DOCSLIB.ORG

Aylesbury Woodlands Non-Techncial Summary

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Aylesbury Woodlands Non-Techncial Summary Non-Technical Summary MARCH 2016 Environmental Statement Non-Technical Summary Aylesbury Woodlands Document Control Sheet Project Name: Aylesbury Woodlands Project Ref: 32113 Report Title: Environmental Statement – Non Technical Summary Doc Ref: Final 001 Date: March 2016 Name Position Signature Date Senior Prepared by: Neil Young Environmental NY 04/03/2016 Scientist Reviewed by: Mark Elton Director ME 08/03/2016 Michael Approved by: Partner MP 09/03/2016 Parkinson For and on behalf of Peter Brett Associates LLP Revision Date Description Prepared Reviewed Approved Final 18/03/2016 Issue for Planning EH ME MP Peter Brett Associates LLP disclaims any responsibility to the Client and others in respect of any matters outside the scope of this report. This report has been prepared with reasonable skill, care and diligence within the terms of the Contract with the Client and generally in accordance with the appropriate ACE Agreement and taking account of the manpower, resources, investigations and testing devoted to it by agreement with the Client. This report is confidential to the Client and Peter Brett Associates LLP accepts no responsibility of whatsoever nature to third parties to whom this report or any part thereof is made known. Any such party relies upon the report at their own risk. © Peter Brett Associates LLP 2016 ii Non-Techncial Summary Aylesbury Woodlands – Environmental Statement Contents 1 Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 1-3 1.1 Background ................................................................................................................ 1-3 1.2 The Proposed Development ....................................................................................... 1-2 1.3 The Application Site and Surrounding Area ............................................................... 1-2 2 Methodology ............................................................................................................................. 2-1 2.1 Scoping and Consultation .......................................................................................... 2-1 2.2 Baseline Conditions .................................................................................................... 2-1 2.3 Assessment of Significance ....................................................................................... 2-1 2.4 Alternatives ................................................................................................................. 2-2 3 Likely Effects on the Environment ......................................................................................... 3-1 3.1 Socio-Economics ........................................................................................................ 3-1 3.2 Traffic and Transport .................................................................................................. 3-2 3.3 Air Quality ................................................................................................................... 3-3 3.4 Noise and Vibration .................................................................................................... 3-1 3.5 Archaeology and Heritage .......................................................................................... 3-2 3.6 Ground Conditions ...................................................................................................... 3-4 3.7 Water Resources and Flood Risk ............................................................................... 3-5 3.8 Ecology ....................................................................................................................... 3-6 3.9 Landscape and Visual ................................................................................................ 3-7 3.10 Agriculture and Soil .................................................................................................... 3-9 4 Summary and Impact Interactions ......................................................................................... 4-1 4.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................. 4-1 4.2 Construction ............................................................................................................... 4-1 4.3 Operational Effects ..................................................................................................... 4-1 1-1 Non-Techncial Summary Aylesbury Woodlands – Environmental Statement 4.4 Impact Interactions ..................................................................................................... 4-2 Figures Figure 1: Site Location Plan ................................................................................................................. 1-1 Figure 2: Illustrative Masterplan ........................................................................................................... 1-2 Figure 3: Operational Transport mitigation measures. (Excerpt of Figure 7.7 of the ES Vol. 1) .......... 3-1 Figure 4.1: Committed Developments within 10 km. ............................................................................ 4-3 Tables Table 1: Generic Significance Criteria .................................................................................................. 