’ Supervisory Board . 58 Subsidiaries . 30 The people behind Arla Foods’ products. Lars Wamberg met some of them in Sweden, the UK and Denmark and photographed them in typical working situations. The photos were all shot under available light. Front cover: Jessica Russo, 22, a machine operator at Gothenburg Dairy for the past year, works with The product photos show some of the year’s new products. production of drinking milk and yoghurt. The numbers refer to the back flap of the report where there is a short description of the products. 3 The Chairman’s Report As a milk producer myself, I can the merger agreement, will adopt agricultural policies of the future, confirm that earnings from prima- a common milk price for co-oper- including the EU’s expansion ry production remain under pres- ative owners in both countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Leading Through Sustainable Business Performance
    CONSOLIDATED ANNUAL REPORT LEADING THROUGH SUSTAINABLE BUSINESS 2019 PERFORMANCE OUR ViSiON C REATE the future OF daiRY to briNG HEALTH and iNSPiRATiON TO the WORLD, naturallY. TABLE OF CONTENTS Management Review Our Strategy Our Brands and Our Responsibility 44 Management remuneration Our Consolidated 03 2019 Performance at 12 Who we are Commercial Segments 30 Our sustainability strategy 45 Our tax affairs Financial Statements a glance 13 Our business model 21 Our brands 31 Our environmental ambition 46 Risk and compliance 65 Primary financial statements 04 Message from the Chairman 14 Our strategy to 2020 23 Europe 32 Sustainable dairy farming 50 Preparation for Brexit 73 Notes of the Board of Directors and and beyond 25 International 33 Inspiring sustainable diets the Chief Executive Officer 15 Embracing change 27 Arla Foods Ingredients Our Performance Review Our Consolidated 07 Highlights 17 Embracing change from 28 Trading Our Governance 53 Market overview Environmental, Social and 09 Five year overview within – Calcium 35 Governance framework 55 Financial performance Governance Data 10 Essential business priorities 19 Essential business priorities 37 Diversity and inclusion 61 Financial outlook 121 Primary statements for 2019 for 2020 39 Our Board of Directors 123 Notes 42 Our Executive Management Team 134 Glossary 136 Corporate calendar Management Review Our Strategy Our Brands and Commercial Segments Our Responsibility Our Governance Our Performance Review Our Consolidated Financial Statements Our Consolidated Environmental, Social
    [Show full text]
  • Creating Value in a Year Like No Other
    CREATING VALUE IN A YEAR LIKE NO OTHER CONSOLIDATED ANNUAL REPORT 2020 ViN SiO TABle OF contents MANAGEMENT reviEW OUR GOVERNANCE C REATE the 03 2020 Performance at a glance 38 Governance framework 04 CEO and Chairman letters 40 Diversity and inclusion FUTURE OF DAiRY 05 Message from the Chairman: 42 Board of Directors A busy and challenging year 45 Executive Management Team 06 Message from the CEO: Creating value 47 Management remuneration TO BRiNG health and in a year like no other 48 Responsible and transparent tax practices 07 Highlights 49 Risk and compliance management iNSPiRATiON TO the 10 Five year overview WORLD, naturally. OUR PERFORMANCE ReviEW OUR strategy 56 Market overview 12 Business model 57 Performance review 13 Good Growth 2020 strategy 61 Financial outlook 16 Creating efficiencies with Calcium programme 18 Embracing change: Major trends OUR CONSOLidated and strategic responses FiNANCiAL STATEMENTS 20 Dealing with Brexit 63 Primary financial statements 21 Essential business priorities for 2020 73 Notes OUR BRANDS AND OUR CONSOLidated CommerciAL SEGMENTS ENVironmental, SociAL 23 Brands AND GOVERNANCE DATA 25 Europe 120 Primary statements 27 International 123 Notes 29 Arla Foods Ingredients 30 Global Industry Sales 135 Glossary 137 Corporate calendar OUR ResponsiBiLiTY 32 Sustainability strategy 33 Environmental ambition 34 Climate Checks on farms 35 Facilitating better animal welfare 36 International dairy development Management Review Our Strategy Our Brands and Commercial Segments Our Responsibility Our Governance Our
    [Show full text]
  • Aylesbury Woodlands Non-Techncial Summary
    Non-Technical Summary MARCH 2016 Environmental Statement Non-Technical Summary Aylesbury Woodlands Document Control Sheet Project Name: Aylesbury Woodlands Project Ref: 32113 Report Title: Environmental Statement – Non Technical Summary Doc Ref: Final 001 Date: March 2016 Name Position Signature Date Senior Prepared by: Neil Young Environmental NY 04/03/2016 Scientist Reviewed by: Mark Elton Director ME 08/03/2016 Michael Approved by: Partner MP 09/03/2016 Parkinson For and on behalf of Peter Brett Associates LLP Revision Date Description Prepared Reviewed Approved Final 18/03/2016 Issue for Planning EH ME MP Peter Brett Associates LLP disclaims any responsibility to the Client and others in respect of any matters outside the scope of this report. This report has been prepared with reasonable skill, care and diligence within the terms of the Contract with the Client and generally in accordance with the appropriate ACE Agreement and taking account of the manpower, resources, investigations and testing devoted to it by agreement with the Client. This report is confidential to the Client and Peter Brett Associates LLP accepts no responsibility of whatsoever nature to third parties to whom this report or any part thereof is made known. Any such party relies upon the report at their own risk. © Peter Brett Associates LLP 2016 ii Non-Techncial Summary Aylesbury Woodlands – Environmental Statement Contents 1 Introduction .............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]