2-2 1-2 Non-Techncial Summary Aylesbury Woodlands – Environmental Statement 1 Introduction 1.1.6 In accordance with Article 5 of Directive 85/337/EEC (as amended) 1.1 Background this document includes the following information: 1.1.1 Buckinghamshire Advantage (the ‘applicant’) are submitting an • a description of the project comprising information on the Site, outline planning application to Aylesbury Vale District Council design and size of the project, (AVDC) to develop a Site known as ‘Aylesbury Woodlands’ approximately 4.5 km to the east of Aylesbury, Buckinghamshire • the data required to identify and assess the main effects (herein referred to as ‘the Site’) shown in Figure 1 . which the project is likely to have on the environment, 1.1.2 Buckinghamshire Advantage is guided under the policy and • a description of the measures envisaged in order to avoid, programme direction of Buckinghamshire Thames Valley Local reduce and, if possible, remedy significant adverse effects, Enterprise Partnerships (BTVLEP). Buckinghamshire Advantage acts as the operational arm of BTVLEP on the delivery of BTVLEP • an outline of the main alternatives studied by the developer funded capital schemes, ensuring local growth funds are invested and an indication of the main reasons for his choice, taking to maximum effect. into account the environmental effects. 1.1.3 The Site was identified within the BTVLEP ‘Growth Deal’, which 1.1.7 To obtain further electronic copies of this Non-Technical Summary focus on key priority areas of the Local Enterprise Partnership free of charge, please contact: (LEPs) Strategic Economic Plan, one of which is the delivery of Aylesbury Eastern Link Road between the A41 and the A418, the Buckinghamshire Advantage purpose of which is to accelerate housing and employment The Saunderton Estate delivery and facilitate the development of the Site. Wycombe Road Saunderton Buckinghamshire, HP14 4BF 1.1.4 The findings of the EIA have been documented in an Phone: 01494 568951 Environmental Statement (ES). E-mail: [email protected] This Document 1.1.8 The ES is divided into three Volumes: 1.1.5 This document summarises the ES in non-technical English. The • Volume 1 – Main Text aim of this Non-Technical Summary is to present the sometimes technical information included in the full ES in an easily • Volume 2 – Figures understood, concise format without having to refer to the main text of the ES. • Volume 3 – Technical Appendices 1-3 Non-Techncial Summary Aylesbury Woodlands – Environmental Statement 1.1.9 The assessment in the main text has been carried out based on 1.2.3 The assessment has been made on the following parameters: information and detailed survey results in the technical appendices. • Land use and amount; 1.2 The Proposed Development • Access and movement; 1.2.1 An illustrative masterplan showing one way in which the proposed • Residential density; development could be designed is shown in Figure 2 . The application is being submitted in outline with all matters reserved • Maximum and Minimum building and infrastructure height; with the exception of means of access, for the development of: 1.2.4 The development will be constructed in a number of phases which ° up to 102,800 sq m employment (B1/B2/B8); will be progressed to ensure that phased infrastructure and associated capacity match built development delivery as well as ° up to 1,100 dwellings (C3); market demand and associated viability. ° 60 residential extra care units (C2); 1.2.5 The first phase of the development is anticipated to include the construction of a new highway access at College Road North and ° mixed-use local centre of up to 4,000 sq m (A1/A2/A5/D1); employment land use supported by associated infrastructure works. ° up to 5,700 sq m hotel and Conference Centre (C1); 1.2.6 The Eastern Link Road (South) is likely to be in place by January ° up to 3,500 sq m Leisure facilities (A1/A3/A4); 2021, establishing a north-south connection across the Site with additional accesses at the Grand Union Canal Bridge and ° up to 16 ha for sports village and pitches; southwards to the Aston Clinton Road (A41). The remaining development
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 'Orkney Island Cheddar' As a Protected Geographical Indication
    Application to Register the name ‘Orkney Island Cheddar’ as a Protected Geographical Indication (PGI) under the EU Protected Food Name Scheme A Consultation Paper Rural and Environment Directorate Food and Drink Industry Division T: 0300-244 9148 F: 0131-244 9990 E: [email protected] ___ March 2011 Dear Consultee APPLICATION TO REGISTER THE NAME ‘ORKNEY ISLAND CHEDDAR’ AS A PROTECTED GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATION (PGI) UNDER THE EU PROTECTED FOOD NAME SCHEME I am writing to you concerning an application the Scottish Government has received to register ‘Orkney Island Cheddar’ as a Protected Geographical Indication (PGI) under the above scheme. You or your members may have an interest, or have previously declared an interest, in this application. Details of the scheme can be found at: http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Topics/Business-Industry/Food-Industry/national- strategy/rep/PFNs If the application is successful and the name is protected then only Orkney Island Cheddar conforming to the registered specification would be permitted to use the name. However, before a decision on whether to forward the application to the European Commission for the next stage of the process can be made, in compliance with Article 5.5 of Council Regulation (EC) 510/2006, we are required to consult interested parties within the UK to give them an opportunity to comment or object to the application. I am therefore attaching the specifications which set out the conditions which would need to be met should the application be approved. If you wish to comment or object to the application please let me have your response by 5pm on 28 June 2011.
    [Show full text]
  • Identification and Mapping of Existing Fuel Producing Industrial Complexes in Europe
    Project title: Project no.: 212831 Development of advanced biorefinery Instrument: Coordination and Support Action schemes to be integrated into existing Project start date: 1 June 2008 industrial fuel producing complexes Project end date: 31 May 2010 Project website: www.bioref-integ.eu Deliverable 1total Identification and mapping of existing fuel producing industrial complexes in Europe Organisation name of lead contractor for this deliverable: ECN Due delivery date from Annex I: November 2008 Actual delivery date: January 2009 Version: Final Fons Maes BVBA Dissemination level PU Public X RE Restricted to a group specified by the consortium (including the Commission Services) CO Confidential, only for members of the Consortium (including the Commission Services) Page 1 of 100 Contents List of tables 3 List of figures 4 Summary 7 1. Introduction 9 1.1 Work package 1 9 1.1.1 Task 1: Identification and mapping existing (fuel producing) complexes 9 1.1.2 Task 2: Definition of reference cases 10 1.1.3 The questionnaire 10 1.1.4 The structure of the report 10 2. Results of the sector-specific existing industrial (fuel producing) complexes in partner-related countries 11 2.1 Bioethanol sector 11 2.2 Biodiesel sector 13 2.3 Pulp & paper sector 16 2.4 Conventional oil refinery sector 17 2.5 Power production sector 17 2.5.1 Biomass-based power generation in partner-related countries 19 2.6 Food industry sector 21 2.7 Agrosector 22 3. Selection and definition of reference case industrial (fuel producing) complexes 25 3.1 Bioethanol sector 25
    [Show full text]
  • Led by Organisations Including ABP, Dunbia, Tulip, Dawn Meats, WM Perry
    Abattoir, Red Meat Slaughter And Primary Processing – Led by organisations including ABP, Dunbia, Tulip, Dawn Meats, W M Perry Ltd, C H Rowley Ltd, Peter Coates (Alrewas) Ltd, JA Jewett (Meat) Ltd, BW & JD Glaves & Sons Ltd, Euro Quality Lambs Ltd, A Wright & Son, Fowler Bros Ltd, C Brumpton Ltd Accountancy – Led by organisations including Baker Tilly, BDO, Costain, Dains, Deloitte, Government Finance Profession , Ernst & Young, Flemmings, Grant Thornton, Hall and Woodhouse, Harvey & Son, Hazlewoods LLP, Health Education East of England, Kingston Smith, KPMG, Lentells Chartered Accountants, London Borough of Barking and Dagenham, NHS Employers, PwC, Solid State Solutions and Warrington and Halton Hospital NHS Foundation Trust with the Association of Accounting Technicians (AAT), Association of Chartered Certified Accountants (ACCA), Chartered Institute of Management Accountants (CIMA), Chartered Institute of Public Finance and Accountancy (CIPFA) and the Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales (ICAEW). Accountancy (Phase 4) – Led by organisations including Derby Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Selby Jones Ltd, Shapcotts, Skills for Health Academy (North West), Bibby Ship Management, Jackson Stephen LLP, HFMA, Civil Service, Spofforths LLP, Norse Commercial Services Ltd, Norbert Dentressangle, Charles Wells Limited, TaxAssist Accountants, Mazars, Armstrong Watson, MHA Bloomer Heaven. Actuarial – Led by organisations including Aon Hewitt, Barnett Waddingham, Grant Thornton, KPMG, Mercer, Munich Re, PwC and RSA with the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries. Adult Care – Led by organisations including Barchester Healthcare, Caretech Community Services, Creative Support, Hand in Hands, Hendra Health Care (Ludlow), Hertfordshire County Council, Housing and Care 21, Oxfordshire County Council, Progressive Care, Surrey County Council, West England Centre for Inclusive Living, Woodford Homecare.
    [Show full text]
  • Meeting the Challenge: Agriculture Industry GHG Action Plan
    Meeting the Challenge: Agriculture Industry GHG Action Plan Delivery of Phase I: 2010 - 2012 04 April 2011 This Action Plan has been developed by an Industry Delivery Partners group including: AEA "We offer this Plan as a serious statement of intent and a commitment to reduce our industry‟s GHG emissions." Agricultural Industry Greenhouse Gas Action Plan - Framework, February 2010 Table of Contents Executive Summary 3 Introduction 4 Objectives 4 Overall Approach 6 Challenges 7 Key Principles 8 Priority On-Farm Actions 10 Activities Encouraging On-Farm Action 11 Opportunities 12 Key GHGAP Activities 15 Consideration of an Information Hub (iHub) 16 Communications 17 Monitoring Progress to 2012 19 Summary of Actions and Milestones 20 Governance 22 Annex A: On-Farm Actions to Reduce Emissions 25 Annex B: Activities to Deliver Each Priority for Action 28 Crop Nutrient Management 29 Soil and Land Management 32 Livestock Nutrition 33 Livestock Health 35 Energy Efficiency and Renewables Generation 36 Management Skills and Advice 37 Improved Genetic Potential 38 GHG Mitigation Research 39 2 Executive Summary The agriculture sector is committed to playing its part in contributing to meeting the national target of an overall 80% reduction in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by 2050. In response to the last Government‟s Low Carbon Transition Plan, published in July 2009, this Greenhouse Gas Action Plan (GHGAP) has been progressively developed by an industry partnership to deliver an initial reduction of 3Mt CO2e GHG emissions by 2020. Building upon an earlier Framework for Action published in February 2010, the first phase of this delivery plan sets out the process that will be implemented by a broad-based industry-led partnership, to encourage farmers and growers to take actions that will reduce their emissions over time.
    [Show full text]
  • Our Responsibility CORPORATE RESPONSIBILITY REPORT Arla Foods Is a Global Dairy Company Owned by More Than 11,200 Dairy Farmers in Seven European Countries
    2017 Our Responsibility CORPORATE RESPONSIBILITY REPORT Arla Foods is a global dairy company owned by more than 11,200 dairy farmers in seven European countries. Our products are sold on 120 markets globally. Foreword. Åke Hantoft, Chairman, and Peder 02 Tuborgh, CEO, share their views on corporate responsibility. Arla’s foundation for sustainability. Starting with 04 our Code of Conduct, we will achieve our vision through our strategy. UN Sustainable Development Goals. We focus 06 our efforts on the goals on which we can have the biggest positive impact. Our contribution to society. We engage in 08 stakeholder dialogue and actively contribute to society. 480,000 In Denmark, Sweden, the UK and Germany, consumers can visit Arla farms to learn more about dairy production and to enjoy Open Farm and cows out to pasture events. More than 480,000 consumers visited farms through these events. 93 % 93 per cent of Arla® branded products fulfill our Nutrition Criteria. No. 1 Arla is the world’s largest producer of organic dairy products. 100 % 100 per cent of our production volume is manufactured at sites with GFSI (Global Food Safety Initiative) certification or similar. We believe sustainability and profitability go hand in hand, and that our dedication to being responsible will benefit our business. Health. We offer a wide range of tasty 10 dairy products and help consumers live healthier lives. Inspiration. We see inspiration in all 16 parts of Arla, from our farmer owners sharing experiences to consumers exploring our products. Natural. We maintain high animal 22 welfare and reduce climate and environmental impact all the way from cow to consumer.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    Table of contents Executive Summary (Mai and Maj-Britt) .................................................................................................... 6 1. Introduction (Mai and Maj-Britt) ........................................................................................................... 8 1.1. Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 8 1.2. Problem statement ............................................................................................................................... 9 2. Method (Mai and Maj-Britt) ................................................................................................................ 10 2.1. Empirical data...................................................................................................................................... 10 2.1.1. Interview guide ............................................................................................................................ 12 2.1.2. Questionnaires ............................................................................................................................. 13 2.2. Theory of science ................................................................................................................................ 14 2.2.1. Hermeneutics ............................................................................................................................... 14 2.3. Theory of science in the thesis
    [Show full text]
  • Stay in Tune Ingredients • Packaging • Transportation
    Flexible & Innovative Dairy & Food Production Processing • Hygiene • Analysis Stay in Tune Ingredients • Packaging • Transportation 21 June 2011 Denmark - June 2011 Stay in Tune! “Stay in Tune” is the major theme running through Danish Dairy & Food In- dustry … worldwide this year. With the musical term “Stay in Tune”, we focus on how the dairy industry constantly must stay in tune on market conditions to meet trade and customer requirements. The global consumer preferences for dairy products are in fact multifaceted and cover besides disposable income also expectations of the in- dustries high CSR-profiles along with a lot of other implicit food qualities such as: natural, environmentally friendly, ecology, functional, convenience, health and wellness, indulgence, gourmet and inexpensive etc. Thus, the dairies sharpen their demands on the supplying industry to stay in tune on innovative solutions and equipment enabling the industry to produce dairy products on market demands. How do suppliers navigate through the dairy and food companies as well as the modern consumers constantly changing preferences for novelties? Flexi- The cover shows a lure. This instru- ble machinery easy adjustable for making different and often small scale prod- ment dates from the Danish Bronze Age (about 600 B. C.). It has only been uct series are just one of the answers. Innovative and/or functional ingredients found in Denmark and the former Dan- and packaging are others. Further also new and highly advanced analytical ish territories. Today it forms part of the Danish Quality sign known as the and hygienic concepts are needed to guarantee that the complex foods are of “Lure-brand”, used on dairy products.
    [Show full text]
  • Own-Brand Food, Homewares, Health and Beauty
    Total Number % of Female % of Male Worker Buying Group ZS Number Site name Address Country of Workers Workers Workers Representation Morrisons Food ZS1000075 Single Source Stafford Park 6, Telford, TF3 3AT United Kingdom 120 58% 42% Yes Morrisons Food ZS1000097 Huegli UK Ltd Oxleasow Road, Redditch, B98 0RE United Kingdom 99 51% 49% Yes Morrisons Food ZS1000985 Oakham Ales - Maxwell Road Maxwell Road, Woodston, Peterborough, PE2 7JB United Kingdom 40 23% 78% No Morrisons Food ZS1000990 Fromageries Papillon Impasse de la Route de Tiergues, Lauras, Roquefort Sur Soulzon, 12250 France 83 48% 52% Yes Morrisons Food ZS1001380 Mademoiselle Desserts - Valade Lieu Dit Valade, Condat Sur Trincou, 24530 France 500 46% 54% Yes Morrisons Non-Food ZS1001455 Kim Duc Vinh Loc 2 Industrial Zone, Long Hiep Commune, Ben Luc District, Long An Province, 850000 Vietnam 800 60% 40% Yes Morrisons Food ZS1001947 Alimentos Sumar S.A. - El Tejar Carretera Interamericana, El Tejar, 1 Guatemala 230 65% 35% No Morrisons Food ZS1002139 Konspol Bis Poznańska Street, Slupca, 62-400 Poland 939 59% 41% Yes Morrisons Food ZS1002164 Place UK Ltd Church Farm, Tunstead, Norwich, NR12 8RQ United Kingdom 577 38% 62% Yes Morrisons Food ZS1002170 TH21 - Minburi Suwinthawong Rd, Sansab, Minburi, Bangkok, 10510 Thailand 1360 61% 39% No Morrisons Food ZS1002195 Baronie UK Darwin Road, Willowbrook Industrial Estate, Corby, NN17 5XZ United Kingdom 136 54% 46% Yes Morrisons Food ZS1002269 Valeo Confectionary - Liverpool Beech Street, Liverpool, L7 0HA United Kingdom 184 41% 59% Yes
    [Show full text]
  • 42158 Arla Omslag GB
    Arla Foods amba Annual Report 2001/02 Skanderborgvej 277 DK-8260 Viby J. Denmark tel. +45 89 38 10 00 fax +45 86 28 16 91 e-mail [email protected] www.arlafoods.com CVR-nr. 25 31 37 63 Design, production & print: Datagraf Auning AS, Denmark Annual Report 2001/02 Contents Key figures . 2 Managing financial risk at Arla Foods . 38 The Chairman’s report . 5 Accounts . 40 Report . 6 Accounting policies . 41 Changes in the production structure . 10 Profit & loss account . 45 Market reports Home markets . .13 Balance sheet . 46 European markets . .17 Overseas markets . .20 Equity movements . 48 Ingredients for the food industry . 24 Cash flow statement . 49 Relations with co-operative owners . 25 Notes . 50 Innovation . 27 Group companies . 56 Environmental considerations . 28 Arla Foods’ Supervisory Board . 58 Subsidiaries . 30 The people behind Arla Foods’ products. Lars Wamberg met some of them in Sweden, the UK and Denmark and photographed them in typical working situations. The photos were all shot under available light. Front cover: Jessica Russo, 22, a machine operator at Gothenburg Dairy for the past year, works with The product photos show some of the year’s new products. production of drinking milk and yoghurt. The numbers refer to the back flap of the report where there is a short description of the products. 3 The Chairman’s Report As a milk producer myself, I can the merger agreement, will adopt agricultural policies of the future, confirm that earnings from prima- a common milk price for co-oper- including the EU’s expansion ry production remain under pres- ative owners in both countries.
    [Show full text]
  • In-Store Sampling Differentiates Products, Educates Consumers
    Volume 33 June 28, 2013 Number 23 Scan this code for breaking In-store sampling differentiates news and the latest markets! products, educates consumers By Aaron Martin likely to purchase a product Consumer education is Spurrell, director, Cheshire if they’re satisfi ed with the especially important when Cheese Co., attributes the INSIDE MADISON, Wis. — Consumers sample, according to a PROMO a company launches a new company’s success to branding have many products to chose Industry Trends report. In-store product, or is trying to build a and marketing through social from in today’s increasingly sampling programs. new brand all together. Bella media and in-store product ✦ Lactalis American Group cluttered marketplace. This is Product sampling programs Via Farms, Baldwinsville, N.Y., samples. to close Mozzarella Fresca why companies ranging from also allow cheesemakers to is a farmstead operation that “As we have a very unusual plant in Tipton, Calif. farmstead artisan cheese- educate consumers about produces Chevre and processes range of fl avored cheese, peo- For details, see page 4. makers to multi-billion dollar specialty products and of- goat’s milk. It was launched ple can be wary of buying. The conglomerates utilize in-store fer suggestions for pairing three years ago. Bella Stahl, sample tasting surprises them ✦ Experts discuss global dairy product sampling programs to and preparation. Kristy Klug, co-owner, Bella Via Farms, says and convinces them that we market, U.S. price outlook differentiate their products marketing communications that engaging consumers with truly have the most amazing at INTL FCStone meeting. and educate consumers.
    [Show full text]
  • Leading Through Sustainable Business Performance
    CONSOLIDATED ANNUAL REPORT LEADING THROUGH SUSTAINABLE BUSINESS 2019 PERFORMANCE OUR ViSiON C REATE the future OF daiRY to briNG HEALTH and iNSPiRATiON TO the WORLD, naturallY. TABLE OF CONTENTS Management Review Our Strategy Our Brands and Our Responsibility 44 Management remuneration Our Consolidated 03 2019 Performance at 12 Who we are Commercial Segments 30 Our sustainability strategy 45 Our tax affairs Financial Statements a glance 13 Our business model 21 Our brands 31 Our environmental ambition 46 Risk and compliance 65 Primary financial statements 04 Message from the Chairman 14 Our strategy to 2020 23 Europe 32 Sustainable dairy farming 50 Preparation for Brexit 73 Notes of the Board of Directors and and beyond 25 International 33 Inspiring sustainable diets the Chief Executive Officer 15 Embracing change 27 Arla Foods Ingredients Our Performance Review Our Consolidated 07 Highlights 17 Embracing change from 28 Trading Our Governance 53 Market overview Environmental, Social and 09 Five year overview within – Calcium 35 Governance framework 55 Financial performance Governance Data 10 Essential business priorities 19 Essential business priorities 37 Diversity and inclusion 61 Financial outlook 121 Primary statements for 2019 for 2020 39 Our Board of Directors 123 Notes 42 Our Executive Management Team 134 Glossary 136 Corporate calendar Management Review Our Strategy Our Brands and Commercial Segments Our Responsibility Our Governance Our Performance Review Our Consolidated Financial Statements Our Consolidated Environmental, Social
    [Show full text]
  • Creating Value in a Year Like No Other
    CREATING VALUE IN A YEAR LIKE NO OTHER CONSOLIDATED ANNUAL REPORT 2020 ViN SiO TABle OF contents MANAGEMENT reviEW OUR GOVERNANCE C REATE the 03 2020 Performance at a glance 38 Governance framework 04 CEO and Chairman letters 40 Diversity and inclusion FUTURE OF DAiRY 05 Message from the Chairman: 42 Board of Directors A busy and challenging year 45 Executive Management Team 06 Message from the CEO: Creating value 47 Management remuneration TO BRiNG health and in a year like no other 48 Responsible and transparent tax practices 07 Highlights 49 Risk and compliance management iNSPiRATiON TO the 10 Five year overview WORLD, naturally. OUR PERFORMANCE ReviEW OUR strategy 56 Market overview 12 Business model 57 Performance review 13 Good Growth 2020 strategy 61 Financial outlook 16 Creating efficiencies with Calcium programme 18 Embracing change: Major trends OUR CONSOLidated and strategic responses FiNANCiAL STATEMENTS 20 Dealing with Brexit 63 Primary financial statements 21 Essential business priorities for 2020 73 Notes OUR BRANDS AND OUR CONSOLidated CommerciAL SEGMENTS ENVironmental, SociAL 23 Brands AND GOVERNANCE DATA 25 Europe 120 Primary statements 27 International 123 Notes 29 Arla Foods Ingredients 30 Global Industry Sales 135 Glossary 137 Corporate calendar OUR ResponsiBiLiTY 32 Sustainability strategy 33 Environmental ambition 34 Climate Checks on farms 35 Facilitating better animal welfare 36 International dairy development Management Review Our Strategy Our Brands and Commercial Segments Our Responsibility Our Governance Our
    [Show full text]